What’s wrong with drug testing pregnant women
The rights of women are under attack in blue states as well as red ones
Topics: women, Drug testing, personhood, Pregnancy, News, Politics News
The New York Daily News’ new analysis of the drug testing of postpartum women in New York City maternity wards — and the neglect proceedings that can follow, often targeting low-income communities — is a reminder that this intersection of the drug war and creeping personhood isn’t limited to red states.
Such testing tends to happen at the discretion of the hospital. “Private hospitals in rich neighborhoods rarely test new mothers for drugs, whereas hospitals serving primarily low-income moms make those tests routine and sometimes mandatory,” concludes The News’ Oren Yaniv. This is true more broadly. According to the National Advocates for Pregnant Women, “More than eighteen states now address the issue of pregnant women’s drug use in their civil child neglect laws, and a growing number of these states make it possible to remove a child based on nothing more than a single positive drug test.”
At least two studies have found that black women and their newborns are far more likely to be tested for drug use — and to be reported for it — than white women, despite similar rates of drug use among the populations. Testing positive for marijuana can unleash a round of child neglect and protection proceedings, though attorneys have presented in court medical testimony that marijuana use, while not exactly beneficial to the fetus, doesn’t actually harm it. And another recent study published in Clinical Chemistry found that infant urine tests were far more likely than adult urine to result in false positives for marijuana.
Of course, New York City is still a long way from Alabama, which routinely prosecutes pregnant women who test positive for drug use for “chemical endangerment,” a statute that was initially enacted to protect children from meth labs. According to an April story by Ada Calhoun in the New York Times magazine, about 60 women have been prosecuted under the law, some for using drugs that are more serious and addictive than marijuana. The director of the Center for Study of Children at Risk, Barry Lester, told Calhoun at the time, “I think what you’re looking at here is a failure to understand that addiction is a disease of the brain. You are looking at people who think that these are horrible women who are rationally, willfully hurting their kids, but it’s more complicated than that. Science has shown that addiction is a disease like any other mental illness, and absolutely treatable.”
Continue Reading Close
Irin Carmon is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @irincarmon or email her at icarmon@salon.com. More Irin Carmon.





Comments
23 Comments