The fat-shaming of school “FitnessGrams”

If schools want healthy kids, how about letting them have more physical activity instead of incessant test prep?

Topics: Body Wars, Education, BMI, Parenting, Editor's Picks,

The fat-shaming of school (Credit: spfoto via iStock)

Here’s a brilliant idea. Let’s send out official letters to kids all across the country, telling them what’s wrong with their bodies. That won’t mess with their heads, right?

What’s that, you say? That sounds like a crap idea? Well, too late, folks. They’re already in your offspring’s hands. This year, children across the country received – often with little discussion or explanation — a cheerfully named FitnessGram telling them the results of a physical fitness assessment test, including a judgment of whether “You have a healthy weight,” or you’re “underweight,” “overweight” or “obese.” Surprise, middle-schoolers! Here’s a little something else to make your life just that much more awesome.

The current test affects roughly 65,000 public schools in at least 19 states. In New York City alone, over 850,000 students get a FitnessGram every year. My family is lucky – at my seventh-grade daughter’s progressive, stick-it-to-the-man school, their teacher recently told the students point-blank the scores were dumb and to feel free to rip them up. And many of the students – at least to outside appearances – dutifully proceeded to simply shrug off the paperwork. “A lot of them laughed,” my daughter told me later, “but a few of them were upset, saying, ‘It says I’m faaaaaat.’”

But my daughter has a close friend at Ballet Tech. How do you think those numbers are received at a school where all the kids are dancers? The girl’s mother told me that she’d regarded the scores warily. “I worry about these kids and anorexia and bulimia,” she said, adding there’s a flip side to the assessments too, for her daughter’s waifish classmates. “At this age, a lot of them are waiting for breasts and butts. They know they’re tiny. But this doesn’t make them feel better about themselves.”



What’s most alarming about sending kids a notice about their size is that it doesn’t begin to take into account what’s going on in their minds. Has anybody involved in how these FitnessGrams are written and distributed actually talked to a tween or an adolescent? Ever? What happens to the lanky boy who now feels he’s officially been declared too small? When we live in a culture in which reaching the lowest possible digit on a scale is deemed an achievement, what becomes of the young girl who feels the first strange stirrings of an odd pride about being “underweight”? What about all the kids, in schools across the country, coming home with a designation of overweight or obese, kids whose image-conscious parents can’t parlay the news into a Vogue feature and a lucrative book deal? 

And results based on data tabulated somewhere else can’t begin to reflect what even a cursory visual assessment of the children themselves could. I was stunned when my daughter told me that a tall, athletic female friend of hers had been declared “obese,” and that her height had been clearly measured well off the mark. In talking to other parents, it quickly became apparent that plenty of kids whose pediatricians had pronounced them within a normal range at their last annual visits had suddenly been deemed “overweight” by their schools.

Even if a child is “overweight” in terms of BMI, that doesn’t necessarily mean anything, since the BMI assessment is notoriously flawed. And as Kate Harding beautifully pointed out a few years back, you’d probably be surprised what constitutes outside the range of normal. Not only that, but as a recent Chicago Tribune story points out, “About half of children whose BMI labels them as overweight (but not obese) are healthy and have no increased risk of diabetes or other conditions.” In other words, guess what? You can be “overweight” and “healthy” at the same time! Fancy that!

There’s no doubt that we are in the throes of a serious public health crisis, and that our kids are going to bear the worst of it. It’s estimated that one-third of our kids are overweight or obese. Believe me, I am all for fitness, healthy eating and helping kids avoid futures marked by diabetes, heart disease, stroke and appearing on the People of Walmart blog. 

But how about working on solutions rather than simply tossing out numbers at kids and their families with a NO DUH note on the bottom that says “Participating in daily physical activity and eating more fruits and vegetables are two of the best things you can do for yourself?”  It’s easy to churn out a letter that says, in essence, “You’re not a ‘healthy’ size, kid.” Revamping a pizza- and nuggets-centric school lunch system that serves the interests of corporations like ConAgra is harder. And letting kids have more physical activity and recess instead of incessant test prep is contrary to the Race to the Top rah rah plan.

In some places, there’s a movement to stop the madness. Earlier this year, Massachusetts – where boys on their school wrestling teams are labeled “obese” — moved to do away with its “fat letters” system. And it’s worth mentioning that the Eating Disorders Coalition says that the student BMI reporting as it stands now “puts people at risk for the development of eating disorders” as well as bullying and teasing, while a 2009 Pediatrics report found that “few studies exist that assess the utility of these programs in preventing increases in obesity or the effects these programs may have on weight-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of youth and their families.” Like well-meaning but ultimately super-boneheaded public awareness programs that stigmatize kids for their weight, the “fat letters” don’t do anything to address the issue of making this a healthier country for our children. Instead, like so much of testing, they just provide them with the beginning of their understanding that their value as individuals can boil down to a number.

Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

Featured Slide Shows

7 motorist-friendly camping sites

close X
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 9

Sponsored Post

  • White River National Forest via Lower Crystal Lake, Colorado
    For those OK with the mainstream, White River Forest welcomes more than 10 million visitors a year, making it the most-visited recreation forest in the nation. But don’t hate it for being beautiful; it’s got substance, too. The forest boasts 8 wilderness areas, 2,500 miles of trail, 1,900 miles of winding service system roads, and 12 ski resorts (should your snow shredders fit the trunk space). If ice isn’t your thing: take the tire-friendly Flat Tops Trail Scenic Byway — 82 miles connecting the towns of Meeker and Yampa, half of which is unpaved for you road rebels.
    fs.usda.gov/whiteriveryou


    Image credit: Getty

  • Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest via Noontootla Creek, Georgia
    Boasting 10 wildernesses, 430 miles of trail and 1,367 miles of trout-filled stream, this Georgia forest is hailed as a camper’s paradise. Try driving the Ridge and Valley Scenic Byway, which saw Civil War battles fought. If the tall peaks make your engine tremble, opt for the relatively flat Oconee National Forest, which offers smaller hills and an easy trail to the ghost town of Scull Shoals. Scaredy-cats can opt for John’s Mountain Overlook, which leads to twin waterfalls for the sensitive sightseer in you.
    fs.usda.gov/conf


    Image credit: flickr/chattoconeenf

  • Nordhouse Dunes Wilderness Area via Green Road, Michigan
    The only national forest in Lower Michigan, the Huron-Mainstee spans nearly 1 million acres of public land. Outside the requisite lush habitat for fish and wildlife on display, the Nordhouse Dunes Wilderness Area is among the biggest hooks for visitors: offering beach camping with shores pounded by big, cerulean surf. Splash in some rum and you just might think you were in the Caribbean.
    fs.usda.gov/hmnf


    Image credit: umich.edu

  • Canaan Mountain via Backcountry Canaan Loop Road, West Virginia
    A favorite hailed by outdoorsman and author Johnny Molloy as some of the best high-country car camping sites anywhere in the country, you don’t have to go far to get away. Travel 20 miles west of Dolly Sods (among the busiest in the East) to find the Canaan Backcountry (for more quiet and peace). Those willing to leave the car for a bit and foot it would be remiss to neglect day-hiking the White Rim Rocks, Table Rock Overlook, or the rim at Blackwater River Gorge.
    fs.usda.gov/mnf


    Image credit: Getty

  • Mt. Rogers NRA via Hurricane Creek Road, North Carolina
    Most know it as the highest country they’ll see from North Carolina to New Hampshire. What they may not know? Car campers can get the same grand experience for less hassle. Drop the 50-pound backpacks and take the highway to the high country by stopping anywhere on the twisting (hence the name) Hurricane Road for access to a 15-mile loop that boasts the best of the grassy balds. It’s the road less travelled, and the high one, at that.
    fs.usda.gov/gwj


    Image credit: wikipedia.org

  • Long Key State Park via the Overseas Highway, Florida
    Hiking can get old; sometimes you’d rather paddle. For a weekend getaway of the coastal variety and quieter version of the Florida Keys that’s no less luxe, stick your head in the sand (and ocean, if snorkeling’s your thing) at any of Long Key’s 60 sites. Canoes and kayaks are aplenty, as are the hot showers and electric power source amenities. Think of it as the getaway from the typical getaway.
    floridastateparks.org/longkey/default.cfm


    Image credit: floridastateparks.org

  • Grand Canyon National Park via Crazy Jug Point, Arizona
    You didn’t think we’d neglect one of the world’s most famous national parks, did you? Nor would we dare lead you astray with one of the busiest parts of the park. With the Colorado River still within view of this cliff-edge site, Crazy Jug is a carside camper’s refuge from the troops of tourists. Find easy access to the Bill Hall Trail less than a mile from camp, and descend to get a peek at the volcanic Mt. Trumbull. (Fear not: It’s about as active as your typical lazy Sunday in front of the tube, if not more peaceful.)
    fs.usda.gov/kaibab


    Image credit: flickr/Irish Typepad

  • As the go-to (weekend) getaway car for fiscally conscious field trips with friends, the 2013 MINI Convertible is your campground racer of choice, allowing you and up to three of your co-pilots to take in all the beauty of nature high and low. And with a fuel efficiency that won’t leave you in the latter, you won’t have to worry about being left stranded (or awkwardly asking to go halfsies on gas expenses).


    Image credit: miniusa.com

  • Recent Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 9

Comments

18 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>