Dolls for girls, science and Legos for boys: The toy aisle is still sexist

A drugstore chain declares science is for boys -- until customers fight back on Twitter

Topics: Gender, Sexism, Consumerism, Peggy Orenstein, Twitter, Editor's Picks,

Dolls for girls, science and Legos for boys: The toy aisle is still sexist(Credit: Reuters/Charles Platiau)

You can’t do away with sexism by doing away with sexist labeling. But it’s a start. So thanks, Boots. After an embarrassing kerfuffle over what it backwardly deems gender appropriate toys, the U.K. drugstore chain is moving toward a more equitable display system.

Boots’ enlightenment began after Twitter user Sean E. Gray posted a photo from the store, with the caption “not impressed.” It revealed the store’s “Girl Toy” section, featuring princess gear and mini-tea sets, and the “Boy” section — chock-full of Science Museum brand kits.

As the Guardian reports, Boots initially defended the placement, saying its real estate choices were based on “customer feedback” and making the stores “easier to navigate.” But in the face of mounting criticism, it has since retreated, promising on its Facebook page that “It was never our intention to stereotype certain toys. It’s clear we have got this signage wrong, and we’re taking immediate steps to remove it from store.”

It’s a move both customers and at least some manufacturers applaud. Gray told the Daily Mail this week, “I thought I might annoy a manager somewhere enough to change something but I had no idea that there’d be this much support. It’s fantastic.” And Science Museum quickly issued a statement asserting that it “is committed to producing products which appeal to both genders.”

This isn’t the first customer battle over the toy aisle. In 2011, U.K. toy retailer Hamleys did away with its “Boy” and “Girl” sections, eliminating pink and blue signs for a uniform red-and-white look throughout. And last year, Change.org launched a petition to get Target to change its spectacularly segregated toy section.

For as long as we’ve had the modern concept of childhood, we’ve been using it to reinforce gender roles. In old photos of my grandmother, she’s solemnly clutching her doll. Growing up, I owned a pretend doctor kit with a picture of a boy on it, and an enormous Barbie head upon which I practiced makeup and hairstyling. My most beloved toy was an Easy-Bake Oven — one that featured a photograph of a rapturous little girl on the box. Yes, girls and boys sometimes play differently. I have watched a preschool girl take a truck, wrap it in a blanket and rock it in her arms. And I did not, by the way, run up to her and say, “You do not have to be subjugated by the patriarchy like that, honey!”



But the excessive polarization of toys by gender – a trend that has been rampantly increasing in recent years – is bad for both sexes. It’s crappy when science toys are presumed to be boy things, and it’s also heartbreaking when parents are scared off from “girl” things. As Peggy Orenstein deftly explained in “Cinderella Ate My Daughter,” “You don’t want to send the message that things that are feminine don’t have value.” That’s why we all win when boys get Easy-Bakes too.

Otherwise, we risk telling our kids that there is science and there is girl science, that there is dress-up play and there is boy dress-up play. And it limits all of them. At my daughter’s birthday party a few months ago, it wasn’t the gift itself – a small set of purple and green interlocking pieces, accompanied by a wide-eyed plastic girl and a kitten — that made my heart sink. It was what my daughter’s friend told her as she handed her the present. “It’s like boy Legos,” she said, “but for girls.”

Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.

    Domino's

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.

    Arby's/Facebook

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.

    KFC

    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    Pizzagamechangers.com

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.

    7-Eleven

    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>