Spring Offer: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Legal analyst: “Ominous” Carroll ruling may foreshadow Trump “incarceration” in hush-money case

Donald Trump's E. Jean Carroll defamation trial could provide a glimpse into what the former president's New York criminal case could look like, CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen argued. That case, brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, charges Trump with 34 counts of document falsification related to hush-money payments the then-2016-presidential candidate made to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

At the time, Trump was attempting to avoid another "damaging scandal" following the attention around his "Access Hollywood" tape, in which he was recorded bragging about how he could sexually assault women, Eisen recounted in a clip flagged by Raw Story

"So, it reminds me — when I look at the E. Jean Carroll case, I say, 'Hey, that's a civil case, tough judge, same thing with the Bragg election interference,'" the Brookings Institution senior fellow told CNN's Jim Acosta on Sunday. "New York jury, same — And we saw they didn't like Donald Trump. Same thing with the election interference. Powerful evidence. Donald Trump's own signature on many of the documents. I think it's ominous for him."

Eisen noted that the category of "election interference cases that have been charged as document falsification" do "lead to incarceration," adding that the "potential is there" for the former president should he be convicted in Bragg's case against him. Eisen went on to laud the New York criminal case, recalling how it was discounted.

People "said, 'Oh, it will be removed to federal court and be tied up forever.' Guess what? The federal court rejected it. They said, 'Oh, you can't charge this as a state prosecution. Election interference has to be federal.' Guess what? The courts threw that out," Eisen said, adding, "That case is on a rocket docket for March, and it's a serious one." 

From “Hot Ones” to “Chicken Shop Date,” the best celebrity interviews take place over chicken

Amid the age of the internet and social media, celebrity press tours have evolved into a spectacle of-sorts. There’s the gaudy fashion: celebrities donning an array of outfits (maybe even 256, à la Blake Lively) at media junkets, talk show appearances and meet-and-greets. There’s also the chicken.

Prior to the onset of the SAG-AFTRA strike, Jennifer Lawrence sat down with Sean Evans, host of the popular YouTube talk show “Hot Ones,” to promote her latest film “No Hard Feelings” over spicy chicken wings. Eight days later, Lawrence made an appearance on Amelia Dimoldenberg’s YouTube series “Chicken Shop Date,” where she indulged in chicken nuggets, crisps and soda.

Noshing on chicken — fried, deboned, breaded or battered — has become a newfound way for A-listers to attain good press and tout their latest (and upcoming) projects. On Thursday, Sydney Sweeney, who recently starred in the rom-com “Anyone but You” and will star in Marvel’s upcoming “Madame Web,” sat down with Evans in the season 23 premiere of “Hot Ones.” Same with Mark Ruffalo, who enjoyed meatless nuggets just one day before the premiere of Yorgos Lanthimos’ Oscar-nominated film “Poor Things,” and Sterling K. Brown, who made his appearance following the premiere of Cord Jefferson’s Oscar-nominated film “American Fiction.” Oh, and there’s Paul Mescal, who recently starred in the queer romantic fantasy film “All of Us Strangers” and went on a chicken shop date with Dimoldenberg on Friday.

Food is a key star in both “Hot Ones” and “Chicken Shop Date.” The former features celebrities being interviewed by Evans while enjoying a platter of increasingly spicy chicken wings. The hot sauces range anywhere from 700 Scoville units to a whopping 2,000,000+ Scoville units and their lineup varies from season to season. As for “Chicken Shop Date,” the online series first began with Dimoldenberg interviewing grime artists over greasy chicken and deep fried spuds before doing the same with Hollywood celebrities. Each interview is framed as a first date and takes place in a London-based chicken shop, a location that Dimoldenberg said is “somewhere you wouldn't usually go on a date.”

“Hot Ones” and “Chicken Shop Date” draw inspiration from quirky interview shows of the past, like Alexa Chung's “Popworld” and Zach Galifianakis’ brash yet comical “Between Two Ferns.” But unlike their successors, both shows have managed to incorporate food as a clever ice-breaker. There’s the age-old expression “breaking bread together,” meaning people share a sense of brotherhood/sisterhood with those they share a meal with. Sitting down to eat (or solely indulge in chicken) with another individual is a bonding moment in itself. “Food is about bringing something into the body. And to eat the same food suggests that we are both willing to bring the same thing into our bodies,” Ayelet Fishbach, professor of behavioral science and marketing at the University of Chicago, told NPR. “People just feel closer to people who are eating the same food as they do.” Indeed that’s the beauty of both “Hot Ones” and “Chicken Shop Date,” where food and its interviewees are both humanized. Coupled with Evans’ down-to-earth spirit and Dimoldenberg’s deadpan humor, each interview feels akin to a casual conversation shared between friends or, yes, a first date. It’s charming, sometimes awkward but mainly a ton of wholesome fun.

We need your help to stay independent

Within celebrity culture, food continues to exist as a gag and a villainous entity. Take for example James Corden’s “Spill Your Guts or Fill Your Guts” segment, a food-centric rendition of truth-or-dare where celebrity guests must either answer a high-stakes question or eat a “disgusting” food on Corden’s “The Late Late Show.” The segment was blasted for being insensitive toward Asian cultures after Corden implied that certain foods, like thousand-year-old egg, balut and cow tongue, are “gross.” Corden later addressed the controversy, saying his show would keep the segment but adjust the foods used. Regardless, food is still utilized for voyeuristic pleasure. Not only are viewers watching boldface names eat, they’re also watching them eat foods that are considered distasteful — which goes against the prim and proper image that celebrities are expected to uphold.

There’s also the issue of diet culture, a perennial specter, especially as more celebrities have hopped on the Ozempic craze. In the past few years, a handful of celebrities have spoken in favor of restrictive eating, extreme calorie counting weight loss: Gwyneth Paltrow said her daily “wellness” routine involves fasting until midday, bone broth, and a light paleo dinner; Chris Martin said he only eats one meal a day to look more "in shape," like Bruce Springsteen; and Rebel Wilson said she ate 600 calories a day for “detox purposes.”

Watching celebrities eat chicken wings — which are known to be incredibly messy — is the direct opposite of what we expect to see from celebrities. It’s why “Hot Ones” and “Chicken Shop Date” feel so familiar and, frankly, normal. In both shows, humans are simply being humans: enjoying good company over equally good food.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


"First We Feast," the online food-culture magazine behind “Hot Ones,” currently touts more than 13 million subscribers and over 2 billion views across social media. On YouTube, Dimoldenberg has more than 2 million subscribers and her show has nearly 1.5 million followers on TikTok. Both “Hot Ones” and “Chicken Shop Date” have also enjoyed their fair share of viral clips on social media. There’s the meme of Shaquille O'Neal, which was taken from a clip of his “Hot Ones” appearance and is now used as a humorous reaction image. An audio of Jennifer Lawrence repeatedly asking “what do you mean?” during her “Hot Ones” episode remains a viral sound on TikTok.

Of course, praise must also be awarded to Evans’ and Dimoldenberg’s impeccable style of interviewing. After years of hosting their individual programs, Evans and Dimoldenberg finally appeared on each others’ shows in what they described as “maybe the greatest crossover of all time.”

“Marvel, I don’t think, has anything on us,” Dimoldenberg told Evans when he appeared in an episode of “Chicken Shop Date.”

Indeed they don’t.

“Trump doesn’t have an appeal”: Experts say Trump may fire lawyer after being “burned very severely”

Former President Donald Trump's appeal of the $83.3 million verdict in the defamation case brought by E. Jean Carroll is unlikely to succeed, legal experts say.

"Let me ruin the suspense for everyone. Trump doesn't have an appeal," Nashville lawyer Brian Manookian argued Friday. "I know the talking heads on TV who have never tried a case or appealed a jury verdict have to mention it. Here's why it isn't going to fly."

A person must "preserve a reversible error at the trial level" in order to have a case with merit on appeal, Manookian explained, ultimately blaming Trump's lack thereof on his legal team in the case. 

"This is why you hire competent counsel. You need someone who actually knows the rules of evidence and procedure," he said. "Alina Habba had no clue what was occurring throughout the trial. She not only failed to preserve any remote grounds for appeal, like a moron, she repeatedly and unintentionally waived them over and over."

"Unfortunately for Mr. Trump, what she was doing over and over was waiving his ability to appeal over those evidentiary issues," Manookian added, discussing Habba saying "no objection" to exhibits as they were entered into evidence. "Because she is a moron who would rather *play* lawyer than do the research to *be* a lawyer."

Former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman also criticized Habba's courtroom skills during a Sunday MSNBC appearance, dubbing them a "comedy of bumbling errors. 

Litman suggested that the former president may consider booting Habba from his legal team after her poor performance in the trial.

"Alina Habba — maybe in [Trump's] own mind is like, 'That's a path I can't go on. I've been burned very severely,'" Litman said, adding later: "I do think part of the rough week he had was having chosen a counsel who doesn't seem to have any, not just chops, but judgment about how you try a case like this when it's already been established and you may not quibble that your client has sexually assaulted the plaintiff and then lied about it."

“So much the IKEA culture”: This is how many millions of meatballs IKEA sold in 2023

There may be no other furniture store as associated with its distinct concessions than IKEA.  Some even flock to the store moreso for their iconic Swedish meatballs than they do for the actual furniture. Perhaps that's why it's not a a complete surprise that IKEA, which just celebrated its 80th anniversary, also noted in its Annual Summary that American customers ate over 54 million meatballs during 2023, country-wide.

Developed in 1985 by Swedish chef Severin Sjöstedt, the meatball has been sold to hordes of fans ever since. During the early days of the pandemic, IKEA even released a recipe so meatball lovers could make the meatballs at home. Did you know that Ikea has also tapped into the plant-based sector? They sold over 4 million "plant balls" in 2023 alone. They also have chicken, vegetarian and salmon variations, too.

In a video on an IKEA food site, Sjöstedt himself talks about how the recipe came about, working on it and developing (and developing) the meatball for about 10 months before landing on the ideal version. "For me, the meatball is so much the IKEA culture," he said. "It's convenient, it's Swedish and pretty much for everybody. And it's still served in all of the restaurants in IKEA stores in the world, joined by a whole family of different kinds of meatballs."

 

Our blood is teeming with “forever chemicals.” Can we remove them by donating blood?

In their daily job of protecting lives, firefighters are exposed to a lot of hazards — not just smoke and fire, but unsafe traffic, violence and vicious cats in trees. However, one of the most perilous risks in firefighting can be somewhat invisible: so-called "forever chemicals," the substances that are used to suppress fires, such as in fire extinguishers and foams dumped on wildfires.

One common class of forever chemicals are PFAS, which stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and they are compounds made of chlorine and fluorine nicknamed "forever chemicals" because they essentially never break down.

This resilience is exactly what makes them so popular. PFAS are greatly resistant to water, grease, oil and stains, and as such are ubiquitous in products like food packaging, fast food wrappers, receipt paper, umbrellas, stain-resistant clothing, stain-resistant furniture and nonstick cookware. PFAS have even been found in our food and drinking water.

"If this becomes a common way to treat PFAS exposure we will need to look at the implications for recipients."

Because they are in all of the products we regularly use, they are constantly getting into our bodies, which seems to have a harmful effect on us. They've been linked to cancers, liver diseases, reproductive diseases, type-2 diabetes, hypertension and immune disorders.

The 285 firefighters who worked for Fire Rescue Victoria — a fire department in the Australian city of Melbourne — continued their public service despite the crises that surrounded them. They were diligent about their work during the Black Summer Bushfires that spanned 2019 to 2020. They persisted even as the COVID-19 outbreak became one of the worst pandemics in modern history.

But these firefighters were also participating in a study to see if scientists could remove so-called "forever chemicals" from their bodies. As a result of the firefighters' efforts and those of the scientists who conducted the research, the public now knows a little more about whether these controversial chemicals — which are absolutely everywhere — can even be escaped.

The parameters of the study, which was published in the journal JAMA Open in 2022, were straightforward: The firefighters were divided into three groups so that the amount of PFAS in their blood could be measured over the course of 12 months. During the 12 months of the experiment, one group of firefighters donated plasma every six weeks; a second group donated whole blood every 12 weeks; and the final group did not donate blood at all.

"Because PFAS bind to serum proteins in the blood, removing blood or plasma containing these proteins could reduce the level of PFAS in the blood. But we don't know for sure."

After the results were analyzed, scientists learned that "plasma and blood donations caused greater reductions in serum PFAS levels than observation alone over a 12 month period."

In other words: Donating blood or plasma can actually extract PFAS from your body. That said, the researchers behind the study admit that the mechanisms behind these PFAS reductions are murky.

"Our hypothesized mechanism is that because PFAS bind to serum proteins in the blood, removing blood or plasma containing these proteins could reduce the level of PFAS in the blood," Miriam K. Forbes, PhD, an associate professor at Macquire University and a co-author of the paper, wrote to Salon. "But we don't know for sure."

Forbes added that "to our knowledge, this is the only study that has identified a method for reducing serum PFAS levels: Both blood and plasma donations resulted in significant reductions in PFAS, and plasma donations resulted in a more substantial decrease than blood donations."

