Is a not-so-grand bargain back?
Report: House GOP would hike revenue to get a big political win -- a Democratic president slashing popular programs
By Joan WalshTopics: Entitlement cuts, "grand bargain", Social Security, Medicare, Sequestration, Editor's Picks, News, Politics News
The National Journal’s Ron Fournier apparently breaks some news today, with House GOP sources telling him, not for attribution, that they’re open to a compromise that includes tax revenue in order to achieve a deficit-cutting “grand bargain” – as long as it contains the entitlement cuts President Obama says he’d support.
For two years now the only sure thing standing in the way of an entitlement-cutting, not-so-grand bargain has been the intransigence of the far right House GOP caucus. So far, that’s been mostly a win for the president. He gets to say he’s for compromise, including “sensible” entitlement reductions, without ever having to make them. And his most fervent progressive devotees get to say he doesn’t really mean it, it’s just a bargaining stance, and since no deal is ever made, Obama outfoxed his opponents again. He’s the only adult in the room!
But the must-read part of Fournier’s piece isn’t the news that the House GOP is open to a deal, which is important, but his explanation of why:
What is the GOP incentive to deal? First, getting the signature of a Democratic president on a bill reducing entitlements would be a victory for a generation’s worth of Republican candidates. Casting GOP politicians as Granny-bashers would be harder to do after a Democratic White House tweaks Medicare and Social Security. Second, even token reforms by Obama in 2013, opens the door to deeper entitlement changes in the future.
On one level, this isn’t news: MSNBC’s Luke Russert quoted his GOP sources saying the same thing last December. “If they have entitlement cuts as part of this deal, they would make it, through their marketing ways, and they’re better communications operatives than Democrats, that the president would own the entitlement cuts,” Russert said. “They would say ‘the president owns that’ in 2014 and 2016.” Now comes Fournier, a Beltway veteran, and he’s pushing this story hard. It’s too bad so many Democrats aren’t paying attention to the political trap that’s being laid for them.
Let’s go over what Obama and other top Democrats have supposedly agreed to: the so-called chained CPI for Social Security – a way of formulating cost-of-living adjustments that amounts to a benefit cut – and some kind of “means-testing” for Medicare recipients. Wealthy seniors already pay higher premiums, but means-testing would also limit the services they receive.
And let’s revisit why those are bad bargains. The chained CPI is not, in fact, a more accurate measure of how consumer prices rise. It reflects the costs and consumer behaviors of all Americans, when we know seniors spend much larger sums on two things, healthcare and housing, that aren’t subject to the kinds of cost-cutting and product-substitution — switching out chicken for steak, to use the cliché that explains why rising costs aren’t as problematic as they may seem – that let non-seniors cope with higher product prices. Meanwhile, means-testing for Medicare is the first step to making it a welfare program, subject to the same marginalization, demonization and constant cutting that other welfare programs endure.
Social Security can be “fixed” by raising the level at which incomes are taxed, and perhaps by adopting a new inflation measure that accurately reflects the way seniors live, rather than all consumers. Medicare costs can be controlled by a range of innovations and efficiencies – some of which are already working to reduce Medicare spending.
Jared Bernstein had a must-read wonky column Tuesday (h/t Digby) showing that the Congressional Budget Office’s 10-year projections for the growth of Medicare and Medicaid spending have dropped by $500 billion compared to projections made just a few years ago. Healthcare costs overall are growing more slowly in the last few years, and yes, some of these lower-cost years were during the recession. But while healthcare costs overall grow more slowly during recessions, as people cut their personal spending, Medicare costs don’t, since they tend to be for medical expenses that are more urgent, and mostly paid for by the government anyway, so pinched consumers don’t have to economize.
Nobody knows why costs are down for sure, but there’s good reason to believe that it has to do with innovations and efficiencies introduced over the last few years, including by Obamacare, including better technology, accountability for hospital readmissions and other cost controls. The bottom line for Bernstein:
My guess is there’s something lasting going on here, and that means the doctor has just prescribed a very large chill pill for those who want to whack away at Medicare and Medicaid and CHIP because “they’re going bankrupt…bankrupt I tell you!” They’re not, and our energies would be much better spent on careful research on the factors behind these recent cost trends and how we can build on them. The goal is not to diminish these extremely valuable programs. It’s to enhance their efficiency so as to ensure that they remain a solid part of American social policy.
As Digby also notes, this means Obamacare could be the president’s lasting legacy in terms of deficit reduction, too; he doesn’t need an entitlement-slashing grand bargain. Unless he wants one.
Greg Sargent makes the sobering case that progressives ought to be thinking about whether they’re willing to trade entitlement cuts for lifting the sequester cuts, since it’s looking like Republicans may have won that political battle for now: There’s nothing like the outcry many Democrats predicted once the cuts took effect. And yet they’re having an impact nonetheless, especially for low-income families and the programs that serve them. Progressive caucus members like Jan Schakowsky and Keith Ellison told Sargent they think it’s too soon to begin mulling such a trade-off, and I agree.
