The inauguration of struggle
The second inauguration was about closing the gap between America's promise of equality and the reality for all
Topics: Inauguration, Barack Obama, Myrlie Evers-Williams, Selma, Stonewall, Seneca Falls, richard blanco, News, Politics News
President Barack Obama deliver his Inaugural address at the ceremonial swearing-in at the U.S. Capitol during the 57th Presidential Inauguration in Washington, Monday, Jan. 21, 2013. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)(Credit: Carolyn Kaster)The people onstage at the Inauguration today, in spirit and in person, have always been a part of history in one form another, if you knew where to look and did the work. They’ve just never been this visible, nor this powerful.
A grandiose ceremony like an inauguration is about visibility as much as it is about repeating foundational rhetoric. Barack Obama’s second inauguration explicitly made the argument that not only did all those citizens — female and queer and brown and immigrant and belonging to different generations — belong there, but that they had come there through a necessary struggle to make all of America what it promised to be.
The most important line in Obama’s speech, to my mind, was, “For history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they have never been self-executing.” Closing the gap between the country’s pledge of liberty and equality and the lived reality of the centuries didn’t just happen. First there were radical struggles, the ones Obama invoked when he said that the self-evident truth of equality “is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall.” Yes, that’s right: Our forebears. Our country. It’s a vision that recognizes separate experiences yet suggests they are not forces for division, but for a more honest unity.
Compare that with Obama’s sober 2008 inaugural speech, which had a far more conventional view of American history. Speaking about ancestors, he said, “For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life. For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West; endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth. For us, they fought and died, in places like Concord and Gettysburg; Normandy and Khe Sahn….We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve[.]” That’s a different vision (and a fairly uncomplicated rendition of Westward expansion), one that puts the struggle firmly in the past and seeks the dissolution of difference. That Obama sought to rise above, as if such a thing could ever happen by force of language. This Obama realizes that things happen in the muck.
Irin Carmon is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @irincarmon or email her at icarmon@salon.com. More Irin Carmon.










Comments
16 Comments