Dr. Anna Reade and Dr. Katie Pelch are environmental scientists at the Natural Resources Defense Council, where they both have background in studying PFAS. They were not involved in the PFAS blood study, but they agreed it "makes sense." In a joint email, they told Salon "certain PFAS, especially PFOA [Perfluorooctanoic Acid] and PFOS [Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid], stay in our bodies for a long time because our bodies are generally unable to break them down to be eliminated."

At the same time, it is known that PFAS can be directly eliminated in women through menstruation, placental transfer during pregnancy and breastmilk transfer.

University of Michigan epidemiologist Sung Kyun Park, who was also not involved in the study, told Salon by email that his reaction to it was "positive" as it demonstrates that forever chemicals "are stored in blood and blood loss is an important elimination pathway of PFAS." Like Reade and Pelch, he mentioned how this is consistent with the existing medical knowledge that women of reproductive age have lower PFAS levels than men of the same age because they menstruate.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"Contamination of the blood supply is yet another reason we need to address widespread exposure to toxic chemicals."

"One caveat is that donated blood is not monitored for PFAS concentrations," Park added. "To my knowledge, no study has been conducted on the impact of blood transfusions on PFAS exposure. Young children may be more susceptible to blood transfusions with high levels of contaminants, not only PFAS but also other toxicants such as lead."

Liz Costello, a PhD student at the University of Southern California who has studied PFAS and was likewise not involved in the study, praised its science as "interesting and relatively straightforward" but also expressed ethical concerns in her email to Salon.

"If this becomes a common way to treat PFAS exposure we will need to look at the implications for recipients," Costello said. "Someone in need of a blood donation may also be more vulnerable to PFAS-related health effects. This study, perhaps inconveniently, also highlights the need to understand how PFAS in blood donations might impact the safety of the blood supply and what threshold(s) might be acceptable."

Indeed, Costello expressed reservations that the study could be used to encourage people to donate blood simply to eliminate the PFAS in their own body.

"Reading this study certainly left me with some new and unexpected ethical concerns," Costello concluded. "As we learn more about the health impacts of PFAS and other environmental chemicals, I do think the implications for blood and other donations will become more important to consider."

"Reading this study certainly left me with some new and unexpected ethical concerns."

Costello added that 'if we can find ways to remove PFAS from donated blood, we might go a long way towards reducing overall PFAS exposure and make the blood supply even safer for recipients."

Simon Fraser University health sciences professor Dr. Bruce Lanphear, who contributed to the study along with Dr. Forbes, expressed his own ethical concerns about the way humans today are dealing with PFAS pollution.

"Not surprisingly, blood banks have not wanted to deal with the inconvenient questions about blood donations having high concentrations of PFAS, lead or other toxic chemicals," Lanphear wrote to Salon. "Still, contamination of the blood supply is yet another reason we need to address widespread exposure to toxic chemicals. Not only are toxic chemicals widespread, our regulatory agencies are failing to regulate chemicals (e.g., pesticides, heavy metals, flame retardants) to protect the public."

Lanphear is in a good position to know about insufficient chemical regulation; he resigned from Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency in July 2023 because he asserted it had a "flawed" way of regulating of "pesticides and other toxic chemicals," as Lanphear explained to Salon. "I already knew it was flawed, but I could no longer be silent about it."

He insisted that there are many commonly used chemicals which are dangerous to human health but are not widely recognized as such due to inadequate regulation.

So what can one do to get PFAS out of your body? At present, nothing — but you can at least reduce your exposure.

We need your help to stay independent

"You can test your water (or ask your water provider if they have tested for PFAS)," Reade and Pelch said. They also suggested water treatments that can treat for PFAS and avoiding PFAS containing substances by "avoiding water, stain, and oil resistant products, look for 'PFAS-free' labels, ask your favorite brands if they are PFAS free."

Reade and Pelch also suggested that people who wish to learn about the extent of their PFAS exposure "have your blood tested and to compare this to the screening levels set by the National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) committee. NASEM and other authoritative bodies have linked PFAS exposure to kidney, testicular and breast cancer, decreased immune system function, changes in blood lipid levels, thyroid disease and dysfunction, changes in liver enzymes and gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia."

In other words, if blood donation doesn't work to remove PFAS, we definitely better find other solutions as quickly as possible.

Here are 5 ways to spice up your morning cup of tea

If you’re like me and reside on the east coast, you’re probably reveling in the cold weather and recent snowfalls. The outdoors may be frightful, but indoors is where time is best spent amid the frigid cold month of January. There’s nothing like curling up with a warm blanket, reading your favorite book and enjoying a warm cup of tea.

Speaking of tea, January also happens to be National Hot Tea Month. The apt theme is a wonderful reminder of the simple yet wholesome powers of tea. Feeling cold and dreary? Sip on a cup of tea. Need a quick pick-me-up? Sip on a cup of tea!

There’s of course no right or wrong way to enjoy tea. If you take your tea as is, that’s perfectly swell. But if you’re looking for ways to add some variety to your morning (and daily) cups, then Salon Food has got you covered.

From citrusy additions to non-dairy milk alternatives, here are five ways to spice up your tea:

01
Add a slice (or two) of lemon

Tea is packed with antioxidants, hence why so many ardent drinkers prefer it over its caffeinated cousin, coffee. A great way to amp up tea’s immune boosting qualities is to simply add a slice of lemon. Lemons are full of antioxidants, minerals, and vitamin C — which are all necessary to help battle the bitter cold. They also tout several health benefits, like preventing kidney stones, cleansing the digestive system and soothing a nagging sore throat, just to name a few. Pair the lemons with freshly grated ginger and you’ve got yourself the perfect cold-fighting cocktail.

 

The practice of adding lemon to tea first began in China and later, was adopted by Russians and European aristocrats. Lemon pairs exceptionally well with Earl Grey, Assam or Oolong teas. It can also be added to herbal teas for extra tartness and sweetness.

02
Don’t be afraid to throw in some fresh mint leaves

Reddit user u/meganips raved about adding plain dried spearmint leaves to their cups of tea. “I think it cuts some of the bitterness out and balances the [flavor],” they said. The leaves are thrown into black tea along with a bit of cream and some sugar. The mint leaves, u/meganips added, also taste great in green tea and chai.

 

Other fellow mint lovers recommended brewing fresh sprigs of mint with various herbal teas, like chamomile, hibiscus, valerian and rooibos. If you don’t have fresh mint on hand, a bag of mint tea also works fine! Simply add the bag to your choice of warm tea and enjoy.

03
Take a chance on non-dairy alternatives

Dairy-based creamers may get a lot of praise for its high fat content, but non-dairy substitutes also have much to offer. First, they provide just the right amount of sweetness to offset the bitterness of tea. Second, they help produce a smoother, creamier beverage. Third, they are the ideal option for those who can’t handle lactose. And fourth, they offer more variety than plain, boring milk. There’s almond milk, coconut milk, soy milk, oat milk, rice milk and so much more. Oh the possibilities!

 

Creamers and milk are best paired with any blend of black tea, be it English breakfast tea, Darjeeling or Earl Grey teas.

04
Experiment with spices and florals

Lavender, rose petals, cloves, cinnamon and star anise are just a few popular options. Take for example Thai tea, which is made from strongly-brewed black tea and spiced with star anise, crushed tamarind and cardamom. There’s also classic hot spiced tea, a perfect beverage for both the holidays and the cold winter months. All you’ll need is water, whole cloves, a cinnamon stick, black tea, orange juice, pineapple juice, lemon juice and sugar.

 

Spices and florals also pair incredibly well with honey. In addition to lemon-ginger tea, warm tea infused with spices and mixed with honey makes for a potent cold-fighting cocktail.

05
If honey isn’t your cup of tea (pun intended), try maple syrup instead

Described as “a less bad version of sugar” by Healthline, maple syrup is another great option for sweetener if honey, creamers or plain sugar aren’t all that appealing. Many tea lovers on Reddit recommended adding maple syrup — which has a considerable sugar content — to a strong cup of black tea. Despite its thick and sticky consistency, maple syrup won’t settle at the bottom of your cup and instead, dissolves rather quickly.

 

When it comes to spicing up your tea, experimentation is your best friend. Don’t be afraid to add whatever your heart desires to create your own unique concoction. The results may shock you or change your life forever. After all, that’s what the joy of drinking tea is all about.

Smartmatic accuses pro-Trump OAN of engaging in “criminal activities” while pushing election lies

An email with a spreadsheet alleged to contain passwords of employees from voting technology company Smartmatic was sent to ex-Donald Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell from the president of rightwing network One America News, court filings claim. Smartmatic is suing OAN for defamation and recently discussed the spreadsheet, said to have been circulated in the aftermath of the 2020 election when Powell and others were parroting false voting fraud claims. CNN examined court records from three cases pertaining to the 2020 election to determine who was involved in the email exchanges. 

The email and spreadsheet suggest OAN's leaders “may have engaged in criminal activities” because it appears they "violated state and federal laws regarding data privacy," attorneys for the voting tech company told a federal judge. The alleged passwords were spread around the time Powell, her associates and other Trump allies made efforts to breach voting systems nationwide to support their claims of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential contest, the court records said. The court filings do not disclose how OAN gained access to the spreadsheet, nor if the passwords it contains were real, and no one from the network has been charged with any crimes.

The Jan. 8, 2021, email from OAN President Charles Herring to Powell is not public, but Smartmatic revealed parts of it in a public filing following the case's discovery process. Though the voting tech company's filings did not identify either party, Herring and Powell exchanged emails on the same date according to court records from a different, 2020-related lawsuit, confirming they were the sender and recipient, CNN reported.

"The pair’s communications about the purported Smartmatic spreadsheet, which have not been previously reported, resurrect questions that have dogged OAN for years regarding its tendency to blur the lines between opinion journalism and brazen political advocacy," the outlet added.

Retired Republican judge: “Absolutely damning” evidence in new bid to bar Trump from Illinois ballot

A hearing officer for the Illinois State Board of Elections in a recommendation released Sunday determined that Donald Trump spearheaded "an elaborate plan" to interfere with the transfer of power following his 2020 electoral defeat. Retired Republican Judge Clark Erickson cited "absolutely damning" evidence in the report, authored in response to a push for the former president to be removed from the state's primary ballot for engaging in insurrection. But Erickson concluded that the elections board does not have the power to give Trump the boot, instead saying the issue should be deferred to the courts. 

Erickson scrutinized Trump's role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol after a group of five voters, two Chicago law firms and voting rights organization Free Speech for People challenged Trump's eligibility. They cited the 14th Amendment prohibitions on "insurrectionist office holders" in arguing for the former president's removal from the ballot, according to The Messenger. The "preponderance of evidence" shows that Trump engaged in insurrection, Erickson said in the report. 

The former president "does not dispute that he knew violence was occurring at the Capitol. He understood that people were there to support him," the ex-judge wrote. Trump's tweet criticizing then-Vice President Mike Pence's "lack of courage" in refusing to axe electoral votes for Joe Biden is "absolutely damning" to the denial of Trump's role in the insurrection, Erickson added. Trump "knew the attacks were occurring because the attackers believed [his claims] the election was stolen, and this tweet could not possibly have had any other intended purpose besides to fan the flames," Erickson said. The Illinois Board of Elections will vote Tuesday on the recommendation. The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Trump's eligibility on Feb. 8 when it reviews the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Trump from the state's primary ballot. 

Nikki Haley is not on a noble mission — but we should still root her on

Nikki Haley may not have a snowball's chance in hell of winning the Republican presidential nomination but she's decided she's not going to go quietly. She's not only needling Donald Trump constantly about his mental fitness, she's taken on the Republican National Committee (RNC) for their servile move to prematurely declare Trump the "presumptive nominee." In her South Carolina town halls, Haley's become downright feisty:

I suspect it's the laughing at Trump that bothers him the most — although I doubt it's the first time a woman has done so.

You have to wonder what might have been if Haley and the others had gone after Trump this way from the beginning. I always assumed he would win the nomination but they didn't have to make it so easy for him. Who knows, if they had jumped on him hard in those days after the 2022 loss when many in the party were saying they were getting tired of losing and blaming his disastrous endorsements, maybe one of them could have made a real run for it.

In the end, trying so hard not to alienate Trump and his followers didn't work anyway. But better late than never and I have to admit that I find it fascinating to watch yet another rising star in the GOP self-immolate on the alter of Donald Trump's MAGA party.

I don't expect Haley to pull a Liz Cheney. She's really not that bothered by the authoritarian turn of the Republican Party. She just wants to be president and would be happy to follow most of the MAGA agenda just with a little less rhetorical unpleasantness. I'd guess you wouldn't see her telling Republican governors to defy the federal government as Trump just did with the Southern border in Texas but she would almost certainly enact the same draconian immigration policies.

Haley's bellicose foreign policy sounds different but in the end, she and Trump would arrive at the same place. Trump would be manipulated into it because he's too ignorant of the issues to know which end is up and she would get there because she's a full-fledged right-wing hawk. Haley wouldn't make a fool of herself on the world stage with Trump's dramatic flair but she seems to see herself as the second coming of Margaret Thatcher so you could certainly expect fireworks.

Her domestic agenda would almost certainly be the same and because she's not crude and boorish about it she'd probably succeed in weakening the opposition by dividing the Democratic Party. She won't succeed in cutting Social Security and Medicare, as she obviously longs to do, but benefactors would be pleased that she had it back on the agenda and precluded any talk of expanding benefits.

Nikki Haley is a member of the Republican Party and it is the MAGA party now, a far right-wing, populist, authoritarian, Christian nationalist party. She isn't bucking that trend in any substantial way so if she blows up her political future by opposing Donald Trump it will only be because she's insulted their Dear Leader, an unpardonable sin, not because she opposes what he stands for.

We need your help to stay independent

Her benefactors in the Koch Network are just like her, which is undoubtedly why they chose to back her. They were of the libertarian bent, all about corporate greed, low taxes, exploitation of labor, deregulation, all of which has been achieved through the manipulation of voters through culture war issues, primarily racism and grievance over status. She is on board with all of that. They don't like Trump because he makes the right look bad and ultimately weakens them, not because they care much about the specifics of his agenda, such as it is. The question is if he can win.

CNN reported that the Koch Network's Americans for Prosperity Action told their top donors over the weekend that backing Haley was the right decision because she is the last candidate standing against Trump which, considering the obvious handwriting on the wall, is hardly the validation they might want it to be. But they have a backup plan: flip the Senate which they see as vital with a Trump nomination in order to maintain their influence. According to Puck, the network's internal polling shows that "Trump is a disaster at the top of the ticket, and so he either must be defeated in the primary, or they need to make a major down-ballot investment to prevent a Democratic sweep."

They aren't the only ones. This week another group of major Republican donors associated with American Opportunity Alliance, which includes billionaires Paul Singer, Ken Griffin, the Ricketts family and others will be meeting with representatives of the Haley and Trump campaigns to hear their pitches. Puck reports that while this group has historically been anti-Trump they are accommodating themselves to the inevitability of his nomination. Some were at pains to mention that "Trump delivered for the Wall Street community. 'It was kind of fun when he won,' one said." Yeah. Fun.

Haley and Trump, meanwhile, are chasing these big money donors all over the country. Trump believes they'll all come to kiss the ring before long, begging for his dispensation and he's probably right. He's holding a huge fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago next month which features an exclusive dinner for those who want to contribute more than the $100,000 limit.

Haley has at least one big Silicon Valley supporter, a Bitcoin guy named Tim Draper, who even wrote a Haley campaign song. (Please listen to it. You won't regret it.) Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' good buddy Harlan Crow is a big supporter of No Labels, the group potentially running a third-party ticket but his wife is a Haley fan who is holding fundraisers with other rich billionaire wives.

What this all shows is that these people have way too much money. They are cavalierly throwing millions away on Haley's doomed campaign and Donald Trump, the self-described billionaire who has an army of marks who are happy to send the self-described billionaire half their social security checks whenever he asks. It's really nothing more than a game to them. These mega donors are just having "fun" while the country burns.  

“Tax evasion”: Legal experts say court report footnote caught Trump “intentionally” breaking laws

A court-appointed monitor overseeing Donald Trump’s businesses on Friday alerted the judge overseeing his New York fraud case that the former president’s financial disclosures are “incomplete” or “inconsistent.”

"I have identified certain deficiencies in the financial information that I have reviewed, including disclosures that are either incomplete, present results inconsistently, and/or contain errors," former federal judge Barbara Jones, who was appointed by Judge Arthur Engoron to monitor Trump’s finances, wrote in a 12-page letter according to The Messenger.

Jones wrote that Trump’s companies have been generally “cooperative” but wrote in a footnote that a $48 million debt Trump claimed to owe to one of his companies for years did not exist, as flagged by The Daily Beast’s Roger Sollenberger.

“When I inquired about this loan, I was informed that there are no loan agreements that memorialize the loan, but that it was a loan that was believed to be between Donald J. Trump, individually, and Chicago Unit Acquisition for $48 million,” Jones wrote, referring to the shell company that held Trump’s debt.

“However, in recent discussions with the Trump Organization, it indicated that it has determined that this loan never existed—and thus that it would be removed from any upcoming forms submitted to the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) and would also be removed from subsequent versions of [corporate financial statements],” Jones wrote.

If true, “that would essentially be an admission from the Trump Organization that all the financial disclosures Trump has filed with the federal government listed an entirely fictional debt worth tens of millions of dollars, which Trump claimed he personally owed to one of his own companies,” Sollenberger explained.

Alan Garten, chief legal counsel for the Trump Organization, denied the allegation and insisted that the loan did exist.

“That’s one of many inaccuracies contained in the monitor’s letter, which we will be addressing with the court,” Garten told The Daily Beast, adding that it was an “internal loan” where Trump “lent money to the entity that he owns.”

But in contradiction to Trump’s own statements, Garten claimed that the LLC actually owed the money to Trump. Trump’s most recent financial disclosure last October stated that it was Trump who owed the Chicago Unit Acquisition LLC more than $50 million. Trump told The New York Times in 2016 that he bought the loan back from a “group of banks several years ago” and chose to keep the debt on the books to pay interest on it to himself.

“We don’t assess any value to it because we don’t care,” Trump told the outlet. “I have the mortgage. That is all there is. Very simple. I am the bank.”

Jordan Libowitz, a spokesperson for the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, told The Daily Beast that Jones’ report suggests Trump broke the law.

“When you fill out your personal financial disclosures, you attest under penalty of the law that the information is true. Trump had to know that his Chicago business never gave him a loan of more than $50 million, as he claimed, repeatedly,” he said.

We need your help to stay independent

“While the reasons behind claiming this fake loan are still unknown, at the very least he misled the government for years about his finances,” he added. “It appears that Trump knowingly and intentionally broke the law. The only question is how many laws.”

Kedric Payne, general counsel for the watchdog group Campaign Legal Center, told the outlet it “seems clear that Trump inaccurately reported this loan, and it’s unlikely that he will get the benefit of the doubt that it was a simple mistake.”

“It defeats the purpose of the disclosure laws if the public does not have complete and accurate financial information for their elected officials,” he added.

Martin Lobel, a prominent D.C. tax lawyer, told The Daily Beast that “assuming Judge Jones’ letter is accurate,” this “amounts to tax evasion.”

“This explains why the Republicans have been so intent on cutting the IRS’s budget,” he said, “because they don’t want it to be able to audit transactions like this.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Martin Sheil, former special criminal investigative agent for the Internal Revenue Service, told the outlet that the whole matter appears “shady.”

“The fact that Jones, as a court appointed monitor, officially references the transaction as a $48 million loan that never existed, should raise eyebrows,” Sheil said. “That there exists no loan agreements or other indicia of an actual loan certainly suggests the existence of an alternate possible characterization of the large money transfer as income.”

Sheil added that an investigation would have to establish intent, which may mean getting witnesses to cooperate.

“Documents don’t lie but people do,” he said.

Trawling for trouble: How fishing along the seafloor significantly worsens climate change

When fishing companies go trawling, an industrial fishing method the involves dragging a fishing net across the seafloor, they wreak havoc on the lives of countless ocean creatures. These heavily-weighted nets can severely disrupt the delicate ecosystems deep beneath the waves. Furthermore, trawling doesn't discriminate, frequently scooping up aquatic life that is unmarketable, or sometimes even illegal to fish, right along with any desired catch. All of this has evident since the practice began in the 14th century — but what has been less well-known is the other impacts trawling, especially climate change.

"Our findings emphasize the need for policy to avoid exclusive focus on avoided atmospheric emissions."

Now a recent study in the journal Frontiers in Marine Science sheds light on this murky subject, while presenting some sobering data: Between 55% and 60% of trawling-induced aqueous CO2 has been released into the atmosphere over the past seven to nine years. The authors estimate that, between 1996 and 2020, trawling could have released around 340 billion kilograms (750 billion pounds) of CO2 to the atmosphere all over the planet.

That said, there is some good news here. The fundamental challenge in fighting climate change involves reducing humanity's emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, which will in turn cause the planet to stop overheating. When it comes to symptoms of climate change like sea level rise and shifting seasonal times, they are baked into humanity's future; even if we altered all of our behaviors for the better today, we still face these outcomes. They will be far worse if we do nothing at all — the best we can do at this point is try to prevent the damage from getting worse — but world leadership has collectively ignored too many milestones when it comes to stopping some aspects of a changed climate.

Yet if the human species was willing to put an immediate stop to trawling tomorrow, doing so could instantly take a large bite out of our carbon emissions problem.

"The rapid release of CO2 from the ocean to the atmosphere suggests that historical trawling has only short-term legacy effects on atmospheric emissions," the authors explain. "Thus, policies that eliminate or significantly limit trawling impacts on sedimentary carbon stocks would quickly reduce this industry’s contribution to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations with maximum benefits occurring 7-9 years after implementation."

The authors argue that the information gleaned from their study could be invaluable to future scientists "for evaluating the reduction of bottom trawling effort as an effective ocean-based climate solution." That said, they argued that further research will need to be performed to fill in the knowledge gaps regarding how bottom trawling specifically interferes with the process that lead to carbon remineralization and preservation. Scientists will also need to develop more sophisticated models for estimating emissions in specific areas. Yet there is one undeniable conclusion from their research: When it comes to limiting greenhouse gas emissions, activists should not only be looking at the air.

"Our findings emphasize the need for policy to avoid exclusive focus on avoided atmospheric emissions, as our results show that trawling-induced increases in DIC [dissolved inorganic carbon] in seawater could have severe implications for local or regional ocean acidification," the authors point out.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"Historical trawling has only short-term legacy effects on atmospheric emissions."

Other recent scientific research has also connected climate change to trawling in the fishing industry. In a May study in the journal Nature, the authors argued that previous estimates of the CO2 being released through trawling had been overestimated "by several orders of magnitude" due to a number of alleged errors in their methodology. Their conclusion was that "we currently do not know enough about the impact of trawling on seabed carbon to make robust global projections."

By contrast that original 2021 study in the journal Nature — which offered the initial estimates about carbon released from trawling — did so as part of a larger warning about the need to protect Earth's oceans.

"We find that a substantial increase in ocean protection could have triple benefits, by protecting biodiversity, boosting the yield of fisheries and securing marine carbon stocks that are at risk from human activities," the authors argued. "Our results show that most coastal nations contain priority areas that can contribute substantially to achieving these three objectives of biodiversity protection, food provision and carbon storage."

An analysis by The Guardian also found that the study's estimate for the amount of carbon dioxide emitted — namely, between 0.6 and 1.5 gigatons of carbon dioxide a year, amounting to an average of 1 gigaton annually — was equivalent to aviation emissions of carbon dioxide in 2019, which equalled 918m tons.

There are links between the fishing industry and climate change in ways that go far beyond the practice of trawling. Plastic pollution is a persistent problem, with a trash island known as the North Pacific garbage patch taking up more than 610,000 square miles (1.7 million square kilometers), making it approximately twice the size of Texas. The North Pacific garbage patch is only a grotesque symptom of the larger problem, as plastics large and small covering the Earth. Much of these plastics come from the fishing industry, with Greenpeace estimating that nets, lines, traps, pots and other abandoned or lost gear from commercial fishing makes up the majority of large plastic pollution in the ocean. A 2022 study in the journal Scientific Reports concluded that "most floating plastics in the North Pacific subtropical gyre can be traced back to five industrialised fishing nations, highlighting the important role the fishing industry plays in the solution to this global issue." On-the-ground workers fighting plastic pollution by disentangling seals estimated to Salon that roughly 70 percent of the debris they encounter is in some way linked to commercial fishing.

As these synthetic plastic molecules are produced — even when we have plenty of viable alternatives — they are disposed of and continue to accumulate indefinitely. Through this process, they pour a massive amount of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere: After all, they are originally derived from fossil fuels. As a result, the UN Environment Programme estimates that the problem of plastic pollution — from the moment a product is made to when it is ultimately discarded — overall accounts for 19 percent of the total global carbon budget by 2040.

Climate change is also expected to adversely impact the fishing industry itself. According to a 2020 report in the journal Marine Policy, climate change is likely to cause conflict within the fishing industry as the changing environment harms the business in innumerable ways. The fish stocks on which the industry relies will become less productive and change their distribution, while coastal infrastructure will be damaged by the intensified elements, to name just two of the serious issues with which fishers' will have to grapple as climate change worsens. Indeed, the industry is currently so under-regulated that fish fraud — or the practice of mislabeling the fish sold to consumers, so that they are not eating the type of fish they intended to purchased —remains prevalent.

Ron DeSantis, humiliated in defeat, returns to Florida a bigger threat

Donald Trump stands astride his Republican Party like a Colossus. With his primary wins in Iowa and New Hampshire – and soon in South Carolina – the 2024 Republican presidential nomination is basically his. On his road to victory, Trump easily vanquished Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a “rival” to Trump’s control over the Republican Party who was elevated to that position by the mainstream news media and so-called traditional conservatives.

But DeSantis’s threat to Trump, which is also true of former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, was very much exaggerated and mostly a creation of the news media and DC beltway political consultant class. After all, why would Republican and MAGA voters want pretenders when they can have the real thing?

DeSantis can generously be described as having an odd personality, strained interpersonal skills, and in total a lack of charisma. Possessing one of those traits would be difficult for an otherwise gifted politician in the age of TV and 24/7 news media spectacle to overcome. DeSantis was cursed with all three.

