Why is Steve Emerson still a “terrorism expert”?
Conservative investigator Steve Emerson was pretty sure it was the Saudi, until he ruled it out six hours later
Topics: Steve Emerson, Boston Explosions, Terrorism, Boston, Boston Marathon, Politics News
In the murky world of self-styled terrorism experts, Steve Emerson is one of the most well known and most controversial. Emerson and his Investigative Project on Terrorism have drawn praise from the Pamela Geller set, though he never goes nearly as far as she does, and sharp rebukes from groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which Emerson has accused of being tied to Hamas.
So naturally, after any event like the one in Boston yesterday, Emerson gets called upon by major news networks (though mostly just Fox, these days) to offer his analysis, especially when so much attention turned to a Saudi national whom police questioned and whose home they searched.
Here’s what Emerson said at 9:20 this morning on C-SPAN, citing “confidential information:”
EMERSON: I have been given privy to certain classified information, it appears that it was a political act of terrorism done for political reasons. Yes, there has been no person arrested. There have been people interrogated. Not just in one house, but raids on several houses. On the Facebook page of the person of interest, there were interesting entries against the United States. Again, he has not been convicted, but the burns on his skin match the explosive residue of the bomb that exploded.
HOST: Is this the Saudi national or those two different people?
EMERSON: The Saudi national.
But this afternoon, officials ruled out that Saudi national, according to multiple reports. When Emerson went on Fox News with Megyn Kelly a few hours later, he even said so himself, again citing confidential sources:
EMERSON: We’re back to square one in terms of suspects, because the Saudi suspect has been ruled out.
Emerson was careful not to pin the blame on the Saudi this morning, but it’s a pretty big change of tune for six hours. And importantly, Emerson told Kelly that he still believes the attack was perpetrated by Islamic extremists because the type of bomb carries the “hallmark” of jihadis. And it’s probably not a right-wing extremist group, he explained, because “those domestic extremist groups, the white extremists groups, or individuals, use guns to carry out their attacks.”
Alex Seitz-Wald is Salon's political reporter. Email him at aseitz-wald@salon.com, and follow him on Twitter @aseitzwald. More Alex Seitz-Wald.





Rick Perry Levels Targets With An AR-15
FBI Soliciting Benghazi Tips With New Arabic-Language Video
Joe Biden Loves John McCain
Comments
59 Comments