Cars from an Amtrak train lay spilled onto Interstate 5, in DuPont, Wash, Dec. 18, 2017. (AP/Elaine Thompson)

Donald Trump's first words about deadly Amtrak crash were about infrastructure

Trump takes to Twitter in the wake of tragedy — but doesn't do what a president should


follow us in feedly
Matthew Rozsa
December 18, 2017 7:54PM (UTC)

President Donald Trump took to Twitter on Monday to imply that the Amtrak crash would not have happened had Congress passed his infrastructure bill.

A few minutes later, he submitted a tweet that offered sympathy to the victims instead of promoting himself.

Advertisement:

The Amtrak train derailed during its inaugural trip near Dupont, Washington, according to CNN. While a final casualty count has not yet been established, a spokesman for the Pierce County Sheriff's Office said that there were "multiple fatalities" that were "all contained to the train."

One big problem with Trump's initial tweet — aside from questions about whether it was presidential — is that it was issued without full knowledge of what had caused the derailment. One official said that a track obstruction has been cited as a possible cause, according to the Associated Press.

Another problem with Trump's tweet is that it ignored how he has prioritized his own policy agenda. Although he told The New York Times in April that he was "accelerating" the infrastructure bill that he had promised since his presidential campaign, he subsequently focused more on repealing the Affordable Care Act and passing tax reform legislation.

That said, Trump has decided to announce a $1 trillion infrastructure plan shortly after Congress has passed tax reform, according to Politico. The bill is expected to spend roughly $200 billion on everything from repairing bridges to improving broadband internet access, with the rest intended to come from local and state governments or private investment. The bill has been heavily criticized by Democrats for including budget cuts, making different projects compete against each other for federal assistance and rolling back environmental regulations.

Another criticism, as summed up by Oregon Rep. Peter DeFazio, is that Trump has been wildly inconsistent about what exactly would appear in his bill.

"They’ve gone from a trillion dollars to $200 billion that would be done with [public-private partnerships], and then Trump doesn’t like [public-private partnerships], so it’s $200 billion that [White House aide D.J. Gribbin] said last week would be cut from other domestic spending," DeFazio, a Democrat, told Politico.


Matthew Rozsa

Matthew Rozsa is a breaking news writer for Salon. He holds an MA in History from Rutgers University-Newark and is ABD in his PhD program in History at Lehigh University. His work has appeared in Mic, Quartz and MSNBC.

MORE FROM Matthew Rozsa

BROWSE SALON.COM
COMPLETELY AD FREE,
FOR THE NEXT HOUR

Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access

Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available
No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address

•••






Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •