Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Trump may have violated gag order by sharing AG Letitia James’ address on Truth Social

Former President Donald Trump took shots at New York Attorney General Letitia James as his civil fraud trial continues to play out in New York by ranting on his Truth Social platform, sharing James's address online, and potentially violating one of his recently imposed gag orders in the process. U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan on Monday issued a limited gag order on former President Donald Trump in his Washington D.C. federal election case, doubling up on the partial gag order New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron hit the former president with earlier this month. Each order came as the result of the former president's proclivity to publicly target and attack perceived enemies online, which typically includes individuals involved, either directly or indirectly, in his numerous legal woes.

On Monday night, Trump took to Truth Social to rip into James, sharing a Substack article from far-right activist Laura Loomer that, in a series of unfounded claims, accused James of being in cahoots with “Christian J. French, The Trump hating COO and heir to the Anti-Trump ‘Regional News Network.’” The article also linked to a number of documents that appear to disclose James' home address. "Her Fake Case against me should be dropped immediately!" Trump fumed. "My Financial Statements are extremely conservative, and her numbers were way off, including the fact that she undervalued Mar-a-Lago and Doral by Billions of Dollars. She also didn’t reveal the 100% Disclaimer Clause at the front of the Financial Statements, and that she sued me under a Statute that was never used before. MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND ELECTION INTERFERENCE ALL WRAPPED UP IN ONE!"

Trump may have violated Judge Engoron's gag order, The Daily Beast reported. The order bars Trump from attacking court personnel involved in his New York civil fraud case, and while James is technically not a staffer, she remains a critical linchpin of the probe and subsequent indictment. 

“Built his empire on lies”: Trump Org appraiser calls out “inaccurate” statements as Trump watches

Former president Donald Trump ventured back to Manhattan on Tuesday as part of his civil fraud case, which came about after New York Attorney General Letitia James argued that Trump, along with his sons Donald Jr. and Eric and the Trump Organization, had inflated the value of more than a dozen assets by hundreds of millions, subsequently using those phony values to defraud banks and insurers in order to secure more advantageous deals and secure loans.

As he entered the court, Trump chastised the case as “a witch hunt by a radical lunatic attorney general."

"We built a great company — a lot of cash, it’s got a lot of great assets, some of the greatest real estate assets, anywhere in the world,” the ex-president added. 

A key part of Tuesday's trial proceedings came in the form of testimony from a real estate appraiser for the Trump Organization, who harshly criticized the company's "inaccurate and inappropriate" behavior in attributing the faulty numbers to him. 

The New York Daily News reported that former Trump organization executive Jeff McConney, in statements shown in court accounting for Trump's value between 2013 and 2018, said that the appraiser — Cushman & Wakefield executive director Doug Larson — had advised him via phone in the specifics of assigning swollen values to assets such as Trump's Wall Street tower.

Larson vehemently denied that the call took place, however, also rejecting McConney's claim that he had worked "in conjunction" with the former president of any affiliates of the Trump Organization to appraise assets. “It’s inappropriate and inaccurate,” Larson said. “I should have been told, and an appraisal should have been ordered.”

At one point, Mark Ladov, a lawyer for the attorney general's office, cited an instance in which the Trump Organization ignored the numbers Larson crunched, adding a whopping 35 percent to 40 Wall Street in 2016, which Larson had valued at $540 million. In that year's financial statement, the skyscraper was listed by Trump's company at $735.4 million. And in 2013, the Trump Organization tacked on a 3.12% capitalization raise to 1290 Avenue of the Americas, attributing the rise to Larson's input and increasing the building's value to just shy of $1 billion.

We need your help to stay independent

Following Tuesday's events, Attorney General James said that while the former president could “rant and rave” all he wanted, it would not alter the fact that he “built his empire on lies.” 

“Mr. Trump may lie, but numbers don’t lie,” she said. “Mr. Trump’s entire empire is built on nothing but lies. Sinking sand.” 

James has asserted that Trump routinely overstated his net worth to financial institutions by between $812 million to $2.2 billion, depending on the year and the specific applications he filed. She is seeking a penalty of about $250 million. Late last month, New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron, in a summary judgment, ruled that Trump had committed fraud in the state for years by misrepresenting his financial status while steadily expanding his real estate. 

Engoron's decision effectively barred Trump and his adult sons from conducting business in New York ever again. The judge also ordered punitive measures, including that some of Trump's business licenses be rescinded — meaning he will lose control of key real estate if upheld following appeal — and ordered that an outside "receiver" must be appointed to supervise the management of those Trump properties. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“The next borrower, or the one after that, might default, and if its (financial statements) are false, the lender might unfairly be left holding the bag,” Engoron wrote. “This will distort the lending marketplace and deprive other potential borrowers of the opportunity to obtain loans and create wealth.”

Trump at the hearing also took shots at his former personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen, saying he "didn’t have the guts” to show face. Cohen has acted as a key witness in 2019, providing pivotal testimony that catalyzed James's investigation.

“If I was afraid of Donald, I wouldn’t have written 2 NYT bestsellers, testified before the Mueller team, seven congressional committees, 23 appearances before the Manhattan DA, and provided information to the NYAG that is the basis of this trial,” Cohen told the Daily News. 

“Looking forward to seeing you in court very soon!” he quipped to his old client. 

Biden in Israel: “The other team” appears to have caused Gaza hospital blast

President Joe Biden arrived in Israel Wednesday, vowing solidarity in its war against Hamas and saying that the explosion that killed a massive number of Palestinians at a Gaza hospital appeared to have been caused by a Palestinian group, Reuters reports. Gaza officials accused Israel of launching an air strike, which they projected killed as many as 500 people, on the Al-Ahli Arabi hospital. Israel denied responsibility, blaming a failed rocket launch by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad militant group, which also denied responsibility.

"I was deeply saddened and outraged by the explosion of the hospital in Gaza yesterday, and based on what I've seen, it appears as though it was done by the other team, not you," Biden said, speaking alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. "But there's a lot of people out there not sure, so we’ve got a lot, we’ve got to overcome a lot of things," he added. "The world is looking. Israel has a value set like the United States does, and other democracies, and they are looking to see what we are going to do." Biden later attributed his confidence about who is to blame on "data I was shown by my Defense Department."

The president's planned diplomatic trip to the Middle East was intended to calm the region even as the United States extended support for its ally Israel, which has vowed to wipe out Hamas after its fighters killed 1,400 Israelis in an attack on Oct. 7. But after the fireball ravaged the hospital on Tuesday evening, Jordan's leaders canceled the planned summit in Amman between them, leaders of Egypt and the Palestinian Authority, and Biden. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz traveled to Cairo on Wednesday and stressed that “we still do not know exactly what happened," calling for the incident to be "investigated very thoroughly.” French President Emmanuel Macron similarly called for “all the light must be shed on the circumstances.”

Jim Jordan’s no outlier: He fits right into the GOP’s post-Gingrich history of ruthless trolling

Another day, another clusterf***k in the U.S. House of Representatives. After days of behind-the-scenes haggling (and reports of strong-arming) Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio said he was ready to call a vote that would make him the new speaker of the House. Word on Tuesday morning was that his team believed they had commitments for the necessary votes and the worst-case scenario would be GOP defections in the single digits, which were rationalized as protest votes that would fall away on a second ballot. As it turned out, Jordan lost 20 votes among his fellow Republicans. After originally calling for another vote on Tuesday evening, he scuppered the whole thing until Wednesday morning.

By the time you read this, that vote could have taken place already — or perhaps Jordan has seen the writing on the wall and dropped out. Reports suggest there are now serious discussions of electing Speaker Pro Tem Patrick McHenry of North Carolina, who is virtually powerless, as a real-but-temporary speaker with full powers to get the House through the appropriations process. Nobody seems to know exactly how that would work, since the House has to have a speaker before it can vote on anything else (such as changing the rules about the speakership). Some congressmen are now calling for defrocked former Speaker Kevin McCarthy to be reinstated, which would mike the perfect coda to this absurd brouhaha.

One of the main objections to Jim Jordan is that he's too ideologically extreme and will hurt the Republicans' chances of maintaining the majority in 2024. There are 18 House members who were elected in congressional districts won by Joe Biden in 2020, and it's assumed they will be in danger if a full-blown MAGA wingnut becomes speaker of the House. Some of those members voted for Jordan on Tuesday so they may not be convinced, but Democrats are making it clear that they see this as an opportunity. Jordan's record is as far right as you can get, and he's joined at the hip with Donald Trump, who is likely still toxic in those districts.

But the idea that Jordan would be a departure from all the alleged statesmen who previously served as Republican House speakers, and that the maelstrom that's engulfed this Congress since the GOP took over in January is completely unprecedented simply isn't true. In fact, Jordan and the rest of the House rebels are part of a long Republican tradition.

Back in the 1980s, the "Reagan Revolution" brought into Congress a group of backbench bomb-throwers led by an obscure Georgia Republican named Newt Gingrich. He was highly adept at getting attention from the nascent right-wing media, which in those early days mostly meant talk radio. He first came to national notice in 1988, when he maneuvered to oust Democratic Speaker Jim Wright over an ethics complaint. He said at the time, “I’ll just keep pounding and pounding on his ethics. There comes a point where it comes together and the media takes off on it, or it dies. What I really want is to get some people with subpoenas poking around." (Gingrich himself had a similar ethics problem, which made this a "chef's kiss" of a political gambit, and secured his place in GOP as a bold risk-taker.) Wright was hastily replaced by another Democratic speaker, Tom Foley, but that was the play that started the process that led to where we are today.

Gingrich started his climb into the leadership right away and by 1994 he was not only the undisputed leader of the House Republicans but effectively the leader of the entire Republican Party. When he led the GOP to their massive win in that year's midterm elections, there was talk in the political media that Gingrich would become "co-president" with Bill Clinton, and might have to run against him in 1996 for the good of the country.

We need your help to stay independent

He and his accomplices reveled in persecuting Bill and Hillary Clinton, feeding on the tales of small-state corruption and lurid sexual misdeeds of Arkansas' gothic political culture. That launched the practice of nonstop tabloid-style congressional investigations that continues to this day. Their smash-mouth rhetoric and crude character assassination was not entirely without precedent in American politics — but it was the modern conservative movement, under Gingrich, that took it mainstream.

But the old "live by the sword, die by the sword" trope came back to bite Newt in 1997 when an insurgent group of 20 or so members from the class of '94 concluded that Gingrich had betrayed their principles and recruited his top lieutenants to bring him an ultimatum: Resign, or they would remove him by parliamentary maneuver. Unfortunately for them, the top lieutenants began bickering among themselves like Keystone Kops; the plot leaked to the press and Gingrich survived, although from that moment onward he was hanging by a thread.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


When his predictions of massive gains in the 1998 midterms turned to dust, Gingrich knew he no longer had the support of the GOP caucus and resigned. At that time it seemed like half the men in Washington were being exposed as philanderers and Gingrich was among them, as was the man who maneuvered behind the scenes to become his apparent successor, Bob Livingston of Louisiana. After Livingston's candidacy flamed out, Republicans settled on a little-known member of the leadership, Dennis Hastert of Illinois, who became who became the longest-serving GOP speaker. It was only years later that it became clear Hastert had been paying off a former student to stay quiet about his sexual abuse of underage boys as a high school teacher and wrestling coach, which landed him in federal prison. 

The next Republican speaker, after the GOP won back the House in the "Tea Party wave" of 2010, was John Boehner of Ohio, one of the original Gingrich coup plotters. As many readers will remember, he was eventually forced out by Tea Party backbenchers, one of whom was Jim Jordan among them. Boehner's eventual successor, Paul Ryan, found himself jeered at town halls and rallies and quit Congress after Democrats won back the majority in 2016. That brings us all the way to Kevin McCarthy who was ousted after less than nine months as speaker, in a parliamentary maneuver much like the one the Keystone Kop coup plotters of '97 used to threaten Gingrich.

So Jim Jordan is certainly an extremist whose legislative record is nonexistent and whose entire career in Congress has been devoted to culture-war issues, Fox News hits, insurrection and character assassination. But he's hardly unique. (Hey, he's even got a wrestling-related abuse scandal on his résumé.) If anything, he's the natural heir to the Gingrich revolution. And there are plenty more lined up right behind him. 

Nancy Pelosi buries Jim Jordan’s speaker bid as GOPer admits “bullying” spectacularly “backfired”

House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan’s, R-Ohio, speaker bid appears to be on life support Wednesday morning after 20 Republicans voted against him on the House floor Tuesday despite a fierce pressure campaign by his allies.

Jordan failed to get the 217 votes he needed to become speaker during a vote on Tuesday. After scrapping plans for a second vote Tuesday evening, he said the House is expected to hold another vote Wednesday at 11 am despite reports that even more Republicans may defect on the second ballot.

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., who voted against Jordan, told Politico that he faced strong pressure from Jordan’s supporters.

“Jim’s been nice, one-on-one, but his broader team has been playing hardball,” he told the outlet.

Bacon’s wife told Politico’s Olivia Beavers that she received multiple anonymous emails and texts from people demanding her husband back Jordan.

“Your husband will not hold any political office ever again,” one message read.

Other Republicans similarly told Politico they “received a barrage of calls from local conservative leaders,” though they blamed the onslaught on Jordan’s supporters rather than the congressman himself. Other Republicans have referred to the tactics as “bullying.”

Even Jordan ally Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., admitted he thinks the tactics came back to bite Jordan.

“I think some of the pressure campaigns have backfired,” he told Fox News on Tuesday, citing conversations with fellow members who said “they felt that.”

“They have not worked,” he said. “And so, I think that right now under the leadership of Jim Jordan, I would request that people just take a break, take a pause, let the members work and figure this out amongst ourselves so we can elect Jim Jordan as Speaker, and then we can get back to the work that we have to do.”

We need your help to stay independent

Jordan on Tuesday vowed to “keep working” to “get the votes” ahead of a likely vote Wednesday morning but one anonymous House Republican warned to Politico that Jordan and his lieutenants are “calling people who voted for him trying to stop the bleeding” but were “pissing off” members rather than willing them over.

Rep. Carlos Gimenez, R-Fla., who voted for former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Tuesday, told Politico that the “pressure tactics” only made him double down on his position.

”He supposedly said ‘stand down’ and they haven’t stood down. Leaders are followed,” he told Politico.

“The one thing that will never work with me — if you try to pressure me, if you try to threaten me, then I shut off,” Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart, R-Fla., agreed.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Numerous Jordan backers in conservative media have also sought to pressure Republicans to back him while attacking potential rivals. Fox News host Sean Hannity’s staff has specifically targeted members that oppose his bid.

“He’s lost support because of this,” an unidentified House Republican told Politico. “Constant smears — it’s just dishonesty at its core.”

Some members who voted for Jordan have suggested privately that they may switch their votes on the second or third ballots. Some moderates have suggested that the more likely outcome is not a Jordan speakership but a vote to empower acting Speaker Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., though it’s unclear if that would succeed with just Republican votes.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said after Tuesday’s failed vote that she feels “sad for the institution.”

“I think it’s sad that they’re getting worse and worse,” she told HuffPost’s Jennifer Bendery. "They should take a lesson in mathematics and learn how to count.”

Fur seals are declining thanks to lack of food and climate change, study finds

The Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) is among the most beloved sea animals, with its wet puppy dog eyes, big white whiskers, rolly poly gray body and slippery flippers. Unsurprisingly, the fur seal is almost universally regarded as adorable. The act of clubbing one for its fur is a horrific practice that has thankfully been banned — but in a way, humans are still clubbing these animals over the head with drastic changes to the global climate.

As explained by the authors of a recent study in the journal Global Change Biology, Antarctic fur seals are a "key indicator species" that helps scientists learn more about the overall health of the ecosystem in the subantarctic islands of South Georgia, where nearly all fur seals live. Perhaps this is why it is so troubling that, according to those same researchers, South Georgia fur seal populations are on the decline — and that one major culprit is climate change.

The recent population crash is particularly disappointing because it reverses a century of population recovery.

“We found both good and bad news about the fur seals," Jaume Forcada, a British Antarctic Survey (BAS) scientist who led the new study, said in a statement. "The population has recovered very impressively throughout the twentieth century when seal hunting was banned. But twenty-first century changes to the abundance of krill in the Southern Ocean are now threatening these iconic animals all over again.”

Although the BAS scientists studied whether krill fishing pressure might have played a role in the dropping seal populations, they found this to not be the case. This is not to say that they felt that this variable should not be investigated, nor for that matter that climate change alone accounts for the declining seal populations.

"The effects of krill extraction on fur seal populations should be re-evaluated in the light of increasing environmental pressures on both the krill and the fur seals," the scientists write. "Besides climate warming, these pressures include the effects of regional humpback whale recovery … and its direct competition for food with fur seals and other abundant krill-dependent predators such as macaroni penguins."

The problem for the fur seals, when it comes to climate change, is that the krill are struggling to survive in the warming ocean temperatures. Because krill comprise roughly 80% or more of the diet of fur seals at South Georgia, the decline in krill populations means the seals will experience "catastrophic declines" both in how many pups they can produce and the number of individuals overall that can survive. "Environmental conditions remove the krill from their immediate foraging areas," the authors explain.

The recent population crash is particularly disappointing because it reverses a century of population recovery, one that resulted in a peak of 3.5 million individuals in 2009. In the early 20th century, by contrast, there were so few fur seals still alive in the wild that conservationists intervened, deeming that they should no longer be hunted commercially. Over the previous two centuries, fur seals were prized for their pelts and therefore slaughtered in the millions. Only strict protections, along with an abundance of food and the seals' natural breeding abilities, allowed their populations to bounce back.

Yet at Bird Island, a South Georgia location with a large fur seal community, the 2009 population peak was followed by 7% declines in every succeeding year. Presently the fur seal population at Bird Island is at its lowest since the 1970s, when the animals were still in recovery.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"Environmental conditions remove the krill from their immediate foraging areas."

Climate change is not the only threat that is afflicting seals and other pinnipeds, the group of carnivorous aquatic mammals that includes seals and sea lions. Plastic pollution is also rapidly killing these animals, as Salon learned last year when speaking with Dr. Kim Warner, a senior scientist at the nonprofit Oceana and co-author of a 2020 report on how both sea turtles and marine mammals suffer because of plastic pollution along the coast of the United States.

"What is really sad is that a lot of these species that we were studying are threatened with or vulnerable to extinction under the Endangered Species Act," Warner explained. "These are besides all the dangers they face from other threats to their survival. It's an added stressor and sometimes the cause of death for these animals that are either ingesting or becoming entangled with plastic."

We need your help to stay independent

Plastic pollution is such a pervasive problem for seals that the famous activist group Ocean Conservation Namibia, which has 1.73 million subscribers on YouTube, exists for the main purpose of helping individual seals get disentangled from plastic pollution of all kinds, with one member of the organization estimating to Salon last year that "probably excess of 70% of all our entanglements are directly fishing-related."

As John Hocevar, a marine biologist and director of Greenpeace's oceans campaign, also told Salon last year, "There are beaches in Hawaii where you can literally watch the plastic come in, with every wave on some beaches. You can see the microplastics with your naked eyes in your hand among the grains of sand that you pick up. And a lot of it is clearly coming from fishing gear."

Jim Jordan faces the abyss — but GOP “moderates” can’t escape the MAGA vortex

Republicans continued their downward spiral into MAGA Land on Tuesday. Yes, in what feels like a minor miracle, they avoided electing Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, a toilet swirlie in human skin, as speaker of the House. But they also didn't come close to coalescing behind anyone else, despite Democratic leadership repeatedly offering to strike a deal to drag one of the few remaining zombie moderate Republicans over the line. Worse, Jordan's candidacy is still alive, even if he decided not to go for another vote on Tuesday night after a humiliating first-ballot defeat. (At this writing, another vote the is tentatively scheduled for Wednesday morning.)

It's been two weeks since a small faction of mega-MAGA Republicans, led of course by Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, ousted the previous speaker, Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California. A lot of those same folks, along with others, then blocked Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, basically for not being quite enough of a pro-Trump berserker. Now another group of Republicans, slightly larger than the group that torpedoed McCarthy, has blocked Jordan's ascension, most likely because they're worried about being tied too closely to the MAGA movement during next year's election campaign. Jordan hasn't dropped out yet, probably because, as virtually the only person standing who is nuts enough to want the job, he still has a shot. 

It's easy to see why these rebel Republicans are worried that Speaker Jordan might be an especially bad look. No one in history has embodied the role of a fascist gym teacher more thoroughly than Jordan, a man whose only waking mode is "hectoring." That's why his denials of guilt in the infamous sex abuse scandal at Ohio State are somewhat difficult to believe.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


It's not just that there's considerable evidence against Jordan. It's that his pro-bullying impulses seem to drive him to side reflexively with sexual abusers, as he does with self-proclaimed pussy-grabber Donald Trump. 

And that person, of course, is why even if House Republican manage to vote down Jordan, it will do little to salvage their reputation. Consider the small but meaningful percentage of former Republican voters who have decamped to the Democrats in recent elections, in response to GOP radicalization. No doubt they'll be pleased to see the party deny the speaker's gavel to an out-and-proud MAGA troll. But when Trump wraps up the nomination next year and the entire Republican establishment lines up behind him, those people will mostly continue to hold their noses and vote for Democrats. 

Trump's stranglehold on the party is likely why Jordan still thinks he can browbeat the party into submitting to him. It certainly seems like his only real strategy to win the speaker's seat is intimidation. Jordan recruited Fox News host Sean Hannity to badger reluctant House Republicans, backed up by threats that they'll be villainized on the network if they didn't comply. One Jordan supporter, Rep. Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota, made the blackmail explicit. He told the Washington Post he's been calling other GOP members and telling them that Jordan is "the best person to keep conservative media off our backs." 

There's been some minor pushback from House Republicans, such as the one who anonymously griped to Axios that "the bullying tactics need to stop." But we've heard this song and dance before: Republicans complain about Trump over and over, but never for attribution. And it never stops them from coming to heel when their orange master calls.

So Jordan isn't crazy to think he's still got a shot, even after 20 House Republicans voted against him. (Which is one more than voted against Kevin McCarthy on the first ballot, back in January.) Jordan's carefully crafted persona of delusional belligerence is the soul of the modern GOP. His purpose in Congress has always been destructive, not constructive. It's not for nothing that former Speaker John Boehner, a fellow Republican, called him a "legislative terrorist." Jordan's not there to make life better for Americans, not even the people in his district. He's laser-focused on one goal: Annihilating anyone he believes gets in the way of total domination by white Christian conservative men. Which means not only defeating, undermining or kneecapping any and all Democrats, but also any Republicans seen as overly accepting of religious freedom or racial equality. 

Jordan's carefully crafted persona of delusional belligerence is the soul of the modern GOP. It's not for nothing that former Speaker John Boehner, a fellow Republican, called him a "legislative terrorist."

Adam Kinzinger, who was a Republican congressman from Illinois until his opposition to the Big Lie drove him out of the party, explained this on CNN earlier this month: Jordan, he said, "truly believes that the Democrats, or the left, is an enemy of America and he will do anything, even extra-constitutionally, to defeat them."

Kinzinger added that he would classify Jordan "in the camp of Christian nationalist, where he believes that he is truly fighting the dark forces and the Constitution, in some cases, is an impediment."

