SALON

Wednesday, Nov 21, 2012 1:47 PM UTC

The fake cure for Akin-ism

The Republican establishment's plan to avoid a repeat of the Todd Akin debacle ignores the real problem

By

Topics: Opening Shot, Tea Party, Todd Akin, Tommy Thompson, Richard Mourdock, Chris Chocola,

The fake cure for Akin-ismIn this Oct. 30, 2012 photo, Republican U.S Senate candidate Todd Akin appears at a campaign event in Lee's Summit, Mo. Akin is running against Democrat Claire McCaskill for Missouri's Senate seat. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)(Credit: AP)

There’s no denying that Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock were embarrassments for the Republican Party in 2012, and that their nominations cost the GOP otherwise winnable Senate seats and complicated its efforts to take back the chamber. Similarly, there’s no doubt that Christine O’Donnell and Sharron Angle and Ken Buck were embarrassments for the GOP in 2010 and lost races that should have been gimmes for the party.

But a fight is breaking out on the right over the precise significance of these defeats, and what can be done to avoid a repeat in 2014.

In the wake of this month’s election, the outgoing chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, suggested the committee might junk its hands-off approach to Republican primaries going forward.

“What is the goal here?” he asked. “I think the goal is to elect principled conservatives in November, not just nominate somebody in the primary that has very little chance of getting elected in November. That doesn’t advance the conservative agenda, because you have to get elected before you can govern.”

Karl Rove also suggested that his pro-GOP super PAC, American Crossroads, might also turn its attention to GOP primaries in ’14 in an effort to steer voters away from Akin-like candidates.

This talk has prompted Chris Chocola, the head of the Club for Growth, a powerful force within the conservative movement, to warn against efforts by the party establishment to secure nominations for supposedly “electable” candidates.

In an Op-Ed in the Kansas City Star today, Chocola notes that the GOP’s problems in the past two cycles go beyond fringe candidates like Akin and O’Donnell – that establishment-approved nominees such as Tommy Thompson, Rick Berg, Denny Rehberg and George Allen also lost Senate races that were supposed to be winnable. What’s more, Chocola notes, it’s not as if every insurgent conservative who grabs a GOP nomination goes on to lose in the fall – as Pat Toomey, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz can attest.

“[T]he Republican establishment has a horrendous track record of accurately identifying which candidates are truly unelectable and which are not,” he writes.

There’s something to be said for Chocola’s argument, although he doesn’t grapple with the very different nature of the 2012 and 2010 electorates. In ’10, a midterm election in which turnout among core Democratic groups was depressed, Republicans didn’t really pay a price for nominating candidates like Toomey who embraced Tea Party ideology; it was only candidates like O’Donnell who attracted attention with behavior that conformed to the stereotype of a kooky ideologue who had trouble. Virtually any Republican – whether a conservative purist or an establishment-approved pragmatist – could have won virtually any competitive Senate race in 2010. Had Thompson, Berg and Rehberg been on the ballot then, they’d be in the Senate now.

In the presidential year of 2012, by contrast, turnout among core Democratic groups swelled, creating a trickier environment for Republicans – one in which they had much less margin for error. In the climate of ’12, it’s hard to see Toomey replicating his narrow ’10 victory over Joe Sestak.

But yes, it’s true, establishment-type Republican candidates did take a beating this year. Republicans entered the ’12 cycle with what looked like an enviable map. The only real question seemed to be how big their majority would end up being, not whether they’d manage to secure one. But even if Mourdock and Akin had somehow won their races, the GOP would still be three seats short of 50 right now. So it’s not enough to say that the GOP will save itself in the future just by weeding out fringe candidates before they win primaries.

The real problem here is that there hasn’t been any room in the Tea Party era for electable Republican candidates to behave like electable candidates.

Take the example of Thompson, who served four terms as Wisconsin’s governor and who came to this year’s race with deep statewide popularity. He was the GOP establishment’s dream candidate, and while it was close, he was able to secure the nomination. But it came with a price. To keep the conservative masses from revolting against him, Thompson recalibrated his positions and rhetoric during the primary, trying to convince the right to see him as a fellow traveler. This included showing up at a Tea Party event and declaring his desire to “do away with” Medicare and Medicaid. When a video of that comment came out during the general election, it had a disastrous effect on Thompson’s campaign.

As long as the opinion-shaping forces within the Republican Party – Fox News, talk radio hosts and other media personalities, conservative leaders, Tea Party groups and so on – continue to demand absolute fealty to a rigidly ideological, far-right agenda, there’s only so much that the NRSC and groups like Rove’s will be able to do. Even for establishment-type candidates, the pressure will still be on to cater to the base. And the overall image of the party will continue to be a drag.

2014 may end up being a decent year for Republicans, since it will be a midterm and the other party is running the White House. They might be able to slip a few Toomey-ish candidates through again. But in the long term, the GOP will have a lot more general election success if the terms of acceptable debate within the party expand.

 

Continue Reading Close
Steve Kornacki

Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki More Steve Kornacki.

Next Article

Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

What To Read Awards: Top 10 Books of 2012 slide show

close X
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 10
  • 10. "The Guardians" by Sarah Manguso: "Though Sarah Manguso’s 'The Guardians' is specifically about losing a dear friend to suicide, she pries open her intelligent heart to describe our strange, sad modern lives. I think about the small resonating moments of Manguso’s narrative every day." -- M. Rebekah Otto, The Rumpus

  • 9. "Beautiful Ruins" by Jess Walter: "'Beautiful Ruins' leads my list because it's set on the coast of Italy in 1962 and Richard Burton makes an entirely convincing cameo appearance. What more could you want?" -- Maureen Corrigan, NPR's "Fresh Air"

  • 8. "Arcadia" by Lauren Groff: "'Arcadia' captures our painful nostalgia for an idyllic past we never really had." -- Ron Charles, Washington Post

  • 7. "Gone Girl" by Gillian Flynn: "When a young wife disappears on the morning of her fifth wedding anniversary, her husband becomes the automatic suspect in this compulsively readable thriller, which is as rich with sardonic humor and social satire as it is unexpected plot twists." -- Marjorie Kehe, Christian Science Monitor

  • 6. "How Should a Person Be" by Sheila Heti: "There was a reason this book was so talked about, and it’s because Heti has tapped into something great." -- Jason Diamond, Vol. 1 Brooklyn

  • 4. TIE "NW" by Zadie Smith and "Far From the Tree" by Andrew Solomon: "Zadie Smith’s 'NW' is going to enter the canon for the sheer audacity of the book’s project." -- Roxane Gay, New York Times "'Far From the Tree' by Andrew Solomon is, to my mind, a life-changing book, one that's capable of overturning long-standing ideas of identity, family and love." -- Laura Miller, Salon

  • 3. "Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk" by Ben Fountain: "'Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk' says a lot about where we are today," says Marjorie Kehe of the Christian Science Monitor. "Pretty much the whole point of that novel," adds Time's Lev Grossman.

  • 2. "Bring Up the Bodies" by Hilary Mantel: "Even more accomplished than the preceding novel in this sequence, 'Wolf Hall,' Mantel's new installment in the fictionalized life of Thomas Cromwell -- master secretary and chief fixer to Henry VIII -- is a high-wire act, a feat of novelistic derring-do." -- Laura Miller, Salon

  • 1. "Behind the Beautiful Forevers" by Katherine Boo: "Like the most remarkable literary nonfiction, it reads with the bite of a novel and opens up a corner of the world that most of us know absolutely nothing about. It stuck with me all year." -- Eric Banks, president of the National Book Critics Circle

  • Recent Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 10

Related Videos

More Related Stories

Comments

 31 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( profile | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>

Steve Kornacki surveys the burgeoning and bloated world of political news and opinion and explains the day's most essential story in Opening Shot, posted by 8:30 a.m. each weekday. Bookmark this page; follow @SteveKornacki on Twitter.

follow salon

Most Read

From Around the Web

Recommendations