Spring Offer: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Legal scholars: Gagged Trump “playing with fire” in Truth Social posts targeting judge’s daughter

Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday shared links to articles attacking the wife and daughter of the judge overseeing his Manhattan criminal hush-money case.

Trump posted links to posts from far-right activist Laura Loomer accusing the judge of bias because of his daughter’s consulting work on Democratic campaigns. Loomer also claimed that Judge Juan Merchan’s wife previously worked for New York Attorney General Letitia James, which has not been independently confirmed. Loomer’s posts also repeated that false claim that Merchan’s daughter posted an image of Trump behind bars that the New York state court system said came from a hoax account, according to Business Insider.

The posts came after Merchan expanded his gag order to bar Trump from publicly attacking his family members, accusing the former president of seeking to “inject fear” into the proceedings.

“Is this intentional interference with the administration of justice or the intact right to question a state actor’s impartiality?” questioned Georgia State Law Prof. Anthony Michael Kreis. “Someone is really playing with fire.”

Longtime Harvard legal scholar Laurence Tribe tweeted that Trump had effectively “dared” the judge to enforce the new gag order, urging Merchan to incorporate the gag order as a “binding condition of Trump’s pretrial release from jail.”

“They decided to get even with him”: Trump’s revenge against Julian Assange broke the media

As divisive as politics have become in this country, there is one thing upon which most people agree: The media sucks.

We’ve heard it all: The New York Times online is just a word puzzle page. Legacy media is dying. Online viewing on news sites is down. Reporters are hacks. Editors are worse and about the only institution trusted less than the media is Congress – thanks to Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert, Jim Jordan and James Comer among others.

While all of this is to some extent true, you have to wonder why we got there. Did big media bosses suddenly decide they’d be shills for no reason? Or was there something else involved?

I’ll cut to the chase: Politicians from all walks of life denigrate journalists. They may cheer for a single report they agree with, but will turn and lambast the same reporter or publication when they do not. It is politicians, particularly every president since Ronald Reagan, who are responsible for the decline of the press.

Last week in the White House briefing room, the Biden administration rallied for Evan Gershkovich, a Wall Street Journal reporter charged in Russia with espionage, who has spent a year in prison because he did his job in Putin’s Russia. The AP reported in January there are more than 300 journalists jailed around the world for simply doing their job. 

Across the globe, more and more, reporters are being jailed and killed. We are called the “Fake Media”, propagandists and idiots. On the left, we are called enablers who engage in false equivalency. From the right, we are called libtards, communists, fascists and the “mainstream liberal media.”

In the meantime, various media organizations have reported that at least 77 members of the press have died trying to cover the war in Gaza since it began last October. 

Those are cases of literally shooting the messenger. Metaphorically, our audience long ago settled on blaming us for the news they did not like. Members of governments do this and get people questioning reality. Their goal is deflection and deception. They want you to blame us, so you don’t call them into question. Every government does it. Some do it better than others.

Russia is great at this. So is North Korea and so is every tinhorn dictator and second-class banana republic on the planet. But one country has led the way. One country has provided the blueprint for everything done across the globe to journalists: The United States.

Whatever else you think of Assange, his actions, and what he’s being prosecuted for, were acts of journalism that used to be commonplace and are now extinct. The U.S. government hounds him because at the end of the day, our government doesn’t want its dirty little or big secrets aired.

I take no joy in saying it, but the United States is devolving into a pettiness unseen in my lifetime. The lack of education and the horrible state of journalism is to blame. Ronald Reagan and every president since, has contributed to our demise.

Reporters Without Borders ranks the U.S. 45th among all nations for a free press. We are a troubled democracy. There are nearly three times the number of people on this planet as on the day I was born and a quarter of a number of reporters. Media consolidation created this problem. Six companies now own more than 90 percent of what you see, read or hear. Our federal government, beginning with Reagan, made media consolidation possible with the same logic that brought us trickle down economics. Neither has worked. Both are detrimental to the body politic. 

Computers aren’t to blame. The Internet isn’t to blame. Poor management, chain-store marketing and massive layoffs due to what our government has done to journalism – those are the causes of our problem.

While the current presidential administration has often cheered the Free Press from the podium of the Brady Briefing Room, and while President Joe Biden himself has many times said he supports us, he has also contributed to our demise. Do not misunderstand me. This isn’t a false equivalence. This is a fact. The two presidents who’ve contributed most to the decline of journalism are Ronald Reagan and The Orange Don – with Trump being by far the worst.

But even as Biden continues to speak about busting up monopolies, not once has he indicated the need to do so when it comes to newspapers, television, radio or social media. And while Biden asks us to remember Gershkovich, who is remembering Julian Assange? Russia has charged Gershkovich with espionage. The American government has charged Assange for nearly the same thing – and in less than a week he’ll have been in prison for five years without ever coming to trial. 

Assange went to prison for actions former Attorney General Eric Holder said were similar to those taken when the New York Times and the Washington Post published the Pentagon Papers. Publishing the secrets of government is what we should be in the business of doing. Today, we publish swill because we cannot get anything better – lest we risk going to prison. 

That’s what Assange did. The Obama administration, of which Biden was a part, decided not to prosecute Assange for what he did. The lunatic Trump changed that.Nothing is more indicative of the need to make sure that Donald Trump never gets back in office than what his weaponized Department of Justice did to Assange. 

“People understand what Julian did,” his brother Gabriel told me last week. “He published information that embarrassed the U.S. government. They decided to get even with him.”

Human Rights Watch noted the importance of the Assange case when it first came to light nearly 15 years ago. "This is a signature moment for freedom of expression and information in both the US and abroad," said Dinah PoKempner, general counsel at Human Rights Watch. "Prosecuting WikiLeaks for publishing leaked documents would set a terrible precedent that will be eagerly grasped by other governments, particularly those with a record of trying to muzzle legitimate political reporting."

The DOJ under Donald Trump pursued Assange. That was predictable after Trump decided to tear down and undo everything done during the Obama administration. But Assange has spent more time in prison under the Biden administration than he did during the Trump administration. He sits in a dank cell in England while he fights extradition to the U.S. His brother said that is having a serious effect on him. “He’s 52, but he looks much older,” his brother said after last visiting him.

We need your help to stay independent

After visiting Assange in prison on 9 May 2019, Nils Melzer, the United Nations special rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, concluded that "in addition to physical ailments, Mr Assange showed all symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to psychological torture, including extreme stress, chronic anxiety and intense psychological trauma,” as reported in Wikipedia.

“It is a slow torture. He’s never held his youngest son,” his brother explained. “He’s spent five years in prison for doing the job of a reporter.”

If it’s all that’s lost on you, that is understandable. We are lost in a world of headlines from stories like “I am a sociopath and here’s what I want you to know,” to  “What John Lennon said about Elvis,” and “Ten of the best Sci-Fi movies on Netflix this month”. It’s either pap, old crap or sap meant to promote pap and crap.

What Assange did is what American journalism used to do and often no longer does. It’s not a coincidence that he’s not from this country, most reporters still left in this business from this country are bought and sold by the large companies that own them.

Whatever else you think of Assange, his actions, and what he’s being prosecuted for, were acts of journalism that used to be commonplace and are now extinct. The U.S. government hounds him because at the end of the day, our government doesn’t want its dirty little or big secrets aired. The Australian parliament, several members of Congress, the German Chancellor and others across the world have pleaded with the U.S. government to drop its case against him.

I’ve asked repeatedly, many times, for a statement from the DOJ about the case. I’ve never received an answer. The White House merely refers you to the DOJ. “It’s up to the attorney general to decide,” we’re always told.

In the meantime, freedom suffers. 

Every conspiracy theory gains ground with our government’s action against Assange and its lack of transparency with the public – whether a conspiracy actually exists or not. Every scream of “Deep State” gets traction due to the same. And more importantly, our government, as many have pointed out, is providing the template by which authoritarians around the world justify their actions against truth-seekers and fact-tellers.

With each passing day that Assange spends in prison, it should be clear to everyone – free speech is dying. We live in a world of rising authoritarianism. If Joe Biden cares about Free Speech and the press as much as he claims (we all know Trump doesn’t care and in fact wants to eliminate any criticism against him) then he should speak out and urge Merrick Garland to drop the case against Julian Assange.

Don’t expect that to happen before the election, unless it becomes clear that a high-profile trial of Assange during the election season would hurt Biden’s chances at re-election. Of course, the government could also drag its feet and keep Assange from his family until after the election so the story gets little or no attention from corporate media.

That is how free speech, and perhaps Julian Assange, will die; misunderstood, mostly forgotten, loathed and feared.

It’s all about controlling the message.

“Thin ice”: Legal experts think Judge Cannon may be removed from Trump case over “evidence of bias”

The Trump-appointed judge overseeing his classified documents case may be at risk of being removed from the case after special counsel Jack Smith pushed back on her recent order, legal experts say.

Smith earlier this week submitted hypothetical jury instructions in response to an order from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon asking for proposed jury instructions that seemed to give credence to Trump’s claim that the Presidential Records Act allowed him to deem government records as personal property. Smith said these instructions were based on a “fundamentally flawed legal premise” and that the PRA “has no bearing” on Trump’s charges under the Espionage Act.

Smith asked Cannon to rule quickly before the trial so that he could appeal if she rules against him. But some legal experts think the court may go further if it reaches that point.

“Smith spoon feeds the Judge the law, giving her the opportunity to get it right even at this late date. If she doesn't, expect the 11th [Circuit] to bench slap her when he appeals in a way that makes last year's decision look mild,” predicted former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance.

If “this gets to the 11th Circuit, it will both reverse Cannon again — AND I think it will remove her from the case- 3 reversals is more than enough for this inexperienced judge, who gets the law wrong and always in Trump's favor,” agreed former Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann.

Cannon is on “thin ice,” legal experts Norm Eisen, Danya Perry and Josh Colb wrote in a CNN op-ed.

“Cannon is headed for the most trouble she has faced since that 11th Circuit reversed her twice in her original meddling in the government’s pre-indictment investigation. If she does not course-correct, she’s headed for another shellacking by the circuit – and possible removal from the case,” they wrote, noting “we have never seen anything” like Cannon’s jury instructions order.

A judge can be removed in the 11th Circuit if their conduct creates “the appearance of impropriety or a lack of impartiality in the mind of a reasonable member of the public.”

“She still has time to rectify this — by, for example, abandoning these incorrect jury instructions or granting Smith’s motion to reconsider revealing witnesses’ identities,” the experts wrote. “But if she doesn’t, and clings to even a few of these wrong decisions, Smith would be entitled to seek the review he threatens by the circuit and her removal. Ejecting her from the case would be extremely unusual and Smith does not mention seeking it in his papers. But neither does he rule it out, and Cannon’s reasoning on the jury instructions and on exposing witnesses is lawless enough that, unless she reverses course, he may have no other choice.”

We need your help to stay independent

Former Trump White House lawyer Ty Cobb pushed back on legal commentators who have suggested that her “missteps” relate to her “experience or incompetence.”

“I think the evidence of her bias is pretty palpable at this stage of the game,” he told CNN on Wednesday, noting the 11th Circuit’s repeated rebukes of her rulings.

“Her delays here are extraordinary” and it is “remarkable” that Cannon has yet to set a trial date, he continued.

“I think that Jack Smith – I think the filing today makes it plain that she has to rule, and if she doesn’t rule under either scenario, they’ll be in a position to take her up to the 11th Circuit. And I think the 11th circuit will likely take her off the case,” he said.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“I think the evidence is just too overwhelming,” he added. “I mean, yes, she may be incompetent, but at this stage of the game, her incompetence is so gross that I think it clearly creates the perception of impartiality– of partiality, and her attempt to put her thumb on the scale. So, I think that should disqualify her.”

But CNN legal analyst Elie Honig said a push to get Cannon removed amid the delays could end up backfiring on Smith.

“That’s quite a drastic step. It is very rarely, not never, but very rarely taken by prosecutors. And there’s no assurance that they win,” he said. “But the sort of irony of all of this is if Jack Smith appeals this, and if Jack Smith asks the appeals court to remove Judge Cannon, that will delay this more than anything that’s happened so far."

Rebooting digital equality: FCC to restore net neutrality, reversing Trump-era repeal

On April 25, the Federal Communications Commission will vote to restore landmark rules governing net neutrality — a federal policy with a history of popular bipartisan support that safeguards free speech online by requiring federally contracted telecom companies like AT&T to treat all internet traffic the same, barring them from blocking websites or slowing down internet speeds for profit. In October, Democrats retook majority control of the five-member FCC, finally ending the commission's 2-2 partisan deadlock which has stymied efforts by President Joe Biden to restore Obama-era Title II net neutrality rules for more than three years. 

"The pandemic made clear that broadband is an essential service, that every one of us — no matter who we are or where we live — needs it to have a fair shot at success in the digital age," FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel told Reuters in a Tuesday interview. "An essential service requires oversight and in this case we are just putting back in place the rules that have already been court-approved that ensures that broadband access is fast, open and fair."

Under Title II of the Communications Act, the restored net neutrality rules would grant the FCC oversight authority over broadband companies, re-affirming the internet as an essential service. This would allow the commission to enforce uniform standards among US internet providers, instead of requiring companies to navigate an increasingly complex patchwork of state laws in the absence of federal guidance. 

We need your help to stay independent

Government watchdog group Common Cause has long championed net neutrality protections, arguing that the rules protect the public's right to the equal access of publicly-funded internet infrastructure. 

“The internet is a gateway to democracy for many and every voter has the right to a free and fair internet. From looking up information about candidates to finding polling sites, this net neutrality proposal will make it easier for every voter to participate in our modern democracy. We strongly encourage the FCC to restore net neutrality and return control of the internet to the people. Especially in a major election year, the FCC must do all it can to protect every voter’s right to basic information online," said Ishan Mehta, director of Common Cause's Media & Democracy Program, in an emailed statement Wednesday.

"The internet is a gateway to democracy for many and every voter has the right to a free and fair internet."

Opponents of net neutrality, however, criticized the digital equity policy despite its history of bipartisan support. In an emailed statement, the conservative Foundation for American Innovation (FAI) accused the commission of "unleashing a regulatory onslaught" by restoring net neutrality rules. The Silicon Valley think tank is a member of the Charles Koch-funded lobbying organization, the State Policy Network. Previously known as the Lincoln Network, FAI was co-founded by former President Donald Trump tech staffers Aaron Ginn and Garrett Johnson. 

"The agency looks poised to saddle broadband providers with Title II rules that will increase compliance costs for ISPs and drive up the price of deploying networks. This would exacerbate the problems posed by the FCC's 'digital equity' rules and the NTIA imposing illegal price controls through the BEAD program," said FAI Senior Fellow Evan Swarztrauber. 

Swarztrauber is a previous policy advisor to former Verizon lawyer and former FCC Chairman Ajit Pai — the Trump appointee who led the net neutrality rollback, known for "defanging" the FCC, frequenting Koch parties, and giving $9.2 billion in federal funds to internet providers in a "reverse auction" so questionable that some companies may even have to give the money back. 

"The FCC has already wasted precious resources on a partisan relitigation [sic] of a tiresome debate that could, and should, be resolved by Congress via simple non-discrimination rules that would have bipartisan support. The agency will never be able to regain the staff time spent on this issue that could have gone to worthy initiatives. And if the Supreme Court strikes down Title II under the major questions doctrine, then even the partisan goals of this regulatory effort will have been sought in vain," said Swarztrauber. 

Rosenworcel has been adamant, however, that Title II rules do not allow the FCC to impose any form of price control — echoing findings of the non-partisan Congressional Research Service

"This is not a stalking horse for rate regulation. Nope. No how, no way," the chair said in October. "We know competition is the best way to bring down rates for consumers. And approaches like the Affordable Connectivity Program are the best bet for making sure service is affordable for all. We will not let broadband providers, gatekeepers to the internet, dictate what we can and cannot say online."

Anti-censorship advocacy group Free Press Action celebrated the FCC's move in a Wednesday release — exclaiming "It's happening!," in a Wednesday tweet.  


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"We’ve been fighting for this moment since Trump’s FCC threw out strong Title II rules and abandoned net neutrality back in 2017 – and really for nearly 20 years since net neutrality first came under threat," said Free Press Action co-CEO Craig Aaron in a statement. "By restoring these essential protections that millions fought so hard to make a reality, the FCC would once again be following the law Congress wrote for modern internet-access service … Under these strong but flexible FCC rules, every ISP will be responsible for making resilient networks available to people on just and reasonable terms. And they won’t be able to pick and choose what any of us can say or see online." 

The Biden administration signaled early support for the FCC's initiative last month. The Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the lead advising body for the president on internet matters, said that Title II rules go beyond protecting net neutrality — supporting national security objectives to close up loopholes exploited by international cybersecurity threats. 

"Fair and open access to the Internet underpins virtually every aspect of American life,” said NTIA head Alan Davidson, in a March 21 statement. "An internet that is open, secure and accessible to all is an Internet that drives innovation, economic growth and the free exchange of ideas around the world. Net neutrality helps ensure that creators of new Internet-based applications and content, for example, are able to make their products available to users around the world without needing to negotiate with every Internet service provider."

The FCC is encouraging public input and comments ahead of the April 26 rule-making meeting, which can be submitted via the commission's website form.

Evicted, arrested and being sued by the boss: When will MAGA learn loyalty to Trump ends in sorrow?

When I saw the news that the stock price of Truth Social went into freefall after the company initally went public for $8 billion, I immediately sent a joke to a friend text circle: "Whoever allowed the contract to keep Trump from dumping the stock until 6 months post-sale is gonna be covered in ketchup." Shortly after it was released, the company's stock soared to $70 a share, initially meaning Trump, on paper at least, had netted $3 billion in wealth. But Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida’s Warrington College of Business, told CNN he was "confident the stock price will eventually drop to $2 a share and could even go below that," because Truth Social's business model is not conducive to profit. 

"The large mismatch between stock price and stock value will sorely tempt the cash-poor Trump to sell off a significant portion of his shares, in a potential maneuver that I believe I am the first to label 'Trump and dump,'" Timothy Noah of the New Republic joked. "Pump and dump is an unethical practice where influential figures talk up a stock they own a lot of shares in, artificially inflating the value, and then sell it off for a major profit before the rubes realize they bought a lemon. Because Trump is contractually obliged not to sell his shares yet, he's watching the value slide downhill before he can cash in, while other hustlers openly brag to Reuters they used the blind loyalty of Trump fans to pull off the pump-and-dump.

One investor bragged he bought at $35 when the stock first released, waited "for Trump's fan base to hear about it," which doubled its value, and then dumped it. Because of these shenanigans, Trump's already lost a billion of his initial $3 billion valuation. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


We do not know yet how many ketchup bottles lost their lives due to Trump's anger over this, but he's found a public way to lash out at his underlings: He's suing them.

In a lawsuit filed right before public SEC filings showed Truth Social lost $58 million last year, Trump tried to push the blame onto his co-founders, two former "Apprentice" contestants named Wes Moss and Andy Litinsky. It is true the two only managed to get, as Noah calculated, fewer than 2% of MAGA Republicans to create accounts. But still, they managed to make Trump $2 billion richer (on paper), while also giving him an outlet to whine incoherently for hours a day. That is, of course, how it goes: Bend over backward to help Trump out, and he will thank you by coating you in rage-ketchup. 

It is repulsively true that Trump wriggles out of consequences for his crimes time and time again. But that is because he is a master at finding someone else to take the fall for him, from the January 6 defendants to his former lawyer Michael Cohen to Fox News and Rudy Giuliani.

Trump regularly offers paeans to the Jan. 6 insurrectionists, holding a ceremony to honor those who are facing legal consequences for their criminal efforts to help him overthrow the government. Sometimes he even promises pardons. All this is done for a nakedly obvious purpose: To convince followers to risk their own skins in the future on Trump's behalf. But it's telling that Trump never offers any material support to the over 1,300 people who have been charged with crimes. Despite his claims to be a "billionaire," he hasn't paid their legal bills or helped their families after they lost their jobs.  He loves to get publicly maudlin about Ashli Babbitt, the insurrectionist shot by Capitol police, but he didn't offer to say, cut back a little on his golf club budget to pay for Babbitt's funeral. 

Wednesday, yet another Jan. 6 defendant was convicted. Taylor James Johnatakis got 7 years in federal prison for carrying a megaphone and barking orders at rioters as they attacked police. "In any angry mob, there are leaders and there are followers. Mr. Johnatakis was a leader," the judge said, correctly. But it's also true that Johnatakis was following the lead of Trump. Maybe he'll be included in Trump's future public singalongs about the so-called J6 hostages. But he certainly didn't get a dime of support from Trump during his criminal trial. 

All of this fake support for people who commit crimes for him seems to have bamboozled Tyler Vogel, 26, of Lancaster, New York. Last week, Vogel was arrested by Erie County authorities for texting threats to New York Attorney General Letitia James and New York Justice Arthur Engoron, who prosecuted and presided over Trump's civil case for committing decades of fraud in New York. "Mark my words I will kill you if you even dare to permanently steal Donald Trumps assets or his property," Vogel texted after Trump lost the case, incurring a fine of nearly half a billion dollars. 

Not that Vogel deserves an ounce of sympathy, but this is yet another pitiful example of someone throwing everything away for a man who would not give them a penny if they were starving. It's especially pathetic to see someone give up his freedom to defend Trump's "right" to keep private jets and golf courses that were obtained through decades of fraud. Trump has been on social media for months, unsubtly begging his supporters to get violent against law enforcement trying to hold him accountable. But we can all guess how much he'll do for this one guy who did what his orange god-emperor asked of him: Absolutely nothing. Yet that reality never seems to breach thick MAGA skulls, where the faith that Trump cares about them — despite daily evidence he does not — seems immovable. 

When is the last time Trump even bothered to call Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, who put his considerable fortune to work paying for what Trump would not: Various efforts to validate the Big Lie and rally support for Trump's coup? Lindell's once-mighty linens empire was delivered another humiliating blow last week when his company was evicted from a Minnesota building after falling behind $200,000 on rent. The month before, Lindell was hit with a $5 million judgment, owed to a software engineer who entered Lindell's "Prove Mike Wrong Challenge," in which Lindell claimed no one could debunk his supposed "evidence" that President Joe Biden stole the 2020 election from Trump. But the "data" Lindell claimed to have appears to be random nonsense that has nothing to do with the election. 

We need your help to stay independent

Good luck to that engineer ever seeing a penny of what's owed. Lindell hasn't been paying his lawyers and had MyPillow ads removed from Fox News for non-payment. He's also facing a massive defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems, which already won a similar lawsuit against Fox News for airing false claims that the company was part of a conspiracy to steal the 2020 election. Dominion is seeking over $1 billion in damages. Trump's minion Rudy Giuliani has also gone broke in his push to help Trump steal the election. He finally filed bankruptcy in December, after losing a defamation lawsuit, to the tune of $148 million, for false accusations aimed at two random election workers in Georgia. 

MAGA never learns, though.

After months of insisting to the press that she would prevail in court, failed Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake declined to defend herself against a defamation lawsuit filed by Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer, a Republican official she's been lying about for years in her efforts to pretend the 2022 election was stolen from her. The reason she backed down, of course, is the same reason Giuliani eventually did. And it's the same reason why Infowars host Alex Jones refused to cooperate in the defamation lawsuits he lost: They know the evidence they lied is so overwhelming it's impossible to argue against it. 

Considering that a jury will soon decide how much Lake owes Richer for lying about him, you'd think she'd shut up and start performing the remorse she is clearly incapable of feeling. Instead, she's out there talking smack about him, releasing a video where she openly gaslights him with, "Show me on a doll where my words hurt you" and offering to pay him for a "therapy dog." Richer has documented the death threats against him and his family, for which people are still getting arrested.

It seems that MAGA people believe they are endowed with the impunity that Trump has so long enjoyed, due to his wealth and status. It is repulsively true that Trump wriggles out of consequences for his crimes time and time again. But that is because he is a master at finding someone else to take the fall for him, from the January 6 defendants to his former lawyer Michael Cohen to Fox News and Rudy Giuliani. Loyalty to Trump doesn't mean getting a piece of his unbelievable levels of undeserved privilege. It just means being the next in line to be thrown under the bus as Trump escapes accountability yet again. 

A dangerous return to denial: Trump’s threats against Biden met by familiar media shrug

Donald Trump has repeatedly shown himself to be a very dangerous man. As seen on Jan. 6 with his coup attempt and the lethal assault by his MAGA followers on the Capitol, he appears to have an erotic attachment to violence. 

Last Friday, Trump shared an image of President Biden bound and gag, hog-tied, in the back of a pickup truck. Michael Tyler, who is the Biden campaign’s communications director, condemned Trump’s most recent threat. “[He] is regularly inciting political violence, and it's time people take him seriously — just ask the Capitol police officers who were attacked protecting our democracy on January 6. Donald Trump is perfectly comfortable with violence when he thinks it benefits him. In fact, he encourages it. Put simply, his campaign is about itself. It's about revenge. It's about retribution….Political violence has been and continues to be central to Donald Trump's brand of politics.”

In a video post on X/Twitter historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat, who is one of the world’s leading experts on fascism and authoritarianism, offered this context: "Being life-size, this image is allowing Americans to imagine a fate that Biden would have if he were removed in a violent way….And so it's continuing the coup of January 6."

We must be the hope and salvation we are looking for because the elites will not save us or this country.

Explaining how coups involve harm being done to the deposed leader, Ben-Ghiat warns that Trump’s incitements of violence against President Biden are an “emergency” that should be taken very seriously.

Trump, for his part, claimed the video image of Biden being hog-tied by one of the MAGA people was filmed on Thursday while he was attending the wake of a New York police officer who died in the line of duty. This is no coincidence: Trump views America’s police and other law enforcement as his personal enforcers who will do the bidding of his regime when/if he becomes the country’s first dictator. That loyalty appears to be reciprocated, as Donald Trump seems to enjoy a large amount of support from many of the country’s police, immigration and border agents, members of the military and other violence workers. To that end, Trump has promised the police that he will empower them to act with impunity and to not be held responsible when they abuse the public (in practice this means unlimited thuggery and abuse against black and brown people and members of other marginalized communities). 

Trump’s repeated threat(s) against President Biden’s life and safety are likely a crime. In an interview with MSNBC on Sunday, former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann explained, “A standard condition of being out on bail applies in New York and in the D.C. federal case and in the Georgia state case: that you not commit a crime while you are out on bail….Threatening the president of the United States is a crime, so the question would be the legal and factual question whether what he has engaged in with respect to posting the image of Joe Biden bound and gagged….”

Predictably, Donald Trump’s threats of murder and other violence against President Biden are now being mostly ignored and willfully forgotten by the mainstream news media. By mostly ignoring Trump and his agent’s and followers’ threats of (and real acts of) violence against President Biden, leading Democrats, and other people deemed to be the “enemy”, the mainstream news media is enabling and encouraging such behavior – and by implication undermining American democracy and civil society.

Clearly documenting Trump’s years (and decades) of violent and other antisocial behavior is a form of essential testimony and witnessing for the truth and the facts in an era when such basic concepts are being smeared, blotted out, if not wholly erased by ascendant American fascism and the larger global anti-democracy movement.

Donald Trump attempted a coup against American democracy (and specifically multiracial democracy) on Jan. 6, threatened to kill an American general who dared to be more loyal to the Constitution than to him, used stochastic terrorism, de facto commanding his MAGA people to assassinate President Biden, President Obama, Hillary Clinton and other leading Democrats, led a COVID democide, channeled Hitler and the Nazis with his threats of mass extermination for the human “vermin” who are “poisoning the blood” of America, continues public statements of admiration for murderous tyrants such as Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un, promises to have Biden and other Democrats put on trials and punished for “treason” when/if he becomes the country’s first dictator, plans to put non-white undocumented residents, migrants and refugees in concentration camps, repeats acts of harassment and intimidation against the judges, prosecutors, district attorneys and other members of law enforcement (and their families) who are daring to hold him responsible under the law for his obvious crimes, has been credibly accused by dozens of women of sexual harassment, sexual assault and even more serious crimes, and claims to be a type of prophet and messiah chosen by God and Jesus Christ. 

Once again, none of this is normal. The Trumpocene is a state of malignant normality, where all the wrongness in the form of American fascism, the culture of cruelty, gangster capitalism, massive violence both domestically and internationally, collective pathology, and so many other bad things manifest in both the corporeal form of Donald Trump and what he represents and has channeled with his MAGA movement have now become normalized and a type of background noise in America life.

As I explained in a previous essay here at Salon, those of us who can see clearly through the miasma and other poisoned air of the Trumpocene have an obligation to keep doing so and sounding the alarm about the monsters lurking inside. We must be the hope and salvation we are looking for because the elites will not save us or this country.

We need your help to stay independent

In an essay several days ago at the New Republic, Michael Tomasky, who is one of the few prominent public voices who has consistently and directly warned of the extreme dangers of normalizing the Trumpocene, called out the American mainstream news media for their role in nurturing the disaster:

Republicans have gotten away with this for ages. The mainstream media has come to expect and tolerate this state of affairs for two reasons. It’s simple human nature: If a parent has a well-behaved kid and an unruly kid, the parent naturally over time expects more of the former and lowers the bar for the latter. And once something has happened a thousand times, it isn’t really news anymore.

The result has been this: House Republicans utter outlandish lies about Obama or Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden or whomever, and it gets reported, but we hardly bat an eye. That’s what we expect of them. Then, once in a while, a Democrat says something that crosses the normal lines of discourse….and a massive hubbub ensues, leaving the casual viewer with the impression that both sides are equally guilty of extreme rhetoric, or indeed that the Democrats are worse.

When it comes to Trump—well, he has so thoroughly corrupted our standards of discourse that nothing he says is shocking anymore. So of course he posted a video of a hog-tied Joe Biden. What else is new? The news stories on Sunday reporting the event were brief and kind of ho-hum.

Whereas, if Biden posted a video of a hog-tied Trump … you can just imagine the faux outrage on the right. And high-ranking Democrats, who would be genuinely kind of offended to see their standard-bearer for the presidency behave in such a tawdry way, would indeed rebuke Biden for having done so….

This is the advantage to the debaser of debasing standards of behavior. He is eventually held to no standard in the media, which just rolls its collective eyes. I would like to think, though, that voters, or at least enough of them, still have standards. Trump will do things between now and November to make this Biden video look mild, and the voters will finally say enough.   

One of the great errors of the American mainstream news media in the Age of Trump is an assumption that democracy is a settled matter in this country and that Republicans and Democrats are both equally invested in normal politics and consensus where the differences are just “partisan” and not existential. In the Age of Trump (and the years and decades that brought us here), that is manifestly not true. Public opinion polls and other research show that today’s Republican Party and larger “conservative” movement no longer support pluralistic multiracial democracy. Any members of the news media who conclude “everyone already knows” about Donald Trump's violence so “why keep reminding them, it is old news,” is committing a number of gross errors in logic and inference.

Most Americans do not follow the news and current events closely. Moreover, political scientists and other experts have repeatedly shown that the mass public is ignorant and not highly sophisticated in terms of their political decision-making and knowledge. Even worse, public opinion polls now show that a larger percentage of Americans are possessed by collective amnesia and are actually yearning for a return to the horrible years when Donald Trump was in the White House.

This refusal to adapt and change for the better in service to real pro-democracy journalism and its dictate to pursue the real truth and not just what is comfortable and the “consensus”, is one of the many reasons why the mainstream news media has lost credibility with huge swaths of the American public.

Channeling Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels, Donald Trump and many of his MAGA followers have already targeted the American mainstream news media and its reporters and journalists as “enemies of the people." To that end, Trump and his enforcers are threatening and planning (as publicly documented in Project 2025, Agenda 47, and elsewhere) how they are going to put "disloyal” and “non-complaint” (in their words “unpatriotic”) reporters, journalists, and other truth-tellers in the back of those pickup trucks right next to President Biden and their other enemies. Those threats are not metaphorical. They are literal.

When the autocrat, fascist, or some other enemy of democracy tells you what they are going to do you should always believe them. They are not kidding. Unfortunately, too many members of the American news media refuse to do so — and it will only be their undoing. They were repeatedly warned. Denial will not save them.

Touching fentanyl won’t kill you. Why won’t cops and policymakers get the memo?

A dangerous myth about illicit fentanyl, the opioid largely behind the surge in overdose deaths, simply will not die. While addiction and drug policy experts have repeatedly refuted the idea that touching fentanyl alone can cause an overdose, like a stubborn weed, the lie keeps coming back. And now the myth has drifted upward to policymakers, who are ignoring the lack of evidence that mere exposure to fentanyl can be deadly.

At this moment, three bills — one in Florida (SB 718), one in West Virginia (HB 5319) and the other in Tennessee (SB 1754) — are making their way through their respective state legislatures.  All three will allow for a felony charge to be levied against people who expose a first responder to fentanyl or a fentanyl analog, such as carfentanil or remifentanil. But HB 5319 casts an even wider net, encompassing any opioid regardless of potency. 

In all of the bills, the language is broad, allowing for routes of exposure to include touch, inhalation and ingestion. And very critically, while HB 5319 does include language which would require a laboratory test for opioids be administered to the first responder in question, SB 718 and SB 1754 do not.

Specifically, Florida’s SB 718 allows for criminal penalties to be levied against people who “recklessly expose first responders to fentanyl, fentanyl derivatives, analogs of fentanyl, or mixtures containing such substances and an overdose or serious bodily injury of a first responder results.”

As deadly as fentanyl can be, touching it or being merely exposed to it is just not a threat. That’s not how fentanyl works.

Tennessee’s SB 1754 would allow for aggravated assault against a first responder charges against anyone who “knowingly possesses fentanyl, carfentanil, remifentanil, alfentanil, or thiafentanil in a manner that would be reasonably foreseen to expose a first responder to the substance while the first responder is discharging or attempting to discharge the first responder's official duties and the first responder is exposed to the substance.”

And West Virginia’s HB 5319 is similar, levying a felony charge against anyone exposing first responders “to opioids,” resulting in any one of an ill-defined array of effects, including “any impairment of physical condition.”

These bills probably seem innocuous, perhaps even necessary — why shouldn’t we want to protect first responders from a substance involved in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people over the last two decades?

Because as deadly as fentanyl can be, touching it or being merely exposed to it is just not a threat. That’s not how fentanyl works. And yes, this distinction matters.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


Fentanyl is indeed a very potent opioid, meaning that its effects, such as pain relief and euphoria, are felt with only a relatively small dose. In the context of hospitals and ambulances — where fentanyl is safely used every day without incident — the drug is dosed in micrograms, orders of magnitude smaller than the more familiar milligram.

It’s this high degree of potency that makes it deadly for people who use unregulated drugs, because unlike the clinical context for pharmaceutical fentanyl, where we can dose and administer very precise amounts of drugs to patients, the unregulated fentanyl in the illicit supply offers no such insight. People using drugs are often caught unaware and by surprise at the presence or amount of fentanyl in their supply. And without having someone nearby, armed with the opioid overdose reversing drug naloxone, this is frequently a fatal situation.

But while fentanyl is easily absorbed through injection, pyrolyzing and inhaling its vapor, snorting it or swallowing it, it isn’t good at passing through skin. When it hit the market in the 1990s, Duragesic, the trade name for the fentanyl skin patch, was a minor marvel of drug delivery innovation precisely for this reason. It took many years of effort to develop and refine a way to move fentanyl across the skin, much less in a controlled and predictable way. And even then, reaching a steady, pain-relieving blood concentration of fentanyl with the patch takes several hours, even with sustained contact. Fentanyl also does not aerosolize on its own, which is why people have to either snort (i.e., insufflate rather than inhale) or intentionally vaporize it.

If the science here is so straightforward, why is there still confusion? This myth of passive fentanyl overdose was first put forth in a 2016 bulletin from the Drug Enforcement Agency, which has since been updated, and the language softened. Other authoritative bodies like the CDC have repeated the myth, and despite changing their warnings to reflect the fact that there is no evidence this can happen or has ever happened, the agency still maintains a rather misleading guide under NIOSH’s website, which largely deals in hypothetical situations that are very unlikely to ever happen.

The more likely explanation is an anxiety reaction or a similar psychosomatic response, like the “nocebo effect.”

But if you’ve been following headlines, this all may be a surprise to you. Over the years, we’ve seen a steady drip of pieces on police encounters with fentanyl resulting in alleged overdoses. The more peripheral details vary, but the core remains strikingly consistent — an officer saw something that looked like a drug, or perhaps dusted some powdery grains off of their uniform. Someone mentions fentanyl. Suddenly they feel something — heart pounding, chest tightening, fingers tingling, light-headedness. Often, these officers are able to give themselves naloxone, the antidote to an opioid overdose. And while these experiences are certainly frightening, they aren’t opioid overdoses, which cause slow or absent breathing and a loss of consciousness.

Despite their viral spread in media and online, the smallest amount of scrutiny is able to disprove every single instance. The more likely explanation is an anxiety reaction or a similar psychosomatic response, like the “nocebo effect” (essentially the opposite of the placebo effect), where simply believing something can harm you will cause very real symptoms. We can, indeed, convince ourselves that boogeymen are real. Who among us hasn’t jumped at every small noise after watching a scary movie alone at night? But ultimately, we must separate myth from fact. Especially when, as is the case here, the myth actively harms others.

We already know that increased criminal justice involvement makes it harder, not easier, for people who use drugs to have a bright future, or any future at all. Release from jail or prison is well-known to be a factor in significant overdose risk. And despite common rhetoric to the contrary, drugs are commonly accessible to incarcerated people, bursting the oft-cited “you can get sober inside” bubble.

With a drug conviction on one’s record, it becomes monumentally more difficult to get an apartment, a job or access a litany of social services which would be of considerable use to someone exiting incarceration. And these are the easily tracked consequences, which say nothing of the stigma and shame carried with a criminal record, especially one related to drug use. Simply put, we have already set these people up to fail. And now Tennessee, West Virginia and Florida are about to make it even easier — without any scientific or logical justification — to further hobble their citizens who use drugs.

And unfortunately, these bills represent a worrying inflection point for American drug policy, such as Idaho banning their syringe access programs in defiance of decades of scientific precedent or Oregon’s legislature overturning the will of voters by repealing Measure 110, which treated drug possession as a health problem instead of a criminal one.

We need your help to stay independent

The underground nature of illicit drug markets make them ripe for misinformation and rumors. While passive fentanyl exposure myths have been a stubborn fixture in recent years, this is the first time since the start of the overdose epidemic that such a thoroughly disproven fentanyl myth has been weaponized into legislation. Moving towards effective drug policy requires, at minimum, laws and policies based in reality. These bills not only miss that mark, but if they pass, will wield this myth like a cudgel against their own people.

Additionally, while the evidence behind these bills is nonexistent, this is not the message received by the public. A law stating that first responders are in need of extraordinary protection from contacting fentanyl says that passive overdose risk is real, and would necessarily apply to anyone. Even before these bills were written, anxiety about potential risks of touching someone who is experiencing an overdose has threatened timely bystander response to opioid overdose. What we desperately need is more community response to overdose, not less.

Rampant and stubborn mythologies about the contact risks of fentanyl have already created confusion and anxiety in the American public. People need fact-based education about real risks, rather than worrying about fantastical narratives which only stir up panic. At the very least, we can choose not to codify this fiction into laws that will further harm people who use drugs, while protecting no one. 

TikToker blasted for saying “SNL” has never hired a hot woman

In a now viral video posted to TikTok, a user who goes by the name Jahelis makes the truly wild declaration that in just under 50 years, "Saturday Night Live" has never cast a "hot woman" as part of the show's core ensemble. And the reactions to that swing and miss have not been favorable. 

"They all just kind of have looks that eventually grow on you,” Jahelis says, using current cast member Heidi Gardner as her first example although, in the clip, she blanks on her name while repeatedly using the word "skit" when it should be "sketch." Being that "Saturday Night Live" is a sketch comedy show and all.

"They make every skit that she's in — at least one skit per episode she's in — being like where she plays someone super hot and super dumb and the point of the joke is that she's super pretty. And it always makes me laugh because, no offense to her, but she's not that pretty," she says of Gardner, later adding, "Why don't they hire better looking people? It's TV?"

Jumping to the defense of Gardner, the ghost of Gilda Radner and themselves, cast members Chloe Troast and Sarah Sherman fired back at Jahelis' comments.

"Just found out i’m not hot. Please give me and my family space to grieve privately and uglily at this time," Sherman said in a post to X (formerly Twitter.)

Sharing the video to Instagram as she sang Christina Aguilera’s “Beautiful,” Troast offered Jahelis the two-bird salute.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5RtbssOvCl/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=a4d3b487-d2a1-45e9-ad26-d0d822b7ed10

“I never expected that video to go viral,” the content creator said in a statement following the backlash. “Had I known, I would’ve maybe articulated myself a little bit better. I was expecting to have a dialogue with my community, who is used to my unfiltered opinions that rarely come from a place of malice.”

Judge shoots down Trump’s motion to delay start of hush money trial

On Monday, attorneys for Donald Trump filed a motion to delay the start of the former president's New York criminal trial pending the Supreme Court's ruling on his claim of presidential immunity, further claiming that he can't have a fair trial due to "pervasive pre-trial publicity," asking for the hush money case to be canceled altogether or be subject to "a significant adjournment."

After taking a brief while to ponder that request, Judge Juan Merchan shot it down on Wednesday, breaking-down his decision in an order, writing, “This Court finds that Defendant had myriad opportunities to raise the claim of presidential immunity well before March 7, 2024. After all, Defendant had already briefed the same issue in federal court and he was in possession of, and aware that, the People intended to offer the relevant evidence at trial that entire time. The circumstances, viewed as a whole, test this Court’s credulity. The Court declines to consider whether the doctrine of presidential immunity precludes the introduction of evidence of purported official presidential acts in criminal proceeding." 

Originally scheduled to begin on March 25 and then pushed to April 15 due to a dump of new documents being presented by federal prosecutors, the trial seeks to put an end to discourse over payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential campaign, which Trump pushed off on Michael Cohen. In a post to social media made in 2018, Trump referred to the payment to Daniels as a "simple private transaction," claiming, "there was no violation based on what we did."

 

Bird flu outbreaks are popping up across the U.S. Should you be concerned?

Four years after the COVID pandemic first began, public attention has turned to another virus: highly pathogenic avian influenza A (also known as H5N1), which has been the center of a rash of outbreaks across dairy farms in the U.S. Even more worryingly, a few humans have also gotten sick.

But wait, isn't this a pathogen that only infects birds? Technically, it originated in birds, but as we've seen many times in the history of public health, some of the most problematic viruses jump from animals to us. The long list of so-called zoonotic transmissions includes Ebola, SARS-1, MERS, Lyme disease and most likely, SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19.

Indeed, bird flu, as H5N1 is also known, has been around for a long time, and has infected plenty of humans before, often with deadly results. But thankfully, the virus hasn't caused widespread infections in humans yet. However, a global bird flu pandemic in birds and other animals has been causing chaos for over three years now, killing hundreds of elephant seals in Antarctica, spreading throughout mink farms in Europe, not to mention cats, and massacring untold millions of birds. It marks the worst bird flu pandemic in recorded history.

So far, this global bird flu crisis hasn't significantly translated to humans. But the fact that so many dairy farms lately are seeing outbreaks, which has spread to at least two people, has many worried that this crisis could intensify.

The first infected individual resides in Texas and is suspected of having made direct contact with an infected cow, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services. The patient's only symptom was eye inflammation. The infection, however, occurred after it was confirmed that cows were transmitting a new bird flu strain between themselves, which signifies the virus could be adapting to mammalian (as opposed to avian) hosts.

So how worried should you be? Here's what we know so far.

Where are bird flu outbreaks happening?

So far, 12 H5N1 outbreaks in dairy cows across at least six states have been confirmed, alarming health experts. The first cases appeared in Kansas and Texas, but were soon detected in Idaho, New Mexico and Michigan. On Thursday, Ohio became the latest state to become part of the growing outbreaks, with some officials anticipating that outbreaks will rise over the next few days.

Only weeks earlier, the same bird flu strain was detected in goats on a Minnesota farm where bird flu had previously infected the poultry. That was the first ever confirmed American case of bird flu being transmitted to livestock. The infected animals display symptoms such as lethargy, low appetite and decreased lactation. Outside of dairy farms, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., the largest producer of fresh eggs in the U.S., was hit by a bird flu outbreak, resulting in the company culling 1.6 million chickens, approximately 3.6% of its entire flock.

"The best way to reduce your risk in general from respiratory diseases is to get your annual flu shot, cover of your nose and mouth when you cough or sneeze and wash your hands frequently."

The good news is that there is no indication that consumers are at risk of drinking bird flu-infected milk, according to US officials on Monday. At the same time, a spokesperson for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) still urges Americans to be careful.

"The best prevention is to avoid sources of exposure," the spokesperson said. "The best way to prevent avian influenza is to avoid sources of exposure whenever possible. Infected birds shed bird flu virus in their saliva, mucous, and feces. People rarely get bird flu; however, human infections with bird flu viruses can happen when enough virus gets into a person’s eyes, nose or mouth, or is inhaled."


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


The most "worrisome" detail about the disease, according to Haseltine, will be "if that infection spreads in people."

What precautions should we take?

Dr. William Haseltine, a pioneer in fighting HIV/AIDS and chair and president of the global health think tank Access Health International, says that ordinary consumers should practice the same precautions that were widespread during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. These include wearing masks in public places (especially airline flights), frequently and thoroughly washing one's hands when outside the house and stocking up in advance on the new anti-flu drug (Xofuza) to take when exposed.

As for the seasonal flu vaccine, Haseltine says "it isn't a good match for the cow-derived flu but the best that is now available."

Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, told Salon that although most people are at a "very low risk" of getting infected unless they work around sick animals, "the best way to reduce your risk in general from respiratory diseases is to get your annual flu shot, cover of your nose and mouth when you cough or sneeze and wash your hands frequently."

"The annual flu shot will not protect you from bird flu but it does help in protecting you from coinfection with bird flu and theoretically would lead one to look for bird flu if you came down with flu-like symptoms and you had exposure risk factors," Benjamin added.

Benjamin also said that people should avoid uncooked and undercooked food, as well as unpasteurized milk or cheeses. "This is especially important if you go to farms, county fairs which have animals or petting zoos. Also stay at home of  you are sick or have symptoms from a respiratory disease."

In a press release on Monday, the CDC said that Americans "should avoid unprotected exposures to sick or dead animals including wild birds, poultry, other domesticated birds, and other wild or domesticated animals (including cattle), as well as with animal carcasses, raw milk, feces (poop), litter, or materials contaminated by birds or other animals with confirmed or suspected HPAI A(H5N1)-virus infection."

Will H5N1 be the next pandemic?

While no one can predict the future trajectory of this virus, pandemics are a regular occurrence in our hyperconnected global economy (and regularly occurred even before the invention of capitalism.) It's only rarely in Western countries where an epidemic becomes severe enough to warrant the kind of response appropriate for COVID. Most people may not even recall the swine flu (H1N1) pandemic in 2011.

While all of these bird flu outbreaks are worrisome, the worst case scenario is in which human-to-human transmission becomes widespread. Presently it is unknown if that will happen. According to a spokesperson for the CDC, avian influenza A outbreaks occur in poultry throughout the world and in North America from time to time. In the United States there was an H5 outbreak in 2014-2015, an H7N8 outbreak in 2016, an H7N2 outbreak in cats in 2016 and an H7N9 outbreak in 2017.

Another concerning detail about the disease is that cow-to-cow transmission has been confirmed. which indicates "transmission can occur to other animals including birds and people. In that process the virus can mutate and become more virulent and/or infectious," Benjamin said. "When this happens, serious outbreaks can occur that can cause severe illness."

Benjamin described the confirmed fact of human infections as "a red flag that tells us we need to step up our disease surveillance and our infection control efforts for at risk animals and people."

Trump in legal battle with Trump Media co-founders over back-and-forth regarding company shares

In a lawsuit filed on March 24 in Florida state court, Donald Trump is suing Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss — former contestants on Trump’s reality-TV show “The Apprentice,” and co-founders of Truth Social's newly public parent company, Trump Media & Technology Group — seeking forfeit of their shares.

In the filing, Trump alleges that Litinsky and Moss made "reckless and wasteful decisions," and caused "significant damage" to the company by getting in the way of an earlier attempt to take Trump Media public, causing a significant delay, and hits back at a complaint filed by the two of them in February in which they sought to block Trump from taking steps that they saw as potentially reducing their combined 8.6% stake.

"TMTG has been forced to file this action to remedy the harm inflicted upon it by two faithless fiduciaries and a company they own — Wesley Moss, Andrew Litinsky, and [United Atlantic Ventures] — and to halt their ongoing attempts to do even more damage," the filing said, per ABC News. Trump's stake in the company is currently worth more than $4 billion.

Joe Scarborough, former politician and co-host of Morning Joe on MSNBC, calls this "the Trumpiest story of all time,” weighing-in on the lawsuit saying, "So this guy starts a company, goes public, everything Trump does, you know, he loses billions of dollars it seems, and then he sues his co-founders. This is, literally, everything he does, his whole life. He gets a painter to paint his office, they’ll paint it, he’ll sue them, and say, ‘I’ll give you 50%.’ It is so sleazy . . . Everybody that goes into business with this guy regrets it because he’s a terrible businessman and he sues you.”

 

“We all have power:” Michelle Obama says Beyoncé’s “Cowboy Carter” reminds us of voting power

Michelle Obama, a long-time Beyoncé fan and supporter, praised the musician's new country album "Cowboy Carter," while also calling for voters to use their power and vote.

The former first lady took to Instagram on Wednesday to shower Beyoncé with praise, telling the Texas pop star, "You are a record-breaker and history-maker." She continued that "Cowboy Carter" has "changed the game once again by helping redefine a music genre and transform our culture. I am so proud of you!"

Moreover, Obama said the album is a "reminder that despite everything we’ve been through to be heard, seen, and recognized, we can still dance, sing, and be who we are unapologetically."

Outside of praising the singer, Obama used the post as a rallying call to appeal to voters, stating that "Cowboy Carter" reminds us that "we all have power. There’s power in our history, in our joy, and in our votes — and we can each use our own gifts and talents to make our voices heard on the issues that matter most to us."

Obama urged voters to stand up for their beliefs, saying, "We must do that at the ballot box this year. The issues that impact us most are on the ballot across the country — from equal pay and racial justice to reproductive healthcare and climate change."

She concluded with a voter registration link and stated that "Queen Bey says at the end of 'Ya Ya,' we need to 'keep the faith' and 'VOTE!'"

https://www.instagram.com/p/C5RYHS9u9cN/

Food fraud is a growing economic and health issue – but AI and blockchain technology can help combat

A multi-billion pound criminal enterprise lurks amid our supermarket shelves. Food crime not only harms our wallets but threatens public health. It includes activities such as mislabelling a product, replacing a food or ingredient with another substance that is inferior, and even poisoning.

This is a global concern because of how food crime is evolving. The complexity of food supply chains, the globalisation of food markets, and a lack of transparency heightens the vulnerability of the food sector. So, rethinking how we combat food crime by using technology is imperative.

Food crimes now inflict an estimated US$40 billion (£31 billion) in damages globally each year. The UK's Food Standards Agency defines food crime as "serious fraud and related criminality in food supply chains".

If we think about food crime from a profit-driven criminal perspective, we can understand its dual role both as a way for criminals to generate dirty money that needs to be laundered, and as a means of laundering illicit funds from other criminal activities.

The seven types of food crime explained by the Food Standards Agency.

 

The food industry is particularly attractive to fraudsters because of its potential to be very profitable. Researchers have uncovered two main approaches adopted by fraudsters in relation to high-demand products.

First, they target relatively low-cost everyday foods, such as bottled water or olive oil, because these involve a large proportion of consumers, which means they can maximize profits. For example, a Spanish and Italian investigation in 2023 led to 260,000 liters of olive oil being seized. Investigators found that olive oil labelled as "virgin" or "extra virgin" had been diluted with a low-quality variant.

Another example was the 2013 horse meat scandal, when beef products across Europe were found to contain horse meat. Such meat was more than four times cheaper to produce.

Alternatively, some fraudsters trick non-discerning "foodies" into paying premium prices for cheaper food dressed up as a superior product – for example, cheap truffles masquerading as exotic Italian truffles.

Unfortunately, our understanding of these complex financial crimes is often limited, making the detection and prevention of food fraud a challenging task.

 

Emerging technology

The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, an international anti-fraud body, found that 91% of organizations globally have used data analysis technology in response to growing financial crime risks. This technology holds promise because it can unearth hidden patterns in vast datasets, leading to better detection and prevention of crimes.

Machine learning, for example, can analyze data and identify suspicious activity. It can also learn and adapt as new information becomes available. In the context of food crime, this could involve flagging particular locations, individuals or businesses that might pose a risk.

Evidence is limited on this topic, so we think further research needs to be conducted to analyze past food fraud cases. Identifying recurring themes and patterns using machine learning could develop a better detection model which, when combined with the expertise of regulators, food producers, distributors and retailers, could be a powerful tool.

The food industry is undergoing a potential shift, with researchers suggesting that blockchain technology could empower consumers to make better decisions when they buy food. Blockchain is like a secure public ledger that can't be tampered with. So this technology offers the possibility of giving everyone from supermarket chains to individual consumers the ability to trace their food's journey back to its origin, with ease and confidence. Imagine being able to make informed choices at the shop, knowing exactly where your food comes from.

In Australia, the implementation of blockchain technology by some producers in recent years is expected to help address the multi-billion dollar problem of food and wine fraud. A recent study found blockchain's data security and resistance to data corruption were important features that underlie its potential to combat food fraud.

 

Collaboration is key

While new technology offers promise in fighting food crime, there are hurdles to overcome. Implementing blockchain across the global food supply chain, for instance, faces challenges including a lack of international standards and difficulty handling massive amounts of data. Blockchain technology may also require additional technology, making it expensive for small food producers.

Ultimately, the key to tackling food fraud lies in collaboration. We need to bring together law enforcement, industry professionals, organizations of all sizes and academics, each with proper ethical oversight from their institutions.

Any anti-fraud measures shouldn't make it substantially harder for consumers to buy food. If the process becomes too cumbersome, people might find ways to circumvent it, which may create new vulnerabilities in the food system.

Adrian Gepp, Professor of Data Analytics, Bangor University and Milind Tiwari, Lecturer in Fraud and Financial Crime Studies, Charles Sturt University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Experts say Smith’s response to Cannon’s recent order was “forceful” but “appropriate”

Attorneys for Donald Trump and federal prosecutors submitted hypothetical jury instructions in the former president's classified documents case late Tuesday, with special counsel Jack Smith also delivering a scathing rebuke of the presiding judge's order requesting them. 

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon last month ordered both parties to draft and file hypothetical jury instructions drawing from competing interpretations of two laws related to the case, a request legal experts have said is unusualThe Washington Post reports

In his team's filing, Smith rebuffed the judge, arguing that the jury instructions were based on a "fundamentally flawed legal premise.” He asked the Trump-appointee to "promptly" decide whether the "unstated legal premise" undergirding her order represents the court's view of a "correct formulation of the law," warning that he may appeal if the court finds "wrongly" that it does.

Though Smith's response to Cannon's recent order was "forceful," it was "appropriate," former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Salon.

"Judge Cannon is wrong on the law. She's consistently wrong on the law and . . . she has entertained every one of Trump's frivolous arguments," he said, adding: "The fact that Jack Smith has clearly signaled that he's going to appeal — I mean she's got to think long and hard about this order that she's gonna issue."

The special counsel's response to Cannon underscored his team's frustration with the exercise. He told Cannon, who was appointed to the federal bench in 2020 and whose relative inexperience as a judge has earned her much scrutiny, that relying on Trump's interpretations of the laws in question would "distort the trial."

If the court “were to defer a decision on that fundamental legal question it would inject substantial delay into the trial," Smith added in the 24-page filing

Legal experts have emphasized that Cannon's focus on jury instructions at this point in the case seems "odd" because the trial date is uncertain and she has a number of remaining pretrial decisions to make before the instructions become relevant, The Post notes. Rahmani told Salon that jury instructions are not typically crafted until "well into the case, often in the middle of the trial."

"The fact that she's doing this is very out of the ordinary — doesn't make any legal sense," he said. 

Experts have also noted that the premise of Cannon's orders signal she has entertained some convoluted interpretations of laws that Trump's lawyers and supporters have put forth. 

In the defense's filing, Trump's legal team said Cannon's instructions exercise aligns with his position that the "prosecution is based on official acts” he took as president and not illegally retaining materials as he's been accused of, according to The Post. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The judge asked the lawyers to create jury instructions about the Presidential Records Act (PRA), which makes presidential records government property and requires they be turned over to the National Archives and Records Administration after that president leaves office. 

In one of the two scenarios Cannon presented, the Florida judge asked the parties to draft jury instructions that assume the PRA allows the president to claim any documents as personal at the end of a presidency, which is what Trump's legal team has argued. The second asks the parties to write jury instructions based on the notion that jurists would be able to delineate which of the documents Trump is accused of illegally keeping as personal or presidential. 

Based on that request, David Schultz, a Hamline University legal studies and political science professor, said he believes Cannon "misunderstands the law."  

"Her suggestions for jury instructions really reflect a complete misunderstanding of the Presidential Records Act," he told Salon. "I think that's what Smith is really criticizing or saying: that either of the two possibilities — in terms of asking for proposals for jury instructions — are just based on the fundamentally flawed notion of what the Act requires."

Cannon is "conflating the Presidential Records Act and the Espionage Act," Rahmani added. "She is abdicating her duty, and this is something that she needs to decide, not a jury. It's a question of law, not a question of fact."

The government has countered that it is the Espionage Act — not the PRA — that governs classified materials. Trump stands charged with 32 counts under the Espionage Act and faces eight felony charges related to alleged attempts to obstruct the government's document retrieval efforts. Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The trial was originally scheduled to begin in May but that date "seems all but certain to be moved back," The Post notes. A hearing last month to determine when the trial should occur did not provide any clarity as to when trial may begin, and Cannon has not yet ruled on a date. 

Schultz suspects that if Cannon doesn't decide "very quickly" to change the legal premise of the proposed jury instructions, Smith will appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals "just about immediately." 

Rahmani agreed, underscoring that the special counsel is working to move the case forward and get to trial "as quickly as possible."

An appeal, however, would result in a procedural delay in the case that could push proceedings out "weeks or months," he said, explaining that, should Trump be reelected before the case goes to trial, it "has to be dismissed" based on longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president.  

Still, Rahmani hopes that Cannon will make the legally correct decision in response to Smith's filing, at least, for her sake.

If the government "appeals again — and she will be reversed — again, it would be her third reversal, and we haven't even gotten to trial yet," he said, referencing the 11th Circuit's previous reversals of Cannon's pre-indictment decisions during the investigation of Trump's retention of classified documents.

Cannon had appointed a special master to review the records the FBI seized in August 2022 from Trump's Mar-a-Lago property. The appellate court first overturned her rejection of a stay on the special-master order that the Justice Department requested. The court later reversed her appointment of the special master altogether.

