Gibson's Food Mart & Bakery in Oberlin, Ohio (AP/Dake Kang)

Here's what you need to know about the bizarre lawsuit between Oberlin College and a local bakery

The school was accused of defaming a local bakery over a shoplifting incident in 2016


Shira Tarlo
June 14, 2019 8:44PM (UTC)

Oberlin College has been ordered by a jury to pay $44 million to a local bakery and convenience store after the midwestern liberal arts school was found responsible for defamation, infliction of emotional distress and intentional interference of business relationships.

The verdict comes nearly three years after a skirmish broke out between Jonathan Aladin, a black student at the liberal arts college, and Allyn Gibson Jr., the son and grandson of the owners of Gibson's Bakery and Food Market, a family-owned establishment near the college's campus in Oberlin, Ohio.

Advertisement:

The altercation set off a bitter standoff between the liberal arts college and the local bakery, which has been a fixture in the college community for more than 100 years, over free speech, racial profiling and discrimination.

Jurors in Lorain County on Thursday awarded Gibson's Bakery $33.2 million in punitive damages. Last week, the same jury awarded the bakery $11 million in compensatory damages.

In an emailed statement sent to Oberlin College students and alumni Friday morning, President Carmen Twillie Ambar wrote that the legal process was far from over.

"Let me be absolutely clear: This is not the final outcome. This is, in fact, just one step along the way of what may turn out to be a lengthy and complex legal process," she said.

The case stems from the November 2016 arrest of Aladin, who was accused of attempted robbery for trying to "steal wine or otherwise illegally obtain wine" from the bakery with a fake ID, according to court documents. Gibson Jr. then confronted Aladin about two bottles of wine he had seen the student attempt to hide under his shirt, and told him he was contacting the police and not to leave, according to police reports. Gibson Jr. then took out his phone to take a picture of Aladin, who slapped the phone from his hand and caused the device to strike Gibson Jr.'s face. Police said Aladin then ran from the store, dropping the two bottles of wine to the floor.

Gibson Jr. then "chased the student out of the store across West College Street and into Tappan Square .  . . where he placed the student in a chokehold." Two of Aladin's friends, black female Oberlin College students, intervened and "tried to pry Allyn Jr. off Mr. Aladin," the college claimed.

Advertisement:

Oberlin police officers arrived at the scene and arrested the three students — Aladin with robbery and his friends with assault — but did not arrest Gibson Jr.

The Nov. 9, 2016 arrests of the three students, just a day after Donald Trump clinched the presidency, prompted a series of heated demonstrations in front of the local business, with some students waving fliers that encouraged a boycott of the establishment, according to the complaint.

"A member of our community was assaulted by the owner of this establishment yesterday," read a flier issued outside the bakery, calling Gibson's a "RACIST establishment with a LONG ACCOUNT of RACIAL PROFILING and DISCRIMINATION," according to the complaint.

The flier also identified ten of the bakery's competitors where the demonstrators urged Gibson Bakery's customers to shop instead, the court documents state.

Advertisement:

Vice President and Dean of Students Meredith Raimondo "distributed the flyer to Oberlin College students, faculty, the public and even the media," the complaint states. "Raimondo and other Oberlin College professors, including Tita Reed, the assistant to the President of Oberlin College, raised their firsts in support of the demonstration, while shouting the defamatory statements on a bullhorn, thereby assuring that a large audience would hear their defamatory statements," the bakery alleged.

In response to the accusations of racial profiling at the bakery, police conducted an investigation and found that 40 adults had been arrested for shoplifting at the bakery in the past five years, among them six African Americans.

In an email to students on the Friday after the arrest, Oberlin's then-president, Marvin Krislov, and Raimondo acknowledged that fiery reactions to the case may be linked to "fears and concerns that many are feeling in response to the outcome of the presidential election." They vowed to use "every resource to determine the full and true narrative" and said they were "deeply troubled because we have heard from students that there is more to the story than what has been generally reported."

