Spring Offer: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Supreme Court appears to accidentally publish abortion ruling on its website

According to a draft of the majority opinion briefly posted on the Supreme Court website and obtained by Bloomberg, the nation's highest court seems poised to allow emergency abortions to take place in Idaho, reinstating a lower court order that said they could be performed to protect the health of the mother.

After the 2022 Dobbs decision overturned the constitutional right to an abortion, Idaho Republicans passed a law that banned all abortions except in cases where a doctor explicitly states that the patient will die unless they terminate the pregnancy. The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the state of Idaho, arguing a federal law, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA, overrides state law and require any hospital that receives Medicare funds to treat anyone with an emergency medical condition. When the lower court sided with the Biden administration, Idaho brought the case to the Supreme Court.

The opinion was written by a 6-3 majority, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissenting, according to Bloomberg. They argued that the case was "improvidently granted," as in, the court should never have accepted the case. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote separately that delaying the case did not represent a victory for pregnant patients in Idaho, but rather an unnecessary delay.

"While this court dawdles and this country waits, pregnant people experiencing emergency medical conditions remain in a precarious position, as their doctors are kept in the dark about what the law requires," she said.

Bloomberg noted that the opinion, apparently posted by accident and then taken down, isn't necessarily the final ruling, given that it hasn't been officially released. The ruling would temporarily allow emergency abortions to continue in Idaho while the state's Republican leaders take the case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Police believe “multiple people” should be charged in Matthew Perry’s death: Report

A law enforcement source investigating the death of Matthew Perry shared with PEOPLE that they are nearing the end of their probe and believe "multiple" individuals should face federal charges. 

The "Friends" actor was found unresponsive in a hot tub at his Los Angeles home in October 2023 and was pronounced dead shortly after at the age of 54. A postmortem toxicology report conducted by the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner's Office determined that Perry had died from a combination of drowning, coronary artery disease and the effects of buprenorphine, with the effects of ketamine as the primary cause. The manner of death was ruled accidental.

The source told PEOPLE that the U.S. Attorney's Office will have the final say on whether or not to press charges. ABC reported that the U.S. attorney could opt to refer the case back to California prosecutors if they do not elect to file charges. 

In May, the Los Angeles Police Department began working alongside the Drug Enforcement Administration and U.S. postal inspectors to deduce where the ketamine Perry had used came from, per what an LAPD investigative source told PEOPLE. The police department launched its formal investigation in December, following the release of the medical examination. 

We’re living in the “little treats economy.” Whole Foods is ready to cash in

The dairy section of my local supermarket is pretty grim. Not in terms of product, but just pure superficial presentation. The lights are always a little dimmer there than the rest of the store and emit a droning static hum. Somehow, the area has also become the depository for miscellaneous grocery items that have seemingly no permanent home — seasonal plastic beach toys, a rolling baker’s rack topped with a scant selection of discounted goods, a crate of chicken Rice-A-Roni boxes —which means customers are constantly side-stepping the displays and each other to reach the cream cheese and Cheddar slices. 

I think that’s one of the reasons Petit Pot’s products stood out to me. The French-inspired puddings (which are actually made in Emeryville, California, and come in flavors like vanilla bean, dark chocolate and pistachio) come in sets of two for $5.79, and are served in 4-ounce glass pots, which look remarkably smart, especially when positioned next to the flimsy tubs of store-brand rice pudding. 

I wouldn’t necessarily even classify myself as a pudding fan, per se, but I bought them, largely because I stood there in the aisle, imagining how nice, at the end of a long day, one of the little cool, glass pots would feel in my hand. After all, who doesn’t want a little treat? 

As a millennial, I have paid close attention to the burgeoning “little treat economy” over the past several years. A little treat is exactly what it sounds like — a small luxury, typically under $15, that serves as either a reward or a consolation prize for maneuvering through the trials and tribulations of simply existing in contemporary society. The phrase really caught on during the pandemic, when we were mostly homebound, deeply anxious and largely powerless. 

Some, like the New York Times, attributed that period of time to rise in popularity of these micro-moments of self-care, while slightly less generous market forecasters have blamed the trend on what they perceive to be my generation’s (as well as Gen Z’s) general sense of adulthood malaise, but I think food writer Bettina Makalintal put it best on Twitter back in 2022: “i deserve a treat when i have a bad week but i also deserve a treat when i have a good week. i simply always deserve treats.” 

Now, Whole Foods is looking to cash in on that attitude among its customers and the company is already adapting their product offerings in response. 

On Monday, Whole Foods Chief Executive Jason Buechel gave the keynote address at the Specialty Food Association’s annual Summer Fancy Food Show, held at New York City’s Javits Center. During the talk, Buechel showed what was in his “Whole Foods bag,” a collection of his top product finds from the show floor that exemplify the Whole Foods Market brand. One of those was Petit Pot puddings, which he said are ideal for people who “are still trying to enjoy something” without overindulging from a health or financial perspective. 

This plays into Whole Foods belief that “little luxuries” are the next big food trend.

We need your help to stay independent

“TikTok creators have brought ‘Little Treat Culture’ into the zeitgeist, and we’re on board,” the company wrote in a recent report. “We know firsthand the power of a treat, like an impulse macaron buy or a fizzy, functional and flavor-forward bev. Brands are getting in on the trend by considering both cost and format — like individual serving packages that add joy without breaking a budget.” 

The report continued: “Whether it’s a daily ritual like having a milk tea on your commute home or a spontaneous reward like a bath bomb in your grocery cart, get ready to make room for those little luxuries.” 

Within their marketing materials, some of the items Whole Foods has characterized as little luxuries include items from both buzzy brands — like Fishwife Tinned Seafood Co. Sardines with Preserved Lemon and Sardines with Hot Peppers and Mayawell Prebiotic Beverage Sparkling Pineapple Turmeric  — as well as products from the Whole Foods store brand, like 365 brand Blueberry Lavender Kombucha, Whole Foods Market Caviar and Whole Foods Market Brown Butter Latte. 

"Whether it’s a daily ritual like having a milk tea on your commute home or a spontaneous reward like a bath bomb in your grocery cart, get ready to make room for those little luxuries."

Buechel’s discussion about how the chain will be approaching “little treats” comes as snack companies are also looking to adapt in response to the trend. 

For instance, as “Food & Wine” reported in May, Tate’s Bake Shop announced that its bite-sized Tiny Tate’s cookies, which were originally launched in 2015, are now available in 5.5-ounce resealable bags optimized for on-the-go snacking. “While that’s an added convenience for just about anyone, a Tate’s representative noted to Food & Wine that the company aims to appeal to Gen Z’s snacking habits, which are shaped by social media trends around treat culture,” writer Marnie Shure noted. 

This is something that is backed up by data, too. In 2023, the retail insights agency Acosta Group conducted a survey to better understand consumer behavior around snacking. "We wanted to learn more about the shopper path to purchase by understanding when and why shoppers are snacking, as well as where and what they're buying on different occasions or shopping trips," said Kathy Risch, the company’s senior vice president of Consumer Insights and Trends.

As a result, among recommending snack companies to explore healthier formulations and organic versions of their products, representatives from Acosta recommended brands “create promotional pricing strategies that encourage impulse buys, reassuring shoppers that it's okay to treat themselves.”

Sure, let’s drug-test the debates: Is that what Donald Trump really wants?

Donald Trump, snuffling and sounding even less coherent than usual, keeps demanding that Joe Biden take a drug test before their first debate on Thursday night. He has claimed Biden was "high as a kite" during his State of the Union address in February and seemed to suggest that Biden might have been using cocaine found at the White House “last month.” (In the real world, a small packet of coke was found in a visitor’s locker nearly a year ago.)

Trump has constantly tried to manage expectations for the debate, but keeps shifting his approach. He started out by praising Biden’s debating skills, describing the president as a “worthy” opponent. Two days before Thursday’s debate, he returned to form, demanding that Biden be tested (for unspecified drugs and unspecified reasons). His minions in Congress, including Rep. Ronny Jackson of Texas, the former White House doctor whose name Trump cannot remember, jumped on board. You might remember that Jackson — a former Navy admiral who was demoted and reprimanded for his erratic conduct as presidential physician — said back in 2018 that Trump’s physical and mental health were excellent and that he had “incredible genes.” Somehow, he then got elected to Congress.

When Trump says that someone else is on drugs, it's only natural to wonder about projection. Compare the Father’s Day greetings that he and Biden sent to the world and ask yourself which of them sounds hyped-up and deranged.

In a recent interview with Terry Gross on NPR’s “Fresh Air,” comedian Hannah Einbinder talked about taking Adderall, the well-known stimulant medication often used to treat ADHD, when she was a teenager. The drug may have helped her pay more attention in math class, Einbinder said, but it made her “feel cut off from my soul," disconnected from her emotions and “quick to anger.” As she noted, in chemical terms Adderall and related ADHD medications are basically speed, only slightly different from street drugs such as methamphetamine.

Allegations that Trump uses Adderall or something similar, with or without a medical prescription, have followed him throughout his career in public life. They aren't helped by his sniffling, perspiring, highly digressive rapid-fire speech patterns or his accordion-playing mime act during public speeches and previous debates. Listen to him lose the thread of his thoughts during a long string of semi-coherent sentences and you might well wonder, “Is that guy on something?”

To be clear, I have no idea whether those rumors are true, and no inside information. Some years back, Salon’s Andrew O’Hehir wrote that asking whether Trump was on drugs wasn't the right question. His point was that if we focus on unsubstantiated claims about Trump’s drug abuse, we're avoiding the harder questions about how and why America had put a con man and grifter in our nation's highest office:

Essentially, the question of whether Donald J. Trump is an unregenerate speed freak, or is pounding controlled substances of some other kind, is a plaintive protest against the fact that things are not normal in the United States of America. We once lived in a normal country where the president wasn't a delusional racist or a would-be tyrant who constantly "jokes" about serving more than two terms. Maybe this can be explained away, or mitigated, or made to be less painful, if we conclude that he's wired to the gills on psychiatric amphetamines 24/7.

Point taken — and honestly, I'd rather not be writing about this. And yet, in the context of MAGA-world's accusations that Joe Biden must resort to speed or cocaine simply to remain upright, it seems just plain weird not at least to point to Trump’s frequently addled behavior. Thinking of what Einbinder said about the way taking Adderall had affected her, I wonder if it could explain the least appealing aspects of Trump’s personality: Why does this guy feel such a relentless need to lie, cheat and seek vengeance? Why does he, along with many of his fellow authoritarian-type personalities, seem to lack ordinary empathy or, for want of a better word, a soul?

We need your help to stay independent

There might be other plausible explanations, of course. Trump's diet is atrocious, and reportedly includes a steady stream of Diet Cokes. The effects of ingesting a highly processed McDiet are potentially dire, and not all that well understood, but I'm not aware of any evidence it's likely to cause unfocused whining and anger, or lead someone to dehumanize others and encourage violence

Mary Trump, who is the ex-president's niece as well as a clinical psychologist, wrote in her bestselling book “Too Much and Never Enough” that her uncle's diet, lack of exercise, a possible sleep disorder and a “long-undiagnosed learning disability” may all be factors that have overlapped, intersected with and exacerbated other possible medical or psychiatric issues, making no straightforward explanation possible:

The fact is, Donald’s pathologies are so complex and his behaviors are so often inexplicable that coming up with an accurate and comprehensive diagnosis would require a full battery of psychological and neuropsychological tests that he’ll never sit for.

