Clinton revisionism will cost the right

Using Bill and Hillary to try to win this year’s election could cost the GOP dearly in the next one

Topics: Opening Shot,

The controversy over the “chains” metaphor that Joe Biden used in a speech earlier this week has given Republicans another excuse to engage in one of their favorite Obama-era past-times: Talking up the Clintons.

In this case, it’s Hillary who is the subject of their rhetorical largesse, with several Republicans claiming that Biden’s comment should prompt President Obama to make a running-mate switch.

Sarah Palin, for instance, branded Biden’s remark “disgusting” during a Fox News appearance Tuesday night and said, “If that’s not the nail in the coffin, really, the strategists there in the Obama campaign have got to look at a diplomatic way of replacing Joe Biden on the ticket with Hillary.” Fox’s Neil Cavuto was then able to refer back to this in a Wednesday interview with John McCain, who gamely played along by saying that it “might be wise” for Obama to swap Clinton in for Biden.

“But that’s not going to happen,” McCain quickly added, “for a whole variety of reasons.”

He’s right about that, it should go without saying. But the Palin and McCain comments, and the eagerness of Fox News, the leading opinion-shaping organ on the Republican side, to promote them, is the latest example of how Barack Obama’s 2008 victory altered the right’s relationship with the Clintons.

As I’ve written before, you can almost pinpoint the moment Bill and Hillary stopped serving as villains in conservative storytelling. For 16 years, starting with Bill’s rise in 1992 and extending well into the 2008 campaign, the right regarded the Clintons as the faces of the national Democratic Party and treated them accordingly – an almost never-ending stream of attacks designed first to strip them of power and then to prevent them from reclaiming it. But when it became apparent in the spring of ’08 that Obama would be supplanting them as the Democrats’ leader, they revised history almost overnight: Suddenly, the Clintons embodied a bygone spirit of bipartisanship and political moderation that the radical, far-left Obama was intent on destroying.

This has been a politically useful framing for Republicans these past few years. It’s added a whiff of reasonableness to their relentless criticisms of Obama. See, we’re not against all Democrats – we actually think Bill was a good president, and that Hillary would be a lot better than Obama! Accordingly, Bill and Hillary have featured prominently in Mitt Romney’s speeches and ads and in general Republican talking points.

But there’s a flip-side to all of this: Republicans could be setting themselves up for trouble in the post-Obama era. Just consider the effect that GOP’s decision to treat the Clintons as friends has had on their political standing. A recent poll gave Bill his highest personal popularity since his presidential honeymoon in early 1993. It’s the same story for Hillary who, but for a brief period during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, has never enjoyed favorable scores like she’s had for the last three years. Look closely at Hillary’s popularity trendlines, in fact, and you can see that the favorable and unfavorable lines begin their dramatic divergence in the middle of ’08 – almost exactly when the right’s revisionism began.

This could come back to bite Republicans in a few weeks, when Bill delivers a primetime speech at the Democratic convention. Republicans have helped to make him one of the country’s most well-liked public figures, which will give his endorsement of Obama and any accompanying criticisms of Romney more weight.

But the real problem for the GOP is longer-term. Whether Obama wins or loses this fall, the Democratic nomination will be open in 2016. And with the popularity and respect she’s gained the past few years, Hillary will loom over that race as the overwhelming favorite – much more so than she did in the run-up to ’08, when many Democrats were concerned she’d be too polarizing.

Yes, if and when the Clintons return to day to day politics, the right will stop treating them nicely and the attacks will pick up again. Those record-setting favorable scores won’t last long. But that will be the result of Republican voters turning moving away from them, at least at first. But with middle-of-the-road voters, who have been encouraged by both parties to fall back in love with the Clintons these past few years, it could be a different story. In other words, using the Clintons to try to win this year’s election could make it harder for Republicans to prevail in the next one.

Steve Kornacki

Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>