Juan Williams

GOP crowd uses Juan Williams as an Obama stand-in

At Fox's MLK day debate, the black pundit was booed as Gingrich belittled him for asking tough questions on race

News analyst Juan Williams (Credit: AP/Richard Drew)

The Fox News debate began auspiciously, with moderator Bret Baier noting that it was our national holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Then his actual question had nothing to do with Dr. King. But those of us who feared the debate would duck racial issues worried for naught. The night climaxed with the South Carolina crowd giving Newt Gingrich a standing ovation for smacking down Fox’s leading black contributor, Juan Williams, for his impertinent questions about race.

Williams asked for it, of course. What was he thinking making tough racial queries at a GOP debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C.? First, he asked Romney how he squared his harsh anti-immigrant rhetoric with his own family’s story of moving to and then from Mexico seeking religious freedom. He asked Rick Santorum, who purports to care about poverty, what he would do about high African American poverty rates. He asked Ron Paul whether he thought the nation’s harsh drug laws were bad for black people. Then he made the mistake of asking Newt Gingrich about his comments that poor urban children came from communities that lacked a “work ethic,” and his calling Barack Obama “the food stamp president.”

Gingrich couldn’t believe his luck. With a gleam in his eye, he thrashed Williams, and Steve Kornacki believes he may have given his candidacy one last shot with his savvy thumping of Fox’s leading black commentator. It hurt to watch. If Newt gets the nomination – he won’t, but a Democrat can dream – he’ll have to thank Williams at the GOP convention in Tampa, even before he thanks Callista.

Sure, Santorum took his chance to demagogue on race, telling Williams that it only took three things to stay out of poverty in America: “Work, graduate from high school, and get married before you have children.” He didn’t allow that any residue of racism or discrimination might make it harder for African Americans to work, graduate from high school or marry. Santorum also made unfounded allegations, again, about the Obama administration forbidding certain federal programs from talking about marriage. But at least he answered Williams with some personal respect.

Gingrich looked as happy about Williams’s questions as he looked deflated at the last New Hampshire debate. The former NPR analyst referenced Gingrich’s belittling comments about poor kids lacking role models with a work ethic, and the NAACP “demanding” food stamps not jobs, and asked, “Can’t you see that this is viewed at a minimum as insulting to all Americans, but particularly to African Americans?”

“No,” Gingrich said petulantly, with a slight pause. “I don’t see that.” The crowd screamed with glee. Gingrich went on to bash unionized janitors in public schools, and I realized that his student-janitor comments represent a right-wing political trifecta, bashing anti-business regulations like child labor laws, public sector unions and lazy “urban” kids. Oh, and he also got to attack elites this time around, insisting his janitor plans drew liberal disapproval because “only the elites despise earning money.”

But Williams didn’t back away. “The suggestion you made was about a lack of work ethic,” he told Gingrich. “It sounds as if you are seeking to belittle people.” The crowd booed Williams lustily, and Gingrich got a special twinkle in his eye. He looked at Williams like he was a soon-to-be ex-wife.

“First of all, Juan” – and there was a slight cheer when the former speaker called the Pulitzer Prize winner “Juan” – “the fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history. I know among the politically correct you’re not supposed to use facts that are uncomfortable.

“Second, you’re the one who earlier raised a key point,” he continued. “The area that ought to be I-73 was called by Barack Obama a corridor of shame because of unemployment. Has it improved in three years? No — they haven’t built the road, they haven’t helped the people, they haven’t done anything. I’m going to continue to help poor people learn how to get a job, learn how to get a better job, and someday learn how to own the job.” The crowd jumped to its feet screaming “Newt! Newt! Newt!” Fox cut to a commercial.

Where to start? Of course Obama hasn’t “put” anyone on food stamps. The Bush economy nearly doubled the poverty rate, the GOP wouldn’t stand for a stimulus as large as needed, and unemployment and underemployment remain scandalously high. And South Carolina’s famous “corridor of shame” isn’t about the proposed I-73, or unemployment – the term refers to a band of decrepit, under-funded rural African American schools that happen to be near that stretch of interstate. Candidate Barack Obama famously visited some of those broken schools and denounced the broken promises they symbolized.

And at his first address to Congress, he invited Ty’Sheoma Bethea, a student at Dillon, S.C.’s J.V. Martin Middle School, who wrote a heart-breaking letter asking for help that concluded memorably, “We are not quitters.” Bethea sat in a box with First Lady Michelle Obama, an angry black girl alongside to an angry black woman in the eyes of the right. The Washington Times attacked Bethea for demanding a handout and denounced the 14 year old as a symbol of “not responsibility but irresponsibility.” Gingrich didn’t mention the girl, but he’d probably suggest she get a janitor job at her school rather than complain about its funding.

Beating up on Williams as well as poor kids like Ty’Sheoma Bethea, Gingrich had his best debate night yet. It’s not likely to be enough to beat Romney, but it should help him fend off Santorum, despite the (contested) endorsement of right-wing evangelicals this weekend. Once again, South Carolina proves to be the corridor of shame in the GOP presidential primary, featuring some of the ugliest racial politics seen anywhere. Strom Thurmond is gone but not forgotten.

 

 

 

 

 

Joan Walsh

Joan Walsh is Salon's editor at large.

Juan Williams, Fox employee, calls NPR “white”

The professional "political correctness" victim's new workplace throws much more diverse parties, apparently

Juan Williams

Boy, was getting fired from NPR the best thing that ever happened to mediocre commentator Juan Williams. The entire book he wrote on the subject of getting fired from NPR, “Milking It: The Juan Williams Story” (sorry, I meant “Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate”) is out next week, and various anti-NPR excerpts are now up at Politico. Juan Williams, who now works for Fox, where he is a professional “victim of the liberal media,” says NPR is a “very elitist” and “white institution.”

Juan Williams, again, works for Fox News. The closest Fox News gets to a regular minority presence is brunettes. (And Geraldo, I guess.) It’s the channel of aggrieved white people who think they don’t count as “elites” because they don’t … listen to NPR.

“NPR editors and journalists found themselves caught in a game of trying to please a leadership team who did not want to hear stories on the air about conservatives, the poor, or anyone who didn’t’ fit their profitable design of NPR as the official voice of college-educated, white, liberal-leaning, upper-income America,” he writes.

Yes, well, you are significantly more likely to hear stories about “the poor” on NPR than you are on Fox, unless Fox is reporting on how ACORN is stealing elections by registering poor people to vote.

Which is not to say that Juan Williams is totally wrong about NPR! It is, indeed, white and elite. Its target audience is largely white, and elite. But NPR is also a news-gathering organization with professional standards of objectivity and traditional journalistic ethics. Everything NPR produces is informed by its elite institutional bias, but it’s not defined by a specifically partisan bias, like Fox. (And NPR is not owned by a multinational media organization currently under fire for a widespread culture of breathtaking corruption, but that mostly came out after the book went to press.)

Williams is still either purposefully or ignorantly confusing NPR getting embarrassed by the dumb things he constantly said with NPR “censoring” him due to “political correctness.” It’s not really worth trying to argue with Williams’ claims, though, because everything he’s done since making his idiotic anti-Muslim comments has proved that he is essentially a buffoon. And, if the eagerness with which he jumped into the role of professional victim is any indication, not even a self-respecting one.

But he is happy, I guess, with his million-dollar contract and his new best friends in the conservative movement, who actively and passionately work every day of their lives to destroy everything “liberal” Williams supposedly believes in.

According to Newsmax, even Williams’ wife, Delise, is happier with Juan at Fox.

Williams’ wife says everyone at NPR was mean to her all the time, and says her and her husband were the only black people at NPR parties. That’s probably mostly true! But she goes on to say that Fox is a regular rainbow coalition.

“The Fox gatherings are much diverse,” she says. “They have both African-American and whites. It’s great because when I sometimes go down to Fox and wait for Juan in the green room, they all speak to me as if they know me and are very friendly. I feel very comfortable there. With the NPR people, I did not feel comfortable.”

Here is a brief description of Williams’ Fox-hosted book party, by the way:

At Juan’s book party given by Fox News anchors Bret Baier and Shannon Bream and others, Fox News contributors Charles Krauthammer, Stephen Hayes, and Baier all expressed their esteem for Juan despite their often differing views.

Diversity in action!

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Juan Williams defends Obama’s Japan response

"What do you want him to do? Fly over there like he's Superman? You really think he's the Messiah."

