Spring Offer: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Rebeca Andrade’s unique “Grey’s Anatomy” strategy for preparing for her Olympics gymnastics routines

Brazilian gymnast Rebeca Andrade and top Team USA opponent at the Paris Olympics shared a unique anecdote about one of the ways she prepares herself for competition. Andrade bested U.S. standout Simone Biles in the women's floor event, earning a score of 14.166 and the top podium position after claiming the silver medal in the women's all-around.

When asked this week what she does to pump herself up, Andrade shared that she tends to focus on food and television. “I was thinking about the recipes that I will make when I get back to Brazil," she said, according to NPR. “There was one that was with potatoes and cheese, chicken. There’s cake. There’s cookies. A lot of things.”

When it came to what she did before her golden floor routine, Andrade that she had a certain medical drama series on her mind. “Today, I wasn’t thinking about recipes because I watched a lot of TV shows [episodes] yesterday,” Andrade after her win. “So I dreamed of the show I was watching. I was watching: 'Grey’s Anatomy.' So I dreamed that I was a doctor, that I was operating and so on.” 

Andrade had previously won a gold medal in the vault event at the Tokyo Games in 2021 after Biles withdrew from the competition after being plagued with a bout of the "twisties."

Tim Walz shops at Menards, making our Hallmark governor dreams a reality

Days before Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz was officially tapped to be Democratic nominee Kamala Harris’ running mate, the internet let us know what kind of man he is. A photo of him beaming while holding a piglet checked the state fair campaign stop box, the difference being that he looks genuinely ecstatic to be cuddling it.

In another video, he talks about replacing the headlight harness on a 2014 Ford Edge, which is not a sexy car, before urging his constituents to vote.

What sold Walz for me is a clip from Twin Cities PBS’ “The Wrap,” the St. Paul, Minn., public TV station’s weekly web series.

The full exchange lasts nearly four and a half minutes, but the 17 seconds that went viral show reporter David Gillette asking him, “What is the last thing that you did, truly out in the public, truly by yourself?”

“I went to Menards and bought an air filter for my furnace,” Walz responds.

One of the fastest ways to murder a meme is to try to explain it (R.I.P. Brat Summer; cause of death: that CNN panel). Memes are the materialization of vibes, the innate wisdom of a feeling, the idea that when you know, you know.

But some small details beg to be noticed. Walz took it upon himself to run an errand other governors might pawn off on a staffer. Choosing to do it himself shows competence, thriftiness and humility, which may be why this bit clicked so broadly.   

But Menards is a specifically Midwestern reference. Walz could have gotten that furnace filter at Home Depot or Lowe’s. Instead, he hit up a regional chain whose longtime jingle is a banjo riff set to the straightforward motto of, “Save big money at Menards.”

It smacks of a very down-to-Earth Midwestern TV dad choice, the energy Walz is bringing to the national stage.

Americans aren’t alone in gravitating toward fathers in troubling times, but our TV shows and movies sell daddy comfort like few other cultures can. Ask Pedro Pascal, who built a career peak out of playing father figures sheltering youngsters from the ravages of lawlessness. Or Tom Hanks, who weeks before the 2016 election gave us a pep talk as America’s Dad on “Saturday Night Live.” Then there’s Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, who was also on Harris’ shortlist for VP due to his stern but caring and empathetic leadership in the earliest days of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“In an incredibly difficult and destabilizing time, Andy Beshear is modeling a masculinity that stands in direct opposition to what pop culture, at least, has told us we'd be drawn to when the s**t goes down,” wrote Salon’s Chief Content Officer Erin Keane in 2020.

Soothing Hallmark movies commonly feature kindly small-town mayors, but if one were to show off a governor who also runs a Christmas tree lot, he’d probably look like Walz.

Four years later we find ourselves in another difficult and destabilizing time. But when the threat is a sex offender convicted on 34 felony counts publicizing his authoritarian intentions for the presidency, we don’t need a governing "daddy" as much as a solid Midwestern dad pushing us to do the right and responsible thing.

Politicians and Hollywood treat the Midwest as an abstraction more than a geographical description of 12 states. That view treats Middle America as a catchall for sensibility, moral uprightness and a mythical strain of virtue incorrectly believed to be absent from the supposedly libertine coasts or in large cities. They call it "real America," pitting those voters against out-of-touch blue state residents.

This forgets that some of the biggest cities that define what American culture is – Chicago, St. Louis, Cleveland, Minneapolis – are also in the Midwest. Many of those places are amply represented on primetime TV.

But so is the Midwestern father Walz epitomizes. 

“Almost no one knows who Tim Walz is,” read an early Washington Post headline on Tuesday, which is true; it's also OK. Thanks to TV and movies, and the ever-present emphasis on playing to Middle America, they know his type, and that's enough of a sell for voters who are dying to unclench a little. Soothing Hallmark movies commonly feature kindly small-town mayors, but if one were to show off a governor who also runs a Christmas tree lot, he’d probably look and behave like Walz.

Fargo” sells a hyper-realistic take on “Minnesota nice” that does not resembles Walz’s demeanor. But the character closest to what we imagine he represents could be Lou Solverson, the principled police chief and veteran who raised his daughter to be a tough and capable cop.

He's a bit like Mike Heck from "The Middle" mixed with a little of Dan Conner's DNA, and wasn’t Dan's affability a main reason “The Conners” could move forward without Roseanne Barr?

The Nebraska-born Walz also emanates the positivity of Ted Lasso, a Kansan, minus the stuffed-down crippling depression and the barrage of folksy similes. But he can also be tough in a way "That ‘70s Show" patriarch Red Forman would respect. "There’s a golden rule: Mind your own damn business,” he told attendees at Tuesday's Philadelphia rally, where the campaign formally introduced him.

Yet he can gently pull off a comedy duo act with his vegetarian daughter Hope in a way that is regionally specific and hilarious, for reasons other than their stage being the 2023 Minnesota State Fair.

"We’re going to go get some food. Corndog?” he asks Hope.

"I'm vegetarian," she deadpans.

"Turkey, then," he says.

"Turkey's meat," she reminds him.

"Not in Minnesota,” he finishes, “Turkey is special."

We need your help to stay independent

Walz’s background as a social studies teacher who coached the football team at his Mankato, Minn., high school reminds us of Coach Taylor from "Friday Night Lights” although, obviously, Texas isn’t part of the Midwest.

All this on top of being a guy who knows his way around auto parts and appliance repair aisles gives Walz an aura of familiarity JD Vance lacks, which is vital in an election that hangs on feelings and brand association more than policy.

We don’t need a governing "daddy" as much as a solid Midwestern dad pushing us to do the right and responsible thing.

Menards is a quintessential Midwestern fixture present in large cities and smaller towns, whereas Vance's Diet Mountain Dew name-drops are weak pandering to a demographic to which he has no true claim. Vance is also weird, a descriptor Walz popularized and Republicans haven’t figured out how to counter.

Referring to something or someone as weird is an acceptable if pointed way of calling out the abnormal and an entry point to showing a better alternative that is not weird.

After Walz’s pick became public, Donald Trump’s supporters tried to tack the hashtag #TamponTim onto him to cite his policy of ensuring all school bathrooms offered feminine hygiene products for free, which a thoughtful voter may see as common courtesy. After all, half of the population menstruates. Trying to present that as weird just made those MAGA attacks look even weirder and more out of touch.

Actions and reactions like this draw a bright spotlight between the two types of Midwest represented on each major party’s ticket. In Vance, Republicans have a potential vice president who projects a hostile affectation of purported Middle American family values.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In Walz, Democrats are countering with genuine Midwestern decency and everyday aptitude encompassed by a guy accustomed to keeping his house in order and vehicles in good repair.

Common thinking about vice presidential nominees indicates they don’t make much of a difference in terms of swaying voters’ choices. But in a race that’s so far been fueled by emotions more than a candidate’s qualifications, Walz's selection complements Harris by tapping into the best of both.  

In the full interview with Gillette, Walz answers other lighthearted questions similar to the classic MTV “boxers or briefs” question that Bill Clinton fielded back in the ‘90s – but the "Minnesota nice" edition, being public television and all.

Does he eat the last muffin in the office breakroom or cut it in half? Trick answer: He'd take the muffin top, leaving the bottom. How many pairs of shoes does he have? A sensible seven.

As for that Menards run, Gillette asks if Walz did it with total anonymity. “Yeah, the people there knew me but they had, like, been angry at me enough. They were tired of yelling at me,” he said, so his errand went smoothly.

Then he laughed like a man who accepts that neighbors can disagree on policy, but find common ground in appreciating the effort that goes into repairing what's broken instead of chasing convenient fixes. "Repair" and "fix" may be synonyms, but your trustworthy Midwestern TV dad understands the difference.

Eating quickly saves time, but it takes a toll on your health – here’s how

Our fast-paced modern lives often rob us of time for basic activities like eating. Many of us grab something quick for breakfast on the way out of the house, or wolf down our lunch so we can gain a sliver more time to be productive at work, or to dedicate to our personal lives.

Beyond more philosophical reflections on our culture of haste, it is worth weighing up the impacts of eating too fast on our health. Have you ever experienced excessive gas? Do you often suffer from difficult, heavy digestion or bloating? How long since you paid attention to how hungry or full you actually feel?

 

Excess gas

With regard to the first of these problems, there is a condition that involves swallowing excessive amounts of air during and between meals, known as aerophagia. It can cause anything from mild discomfort and a feeling of heaviness and bloating to abdominal pain and distension (a visible increase in abdominal size after eating).

The normal amount of gas in the digestive tract when our stomachs are empty is around 200 ml. If this amount increases significantly, the physiological mechanisms for its expulsion can become very uncomfortable. This amount of air depends on the balance between the intake, production and elimination of gas through belching, flatulence or its consumption by the intestinal microbiota.

Eating quickly is one of the main factors in increasing both air intake and gas production, although chewing gum, smoking and alterations in the gut microbiota may also contribute.

 

Not chewing enough

When eating in a hurry we have less time to chew, meaning food reaches the stomach almost whole. More stomach acids are therefore needed to digest it properly. As well as requiring a greater metabolic effort, this also causes the uncomfortable feeling of heaviness and indigestion that accompanies rushed meals.

Another effect of not chewing enough – thus not allowing oral enzymes to do their work – is the absorption of food in the small intestine. Despite the stomach's best efforts, unchewed food may reach the intestine without being sufficiently digested.

 

Not knowing when to stop

When it comes to sensations of hunger and fullness, the gut-brain axis comes into play – the brain is responsible for sending the signals that govern digestive processes, as well as making us eat or stop eating.

Two hormones regulate how full or hungry we feel – ghrelin triggers feelings of hunger, while leptin makes us feel full. Once we see, smell and start eating food, it takes 20-30 minutes for leptin to become active. This means that, when we eat too quickly, we ingest more than we actually need – leptin does not have enough time to kick in and tell us that we have had enough.

 

More serious consequences

Eating too quickly can have more severe repercussions for our health. Several studies show a relationship between the speed at which we eat and cardiovascular risk factors, elevated triglyceride levels and increased chances of developing metabolic syndrome (up to 59% higher), or becoming overweight or obese, especially among diabetics.

It is therefore definitely worth slowing down and taking a moment to enjoy a more leisurely breakfast, lunch or dinner. Chew slowly and pay attention to how full you feel. Invest a little time, and and it will pay dividends for your health.

Esther Martínez Miguel, Doctora en Ciencias de la Salud. Directora del Grado en Enfermería. Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida y de la Naturaleza, Universidad Nebrija and Silvia Gómez Senent, Médico de Aparato Digestivo. Directora del Máster en Microbiota Humana. Profesora en el Grado de Enfermería, Universidad Nebrija

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Kamala Harris is reclaiming what it means to be a “woman in the kitchen”

Videos of vice president Kamala Harris cooking and talking about food have popped up all over the internet ever since she replaced President Joe Biden as the presumptive Democratic nominee over two weeks ago.

“Under the skin with some butter, before you’re going to cook it, so that butter will just melt in there” she said in a 2019 video where she explains how to cook a turkey just 60 seconds before a live interview. 

“And then get a nice big bottle of cheap white wine to base the butt — Yes, hi!” she interrupts herself to go live on air.

The resurfaced video has gone viral in recent weeks. As she waits to go on air, Harris’ light up and she describes every step of the process with her hands, desperate to share her turkey recipe before the interview begins. It’s clear this is a woman who loves food.

Cooking has become a rather significant part of the Democratic nominee’s public persona. From teaching Sen. Mark Warner how to make a proper tuna sandwich in a pandemic-era Instagram live, to her “Cooking with Kamala” series on YouTube, the vice president’s culinary skills have taken the public by storm. Food and cooking have been a small but still significant part of her political campaign since she first ran for president in 2020. 

For decades, the kitchen has been closely associated with a particular type of femininity. Kitchen work has often been considered the undervalued physical labor of mothers, grandmothers, wives and girlfriends, a space where they fulfill their duties as domestic providers. 

But Harris is reclaiming what it means to be a “woman in the kitchen”, a stereotype long used by men to imply that a woman’s rightful place is in the home, not in the workplace. Harris has autonomy over the kitchen and cooks because she loves food, not because she is bound by a certain gender obligation. 

In every video of Harris cooking, her authentic love of food and flavor shine through, as do her kitchen skills. In a particularly popular cooking video from 2020, Harris impressed actress and comedian Mindy Kaling with her deft onion slicing. She bonded with the actress over South Indian dishes they ate in childhood and how their parents both keep their spices in Taster’s Choice coffee jars.

In another 2020 campaign video, Harris admires the history of a handwritten recipe passed down from generations before handily cracking an egg with one hand. She uses the casual setting of the kitchen to relay stories of family and connection through food, not to mention to show off her culinary prowess.

It may seem like a bold choice to use the image of a female politician in the kitchen as a political tool. In the White House, matters of cooking have historically been left to the first ladies of America. From Nancy Regan’s brownies to Barbara Bush’s famous chocolate chip cookies, many first ladies — Republicans in particular — have embraced cooking to fulfill the image of American womanhood.

We need your help to stay independent

Other female politicians have rejected the kitchen and its gender associations in the name of feminism.

“I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was to fulfill my profession,” Hilary Clinton controversially said in 1992. The comment sparked outrage among stay-at-home mothers across the country, who thought Clinton was implying they were less important for staying home.

It’s a narrative that’s been pushed onto women for decades: to be successful, one has to choose between being a “woman in the kitchen” or a “woman in office.”

But Harris is both. She is a woman who loves to cook and one of the country’s most powerful politicians, a duality that shows the world that women are not bound to a place of domesticity or success, they can move between both as they please.

To Harris, cooking is not a lowly pursuit reserved for domestic women, nor is it an obligation bound by gender. It is a creative outlet, an expression of joy and a form of self-care. She even reads cookbooks to unwind before she goes to bed, she told The Cut in 2018. 

“Everything else can be crazy, I can be on six planes in one week, and what makes me feel normal is making Sunday-night family dinner. If I’m cooking, I feel like I’m in control of my life,” Harris told The Cut.

Refreshingly, there is not a sprinkle of diet culture rhetoric when she discusses recipes either. She doesn’t suggest “healthy” alternatives or justify including oil, carbs or sugar. She cooks to eat.

“My mother said to me, ‘Honey, you like to eat good food. You better learn how to cook,’” Harris recalled in one “Cooking with Kamala” video.

Her love of food is authentic and that’s why it works. 

 

Racism and discrimination lead to faster aging through brain network changes, new study finds

Racism steals time from people’s lives – possibly because of the space it occupies in the mind. In a new study published in the journal JAMA Network Open, our team showed that the toll of racism on the brain was linked to advanced aging, observed on a cellular level.

Black women who were more frequently exposed to racism showed stronger connections in brain networks involved with rumination and vigilance. We found that this, in turn, was connected to accelerated biological aging.

We are neuroscientists who use a variety of approaches, including self-reported data and biological measurements like brain scans, to answer our questions about the effects of stressors on the brain and body. We also use this data to inform the development of interventions to help people cope with this stress.

Why it matters

Aging is a natural process. However, stress can speed up the biological clock, making people more vulnerable to aging-related diseases, from cardiovascular disease to diabetes and dementia.

Epidemiological studies consistently show that Black people experience these aging-related health problems at an earlier age than white people. New studies also show focal effects of aging on the brain, indicating disparities in brain aging between Black and white populations.

Race-related stressors, including racial discrimination, affect the rate at which people age on a biological level. These experiences activate the stress response system and have been linked to greater activity in brain regions that process incoming threats. However, until now, researchers in our field have not understood how brain changes linked to racism contribute to accelerated aging.

Racial discrimination is a ubiquitous stressor that often goes unnoticed. It might look like a doctor questioning a Black patient’s pain level and not prescribing pain medication, or a teacher calling a Black child a “thug.” It is a constant stressor faced by Black people starting at an early age.

Rumination – reliving and analyzing an event on a loop – and vigilance, meaning being watchful for future threats, are possible coping responses to these stressors. But rumination and vigilance take energy, and this increased energy expenditure has a biological cost.

In our study of Black women, we found that more frequent racial discrimination was linked to more connectivity between two key regions. One, called the locus coeruleus, is a deep brain region that activates the stress response, promoting arousal and vigilance. The other is the precuneus, a key node of a brain network that engages when we think about our experiences and internalize – or suppress – our emotions.

Graphic illustration of a brain with locus coeruleus highlighted in blude and precuneus region highlighted in green.

Locus coeruleus highlighted in blue; region of precuneus highlighted in green. Negar Fani

These brain changes, in turn, were linked to accelerated cellular aging measured by an epigenetic “clock.” Epigenetics refers to changes that happen to our DNA from the environment. Epigenetic clocks assess how the environment affects our aging at a molecular level.

Higher clock values indicate that someone’s biological age is greater than their chronological age. In other words, the space that racist experiences occupy in people’s minds has a cost, which can shorten the lifespan.

What still isn’t known

Although we saw links between racism, brain connectivity changes and accelerated aging, we did not measure coping responses like rumination and vigilance in real time, meaning as people were experiencing them.

We also do not know how other factors such as neighborhood disadvantage, gender and sexuality intersect to influence accelerated aging and related health disparities.

What’s next

Our next steps are to use real-time measurement of everyday racism along with physiological measurements and neuroimaging to take a deeper dive into these research questions.

We want to know how different types of racial discrimination and coping styles influence brain and body responses. Understanding these issues better can bring more attention to prevention, such as programs that target implicit bias in physicians and teachers. It can also inform interventions like neuromodulation, which involves the use of external or internal devices to stimulate or inhibit brain activity. Neuromodulation can be used as a therapy aid to reduce stress.

The Research Brief is a short take on interesting academic work.The Conversation

Negar Fani, Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Emory University and Nathaniel Harnett, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Experts say Elon Musk’s PAC could be in legal trouble for falsely claiming it registered voters

Election officials in two states have launched investigations into tech billionaire Elon Musk's pro-Trump political action committee after CNBC first reported it falsely claims to register eligible swing-state voters on its website. An election law expert told Salon that officials in other states could soon follow. 

The North Carolina Board of Elections on Monday told CNBC that it has opened a probe into the Musk-backed America PAC after it received a complaint over the group's collection of personal user data under the guise of registering them to vote — while failing to do so.  

“North Carolina law makes it a crime for someone to fail to submit a voter’s registration form if that person has told a voter that they would be submitting the voter’s registration form,” board’s spokesman Patrick Gannon, told the outlet.

The new inquiry follows the announcement on Sunday of a similar investigation into the PAC's tactic being carried out by the Michigan secretary of state's office.

Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, a Stetson University law professor whose specializations include election and campaign finance law, told Salon that state officials are "well within their rights to enforce rules against any person or entity which is trying to interfere" in their elections or mislead residents into thinking "they have been registered to vote if the opposite is true."

Misleading people about their voter registration status can create a problem where hundreds or even thousands of people who believe they are registered to vote show up to the polls on election day and get turned away, she said. 

"Done on a large scale, misleading potential voters in swing states about their status as registered voters could cause chaos for individual voters, poll workers, and ultimately the state who will have to deal with this," Torres-Spelliscy said, also noting the "privacy concerns for the people who get entangled in this trap."

"If a person is trying to register to vote," she added, "they want their information to go to the board of elections not to some billionaire’s political action committee."

According to CNBC, the PAC asked website visitors who entered zip codes in battleground states to enter personal data — including dates of birth, full addresses and phone numbers — claiming it would help them register to vote through the site. Users in non-competitive states, however, were directed to their states' official voter registration pages. 

Michigan, North Carolina, Arizona, Wisconsin and Georgia were among the battleground states where visitors to America PAC's website did not receive help submitting their voter registration despite the site claiming it would provide assistance, CNBC noted. 

As of Wednesday morning, the America PAC website had scrubbed its homepage and removed the voter registration button, only leaving avenues for users and media to contact the PAC. Its voter registration page, which had been accessible through a web search following the button's removal, also now returns a "404 page not found" error.

America PAC did not immediately respond when asked why it had removed the pages from its website.

When accessing the voter registration page via web search on Tuesday afternoon, a pop-up read: "It was brought to our attention on August 2 that some people may have been unable to complete the registration process on this website on August 1 and 2. If you had any difficulty, please try to complete the registration process again or email info@theamericapac.org for assistance."

Salon previously confirmed that entering zip codes in Democrat- or Republican-stronghold states, like New York and Ohio, respectively, redirected users to their official state websites for voter registration. If a zip code for a swing-state like Michigan and North Carolina was entered, the site instead prompted the user to enter, submit and confirm personal information but did not provide links to the states' official voter registration sites.

A spokeswoman for the North Carolina attorney general on Monday told CNBC that "our office is aware of this issue and is looking into it," adding that it has "not opened a formal investigation."

A spokeswoman for Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson told the outlet Sunday that her office is investigating the PAC to determine whether it has broken state law. 

North Carolina General Statute Chapter 163-82.6 declares it a Class 2 misdemeanor for any person to "communicate to the applicant acceptance of the delegation" to submit their voter registration form "and then fail to make a good faith effort to deliver the form so that it is received by the county board of elections in time to satisfy the registration deadline" for the next election. 

Michigan legal experts, however, were unsure if the PAC's deceptive practice violated any laws in their state. Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, told CNBC that she was "not aware of any laws being broken."

Still, according to Mary Massaron, a partner of Michigan law firm Plunket Cooney and leader of it's Election Law Practice Group, the America PAC claiming to assist eligible voters in registering to vote and failing to do so is "concerning." 

"If any candidate or PAC’s website suggests it will help citizens get registered to vote, elicits personal information, and then fails to provide the information about how to register to vote, it is concerning," she told Salon. "Steps to make registration and voting easy for every citizen are important. And steps that serve to frustrate someone trying to figure out how to participate are a disservice to democracy and our democratic elections."

Whether America PAC's tactic could amount to a violation of federal law is also a complex question. According to Torres-Spelliscy, federal campaign finance law only regulates how federal PACs, like America PAC, are funded but does not regulate the substantive content of political messages they may produce "with the exception of disclaimer requirements for broadcast ads." Whatever "criminality" a PAC produces, however, may still be "prosecuted under other laws like federal wire fraud laws," she explained. 

"If a PAC is pretending to do one thing and is defrauding the public," that could qualify as a violation, she said, noting that the Department of Justice has prosecuted "scam PACs" using those laws. 

Torres-Spelliscy argued that America PAC's voter registration tactic could also be found to have broken election laws in multiple states at the same time, as seen after former President Donald Trump and his allies' attempted to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

Lawyers aligned with Trump, in trying to acquire fake electors in multiple states who could falsely certify him as the state's victor, were accused of violating those states' election laws, she explained. Rudy Giuliani, Trump's former personal attorney, has been indicted over the scheme in Georgia and Arizona, while Trump campaign attorney Kenneth Chesebro was indicted in Georgia, where he has since pleaded guilty, and Wisconsin.

A "similar" scenario could play out here, she said.

"If this PAC has been tricking citizens in multiple states with the false promise of registering them to vote, the PAC may be faced with investigations in more than just Michigan," Torres-Spelliscy said. 

“Surrender to the smell”: Auntie Anne’s releases a pretzel and butter-scented fragrance

If you too have an affinity for warm, buttery soft pretzels and mall food courts (or perhaps even airports), or are a fragrance connoisseur, then do we have good news for you.

Announced on both X/Twitter and Instagram, Auntie Anne's Pretzels has debuted its new fragrance, "Knead: Eau De Pretzel." The caption on both social media platforms reads: "Infused with notes of buttery dough, salt and a hint of sweetness, Knead transforms the iconic aroma you love into a wearable scent. One spritz is all it takes to envelop you in the nostalgic embrace of freshly baked pretzels. Surrender to the smell."

The tongue-in-cheek, amorous advertisement, which has the energy of a typically seductive, enigmatic fragrance commercial mixed with a 90s late-night-tv-infomercial, says it's "surprisingly captivating, mysteriously alluring, the enchanting aroma of hot and handmade pretzels dripping with butter, it tantalizes every sense  and then some." 

Julie Younglove-Webb, chief brand officer, told Food & Wine that "there are few scents more recognizable than the aroma of Auntie Anne’s.

"Smell is a special and powerful sense," Younglove-Webb said. "Over the years, fans have shared their memories and experiences that began with just a whiff of our pretzels. We’ve bottled that moment and can’t wait for fans to enjoy it in a whole new way.” 

According to Danielle Harling at Delish, Auntie Anne's will be opening New York's first Pretzel Parfumerie on August 13 at 433 Broadway in Soho, New York. There, customers will be able to purchase. There, you'll be able to purchase 1-ounce ($25) and 3.4-ounce ($45) bottles of Knead. Knead will also go on sale on Auntie Anne's website beginning August 14.

 

Arizona Republican is first to plead guilty in 2020 “fake electors” case

A Republican activist in Arizona has pleaded guilty for posing as a presidential elector as part of Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election in Arizona. 

Lorraine Pellegrino, former president of the group Ahwatukee Republican Women, is one of 11 Republicans who falsely posed as one of Trump’s electors and is the first to be convicted in the state’s fake elector case.

She accepted a guilty plea on one charge of filing a fraudulent "Electoral College certificate" and was sentenced to "unsupervised probation." Before the plea, she faced nine felony charges for attempting to corrupt Arizona’s election results.

In 2020, President Joe Biden won the state of Arizona by 10,457 votes. The incredibly close race prompted Trump and his associates to subvert the election results by creating fraudulent Electoral College certificates to falsely claim Trump had won the election in Arizona and other battleground states.

Pellegrino and 10 others met on Dec. 14, 2020 to sign the false certification, a video of which was posted to social media by the state Republican Party. Seventeen other people were charged in the case alongside Pellegrino. 

“Loraine Pellegrino’s decision to accept a plea to a lesser charge reflects her desire to move forward and put this matter behind her,” Joshua Kolsrud, Pellegrino’s attorney, said in a statement.

Trump himself was not charged in the case, but he was identified by the Arizona grand jury as an “unindicted conspirator,” ABC News reported.

Criminal charges related to the fake electors scheme have also been filed in Michigan, Nevada, Georgia and Wisconsin.

“Hot Ones”: Vince Vaughn delves into why Hollywood no longer pursues his brand of R-rated comedies

Vince Vaughn thinks Hollywood studio executives “overthink it” when it comes to making the kind of R-rated comedies the actor is famously known for. 

The “Curb Your Enthusiasm” star — who made a name for himself in the late ’90s and early 2000s with several R-rated titles like “Wedding Crashers,” “Old School” and “Swingers” — shared his hot take on this week’s episode of “Hot Ones.”

“They just overthink it,” Vaughn said of execs while feasting on spicy chicken wings alongside host Sean Evans. “And it’s like, it’s crazy, you get these rules, like, if you did geometry, and you said 87 degrees was a right angle, then all your answers are messed up, instead of 90 degrees. So there became some idea or concept, like, they would say something like, ‘You have to have an IP.’”

Vaughn used the board game Battleship as an example of a nonsensical IP (which stands for intellectual property) that “became a vehicle for storytelling.” He noted that the IP during his early era in Hollywood was more meaningful and relatable — they conveyed “life situations,” as Vaughn described. He pointed to John Hughes’ 1984 rom-com “Sixteen Candles,” in which the IP was simply a girl turning 16. 

“The people in charge don’t want to get fired more so than they’re looking to do something great, so they want to kind of follow a set of rules that somehow get set in stone, that don’t really translate,” Vaughn said. “But as long as they follow them, they’re not going to lose their job because they can say, ‘Well, look, I made a movie off the board game Payday so even though the movie didn’t work, you can’t let me go, right?’”

Although Hollywood doesn’t seem to have an appetite for R-rated movies made in the early aughts, the industry should consider bringing them back for the sake of their audience, Vaughn claimed.  


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


“People want to laugh, people want to look at stuff that feels a little bit like it’s, you know, dangerous or pushing the envelope,” he said. “I think you’re going to see more of it in the film space sooner than later, would be my guess.”

The actor conversed with Evans in anticipation of his upcoming Apple TV+ drama series “Bad Monkey.” Vaughn plays Andrew Yancy, a former Miami Police Department detective turned health inspector, who takes on a rather bizarre case involving a severed human arm.

Watch the full episode below, via YouTube:

 

Voters like Tim Walz a lot more than JD Vance, new poll suggests

On Tuesday, Democratic nominee Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate. 

Voters have reacted positively to the veteran and former school teacher’s selection, according to a new YouGov poll conducted on Tuesday. According to the survey, 35% of voters said Walz was a good pick to be Harris’ running mate. Among registered Democratic voters, the number jumps to 61%.

More voters also view Walz favorably than unfavorably, according to YouGov. Overall, 35% of registered voters expressed a favorable opinion of Harris' running mate, compared to 20% who have at least a somewhat unfavorable opinion of the Minnesota governor.

Walz was one of three candidates short-listed to be Harris' running mate, along with Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly. Before being selected, Walz was seen less favorably, with just 32% of voters saying they approved of him as a VP candidate, compared to Kelly’s 57% and Shapiro’s 46%. But Walz’s low approval number was likely due to most Americans not knowing who he was.

According to a poll conducted in late July, almost 75% of registered voters didn’t know who Walz was. After he was announced as Harris’ running mate, that number dropped to less than half. His overall favorability jumped 14% after the announcement, with 62% of Democratic voters now having a positive view of Walz, while just 5% have a negative view. 

Even some on the right have a favorable view of Walz, including 16% of those who identify as "very conservative," according to YouGov, although 48% of that cohort also say they have a negative opinion of him.

It’s not uncommon for a candidate’s favorability rating to jump immediately after joining the presidential ticket. After GOP nominee Donald Trump selected JD Vance as his running mate, Vance’s net-favorability rating increased by 10%.

In the three weeks since he was selected, however, Vance’s ratings have plummeted. Slammed for his extreme views and at times awkward stage demeanor, voters, including members of the Republican Party, have heavily criticized Trump’s VP pick. 

After the Republican National Convention (RNC), Vance had an approval rating of negative 6%, making him the least liked vice presidential candidate since 1980.

In many ways the two VP candidates are opposites: Vance is a Yale law school graduate and Walz is a former high school football coach who attended state schools. Walz is a fierce advocate of reproductive rights, while Vance has previously said there shouldn’t be abortion exceptions for cases of rape or incest. 

Vance said he will not commit to debating Walz until he is confirmed as the vice presidential candidate at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago later this month, The Washington Post reported.

Walz has said he's ready.

“I can't wait to debate the guy. That is, if he's willing to get off the couch and show up," Walz said at his first campaign event with Harris in Philadelphia on Tuesday night.

Cori Bush loses her primary, becoming the second “Squad” member to fall this cycle

Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., was defeated on Tuesday by St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell in what ended up being the second most expensive primary election in history.

In the weeks before Tuesday's vote, United Democracy Project, the campaign arm of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), spent $8 million on Bell's behalf. The race for Missouri's 1st District was overshadowed in spending only by the primary election in New York's 16th District in June, where AIPAC helped defeat Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., who like Bush is a progressive member of the "Squad" and a critic of Israel.

AIPAC, which targets candidates they deem too critical of Israel and its war in Gaza, sought to make examples of Bush and Bowman this cycle, testing the theory that knocking off two especially vulnerable incumbents saddled with missteps would send the right message. News outlets called the race for Bell, who leads Bush 51.2 to 45.6 percent as of Wednesday morning, hours after polls closed.

“I am deeply honored and humbled by the trust the people of this district have placed in me,” Bell said in a statement. “This victory belongs to every volunteer, every supporter, and every voter who believes in our vision for a better future.”

Bell, the elected lead prosecutor in St. Louis County, initially sought the Democratic nomination to confront first-term Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., but later changed his mind and ran against Bush instead. Though he was backed by AIPAC money and some donors who also contributed to Republicans, Bell campaigned as a progressive who would be a more effective legislator than Bush. Attacks on Bush over her vote against the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law and missed votes for other legislation dominated the airwaves, but the progressive lawmaker narrowed the final vote margin with an effective grassroots organizing campaign that previously helped her beat incumbent Rep. Lacy Clay in the 2020 primary.

Bush, who raised $2 million to withstand the heavy spending against her, also counted on the support of St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones and House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., while Bell got the endorsement of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. AIPAC and its allies bombarded the St. Louis metro area with digital and mail ads supporting Bell and attacking Bush, but true to its playbook hardly mentioned Israel or Palestine.

But the candidates themselves did spar over the issue. In October 2023, Bush called Israel's invasion of Gaza an "ethnic cleansing campaign" and wrote on social media that “collective punishment against Palestinians for Hamas’s actions is a war crime.” She declined to call Hamas a terrorist organization at the time, a position she reiterated in the days ahead of the primary election.

"We were called terrorists during Ferguson," she said of herself and other activists who protested the 2014 police killing of Michael Brown, a Black teenager. "Have they hurt people? Absolutely. Has the Israeli military hurt people? Absolutely."

Bell called those comments "wrong and offensive." Bush responded by criticizing Bell's reliance on outside money, a trait shared by pro-Israel challengers this election cycle; she did so again Tuesday evening in a speech to her supporters.

“Whether I’m congresswoman or not, I’m still taking care of my people,” she said. “Because your side is so weak, you had to spend $19 million.”

We need your help to stay independent

Bush also came under scrutiny for what some residents of her district called unresponsive constituent services, an accusation that also hurt Bowman in his election. She was also criticized for using campaign funds to hire a private security detail that included her own husband, fueling allegations of corruption. Even after the Department of Justice launched an investigation, Bush continued to keep him on her payroll.

Both candidates emerged as public figures from the police killing of Brown and subsequent unrest. Bush took a leading role in the Black Lives Matter protests, becoming a fierce critic of police conduct towards Black Americans. Bell, a private lawyer at the time, began holding meetings about community policing before running against and defeating Prosecuting Attorney Bob McCulloch, who failed to indict Darren Wilson, the officer who shot Brown and claimed self-defense. Bell reopened the examination but ultimately decided there wasn't enough evidence to charge him. Brown's father later starred in a Bush ad accusing Bell of "[using] my family for power."

"And now he's trying to sell out St. Louis," he continued.

The race also featured some positive campaigning. Bush touted her role in bringing $2 billion to the 1st District and said that her protest on the steps of the Capitol in 2021 helped extend the federal eviction moratorium for thousands of her constituents. Bell focused on his record as a prosecutor, which included setting up programs to divert people with mental health and substance abuse problems towards treatment instead of jail and expanding efforts to examine potential cases of wrongful conviction.

The Bush-Bell race is likely to be the last test for AIPAC this cycle. They declined to campaign against other Squad members such as Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., Summer Lee, D-Pa., and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, N.Y., who all cruised to re-election.

“Whirlwind”: The fastest two weeks in American political history

“I launched my campaign for the President of the United States a mere two weeks ago,” Vice President Kamala Harris noted at the start of her campaign rally speech in Philadelphia Tuesday night. “It’s been a bit of a whirlwind.” 

Take a minute to think where we were just a few weeks ago. Joe Biden had been trounced by Donald Trump in their debate in late June, seeming unfocused, hesitant, and sometimes unable to complete sentences. A little more than a week later, the New York Times/Siena poll showed Trump with a six-point lead over Biden. A poll by the Wall Street Journal at the same time produced the same result. Biden had fared poorly in polls by both newspapers earlier in the campaign cycle. This time, the Journal poll found that 80 percent of its respondents thought Biden was too old for a second term as president.

What transpired next was three weeks of hell for Democrats. Biden loyalists insisted that he could beat Trump in November. If we heard “it’s only one debate” once, we heard it a hundred times over those three weeks. But what little gas there had been in the Biden campaign tank was nearing empty with each lackluster clean-up interview. Trump, ascendant, was ebullient. He could taste the first Diet Coke he would tell an orderly to get for him as he settled once again into his chair behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office, a gift from Queen Victoria to President Rutherford B. Hayes in 1880. On the eve of the inauguration Trump would begin signing multiple executive orders his campaign bragged had already been written, overturning every significant act Biden took while in office and adding on more that would reflect. “Dictator on day one” Trump proclaimed his intention. 

Despair settled over the Democratic Party and Biden campaign as Trump — miraculously buoyed by surviving an assassination attempt — got ready for his coronation at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. Biden made a few desultory campaign speeches here and there. His crowds were strong, and Democrats appeared to be behind him. But it was obvious that something was deeply wrong with the Biden campaign and Democrats in general. There was no energy behind Biden, while every time Trump appeared at a rally, he was triumphant and seemingly on his way to victory in November.

And then, over a single weekend late last month, everything changed. 

Joe Biden announced on social media on Sunday, July 21st — days after the end of the Republican National Convention and little more than one week after Donald Trump was injured by a gunman in Butler, Pennsylvania — that he was suspending his campaign. Twenty minutes later, he endorsed Vice President Harris, who had been told of his decision early that morning. Harris immediately assembled her innermost staff at her residence at the Naval Observatory in Washington D.C. and began the process of calling Democratic Party leaders and major donors. She would make more than 100 calls that Sunday. That evening, more than 44,000 Black women organized a Zoom call in support of Harris, kicking off days of record-breaking digital fundraising. By the next morning, the heads of every state Democratic Party had announced their support. That afternoon, Harris appeared before campaign staffers in Delaware and gave a rousing speech promising to continue Biden’s legacy and “finish what Joe started.”  Within the short space of 32 hours, Harris had enough commitments from Democratic delegates to cinch in the nomination.

The next day, appearing as the party’s presumptive nominee, she was in Milwaukee, the same city that had just hosted Trump’s convention, at a fired-up rally with a rapturous, adoring crowd that cheered nearly every line of her forceful, energetic speech. The words “energy” and “enthusiasm” began appearing in stories about Democrats in the press.  Insta-polls started showing Harris pulling abreast of Trump, and just nine days after Biden dropped out of the race, a poll by Bloomberg/Morning Consult said Harris had “wiped out Donald Trump’s lead across seven battleground states, as the vice president rides a wave of enthusiasm among young, Black and Hispanic voters.”

Democrats had a new candidate and a new race. Donald Trump reacted the way he always does to bad news – with confusion, anger, and appeals to racism, misogyny and xenophobia. 

We need your help to stay independent

At a rally on Saturday in Atlanta, Trump reverted completely to type, praising Vladimir Putin for the “good deal” he had gotten from the Biden administration in prisoner negotiations. Only two months before, Trump had been telling crowds that he was the only person who could get the prisoners back, which he promised he would bring about even before he was inaugurated. Trump hit all his recent “high points” at the Atlanta rally, taunting the press over “the great” Hannibal Lecter, a fictional bad guy to whom Trump seemed to compare himself before his MAGA crowds, who ate it up.

On Monday, more bad news lay in store for the panicked Trump campaign.  A new poll conducted by Gary Segura, who specializes in the Latino vote, found Harris ahead of Trump by 55 percent to 37 percent among Latinos in the battleground states of Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, Georgia, Wisconsin, and North Carolina. The poll was conducted July 23-26, just after Harris took the reins as the apparent Democratic Party nominee. 

Also on Monday, Axios reported a new push by the Harris campaign that would broaden the field of states that are usually contested by Democrats in presidential races.  Axios stated that the Harris campaign was prepared to spend “piles of cash” and put into the field “an army of enthused volunteers” that “could put Georgia, Arizona, and North Carolina back in play, forcing Trump to spend in states he considered safe.”

By late Monday, Harris was declared the Democratic Party nominee, an official poll of the convention delegates having produced the virtual votes of 99 percent of them.

On Tuesday morning, Harris picked her running mate, Tim Walz, the progressive Governor of Minnesota, and announced that the two would leave after a Tuesday rally in Philadelphia on a five-day, seven-state barnstorming tour of the battleground states. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


What a difference two weeks makes, huh? 

All those polls are just polls, of course, and elections are decided by voters, not pollsters. But there is the scent of victory in the air among Democrats for the first time in this presidential campaign. Republican nominee for vice president, JD Vance, plans to follow Harris and her running mate on the first three days of their campaign swing. That sounds like as good a metaphor as any for the state of the Trump campaign with the Democratic Party National Convention just two weeks away. Trump and Vance are following Harris in the polls, and now they will be following the Democrats’ momentum as the campaign heads for Labor Day, the traditional start of the fall campaign.

Think about it: two weeks later and the momentum in the race is running in pants suits, heels and, as former high school coach Tim Walz noted on Tuesday, “a sense of joy.”

JD Vance blurbed a book by a conspiracy theorist that argues people on the left aren’t even human

In his latest “weird” endorsement, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, blurbed a book that claims people on the left are subhuman and engaged in am “Irregular Communist Revolution” against the United States.

“Unhumans: The Secret History of Communist Revolutions (and How to Crush Them),” co-written by right-wing conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec and professional ghostwriter Joshua Lisec, is an attack on the left posing as a history of revolutionary “abuses.”

The book argues that throughout history there has always been a group of people on the left who “hate and kill.” A better name for those people? “Unhumans.”

“They don’t believe what they say. They don’t care about winning debates. They don’t even want equality. They just want an excuse to destroy everything. They want an excuse to destroy you,” Posobiec and Lisec wrote in the book, according to reporting from Mother Jones. 

In Vance’s blurb, which is included on the website of right-wing publisher Skyhorse Publishing, the Ohio senator warns of “communists” in everyday settings, like the workplace and college campuses, and praises Posobiec for his insight. 

“In the past, communists marched in the streets waving red flags. Today, they march through HR, college campuses, and courtrooms to wage lawfare against good, honest people,” wrote Vance. “In Unhumans, Jack Posobiec and Joshua Lisec reveal their plans and show us what to do to fight back.”

The book was also endorsed by right-wing political commentator Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr.

Posobiec has a history of promoting baseless conspiracy theories, such as "PizzaGate," falsely claiming that Russia's hack of the Democratic National Committee in 2016 unearthed evidence that elite Democrats run a pedophile ring. He is also known for pushing ideas rooted in right-wing tyranny, arguing the public would be better served by an authoritarian form of government.

“Welcome to the end of democracy,” Posobiec said in a viral speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference earlier this year. "We didn’t get all the way there on Jan. 6, but we will endeavor to get rid of it.”

Throughout the book, Posobiec and Lisec argue that democracy “has never worked to protect innocents from the unhumans." They praise dictators such as Francisco Franco, who overthrew the Spanish Republic in the 1930s, and Augusto Pinochet, who led a coup in Chile in 1973 and "disappeared" thousands of his opponents, The New York Times reported.

January 6 was a beta test for 2025

January 6, 2021, that day of presidential infamy, was also an experiment for Donald Trump and those who wanted to overturn a legitimate election through a quiet coup; when it failed, violence was the fallback. Call it a beta test for what may be in store if Trump loses in 2024. But to be forewarned is to be forearmed. We are better prepared now, in part through a salutary reform of the Electoral Count Act. 

The bipartisan legislation, signed into law by President Joe Biden, limits many underhanded means Trump’s allies would otherwise employ in case of another electoral loss, including sending in bogus alternative slates of electors. 

Still, challenges remain. In fact, since at least last October, Trump has been preparing America for his post-election campaign to overturn the election if he loses. He said then, "You don't have to vote, don't worry about voting. The voting, we got plenty of votes." He said it again to a group of Christian conservatives on July 25. “We don’t need your votes. We have enough votes.” 

With such proclamations, Donald Trump is doing two things. 

First, he’s telling his MAGA troops to aggressively monitor voting. That instruction is not coming out of the blue. MAGA lawyer and strategist, Cleta Mitchell, who, according to the New York Times, “plotted” with him “to overturn the 2020 Trump loss,” has been running a well-funded effort “recruiting election conspiracists into an organized cavalry of activists monitoring elections” using “aggressive methods.” She told 150 MAGA activists-in-training that this was all about “taking the lessons we learned in 2020.”

Ordinary citizens, it is crucial to note, can neutralize intimidation at polling places with our own monitors, as we have in previous cycles.

Trump’s second tactic is about his planning to overturn his election loss if it occurs. He’s softening the ground to repeat his 2020 Big Lie: “I WON THIS ELECTION, BY A LOT.” He paved the way for that claim before election day 2020 by regularly claiming in advance, “The only way we're going to lose this election is if the election is rigged." 

Trump has already signaled, consistent with his 2016 and 2020 pre-election statements, that he will not accept election results if he loses. In a May 1, 2024 Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel interview, Trump said that only if “everything’s honest” would he “accept the results. If it’s not, you have to fight.”

On July 29, Rolling Stone Magazine identified – and seemingly exaggerated — possible trouble ahead: the number of election deniers who now occupy local election offices in swing states, including Nevada, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and North Carolina. Importantly, the astute analyst Robert Hubbell pinpointed the limited scope of the threat reported on by Rolling Stone. “[T]he officials identified by their survey are in ‘16 counties across the six key battleground states.’” Of course, it could well be more. The plan is to refuse to certify results in enough counties that their states cannot formally certify the electoral votes.

Before discussing the remedies, let’s acknowledge that this did not happen by accident. Mere months after January 6, Steve Bannon broadcast on his “War Room” podcast his MAGA world call to take over local election offices “village by village.” 

Here’s the good news. Most of the key swing states have as their top election officials people who will protect free and fair elections. They include Democratic Secretaries of States in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and Wisconsin, as well as Republicans Al Schmidt in Pennsylvania and Brad Raffensperger in Georgia. Most of them won in the midterms, demonstrating once again the importance of protecting our votes.

We need your help to stay independent

Of course, we’ll need not only honest statewide election officials but also courts upholding the integrity of the results. There’s good news on that front, as well. 

State attorneys general are the first responders who decide whether or not to bring legal actions to compel election officials to perform their duty to certify elections. That happened in 2022 in New Mexico when the all-GOP Otero County election officials declined to certify the midterms. Democratic Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver sued and obtained a state supreme court order forcing the county to certify. That is a template for combating future efforts to refuse certification.

Like Oliver, the attorneys general in battleground states Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Wisconsin are Democrats. Kris Mayes, Arizona’s AG, won her election by 280 votes. Every ballot matters.

Recall that after Trump’s 2020 defeat, he scrambled desperately to get battleground state legislatures to reverse their states’ election certifications of President Joe Biden’s victory in their states. But it was too little too late.

Though there are strong firewalls in these swing states, we should not overlook trouble spots. After the 2020 election, when Raffensperger stood up to Trump, the Georgia Republican legislature removed him from the Georgia Election Board, which has election rulemaking power. Its membership is now full MAGA. Trump praised it this weekend – and it is trying to change the rules to benefit Trump. The Board does not certify elections, however; and good government watchdogs, like American Oversight, are doing their best to keep it honest. 

There is another state that could prove more troublesome — Virginia. If the election is close and Trump loses in Virginia, he can go to the Commonwealth’s State Elections Board and try getting them to abandon their duty to certify any win by Vice President Kamala Harris. The Board’s chair and majority are Republicans appointed by Governor Glenn Youngkin. 

Youngkin, despite his genial manner and fleece vests, has proven to be a full-on Trump loyalist. With a green light from him, the Elections Board could try to knock Virginia out of Kamala Harris’s electoral count total. 

Significantly, short of a massive national victory, every likely route for Vice President Harris to electoral college victory, including winning the “Blue Wall” states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania – depends on holding Virginia’s 13 electoral votes. Without Virginia, in a close election, Vice President Harris could lose an electoral college majority. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


If neither candidate gains such a majority, under the 12th Amendment, the election gets thrown into the House, where each state delegation gets a single vote. House Republicans currently have majorities in enough states to prevail. Even if Republicans lose their narrow majority in November, in a contingent election the odds favor them continuing to hold majorities in enough House state delegations to make Trump president.

Virginia’s voters, like citizens in any vulnerable swing state, can do things to help prepare for “the Day After,” blocking Trump from successfully targeting those states for his anticipated made-out-of-whole-cloth, “Stop-the-Steal” campaign. In addition to using social media and news outlets, citizens can make news outlets and state legislators aware of the potential January 6, 2025 “quiet coup” to deprive Vice President Harris of a win in their states and the country. 

Importantly, journalists can press all of the relevant officials to pledge that they will do their duty to respect and certify the results of the election in their states. And should that not work in Virginia, post-election, although the state’s attorney general is a Republican, if he does not sue the Election Board for an order to compel them to do their duty, the Harris campaign can.

Most obviously, to avoid that need, Virginians can help ensure a massive turnout, and a clear election defeat for Trump. That will give pause to any state executives before they accede to democracy-defying pressure from the former president. And all the more so if battleground states send the man who would be king, and the party that has enabled him, to his final election defeat.

“Bringing back the joy”: Kamala Harris’ rally blows away JD Vance’s weird appearance across town

"He's so weird! He's so weird!" the crowd chanted in a sing-song, taunting voice that echoed across Temple University's packed basketball stadium Tuesday evening. Gov. Josh Shapiro, D-Penn., was the first person to mention Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, to the crowd that had packed the overflowing Philadelphia rally for Vice President Kamala Harris, as she introduced her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn. The spontaneous chant cracked Shapiro up, causing him to pause momentarily before laying back into the authoritarian threat posed by Donald Trump's "weird" and beardy running mate. 

The chanters didn't know the half of it. Hours earlier, I had been at a South Philly venue where Vance spoke briefly to about 200 supporters and a group of bored journalists. Vance's event was small, mean, and yes, weird, featuring the unjustified sarcasm of the candidate and a desperate feeling reminiscent of the mood at a strip mall shot bar at 2 AM on "ladies' night." 

Meanwhile, the Harris/Walz rally felt like a rousing speech by Coach Eric Taylor of "Friday Night Lights" combined with the front row at Coachella. The cheers were so loud that I regretted not bringing my earplugs. The mood was jubilant, even though folks had to wait hours in the heat and humidity to even get into the place. The campaign claimed over 12,000 people showed up, which is not an exaggeration. Even as Harris and Walz gave the final speeches of the evening, the line to get into the overflow room — just to watch the event on TV — went on for multiple city blocks. 

"Thank you for bringing back the joy," Walz said, to a thunderous reception. A simple line, but it brought the house down because of the plain-spoken truth Walz has swiftly become famous for. "Joy" was the word of the night. People in the stands practically vibrated with it. In the air was a visceral hope that this campaign would be the end of the long national nightmare that is Trump and the MAGA movement. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


The crowd was so exuberant that Harris and Walz could have done shadow puppets and the place would have erupted. Even before they spoke, DJ Diamond Kuts had the crowd repurposing classic hip-hop lyrics into political chants, with the funniest being "move, Trump, get out the way" rather than the expletive used in the original Ludacris tune. But both brought their A-game. Harris drew ecstatic applause with her promises to end Trump's criminal career. Walz has honed "Minnesota nice" into a deadly rhetorical weapon, both making his desire to help people sincerely felt while also making "weird" burn like Dorothy Parker's ghost had insulted you. 

Vance's speech, on the other hand, wasn't just underwhelming but a little uncanny. Despite using room dividers to shrink the space, the campaign could not hide that the crowd felt like a medium-sized wedding, albeit a pathetic one where no one cares for the couple. Vance, perhaps recognizing charisma isn't his strong suit, spoke briefly before bringing up a series of local citizens ready to blame Mexicans for their familial tragedies of drug addiction. He spoke for a couple more minutes, before taking the reporters' questions about cat ladies

Even in his short speech, it seemed Vance — like the Trump campaign overall — is still struggling to accept that they are running against Harris and not President Joe Biden. It felt like the speechwriter had typed Ctrl-F "Biden" and replaced every instance with "Harris," whether it made sense or not. Vance accused Harris of hiding from the press with a "basement campaign." Never mind that Harris is now the young and spry candidate who can keep up with an aggressive schedule, while Trump is the tired old man who can barely campaign between naps. 

One upside to the Vance event: There was no line to use the ladies' room. Sure, there were women in attendance, but the gender ratio felt like the guest list on Joe Rogan's podcast. There was one kind of diversity in this small but weirdly intense crowd. Every type of white man that gets a hasty "swipe left" on his dating profile was in attendance: 'Roided out dudes with bad tribal tattoos. Older men radiating "bitter divorce" energy. Men with enormous beards that have never known the touch of a trimmer. Skinny fascists wearing expensive suits, despite the oppressive heat. Glowering loners staring at the two women under 40 like cats watching birds out a window. 

It's not just about Vance, either. The Trump campaign often has the dwindling energy of a concert for a D-list band well past its prime. As my colleague Andrew O'Hehir wrote of the Republican National Convention, it was "a startlingly quiet, polite, low-energy event," without the "chaotic, unhinged, angry energy" of the 2016 convention. As far as the Salon team could figure out, this was borne out in the numbers. The Cleveland convention of 2016 brought in an estimated 44,000 people. Despite GOP predictions that this year's would be even bigger, the Secret Service told Salon only 27,000 people had credentials to enter this year. 

Trump has already started floating conspiracy theories, such as insisting officials are keeping invisible fans away from his events, to explain away the perceived difference in crowd enthusiasm at his rallies vs. the excited reception Harris has for her fledgling campaign. There's a lot of chatter in MAGA circles about how the enthusiasm for Harris is "manufactured," as if all the people bringing down the house on an early Tuesday evening in Philadelphia are phantoms instead of real people. 

We need your help to stay independent

But boy, I was there, and they are very real. More than that, the contrast with the Vance event underscored the Democratic messaging about "normal vs. weird." The people who flooded the Temple stadium looked like any cross-section of America on any given night. There was old, young and all in-between. There were tattooed hipsters and soccer moms. There were people of every race, dressed in every which way. It could have been a crowd of people chosen at random from the streets of Philadelphia, or any city in America, really. They were brought together by the chant quickly becoming the Harris campaign slogan: "Not going back." They were also brought together in laughter when Walz offered a corny dad joke about Vance: "I can't wait to debate JD Vance. That is, if he's willing to get off the couch and show up."

Like all good dad jokes, the sexual innuendo is implied in the faintest of ways. But really, the sexual innuendo is almost beside the point. It's just another way to say, as the crowd had chanted merely half an hour earlier: "He's so weird." But in a nice way, like your high school football coach ought to. 

Necessary caveat: Trump can still win. Indeed, as Harris reminded the screaming crowd, she's still the "underdog" in polling. There are still millions of Americans so poisoned by political polarization and Fox News propaganda that they can see the swelling crowd at a Harris campaign and feel resentment and fear instead of joy. But it's still a hopeful sign that the MAGA hate just isn't moving the masses like Harris's "not going back" message seems to be doing. It may even be enough to finally tilt the polls towards the outcome most Americans want, which is not and never has been Trumpism. 

Why Thailand legalized marijuana — and then almost banned it again

In sticky, sweaty Bangkok, there seemed to be more weed shops than there were Buddhist temples — and there were a lot of temples. Some shops were decorated with psychedelic art on the walls, beanbags laid out over the floor and ambient music playing; others were little more than just wooden table stalls in the middle of the street. I found one place selling Scotty Pie hybrid strain blunts for 480 baht (>$13) whereas a simple roll of Thai weed will only set you back 100 baht . The budtender unscrewed a jar to let me sniff the fresh aroma, but since rolling a joint for me is like solving a Rubix Cube, I bought a pre-rolled Thai and went on my merry way.

On 9 June 2022, Thailand made history as the first Asian nation to lift the ban on cannabis after decades of prohibition. The plant was removed from the list of dangerous narcotics, and although casual consumption technically remained off-limits, nobody, not even the cops, seemed to care. Thousands of prisoners were set free that very day. It was de-facto legalization.

Then Thailand threatened to revert course yet again. The opposition made cannabis a wedge issue in last year’s elections, and having stepped into power, nearly backtracked on the reforms that made the Thai kingdom a pioneer in Southeast Asia.

Thailand has one of the world’s longest relationships with weed, locally known as ganja. Having likely made its way to Southeast Asia from India, for centuries the plant wasn’t motivating teenagers to spray their rooms with Febreze before their parents walked in. Instead, it was mostly used as a herbal remedy for various ailments as well as a savory condiment for meals, including the famous boat noodle soup served in the floating markets of Bangkok’s canals. 

That said, the intoxicating side of weed was not forgotten, either: the word “bong” itself – meaning a bamboo water pipe for smoking ganja – is Thai. 

“How is it?” asked Arun ‘Max’ Avery over a bowl of ganja-spiced soup at his café, Highland, in northern Bangkok, where we’d met at opening time (4:20 p.m.). “There’s a certain flavor, a certain taste, that makes you want to keep slurping, right? That’s what the cannabis does. There was one time – this is pre-legalize – my girlfriend was throwing a party for like 20 to 30 people, and I brought this pot of soup that’s as big as this refrigerator. We threw in like two or three whole chickens and two whole plants of cannabis without flowers. And I kid you not, the pot was empty but two whole chickens were left. People were just slurping up the soup. That’s how delicious it was.”

Thailand, as America’s ally against communism, came under pressure and the war on drugs truly began.

Weed was originally banned in Thailand under international agreements in 1934, but enforcement was very relaxed. Then during the Vietnam War, TV footage of American GIs sucking reefer smoke out of gun barrels alarmed the top brass. At the time, the Thai Stick variety of ganja – the buds wrapped around a small bamboo stick like a green kebab or a cigar – enjoyed a reputation as being the finest in the world, much of it grown in the fertile soil of the impoverished northeastern province of Isan along the Mekong River marking the border with Laos. Thailand, as America’s ally against communism, came under pressure and the war on drugs truly began. Under the 1979 Narcotics Act, cannabis distribution could now earn you fifteen years in the slammer. 

“When I was young, before the Americans came, we were free, you know,” artist Piak Lexhip reminisced. Lexhip is perhaps the closest equivalent the kanchachon (“ganja people”) have to a Cheech and/or Chong, being the inspiration for a character in the cult classic novel Mad Dogs & Co. by author Chart Kobjitti. He is now eighty years old, and has been smoking since he was fifteen. “You had opium to breathe. And then [in the] 1960s they have a war in Vietnam and the Americans come. Before you can smoke in town and like the doctor, you know, Thai medicine. But then Americans come and they have a law.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


Cannabis can help treat conditions such as epilepsy, and parents risked imprisonment procuring medicine for their children from underground pharmacists. It didn’t matter if you had a tumor the size of a football – if you were holding a Thai Stick, you were going to jail. The prison population climbed from around 20,000 in the ‘60s to 330,000 by 2015, the majority serving hard time for drugs.

Then in 2014 the military seized power in one of Thailand’s clockwork coup d'états, and even the generals were growing concerned with the overpacked prison cells. A window had finally opened for reformers.

Before becoming a café, Highland began life as a Facebook page, later evolving into Thailand’s equivalent of High Times magazine. Avery told me how they’d lobbied for legalization.

A multi-billion baht industry materialized literally overnight.

“We started by talking about the benefits of cannabis – whether health-wise or politics or social life,” he explained. “Our team decided to organize the first 4/20 [April 20th] event, which happened to be a conference at a university, and we got a physician, a political figure and a policeman there to talk about cannabis. That kind of took off, and then the Ministry of Public Health started holding conferences about cannabis and its benefits, so we started attending those and that’s how we got all the way to influencing the officials in parliament, to a degree.”

Highland’s seminar at Bangkok's Dhurakij Pundit University in 2015 was a turning point. The debate gained even more traction the following year, when Dr. Somyot Kittimunkong published a book on cannabis and cancer that helped sway public opinion. 

Then in 2018 the reigning junta finally allowed medical marijuana as a “gift to the Thai people.” The following year elections were held for the first time since the coup and the Bhumjaithai Party (BJT), led by construction magnate Anutin Charnvirakul, ran on the legalization ticket, winning votes from struggling farmers in Isan. Charnvirakul was appointed health minister and on 9 June 2022, pushed through the reforms.

The Highland crew were among those cashing in, opening their own café, which now serves everything from native Thai and hybrid strains to ganja garlic bread. 

“We told every grower to ship [their weed] on or after midnight,” Avery remembered. “We didn’t pay them yet because we didn’t have that much money. And sure enough, that night, we started weighing and packing until like 4 a.m. The store opened at 9 a.m, and of course we needed to be here, so we had only a couple hours of sleep. People were lining up just to get the first legal cannabis. We invited reporters and sure enough, they came that morning. We had no less than thirty reporters just hanging around just trying to take a picture of the first legal cannabis buyer.”

A multi-billion baht industry materialized literally overnight. On paper, all sales were for medicinal purposes only, but the streets of tourist hubs — like the party island of Koh Phangan and Bangkok’s Khaosan Road — were liberally lined with dispensaries proudly proclaiming themselves with large, green, neon signs. Restaurants and cafés served weed-flavored dishes and drinks and Charnvirakul himself was spotted slurping a ganja-infused curry. There were stoned yoga classes and blunt-rolling workshops. PlookGanja, a government app offering registration for aspiring cannabis growers, crashed after being flooded with over nine million applications.

But the initial euphoria quickly gave way to a moral panic. It may have once been tradition, but millions of Thais had nevertheless grown up only hearing that ganja is a “dangerous drug” (conflating cannabis with stronger drugs like meth) and the new, 420-friendly climate left them uncomfortable. Reefer madness re-emerged in the press: such as a March 2023 case in which a 23-year-old Bangkok man was admitted to hospital for a “marijuana overdose,” during which he crashed a stolen ambulance.

Part of the problem was lawmakers were too hasty in pushing ahead legalization without regulation, leaving a wide open goal for both prohibitionists and the opposition eager to score easy political points. 

“I don’t want my children to grow up in a country where drugs are easy to find and cannabis is liberalized,” Paetongtarn Shinawatra, leader of the Pheu Thai Party (PTP), declared at a campaign rally. “We need to suppress drugs.”

Shinawatra is the daughter of media mogul and ex-prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who in 2003 launched a Duterte-style war on drugs in which the police summarily executed 2,500 suspected low-level drug sellers, of which over half were later found to be innocent. The drug trade itself was left largely unaffected, and Shinawatra himself was deposed in yet another coup in 2006.

