Richard Schiffman

Limbaugh rejects teachings of Jesus

He mentions the Christian savior often but usually abuses his message

  • more
    • All Share Services

Limbaugh rejects teachings of Jesus Rush celebrates Jesus' birthday by ignoring his gospel (Credit: rushlimbaugh.com)

America’s most popular talk show host has spoken the word “Jesus” approximately 2,420 times during his last 20 years on the air. He has mentioned “Christ” 2,130 times and the “Messiah” 4,038 times, according to one blogger with a whole lot of time on his hands. The purpose of his exhaustive research was to dispel doubts about Limbaugh’s Christian credentials, which have been under fire lately by certain evangelicals who cite the fact that Rush — according to his own brother, David — was never “born again.”

This is a hot topic for fundamentalists. “Is Rush a real Christian?” is the most frequently Googled question about the controversial radio personality.

So I decided to do a little research of my own, which I hoped might shed some light on the impending holiday season. Do Rush Limbaugh and the Prince of Peace really see eye to eye? Often the answer is no.

Jesus said, “You have heard it said: ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’ But I say to you, Offer the wicked man no resistance. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also.” (Matthew 5:38-42)

Rush — an opponent of gun control, a supporter of capital punishment and a big fan of American wars abroad and militarism in general — quipped on one occasion, “There is only one way to get rid of nuclear weapons … use them.”

Jesus said, “Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.” (Matthew 5:5-9) Rush excoriated president Obama for sending in peacekeepers to rein in “The Lord’s Resistance Army,” who he claimed were “Christians fighting the Muslims in Sudan.” Well not exactly. The Lord’s Resistance Army is actually a gang of Hitler-esque thugs in Uganda who murdered, pillaged and raped untold thousands. But let’s not quibble over facts. Christians are Christians, right?

When a mob was preparing to stone a woman who was accused of adultery, Jesus told them, “He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.” (John 8:7) When 15-year-old gay teen Lawrence King was murdered in class by a homophobic fellow student, Rush blasted the assistant principal of the school for “promoting a gay agenda.”

Jesus said “Judge not and you will not be judged.” (Luke 6:37) Rush, by contrast, has few compunctions on the judgment front. He calls environmentalists “”long-haired maggot-infested … wackos.” Liberals, he says are  “dittoheads” and “retards.” He compared President Obama to Hitler. He labeled American military personnel who support withdrawal from Iraq “phony soldiers.”

Jesus said, “You have learnt how it was said to our ancestors: ‘You must not kill; and if anyone does kill he must answer for it before the court.’ But I say this to you: anyone who is angry with his brother will answer for it before the court.” (Matthew 5:21-22)

Rush, on the other hand, breezily dismissed the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib saying, “This is no different than what happens at the Skull and Bones initiation … I’m talking about people having a good time, these people, you ever heard of emotional release?”

Jesus said, “The man who has two tunics is to share with him who has none; and he who has food is to do likewise.” (Luke 3:11)

Rush believes that unleashing the forces of the free market will be more effective. “What do you think has fed more mouths, greed or charity? What do you think, folks? What has fed more mouths in this country, the world, whatever subset of people you want to talk about. What has fed more people … greed or charity? That’s right. Greed has fed more mouths than charity ever could.”

Jesus, the tenderhearted master of empathy and compassion, told his disciples to tend the sick and feed the poor. He said, “This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you.” (John 15:12)

Rush, by contrast, responded to an ad in which the actor Michael J. Fox advocated funding for stem-cell research by fuming that Fox “was  exaggerating the effects of the disease. He’s moving all around and shaking and it’s purely an act … This is really shameless of Michael J. Fox. Either he didn’t take his medication or he’s acting.”

“Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth,” said Jesus extolling the virtue of humility. (Matthew 5:5) “I have talent on loan from God,” boasted Rush.

OK, nobody expects Rush Limbaugh — or any mere mortal for that matter — to fully live up to Christ’s moral code. But that’s not the point. The point is that someone who invokes Jesus’ name in practically every broadcast might know a little more about what the founder of Christianity actually taught. Limbaugh is free to spout any bigoted, mean-spirited, vitriolic and unenlightened opinions that he likes. But with the Christmas holiday coming, please do us all a favor and leave Jesus out of it.

NPR dodges the peril of socialist opera

The network cancels Lisa Simeone's opera program instead of standing up for her First Amendment rights

  • more
    • All Share Services

NPR dodges the peril of socialist opera Lisa Simeone(Credit: AP/NPR)

The timing could not have been worse for the latest in a series of controversies to hit the nation’s scandal-prone public radio network. But the fact that it was pledge week didn’t prevent NPR from caving in to conservative pressure and canceling its distribution of  “The World of Opera,” last Friday after right-wing bloggers indignantly reported that host Lisa Simeone had taken part in Occupy DC, a spin-off of the Occupy Wall Street movement, a protest against corporate greed that is spreading to cities nationwide. Earlier in the week, Simeone, an independent producer, was sacked from her other job as host of the public radio documentary series “Sound Print” for her political activities.

In justifying the actions, NPR spokeswoman Dana Davis Rehm said that it is a conflict of interest for a journalist associated with NPR to take a role in a political protest movement, ignoring the fact that Simeone is a freelancer and not an NPR employee, and a music host, not a journalist. Time magazine’s James Poniewozik  jested: “Public radio listeners! Have you long worried that your station was undermining capitalism through its broadcasts of the Ring Cycle? Tired of having your children brainwashed by the socialistic messages of La Traviata?”

For hundreds of listeners who flooded NPRs own blog and switchboard with messages of outrage over the weekend, however, it was no laughing matter. New York University journalism professor Jay Rosen said “NPR’s solution to getting bullied on the playground every day is bring more lunch money so that all who threaten it can have some.”

Many saw the incident as merely the latest chapter in the network’s drift to the right in an effort to appease Republican critics in Congress, which funds the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a major source of NPR’s operating budget.

Critics also pointed out that the network has a double standard when it comes to the political speech of its hosts and reporters. While dropping Simeone for taking part in a protest rally, NPR routinely permits its own staffers to sound off on the issues that they report on.

In 2001 NPR host Scott Simon published a piece in the Wall Street Journal supporting American military interventions in the Middle East and likening antiwar protesters to “a Halloween parade.” NPR reporter Mara Liasson doubles as a commentator for Fox television where she lambasted congressmen on a fact-finding mission in Iraq before the U.S. invasion and called on them to resign. NPR’s Cokie Roberts regularly espouses her center-right opinions in handsomely paid corporate speeches on everything from healthcare reform to the minimum wage. What rule has Simeone violated that these NPR journalists have not?

The media watchdog group FAIR, (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) has criticized NPR for its excessive dependence on  “inside the Beltway” sources for its stories, with women only accounting for one in five. It also found that the network favors Republican over Democratic sources by a 3-to-1 margin, and routinely gives short shrift to protest movements like Occupy Wall Street.

In fairness, NPR has many fine reporters and its hour-long program blocks allow for a more in-depth and often intelligent coverage of issues than anywhere else on radio. There are still shows like “Fresh Air” with Terry Gross, where a diversity of voices can get an airing.

Furthermore, local community and public radio stations that carry NPR programs are often independent of the network and often broadcast a far wider and more gutsy range of voices than the Washington-produced newsmagazines. But while the fringes of the public radio world have frequently flourished, the center has shied away from controversy and silenced dissident voices.

The NPR of today takes few risks, producing a bland and corporatized news stream that genuflects to the powers that be, and in which the concerns of the poor, the disenfranchised and protesters of all stripes are marginalized. It is a place where some are allowed to speak freely on Fox News, but others who take up a placard and exercise their First Amendment right to protest social inequities will be thrown off the airwaves. That’s not what public radio should be.

Continue Reading Close