Advertisement:

In the days following the students' arrest, Oberlin College announced it had severed its business relationship with Gibson's Bakery, the lawsuit stated. The bakery had supplied baked goods for the school's dining services through a third-party company, Bon Appetit Management Company. Gibson's Bakery claimed Raimondo "approached the Oberlin College of Dining Services Michelle Gross and demanded that she instruct Bon Appetit to cease from engaging in any business with Gibson's Bakery." The move, according to the complaint, "resulted in extreme emotional distress of Michelle Gross causing her to take a leave of absence and then early retirement."

The complaint also said that, approximately a week after the college  cut its contract with Gibson's, the school demanded the bakery dismiss all criminal charges against the three students involved in the initial incident as "quid pro quo for resuming business with Gibson's Bakery." It also said that the college "insisted that Gibson's Bakery call Raimondo when students are caught stealing rather than informing the police."

David Gibson, the owner of Gibson's Bakery and the grandfather of Allyn Gibson Jr., did not agree to such a request and Oberlin "continued to attempt to steamroll and intimidate Gibson's Bakery and refused to retract its defamatory statements or reinstate its business with Gibson's Bakery," according to the complaint.

Advertisement:

Three months later, the college "allowed Bon Appetit to reinstate its business with Gibson's Bakery" but "refused to retract the defamatory statements that had been made," according to the complaint, which noted that the shop had already suffered dire consequences.

In August 2017, Aladin and the two students pleaded guilty to attempted theft and aggravated trespass, court documents state, and were required to pay a fine. Before their sentencing, each student read a statement acknowledging that Gibson's was justified in trying to restrain Aladin and that the actions of the shop's employees had not been racially motivated.

"This unfortunate incident was triggered by an attempt to purchase alcohol," Aladin wrote, according to court documents. "I believe the employees of Gibson's actions were not racially motivated. They were merely trying to prevent an underage sale."

For Gibson's owners, the plea agreement reached by the trio with prosecutors did not settle the case. The bakery alleged that even after the students reached a plea bargain, Oberlin College continued to "prominently display the defamatory statements that Gibson's assaulted a black student and has a history of racial profiling and discriminatory conduct," according to the complaint. Gibson's claimed the college's conduct has resulted in a "permanent economic sanction" against Gibson's Bakery and the Gibson Family.

Advertisement:

As a result, Gibson's filed a civil lawsuit against Oberlin in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas in November 2017, approximately one year after the incident.

The bakery accused the college of supporting and promoting the students' claims of racism and sued the liberal arts school, as well as Raimondo, for libel, slander, interference with business relationships, interference with contracts, deceptive trade practices, infliction of emotional distress, negligent hiring and trespass.

The bakery's owners argued that Oberlin College "facilitated, encouraged, and promoted the illegal defamation and economic boycott" of Gibson's Bakery by helping students copy and distribute fliers, suspending classes and supplying protesters with free food and drink. College leaders also "encouraged students to demonstrate outside Gibson's Bakery in lieu of attending scheduled classes and provided credit to the students who attended and participated in the demonstration(s)," according to the complaint. Additionally, Gibson's argued a Facebook post by an Oberlin's Department of Africana Studies stated: "Gibson's has been bad for decades, their dislike of Black people is palpable. Their food is rotten and they profile Black students. NO MORE!"

The lawsuit claimed college tour guides continue to advise prospective and future students not to shop at Gibson's Bakery because it is a "racist establishment" that "assaults students," the complaint stated.

Advertisement:

The combined effects of the "defamation, boycotts, demonstrations, and refusal to do business with Gibson's Bakery was having a devastating effect on Gibson's Bakery and the Gibson family." The college's behavior also took a "severe emotional and physical toll" on the family, who suffered damage to their reputation, financial welfare and their personal standing within the community, according to the complaint. The Gibson's home was damaged "on one or more occasions" and car tires had been punctured, the family said.

