Obama has a blue state problem
Obama's winning blue states by smaller margins than in '08 -- and could be elected while losing the popular vote
By Steve KornackiTopics: Opening Shot, Politics News
President Barack Obama holds up a copy of job plan during a joint campaign appearance with Vice President Joe Biden, not seen, Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2012, at Triangle Park in Dayton, Ohio. (AP Photo/Al Behrman) (Update below)
There’s a real chance, as you’ve probably heard, that there’ll be a split popular vote/Electoral College decision on November 6.
As of this writing, the Real Clear Politics polling average has Mitt Romney leading by 0.7 points in the national horserace, while HuffPost Pollster puts the GOP nominee up by 0.4. The electoral map is more decisive, though, at least for now, with Obama ahead in all of his must-win states, and well-positioned to pick off a couple of Romney’s. If the election were held this minute, the odds are very good that Obama would win the Electoral College, and decent that he’d lose the popular vote.
This would officially be the fifth time in history this has happened, after 1824, 1876, 1888 and 2000 (although Sean Trende made a strong case last week that it also happened in 1960). The question is where the disconnect is coming from – why is Obama apparently performing better in swing states than he is elsewhere?
Many reflexively argue that this is a product of Southern and Appalachian antipathy toward the president. He’s faring so terribly in these areas, the logic goes, that it’s dragging down his standing in the national polls (and elevating Romney’s) by a point or two.
On the surface, this makes sense. In a wide swath of territory extending from Oklahoma up through West Virginia, Obama actually found himself losing dozens of rural counties to fringe challengers in this year’s Democratic primaries – something that didn’t happen outside that region. So if he’s facing that much Southern/Appalachian trouble within his own party, then imagine how bad his plight is with all voters there. Obama’s campaign itself made this argument a few months ago, as John Heilemann relayed back in the spring:
[Obama campaign manager Jim Messina] doesn’t give a whit about national polling, in which Obama’s numbers are dragged down by his horrific performance in the Deep South and Appalachia – but is obsessed with the president’s standing in battleground states.
This view was reinforced a few weeks ago when Markos Moulitsas flagged regional subsample data from Gallup’s weekly poll which showed Obama running 4-6 points ahead in the East, Midwest and West – and 22 points behind in the South. So that settles it, right?
Actually, no.
First, as Nate Cohn has documented, the Gallup regional numbers are at odds with what most other pollsters are finding. In six other national polls, Obama trailed in the South on average by 7.5 points, which is actually a tick better than the nine-point loss he suffered in the region to John McCain four years ago. Of course, take all of this with a grain of salt; the polls that this data was drawn from are national in nature and aren’t necessarily designed to show the state of the race region by region.
Still, when you think about it, it makes sense that the South/Appalachia wouldn’t really be Obama’s trouble spot, because it’s an area that never liked him to begin with. Don’t forget, this is the part of the country where in many counties Obama actually fared worse in 2008 than John Kerry did in 2004. Even before his popularity began dropping with voters elsewhere, voters in this area had already turned on him. So while he’s not doing well in the South, he’s probably not doing that much worse than he did in ’08.
Patrick Murray, who runs the Monmouth University poll, suggests that a more helpful way of understanding why Obama’s national support is lagging is to divide the country into three types of states – red, blue, and competitive – and to compare Obama’s showing in these states to how he’s doing now. Using the ’08 results and Monmouth’s latest numbers, here’s what Murray came up with:
Competitive states
Obama ’08: +7
Obama ’12: -5
Red States
Obama ’08: -15
Obama ’12: -15
Blue states
Obama ’08: + 24
Obama ’12: +11
It’s not surprising that Obama’s standing has declined in competitive states, but what jumps out is that he’s not doing any worse in red states now than he was in ’08 – but that he has suffered a huge drop in blue state America.
This gets us closer to understanding the potential popular vote/Electoral College split. Obama is still going to win all of the blue states he won in 2008 –New Jersey, California, Massachusetts and so on – but he could do so by significantly reduced margins. This wouldn’t change the electoral math, but it certainly would affect the national popular vote. I asked Murray why Obama would be falling off so much in blue states, and why the damage isn’t worse in battleground areas. His theory is that it’s an enthusiasm issue, and he offers some more data from his poll to support this – the percentage of voters from each party who make it through his likely voter screen:
Competitive states
Republicans: 92%
Democrats: 88%
Red states
Republicans: 86%
Democrats: 87%
Blue states
Republicans: 90%
Democrats: 81%
As you can see, enthusiasm is highest for both parties in the battleground states – not surprising, given how much attention they receive – and lowest in their respective safe zones. But the drop-off is more severe for Democrats in blue states, where they’re almost ten points behind Republicans on turnout likelihood. Here’s what Murray told me:
I really think it’s an enthusiasm gap. It’s offset in competitive states by the fact that there is an active campaign. My theory is that Blue state Dems are a bit disappointed over how the first term has turned out. They don’t want Romney to win but feel that Obama can win their state’s EVs without their support.
This certainly seems plausible. Democrats in, say, Ohio and Massachusetts probably both feel disappointed in how the last four years have gone. But in Ohio, they feel an obvious urgency to vote anyway and to keep the other party from winning, and they’re bombarded daily with paid and free media messages pounding home this point. In Massachusetts, though, there’s no campaign, except from the ads on Boston TV stations that are aimed at New Hampshire voters. Democrats there can shrug and say, “I’d rather Obama wins, but it’s not like me voting here will do anything for him.”
I’d say this might be an argument for ending the Electoral College, if the non-battleground status of most of the country actually is affecting participation levels. But at the very least, it seems like a pretty good explanation for why Obama may lose the national horserace but still win the Electoral College.
Update: I’ve received a number of emails and tweets pointing out that the Monmouth poll produced a funny result among Latino voters:
@stevekornacki Good article. But think Monmouth’s low on O’s Hisp (48%) & AA (83%) vote. Would impact blue states. See: bit.ly/RTzNgj
— Nick Gourevitch (@nickgourevitch) October 25, 2012
This is true. Overall, Monmouth’s poll has Romney leading Obama 48-45 percent, but among Latinos, Obama’s edge is only 48-42 — even though Obama won Latinos by 36 points in 2008 and is performing as well (or better) in most other national polls. I asked Murray about this, and he replied:
I can break that down. Obama is winning Latino voters in Blue states by a more than 2 to 1 margin in my poll (60 to 27) – pretty much where we would expect him to be in those states. He is losing the Latino vote in Red states (53-38 on an EXTREMELY small sample size – so no real impact there) and losing it narrowly in competitive states (48-44).
In other words, my Blue State Latino vote matches expectations. The one place where there might be some sampling error is in the competitive states - which could affect Obama’s margin there by a couple of points (keeping in mind, of course, that we are talking about a small sub-sample with a large margin of error).
So this still seems consistent with the idea that blue states explain the potential popular vote/Electoral College disconnect.
Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki More Steve Kornacki.
Related Stories
More Related Stories
-
How right-wingers use semantic tricks to kill government
-
The conservative case for raising the minimum wage
-
Alex Gibney: Julian Assange has become like "those he despises"
-
The week in 10 pics
-
We're living in an Ayn Rand economy
-
Obstruction will ruin GOP
-
The real IRS scandal
-
Krist Novoselic: My plan to fix Congress, curb obstruction
-
RNC Chair: Don't call for impeachment without evidence
-
Power tool industry too powerful to regulate?
-
Will a GOP aide be fired over Benghazi email changes?
-
Is safe fracking possible?
-
How a fight with Rick Santorum made an IRS commissioner
-
Cornel West: "You can get killed out here trying to tell the truth!"
