The ozone hole (NASA)

The Earth's ozone hole is the smallest it's been in 29 years — and that's a good thing

In a rare instance of positive environmental news, NASA observed the smallest ozone hole in decades


Charlie May
November 3, 2017 9:41PM (UTC)

The massive hole in the Earth's protective ozone layer has shrunk to its smallest size since 1988, highlighting a rare piece of good news regarding the environment, and the further need for international cooperative agreements to combat the global threat climate change presents.

The ozone hole, which was largely caused by the release of synthetic industrial aerosols into the atmosphere, reached its annual peak on September 11, 2017, when it measured 7.6 million square miles, but then decreased for the rest of the month and throughout the month of October, according to a NASA press release.

Advertisement:

"The Antarctic ozone hole was exceptionally weak this year," said Paul A. Newman, chief scientist for Earth Sciences at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. "This is what we would expect to see given the weather conditions in the Antarctic stratosphere."

One scientific reason behind the historically small ozone hole is that it was "strongly influenced by an unstable and warmer Antarctic vortex – the stratospheric low pressure system that rotates clockwise in the atmosphere above Antarctica."

NASA elaborated in a release:

This helped minimize polar stratospheric cloud formation in the lower stratosphere. The formation and persistence of these clouds are important first steps leading to the chlorine- and bromine-catalyzed reactions that destroy ozone, scientists said. These Antarctic conditions resemble those found in the Arctic, where ozone depletion is much less severe.

In 2016, warmer stratospheric temperatures also constrained the growth of the ozone hole. Last year, the ozone hole reached a maximum 8.9 million square miles, 2 million square miles less than in 2015. The average area of these daily ozone hole maximums observed since 1991 has been roughly 10 million square miles.

The smaller ozone hole is also as a result of the international community signing the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, which brought forth regulation on certain ozone-depleting compounds like chlorofluorocarbons (CFC), the complex molecules inside aerosols. Once unleashed, chlorofluorocarbons wreak havoc on ozone molecules in the upper atmosphere, pinging from ozone molecule to ozone molecule as they break the weak bonds between their oxygen atoms.

"The ozone hole over Antarctica is expected to gradually become less severe as chlorofluorocarbons—chlorine-containing synthetic compounds once frequently used as refrigerants – continue to decline. Scientists expect the Antarctic ozone hole to recover back to 1980 levels around 2070," the press release said.

If the Earth's ozone layer were to completely dissipate, more ultraviolet light would get through to the surface, increasing incidence of cancer and cataracts in humans and further warming the planet. A NASA simulation showed that, without an ozone layer, one would get sunburned after five minutes of standing outside in Washington, D.C. Likewise, skin cancer rates would rise drastically, possibly killing plants as well.

Advertisement:

Positive news about the environment is rare these days. Yet the good news about the shrinking ozone hole exemplifies the importance of international cooperation in the vein of the successful Montreal Protocol. President Donald Trump has announced he would pull the United States from the Paris climate agreement, which would make the U.S. and Syria the only two nations who refuse to be signatories. Such international agreements are pivotal to assuring that climate change is dealt with.

Ironically, late on Friday afternoon, the Trump administration signed off on an extensive scientific report on climate change from 13 federal agencies. The report — which states that humans are the dominant cause behind global temperature rise — is not only a stark contrast to the Trump administration and the Republican party's stance on climate change, it proves their views to be scientifically inaccurate.

 


Charlie May

Charlie May is a news writer at Salon. You can find him on Twitter at @charliejmay

MORE FROM Charlie May

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Climate Change Climate Change Denialism Nasa Noaa Ozone Ozone Layer President Donald Trump Science




Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •