Supreme Court security worse than leak investigation initially showed

Multiple sources reveal that justices often used personal email accounts for sensitive communications

Published February 5, 2023 4:00AM (EST)

Associate Justice Samuel Alito (Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)
Associate Justice Samuel Alito (Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)

This article originally appeared on Raw Story


Supreme Court employees raised security concerns that were not made public when an internal investigation was completed following the leak of a draft opinion reversing abortion rights.

Multiple sources familiar with the court's operations told CNN that justices often used personal email accounts for sensitive communications, employees used printers that didn't produce logs and "burn bags" to collect sensitive materials for destruction were often left open and unattended in hallways.

"This has been going on for years," one former employee said.

Some justices were slow to adopt email technology -- they were "not masters of information security protocol," according to one source -- and court employees were afraid to confront them over the security risks.

Supreme Court marshal Gail Curley in her investigative report noted that printer logs intended to track document production were insufficient, but a former employee said employees who had VPN access could print documents from any computer, and remote work during COVID-19 shutdowns and otherwise meant draft opinions could have been taken from the building in violation of court guidelines.

Curley's report noted that court methods for destroying sensitive documents should be improved, but three employees said striped burn bags supplied to chambers were often left sitting out unattended, and each justice had their own protocols for disposing of court documents.

A source familiar with court security practices said some colleagues stapled burn bags shut, while others filled them to capacity and left them near their desks, and others simply left them sitting in hallways where anyone with access to non-public areas could have taken sensitive materials.

By Travis Gettys

MORE FROM Travis Gettys

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Partner Raw Story Supreme Court