Immigration reform’s worst possible defense
The legislation is long overdue for a variety of reasons, but not because there's a shortage of low-wage workers
Topics: On the Economy, Immigration Reform, Census Bureau, Unemployment, U.S. Economy, Business News, Politics News
Readers know I’m a supporter of immigration reform for many reasons, some of which go beyond economics into the realm of America as a welcoming country for those seeking opportunities. There’s no doubt in my mind that both my own life and that of our nation has been enriched by those who have left their homes to come to America in search of a better life.
But when we defend reform, I think we have a responsibility to stick to the facts as best we can, and I thought this piece went far beyond that threshold, particularly in claiming a shortage of low-wage workers (h/t: KR in comments):
In 1950, according to the Census Bureau, 56% of U.S. workers were high-school dropouts. Today, the figure is less than 5%.
The result is that the pool of people available to fill low-skilled jobs has shrunk dramatically.
The argument that we have a shortage of high-skilled workers in this country is dicey, but there’s a case to be made (a weak case, but that’s a different discussion). But I know of no credible arguments that we have a shortage of low-skilled workers (obviously, we’re not talking about right now, when shortages are clearly on the demand side–not enough job slots). If their wage and employment trends over the past thirty years doesn’t convince you that there’s no supply shortage in the low-wage sector (here’s the wage evidence; for jobs evidence, see the unemployment rates of the least skilled/educated—it’s consistently way above the average), then you’re playing with a very different set of cards than the rest of us.
These facts have led some to worry—reasonably—about the impact of immigration reform on the wages of less advantaged domestic workers. That’s been carefully examined and here, in contrast the illogic of the WSJ piece, is what the research shows:
–Most contemporary research finds that immigrants don’t place significant downward pressure on the wages of domestic workers because they’re more often complements than substitutes. But, and here’s where the WSJ is especially off, when they are substitutes (i.e., domestic workers or recent immigrants with low skills) the wage effects from immigrant competition are significant and negative.
Jared Bernstein joined the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in May 2011 as a Senior Fellow. From 2009 to 2011, Bernstein was the Chief Economist and Economic Adviser to Vice President Joe Biden. Follow his work via Twitter at @econjared and @centeronbudget. More Jared Bernstein.











Comments
2 Comments