Truthers and Birthers … and now Tenthers
Bachmann, Perry and other odd theorists who think the U.S. government is unconstitutional
Topics: 2012 Elections, War Room, Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., Rick Perry, Politics News
Michele Bachmann likes to call herself a “constitutional conservative.” As her campaign wears on, she owes the country a clearer understanding of precisely what this means. Now comes Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the new leader in the Republican nomination race polls, with a record of similar publicly uttered impulses that seems to want to use the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to repeal most of the 20th century.
It’s not really new for “tenthers” like Bachmann and Perry to enlist the 10th Amendment as an argument against programs they dislike, although their tentherist utterances exceed similar impulses by yesterday’s righties.
Don’t get your hopes up, but wouldn’t it be great if this campaign, especially the Bachmann and Perry campaigns, led the country to face the fundamental question of tentherism?
For those of you coming late to the discussion, the Tenth Amendment, written by James Madison to fulfill a bargain even though he thought it unnecessary, states:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
In a piece yesterday about Perry’s tentherism, New York Times reporter Manny Fernandez made a pretty serious mistake. He said, in his own voice, that the Tenth Amendment “reserves to the states the powers not explicitly given to the national government.”
If that word “explicitly” was in the 10th Amendment, this would probably be a very different country. But, as you can see from the full text of the amendment above, “explicitly” ain’t in there, although Bachmann and Perry proceed, selectively and erratically and without an honest discussion, as if it were.
Forget about “Obamacare,” the constitutionality of which is now before the courts. If the Congress has only those powers explicitly delegated by the words of the Constitution, then Medicare and Medicaid are unconstitutional. The Constitution never mentions healthcare or insurance, let alone two vast nationalized programs to provide health insurance to the poor and the elderly.
A question
Somebody needs to ask Bachmann and Perry (I’ve tried, multiple times, with Bachmann, but she hasn’t responded) what provision of the Constitution explicitly authorized the creation of Medicare and Medicaid (and, for that matter, the Centers for Disease Control, the VA hospital system and everything else that the feds do in the field of public health)? If these programs are unconstitutional, why do they not explicitly seek their abolition?





House Democrats Dismiss Existence Of Obama Scandals
Obama Faces Dogged Heckler At Drone Speech
Comments
81 Comments