If Trump is indeed using stimulant medication, as has repeatedly been alleged over the past two decades or so, it might merely amplify the soul-destroying demand from his father that he be a “king” and a “killer,” along with the mobster-style counsel of mentor Roy Cohn, who taught Trump always to exact revenge for any slights.

Trump, his MAGA followers in Congress and the right-wing media seem curiously focused on the claim that Biden was “juiced” for his vigorous State of the Union address, which seemed to quiet concerns about the president’s mental coherence and vibrancy.

Under Trump, the White House medical unit had exceptionally loose standards when it came to handing out stimulants and anti-anxiety medications. One former staffer told Rolling Stone the place was “awash in speed” as well as other drugs.

Meanwhile, Trump, his MAGA followers in Congress and the right-wing media seem curiously focused on the claim that Biden was “juiced” for his vigorous and wide-ranging State of the Union address, which at least for the moment seemed to quiet  concerns about the president’s mental coherence and vibrancy. As Salon's Heather Digby Parton wrote, it was a "barn burner of a speech," which meant that Team Trump had to make excuses and explain it all away. So they engaged in their customary exercise of psychological projection and accused Biden of doing the same thing Trump has been accused of doing for years.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


As I wrote last fall, I couldn’t do half of what Biden does — and I’m quite a bit younger than he is. This month alone, he flew to Europe twice in a week, first for the D-Day commemoration in Paris and then for the G7 summit meeting in Italy. Could you imagine Trump having anything useful, or even coherent, to say about the numerous agreements made between the U.S. and its global partners during those meetings? We already know he can't be trusted with a classified document.

Trump began his first campaign, nine long years ago, by claiming that Mexican immigrants were “bringing” drugs, crime and rape into our country. To borrow the con man’s favorite bit of flimflam, we didn't all know back then what we should certainly know now: Whenever Trump accuses people of something, he’s invariably projecting his own malign desires and aberrant behavior. Trump is the cheater who thinks everyone else is cheating, the unfaithful husband who suspects his wife of having an affair. His naturally authoritarian makeup may or may not be chemically augmented, which would be nothing new for a would-be despot, and it may or may not matter. 

Here's one thing I'm sure of: Trump has been “demanding” drug testing at every debate since he stalked Hillary Clinton around the stage in 2016, and he’ll submit to one himself right after he testifies under oath at one of his criminal trials.

Furthermore, Trump has managed expectations effectively enough: He's expected to sound like an angry blowhard who spouts lies about anything and everything and is proud of his ignorance and bigotry. Joe Biden is expected to be calm, reasonable and well-informed — or to put it another way, presidential. The question is which of those things Americans really want.

“Absurd and atextual”: Ketanji Brown dissents over Supreme Court gutting of anti-corruption law

The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday to weaken a federal statute that guards against public corruption, a reading that Justice Kentaji Brown Jackson said “only today’s court could love.”

In a 6-3 ruling by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the conservative supermajority sided with James Snyder, the former mayor of Portage, Indiana who accepted an alleged bribe of $13,000 in exchange for a towing contract. Snyder argued the exchange was an “after-the-fact gratuity,” not a bribe, CNN reported.

The law in question makes it a federal crime to “corruptly accept anything valued above $5,000," monetary or not.

The Supreme Court's ruling means that local officials may now legally accept de-facto bribes if they come in the form of gratuities. All three liberal justices dissented.

“The Government’s interpretation of the statute would create traps for unwary state and local officials,” Kavanaugh argued. 

Jackson, by contrast, said that the law honors “Congress’ intent to punish rewards corruptly accepted by government officials in ways that are functionally indistinguishable from taking a bribe.” She also called the court’s reading of the law “absurd and atextual.” 

“I respectfully dissent,” she concluded. 

The case, Snyder v. United States, is the latest in a string of decisions weakening anti-corruption laws. Most notably, last year the court scrapped fraud convictions in two cases against aides of former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

“She had a certain expectation”: Martin Short mocks report that Melania won’t return to White House

Comedian Martin Short on Tuesday roasted former President Donald Trump while guest hosting "Jimmy Kimmel Live!"

"What would Jimmy usually do right now?" Short, who was filling in for Kimmel while he is on summer break, asked sidekick Guillermo Rodriguez as he kicked off his monologue.

"He would be talking about Donald Trump," Rodriguez replied. 

“Well, I guess you can’t go to Outback Steakhouse without ordering the Bloomin’ Onion,” Short said. 

From there, the "Only Murders in the Building" star broached the question of who will serve as the ex-president's running mate, noting how Trump has reportedly narrowed his selection to a trio of Republicasns.

"It was four, but O.J. died, so…," Martin quipped, referencing the recent passing of the football legend who was acquitted of murdering his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman in 1994. 

Martin then honed in on Trump's potential vice president picks. 

“What a choice Trump has in his tiny little hands,” he said. The first option, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, “sounds like the name of your most annoying co-worker." The second choice, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., once referred to Trump as a con artist, Short said. “Or should we go to doormat number three?" he continued. "Ohio Senator JD Vance," a Republican who said Trump was either cynical "like Nixon or America’s Hitler."

“When have you ever said something like that about somebody and then changed your mind?” Short asked the crowd.

Short then mocked Trump's baseless argument that Biden will use drugs to ensure he makes it through the upcoming presidential debate, showing a clip from the former president's rally in Pennsylvania last weekend. 

We need your help to stay independent

"So a little before debate time, he gets a shot in the a—,"  Trump said. "I say he’ll come out all jacked up," he added, before separately alleging that a bag of cocaine found at the White House last year was Biden's. 

“He’s something, that Trump. He says he wants them both to submit to a drug test before the debate,” Short said, quipping at both presidential candidates' ages. “Do you have any idea how long it takes to get a urine sample from men who are close to 80? I’m 74, and the only time I don’t have to pee is when I’m peeing.”

Keeping in theme with his "contractually obligated 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' Trump jokes," Short also went on a tangent about former first lady Melania Trump, addressing reports that she will not live with her husband in the White House should he be reelected.

"Apparently, Melania hated her time in Washington, but she still might come to D.C. for state dinners and official events," Short said. "Yes, that's when she really comes alive," he added, before displaying a photo of Melania looking emotionless while seated next to the ex-president. 

"I actually have a little empathy for Melania," Short continued. "I mean, [when] she entered into this marriage, she had a certain expectation, and that expectation was that the average life expectancy for an American male is 76.3 years old."

Climate crimes: Advocates urge murder prosecution charges against Big Oil for heat wave deaths

Last summer, an unhoused man attempting to jump over a school fence to reach shade broke both his legs and died. In another case, a 73-year-old man fell while hanging his laundry and his body was found covered in burns and with a core temperature of 107 degrees. A woman also died in her $1 million Scottsdale home when the AC malfunctioned while a 33-year-old man collapsed and died while on a Saturday hike.

These are a few of the 403 people who died from a brutal heat wave that hit Maricopa County in July 2023, a summer marked by record-breaking temperatures that exceeded 110º F for 31 days straight.

"Who knows how many hundreds or thousands more are going to lose their lives before the summer ends?"

According to climate experts, these surging heat waves are far from natural — climate change from burning fossil fuels is driving our planet into hotter and hotter extreme weather. And given that fossil fuel companies bear the brunt of this crisis, some advocacy groups want to see Big Oil companies like Chevron and Shell criminally prosecuted.

On Wednesday, the consumer advocacy nonprofit Public Citizen released a model prosecution memo laying out a case to hold major fossil fuel companies criminally accountable for climate-related harms, including deaths from climate disasters. A network of former prosecutors, criminal law professors, and other legal advocates developed the memo together, and it was co-authored, among others, by former Justice Department prosecutor Cindy Cho. The memo places the blame on nine Big Oil companies: ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips, Occidental, BHP, Peabody and the American Petroleum Institute. (Salon reached out to all of them for comment and has not heard back at the time of this publication.)

"What struck me was the scope," co-author Aaron Regunberg told Salon. A former Rhode Island assemblyman and currently the senior policy counsel at Public Citizen, Rugenberg described climate change as "a massive public safety threat" and pointed out that "not everyone is going to make it when the heat breaks, and dozens of communities have already recorded deaths this summer from extreme heat. Who knows how many hundreds or thousands more are going to lose their lives before the summer ends?"

The memo makes the case that a person or institution is guilty of reckless manslaughter if it is proved beyond a reasonable doubt that they caused a victim's death through reckless conduct. Second degree murder, on the other hand, is defined as "recklessly causing the death of another person by creating a 'grave risk of death' under circumstances 'manifesting extreme indifference to human life.'" To prove the latter, the state needs to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant(s) caused the deaths of the victim(s) through reckless conduct which created a grave risk and demonstrated extreme indifference to human life.

Public Citizen argues that a strong case exists for both of these charges when it comes to the 403 people who died from the Maricopa County heat wave last year. Many desert cities could one day become too hot for people to live, even with plenty of air conditioning.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"These climate disasters are the specific result of decisions and actions that were made by particular actors."

Following the July 2023 heat wave, an extreme event attribution study determined that the occurrence of such heat in the American Southwest would have been "virtually impossible" but for human-caused climate change, with lead author Mariam Zachariah, a climate scientist at Imperial College of London, saying, "Had there been no climate change, such an event would almost never have occurred."

"These climate disasters are the specific result of decisions and actions that were made by particular actors," Regunberg said. "Massive oil and gas companies, as we detail and report, are responsible for generating a big portion of all the greenhouse gas emissions that have caused the plan to heat up and are deceiving the public about the dangers of those emissions in ways that lead to even more heating and warming. I think the inclination that these heat deaths might be more than just tragedies, but actually crimes, was strongly reinforced through this research process."

The Public Citizen memo is only a sample document; on its own, it carries no legal weight. However, Regunberg and his associates believe that it will spark a much-needed conversation about how to hold fossil fuel companies accountable.

But there are a few cases that have been taken to court with varying results. A 2023 report by the U.N. Environment Programme and Columbia University’s Sabin Center for Climate Change Law found that the total of climate cases has more than doubled over the past five years and such litigation is expected to keep growing. More recently, a group of 13 young people sued Hawai'i's Department of Transportation for failing to protect the environment. Last week, the case was settled, forcing the state to decarbonize its transportation network, among other stipulations. Hawai'i's governor Josh Green released a statement acknowledging "the constitutional rights of Hawaiʻi’s youth to a life-sustaining climate."

We need your help to stay independent

"Certainly our hope is that this kind of work is leading to real conversations," Regunberg said. When asked what ordinary people can do to help their cause and hold Big Oil accountable, Regunberg said "if you're someone who is in a community that has experienced a climate disaster, or are a victim of a climate disaster yourself, we think it's important for folks to be sharing those stories with their local prosecutor in the same way they might for any other street level offense."

Ultimately Public Citizen's goal with the sample memo is to emphasize that — while their particular document focuses on Maricopa County — everyone has a case against the fossil fuel companies.

"Though this memo focuses in on this specific scenario, its analysis we think applies similarly to basically any jurisdiction that has experienced climate heat deaths," Regunberg said."We hope that this can be something of a memo for any public officials who want to investigate how they might seek justice for climate victims."

Genetic analysis of ancient Mayan skeletons challenges virgin girl sacrifice trope

Ritual killing was a common part of religious sacrifice in the ancient Mayan city of Chichén Itzá. For decades, media depictions cast the victims of these acts as young women and adolescent girls. In an eye-opening discovery, however, an international team of researchers have upended that notion. Completing the world’s first analysis of ancient Mayan genomes, scientists said ritual sacrifices, at least in this context, largely focused on male children and their close relatives — including twin boys.