Suddenly, Thailand’s 4,500-odd dispensaries, plus their farmers, investors, customers, suppliers and budtenders, were in a precarious position.

The PTP sabotaged a bill put forward by the BJT that would have created some oversight over the industry. Despite Charnvirakul saying he’d only join a coalition that will back his party’s regulation proposals, after casting his vote in a shirt decorated with bright green ganja leaves, the BJT entered a coalition with the PTP, with the PTP’s Somsak Thepsutin appointed as the new health minister earlier this year. Somsak vowed to reverse his predecessor’s policy by reclassifying ganja as a dangerous narcotic, allowing it only under strictly clinical conditions.

Suddenly, Thailand’s 4,500-odd dispensaries, plus their farmers, investors, customers, suppliers and budtenders, were in a precarious position. A government survey claimed 80% of the population wanted a repeal, and a committee convened in early July 2024 to ponder the matter. Should Somsak’s proposals have gone into effect, ganjapreneurs would have had until New Year’s Day 2025 to close up shop.

Thailand’s cannabis community didn’t take the news lying down. Another activist group, the Thai Cannabis Future Network, staged a sit-in outside the Government House in Bangkok, accusing the health ministry’s doctors of colluding with politicians, using re-criminalization as a ploy to monopolize the industry. The activists demanded the government thoroughly examine the evidence and if the findings showed cannabis is no worse than alcohol, it should be regulated rather than outlawed. Two of the protest’s organizers, Prasitchai Nunual and Akaradet Chakjinda, even went on hunger strike. After five days with no food, Chakjinda was hospitalized.

It was a close call. On Tuesday July 23, now-Deputy Prime Minister Charnvirakul announced that criminalization was called off; instead, the government agreed to go forward with regulation and would hold meetings with relevant stakeholders. It’s still unclear what would happen with recreational cannabis, which is still formally illegal; however, with a ganja economy estimated to be worth over $1 billion by 2025, it seems unlikely they’d totally sideline this cash cow.

“These new events prove that this [criminalization debate] was all about politics,” Avery reflected. “[The PTP] were flexing their power because there are people who, for whatever reasons we can gossip about, don’t want it legal. The police want their dirty money again. Initially, I did have a bit of stress in terms of the worst-case scenario that could happen. But it wouldn’t make sense, and Anutin wouldn’t let that happen. But how was he going to pull that off? I didn’t know at the time, but this week we found out and that was to [threaten to] pull his party from the coalition.”

The Thai Cannabis Future Network called off their hunger strike and thanked the government and the BJT.

We need your help to stay independent

“This success is the result of the collective effort of every individual involved: the visible and invisible supporters from the academic, political and public sectors. Your [BJT’s] contributions have been instrumental in this significant achievement,” they said in a statement shared with me. “We urge cannabis enthusiasts and the public to closely follow the drafting process of the Cannabis Act from this point forward, as this law will be crucial in shaping the systemic structure for cannabis regulation in Thailand. The Thai Cannabis Future Network will persist in driving our action plan until the Cannabis Act is approved by Parliament and comes into force.”

Avery isn’t certain about the exact future of Thai cannabis, but believes it will remain rather like it is today except perhaps with stricter rules about licensing, while Anutin gets to be the hero for both liberalizing cannabis and bringing it under control.

It’s too early to tell whether Thailand will be like Washington or Colorado, kick-starting a domino effect across Asia. My guess is probably not yet – recent events show cannabis’ standing is precarious even in Thailand. But stoners in Japan, Nepal, Indonesia and elsewhere can take heart in the fact that despite heavy pushback from powerful interests, legalization has not totally failed.

There’s been another interesting development. In April, the Thai authorities quietly eased restrictions on opium and psilocybin "magic" mushrooms, allowing them to be used for medicine and research, signalling yet more potential drug reform. But whether there will be more backlash in the future remains to be seen.

Is the Seine safe for Olympians to swim in?

The Seine has been a central feature of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games, beginning with the memorable opening ceremony. Now, however, it's making headlines again, but for less celebratory reasons.

On Tuesday, an Olympic swimming test has been canceled after larger concerns over the Seine river's water quality. The test run is meant to grant Olympic swimmers the ability to learn the marathon swimming course but the exercise was canceled by World Aquatics, the international body recognized by the International Olympic Committee, The Associated Press reported. Fluctuating bacteria levels in the polluted Seine have "showed levels exceeding the maximum acceptable World Aquatics thresholds," according to World Aquatics.

This cancellation comes days after Belgian athlete Claire Michel fell "unfortunately ill" after swimming in the Paris waterway, prompting Belgium's Olympic committee announcing on Sunday that it would withdraw from the mixed relay triathlon, reports the AP.

Olympic organizers did not elaborate on Michel's illness. Swiss swimmer Adrien Briffod also withdrew due to a gastrointestinal infection, but Simon Westermann replaced him, reports CNN. It's unclear whether Briffod's infection was related to the Seine's water quality.  The mixed relay triathlon proceeded as scheduled on Monday with World Triathlon released data showing that the Seine's levels of fecal bacteria E. coli and enterococci were within acceptable levels for the length of the relay course.

Another marathon swimming test is scheduled for Wednesday. The event's organizers will decide if it will go forward on Wednesday morning. As of this report, the marathon swimming competitions will proceed as planned on Aug. 8 and 9.

UK teenagers get two-thirds of their calories from ultra-processed foods – new study

Humans have been processing food for thousands of years. While some processing can increase food's safety and shelf-life, consuming lots of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is linked to health issues such as obesity, high blood pressure, heart disease and type 2 diabetes.

Adults in wealthy countries, such as the UK and the US, get more than half of their calories from UPFs, but adolescents are thought to consume an even higher amount. (Ultra-processed foods include products such as sweetened yoghurts, margarine, cereal bars, chicken nuggets and energy drinks.)

Our new study analyzed, for the first time, how much ultra-processed food UK adolescents eat and identified characteristics that were associated with its consumption.

We found that two-thirds of adolescents' calories came from UPFs – the highest proportion for any age group. We also found that more disadvantaged groups consume more of these foods.

We used data from food diaries collected by the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey between 2008 and 2019. Participants completed the food diaries with all the food and drink they consumed over four days.

We calculated both the percentage of total energy intake and the amount of UPFs consumed in grams. Our study included data from 2,991 adolescents aged 11 to 18. We investigated the relationship between UPF consumption and individual characteristics, such as age, gender, parents' occupation, body weight, ethnic group, region and level of physical activity.

We found that, on average, adolescents consumed 861 grams of UPFs per day, which made up 66% of their daily total energy intake. Our findings also highlight how social inequalities – measured by differences in parents' occupation, sex, ethnicity, region – are associated with the consumption of UPFs.

Younger adolescents consumed more UPFs – for example, 13-year-olds received 68% of their calories from UPFs compared with 63% for 18-year-olds – as did those with parents in different occupations, those of white ethnicity and those living in the north of England. UPFs comprised 68% of adolescents intake in those with parents in "routine and manual occupations", compared with 64% for those with parents in "higher managerial and professional occupations".

Regions made a difference, too. Those in the north of England got 67% of their calories from UPFs, compared with 64% in the south, including London.

But largest difference in consumption was between white and non-white adolescents, where white adolescents got 67% of their calories from UPFs, compared with 59% for non-white adolescents.

Some UPFs, such as diet drinks, have very few calories. So we also looked at UPF grams consumed, which showed similar results to the calorie intake.

Adolescents from more disadvantaged backgrounds, of white ethnicity, not living in the south of England consumed more grams of UPFs than their counterparts. We also found that male adolescents consumed 941 grams of UPFs daily compared with 776 grams for females.

Older teens also consumed more UPFs. For example, 18-year-olds consumed 918 grams compared with 797 grams for 11-year-olds. And adolescents with obesity consumed more UPFs (924 grams) compared to those who weren't obese (841 grams).

We also explored UPFs consumed in each of the survey years.

Our data spanned 11 years, so there were about 300 adolescents who completed food diaries in each year. We found that UPF consumption varied across the years.

In 2008-09, the first year of measurement, adolescents consumed close to 68% of their calories and 996 grams from UPF sources, whereas in 2018-19, the last year of measurement, adolescents consumed fewer calories and grams of UPF per day (65% calories and 776 grams).

 

Post-pandemic data still needed

However, these figures should be interpreted with caution. They are based on small groups of participants in each year. Until the release of the most recent data, from 2019 onwards, we will not know how UPF consumption has changed since the pandemic.

Addressing the high UPF consumption among adolescents is crucial, as dietary habits formed during this period can persist into adulthood. However, a one-size-fits-all recommendation to reduce UPF consumption may be ineffective or counterproductive, potentially shaming young people and their family food culture.

Instead, involving adolescents in conversations to develop supportive strategies for replacing UPFs with less processed alternatives, improving the quality of food in schools and increasing access and availability of minimally processed foods is essential for fostering healthier dietary habits.

Yanaina Chavez-Ugalde, Research Associate, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge; Esther van Sluijs, Programme lead – Behavioural Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, and Zoi Toumpakari, Senior Lecturer in Nutrition and Behaviour Change, University of Bristol

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

“It’s just not good enough”: Olympic swimmer claims athletes found worms in their food

Athletes are continuing to bash the food being served at the Paris Olympics, with one swimmer claiming that diners have found worms in their meals. British swimmer Adam Peaty recently told i news that the catering at this year’s Games “isn’t good enough for the level the athletes are expected to perform.”  

“We need to give the best we possibly can. [In] Tokyo the food was incredible. Rio was incredible. But this time around? There wasn’t enough protein options, long queues, waiting 30 minutes for food because there’s no queueing system,” he told the outlet.

Several Olympic organizers claimed the lack of food — and poor quality of food — is due to supply problems with Sodexo Live!, the company in charge of catering. Additionally, as part of the Games’ pledge to reduce the carbon footprint of meals produced by half, a strict quality charter was developed in anticipation of the Paris Olympics. A quarter of all ingredients are sourced in a 155-mile (250 km) radius of Paris and 20% are certified organic, BBC reported. Meat, milk and eggs are all from France and a third of the food is plant-based.

“The narrative of sustainability has just been pushed on the athletes,” Peaty said. “I want meat, I need meat to perform and that’s what I eat at home, so why should I change?”

He continued, “I like my fish and people are finding worms in the fish. It’s just not good enough. The standard, we’re looking at the best of the best in the world, and we’re not feeding them the best.”

A Paris 2024 spokesperson told i news: “We are listening to the athletes and take their feedback very seriously. Since the opening of the village, our partner Sodexo Live! has been working proactively to adapt supplies to the growing use of the Olympic Village restaurants, as well as to the actual consumption by athletes observed over the first few days. As a result, the quantities of certain products has been significantly increased and additional staff have been deployed to ensure the service runs smoothly.”

“I will never retire”: David Lynch reassures fans after revealing emphysema has kept him homebound

David Lynch says he "will never retire" even though he can't leave his house.

The "Twin Peaks" and "Mulholland Drive" filmmaker told Sight and Sound Magazine, “I’ve gotten emphysema from smoking for so long and so I’m homebound whether I like it or not. It would be very bad for me to get sick, even with a cold.”

He continued to share that because of emphysema he "can only walk a short distance before” running out of oxygen. This news took his fans by surprise, with people speculating that the Academy Award-winning director would retire.

Lynch released a statement on Monday, quelling those fears. He said on X, “Yes, I have emphysema from my many years of smoking. I have to say that I enjoyed smoking very much, and I do love tobacco – the smell of it, lighting cigarettes on fire, smoking them – but there is a price to pay for this enjoyment, and the price for me is emphysema.

He explained, "I have now quit smoking for over two years. Recently I had many tests, and the good news is that I am in excellent shape except for emphysema. I am filled with happiness, and I will never retire.”

“I want you all to know that I really appreciate your concern,” Lynch concluded, signing off his message with "Love, David."

Lynch just released a new musical project with "Twin Peaks: The Return" actor and singer Chrystabell on Aug. 2.

“Bring normality back”: Joe Manchin and other moderates praise Harris’ selection of Tim Walz

Vice President Kamala Harris' selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate on Tuesday was immediately denounced by Donald Trump, but the choice is earning praise from key constituents in the anti-Trump coalition.

In her announcement, Harris described Walz as "a governor, a coach, a teacher, and a veteran" who has "delivered for working families like his.” Trump, by contrast, wrote on Truth Social: "TIM WALZ WOULD BE THE WORST VP IN HISTORY!”

But moderates and centrists, whose votes Harris will need in November, largely seem on board.

Sen. Joe Manchin, I-W.Va., a centrist who caucuses with the Democrats, seemed pleased that Walz isn’t too liberal of a choice, in his view, writing that the Minnesota governor will “bring normality back to the most chaotic political environment that most of us have ever seen.” Walz will “bring balance back to the Democratic Party," he said, adding: "I look forward to continuing work with him to bring normalcy back to Washington."

The Lincoln Project, a group founded by anti-Trump Republicans, also commended the pick and followed up their initial tweet of a smiling Walz hugging a group of schoolchildren with a video of the same, writing: “Can't wait to watch MAGA twist themselves into a pretzel trying to convince America this guy is evil.”

Writers for The Bulwark, a conservative anti-Trump site, supported the choice although their initial pick was Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, The Guardian reported

“As a matter of modern politics … this one shouldn’t have shocked us," two staff writers there wrote. “In an era where vibes rule everything around us, Walz, by the end, was the guy riding the zeitgeist."

We need your help to stay independent

Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., a fierce critic of Trump, also approved of Harris’s pick. He wrote on X: “I served for years with @GovTimWalz in the house.  We always got along well, and when we would argue issues it was always with respect. He will make a great VP to @KamalaHarris.”

Former Gov. Larry Hogan, R-Md., who is running for Senate in his blue state, also extended his congratulations, writing on X: “We had the chance to work together as fellow governors, and while we come from different parties, I have always appreciated his dedication to public service.”

Businessman Mark Cuban, a moderate, also approved the choice, writing on X: “On the @tim_walz choice, I think people who don’t like it are missing the lesson of the switch to Harris. She went from worst to first as people got to know her. It’s not a reach to think the same thing will happen with Walz.”

“People are tired of the ideologues and hate from both parties," Cuban continued. "They want to vote for normal people they can relate to.  Walz can sit at the kitchen table and make you feel like you have know him forever. That’s an incredible skill these days."

Serena Williams criticizes luxury Paris restaurant for “denying access” to her and her children

Serena Williams took to X on Monday evening to call out The Peninsula Paris, a luxury hotel in the French capital, after she and her children were “denied access” to the hotel’s rooftop restaurant.

“Yikes @peninsulaparis I’ve been denied access to [the] rooftop to eat in [an] empty restaurant of nicer places…but never with my kids,” Williams wrote. “Always a first.” She added a hashtag for the Olympics 2024 at the end of her post.

A staffer at the Peninsula’s rooftop restaurant, Maxime Mannevy, told Variety that Williams arrived with another unnamed woman and she allegedly looked “unrecognizable.”

“When she came there were only two tables available and they had been reserved by clients of the hotel,” said Mannevy, who explained that she was not working when Williams visited the restaurant. “My colleague didn’t recognize her and feels terrible, but he told her what he would have told any other client, which is to wait downstairs in the bar for a table to become available. That was absolutely nothing personal.”

The restaurant also responded on X/Twitter, writing "Dear Mrs. Williams, Please accept our deepest apologies for the disappointment you encountered tonight. Unfortunately, our rooftop bar was indeed fully booked and the only unoccupied tables you saw belonged to our gourmet restaurant, L’Oiseau Blanc, which was fully reserved." The account continued, writing "We have always been honored to welcome you and will always be to welcome you again. The Peninsula Paris"

In addition, William's original X post now has a "readers added context" addition, noting "Serena was not 'denied access.' Rather, the restaurant was fully booked."

We need your help to stay independent

Williams, who retired from professional tennis after the 2022 U.S. Open, arrived in Paris ahead of the Olympic opening ceremony in which she served as a torch bearer. She shared the stage with several acclaimed athletes, including fellow tennis champion Rafael Nadal, along with Carl Lewis, Zinedine Zidane, Teddy Riner and Marie-José Pérec.   

Williams has prolonged her stay in Paris to attend a few tennis matches, including Novak Djokovic’s win over Carlos Alcaraz in the men’s singles tournament.

“Wouldn’t even last a round”: “The Daily Show” calls out Megyn Kelly for misgendering Olympic boxer

"The Daily Show" has called out Megyn Kelly and other conservative voices in media who have taken swings at a new target in the culture war over gender: Algerian boxer Imane Khelif.

Even before her debut at the Olympic Games in Paris, the boxer faced a barrage of unsubstantiated claims about her gender identity, including that she is either a man or transgender. Amid ongoing conservative pushback surrounding transgender athletes in sports, this falsity has been perpetuated by outspoken figures such as Elon MuskJ.K. Rowling and former President Donald Trump.

"The Daily Show" tackled the controversy on Monday as Michael Kosta, filling in for Jon Stewart in the anchor chair, called out Kelly, as well as her former Fox News colleagues, for their role in perpetuating misinformation about Khelif.

Kosta introduced the topic by playing a clip of International Olympic Committee spokesperson Mark Adams, who stated last week that "the Algerian boxer was born a female, was registered a female, lived her life as a female, boxed as a female, has a female passport. This is not a transgender case."

In response, Kosta asked, "Seems pretty open and shut to me, right? She was born a woman, lives as a woman and boxes other women. So what is the argument against that?"

He then played a clip of Kelly discussing Khelif on her SiriusXM show. "This is such an outrage," Kelly said. "Look at this: This is a man. This is a man who is competing in the boxing tournament for women."

"No, she’s not, she’s a woman," Kosta argued. "She’s a woman like you, Megyn Kelly, a woman at the peak of her career, unlike Megyn Kelly, but she still is a woman."

Khelif, who is a cisgender woman, is neither transgender nor intersex. The controversy surrounding her gender began last year when she and another boxer, Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting, were disqualified from the World Championships by the organizer after reportedly failing a gender eligibility test.

The Russian-led International Boxing Association that administered the tests, however, does not oversee Olympic qualifications. Furthermore, as Poynter points out, the body was "stripped of its Olympic recognition in 2023, because of a dispute involving its management, its finances and its judging integrity."

Up next was a clip of "Fox & Friends" co-host Brian Kilmeade dissecting Khelif's gender. "You can only fight and compete in the gender in which you were born," Kilmeade said. "Those are just the rules."

We need your help to stay independent

To that claim, Kosta responded, "Those rules would still let her box with women because, again, she’s a woman. She’s fought as a woman her whole life and even lost to other female boxers nine times. What more proof do you want? Does Fox News need the ghost of Roger Ailes to sexually harass her first? She’s a woman."

He begged, "Can we stop this before America turns it into a presidential campaign issue?"

Next, a clip of Trump's vice presidential running mate, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, at a rally was played. "The far left wants to allow biological males to beat the living crap out of women in boxing," the senator said.

Kosta rebutted the Republican candidate by asking, "Is this really what this race is going to be about? JD Vance is going to be out on the campaign trail like, 'You know when I was growing up in the holler, the one thing we cared about was international women's boxing regulations.'"

The comedian then turned the conservative narrative on its head by pointing a finger at the group's record on American women's rights. "If conservatives are so concerned with women's safety, maybe consider caring about it outside of sports? There are women in America who are like, 'Help me, I'm having an ectopic pregnancy,' and conservatives are like, 'Shut up, we're trying to protect women over here,'" he said.

"Look guys, I'm sorry this elite athlete does not look the way you think a woman should look, but a woman is allowed to be dominating and powerful at a sport without you questioning her gender," he concluded. "Don't forget, these guys dragged her, an Algerian female boxer, into their American conservative culture war. And if they're going to use her as a metaphorical punching bag, the least they can do is step into the ring and let her use them as a literal punching bag. I bet they wouldn't even last a round."

"The Daily Show" airs Monday through Thursday at 11 p.m. ET on Comedy Central and streams on Paramount+.

Civil liberties group condemns Nassau County vote to ban masks in public

On Monday night, lawmakers in Nassau County voted to ban masks in public, despite an ongoing COVID-19 wave occurring across the country. The move is part of a growing crackdown on masks in response to pro-Palestinian protests.

“Unless someone has a medical condition or a religious imperative, people should not be allowed to cover their face in a manner that hides their identity when in public,” said County Executive Bruce Blakeman.

In response, the New York Civil Liberties Union condemned the vote. 

“Nassau County’s mask ban is a dangerous misuse of the law to score political points and target protestors,” NYCLU said. “Barring people who speak out from protecting themselves and their identities puts their health and well-being in danger, particularly people with disabilities, people of color, and those with unpopular views.”

The organization added: “With COVID-19 on the rise across Long Island, face coverings are critical to protecting the health of an individual, their family, and their community.”

Those who violate the mask ban can face a fine of $1,000 or jail time.According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there high levels of viral activity of the coronavirus in wastewater nationwide. Specifically, in New York, cases have been on the rise over the last 45 days. The disease has also spread rapidly through the Olympics games, coinciding with a surge across the globe.