Hillary Clinton places her hand over her hand as she walks to the podium to address the Children's Defense Fund's Beat the Odds celebration at the Newseum in Washington, Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2016. (AP)

Donald Trump says he won't pursue investigations against Hillary Clinton. This is not a good thing

This isn't a kind gesture by the president-elect, and it should worry you

Matthew Rozsa
November 22, 2016 8:19PM (UTC)

Despite telling Hillary Clinton that she'd "be in jail" if he became president and egging on his crowds to chant "Lock her up!" it appears that Donald Trump isn't going to pursue charges against their former Democratic rival.

"I think when the president-elect, who's also the head of your party now, Joe, tells you before he's even inaugurated he doesn't wish to pursue these charges it sends a very strong message, tone, and content to the members," explained senior adviser Kellyanne Conway, who has been downplaying Trump's promise to jail Clinton, during an appearance with "Morning Joe" on Monday. "And I think Hillary Clinton still has to face the fact that a majority of Americans don't find her to be honest or trustworthy.  But if Donald Trump can help her heal then, perhaps, that's a good thing."


In fact, this may not be a good thing.

Aside from the fact that a majority of Trump's supporters believed the president-elect would appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton for creating a private email server, Trump also seemed to be operating under the belief that as president, he gets to decide who is targeted for prosecution.

"Under the laws and Justice Department regulations governing federal prosecution, a President Trump would not have legal authority to direct the Attorney General to appoint a special prosecutor to ‘look into’ Hillary Clinton’s email situation or the Clinton Foundation or anything else," explained Laurence Tribe, professor of constitutional law at Harvard Law School, in an email to Fortune Magazine after the second presidential debate. "That’s not within a president’s power."


Jim Jacobs, a professor at New York University's School of Law, echoed Tribe's analysis.

"It is essential that the Department be apolitical with respect to its choice of law enforcement targets and to its exercise of prosecutorial discretion," he told Fortune, adding that it would be "very improper if the president were to be making phone calls to the attorney general with respect to a particular target of investigation. I don’t know of any president who has done that. If it had been revealed to have happened in the past it would have been a scandal."

Just as Trump wouldn't have had the right to order his Attorney General (most likely Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama) to pursue charges against Clinton, so too would he not have the right to order the Department of Justice to not pursue those charges.


Matthew Rozsa

Matthew Rozsa is a breaking news writer for Salon. He holds an MA in History from Rutgers University-Newark and is ABD in his PhD program in History at Lehigh University. His work has appeared in Mic, Quartz and MSNBC.

MORE FROM Matthew Rozsa

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Hillary Clinton Lock Her Up President Donald Trump

Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •