Digging a hole


Geraldine Sealey
February 26, 2004 10:40PM (UTC)

Maybe it doesn't take professional economists to draw the conclusion that Bush's proposal to make tax cuts for the wealthy a permanent state of affairs isn't the brightest idea in this time of massive deficits. But two Brookings Institution scholars have released a paper laying out the experts' argument against Bush's plan. "Making the tax cuts permanent would be regressive and would dig a fiscal hole over the next 75 years that is as big as the combined Social Security and Medicare trust fund shortfalls over the same period," they say.


Geraldine Sealey

Geraldine Sealey is senior news editor at Salon.com.

MORE FROM Geraldine Sealey

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

War Room



BROWSE SALON.COM
COMPLETELY AD FREE,
FOR THE NEXT HOUR

Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access

Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available
No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address

•••


Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •