(Getty/Wikimedia/Salon)

Federal judges face increasing threats amid Trump’s attacks, American Bar Association warns

“Attacks on the judiciary are becoming more common"


Cody Fenwick
August 15, 2019 5:49PM (UTC)
This article originally appeared on AlterNet.
alternet-logo

Federal judges are uniquely positioned to challenged President Donald Trump and rein in his overreaches. And for precisely this reason, they have become a particularly loathed target of his ire, often drawing derisive condemnation when they deliver rulings that he doesn’t like.

And according to a post from the American Bar Association, judges are coming under greater threat — particularly on social media — as Trump’s attacks on the judiciary have ramped up.

Advertisement:

The conclusion came from a panel discussion about efforts to undermine the courts at the American Bar Association Annual Metting in San Francisco last week.

All six judges on the panel agreed: “Attacks on the judiciary are becoming more common.”

“We are not as wed to the rule of law as we would like to think we are,” Ohio Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor said. “The consequence of that is what we are seeing now.”

Seattle federal Judge James Robart recounted being threatened in 2017 after he blocked Trump’s initial travel ban targeting immigrants from Muslim-majority countries. Trump called him a “so-called judge” and said: “Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens, blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!”

The ABA post continued:

That’s when the threats grew frightening. By the time it was over, Robart had received more than 42,000 calls, letters and emails. Marshals determined that 1,100 were “serious threats,” including more than 100 death threats.

“Here’s the president of the United States saying this person is not a judge,” Robart recalled, “implying you can disregard his ruling, and saying these people are flooding into the country to rape your wife, rape your children and it’s all his fault. I think that crosses a line from legitimate criticism of a ruling and goes into a whole different area.”

Author Amy Siskind noted on Twitter that the trend identified by the ABA is a “Hallmark of authoritarianism.”

Advertisement:

“These very personal and sometimes terrifying attacks are having an effect,” Washington Supreme Court Justice Debra Stephens said. “You can’t do things the way we’ve always done, with our lips sealed and just talking in platitudes. We have to take more aggressive action.”


Cody Fenwick

MORE FROM Cody Fenwick

BROWSE SALON.COM
COMPLETELY AD FREE,
FOR THE NEXT HOUR

Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access

Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available
No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address

•••






Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •