The fuzzy science on whether Fido is actually good for you
Michael SchulsonIn millions of homes, high fluoride in tap water may be a concern
Michael SchulsonCriminologists, looking to biology for insight, stir a racist past
Michael SchulsonAmid the turmoil of COVID, biosafety legislation gets political
Michael SchulsonThe challenges of calculating a lab leak risk
Michael SchulsonThe worrying murkiness of institutional biosafety committees
Michael SchulsonNew evidence revives old questions about E.O. Wilson and race
Michael SchulsonAmong social scientists, a vigorous debate over loss aversion
Michael SchulsonDispensing doctors: Should physicians sell drugs to patients?
Michael SchulsonA curious union: Clorox, Cleveland Clinic, and the CDC Foundation
Michael SchulsonIn the debate over “SIDS monitors,” evidence is thin all around
Michael SchulsonA year into COVID, states debate public health shutdown powers
Michael SchulsonCan cult studies offer help with QAnon? The science is thin
Michael SchulsonWith mass vaccination, medical volunteers face a new test
Michael SchulsonAn uncertain future for a key missing persons program
Michael SchulsonIn fallout over polls, “margin of error” gets new scrutiny
Michael SchulsonAnother election, another round of poll bashing. Is that fair?
Michael SchulsonAmid deadly virus, a push for nursing home alternatives
Michael SchulsonThe peril of state power amid COVID-19 pandemic
Michael SchulsonPsychology still skews western and affluent. Can it be fixed?
Michael SchulsonIn outrage over its bunk science, Goop finds fuel for growth
Michael SchulsonFederal Toxmap shutters, raising the ire of pollution researchers
Michael Schulson
« Previous
Page: 1