
There’s nothing Mitt can say
The presumptive GOP nominee seems powerless to do anything about his Latino problem
By Steve KornackiTopics: Opening Shot, Politics News
For the second time in just over a week, a major development on immigration policy left Mitt Romney essentially speechless on Monday.
The presumptive GOP nominee happened to be in Arizona when the Supreme Court struck down three key provisions of the state’s controversial “Papers, please” law and left a fourth hanging by a thread. But when the ruling was announced, Romney issued an intentionally vague statement, then spent the rest of the day ducking reporters, with his spokesman providing no further clarity. He did allow at a fund-raiser last night that “I would have preferred to see the Supreme Court give more latitude to the states, not less,” but the day ended without Romney addressing the specifics of Arizona’s law or the court’s decision.
This was a replay of what happened when President Obama made a surprise announcement that he was making up to 800,000 law-abiding children of illegal immigrants eligible to apply for work permits that would prevent them from being deported. In a nationally televised interview taped the day after that move, Romney repeatedly (and awkwardly) avoided saying whether he would uphold Obama’s policy as president. Nor did he provide any clarity when he addressed a convention of Latino leaders a few days later. His position on Obama’s deportation order remains nonexistent.
And it’s starting to look like it will remain that way through the November election. When he emerged from the GOP primaries, Romney seemed acutely aware of the damage his hard-right immigration posturing had done to his standing with Latino voters (and, possibly, non-Latino swing voters who aren’t comfortable with anything that smacks of nativism) and appeared to have a remedy in mind: He’d endorse the watered down Dream Act that Sen. Marco Rubio was preparing, a proposal that had the potential to gain quick bipartisan traction.
But Obama’s order preempted Rubio, who now says he won’t be unveiling any legislation before the election, and denied Romney the path to the middle he’d been eyeing. This left Romney to choose from two unpalatable options: Oppose Obama’s new policy and risk worsening his own problem with Latinos and some swing voters; or support it and in so doing tacitly credit the president for a bold and meaningful act of leadership. Don’t endorse it, don’t oppose it, just ignore it.
Monday’s ruling again showed the bind Romney is in. During the primaries, he seemed to endorse Arizona’s law as a “model” for the nation, a smart move for a candidate who was desperately trying to find space to the right of his rivals. But that kind of rhetoric is problematic in a general election setting, which is why Romney’s campaign has suggested Romney was only referring to less controversial aspects of the law when he made his “model” comment. When Monday’s ruling came out, Romney apparently didn’t want to risk offending his party’s base by agreeing that the law is unconstitutional (and that the Obama Justice Department’s decision to contest it was correct), but was also mindful of the perils of fully embracing it. So he again opted to ignore the details.
It’s hard to see this dynamic changing for Romney in the next few months. With Rubio’s watered down Dream Act off the table, there’s no obvious “safe” way for him to create substantive daylight between himself and the anti-immigrant forces in his party. He’s clearly aware of the massive deficit he faces with Latino voters, but also understands that any attempt to cut into that deficit comes with the risk of a backlash from the GOP base. So the best he can do is walk the same fine line he walked on Monday, avoiding saying anything that might worsen his standing with either group. The main effect, of course, is to reinforce Romney’s image as excessively calculating and spineless.
The bigger question is when the dynamics within the Republican Party will change to allow a candidate like Romney to actually pursue Latino voters. Given the country’s demographic evolution, the GOP figures to eventually back off its hardline immigration posture, but it could take a long time. After all, for the average Republican member of Congress, signing off on any kind of comprehensive immigration reform law – the sort of legislation that might resolve the issue and take it off the table in future national elections – would mean encouraging a primary challenge from the right. For Republican office-holders, the threat of being branded ideologically impure is a major concern in the Tea Party-era.
That said, there is a school of thought that a loss at the presidential level this November will force Republicans to budge – especially if the margin is close enough that the party’s Latino problem can be considered the deciding factor. That might prompt just enough conservatives to change their tune that just enough Republicans in Congress feel safe working with Obama next year to enact real immigration reform.
Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki More Steve Kornacki.
You Might Also Like
More Related Stories
-
Seven famous apologies that were just as bad as Serena's
-
The Tea Party's sad, nostalgic reunion tour
-
Poll: Dems like "Obamacare" more than "health care law"
-
House GOPer: Teach kids about traditional gender roles
-
FBI admits to using drones over U.S. soil
-
What everybody gets wrong about Orwell
-
Probe launched into TWA Flight 800 crash
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
Featured Slide Shows
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The protests take on a festive element as police forces move out of the park and square. Wearing a gas mask, this young man dances to traditional Turkish music in front of Taksim Square’s Ataturk Monument.
-
In Gezi Park since March 31st, this protester, originally caught off-guard by the Government’s teargas and water cannons, went out and bought a Russian army mask from WWII, preparing for what was to come.
-
This rambunctious boy seems to be enjoying the chaos. After taking this picture he threw a stone at the already destroyed building in the background.
-
Forming a line, the police face off directly with protesters in Taksim Square. After a while, they retreated and there was a general cheer – a back-and-forth dance that has been common since the beginning of this protest.
-
An elderly woman in Gezi Park reads the news. The tent community occupying the park was violently destroyed on June 16th.
-
Many different groups had set up booths to promote their cause in Taksim Square and Gezi Park. Standing in front of one, this man waves his flag while posing with conviction.
-
Many home-remedies are used to minimize the effects of tear gas. This woman has put a milky solution on her face, removing her mask after the tear gas dissipated. Before sunrise, the police came again for another round of teargasing.
-
People capitalize on the uprising -- selling flags, beer, gas masks, sky lanterns and spray paint to name just a few of the popular items.
-
On Monday morning, June 11, the police execute a strong offensive. Many plain-clothed police officers, like the ones seen here, clash with protesters in the side streets away from the main stand-off in Taksim.
-
The authorities seem to be most aggressive in the night, pushing protesters away from the square and park. After being teargassed this young woman catches her breath with other protesters on Siraselviler Street.
-
Recent Slide Shows
-
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Photos: Turmoil and tear gas in Instanbul's Gezi Park - Slideshow
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The week in 10 pics
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
9 amazing drive-in movie theaters still standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Netflix's April Fools' Day categories
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
Related Videos
More Related Stories
-
Seven famous apologies that were just as bad as Serena's
-
The Tea Party's sad, nostalgic reunion tour
-
Poll: Dems like "Obamacare" more than "health care law"
-
House GOPer: Teach kids about traditional gender roles
-
FBI admits to using drones over U.S. soil
-
What everybody gets wrong about Orwell
-
Probe launched into TWA Flight 800 crash
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
Alex Pareene surveys the burgeoning and bloated world of political news and opinion and explains the day's most essential story in Opening Shot, posted by 8:30 a.m. each weekday. Bookmark this page; follow @pareene on Twitter.
Most Read
-
Bank of America whistle-blower's bombshell: "We were told to lie" David Dayen
-
GOP lawmaker: Extreme abortion ban justified because of masturbating fetuses Katie Mcdonough
-
Why Sarah Palin actually matters again Joan Walsh
-
The best of Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
Vice re-creates female authors' suicides for maximum trolling Michele Filgate
-
GOP plan to appeal to millennials: "Make abortion funny" Alex Seitz-Wald
-
Lynda Obst: Hollywood's completely broken Lynda Obst
-
Guys worry about sex on the first date too Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
The most popular Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
To my daughter on Father's Day: Sorry I used to be a sexist Mo Elleithee

Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

36 points37 points38 points | 44 comments
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
- Chuck Hagel Jokes That Indian Man Asking Him A Question Is A Member Of The Taliban
-
Anti-Immigration Reform Crusader Steve King Feels The Tea Party Love -
Republican Congressman: Does Dianne Feinstein Want Guantanamo Detainees To Die? -
20 Powerful Black-And-White Photographs Of Regular Americans From History -
Michael Hastings In Baghdad



Comments
19 Comments