The NYT’s ridiculous motherhood debate
A throwdown about maternal "obsession" shows how out of touch the paper has become
Topics: Media Criticism, Motherhood, Entertainment News
The New York Times would like to know, what’ll it be, ladies? Motherhood or feminism? I don’t know, I think a better question might be: Are you freaking kidding me?
You’d have to go all the way back to January, when the Times hilariously asked if it should be a “truth vigilante” – i.e., fact-check its sources – to find such a fanciful query in the paper of record. This time, the “Room for Debate” Op-Ed page jumps off from French feminist Elisabeth Badinter’s contentious book “The Conflict: How Modern Motherhood Undermines the Status of Women,” asking, I kid you not, “Has women’s obsession with being the perfect mother destroyed feminism?” It may take its inspiration from a controversial book on the tyranny of attachment parenting, but rarely has a single, short sentence strung together so many incendiary words. You’ve got obsession, motherhood, perfection and the destruction of feminism all in one tidy package, centered about the tacit acceptance of the notion that by, say, co-sleeping with your infant, you’re undermining The Sisterhood. As Time.com editor Jessica Winter mused Tuesday, “Next up: Fatherhood vs. Sports, Childhood vs. School, Coats vs. Shoes and Cats vs. Dogs.”
Let’s put aside the merits of Badinter’s book here, because that’s a whole other can of worms, and focus strictly on the wisdom of a respected newspaper framing an entire conversation in such starkly reductive, not to mention dumb, terms. In that spirit, you’ve got to take your hat off to the women who bravely made a go of answering the question sincerely — even though a few of them really did step in it.
Comedian Heather McDonald, for instance, leapt right out of the gate with the admission that “Yes, women’s obsession with being the perfect mother, especially ‘attachment parenting,’ has been bad for working mothers.” Wait, I did not know that we “women” were obsessed in the first place, unless by “women” you mean a small, privileged, neurotic portion of them. McDonald goes on to brag that she “did not breastfeed, make organic baby food or co-sleep with my children. I instead slept with their father, and I am still happily married to him today,” because apparently there’s a correlation between breast-feeding and divorce. And lest you think sweeping generalizations about motherhood are just for this side of the Atlantic, Pamela Druckerman, author of “Bringing Up Bébé: One American Mother Discovers the Wisdom of French Parenting,” airily declares that “French mothers haven’t succumbed to this spiral” of “guilt.” Good for you, French mothers! All of you!
Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub. More Mary Elizabeth Williams.




Comments
24 Comments