WATCH: Chair of Libertarian Party compares its treatment to experiences of African-Americans before the '60s and women before suffrage

Nicholas Sarwark says libertarians are judged "more harshly" than Republicans and Democrats

By Matthew Rozsa

Staff Writer

Published May 27, 2017 8:30AM (EDT)

"The Libertarian Party is in the same place where African-Americans were prior to the '60s. We're in the same place where women were prior to getting the right to vote. We have to try harder because we are judged more harshly."

This was the response I received from Nicholas Sarwark, the chairman of the Libertarian Party, when we discussed the unfair treatment that its 2016 presidential candidate, Gary Johnson, received at the hands of the media.

In truth, third parties do suffer from major structural disadvantages in the American system, as Sarwark pointed out, but I find it offensive to compare the ordeal of a libertarian candidate to the plight endured by victims of racial or gender-based oppression. No, they are not the same thing.

Of course, Sarwark spoke for a lot of people when he described the election between Republican candidate Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton as a choice between "terrible and terribler." He isn't wrong in pointing out that "if you don't vote your conscience . . . for what you want, you're going to get what they shove down your throat. And that's going to be them fearmongering you."

I believe that our essentially two-party system, which has kept America alternating between Democratic and Republican presidents since the 1850s, stifles independent voices, fosters corruption and keeps out-of-touch elites in power. Creating a multitude of viable parties won't solve all our problems, but a long-term solution might begin with that step.

Of course, while some might agree that America needs a multiparty system, is it always morally justifiable to support a third-party candidate? In the 2016 presidential election, the policies espoused by Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump had major differences. If you didn't cast your vote for the one candidate who could have stopped Trump, this was a terrible, terrible mistake.

So what's Sarwark's solution to overcoming up-hill battle that third party candidates face? "We just try and be better," he argued, saying his party is readying for the 2018 midterms, to run candidates up and down the ballot all over the country.

"The only way that people can actually regain political power in this country and actually work toward a society that lives up to the ideals that our founders wanted  . . . the only way to break that system is to break that system," he said.

Watch the conversation to learn more about the challenges, potential and controversies surrounding third parties in the States.

By Matthew Rozsa

Matthew Rozsa is a staff writer at Salon. He received a Master's Degree in History from Rutgers-Newark in 2012 and was awarded a science journalism fellowship from the Metcalf Institute in 2022.

MORE FROM Matthew Rozsa

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

2018 Midterm Elections Gary Johnson Libertarian Party Nicholas Sarwark Political Parties Third Parties