-
Berlusconi's parties featured women dressed as Obama
-
Human Rights Watch: Syrian government practiced torture
-
Allen West lands a gig at Fox News
-
Deficit reduction can't save us
-
ABC's Benghazi problem festers
-
10 ridiculous Christian Right prophesies
-
Obama pledges to end "scourge" of sexual assault in the military
Featured Slide Shows
The week in 10 pics
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
Lisa Montgomery embraces her nephew Thursday after a tornado tore apart her home in Cleburne, Texas. The twister killed six people and destroyed entire swaths of the North Texas town.
Credit: AP/LM Otero -
Jack McMahon, the defense attorney for abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell, speaks outside the Criminal Justice Center Philadelphia Tuesday. His client was convicted of killing three babies in his clinic, and will serve multiple life sentences.
Credit: AP/Matt Rourke -
A photo taken Monday captures Vice President Joe Biden's response to a Milwaukee second-grader's innovative proposal to end America's epidemic of gun violence. This guy!
Credit: AP/Jenny Aicher -
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., flanked by a grouper-eyed Michele Bachmann, addresses the IRS' admission that it targeted Tea Party groups in advance of the 2012 election. In an op-ed for CNN Thursday, the Kentucky senator slammed the president for his faux outrage.
Credit: AP/Molly Riley -
Ousted IRS chief Steven Miller is sworn in on Capitol Hill Friday. Miller testified before the House Ways and Means Committee on the extra scrutiny the agency gave conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.
Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite -
Attorney General Eric Holder pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill before the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday. Holder is under fire, among other things, for the Justice Department's gathering of phone records at the Associated Press.
Credit: AP/Carolyn Kaster -
O.J. Simpson sits during an evidentiary hearing at Clark County District Court in Las Vegas, Nev., Thursday. Simpson, who is currently serving a nine-to-33-year sentence in state prison for armed robbery and kidnapping, is using a writ of habeas corpus to seek a new trial.
Credit: AP/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Jeff Scheid -
Major Tom to ground control: On Sunday astronaut Chris Hadfield recorded the first music video from space, a cover of David Bowie's "Space Oddity."
Credit: AP/NASA/Chris Hadfield -
When it rains it pours. President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference Thursday with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, inexplicably inspiring an #umbrellagate Twitter meme.
Credit: AP/Jacquelyn Martin -
A smoke plume rises high above a road block at the intersection of County A and Ross Road east of Solon Springs, Wis., Tuesday. No injuries were reported, but the the wildfire caused evacuations across northwestern Wisconsin.
Credit: AP/The Duluth News-Tribune/Clint Austin -
Recent Slide Shows
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Mobile Entertainment: 9 Amazing Drive-In Movie Theaters Still Standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Mobile Entertainment: 9 Amazing Drive-In Movie Theaters Still Standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Netflix's April Fools' Day categories
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Slideshow: Nerd Obama
Related Videos
Alex Pareene surveys the burgeoning and bloated world of political news and opinion and explains the day's most essential story in Opening Shot, posted by 8:30 a.m. each weekday. Bookmark this page; follow @pareene on Twitter.
Most Read
-
Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia
Andrew Leonard
-
Jaron Lanier: The Internet destroyed the middle class
Scott Timberg
-
When the IRS targeted liberals
Alex Seitz-Wald
-
The man behind Abercrombie & Fitch
Benoit Denizet-Lewis
-
Pat Robertson: Husbands won't cheat if the wife makes the home "wonderful"
Jillian Rayfield
-
White House trolls Republicans over Obamacare hashtag
Jillian Rayfield
-
Obstruction will ruin GOP
Jonathan Bernstein
-
Is Reddit censoring openly racist users?
Fidel Martinez, The Daily Dot
-
Report: Millennials don't like Abercrombie & Fitch
Katie Mcdonough
-
Cannes: The 10 hottest movies
Andrew O'Hehir
Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

25 points26 points27 points | 1 comment


Rep. Issa Aware Of IRS Investigation Since Last July
French President Hollande Signs Marriage Equality Bill
Obama Group Braces For Progressive Backlash Over Keystone
Republican Lawmakers Took IRS Union Campaign Cash
Comments
36 Comments