Limbaugh rejects teachings of Jesus

He mentions the Christian savior often but usually abuses his message

Topics: Rush Limbaugh, Christianity,

Limbaugh rejects teachings of Jesus Rush celebrates Jesus' birthday by ignoring his gospel (Credit: rushlimbaugh.com)

America’s most popular talk show host has spoken the word “Jesus” approximately 2,420 times during his last 20 years on the air. He has mentioned “Christ” 2,130 times and the “Messiah” 4,038 times, according to one blogger with a whole lot of time on his hands. The purpose of his exhaustive research was to dispel doubts about Limbaugh’s Christian credentials, which have been under fire lately by certain evangelicals who cite the fact that Rush — according to his own brother, David — was never “born again.”

This is a hot topic for fundamentalists. “Is Rush a real Christian?” is the most frequently Googled question about the controversial radio personality.

So I decided to do a little research of my own, which I hoped might shed some light on the impending holiday season. Do Rush Limbaugh and the Prince of Peace really see eye to eye? Often the answer is no.

Jesus said, “You have heard it said: ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’ But I say to you, Offer the wicked man no resistance. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also.” (Matthew 5:38-42)

Rush — an opponent of gun control, a supporter of capital punishment and a big fan of American wars abroad and militarism in general — quipped on one occasion, “There is only one way to get rid of nuclear weapons … use them.”

Jesus said, “Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.” (Matthew 5:5-9) Rush excoriated president Obama for sending in peacekeepers to rein in “The Lord’s Resistance Army,” who he claimed were “Christians fighting the Muslims in Sudan.” Well not exactly. The Lord’s Resistance Army is actually a gang of Hitler-esque thugs in Uganda who murdered, pillaged and raped untold thousands. But let’s not quibble over facts. Christians are Christians, right?



When a mob was preparing to stone a woman who was accused of adultery, Jesus told them, “He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.” (John 8:7) When 15-year-old gay teen Lawrence King was murdered in class by a homophobic fellow student, Rush blasted the assistant principal of the school for “promoting a gay agenda.”

Jesus said “Judge not and you will not be judged.” (Luke 6:37) Rush, by contrast, has few compunctions on the judgment front. He calls environmentalists “”long-haired maggot-infested … wackos.” Liberals, he says are  “dittoheads” and “retards.” He compared President Obama to Hitler. He labeled American military personnel who support withdrawal from Iraq “phony soldiers.”

Jesus said, “You have learnt how it was said to our ancestors: ‘You must not kill; and if anyone does kill he must answer for it before the court.’ But I say this to you: anyone who is angry with his brother will answer for it before the court.” (Matthew 5:21-22)

Rush, on the other hand, breezily dismissed the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib saying, “This is no different than what happens at the Skull and Bones initiation … I’m talking about people having a good time, these people, you ever heard of emotional release?”

Jesus said, “The man who has two tunics is to share with him who has none; and he who has food is to do likewise.” (Luke 3:11)

Rush believes that unleashing the forces of the free market will be more effective. “What do you think has fed more mouths, greed or charity? What do you think, folks? What has fed more mouths in this country, the world, whatever subset of people you want to talk about. What has fed more people … greed or charity? That’s right. Greed has fed more mouths than charity ever could.”

Jesus, the tenderhearted master of empathy and compassion, told his disciples to tend the sick and feed the poor. He said, “This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you.” (John 15:12)

Rush, by contrast, responded to an ad in which the actor Michael J. Fox advocated funding for stem-cell research by fuming that Fox “was  exaggerating the effects of the disease. He’s moving all around and shaking and it’s purely an act … This is really shameless of Michael J. Fox. Either he didn’t take his medication or he’s acting.”

“Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth,” said Jesus extolling the virtue of humility. (Matthew 5:5) “I have talent on loan from God,” boasted Rush.

OK, nobody expects Rush Limbaugh — or any mere mortal for that matter — to fully live up to Christ’s moral code. But that’s not the point. The point is that someone who invokes Jesus’ name in practically every broadcast might know a little more about what the founder of Christianity actually taught. Limbaugh is free to spout any bigoted, mean-spirited, vitriolic and unenlightened opinions that he likes. But with the Christmas holiday coming, please do us all a favor and leave Jesus out of it.

Richard Schiffman is the author of two books and a poet based in New York City as well as a former freelance journalist for National Public Radio. His work has appeared in the New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor and leading literary journals. His radio stories have been heard on "Morning Edition," "All Things Considered," Weekend Edition and Monitor Radio.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Bet Me" by Jennifer Crusie

    A contemporary romantic comedy set to Elvis Costello and lots of luxurious and sinful sugary treats.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Welcome to Temptation" by Jennifer Crusie

    Another of Crusie's romantic comedies, this one in the shadow of an ostentatiously phallic water tower.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "A Gentleman Undone" by Cecilia Grant

    A Regency romance with beautifully broken people and some seriously steamy sex.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Black Silk" by Judith Ivory

    A beautifully written, exquisitely slow-building Regency; the plot is centered on a box with some very curious images, as Edward Gorey might say.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "For My Lady's Heart" by Laura Kinsale

    A medieval romance, the period piece functions much like a dystopia, with the courageous lady and noble knight struggling to find happiness despite the authoritarian society.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Sweet Disorder" by Rose Lerner

    A Regency that uses the limitations on women of the time to good effect; the main character is poor and needs to sell her vote ... or rather her husband's vote. But to sell it, she needs to get a husband first ...   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Frenemy of the People" by Nora Olsen

    Clarissa is sitting at an awards banquet when she suddenly realizes she likes pictures of Kimye for both Kim and Kanye and she is totally bi. So she texts to all her friends, "I am totally bi!" Drama and romance ensue ... but not quite with who she expects. I got an advanced copy of this YA lesbian romance, and I’d urge folks to reserve a copy; it’s a delight.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "The Slightest Provocation" by Pam Rosenthal

    A separated couple works to reconcile against a background of political intrigue; sort of "His Gal Friday" as a spy novel set in the Regency.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Again" by Kathleen Gilles Seidel

    Set among workers on a period soap opera, it manages to be contemporary and historical both at the same time.   Read the whole essay.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>