SALON

Thursday, Apr 25, 2013 6:59 PM UTC

Is there too much breast cancer “awareness”?

Yes, the world is a pinker place. But an author (and survivor) says we're squandering time, money and resources

By

Topics: Breast cancer, Cancer, Peggy Orenstein, New York Times,

Is there too much breast cancer Atlanta Falcons cheerleaders wear pink in honor of breast cancer awareness month. (Credit: Reuters/Tami Chappell)

Facing the helplessness of disease – especially a disease that has a penchant for women, for our mothers and our friends and daughters – it feels good to go on the offensive. It feels good to believe we are somehow collectively “battling” it. It feels good enough, in fact, to have turned breast cancer into a big, Pepto Bismol-colored business, and to have driven unprecedented droves of women into prophylactic mastectomies.

Yet reality is far more complicated than a jaunty ribbon on a lapel or the hopeful promise of “early detection.” And the key to unlocking the secrets of a pernicious disease will not be found in a pink bottle of nail polish — or even, very likely, in radical defensive surgery.

That point is well-illustrated in author Peggy Orenstein’s blisteringly sensible cover story for the New York Times Magazine on “Our Feel-Good War on Breast Cancer.” (It will appear in print this weekend, but is on the Times’ site now.) Orenstein knows well the nightmare of breast cancer. She was diagnosed in 1996, at age 35. A decade and a half later, she was diagnosed again. And that span of time represents a massive shift in our cultural relationship with breast cancer – and a surprising new concern: what she calls “the dangers of overtreatment.”

As Orenstein writes, a mammogram like the one that first detected her cancer does “reduce, by a small percentage, the number of women who are told they have late-stage cancer, but it is far more likely to result in overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment, including surgery, weeks of radiation and potentially toxic drugs.” Of particular interest to Orenstein are the 60,000 new diagnoses annually – roughly a quarter of them — of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Also known as “Stage Zero,” DCIS is not cancer, just the presence of abnormal cells that could become cancer. Complicating matters is the fact that, as Orenstein notes, “There are at least four genetically distinct breast cancers,” and that “Mammograms, it turns out, are not so great at detecting the most lethal forms of disease.”

The presence of any unusual cells, of course, remains a big, scary red flag. And action has a more can-do appeal than wait-and-see. That’s likely why the same tremendous progress we’ve made in detection has led — and not necessarily helpfully —  to “a 188 percent jump between 1998 and 2005 among women given new diagnoses of DCIS in one breast … who opted to have both breasts removed just in case” and a stunning 150 percent rise among women with early-stage invasive disease. There’s a whole population of women who’ve gone under the knife for something that may well never have blossomed into a life-threatening condition.

As Orenstein told Salon Thursday, “We’ve been lulled into a false sense of security. I felt that some of the issues around mammography and DCIS — and the idea that it was being seen as a triumph of early detection instead of a casualty of it — weren’t being put together in a big coherent way.”

Make no mistake – breast cancer is a very real and horrendous beast. Last year, I watched two friends and fellow mothers die of it, in their mid-40s. I’ve seen countless more women endure the rigors of chemo and radiation and multiple surgeries because of it. But all the easy, rah-rah happy talk of “awareness” in the world – a phrase that anyone who’s faced cancer has heard ad nauseam – is virtually meaningless in the face of the real and sophisticated array of diseases that cancer truly is, and how it behaves. Sure, if you have a condition that can metastasize at a demonic rate – like my own melanoma – early detection and aggressive treatment can make a life-or-death difference. DCIS? Maybe not. Astonishingly, Orenstein says that “a quarter of screening-detected [breast] cancers might have gone away on their own.”

Meanwhile, at a time when women who’ve never even truly had cancer are hailed as “survivors,” people who are seriously sick are lost in the cheerleading for early detection as some sort of miracle panacea. Orenstein reports that “only an estimated 0.5 percent of all National Cancer Institute grants since 1972 focus on metastasis” because unfortunately, as University of Kansas Cancer Center chairman Danny Welch says, “A lot of people are under the notion that metastatic work is a waste of time.”

“Surviving” something that might not ever have grown into a severe threat makes for a happy-ending story. Having a disease that’s genuinely out to kill you? Still alarmingly taboo. It’s kind of funny – for all our talk about “the cure,” so little attention and research and funding is actually going to treat the people who need a cure the most.

In the years since Peggy Orenstein was initially diagnosed, the world of cancer has become an ostensibly more enlightened and indisputably pinker place. It has resulted in a glut of neatly repeated, taken-at-face-value ideas that early detection equals survivorship, and a whole lot of women voluntarily losing their breasts. Yet Orenstein told Salon, “We need to make sure that our focus and our pressure is bought to bear to where it needs to be. I can’t afford to have people squandering so much time and energy and money in the name of breast cancer.” And a spate of sloganeering hasn’t translated into deeper public understanding. As Orenstein says, “Awareness has become obliviousness.”

Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub. More Mary Elizabeth Williams.

Next Article

Related Stories

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

The week in 10 pics

close X
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 11
  • This photo. President Barack Obama has a laugh during the unveiling of the George W. Bush Presidential Center in Dallas, Tx., Thursday. Former first lady Barbara Bush, who candidly admitted this week we've had enough Bushes in the White House, is unamused.
    Reuters/Jason Reed

  • Rescue workers converge Wednesday in Savar, Bangladesh, where the collapse of a garment building killed more than 300. Factory owners had ignored police orders to vacate the work site the day before.
    AP/A.M. Ahad

  • Police gather Wednesday at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to honor campus officer Sean Collier, who was allegedly killed in a shootout with the Boston Marathon bombing suspects last week.
    AP/Elise Amendola

  • Police tape closes the site of a car bomb that targeted the French embassy in Libya Tuesday. The explosion wounded two French guards and caused extensive damage to Tripoli's upscale al-Andalus neighborhood.
    AP/Abdul Majeed Forjani

  • Protestors rage outside the residence of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Sunday following the rape of a 5-year-old girl in New Delhi. The girl was allegedly kidnapped and tortured before being abandoned in a locked room for two days.
    AP/Manish Swarup

  • Clarksville, Mo., residents sit in a life boat Monday after a Mississippi River flooding, the 13th worst on record.
    AP/Jeff Roberson

  • Workers pause Wednesday for a memorial service at the site of the West, Tx., fertilizer plant explosion, which killed 14 people and left a crater more than 90 feet wide.
    AP/The San Antonio Express-News, Tom Reel

  • Aerial footage of the devastation following a 7.0 magnitude earthquake in China's Sichuan province last Saturday. At least 180 people were killed and as many as 11,000 injured in the quake.
    AP/Liu Yinghua

  • On Wednesday, Hazmat-suited federal authorities search a martial arts studio in Tupelo, Miss., once operated by Everett Dutschke, the newest lead in the increasingly twisty ricin case. Last week, President Barack Obama, Sen. Roger Wicker, R.-Miss., and a Mississippi judge were each sent letters laced with the deadly poison.
    AP/Rogelio V. Solis

  • The lighting of Freedom Hall at the George W. Bush Presidential Center Thursday is celebrated with (what else but) red, white and blue fireworks.
    AP/David J. Phillip

  • Recent Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 11

Related Videos

Comments

 38 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>

follow salon

Most Read

Popular on Reddit

links from salon.com

vote
Facebook has been used to find ex-lovers, childhood BFFs or the one who got away. He used it to find the guy who, without his consent, made him his drug mule.
254 points255 points | 24 comments
vote
“This could be a career ender for Michele Bachmann”
177 points178 points | 78 comments
vote
Poll: 3 in 10 voters say “armed revolution might be necessary” - 29% say they believe they'll have to act "in order to protect our liberties" in the next few years
47 points48 points | 18 comments
vote
"New evidence reveals big banks still illegally foreclosing on thousands of homes – and weak settlement allows it."
28 points29 points | comment
vote
Are millennials delusional? New research suggests that members of "Generation Me" are warped by a profound sense of entitlement
25 points26 points | 21 comments

From Around the Web

Presented by Scribol
listener_new_rect The Listener: "The Shelter Cycle": Raised in a cult

Recommendations