"Informed consent" or coercion?

An Oklahoma bill that would force a pre-abortion ultrasound is legally challenged.

Tracy Clark-Flory
October 18, 2008 2:06PM (UTC)

You know, trying to fend off attacks on women's reproductive rights sometimes feels like a game of Whac-A-Mole. You wallop that first little bugger on the head, and then another pops up -- and another and another, faster and faster. Pretty soon, you're contemplating abandoning the provided mallet and just going at 'em double-time with your bare fists. (What can I say, I play to win, folks.)

A perfect example of this dynamic are bills forcing pre-abortion ultrasounds on women. Last year, we persistently wrote about a proposed South Carolina bill that would, in part, require a woman to "review" her ultrasound image before having an abortion -- right on up until the ultrasound provision was dropped from the measure. Phew! Only, now a similar bill -- despicably called the "Freedom of Conscience Act" -- has popped up in Oklahoma and is poised to go into effect Nov. 1.


Luckily, the Center for Reproductive Rights has brandished the largest of mallets in this game: a lawsuit. It's the topic of this week's clip for Current TV:


Tracy Clark-Flory

MORE FROM Tracy Clark-FloryFOLLOW TracyClarkFloryLIKE Tracy Clark-Flory

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Broadsheet Love And Sex


Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access

Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available
No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address


Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •