Sexual Harassment

Herman Cain’s “blame the liberal media” tactic fails, spectacularly

Mark Block embarrasses his candidate on national TV by alleging a conspiracy that immediately falls apart

  • more
    • All Share Services

Herman Cain's Herman Cain (Credit: AP/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Mark Block, Herman Cain’s chief of staff and a complete idiot, went on Hannity last night to finally put this “multiple credible accusations of sexual harassment” issue to bed, so to speak. He came prepared with a stunning revelation:

BLOCK: Karen Kraushaar had come out as one of the women. And we’ve come to find out her son works at Politico, the organization that originally put the story out.

HANNITY: Have you confirmed that? I’ve been hearing that all day, rumors about that. You’ve confirmed that.

BLOCK: We’ve confirmed it that he does indeed work at Politico, and that’s his mother, yes.

See? It’s all a liberal media conspiracy, because the son of one of the five women to have accused Herman Cain of inappropriate behavior works in some sort of capacity at the news organization that originally ran the story reporting that Cain had been accused of sexual harassment (a story that was proven completely true shortly following its publication, meaning that even if it had been a plot, it was still a plot based on complete factual accuracy).

The only problem, of course, is that Josh Kraushaar, the reporter Block is referring to, no longer works at Politico, and hasn’t since 2010. Oh, there is also one other problem: Kraushaar is not Karen Kraushaar’s son. They are not related at all.

Mark Block is so good at managing campaigns, right, Dave Weigel?

This would be funny if it happened once, but we’re talking about Mark Block, who said just six days ago that Rick Perry’s campaign leaked the story, and never backed that up. We’re talking about a guy so inept at managing a campaign that he has an independent counsel looking at whether he broke campaign finance law.

I’m afraid I have to disagree with Weigel here: This is funny no matter how many times it happens.

The Cain campaign finally acknowledged this morning that this fact that they “confirmed” was not a fact at all, but, you know, mistakes happen, right?

Cain spokesman J.D. Gordon acknowledged Block’s mistake in an email to CNN.

“Based upon information available at the time of Mr. Block’s Tuesday night interview on Fox News, the campaign was led to believe that Mr. Josh Kraushaar, currently with the National Journal and a former employee of Politico, was the son of Karen Kraushaar,” Gordon said. “Mr. Josh Kraushaar is in fact, not related to Ms. Karen Kraushaar.”

The “information available at the time” was the same information “available” right now.

The Weekly Standard weighs in: “This is a sub-bush league gaffe.”

Plenty of savvy conservatives are slightly alarmed by the fact that the rubes are taking Cain’s joke of a campaign a bit too seriously, and this certainly won’t help. If your attempt to shift blame to the liberal media fails this spectacularly among people for whom pushing the liberal media bias claim is second nature, you are in trouble.

If Cain is serious about his campaign — or even if he just wants to maybe win Iowa and then flame out and score a well-paid punditry gig — he should probably fire Mr. Block. (He should also stop serially harassing women but that’s another story.)

Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Sharon Bialek, meet the right-wing hit machine

Rush Limbaugh and Dick Morris begin sliming Herman Cain's accuser, but not every prominent conservative follows

  • more
    • All Share Services

Sharon Bialek, meet the right-wing hit machineSharon Bialek and the boyfriend defense (Credit: Brendan Mcdermid / Reuters)

One thing was clear from Sharon Bialek’s media tour of the past 24 hours: She knew what she was getting herself into.

Bialek, the public face of sexual harassment charges against GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain, told CNN’s Piers Morgan last night that: “There’s going to be a lot of backlash and I’m going to have to suffer through that and I’m sure I’m going to be portrayed as different things. I’m willing to handle it. I’m a tough girl.”

On NBC’s “Today,” she recalled her boyfriend telling her that if she said publicly that Cain made unwelcome advances, “It’s gonna be one of those he-said she-said things.” But Bialek insisted that the focus belonged on Cain, not her. “It’s not about me. I’m not the one running for president.” She repeated on every show that she wasn’t getting paid and neither was attorney Gloria Allred.

Biakek’s right, but she’s also smart enough to know that in this media climate, it’s going to be about her anyway — whether she’s a money-grubbing trollop, whether she asked for it. At her press conference, Bialek even described her outfit at the time of the incident, preempting the classic “What was she wearing?” question. It took only a few hours for the Chicago Tribune, her hometown paper, to dig up Bialek’s two bankruptcies, the most recent a decade old, among other not-atypical financial mishaps, and to helpfully inform us that her first date with her fiance lasted 72 hours. There was Rush Limbaugh, slurping over her name being pronounced just like “buy a lick,” and deeming her “a babe.” There was Dick Morris, slimily anticipating a Playboy spread.

And yet. Maybe it’s because Bialek is white, blond, a mother, a willing attendee at Tea Party rallies. Maybe the sheer number — five women at this writing, at least one other Republican — is getting hard to ignore. But this morning, there were signs that at least a few conservatives thought this was a bridge too far, past the previous boys-will-be-boys referendum on whether sexual harassment is even a “real thing.”

Concerned Women of America head Penny Nance announced that “Ms. Bialek appeared credible, and I was very disturbed by her characterization of what happened.”

As Bill Bennett wrote:

Four women are not an insignificant number. One or two anonymous charges, perhaps. Three anonymous charges (where, as I understand the story, Cain knows of at least two of the women) plus one woman who went very public and opened herself up to all manner of investigation, are a lot. It is no longer insignificant … I have watched long enough and held my tongue long enough to give him the benefit of the doubt, but can no longer say this is a witch hunt, “a lynching” to use his word, or any other euphemism.

(Did you know “lynching” is a more gentle way to say “that bitch is lying”?)

Those prominent conservatives reached their conclusions despite any long-standing animus for Gloria Allred (who, after all, was able to say she trumped partisanship by teaming up with Anthony Weiner’s favorite porn star). Allred’s benchmark for wronged women doesn’t just vary wildly from that of conservatives, it can irk feminists who see her as an ambulance chaser who dilutes the meaning of harassment. But this time, it might be different.

Continue Reading Close
Irin Carmon

Irin Carmon is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @irincarmon or email her at icarmon@salon.com.

Page 2 of 2 in Sexual Harassment