In a study published June 12 in the journal Nature, scientists analyzed genetic material obtained from the skeletal remains of 64 ancient Mayan children discovered at a religious site in the Central Mexican city of Chichén Itzá. Previous visual analysis of the skeletons posited that the remains of the juveniles were female. The new findings, however, confirmed that all 64 children were male. Additionally, at least a quarter of the children were closely related to another sacrificed child found in the pit.

“Most surprisingly, we identified two pairs of identical twins,” study co-author and archaeogeneticist Kathrin Nägele, of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology said in a release. “We can say this with certainty because our sampling strategy ensured we would not duplicate individuals.”

Nägele and her team point to the “remarkably similar” dietary patterns of the victims which indicated that more than one child was often chosen from the same household, and which suggests male children were selected in pairs for sacrifice.

"Early 20th century accounts falsely popularized lurid tales of young women and girls being sacrificed at the site."

Researchers note that twins played a prominent role in ancient Mayan origin stories and spirituality, and that the sacrifice of twins is a theme in the group’s 2,000-year-old religious text. The colonial-era K’iche’ Mayan Book of Council, or Popol Vuh, includes a story of twin brothers Hun Hunahpu and Vucub Hunahpu who descend to the underworld. After the two are defeated in a ballgame, the gods sacrifice the two brothers. The one of the two brothers has twin sons who avenge their father and uncle. Known as the Hero Twins Hunahpu and Xbalanque, the younger set of twins outwit the gods by undergoing repeated cycles of sacrifice and rebirth. 

Study co-author and physical anthropologist Oana Del Castillo-Chávez, of the National Institute of Anthropology and History Yucatán, said the findings confirm theories about the meaningful profile of selected sacrificial victims.

“The similar ages and diets of the male children, their close genetic relatedness, and the fact that they were interred in the same place for more than 200 years point to the chultún as a post-sacrificial burial site, with the sacrificed individuals having been selected for a specific reason,” Del Castillo-Chávez said.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


That specific meaning may also be tied to artistic representations throughout the Classic Maya period. Though the ritual structure was used for more than 500 years between the 7th to 12th centuries AD, researchers said the children were interred in the 200-year period of Chichén Itzá’s political apex between 800 to 1,000 AD. During that Classic period, the Hero Twins and their adventures are frequent subjects of stone carvings. Researchers also note that subterranean structures — like the one beneath the iconic El Castillo temple of Chichén Itzá where the children’s remains were discovered — were viewed as entrances to the underworld.

This led the scholars to theorize that the interment of twins and pairs of close-kin boys may be an expression of a ritual that involved recalling the story of the Hero Twins. Harvard anthropologist Christina Warinner, a group leader for the study, indicated that the first-time discovery of male predominance and twin selection among the skeletons offers pushback against popular fantasy tropes about virgin sacrifices — strengthening the importance of textual rites in their early culture.

“Early 20th century accounts falsely popularized lurid tales of young women and girls being sacrificed at the site,” Warinner said. “This study, conducted as a close international collaboration, turns that story on its head and reveals the deep connections between ritual sacrifice and the cycles of human death and rebirth described in sacred Maya texts.”

By comparing their findings about ancient inhabitants of Chichén Itzá to genetic composition of modern-day people in the region, the researchers were also able to confirm — for the first time — the direct genetic continuity of these two civilizations, past and present.

The finding was rooted in scientists’ ability to track the history of colonial-era epidemics through the genetic changes they caused through generations of area residents. The genetic variations include a heightened resistance to Salmonella infection, which caused massive population declines during the 1545 cocoliztli epidemic.

We need your help to stay independent

Lead study author Rodrigo Barquera, an immunogeneticist at the Max Planck Institute, and the other researchers worked closely with residents of the local Maya community of Tixcacaltuyub during the study to understand not only how colonial-era tropes may have impacted the portrayal of Mayan culture, but how colonial-era epidemics continue to impact indigenous populations. 

“The present-day Maya carry the genetic scars of these colonial-era epidemics,” lead author Rodrigo Barquera, immunogeneticist and postdoctoral researcher at the MPI-EVA, said. “Multiple lines of evidence point to specific genetic changes in the immune genes of present-day Mexicans of Indigenous and mixed-ancestry descent that are linked to enhanced resistance to Salmonella enterica infection.”

As the study of ancient DNA increasingly allows researchers to unravel long-standing mysteries of the pre-colonial past — dispelling outdated notions of culture, and tracking understudied generational health impacts — the researchers said these scientific advances have a unique power. They’re allowing Indigenous researchers themselves to correct the narrative about their origins, while allowing them to steer the priorities of health science in the future.

Trump-backed candidates lose elections from South Carolina to Utah in “rough” night for ex-president

Despite previous declarations from Donald Trump that his support is the “strongest endorsement in U.S. political history,” Trump-backed Republican candidates are losing primary races across the country.

“Tuesday was a rough primary night for Donald Trump — and he wasn’t even on the ballot,” Politico reported, with Trump-backed candidates losing their races in South Carolina, Utah and Colorado.

In South Carolina, Trump supported right-wing pastor Mark Burns, who lost to Air National Guard Lt. Col. Sherri Bigs.

In Utah, Trump decided at the last minute to support Riverton Mayor Trent Staggs in the race to replace Trump critic Mitt Romney. Staggs lost the Senate primary race by 20 points to Rep. John Curtis, R-Utah, who refuses to endorse the former president, Politico reported.

In Colorado, former talk show host Jeff Crank decisively beat Trump-backed House Chairman Dave Williams, who faced calls to resign earlier this month after he sent an email from the GOP state account with the subject line “God Hates Pride.” 

The losses on Tuesday come after Trump–backed candidate Christine Serrano Glassner lost the Republican’s U.S. senate primary in New Jersey earlier this month. The former president took another blow when his candidate of choice, Rep. Julie McGuire, lost in Indiana’s lieutenant government race a few weeks ago, MSNBC reported.

In response to criticism in 2022 that an endorsement doesn’t mean as much as he claims it does, Trump said in a statement he is almost “unblemished in the victory count.”

As Mediaite reported, 12 of the 15 candidates Trump has congratulated for winning their primaries on Tuesday won “uncontested without any opposition.”

Vitamix recalls multiple blenders due to potential blade exposure, which poses a “laceration hazard”

If you happen to have a Vitamix Ascent or Venturist blender at home, you'll definitely want to pay attention to this. As reported by Joseph Lamour of TODAY, "Vitamix is recalling hundreds of thousands of its blending containers and blade bases after receiving dozens of reports of injuries." 

Last week, the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission released a notice recalling the Vitamix Ascent and Venturist Series, specifically the 8-ounce and 20-ounce, blending containers and blade bases due to the fact that "the containers can separate from the blade base, exposing the blades, posing a laceration hazard to consumers." The notice writes that the only remedy is repair, also noting that in August 2018, some of the same blender parts were also "previously recalled" in both the U.S. and Canada.

The remedy states to "should immediately stop using the recalled 8-ounce and 20-ounce blending containers and blade bases, and contact Vitamix for a repair kit, consisting of a protective plastic shroud to attach over the blade base and additional instructional labels."

Thus far, according to the CPSC notice, there have been "27 reports of lacerations . . . when consumers' hands came in contact with exposed blades." The blends are sold at Costco, Best Buy, Macy's, Target, Walmart, Crate & Barrel, online at Vitamix.com, Amazon.com and QVC.com and "specialty and independent stores nationwide."

Chipotle is offering its most sought-after Celebrity Card to 5 lucky superfans

Following the launch of its limited-time-only Chipotle Boy Bowl promo, Chipotle is offering another special perk to its many superfans. The fast-casual burrito chain is making its Celebrity Card accessible to all consumers for the first time, Nation’s Restaurant News first reported. Introduced more than 20 years ago, the card has been reserved exclusively for celebrities, including athletes, artists, musicians, and social media influencers. Now, all Chipotle consumers can try their hand at winning the card in the “Chipotle Celeb Card” contest. 

Up until July 3, fans can apply to be a cardholder via LinkedIn Easy apply. Applicants need to submit content that explains why they deserve a card in the “resume” section, Chipotle explained in a recent press release. Chipotle will select up to five winners and notify them via email on July 12.

Cardholders can enjoy one free Chipotle meal per day and catering for up to 50 people during the year.

Chipotle said the contest was inspired by the changing definition of what it means to be a celebrity, which is being influenced by “social media and the speed of culture."

“There’s always been a special mystique around the Chipotle Celebrity Card. Given that the word ‘celebrity’ comes from ‘celebrate,’ we realized there is no group more deserving of a celebration than our everyday superfans,” the company’s chief brand officer Chris Brandt said in a statement. “We are expanding on what it means to be a Chipotle celebrity and relaunching the program to deepen our connections with our most devoted guests.”

Chipotle hopes to catch the attention of younger consumers with its campaign. Gen-Z is the fastest-growing demographic on LinkedIn, according to research from MarketingProfs.

Lauren Boebert wins GOP primary in new Colorado district

Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., won the GOP primary election on Tuesday in her new Colorado district.

Boebert defeated five other Republican candidates with 43% of the vote in the 4th congressional district. She is the heavy favorite to win the seat in November’s election.

The win comes after Boebert announced she was switching from Colorado’s 3rd congressional district, where she was first elected, to the 4th following Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., announcement that he was resigning.

In 2022, Boebert barely edged out Democrat Adam Frisch and was set for a tight rematch this year before she switched districts. In 2020, former President Donald Trump won the 4th district by 19 points, compared to 8 points in Boebert's old district, MSNBC reported.

At her victory party on Tuesday night, the Trump-backed lawmaker sported a MAGA hat and Trump-branded sneakers, CBS reported.

“Our priority here is to honor and glorify God, to honor those who have fought for our great nation, to preserve our freedom, because we truly live in the greatest nation this world has ever seen,” Boebert said in her victory speech. “America will rise again and I’m so excited that you all are here to be a part of it with me.”

Boebert, who has had a particularly hectic year with a very public divorce, is known for her support of gun rights and anti-immigration rhetoric.

“Build the wall, deport them all,” Boebert said throughout her campaign. 

She will face Democrat Trisha Calvarese in the general election.

NASA astronauts must analyze Boeing Starliner failures before returning home

The return trip of the Boeing Starliner commercial space craft has been delayed a third time so that NASA and Boeing engineers can collect critical data about the series of failures which plagued the vessel during its journey to the International Space Station. NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore will remain safely aboard the ISS — where the Starliner is currently docked on the station's Harmony module — until at least July 2nd to accommodate a previously scheduled spacewalk that day, the agency said in a Friday statement

"The problems being reported on the Starliner, namely reaction control thruster and helium leaks in the propulsion system, are all located on the spacecraft’s service module. When the crew departs the ISS and deorbits, the service module is discarded and burns up in the atmosphere on reentry. Thus, the helium systems and thrusters will not return to Earth for failure analysis. They’re gone. As such, the only way to get insight into what might be going on there is in space," said NASA Chief Aeronautics Engineer Steven Hirshorn, in a LinkedIn post Monday.  

"Boeing and NASA have extended the mission in order to collect more data. The helium system is isolated and won’t be reactivated until undocking, which is seven hours before landing. There’s plenty of helium onboard for that operation. The only way to understand what is occurring is to get more data, which can only be done on orbit," Hirshorn said.

The window for Starliner's return, however, is narrowing. According to NASA Commercial Crew Manager Steve Stitch, the ISS' Harmony docking module has enough fuel to allow Starliner to remain docked for 45 days while NASA and Boeing engineers troubleshoot. Early test-firing of the capsule's thrusters — one of the vessel's main problems — has proven successful, though tests remain ongoing.  

“Chance for them to seek a recusal”: Experts say Judge Cannon could give Jack Smith ammo to boot her

The downside to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon scheduling hearings on just about every frivolous claim raised by Donald Trump’s defense is that, eventually, she will have to start making decisions. That — not just entertaining each argument, as it shifts, from the former president, but actually ruling on them — has not worked out well for her in the past and could be how special counsel Jack Smith gets the classified documents case closer to trial.

In recent days, Cannon, who was nominated by Trump in the time between his losing the 2020 election and his inciting the January 6 insurrection, has held hearings and collected filings on a range of issues raised by the defense. Among them: that the naming of a special counsel violates the Constitution; that not specifying a cap on the special counsel’s funding abrogates congressional authority; that the search warrant for Mar-a-Lago was overly broad; and that the whole case should be thrown out because some of the state secrets recovered at Trump’s property were later returned to their boxes in a different order.

At the same time, Smith himself is seeking to modify Trump’s bail conditions, arguing that he should be barred from falsely claiming that FBI agents were authorized to do the “unthinkable” and shoot him dead — another issue Cannon will have to rule on.

The danger for this particular federal judge is that anything she does is potentially subject to review by an 11th Circuit Court of Appeals that has already unanimously, and harshly, rejected her rulings before: In 2022, a panel of conservative judges chided her for ruling that the government could not even review the classified documents it found in south Florida and appointing a so-called “special master” to do so instead.

“Everything she’s heard these last three days, a negative decision would be appealable by Jack Smith,” Mary McCord, a former federal prosecutor, noted in an appearance Tuesday on MSNBC. “Depending on the circumstances,” she added, such an appeal “may or may not be a chance for them to seek a recusal.”

It is unlikely, even now, that Smith would seek to have Cannon removed from the case altogether and try to start it all over again with a new judge. For one, other judges are unlikely to take such a request lightly, typically granting significant discretion to their colleagues on how to proceed with a case, barring clear misconduct. But Cannon’s superiors have demonstrated a willingness to slap down her misapplications of the law.

Smith, in a filing on Monday, alluded to those judges who have the power to overturn Cannon’s decisions, when she decides to make them.

Concerning Trump’s argument that the case should be dismissed because some papers were shuffled around in a box, denying him the ability to claim he might not have seen any state secrets at issue in the case — an argument that can be “added to a list of other evolving, unsupported, and inconsistent explanations for his possession of classified documents” — Smith’s 33-page filing noted that the 11th Circuit, in particular, “has never found that a defendant’s due process rights were violated by the government’s loss or destruction of evidence.” (Besides, Smith added: Trump has already admitted to possessing the documents in question, variously claiming they were planted and that he declassified them in his mind).

We need your help to stay independent

Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. attorney who teaches law at the University of Michigan, noted the extreme reach that is Trump’s defense here. “They’re asking not just that the evidence be suppressed but the whole case be dismissed, suggesting there is something nefarious about all this,” she told MSNBC. It’s clearly not, she argued, but if Cannon rules that there’s something to it that is also clear grounds for Smith to appeal.

Hemming and hawing isn’t that much better an option, either.

“At some point,” McQuade said, “if she simply fails to rule on these motions or set a trial date, that could be a basis for seeking a writ of mandamus, which is really just a request for the higher court to say to the district judge: make a decision, do your job, the time has come, you can’t wait anymore.” Prosecutors have typically only turned to such a writ as a last resort, she added: “It is supposed to be granted only under rare circumstances, but at some point that is a card that the government can play if the judge continues to delay in making decisions.”

There are some, however, who see the piling up of unresolved issues in Cannon’s courtroom as a potential boon not to the defense — and Trump’s strategy of having the case delayed until after the election — but to prosecutors who have more time to build a stronger case. Just this week it was reported that Trump took a previously undisclosed trip to Mar-a-Lago in the weeks ahead of the FBI raid and that he suggested to his lawyers that they just lie and deny that he had any classified documents at all.

“[O]ne thing about this case,” former U.S. attorney Joyce Vance posted on social media: “over time, the government’s evidence keeps getting better.” Delay “helps Trump in a very real sense,” she continued, “but also hurts.”

Donald Trump is stuck in a reality TV loop

One of the more unusual side stories in this presidential campaign cycle is a renewed look at Donald Trump's pre-presidential years as a Reality TV star. It offers some new insights into how he has transformed our politics into a spectacle we couldn't have imagined just a decade ago. The publication of the new book “Apprentice in Wonderland: How Donald Trump and Mark Burnett Took America Through the Looking Glass” by co-editor-in-chief of the Hollywood Reporter, Ramin Setoodeh, offers a unique perspective on Trump's post-White House years. Additionally, a recent article in Slate by a former "Apprentice" producer named Bill Pruitt gives an inside look at the phoniness of reality television and how it perfectly fit Trump's already well-developed phony persona. 

It's amazing that we are still trying to figure out what really makes this strange man tick — but I think that era of his life illuminates one of the most mystifying aspects of his appeal. How is Donald Trump able to convince tens of millions of people to believe him when all the evidence and facts prove otherwise? How does he successfully create an alternate reality for these people and, in the process, change ours as well? 

Trump has always been a braggart and a BS artist. You can watch videos from decades ago and he's boasting and exaggerating about his wealth and success as always. He had books ghostwritten for him extolling his business acumen and he encouraged the tabloids to portray him as a wealthy playboy, the image he cultivated for decades despite being married for most of his adult life. He was a self-promoter desperate to be a celebrity. 

The Trump name was pretty well-known (since he plastered it on everything in sight) and his press game was good enough he achieved a sort of C-list level of fame. But it wasn't until "The Apprentice" that he became a legitimate TV star. Suddenly he had fans all over the country who believed the character they created for the show was the real him. 

Pruitt's story tells just how fake that character really was. We all know by this time that his business success was largely due to the vast inheritance he got from his father and that most of his entrepreneurial attempts were failures. The fame he received from "The Apprentice" offered him the opportunity to create a celebrity brand and all those consumer goods like Trump steaks, ties, water, perfume, etc. It was supposedly a "luxury" brand but products were marketed to his fan base of middle and working-class reality show fans, the same people who became his political base. 

The producers soon found that they wouldn't be able to use Trump's own offices to do the show because they were scruffy and run down. So they created a "board room" in one of the empty spaces in Trump Tower as well as the living quarters for the contestants while they were filming. They covered up all the racism and misogyny and never let that audience know how often he stiffed his contractors or how many of his businesses went belly-up. They created the "business genius" image of Donald Trump and somewhere along the line he learned that he could now lie with impunity because when you're a star they let you do it (among other things.) 

We need your help to stay independent

Sehtoodah's book begins after Trump has left the White House and is reminiscing about his glory days as a TV star. He was down in the dumps and it seemed to perk him up to talk about his knowledge of how show business really works. Trump told him, “It’s all about one thing: ratings. If you have ratings, you can be the meanest, most horrible human being in the world.” (It reminded me of an anecdote from Dr. Anthony Fauci in his book “On Call,” when during the COVID pandemic Trump called Fauci into the Oval Office to brag about the ratings his crazy press conferences were getting.) That's what it's all about —- ratings, poll numbers, Truth Social followers. It's all a measure of his fame and celebrity power. 

According to Sehtoodah, Trump showed signs of short-term memory loss, failing to recall that he'd spent several hours talking to him just a couple of months before and he talked about "dealing with Afghanistan" as if he were still president. Trump also claimed that Joan Rivers told him she voted for him even though she died two years before the election. But what's really interesting is the extent to which reality TV stardom seems to have deeply informed Trump's approach to politics. 

Reality TV is essentially a lie. It maintains the pretense of authentic documentary filming of real life but it is actually a phony, manipulated narrative that tells the story the producers want to tell. (It's like professional wrestling, another Trump obsession.) Trump discovered that his fame and access to media allowed him to literally create a new reality for millions of people through the simple act of manipulating the narrative with lies and repeating it over and over again. I don't know if he even realizes what's real and what's not. At this point, his very survival is on the line. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


This week we are all on tenterhooks waiting for the presidential debate on Thursday and Trump is doing his usual promotional teases to get those all-important ratings up. He's quite talented at that. Recall that in 2016, he staged a press conference and planted women that Bill Clinton had allegedly had affairs with in the front row of the presidential debate as a stunt to rattle Clinton and get the press buzzing. This year he's demanding President Biden take a drug test to prove he isn't going to be "jacked up" on something. Some of that's just trying to psych out the opponent and playing the expectations game. But really, he's just setting up a scenario for the press and his fan base: Could Joe Biden really be on drugs? Is he senile or is he "jacked up"? Will Trump be "tough and nasty" or will he be calm and disciplined? Stay tuned. 

That's all politics is to Donald Trump — another reality show in which he is the star. It's the only way he can understand it. Unfortunately, his massive fame and power have managed to convince almost half the country that it's an actual reality. The rest of us are desperately clinging to facts and truth, dismayed and unnerved that so many around us are susceptible to such an obvious fraud. If only it really was a TV show that we could just turn off or change the channel. Unfortunately, it's all too real and we can't allow ourselves to look away. 

Trump’s claim that Biden is “jacked up” on drugs is more than projection — it’s cult conditioning

Donald Trump has been thinking a lot about cocaine lately, even though drug-running is one of the few felony charges he's not been indicted or convicted for. He has been routinely accusing President Joe Biden of using drugs, with the usual vivid details Trump injects into all his weird fantasies. "So a little before debate time, he gets a shot in the a—," Trump told rallygoers in Philadelphia Saturday. "I say he’ll come out all jacked up," he added, before going off on a diatribe accusing Biden of being the owner of a bag of cocaine found in a White House visitors' closet last year. 

Since there's no flight of Trump's fancy too bizarre for right-wing media, this obsession of Trump's is getting echoed by Republican politicians and MAGA talking heads. Fox News hosts, Republican politicians, MAGA media influencers, and every right-wing troll on Twitter have been playing their part as well-trained parrots, repeating the lie. The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) is even putting the lie in paid advertising. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Everyone knows that Trump's favorite rhetorical tactic is psychological projection. You'd think Republicans would be a little more worried this would raise questions about what Trump has been ingesting. But no: The campaign tapped disgraced former White House doctor Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Tex. to be a major Trump surrogate pushing this lie. Jackson's been hitting both TV and podcasts to toss around drug names like "Adderall" and "Provigil." This only reinforces suspicions that this accusation is a confession, however. When Jackson was Trump's White House doctor, he earned the nickname "Dr. Feelgood" for relentlessly pushing these drugs on people who do not need them. Jackson's behavior was so egregious that the Navy stripped him of his rank.

What's telling about this lie is, as with many MAGA falsehoods, it seems few, if any, of the people repeating it actually believe it. Trump and his allies have accused Biden not just of being a little tired at times, but of having dementia. As Mona Charen pointed out on the "Daily Blast" podcast, if Adderall could restore a demented person's brain, they'd be mass distributing it to the millions of people who are suffering from this disease. As for the cocaine accusation, even the most naive person in the country knows cocaine makes people less coherent, not sharper. It causes people to ramble on about nonsense, which is closer to describing your average Trump speech, not anything Biden has been up to. 

Trump is using his second favorite trick, besides projection: Tricking his followers into believing they're in on his con.

Trump isn't trying to convince anyone of this lie. He's convincing them that, by repeating the obvious lie, they can share in what they believe is his mastery over reality itself. The lie is not a thing the MAGA person sincerely believes. It's a weapon Trump has provided them. When he loses the debate, which they clearly expect he will, the lie gives them a way to participate in the post-debate spin. But it's also the stupidity of the lie that makes it so fun. Saying something deliberately dumb is a reliable way to drive the liberals mad. Angering liberals is the emotional core of the MAGA base. 

This also helps explain why MAGA experiences no cognitive dissonance when Trump openly contradicts himself on the question of Biden's rhetorical skills. As many media outlets have documented, Trump spent weeks deriding Biden as "the WORST debater I have ever faced — He can’t put two sentences together." Now, he's suddenly changed tactics, claiming Biden is a "worthy debater" and warning that his followers "don’t want to underestimate him."

It's the stupidity of the lie that makes it so fun. Saying something deliberately dumb is a reliable way to drive the liberals mad.

None of this bothers Trump's supporters, who know nothing he says should be mistaken for truth. That's part of the fun. He makes them feel like they're part of the lie. No doubt that feels powerful, this ability to speak out of both sides of your mouth, and never being held to account for it. Every time Republican voters repeat an obvious lie, they get to feel they're sticking it to the liberals and the media, with all their pious insistence that words should mean things and lying is bad. It's the same trick Trump used to convince his followers to reject mask-wearing during the pandemic. Sure, spreading a deadly disease on purpose might be frowned upon in some corners, but that's what makes it feel so deliciously naughty. 

As I've written about before, this strategy is the oldest technique in the con artist's book. The best way for a grifter to gain a mark's trust is to make him feel like he's in on the con. Cult leaders operate the same way, by creating this sense of intimacy with their victims. Once the mark feels he's part of the conspiracy, it's that much easier to victimize him. The mark feels like the predator and not the prey, and so he lets his guard down around the actual villain picking his pocket. Trump does this to his followers over and over again, and they always fall for it. Even the Capitol insurrection is a good example. Trump convinced the rioters that they were his partners in the attempted coup. In reality, they were his patsies, set up to take the fall while he hid away in the White House. 

We need your help to stay independent

Tuesday, the New York Times ran a report on how much Trump rallies are being used to swindle the MAGA masses. At the recent Turning Point USA (TPUSA) event in Detroit, the 8,000 people in attendance to hear Trump were first subject to a pitch from Alexander Spellane, "who federal regulators say is also known as Alexander Fisher and Alexander Overlie," on buying gold and silver. The rallygoers were not told that Spellane is under federal investigation for defrauding his so-called "investors." 

But it's no surprise, really. TPUSA is itself a shady organization, as Bill Scher reports in Washington Monthly. "The group reported $9.8 million in donations for 2017, $79.2 million for 2022, and a quarter of a billion since 2016," he writes, with promises to GOP donors that they will be able to turn out the youth vote for Republicans and win states such as Arizona. The group hasn't met its repeated promises to win tight elections in swing states, but by one important metric, they're quite successful: As the Associated Press reports, TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk "bought three high-end properties, all worth over a million dollars, which include his new Spanish-style mansion near Phoenix, as well as a nearby apartment and a beachside condo on Florida’s gulf coast."

Never let it be said that I'm asking readers to pity Trump supporters, however. This is a classic case of "play stupid games, win stupid prizes." If only these fools could limit it to wasting their own money, whether it's on $60 Trump Bibles or their life savings on Truth Social stock. Instead, because Trump flatters their egos to snake their wallets, they are risking our entire democracy. 

A UFC takeover: Donald Trump’s dreams of a migrant fighting league are no joke

Donald Trump is a master propagandist. He is also a juggernaut who will not willingly stop in his quest to be America’s first dictator. Following his historic felony conviction, Trump has only escalated his vile behavior. Last weekend, Donald Trump gave a series of especially sinister speeches. Not content with the Big Lie and his usual demagoguery, the ex-president added a new dimension to his obsessions with violence and suffering when he suggested that non-white migrants and refugees should be put in a special mixed martial arts league for his and his MAGA supporters entertainment:

I said, 'Dana [referring to Dana White, CEO of UFC], I have an idea. Why don't you set up a migrant league of fighters and have your regular league of fighters. And then you have the champion of your league – these are the greatest fighters in the world – fight the champion of the migrants. I think the migrants’ guy might win, that’s how tough they are.

Trump added that “migrants” are “nasty, mean" and "tough people.”

During a speech to the right-wing “Christian” Faith and Freedom Coalition's "Road to Majority" conference on Saturday, Trump made the same suggestion. Watching human beings brutalize each other inside of a cage is of course a very “Christian” thing to do.

Trump’s suggestion that there should be a migrant fighting league is dehumanizing and part of a much larger pattern of racism, white supremacy, and nativism against Black and brown people. Channeling Adolf Hitler, Donald Trump has repeatedly described non-white migrants and refugees as “vermin” and “poison” in the blood of the nation. A migrant fight club is the logical next step in such beliefs.

Trump’s enablers and propagandists responded to criticism of his statements about a migrant fighting league with their standard claim that he was just kidding. When asked, Dana White told reporters, "It was a joke. I saw everybody going crazy online. But yeah, he did say it.”

Of course, based on Trump’s long history of racism and bigoted behavior, this is not true. Moreover, the use of humor and diminutives are a way of legitimizing and normalizing eliminationism and other massive violence against groups deemed to be the Other.

"Trump is actively mobilizing the UFC fan base to support his second attempt to dismantle our democratic system."

Right-wing White Christians are among Trump’s most loyal and enthusiastic supporters because they view him as a weapon to create an American theocracy where they would have special and superior rights over other people. Trump has repeatedly claimed that he is a messiah and martyr who was chosen by “God” to lead the MAGA movement and to “make America great again” in a holy war against “evil” President Biden, the Democrats, and other elements of “the Left.” By definition, such claims are blasphemous and heretical. In keeping with that propaganda strategy, Trump told the attendees at the Faith and Freedom Coalition's "Road to Majority" conference that he could take off his shirt and show them all of the injuries that he has suffered from his imagined enemies.

"I have wounds all over my body.  I took this shirt off, you'd see a beautiful, beautiful person but you'd see wounds all over me. I've taken a lot of wounds. More than I suspect any president ever."

Trump is, again, claiming that he is some type of Jesus Christ-like figure who is being tortured for the salvation of his MAGA cultists and others who follow him.

Trump’s fantasies about a migrant fighting league are not random or happenstance. They are part of a larger propaganda and communications-branding strategy. Donald Trump has modeled himself after a professional wrestling heel and understands how the spectacle of mixed martial arts and other combat sports as a space for a particular type of “traditional” (toxic) masculinity and its emphasis on so-called self-reliance, “rugged individualism”, entrepreneurship, violence, resentment towards “the elites” and “political correctness” is a way for him to gain supporters for his MAGA personality cult and right-wing authoritarian populist movement.

On this, communications scholar Reece Peck explains in a particularly insightful new essay at The Hill how:

Donald Trump’s first public appearance after his recent felony conviction wasn’t a campaign rally or political fundraiser. It was an Ultimate Fighting Championship event. Earlier this month, the raucous, mostly male crowd gave the former president a hero’s welcome as he walked into the arena to the song “American Bad Ass” by Kid Rock. Then, they took up an anti-Biden chant. The choice of venue won’t surprise anyone who’s been paying attention to conservative masculinity lately. For Trump, a professional fight is a political space, and his appearance there is a strategic choice….

As a scholar who studies conservative media, I see the manosphere and its mainstream relatives as part of a new conservative culture war. Right-wing influencers are once again using social issues to distract working-class people from their economic struggles, just as Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck and other Fox News pundits did in the early 2000s with issues like gay marriage and the “War on Christmas.”

These efforts succeed because they speak to real feelings of hopelessness about the future, lack of opportunity, and alienation and loneliness that are common today, particularly among young men. Drawing on a well-worn conservative playbook, the manosphere culture war redirects blame away from economic elites and heightened inequality to feminism and “woke” culture.

Via email, I asked Peck for his thoughts about Trump’s desire to watch a migrant fight club and how that is connected to the country’s democracy crisis and ascendant neofascism:

Before I discuss the politics of the UFC, I want to say that I have been a lifelong fan since UFC 1, its first pay-per-view event in 1993. I was a standout wrestler in my Utah high school, and I still practice jiujitsu as an aging professor. In short, I am no stranger to the UFC and to the broader culture of mixed martial arts. But, much like my horror in watching how the Bush administration weaponized country music—a genre I love and grew up on—to support the Iraq invasion in 2003, it is even more disturbing to see how Trump is actively mobilizing the UFC fan base to support his second attempt to dismantle our democratic system. 

In the 1968 presidential election, the notorious segregationist Alabama Governor George Wallace used the audience data of country music radio stations to plan the locations of his political rallies. Trump is doing something similar with the UFC. He is actively trying to convert a young, multiethnic (mostly male) audience of fight fans into a potentially powerful political constituency. Trump has attended numerous UFC pay view events in just the last year. This seems unprecedented. I can’t recall another candidate in recent political history who has attended this many major sports events in the heart of a presidential election, surely not combat sporting events.

We need your help to stay independent

Reece offered these insights about UFC and its role in the right-wing political project:

One could say the UFC has exuded a conservative sensibility since its inception with its long ties to military recruitment and advertising and with its ring girls and Hooters sponsorship. But this conservative sensibility was also complicated by the sport’s global appeal and by the ethnic and international diversity of its fighters. Additionally, with Ronda Rousey’s rise to become the face of UFC in the early 2010s, the sport became an unlikely platform for women athletes, particularly those from the LGBTQ community, and for a while, the UFC’s branding even leaned into these seemingly progressive traits. But Dana White's appearance at the 2016 Republican National Convention changed everything. By doing this, White directly injected the UFC brand into the world of electoral politics.

Reece adds, “This was the juncture when the UFC’s political identity shifted from a subtle, implicit association with political conservatism to more of an overt partisan one. Prior to the 2016 election, White actually disciplined fighters for talking about politics and for using gay and trans slurs (e.g., Nate Diaz, Matt Mitrione). Post-2016, he, in contrast, encouraged them to make conservative politics a full part of their fighter brands and public personas, most dramatically exemplified by fighters like the anti-“woke” crusader Sean Strickland and the MAGA hat-wearing Colby Covington.”

Journalist and author Irv Muchnick explained to me via email how Trump’s migrant fighting league represents another connection between the convicted felon and hostile foreign actors:

The ties of Trump to the world of combat sports encompass both the real and the fake flavors. He's a crony of UFC's CEO Dana White, and of WWE's disgraced czar, Vince McMahon. The two companies now comprise the TKO Group under Endeavor Group Holdings, which is run by former Hollywood superagent Ari Emanuel, brother of former Chicago mayor and Bill Clinton aide Rahm Emanuel.

Mixed martial arts ties were part of the very first reports of Russian back channels in the Trump White House through fixer lawyer Michael Cohen and short-lived national security adviser Michael Flynn. The vessel was U.S. immigrant and former Ukrainian politician Andrii Artemenko, the only prominent Ukrainian figure known to have backed Trump's 2016 presidential candidacy. The arrangements went all the way back to Trump's fling at promoting legendary fighter Fedor Emelianenko in 2008-09. Emelianenko's manager talked about this relationship on RT, the Putin-puppet network that had Flynn on the payroll.