When DeSantis announced that he was ending his campaign and then basically bowed before Trump, the news media, commentariot, pundits, and many among the public laughed and mocked him. Such a reaction may feel good in the moment, especially for Democrats and others who are desperate for some type of victory, however fleeting and insignificant, in a time of such great anxiety and worry about Trump’s enduring power and the future of American democracy and society. However, there is nothing funny about Gov. Ron DeSantis and the extreme harm – including lost lives – and misery and other suffering that he has caused, and is continuing to cause, the people of Florida and other Republican-controlled parts of the country that are imitating him.

DeSantis put in place policies during the COVID pandemic that led to the unnecessary deaths of tens of thousands of people in Florida.

At DeSantis’ command and encouragement, Florida, like other red states, has implemented a thought crime regime where teaching the real history of Black Americans, and the country’s complex history more generally, has been banned and replaced with right-wing patriotic education that “does not make white children uncomfortable." Florida’s fascist authoritarian thought crime regime includes such measures as banning books, harassing, and firing teachers and other educators who are not in agreement with the goals of the white right and neofascist movement, defunding school programs and departments, and rubbleizing the once respected New College of Florida. DeSantis’ Orwellian thought crime regime is an extension of a decades-long campaign by the American right-wing and “conservative” movement to destroy public education as part of a much larger project to end social democracy.

DeSantis and his allies have also worked feverishly to roll back the civil and voting rights of Black Americans, by for example empowering Jim Crow era “election police”, engaging in racist gerrymandering, and putting in place a de facto poll tax. DeSantis has also provided cover for neofascist right-wing street fighting gangs and paramilitaries to use Florida as a type of main operating base.

DeSantis has taken away women’s reproductive rights and freedoms. He has also de facto engaged in human trafficking and kidnapping by transporting many dozens of migrants and refugees from Latin and South America from Florida to New York — in the cold of winter —  through trickery and against their will.

DeSantis knows that “the cruelty is the point.” To that end he and his regime and their agents have targeted the LGBTQ community by attempting, and succeeding, to erase them from public (and private) life through laws and provisions that make their literal personhood a crime. Leaders fulfill a permission function in society: by dehumanizing the LGBTQ community – and in particular transgender people – DeSantis is legitimating mass violence against them.

There is a great human cost of DeSantis’ war on transgender people and other members of the LGBTQ community, which includes individuals and entire families being forced to flee the state of Florida, public humiliation and harassment, loss of jobs and stable employment, and a range of other harrowing and horrible experiences. Journalist Jeff Sharlet has highlighted the human cost of DeSantis’ policies and the emptiness of celebrating his dropping out of the Republican primaries.

 “As a parent of a trans enby kid attending public school in NH, I'm scared of what's coming in this allegedly 'moderate' state," Sharlet wrote on Twitter. "I'm scared of what's coming if Trump returns. This, below, is foreshadowing. It's also real people's lives. DeSantis isn't a joke. He's a sadist.”

We need your help to stay independent

At the Philadelphia Inquirer, Will Bunch weighs in on DeSantis’ bounty of cruelty:

I’m totally here for the DeSantis jokes, and I hope they don’t stop coming. But I also feel compelled to point out that the way that this small man in search of a balcony conducted himself these last couple of years is really no laughing matter. In the end, DeSantis’ presidential aspirations clung to two things: How much money he could raise from the wealthy, and how many points he could score by dunking on the dreams of the poor, the young, the different, or the struggling.

The modern political innovation of DeSantis — if it can be called that — was taking the kind of blustery rally-stage bravado that characterizes Trump and using his GOP majority in Tallahassee to turn that into all-too-real laws or initiatives. The New York Times Opinion writer Jane Coaston said it best on X/Twitter Sunday when she wrote that “DeSantis’ campaign was like ‘we’re the most online people alive and we’re going to performatively use the state to hurt people you don’t like, just tell me the group and I’ll go hurt them.’”

There are so many examples of folks whose lives have been turned upside down by DeSantis, including a lot of people who decided to leave the state as a new breed of political refugee….

DeSantis’ 2024 presidential campaign will be remembered as nothing more than a punchline. But the American carnage he imposed on everyday people to make himself feel big will stain the red clay of the Florida peninsula for many years to come.

Mocking and laughing at Ron DeSantis because of his failures in the 2024 Republican primary exemplifies a much larger error made by too many that helped to birth our democracy crisis in the first place. The American right-wing thinks in decades and centuries about power and movement building. By comparison, the American centrists, institutionalists and center-left mostly think in terms of weeks and months and election cycles. The mainstream 24/7 news media and commentariot are even more short-term in thinking and ability to conceptualize and understand politics and power.

DeSantis is a prototype for Trump’s successor as leader of the American neofascist movement. DeSantis is also relatively young. He will come back stronger and more polished from his losing experience in the 2024 Republican primaries. Ultimately, DeSantis, because of his education and deep understanding of the law and how to exploit the vulnerabilities in America’s institutions is actually a much greater threat than Donald Trump.

DeSantis is still governor of Florida and the cruel policies he put in place, and which will continue (and get worse) have not ended.

All of those people who are mocking and laughing at DeSantis should remind themselves of Malcolm X’s famous teaching that, "If you stick a knife in my back 9 inches and pull it out 6 inches, there's no progress. If you pull it all the way out, that's not progress. The progress is healing the wound that the blow made.. And they won't even admit the knife is there."

Instead of laughing, such voices should instead be working hard to get justice for all of the people whose lives have been lost, hurt, and otherwise negatively impacted and diminished because of DeSantis’ policies and actions in Florida. But laughter and mocking are far easier, and demands much less, than asking those hard questions about justice and what it will require in the long-term to defeat DeSantis, Trumpism, and the larger culture of cruelty that today’s neofascists and the larger right-wing and “conservative” movement have drawn energy from and made much worse here in America and around the world.

“Terrifying”: Expert outlines “endless” ways AI could “further fracture” elections and our democracy

Misinformation and disinformation have always posed a threat to elections, fostering distrust in the voting process and endangering election workers. But this year's elections are poised to be immensely more challenging with the production of AI-generated content now introducing a new complex dimension. 

Voters have already witnessed the impact AI can play in elections this year when a doctored audio message of President Joe Biden was pushed out to New Hampshire residents, discouraging them from voting in the state's presidential primary last week.

“Republicans have been trying to push nonpartisan and Democratic voters to participate in their primary. What a bunch of malarkey,” a digitally altered voice said. “We know the value of voting Democratic when our votes count. It’s important that you save your vote for the November election. We’ll need your help in electing Democrats up and down the ticket. Voting this Tuesday only enables the Republicans in their quest to elect Donald Trump again.”

As public mistrust in election integrity grows, AI tools’ ability to target voters creates more opportunities to sow doubt in the election process. With the assistance of AI, producing convincing and tailored narratives amplifies the speed and scale at which false information can spread raising concerns among misinformation experts about the unprecedented challenges election officials face. Fake videos, audio, and images have become easy to create using generative AI, yet they can be very difficult to detect.

In other election campaigns, we have seen “faked candidate content” spreading disinformation, Oren Etzioni, professor of Computer Science at the University of Washington and Founding CEO of the Allen Institute for AI, told Salon. Etzioni pointed to Slovakia’s recent election in which AI-generated deepfakes circulated on social media days before the hotly contested parliamentary election. In one, the far-right Republika party falsely depicted Progressive Slovakia leader Michal Šimečka announcing a plan to raise beer prices if elected, Wired reported. Another more troubling deepfake audio had Šimečka supposedly discussing election rigging, including buying votes from the country's marginalized Roma minority.

“AI-generated content is now part of every major election, and particularly damaging in close elections,” Etzioni said. 

Often, the aim is to discourage people from going to the polls by introducing false information or sowing distrust, he added.

Misinformation and disinformation is not a new problem by any means, but something we saw “in spades” in 2016 and 2020, Ben Winters, Electronic Privacy Information Center’s senior counsel who leads EPIC’s AI and Human Rights Project, told Salon. But AI just “supercharges and democratizes” the AI tools that can be used to cause this “devastating harm,” Winters said. He expects that widely available generative AI tools will play a “massive role” in terms of both foreign and domestic interference. This includes text, image and video creation. 

“One of the prominent ways people measure this is how many people believe a certain lie, but I think in actuality the effect is a lot more subtle and therefore harder to track despite being equally damaging.”

“I think it will be used by campaigns in both legitimate and misleading ways, but the bulk of the impact will be by outside users,” Winters said. “I think this is in addition to everything that was used before, and a lot of the technological tools that will have the most impact are data brokers and means of distribution like robotexts, robocalls or social media.”

AI-manipulated videos and audio can often be hard to differentiate from real ones for the untrained eye, presenting a unique challenge in the 2024 election. AI tools can create deepfakes making it easier to disseminate disinformation.

Researchers from the University of Amsterdam conducted an experiment to assess the impact of AI-generated disinformation on people’s political preferences by creating a deepfake video of a politician offending his religious voter base. The study revealed that religious Christian voters who were exposed to the deepfake video had more unfavorable attitudes toward the politician compared to those in the control group.

In the U.S., some campaigns have already experimented with the technology. Soon after President Biden announced his re-election bid, the Republican National Committee responded by creating an AI-generated video illustrating a dystopian version of the future if he wins a second term. The video includes AI-generated images depicting Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris celebrating at an Election Day party followed by imagined reports of international and domestic crises.

We need your help to stay independent

The presidential campaign for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis employed similar tactics, releasing a video on social media that depicts images generated by AI to show former President Donald Trump hugging Dr. Anthony Fauci. The Democratic Party also tested the use of AI, writing fund-raising messages and quickly found that these drafts were often better at encouraging engagement and donations than copy written entirely by humans, The New York Times reported

The use of AI technology has “endless” potential implications for voter behavior and election outcomes, Winters pointed out, adding that “it’s really quite terrifying.”

AI-generated content provides an opportunity for any political actor to discredit opponents or fabricate political scandals to advance their agenda. This can ultimately lead to voters making misinformed decisions based on false information.

Depending on the content, people can “feel scared” to vote due to safety concerns, individuals could be misinformed about when and where to vote and in some cases, people might not vote for a specific candidate “out of fear or blatantly false information,” Winters explained. There is also a “risk” of people seeking donations to financially harm voters. 

“I think AI generated election-related information will really further fracture our already shaky information ecosystem,” Winters said.

Etzioni suggests we need improved technology for detecting deepfakes and better regulation to safeguard elections from the influence of AI-generated misinformation, pointing to a new law in Minnesota, which prohibits the misuse of manipulated video, images and audio that seek to influence elections

The regulations took effect last summer, making Minnesota the first state to address fears about the growing threats artificial intelligence poses to elections, Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon told CBS News.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The law prohibits the use of AI-generated content if it's created without the consent of the person, specifically when created with the intent of harming a candidate or influencing an election within 90 days of Election Day, the outlet reported. 

While the use of AI tools have introduced more opportunities to create and spread misinformation, propaganda and conspiracy theories during election periods, what’s more concerning is that there are only “few efforts” available to “track it or quantify it,” Winters pointed out. 

“One of the prominent ways people measure this is how many people believe a certain lie, but I think in actuality the effect is a lot more subtle and therefore harder to track despite being equally damaging,” Winters said. 

There needs to be a private right of action to enforce “unfair and deceptive practices” from bad actors that create and disseminate mis- and disinformation, he added. 

But in terms of cultural policy decisions, there needs to be a normalization of little media literacy practices, Winters said. This includes the “interstitials” for sharing election-related information on social media, only clicking on links that are actually from the source and using a “trustworthy .gov” for election-related misinformation. 

At the same time, it is crucial for federal, state and local election officials to “purposefully” share accurate information from “clearly authoritative sources to crowd out the false ones,” Winters explained. It’s also on regulators like the Federal Election Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Department of Justice among others to affirmatively make people aware they can report this type of information.

The Trump White House was hopped up on Air Force “go pills” because of course it was

I bet the best part of working in the Trump White House was the drugs. We’re talking about the headquarters of the most powerful man on earth, here — the political wildlife preserve that operates with near-perfect impunity and has its own in-house unlicensed pharmacy. And we’re not talking about the Carter administration, either. 

The joint was under the rule of a geriatric, not-quite-strongman with a spray tan, who peaked in the ‘80s like some kind of John Hughes movie villain and appeared in live presidential debates with what looked like a classic snow-drip sniffle. So you gotta think: Who’s going stop you from getting ungodly high, on whatever you want, whenever you want, in a place like that? 

D.C.’s second ward has always been a speed-fueled judicial Twilight Zone where badge-flashing gentry slither through legal-immunity loopholes from K Street to Federal Triangle while simultaneously inventing new reasons weed can’t be legal. So I’m sure those in the Beltway are wondering why any American would be shocked about the Defense Department Inspector General’s latest report. Sure, it documents how the White House Medical Unit’s pill mill was slinging premium-grade uppers, pro bono, to random staff with the festive abandon of a Cancun DJ firing a “Spring Break 2018” t-shirt cannon at a bunch of topless undergrads. But, come on. 

"Dr. [redacted] asked if I could hook up this person with some Provigil as a parting gift."

The Beltway crowd are also probably wondering the same thing you and I are: What did people think was going on in there when they saw random midnight tweets from POTUS that looked like bad English translations of Ambientoxicated nightmare scripts? How did people think a staff of about 370 kept the executive branch’s lights on 24 hours a day, while still cleaning up the constant FEMA-level aftermath created by Blunder-cane Don? 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


Besides, even those who didn’t already know about D.C. dealers got an earful in 2018 when a bunch of staffers grew sick of White House physician Ronny Jackson being called “candy man” just because he was slinging unprescribed Pez packets like everyone else. The inspector general’s new investigation confirms that earlier report, and tracks the pill trail through White House records from 2017 through 2019. And they didn’t go for the cheap stuff, either. 

“We concluded that, over a three‑year period, the White House Medical Unit spent an estimated $46,500 for brand name Ambien, which is 174 times more expensive than the generic equivalent. Over the same period, the White House Medical Unit also spent an estimated $98,000 for brand name Provigil, which is 55 times more expensive than the generic equivalent,” the report said. 

Trump’s White House staff would not be the first to burn the midnight oil by getting lit on the mother-of-all-uppers, that premium twitch fuel called modafinil — or its brand-name version, Provigil. God knows those West Wing walk-and-talks don’t happen without a little methylphenidate magic, but the Air Force “go pill” moda’ (as its called) is the cleanest, most surreal upper you can get if you’re looking for something that stays conveniently stocked. (There’s a reason it’s prescribed for narcolepsy.)

This stuff was tested on Black Hawk helicopter and F-117 fighter pilots, and hits harder than a Shawshank prison guard. It probably didn’t help matters that, as far as the historical list of prominent names is concerned, a lot of Trump’s appointees didn’t exactly have to be Obama-grade Brain Trust material or have Air Force ASVAB scores to get a gig shuffling Don’s paperwork — so long as they kept the donors coming and the Boogaloo Boys hard. 

“Dr. [redacted] asked if I could hook up this person with some Provigil as a parting gift for leaving the White House,” said one of the 70 witnesses interviewed for the report. “I’m not sure if it was okay as far as, like, what’s medically allowed. But in the unit, it was authorized for us to do that kind of stuff.”

You’re pulling an all-nighter drafting policy notes for Small Hand Nuke ahead of his 3 a.m. phoner with Moscow? Modafinil’s got you. You’re stuck in your sweat-stained Brooks Brothers button-down for 18 hours while juggling three cell phones and getting crop-dusted by the football team who just ate a cold banquet of McDonald’s in the Oval? Modafinil for that, too. You’re spinning the latest military fiasco into publicity gold before the press gets wind of it, while schlepping a dozen boxes of classified intelligence documents into a tacky Florida condo and hoping your face isn’t recorded by the FBI? Praise the Lord, and pass the Provigil. 

Praise the Lord, and pass the Provigil.

“We would normally make these packets of Ambien and Provigil, and a lot of times they’d be in like five tablets in a zip‑lock bag. And so traditionally, too, we would hand these out. … But a lot of times the senior staff would come by or their staff representatives… would come by the residence clinic to pick it up. And it was very much a, 'hey, I’m here to pick this up for Ms. X.' And the expectation was we just go ahead and pass it out," said another witness. 

A witness? Or an angel? You decide. As far as I’m concerned, a handful of team-no-sleep interns and bureaucratic nerds are probably the only reason this country stayed running some nights. And if they hadn’t had the blessing of a tidy little Ziploc baggie and a blind-eye kindly turned, those noble few would have no doubt had to take more desperate measures. How else could anyone of conscience survive the Pennsylvania Avenue fish bowl during a four-year demolition derby of the country, which then climaxed with a literal attempted coup?

Those desperate measures would have undoubtedly been even more expensive and manic. And, sweet merciful maker, you can bet your baggies that White House cocaine hits harder than a Honduran hanger-brick hits the California coastline. But don’t take my word for it — just ask Oliver North.  

An earlier version of this article originally appeared in Salon's Lab Notes, a weekly newsletter from our Science & Health team.

Nancy Pelosi suspects pro-Palestine protesters of being in cahoots with Russia

Former U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi made a number of controversial statements during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, voicing her opinion that protesters calling for a cease-fire in Gaza are in someway in cahoots with Russia, urging the FBI to conduct a probe.

"For them to call for a ceasefire is Mr. Putin's message. Make no mistake," Pelosi said. "This is directly connected to what he would like to see . . . I think some of these protesters are spontaneous, and organic, and sincere. Some I think are connected to Russia. Some financing should be investigated and I want to ask the FBI to investigate that."

As Reuters points out in its coverage of Pelosi's interview, her comments "marked the first time a prominent U.S. lawmaker has accused Russia's leader of backing U.S. protesters calling for a ceasefire."

Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesperson for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, issued a statement on Pelosi's comments, saying, "It is unconscionable that an individual with such influence in this nation would spread unsubstantiated smears targeting those who seek an end to the slaughter of civilians in Gaza and a just resolution to that conflict. Her comments once again show the negative impact of decades of dehumanization of the Palestinian people."

A spokesperson for Pelosi said in a statement to Salon: “As Speaker Pelosi said on CNN, we have to focus on stopping the suffering in Gaza, and she will continue demanding that all hostages be freed now. Speaker Pelosi has always supported and defended the right of all Americans to make their views known through peaceful protest. Informed by three decades on the House Intelligence Committee, Speaker Pelosi is acutely aware of how foreign adversaries meddle in American politics to sow division and impact our elections, and she wants to see further investigation ahead of the 2024 election.”

“Saturday Night Live” pokes at Stanley craze in “Big Dumb Cups” sketch

In a perfect follow-up to the popular 2023 sketch, "Big Dumb Hat," host Dakota Johnson joined "Saturday Night Live" cast members Chloe Fineman and Heidi Gardner this weekend to poke at the Stanley cup craze with "Big Dumb Cups," a hilarious riff on women between the ages of 12 and 70 who go to Target every damn day and are physically or at least spiritually blond.

Mixed in with the refrain, "Hey, mama," the three women — still wearing their big dumb hats — sing the praises of their insulated cups with built-in straws, as Johnson's morphs to the size of a Fiat.

"It's more than just a cup," Gardner says. "It's a big cup."

"Is there a void in your life? Fill it with cup," Fineman adds.

Commenting on the violence that has ensued in stores over women defying safety and reason to obtain these cups, the sketch makes mention of how special attention needs to be made in order to clean them properly, especially their straws. I personally learned this lesson on cleaning reusable straws the hard way when, after offering guests cocktails in mason jars with metal straws not too long ago, I had to lie and say that the green flecks emerging in their drinks was spirulina when it was, in fact, chunks of mold.

Watch "Big Dumb Cups" here:

Adult eating disorders are on the rise, and they’re harder to diagnose and treat

I hadn't seen my friend in a long time, and when we met up for brunch I thought she looked great. The years had seemed to have had no effect on her; she was the same chic, athletic woman she'd been back when we'd lived a few blocks apart. But when I ordered my meal, she said she wasn't hungry and ordered a black tea. And then she told me she'd recently been diagnosed with anorexia. 

For many of us, the default image of someone with an eating disorder is a waif thin adolescent white girl, or maybe a gaunt matron, the kind of woman Tom Wolfe once dubbed a "social X-ray." Yet I assumed I knew better. My own mother struggled with eating disorders her whole life, and I've watched friends of all shapes, sizes and genders go in and out of their own sometimes catastrophic relationships with food. Why then had I been so blindsided that Sunday at brunch? Why hadn't I recognized how invisible eating disorders can be, especially in people we don't expect to have them? 

While eating disorders, which can encompass — anorexia, bulimia, binge eating and other conditions and behaviors — typically manifest in adolescence and mostly in females (roughly 90%), they can strike anyone at any time, across a swath of populations. The Center for Women's Health at Oregon Health & Science University reports that "Eating disorders are now on the rise worldwide. Between 2000 and 2018, prevalence more than doubled (3.4% to 7.8% of all people)." And when they show up in older people, the causes can be different, the symptoms can be harder to detect and the stigma around grappling with disorders often flippantly associated with privileged young girls can make them more challenging to treat.

"Adults might not display the 'classic' symptoms we associate with these disorders, such as extreme weight loss," explains Dr. Judith Zackson, the founder and clinical director of Greenwich Psychology. The National Eating Disorders Foundation notes that fewer than 6% of people with eating disorders are underweight. "Instead," she says, "they might exhibit more subtle signs like restrictions in eating habits, excessive concern over body image despite a healthy weight, or over-exercising."

Even when an adult does undergo a weight change in either direction, it may go unrecognized or remarked on because, as Dr. Kevin Huffman, a primary care physician and Medical Director of Florida Injury Centers says, "They could merely mirror natural fluctuations associated with aging." He adds, "Adding to this complexity is the patients’ tendency — being mature — to develop refined methods of camouflage over time." An older person with an eating disorder is also unlikely to be as well observed as a young person, whose parents and teachers will be more attuned to their habits. Whether we live on our own or with others, most of us don't share all our meals with the same people every day. And even if we do, who's going to say something if a fellow grown-up's habits seem unusual or restrictive — especially when unusual and restrictive eating is so validated and encouraged? 

"The behavior is largely celebrated by modern culture — and often by the person's doctors and health care providers."

"The most under-diagnosed ED (eating disorder) in adulthood is orthorexia, which presents as a rigid set of rules around eating 'clean,'" says Lauren Napolitano, a psychologist in Philadelphia specializing in eating disorders. "This disorder starts as a person doing a 'Whole 30' or 'Dry January' and then slowly morphs into eliminating many different food groups (gluten, carbs, processed food, alcohol, etc.) In the beginning people are impressed with the person's commitment to their health, but over time the rules become increasingly rigid such that this person dreads eating with other people or dining in a restaurant. Their anxiety about ingesting 'non-clean' food rules their life. If you look at TikTok and Instagram, there are tons of social media influencers who are unwittingly endorsing orthorexia by posting 'What I eat in a day' videos where the foods eaten are only fruits and vegetables." And she observes, "Orthorexia is hard to treat in mid-life in part because the behavior is largely celebrated by modern culture — and often by the person's doctors and health care providers."

Katherine Metzelaar, a dietitian and certified intuitive eating counselor and founder of Bravespace Nutrition, says she's observed a similar phenomenon in her practice. "Most adults cannot recognize when they have an ED because so many of the behaviors are normalized in our dieting and wellness culture," she says. "Many adults I work with don't think they have an ED coming in, and realize after some time that actually, they meet criteria for an ED." That's why, she says, "It's essential to consider the life stage someone is in and how long they've been in the ED because that is all important in the recovery process. Many people that I work with have been stuck in disordered eating or the ED for their whole life."

In a culture where skipping meals and powering through the work and parenting day are seen as a badge of honor, it's not a red flag for someone to go without eating. I certainly didn't bat an eye when my friend didn't order any food at a get together we'd specifically arranged at a restaurant. You know why? Because I can't count the number of times I've gone out with friends and they didn't consume a bite.

"Many people that I work with have been stuck in disordered eating for their whole life."

If eating disorders in older people look different than they do in adolescents, their causes are often distinct as well. They often start with three central triggers, explains Mary Anne Cohen, a psychotherapist and Director of the New York Center for Eating Disorders. "A person develops an eating disorder as a teenager, never resolves it, and it persists through various stages of life. A person develops an eating disorder as a teenager, succeeds in resolving it, but relapses when triggered as a middle aged person. Or, a person begins suffering from an eating disorder or body image dissatisfaction for the first time as an adult. The disorder flares up during periods of exceptional stress, such as any major change that shakes the foundation of how a person defines themself. Transitions, ruptures, and grief create the perfect storm for eating disorders to take root."

Cohen cites a number of adult and midlife touchpoints: "Struggles around loss and grief, transitions and fear, uncertainty and the anxious need to be in control. Concerns around an empty nest, retirement, caregiving or death of older parents, possible divorce, menopause and the illness of one’s self or loved ones can get detoured toward eating disorders and body preoccupation." And in moments of stress and change, she says, "Older people often crystallize their emotional pain into one concrete problem — 'I hate my aging body. I need to change it, and change it, and change it some more.'"

Even though my friend couldn't eat with me that recent Sunday we spent together, I'm heartened that she did feel comfortable talking plainly and honestly about her situation, and I'm hopeful for what lies ahead for her. An eating disorder is a brave thing to own up to at our age. "Unlike adolescents, adults might have decades of underlying issues compounded by life stressors like career pressure or familial responsibilities," says Dr. Judith Zackson, adding, "There's a critical need for greater awareness and understanding. The stigma and shame associated with these disorders in adults can be a significant barrier to seeking help. Support for someone with an eating disorder involves patience, empathy, and understanding." And, she says encouragingly, "Recovery is a journey, and with the right support, it is attainable." 

 

 

 

Protesters fling soup at the Mona Lisa in demand for healthy and sustainable food

Leonardo da Vinci's most famous painting, the Mona Lisa, is in need of a good wiping down after protesters splattered its protective casing and an expanse of the wall behind it with soup on Sunday, causing chaos at the Louvre in Paris.

According to BBC, two women belonging to the group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Counterattack) claimed responsibility for the vandalism on the 500-year-old oil painting — which saw no lasting damage from their efforts — calling for the right to "healthy and sustainable food."

Cameras in the Salle des Etats, where the painting is displayed, caught footage of the event, which can be seen below, and the women can be heard yelling "What is more important? Art or the right to healthy and sustainable food? Your agricultural system is sick. Our farmers are dying at work."

Reacting to the situation quickly, museum security positioned black screens around the women to defuse the situation, and then called for a brief evacuation. Per the BBC's reporting, this is not the first attack on the Mona Lisa. It has been behind safety glass since the early 1950s, after damage caused by a visitor pouring acid on it. 

Swing Left fights for the future: “One-stop shopping” for progressive wins in 2024 and beyond

Swing Left was launched in 2017, as the first Women's March dwarfed the crowd at Donald Trump's inauguration. Its immediate goal was winning back the House as a check on Trump’s power. Beyond that, it created an organizing strategy that gave activists and small donors a flexible, effective way to partner with people on the ground in the swing districts where key electoral battles would likely be fought.

The response was immediate and overwhelming, as I reported that same month, and the results in the 2018 midterms were similarly impressive: Out of 84 districts targeted by Swing Left, 16 stayed blue and 39 flipped from red to blue, accounting for all but one of the 40 Democratic pickups in that cycle. 

Swing Left's crucial innovation lay in providing avenues for volunteers and donors in solidly blue cities and regions to connect with under-resourced allies in outer-suburban, exurban and even rural areas where there were winnable or at least competitive races. 

“The core of our mission has remained really simple," Swing Left executive director Yasmin Radjy told Salon. "We believe people around the country have either time, money or a combination thereof that they're not always sure where to direct. So we're the one-stop shop to make sure that they're directing their resources towards the most competitive races for Democrats to gain power.”

Seven years later, this basic focus remains central to Swing Left, even as its strategy and tactics have evolved, as reflected in its Jan. 25 kickoff for the 2024 election and a series of interviews with Salon. 

After the 2018 midterms, Radjy said, “We looked in the mirror and said, ‘Is our mission about the House, or is it really about the balance of power for Democrats?’" The answer was clearly the latter: In 2020, Radjy said, Swing Left understood that "in order to move power away from Donald Trump … we were going to need to win other levels of government,” beginning with the federal trifecta — electing Joe Biden and winning majorities in both houses of Congress — and reaching all the way down to state legislatures.

“The fight ahead of us was not just an immediate one," Radjy said," but also a long-term one of really winning back our democracy.” The result was a “super-state strategy” based on the principle that the most important battles for political control. were concentrated in just 12 states.  

In 2024, Swing Left’s 12 super-states have been divided into three different groups with different characteristics — and, believe it or not, a sense of strong momentum. "Last year, basically everything we wanted we won,” said Matt Caffrey, the Swing Left director of grassroots organizing. “We sent buses from Chicago to Wisconsin for the Supreme Court race there," which was won decisively by a Democrat, "and from D.C. down to Virginia for the legislative races," where Democrats regained full control of the statehouse. They also did "a ton of organizing in Ohio for those two ballot initiatives” that enshrined reproductive rights in that state's constitution. 

Democrats narrowly lost control of the House in 2022, but the "red wave" predicted by mainstream media never materialized, and the thin margin of defeat was well within the range, Swing Left activists say, where organizing makes a difference. “We lost the House by just 6,675 votes” spread across a handful of districts, according to Radjy, and they fully intend to win it back “by doing early and deep work, both on defense and on offense.”

Swing Left has a “watch list” of key races that may change as conditions change, Radjy said, but the strategic framework of the super-states is set. “Eight of those states are what we call 'nested targets,'" she said, meaning that "they're important from the presidential on down to the state legislature." Those eight targets are Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, all crucial to an electoral victory for Joe Biden, but also where Radjy hopes to see “some wins from the bottom of the ballot blowing up." 

While the House is well within reach for Democrats this year, Radjy admits that the U.S. Senate map is "really tough." (Conventional election-watchers have predicted that it's possible or likely that control of both houses will flip — the House to Democrats and the Senate to Republicans.) Democrats almost certainly cannot hold a Senate majority without re-electing Sen. Sherrod Brown in Ohio and Sen. Jon Tester in Montana, two incumbents who face tough battles in increasingly red states. Ohio, in fact, has also been the site of much recent Swing Left activism — as discussed both above and below.

Finally, there are House races in New York and California, two voter-rich and heavily Democratic states which Radjy said are “absolutely critical, just mathematically, for how many absolutely key races there are.” Last April, when Swing Left announced the first stage of its plan to win back the House, it began with a list of six Democratic seats to hold and six Republican seats to flip — and five of that latter group are in New York (three) or California (two). 

Unsurprisingly, a great deal of Swing Left's volunteer and donor base is in those two states, so the group is "asymmetrically positioned to be strong in 2024" in those races, as Radjy put it. Artist and activist Hope Singsen helped launch an early Swing Left group in New York City, which since 2017 has written almost a million letters and sponsored almost 400 events and almost 19,000 volunteer shifts. 

“We were knocking doors in 2017 long before we had specific candidates to support,” Singsen said, and her group did the same in 2023: “We started early canvassing — knocking on doors and talking to voters in the swing congressional districts we knew would be close and crucial to win in 2024.”  

One of those was New York's 3rd district, in Queens and Long Island, where a special election will be held on Feb. 13 after the expulsion of former Rep. George Santos, the notorious fabricator. “We knew there was a fair chance Santos could be expelled, but we would be working there this year regardless,” Singsen said. “All last year, we were there building capacity on Long Island. "We talk to people about how important the 2024 election is going to be. We ask if they will commit to vote and get three people to vote with them. Then they fill out a postcard that we'll send back right before Election Day as a reminder.”

All this “was a fantastic training ground for us to build relationships in the district,” she continued. “So when this special election suddenly dropped in our laps, we were ready to hit the ground running. We have been sending teams out every Saturday and Sunday to door-knock, since the campaign started canvassing.” (Tom Suozzi, a moderate Democrat who held the seat before Santos, is favored to win, which would erode the GOP majority by one seat.)

“One of my messages is that we have come a long way since those first house parties," Singsen said. "We have grown in our skill, in our capacity. We know where the levers are. We're a fine-tuned army. Republicans have given us battle after battle to get strong. And we have beaten them again and again. So we are ready.”

Her group has also worked in Pennsylvania and New Jersey districts, and will do so again. Similarly, groups in California’s core Democratic areas, such as Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area, have helped targeted swing seats in Orange County, the Central Valley and further afield in Arizona and Nevada.

“What happened in 2018," Radjy said, "was that folks in New York and California who were really upset about Donald Trump saw that the fight was actually back home. They engaged in a way that they've never done before, driving from L.A. to Orange County or from New York City to upstate districts, whatever the case may be.” 

“What happened in 2018 was that folks in New York and California who were upset about Donald Trump saw that the fight was actually back home. They engaged in a way that they've never done before, driving from L.A. to Orange County, from New York City to upstate."

Things are arguably more complicated this year. Many people, Radjy admits, are “not sure how they're a part of the solution,” with the intense focus on the looming presidential race between Trump and Biden. “They feel like they're waiting for a few districts or a few precincts in Maricopa County [Arizona] and Bucks County [Pennsylvania] to be revealed months from now. They're not sure how they can be a part of the fight. So a big part of our objective this year is, first of all, to say that there's ways they can get involved from out of state, but, second, that the front lines of the fight for the House, which is going to be critically important — you're probably 90 minutes or less away from a close House district.”

Deciding when and where to focus volunteer energy as well as donations is one of Swing Left’s key concerns, for the sake of its activist base as well as in terms of political effectiveness. In my conversation with Caffrey, he offered a brief history of Swing Left's evolution, describing the 2018 cycle as "one of those magical grassroots organic moments that week that happen every not-very-often. People are coming in and we're putting them into a high-impact thing to do. They're doing a lot of the self-starting. They just need to be pointed in the right direction.”

Even the so-called off-year cycle of 2019 "felt very similar," he said. "We won the Virginia state legislative races that year, giving Democrats a trifecta. That was such an exciting moment. In the late months of 2019 and heading into the early part of 2020, we were feeling the energy. … We were already making trips from California to Arizona and from New York out to Long Island and New Jersey and Pennsylvania. And then, of course, the pandemic hit. Everything hit a brick wall and we really had to reinvent ourselves.” 

That combination of a historic election and a global pandemic meant the 2020 election "didn't have some of the fun," Caffrey said, but even so "there was an outpouring of energy at the grassroots that I had never seen before," although it was largely channeled into millions of phone calls and letters to voters. “There was a palpable sense of relief” after Biden's election, even though “we didn't get everything we wanted” in terms of down-ballot results.

There was unquestionably a downturn engagement after that, which Caffrey said he'd seen before during the Obama years: "This sense of, 'OK, we did the thing, we don't need to do it anymore.'" But Swing Left's local grassroots groups didn't go away, and in the wake of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, he said, "We ended up having a really massive 2022. While we had fewer individual people volunteering, the people who were stepping up to volunteer did more," and clearly shifted the momentum of what Republicans expected to be a wave election in their favor. 

As mentioned above, Swing Left goes into 2024 with a sense of momentum after wins in Wisconsin, Ohio and the Virginia legislative election. "There's no such thing as off years anymore,” Radjy said. But it isn't 2018 either, and a renewed sense of structure may be needed to sustain momentum in the face of a longer struggle than most people expected.

“There's less frenetic energy," Caffrey said. "People either found their answer, 'This is what I can do,' or they are kind of left without a good fit. That presents challenges for our organizing.” Their response is support programs to build new groups: One called Team Up for community organizing and another, Crash Course, for campus organizing. Team Up will match potential activists with three to six others in their community, providing in-person training and then ongoing coaching, support and guidance for the first three months, "to get them through that challenging phase,” Caffrey explained. "Once they get going, once they have a little sense of momentum, they have a sense of community, and a sense of support, the potential is out there."

For 2024, Swing Left wants to build a "new class of [activist] groups right in time to have a big impact ahead of the 2024 elections, but that, critically, will not just disappear after the election, as so often happens in campaign organizing."

Swing Left launched this program in three locations last year: Richmond, Virginia; the Twin Cities in Minnesota; and Queens, New York (which coincidentally includes part of that crucial 3rd district). "In each of those places, we have new groups emerge and start phone-banking and letter-writing and canvassing," Caffrey said. "We're really excited about the program. We're going to have in person trainings in Phoenix, Raleigh and Atlanta in February and March, and we are doing a hybrid version for folks anywhere in the country that want to participate.”

This model is meant to build "sustainable grassroots energy and power for the long haul,” Caffrey said. “We're optimistic that this could help build a whole new class of Swing Left groups right in time to have a big impact ahead of the 2024 elections, but then, critically, not just disappear after the election as so often happens in campaign organizing." 

The campus-based program, Crash Course, is a similar concept, adjusted for the challenging realities of that context. They've hired part-time organizers in key metropolitan areas dense with college students: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston and Washington, D.C., and will recruit potential student leaders to participate in monthly trainings, with the goal of starting campus groups that build their chapters over the spring, "with the idea that in the fall, they can go all out, traveling to swing districts, writing letters, making phone calls.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Campus organizing comes with obvious difficulties — students aren't on campus year-round, and at least one-fourth of them move on in any given year. But it has both short-term and long-term value, Caffrey said. "You never know the ripples that are created — those folks going on to be organizers or to run for office or to do whatever. It's worth investing in."

Swing Left is also working to refine its targeting and grassroots engagement. “Our platform will be further simplified” within the next few weeks, Radjy promised. Precise campaign targeting remains central. “Having too many targets, and having too many 'reach' targets or overly safe targets, really makes it hard for people to trust the information that they're getting,” Radjy said. “If a race stops being competitive, either because the candidate is doing amazingly well and has got all the dollars they need, has got more than enough volunteers, has got it locked down, we deprioritize them, so the marginal dollars that are coming in are more additive to another race."

“We've gotten a lot of feedback from volunteers and donors about feeling like their time or money has been wasted by other organizations or campaigns,” said Yasmin Radjy. So "trust, for us, is fundamental."

The same is true, she added, "in the other direction," meaning that Swing Left won't burn money on hopeless campaigns. She didn't cite examples, but probably should have: Consider Democrat Amy McGrath, who raised an astonishing $94 million for her 2020 Senate race against Mitch McConnell in Kentucky. According to a 2022 New Republic report, McGrath ran more than 83,000 TV ads and garnered 422 million social media impressions — and lost by 20 points. 

“Right now on the Senate side, we need to win every single one of the targets we have on that list," Radjy said. "We do not currently have on our list the bigger reach races such as Missouri, Texas and Florida," all currently held by prominent Republicans who are widely loathed on the left — but unlikely to lose. "We're watching those,” she added. 

Trust is crucial, Radjy said: “We've gotten a lot of feedback from volunteers and donors about feeling like their time or money has been wasted by other organizations or campaigns.” That could be a reference to the McGrath campaign, or to any of several other widely publicized Democratic failures. “For us, the watchlist is an opportunity to keep an honest dialogue with folks," she said. "'You gave 50 bucks to this candidate early on and they were really competitive. They're moving off our list for now and someone else is moving on who really needs the extra $20 you've got later in the cycle.' That trust, for us, is fundamental to why we were able to raise $26 million for candidates in the 2020 race.”

“We talk a lot about trying to make this work sustainable," Caffrey said. "This isn't just something we're doing because there's an emergency for our democracy in this moment. We need to revitalize the democratic character of our society, and get people to think of this is just a sustainable part of their lives — you know, like this is something that we all do.

“Swing Left groups form friendships that are incredible,” he continued. “People who never would have met, but they got together and formed a Swing Left group and now they’re best friends. It's not always the happiest thing: People are like, ‘Yes, there's so much at stake. I'm stressed. I'm worried. That's why I'm putting so much energy into this.’ But they also get a lot of joy when they get to meet other incredible people and they feel that sense of solidarity and camaraderie.” 

Indeed, social isolation is widely understood as an important contributing factor in why American politics has turned so poisonous. So the social dimension is more than frosting on the cake. In the long run, it's arguably the main course. But in the meantime, Caffrey said, the fight will go on — this year, in the 2026 midterms “and for the foreseeable future." He hopes that after the next census and the next redistricting in 2030, "maybe we have a year that produces fairer electoral maps, and we get to saner politics. But I think the disease in the body politic is going to take a while to run its course.” That's why making political activism sustainable, rewarding and even fun is so necessary right now. 

Can we send Trump into exile? It worked (sort of) with Napoleon

Judges overseeing the various criminal trials of Donald John Trump, our only ex-president with a mug shot, have repeatedly warned him that they'll have him removed from the courtroom if he cannot contain himself.

Most recently the judge in the second defamation case brought by E. Jean Carroll — which just ended with a judgment against Trump for $83 million — struggled to deal with the toddler ex-president (presciently parodied in this classic video). When confronted by the judge, Trump petulantly declared he would “love” to be kicked out of court. 

For the sake of the rational citizens of the United States — still the great majority of us — not to mention the rest of the civilized world, don’t you think he needs to be removed a bit farther from view?

Is exile still a thing?

Does the civilized world need to send the uniquely charismatic and dangerous Donald Trump to his own Elba or Saint Helena? The thought kept occurring to me while reading "War and Peace," Leo Tolstoy’s massive novel following a few Russian families during the Napoleonic Wars.

Donald Trump and Napoleon Bonaparte? Really? OK, it's a stretch, but while reading Tolstoy I picked up on some obvious parallels.

There’s a class-inferiority complex, a hypersensitivity to criticism, a lack of concern for others and a demand for absolute power (and immunity) — to name merely a few personality quirks shared by Le Petit Caporal and the man we might call Les Petit Mains. As innumerable clinical psychologists have pointed out, both share megalomania and unbridled malignant narcissism. 

In Tolstoy's account, Napoleon ditched his Grand Army during the catastrophic retreat of the French from Moscow in late 1812, abandoning thousands of them to starvation and frostbite as he scampered back to Paris.

There are some obvious parallels between Trump and Le Petit Caporal: an inferiority complex, hypersensitivity to criticism, a lack of human empathy and a yearning for absolute power (and immunity).

That kind of disloyalty is a hallmark of Trump, who demands absolute loyalty from everyone around him but returns exactly none of it. Recently, he called on his supporters in Iowa to come out to vote in subzero weather, even if it killed them. He is notorious for stiffing people who work for him, and expects his followers to foot the bill for all his legal cases.

Contemporary mental health professionals might say that Napoleon, like Trump, exhibited "a profound inability to empathize."

In “War and Peace,” Tolstoy writes at length, almost obsessively, about how the “great man” theory of history is mostly a crock; so-called leaders are often just riding the waves of larger public sentiments and movements. They often are not even the forgers of history but merely its instruments. As for Napoleon, Tolstoy doesn’t mince words, about the man himself or his acolytes:

For Russian historians — strange and terrible to say — Napoleon, that most insignificant instrument of history, who never and nowhere, even in exile, displayed any human dignity — Napoleon is the object of admiration and enthusiasm; he is grand.

It is hardly necessary to note that Trump has “never and nowhere” displayed any human dignity. Indeed, to list the times he has proven himself to be without dignity or empathy would be near impossible. Such a list would sum up the life he’s led since his father taught him to be a killer and a king and his erstwhile father, the former Joe McCarthy sidekick Roy Cohn, taught him to hit back at any perceived slight 10 times as hard. Despite his utter lack of honor and morals — or, quite likely, because of it — he remains the object of admiration and enthusiasm for his cult followers, who whoop with glee when he demeans women and laugh themselves silly when he threatens people who see through one or more of his innumerable lies and cons. For them, the cruelty is entertainment. Moreover, for an authoritarian, as Adam Serwer noted back in 2018 in The Atlantic, the cruelty is the point.

To a large degree, Trump is the result of the Republican Party's incessant fear-mongering as it turned away from the hard work of creating policies that appeal to voters, not to mention the hard work of compromise. A grifting demagogue like Trump is what you get when propagandists, from Rush Limbaugh to Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, train Republicans for decades to hate their political opponents and use fear tactics to whip up their base while offering no workable solutions.

You might wonder if I see an equivalent for Joe Biden in “War and Peace.” Well, kind of. Tolstoy defends the aging Russian commander, Mikhail Kutuzov, who is criticized from all sides for being old, for not being dashing and charismatic, and for not being decisive in ways others think he should be. But Kutuzov (at least according to Tolstoy, whose account seems to comport pretty well with history) has his vision for victory, based on his great experience and humility. It’s not flashy, but it works:

The source of this extraordinary power of penetration into the meaning of events taking place lay in that national feeling, which he bore within himself in all its purity and force…. This simple, modest, and therefore truly majestic figure could not fit into that false form of the European hero, the imaginary ruler of the people, which history has invented. 

You may object to the word "majestic" being applied to our current president (which is fair enough: we don’t expect that from our system of government), but consider whether you could do even a smidgen of what Biden does every day

I also note that back in 2020, when Trump was repeatedly comparing himself to Abraham Lincoln, our one truly majestic president, I thought that it was Joe Biden — a man from a modest, loving family background who has suffered great personal losses — who could make that kind of claim. (He would personally never compare himself to Lincoln.) Like Kutuzov, he has a vision — to prove that government and democracy can work when we work together — and will doggedly try to see it through, despite all the muttering about his age and bogus charges lodged by far-right extremists and aided by corporate media. No matter what Fox News propagandists claim, his administration already has a record of accomplishments in one term that any president would be proud to claim.

It is said that democracy is fragile (Benjamin Franklin warned us about that) and that, perhaps, authoritarian streams run alongside democratic ones because people yearn for things they don't have or for a past that never quite was, or because they just fear the future. Political theorizing aside, the real-world effects of a Trumpian dismantling of the U.S. government and our relations with our NATO allies would be devastating to both the nation and the world. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


As Salon's Andrew O’Hehir notes in the essay linked above, the irony of the MAGA faithful standing behind Trump is that their hero, and the party he took over, has no desire to re-establish the post-World War II economy they claim to yearn for. That era was fueled by reasonable taxation of the wealthy and big corporations, support for labor unions, and a core belief in expertise in government — all things that most Democrats, broadly speaking, still believe in. 

But there is another past that Trumpians dream of, one that Trump does support — another deep and dangerous current in America in which white men rule and where the standard is not the Stars and Stripes but the battle flag of the Confederacy. For these people, as Salon’s Lucian K. Truscott IV wrote back in 2021, the new Lost Cause myth is the Big Lie

Like Tolstoy's Kutuzov, Joe Biden has a vision — to prove that government and democracy can work when we work together — and will doggedly try to see it through, despite all the muttering about his age and bogus charges by far-right extremists.

Trump has made the refusal to behave properly and respectfully in a civilized society into his personal and political brand. He rejects any criticism of his actions, like a toddler who has had too much birthday cake and Hawaiian Punch, and makes it clear to his followers that violence is, at least potentially, an appropriate remedy for anything that damages him or limits his power. He ceaselessly lies about election results, further eroding the public’s trust in our system. In his rambling, angry, incoherent victory speech after the New Hampshire primary he was at it again, making numerous false claims, including that he had won the state in the general election twice. He lost New Hampshire in both 2016 and 2020 and the second time it wasn’t even close. (Trump also appeared to be sweating through his thick makeup, which reminded me of the beige paint I was trying to match in our kitchen this week.)

On both immigration and the economy, the two big issues of this election year, Trump opposes what most Americans, and even most Republicans, apparently want. As the economy continues to improve dramatically, he openly roots for economic collapse and a stock market crash. As the Senate finally approaches a workable compromise on a border and immigration bill, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell says they cannot move forward because Trump doesn’t want a solution.

As everyone in this country, except MAGA cult members, has long understood, Trump doesn’t care about America or its people. Trump cares only about Trump. 

Hey, it turns out banishment is still a thing! Just look at this list of heads of government who have been sent away or have departed on their own to escape justice. One of the most recent, Jair Bolsonaro, the Trumpian former president of Brazil, exiled himself to Florida for a spell, possibly because he felt right at home with the repressive atmosphere under Ron DeSantis. I will note that Bolsonaro has been barred from running for office in Brazil until 2030 because he abused his power and pushed his own Big Lie about a "rigged" election — leading to a Jan. 6-like attack on the Brazilian capital last January. 

At what point will we realize that it will never be enough for juries to convict and sentence or fine Trump, or for the voters to reject him, since he will never accept either outcome? It's time to send him away to an island? We'll give him a golf course, so that “Pelé” Trump (as some caddies reportedly called him) can kick his balls back into the fairway, cheating at the very game that most relies on players' sense of honor. Even at 77, he is no more than an obstreperous child, and an unhinged and dangerous one at that. His endless claims to know more than anyone else on every imaginable topic stand as peerless examples of the Dunning-Kruger effect, and his mental faculties have clearly continued to erode.

Even if we found a way to send Trump away, we would no doubt continue to hear from him, in all caps. While Napoleon was in exile on Saint Helena, an island in the South Atlantic thousands of miles from Europe, the world still heard from him, even without social media. Tolstoy writes in his epilogue: “Napoleon in exile makes childish and deceitful plans for how he would have made mankind happy if he had had power.”

So it would be with Trump, as it is now: childish and deceitful plans. Let’s not even call it exile; it's a long overdue timeout. Is that island once owned by Jeffrey Epstein available?

What the tests that tell your “true age” really mean

Quick, how old are you? Chances are, the answer that springs first to mind corresponds with the number of candles on your last birthday cake. But our bodies age in uniquely individual ways, and chronology is only one way — if a simple and universally accepted one — of looking at our lives.

Now, sophisticated new methods for quantifying "biological age," offer the chance to, at least in theory, challenge what the calendar tells us. But are these enticing testing services offering us a chance to optimize our health and get a jump on early risk factors for diseases and chronic conditions — or are they just a tool for quantifying (and exploiting) our terror of growing older?

The concept of biological age is a fairly new one, one whose recent popularity is credited largely to UCLA professor Dr. Steve Horvath. In 2013, Horvath proposed the idea of an "epigenetic clock … to address a host of questions in developmental biology, cancer and aging research." Epigenetics examines how external factors interplay with your genetic makeup. You can't change your DNA any more than you can change your birth date, but for better or worse, your behavior can influence your health. Exposure to UV radiation and human papillomavirus, for example, can mutate your DNA, but it's not like you can schedule an appointment with a geneticist to become a member of the X-Men.

We need your help to stay independent

For most of us, this basic knowledge has come in the form of our doctors telling us to quit smoking, or the realization that we feel better when we eat more fiber and get enough sleep. But now, in our data-driven world, we can — if we have the inclination, the money and the willingness to take a blood and/or urine test — go deeper.

A growing consumer market for home test kits which promise to help you "take control of how you age" — and can run upwards of $300 for a single kit, not to mention $130 a month for personalized "action plans," supplements not included. The overall genetic testing market is a nearly $2 billion a year business, with a recent Precedence Research report grimly explaining that "The increased prevalence of various chronic diseases among the majority of the population, coupled with increased consumer expenditure on healthcare, has exponentially boosted the market growth." But what are you really getting for your money with these things?

"These bio age testing kits assess various biological markers within your body," explains Dr. Johannes Uys, a general practitioner working at Broadgate General Practice in London. "Factors like telomere length, DNA methylation patterns, and biomarkers related to one’s metabolism, inflammation and cellular health are generally analyzed in bio age tests. The idea behind these kits is that an individual can make lifestyle changes once they understand their bio age better, potentially slowing down the aging process and improving their mental and physical well-being."

"The accuracy and effectiveness of these tests remain speculative, with research and debate ongoing."

Uys notes that "There’s little doubt that these tests have been gaining popularity in recent years," but adds, "That being said, the accuracy and effectiveness of these tests remain speculative, with research and debate ongoing. Bio age tests have their critics, with many arguing that the concept of bio age is a complex matter. We do not have a universally agreed-upon method for its accurate measurement, making it difficult to validate the effectiveness of these kits with definite accuracy."

It's also notable how these kits are marketed, usually putting the word "age" front and center. It may all be in service of tracking your health, but you can't overlook the clear incentive for bragging rights on a playing field where youth triumphs over everything else. 