Former congresswoman Liz Cheney was also blunt about this earlier this month, telling an audience at the University of Minnesota, "Jim Jordan knew more about what Donald Trump had planned for Jan. 6 than any other member of the House of Representatives," accusing Jordan of being "part of the conspiracy." 

As Aaron Blake of the Washington Post pointed out, Jordan has no legislative record to speak of. He "has yet to get a bill signed into law since being elected in 2006," mostly because he rarely bothers to sponsor legislation. Jordan doesn't even pretend to be anything but a human tornado, ripping through the tattered remnants of our democratic system. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Most likely, the modest Republican faction that broke away from Jordan on Tuesday hoped to use their "no" votes to portray themselves as moderates or centrists. After all, Jordan is up there with Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene as a leading figure among Republicans who supported Trump's attempted coup that ended in the Capitol insurrection. 

Without question, it's better for Republicans next year if Democrats can't run a bunch of ads about Jordan's sexual abuse scandal, or that feature video clips of Jordan in full MAGA attack mode. As Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post pointed out, the best political option for Republicans at this point would be to join with Democrats in electing an actual moderate Republican as speaker. That might even convince the modest but influential group of never-Trump Republican voters to split the ticket, voting for Joe Biden next year while also backing their "centrist" Republican in Congress. 

But as bizarre as politics has become these days, it's pretty much impossible to imagine that path forward. Republicans in swing districts don't want to be overly associated with MAGA, but they don't want to be called RINOs either. What they don't understand is that there is no Door No. 3. For the MAGA movement, purging the ranks of those perceived as disloyal to the cause is nearly as important as annihilating the Democrats. That's why we can't count Jim Jordan out. Republicans in Congress have years of experience when it comes to squelching their doubts about rising fascism and backing Trump. Sucking it up and voting for Jim Jordan — right now or tomorrow or next week — is basically just more of the same. 

This entire debacle underscores why it's increasingly hard for Republicans to conceal how fully the MAGA movement has consumed their party. Whether Jordan wins or loses, the takeaway is that the GOP is a nihilistic party, hellbent on chaos. If he wins, a bug-eyed right-wing nut becomes the most powerful figure in Congress, third in line for the presidency. But not electing Jordan only reinforces a larger narrative, which is that Republicans are so far gone that the most basic task of a legislative majority — choosing one of your own to be the leader — is beyond their capabilities. Either way, campaign ads for the Democrats next year should be fun. 

Record-breaking wildfires blanket Brazil with smoke

A record-breaking number of wildfires are blanketing the Amazon with smoke, choking some Brazilian cities and further isolating many Indigenous villages. Over 2,700 wildfires have been reported in the region in the first 11 days of the month — the highest number for any October since 1998, when the record-keeping began. 

Air quality became so poor last week in places like Manaus that officials had to postpone the city’s annual marathon, and major universities canceled classes. Philip Fearnside, research professor at the National Institute for Research in Amazonia, said hospitals in the city are full of people who are having respiratory issues. “That should be a wake up call to actually change government policies and individual behavior to actually contain global warming,” he said. 

Part of the issue is that the Amazon is in the middle of a severe drought. Water levels in the region’s major rivers have become so low as to be unnavigable, leaving many Indigenous river communities without any way to obtain certain foods, drinking water, or medicine, according to Reuters. Commercial shipping has also been impacted as vessels from the Denmark headquartered company Maersk suspended service in Manaus, after a barge ran aground on the Negro River last month. 

“It’s a very worrisome situation,” said Marcia Macedo, an associate scientist at the Woodwell Climate Research Center. “We’ve seen large fish kills [an event in which numerous dead fish are suddenly observed in a body of water], water levels dropping way faster than normal — lake levels, river levels, like, six meters below what would be expected at this time of year — and definitely the potential for it to get a whole lot worse before it gets better.” 

On Wednesday, Indigenous tribes in the region called for the Brazilian government to take more formal action. “We ask the government to declare a climate emergency to urgently address the vulnerability Indigenous peoples are exposed to,” read a statement from the Indigenous umbrella group APIAM, which represents over 60 Amazonian tribes.

As of Friday, almost all of the 62 cities in the state of Amazonas, which includes Manaus, had declared a state of emergency. 

As of Friday, almost all of the 62 cities in the state of Amazonas, which includes Manaus, had declared a state of emergency. 

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva campaigned on protecting the Amazon from deforestation and further destruction in sharp contrast to his predecessor, Jair Bolsonaro. But while Lula’s administration has upheld Indigenous rights by restoring land in the rainforest and the Brazilian Supreme Court struck down a challenge to Indigenous land rights last month, deforestation remains a major concern. 

Tree loss is not the only factor contributing to the current crisis. Climate change as well as El Niño, a weather phenomenon that results in a mass of warm water traveling east over the Pacific and crashing into South America, are also driving dry conditions. “Deforestation contributes to global warming, although fossil fuels globally are the main cause,” said Fearnside. “But global warming is changing climate all over the world, including here in the Amazon.”

El Niño, climate change, and extreme heat

El Niño is a natural weather phenomenon that fuels above-average global heat and more intense natural disasters in parts of the world. It is characterized by warmer than normal sea-surface temperatures in the eastern Pacific Ocean. The hottest years on record tend to happen during El Niño.

The planet’s weather over the past three years has been dominated by El Niño’s opposite extreme, La Niña, which has had a cooling effect on the globe. Even so, the past eight years were the hottest in recorded history, the result of the warming effects of climate change.

Now, in conjunction with accelerating climate change, El Niño means a wide array of exacerbated hazards may be coming down the pike. El Niño’s impacts differ by region, but can range from extreme rainfall to severe drought and increased wildfire risk.

Macedo warns that if the cycles that maintain the Amazon rainforests’ trademark wet, rainy, cloudy conditions start to dissipate, the forest could be permanently altered. 

“If you get beyond a certain amount of deforestation, you start to affect that recycling of rainwater back to the atmosphere that helps to kind of cool the land surface and also seed new rain clouds,” she told Grist. “If fires get out of control, then you have less forest cover and these droughts are even more intense, and so on and so forth.”  

While the system is fairly well understood, Macedo says it’s difficult to pin down at what point things will stop working as usual. 

“It’s not linear. It’s not it’s not a simple process to kind of pin down,” Macedo said.

 

David Rothkopf on war in Gaza: “Revenge is not a strategy. It doesn’t make people safe”

Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza is a test of both America’s global leadership and our dysfunctional domestic politics. Both those problems are largely the result of the Republican Party's all-out embrace of Donald Trump, borderline fascism and outright chaos.

This war is also a test of the American people’s collective capacity for solidarity and empathy, both with the Israeli people as they confront a 9/11-style disaster and the Palestinian people of Gaza, most of whom had nothing to do with the Hamas attacks but now face the catastrophic consequences of a large-scale war.

In an attempt to begin processing these complex questions of morality, truth-telling, American politics and Israel's war in Gaza, I recently spoke with David Rothkopf. He is the host of the Deep State Radio podcast and the author of several books, including “American Resistance: The Inside Story of How the Deep State Saved the Nation.” Rothkopf is also a columnist for The Daily Beast and a contributor to USA Today, and has written hundreds of articles on international, national security and political themes for many leading publications, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Financial Times, Foreign Policy and Foreign Affairs.

This conversation has been edited for clarity and length.

Given the terrorist attacks by Hamas and now the likely Israeli invasion of Gaza, not to mention the state of the world more generally, how are you feeling? How is your hope tank doing?

I'm feeling pretty much the way I felt before all this started. There's a lot of bad things going on in the world. There's a great deal of suffering being endured by a lot of innocent people. But that is as it always was. There have always been conflicts and injustices. I believe that our job is to learn from what we see and do what we can do to try to improve the lives of those people who we can impact.

I'm devastated, obviously, to see the horrors of this past week in Israel and Gaza. But we've been seeing horrors of the same type every single week in Ukraine and all over the world. The Palestinians have been impacted by such horrors for years. We live in a world where our compassion gets a workout every day. The challenge is whether and how we can act on that, how we try to help, to make a difference in whatever way we are able.

"Our compassion gets a workout every day." That is a powerful statement. These crises and horrors are moral tests for us as individuals, as a society and for our leaders and other elites. Are we passing or failing?

Our collective character is compromised. There are many individuals out there who subordinate morality or ethics to self-interest and prejudice. That's something every society has to struggle with. We each have one asset in the world, and that's time. The real test is: How much of your time do you spend trying to push back against those who threaten our ideas of how the world should be? How do we help people who need it, or shape discussions and communities that are trying to have a positive impact on society? For everybody, the test is different. But the stakes are always the same: How are you using your time?

As someone with a public platform, how do you negotiate your responsibilities in a moment like this, with the expectation that you will have something to say? There are too many members of the pundit class who offer observations and "expertise" on subjects where they should not. We see this whenever there is a crisis, on the internet and social media. Sometimes there's wisdom in knowing when to be quiet. But so many people are desperate for attention. On Monday they are experts on Ukraine. The next day, they're experts on Israel and Gaza. Then the next day there's something else.

The advent of social media has sent the wrong message to a lot of people, which is that they ought to have an opinion about everything all the time, or that we ought to know their opinion about everything all the time. Of course, neither of those things are true. From my perspective, I hear a great deal from people who actually do know what's going on in these areas, but who compromise their opinion by subordinating their insights to political or social or economic or other such priorities. 

"What we've seen in the media and among political opportunists is a kind of bloodlust that reminds me so much of what we saw after 9/11, where there was political hay to be made by sounding tougher, being more aggressive and talking about revenge."

If I seem a little subdued right now, it's because this past week has been troubling on more than one level. Obviously, it's been a troubling week because we have seen the atrocities that were committed in Israel. But it's also troubling to me because what we've seen in the media and among political opportunists is a kind of bloodlust that reminds me so much of what we saw after 9/11, where there seemed to be political hay to be made by sounding tougher, being more aggressive and talking about revenge. Given the horrors of what happened in Israel, we can certainly understand why people might want revenge. But revenge is not a strategy. Retribution is not a strategy. It doesn't make people safer.

In fact, history shows that revenge perpetuates cycles of violence that simply compound one set of atrocities with another set of atrocities. And that seems exactly where we're headed with these horrible events in Israel. That is exactly where we were headed after 3,000 Americans died on 9/11. It was a horror, and it led us to fight an unnecessary war, based on lies and bad intelligence and contrary to our national interests, where 600,000 innocent people would die in Iraq. America's collective response was, "We were justified because we were hurt."

In the Gaza war of 2014, there were approximately 60 Israelis killed and 2,500 Palestinians killed. I'm not suggesting a moral equivalency. I'm not even getting into that discussion. If a baby dies, a mother's heart is broken, whether that's an Israeli baby or a Palestinian baby, a Ukrainian baby or a baby at the border in the United States. 

Social media really prefers high drama and strong statements. It doesn't like nuance. It doesn't like restraint. It doesn't like stopping to think. But those are things that are essential if we're going to get beyond the passions of the moment and try to figure out how to solve a problem. In the case of Israel and the Palestinians, the Israelis are perfectly within their rights to want to go after Hamas, and if they kill every single terrorist in Hamas, I will not shed a tear.

But I will shed a tear for every innocent civilian that is killed, and my heart will be broken by every step that ensures more violence in the future, every step we take away from laying the foundations for the political solution we ultimately must have. To have real peace and a long-term solution requires a political solution. When what you want is real peace and stability, what you need is a political solution. 

What are the boundaries of approved public discourse, in terms of what you are allowed to say in the mainstream news media and among the respectable political class about Israel and the Occupied Territories? There are some positions and views that are verboten, where you risk being exiled from those circles if you offer them.

For example, the reasons for these attacks are many. The main reason is that these Hamas terrorists are despicable people with twisted values that are fueled by hate. It is definitely not my intention to minimize that when I say there were other reasons. But there were multiple reasons. And the minute you suggest there are other reasons — whether it's because Hamas wanted to derail the Saudi-Israeli normalization talks, or because they saw an opportunity because Netanyahu had moved the military up to the West Bank, because his focus was on further annexations and saving his skin politically and legally — people call you an apologist for the monsters that committed those crimes.

Which is not the case, but if you seek long-term solutions, you really need to understand all the factors at play that led us to be where we are. The Netanyahu government is also very extreme: he has two people in his cabinet who were found guilty by an Israeli court of being terrorists. But if you start going on TV and saying, "I think we need to look at apartheid and the assaults on the rights of Palestinians," then the response is: You're blaming the victim.

My response to that is: I feel for the victim. I have friends and relatives who have been touched by this directly. What I'm trying to do is to understand the reasons for the violence and conflict, because I want the problem to be solved. But in the heat of the moment there is not much appetite for that kind of analysis.

Help me with my moral accounting and some critical self-reflection. Earlier today, I saw a college-aged young man riding his bicycle down the street with a large Palestinian flag attached to the back. He was obviously doing this to get attention. I rolled my eyes and heard myself saying aloud, "Really, man? Now? What the hell." I stand in solidarity with all good people in that region who are suffering unfairly from this violence. But talk about bad timing, given what just happened with these terrorist attacks by Hamas. Help me understand what I was feeling in that moment. 

"My heart will be broken by every step that ensures more violence in the future, every step we take away from laying the foundations for the political solution we ultimately must have."

Your feelings were reasonable and normal. One can believe that the Palestinians have the same kinds of rights as Israelis and that the Palestinians' rights have been violated by Israel for many, many years. One can also believe that the plight of Palestinians who are trapped in Gaza or in the West Bank is grave and deserves the world's attention. But if you have a friend or a relative who just died, you don't go the funeral and talk about their flaws. You wait for a few days at least. It's just the wrong moment.

People are emotionally raw. In the wake of what were disgusting, inhumane, demented atrocities committed by Hamas against the Israelis, people need some time to regain their bearings. When you carry a Palestinian flag down the street, as warranted as that may be if you're concerned about potential civilian casualties in the next several weeks, you've just got to ask yourself: What am I achieving? Candidly, I believe that a lot of the people who are doing that have bad motivations. I think they're trying to stick their thumb in the eye of the Jewish community. 

There are some idiots who are on college campuses celebrating Hamas. That's even a step further. Those people are saying, "Oh well, I side with the murder of babies and the rapists and the kidnappers and so forth." I can basically understand why somebody might want to express their solidarity with the Palestinian people, but not with Hamas. They're criminals. They're terrorists. They are ISIS. They are the Russian army, throwing children into mass graves in Ukraine. They're the bad guys. When people who are on the fringe left behave that way, it empowers the right wing in America to make claims, which are lies by the way, that "the left" supports Hamas and is not standing with Israel. Those on the left who believe such things are on the far, freaky fringe. They are idiots.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


I also think it is extremely absurd that people on the right are trying to claim they support Israel and a strong national defense and standing up against terrorists when they're the ones trying to block support for Ukraine. Ukraine is suffering the same types of attacks as Israel. Or they're the ones who actually support a presidential candidate in Trump who said “there were good people on both sides” when a crowd marched down the street in Charlottesville saying, "Jews will not replace us." How can Republicans and others on the right say that they stand with Israel while they support Donald Trump, who is an antisemite?

Too many people want simple answers when the world is actually complicated. That is true of political leaders and everyday people as well. Two things can be true at once. Hamas is a criminal terrorist organization that deserves to be obliterated. But I'm deeply disturbed by watching innocent Palestinian people being victimized, just as I am disturbed by seeing innocent Israelis being victimized. I believe that the state of Israel and the Jewish people, like all countries and peoples, have an inherent right to self-defense. But I also believe we must respect the human rights of all people, especially in terms of their self-determination, dignity and freedom. That includes the Palestinians of Gaza and the West Bank. How do we balance this complexity? 

I don't think that what you're describing is that difficult. You are manifesting what the moral imperative should be in action. You have values. Are you against murder? Yes. Do you accept that people have a right of self-defense? Yes. Are you against terrorists? Yes. Do you sympathize with people fighting for their freedom? Yes. Are you against the indiscriminate killing of civilians by the military? Yes. Do you recognize that some military goals are so important that there will be some collateral damage? Yes.

What you are describing is a basic sense of right and wrong. The thing that makes it hard is a hyper-politicized atmosphere where people jump to the wrong conclusions because it suits them. Such people do not care about what's right and wrong. They care more about what suits their political objectives, what other people in their group are saying, what is being accepted in the news media and other kinds of filters that distort a person's understanding of right and wrong.  

What does the war between Israel and Hamas and this larger crisis revealing about the differences between Joe Biden and the Democrats versus Trump and the Republicans? This is a moral test as well. 

They're just not comparable. Joe Biden is a good man, a dedicated and effective public servant who's trying to do a good job, who believes in our institutions, who believes in our values, who believes in alliances, who believes people are fundamentally good, and who is the kind of person Donald Trump thinks is a sucker. Donald Trump is a bad man; he is all about himself. He doesn't care. He has no moral code whatsoever. He doesn't believe in the rule of law. He doesn't believe in the Constitution. He doesn't believe in American values. He actually has embraced the tactics and approaches of some of the world's worst people, whether it's Putin or keeping the speeches of Adolf Hitler bedside when he was married to Ivana or celebrating Kim Jong-un or the Saudis. Trump is a racist, a misogynist, a criminal and a rapist.

The fundamental question is: What is so wrong in American society and its political system that a man who should be cast aside by any healthy society is still so powerful? Why hasn't Trump been expelled like a poison or sickness? Why isn't that happening here? Why is it that with every additional felony count and every additional crime, Trump's popularity goes up? That is the riddle of our time. Why is it that tens of millions of Americans are embracing a leader and movement that are fundamentally terrible?

As birthing hospitals close, Alabama’s maternity care crisis is a warning for the rest of the nation

The United States is in the midst of a maternal health care crisis, one made even worse by states who refuse to listen to those who have been in the birth trenches for centuries: midwives. This is currently playing out in real time in Alabama, where the state’s Department of Public Health missed the opportunity to alleviate the maternal health care emergency residents are facing.

According to a recent March of Dimes study, 37.3% of counties in Alabama are considered a “maternal care desert” and 31.3% have low or moderate access to maternal care. This means that almost 70% of the population is living in areas without a hospital or birth center, making access to appropriate preventive, prenatal and postpartum care difficult. On top of this scarcity of care, Alabama has the third highest rate of maternal mortality and the fifth highest rate of infant mortality in the country. State officials should be doing everything in their power to fix this. Instead, recent news reports indicate that three hospitals in the state will soon close their maternity units, including one in a predominantly Black neighborhood.

We know that midwives are a proven solution to increase access to safe, quality care with better outcomes for low risk pregnancies and births. However, the state has made it difficult for Alabama midwives to do their work.

Last year, the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) resurrected antiquated regulations from 1985 to control who is able to provide care at freestanding birth centers in the state. Without inviting any midwives to the table, a group of hospital connected, non-obstetric nurses, non-OB physicians and non-midwifery professionals amended the proposed birth center regulations to their own interpretations. These regulations are not in line with any current standard of pregnancy and birth care in North America.

These regulations are not in line with any current standard of pregnancy and birth care in North America.

Over the summer, the ADPH hosted a two hour public hearing regarding these regulations. Birth workers and allies did what they’ve always done: show up. The room was packed, and it was full of midwives, doulas, physicians, OBGYNS, community members, mothers, and other supporters who traveled to Montgomery to speak truth to power.

Not a single person spoke in favor of these archaic regulations. And yet the regulations remained.

In response to the state’s inaction, a handful of doctors and midwives (including Dr. Stephanie Mitchell), filed a lawsuit in AL state court challenging the ongoing actions by the ADPH, arguing that the state has made it impossible for birth centers to even attempt to obtain a license, creating a dilemma that is both unlawful and unjustified. On September 30th, the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court issued a ruling, blocking the ADPH from continuing to prevent the operation of midwife-led birth centers in Alabama. This will allow midwives in the state to do their jobs for now, and will provide Alabama residents with access to much-needed care.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


Unfortunately, Alabama is not unique, and our entire country is suffering similar maternal care challenges. The U.S. has the worst rates of maternal mortality among highly resourced countries, and this rate only continues to increase. We know that 84% of pregnancy-related deaths are preventable, yet systemic change is too slow and severely lacking. And, like Alabama, many states have regulations surrounding midwifery, making it difficult for them to provide care in an independent setting.

Alabama is not unique, and our entire country is suffering similar maternal care challenges.

Even when birth trauma and tragedy strikes those in the spotlight (such as Serena Williams and Tori Bowie), their stories make waves for a moment, we condemn the system, but then nothing changes. The crisis continues, and in many cases, it’s getting worse, particularly for those most at risk: Black women.

In Alabama, the ADPH’s regulations were rooted in racism and oppression. They were an attack on Black birthing bodies and the Black providers that are creating solutions and working to lower the high rates of maternal and infant mortality in the state. Black women in particular have a disproportionately higher rate of birth complications and maternal mortality, and Alabama has an opportunity right now to expand culturally competent care in the attempt to save more lives. These regulations threatened to discourage solutions to existing poor outcomes and limited access to care. They eliminated the possibility of midwives from operating within the defined scope of practice and expertise. These barriers reinforced the fact that this is not about access to healthcare for pregnant people or about better outcomes for birthing families.

These regulations threatened to discourage solutions to existing poor outcomes and limited access to care.

When those in charge failed to do the right thing, it was birth workers who organized and activated for change. Instead of listening to the experts when they had the chance, the ADPH needed a court order to prevent them from enforcing their outdated and harmful regulations. However, the injunction isn’t a permanent solution. We don’t know whether the ADPH will continue to withhold licenses or try to enforce their rules. Until these regulations are completely off the books, the fight for better, safer pregnancy and birth care continues. 

We need your help to stay independent

Alabama is currently at a precipice when it comes to birth, and the rest of the nation must be invested in the outcome. This southern state – one that continues to have poor outcomes when it comes to birth – has the chance to start shifting the narrative. Instead of lamenting our high rates of maternal mortality, we should be celebrating how a southern state is leading the way in allowing skilled, professional midwives to do the work they’ve been trained to do, while helping to fill in the care gaps that plague the state. Alabama has an opportunity to show the rest of the country what can happen when birth providers work together for the betterment of their communities.

The alarm bell has been sounding and it’s time to listen and follow the lead of those who have been in the birth trenches for centuries. We do not have the leisure to wait while Alabama — and this country — falls further into a maternal care crisis.

“We can’t bomb our way to peace”: House progressives’ resolution demands immediate Gaza ceasefire

A group of progressives in the U.S. House introduced a resolution Monday calling on the Biden administration to push for an immediate deescalation and cease-fire in Israel and the occupied Gaza Strip amid a worsening humanitarian disaster.

The "Cease-Fire Now Resolution" urges Biden administration officials to use the "immense diplomatic power" of the United States to "save Israeli and Palestinian lives."

The brief resolution also demands that the administration "promptly send and facilitate the entry of humanitarian assistance into Gaza" as the World Health Organization warns that the territory has roughly 24 hours of water, electricity, and fuel left.

"I am grieving for every Palestinian, Israeli, and American life lost to this violence, and my heart breaks for all those who will be forever traumatized because of it," Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.), one of the leaders of the new resolution, said in a statement. "The United States bears a unique responsibility to exhaust every diplomatic tool at our disposal to prevent mass atrocities and save lives. We can't bomb our way to peace, equality, and freedom. With thousands of lives lost and millions more at stake, we need a cease-fire now."

A dozen House Democrats joined Bush in backing the cease-fire resolution: Reps. Rashida Tlaib (Mich.), André Carson (Ind.), Summer Lee (Pa.), Delia Ramirez (Ill.), Jamaal Bowman (N.Y.), Bonnie Watson Coleman (N.J.), Jesús García (Ill.), Jonathan Jackson (Ill.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.), and Nydia Velázquez (N.Y.).

The resolution was also endorsed by dozens of advocacy groups, including Jewish Voice for Peace Action, 350.org, American Muslims for Palestine, and the Working Families Party.

"With over 2,600 Palestinians, more than 1,400 Israelis, and 30 Americans killed, scores of others wounded, hostages' lives at risk, and millions in Gaza lacking food, electricity, and clean drinking water, we must pursue an immediate cease-fire to protect civilians and save lives," Pressley said in a statement. "The United States has a moral obligation to get Americans in Gaza and Israel safely home, save Israeli and Palestinian civilian lives, and ensure humanitarian assistance is provided to Gaza. Our shared humanity is at stake and we must move with urgency."

The resolution came as hundreds of Jewish Americans and allies rallied outside the White House on Monday imploring the Biden administration to support a cease-fire. Last week, HuffPost viewed internal emails showing that U.S. State Department officials have urged diplomats not to use the terms "deescalation" or "cease-fire" in press materials.

Meanwhile, the White House and congressional leaders are working on a major weapons package for Israel as it continues its relentless bombing campaign in Gaza, obliterating the enclave's infrastructure, displacing more than a million people, and wiping out entire families.

Relatively few U.S. lawmakers thus far have been willing to demand a cease-fire even as the grisly death toll in Gaza and Israel mounts and the humanitarian crisis in the occupied territory deepens, fueled by Israel's airstrikes and total blockade. Those who were first to publicly call for a cease-fire—including Bush and Tlaib—were attacked by their fellow lawmakers, including members of their own party.

Tlaib, the first Palestinian-American woman ever elected to the U.S. Congress, is currently facing a Republican-authored censure resolution. The Michigan Democrat has condemned the measure as an attempt to "silence" her voice.

Other members of the House, led by Reps. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) and Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), are pushing a resolution that says the U.S. "stands ready to assist Israel with emergency resupply and other security, diplomatic, and intelligence support."

That resolution doesn't mention the thousands of Palestinians that Israel has killed in Gaza since October 7 or the humanitarian crisis.

In a statement on Monday, Tlaib said that "we need legislation that saves as many lives as possible, no matter one's faith or ethnicity."

"I am proud to join my colleagues and a coalition of human rights advocates in calling for deescalation, cease-fire, and a strong humanitarian response that prevents more devastating civilian casualties across the region," said Tlaib.

Arizona is evicting a Saudi alfalfa farm, but the thirsty crop isn’t going anywhere

As Arizona struggles to adapt to a water shortage that has dried out farms and scuttled development plans, one company has emerged as a central villain. The agricultural company Fondomonte, which is owned by a Saudi Arabian conglomerate, has attracted tremendous criticism over the past several years for sucking up the state’s groundwater to grow alfalfa and then exporting that alfalfa to feed cows overseas.

Governor Katie Hobbs responded to those calls for action on Monday when she canceled one of Fondomonte’s four leases in the state’s rural Butler Valley and pledged not to renew the other leases when they expire next year. Hobbs, a Democrat who took office earlier this year, said in a statement about the decision that the company “was operating in clear default” of its lease and had violated state laws around hazardous waste. She also pledged to “hold defaulting, high-volume water users accountable” and “protect Arizona’s water so we can sustainably grow for generations to come.”

That will require Hobbs to tackle a problem that is larger than just one company. Agriculture accounts for around three-quarters of Arizona’s water use and alfalfa is one of the most water-intensive crops in the West. The state may have managed to fend off one egregious company, but fixing the region’s overall water deficit will involve much harder political and economic choices.

“I think the governor was looking for a reason to cancel these leases,” said Kathleen Ferris, a senior research fellow at Arizona State University’s Kyl Center for Water Policy and an architect of the state’s landmark 1980 groundwater law. “But the bigger problem is unregulated use of groundwater in rural areas of the state. That’s the big elephant in the room — we are just not addressing this use of groundwater and it’s finite.”

Fondomonte’s aggressive water use in Butler Valley has drawn attention to Arizona’s lax groundwater regulations and the high water demand of crops like alfalfa. The state has set limits on groundwater pumping around population centers like Phoenix and Tucson, but companies in rural areas can still pump as much as they want with no restrictions, even if that means sucking water away from neighboring homes and businesses. 

To make matters worse, the Saudi-owned company operates on a section of state-owned land in a valley northwest of Phoenix and it pays just $76,000 per year to lease that land from the state. In most parts of Arizona, it’s illegal to move water from one basin to another, but state lawmakers had marked the Butler Valley in the 1980s as one of two places that might someday send water to thirsty Phoenix. (Saudi Arabia outlawed the production of alfalfa and other crops in 2018 amid a severe water shortage in the country.)

Fondomonte has said it will appeal Hobbs’ decision, but even if Arizona succeeds in forcing out the company, the state will still have a big alfalfa problem. The hay plant is one of the most water-intensive crops in the United States, requiring about five acre-feet of water per acre each year. An acre-foot of water is equivalent to 326,000 gallons or enough water to supply two average homes for about a year. Fondomonte told the state government in a letter in February that it grows about 7,000 acres of alfalfa in Arizona.

Producing the crop was a big business in Arizona before the Saudis arrived around a decade ago, in large part because the state’s warm climate allows farmers to achieve much bigger yields than they do in other parts of the country. The state produced more than 2 million tons of alfalfa in 2021 or about 8.2 tons for every acre planted. That’s much more than the national average of 3.2 tons per acreFondomonte’s production accounted for a small part of that: In its February letter, a company official said the firm produced only 70,000 tons of the crop every year or 2.5 percent of the state’s overall output.

Tackling the larger water footprint will be far more difficult. Fondomonte was operating on state land that it had acquired at cut-rate prices, but most of the state’s alfalfa production takes place on private land. That’s the case in Cochise County, on the state’s southeast edge, where rural residents have lost out on well water since corporate giant Riverview Dairy started growing alfalfa in the area. Other foreign nations have also gotten in on the business: A United Arab Emirates-based company called Al Dahra grows and exports alfalfa in La Paz County, with support from the state’s own pension fund. Fondomonte itself has other operations on private land in Vicksburg, near Butler Valley.

“We have a church that’s just up the road from them in Vicksburg and they haven’t had water for three years,” said Holly Irwin, a member of the La Paz County Board of Supervisors who has fought Fondomonte. She praised Hobbs for canceling the lease, but worried that the state could lease the same acreage to another company that might take over the farm.

“Moving forwards, they’re going to have to evaluate how things are done and maybe restrict the amount of water that comes out of each well,” she said.

Foreign corporations aren’t the only ones responsible for Arizona’s groundwater shortage, though. The state exported around 22 percent of its alfalfa crop last year, up from almost none in 2011, but the vast majority of its crop still goes to feed dairy cows within the state or in other parts of the West. Moreover, most of the state’s largest groundwater pumpers, such as Riverview and Peacock Nuts, a massive nut farm operation in the western part of the state, are owned and based in the U.S. Without action from lawmakers, Hobbs can’t do anything about this overdraft on private land, even though these companies may be taking just as much water as Fondomonte.

“Our concern is that one of the things that the governor mentioned in her press release was the idea that the water use was one of the determining factors in canceling those leases,” said Philip Bashaw, the CEO of the Arizona Farm Bureau, which advocates for the state’s farmers. “We are concerned about the precedent this might set for other agricultural leases on state land.” The state leases about 150,000 acres of its trust lands for agriculture or 1.6 percent of its total acreage.

In a statement to Grist, Fondomonte said the company hadn’t broken the terms of its state lease and vowed to appeal Hobbs’s decision. A spokesperson said the company “remains committed to progressive, efficient agricultural practices on all operations.” 

In some cases, locals have fought back against thirsty corporations, but progress has been difficult. Residents of Cochise County voted last year to impose new water restrictions in one overtapped groundwater basin, but the basin’s largest dairy and nut farms would be grandfathered in under the new rules and they won’t have to slow down their pumping. Another referendum in a nearby basin failed after organizations backed by Riverview mounted a lobbying campaign to oppose it.

There aren’t any other takers right now for the water in Butler Valley, but alfalfa’s water demand presents an acute problem in the state’s population center of Maricopa County, which in 2017 produced around 30 percent more alfalfa than La Paz County, where Fondomonte operates, according to USDA statistics. Farms in the Phoenix area have been draining groundwater for decades to grow alfalfa and other crops and until the turn of the 21st century they used more water than the county’s 4 million residents did. That’s despite the fact that Phoenix has far stricter groundwater regulations than rural areas like Butler Valley. 

It’s not only Arizona that has embraced the crop. California, Oregon, Idaho, Colorado and Utah all boast alfalfa farms that stretch across thousands of acres and the crop has guzzled up plenty of water in these states, too. According to one estimate, alfalfa and other silage crops account for as much as 55 percent of water usage in the Colorado River basin and more than half the water usage in Utah, the nation’s second-driest state. 

The reason for this is simple: Alfalfa is a lucrative business. The hay product fetched about $320 per ton in 2022, up from $210 the year before, making it more lucrative than other large-scale crops like wheat. It provides nutritious and healthy feed for cattle and dairy cows, which means there’s significant demand for it both in the United States and overseas in places like Saudi Arabia.

“The vast majority of the alfalfa that’s grown in Arizona is grown to support our local agriculture industry, which is there to support the urban areas,” said Bashaw, adding that the hay feeds cows that produce goods like milk, cheese and beef and that more than 70 percent of those goods are sold within the state. “Alfalfa is a really critical part of being able to source dairy products locally for a large metropolitan area.”

For as long as companies can harvest ample water from underground aquifers or from the Colorado River, they’re likely to keep growing it wherever they can and water sources across the region will keep dwindling.

“The longer this goes on, the bigger the problem,” Ferris told Grist, “because the more land that gets put into cultivation, the harder it is to do anything to control the depletion. As long as farmers have the ability to pump water, they grow what they think is the most valuable crop.”

Chick-Fil-A releases first-ever digital cookbook to combat food insecurity, reduce food waste

On Monday, Chick-Fil-A officially released its first-ever digital cookbook titled, "Extra Helpings: Inspiring Stories and Inventive Recipes from Chick-fil-A Shared Table.”

Per Mashed, the cookbook is free to download and contains 26 recipes inspired by Chick-fil-A Shared Table, a program for participating Chick-fil-A owners and operators to donate surplus food to charitable organizations in their community. The donated foods are then transformed into new meals and served to those in need.    

According to a press release obtained by Mashed, the fast food chain put together the cookbook in an effort to raise awareness about combating food insecurity and reducing food waste. Recipes include Chicken Enchiladas, Breaded Chicken Fajitas and a Chicken and Egg Breakfast Casserole — which are all made using leftovers. There are also recipes for several Chick-fil-A staples, like creamy coleslaw or the famed yet discontinued Chick-fil-A Chicken Salad. Unfortunately, there’s no recipe for Chick-fil-A's secret sauce, so that’ll remain a mystery for the time being.

Additionally, Chick-fil-A will be donating $150,000 to both Feeding America and Second Harvest. The chain will also donate $100,000 to each of its seven Chick-fil-A Shared Table nonprofit partners.

 

Britney Spears reveals she had an abortion because Justin Timberlake “didn’t want to be a father.”

Britney Spears revealed that she had an abortion at 18 when she was pregnant with her then-boyfriend and NSYNC star Justin Timberlake. In an excerpt posted by People Magazine from her new memoir "The Woman In Me," the pop star candidly shared that “to this day, it’s one of the most agonizing things I have ever experienced in my life."

The singer said that the pregnancy was a surprise but for her, "it wasn’t a tragedy. I loved Justin so much. I always expected us to have a family together one day. This would just be much earlier than I’d anticipated.”

But for Timberlake, it was another story. "Justin definitely wasn’t happy about the pregnancy. He said we weren’t ready to have a baby in our lives, that we were way too young," Spears wrote. Spears also said in the memoir that if it was solely her decision, "I never would have done it. And yet Justin was so sure that he didn’t want to be a father."

The couple first met in 1992 on the set of "The Mickey Mouse Club," when they were 11 and 12. Spears recalled in the memoir that she had her first kiss with Timberlake during a game of Truth or Dare. They did not start dating until 1999 when Spears was 17 and they were together until 2002. The infamous pair took pop culture by storm during their three-year relationship, adorning Canadian tuxedos at the 2001 VMAs. Timberlake did not immediately respond to People Magazine's request for comment. Spears' highly anticipated memoir will be released on Tuesday, Oct. 24.

Gaza Health Ministry: Hundreds dead in hospital explosion

The Gaza Health Ministry claimed that an Israeli airstrike on Tuesday hit a Gaza City hospital filled with wounded and other Palestinians in search of shelter, killing hundreds, according to The Associated Press. The health ministry, which is run by Hamas, said at least 500 people had been killed at Al-Ahli Arabi Hospital, while a Gaza civil defense chief, whose department is also Hamas-run, said on Al-Jazeera television that more than 300 people were killed, per Reuters. Israel denied the attack, blaming a Palestinian terrorist group. President Joe Biden on Wednesday backed Israel's denial, citing Defense Department data.

Photos said to have been from the hospital shared widely on social media showed fire overtaking the building, widespread damage and bodies dispersed among the wreckage. The AP could not independently verify the images. Several hospitals in Gaza have become refuges for hundreds of people hoping to evade attacks after Israel ordered all residents of the city and surrounding areas to evacuate to the southern part of the Gaza Strip. Hamas, whose attack last week killed more than 1,400 Israelis and sparked the latest war, called Tuesday's hospital strike "a horrific massacre,” adding in a statement that most of the casualties were displaced families, patients, children and women.

Israeli military spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari told the AP that the Israel Defense Forces are looking into the reported strike. “We will get the details and update the public. I don’t know to say whether it was an Israeli air strike," he said. He said — per CNN — that it is still unclear whether the hospital was hit by an Israeli Air Force strike or a failed Hamas launch. An IDF spokesperson later said in a statement that “an analysis of IDF operational systems indicates that a barrage of rockets was fired by terrorists in Gaza, passing in close proximity to the Al Ahli hospital in Gaza at the time it was hit.” The statement added that intelligence from "multiple sources we have in our hands indicates that Islamic Jihad is responsible for the failed rocket launch which hit the hospital in Gaza." The Palestinian Islamic Jihad is a smaller militant group that also has reported ties to Iran.

Tesla’s $150 limited edition beer, CyberBeer, is officially out of stock

Tesla, the multinational automotive company helmed by Elon Musk, is offering something new that’s unlike its signature products. Nope, it’s not an electric car, but rather, a brooding, black bottle of beer.

Officially called the Tesla CyberBeer, the boozy beverage is described as “a Helles Lager with European Noble Hops Saaz and Hallertau Mittlefruh,” per Tesla’s website. The beer — which is only available as a limited edition set — “celebrates the angular exoskeleton of Cybertruck,” which is “designed to have the utility of a truck with sports car performance.” 

“Accentuated by notes of herb and spice and more notable aromas of tea and citrus, each bottle features a gloss black sleeve with a CyberBeer watermark (that looks even better chilled),” CyberBeer’s description claimed.

The beer is only available in North America. The complete Tesla CyberBeer set includes two bottles of beer along with two matte black ceramic beer steins. Tesla CyberBeer is brewed and bottled in California by Buzzrock Brewing Co.

At this time, Tesla CyberBeer is out of stock.

 

Altruism may exist in honey bees, which is inherited through their mothers: study

A new study reveals a potential genetic basis in altruism — or demonstrating selflessness to benefit others — and it does so by looking no further than the common honey bee. According to a recent paper in the journal Molecular Ecology, it comes down to the development of female honey bees. Because only one female honey bee in the hive gets to be queen, the other female honey bees are relegated to the status of worker bees. The way this hierarchy shakes out is through phermone exposure. Specifically, female honey bees are exposed to the designated queen honey bee's mandibular pheromone (QMP) either directly or through other worker bees. The exposure to QMP deactivates their own ovaries and makes them inclined to instead raise the queen honey bee's offspring, known as retinue behavior.

The researchers behind the paper unlocked the genetic secrets behind how this happens. There are specific genes that cause female worker bees to be more receptive to this pheromone, and consequently to engage in retinue behavior. Although these genes can be passed down from either the father or mother bees, there is only one situation in which it will lead to altruistic behavior: When they are passed from the mother.

This is not the first study to highlight the unique importance of bee mothers. In September a different study published in the journal Communications Biology revealed that carpenter bee mothers spend an unusually large amount of time with their offspring because it helps them ward off potentially deadly diseases.

“This will get worse”: Jordan loses first speaker vote — and even more Republicans plan to defect

With only 200 votes out of the 217 needed to secure a victory, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, lost his first attempt to be elected speaker of the House of Representatives Tuesday in an electoral battle defined by the same GOP in-fighting that led to former Speaker Kevin McCarthy's ouster two weeks earlier. The failure came despite a right-wing pressure campaign to garner the support of other Republicans who opposed him, The New York Times reports.

Twenty Republicans, including powerful members of the House like Appropriations Committee Chairman Kay Granger, R-Texas, and several GOP representatives from politically competitive districts, instead cast their vote for others. Rep. Steve Scalise, La., who the party initially nominated for the role last week, was the number two pick among conservative members of Congress, winning seven total votes, while McCarthy won six. Democrats remained united and steadfast in favor of their nominee, New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, who earned all 212 of the party's votes. 

After the vote, Republicans called a recess to regroup and eke out a path forward. Jordan, a co-founder of the far-right House Freedom Caucus and loyal ally of former President Donald Trump, indicated before the vote that he was willing to force multiple rounds: “Whatever it takes to get a speaker today.” Rep. Jeff Van Drew, R-N.J., told the Times he expects another vote to elect a speaker on Tuesday. The timing of a second round, however, depends on how long it takes Jordan to connect with his opposition, and its success may be less likely than before. “I personally know 5 will change their votes from yes to no on second round. That’s what they told me. This will get worse,” one House member told Politico reporter Olivia Beavers.

“Shouldn’t we refer to her as Trump defense counsel?”: Experts slam Cannon order scolding Jack Smith

U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over former President Donald Trump's classified documents case in Florida, issued an order to special counsel Jack Smith's office Tuesday scolding the prosecutors for not providing access to classified materials to the defense in an "accredited facility" within the Southern District of Florida, MSNBC's Katie Phang reports. The order follows the prosecution and defense's squabble this week over the case's discovery process, during which both parties exchange records about witnesses and evidence they may present at trial, according to The Messenger.

In a Sunday night filing, Trump's attorneys said Smith's office had not yet made around 2,400 pages of classified discovery available for review in the district and asked for an extension to file additional motions. Prosecutors, who have provided over 1.3 million pages of unclassified records in the case, partially objected to the extension request Tuesday. While they did not reject a 10-day extension regarding classified records, of which the case involves thousands of pages, they did oppose any motion to extend deadlines for unclassified discovery motions.

Experts criticized Cannon's order online. "Shouldn’t we just refer to her as Trump defense counsel Cannon?" Norman Ornstein, an emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, said on X, formerly Twitter. "I'm trying to think of a single time in a case involving classified information that my convenience or proximity to access to the relevant [sensitive compartmented information facility] was a consideration," national security lawyer Bradley Moss added. Phang pointed out that Cannon also recently scolded a prosecutor on Smith's team in Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta's contentious conflict-of-interest hearing that was rescheduled for Friday. "I am interested to see how Judge Cannon reacts to the DOJ at this hearing on Friday." Phang tweeted. "Her very visible irritation and dressing-down of the Special Counsel’s team last week was remarkable, to say the least."

Pope Francis laughed when Whoopi Goldberg shared “Sister Act” merch with him

When "Sister Act" actress, Whoopi Goldberg met Pope Francis in Vatican City, the long-time "The View" moderator joked in Monday's episode of the show that she thought she would "walk into this building and I'm going to burst into flames." But she called the meeting an "extraordinary experience."

Pope Francis told Goldberg that she was "very important," before she handed him the "Sister Act" memorabilia that he personally asked for. The Pope also asked about the film, teasing about her iconic red shoes seen in the film.

"You know, we're trying to help bring the sisters into the 21st century," Goldberg told him. Though Goldberg called the film's tone "silly," Pope Francis corrected her. "One of the best things you can do for people is to help them and to have joy and to make them laugh," he said. Overall the meeting with the Pope gave Goldberg a new perspective on religion she said.

"It was kind of shocking, because for 11 years, this is something I've tried to do," she said. "He was quite amazing. He is exactly what I hoped he would be, which is a Pope for all people, regardless of religion, which I appreciated. I wanted to thank him for all of my gay friends, and for all of my divorced friends, because he said 'Listen, God loves you no matter what, come back to the church."

 

 

 

 

Day of the goons: Win or lose, Jim Jordan marks a new low point for the GOP

I think I finally understand George Carlin.

He said that when he finally came to a certain awareness about humanity it freed him to make observations as an outsider which made his comedy more relevant. 

“I sort of gave up on the human race,” he once said on Charlie Rose’s show. “I gave up caring about the outcome. … I watch it with a combination of wonder and pity.” 

I don’t know about all that, but last week’s activities in the House and the coming week of expected insanity have sent me into regions I never thought I’d visit. I’m right there with Carlin on the “I don’t give a s**t” meter.

The U.S. government stands as a mockery to its intentions, and the disease that was formerly in the White House now runs wild in Congress. This iteration of insanity is harder to handle because there are literally dozens of morons running loose, unfettered, without hope or prayer of finding a sane moment. 

When Trump was president, we focused on the disease in one human. Now,  we have to deal with the likes of George Santos running down the hallway screaming at imaginary foes. It’s Kevin McCarthy unable to grasp his own irrelevance. It’s Jim Jordan pretending to be an adult male. And it’s so much more. 

In order to survive the ongoing dysfunction, I must either stick to a stiff regimen of hallucinogenic psychosis made possible via whatever pharmacological concoction is obtainable — or I can turn it all off.

Divorcing yourself from humanity has some added perks that overdosing on your favorite drug doesn’t — including survival, the ability to maintain rational thought (if you previously possessed it, that is) and the ability to discern and disseminate sarcasm.

You have to wonder if President Biden has come to the same conclusion. When asked by Fox News reporter Peter Doocy last Friday night what worried him most about Israel’s impending ground invasion in Gaza, the president replied in deadpan tones, “Death.” 

And some of you folks think this guy has lost it?

House Republicans have lashed themselves to the mooring of their sinking ship, and are destroying themselves in public for the third time since they took over the majority — nine months ago.

Compare that to the rolling peptic tide that spewed from Donald Trump over the past week or so. His claim that Hezbollah was “smart” was only the tip of the iceberg. His trip from relevance to irrelevance is being measured in nanoseconds by the majority of the world. His MAGA maggots haven’t changed; they are what they are.

Late on Friday, the seditionists cornered themselves in the House. Donald Trump squirmed as his last hold on government slowly dissolved in his tiny hands. 

Then came a guttural scream. Trump wailed in distress, both hunted and haunted by his own actions. Along with millions of his followers, Trump was holding out for his last hope: the election of loyal sycophant Jim Jordan as speaker. 

Beyond here be dragons. 

House Republicans have apparently lashed themselves to the mooring of their sinking ship, floundering in a storm of their own making. They are not unlike toddlers sloshing back and forth in the bathtub and crying about the results. 

The rambunctious, impetuous and chronically underachieving Republicans, eager to blame everyone else for everything while accepting responsibility for nothing, are busy destroying themselves in public for at least the third time since they took over the House barely nine months ago. The first time was in the ridiculously long and painful election of Kevin McCarthy and the set of rules he had to swallow, which in turn brought about the second GOP self-immolation, when Matt “Zoltan” Gaetz pulled the trigger that booted McCarthy from the job he’d fought so hard to get. Gaetz frolicked in the pungent aroma of his own stench like a dog admiring its flatulence.

We need your help to stay independent

But they say “three’s a charm,” so some have crossed their fingers and prayed to a big old statue that the GOP can get it right this time. Even so, the only people convinced that the Republicans can or will accomplish anything before next November are also waiting for tickets to Elvis’ next performance.

This is truly crazy, folks. It’s not politics. It’s just self-mutilation and destruction on a larger stage than the Jim Jones electric Kool Aid cyanide test. 

Jim Jordan hasn’t passed one single bill through Congress in 16 years. He’s supposed to shepherd legislation? I’m not sure he’s ever read any. Should he become speaker, the government will most likely shut down in mid-November and Ukraine will most likely lose U.S. funding.

UPDATE: Jordan failed to win the speakership in the first House vote on Tuesday, with 20 Republicans voting against him — a much larger number than anyone expected. He has to win back at least 16 of those resistance voters, so his prospects remain murky, to put it mildly. One member of Congress told me outside the chamber, "He will never be speaker."

Jim Jordan hasn’t passed one single bill through Congress in 16 years. He’s supposed to shepherd legislation? I’m not sure he’s ever read any.

Of course Jim Jordan didn’t come to town to build anything. He came in a foul stench to tear it all down and piss on it, wearing a tie but no jacket, a perpetual sneer and the general demeanor of a waiter in a cheap diner surviving three-day shifts on speed and coffee.

Any “deals” he will now try to make to get the speaker's gavel are irrelevant. A few more so-called “moderates” may fall in line to elect Jordan, giving up their votes to both his overt threats and his promises to keep the government open — but they should know by now that they trust Jordan at their own risk. His deals mean nothing.

Meanwhile, sources told me on Friday that Democrats and Republicans “were actually talking” — but, for God’s sake, about what? Who knows? It was probably about where the nearest weed dispensary was. Twenty milligrams of sativa in a gummy works wonders on most members of Congress, and certainly helps get a staff party started. Those guys need a laugh more than the rest of us — they’re right in the middle of chaos in a blender. And they turned on the blender.  

I don’t buy it: I suspect that little actual talk across the aisle is taking place. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said all he needed to say on Friday afternoon, when he spoke about Jordan’s lack of production and overabundance of obstruction. 

If a dozen or so Republicans actually wanted to join the Democrats and elect Jeffries as speaker, the Democrats would nod and concede little, while smiling like Cheshire cats.

But if Republicans want any Democrats to support a GOP nominee for speaker, they will have to guarantee funding the government after Nov. 17 and also continued funding for Ukraine’s war effort. The menu of possible Republican speakers doesn’t include much of that, even as a side dish. You don’t see anybody smiling on the Republican side of the aisle.

So there’s considerable incentive for the Republicans to elect Jordan quickly, rather than face a degree of stagnation that offers the Democrats more leverage. It says something that some Republicans who have swallowed as much political sewage as they have in the last few years finally find themselves choking on Jim Jordan. That’s a bitter pill to add to the daily congressional swill. Imagine how low Jordan must be that the other primitive life forms in the GOP have trouble accepting him.

Racism, idolatry, violence, perversion, ignorance and vindictiveness are heavy on the menu at the GOP and like a sounder of swine they lap up the fetid slop with gusto and a hearty cheer that’s humorous to watch — if you can divorce yourself from the sheer human anguish of all this. Apparently that’s also the preferred course of action for many Republican officeholders. They aren’t serving their constituents, only appealing to their fans or, in Jim Jordan’s case,  playing to a mirror that says “Caution, objects may be smaller than they appear.” I’m talking about his heart and his head; any other interpretation is on you.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Our system isn’t broken, necessarily. But  many people in elected office definitely are, and a lot of those are gathered in the GOP, a party that collects broken people and maniacs much as a landfill collects refuse.

Make no mistake, the Republicans’ inability to govern is apparent to most people — including Republicans themselves. 

It’s no huge surprise that Kevin McCarthy is a little slow on the uptake. When CNN’s Manu Raju cornered McCarthy last Friday, he asked the former speaker, “What does this do to your swing district Republicans?”

McCarthy claimed not to grasp the question, asking, “That all the Democrats voted to try to bring chaos?”

Raju corrected him: “That you guys can’t govern.”

That’s it precisely. Even if Republicans somehow came together over the last three days and decided to elect a new speaker, the problems inside the GOP and the House remain deep desert canyons in American politics. And a great many people both in government and among those who observe it closely can see no path through the desert. 

The House has been without a speaker for close to two weeks. That’s never happened before in our history. 

But the work still has to be done. The rest of us go about our business, trying to take care of our families, working our jobs and paying our bills. Members of Congress refuse to do their jobs, still get paid and pander to trolls to stay in power while loudly slip-sliding away.

If that isn’t a comedy,  it’s a tragedy.

You know, a funny thing happened on the way to the Forum … 

Tragedy tomorrow, comedy tonight.

Is there hope for canned cold brew?

Over the next four years, the canned cold brew coffee market is expected to grow by more than $400 million, reaching a total valuation of $1.37 billion. This shouldn’t come as a surprise. In 2021, cold drinks accounted for 75 percent of Starbucks’ total beverage sales—a result that led CEO Howard Schultz to describe the company’s global cold coffee opportunity as “simply enormous.” And yet, despite its substantial tailwind, the consensus among my friends, co-workers and online coffee communities (yes, these are separate groups), is that canned cold brew stinks.

When not canned, cold brew has a high approval rating among my coffee-drinking peers. As its name suggests, the beverage is brewed cold, a process that typically involves soaking coarsely ground coffee in water, steeping the mixture overnight and then finely straining it. When brewed cold, coffee extracts slower, meaning it takes longer for the beans’ flavorful compounds to dissolve into water. The process impacts coffee’s flavor and chemical makeup, ultimately producing a beverage many describe as “smoother” than traditional, hot-brewed coffee.

Although cold brew has been around since the 1600s (it originated in Japan), the beverage was not widely distributed in ready-to-drink packaging until recently. In fact, canned cold coffee of any kind didn’t exist until 1969, when Japan’s Ueshima Coffee Company launched its canned, milk coffee product. Per Coffee Intelligence, the first shelf-stable, ready-to-drink canned cold brew sold in the United States was made by High Brew—a company founded in 2013. And by 2014, coffee stalwarts Starbucks, Chameleon and La Colombe had conquered the market.

Producing ready-to-drink cold brew isn’t as simple as pouring the beverage into a can. Although roasted coffee beans and tap water are often sterile on their own, when combined, they create a low-acid environment that offers potential contaminants—like botulism and listeria—a chance to grow. For this reason, the FDA requires all canned, shelf-stable cold brews to be pasteurized.

According to Dr. Bruno Xavier, a microbiologist and associate director of Cornell’s Food Venture Center, the pasteurization process impacts cold brew’s ultimate flavor. “It has to be thermally processed to become commercially sterile,” he says. There are two ways to thermally process coffee: ultra high temperature (UHT) and retort. Per Dr. Xavier, during UHT, canned cold brew is heated to 270 degrees Fahrenheit for less than ten seconds. Retort is slower and cooler, heating the can to only 250 degrees Fahrenheit for seven minutes. “UHT has less impact on flavor,” he continued, citing processing time as the driving factor in flavor impact.

When describing canned cold brew’s altered flavor, consumers have complained that the beverage tastes “off” or “weird.” They’ve also claimed it smells off, as evidenced by studies investigating how manufacturers could mitigate canned cold brew’s “retort smell.”

Non-pasteurized, ready-to-drink cold brew can exist. However, for the beverage to bypass pasteurization, it must be refrigerated throughout its entire lifecycle, including transportation and storage. Unfortunately, the increased costs of cold shipping and storage combined with reduced shelf life, make pasteurization the most economical choice for most cold brew manufacturers.

As the beverage’s growing market suggests, not everyone dislikes canned cold brew. For many, it’s surely a matter of utility, as cold brew—canned or not—has more caffeine than regular coffee. Also, it’s dependable and accessible: You can find the leading cold brew brands at most gas stations, grocery stores and delis around the country. And some people—including my colleagues—actually enjoy its flavor. We recently conducted a blind cold brew taste test and asked participants to pick their favorite of two options: One that we made from scratch in the office and a canned option we bought at the grocery store. The taste test resulted in a tie.

Canned cold brew may not be doomed forever. According to Dr. Xavier, Velcorin—a chemical compound commonly used to pasteurize juice—could potentially enable the drink to be pasteurized without compromising flavor. “It’s very toxic, but it evaporates within a few seconds and the time is sufficient to pasteurize the product,” he said. While there’s no readily available canned cold brew using Velcorin, based on the beverage’s ballooning market, I wouldn’t be surprised if somebody made one soon.

Jada Pinkett Smith opens up about depression, writing “Worthy” and her version of a happy ending

Jada Pinkett Smith has it all: a beautiful family, famous husband, Emmy Award-winning talk show. She is a rockstar, author of a bestselling children’s book and star of multiple movies and TV shows. At 52, Pinkett Smith has lived the dreams of so many people and is still growing. And yet, even with her success, she recently contemplated suicide. Pinkett Smith opened up about her bouts with depression and the road to understanding the things that really mattered on a recent episode of "Salon Talks."

Jada Pinkett Smith is most known for hosting "Red Table Talk" and appearing in hit films such as "Scream 2," "Ali" and multiple installments of "The Matrix" and "Madagascar franchises. She is also a producer, with "The Secret Life of Bees," the Tony Award-winning Broadway musical "Fela!," the 2014 film remake of "Annie" and the 2010 remake of "The Karate Kid" among her credits. While Hollywood and her fans were celebrating Pinkett Smith's accomplishments over the last 30 years, she was fighting what seemed to be insurmountable pain — in her words, "looking for cliffs to drive myself over to make it look like an accident." Pinkett Smith details this and much more in her new memoir "Worthy."

"Worthy" is a deep dive into the life of Jada, beginning with her days in Baltimore, where she was a young drug runner, the moment when she realized that she could be transformed by art, and her journey to Hollywood. "Worthy" answers questions about her family, her relationship with slain rapper Tupac Shakur, her separation from husband Will Smith, and how she has managed to survive and find normalcy while living an extremely public life. And most importantly, "Worthy" defines and documents the many ways in which Pinkett Smith has and continues to heal. 

You can watch my "Salon Talks" episode with Jada Pinkett Smith here or read a Q&A of our conversation below to learn more about the role she wants to play in dealing with suicide prevention, the many struggles that came with releasing this memoir, and while she wasn't rattled during the biggest slap in Hollywood history.  

The following conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

You really were always — and I've told you this before — but as an artist, as a person who made it out of the city, you set the standard, artists and non-artists alike.

Yeah, thank you. We were just in the city. I just did a primetime special with Hoda at Baltimore School for the Arts, and then I went to my old neighborhood on Price Avenue. I went to some of my old stomping grounds over there, Dolfield and Cold Spring Lane. Baltimore is still Baltimore, to say the least. I almost got caught up over there bad, but it was like, "Here's Baltimore. This is what it is." But it's still my hometown. I just love it.

You wrote this beautiful memoir, and you covered so much. I wasn't expecting the book to open up with suicidal thoughts, which is a conversation that we're not having enough. Could you talk about that? 

"I wanted to unlearn what was keeping me in pain."

I talk about that a couple of times throughout the book. The first time, I was 21 years old. I call it a nervous breakdown when I had extreme suicidal thoughts, and those thoughts pretty much followed me up until 40. At 40 years old, it just got really bad, to the point that I was looking for cliffs to drive myself over to make it look like an accident because I didn't want my kids to ever think that I had committed suicide. 

It was really about, I think, that idea that if you have a certain amount of success, and you've achieved, then you are exempt from all the ills of the human condition and that all your problems will be solved. I understand why people believe that because I believed that for a long, long time. But at 40 years old, I just hit a wall and that was it.

Suicides have risen in communities of color across the board. So, again, I think it's very important that you're having this conversation. As a society, what do you think we, as a collective, can do better?

I think that one of the difficulties that I find in our community, and I suffer from still, I'm in trauma therapy and a lot of us grow up in war zones, and there's so much stuff going on, we actually don't feel as though we have the right to feel pain or upset, or that we can't afford to because we've got to keep it moving. 

All of this trauma, all this pain, all of these emotions just get compacted, whether it's anger, whether it's rage, whether it's despair. And I think that that is prevalent in our community. And we just don't have a lot of resources either. We just don't have a lot of resources. I think where we need to do better is that we need more resources and we need more professionals that understand our specific experience in order to help us navigate our emotional landscapes.

As I've grown in my own career, one of the things that makes a lot of people, especially in talking to different networks or talking to people who have power to make certain decisions, when they find out I'm from Baltimore, or when they read one of my books about growing up in Baltimore, it's always like, "Oh, he's from Baltimore." Was it like that for you when you first got into the industry?

Not really. I think it might've been, maybe, after "The Wire." I mean, when you say it now, it's like, "Oh." It's like what you said, "You're from Baltimore." But, yeah, I came to LA in the early '90s. Like, '90, '91. It was just like, "Oh, Baltimore!" 

Lena from Baltimore had an edge.

"There was just a lot of ways we helped each other survive."

Oh, yeah. Lena from Baltimore definitely had an edge. But when I [went] into the rooms, not everybody knew. When I went in there and I was with Debbie, Debbie knew when I came in. She was like, "Tell me about you." And so, telling her that I'm from Baltimore, telling her what my upbringing had been, and I think that edge a lot of times gave me the edge in some of those rooms. And then, sometimes, it was too much edge. But I always have felt like my upbringing in Baltimore, I talk about it in a couple of chapters in my book, the university are the B-more streets, because, honestly, I don't think that, without that university, I would've been able to come to LA and survive on my own the way that I did.

The way you write about Tupac, and you just released that video the other day of you guys — we take that three-hour ride to Kings Dominion. That's our Disney World.

Yes!

But the fun, that moment, the innocence, the beauty, it is such a perfect video that captured an era from the way you were dressed to just that fun. Have you ever felt like you miss that time period, those moments in life, that innocence, being in the School for the Arts, dreaming?

Absolutely, I do. That was a really magical time. Even with all the difficulty and challenges, it was a really magical time. It's so funny because I hadn't seen that video in a while. Before I put out that clip, I put out another clip speaking on an excerpt that I have from one of the chapters that talks about my relationship with Tupac, and when I was watching that video, we were both so innocent, had no idea what life was about to bring our way. It's just so funny how life plays out like that and the fact that we are lip-syncing to Will's song. It's just totally crazy. It's crazy. One of the things that I feel really blessed to have the opportunity to do is really take people on the journey of my relationship with Pac so they can understand our friendship.

I mean, we go through this, but I feel like society doesn't do a good enough job at acknowledging and recognizing real beautiful friendships between men and women. It's like everything's not some type of motive, and people don't always have their eyes set — it's that brother and sister type of love.

Yeah, definitely.

I think you do a great job explaining that.

Thank you. Thank you. Look, and I totally get it. You know what I mean? I get it. Without the context of what our story has been together. I mean, I totally understand why people are, "Yeah, they were so tight. Why were they so tight?" We just took really good care of each other. And that dude was like my father at times, my brother at times, you know what I'm saying? And we just really took good care of each other.

They also don't really fully understand the position that you guys were in. I'm from East Baltimore, so I know I didn't even have the courage to be an artist when I was a teenager, and I wanted to be an artist my whole life. I didn't even have the courage to go away from the status quo and pursue art. So, even being in a space like School for the Arts is a culture shock. Coming from where you come from, it could be culture shock, so you lean on your people.

Absolutely, and because of your challenges, I mean, part of what made my relationship with Pac so solid is because we were both challenged with having mothers that were addicts. We really tried to supplement for the lack of parental attention. There was just a lot of ways we helped each other survive. That's just the bottom line. 

With that, there's this level of loyalty through and through. Specifically, when you get out here in these Hollywood streets, and everybody now wants to love you because you got a hit record or you're on a hit TV show, you are going to lean even more on the people who were down for you who knew you when, before all that.

In the book, you write, "We all have traumas in our childhood that can make us overlook the beauty that surrounds us. Often, we believe we have to focus more on negative events because they caused us so much pain." Do you feel like too many young people are missing out on joy, the joy you displayed in that video, because of trauma? Or are we allowed to experience that joy because so many things are just so heavy? 

"A happy ending for Jada Pinkett Smith is knowing her self-worth."

No. It's really hard if you don't know how to look around you to find the laughter because for some of us, it is not as apparent. It makes it really difficult, but that's why I feel like young people today, we just need better resources. Really, it is on us. We have to figure out how to help people, and young people specifically, with the challenges that the world presents to young people on a daily basis. 

Because here's the one thing: I just had to worry about what was in front of me. Kids today, they've got to worry about what's in front of them while also having all the pressures of what's going on in Ukraine, what's happening in Africa, like "Oh no, in Morocco, there's this whole thing going on." There's the storms happening over there in Ohio. You are connected to so much information. And even if you think, "Well, that don't have nothing to do with me," that stress is still compounding upon the consciousness of all of us — not even just young people. Adults, too. So, really, just finding resources that help us navigate all the difficulties that we're challenged with. We're bombarded with so much information today.

Have you always been so insightful?

No. That's called having to do a lot of work because I've been through so much.

I feel like watching "Red Table Talk" and seeing how you process heavy conversations and heavy information, and a long time ago I had a meeting at your house with your brother Caleb to talk about doing the film, "Charm City Kings." We were having one of those heavy conversations where we're talking about the lives of the people that were to be portrayed in the film. Everything you said, it just felt like wisdom. Where did that come from? 

Well, it's been over the years of just me having to learn how to deal with my challenges. So, whether it's through trauma therapy, whether it's through experiences with plant medicine, whether it's through learning about different spiritual concepts and ideas and different religious scripture, talking to people, along the way I have been so determined to heal and so determined to have a better understanding of what this life is all about so that it doesn't hurt so much. I just was tired of hurting. My whole life has been about seeking answers so that I can just have a more easeful time here. So, whatever false beliefs I might have, whatever misunderstandings I might have about life, I wanted to unlearn what was keeping me in pain.

Are your children drawn to Baltimore?

No.

Can they imagine your reality?

It is hard for them to imagine, but they love hearing about what my life was like. It's hard for them to imagine that their mother used to run the streets the way she did. It is hard. I mean, even going back to Baltimore and going back to some of my old stomping grounds, I was just like, "Wow. Wow." That's when I know God is so real. God is so real.

What was the conversation with your family like before you decided to pass in the final version of that manuscript? 

"They didn't know that their mother was contemplating suicide."

I had different conversations with different family members. It was just talking to the kids about what I was expressing in the book about my journey with them and making sure that they knew. They weren't really aware of how deep my depression was. They knew that I wasn't happy, but they didn't know that their mother was contemplating suicide. So, just know that was part of my journey and that's going to be in the book. 

I had conversations like that, but the entire family has been so supportive and has really been cheering me on. Will specifically has been really helpful in guiding me in regards to understanding how difficult it can be to write your story. He was really helpful in giving me tips on how to get through some challenging moments while I was writing.

Yeah, he's good at talking about how we need to go through certain things to appreciate the things that we have.

That's right.

Was there anything you were hesitant to put in the book that made the final copy?

Nothing event-wise. It's very difficult when you're telling your journey not to feel like you have the right to tell someone else's journey — meaning not tell someone else's journey, like actual events, but even how they might feel about an event that you are experiencing together. I wanted to be really careful of making sure that the lens always stayed on me in regards to what I was going through, what I was thinking, and leave it to everyone else to tell their story, whether it's my kids or whether it's Will or my mother. I can say how I felt and what was going on with me, but I wanted to be very careful not to get too involved about what I thought they were thinking at that time because you really can't know.

Sometimes writing a memoir and telling your story, hurting people is par for the course. It happens, and you don't want to try to assume or imagine that perspective.

Exactly, and that's the thing to be careful of, right? I was there, this is what I think was going on, but that's not for me. You know what I mean? It's just making sure, because the whole book is about my journey from unworthy to worthy.

That was really an interesting lesson because, even in life, just staying open to the idea, "OK, I might know what's going on with me, but I need to listen and look at the person in front of me so that they can tell me, get me out of my assumptions." Because my assumptions, they might be close around the area of what's happening with someone else, but it's never bullseye.

Was it easy for you to write about the Oscars?

Yeah and no. I'll tell you what wasn't easy about writing about the Oscars. It is such a layered, complex event that will continue to unfold for many years to come. I could have talked about it from 50 million different perspectives. It was really just honing in on, just streamlining, all my thoughts. I had so many thoughts, so I had to streamline it, and I think that was the part that was challenging.

My wife is from West Baltimore, and when it happened, we were watching it. She said, "You know Jada's from West Baltimore. She's so cool. She doesn't rattle easy at all."

Right.

"It is who we are."

Right, right.

But being able to grow and being able to understand situations and talk about them is the only way we'll get through any of this stuff.

Absolutely. It's real talk. I think that this life is a university. This life is about curriculums, and we are all here to learn. That was a big learning moment for a lot of us.

You start the book in a dark place, but we end on a positive note. What is the happy ending for Jada Pinkett Smith?

A happy ending for Jada Pinkett Smith is knowing her self-worth. When we know, and me knowing my self-worth, that is the foundation of happiness. We think that it's all about external circumstances, being a specific way, or I want that specific house, or I want that specific thing, and all of that is beautiful. All of that can assist the foundation, but it can't be the foundation. Really sitting in this chair today and having 10 toes down on understanding and believing in my self-worth.

If you are in crisis, please call the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by dialing 988, or contact the Crisis Text Line by texting TALK to 741741.

“We thought it would be very funny”: Biden joins Truth Social to troll Trump

President Joe Biden's campaign on Monday announced that he had joined political adversary Donald Trump's social media platform, Truth Social, with a Biden spokesperson telling Fox News that the move was made in order to "meet voters where they are." Republicans "can’t even agree on a speaker of the House, so clearly, not every Republican thinks the same," the campaign official added. “We will be leveraging the fact that Republicans can sometimes be our best messengers."  

The campaign conceded on X, formerly Twitter, that while the chief reason for joining Trump's network was to fight the spread of misinformation, they also joined Truth Social "mostly because we thought it would be very funny." @BidenHQ's first post reads, “Well. Let’s see how this goes. Converts welcome!” The decision also appeared to be based on a desire to troll Trump's campaign as the 2024 presidential election draws near.