Beyond being a “joke” as his defenders claim, Trump’s desires for a migrant fight club serve a much larger political project to normalize fascism and authoritarianism in America and the type of inhumanity his dictatorial regime will unleash and empower.

I asked social critic and cultural theorist Peter McLaren for his thoughts about these much larger dynamics and implications. He explained to me via email:

When Trump expresses a desire to watch migrants crossing the border to be forced to fight each other inside the MMA octagon and then have their champion face off against a hardened professional UFC fighter just to satiate the blood lust of Trump and his millions of UFC fans — then this serves as an official license for other fight fans to follow Trump’s example and desire the same. But it’s Trump’s enablers who reinforce Trump’s culture of cruelty.  During a Sunday edition of Fox & Friends, Rachel Campos-Duffy and her co-host expressed supreme delight at Trump's idea of forming a fighting league for migrants, insisting that Trump's proposal was a "brilliant" idea for his campaign.

While Trump’s disaffected followers are only too happy to join him in creating an Ultimate Fighting Championship culture based on taunts and personal attacks, often related to race and religion, and the thrill of crushing social justice warriors and ‘woke’ liberal elites, they are foot stomping on America’s long-admired empathy for immigrants and vulnerable populations. The UFC has evolved to where the term ‘savage’ and other exaggerated and domineeringly masculine adjectives are frequently used to complement fighters after they have knocked their opponents unconscious.

Young men who are cultivating their identities in such an environment are not doing society, or the martial arts community for that matter, any good. Trump supporters might be titillated by the gladiatorial atmosphere of the Roman arena, when gladiators were forced to fight each other to the death, and find it supremely amusing to imagine migrants—already labelled as rapists, murderers and vermin, as inmates escaped from insane asylums south of US-Mexico border who are poisoning the blood of the country — beat each other into oblivion.  But they need to understand that this says more about them than the migrants whom they relish in their derision.

McLaren explains the power of Trump as a master propagandist and how he gives permission for inhumane behavior by his MAGA political cultists and other followers:

When Trump suggests that undocumented immigrants are only good for providing amusement for real “legacy” Americans, he is not merely issuing an incendiary remark; as former president of the United States, his comments carry the potency of a demonic spell cast upon countless individuals who have risked life and limb to provide a better future for themselves and their families. We should not compare Trump’s comments to your drunken uncle embarrassing himself at Sunday dinner. This is a highly calculated strategy.  This is part of Trump’s ideological juggernaut and is what makes him the most self-assured and seemingly invincible candidate in the chronicles of American politics. It’s important to recognize how Trump’s demonizing of migrants has a ‘carry over effect’, fueling some of Trump’s most incendiary positions, contributing to the replication of specific associations—excitable affiliations—that young people are learning to make for all “outsiders” and “unwanted others.” Trump’s slanderous comments serve as elements of cultural transmission that will eventually settle into the sedimentary layers of America’s historical memory. In this sense Trump’s remarks are pedagogical. They are teaching young Americans whom to jeer and hate. They are also teaching us about ourselves.

Donald Trump, like the other fascist and fake populist demagogues who are imperiling democracy around the world, is an expert at manipulating human emotions. The American mainstream media and political class have largely been unable to stop such forces because they are fixed on normal politics and institutions, and have a vision of political reality that no longer holds true. Trump’s dreams of a migrant fighting league are one more example of how he knows what his followers want and how to titillate the darkest and most cruel parts of their minds and souls. By comparison, the mainstream news media and political class insist on focusing on polls, votes, the debates, and the horserace when Trump and the other neofascists and enemies of democracies are winning hearts and minds. On Election Day in November, the future of the country will be largely decided by whose message is more persuasive and compelling.

Environmental watchdog warns of “fecal soup” runoff as floods rage in Iowa

Amidst record-breaking floods in Northwest Iowa, environmental groups are warning of the potential health risks from flooded factory farms and manure runoff. 

On Monday, President Biden declared the Iowa floods — which have been raging since June 16 — a major disaster. Officials warned residents in various regions not to drink their water due to bacteria contamination. Food and Water Watch, an environmental watchdog group, warns that flooding on factory farms will only exacerbate this contamination and threaten the already severe public health risks.

“Factory farm waste poses a serious threat to public health — especially when it’s flooding your living room," Amanda Starbuck, the research director at Food and Water Watch, said in a statement. Manure pits and lagoons are disasters waiting to happen; when extreme weather hits, they put everything downstream at risk of serious contamination. Iowans recovering from these devastating floods must remain on constant guard against the threat of animal waste contaminating properties, water supplies and waterways.”

The five counties hit worst by the flooding are Clay, Emmet, Lyon, Plymouth and Sioux, which are home to over 900 factory farms which produce over 23 billion pounds of animal waste per year. That’s 175 times the amount of human waste, according to Food and Water Watch. 

Most of these farms store manure in large pits or lagoons and flooding can lead to overflow or breaches in those pits. “Fecal soup,” (animal feces mixed with water)  is often then flushed into local homes and waterways which can put the health of local residents at risk, the group says.

As manure-contaminated water contains a variety of chemicals and pathogens, exposure can lead to E.Coli contamination, Giardia, respiratory illness and birth defects, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Past flooding in North Carolina, another region littered with factory farms, paints a foreboding picture for Iowa. In 2018, Hurricane Florence flooded over 50 manure lagoons in North Carolina, two of which released an estimated 7 million gallons of pig sewage into nearby waterways. Private wells saw major spikes in E.Coli contamination, impacting the health of nearby residents, Food and Water Watch reported. 

In the same year, extreme rain in Northwest Iowa caused manure systems at nearly 30 farms to overflow. 

Since the extreme weather in Iowa began over a week ago, several discharges on animal feeding operations have already occurred. The disastrous floods have also shut down major roads and damaged over 2,000 properties.

3 answers to the most challenging debate questions for Joe Biden

Count on CNN moderators Dana Bash and Jake Tapper to try to put both candidates on the defensive with their questions during Thursday’s debate, the first of the general election. Here’s how President Biden can parry, turning tough questions to his advantage.

1. "Mr. President, you know the questions about your age. Can you reassure Americans that you have not slowed down so much that it keeps you from fully performing your duties for four more years?" 

“I wouldn’t be running for re-election if I wasn’t ready and able to serve,” the president should forcefully retort. “As my doctor wrote in February after doing a thorough examination, I am ‘“a healthy, active, robust 81-year-old male, who remains fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency.’

“This ‘healthy, active, robust’ president is used to being doubted and counted out. Look at my record, folks.”

“People scoffed in 2020 when I campaigned on enacting bipartisan legislation to get America moving again. As President, I signed the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill into law. Today, we’re building roads, bridges, and internet connections in small towns, creating 2.4 million jobs. And there is more to come.

“Then I got the Reduce Inflation Act passed. It’s delivering $200 million in green energy projects for our young people’s future, creating another 195,000 jobs, most of them in red states. Unlike my opponent, I am president of all the people, whether they vote for me or not. 

“Check out all these Republicans taking credit at home for bills they voted against in Congress. I say, ‘Welcome, my friends, to an America that wants to move forward, not backward.’

“And no one thought my administration could get the budget through the MAGA Freedom Caucus in the House. We did. Same for aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. We fight for freedom against our enemies in the world. And we do it without putting America’s soldiers in harm’s way.

“I’m still Joe from Scranton, and I can give more than I get. You saw me take on those rude MAGA Republicans at my State of the Union. I’m for civility, but I fight when it’s not returned. 

“Two weeks ago, when my 78-year-old opponent met with the Business Roundtable, the CEOs said afterwards he was [quote] “meandering, could not keep a straight thought and was all over the map.” I’m quoting CNBC. 

We need your help to stay independent

“But I’m not going to hold it against him that he rants and raves. He lacks the heart, soul, and experience in government to do the people’s work. 

2. “Mr. President, many people have lost confidence in your ability to manage the economy because of inflation. What’s your answer to them?”

“First, I get it. Inflation hurts ordinary Americans. 

“I know what it costs to go to the grocery store or fill up at the gas station. I wasn’t born into wealth. I didn’t have a father give me $400 million like my opponent did. I know what it is like to struggle, to sit at the kitchen table trying to figure out how to make your dollars cover everything. I’ve lived that life.”

“I know what life is like for working people. I know that middle-class life is too expensive right now. That's why I’ve passed laws to lower costs.

“Let’s look at the record. 

“Inflation was 5.2% when I came into office. Now it’s just over 3%. That’s still too high, but stay tuned – the nonpartisan economists at Moody’s Analytics just predicted that it will drop ‘to the Fed’s 2 percent target by summer 2025’ with me as president.

“They also projected that if my opponent is elected, inflation goes up. And they explained why: ‘Trump policies — including higher tariffs, tax cuts that stimulate the economy and an exodus of foreign immigrants that could tighten the labor market and increase labor costs.’ Trump would reverse the great progress we’ve made in cutting the rate of inflation." 

“And even though inflation is tough across the globe, the Wall Street Journal had a recent headline about our economy, saying it’s the – [I’m quoting now] –  ‘“Envy of the World.’” 

“Under my Administration, real wage growth is beating inflation – our economy has American wage-earners gaining more than what inflation takes away.” “Unemployment is at historic lows, almost 3% below what it was when I took over.” 

You want more jobs while inflation continues to drop? That’s what you’ll get if you vote for me.”

3. “President Biden, on immigration, polls report that American voters trust President Trump more than they trust you. Why?”

“I know that illegal immigration is a real problem. And I have worked hard to stem the tide of illegal immigration.”

“That’s why on my first day in office, I sent Congress comprehensive legislation to completely overhaul the broken immigration system I inherited: cracking down on illegal immigration; strengthening legal immigration; and protecting Dreamers, the children of parents who are undocumented parents and here through no fault of their own, as well as immigrants with temporary protected status and farmworkers, who are all part of the fabric of our nation.

“But congressional Republicans refused to consider my comprehensive plan. 

“From that day until today, I have worked hard to solve the immigration problem. In fact, in January, we had the solution until my opponent blew it up.

“I hope the media, including your network, Jake and Dana, will tell this truth because it’s the whole truth: We had a bipartisan border security bill that my administration negotiated with Republican Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma and Leader Mitch McConnell. 

“Donald Trump didn’t want the problem solved; he wanted it to continue so he could yell about it and hope it helps get him elected. That’s who he is – in it for himself, not you, the American people. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Let me tell you about the bill he stopped. It would have given a president the express authority to shut the border when traffic got too high. The bill would have spent $20 billion for:

  • new Border Patrol officials;
  • Screening out phony asylum requests 
  • Expand detention facilities to hold those who cross the border illegally; and,
  • increase screenings for fentanyl. 

“In the negotiation, I gave and I got. That’s compromise. It’s how the government works for the people in this country. I want to solve the immigration problem. 

That’s not what my opponent wants. He wants power, and he’ll do or say anything to get it even if he needs to hurt the country to get it.

“But, Dana, I am still doing everything a president can without that bill. We’ve just issued orders saying no one entering the country illegally may apply for political asylum. 

“We’ve intercepted more fentanyl in the last two years than in the previous five combined.

“We’ve imposed sanctions on the Daniel Ortega regime in Nicaragua for selling visas, and we’ve launched new initiatives to dismantle human smuggling rings. 