Controversial Fox News contributor Juan Williams stood behind President Obama’s earthquake and tsunami relief efforts in Japan last night on Fox Business’ “Follow the Money with Eric Bolling.” The right has heavily criticized Obama for everything from going golfing over the weekend to filling out a March Madness bracket since last Friday’s quake and insisted that the President could do more to help. MSNBC’s Martin Bashir urged his viewers yesterday to “give him a break” and Juan Williams took the defense a step further:

Adam Clark Estes blogs the news for Salon. Email him at ace@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @adamclarkestes

Juan Williams thrilled as man is fired from NPR for having wrong opinions

The former public radio commentator gloats as Ron Schiller's career ends due to right-wing political correctness

Juan Williams

Conservative activist James O’Keefe tricked NPR fundraiser Ron Schiller into saying impolitic things into a camera, which, predictably, caused some outrage. Schiller was fired, even though he’d already given notice that he was leaving for a new job. NPR was decried as racist and anti-conservative, even though Schiller had nothing to do with the editorial side of the corporation and explicitly said that he was airing his personal views and not the views of NPR. Like all O’Keefe sting videos, the released tapes were misleadingly edited and claims about the contents of the tapes were exaggerated with the knowledge that people ideologically predisposed to believe the worst about the sting subject wouldn’t bother to check the transcripts. And Schiller repeatedly refused to take the fake check from the fake Muslims. (I think O’Keefe could “release” a Rick Astley video with a headline claiming he “caught” everyone at the New York Times saying they hate white people and it’d lead to Bill Keller’s resignation.)

NPR’s management clearly couldn’t figure out how to handle the embarrassment. They apologized for remarks they weren’t responsible for and fired a man who was on his way out anyway. NPR chief executive Vivian Schiller (no relation) has resigned.

And now the other Schiller, the one who hates Tea Party bigots, is not going to take his new job with the Aspen Institute. Ruined for the crime of having liberal personal opinions!

Again, this Schiller’s crime was indulging a potential donor politely, which was his job, and expressing his personal opinions, which — while offensive to white Tea Partyers — are not particularly outrageous or uncommon. They are, in fact, the mirror of what Tea Partyers think about liberals. It is not news that half of America hates the other half.

One man who’s altogether thrilled about this is former NPR commentator Juan Williams, who was fired for saying something bigoted into a non-hidden camera and declining to apologize for it. That firing was handled poorly as well — Williams was on notice for a number of stupid statements and simply letting his contract expire would’ve saved everyone a culture war battle — but Williams landed comfortably on a pile of Rupert Murdoch’s money at Fox News, where he is an official Fox Liberal with experience in the heart of the vast liberal media conspiracy.

In an “exclusive” interview with FoxNation.com, Fox’s weird openly conservative Internet community thing, Williams repeatedly confirmed what everyone at Fox already “knows” about everyone at NPR:

“This was an act of incredible condescension,” said Williams. “The rank hypocrisy of his remarks was telling for me. They will say things to your face about how there’s no liberal orthodoxy at NPR, how they play it straight, but now you see it for what it is. They prostitute themselves for money.”

Juan is exactly right: They do prostitute themselves for money, because that is how capitalism works.

So Juan Williams, who was fired for expressing perfectly common views that upset a bunch of uptight liberal p.c. police ninnies, is thrilled that a man was fired for expressing perfectly common views that upset a bunch of upstanding brave conservative American heroes.

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Juan Williams writing a book on NPR firing

He plans to explore "the growing difficulty in America of speaking out on sensitive topics"

The commentator fired by National Public Radio in October for his remarks about Muslims has a deal to write two books.

Crown Publishers announced Tuesday the first book by Juan Williams will “focus on free speech and the growing difficulty in America of speaking out on sensitive topics.”

Williams was let go by NPR after saying on the Fox News Channel he gets nervous when he sees on a plane people with clothing that identifies them as Muslim.

NPR said his remarks violated its standards of not having on-air personnel giving opinions. Williams said he was hurt by the suggestion he’s a bigot.

Williams’ first book is due this summer. It’s currently untitled.

Crown is an imprint of Random House Inc.

Juan Williams lands two-book deal

Fired NPR pundit to focus on free speech and America's growing difficulty speaking about sensitive topics

The commentator fired by National Public Radio in October for his remarks about Muslims has a deal to write two books.

Crown Publishers announced Tuesday the first book by Juan Williams will “focus on free speech and the growing difficulty in America of speaking out on sensitive topics.”

Williams was let go by NPR after saying on the Fox News Channel he gets nervous when he sees on a plane people with clothing that identifies them as Muslim.

NPR said his remarks violated its standards of not having on-air personnel giving opinions. Williams said he was hurt by the suggestion he’s a bigot.

Williams’ first book is due this summer. It’s currently untitled.

Crown is an imprint of Random House Inc.

Page 1 of 3 in Juan Williams