That doesn't mean that these kits are aren't useful, both for consumers and researchers alike. Gil Blander, the chief scientific officer of the biological age testing and wellness company InsideTracker, wants consumers to recognize what these tests can and can't do. Speaking to me while in the midst of a winter cold, he cites a personal example. "When you're sick, you have a increase of a specific population of cells, for example, lymphocytes," he explains. "When you have them, these kinds of cells tend to be older than other kinds of cells. It doesn't mean that when you're sick, you're getting older, and then a week later, you are getting younger again." 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


But when used and assessed properly, Blander says that these tests can flag biomarkers for certain conditions that you can start making lifestyle interventions around.

"Let's start with the genetic predisposition for genetic diseases," he says. "You can do DNA testing and find whether you have a predisposition for high cholesterol, high glucose. Genetic tests can provide you a clue." But, Blander explains, "Even if you have high risks for cholesterol, 80% of that is under your control, using lifestyle and nutrition and exercise. The problem with our health care providers is that they are treating disease; they are not preventing disease."

He pointed to the term "healthspan," explaining "It means you will live until your last moment in good health. And that's what we're trying to do here." 

Xiaojing Yang, lead scientist for myDNAge, notes another, wider appeal for the boom in biological age testing. "Aging research is a serious scientific topic," she says. "We go into this field for public health. We understand our global population getting older, and we really want to study why people age and how can we understand that aging process better, to help general population become healthier."

She explains, "This [testing] is a quite new thing, about ten years. Before that, your chronological age was nearly the only risk factor for a lot of diseases — cancer, diabetes, cardiac disease. But we're seeing more and more research showing that epigenetic age, in certain cases, can be a stronger, more accurate factor. You can see that if your epigenetic age is younger, you should be at lower risk for certain diseases. I don't think we're going to replace the routine health check, but we're on the way to utilizing this molecular technology to give you early indicators, before any syndrome is detected, for observation." And she says, "No matter whether there are solutions or not, my vision for this work today is that I would like to tell you the risks earlier."

"We're seeing more and more research showing that epigenetic age, in certain cases, can be a stronger, more accurate factor"

We're all innately curious about ourselves. You need only look to the explosive popularity of ancestry and DNA tests as evidence. I've certainly been intrigued by the notion of finding out how old I "really" am. But I also know that it's complicated. After my last physical, I could see from my labs that my blood pressure, BMI and glucose levels are all healthy and have been holding in the same range for several years. I also have been diagnosed with (and treated for) early onset osteoporosis, giving me the bone density of a person decades older.

So I guess at this point I'm not sure if a $300 kit could tell me something helpful that I don't already know, or if this graying Gen Xer would just want to buy some reassurance that she's winning at aging. More significantly, I'm doubtful of how far back I could turn the clock even if I really threw myself into the effort. 

A recent New York Times profile of 46 year-old entrepreneur Bryan Johnson noted his elaborate diet and fitness routine, as well as his fixation on meticulously testing and documenting different markers of his age, from his hearing to his wrinkles to his heart health. And it noted that  "His 'biological age,' he claimed until recently, is 42.5. … In other words, he has spent about three years shaving off — maybe — a little more than three years." Three years and, by his own count, "millions of dollars."

A 2020 episode of Netflix's "The Goop Lab" produced similar results, as Gwyneth Paltrow and two of her colleagues experimented with a "health-span plan," to "extend youth." And after a truly horrendous sounding, incredibly restrictive cleanse, one that she said made her feel "dying and hangry," she had shaved off a mere 1.7 years from her biological age. And she's Gwyneth Paltrow.

If it's all a numbers game, that's not much of an incentive. Maybe if I had a compelling concern about my lifestyle choices or a genetic risk I didn't think my healthcare team was addressing, I might invest in a bio age kit. For now, anyway, I'd rather save my money, take my chances, and just be the age it says on my driver's license.

Joe Biden’s stark choice: Ceasefire in Gaza — or regional war in Middle East

In the topsy-turvy world of corporate media reporting on U.S. foreign policy, we have been led to believe that air strikes on Yemen, Iraq and Syria are legitimate and responsible efforts to contain the expanding war over Israel’s slaughter in Gaza, while the actions of the Houthi government in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Iran and its allies in Iraq and Syria are all dangerous escalations.

In fact, it is U.S. and Israeli actions that are driving the expansion of the war, while Iran and others are genuinely trying to find effective ways to counter and end Israel’s invasion of Gaza while avoiding a full-scale regional war. 

We are encouraged by Egypt and Qatar’s efforts to mediate a ceasefire and the release of hostages and prisoners of war by both sides. But it is important to recognize who are the aggressors, who are the victims, and how regional actors are taking incremental but increasingly forceful action to respond to genocide.

A near-total Israeli communications blackout in Gaza has reduced the flow of images of the ongoing massacre on our TVs and computer screens, but the slaughter has not abated. Israel is bombing and attacking Khan Younis, the largest city in the southern Gaza Strip, as ruthlessly as it did Gaza City in the north. Israeli forces and U.S. weapons have killed an average of 240 Gazans per day for more than three months, and 70% of the dead are still women and children. 

Israel has repeatedly claimed it is taking new steps to protect civilians, but that is largely a P.R. exercise. The Israeli government is still using 2,000-pound and even 5,000-pound “bunker-buster” bombs to dehouse the people of Gaza and herd them toward the Egyptian border, while it debates how to push the survivors over the border into exile, which it euphemistically refers to as “voluntary emigration.”

People throughout the Middle East are horrified by Israel’s slaughter and plans for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, but most of their governments will only condemn Israel verbally. The Houthi government in Yemen is different. Unable to directly send forces to fight for Gaza, they began enforcing a blockade of the Red Sea against Israeli-owned ships and other ships carrying goods to or from Israel. Since mid-November 2023, the Houthis have conducted about 30 attacks on international vessels transiting the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. None of these attacks have caused casualties or sunk any ships.

In response, the Biden administration, without congressional approval, has launched at least six rounds of bombing, including airstrikes on Sanaa, the capital of Yemen. The U.K. has contributed a few warplanes, while Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and Bahrain also act as cheerleaders to provide the U.S. with the cover of leading an “international coalition.”

We need your help to stay independent

President Biden has admitted that U.S. bombing will not force Yemen to lift its blockade, but he insists that the U.S. will keep attacking it anyway. Saudi Arabia dropped 70,000 mostly American (and some British) bombs on Yemen in a seven-year war, but utterly failed to defeat the Houthi government and armed forces. 

Yemenis naturally identify with the plight of the Palestinians in Gaza, and a million Yemenis took to the street to support their country’s position challenging Israel and the U.S. Yemen is no Iranian puppet, but as with Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran’s Iraqi and Syrian allies, Iran has trained the Yemenis to build and deploy increasingly powerful anti-ship, cruise and ballistic missiles.

Joe Biden has admitted that U.S. bombing will not force the Houthi government in Yemen to lift its Red Sea blockade. He insists that the U.S. will keep attacking it anyway.

The Houthis have made it clear that they will stop the attacks once Israel stops its slaughter in Gaza. It beggars belief that instead of pressing for a ceasefire in Gaza, Biden and his advisers are instead choosing to deepen U.S. military involvement in a regional Middle East conflict.

The U.S. and Israel have now conducted airstrikes on the capitals of four neighboring countries: Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and Yemen. Iran also suspects U.S. and Israeli spy agencies of a role in two bomb explosions in Kerman in Iran, which killed about 90 people and wounded hundreds more at a commemoration of the fourth anniversary of the U.S. assassination of Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani in January 2020.

On Jan. 20, an Israeli bombing killed 10 people in Damascus, including five Iranian officials. After repeated Israeli airstrikes on Syria, Russia has now deployed warplanes to patrol the border to deter Israeli attacks, and has reoccupied two previously vacated outposts built to monitor violations of the demilitarized zone between Syria and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

Iran has responded to the terrorist bombings in Kerman and Israeli assassinations of Iranian officials with missile strikes on targets in Iraq, Syria and Pakistan. Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdohallian has defended Iran’s claim that the strikes on Erbil in Iraqi Kurdistan targeted agents of Israel’s Mossad spy agency. 

Eleven Iranian ballistic missiles destroyed an Iraqi Kurdish intelligence facility and the home of a senior intelligence officer, and also killed a wealthy real estate developer and businessman, Peshraw Dizayee, who had been accused of working for the Mossad, as well as of smuggling Iraqi oil from Kurdistan to Israel via Turkey.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The targets of Iran’s missile strikes in northwest Syria were the headquarters of two separate ISIS-linked groups in Idlib province. The strikes demolished both buildings at a range of 800 miles, using Iran’s newest ballistic missiles called Kheybar Shakan or "Castle Blasters," a name that equates today’s U.S. bases in the Middle East with the 12th- and 13th-century European crusader castles whose ruins still dot the landscape.

Iran launched its missiles not from northwestern Iran, which would have been closer to Idlib, but from Khuzestan province in southwestern Iran, which is closer to Tel Aviv than to Idlib. So these missile strikes were clearly intended as a warning to Israel and the U.S. that Iran can conduct precise attacks on Israel and U.S. “crusader castles” in the Middle East if they continue their aggression against Palestinians, Iranians and their allies.

At the same time, the U.S. has escalated its tit-for-tat airstrikes against Iranian-backed Iraqi militias. The Iraqi government has consistently protested U.S. airstrikes against the militias as violations of Iraqi sovereignty. Prime Minister Sudani’s military spokesman called the latest U.S. airstrikes “acts of aggression,” and said, “This unacceptable act undermines years of cooperation … at a time when the region is already grappling with the danger of expanding conflict, the repercussions of the aggression on Gaza.”   

After wars in Afghanistan and Iraq killed thousands of American troops, the U.S. has avoided large numbers of military casualties for the last 10 years. The last time the U.S. lost more than a hundred troops killed in action in a year was in 2013, when 128 Americans were killed in Afghanistan. 

Since then, the U.S. has relied on bombing and proxy forces to fight its wars. The only lesson American leaders seem to have learned from their lost wars is to avoid putting U.S. “boots on the ground.” The U.S. dropped more than 120,000 bombs and missiles on Iraq and Syria in its war on ISIS, while Iraqis, Syrians and Kurds did all the hard fighting on the ground. 

Israel's assault on Gaza is unleashing a crisis that is spinning out of control across the region — and may eventually involve U.S. troops in combat.

In Ukraine, the U.S. and its allies found a willing proxy to fight Russia. But after two years of war, Ukrainian casualties have become unsustainable and new recruits are hard to find. The Ukrainian parliament has rejected a bill to authorize forced conscription, and no amount of U.S. weapons is likely to persuade more Ukrainians to sacrifice their lives for a Ukrainian nationalism that treats large numbers of them, especially Russian speakers, as second-class citizens. 

Now, in Gaza, Yemen and Iraq, the U.S. has waded into what it hoped would be another war free of U.S. casualties. Instead, the Israeli assault on Gaza is unleashing a crisis that is spinning out of control across the region and may soon directly involve U.S. troops in combat. This will likely shatter the illusion of peace Americans have lived in for the last 10 years of U.S. bombing and proxy wars, and bring the reality of U.S. militarism and war-making home with a vengeance. 

Biden can continue to give Israel carte blanche to wipe out the people of Gaza, and watch as the region becomes further engulfed in flames. Or he can listen to his own campaign staff, who warn that it’s a “moral and electoral imperative” to insist on a ceasefire. The choice could not be more stark.

Jay Leno files for conservatorship over wife due to her worsening dementia

Comedian and TV personality Jay Leno filed court documents on Friday, seeking to become conservator over his wife Mavis — who he's been married to since 1980 — stating that her worsening dementia diagnosis has led to her no longer being capable of handling her own affairs.

According to several outlets, including The Los Angeles Times, Leno has taken the matter before a family court judge in an effort to create a living trust and other estate plans to ensure that his 77-year-old wife has "managed assets sufficient to provide for her care" in the event that he passes away before her.    

“Unfortunately, Mavis has been progressively losing capacity and orientation to space and time for several years,” the petition details. “Jay is fully capable of continuing support for Mavis’s physical and financial needs, as he has throughout their marriage,” furthering that Mrs. Leno "does not contest the establishment of a conservatorship and does not prefer another person to act as conservator."

As The Los Angeles Times furthers, "It was unclear when Mavis Leno was first diagnosed with the disease, but a doctor’s report from November, filed as part of the court proceedings, said she suffered with impairments to her memory, ability to concentrate and use of reason." 

“He is not as entertaining as he once was”: Gavin Newsom has some notes for Donald Trump

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has been making the media rounds in recent weeks, appearing as a guest to help kick-off the 22nd season of "Real Time with Bill Maher" — on which he discussed the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes — and jumping on MSNBC to speak to host Alex Wagner about the ways in which Donald Trump's political career is going off the rails, over the median and into the bushes.   

Referring to Trump as "damaged goods," Newsom had a quite a few notes on the former president and 2024 GOP frontrunner's campaign performance, saying, “He is weakness masquerading as strength . . . He can’t be beaten in a primary, but in a general election, I think he’s the most flawed candidate in my lifetime."

Putting some muscle into his verbal beat-down, Newsom went in harder as the interview progressed, calling Trump's ability to grab and hold the attention of his MAGA followers into question.

“He is not as entertaining as he once was. He’s more unhinged than he ever was, more extreme, obviously more dangerous across the spectrum of issues." 

Watch here: