Boston explosions highlight a frightening new reality
As we sort out what exactly happened in Boston, the fact that the explosions aren't surprising is itself terrifying
Topics: Boston, Terrorism, Security, Homeland Security, Boston Explosions, News, Politics News
Medical workers aid injured people at the finish line of the 2013 Boston Marathon following an explosion in Boston, Monday, April 15, 2013. (Credit: AP/Charles Krupa)We don’t know what the cause of the Boston Marathon explosion yet. It could be terrorism (especially with initial reports of multiple explosive devices). It could be some infrastructure-related explosion. But the fact that such a catastrophe is no longer completely surprising is terrifying.
I heard the news as most did – through the digital grapevine. My initial reaction was the same as that of many people with loved ones in Boston – entirely personal and worried about possible friends and family who might have been maimed or, god forbid, killed. But while I fretted and texted and called, I also realized that something had changed in me — and in all of us — since I fled the U.S. Capitol back on Sept. 11, 2001. What had changed was that while I was nervous, worried, disgusted and anxious — and while I was shaking my head muttering rhetorical questions about the senselessness of the world — I was no longer shocked.
If it is terrorism, this will be classified — as the TV anchors are now reminding us in “Clockwork Orange”-like repetition — as simply life in the “post-9/11” era. If it is some sort of infrastructure-related tragedy, it will be classified as just daily life in a nation whose neglect of its physical plant brings us sinkholes, power outages and pipe explosions.
Whatever the cause of this catastrophe, though, the reaction is proof that we have reached a new normal — one that increasingly defines major news events in America as those exclusively involving death and carnage.
Yes, it’s true; since humans put pen to paper to report current events, news has always been defined by the “if it bleeds, it leads” ethos. But in recent years, with the heightened prospect of terrorism, the proliferation of mass shootings and the persistence of now-mundane gun violence, the aphorism seems like it has been flipped around: If it leads, or if it is even considered news, it inevitably must bleed.
How much of this new normal is a matter of perception and how much of this is real? It is difficult to answer. We know that violent crime is down. We also know that terrorism worldwide is down.
David Sirota is a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist, magazine journalist and the best-selling author of the books "Hostile Takeover," "The Uprising" and "Back to Our Future." E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com. More David Sirota.




Ken Cuccinelli Once Filed An Amendment To Change Virginia's State Song To The Beatles' "Taxman"
Masters Of The Universe: Lawmakers Obsess Over Threats From Space
Commerce Appointment Opens A New White House Rift

Comments
141 Comments