The rise of the baby al-Qaidas

Bush's failed strategy in the war on terrorism has spawned more al-Qaidas -- and they're funded by the booming heroin traffic in Afghanistan.

Husain Haqqani
April 8, 2004 12:18AM (UTC)

In the 30 months since President Bush's declaration of war against global terrorism, the U.S. and its allies have ostensibly detained or killed 70 percent of al-Qaida's senior leaders. But the frequency of terrorist acts worldwide attributed to al-Qaida has increased, compared to the pre-9/11 period. Baby al-Qaidas are being spawned in new regions of the world -- striking from Turkey to Spain, from Uzbekistan to Tunisia -- and a new generation of terrorists is stepping up to take the place of those killed in Afghanistan or detained in Guantanamo. Is the U.S. underestimating the enemy and not paying sufficient attention to al-Qaida again? Or are the war in Iraq and the grandiose scheme to democratize and reshape the Middle East it represents distracting the administration from the pursuit of the perpetrators of 9/11?

The State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, J. Cofer Black, testified last week before the House Subcommittee on International Terrorism, Nonproliferation and Human Rights. In his testimony, the 28-year veteran of the CIA's Directorate of Operations listed "some important successes against the al-Qaida organization" resulting from the coordination of U.S. efforts with those of its allies. Al-Qaida had been deprived of "a vital safe haven" in Afghanistan, most of its known leadership had been decapitated, and it had been "separated from facilities central to its chem-bio and poisons development programs."


But, according to Black, "a new cadre of leaders" and "relatively untested terrorists" has started to emerge. "Al-Qaida's ideology is spreading well beyond the Middle East" and "has been picked up by a number of Islamic extremist movements which exist around the globe." Black also said that "Some groups have gravitated to al-Qaida in recent years, where before such linkages did not exist" -- something that "greatly complicates our task in stamping out al-Qaida".

Iraq was described by the State Department's senior counterterrorism official as the emerging "focal point for the foreign jihadist fighters." According to Black's testimony, "Jihadists view Iraq as a new training ground to build their extremist credentials and hone the skills of the terrorist." In short, the war in Afghanistan struck a severe blow to terrorism, but the war in Iraq may have resuscitated it. The U.S. will prevail against terrorism eventually, but the problem is with us for the foreseeable future. The administration's desire to proclaim "mission accomplished" too quickly might actually have prolonged the war against terrorism.

Much has been said by U.S. politicians and analysts about how the war against al-Qaida in Afghanistan should have been finished before starting another war in Iraq. But the conduct of the war in Afghanistan itself has been insufficiently scrutinized. The decision to commit fewer troops to the Afghan war and "outsourcing" the hunt on the ground for al-Qaida to the Northern Alliance and Pakistan probably enabled al-Qaida operatives to disperse instead of waiting to be destroyed by U.S. bombardment from the air. The only reason the U.S. feels it has destroyed 70 percent of known al-Qaida leaders is that its knowledge of al-Qaida operatives was limited to begin with. Less-known veterans of the anti-Soviet jihad started slipping out of Afghanistan soon after the U.S. started bombing Afghanistan on Oct. 7, 2001. Pakistan did not deploy significant numbers of troops along its border with Afghanistan until Dec. 7, giving al-Qaida trainers almost two months to spread out. These individuals have most likely served as midwives of the baby al-Qaidas the U.S. now confronts from Morocco to Indonesia.


The core assumption of the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan was that terrorists cannot operate without state sponsorship. Once the Taliban regime in Afghanistan had been dislodged and al-Qaida's safe haven had been destroyed, Osama bin Laden's organization was expected to wither away or at least decline in significance as a source of threat. There was little contingency planning for al-Qaida's ability to evolve in new ways, operating without state sponsorship in remote parts of insufficiently governed countries. It is true that al-Qaida no longer has the elaborate training camps it had while the Taliban ruled Afghanistan. But these camps were partly needed to train soldiers for conventional war in defense of Taliban control of Afghan cities. With no cities to protect, al-Qaida no longer needs conventional military training. Suicide bombers can be easily trained in the caves of south and eastern Afghanistan and northwestern Pakistan, the jungles of Mindanao in southern Philippines and in basements of homes in the Sunni triangle in Iraq.

Ideological motivation for young men to join its ranks is now more important to al-Qaida than a state sponsor. That motivation has been provided by the haste to war in Iraq. Officials in several Muslim countries have noted a rise in recruitment to extremist groups, and even U.S. officials (including Black) acknowledge that "there are literally thousands of jihadists around the world." These extremists have added anti-Americanism to their causes, which in the past involved only local separatist wars in remote parts of the world such as Chechnya and Kashmir.

While Osama bin Laden remains at large in Afghanistan or its border region with Pakistan, far more troops and resources have been committed to Iraq than to Afghanistan. There are only 13,500 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, compared with 150,000 in Iraq. Fifty countries promised a total of $8.2 billion in aid to Afghanistan at a donor's conference in Berlin last week after President Hamid Karzai warned that his country could slip back into being "a haven for drugs and terrorism."


The U.S. has promised to double its aid to Afghanistan, raising it to $2.2 billion over the next two years, but that is a drop in the bucket in comparison with U.S. spending in Iraq. Afghanistan has massively resumed harvesting opium and now accounts for 77 percent of global opium production according to the last annual report of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime. Twenty-eight out of 32 provinces in Afghanistan now produce the drug crop, up from 18 provinces in 1999. Drug revenues, estimated at $2.3 billion annually (obviously more than U.S. aid commitments), now finance local warlords and terrorists, including some al-Qaida affiliates and the resurgent Taliban.

The U.S. and its allies have frozen $130 million in terrorist assets worldwide since 9/11, but that figure pales against the readily available drug money that can continue to finance terrorism for years. If terrorist recruitment is up, al-Qaida has morphed into something different but equally deadly, and terrorist financing continues to increase, victory in the war against terrorism is far from imminent.

Husain Haqqani

Husain Haqqani is a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington. He previously served as an advisor to former Pakistani Prime Ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif and as Pakistan's ambassador to Sri Lanka.

MORE FROM Husain Haqqani

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

9/11 Afghanistan Al-qaida Iraq Middle East Osama Bin Laden Taliban Terrorism

Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •