Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Is red meat bad for you? And does it make a difference if it’s a processed burger or a lean steak?

A juicy burger is a staple in many Australians’ diet. Yet research shows regularly eating red meat can increase your risk of developing type 2 diabetes, heart disease and certain cancers.

But is eating a beef burger worse for your health than eating a lean grass-fed steak? And how much red meat should we really be eating?

 

Types of red meat

First of all, it’s good to clarify that red meat refers to all mammalian muscle meat. So that includes beef, lamb, pork, veal, mutton and goat.

Then we can distinguish red meat types by how the animal has been raised and how the meat is processed. Here are some key terms to know.

Conventional meat, also called grain-fed, is meat from animals that are grass-fed for part of their lives and then given a grain-based diet for the remainder. Most red meat available in major supermarkets is grain-fed.

Grass-fed meat comes from animals that have grazed on pasture for their entire lives. This means grass-fed meat tends to have higher levels of unsaturated fats than conventional meat and is why some research suggests it’s healthier. Grass-fed meat is also likely to cost more.

Organic meat is seen as a premium product as it has to meet government standards for organic produce. For example, meat labelled as organic cannot use synthetic pesticides or use hormones or antibiotics to stimulate growth.

Processed meats have been preserved by smoking, curing or salting or by adding chemical preservatives. Examples include sausages, ham, bacon and hot dogs.

 

What is the nutritional value of red meat?

Red meat contains many nutrients that are important for health, including protein, vitamin B12, iron and zinc. Red meat is a good source of iron and zinc as they are more easily absorbed by the body from meat than from plant foods.

Red meat is often high in saturated fats, but this can range widely from less than 1% to over 25% depending on the cut and whether it’s trimmed of fat or not. Minced meat typically ranges from 2% to 9% saturated fat depending on whether its extra lean or regular.

To limit intake of saturated fats, opt for leaner mince and leaner cuts of meat, such as pork tenderloins or beef steak with the fat trimmed off.

Wagyu beef (which simply translates to Wa = Japanese and Gyu = cow) has been touted as a healthier alternative to conventional red meat, as it tends to be higher in unsaturated fats. But research is limited and ultimately it still contains saturated fat.

Processed meats, such as bacon, salami and sausages, contain beneficial nutrients, but they are also high in saturated fat, sodium and contain preservatives.

 

Is red meat bad for your health? And does the type matter?

It’s widely reported eating too much red meat is bad for your health, because it can increase your risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes and some cancers.

But most of the evidence for this comes from observational studies, which cannot determine whether red meat intake actually causes the condition.

Most evidence is observational because it’s simply not ethical or feasible to ask someone to eat large amounts of meat every day for many years to see if they develop cancer.

So let’s take a look at the evidence:

Heart disease and type 2 diabetes

In a review of 37 observational studies, the authors found weak evidence of an association between eating unprocessed red meat and heart disease and type 2 diabetes.

But for processed meat, a recent review showed that for each additional 50g of processed meat consumed per day, the risk of heart disease increased by 26% and the risk of type 2 diabetes increased by 44%, on average.

Cancer

Leading international organizations have declared there’s strong evidence consumption of red and processed meat increases the risk of colorectal cancer.

For example, in a study of nearly 500,000 people, each additional 50g of red meat consumed per day increased the risk of colorectal cancer by 18%. And each additional 25g of processed meat consumed per day, equivalent to a slice of ham, increased the risk by 19%.

While research has linked consumption of red and processed meat with increased risk of other types of cancer, such as lung, pancreatic and breast, the evidence is not consistent.

It also matters how red meat is cooked. For example, cooking a steak over a high heat, especially an open flame, chars the outside. This causes chemical compounds to form that have been shown to cause cancer in very high doses in animal models and some studies in humans have found an association with increased cancer rates.

When it comes to how the animal was raised or its breed, based on current evidence, it’s unlikely the nutritional differences will have a substantial impact on human health. But research is limited in this area.

 

How much red meat should you eat?

Our national dietary guidelines recommend the average adult eats a maximum of 455g of cooked lean red meat per week (or less than 65g a day, equivalent to one small lamb chop). This is also what’s recommended by the national Cancer Council.

For heart health specifically, the national Heart Foundation recommends eating less than 350g of cooked, unprocessed red meat per week (or less than 50g a day).

Many dietary guidelines around the world now also recommend limiting red meat consumption for environmental reasons. To optimize both human nutrition and planetary health, the EAT-Lancet commission recommends consuming no more than 98g a week of red meat and very low intakes of processed meat.

 

So what does all of this mean for your diet?

The bottom line is that red meat can still be enjoyed as part of a healthy diet, if not eaten in excess. Where possible, opt for unprocessed or lean cuts and try to grill less and roast more. Consider swapping red meat for lean chicken or fish occasionally too.

If you are looking for alternatives to meat that are better for your health and the environment, minimally processed plant-based alternatives, such as tofu, beans and lentils, are great options.

Katherine Livingstone, NHMRC Emerging Leadership Fellow and Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

“He kind of cornered her”: Video shows Trump aide being accused of “molesting” women at Arizona club

A woman told police that Boris Epshteyn, a special advisor to former President Donald Trump who worked with Arizona politicians to reverse Trump’s 2020 election loss, groped her and her younger sister repeatedly at a nightclub in Scottsdale, Arizona, police body camera footage obtained by The Arizona Republic shows. 

Epshteyn was accused of sexually assaulting the two women at the Bottled Blonde nightclub in the early hours of Oct. 10, 2021. 

“All night he’s been touching me and my sister, especially my sister. He kind of cornered her and grabbed her and is just making her super uncomfortable,” the unnamed, 27-year-old woman told police in the footage.

According to the video, the woman described Epshteyn’s actions as “molesting” them and other women in the bar, adding that the bar told them to drink with him.

She recounted that Epshteyn had pulled her younger sister onto his lap and that she told the club’s security that he, then unidentified, was behaving inappropriately. But the security team initially declined to take action because “he’s spent like fifty grand here tonight,” she told police, quoting the club. 

“Touching her chest, touching her hips, touching her crotch,” the woman continued, describing in more detail Epshteyn’s conduct just before the officers identified and ordered him, who was donning shorts, sandals and a collared shirt, to sit on a nearby curb.

Epshteyn declined The Arizona Republic’s request for comment and to say whether he spent the alleged amount.

The attorney was charged with “assault touching,” “attempted sexual abuse,” “harassment-repeated acts” and “disorderly conduct-disruptive behavior or fighting.” While the first three charges against him were dismissed, Epshteyn pleaded guilty in Scottsdale City Court to the fourth charge and served probation. His conviction was later set aside by the court in January this year.

We need your help to stay independent

The owner of the nightclub released a statement responding to the women’s account of the events.

“We have a robust security team who are singularly focused on the safety and enjoyment of all of our guests day-in and day-out,” the statement said in part. “This was an isolated incident, and we have had no additional interaction with these guests, or complaints of this nature in our 10 years in business.”

Representatives from Evening Entertainment Group added that if Epshteyn “approached our door and was recognized, they would not be allowed entrance going forward.”

The police report and its supplements indicated that a security guard at Bottled Blonde flagged authorities on patrol in the district and informed them of a possible sexual assault earlier that morning. The body camera footage also reportedly shows the older woman explaining that Epshteyn grabbed the younger sister again as they were leaving the nightclub.

“We have a high tolerance of people like being weird, but that went above and beyond,” she later said to police, according to the footage.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“I was like, stop touching my sister. Stop touching me. Stop touching my friends,” she continued, adding that the man, who she described to authorities as “fat, ugly, like drooping face, white Ralph Lauren Polo, like fatter Tony Soprano” grabbed the women about 10 times.

The older sister then enthusiastically agreed to press charges against Epshteyn, whom officers cuffed and detained about 20 minutes after they arrived at the scene.

“I didn’t touch anybody,” Epshteyn was heard saying in the footage after police directed him to the curb, later adding, “I had nothing to do with those women over there.”

He received a five-day jail sentence but was credited with time served if he completed 11 months of probation and an alcohol program, paid a fine and did not contact the two women. 

Epshteyn has been the subject of speculation of late in the aftermath of Trump’s latest indictment for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, which was handed down by a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C. last week, with many legal experts suspecting that the lawyer is the sixth, unindicted co-conspirator listed unnamed in the charging document.

The 2021 incident is also not the first time Epshteyn had been arrested in Arizona, according to the outlet. In 2014, he was charged with “assault touching” at another nearby club in Scottsdale, Dierks Bentley’s Whiskey Row.

Epshteyn signed a plea deal in the earlier case, agreeing to cut contact with the victim, never return to the venue, pay court fees and complete 25 hours of community service. Handwritten notes on the deal show he was permitted to complete the program in New Jersey, his home state.

Experts: Trump’s Twitter account may be key “part of the puzzle” for Jack Smith to “prove intent”

Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained a secret search warrant for former President Donald Trump’s Twitter account to look “for evidence of criminal offenses” earlier this year, according to unsealed court records

The court granted a search warrant as part of a criminal case requesting that Twitter, the platform now known as X, produce information to the government related to “@realDonaldTrump.” The order came with a nondisclosure order, barring Twitter from informing anyone about the warrant’s existence or its details. 

“[T]he district court found that there were ‘reasonable grounds to believe’ that disclosing the warrant to former President Trump ‘would seriously jeopardize the ongoing investigation’ by giving him ‘an opportunity to destroy evidence, change patterns of behavior, [or] notify confederates,'” according to the 34-page opinion. 

Initially, Twitter refused to comply with the Jan. 17 warrant and postponed providing the necessary materials specified in the search warrant. The company instead pursued legal challenges against the nondisclosure order, which ultimately proved to be unsuccessful.

While Twitter eventually complied with the warrant, it only provided the requested information in its entirety three days past the court-ordered deadline. The district court found Twitter in contempt and imposed a $350,000 sanction for its delay.

“Twitter’s resistance to the warrant is likely rooted in Elon Musk’s hostility to laws regulating conduct,” V. James DeSimone, a California civil rights attorney, told Salon. “His Tesla company has been found liable for race discrimination and his apparent decision to defy laws protecting employees has resulted in numerous lawsuits against Twitter. And the delay in providing the documents, even after being ordered to by the court, could be related to the dysfunction within the company after Musk’s purchase of it.”

Twitter along with other social media companies have taken the position from a business standpoint that “it is better for them to resist freely complying with subpoenas for customers’ information,” Ted Spaulding, an Atlanta trial attorney, told Salon.

“They fight hard to be a platform that values privacy and have taken it to the extreme,” Spaulding said. “They will fight the government in giving access to data because they ultimately believe it makes their platform more attractive to people because they will not just give up their user’s data with a simple subpoena from someone, not even the government.”

The government encountered issues when first trying to serve Twitter with the warrant and nondisclosure order on Jan. 17, 2023. Twitter’s legal page was inoperative, which delayed the government from serving Twitter through its website until two days later, according to the documents. 

When the government contacted Twitter’s counsel to check on the status of their compliance on Jan. 25, the company’s counsel responded by saying that she hadn’t heard anything about the warrant and that an on-time production “would be a very tight turnaround,” but she confirmed that the account’s available data was preserved.

Finally, on Feb. 1, which was four days after the compliance deadline, Twitter objected to producing any of the account information. While the company did not challenge the legitimacy of the search warrant, it contended that the nondisclosure order violated the First Amendment. 

“Twitter informed the government that it would not comply with the warrant until the district court assessed the legality of the nondisclosure order,” according to unsealed records.

Twitter submitted a motion on Feb. 2, to “vacate or modify the nondisclosure order.” Concurrently, Smith’s team sought a contempt order from U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell, the federal judge overseeing the matter at the time.

The government suggested sanctions starting at $50,000 per day and doubling every day that Twitter did not comply. Howell approved the suggestion and Twitter did not object to the sanctions formula. 

The court ordered Twitter to produce the records outlined in the warrant by 5 p.m. on Feb. 7. 

“If Twitter did not purge its contempt by that time, the district court ordered ‘escalating daily fines’ that were ‘designed to ensure Twitter complies with the search warrant,'” according to documents. 

We need your help to stay independent

Twitter missed the deadline and only produced some records, failing to comply with the request.  As a result, the government fined Twitter a total of $350,000 after they submitted all the records on Feb. 9.

There is little indication in the documents regarding the specific nature of Smith’s request. It only mentioned that the special counsel directed the company “to produce data and records” related to the ex-president’s account.

“Getting access to [Trump’s] Twitter account could be hugely beneficial to the prosecution,” Spaulding said. “They are looking for evidence of Trump’s mindset leading up to Jan. 6 to prove intent to commit a crime. That is normally very hard to prove because you cannot really get into the mind of the accused. The thought is his Twitter posts could provide them insight into what Trump was thinking and ultimately his intentions.”

Smith may be interested in obtaining internal Twitter information to understand the reach of Trump’s tweets, Temidayo Aganga-Williams, white-collar partner at Selendy Gay Elsberg and former senior investigative counsel for the House Jan. 6 committee, told Salon. 

He referred to Trump’s infamous December 19, 2020 “‘Be There. Will Be Wild!'” tweet, which called people to come to Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6 and “set off the planning of the rally that preceded the attack”. 

“It is an essential part of the puzzle of Trump’s post-election actions,” Aganga-Williams said.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Trump has responded to the secret search warrant as he usually does attacking President Joe Biden and referring to the special counsel as “deranged”.

“Just found out that Crooked Joe Biden’s DOJ secretly attacked my Twitter account, making it a point not to let me know about this major ‘hit’ on my civil rights,” he wrote on Truth Social. “My Political Opponent is going CRAZY trying to infringe on my Campaign for President. Nothing like this has ever happened before. Does the First Amendment still exist? Did Deranged Jack Smith tell the Unselects to DESTROY & DELETE all evidence? These are DARK DAYS IN AMERICA!”

But his First Amendment claim has no merit, especially with respect to the subpoena itself, DeSimone pointed out.

“It will ultimately be for a jury to decide if the First Amendment protects a sitting president’s attempt to prevent his democratically elected opponent from taking office,” DeSimone said. “Words can be crimes, that is what a conspiracy is all about. Charles Manson used words to manipulate his followers to kill, Trump used his words to manipulate his followers into trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power, a hallmark of American democracy. Those followers would not have been chanting ‘hang Mike Pence’ without being incited to do so.”

Spaulding added that access to Trump’s posts is not really a First Amendment issue since the First Amendment is really about whether someone is being suppressed in their ability to speak their mind. 

“Not whether someone can use your speech against you once you have said it,” he said. 

This is not the first time that Twitter has taken a troubling stance as it relates to Trump’s conduct after the 2020 election, Aganga-Williams told Salon. The January 6th committee obtained evidence that social media companies like Twitter largely ignored concerns that were raised internally prior to January 6.  

“Now, Twitter’s decision regarding this validly issued subpoena demonstrates that the social media company has not learned any lessons from its part in what transpired after the 2020 election,” he said.

This no-cook dessert, studded with both fresh and frozen fruit, is the perfect summer treat

Like your favorite strawberry lemonade, this refreshing dessert (or maybe even breakfast?!) is loaded with berries and sweetened just enough to balance the bright, tangy, fresh lemon juice squeezed into the creamy final layer. The brilliant part of this stellar creation is ten to fifteen minutes of prep time yields what tastes like hours of effort.

Frozen strawberries and a store bought pound cake make putting this together a cinch and it is truly a crowd pleaser. 

This old standby has been around a long time and has evolved over the years from the original.

By the time I inherited it, the angel food cake — what makes up the base — had been changed to pound cake (probably because my mother was not an angel food fan). The frozen strawberries were no longer the syrupy-sweet boxed variety, but rather just simple, unadulterated, bagged, frozen berries. And the amount of condensed milk had been drastically cut, thank goodness! This updated version that I am sharing with you is delicious and amazingly easy.

Over the years I made my own changes to this recipe by increasing the amount of lemon juice to give it more zing and substituting canned coconut condensed milk, a product that is becoming increasingly more common to find. I really prefer it to traditional sweetened condensed milk.

The strawberry-lemon combination is my favorite for summer, but you can change the fruit to anything you like to make it fit any season. As it is, it could not be more perfect for these hot, humid dog-days (and evenings) we are having under the incessant heat dome plaguing so much of the country right now. 

According to preference, you can serve this cold from the refrigerator or barely thawed from the freezer. If choosing the latter, set it out for about twenty minutes so that it isn’t hard-frozen. I don’t know which I prefer, the chilled or the frozen, but generally choose the colder option when making it in the summer months. I believe these flavors work for anytime of the year and because you use frozen berries, there is no fussing about trying to find fresh.

This is one of those keep-in-your-back-pocket desserts; it’s ready when you are since you can keep the ingredients on hand easily without fear of spoilage. You can whip it up in a moments notice, which makes it ideal for unexpected company. (Actually, you will need at least a two hour’s notice to account for that minimum amount of chill time.)


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


If, like me, you live where triple digit heat indexes have been the norm for many weeks now, this dessert may well be life-affirming and rejuvenating. I can attest to its curative qualities as I am now convinced the harsh sun rays and excessive heat are about to push me to my limits. My everyday tasks have become more akin to what I think running a marathon might feel like in this weather and this dessert has been a lifesaver through pure pleasure and great flavor.     

This recipe is easily doubled for a crowd, but don’t necessarily double the lemon juice without tasting it as you go. This is a wonderful finish to a meal of fresh summer veggies or a big salad. It is cooling and revitalizing. 

Recently, my friend sent over a study about how this kind of prolonged heat can trigger its own SAD (seasonal affective disorder). One of the reasons cited is that it produces some of the same physical symptoms as panic and anxiety: profuse sweating, rapid heartbeat and the like. I know my own racing, negative thoughts have gone up as I worry nearly constantly that our air conditioning may go out. 

Additionally, I have taken on what feels like a part time job replenishing our birdbaths and filling and refilling deep tubs of water outside to ensure our wildlife has access to something to drink. As my husband says sympathetically, “It’s got to be hard being you,” always mothering and worrying over creatures you cannot in any way save or control. I am sensitive to a fault and have been told throughout my life, but that is who I am. I guess I will go down trying! 

Regardless, I hope you love this “cold cake” as much as I do. Let it take you away  at least for a little while  from your cares, concerns and worries. And in case no one else reminds you, don’t forget to stay hydrated and avoid prolonged exposure out in this heat!

Strawberry-Lemon Cold Cake
Yields
8 to 12 servings
Prep Time
15 minutes, plus refrigeration or freezing time

Ingredients

1 pound cake, store bought or bake your own

4 to 5 ounces cream cheese (about half a block)

8 ounces condensed milk

Juice of 3 to 4 lemons, zested

1 bag of frozen strawberries, thawed

1 to 2 tablespoons sugar, optional

Chopped fresh strawberries, for garnish, optional

 

Directions

  1. Slice thawed berries and place into a bowl along with some with some of their juice. Optional: Sprinkle sugar over berries and allow time for sugar to dissolve. 

  2. Cut pound cake into bite size pieces and place in a 9″ or 10″ square baking dish. 

  3. Using a blender or mixer, thoroughly mix/blend cream cheese, condensed milk and lemon juice.

  4. Sprinkle sliced strawberries and juice over cake pieces.

  5. Pour blended mixture over strawberries and cake. Cover and refrigerate at least a few hours before serving. Or place in the freezer if you’d like to try the frozen option.

  6. To serve, if frozen, set out for about 20 min to thaw a bit; otherwise, remove from refrigerator and spoon into shallow dishes and top with whipped cream if desired.

  7. Garnish with grated lemon zest and chopped fresh strawberries (if in season). 

We need your help to stay independent


Cook’s Notes

-Use thawed frozen fruit rather than fresh. Once thawed, the fruit is softer than fresh and that is the preferred texture for this cake.

-The condensed milk is sweet, so adding additional sugar to your thawing berries might make it too sweet for your taste.

-Give coconut condensed milk a try if you haven’t already. I much prefer it in this recipe.

-As mentioned, the original recipe called for angel food cake as the base; feel free to try that if you prefer it to pound cake.

Biz Markie was the “essence of hip-hop”: Hailing the rapper who made us laugh as hip-hop turns 50

Biz Markie was hyper-animated, hilarious and larger than life. The late rapper was the best at injecting fun into his rhymes, in a way that helped me and a whole generation of young people fall in love with hip-hop culture – namely with his 1989 breakout mega hit “Just a Friend.”

“All Up in the Biz,” a new documentary from director Sacha Jenkins, covers every facet of Biz Markie’s life from being raised in foster care, to his ability to befriend anybody and how hip-hop changed his life. Jenkins also collects narratives from a wide range of Markie’s family members and hip-hop legends like Rakim, who share personal stories about hanging with Biz, the way he loved to joke and how he amassed a fascinating collection of toys and gadgets.

“All Up in the Biz” premieres on Showtime and Paramount+ on Aug. 11, the day hip-hop officially turns 50. But, Jenkins shared with me on “Salon Talks,” “Hip-hop is way older than 50 years old.” “It’s not just two turntables and a microphone. Hip-hop at the end of the day is people.” If he had to put an age on hip-hop’s existence, Jenkins says he’d classify it as “thousands.”

Watch the “Salon Talks” episode with Sacha Jenkins here or read a Q&A of our conversation below to learn more about the life of Biz, his contributions to hip-hop and what makes any music legend worthy of the documentary treatment.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

I discovered Biz Markie when I was a young kid. I was born in the early ’80s, and it was something called “Jukebox Television,” where you had to pay a dollar and you get like three videos. That’s how he came across my radar in my tiny section of East Baltimore. What was your first encounter with Biz Markie?

Growing up in Queens, in Astoria, our cousins were in Queensbridge. Queensbridge was a hotbed of musicians and rappers. The Juice Crew, basically their headquarters was Queensbridge, so listening to Marley Marl’s “Mix Show,” I first heard Biz on that show. 

One of my favorite songs was “Nobody Beats the Biz.” I have very fond memories because it samples the Steve Miller Band and back in the ’70s, hip-hop-like DJs played a little of everything. You could like a little bit of rock and roll, you can like disco, you can like whatever. It was a combination of hearing the Steve Miller Band in the hip-hop song in a way that just brought me back to my youth. At that moment in time just made me feel like I was connected to something that was bigger than me.

Thinking about it in a historical context, hip-hop is embedded in everything that we do from creative writing to filmmaking. How would you introduce Biz Markie, his contributions and his body of work, to people who are new to the genre of music, young listeners, people who are still in elementary school, just finding their way? 

“He was the essence of hip-hop.”

When you see the film and you see what an influence he was on such important MCs like Big Daddy Kane and Rakim — I mean, Rakim wept at the memory of his friend — when you think about who those guys are and you think about Biz, I mean, those two guys, Kane and Rakim are very serious, well-respected lyricists, and Biz was this guy who he had jokes, he was funny. He didn’t take himself seriously. You wouldn’t think that this guy who had so much humor [and] had a song called “Picking Boogers” would be such a profound influence on two very important voices, foundational voices, like Rakim and Big Daddy Kane. I think to see, to understand Biz Markie is to understand what the essence of hip-hop is. 

What I’ve come to understand is that, yes, this year is the 50th anniversary of hip-hop, but hip-hop is way older than that. If you think hip-hop is 50 years old, you’re smoking crack in 2023. I did a film about Rick James. I did a film about Louis Armstrong, same guys, same language, same environment. It’s the same thing. You’re going to tell me that hip-hop is different from Louis Armstrong growing up in the hood in New Orleans or Rick James growing up in the hood in Buffalo? It’s the same story over and over again. Black music in America is a reflection of and reaction to the environment. So 50 years, get your money, everybody in hip-hop and it’s great. Yes, Kool Herc and lots of other pioneers set this thing off that we understand to be hip-hop, but understand hip-hop is way older than 50 years old.

If you had to put an age on it?

I mean thousands of years. It’s how we speak, it’s how we express ourselves. It’s how we dress, it’s our language. It’s how we react to the environment. It’s how we speak to each other. That’s what hip-hop is. It’s not just two turntables and a microphone. It’s people. Hip-hop at the end of the day is people.

I think Biz Markie deserves a biopic and all of that, and definitely this film that you made. Tell me how the project came about.

When Biz was alive, I met with him. He approached me about doing a doc on his life, and we had a great conversation and we talked about a lot of the things that wound up in this film, but I couldn’t get a deal for it. I couldn’t sell it. Then Mass Appeal wound up having this program called “Hip-Hop 50” where we were producing all of these films for Showtime, specifically ramping up to the 50th anniversary of hip-hop. I approached them again with the project and said, “Hey, this would be a great project for the Hip-Hop 50,” and that’s how it happened.

What did you learn about Biz while working on the film?

“It’s not just two turntables and a microphone. It’s people. Hip-hop at the end of the day is people.”

He knew who he was. I think I know who I am, but I mean, it took me some years. He knew at a young age who he was, and he embraced it. He was different from everyone else. People made fun of him. He embraced that and made that his armor, his personality. He made you laugh, but not laugh at him, laugh with him. The power of hip-hop. 

Eminem does the same thing. A lot of rappers use their pain from their youth or whatever, turn it around on its head to become a shield. To know who you are at that age, at such a young age, that’s why he became who he became. That’s something I think is universal. Everyone should want to know who they are and be confident in who they are, and that confidence made him who he became.

I didn’t know he was such a collector of toys and games and all kinds of interesting objects.

It started once he got money because, as his wife would say, he was sort of making up for all the things that he didn’t have as a kid. I think once he started having money and traveling, you’re in Arizona and you see an Evel Knievel action figure at a thrift store, you’re going to buy it. Once he started traveling and coming into money is when he officially became a collector.

What else did you learn?

He was the essence of hip-hop in terms of being open to so many different things and traveling. When he traveled back then there weren’t cell phones or beepers or anything. For him to be a guy from Long Island who traveled from way out in Long Island to be in the Bronx, be in Queens, be in Brooklyn, and to be known to make a name for yourself, he built his own celebrity in the way that people use social media today. There was no social media. He was the platform. And so he made that platform work in ways that were phenomenal and way ahead of his time.

It’s always interesting to me that when we do these lists of top rappers, his name doesn’t come up, even felt like Rakim’s name. I felt like their names don’t come up enough.

Right. I did a book called “The Book of Rap Lists,” where there’s lots of lists in there. Yes, it is subjective, but I mean, these days, do people really care about lists? It’s really just whoever’s making the list, them broadcasting or transmitting who they think is the greatest. But I mean, do these kids really care about who’s the greatest?

I know around my family, we fight. We fight about this. I damage relationships.

I hear you. I think at the end of the day though, hip-hop is people, as weird as it sounds. It’s a culture. So it’s like, is there one thing in your culture that’s better than something else? Well, no. Everyone is contributing to that culture. You know what I mean? You could be really whack like a mumbo rapper now, or you could be Rakim. Everyone’s making a contribution at some point.

You ever felt like hip-hop has become so big, that it should be kicked back to the founders and the pioneers? 

“People in general, Black people specifically, should be having more conversations around health and mortality.”

It’s the old story of the blues and jazz and everything else. We are masters of language and art and style, but when it comes to the business that’s run by others, sometimes we get taken advantage of. My hope is you look at a guy like Jay-Z, who’s more successful than anybody, he’s a great example, and hopefully there’ll be more people like him who can lead the way in terms of doing good business. I think Nas is someone who I know who has come a long way, who has great representation and does good business.It’s evolving, but there’s always going to be people who are going to be exploited, unfortunately. It feels like these days, artists have more control over their art and their commerce. Hopefully more people are taking advantage of that.

The world was shocked when Biz Markie passed. It just wasn’t expected. But then I think about DMX and muMs the Poet and then Coolio and Shock G, and it makes you just pull back. For me, I’m looking at different health issues with people in my family, it makes me think about my own mortality. Should we be having a bigger conversation about this?

Yeah, I think people in general, Black people specifically, should be having more conversations around health and mortality and lots of other things that are being discussed directly and indirectly in the music. That’s what’s powerful about the music. A kid could be from the Bronx and a mumble rapper or whatever, a drill rapper and rapping about hyper-materialism, but he’s doing that because it’s a reflection and reaction to how he feels about himself in America and where he thinks he needs to be to be important. It’s all baked in there, but we have to unpack it and unravel it to have more of these discussions to make some changes.

Greg Tate too, I was like, damn. It’s heavy. You’ve done projects on Wu-Tang, Rick James, Louis Armstrong. What in your eyes makes a music star a legend? And what does that legend need to have to make it a good story for you to feel like telling?

I think they need to be original. I think they need to have challenges in their lives. Most of these people who I’ve had the privilege of making films about have amazing challenges that they overcame. I think those kinds of challenges and personal issues are things that are universal, that go beyond music.

Not everyone is going to be able to be a great rapper, a great guitar player, but the personal stuff that we all go through, when you can unpack that stuff and weave it into the art that they make, it helps you better understand their art by understanding their personal lives. It’s the personal stuff that’s more relatable to most people, so you got to have a compelling backstory.

What’s next for you?

I’m doing a series with Jordan Peele about Black cowboys right now and I also have a film about Ed Sullivan that’s about to drop.

He’s got an interesting backstory that people don’t know. He was an ally. People talk about white people just being woke or whatever, the time in which he was woke and what he did with television and giving Black people a voice on national television when so many people, including advertisers that we all know and love today, did not want Ed Sullivan to put these Black people on TV. He made a contribution in his way, and that’s what the film’s about.

Tell everybody when they can see “All Up In the Biz.”

“All Up In the Biz” is August 11th, which is Hip-hop’s 50th birthday. So happy birthday, hip-hop.

That and the 50,000th.

Well, you know. It’s the 50th, Happy Birthday, Kool Herc and everybody else who was an early contributor who gave us the opportunity to do what we do today. I started out as a writer, a publisher of magazines. I’ve had a way longer career in hip-hop than a lot of rappers. I’m very thankful for what hip-hop has done for me, for sure.

 

Florida MAGA candidate caught committing “egregious” plagiarism from Wikipedia: report

Anthony Sabatini, the chair of the Lake County GOP and a right-wing Florida congressional candidate who proudly declares his undergraduate graduation from the University of Florida with magna cum laude honors, widely plagiarized his 2012 college honors thesis, according to The Daily Beast’s review of the treatise. In the paper titled “A Profound Logic of The Blood” centered on the political legacy of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, Sabatini swiped large portions of his content verbatim from other uncited sources and frequently pulled passages from Wikipedia without providing any clear attribution, the outlet reported.

In some instances, Sabatini, who double-majored in history and philosophy at the university before attending law school, also swapped slightly different words and phrases into the streams of ideas from other authors. In others where he did reference an outside source, The Daily Beast found the citations themselves are often dubious, incorrect and, according to a plagiarism expert, made up. Even the very first sentence of the thesis was lifted almost exactly from the abstract of an academic text published 20 years earlier titled, “The Nietzsche Legacy in Germany, 1890-1990.”

After analyzing Sabatini’s thesis, Mark Algee-Hewitt, the director of graduate studies and associate professor of digital humanities in Stanford University’s English department, determined the conservative candidate had committed “egregious” acts of plagiarism. He also noted that “the frequent misspellings in Sabatini’s text make matching these harder than it should” and that “many of the references to his secondary sources seem largely fabricated, right down to the page numbers.” Sabatini did not return the outlet’s request for comment.

India, the world’s most populated country, is on track to achieve its climate goals: report

A new report submitted by the Indian government to the United Nations offers a glimmer of hope when it comes to the fight against climate change: Over the past 14 years, the world’s most populous nation has reduced its carbon emissions by a larger-than-expected 33%. According to the report filed to the United Nations Convention on Climate Change, India is well on its way to achieving the goal it established for itself in the Paris climate accord: To reduce its carbon emissions intensity by 45% from its 2005 levels by 2030.

India’s position stands in stark contrast with that of other nations, including the United States, which under President Donald Trump adopted explicitly anti-science policies when dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic as well as when dealing with climate change. This included yanking America out of the Paris climate accord and removing all information about climate change from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website.

The need for action on climate change was reinforced throughout Summer 2023. July 2023 was the hottest month in recorded history, with residents of Phoenix, Arizona suffering through weeks of temperatures at or above 110ºF (43.3ºC). Thousands of temperature records all over the planet have been broken since the heatwaves began on June 10. They have contributed to wildfires, droughts and other extreme weather events all over the planet.

“It’s a ‘new abnormal’ and it is now playing out in real time,” Dr. Michael E. Mann, a professor of Earth and Environmental Science at the University of Pennsylvania, told Salon last month.

Facing Big Lie defamation lawsuits, Newsmax adds election disclaimer to Trump’s interview

Right-wing cable outlet Newsmax aired an election disclaimer immediately following its prerecorded interview with former President Donald Trump, in which the three-time-indictee repeated his unfounded claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him. In the sit-down with host Eric Bolling, Trump complained about his latest indictment over efforts to subvert 2020 election results and his potential upcoming charges in Georgia for meddling in the state’s election. “I believe I won that election by many many votes,” the current GOP frontrunner told Bolling.

But once the interview came to an end, the conservative anchor cut to a brief disclaimer: “Alright, folks. Now, just a note. Newsmax has accepted the election results as legal and final,” he announced before transitioning to the next segment. Newsmax is currently facing defamation lawsuits from voting software technology companies Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic for airing false claims about widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election in line with Trump’s allegations that it was “rigged.” Last month, according to Rolling Stone, Smartmatic subpoenaed Newsmax employees for their personal communications and work, and in a court filing last week, Dominion requested all relevant correspondence between the channel’s staffers and Trump administration officials in the wake of the 2020 election. Fox News, which faced a similar suit from Dominion and faces another suit with Smartmatic, settled with the former for $787.5 million earlier this year.

Does an apple a day really keep the doctor away?

We’ve all heard that an apple a day keeps the doctor away, but how true is that?

Apples are not high in vitamin A, nor are they beneficial for vision like carrots. They are not a great source of vitamin C and therefore don’t fight off colds as oranges do.

However, apples contain various bioactive substances — natural chemicals that occur in small amounts in foods and that have biological effects in the body. These chemicals are not classified as nutrients like vitamins. Because apples contain many health-promoting bioactive substances, the fruit is considered a “functional” food.

For years, I have taught university classes on nutrients such as vitamins, minerals, carbs, proteins and fats. But recently I developed a course specifically on functional foods. The class explores the various bioactive substances in food and how some may even function like a medicine.

 

Functional foods defined

Functional foods are not the same as superfoods. “Superfood” is a buzzword marketers use to promote foods like kale, spinach and blueberries. Labeling them as “super” appeals to the public and increases sales. But superfood is generally meant to imply a food that has superior nutritional value and that is high in nutrients that are beneficial for health. For example, salmon and tuna are considered superfoods because the omega-3 fats they contain have been linked to heart health.

Superfood advertisements claim that eating the food will improve some aspect of health. The problem is that most of those claims are not based on scientific research, like the criteria for functional foods are.  

In addition to the nutrients that our bodies need for growth and development, functional foods contain a variety of bioactive substances, each with a unique function in the body. The bioactive substances can be found naturally in foods or added during processing.  

The list of bioactive components in foods grows daily as research expands. Though the components themselves are not new, the evidence-based research confirming their health benefits is.

The carotenoids are the most easily recognizable examples of bioactive substances. They are a group of 850 different pigments that give yellow, orange and red fruits and vegetables their color. Carotenoids primarily function as antioxidants, which means they promote health by helping to prevent damage to the body’s cells. Various individual carotenoids may function in different ways.  

Beta-carotene is the most well-known carotenoid because of the high amounts found in carrots. Beta-carotene converts to vitamin A in the body after we consume it. Vitamin A is needed for normal vision.

Lutein and zeaxanthin are the yellow carotenoids found in corn and peppers. The two help support vision, especially among older adults.

Research suggests that the carotenoids from foods and the other categories of bioactive substances may help prevent certain cancers and improve heart health. It’s important to note that carotenoid-rich fruits and vegetables are associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular disease and some cancers but that carotenoids in supplements offer fewer benefits.

 

History of the functional food movement

Though the adage about apples and health originated in the 1800s, nutrition is a relatively young science — and the idea of functional foods and bioactive components is even younger.

From the early 1900s to the 1970s, nutrition research focused on vitamin deficiencies. The public was encouraged to eat more vitamin-fortified, processed foods to prevent nutrient deficiency diseases like scurvy, which is caused by a severe vitamin C deficit, or rickets, caused by prolonged vitamin D deficiency.

This emphasis on eating in order to correct nutrient deficiencies had the tendency to cause people to focus on certain nutrients, which can contribute to overeating. This, combined with an increased availability of highly processed foods, resulted in weight gain, which led to increased rates of diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease.

In 1980, the U.S. government published the first dietary guidelines that encouraged people to avoid fat, sugar and salt. Public health messaging encouraged people to replace fatty foods with starchy foods such as breads and pasta.

The logic of this recommendation was that if people consume less fat, they should increase their calories from carbohydrates to ensure adequate calories. That nutritional advice contributed to the skyrocketing obesity and diabetes rates that continue today.

 

Japan’s focus on foods for health

Historically, the Japanese were one of the healthiest populations on Earth. However, as the 21st century approached, many Japanese people had adopted the American diet and developed health problems similar to those in the U.S.

As a result, the Japanese government became concerned about its citizens’ expanding waistlines and declining health. To correct this problem, Japan became the first country to introduce the concept of functional foods in the 1980s.

Today, Japan uses the phrase “Food for Specialized Health Uses” for products that can be scientifically shown to promote health.  

It has paid off. Japan has more than 1,000 foods and beverages approved as food for specialized health uses, such as hypoallergenic rice. Rice allergies, though uncommon, are a major problem for Japanese people who have them because rice is a staple food.

About half of Japan’s health claims relate to improving digestion using bioactive prebiotic dietary fibers.

 

The bioactive components in apples

An apple’s natural dietary fibers are one of the bioactive components that lead to its being classified as a functional food. The fiber pectin is found mainly in an apple’s pulp.

Pectin functions to reduce the amount of sugar and fat that is absorbed into the body. This helps reduce the risk of diabetes and heart disease.

           

Functional foods, such as probiotic yogurt, provide additional health benefits beyond basic nutrition.

         

Apple peels are also packed with fiber that acts as a laxative.

In addition, apples contain high amounts of natural chemicals known as polyphenols that have vital roles in promoting health and reducing chronic disease. More than 8,000 polyphenols have been identified in various plant foods. Because they are mainly in the peel, whole apples are better sources of polyphenols than juice or applesauce.

Anthocyanins are a subclass of the polyphenols that give the apple peel much of its red color. Diets high in anthocyanins help improve heart health and are being studied for use in treating Alzheimer’s disease.

Another of the primary polyphenols in apples is phloridzin. Researchers have studied the role of phloridzin in helping to control blood glucose for more than 100 years. Recent studies confirm that it plays an important role in regulating blood glucose levels by decreasing the amount of glucose absorbed from the small intestine and increasing excretion from the kidneys.

 

Revisiting the original question

So if apples are functional foods that promote health, do they really help keep the doctor away?

Researchers have tried to figure this out. One U.S. team analyzed the apple-eating patterns and number of doctor visits among more than 8,000 adults. Of those, about 9% ate one apple daily. Once adjusted for demographic and health-related factors, the researchers found that the daily apple eaters used marginally fewer prescription medications than the non-apple eaters. But the number of doctor’s visits was about the same between the two groups.

If one apple a day is not enough to make us healthy, what about eating two or three?

A group of European researchers found that eating two apples a day improved heart health in 40 adults. And Brazilian investigators found that eating three apples daily improved weight loss and blood glucose levels in 40 overweight women.

While eating an apple a day won’t necessarily cut down substantially on prescription medications or doctors visits, it could be one step in the direction of making the transition to eating more healthful, fiber-filled, whole foods.

Apples require no cooking or refrigeration at least for a week or so and one red delicious apple costs about 50 U.S. cents.

So next time you are in the grocery store, grab some apples and — if you feel like it — try eating at least one a day.

Janet Colson, Professor of Nutrition and Food Science, Middle Tennessee State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

“Staggering levels of grift”: Experts say Clarence Thomas trips expose SCOTUS corruption “crisis”

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ acceptance of copious amounts of extravagant gifts and failure to disclose any of it, as reported by ProPublica Thursday, drew condemnation from legal experts and political pundits, further fueling the widespread distrust of the high court in the public eye, demands for the imposition of an ethics code on the court and calls for his removal from the bench.

Since ascending to the highest court, Thomas has received an expansive swath of luxury gifts and travel from wealthy, conservative benefactors including, at minimum, 38 destination vacations, among which is a previously unreported voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas; 26 flights on private jets and eight by helicopter; a dozen VIP passes to professional and college sporting events with seats in the skybox; two luxury resort stays in Florida and Jamaica; and one standing invitation to an especially exclusive golf club along the Atlantic coast.

“This accounting of Thomas’ travel, revealed for the first time here from an array of previously unavailable information, is the fullest to date of the generosity that has regularly afforded Thomas a lifestyle far beyond what his income could provide,” ProPublica reported. “And it is almost certainly an undercount.”

The report comes after the outlet exposed earlier this year Texas real estate billionaire Harlan Crow’s decades of generosity toward the justice, which included funding his vacations, flights on private jets, purchasing Thomas’ mother’s house and footing the bill for Thomas’ great nephew’s tuition payments for two years. Thomas defended his relationship with the magnate at the time, saying that the Crows “are among our dearest friends. As friends do, we have joined them on a number of family trips.”

Some of the hospitality, such as stays in personal homes, Thomas received from the megadonors — Crow; a previously unreported oil baron, Paul “Tony” Novelly, and two others revealed by The New York Times to be former top Berkshire Hathaway executive David Sokol and H. Wayne Huizinga, the billionaire behind Blockbuster — may not have needed to be disclosed. However, Thomas appears to have violated the law in failing to disclose flights, cruises and pricey sports tickets from each of these men, who first met Thomas after he became a justice, ethics experts told ProPublica. 

More significant still is how Thomas’ pattern of accepting lavish gifts reflects consistent violations of judicial norms, experts, which include seven current and former federal judges appointed by both political parties, told the outlet.

“In my career I don’t remember ever seeing this degree of largesse given to anybody,” Jeremy Fogel, a former federal judge who served on the judicial committee that reviews judges’ financial disclosures, told the outlet. “I think it’s unprecedented.”

The total value of the undisclosed trips the benefactors, who — with the exception of Crow — did not appear anywhere in Thomas’ financial disclosures, have given the justice since his appointment in 1991 is unclear. However, ProPublica has estimated the amount is most likely in the millions.

“It’s just the height of hypocrisy to wear the robes and live the lifestyle of a billionaire,” Don Fox, former general counsel of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, told the outlet. 

He added that taxpayers have the right to expect that justices of the Supreme Court are not funding their lives off others’ money. Fox said he told every new political appointee that their wealthy friends are those they had before their appointment. “You don’t get to acquire any new ones,” he told them.

We need your help to stay independent

CNN legal analyst Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor, called out the “appearance of impropriety” from Thomas’ failure to include these lavish gifts in any of his financial disclosures. 

“How does Clarence Thomas think the world actually works? We all have friends. Do any of your friends pay for your private vacations? It’s unheard of,” Honig said Thursday.

“The reason why this is a problem is this undermines public confidence. Rightly so. We all ask, I think logically, why on Earth are these guys spending millions of dollars, why is he accepting this, why isn’t he reporting it? And when you see these polls that show that the American peoples’ confidence is at an all-time low in the Supreme Court, I don’t think it is because of the judicial outcomes they are delivering

“I think it’s because we’re now learning more than ever about all the money flowing through here and all the lack of disclosure and transparency,” he added. 

Honig went on to decry the lack of oversight over the Supreme Court with the other panelists, noting the “condescending” response and declination from Chief Justice John Roberts when the Senate Judiciary Committee invited him to testify at a public hearing about Supreme Court ethics reform.  

“It was just this blow-off, and you wonder why people have no faith in them,” Honig concluded. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Kyle Herrig, senior adviser at the left-leaning government watchdog group Accountable.US, alleged that Thomas’ perception of “his position on our nation’s highest court as a way to upgrade his own lifestyle via his billionaire benefactor social circle” in a statement released Thursday.

“It was his own decades-long improper financial relationship with Harlan Crow that sparked the Supreme Court corruption crisis in the first place — and that was just the tip of the iceberg,” Herrig concluded. “Harlan Crow, Justice Thomas, Leonard Leo, and other key players in this Court corruption crisis may believe they exist above the law, but they don’t. We need accountability and reform now.”

Other legal and political experts further decried Thomas’ luxury travel, with some calling for Thomas to step down or face impeachment.

“The imperiousness of Thomas is beyond the pale,” tweeted NYU Law Professor Andrew Weissman, a former federal prosecutor.

“Any other federal employee with this extended pattern of misconduct would be fired, at a minimum,” former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance added

“Just staggering levels of grift, corruption, and lawbreaking by a nominal public servant who wields tremendous power over all our lives. Clarence Thomas should resign, or be impeached,” tweeted court accountability advocate and lawyer Alex Aronson, who served as the chief counsel to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I.

“I said it would get worse; it will keep getting worse. Omertà must stop; it becomes complicity,” Whitehouse himself wrote, seemingly referencing a code of silence about criminal activity and refusal to cooperate with the authorities practiced by the Mafia.

Sherrilyn Ifill, former president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, said Thomas’ reported travel underscores a “crisis” on the Supreme Court and “we need to start treating it as such.”

“Our profession, the Senate Judiciary Committee, newspaper editorial boards, & the Chief,” she wrote, “will need to summon the courage needed to call for what, by now, should be the obvious next step.”

Maui’s wildfires overwhelmed hospitals with victims. Is this a preview of our climate future?

Apocalyptic wildfires erupted on the island of Maui this week, spreading rapidly and covering so much territory that some residents were forced to jump into the ocean to avoid the flames. It’s yet another chapter in a record-breaking summer of heatwaves and raging wildfires.

The Hawaii fires, exacerbated by extreme winds from Hurricane Dora, took down power lines, cutting cell service for thousands of residents and prompting a state of emergency. While some people are still being accounted for, the Associated Press reported at least 36 people have died, dozens have been injured and more than 270 structures have been destroyed.

Maui’s emergency and rescue services were already strained before the wildfire, therefore at least six patients had to be transported to neighboring islands like Oahu or Honolulu for care. In January, an air ambulance crash in which three medical personnel were killed revealed huge gaps in emergency care services available on the island: Only one company in the state, Hawaii Life Flight, offers air transport for patients with medical needs.

“Our hospital system in Maui is overburdened with burn patients and people suffering from inhalation,” Hawaii Lt. Gov. Sylvia Luke said in a CNN interview. “We are already in communication with other hospital systems about relieving the burden.”

“Our health system operates within a much more narrow tolerance and bandwidth for surge than ever before.”

The wildfires in Hawaii follow blazes in Canada, Greece and Italy this year. The former of which destroyed nearly 25 million acres and caused a smokey haze to settle over states thousands of miles away for weeks. Extreme heat was recorded in nearly every corner of the globe this summer, with July being the hottest month in recorded human history. Fires and the toxic smoke they spread are just one of many disasters worsened by the burning of fossil fuels, which traps greenhouse gases and cooks the planet.

The situation in Hawaii illuminates that the climate crisis is impacting everyone and the health care system needs to prepare itself to tackle multiple events at once, said Dr. Matthew J. Levy, the deputy director of emergency medicine at Johns Hopkins University & Medicine.

“Our health system operates within a much more narrow tolerance and bandwidth for surge than ever before,” Levy told Salon in a phone interview. “Why that is has to do with a multitude and myriad of factors not the least of which include funding, staffing and space — not to mention the equipment you need.”

The pressure put on an already strained health system in Hawaii may be a grim preview into the future as climate disasters become the “new abnormal.”

Hospitals will be tasked with treating not only the immediate injuries sustained by wildfires, for example, but secondary effects of smoke exposure, which can cause headaches, coughing and bronchitis, or, in severe cases, reduced lung function and even death. Meanwhile, heat-related illness is on the rise, and some people, like those with asthma or other respiratory diseases, older adults, and pregnant women — as well as people who work outside — are at a greater risk for negative health effects. 

“We have to remember that during these types of events, oftentimes the people who are the most vulnerable are the ones who have less access to resources, the ones living in economically deprived environments, the ones who don’t have the financial means to get their loved ones or themselves out of harm’s way,” Levy said.

The pressure put on an already strained health system in Hawaii may be a grim preview into the future as climate disasters become the “new abnormal.” Writing in Health Security, Elizabeth Lugten and Neetu Hariharan, both health system advisors contracted to the U.S. Agency for International Development, argued the country’s health systems need to be sizeably beefed up to prepare for waves of patients amid potentially concurrent disasters.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“If climate change continues to be ignored by health system practitioners, health systems globally can face enormous strains, exposing longstanding gaps in public health and further exacerbating chronic inequities,” they wrote.

Luke deployed the National Guard and the American Red Cross to provide emergency services to Hawaiian residents. But if unexpected and concurrent disasters happen at once, resources like these could be stretched thin.

One study published in May in the journal Environmental Science & Technology projected half of Phoenix, Arizona could be hospitalized if a blackout and a heat wave coincided, which doesn’t sound too far-fetched considering this summer’s heat and the fact that blackouts nationwide have doubled since 2015. In such a scenario, researchers projected close to 800,000 people could visit an emergency room, despite the city only having 3,000 beds — and that upwards of 12,000 people could die. Similar but less extreme findings were reported for other cities studied in the paper, such as Atlanta and Detroit.

We need your help to stay independent

It’s possible to increase resilience to climate disasters via maintaining a sufficient workforce, improving early warning systems and re-evaluating disaster planning in light of the evolving climate crisis, according to a 2019 report from the Global Center on Adaptation

There are also things individuals can do — like reducing exposure to infectious diseases or having an evacuation plan — to prevent and reduce harm. But as the COVID pandemic demonstrated, health care facilities can bend, but they can also break.

“COVID has taught us that our acute care health system can flex and adapt relatively quickly, but not without consequence,” Levy said. “That consequence often comes in the way of staff turnovers and burnout.”

FBI whistleblower tells Congress superiors suspiciously “suppressed” investigation of Trump allies

An FBI agent’s supervisor told him to halt an investigation into Rudy Giuliani and cut ties with any informants who reported on the corruption of former President Donald Trump’s associates in August 2022, a 22-page whistleblower complaint obtained by Insider shows. The 14-year veteran of the bureau, whose tenure includes a long-term assignment to Russia-centered counterintelligence, alleged in the statement that his bosses interfered with his work in “a highly suspicious suppression of investigations and intelligence-gathering” seeking to shield “certain politically active figures and possibly also FBI agents” who were tied to Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs.

Those individuals, according to the statement, explicitly included “anyone in the White House and any former or current associates of President Trump.” The complaint was leaked and posted to a Substack newsletter in mid-July after being originally prepared for Senate Judiciary Committee staffers. The whistleblower, the name of whom the outlet is withholding because he is still an FBI employee and seeking protections from Congress, said he was motivated to file the complaint by a desire to improve the federal agency because of its power to hold “policymakers accountable, whether they’re on the left or the right.” He added, “This is a decision point. Are we going to do public corruption or not?”

Though Insider has independently obtained a copy of the document and verified its authenticity, it had not corroborated all of its claims. Spokespeople for Trump and Giuliani did not immediately respond to Insider’s requests for comment, and the FBI’s national press office declined. 

Legal experts: Judge Cannon risks “recusal” as Trump asks to bring docs back to “scene of the crime”

Lawyers for former President Donald Trump on Wednesday asked the judge overseeing his classified documents case to reestablish his Mar-a-Lago resort as a “secure facility” where he can discuss classified discovery evidence in the case.

Special counsel Jack Smith’s team requested a protective order that would require Trump to only review and discuss classified evidence in one of several highly secure locations run by Florida’s federal courts. Trump’s lawyers on Wednesday asked Judge Aileen Cannon, the Trump appointee handling his case, to instead allow him to review and discuss the classified evidence at “a previously approved facility at or near his residence,” an apparent reference to Mar-a-Lago, according to The New York Times.

Trump attorney Christopher Kise told the judge that re-establishing “the same secure area” would reduce the “immense practical and logistical hurdles and costs” of having Trump travel to one of the sensitive compartmented information facilities, or SCIFs, which are run by the courts.

“Efforts to safely transport and protect President Trump—all of which are required by the Secret Service—cost the United States government and state and local municipalities hundreds of thousands of dollars per visit, which is significantly more than the fixed amount necessary to re-establish the secure area at which President Trump (and his lawyers) were once permitted to discuss classified information,” the filing said.

Smith’s team last month argued in favor of the SCIFs last month.

“The government is not aware of any case in which a defendant has been permitted to discuss classified information in a private residence, and such exceptional treatment would not be consistent with the law,” prosecutors said in a July filing.

Trump’s lawyers called the argument “misleading” because of the “uniqueness of President Trump’s residence, including that it is in a highly protected location guarded by federal agents that previously housed a secure facility approved for not only the discussion, but also the retention, of classified information.”

But the attorneys also acknowledged that the facility was “decertified” in 2021 before Trump was charged with illegally stashing over 100 classified documents at his residence and obstructing government efforts to recover them. Trump pleaded not guilty.

Legal experts expressed alarm over the request.

“This ask by Trump is not only unusual, but basically asks Judge Cannon to make the literal scene of the crime into a SCIF,” tweeted MSNBC legal analyst Katie Phang, adding that the “bathrooms at Mar-a-Lago are not SCIFs,” a reference to photos in Trump’s indictment showing boxes of materials taken from the White House stored in one the resort’s restrooms.

We need your help to stay independent

National security attorney Mark Zaid called it a “ridiculous request.”

“No way [the government] would agree to provide Trump with lawful method to store or review classified info at location that remains [a] threat, not to mention risks he poses,” he tweeted. “And it’s not inexpensive to build SCIF. Has Trump even offered to pay for costs?”

Brandon Van Grack, a former DOJ national security official and member of former special counsel Bob Mueller’s team, said that it would be “unprecedented” if Cannon granted the request, noting that it does not appear that Trump’s lawyers had discussed the feasibility with a classified information security officer.

“What authority would Cannon possibly have to order the government to establish a SCIF anywhere?” questioned former federal prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega. “A US District Court Judge has no authority to do that.”

“The DOJ should oppose this based on [Trump’s] track record of complete dereliction with respect to security procedures at Mar-a-Lago,” added former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman. “If Cannon approves it notwithstanding, that record, I think it makes a strong case for recusal.”

Donald Trump has gone off the deep end for real: He’s a danger to humanity

But however close we sometimes seem to that dark and final abyss, let no man of peace and freedom despair. For he does not stand alone. — John F. Kennedy, address to UN General Assembly, Sept. 25, 1961

Donald Trump’s insanity is a clear and present danger to the existence of humanity.

Facing 78 felonies in three different jurisdictions, with a grand jury in Fulton County, Georgia, still waiting to weigh in — and perhaps facing additional federal charges or possible state charges in Michigan, Arizona and elsewhere — Donald Trump has spent the last few days spewing forth an extraordinary level of venom, even for him. While our current president is dealing with the economy, an overseas war and increased aggression in the Middle East and Asia, Trump is running for president hoping to avoid prison time, while also seeking revenge for his 2020 defeat. He is unquestionably insane, either temporarily or for good.

Perhaps he’s setting himself up to plead diminished mental capacity after a slew of recent posts on his favorite social media platform that sound like a horrible cry for help. Call it the wailing of the banshees or whatever else you want, but Trump now seems the living embodiment of Edvard Munch’s famous 1893 painting in oil tempera, pastel and crayon, “The Scream.” He is out there with only his Kool-Aid drinkers beside him as he melts down into a puddle of sweat, makeup and a Rodney Dangerfield suit.

On stage in New Hampshire this week, standing behind a bright light that cast harsh shadows and resembled for all the world a prison-yard searchlight focused on an escaped con, Donald Trump erupted against several of his enemies for a variety of fictional slights. His latest target was Fani Willis, the Atlanta prosecutor who is likely to present evidence before a grand jury next week that could lead to an extensive array of racketeering charges related to the last presidential election. Trump has called Willis (who is Black) a “racist” and spread stories that she “ended up having an affair with the head of a gang or a gang member.” She wants to prosecute him, Trump said, for another “perfect phone call,” one even “more perfect” than the call with Volodymyr Zelenskyy that got him impeached in 2019. (In the more recent call, if you’re keeping score, Trump asked the Georgia secretary of state to “find” him thousands of nonexistent votes.)

In that same speech, Trump  alluded to what a great favor he’s doing the country by running for president again. “I could have been relaxing at Mar-a-Lago or the South of France,” he said, “which I would prefer to being in this country, frankly.”

That’s a unique campaign strategy, if not a literally insane one. He’d prefer to be in another country, but he’s got such a big heart he’ll agree to run this one. I’ve never heard anyone campaign for president that way before. 

To top it all off, Trump reminded us that “I went to Wharton School of Finance. We never studied indictment. We never studied arrest. We never studied prison. These are sick people we’re dealing with.”

Maybe he should have studied a bit of law, honestly.

Trump is also fuming because he has so far been unsuccessful in getting Judge Tanya Chutkan in Washington to delay the forthcoming criminal trial stemming from his most recent indictment related to the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Maybe that’s why he looks so sweaty on television. 

Trump’s rhetoric has been consistently endorsed and the fire stoked by conservative members of Congress, but as reported in the Hill, Rep. Nancy Mace, a South Carolina Republican, recently said, “There’s only so much people can take before they say enough is enough.”

Trump claims he’s doing us a favor by running again: “I could have been relaxing at Mar-a-Lago or the South of France, which I would prefer to being in this country, frankly.”

Indeed, all that is likely to change rapidly. Ohio voters overwhelmingly voted this week not to change the way their state constitution is amended, which will likely enable them to pass an abortion rights amendment this fall. If Republicans hope to win elections going forward, the “moderate” wing of the GOP will have to abandon Trump and the hardliners.

Donald Trump’s world, in other words, is crumbling.

We could see that not just in his New Hampshire speech, but in his posts on social media. He calls special counsel Jack Smith “Deranged” and continues to lie about the recent charges against him — describing them as violations of his “FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS” — and to accuse the Justice Department and its “many thug prosecutors” of “illegally leaking everything and anything to the Fake News Media.”

The truth is that it’s Trump’s attorneys who are trying to delay the criminal proceedings, mostly so they can go on the Sunday talk shows and pitch Donald’s case to the media. Jack Smith and his crew have only spoken through the indictment, which I’m told is what Trump means when he talks about “illegal leaking.” 

That’s hardly the only evidence that Trump has lost his tenuous grasp on reality. Other posts have been filled with images of hell, and include outrageous, inflammatory attacks on former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: “She is a wicked witch whose husbands [sic] journey from hell starts and finishes with her. She is a sick and demented psycho who will someday live in HELL!”

Those are the words of a man whose followers view him as a messiah. Contrast that with what  John F. Kennedy said five months before he was assassinated, in a commencement address at American University:

And if we cannot end now our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children’s future. And we are all mortal.

Not convinced yet that Trump is nuts? How about this one, after the U.S. women’s soccer team lost to Sweden in the World Cup, specifically attacking Megan Rapinoe, the American star who missed a penalty kick: “WOKE equals failure. Nice shot Megan, the U.S.A is going to HELL!!! MAGA.” How soon before he starts screaming for the kids to get off his lawn? 

Former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger agrees with me here, writing on social media that Trump is “[l]iterally insane. Not metaphorically insane. Donald Trump is actually clinically insane.”

I saw Trump in the White House and I see him now. During his time as president he was often loud, obnoxious and abusive. I remember being in the upper press area in the West Wing and hearing him yell about the thermostat in the Oval Office, some 50 feet away and through several walls.

I remember him winking at me and then yelling at me before he took my question — all within the space of a few moments. I remember him telling me to sit down and when I said, “I’m already sitting down,” he smiled and said, “I know.”

At those times, I echoed what others thought. “He’s acting like a mob boss,” said author Dan Moldea, who has written about organized crime for years. 

Yeah, except now he’s like an unhinged and crazy mob boss. Maybe we’ll see him roaming the streets in his pajamas like Vincent “The Chin” Gigante, the fabled “Oddfather,” muttering “Covfefe,” “Fake News” and “It was a perfect call” as he urinates on a fire hydrant. That would be some real illegal leaking. 

But remember, Gigante’s schtick was an act. He got caught. That doesn’t bode well for Donnie.

Trump’s far-right fanatics refuse to abandon him, mostly because they can’t. Their future is tied to him, and as sure as the toilet paper circles the bowl after the flush, so will his supporters. They scream that the indictments are the action of a “banana republic” when actually that’s what not indicting him would be.

Others complain that only one side of the story was heard before these indictments. That’s how it works, folks. You can’t just yank people off the streets and put them on trial. You provide evidence to a grand jury of citizens, who listen to the evidence and then agree that charges can be proffered. Trump’s fans may not believe this, but that protects the accused.

Some of them actually claim to believe that Trump is the victim of a “two-tier justice system.” They are correct that there are two tiers. But when you’ve been  charged with 78 felony counts in three different jurisdictions, have your own private plane, don’t have to get a mugshot or pay bail and don’t have to give up your passport — well, guess which tier you’re in. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Trump is either genuinely crazy or he’s acting like it to try to avoid prison. His supporters are incapable of adapting to that reality.

They are supported by the “culture of lies” orchestrated by Donald Trump, and alluded to in Jack Smith’s latest indictment. It’s not a crime to tell lies, and he does so often. But it’s the actions based on those lies that have caused Trump legal problems and led to these indictments. Not the speech. Not the thoughts.

This brings up the question of whether we human beings are in fact a sentient species.

We face climate change, potential nuclear war, famine and global militarization, but we’re stuck talking about this one crazy SOB — apparently we can’t solve the other problems until we fix this one.

We have very real concerns, including some of the toughest existential threats humanity has ever faced. Climate change, potential nuclear war, famine and global militarization threaten our survival, but we’re stuck talking about this one crazy SOB — apparently we can’t solve the other problems until we fix this one.

Yet we seemingly cannot adapt. It makes you wonder if we even have the mental capacity of squirrels.

The squirrels on the White House campus have adapted. They’re no longer afraid of humans — at least those who haven’t been consumed by the resident falcon at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. 

A few of those squirrels will come up and eat out of your hand — and then bite it if you’re not careful. I remember one from a previous administration who used to look at me like I owed him rent money: “You want in there? You gotta pay.” Very cheeky fellow.

Is that some kind of a metaphor? You figure it out.

Animals adapt. We seem ready to be cattle for our alien overlords. Just kidding — I’m not worried about them. It’s the stupid, crazy and all too real terrestrial overlords I am concerned about. 

Donald Trump represents that ruling class, in the worst possible way. He is a true vulgarian. His mannerisms are crude, his language antagonistic, his thoughts are vindictive and he’s always whining and playing the victim card.

That has never changed and never will. Too many among us don’t even want it to.

I look again to the words of John F. Kennedy, less than a month before his death, upon receiving an honorary degree from Amherst College. “A nation reveals itself not only by the men it produces but also by the men it honors, the men it remembers,” he said.

Perhaps the best thing we could all do is forget all about Donald Trump — after he’s long gone. The best he can do is to plead insanity.

That might be the best outcome for all of humanity.

But don’t count on it. Donald Trump does not care about humanity. He only cares about himself — and now his survival instincts are failing. 

 

Clarence Thomas’ 38 vacations: Other billionaires treated the Supreme Court justice to luxury travel

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Series: Friends of the Court:SCOTUS Justices’ Beneficial Relationships With Billionaire Donors

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ decadeslong friendship with real estate tycoon Harlan Crow and Samuel Alito’s luxury travel with billionaire Paul Singer have raised questions about influence and ethics at the nation’s highest court.

During his three decades on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas has enjoyed steady access to a lifestyle most Americans can only imagine. A cadre of industry titans and ultrawealthy executives have treated him to far-flung vacations aboard their yachts, ushered him into the premium suites at sporting events and sent their private jets to fetch him — including, on more than one occasion, an entire 737. It’s a stream of luxury that is both more extensive and from a wider circle than has been previously understood.

Like clockwork, Thomas’ leisure activities have been underwritten by benefactors who share the ideology that drives his jurisprudence. Their gifts include:

At least 38 destination vacations, including a previously unreported voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas; 26 private jet flights, plus an additional eight by helicopter; a dozen VIP passes to professional and college sporting events, typically perched in the skybox; two stays at luxury resorts in Florida and Jamaica; and one standing invitation to an uber-exclusive golf club overlooking the Atlantic coast.

This accounting of Thomas’ travel, revealed for the first time here from an array of previously unavailable information, is the fullest to date of the generosity that has regularly afforded Thomas a lifestyle far beyond what his income could provide. And it is almost certainly an undercount.

While some of the hospitality, such as stays in personal homes, may not have required disclosure, Thomas appears to have violated the law by failing to disclose flights, yacht cruises and expensive sports tickets, according to ethics experts.

Perhaps even more significant, the pattern exposes consistent violations of judicial norms, experts, including seven current and former federal judges appointed by both parties, told ProPublica. “In my career I don’t remember ever seeing this degree of largesse given to anybody,” said Jeremy Fogel, a former federal judge who served for years on the judicial committee that reviews judges’ financial disclosures. “I think it’s unprecedented.”

This year, ProPublica revealed Texas real estate billionaire Harlan Crow’s generosity toward Thomas, including vacations, private jet flights, gifts, the purchase of his mother’s house in Georgia and tuition payments. In an April statement, the justice defended his relationship with Crow. The Crows “are among our dearest friends,” Thomas said. “As friends do, we have joined them on a number of family trips.”

The New York Times recently surfaced VIP treatment from wealthy businessmen he met through the Horatio Alger Association, an exclusive nonprofit. Among them were David Sokol, a former top executive at Berkshire Hathaway, and H. Wayne Huizenga, a billionaire who turned Blockbuster and Waste Management into national goliaths. (The Times noted Thomas gives access to the Supreme Court building for Horatio Alger events; ProPublica confirmed that the access has cost $1,500 or more in donations per person.)

Records and interviews show Thomas had another benefactor, oil baron Paul “Tony” Novelly, whose gifts to the justice have not previously been reported. ProPublica’s totals in this article include trips from Crow.

Each of these men — Novelly, Huizenga, Sokol and Crow — appears to have first met Thomas after he ascended to the Supreme Court. With the exception of Crow, their names are nowhere in Thomas’ financial disclosures, where justices are required by law to publicly report most gifts.

The total value of the undisclosed trips they’ve given Thomas since 1991, the year he was appointed to the Supreme Court, is difficult to measure. But it’s likely in the millions.

Huizenga sent his personal 737 to pick Thomas up and bring him to South Florida at least twice, according to John Wener, a former flight attendant and chef on board the plane. If he were picked up in D.C., the five-hour round trip would have cost at least $130,000 each time had Thomas chartered the jet himself, according to estimates from jet charter companies. In February 2016, Thomas flew on Crow’s private jet from Washington to New Haven, Connecticut, before heading back on the jet just three hours later. ProPublica previously reported the flight, but newly obtained U.S. Marshals Service records reveal its purpose: Thomas met with several Yale Law School deans for a tour of the room where they planned to display a portrait of the justice. (Crow’s foundation also gave the school $105,000, earmarked for the “Justice Thomas Portrait Fund,” tax filings show.)

Don Fox, the former general counsel of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics and the senior ethics official in the executive branch, said, “It’s just the height of hypocrisy to wear the robes and live the lifestyle of a billionaire.” Taxpayers, he added, have the right to expect that Supreme Court justices are not living on the dime of others.

Fox, who worked under both Democrat and Republican administrations, said he advised every new political appointee the same thing: Your wealthy friends are the ones you had before you were appointed. “You don’t get to acquire any new ones,” he told them.

Thomas and Novelly did not respond to a detailed list of questions for this story. Huizenga died in 2018 and his son, who is the president of the family’s holding company, also did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

In a statement to ProPublica, Sokol said he’s been close friends with the Thomases for 21 years and acknowledged traveling with and occasionally hosting them. He defended the justice as upright and ethical. “We have never once discussed any pending court matter,” Sokol said. “Our conversations have always revolved around helping young people, sports, and family matters.”

“As to the use of private aviation,” he added, “I believe that given security concerns all of the Supreme Court justices should either fly privately or on governmental aircraft.”

The justices have said they follow court rules prohibiting them from accepting gifts from a group of people so frequently that “a reasonable person would believe that the public office is being used for private gain.” But what actually constitutes a gift under those rules is ambiguous and, in practice, justices have few restrictions on what they can accept. Other members of the court have accepted travel underwritten by wealthy businessmen and speaking invitations at universities. Stephen Breyer accepted a flight to a Nantucket wedding from a Democratic megadonor. Ruth Bader Ginsburg took a tour of Israel and Jordan paid for by an Israeli billionaire. Those gifts are public because Breyer and Ginsburg disclosed them.

Thomas, however, is apparently an extreme outlier for the volume and frequency of all the undisclosed vacations he’s received. He once complained that he sacrificed wealth to sit on the court, though he depicted the choice as a matter of conscience. “The job is not worth doing for what they pay,” he told the bar association in Savannah, Georgia, in 2001, “but it is worth doing for the principle.”

To track Thomas’ relationships and travel, ProPublica examined flight data, emails from airport and university officials, security detail records, tax court filings, meeting minutes and a trove of photographs from personal albums, including cards that Thomas’ wife, Ginni, sent to friends. In addition, reporters interviewed more than 100 eyewitnesses and other sources: jet and helicopter pilots, flight attendants, airport workers, yacht crew members, security guards, photographers, waitresses, caterers, chefs, drivers, river rafting guides and C-suite executives.

ProPublica has not identified any legal cases that Huizenga, Sokol or Novelly had at the Supreme Court during their documented relationships with Thomas, although they all work in industries significantly impacted by the court’s decisions.

In a small-circulation biography given to Huizenga’s friends and family, Thomas acknowledged that he and Huizenga discussed some of the billionaire’s companies but said their relationship was never transactional. “It wasn’t that kind of friendship,” he told the interviewer. The justice said they’d prefer to go to a small restaurant in a strip mall or sit on the billionaire’s lawn and drink tea or diet soda.

“We are in a society where everything is quid pro quo,” Thomas said, but not with the Huizengas. “I don’t do anything for them and they can’t do anything for me.”

“Four Lucky Couples”

On Labor Day weekend 2019, Thomas boarded a private plane in Washington, D.C., for the first leg of a sojourn out West. The vacation had been months in the making and, thanks to Sokol, it was all taken care of. He’s hosted the Thomases virtually every summer for a decade.

The first stop was the Great Plains. It was the home opener at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, which Ginni Thomas had attended before transferring. The Thomases were joined there by other couples, including one of the justice’s most vocal advocates, Mark Paoletta, who then worked for the federal government, and his wife.

Sokol, a major university donor who graduated from the Omaha campus, arranged for the group to attend the football and volleyball games with all-access passes. Clarence Thomas met with the football team the day before the game. The group walked out of the tunnel before kickoff. During halftime, they stood on the sidelines to watch the marching band perform, at one point posing for a picture in the end zone: “The Sokols took four lucky couples to the first Nebraska footbal game of the season,” Ginni Thomas wrote in one of the card captions.

Sokol runs a private equity firm and now also chairs a holding company that owns large international shipping and power utility corporations. He resigned from Berkshire Hathaway in 2011 amid an internal investigation by the company that found he had violated its insider trading policy. (At the time, Sokol denied wrongdoing and said his resignation was unrelated to the episode; he was never indicted.)

That Saturday, the group watched both the football and volleyball games from luxury suites. The football skybox, which typically costs $40,000 annually, belonged to Tom Osborne, a former Republican congressman who was also the head coach of the team for 25 years. Hosting the Thomases had ripple effects. A local priest requested a ticket for his 87-year-old mother, but the volleyball coach had to tell him none was available. “All of our tickets have been taken for Clarence Thomas and his group,” the coach wrote.

The Thomases have been treated to at least seven University of Nebraska-Lincoln games — five arranged by Sokol — in recent years. The Times first reported on Thomas’ appearances at some of them.

Thomas has never reported any of those tickets on his yearly financial forms. Judiciary disclosure rules require that most gifts worth more than $415 be disclosed. “It’s so obvious,” said Richard Painter, former chief White House ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush. “It all has to be reported.” ProPublica identified more than 60 federal judges who disclosed tickets to sporting events between 2003 and 2019. In 1999, Thomas disclosed private flight and accommodations for the Daytona 500 but hasn’t reported any other sporting events before or since.

In a statement, Osborne confirmed Thomas has “watched a couple of football games” in his suite, which the university had given to him. He said he is “taxed” for the use of the suite but did not answer whether Thomas has ever reimbursed him. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln did not respond to requests for comment.

On Sunday, the morning after the football game in Nebraska, Sokol flew with Thomas by private jet to Sokol’s Paintbrush Ranch just outside Jackson Hole, Wyoming. The property, valued in the low eight figures, sits in the foothills of Shadow Mountain. A local radio personality said of the estate: “This is the ultimate home and it has the most iconic view of the Tetons I’ve seen. Ever.”

Sokol also owns a waterfront mansion in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, currently worth $20.1 million, where he’s hosted the Thomases as well, according to photos of the visits. The 12,800-square-foot property includes a home theater, elevator, walk-in wine cellar and yacht docking. (In addition, Sokol and Thomas have shared an opulent lodge together while vacationing at Crow’s private lakeside resort, Camp Topridge, in the Adirondacks.)

In Wyoming, the Thomases fished, rafted on the Snake River and sat by a campfire overlooking the Teton Range with the other couples. At one point, the Paolettas serenaded the justice with a song they wrote about him.

Like Thomas, Paoletta did not disclose the trip on his yearly financial filings. At the time, Paoletta was general counsel and the designated ethics official at the Office of Management and Budget. In a statement, Paoletta said he wasn’t required to disclose the trip because he had reimbursed Sokol, but he did not say how much or provide documentation of those payments. “I complied with all ethics laws and regulations,” Paoletta said.

Details of the vacation to Nebraska and Wyoming were drawn from photographs, trip planning emails and social media posts, as well as interviews with airport workers, local residents and others familiar with the travel, including river raft guides.

Since 1990, Sokol and his wife have donated more than $1 million to Republican politicians and groups, along with smaller amounts to Democrats. Last October, in New Orleans, Sokol made a direct reference to a pending Supreme Court case while addressing a group of former Horatio Alger scholarship recipients. (Thomas was not in attendance.)

The speech veered into territory that made many of those in attendance uncomfortable and left others appalled, emails and others messages show. Sokol, who has written extensively about American exceptionalism and the virtues of free enterprise, minimized slavery and systemic racism, some felt. He then criticized President Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan, arguing Biden had overstepped the government’s authority, according to a recording of the speech obtained by ProPublica.

“It’s going to get overturned by the Supreme Court,” Sokol predicted, echoing a common legal commentary.

He was right. This summer, the court struck down Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan. Thomas voted in the majority.

Deep Sea Fishing in the Caribbean

Nearly every spring, Novelly, a billionaire who made his fortune storing and transporting petroleum, takes his two yachts on a fishing expedition to the Bahamas’ Exuma Islands. Photographs from the trips show porcelain beaches, cerulean waters and fresh mahi-mahi. Friends and family come and go for days at a time.

Three of Novelly’s former yacht workers, including a captain, told ProPublica they recall Thomas coming on board the vessels multiple times in recent years. Novelly’s local chauffeur in the Bahamas said his company once picked Thomas up from the billionaire’s private jet and drove him to the marina where one of the yachts, Le Montrachet, frequently docks.

Le Montrachet, named after the premium French wine, is a 126-foot luxury vessel complete with a full bar, multiple dining areas, a baby grand piano, accommodations for 10 guests and a handful of smaller fishing boats and jet skis. Novelly charges about $60,000 a week to outsiders who want to charter it.

Another past guest on Novelly’s yacht is “Alligator” Ron Bergeron, one of the biggest land and roadway developers in Florida. Around 2018, Novelly and Thomas went to Bergeron’s private ranch on the edge of the Everglades — a sprawling, gated estate with centuries-old cypress trees and an 1800s-style saloon on site. He described Novelly as a man who likes to share his success with others. “He’s very generous with all his friends,” Bergeron told ProPublica.

Bergeron said his conversations with Thomas at the ranch were strictly about charity work and not business. “You’re talking about a great man,” Bergeron said, “who gives his time to make a difference for America.”

Since 1999, Novelly’s family and companies have publicly disclosed at least $500,000 to conservative causes and Republican candidates in federal elections. (Before then, he had given to both parties.)

Novelly, who recently stepped down from his CEO roles, ran his business affairs aggressively, ending up on the wrong side of the government in at least two cases. He spends much of his time between St. Louis and Boca Raton, Florida, where he has a 23,000 square-foot palatial estate appraised at $22.2 million. In 2002, Novelly established residency and a holding company in the Virgin Islands. During a hearing with local officials, Novelly described the arrangement there as a “quid pro quo,” meaning the U.S. territory received a boost to the local economy in return for offering substantial tax breaks. The IRS would later call it an “abusive tax avoidance scheme” and pursued Novelly for millions in back taxes and penalties. Novelly denied the characterization and eventually settled with the government for a negotiated amount.

There’s no evidence his friendship with Thomas helped Novelly in one of his most significant disputes. In 2005, the Justice Department sued Novelly’s company, Apex Oil, because its corporate predecessor had contributed to a massive groundwater contamination beneath an Illinois village and then Apex refused to help with the cleanup. Apex argued the spill had occurred before the company went through a bankruptcy years earlier. Several judges ruled against Apex, which eventually appealed to the Supreme Court in 2010. The justices declined to hear the case, and the company had to pay about $150 million to help remove oil from the soil.

It’s not clear how Thomas voted in the case because such votes are not typically public. The vacations ProPublica identified appear to have occurred after the case was resolved.

In 2020, Apex Oil, Sokol and Crow helped fund a documentary defending Thomas as a response to an HBO film that was critical of the justice. Sokol called the HBO movie a “Molotov cocktail into our homes” and a prime example of America’s eroding civility.

The “Most Coveted” Invitation in the World

Thomas’ first billionaire benefactor is likely H. Wayne Huizenga, believed to be the only person in American history to build three separate Fortune 500 companies. One of the three was AutoNation, which Huizenga founded in 1996 before building it into the largest car dealer in the country. Between 1998 and 1999, Huizenga’s holding company spent $500,000 lobbying federal agencies that regulate the automotive industry, according to OpenSecrets data. Over the years, the Huizenga family and companies gave millions to state and federal Republican candidates and once threw a fundraiser for the Florida GOP that helped keep the party afloat for months.

The billionaire was known to regularly lavish gifts and perks on those in his orbit. He routinely took friends on opulent vacations. He paid his employees handsomely and sometimes covered their bills and personal expenses. On a whim, Huizenga once handed box tickets for the opera, which were worth thousands, to his caterer, Bob Leonardi.

“I led the life of a multimillionaire without being one,” Leonardi said.

For 20 years, Thomas benefited from Huizenga’s attention as well, availing himself of the billionaire’s fleet of aircraft and other luxuries. Huizenga took Thomas to see the Miami Dolphins and Florida Panthers several times between the mid-’90s and mid-2000s, according to interviews and photographs. Huizenga owned both teams at the time.

Executives saw Thomas around Huizenga’s office often. Richard Rochon, the former president of Huizenga Holdings, said Thomas once shadowed the billionaire during meetings. “He just wants to see what I do every day,” Rochon recalled Huizenga saying.

On at least two occasions, Thomas attended Huizenga’s birthday and Christmas parties, which the billionaire held inside his private hangar at the Fort Lauderdale airport. Van Poole, a lobbyist and former chairman of the Florida GOP, recalled riding down the elevator at the nearby Hyatt Pier 66 hotel — which Huizenga also controlled — when the Thomases stepped in with a security detail. The group discussed college sports and then traveled to the party together, Poole said.

Thomas occasionally flew on Huizenga’s helicopters, sometimes taking off from the roof of the corporate headquarters, and at least one of his Gulfstream jets around Florida, according to his former pilots. But the billionaire’s most luxurious planes were a pair of 737 jets he had retrofitted like a lounge, complete with recliners, love seats, mahogany dining and card tables and gourmet food.

At least two times in the mid 2000s, Huizenga sent one of them to pick up Thomas and deliver him to Fort Lauderdale, said John Wener, the flight attendant on board.

Wener recalled chatting with the justice about his nomination to the Supreme Court and the tumultuous Senate confirmation hearings after Thomas’ former aide, Anita Hill, accused him of sexual harassment. “He said, ‘Just imagine a job interview and you’re in front of 100 people that hate you,'” Wener recalled Thomas remarking. “‘How would that interview go?'”

In the early 2000s, Huizenga gave Thomas something that was priceless at the time: a standing invitation to his exclusive, members-only golf club, the Floridian. Designed by golf legend Gary Player, the course was lined with cottages for Huizenga’s friends, a yacht marina for them to dock and a helipad if they wanted to fly in. One family friend told the Huizenga family biographer that the Floridian was “the most coveted private golf invitation in the world.” Those who worked and played there said the membership rolls were a Rolodex of the rich, famous and powerful: From Michael Douglas and Rush Limbaugh to Michael Bloomberg and former Vice President Dan Quayle. Donald Trump once asked to be a member but Huizenga spurned him, according to three of Huizenga’s former employees.

All 200-plus members were “honorary” and didn’t pay dues — Huizenga covered everything. “It was a little slice of heaven, a magical place,” former media personality Matt Lauer told the biographer. “You drove through the gates and it was this fairytale land that he had created.”

It’s unclear if Thomas was a member or Huizenga’s frequent guest with similar privileges. The billionaire’s former personal photographer and two former golf pros at the club recalled seeing Thomas there multiple times over the years. One of Huizenga’s helicopter pilots said he had picked the justice up from the property. And a fifth employee, a former waitress and concierge, said she once served Thomas and Huizenga, who were wearing golf attire, as they dined alone in the enormous waterfront clubhouse for lunch. “Have you met a Supreme Court justice?” Huizenga asked the waitress before she took their order. “This is Clarence Thomas.”

Today, the Floridian, which the Huizenga family sold in 2010 before it underwent renovations, has a $150,000 initiation fee.

Paying for Access to the Supreme Court Chambers

Thomas first met Huizenga at a formal gala in Washington, D.C., in 1992, when they were both inducted into the Horatio Alger Association. Henry Kissinger and Maya Angelou were among the other honorees that year. The organization, named after the 19th-century novelist who popularized rags-to-riches folklore, gives millions in college scholarships each year and also brings together some of the country’s wealthiest, self-made business tycoons for opulent events. (In real life, Alger was a minister on Cape Cod who resigned from his parish after he was credibly accused of molesting boys.)

“We were proud to honor Justice Thomas more than 30 years ago,” an association spokesperson said in a statement, “and remain grateful for his continued involvement in our organization.” She said Thomas spends countless hours mentoring scholarship recipients.

Thomas appears to have met Huizenga, Sokol, Novelly and Bergeron through the organization. Several of Thomas’ trips to Florida in the 2000s appear to have been connected with the association. In that time period, he joined Huizenga at Horatio Alger scholarship ceremonies in South Florida, travel that the justice disclosed in several of his yearly financial filings.

However, he never identified Huizenga in any of his disclosures. The association spokesperson confirmed to ProPublica that the billionaire hosted those events “and covered all costs involved.”

Experts said that means Thomas’ disclosures would be, at a minimum, incomplete and misleading because the rules require federal judges to identify the source of the gifts they receive. “Source means the person or entity that paid for it,” said Kathleen Clark, a legal ethics authority at Washington University in St. Louis.

Belonging to the association has had its privileges. As part of a board meeting, the Thomases once went on a lavish trip to Jamaica, where they were hosted by a wealthy donor who owned a luxury hotel atop a former sugar plantation. Johnny Cash performed. Horatio Alger Association membership itself is worth at least $200,000, according to the organization’s meeting minutes in 2007, a sum that those who nominate a new member are responsible for raising in that person’s honor. The association spokesperson said there was no requirement to raise money for new members back when Thomas was inducted.

Thomas has likely helped the group earn many times that figure since then. Every year, the justice hosts an event for members inside the Supreme Court’s Great Hall. The Times previously reported that the event afforded the Horatio Alger Association unusual access to the court.