"At a certain point, you'd have to care about your reputation as a judge and not being a laughingstock, which really [is] what she is quickly becoming in the legal community," Rahmani said, also arguing that Cannon's decisions have been "consistently in Trump's favor" and "consistently wrong."

"If past precedent tells us anything, she's going to continue along the same path," he added. "But maybe, just maybe, she'll realize the error in her ways and get things right. It's tough to predict because she's an unpredictable judge."

“Hitler level stuff”: Kanye West faces new lawsuit alleging antisemitism and abuse at Donda Academy

Kanye West (who also goes by the name Ye) was sued on Tuesday by a former employee who accused the rapper of threatening staff and students at Donda Academy, West's private and unaccredited Christian school in Ventura County, Calif.

Filed in Los Angeles Superior Court by Trevor Phillips, the 47-page lawsuit also claimed that West engaged in discriminatory and antisemitic behavior, likening himself to Adolf Hitler and creating a hostile work environment. Phillips worked for both Donda Academy and West's fashion brand, Yeezy, from November 2022 to August 2023. The suit states that Phillips’ daughter and younger brother attended Donda, and that Phillips’ mother assisted him in getting the job. He was hired shortly after the rap mogul's businesses began to flounder and his major-record label was cast into jeopardy, following his repeated antisemitic comments. Notably, West at the time tweeted that he would support "death con 3 ON JEWISH PEOPLE," causing X/Twitter and Instagram to subsequently restrict his account. 

Phillips' suit states that he was initially hired to assist with “projects related to growing cotton” and other plants in an effort to make Yeezy "self-sustainable," before shifting to his role at Donda Academy. The former staffer asserted that West continued to make antisemitic remarks in front of employees at the school, including “the Jews are out to get me” and “the Jews are stealing all my money," per a report from The New York Times. After sports empire Adidas severed ties with West in October of 2022 over his statements, the music artist reportedly told Phillips, “The Jews are working with Adidas to freeze up my money to try and make me broke!" per the lawsuit.

West ultimately issued an apology to the Jewish community last year, releasing a statement written in Hebrew that said, "It was not my intention to offend or disrespect and I deeply regret any pain I may have caused.” The apology also claimed that he was committed “to learning from this experience to ensure greater sensitivity and understanding.” Phillips however, in the latest in a series of lawsuits filed by former Donda employees, alleged that West continued to make antisemitic comments behind closed doors at work. The lawsuit says that West during one dinner at high-end sushi restaurant Nobu pretended to masturbate and described his sex life in detail to Phillips, who believed the meeting was concerning Donda's horticulture program, per Business Insider. West also during the meeting referred to the Holocaust as "fake" and called Hitler "great," saying that the German dictator responsible for a genocide that killed millions was an "innovator."

"He invented so many things. He’s the reason we have cars," the complaint purports West to have said. During the same conversation, the suit claims, West said, “Yeah I am going for the gays! FIRST the Jews, THEN the gays.”

"Gay people are not true Christians," the suit quotes West to have said. "And Gay people are controlled by Bill Gates so that they don't have children for population control."

Text messages from another conversation about seeds for the Donda Academy garden reportedly show West to have said, "I am on some complete Hitler level stuff. Minus the gas chambers. In Jesus name."

"Phillips, on several occasions, witnessed Kanye preach to his staff obscenities such as 'the Jews are out to get me' and 'the Jews are stealing all my money,'" the suit reads. "Fearing for their jobs and also to de-escalate Kanye's absurdities (so that the two present school children did not hear), the school staff did their best to ignore him."

The complaint also accuses West of threatening two Donda Academy students, reportedly telling the children that he "wanted them to shave their heads and that he intended to put a jail at the school — and that they could be locked in cages.”

“The staff quickly distracted the children and escorted them out of the room," the lawsuit says.

Phillips, who is Black, also detailed how West allegedly treated Black employees at Donda, including himself, “considerably worse than white employees.” At Paris Fashion Week in the fall of 2022, West wore a shirt that featured a slogan of white supremacists — "White Lives Matter " — which is deemed hate speech by the Anti-Defamation League. 

Business Insider reported that Phillips is seeking $35,000 in damages and an injunction to prohibit West from owning and operating any sort of educational school for kids under 18 years of age in the state of California. "By filing this lawsuit, we hope our injured clients' rights are vindicated, and that the famous artist Mr. West understands that his messages — which we alleged preach discrimination, antisemitism, and Hitler-love — have no place in the world," Carney R. Shegerian, whose law firm is representing Phillips, told the outlet.

Don’t be afraid of bitterness in cooking — just learn how to best harness it

The inherent notes in coffee, the subtle flavor of anise or fennel, incredibly dark chocolate, the sharpness of arugula, the unique flavor of broccoli rabe, a particularly pucker-y grapefruit, endive, radicchio, rhubarb, Aperol, citrus — despite being a note many fear, bitterness plays a role in so many ingredients but is so rarely harnessed to elevate dishes, no matter if sweet or savory.

That's one of the reasons why, in this week's "Top Chef" Quick Fire challenge, the cheftestants were asked to prepare a dish with hops, one of the primary building blocks of beer. Although you’re probably not going to be using hops in your next meal, that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t harness bitterness and its often underrated culinary capabilities.

Now, don't get me wrong: Too much bitterness is decidedly not good, veering into acrid or becoming generally unpalatable. But when there’s a touch of it in a dish, it can be a beguiling, alluring flavor component, especially when it plays in contrast to other flavor notes. You just need to be sure to have a light hand. "A little goes a long way" is perfect when applied to using bitterness in a balanced manner. 

In this piece from Jenny Dorsey with the Institute of Culinary Education, she writes that "bitterness is a critical component of building intensity and complexity of flavor, but here in the U.S. we often shy away from using bitterness to accentuate our food." She recommends "sprinkling a warm, rich, bitter ingredient like cacao powder on top to finish a dish versus braising meat in a juicy but tannic red wine for hours feels different because the ingredient's bitterness reaches our tongues in varying stages when eating."

From a scientistic perspective, bitterness is perceived by one of the taste bud receptors at the back of our mouths, per Dorsey, which may have developed as a protective mechanism to prevent people from consuming anything poisonous or harmful. 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


Furthermore, as registered dietician Amy Fischer tells Zee Krstic at Good Housekeeping, bitterness is also a tool that can help to "revolutionize your gut health," helping with everything from digestion and constipation to bloating and irregularity. She specifically highlights grapefruit, cacao, cranberries, coffee and more as everyday, commonplace ingredients you can incorporate more into your dishes or diet for both boosts in flavor and health. Over at NBC News, integrative health expert Taz Bhatia likens bitter foods to prebiotics and how they impact the gut and microbiome overall. 

This piece from Meher Mirza in Saveur acknowledges India's embrace of "beautifully bitter flavors," writing that "The subcontinent’s many bracing ingredients are essential to its cultures, cuisines, and traditional medicines." Mirza also writes that "the brace of bitterness that sluices our taste buds is these ingredients’ most enduring appeal," which pretty much sums up the whole appeal, does it not? 

If you do like the flavor, though, why not make a broccoli rabe pesto? Why not incorporate some coffee grounds into baked goods? Why not make cocktails (with or without alcohol) with Aperol or other bitter flavors? There are so many options, often with items you probably already have on hand. 

Don't shy away from it; you never know what embracing bitterness might do for your own home cooking. 

We need your help to stay independent

Top Chef Takeaways, episode 2: 

  • Warning: Rant incoming. No offense to Tom, Soo or Valentine, but I quite literally couldn’t focus on Last Chance Kitchen because I was frantically scanning the internet to find out where in the world is David Murphy? Why was he not even mentioned? His absence was glaring and bizarre. I am almost annoyed whenever a character inexplicably goes missing and there is no mention from the show itself, no matter if it's Judy Winslow on "Family Matters" or a random reality show contestant. And it turns out we may need know. In an Instagram comment, Murphy simply wrote the cryptic message: "I wasn’t allowed to participate, beyond that I can’t say anything else… NDAs." 
  • Was I hallucinating or were the guests at the elimination challenge never actually introduced? I'm sure Kristen still did it, but maybe it was edited out which seems like an odd change and I hope that thats not gong to be a permanent format shift. I found it jarring how the entire table would immediately guffaw at everything that one man said until I realized that he was apparently a comedian.
  • We're starting to see a clear distinction between the chefs on the red team, who have been more outwardly "lauded" by the industry at large, and the chefs on the yellow team, who are more like the underdogs. Interestingly enough, a classic David versus Goliath narrative played out this week as the yellow team pulled out the win — but will this streak continue? Will cheftestants like Alisha — who is self-taught and identified the "fine dining versus rustic" disparity on display this season  happen to topple the Michelin-starred and James Beard nominated cheftestants? Perhaps! We shall see.

“I wish I had kept my mouth shut”: Andy Cohen regrets playing into Kate Middleton theories

Bravo host Andy Cohen is the latest in a line of celebrities and public figures who have expressed remorse for commenting on Kate Middleton's alleged disappearance following major planned abdominal surgery in January. 

After months of online rumors and conspiracies regarding the Princess of Wales' whereabouts — from speculations of a coma to questions about the integrity of her marriage to Prince William — she issued a public video statement to share that she had been diagnosed with cancer.

Cohen during the Monday episode of his SiriusXM show, "Radio Andy," addressed a number of jesting messages he had shared regarding the royal situation. In response to a contested sighting of Middleton in public, for example, the "Watch What Happens Live" host took to X/Twitter to write, "That ain't Kate . . ."

“I just want to say, I am heartbroken by the news about Princess Kate,” Cohen said. “And I think someone on Sky News called me a ‘numpty’ during that whole conversation, and they were right.

“I wish I had kept my mouth shut, and we are all praying for Princess Kate and King Charles," he continued. "And so, I just had to say that right at the beginning. It’s the first opportunity back in front of a live microphone.”

On “Finding Your Roots,” Michael Douglas discovers he’s distantly related to Scarlett Johansson

Oscar-winning actor Michael Douglas hails from humble ancestral origins.

On Tuesday's episode of "Finding Your Roots," the "Fatal Attraction" and "Basic Instinct" actor traces his paternal roots back 200 years to a part of Belarus when it was part of the Russian territory the Pale of Settlement. The show found the resting place of the Douglases' Jewish ancestry — ancestors who suffered discrimination and challenges in Europe because of their Jewish identity.

"I feel more of a spiritual religious connection to Judaism than I ever had before," Douglas shared with host Henry Louis Gates Jr.

Gates asked what Douglas' late father, Hollywood legend Kirk Douglas, would think about the discovery, and Michael Douglas replied, "I think he'd be very very touched and really appreciate it. He always, even though, his path, his career took him away from Amsterdam, New York and everything else — he tried to always touch base with his six sisters back there to some degree. I think [he] would have [felt] very blessed and cherished to be able to share this.

"I wish I could go through a family album with him now — be able to show him," Douglas said.

Another surprising discovery for Douglas was a secret celebrity distant relative. The show ran his DNA against other celebrity guests who had been on the series and found a surprising match. 

Gates divulged to Douglas that his "DNA cousin is Scarlett Johansson." The show's DNA researchers found that Johansson's maternal side also stretches back to Jewish communities in Eastern Europe just like Douglas'.

"Oh, that's amazing. Alright, this is cool. This is so cool," he exclaimed. "That's incredible. I look forward to seeing Scarlett next time!"

We need your help to stay independent

On the side of Douglas' stage actress mother Diana Dill, "Finding Your Roots" traced back the Dills to the British territory of Bermuda. It's here that Douglas' family dates back to the 1600s with a line of prominent lawyers, merchants and slave owners, the show's researchers found.

However, his grandma's side could also be traced back to colonial New Jersey to his distant relative and merchant, John Nielson. Nielson was also a colonel and was famous for winning the Battle of Bennett's Island. The success earned him a nod from George Washington himself, who was president at that time.

While Nielson's heroic efforts were highlighted, Gates shared with Douglas that his ancestor was also a slave owner. "We have this expression in Hebrew, 'tikkun olam' which means to make the world a better place or to try to repair the world. You just feel that obligation much more when you see something like that. It makes you want to be a better person," Douglas said.

“Finding Your Roots” airs Tuesdays at 8 p.m. ET on PBS.

Costco’s small change to its rotisserie chicken has inspired big reactions

Costco's $4.99 rotisserie chicken is one of the world' most iconic foods — and for good reason. For me, there is no comparable, economical rotisserie chicken option; Costco has the market completely covered. However, there is a pending change coming that may affects some's adoration for the product.

According to Zoe Strozewski of Eat This, Not That, a since-deleted "apparent internal memo" went viral on Reddit last month, stating that "Costco planned to start serving its rotisserie chickens in plastic bags instead of the clear plastic 'shell' containers it has long used in the United States." This was reportedly motivated by a desire to reduce plastic usage as a company.

Costco didn't confirm or deny the change, but as of last week, a customer in Washington happened to notice the bagged chicken was now on shelves. She also noted on Reddit that it "tastes the same." The bag features handles and a "window" to see the bronzed chicken.

While some are discouraged over the change and lament the chicken's former plastic home, others don't think it matters much since it's better for the environment and it tastes the same. Others also are happy about the fact that the bagged chicken is ostensibly easier to store and takes up less room. 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


According to Danielle Harling with Delish, however, it is noted that the bag is "reportedly prone to leaks" and that, according to one shopper, "the bag was super greasy" upon touching it.

We'll see how the change may proliferate in the coming weeks. It should also be noted that rotisserie chicken in bags is not a new thing: Wegmans and BJs both also employ bag packaging for their rotisserie chickens. While Costco hasn't officially confirmed a nationwide roll-out, it seems the bags have already been deployed in some stores in certain states.

“The whole world is wet – and we’re dry”: Why Ramy Youssef’s feelings and prayers on “SNL” matter

Presuming you’re familiar with Ramy Youssef, which the comedian himself doesn’t take for granted, you may have recognized his eight-minute “Saturday Night Live” monologue’s consistency with his other work.

It held a specific tether to his latest stand-up special “More Feelings,” for one. The bulk of his gentle material is lifted directly from that hour, albeit with a few tweaks and edits, like his anecdote about a visit to upstate New York when he found himself in MAGA country.

His mother called him on the phone, and instead of replying to her greeting of “As-salaam alaykum” with the standard, “Wa alaikum assalam,” he says, “I was like, ‘Mother, peace be upon you, you know – and the prophet. You know which prophet. The best one. The last one.’”

But the leavening agent that made space for his tension-dissolving jokes offered a wider embrace encircling both the religious and the secular. “This is an incredibly spiritual weekend,” Youssef points out, listing a trinity relatable to the broadest possible audience. “We’re in the holy month of Ramadan. Tomorrow is Easter. And yesterday, Beyoncé released a new album.

America’s rifts are raw and frightening, but Youssef, a devout Muslim, knows that many of its people are praying folk like he is. His faith fortifies his material, especially his bits covering his efforts to merge his beliefs into his busy life as a comic and a guy raised in New Jersey.

His March 30 "SNL" appearance capitalized on our understanding of prayer as a force of good to voice his public support for Gazans besieged by Israel’s military strikes.

Youssef says he’s one of the few among his friends that prays. “Like, I'm friends with a lot of sinners. Disgusting people. And they call me when they're in trouble,” he jokes. One he calls Brian asked him to pray that he’ll get his dog back from his ex-girlfriend. He assures him he will. Not long after, another worried friend named Ahmed begged him to pray for his suffering family in Gaza who are missing and endangered.

In a nation that claims to be guided by prayer, who can find fault with an honestly expressed entreaty to God?

“So that night, I go to pray. And my prayers are complicated. I’ve got a lot to fit in,” he says. “I’m like, ‘God, please, please help Ahmed’s family. Please stop the suffering. Stop the violence.”

Then comes the line that made the audience erupt in raucous applause. “Please free the people of Palestine. Please,” he says, pausing to let the cheers subside before adding, “And please free the hostages. All the hostages. Please.”

“Saturday Night Live” has a fraught, lengthy history with stars making political statements, making Youssef’s plea significant both in its directness and its overwhelmingly positive reception.

As Salon contributor Dean Obeidallah notes in a CNN column from Monday,

Hearing someone on national network television say the words “Free Palestine” — and having the audience spontaneously burst into applause — is not something I’ve seen before. It’s something I wish my late father, a Palestinian immigrant to the US, had been alive to see.

Obeidallah goes on to posit that wrapping that statement in a joke rooted in honesty helped it land solidly — and on a pad softened by the punchline, “And while you’re at it, you know, free Mr. Bojangles. I mean he is, he’s a beautiful dog. I’m praying for that dog.”

Youssef may have been kidding about Mr. Bojangles. Not the prayers. He means that part, which may be why his statement resounded. In a nation that claims to be guided by prayer, who can find fault with an honestly expressed entreaty to God?

Youssef’s moment ever so loosely bookends Pete Davidson’s season opener, which aired seven days after Hamas militants crossed into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, and killed nearly 1,200 people, taking around 250 hostages. An estimated 96 people are still being held in Gaza, including some Americans, according to Israeli government data shared in The Washington Post.

We need your help to stay independent

Davidson’s cold open was saturated in humility, confessing that he recognized he wasn’t necessarily the best person for a most difficult job.

Then he demurred. “In a lot of ways, I am a good person to talk about it because when I was seven years old, my dad was killed in a terrorist attack. So I know something about what that's like,” Davidson says, citing the images of suffering Israeli children and Palestinian children shown on the news.

“No one in this world should be forced to suffer like that, you know,” he says, “especially not kids.”

Six months later nearly 33,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel’s asymmetrical retaliation, with women and children comprising around two-thirds of the dead, according to Gaza Health Ministry statistics reported by the AP.

The American public’s support for Israel spiked as bombs began falling. Anyone calling out the atrocity of targeting unarmed civilians trapped in a small area of land risked being branded an antisemite. That remained true even for people calling for a ceasefire.

Youssef was unafraid to use that term on the Oscars red carpet, where he appeared with the rest of the “Poor Things” cast.

“We’re calling for [an] immediate, permanent ceasefire in Gaza. We’re calling for peace and lasting justice for the people of Palestine,” he told to Variety. “It’s a universal message of, ‘Let’s stop killing kids. Let’s not be part of more war.’ No one has ever looked back at war and thought a bombing campaign was a good idea.”

The sad truth is that America has long numbed to the obscenity of children dying by gun violence. If that weren’t the case, this country would have gone in a very different direction in the gun control debate following the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Instead, politicians have gotten comfortable with absolving themselves in the wake of atrocities with empty offerings of “thoughts and prayers.” 

In contrast, Youssef’s divine plea is unquestionably legitimate, recognizing the power of where many are situated emotionally and ethically. He wasn't afraid to be awkward and kind while exercising an expert’s timing, a critical mastery for any comedian.

Do not misinterpret what that means. Youssef’s “SNL” statement moved us, but to deem it to be the "correct" approach would be morally incorrect. That implies there are right and wrong ways to stand up for the oppressed on a major broadcast platform, which is akin to demanding of suffering people that their non-violent protest be undertaken "the right way."  

The difference rests in how uncomfortable and inconvenienced those who aren’t protesting are made by those demonstrations, along with whether the people doing the marching are serving the dominant power structure.

Director Jonathan Glazer’s Academy Awards acceptance speech for “The Zone of Interest” went toe-to-toe with such a giant. In the weeks following Hamas' attack, a number of stars were dropped from projects or fired by their agencies for publicly voicing their support for the Palestinians.

Glazer took a bolder leap, taking fire based on a selective interpretation of this Oscar night statement: “Right now we stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people. Whether the victims of October the 7th in Israel or the ongoing attack on Gaza, all are victims of this dehumanization. How do we resist?”

Although this was an awkward way of rejecting a government’s weaponization of his religion and identity to justify waging war on a noncombatant population, many were horrified. Some 450 stars and executives signed an open letter condemning Glazer, including Debra Messing and Eli Roth.

More recently, fellow director Ken Loach and screenwriter Tony Kushner stepped forward to support him, perhaps emboldened by knowing the public’s support for Israel’s aggression in Gaza is plummeting.

Youssef never swayed in his call for a ceasefire or supporting Palestinians, having donated all the proceeds from the latter months of his recent tour to American Near East Refugee Aid’s assistance efforts in Gaza.

Tuesday’s Israeli military strike that killed seven World Central Kitchen workers underlines what dangerous, necessary work that is. Other organizations paused their aid efforts following that tragedy, leaving Gazans to fend for themselves in a humanitarian catastrophe.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In “More Feelings” Youssef half-seriously admits that he doesn’t like performing for charity, because as soon as he picks one he gets “cooked” by other Muslims for failing to support the “right” causes in the “right” way. One man blasted him for neglecting to contribute to relief efforts after the 2023 floods in Pakistan.

“He really got to me. I started thinking, like, where was I when the floods happened in Pakistan? I was dry,” he says, which got a laugh.

Then he changes this insight into metaphor. “Like, I think that everyone here was,” he tells his audience, “and that’s the problem. It’s hard to care about a flood when you’re dry, right? The whole world is wet . . . and we’re dry.”

At the end of “More Feelings,” he reaffirms how serious he is about praying in dark times, no matter what religion you are. “Just pray however you pray . . . you don’t understand how much I don’t care,” he says. “Last week I was on a Zoom with three witches. I was just like, ‘Ladies, let’s go, we need some spells, like . . . potions for Palestine, whatever you’ve got, we need it.’”

On a “Saturday Night Live” scheduled during a uniquely holy weekend Youssef decided to walk out into that storm armed with his faith, a sense of humor, and a wholeheartedly American prayer for the freedom of those in dire need.

It did not fall on uncaring ears. Nor was it shouted down. For those feeling helpless and lost on dry land in that moment, that was a sufficiently spiritual answer. 

Are potatoes a vegetable or grain? Why lawmakers are fighting over how they’re classified

Every five years, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the USDA publish the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, a collection of evidence-based recommendations to promote overall health and reduce the risk of chronic diseases. This generally includes commonsense advice about limiting one’s alcohol intake, monitoring portion size and eating a colorful variety of fruits and vegetables. However, some recent reports have farmers, trade groups and even politicians really concerned about what information will be contained in the next set of guidelines — specifically when it comes to potatoes. 

Currently, the government classified potatoes as a vegetable, but there has been speculation the 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans could recategorize them as a grain. Some public health authorities, such as Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, have already removed potatoes from the vegetable category, specifically because of how they impact blood sugar. 

That said, lawmakers, including 14 senators, have spoken out on the potential change, saying that any modification to potatoes’ current classification under the Dietary Guidelines “would immediately confuse consumers, retailers, restaurant operators, growers, and the entire supply chain.” 

From a nutritional standpoint, potatoes don’t actually affect our bodies in the same way that non-starchy vegetables — like spinach, broccoli or celery — do. Instead, according to Harvard’s School of Public Health, they are the type of carbohydrate that the body digests rapidly, causing blood sugar and insulin to surge and then dip. “In scientific terms, they have a high glycemic load,” the school’s staff wrote in a 2014 article titled “The problem with potatoes.” 

“For example, a cup of potatoes has a similar effect on blood sugar as a can of cola or a handful of jelly beans,” they write. “The roller-coaster-like effect of a high dietary glycemic load can result in people feeling hungry again soon after eating, which may then lead to overeating. Over the long term, diets high in potatoes and similarly rapidly-digested, high carbohydrate foods can contribute to obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.” 

The article authors pointed to a 2011 study that tracked the diet and lifestyle habits of 120,000 men and women for up to 20 years and looked at “how small food-choice changes contributed to weight gain over time.” The study found that people who increased their consumption of French fries, baked or mashed potatoes gained more weight over time, while people who decreased their intake of these specific foods gained less weight, as did people who increased their intake of other vegetables. 

However, Kam Quarles, CEO for the National Potato Council, doesn’t believe potatoes should be classified as grains because of other key elements of their nutritional makeup. In speaking with the National Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee in September, he opened his statement by saying: “First: Potatoes are a vegetable.” 

We need your help to stay independent

“We understand that the Committee is considering changes to food groups within US dietary patterns. One of those discussions involves the interchangeability of starchy vegetables and grains,” Quarles said. “While NPC is sensitive to individual needs and cultures, we urge the Committee to recognize a potato is not a grain. Potatoes are the most widely produced vegetable in the U.S.” 

He continued: “Starchy vegetables and grains are two vastly different food groups that play distinctly different roles in contributing nutrients to the diet. Unlike grains, white potatoes are a strong contributor of potassium, calcium, vitamin C, and vitamin B6 and fiber. Research shows that diets high in vegetable consumption, including potatoes, promote healthy outcomes overall.” 

"We urge the Committee to recognize a potato is not a grain."

This is a point that was echoed in a letter to USDA Secretary Thomas Vilsack and HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, sent and signed by two dozen senators last week. In the letter, the bi-partisan group — which included Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Michael Bennet (D-CO) — cited a 2013 study from the National Library of Medicine that said potatoes should be classified as a vegetable as they "contribute critical nutrients." The study said, "all white vegetables, including white potatoes, provide nutrients needed in the diet."

“Given this strong, fact-backed assertion produced from the National Library of Medicine study, it does not make any sense for your departments to reclassify potatoes as a grain,” the senators concluded. “We strongly urge you to avoid reclassifying potatoes as a grain or suggest grains and potatoes are interchangeable. Given the rapid timeline that the DGAs [Dietary Guidelines for America] are on, we ask that you provide us an update on this issue as soon as possible.”

The Grain Chain trade group also agrees that potatoes should continue to be classified as vegetables, saying that  putting potatoes in their category “could further exacerbate nutrient shortfalls.” 

Whether potatoes are officially classified as a vegetable or grain has implications beyond the nutritional recommendations provided within the guidelines; those recommendations impact how real-world programs, like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and National School Lunch programs, allocate benefits and budgets. 

“Our federal nutrition programs rely on the DGAs to ensure that program beneficiaries are receiving well-balanced, nutritious food,” the senators wrote. “Such a change could also come at a cost to our nation’s schools. Under the National School Breakfast and National School Lunch Programs, schools already struggle to meet vegetable consumption recommendations at a reasonable cost, and potatoes are often the most affordable vegetable.”

Major fast-food chains plan to implement more digital order kiosks in hopes of boosting profits

Fast-food chains like Burger King, Taco Bell and more are looking to add more digital order kiosks in restaurants nationwide. The latest initiative follows in the footsteps of Panera Bread's and is projected to help boost profits, Business Insider reported.

Burger King will speed up the rollout of its digital order kiosks following a pilot with “tremendous results,” Josh Kobza, CEO of parent company Restaurant Brands International (RBI), told investors in November. Kobza said he thinks “the US is ready for kiosks now and we're likely to see a faster rollout of those around the world.” Burger King previously rolled out the technology across its international markets, more than half of which has been “converted” to kiosks, Kobza added.

In the same vein, Shake Shack said in February that it had added kiosks to "nearly all" of its nearly 300 US company-operated restaurants. Kiosks make up “well over” half of the company’s in-restaurant orders at these locations, CFO Katie Fogertey told investors in November. Management also noted that over 50% of restaurant sales are now coming from kiosks, which is a significant increase from previous quarters, per a 2023 Seeking Alpha report.

Digital order kiosks are also available at all of Taco Bell's US restaurants. KFC introduced kiosks in approximately 500 US restaurants at the end of 2023 and plans to have them in the “vast majority” of its non-China restaurants by the end of 2026, Yum! CFO Chris Turner told investors in February.

The planned implementation of more touchscreen kiosks is part of an ongoing effort by restaurants to increase overall revenue. As explained by Business Insider, kiosks help businesses save money on manual labor. Restaurants can hire fewer staff at counters, since their jobs have become digitized, or they can utilize them in other areas of the business.

In Burger King’s case, kiosks eliminated “stressful interactions” for both customers and staff and allowed staff to spend more time in the kitchen preparing food. Additionally, many restaurants found that kiosks increase order accuracy and allow businesses to easily adjust menu items along with their prices in real-time. 

The technology also encourages customers to spend more money. Burger King said its kiosks prompted customers to place larger orders. Same with Shake Shack, which said that customers who ordered digitally rather than in-person at cashiers spent “on average nearly 10% more.” That makes sense considering that customers have more time to browse the menu when using a kiosk. They also feel less rushed to make a decision promptly and are more inclined to tack on extra sides or drinks, switch to larger portion sizes or add more expensive customizations. Shake Shack, in particular, recently introduced new technology to “drive increased attach rates and customization,” meaning its kiosks are programmed to push customers to make more costly orders.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


Some restaurants were initially hesitant about introducing digital kiosks because it felt pointless at the time to spend extra money on technology that customers readily have at their disposal (i.e. online restaurant loyalty apps on computers and phones). The pandemic, however, made customers more comfortable with digital ordering, in turn making them more comfortable with using kiosks once they became more widespread in the US.

Patrick Doyle, executive chairman of RBI, which owns Burger King, Popeyes, Tim Hortons, and Firehouse Subs, told investors in November that digital ordering channels are the “North Star of where we want to go with the business.” Similarly, Shake Shack called kiosks a “key tool” that will heighten total digital sales.

How food preferences are linked to cognition and brain health

From the crispy crunch of fresh veggies to the creamy indulgence of decadent desserts, we all have different food preferences. Our palates develop uniquely, shaped by genetics, culture and personal experiences.  

Food preferences play a significant role in shaping our dietary habits. Highly palatable foods rich in sugars, fats and salts often appeal to people's tastebuds and provide immediate satisfaction. However, these foods are typically high in calories and low in essential nutrients, leading to weight gain, and a higher risk of physical and mental health conditions.

Now we have discovered that the food you choose to eat isn't just linked to your physical and mental health, but also to your cognitive function, brain structure and genetics.

A widespread preference for fast food is likely contributing to an increase in obesity worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2022 one in eight people worldwide were obese. This rate has doubled since 1990.

Obesity isn't just linked with an increased risk of diseases including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but also with a 30-70% higher risk of mental health disorders.

 

Benefits of a healthy, balanced diet

Our new collaborative study from Fudan University in China and the University of Cambridge in the UK, published in Nature Mental Health, used a large sample of 181,990 participants from the UK Biobank to examine how food choices are associated with cognitive function, mental health, metabolism, brain imaging and genetics.

We examined the consumption of vegetables, fruit, fish, meat, cheese, cereal, red wine, spirits and bread. We found that 57% of participants had food preferences for a healthy balanced diet. This included a balanced mix of all the foods we examined, with no excessive amounts in any category.  

We further showed that those with a healthy balanced diet had better brain health, cognitive function and mental health than others. We compared the balanced diet to three other diet groups – low-carb (18%), vegetarian (6%) and high protein/low fibre (19%).

We found that people who ate a more balanced diet had better fluid intelligence (the ability to solve new problems), processing speed, memory and executive functions (a set of mental skills that include flexible thinking and self-control) than the other diets. This also corresponded to better brain health – with higher grey matter volumes (the outermost layer of the brain) and better structured neurons (brain cells), which are key markers of brain health.

Perhaps surprisingly, the vegetarian diet did not fare as well as a balanced diet. One reason for this may be that many vegetarians don't get enough protein. Two healthy, balanced diets for the brain are the Mediterranean and Mind (Mediterranean intervention for neurodegenerative delay) diets.

These promote fish (especially those oily fish), dark leafy vegetables and fresh fruits, grains, nuts, seeds, as well as some meat, such as chicken. But these diets also limit red meat, fats and sugars.

In fact, research has shown that the Mediterranean diet can alter our brains and cognition. One study showed that people showed improved cognition after only 10 weeks on this diet.

Another study showed that following the Mediterranean diet was associated with lower levels of a harmful peptide known as beta-amyloid in the brain. Beta-amyloid, together with tau protein, are measures of the brain damage that occurs in Alzheimer's disease.

Previous studies have also shown that Japanese diets, including rice, fish and shellfish, miso, pickles and fruits, protect against brain shrinkage.

We also discovered that there were some genes that may be contributing to the association between dietary patterns and brain health, cognitive function and mental health. This may mean that our genes partly determine what we like to eat, which in turn determines our brain function.

However, our food choice priorities are also affected by a number of factors, including price, allergies, convenience and what our friends and family eat.

Some people opt for going on diets, which may lead to weight loss, but involve cutting out entire food groups that are important for the brain. While there's some evidence that ketogenic diets (low carb), for example, have beneficial affects on the immune system and mental health, it does seem that balanced diets, such as the Mediterranean diet, is best for overall brain health and cognition.

 

Ways forward

It is clear that adopting a healthy balanced diet and doing exercise can be good for our brains. But for many people, this is easier said than done, especially if their current food preferences are for very sweet or high fat foods.

However, food preferences aren't destiny. For example, if you reduce your sugar and fat intake slowly and maintain it at a very low level over a number of months, you will actually begin to prefer that type of food.

Establishing healthy food preferences and an active lifestyle early in childhood is vital. Other important techniques are to eat slowly, pay attention to what you eat and enjoy it, rather than finishing a sandwich on the go or while looking at your mobile screen.

It takes time for your brain to register that you are full. For example, it has been shown that consumers generally eat more when watching television, listening to music, or in the presence of others, because the distraction decreases our reliance on internal satiety signals.

Social support from friends has also been shown to encourage adherence to healthy eating habits, as has cognitive behavioural therapy. Distraction is another excellent technique – literally anything you like to do (that isn't eating) could help.

One interesting survey study found that how you set your priorities affects your food choices. If you are keen to remain healthy and to have a physically fit appearance, you will choose healthy foods.

We live in tough economic times. Socioeconomic status shouldn't limit dietary choices, though this seems to currently be the case. Clearly, governments have an important duty to prioritize affordable healthy eating options. This will help many of us choose a healthy diet for either health reasons, reduced food prices, or both.

Now that we know that the food we eat can actually affect our brains and how well we perform cognitively, having a healthy balanced diet is more important than ever.

Barbara Jacquelyn Sahakian, Professor of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Cambridge; Christelle Langley, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Cambridge; Jianfeng Feng, Professor of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence/ Computer Science, Fudan University, and Wei Cheng, Young Principal Investigator of Neuroscience, Fudan University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Moon standard time: White House instructs NASA to create lunar time zones

On Tuesday the Biden administration called on NASA to set an internationally useful standard for measuring time on the moon and other celestial bodies — where clocks behave differently than they do on Earth. As reported by Reuters, a memo from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) directed the agency to work with other federal government bodies to create a plan for what it called a Coordinated Lunar Time (LTC) by the end of 2026. LTC would be the space version of the Earth's time standard of UTC, or Coordinated Universal Time.

The White House orders come as the private-sector space race heats up. And U.S. officials told the outlet that without a way for the increasingly crowded field to synchronize their watches, space-farers risk safety issues — ranging from data-transfer security and communications timing, to actual planetary landing mapping. 

"The same clock that we have on Earth would move at a different rate on the moon," said Kevin Coggins, NASA's space communications and navigation chief, in an interview with Reuters. "Think of the atomic clocks at the U.S. Naval Observatory (in Washington). They're the heartbeat of the nation, synchronizing everything. You're going to want a heartbeat on the moon."

The physics of time measurement in space are odd, but predictable. U.S. officials said that, for a person on the moon, Earth-based clocks appear to lose about 58.7 microseconds per Earth-day, a gap that would widen with other variations — and that atomic clocks on the moon may be needed to set lunar time, just as Earth-based atomic clocks set our planet's tempo. UTC could impact how LTC standards are set, and its development will require international agreements with "existing standards bodies" as well as the 36 countries who have so far joined the Artemis Accords space pact. The next manned mission to the Moon was slated for November 2024, but it was recently delayed until 2025.