Sen. Orrin Hatch wants Republicans to keep the filibuster for "protection for the minority"

"It's the only way to protect the minority, and we're in the minority a lot more than we've been in the majority"

Published November 17, 2016 2:09PM (EST)

 (AP)
(AP)

Republicans like Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker may be telling reporters that they want to abolish the filibuster, but one powerful Senator won't hear of it — Senate president pro tempore Orrin Hatch.

“Are you kidding?” Hatch said in an interview with The Huffington Post on Thursday. “I’m one of the biggest advocates for the filibuster. It’s the only way to protect the minority, and we’ve been in the minority a lot more than we’ve been in the majority. It’s just a great, great protection for the minority.”

Hatch isn't alone in objecting to the idea of eliminating the filibuster. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina echoed the same thoughts on Tuesday, telling reporters that getting rid of it would be "a horrible, horrible idea" and that he'd vote against any effort to do so "in a heartbeat."

The opposition by Hatch and Graham is more than merely symbolic. In order for the filibuster to be revoked via the so-called "nuclear option," 51 votes would have to be counted in favor of doing so. Right now Republicans only have 51 members of the Senate lining up for them compared to 48 for the Democrats (Bernie Sanders, though registered as an independent, caucuses with the Democrats). Even if the GOP wins the Louisiana Senate race on Dec. 10 and acquires 52 votes, the loss of Hatch and Graham will require Vice President Mike Pence to cast a tie-breaking vote in order to eliminate the filibuster.

If any other Republicans refuse to revoke it, then doing so will be legally impossible.

The irony in the GOP's opposition to filibustering, of course, is the fact that Senate Republicans filibustered President Obama's judicial and other appointments with a regularity that many political observers found alarming. Now that a Republican is in the White House, of course, they have a vested interest in opposing the obstructionist tool. The fact that it may hurt them in the 2018 midterm elections probably factors into their thinking as well.


By Matthew Rozsa

Matthew Rozsa is a professional writer whose work has appeared in multiple national media outlets since 2012 and exclusively at Salon since 2016. He specializes in covering science and history, and is particularly passionate about climate change, animal science, disability rights, plastic pollution and a wide range of political issues. He has interviewed many prominent figures (reflecting his diverse interests) including President Jimmy Carter (1977-1981), Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak (1999-2001), animal scientist and autism activist Temple Grandin, inventor Ernő Rubik, epidemiologist Monica Gandhi, theoretical cosmologist Janna Levin, mRNA vaccine pioneer Katalin Karikó, philosopher of science Vinciane Despret, actor George Takei ("Star Trek"), climatologist Michael E. Mann, Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson (2012, 2016), actress Cady McClain ("All My Children"), Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Lieberman (2000), Ambassador Michael McFaul (2012-2014), economist Richard Wolff, director Kevin Greutert ("Saw VI"), model Liskula Cohen, actor Rodger Bumpass ("SpongeBob Squarepants"), Senator John Hickenlooper (2021-present), American Public Health Association Executive Director Georges Benjamin (2002-present), comedian Bill Burr ("F Is for Family"), novelist James Patterson ("The President's Daughter"), comedian David Cross ("Scary Movie 2") and right-wing insurrectionist Roger Stone.

MORE FROM Matthew Rozsa


Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Filibuster Orrin Hatch Republicans Senate United States Senate