ProPublica examined boxes of the association’s historical archives, including financial records that show the group has required donations of at least $1,500 — $7,500 for nonmembers — to attend the Supreme Court event. In 2004, those who donated $100,000 for a table at the main ceremony got 10 seats inside the Supreme Court. In the judiciary’s code of conduct — which is general guidance that does not apply to Supreme Court justices, though they say they consult it — there is explicit language advising federal judges against using their position to fundraise for outside organizations.

But that’s what Thomas has done, said Virginia Canter, a former government ethics lawyer who served in administrations of both parties and reviewed the association’s financial records at ProPublica’s request.

“To use the Supreme Court to fundraise for somebody’s charity is, to me, an abuse of office,” she said. Canter acknowledged the organization may do good work, but that’s besides the point, she said, because wealthy donors aren’t supposed to be able to pay thousands of dollars to visit a justice inside the courthouse walls.

“It’s pay to play,” Canter added, “isn’t it?”

Bumps in the air: What’s climate change got to do with it?

Cups bouncing off trays, flight crews strapping on to their seats midflight, bumps in the sky: Into this zig-zagging volatility we fly.

That is, if you make it off the ground.

This past weekend — high season for summer travel — about 2,450 flights were cancelled across the country, driven by the sequence of rollicking extremes wreaking chaos in our lower atmosphere. In July they came like plagues: the Canadian wildfires that choked much of New England; the rainstorms that deluged New England and the Eastern Seaboard; and the blistering heat wave across the Southwest.


Join our email list to get the stories that mainstream news is overlooking.
Sign up for Capital & Main’s newsletter.

 
All these events came in a two week span in July — atmospheric dissonance raged. Of course they all overlapped, and as if we need reminding, they’re all part of a continental (and global) weather system: Havoc wreaked in New England does not take long to ripple across the flight patterns in and out of L.A. or any other destination.

Is it bad luck, or is it a pattern?

The only thing predictable about that string of biblical-scale disasters was that it has been predicted. For more than a decade, scientists have identified the fundamental characteristic of our greenhouse gas-soaked atmosphere: While the temperatures are rising, just how much they rise and just how much disruption they cause depends on where you’re located. But for everyone, no matter where on the planet, our primary experience of climate change is one of volatility, experienced by everyone and everywhere and all at once.

“Insert Quote”

The disruptions to the atmospheric equilibrium are altering weather patterns into patterns we’ve never seen before. Which is why all the records — for heat, rain, smoke, windstorms — are being broken with every new weather cataclysm. Frequency of such extreme events — fires, floods, heat waves and intense rainstorms (warmer temperatures mean that more water is absorbed in the atmosphere, until it’s not) — are attributable, to a significant degree, to the ever-thickening overcoat of greenhouse gases enveloping the Earth. And we feel that most vividly and directly in airplanes, which fly directly into the maelstrom above.

The turbulent skies are affecting not only when or whether we fly, but how. Ocean currents are shifting because of rising temperatures in the waters below our feet, and a similar shift is underway in the air currents above our heads.

Turbulence starts with a domino effect: Higher atmospheric temperatures fueled by CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions are dramatically altering wind patterns. It’s a newly dynamic world up there, as this paper in Nature Climate Change points out, of colliding downdrafts and updrafts. Warmer air pushes colder air upwards, where it heats and then comes down again. Those vertical wind shears, deeply destabilizing to the cruising altitudes most often used by commercial airplanes, are made more erratic and fierce by the changing climate.

Those vertical wind shears, deeply destabilizing to the cruising altitudes most often used by commercial airplanes, are made more erratic and fierce by the changing climate.

The amount of strong clear air turbulence over the North Atlantic and North America increased by 55% between 1979 and 2020, according to research published in June in Geophysical Research Letters. The study assigns most of the responsibility to the increasing concentration of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere — in other words, to the fossil fuel industries and our consumption of their products.

Climate change is fed by cause-effect loops over time spans that are getting shorter. For example, rising temperatures melt glaciers, ocean waters expand and those warmer waters in turn contribute to the melting of more glaciers. Still, all the stages of that cause-effect-cause dynamic are hard to experience unless you’re driving a fossil-fueled car on the edge of a melting glacier, and on a beach with a rising sea at the same time.

Airplanes take us straight into the very same atmosphere where air currents are being sent into new patterns because of the distorting impacts of greenhouse gases — an abundance of which will be coming from your airplane. Airplanes place us in the middle of the climate feedback loop.

From the exhaust of planes comes a cocktail of greenhouse gas-enhancing substances, including CO2 and nitrous oxide; aviation contributes 3.5-4% of global greenhouse gas emissions. So while strapped to our airplane seats, bouncing along eight miles high, we’re also contributing in real time to our own and fellow passengers’ unease as the plane rattles and hums through the turbulence we’ve contributed to creating.

For at least a decade, scientists and environmental campaigners have been pushing regulatory authorities in the U.S. to limit the greenhouse gas emissions of airplanes, which are now subject only to the voluntary guidelines offered by the International Civil Aviation Organization. In 2021, the Center for Biological Diversity and Earthjustice sued the EPA to tighten the regulations governing aviation emissions. The case is still winding its way through the courts, and kicking up plenty of data on airplanes’ disruptive effects on climate  along the way.

After a brief decline at the height of the pandemic, airline emissions have been growing steadily and are expected to triple by 2050.

Brace yourself for bumpier rides.

Don’t be fooled by the spin: Republicans are banning courses and harassing teachers out of their job

Another week, another lesson in a truth that will not be heeded by the mainstream media: Republicans are liars, and you should never take what they say at face value. This time it was over yet another education scandal in Florida under the leadership of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. It started when the College Board, a non-profit that manages educational standards for those seeking higher education, announced that Florida had banned an Advanced Placement (AP) psychology course that over 30,000 Florida high school students had enrolled in for the fall.

Long story short: The DeSantis-signed bill barring schools from offering “instruction” in gender or sexual orientation, dubbed the “don’t say gay law” by critics, made it impossible for teachers to address very basic ideas like “sexuality is a part of the life experience.” Rather than offer a substandard program, the College Board was forced to pull the AP classes, which many students could use for college credit, from the schools. 

In response to the bad press, the GOP-controlled Florida government went into heavy spin mode, releasing a letter claiming the AP Psychology course can be “taught in its entirety,” but only “in a manner that is age and developmentally appropriate.” This was widely — and falsely — reported in the press as a “reversal,” with even LGBTQ-oriented sites getting caught up in the hype. Thankfully, the team at Popular Information was on hand to debunk the lie, pointing out that the “developmentally appropriate” language is a poison pill that amounts to a de facto ban on the AP Psychology course. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


“A teacher can exclude the content in AP Psychology related to sexual orientation and gender identity and put their students at risk of not receiving college credit,” Judd Legum and Tesnim Zekeria explain. “Or a teacher can include those topics and risk losing their certification and their job.” Despite reports implying otherwise, therefore, Florida schools are canceling the classes. 

Luckily, the Washington Post quickly updated the story with the correct information, under the headline “Florida schools drop AP Psychology after state says it violates the law.” 

All this confusion is very much by design. The mixed messages coming from Republican leaders on what is and isn’t allowed in schools serves a larger purpose: making it so impossible for teachers to do their jobs that they give up even trying.

In some cases, teachers leave the profession or move to a less hostile state to work. In others, it’s more a quiet-quitting, as the limitations force teachers to offer a substandard education to their students, out of fear that actually challenging kids to learn will cross some legal line that will land teachers in serious trouble. Either way, children in red states are losing access to quality education. 

All these various faux-outrages over education are being ginned up by Republicans and groups like Moms for Liberty for one reason: As pretexts to make it impossible for teachers to do their jobs. The strategy increasingly embraced by Republicans is to destabilize schools by harassing the teachers out of even trying to do their jobs, through confusing and contradictory rules. 

The strategy isn’t even hidden: Write the rules so that there is no way to avoid breaking them, and then use the rule-breaking as a pretense to end public education entirely. 

As Kathryn Joyce reported for the New Republic in 2021, Republican leaders object to “the very existence of public schools.” Carol Corbett Burris, executive director of the Network for Public Education described the end game that Republicans are aiming for: “It will be a stratified system, where wealthy kids receive the absolute best education; kids in the middle will probably receive a decent education; and kids that are poor and disadvantaged will sit in a big room in front of computers with someone standing at the door keeping them in.”

Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, told MSNBC that this attack on AP psychology is more of the same. “What this is doing is just eroding opportunity for Florida’s students. That’s what the governor is doing, and that’s what the department of education is doing.” 

We need your help to stay independent

The absurdity of teaching under Republican rule is illustrated by another recent story from the Tampa Bay Times about Florida schools pulling the complete text of Shakespearean plays from the classroom. The Bard is considered too risqué under the DeSantis-era speech regulations. Instead, students will only read highly censored excerpts of a play like “Romeo and Juliet.” The are-you-kidding excuse is that high school kids are too young to know that the famous couple has S-E-X on their W-E-D-D-I-N-G-N-I-G-H-T.

This also makes it impossible for public school English teachers to prepare their students for college, which expects kids to be grounded in the basics of literature like Shakespeare. This no doubt suits the goals of Republicans, who clearly think that college should be a privilege only for those wealthy enough to afford private school tuition. 

Republicans want to convert public schools from places of learning to prisons for children, where they will be kept in ignorance until they’re too old to ever compete with the children of well-heeled white people for spots at elite universities. 

So instead of teaching Shakespeare, Florida teachers are now being told to use materials created by a right-wing disinformation mill called “PragerU.”  Unsurprisingly in the anti-reading world of Republican politics, PragerU focuses not on books but on videos that are rife with lies and misrepresentations. Videos now deemed “educational” materials in Florida are on topics like why racism is a myth that Black people prop up because of  “the victim mentality.” Or how being a climate change denialist is the same thing as “the Warsaw Uprising, when the city’s Jews fought back against the Nazis.” One especially vile video uses a cartoon figure of Booker T. Washington to make excuses for American slavery

Replacing real materials with right-wing propaganda isn’t just immoral, but makes it pretty much impossible for teachers to do their job. First of all, good teachers don’t lie to students. Plus, this sort of thing makes it difficult for students to develop the knowledge and skills necessary to go to college or get jobs in the real world. PragerU materials both encourage bigotry and discourage basic literacy. They are functionally an anti-education, meant to make the person receiving it less intelligent than they were before. 

It’s not just Florida. In Oklahoma, the Republican Superintendent for Public Instruction, Ryan Walters, has made it a habit of publicly targeting individual teachers with conspiracy theories. One teacher, Summer Boismier, was hounded out of her job for sharing a link to the Brooklyn Public Library’s “Books Unbanned” program, which gives access to the library’s catalog to out-of-state teens. Now Walters is accusing “communist China” of “giving money to Tulsa public schools in order to try to undermine our United States government.” It’s not true, of course, but the goal of the lie appears to be putting a target on the back of a Chinese language teacher for the sin of being good at her job. 

Walters has borrowed from the DeSantis playbook of imposing contradictory regulations on teachers. As the Daily Beast reports, teachers “are required by state law to cover the Tulsa Race Massacre and the Holocaust, but are also required to do so without talking about race or making the subject matter controversial.” Walters in particular made comments arguing that the Tulsa Race Massacre was somehow not about race, even though it was caused by white people mass-murdering and stealing from Black people in an orgy of racist violence. 

Walters is taking advantage of the damned-if-you-do-damned-if-don’t situation he created, threatening to strip the entire Tulsa public school system of accreditation. The strategy isn’t even hidden: Write the rules so that there is no way to avoid breaking them, and then use the rule-breaking as a pretense to end public education entirely. 

We can see how this plays out in Texas, where Republicans used phony claims of school underperformance in the racially diverse city of Houston as a pretext for the state to forcibly strip Houston voters of control over the local school district. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott instead installed a crony, Mike Miles, as the school district superintendent. Miles was chosen for his destructive talents, having left the Dallas school system in tatters after a three-year stint of successfully driving down test scores and running off talented and experienced teachers and principals. Now Miles is in Houston, pretending to lead while actually setting things on fire. One of his first decisions was so on the nose that it’s almost hard to believe: He is shutting down libraries —so they can be replaced with “discipline centers.”

The goal has never been more starkly illustrated. Republicans want to convert public schools from places of learning to prisons for children, where they will be kept in ignorance until they’re too old to ever compete with the children of well-heeled white people for spots at elite universities. 

Public education in the U.S. has long been underfunded and under-served. But even when it falls short, it’s an important part of realizing the American dream of equal opportunity. That is due in large part to the dedication of school teachers, who miraculously show up in droves, ready to do what they can to help kids learn and grow, even as they face obstacles like racism, poverty, oppression, and even just benign neglect. Some students manage to leverage a public education into higher education and careers that their parents never dreamed of. Everything great about public education is why Republicans hate it so much. These attacks on schools and teachers aren’t just penny ante culture war politics meant to rile up the base for the next election. It’s part of a larger assault on the very idea that every kid deserves an education, no matter who their family is. 

“You will get violence”: Leading democracy expert says Donald Trump is not running to win election

Contrary to what many professional centrists and hope-peddlers in the American mainstream news media and political class would like to believe, the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol was not the climax of the Age of Trump. In reality, Jan. 6 was a proof of concept for how the Republican fascists will use political violence to obtain and keep power against and over the democratic will of the American people in an increasingly diverse society. In all, Jan. 6 was not the end of something but rather the next chapter in what journalist Jeff Sharlet has described as a “slow civil war” here in America.

To that point, in response to his indictment for his alleged crimes of Jan. 6 and the larger plot against democracy, Trump has been escalating his threats of violence, both direct and implied, against Special Counsel Jack Smith, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Judge Tanya Chutkan and the other prosecutors, members of law enforcement, and potential jurors who are attempting to hold him accountable under the law. Law enforcement and other experts in domestic terrorism and national security are continuing to warn that Trump, his MAGA followers and the larger white right constitute an extreme danger to the country’s security.  On Wednesday, for example, the FBI said that a Utah man who had made threats to President Biden and several prosecutors on different Trump criminal cases was shot and killed during an FBI raid. 

In an attempt to understand what comes next with an imperiled Donald Trump and the growing reality of right-wing violence and its impact on American democracy and society, and how the Republican Party and larger white right are not merely “polarized” from the mainstream of American political society but have actually become radicalized into extremism in its various forms, including violence, I recently spoke with leading democracy expert Trygve Olson. He is the author of the Lincoln Democracy Institute’s new research project, the “Democracy Index,” whose goal is “focused on quantifying and comprehending the existential crises we are facing in American democracy today.”

This conversation has been lightly edited for clarity and length.

Beyond the critically important new research you have conducted about the country’s democracy crisis and violence, how are you feeling at this point in the Age of Trump?     

Having worked around the world fighting for democracy in places like Ukraine, Belarus, Nigeria, and Venezuela, the Age of Trump is sad and perhaps not unexpected. I found that a slide into autocracy through extremism, radicalization, and violence can happen anywhere. 

So far, America’s democratic institutions and democratic guardrails are holding on. Still, we see the challenges presented by a cycle of political extremism (polarization, normalization, demonization, and violence) coupled with Trump’s willingness to pursue and permanently obtain power by any means necessary, which causes cracks that can ultimately destroy a democracy.

Several weeks ago, Donald Trump de facto commanded his followers to assassinate President Obama. What is the big picture about political violence and extremism in the Age of Trump and beyond? Where are we?

I have found that universally, autocratic actors – and Trump is one – use six tactics to gain and maintain power. They are Big Ideas/Big Lies, Misinformation/Disinformation, Marginalization of Opponents, Dependency of Allies, Divide and Conquer, Threats, Repression and Violence. 

We need your help to stay independent

The assumption is that autocratic actors resort to violence often. Yet in reality, they do so only when they are most vulnerable in order to send a message about the consequences of crossing them. That is why Mike Pence was the target on Jan 6.  No one was more loyal to Trump than Mike Pence, so if Trump was willing to send the mob to get Pence, what message did that send to lesser and lower-level appeasers? 

We are witnessing Trump telling America that if he doesn’t get his way — regardless of democratic norms like elections or the rule of law — then you will get violence. While it isn’t exactly the same as what Putin was saying to Ukrainians, it is the same principle and concept at work. In both cases, we need to take them at their word, be vigilant and united in standing up to their attempts to overturn norms. Whether they are international in the case of Putin or domestic in the case of Trump.

As a whole, the mainstream American news media keeps defaulting to incorrect language such as “the potential for violence” or “extremist threat” when in reality the violence is already here and experts in law enforcement and national security have been trying to sound the alarm repeatedly. But for a range of reasons including denial and normalcy bias those warnings appear to be falling on deaf ears.

Your premise is spot on. I think the challenge for the media is the assumption that the norms of our democracy apply to Trump. Our democracy and its institutions are based on the idea of a win-win game, where even if you don’t get all of what you want, you get enough to make it worthwhile. This plays out when a candidate loses an election, their supporters will consent to be governed and not resort to violence because they know that there is another free and fair election in a few years. 

The problem for the media is Donald Trump isn’t playing a game based on democracy’s rules. He and his supporters believe that for him to win, the other side must lose. This game is the one all autocratic actors play. For Trump, he must return to office to escape being held accountable and potentially spending the rest of his life in jail. The media typically misses that Trump uses the norms of our democracy but to the end of his zero-sum game. 

What does your new research reveal and help us to better understand about political violence and polarization in the Age of Trump and beyond?

Polarization is often the first step in a cycle of political extremism, which can lead to Violence. In between, you have a normalization of the division that polarization causes and the demonization of the others who don’t share your political side. The nation has reached a stage where demonization has become the norm for much of the right in America today. There are also some on the far left as well, but our research shows that some of that is in response to what is happening on the right. 

It’s a vicious cycle with one side’s actions leading to the other responding in kind. And it’s what makes 2024’s election so dangerous for the nation: Trump’s wing has already demonstrated its use of Violence and there is the worry the left could respond if it happens again.  

Now that Trump has normalized saying elections are fraudulent, we must ask whether either side is willing to accept an election result they don’t like and concede power to the other without resorting to violence.

Definitions matter: how do you operationalize the concept of “polarization”. That word is thrown around too much by the mainstream news media, commentariot, and larger political class and it is not properly defined or specified. What do we know empirically?

Our research shows the difference between the political right and left today is that roughly a quarter of the right isn’t just politically extreme but fully radicalized. It is these radicalized actors that are more prone to believing that Violence is a viable answer that might be necessary.

Both sides have issues with political extremism – which is how much tolerance they hold for differing political views – that is really at the heart of polarization. I think some of the use of polarization in both the media context and by our political class is not fully understood within the realities of what I call, the Game We Know (Democracy) and the Game We Are In (autocracy and zero-sum).

Can you elaborate on the Normalization, Polarization, Demonization, and Violence model that you apply in your new research?

The model came out of academia post-9/11 and captures the cycle of how political extremism typically works. 

If you think about what happened from election night 2020 through events on Jan. 6, you had Trump suggesting the “elections were a fraud” from the White House on election night. Polling suggested most Republicans didn’t buy his lies. But as the message was repeated by Trump and his allies, with constant drumming from the right-wing media ecosystem, there was a shift in how Republicans felt. That was how the ‘Big Lie’ was normalized – a false grievance playing off polarization. 

Ultimately, violence happened after creating a Need. The election is a fraud. Network – Join Fellow Patriots in Washington on J6 to defend your nation. Narrative – We are going to walk down to the Capitol/Mike Pence didn’t do the right thing.

What do we know about how Republicans and Trumpists view violence as a tool for advancing their political goals? How are their views about political violence and its legitimacy different from those held by Democrats and other voters?

So non-MAGA Republicans, those who don’t self-identify as MAGA conservatives, are no more likely than those on the left to see violence as acceptable within our democracy. Those who say they are MAGA conservatives are far more likely to suggest violence is acceptable or necessary to save the country. The problem is when you are in a cycle like the one the nation is currently enduring, you run the risk of things escalating quickly.

A scenario that could be born out: If the day after the 2024 Election, the nation learns that Trump has lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College, where do we go? How likely are those on the left to concede power back to a man who is unwilling to give it up and who has undoubtedly implied that if he gets it back, he will use it to maintain power? 

Those are fair questions and if we are honest with ourselves, we realize there is a real problem on both sides. If Trump didn’t accept the results in 2020, why would we think he and his supporters will in 2024?

Trumpism and American neofascist are cultural problems that are much larger than any one person or leader.

Our data confirms the problem of radicalization on the right is far deeper than Trump. That said, it is also true that for radicalized and extremist groups, leadership is not easily transferable. I think the bigger issue is how much Trump has normalized the demonization of the left (or any others for that matter) within the GOP. This is shown to some degree by all the candidates running, particularly with DeSantis basing his campaign the way he has.

What did you find most disturbing and/or troubling from your new research findings?

I was shocked by the dangerously high amounts of radicalization. I think the fact that so many on both sides of the political spectrum are either distrusting or intolerant of the other side of the spectrum is a disaster waiting to happen. The reality is that despite the left’s denials (or hopes) the data shows Trump has a very good chance of winning the Electoral College again (probably a 47% to 49% chance). This is a real problem.

Donald Trump is facing multiple criminal trials. He is escalating his threats of violence and mayhem. He is only going to get worse. You are not psychic. But based on your new research and deep professional experience, what do you want to prepare the American people and their leaders for?

I have found from my work worldwide that autocratic actors like Trump have the same objective: to gain and maintain power. They use the same strategy: creating a perception of inevitability and invincibility through fear. They all generally use the tactics I outlined above.  

Donald Trump isn’t playing the game by the rules of our democracy. We have to recognize when we have someone playing a zero-sum game. There is no potential for a win-win upon which our democracy depends. We must be prepared to take him at his word that he is going to try using violence if he has to in order to win.

The best way to ensure Trump fails is to ensure he can’t use the threats to our democracy to destroy our democracy. That means he must be held to the same laws and justice system as any other American, and it means he must be resoundingly defeated in the next election. By this, I mean Biden must win by a large enough margin to ensure the flipping of no single state’s electoral votes would put Trump in power.

Will glaciers go “extinct” in our lifetime? Here’s what a future without polar ice would look like

July 2023 was officially the hottest month in recorded history — and, as such, was a regrettable milestone in the history of climate change. Scientists lamented the "new abnormal" that made itself apparent throughout that month, one that included extreme weather events like wildfires, tropical storms and freakishly scorching heatwaves.

Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree that this global warming is primarily caused by human activities such as burning fossil fuels, and as such July 2023 has increased public pressure on political officials to impose effective environmental regulations.

In the midst of these developments, researchers from the United Kingdom, South Africa and Chile published a paper in the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science. Simply titled "Antarctic extreme events," the authors analyzed a wealth of data about extreme weather events in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. They did so across a range of environments and timescales, with the purpose of determining the extent of the continent's vulnerability.

Their conclusion was sobering. Reaching the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C goal will be tough, they surmise, unless we take strong action now to cut down greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050. Otherwise, the authors write, "it is virtually certain that future Antarctic extreme events will be more pronounced than those observed to date." In other words, the extreme weather we're seeing this year, from floods in Alaska to wildfires in Hawaii, could get even worse.

To learn more about the world of the Arctic and Antarctic, and how climate change will change these regions, Salon spoke with the study's lead author Prof. Martin Siegert, a glaciology professor, vice president at the University of Exeter, and former co-director of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change at Imperial College London.

"The last time there was no ice on the planet, no ice at all, would've been during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum 55 million years ago."

The following interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

When can we expect there to be no more ice in the Arctic and Antarctic?

That's a good question. The answer to the Arctic is very different than the answer to the Antarctic.

The Arctic is largely an ocean surrounded by land and over the ocean, the Arctic Ocean, there is a thin layer of sea ice. And that has been retreating pretty much every year since the 1970s. Maybe before that, but that's when we started measuring. There have been predictions about there being no summer ice — ice grows in the winter, it shrinks in the summer — somewhere around the mid-century. Some people say 2030. I think that's a bit too early, but somewhere around mid-century: 2050, 2060. In the wintertime it'll grow back, of course, because it's still pretty cold.

The massive ice sheet in Greenland, that's going to take some shifting. Those massive ice sheets, they take an awfully long time to build up and to melt. The last time we were between ice ages, which was about 125,000 years ago, the ice sheet would've been far less extensive. It would've been only occupying the northern part of Greenland. So large parts of southern Greenland that now have a big ice sheet would have been free of ice.

"Antarctica is a different matter entirely. The Antarctic ice sheet has been in a pretty persistent state for about 14 million years."

Now Antarctica is a different matter entirely. The Antarctic ice sheet has been in a pretty persistent state for about 14 million years, and it would take a colossal amount [of climate change] to totally get rid of that, and it would take tens of thousands of years to do it. But the ocean is different because the ice sheet will only sort of come and go when there is surface melting to take it away — because it's in the central part, it's on land — but the sea ice and the periphery of the ice sheet can be melted by the atmosphere and also, importantly, the ocean. And its ocean warmth that is melting the Antarctic ice sheet at the moment…

That makes sense. How much will sea levels rise if the climate change-vulnerable regions of the Arctic and Antarctic melt, and how many people will be impacted? 

We've done some research on that. The IPCC [the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] has projections of sea level rise from now to 2100, and then running onwards after that. It says somewhere between half a meter [20 inches] and a meter [39 inches], depending on which scenario and which model — but I think that's an underestimate, and other glaciologists do as well.

What do you think if it is instead half-a-meter or a meter?

Yeah, it could be higher. The way the IPCC works is it's all bounded in probabilities, so it's likely for sea levels in 2100 to be somewhere between half a meter and a meter higher than today. But what that likely means in IPCC speak is a 66% probability of that range. And what they're telling us is that there's a one in three chance of it being outside that range. There is no chance it's going to be less than 50 centimeters. So that means there's a one in three chance it is going to be higher than a meter.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


"We're talking about a billion people on the planet that are close to at the water's edge right now. They will be displaced."

You can't discount that. That's far too likely. And I and another glaciologist have pointed this out: you wouldn't discount there being one-and-a-half, maybe two meters by the end of this century now — and it doesn't stop at 2100. It just keeps going. So it's quite possible for there to be five meters by 2150, and five meters by 2150 will be a disaster. Lowline Pacific nations are going to go, the Netherlands probably won't be able to survive, downtown New York City will probably be underwater. There is real significance we could be talking about under that scenario.

Let us talk about the lower range of the estimate, half-a-meter to a meter. If it just rises that much, will New York City still be underwater? Will the Netherlands still be underwater? I'm guessing Venice will be in trouble, to put it mildly.

Yes, yes, all of those things. It's not just the sea level itself. It's the spring tide. It's the low pressure zone. When you have low pressure over the ocean, artificially, you have lots of water trying to run off into the ocean that's got to go somewhere. We've got a lot of winds pushing the water in one direction. Sometimes you get this sort of coalition of all of those things together: Low pressure, lots of water trying to get out of the rivers, the wind also pushing the ocean back into a certain place. And that's a flooding event, right? That's what you get: A spring tide flooding event. Add another meter on top of that, and it's even worse. Add another five meters on top of that, and it's a total disaster of course.

And that's really what we're talking about. We're talking about a billion people on the planet that are close to at the water's edge right now. They will be displaced. They will have to go somewhere.

I appreciate you being so thorough. I'm going to pivot a little bit. What glaciers do you think will be the "last glaciers," and how do glaciologists feel about that depressing prospect?

I'm just about to go to the Alps for holiday — going to go by train, low carbon route, very conscious of the carbon footprint — and the Alps glaciers are shrinking fast. They're going back at 10, 20 meters a year, so you can see them lose over time. I was there about five years ago, so some of the glaciers are going to be 50 to 100 meters retreated compared to what it was the last time I was there. You just need to revisit this place. That's a concern.

US Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station in AntarcticaThis handout photo dated 31 October 2002 shows an aerial view of the new elevated station (bottom-C) being built at the US Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station in Antarctica. (DAVID MCCARTHY/AFP via Getty Images)

"Even though Antarctica was in complete darkness for six months, the blanket of greenhouse gases kept the planet so warm that ice couldn't form."

But there are parts of the planet where ice is going to stay around for a long time. In the East Antarctic that will definitely be the case. I said the East Antarctic ice sheet has been around in a persistent state for 14 million years. And there are parts of East Antarctica that are going to take some shifting [to melt]. The last time there was no ice on the planet, no ice at all, would've been during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum. That's 55 million years ago.

That's when CO2 levels in the atmosphere were a thousand parts per million. They're about 400 at the moment. And the temperature was about 12 degrees warmer in Africa than it is today. Even though Antarctica was in complete darkness for six months, like it is right now, the blanket of greenhouse gases kept the planet so warm that ice couldn't form. Now we are nowhere near that. The answer to your question, Where will the last bit of ice to go be? It will be in Central East Antarctica, but it's so far off. We've got so many more problems to face before we reach that.

This question is very important to me on a personal level because I believe that people can better understand climate change if they visualize it, if they can hear it and feel it. When talking about the disintegration of large sections of the Larsen A, Larsen B and Wilkins ice shelves, can you help readers viscerally understand what that was like when these ice shelves collapsed? I think of the opening scene in "The Day After Tomorrow," which recreates the real-life collapse of Larsen B ice shelf in 2002. My question is, if a human could stand in the middle of this, what would it be like? 

You wouldn't want to be in that situation. I actually watched "The Day After Tomorrow" for the first time again since it first came out just recently. It's brilliant imagery, but it was an iceberg calving event. A great big crack through the ice shelf happened, and their camp happened to be right in the middle of that. It was sort of split, the tents went one way and the other [stuff] went the other way. A bit unlucky really, but that's Hollywood for you, I guess.

We need your help to stay independent

That's not how Larsen B ice shelf broke up. Those ice shelves, the ones that broke up, would've had lots of melted water on the surface. In "The Day After Tomorrow," there was no melted water at all. There'd be ponds everywhere, and those ponds melt on the shelves — and down into the ice shelf, into the floating slab of ice through a hole. And if they hit the bottom, then that punctures the structural integrity of the ice shelf. And these ponds would've put a hole in many of them — dozens of holes, hundreds of holes — all around this ice shelf.

All of a sudden, your slab of ice goes from being a really strong body of ice to really weak. And what happens is a catastrophic domino effect, possibly with a bit of tidal influence, because this ice shelf is lifted up and falling down all the time. A crack appears, and because you are puncturing holes all around it, then the ice slab simply falls. It topples over, it knocks the next one over and the next one over, and it all goes really quickly.

So this massive slab of ice disappears in about like three days, like it just blows up. And it does that because of the meltwater on the surface puncturing down into the ice itself. And that just causes weakness, structural weakness, to the whole slab of ice. And so once one bit falls, the rest of it kind of goes.

Energy breakthrough or resistance letdown? Here’s what’s so super about superconductors

Don’t feel bad if you have absolutely zero clue why the tech-savvy online are all freaking out about this weird thing called LK-99, a supposed superconductor that can operate at room temperature and at ambient pressure. I’m right there with you. Or rather, I was. Though conversant in most forms of niche nerdery, materials science isn’t my bag. Still, the recent speculation that LK-99 could herald limitless clean energy and a quantum computer in every pocket is an eyebrow-raising claim worth parsing.  

So I went on the hunt for us, and I’m back with the 101 about this potential development in tech that some call the holy grail of materials science. Here’s the breakdown on how a superconductive material like LK-99 might upend the entire tech world — and whether or not this latest iteration is more hype-ful than hopeful. 

What is a superconductor?

Insulators like wood and rubber slow down or stop electricity, but conductors — like the copper wires in your house and the gallium metal in your phone — are veins through which electricity can pass easily. Even so, no matter how conductive a metal is, it’s always going to lose some of the electricity that your utility line or phone battery sends through it. That’s called resistance, and it’s the enemy of computers and clean energy. 

A superconductor is a material that lets electricity pass through with zero resistance — whether that material is an elemental metal like tin or a compound made of copper and oxygen. It also expels all magnetic fields. Some superconductors work only at extremely low temperatures or at extremely high pressures — making them wholly impractical to use at scale. So far, no one has confirmed the existence of a reproducible superconductor that works at room temperature and normal ambient pressure. 

In the past few years, though, excitement has been growing as some in the field believe we’re closer than ever to finding the magic material. And now that hope is sparked anew with recent research from two universities. 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


What would a room-temperature superconductor do? 

That’s the exciting part. Right now, we’re wasting tons of power fighting basic electrical resistance in every electronic device and every electrical grid. Room-temperature superconductors would be able to eliminate that margin of waste and could launch us toward our most energy-efficient future yet. 

How so? In order to account for the amount of power you’ll lose to resistance, you have to generate more power than you actually use for any electronic device. That unused electricity turns to heat, which means you need more parts in that device to cool it down. At a global scale, all of this costly wasted energy-heat adds up quickly — from massive server farms to supply chain logistics, power-hungry Magnetic Resonance Imaging machines to quantum computers. 

“Even though promising efforts have been seen probing the edges of possibility, some high-profile failures have most in the scientific community casting a skeptical on any claims of discovery.”

Some of the most exciting and promising clean tech — like magnetic levitation trains and other low-cost, high-speed transportation — could finally be viable for mass development with superconductor use. Practical superconductors could also lead to smaller, cheaper MRIs, which might no longer need helium to be cooled down — good news given we could one day run out of helium. Nuclear fusion reactor cooling could become safer and easier. Batteries of all kinds, full of dangerously mined precious metals and hazardous chemicals, could be reduced to mere backup players with the introduction of superconducting magnetic energy storage. 

If it uses electricity, a room-temperature superconductor would probably make it better smaller, and more efficient. It would also probably win researchers a Nobel Prize and potentially make them extremely wealthy to boot.

What is LK-99 and is it real?

According to two new research papers, LK-99 is a purported superconductor made of a lead-apatite and copper combination which works at room temperatures and ambient pressures. The researchers are from the Quantum Energy Research Centre in South Korea and Virginia’s College of William & Mary. 

The research hasn’t been fully peer-reviewed, but the preliminary results were published on the preprint server arXiv. Researchers at other labshave been encouraged to attempt to replicate the work. What really grabbed everyone’s attention in the science world was a video of the researchers’ work — featuring a dark gray chunk of their material, levitating over a magnet. Though not a guarantee of superconductivity, the image indicates the material is displaying at least one promising, tell-tale sign of it.

The gist of the discovery is that this surprisingly simple combination of a couple of normally non-conductive minerals (lead is often an insulator, for instance) can supposedly become unconventionally superconductive without any great strain. The paper describes a remarkably simple process: powder the elements, mix them well, then bake it in an oven. 

We need your help to stay independent

Why are people skeptical of LK-99? 

Claims of finding the long-sought holy grail of material science are already bound to be met with a keen sense of scientific skepticism on even the best days. It doesn’t help that superconductors are among the hottest topics in science at the moment, and have been topically ripe for shoddy science. 

Even though promising efforts have been seen probing the edges of possibility, some high-profile failures have most in the scientific community casting a skeptical eye on any claims of discovery and looking closely at the data to find holes. The data in the LK-99 research has left some scientists cautious due to the absence of a few key measurements, even as many attempt to replicate the results. 

More suspicions surfaced when the paper’s authorship came under question. As it turns out, a six-member team of researchers had previously published a strikingly similar paper, with some results suggesting that the material wasn’t a superconductor. One researcher who was on both the six-author team and the three-author LK-99 team even said the results were published without permission of other authors. 

By the end of July, two independent research teams were unable to replicate LK-99’s superconductivity, and more question have risen since. On August 9, New Scientist reported that “mounting evidence” suggests “the chances of LK-99 being a superconductor are looking increasingly slim.”

What’s next for LK-99? 

The race is on to reproduce LK-99, and researchers both amateur and academic are abuzz with efforts

Some, like physicist Sinéad Griffin of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, have already published theoretical studies exploring LK-99’s similarities to other kinds of superconductors via computer simulation. 

But, as CNET journalist Jackson Ryan puts it: Science, in action, takes time. 

Even though superconductor company stocks have been sent soaring in the past few weeks and the future-attuned are getting a heady whiff of potentially world-changing tech, the proper vetting and testing of any possible room-temperature superconductor by the material science community is going to be slow. 

If LK-99 actually turns out to be the Nobel-winning discovery of a generation, implementing that discovery into consumer and industrial tech that we can buy would still require massive changes in the global sprawl of manufacturing processes — a shift which can only occur at a glacial pace.  

Slow as it may be, though, it’s still a pace worth pursuing if it means we can all finally have real hoverboards. For now, we’re stuck with fumbling prototypes — and everyone knows those boards don’t work on water, McFly.

People fleeing flames jump into the ocean as Maui wildfires burn down a Hawaiian town

As catastrophic wildfires spread across the Hawaiian island of Maui, 911 and cell phone services are down, roughly 14,000 homes and businesses are without power, and hospitals are overwhelmed with burn and smoke-inhalation victims. Home to about 117,000 people, Maui residents and tourists remain stranded on the island, with some trying to escape the fire and smoke by jumping into the ocean — resulting in 12 Coast Guard rescues, as reported by CNN. The downtown area of Lahaina, a small town with a population of 13,000 people, was mostly destroyed.

Evacuation orders are in place and about 1,800 travelers are sheltering at the Kahului Airport. At least six people have died. Additional Hawaiian National Guardsmen are expected to join Maui officials late Wednesday to assist in managing the crisis. Hawaii Lt. Gov. Sylvia Luke (Gov. Josh Green is currently out of state) declared a state of emergency and called the crisis “unprecedented” on Wednesday and described the difficulty of coordinating evacuations.

“What we are trying to do is deploy individuals to go into areas with satellite phone service. We have only been in contact with perhaps one hotel because the one hotel, the people in charge of that hotel have satellite phones,” Luke told CNN. “The reality is that we need to fly people out of Maui to give them burn support because Maui hospital cannot do extensive burn treatment.”

Graphic, harrowing videos of the wildfires have surfaced on social media sites, posted by those who managed to receive intermittent cell signals — some show victims laying motionless in the street as captured by passengers of vehicles that navigate through seemingly impassible smoke and flame, others show people fleeing into treacherous waters full of flaming debris. 

Erratic winds up to 60 mph and high-pressure conditions created by Dora — a powerful Category 4 hurricane some 800 miles southwest — have coupled with decreased humidity on the island to aggravate wildfire conditions. Dora is expected to move far enough westward by Thursday to allow winds to subside and wildfire conditions to be reduced. 

“Poisoned”: The 6 most horrifying revelations from Netflix’s food safety documentary

It’s been said many times that the U.S. has one of the safest food supplies in the world. But take a look at our food safety history and you’ll believe otherwise. Meats can be sold with food-borne pathogens in them. Peanuts were once shipped with positive salmonella contamination. And leafy greens, namely romaine lettuce and spinach, are the largest (and most notorious) carriers of E. coli.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), roughly 48 million people get sick from food-borne illness each year in the U.S — which is not a comforting statistic. While many strides have been made toward improving food protocols and regulations, the overall system remains broken as major regulatory agencies continue to take advantage of consumer safety.

A lot of what we know about our foods is still a mystery. And it’s also quite nightmarish — so much so that you may be compelled to ditch the grocery stores and forage for your own food out in the wild. The nationwide food system is explored (and exposed) in Netflix’s “Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food,” a documentary that delves into the ugly side of food production, regulation and law. At the center of the documentary is Bill Marler, a personal injury attorney and ardent food safety advocate. Marler has litigated numerous cases concerning romaine lettuce, cut fruit, caramel apples, tomatoes, cookie dough, baby formula, Lucky Charms . . . you name it. The documentary also spotlights the families of those who either lost their lives to or were severely affected by food-borne illnesses.

Here are the six most harrowing revelations from the doc: 

01
Jack in the Box E. coli outbreak was the “largest foodborne outbreak” in the U.S.
Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your FoodPoisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

The deadly and ruthless outbreak took place between 1992 and 1993, when the Washington State Department of Health investigated several cases of children with bloody diarrhea and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) caused by E. coli O157: H7. The source of the bacteria and string of illnesses was traced to contaminated hamburger patties sold at area Jack in the Box restaurants. Numerous E. coli infections were later reported in Idaho, California, and Nevada. In total, 73 different Jack in the Box locations were linked to the outbreak, which affected over 700 people — 602 of whom were in Washington. Four children died and 178 others were left with permanent effects including kidney problems, brain damage and asthma.

 

The investigation found five slaughterhouses in the U.S. and one in Canada as possible sources of the bacteria but was unable to track down the producer behind the contaminated meat, Von Corporation of California. Legal documents obtained by Marler also found that Foodmaker, Inc. — the operator and franchisor of Jack in the Box restaurants — refused to comply with the State of Washington Department of Health’s guidelines to cook ground beef at the required 155 degrees. The company said the high temperature made their burgers too “tough,” despite receiving several warnings that their hamburgers were being undercooked.  

 

The four deaths in the outbreak were six-year-old Lauren Beth Rudolph, two-year-old Brenda Nole, two-year-old Celina Shribbs and seventeen-month-old Riley Detwiler, whose father Darin Detwiler is both a professor and food safety advocate.

02
Romaine lettuce and spinach are major carriers of foodborne pathogens
Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your FoodPoisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

Many will be shocked to learn that the most concerning — and potentially fatal — part of their burger isn’t the meat patty but rather, the lettuce. In fact, both lettuce and spinach pose the highest risk of E. coli contamination to consumers. That’s because lettuce and spinach that are grown in close proximity to livestock can get tainted with pathogen-filled feces, which are washed into irrigation canals and then sprayed onto plants. This distribution system makes it incredibly easy for deadly pathogens to easily travel from animals to produce. And unfortunately, there aren’t any clear solutions on how to better the situation.

 

“The regulation of animal waste is minimal,” explained Marion Nestle, a molecular biologist and author (“Safe Food: The Politics of Food Safety” and “Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health”). “We have laws on the books, but they’re not enforced. That is an American scandal.”

03
Stephanie Ingberg fell gravely ill after eating a Panera Bread salad
Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your FoodScott and Candie Ingberg in “Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

In the documentary, Stephanie’s parents, Scott and Candie, recalled that their daughter fell sick before leaving for a family vacation to the Dominican Republic. Stephanie had gas and diarrhea, which her parents dismissed as an upset stomach. Her symptoms, however, worsened throughout the night, prompting her parents to seek medical help.

 

“The next morning when they let me go in to see her, she didn’t recognize me,” said Candie. “She was pulling at her hair . . . her kidneys had stopped functioning and she was having swelling of her brain.” Stephanie was eventually admitted to St. Luke’s Hospital in St. Louis where doctors discovered that she had Shiga toxin, which is produced by the dangerous E. coli O157:H7.

 

“This condition in her body was like a nuclear bomb exploding inside you, where it hits every single organ and you have to get in there and pick up the pieces,” explained Stephanie’s doctor, Dr. Pablo Dayer. 

 

Upon further investigation, Stephanie’s parents learned that their daughter had eaten a Panera Bread salad made with contaminated lettuce. Civil lawsuits were filed in the Circuit Court of St. Louis (MO) County on behalf of Stephanie and in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, on behalf of Brianna Ruocchio, who also suffered from severe HUS four days after eating a Panera salad. 

 

Stephanie ultimately came out of her coma and recovered from her illness, though she still struggles with medical complications and may need a kidney transplant one day.

 

“It took me a long time to rebuild my strength. My coma kind of knocked me out for the hardest parts, but I know there were moments that my family and my doctors didn’t think I was gonna make it through, which has been really hard on them, and it’s hard for me to know that I put them through that pain,” Stephanie said.

 

“I ate a salad, and now I have long-term health effects from it.”

04
Food safety regulations are actually “pretty complicated”
Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your FoodRosa DeLauro in “Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

That’s because there are 15 federal agencies that are each responsible for regulating very different food products. Take for example the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The former regulates meat and poultry products, egg products and catfish. The latter regulates “all foods involved in interstate commerce” or “80% of the U.S. food system,” per Frank Yiannas, FDA Deputy Commissioner for Food Policy and Response. That includes produce, like leafy greens.

 

Food safety gets tricky when it concerns foods made in a restaurant, which contain ingredients that fall under several agencies’ jurisdiction. Think about a taco. There’s beef, a USDA-regulated food. The cheese, pico de gallo and additional fixings are all FDA-regulated foods. And the restaurant itself is regulated by the local health department. 

 

“When there’s a food-borne illness outbreak, no single agency is responsible,” said Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-CT). “So there’s a lot of finger-pointing.”

05
Peanuts contaminated with salmonella were knowingly shipped out
Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your FoodBill Marler in “Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

The infamous Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) came under fire in late 2008 and early 2009, when nine people died and at least 714 people in 46 states fell ill due to food poisoning from eating products containing salmonella-contaminated peanuts. The source of the outbreak was determined to be poor sanitation — rat droppings were found throughout PCA, a rat was spotted dry-roasting in a peanut area, and a family of baby mice were found in a bag of peanuts, according to former employees.

 

PCA supplied their peanuts to several major companies, who enforced contractual requirements to test the peanuts before they were shipped. When several batches of peanuts tested positive for salmonella, PCA began forging their test results, saying that they were negative. PCA’s quality assurance manager even changed the dates of old positive results to more recent dates before sending them out to companies.

 

In September 2015, PCA owner and CEO Stewart Parnell was sentenced to 28 years in federal prison for his role in the nationwide outbreak.

06
Companies can legally sell chicken contaminated with salmonella
Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your FoodPoisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

It is 100% legal for companies to sell raw chicken contaminated with salmonella, thanks to the 1974 case American Public Health Association v. Butz. In it, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that salmonella was naturally present in meats and thus, the consumer’s responsibility to properly handle and cook their meats to rid them of pathogens.

 

“In this country, if you buy poultry from any grocery store, regardless of the brand that you buy, your primary assumption should be that it contains pathogens such as salmonella and campylobacter,” said Mansour Samadpour, Ph.D., CEO of IEH Labs in Seattle, Washington, in the documentary. 

 

Many lawmakers have retaliated against the decision, including Marler, who petitioned the USDA to ban several types of salmonella in raw chicken products.

 

“After receiving Marler’s petition, the USDA decided to ban Salmonella in some chicken products,” the documentary revealed at the end. “But the problem is far from solved, as Salmonella is still legally allowed in most chicken products sold in the U.S.”

“Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food” is currently available for streaming on Netflix. Watch a trailer for it below, via YouTube:

Music lovers mourn the loss of Robbie Robertson, lead guitarist and songwriter for The Band

Guitarist and songwriter Robbie Robertson — best known for his work with the Canadian-American rock group The Band — died on Wednesday at the age of 80 after battling prostate cancer for about a year.  

In a statement from his manager of 34 years, Jared Levine, he says, “Robbie was surrounded by his family at the time of his death, including his wife, Janet, his ex-wife, Dominique, her partner Nicholas, and his children Alexandra, Sebastian, Delphine, and Delphine’s partner Kenny. He is also survived by his grandchildren Angelica, Donovan, Dominic, Gabriel, and Seraphina.”

In addition to his work in The Band, for which he composed some of their biggest hits such as “Up On Cripple Creek” and “The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down,” Robertson composed music for films, working closely with Martin Scorsese on a number of them. His music can be heard in “Raging Bull,” “King Of Comedy,” “The Color Of Money,” “Casino” and most recently, the upcoming “Killers of the Flower Moon.” Obviously a fan, Scorsese directed a concert film of The Band’s farewell 1976 performance, “The Last Waltz.” In a statement on the passing of his friend and collaborator, he said, “Robbie Robertson was one of my closest friends, a constant in my life and my work.” 

 

 

Mattel selling a Weird Barbie doll is antithetical to the whole Weird Barbie aesthetic

As if we haven’t had enough “Barbie” overload, Mattel is going to start selling Weird Barbie to cash in on the hype. I know, weird. 

The toy company recently announced on its Facebook page the newest iteration of Barbie will launch on Aug. 18 (pre-order her now!) after the movie’s wildly successful first month in theaters. Weird Barbie is based on Kate McKinnon’s portrayal of the doll in Greta Gerwig’s blockbuster.

Weird Barbie tends to do the splits a lot.

In the film, when Stereotypical Barbie (Margot Robbie) begins to lose her doll-like features – walking on horribly flat feet and harboring dreadfully existential thoughts – the other Barbies send her on a journey to seek advice from someone who understand imperfection. Enter Weird Barbie (McKinnon), an outcast who has the wisdom because well, she’s a weirdo.

The lore surrounding Weird Barbie’s creation is fascinating because she’s only Weird Barbie as a result of her owner’s . . . more creative alterations, as kids often do. Weird Barbie sports short, pink punky hair (cut in a raggedy mess by a child hairdresser),  wears a poofy fuchsia dress with ugly scribbles all over it and matching child-like scribbles around her eyes. She tends to randomly do the splits a lot.

Weird Barbie also serves as a guide teaching Barbie about the harsh realities of life (permanent flat feet and Birkenstocks) and how she can leave Barbieland and journey into the real world to fix all of Barbie’s more human faults. Weird Barbie is one of the only Barbies with real consciousness about the role she plays in Barbieland. She is willfully aware she is an outsider in this toy world of perfection.

Naturally, it makes a lot of sense why Mattel is selling a Weird Barbie. The movie has just crossed a billion-dollar box office within less than a month of release and it’s a cultural hit regardless of age, gender and race. “Barbie” is a success and of course, it was going to be with its pricey global marketing campaign and all the Barbie collaborations with a plethora of popular businesses. 

Weird Barbie’s whole aesthetic is that she is custom-made by her owner.

But it does not make sense from a Weird Barbie perspective. I think Weird Barbie herself would probably even reject the notion of being sold to millions, going mainstream and popular. Weird Barbie is a weird girl. She flourishes in her irregularity — I mean she literally does random splits because she can or because her owner makes her do them! She’s punk rock and there’s nothing punk rock about selling out to Mattel. 

We need your help to stay independent

Also, Weird Barbie’s whole aesthetic is that she is custom-made by her owner, who is fully responsible for how she looks. Whether that means chopping off all her hair, scribbling all over her plastic body, or changing her clothes from fast fashion to a trash bag — that is how Weird Barbie is made. She isn’t mass-produced in a factory to be sold in a Target or on Amazon. She purposefully exists as an original — one that stands out and is ostracized from the mass-produced Stereotypical Barbie. She is personal to her owner because her existence hinges on the owner’s creativity and impulsiveness.

Mattel’s capitalistic urge to monetize one of the original aspects of “Barbie” defeats the doll’s entire purpose and symbolism in the film. Weird Barbie’s character represents a personal relationship that a doll has with its owner — she only exists because she’s been created by her owner. This is the type of wacky, uniqueness you can’t really sell. If you really want your own Weird Barbie, make your own and have her be 100 percent original, unlike the movie character or any other Barbie. (Or, if you’re going to buy a movie-inspired doll, where’s our reissued Allan?)

Sadly, this move from Mattel just stresses that whatever’s original about us weird girls is also marketable too. Nothing is original, everything is up for sale — even the weirdest of Barbies.