Go to church, or go to jail!
A drunk-driving teen in Oklahoma is sentenced to a decade's worth of sermons. Is that even constitutional?
Topics: The Fix, Alcohol, Constitutional Law, Oklahoma, ACLU, Politics News
A year ago, two buzzed Oklahoma teens lost control of their pickup truck, drove off the road and smashed into a tree, ejecting and killing the passenger. The driver, Tyler Alred, confessed to drinking earlier in the evening, and blew a 0.07 on the breathalyzer, above the legal limit for a minor. In August, Alred pled guilty to first-degree manslaughter, and was sentenced to four years to life, with parole. But a judge named Mike Norman changed Alred’s sentence to 10 years deferred—meaning no jail time—provided he graduates from high school, passes regular drug and alcohol tests, performs community service … and goes to church every Sunday for a decade. If that seems constitutionally dicey—well, the Oklahoma ACLU and the US Supreme Court agree.
The SCOTUS has said ”it is beyond dispute that, at a minimum, the Constitution guarantees that government may not coerce anyone to support or participate in religion or its exercise.” And the ACLU is filing a formal complaint today with the Oklahoma Council on Judicial Complaints. According to ACLU of Oklahoma Executive Director Ryan Kiesel, forcing a person to choose between prison and Sunday school is “not really a voluntary choice.” Which brings up a further question: Could a judge mandating attendance at a 12-step program also conflict with the First Amendment’s freedom-of-religion clause? AA and NA programs may not be associated with any specific faith, but they areexplicitly spiritual programs, prescribing reliance upon a “higher power” or “a god of one’s own understanding” to get sober.
Continue Reading Close


Comments
19 Comments