“Meanwhile, we’re helping the Dreamers, the children of undocumented parents who are here through no fault of their own.

“We have a new initiative that will, for the first time, swiftly give them work visas, through their employers. These are people who are contributing to America. In May, we extended access to health care coverage to 100,000 of them. That saves our communities the costs of emergency room visits.” 

“These Dreamers join millions of people my Administration has helped get Obamacare. My opponent wanted to end it because he’s all about punishing his rivals and anyone who opposes him.”

“We also have a new initiative that would allow undocumented spouses of American citizens who’ve been married 10 years to apply for permanent residency without leaving the country. That’s just plain old human decency.”

"One last point. My opponent tries to frighten you with his usual scare tactics, not facts. But facts are stubborn things. Researchers who study them tell us that immigrants are associated with lower crime rates not higher. And all violent crime in the United States is down to a near-50 year low."

“I need your vote. We can secure our borders by working across the aisle once Americans defeat Donald Trump. And we will do it with compassion for the people, especially young people, who deserve it. We’re America, second to none. And we own the finish line.”

Dollars and scents: how the right smells can encourage shoppers to buy healthier foods

Imagine walking down the aisle of your local grocery store. The scent of mixed herbs catches your attention, mentally transporting you to a kitchen filled with the aroma of your favorite home-cooked meal.

Suddenly, you're craving hearty minestrone soup or yearning for homemade beef lasagna. In an instant, your plans for dinner – and your shopping list – change.

This sensory experience is not a new phenomenon. Using scent to sell in retail stores is a well-established strategy. But our new research has found introducing a herbal scent (such as thyme, rosemary, oregano and basil) in supermarkets can encourage shoppers to select and purchase more wholesome foods.

Beyond general smells that come from the products, supermarkets often use artificial scent strategies, such as diffusing grapefruit in the produce section, chocolate in the confectionery aisle,  rosemary focaccia by the bakery, and baked cheesecake in the aisles to boost sales.

Previous research has found diffusing a chocolate scent in a bookstore increased interest in romance books and cookbooks. And natural scents in a store boosted spending on  products with fewer artificial or synthetic characteristics.

Scents such as rose maroc (considered "masculine") and vanilla (deemed "feminine") have been shown to influence shopping behaviors toward gender-specific clothing.

Understanding the influence of certain smells isn't just about boosting sales. Supermarkets play a pivotal role in shaping food choices. Using scent strategies to nudge consumers toward more wholesome food options is an under-explored opportunity to improve public health outcomes.

So, can the right smell increase choice and sales of nutritious wholesome foods?

 

Understanding the effect of herbs

Our research was broken into three parts – experiments in the laboratory, field study and online surveys.

We invited participants into our sensory laboratory at Auckland University of Technology. Each person was exposed to the smell of mixed herbs while shopping in a virtual supermarket. Shoppers purchased more wholesome baskets of goods when exposed to the herbal smell compared to the non-herbal smell (baked goods).

For every $155 spent, shoppers exposed to herbal smells bought three more wholefood items compared to those who were given non-herbal scents.

To test if those effects also occurred in-store, we collaborated with a New Zealand supermarket retailer to run a field study. We diffused a herbal scent in two stores and found shoppers exposed to the scent purchased more wholesome fresh food items than those not exposed to any scent.

We also wanted to understand the extent to which scent can influence wholesome food choices. Is the effect of smell strong even if consumers simply imagine the scent? The answer is yes.

In an online survey, we asked participants to imagine walking into their local supermarket and noticing the smell of mixed herbs. Those who imagined the herbal scent showed a stronger desire to buy ingredients for a homemade herb-rich pasta sauce and fresh ingredients for beef stew compared to those imagining no scent.

The research shows smells have the power to help us make better choices at the supermarket – even when they are only imagined.

 

Why does smell influence choices?

Scent marketing influences human emotions, memories and motivations. This is largely due to the direct link between the olfactory system from our noses and the limbic system – the part of the brain responsible for memory and behavioral responses.

When odors are processed and retrieved, they can activate associations with sensory knowledge, leading to important changes in our behavior. This is fascinating to think about. Past research shows that when participants were exposed to a citrus scent, it triggered cleaning behavior.

That led to more people in the study smelling citrus, and then doing more of the cleaning up after an eating task – compared to participants who didn't smell citrus.

When it comes to food, participants primed with a fruity scent (like melon and pear) had thoughts about fruit and vegetables, and were more likely to pick starters and desserts with vegetables and fruit.

The smell of herbs is a scent many consumers are familiar with — used for centuries in global cuisines and everyday home cooking to enhance the flavour of food. Repeated exposure to a scent and the accompanying experiences can form strong associations in memory.

Our research shows these associations (herbs and Sunday roast, for instance) can drive food choices in supermarkets.

The mere act of smelling or imagining a herbal scent stimulates memories of cooking and eating home-cooked meals prepared from fresh ingredients. We found the association with home-cooking then stimulates a desire to choose and purchase related wholefoods rather than more processed foods.

Whether New Zealand retailers adopt artificial scents to nudge consumers toward more wholesome foods remains to be seen. But the potential for improving food choices, and by extension public health, is significant.

 

Megan Phillips, Senior Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in Marketing, Auckland University of Technology and Sommer Kapitan, Associate Professor of Marketing, Auckland University of Technology

 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

“I trust Shondaland’s vision”: “Bridgerton” author tells fans angry over gender bend to have “faith”

Julia Quinn, the author behind the "Bridgerton" book series, has responded to the ire of fans who took issue with a gender twist in the finale of the Netflix adaptation's third season.

After Francesa Bridgerton (Hannah Dodd) marries Lord John Stirling, Earl of Kilmartin (Victor Alli), she comes face to face with his cousin Michaela Stirling (Masali Baduza) and has an instant, visceral reaction. Francesca flubs her words and forgets her own name. It's a shocking appearance to Quinn's readership as well because those familiar with the books recognize a version of that name: Michael. Warning: spoilers ahead the books.

It turns out that Netflix's adaptation of "Bridgerton" has gender-bent cousin Michael – the man who will eventually win Francesca's heart after the death of John – to be Michaela, which will make the first queer love story official for one of the eight Bridgerton siblings. While many who have been watching the series celebrated the change especially for Pride month, the swap was received poorly by much of the "Bridgerton" book fan base, with many opining that the addition of a new queer character and subplot was too much of a diversion from the book's original content. Discourse raged online.

On Monday Quinn posted on her Instagram account a statement addressing the fandom's outrage. “Anyone who has seen an interview with me from the past four years knows that I am deeply committed to the 'Bridgerton' world becoming more diverse and inclusive as the stories move from book to screen,” Quinn wrote. She acknowledged that “switching the gender of a major character is a huge change," and explained that she consulted with showrunner Jess Brownell before "conferring my agreement.

“I trust Shondaland's vision for 'Bridgerton,' but I wanted to be sure that we could remain true to the spirit of the book and of the characters," Quinn added. 

“My publisher was worried that writing about Fran's love for John would take away from Michael's role as the eventual romance novel hero,” Quinn explained. “But I felt that if I didn't show how deeply she loved John, and how deeply Michael, his cousin, also loved him, then their feelings of guilt at falling in love with each other after John's death made no sense. I didn't want to just tell the reader that they loved him. I wanted the reader to feel it.

“I'm confident now that when Francesca has her 'Bridgerton' season, it will be the most emotional and heart-wrenching story of the show," the author continued. "I am grateful for your understanding and touched by your deep commitment to the characters of the 'Bridgerton' world. I ask that you grant me and the Shondaland team some faith as we move forward. I think we are going to end up with two stories, one on page and one on screen, and they will both be beautiful and moving.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/C8nqNJfv4fB/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA%3D%3D&img_index=1

“A lot of frustration”: Legal expert calls out Judge Cannon’s “unprofessional” shot at prosecutor

As tensions flare in a Fort Pierce courtroom over pre-trial motions in Trump's classified documents case, a former federal prosecutor says a prosecutor's frustrated tone isn't enough for U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to order him replaced.

A prosecutor on special counsel Jack Smith's team apologized Monday for unprofessional conduct as he asked the court to limit Trump's statements about law enforcement agents, according to the South Florida Sun Sentinel

Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Salon that he's not surprised that prosecutors are "frustrated."

"They're dealing with a judge who is unlike any other judge," Rahmani said. "She is entertaining some ridiculous arguments. She's allowed outsiders who really have nothing to do with the case, to submit briefs and to argue. No judge would allow that."

University of Miami School of Law Craig Trocino said judges do have to keep control of a courtroom — and that it's common in high-profile cases for tensions to overrun. 

Still, he said that lawyers typically avoid doing anything that could antagonize a judge: "Lawyers who've been practicing for a long time know that the judge can get away with saying whatever they want to you, and you can't."

The trial remains stuck in limbo after Cannon – a Trump appointee – indefinitely pushed the trial date back in May. Trump pleaded not guilty last year to 40 criminal charges stemming from the discovery of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago after he left office.

"She's made it clear that she doesn't really care how long this trial takes," Rahmani said. "So there's a lot of frustration."

The newspaper reported that Harbach sounded "irritated" as Cannon pressed him to link Trump's comments and threats against law enforcement agents.

Cannon told Harbach she didn't "appreciate" his tone when he said he had not stated all his examples yet.

And Cannon said this wasn't the first example of such a dispute over tone, telling Harbach: "We have been here before."

We need your help to stay independent

According to the Sun Sentinel, Cannon said a colleague could instead take his place. 

Harbach later said: “I just want to apologize about earlier. I didn’t mean to be unprofessional. I’m sorry about that.”

Trocino said he's heard "much, much worse" in state court — including lawyers yelling at each other. But he said "federal court is a different beast" and that he personally wouldn't have responded to the judge like Harbach did.

"You can't respond in that in that manner, you know, but in the grand scheme of things, I didn't think it was horrible," he said.

He further explained: "It's the type of thing where you bite your lip, you do what you have to do, and then when you tell the story later, you say: 'What I should have said was,' and then everybody laughs about it."

Trocino said he doesn't believe that the judge could have Harbach replaced for "a fairly innocuous comment."

He said a judge could ask for a prosecutor to be replaced. "But the prosecution's under no obligation to do that," he said. 

Trocino said in extreme circumstances, judges could say a lawyer is no longer involved in a case. He said in a recent Miami state-level criminal case, a judge decided to disqualify two prosecutors. 

"That's a situation where the judge was was actually asked to take action and had a long hearing, hundreds of pages of transcripts, and made that determination, and that litigation is still ongoing," Trocino said. 

Rahmani said in his view, Harbach should not be replaced.

"Judges have a lot of judges have a lot of discretion, but to order a particular attorney off the case because of what I would consider advocacy, that's something that will probably get reversed," Rahmani said.

Rahmani said judges need "to be a little more thick-skinned."

"There's nothing that has crossed the line, in my opinion," he said. "And if anything, the judge herself has been unprofessional and kind of criticizing the prosecution in a way that, again, most of the judges would not."

Smith is seeking the court to approve a motion asking Cannon to modify Trump’s conditions of release to ensure he cannot “make statements that pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents participating in the investigation and prosecution of this case.”

Smith referenced Trump’s comments concerning the Mar-a-Lago raid – claims which have included that President Joe Biden was “locked & loaded ready to take me out." 

But there is no evidence of a plot to kill Trump, as The Associated Press reported.

US Surgeon General declares gun violence “a public health crisis”

U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy declared firearm violence a public health crisis, as gun deaths and injuries punctuate daily life in America.

On nearly every day of 2024 so far, a burst of gunfire has hit at least four people somewhere in the country. Some days, communities have endured four or five such shootings.

The nation’s top doctor called on policymakers to consider gun safety measures such as bans on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines and universal background checks for all firearm purchases. His advisory also urges a “significant increase” in funding for research on gun injuries and deaths, as well as greater access to mental health care and trauma-informed resources for people who have experienced firearm violence.

In 2022, more than 48,000 people were killed by guns in the U.S., or about 132 people a day, and suicides accounted for more than half of those deaths, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. An additional 200-plus Americans seek emergency care for firearm injuries each day, according to estimates from Johns Hopkins University research. No federal database records nonfatal gun injuries.

The Office of the Surgeon General does not set or carry out gun policy, but historically its reports and warnings have nudged policymakers and lawmakers to act.

Murthy, a physician, told KFF Health News he hoped to convey the broader toll of gun violence on the nation and the need for an urgent public health response. He cited soaring gun deaths among children and teens and noted that “the mental health toll of firearm violence is far more profound and pervasive than many of us recognize.”

“Every day that passes we lose more kids to gun violence,” Murthy said, “the more children who are witnessing episodes of gun violence, the more children who are shot and survive that are dealing with a lifetime of physical and mental health impacts.”

Firearm-related homicides over the past decade and suicides over the past two decades have driven the sharp rise in gun deaths, the advisory says.

"I’ve been studying gun violence for about 33 years now and there’s still some really basic and fundamental questions I can’t answer."

Guns are the leading cause of death for children and teens, with higher death rates among Black and Hispanic youths. Researchers from Boston University found that during the height of the covid pandemic, Black children were 100 times as likely as white children to experience gun injuries. Hispanic and Asian children also saw major increases in firearm assault injuries during that time, that study showed.

Joseph Sakran, executive vice chair of surgery at John Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore and chief medical officer for Brady United Against Gun Violence, said the surgeon general’s declaration is a “historic moment that sounds the alarm for all Americans.”

But Sakran added: “It cannot stop here. We have to use this as another step in the right direction. No one wants to see more children gunned down.”

Murthy has long said gun violence should be framed as a health issue. He argued that the approach has been successful in combating significant societal problems, citing tobacco control efforts that took hold following the then-surgeon general’s landmark 1964 report concluding that smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer and other diseases.

“We saved so many lives, and that’s what we can do here, too,” Murthy said.

Murthy’s move is one of several recent Biden administration actions designed to combat gun violence, as most gun-related measures remain political nonstarters in Congress. Federal officials have allowed states to use Medicaid dollars to pay for gun violence prevention, and the White House has called on hospital executives and doctors to gather more data about gunshot injuries and to routinely counsel patients about the safe use of firearms.

While available data points to tragic outcomes across American communities, government officials and public health researchers have long been stymied by sparse federal funding devoted to gun violence research and the scope of its health effects.

“I’ve been studying gun violence for about 33 years now and there’s still some really basic and fundamental questions I can’t answer,” said Daniel Webster, a gun violence researcher at Johns Hopkins University.

“To really understand gun violence, you need to do more than just look at publicly available surveillance data,” he said. “You need to actually do in-depth studies involving the populations at highest risk for shooting or being shot.”

A Brady analysis found that of the 15 leading causes of death in the U.S., firearm injuries received the third-lowest amount of federal research funding through the National Institutes of Health for each person who died. The only causes of death that garnered less research funding through NIH were poisonings and falls, according to the analysis.

Sonali Rajan, an adjunct associate professor of epidemiology at Columbia University who researches the effects of gun violence on children, said political leaders and others need to reframe the debate on gun violence from crime to public health.

“We are raising a whole generation of children for whom exposure to gun violence is normal,” Rajan said.

In Michigan, “we had a kid survive the Oxford High School shooting only to go to Michigan State University and see another mass shooting,” she said. “It is unbelievably shameful.”

Serving as President Joe Biden’s surgeon general since 2021, Murthy has, at times, caused political controversy with his views on gun violence.

Over a decade ago, former President Barack Obama nominated Murthy to be the nation’s top doctor. But Murthy’s support for a federal ban on the sale of assault weapons and ammunition and additional restrictions on gun purchases drew the ire of the National Rifle Association, as well as Republicans and some Democrats in Congress. The U.S. Senate narrowly confirmed Murthy to the job in December 2014, more than a year after his nomination.

Murthy has previously issued advisories on social isolation and loneliness, youth mental health, and the well-being of health workers. He said gun violence comes up in many of his conversations with young people about the mental health challenges they’re facing.

“Fears around gun violence have really pervaded so much of the psyche of America in ways that are very harmful to our mental health and well-being,” Murthy said.

Many other causes of death are treated differently as to understanding the problems and developing solutions, Webster said. But “that’s generally not what we’ve done with gun violence. We’ve oversimplified it and overpoliticized it.”

As Sakran put it: “As we look at firearm injuries, there’s arguably no public issue that’s as urgent.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing.

Legal scholars worry Supreme Court may prioritize “politics” over “real stakes” in trans rights case

The Supreme Court said Monday it will settle a legal battle over state bans of gender-affirming care in its next session, accepting for review what experts say could be one of the most pivotal cases for transgender rights  — should the justices take the opportunity to make it so.

The case pertains to a Tennessee law restricting transgender minors' access to puberty blockers and hormone therapy. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati grouped the legal challenge with a similar case from Kentucky and allowed both laws to go into effect after they were blocked by lower courts. The high court opted not to act on a separate appeal from Kentucky.

The move comes amid a wave of Republican-led states enacting restrictions on the lives of trans people — and pushing many more — in areas like healthcare, school sports and bathroom usage. The Biden administration, which appealed to the court in an effort to block the state bans, has instead expanded protections for transgender Americans, including in a new federal regulation aiming to protect trans students, the Associated Press reports.

"This is a political Supreme Court, and transgender health care is a polarizing issue," Jessica Clarke, a USC Gould School of Law professor specializing in anti-discrimination law with a focus on sex, gender and sexuality, told Salon. "I am worried that the decision will be driven by politics rather than principle."

The Supreme Court has rarely taken up cases around transgender rights, instead avoiding various opportunities to offer a definitive opinion on the group's protections. This case, LW. v. Skrmetti, will mark the first time the high court will squarely determine whether transgender people in the United States will have equal protections under the 14th Amendment — and is poised to have myriad legal ramifications beyond it, according to Ruth Colker, a professor of law at The Ohio State University specializing in constitutional law and LGBTQ rights.

"This is a constitutional challenge, and the argument is that the state is treating transgender people differently than other people who are similarly situated — other young people who are not transgender, and for some reason or other would benefit from hormone therapy can get it — but this group of young people cannot," she explained. "The court is being asked to decide whether there's some constitutional protection for people who are transgender" as in "does a state have to have an especially good reason for why it's treating them adversely?"

Most of the state restrictions to gender-affirming care for transgender youth face lawsuits, according to the AP, and the justices have previously allowed Idaho to enforce its ban after lower courts blocked them.

Other laws also curtail care for transgender adults, while proposed bills seek a ban on gender-affirming care altogether, The Hill reports

At least 24 states have enacted laws prohibiting trans women and girls' participation in certain women's or girl's sporting competitions, while at least 11 states have authorized laws that bar trans people from using the bathroom in public schools and other government facilities that aligns with their gender identity.

In deciding this case, the justices have the opportunity to apply "heightened scrutiny" to the care bans, which would offer particular protections against discrimination to transgender people that are "equivalent to the kind of protections that we now offer on the basis of gender and race," Colker explained.

Should the court decide against attaching heightened scrutiny, determining that the Tennessee statute did not discriminate on the basis of gender identity, trans Americans will be left vulnerable to "rationale basis scrutiny," which effectively allows states to offer some rationale for the disparate treatment of trans youth and "get away with it," she said. One such rationale could be as simple as gender-affirming-care-ban proponents' arguments that states are passing such legislation to protect students from making irreversible decisions before they're mature enough to do so as an example. 

The Supreme Court previously determined that this treatment of trans people could be understood as discrimination on the basis of sex at the statutory level, holding in the 2020 Bostock v. Clayton County decision that Title VII protects, gay lesbian and trans people from employment discrimination. 

But complicating the case further is the court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which protected the fundamental right to privacy upheld by the 14th Amendment's due process clause and thus a person's right to seek abortion care.

We need your help to stay independent

The upheaval of Roe made litigating these types of medical cases, which historically relied on the due process clause, much harder, Colker said, noting the "interesting irony" that the high court chose to take on the Skrmetti case on the second anniversary of the Dobbs decision. 

"It's not not just about abortion, it's about all of us who want to have the autonomy to make decisions about our personal lives, including, in this case, medical decisions," she said. "Roe offered some protection there that is now gone."

Trans youth having to travel out-of-state or move altogether to access gender-affirming care as a result of state bans runs "completely parallel" with the abortion travel pregnant people have been forced to undertake in droves in the aftermath of Dobbs, Colker argued. The need for longer-term if not continuous access to the treatment trans youth seek only exacerbates the challenge.  

"This is an everyday thing that they're going to be facing," she said, adding: "I can't imagine what it'd be like, being 13, 14, trying to get help and having all these barriers, and we know there's a high suicide rate already in the transgender community. This doesn't make that situation better."

The justices are expected to hold oral arguments for LW. v. Skrmetti during the next judicial session that begins this fall, with a final ruling anticipated for summer 2025. 

Clarke said she worries the "real stakes of this case — the tragic results when transgender minors are denied essential health care — may not be the focus of the oral argument," citing the focus on the implications for transgender people's restroom use during Bostock's oral arguments even though the plaintiffs of that case were not challenging any restroom policy. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Colker had a similar assessment, telling Salon she does not expect the Supreme Court to consider mental health in its decision-making either. Instead, she expects the justices to take a deeply theoretical approach to oral arguments, focusing on whether to grant trans Americans heightened scrutiny and the policy implications of either choice.

The opinion the court will ultimately come to is a more dicey matter. Should the justices' ruling hold that laws targeting trans minors are not subject to "any particular constitutional scrutiny," Clarke said, it would "give conservative state legislatures carte blanche to continue restricting transgender rights."

If the justices do deliver a victory to the plaintiffs, Colker said she expects the decision to be "mushy," with the justices only narrowly deciding trans youth can obtain gender-affirming treatment under "various safeguards" because parents, in conversation with physicians, find the care appropriate, and avoiding a broad relief that could apply to all transgender Americans who approach the court with civil rights cases.

The "court is not the one to hand a broad victory to the transgender community," she said, noting that every time the court — regardless of ideological leaning — has previously had a chance to attach heightened scrutiny to LGBTQ rights cases, it has "refrained from doing so." On the other hand, she said, "it might possibly feel uncomfortable handing them a broad loss as well, because anyone who opened up a newspaper knows the long list of things that the political right is trying to do." 

Clarke, however, said she remains hopeful that the Supreme Court will adopt a "moderate holding," instruct the Sixth Circuit it "applied the wrong standard to the case" in failing to attach any heightened scrutiny and return the case to the lower court to reevaluate the justifications behind the ban to "determine if they pass muster."

"With a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court, many think politics will prevail over principle," she said, adding: "My hope is that the court will issue an opinion that hews to its precedents and holds that when a legislature draws lines based on sex, those laws must be carefully scrutinized by judges."