All week I’ve found myself thinking Paul Krugman was right when he compared the selling of the Iraq War 10 years ago to the selling of entitlement cuts, as a comparable sickness of Beltway delusion and “seriousness” that gradually spreads to include liberals who want to be taken “seriously” in newspapers, magazines, the blogosphere, TV and Twitter.
I’m not saying that includes Sargent – even though Fournier includes him as a progressive who’s getting “serious” about mulling entitlement cuts in exchange for restoring the worst of the sequester cuts. Sargent’s column raised the question; it didn’t endorse an answer. But with the deficit actually shrinking at the fastest rate since just after World War II, and even Medicare costs rising more slowly than they have in years, despite an aging population, progressives need to be fighting the Beltway deficit hawks, not making excuses for Obama caving to them.
Joan Walsh is Salon's editor at large and the author of "What's the Matter With White People: Finding Our Way in the Next America." More Joan Walsh.
Related Stories
More Related Stories
-
Cicadas prepare to invade by the billions
-
More people in U.S. die from suicide than car accidents
-
Gay French politician receives death threat over marriage announcement
-
Dow Jones crosses 15,000 for first time ever
-
Dow Jones soars following April jobs report
-
Jeffrey Goldberg's Qatari myopia
-
California wildfire burns 15-mile path to Pacific
-
Inside the kiddie gun market
-
UN: Gitmo force-feeding is inhumane
-
Must-see morning clip: Veterans still waiting for medical benefits
-
Jobs report: Unemployment rate falls to 7.5 percent
-
Obama "comfortable with" FDA decision allowing girls 15 and up to buy Plan B
-
Hagel: Arming Syrian rebels is an option
-
How shoppers can help prevent Bangladesh-type disasters
-
Bangladesh official: Disaster is "not really serious"
-
Rhode Island legalizes gay marriage
-
Bombing suspects originally plotted July 4 attack
-
Assata Shakur first woman named on FBI most wanted list
-
Georgia town allegedly diverting sewage to black neighborhood
-
Pic of the day: World Trade Center reborn
-
Hacker steals sensitive infrastructure data from U.S. military
Featured Slide Shows
The week in 10 pics
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
This photo. President Barack Obama has a laugh during the unveiling of the George W. Bush Presidential Center in Dallas, Tx., Thursday. Former first lady Barbara Bush, who candidly admitted this week we've had enough Bushes in the White House, is unamused.
Reuters/Jason Reed -
Rescue workers converge Wednesday in Savar, Bangladesh, where the collapse of a garment building killed more than 300. Factory owners had ignored police orders to vacate the work site the day before.
AP/A.M. Ahad -
Police gather Wednesday at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to honor campus officer Sean Collier, who was allegedly killed in a shootout with the Boston Marathon bombing suspects last week.
AP/Elise Amendola -
Police tape closes the site of a car bomb that targeted the French embassy in Libya Tuesday. The explosion wounded two French guards and caused extensive damage to Tripoli's upscale al-Andalus neighborhood.
AP/Abdul Majeed Forjani -
Protestors rage outside the residence of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Sunday following the rape of a 5-year-old girl in New Delhi. The girl was allegedly kidnapped and tortured before being abandoned in a locked room for two days.
AP/Manish Swarup -
Clarksville, Mo., residents sit in a life boat Monday after a Mississippi River flooding, the 13th worst on record.
AP/Jeff Roberson -
Workers pause Wednesday for a memorial service at the site of the West, Tx., fertilizer plant explosion, which killed 14 people and left a crater more than 90 feet wide.
AP/The San Antonio Express-News, Tom Reel -
Aerial footage of the devastation following a 7.0 magnitude earthquake in China's Sichuan province last Saturday. At least 180 people were killed and as many as 11,000 injured in the quake.
AP/Liu Yinghua -
On Wednesday, Hazmat-suited federal authorities search a martial arts studio in Tupelo, Miss., once operated by Everett Dutschke, the newest lead in the increasingly twisty ricin case. Last week, President Barack Obama, Sen. Roger Wicker, R.-Miss., and a Mississippi judge were each sent letters laced with the deadly poison.
AP/Rogelio V. Solis -
The lighting of Freedom Hall at the George W. Bush Presidential Center Thursday is celebrated with (what else but) red, white and blue fireworks.
AP/David J. Phillip -
Recent Slide Shows
-
The week in 10 pics
-
"Arrested Development" character posters
-
Photos of the Boston manhunt
-
Newspaper headlines covering the Boston explosion
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
Related Videos
Most Read
-
71 names so awful New Zealand had to ban them
Kyle Kim, GlobalPost
-
"This could be a career ender for Michele Bachmann"
Alex Seitz-Wald
-
He made me his drug mule
Alix Wall
-
Ted Cruz will never be president
Joan Walsh
-
Claire Messud to Publishers Weekly: "What kind of question is that?"
David Daley
-
Pictures of people who mock me
Haley Morris-Cafiero
-
Is Michael Pollan a sexist pig?
Emily Matchar
-
How conspiracists think
Sander van der Linden, Scientific American
-
Bush cancels Europe trip amid calls for his arrest
Justin Elliott
-
"Star Trek's" Wil Wheaton tells newborn girl why being a nerd "is awesome"
Prachi Gupta
Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

28 points29 points30 points | 4 comments

26 points27 points28 points | 10 comments
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
-
Please Don't Fire Howard Kurtz, CNN -
Mitch McConnell Really Wants You To Know He Loves The Kentucky Derby -
CNN Panelist Calls Mitt Romney A "Religious Fanatic" For Encouraging Mormon Graduates To Have Families -
How The Supreme Court's DOMA Ruling Could Upend The Immigration Debate -
Ken Cuccinelli Once Filed An Amendment To Change Virginia's State Song To The Beatles' "Taxman"





Comments
45 Comments