Michelle Delio

Loud hogs for easy riders

Harley-Davidson's new motorcycles are built to meet noise and pollution standards. But bikers say they miss "the sound of rebellion."

  • more
    • All Share Services

Loud hogs for easy riders

Back when he was the editor of Cycle magazine, Phil Schilling wrote what could have served as the Harley-Davidson Motor Co.’s official mission statement for much of its hundred-year existence.

“Harley-Davidson makes lousy motorcycles and great Harley-Davidsons,” Schilling wrote. “And since they’re in the Harley-Davidson business and not the motorcycle business that’s exactly what they should be doing.”

Mechanically, Harley-Davidson motorcycles have improved considerably since Schilling wrote his edict 20 or so years ago. But the spirit behind the words hasn’t altered one bit. The better Harleys get, the less some purists like them.

“Harleys have become civilized over the past few years and that’s a shame. The last thing most people want is a mannerly motorcycle,” said Elliot Borin, former editor in chief of Supercycle magazine. “Harleys don’t even sound right anymore.”

The classic Harley sound is pure machine music — valves clattering, push rods jamming up and down, gears whining — all rattling up through that thumping exhaust noise in an ascending roar. But the sound is a big problem for Harley-Davidson engineers, who have to carefully incorporate new technology into their factory-fresh models to suit modern environmental, noise, pollution and performance standards without destroying the sound, which the company considers to be a trademark and one of the fundamental reasons many people opt to purchase a Harley.

“I was 5 years old the first time I heard a Harley. I thought the heavens had opened up and that Thor was smashing the world to atoms,” Dave Nichols, editor of Easyriders magazine, recalled. “You could hear that Harley thunder coming from miles away. It was, and is, the sound of rebellion. It is a sound as unique as American rock ‘n’ roll.

“Is the Harley sound as big an attraction to sales as Harley-Davidson thinks? Abso-fuckin’-lutely!”

The sound was created by engineering techniques that may have been cutting edge, or at least acceptable, when the first H-D hit the road, but they are not considered correct or efficient now. William Harley created the thumping staccato in 1907 when he opted to graft a second cylinder onto his one-cylinder engine design rather than whip up a true two-cylinder engine. Harley used a connecting rod to join two pistons to a single crankshaft. This, combined with Harley’s V-shaped engine design, resulted in a rough rumble caused by pistons that don’t fire at even intervals. And so the sound was born.

Spine-rattling vibrations that stress the bike’s structure and components were a byproduct of that design choice. Due to all that shaking, rattling and rolling, classic Harleys tend to age rapidly, needing a lot of loving care to keep them road worthy. Happily the company over-engineers almost every component of the bike, so Harleys don’t exactly break — they just leak, snap, crackle and pop, something that more than a few of their owners can relate to.

But while the faithful want their Harleys to sound just like they always have, some of Harley’s newest customers prefer to have the Harley look without the attendant performance and maintenance issues.

Finding a balance between building a contemporary bike that people can hop on and ride without spending three days in the garage prepping it, a bike that doesn’t threaten to Mixmaster its riders’ internal organs, and maintaining the Harley mystique is a major design and engineering challenge, but one that Harley-Davidson executives believe is absolutely essential to the continued success of their product.

The team responsible for keeping Harley’s heart roaring is the 32-person “noise vibration harshness” engineering team, headquartered at the Harley-Davidson Product Development Center in Wauwatosa, Wis. The facility is closed to the public, even during the frequent factory tours that Harley sponsors for H-D devotees. Company employees of the non-engineer sort are also mostly kept out of what is one of the most sophisticated mechanical sound engineering facilities in the world.

NVH team members are involved in every step of the design process and are responsible for ensuring that any tweaks to the bikes that are intended to improve performance or to bring them into line with noise and environmental regulations also “protect or enhance” the classic sound, according to Deane Jaeger, manager of sound and vibration technology for Harley-Davidson.

“Changing an engine’s specifications, even seemingly inconsequential changes simply intended to make the engine look better, can dramatically alter the sound,” Jaeger said during a recent meeting of the Society of Automotive Engineers in Traverse City, Mich. “Every proposed change is evaluated for both performance and sound quality.”

Harley-Davidson’s NVH facility has a anechoic (echoless) chamber used for testing engines and transmissions and a semi-anechoic chamber for testing entire bikes. Naked prototype parts or complete bikes are placed in the chambers and cranked up full throttle. Robotic arms with an array of microphones and sensors then slowly rotate around the bike, capturing its sound and creating a digital profile of the noise and vibration it’s producing.

The data is fed into Silicon Graphics workstations and analyzed using custom applications along with sound analytic software from LMS International. With the data collected from the chamber tests engineers can predict how sound from an isolated engine will sound when it’s bolted onto a bike frame or how new design suggestions will dampen or amplify the engine’s tone.

The sound data is also digitized and transformed into graphed sound waves and acoustic holography images so that engineers can visually check rhythm, roughness, and tone.

It’s not all done with technology. Harley engineers are encouraged to trust their ears. And Harley’s NVH facility also has a listening room where “juries” of 15 or so Harley-riding employees are occasionally ushered in to listen and pass judgment on new designs, voting on whether the bike sounds right. Similar tests are conducted off-site with Harley customers.

But despite all that effort and care, some loyal customers are less than thrilled with Harley’s latest engines. The V-Rod, introduced in 2002, has been particularly castigated. Few fault the performance of the liquid-cooled, 1,130-cc, 60-degree V-twin engine, which Harley co-developed with Porsche. But the sound — the classic sound officially described in court documents as the “potato, potato, potato” by Joseph Bon, Harley’s trademark attorney, just isn’t there. Some riders dismiss the V-Rod as nothing more than a “sweet potato.”

“The V-Rod is the first Harley-Davidson engine built pretty much totally with computer engineering,” said an H-D engineer who requested anonymity. “There were no actual prototypes built until right before we went into production. I think the computer work resulted in a great engine, but it is without that indefinable soul that our other engines possess.”

“Harley-Davidson does an excellent job of balancing the mystique of their brand while moving ahead with technological improvements,” Easyriders’ Nichols said. “The V-Rod is a leap forward for Harley, and though sales are off to a slow start, the biker world will soon get used to the V-R platform. All you have to do is ride a V-Rod and you’ll forget most of the reasons you thought your old shovelhead was so cool.”

But some still aren’t quite convinced.

“I took a V-Rod for an extended road test the other day — more extended than the dealer probably expected, actually,” said Cosmo, a longtime Harley rider from Brooklyn, N.Y. “Great ride, but it wasn’t a Harley as far as I’m concerned. My ol’ lady didn’t hear me coming from a few blocks away, which confused and pissed her off. She likes having that early warning system.”

Fortunately for people who like loud motorcycles, there’s the Harley aftermarket — a billion-dollar-a-year industry, much of which is devoted to producing and selling exhaust systems that take advantage of an important legal loophole: Exhaust makers can evade legal penalties for busting state noise-level laws by labeling their systems “for off-road use only.”

“Everyone who rides a Harley and wants people two miles (or even 10 feet) away to know it, bolts on an “off-road use only” aftermarket exhaust,” Borin said.

“EPA noise limits and emission requirements — especially in California — put paid to the classic, almost wide-open Harley pipes used on pre-Evolution-engine Harleys,” Borin added. “The factory has tried very hard to tune their exhaust systems to match that sound, but there is no way in today’s regulatory environment they can allow that much volume.”

You can, Borin said, buy exhaust systems that will make your bike sound like crap and make stock bikes look like they’re standing still in a stoplight derby. And you can buy exhaust systems that make your bike sound like a classic Harley and run like a three-legged dog. You can also, if you do your homework and aren’t looking to save money, find one or two or, possibly, six exhaust systems that will make the bike run better and sound better.

A good part of the official Harley accessory catalog is also devoted to loud exhaust systems, and many dealers strip off the stock exhausts and replace them with louder pipes before even putting the bikes on the showroom floor. And besides just liking the sound, many bikers firmly believe that loud pipes save lives, since drivers in four-wheeled “cages” so often just don’t notice quiet motorcycles until right after their cars pull out directly in front of the bike.

“I’d much rather they hear my pipes than they hear the thud of my body as it lands on their hood and the smash of glass as my head goes through their windshield,” Cosmo explained.

“The people at the motor company have to deal with a lot of governmental restrictions on emissions and sound levels, so yes, the new Harleys are fairly quiet,” Nichols said. “Most folks do bolt on a set of aftermarket pipes to get back a little of that Harley rumble of old.”

“But stock pipes or not, a Harley still sounds like a Harley. And to the faithful, it’s sweet music indeed.”

A spam fighter’s work is never done

Suresh Ramasubramanian's job is to stop junk e-mail from ever getting to your in box. But for every spammer he blocks, a dozen more rise up.

  • more
    • All Share Services

A spam fighter's work is never done

It was the end of another 12-hour day filled with hostility, deception and confusion, and an exhausted Suresh Ramasubramanian, a systems administrator at a Hong Kong ISP, was finally getting ready to head home.

On his way out the door he happened to take one last look at the network status and noticed that a mail bomb — a flood of incoming spam messages — had just begun.

Ramasubramanian realized he probably wouldn’t be getting any sleep that night.

He spent the next eight hours struggling to block the spam attack and contain the damage. The huge volumes of mail the spammer was sending — several hundred thousand messages at a time from different Internet protocol (IP) addresses at the rate of 20,000 every 10 minutes — was clogging his servers and seriously slowing down mail service to his legitimate users.

Stopping a spam surge usually isn’t rocket science; skilled workers can trace and trap a spam flood within a few minutes by determining what IP address the spam is coming from and then blocking access to the spammed servers from that IP address.

Unfortunately, expert spammers can also switch IP addresses as quickly as the blocks are applied. Ramasubramanian wasn’t surprised to see that each time he located the IP address the spammer was spewing from and blocked it, the spammer quickly jumped to another IP address.

“It’s intense, because you’re trying to stay right ahead of them and at the same time you’re having to clean up the unholy mess they are making on your servers,” says Ramasubramanian. “This kind of job tends to age a guy very quickly.”

Eventually the spammer gave up — at least for that night. But there would be plenty more to replace him the next day. And the next. Working the spam-abuse desk is an endless job, filled with hostility coming from all sides. Spammers complain that their rights are being infringed upon. Spam recipients howl with anger at the daily flood. Even other spam fighters fuel the frenzy, mistakenly considering people like Ramasubramanian enemies instead of friends. And no matter what you do, still the spam comes.

Despite many people’s best efforts, spam is on the rise. According to statistics from Brightmail, an anti-spam software vendor, about 40 percent of all e-mail traffic in the United States is spam, up from 8 percent in late 2001. Most spam experts assume that within the next year at least half of all e-mail will be spam.

Imagine what your in box might look like without the efforts of Ramasubramanian and his cohorts.

Ramasubramanian has spent the last five years smacking spam, first as the founder and president of the Indian chapter of the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail (CAUCE) and then as an abuse-desk worker at various ISPs. He is currently the abuse-desk administrator at Outblaze, a Hong Kong provider of outsourced e-mail services. Outblaze is one of the largest such services in the world, with over 30 million users.

Most of his workdays are spent battling a predictable blend of both spammers and, sometimes, angry anti-spam advocates. But occasionally the spam really hits the servers and he and his team are faced with “a full-blown crisis situation straight out of M*A*S*H.”

In recent weeks he’s been battling one very persistent spammer who sends millions of spams every day with forged headers and return e-mail addresses that make it appear as if the spam is coming from Outblaze’s servers.

“So the bounces come straight to our servers as there’s no where else for them to go, given the way he’s forged these headers. Millions of spam bounces a day.”

And that’s just from one targeted attack. Every day, 80 percent of all incoming mail to Outblaze is rejected as spam and filtered out before Ramasubramanian and his team have to deal with it. Out of the remaining 15 million messages per day that do pass through Outblaze servers, about 15 percent is spam that managed to sneak through the filters.

“My job is like trying to keep cockroaches and rats out of a warehouse. Only, in my case, the warehouse is huge and surrounded by swamps full of the damned pests,” Ramasubramanian says. “The spam doesn’t ever stop coming, and we just have to grit our teeth and hang on, blocking as much as we can.”

The spam that comes into Ramasubramanian’s servers originates from no particular locale and is more or less evenly divided between “dedicated spam factories, some run by some pretty technically smart people” that spam for themselves and others on a contract basis, and “newbie” spammers.

The newbies tend to be smalltime spammers who buy a CD full of e-mail addresses which they are assured are “guaranteed 100 percent opt-in targeted biz leads!!!” These folks are easy to catch as they usually spam directly from their personal e-mail accounts.

But Ramasubramanian says he’s been watching a troubling new development, people whose computers have been hijacked by computer viruses or other sneaky software programs and then transformed into spam-generating factories.

“Sometimes the spam is highly objectionable, ads for things like bestiality, child porn and cracked software,” says Ramasubramanian. “And quite frequently the people with these infected computers are unaware that they are generating spam, and are horrified when someone from their ISP contacts them about the stuff being sent from their computers.”

Figuring out new and better ways to stop spam sent from both the clever and the clueless is a big part of Ramasubramanian’s job.

Ramasubramanian currently uses eight blacklists from different anti-spam groups, and also independently blocks chronic spam sources that have troubled his network before. Outblaze and many ISPs also scan all the mail servers that connect to their service, checking to see if they are running “open relays” that spammers can use to pass e-mail through, thereby hiding their own identity and the real source of the spam. In the United States, it is increasingly standard practice for ISPs to block all mail coming from mail servers that are configured for open relaying.

Ramasubramanian knows these broad blocks often seem unfair to the legitimate users of the mail server, who see their perfectly valid mail blocked because of a single spammer. But he said it is a sad necessity when you consider that a single spammer can pump as many messages through a server in an hour as all the other users will send in a month.

No matter what he does, he can’t please everyone. According to Tiffiany Mork, senior abuse engineer at Allegiance Internet, a very thick skin is a requirement for an abuse-desk worker. Her typical day includes verbal harassment, screaming, threats, and “all manner of nasty things.”

Ramasubramanian’s business card includes the odd titles: “Email Sturmbahnfuehrer” (sic) and “Lower Middle Class Sysadmin.” The names were bestowed on him by spammers.

Sturmbahnfuehrer came from a Usenet post by a spammer whom Ramasubramanian had blocked. The spammer protested that systems administrators were stopping him from sending out his “legitimate business offers” to the Internet at large, and specifically raged at Ramasubramanian, calling him the evil “E-mail Sturmbahnfuehrer.”

“That spammer also claimed that he’d reported me to the INS for stealing office supplies. Nice, trying to deport me from India to India. I never figured out quite what that was all about.”

The other title came from a spammer who asked Ramasubramanian what she’d done that made him report her to her ISP.

“I gave her a standard set of links and information on why spam is bad, and took the time to explain all this to her. She then asked me what I did for a living. When I replied that I was a Unix administrator at an ISP, she blew up and said, ‘I thought you were a successful businessman and marketer, but you are only a lower-middle-class Unix sysadmin. Don’t you dare talk to me like this!!!’”

The abuse that abuse-desk workers are subjected to doesn’t just come from spammers. Mork says a lot of aggravation comes from other spam fighters.

“It always bothers me when I’m being yelled at by people that I consider to be on the same side,” Mork says. “I do understand people get frustrated. They think we’re not taking action if they don’t hear back from us in response to their complaints. But sometimes understaffed abuse desks have to choose between dealing with the spammer or dealing with spam fighters. We always opt to go after the spammers.”

Mork also noted that the triage atmosphere of abuse desks often requires workers to rank spam in the order of the disturbance it’s causing and deal with it accordingly.

“The rare cases of kiddie porn spam always get priority; we work with the FBI on those. After that, we look at who is the most active, who is causing the most damage today,” Mork explained.

“So while stopping a person who is spamming, say, offensively graphic animal sex material will usually strike us as an urgent task, we will go after the guy who is flooding us with thousands of messages before we go after a small-time mailing by Mr. Barnyard Sex. But meanwhile the people who are receiving e-mails with images of horses in compromising positions are screaming at us. It can get difficult.”

Ramasubramanian says he’s troubled by “radical fringe” anti-spammers who firmly believe that the only way to get an ISP from mainland China to do anything at all about spam coming from their network is “to e-mail the spammer, assorted other addresses at his/her ISP, and several Chinese government e-mail accounts, and including in the message words like “Falun Gong” and “Free Tibet.”

“Since the government of China supposedly filters and monitors every single e-mail sent into mainland China, the general idea of this stupid trick is to scare the admins into taking action, or get them into serious trouble with their government, all because they are unwise enough to allow spam onto their network.”

Ramasubramanian’s situation as the head spam fighter at an ISP based in Asia is particularly complicated and sometimes puts him squarely in the middle of many anti-spam efforts.

“Some of the most aggressive spammers around now have servers in China, India and several other countries around the world, hosted at ISPs where the management is apparently happy to do nothing as long as the dollars keep flowing in,” Ramasubramanian says. “So some systems administrators have responded by blocking much or all of the traffic from Asian ISPs.”

Outblaze has servers around the world, so when Ramasubramanian sees blocks that take out a wide swath of Asia he can route his users’ legitimate mail through servers elsewhere. And since he’s well-known in the abuse-desk world, most large ISPs try not to block Outblaze e-mail. But Ramasubramanian still spends a significant amount of time every day contacting systems administrators of smaller networks who have blocked Outblaze’s servers.

“They’ll see a stray item of spam from our network, learn from a Whois lookup that we are based in Hong Kong and then figure it’s OK to block over 30 million users,” Ramasubramanian sighs.

Laura Atkins, president of the SpamCon Foundation, an anti-spam organization, has been fighting spam since 1996. She agrees that some spam fighters sometimes don’t know how to work effectively with abuse-desk staffers.

“Abuse desks are understaffed and people are overworked. But spam is such an emotional issue; it’s hard not to get frustrated when you feel like you are under siege. It’s important to remember that we are all on the same side here. With almost no exceptions, Internet service providers hate spam, and will cut off the spammer’s connectivity when they find out about it.”

And then wait for the next attack.

“The challenge we face is the same challenge little Hans Brinker faced when he stuck his finger into that dam,” Ramasubramanian said. “We know that as soon as we let our collective fingers slip out of the thousands of tiny holes we are plugging we will drown in a massive sea of spam.”

Continue Reading Close