"Persons came to the apartment of Allyn W. Gibson, who is 89-years-old, late one night and loudly banged on his door and windows while he slept," the complaint stated. It noted that Gibson, who feared for his safety, was "startled and fell as he was attempting to determine who was banging on his door and windows. That fall caused him to suffer life threatening injuries, including a broken neck and multiple fractured vertebrae. Allyn Gibson required an extended hospital stay and will require the use of a neck brace for the rest of his life."

Oberlin responded to the lawsuit by arguing that none of the statements cited by the bakery's owners had been defamatory, and said the school was not responsible for the views expressed by its students. The college said Raimondo attended the demonstrations to "ensure that students' freedom of speech was protected and that the student demonstrations were safe and lawful."

"Colleges cannot he held liable for the independent actions of their students," Oberlin Vice President Donica Thomas Varner said in an email to the campus community. "Institutions of higher education are obligated to protect freedom of speech on their campuses and respect their students' decision to peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights. Oberlin College acted in accordance with these obligations."

Advertisement:

Jurors in Lorain County heard the case this spring. Communication unsealed in court filings and at the trial underscored how the case sparked very different reactions from members of the college community. Some were apparently "disgusted" and "embarrassed" by the protests, which they felt reflected poorly on the campus, while others said the boycott had successfully targeted Gibson's with a "smear on their brand."

"So here's one rhing [sic] on my mind about gibsons. They own so much prime property in oberlin that boycotting doesn't hurt them that much. The smear on their brand does, and that's been taken care of," associate professor of music theory Jan Miyake said in an unsealed court filing.

Raimondo took the stand at the trial and denied accounts that she had encouraged people to boycott the bakery. She said she did not have "control and influence" over the students. Court documents revealed that she and another administrator expressed outrage after a professor spoke out against the boycott.

"F--k him," Raimondo wrote in a text message, the Chronicle-Telegram reported. "I'd say unleash the students if I wasn't convinced this needs to be put behind us."

Advertisement:

The judge denied the school's request on Tuesday to declare a mistrial in the case.

The lawsuit divided the Oberlin community, with some students urging their colleagues to boycott Gibson's Bakery and protest the establishment, while others advised against taking action against the bakery.

Kameron Dunbar, a student at the liberal arts college who was present at many demonstrations in front of Gibson's Bakery, told Salon that the lawsuit "impacted how the student body understands our relationship with the town of Oberlin."

"It cemented the idea that freedom of speech is never free," he added. "I could see [the verdict] discouraging college administrations from doing their full duty to protect and ensure the safety of their student body."

Advertisement:

Sydney Allen, the former editor in chief of Oberlin's student newspaper, The Oberlin Review, who has written extensively about the lawsuit during her time on campus, told Salon that she believes the campus "will be dealing with the ramifications of the lawsuit for a while."

"I don't expect this is the end of the conflict with Gibson's and I imagine if Gibson's continues to operate in Oberlin, its relationship with the college, and especially students, will continue to be very frosty."

Allen said she feels "very alienated from the community and people who supported Gibson's in this case," and noted she "received a lot of vile, hateful and threatening messages" for her coverage of the case.

"This divide and alienation is not just siloed in Oberlin, but is representative of a larger national divide that has worsened in recent years, as many Americans become more and more nationalist and rally against progressive thinking and higher education," she added. "This case represented an opportunity to 'stick it to' a leftist institution and I think some people rallied behind that."

Some free speech advocates and lawyers have said the verdict of the case raises concerns about freedom of speech on college campuses.

Alison Schary, First Amendment lawyer at Davis Wright Tremaine, called the verdict "deeply troubling."

"Holding universities financially liable for student speech will inevitably lead them to police and censor that speech, creating a chilling effect that is antithetical to the First Amendment," Schary told Salon.

Jane Agler and Urie Dvorozniak contributed reporting.


Shira Tarlo

Contact Shira Tarlo at shira.tarlo@salon.com. Follow @shiratarlo.

MORE FROM Shira TarloFOLLOW @shiratarlo

BROWSE SALON.COM
COMPLETELY AD FREE,
FOR THE NEXT HOUR

Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access

Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available
No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address

•••






Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •