Spring Offer: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“Outrage and disservice”: Mike Pence blasts Trump conviction as political prosecution

Former Vice President Mike Pence weighed in on Donald Trump’s 34 felony count conviction, undermining the verdict of 12 New York jurors who found that the former president falsified business records.

"The conviction of former President Trump on politically motivated charges is an outrage and disservice to the nation," Pence told Fox News. "No one is above the law, but our courts must not become a tool to be used against political opponents . . . To millions of Americans, this was nothing more than a political prosecution driven by a Manhattan DA who ran for office on a pledge to indict the former president and this conviction undermines confidence in our system of justice."

With this verdict that Pence is railing against, the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, led by Alvin Bragg, became the first municipality to prosecute the former president, convincing jurors — who proved themselves to be unbiased enough to avoid dismissal by Trump’s legal team during selection — beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Bragg rejected claims that the prosecution was politically motivated during a Thursday press conference, noting the years of investigation ramping up to the verdict, saying, “I did my job.”

Pence, whose faith in the justice system was seemingly unshaken after his former boss bucked all accountability and went so far as to allegedly call for his execution as his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2021, said the jury verdict would further divide the country.

The search for his replacement on the third Trump ticket is still underway, with a running mate expected in time for the July Republican National Convention.

Texas Supreme Court rules against women who say their lives were endangered by state abortion ban

All nine Republican justices of the Texas Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the state's strict abortion ban on Friday that was brought by a group of women who said their lives were put at risk when they suffered serious pregnancy complications and could not access the necessary medical care.

The lawsuit, brought on by five women in March 2023, was the first legal challenge to the state’s ban to focus on women with complicated pregnancies, NBC News reported. The plaintiffs said that they were denied abortions even though the issues that arose during their pregnancies endangered their lives. They claimed this happened because the state's abortion law isn’t sufficiently clear when exceptions are allowed; the Texas court maintained that exceptions to the law as written might be broad but are definitely not unclear. 

“Texas law permits a life-saving abortion,” read the court order, signed by Justice Jane Bland. 

The case, Zurawski v. Texas, grew to include 20 women and two doctors. The plaintiffs also wanted medical professionals to have more autonomy to intervene should complications in pregnancies arise. In August, women in Texas gained a bit of respite when district court Judge Jessica Mangrum, who previously heard the case, issued a temporary injunction that prevented the state from enforcing the law against doctors who terminated unsafe pregnancies. 

Mangrum's ruling stated: “The Court finds that there is uncertainty regarding whether the medical exception to Texas’ abortion bans … permits a physician to provide abortion care where, in the physician’s good faith judgment and in consultation with the pregnant person, a pregnant person has a physical emergent medical condition.”

It's that ruling that was overturned Friday by the Texas Supreme Court, despite harrowing testimony from plaintiffs last year.

We need your help to stay independent

Amanda Zurawski, the lead plaintiff, had testified that she nearly died in August 2022 because doctors delayed giving her a medically necessary abortion after serious complications in her 18-week pregnancy. She later went into sepsis, which is caused by an infection, and spent three days in the ICU. Doctors later advised her not to carry a baby again.

Texas' highest court ruled that the state law never required that the risk to a mother’s life be “imminent” when weighting whether they are eligible for an abortion. Because of this, the court wrote: “Ms. Zurawski’s agonizing wait to be ill ‘enough’ for induction, her development of sepsis, and her permanent physical injury are not the results the law commands,” the Los Angeles Times reported.

Zuawaski shared her anger with the decision in a statement Friday.

“I am outraged on behalf of my fellow plaintiffs who the Court deemed not sick enough,” she said after the ruling, the Associated Press reported. “We all deserve bodily autonomy. Every day, people in Texas are being told that they have no options. It’s sickening and wrong.”

The Texas law bans all abortions unless they save the life of a pregnant patient. In fact, doctors can lose their medical license, face up to 99 years in prison, or incur a $100,000 fine at minimum should they violate the law. And this is exactly the plaintiffs’ point — the ambiguity in the abortion ban of what precisely constitutes a medical emergency intimidates doctors, who may deny technically legal care because they fear liability. 

Ken Paxton, whose office defended the abortion ban before the Supreme Court, took to social media to praise the ruling. “I will continue to defend the laws enacted by the Legislature and uphold the values of the people of Texas by doing everything in my power to protect mothers and babies,” the Republican attorney general posted on X.

Madonna sued for “pornography without warning” and for “deceptively” marketing her world tour

Madonna's Celebration world tour is at the center of yet another controversy.

According to People Magazine, in a class action lawsuit filed on Thursday, the singer is being sued by a fan who said Madonna subjected concertgoers to watch "pornography without warning." They are alleging claims of negligent misrepresentation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract and false advertising.

Moreover, the lawsuit claimed that during Madonna's March 7 concert in Los Angeles, there were "topless women on stage simulating sex acts," while detailing a concertgoing experience that was "hot" and "uncomfortable" due to the lack of air conditioning. The fan alleged that Madonna ordered the air conditioning to be turned off, and as a result of no air conditioning, he says he became physically ill because of the heat, Entertainment Weekly reported.

Throughout her career, Madonna has cultivated a sex-positivite persona. Her shows have included erotic dancing, suggestive touching and lap dances that would include singers such as Maluma and Ricky Martin, People said. Alongside Madonna, the plaintiff also has also named the entertainment company, Live Nation, owner of Ticketmaster for luring concertgoers into purchasing  "expensive tickets" and “purposely and deceptively” concealing information about the singer's show not starting on time as it was marketed.

The complaint stated that the show was marketed to start at 8:30 p.m. but Madonna didn't take the stage until after 10 p.m. However, when the singer eventually appeared on stage, the lawsuit claimed she was lip-syncing even though the concertgoers had paid for a live experience and performance.

"Forcing consumers to wait hours in hot, uncomfortable arenas and subjecting them to pornography without warning is demonstrative of Madonna's flippant disrespect for her fans," the complaint said. Madonna and her legal team have not yet responded to multiple requests to comment.

Madonna's alleged tardiness is also the reason for a previous lawsuit filed against the singer in January. Two concertgoers at one of her New York tour dates accused the singer of "unconscionable, unfair, and/or deceptive trade practices" for beginning her show at 10:30 p.m. instead of the marketed time of 8:30 p.m. At the time, Madonna's representatives said the show's delay was due to technical difficulties.

We need your help to stay independent

Last month, Madonna's attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, stating that "no reasonable concertgoer — and certainly no Madonna fan — would expect the headline act at a major arena concert to take the stage at the ticketed event time."

Madonna's alleged sexual performances and tardiness are not the only controversial moments during her Celebration tour. In March, the singer called out an audience member sitting down during her show. In a video recorded by a concertgoer, the singer was heard yelling from the stage, "What are you doing sitting down?" to suggest that audience members should be standing and or dancing. She realized her mistake when she looked at the audience member who was in a wheelchair.

The singer said on stage, “Oh, OK. Politically incorrect, sorry about that. I’m glad you’re here." However, Madonna's actions was met with backlash. Criticisms online stated that her comments were "pure ableism & glaring privilege."

“My juror”: Trump believed a loyalist on the jury could save him, until the very end

Donald Trump apparently held out hope that one juror — who he viewed as skeptical of the New York prosecutors’ case — would keep a guilty verdict from being imposed in his hush money trial.

Per Rolling Stone, Trump insiders were still disillusioned that a lone juror could keep the former president safe from any number of the 34 counts of felony falsification of business records. Ultimately, all 12 jurors found him guilty on each of the counts, after the weeks-long trial ended on Thursday afternoon.

Trump went so far as to call the jury member “my juror” in private conversations, based on his confidence in his legal team’s analysis of the Manhattan resident’s body language, Rolling Stone reported. They were hopeful that smiles and approving nods from the juror could be enough to achieve a hung jury. 

Any one juror who was not convinced, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Trump had engaged in the falsification of business records, or even that he had not conspired to commit election interference when covering up the payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels, would have been enough to save him from accountability. Even so, prosecutors successfully dispelled any doubt.

Trump and his lawyers were allowed to learn the identity of the jurors during the case, though Judge Juan Merchan did order their identities be kept from the public, instructing journalists to keep their descriptions of jurors to a minimum after a Fox News host spooked a potential juror in April. Though the legal team has claimed to the state’s Supreme Court that a Manhattan jury would be biased against the president, all 12 members were selected after deliberate and thorough investigation into their potential biases from the prosecution, defense, and judge.

Attacking Judge Merchan and the prosecution, led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, Trump made careful effort not to mention or criticize the jury in a press conference on Friday morning. 

While his legal team plots a fight in appellate courts, Trump’s most violent supporters angle for vengeance. The jurors, now dismissed from service after delivering their verdict, still face serious threats and doxxing attempts online, with some suggesting that a member of the Trump legal team should leak their identities.

Vermont becomes first state to penalize oil companies for climate change

Last year, Vermont suffered a catastrophic series of torrential rains that washed out major cities like Montpelier, the state's capital, and the nearby municipality of Barre. Many businesses took months to rebuild and many homeowners were left stranded. Some Vermonters said it was the worst natural disaster to hit the state since a 1927 flood killed dozens of people.

Now, Vermont has become the first state to require oil companies to compensate the public for damages caused by climate change. On Thursday, the Vermont legislature passed a law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of damages caused by climate change.

The bill is controversial. Vermont's Republican governor, Phil Scott, issued a public statement saying, “I understand the desire to seek funding to mitigate the effects of climate change that has hurt our state in so many ways." He allowed the bill to become law without his signature because he expressed concern about the costs of what is expected to be a prolonged legal battle.

Scott Lauermann, a spokesperson for the American Petroleum Institute, told the National Review that this is a "punitive new fee" that is part of "a coordinated campaign to undermine America’s energy advantage and the economic and national security benefits it provides. Rather than work collaboratively with the industry to further our shared goal for a lower carbon future, state lawmakers opted to pass a bill designed by activists to further their own interests.”

While this may be seen as a win for anyone hoping for better regulation of fossil fuel companies, it will likely entail a long legal battle, the Guardian reports. “We know that big oil will fight this in the courts,” Martin LaLonde, chair of the state’s house judiciary committee, told the outlet. “But, as an attorney myself, and having worked closely with many legal scholars in shaping the bill, I believe we have a solid legal case.”

“Confused, desperate, and defeated”: Biden and his campaign take on Trump’s “rigged” trial rhetoric

A day after his conviction on 34 felony charges, former president Donald Trump held a rambling press conference Friday during which he bad-mouthed the U.S. justice system and just about everybody but himself. Capitalizing on this this, the Biden administration issued a statement that called the Republican candidate and convicted felon unfit for public office.

“America just witnessed a confused, desperate, and defeated Donald Trump ramble about his own personal grievances and lie about the American justice system, leaving anyone watching with one obvious conclusion: This man cannot be president of the United States,” Michael Tyler, the Biden campaign communications director, said in a statement.

To secure the last nail in the coffin, Tyler added: “Unhinged by his 2020 election loss and spiraling from his criminal convictions, Trump is consumed by his own thirst for revenge and retribution.”

President Joe Biden went on to hold his own press conference where he took his own jabs at Trump

“The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed,” Biden told reporters. He noted that Trump had opportunities to defend himself (he chose not to testify) and that the jury was in his hush money case was chosen, as with any other case, with input from the defense counsel. Like "everyone else," Biden said, Trump also has the right to appeal the verdict.

“That's how the American system of justice works,” Biden said. “And it's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was 'rigged' just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years and it literally is the cornerstone of America.” 

In addition to Trump, numerous elected Republicans have come out against the jury's verdict, which House Speaker Mike Johnson asserted was a "shameful" instance of "lawfare."

In a shout out into the void, Biden concluded his remarks on the Trump verdict by arguing that the justice system should be respected by all, including Republicans, and that nobody should ever be allowed to “tear it down.”

“The strangest cat I’d ever seen”: Earl Slick recalls meeting David Bowie in rock ‘n’ roll memoir

Earl Slick’s "Guitar: Playing with David Bowie, John Lennon, and Rock-and-Roll’s Greatest Heroes" affords readers with a ringside seat for many of popular music’s most iconic moments. But it’s more than that. "Guitar" provides a warts-and-all reading of what life as a working rock-and-roller is really like. From the soaring highs to the despairing lows, "Guitar" offers a fascinating account of life in many of rock’s fastest lanes, where superstardom’s rarefied air is marked by an exacting blend of high-stakes competition and fleeting instances of joy amidst the mayhem. 

Written with Slick’s musical collaborator Jeff Slate, a gifted writer and guitarist in his own right, "Guitar" hits its finest notes when the musician recalls his passion for mastering the instrument, a journey that has taken the balance of his lifetime. His steadfast pursuit of greatness is marked by an uncommon humility in a world so often known for its runaway bravado. And this sense of unpretentiousness doesn’t merely extend to his musicianship. When the chips are down — when he can’t get a solo career off the ground or a regular gig — Slick checks his ego and sells timeshares to make ends meet. 

Not surprisingly, "Guitar" is filled with dramatic descriptions of the instances in which Slick first encounters the artists who would change his life. His first meeting with Bowie makes for an unforgettable scene. “Man, he was skinny as a rake. And pale,” Slick recalls. “He was dressed the way an English rock star might think a Harlem pimp would dress. Loose, baggy pants matched with Capezio dance shoes. It was a weird combo, but very cool, too. And I was especially struck by the way he moved. He was graceful for a rock-and-roll guy. To top it off, he had bright orange hair under a grey fedora. Then, as he got closer, I noticed he didn’t have any eyebrows!”

For Slick, such outlandish moments prove to be par for the course. “David was definitely the strangest cat I’d ever seen, and I’d been around some off-the-wall characters, even at that point in my career.” Later, during the production of Bowie’s "Young Americans" album, Slick would succumb to the substance abuse at the heart of so many rock ‘n’ roll lives — so much so, in fact, that he wouldn’t be able to recall John Lennon — one of Slick’s genuine idols — participating in the sessions for “Fame” and Bowie’s cover version of the Beatles classic “Across the Universe.”

There's Only One John and Yoko"Guitar: Playing with David Bowie, John Lennon, and Rock-and-Roll’s Greatest Heroes" from Chapter 8: There's Only One John and Yoko (Penguin Books)This would prove to be a hazard of sorts in 1980 when producer Jack Douglas tapped Slick to play guitar in Lennon and Yoko Ono’s "Double Fantasy" band. “Now, I never get nervous. Ever,” Slick writes in "Guitar." “I’d been in a room with all kinds of people up to that point. But that first day working with John, I got nervous. This was a real ‘holy s**t’ moment.” He arrived at the studio early on the first day, hoping to impress Lennon with his professionalism and promptness. As it turned out, he would be shown up by Lennon, of all people — the very person whom he had most hoped to impress that day.

Even stranger still, Lennon greeted him warmheartedly, exclaiming “Nice to see you again!” Having blanked the Bowie sessions for "Young Americans," Slick spent much of the "Double Fantasy" recordings being endlessly taunted by Lennon, who took to asking him, in a kind of hilarious, albeit good-natured deadpan, “Remember me now?”

For all of the magic and majesty of his experiences working with the likes of Bowie and Lennon, Slick’s memories are inevitably tempered by the larger-than-life artists’ passage into the arms of history. Lennon’s senseless murder would prove to be devastating, of course, for Slick. Bowie’s death decades later would be harrowing in its own right, given the musicians’ longstanding collaboration both in the recording studio and on the concert stage. 

But throughout the whole of his rock ‘n’ roll life — a journey that continues into the present day — Slick remains driven by the seemingly unattainable spark that lingers just beyond his reach, yet motivates him to wake up and do it all over again. 

Shiloh Jolie-Pitt wants to drop the Pitt from her last name

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's daughter Shiloh is seeking to legally remove Pitt from her last name, per new filings. 

According to TMZ, the documents were filed on Monday, May 27 — Memorial Day and Shiloh's 18th birthday. Shiloh is not the first of the former couple's six children to have reportedly dropped their father's last name; PEOPLE reported that their teenage daughter Vivienne's name is listed as Vivenne Jolie in the playbill for the musical production of "The Outsiders," when Vivienne assisted her mother in producing. The outlet added that Pitt and Jolie's eldest daughter, Zahara, introduced herself as Zahara Marley Jolie while joining her sorority at Spellman College, per a video shared by Essence.

The name amendments follow reports in recent years that allege a strained family dynamic. In 2022,  it was reported that Jolie in a 2016 FBI report had accused Pitt of physically abusing her and their children while in flight on a private plane. A new filing made in April of 2024 claimed that “While Pitt’s history of physical abuse of Jolie started well before the family’s September 2016 plane trip from France to Los Angeles, this flight marked the first time he turned his physical abuse on the children as well. Jolie then immediately left him.”

Pitt in February of 2022 sued Jolie for violating “contractural" rights after she sold her portion of the ex-couple's French winery, Château Miraval. Jolie filed a countersuit in response, purporting new details of the plane incident, claiming that Pitt had "choked one of the children and struck another in the face” and “grabbed Jolie by the head and shook her," per Variety.

Here comes the spiral: A criminally guilty Donald Trump is a dangerous Donald Trump

On Thursday, the jury in Donald Trump’s New York hush-money trial issued their verdict: Guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The former president's sentencing is scheduled for early July.

Donald Trump, is quite predictably, very upset and enraged. On Wednesday, as Trump was leaving the courthouse, he complained, wallowing in self-pity, that the trial was “very unfair” and “Mother Teresa could not beat those charges, but we’ll see. We’ll see how we do.” Trump spent the day on his Truth Social disinformation platform ranting and raging about the legal "witch hunt” against him. Of course, none of this is true. Donald Trump is finally being held somewhat responsible for his decades-long crime spree.

A group of Donald Trump’s political cultists have reportedly been crying and praying outside of the Manhattan courthouse. To have 12 everyday Americans find him guilty must be disconcerting for both Trump and his MAGA political cult members. On this, John Gallagher writes:

While much has been made of the magnitude of the moment – the first president ever to undergo a criminal trial – what emerged during the beginning of the trial was not how big the trial was but how small it made Trump look. The courtroom is tired and shabby, the antithesis of the garish surroundings that are so important to Trump. The room itself is cold, leaving Trump at the mercy of a malfunctioning HVAC system. For someone who insists on ostentatious displays of wealth and control, the setting itself is precisely the kind of place that Trump would never deign to set foot in, let alone spend weeks in.

Then there was the problem that Trump can’t rage at his enemies, real or perceived. He had to sit there and take it as would-be jurors variously described him as “selfish,” “negative,” and “self-serving.” Then there were the social media posts of jurors, which are sometimes read in court by Trump’s own lawyers. One particularly choice post said, “I wouldn’t believe Donald Trump if his tongue were notarized.”…

For someone for whom that image is everything, the trial really shake Trump’s very being. He could not escape the courtroom without appearing diminished, less than he wants people to believe he is. If he’s convicted, he will be in an even worse place, as the thought of jail by many accounts frightens him.

Trump’s rage was an expression of his deep foreboding and knowledge that he was likely going to be convicted.

On Thursday, shortly after he was convicted, Trump sent out a fundraising email declaring that he is now a “political prisoner." Later in the day, Trump sent out another fundraising email — this one even more venomous and vile:

BREAKING FROM TRUMP: JUSTICE IS DEAD IN AMERICA!
I was just convicted in a RIGGED TRIAL meant to interfere in our elections.

Their sick & twisted goal is simple: Pervert the justice system against me so much, that proud supporters like YOU will SPIT when you hear my name.
BUT THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN! Friend –

NOW IT’S TIME FOR ME & YOU TO SHOVE IT BACK IN THEIR CORRUPT FACES!

Today is a DARK DAY  in history, but your response right now will shine brighter than the 1,000 suns.

Only with your support can we STOP these people from DESTROYING our country.

But I know with you by my side, WE WILL WIN!
WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Again, Donald Trump is distorting the facts, outright lying, and attempting to get money from his MAGA political cultists while also encouraging their violence and insurrection.

It is already happening. On Thursday, NBC news reported that Judge Juan Merchan has been targeted with death threats from Trump’s MAGA people.

In a statement delivered outside the courthouse after his verdict, Trump told the world, “This was a disgrace….This was a rigged trial by a conflicted judge who's corrupt. It's a rigged trial, a disgrace. They wouldn't give us a venue change. We were at 5% or 6% in this district, in this area. This was a rigged, disgraceful trial. The real verdict is gonna be Nov. 5, by the people. And they know what happened here, and everybody knows what happened here . . . we didn't do a thing wrong. I'm a very innocent man. It's okay. I'm fighting for our country. I'm fighting for our Constitution. Our whole country is being rigged right now. This was done by the Biden administration, in order to wound or hurt a political opponent. And I think it's just a disgrace. And we'll keep fighting. We'll fight 'til the end, and we'll win."

We need your help to stay independent

In all, Donald Trump’s hush-money trial is truly historic. It is the first time a former or current president has been put on trial for criminal offenses (felonies). As such, this is the first time a jury has found a former President of the United States criminally guilty. 

Whatever the outcome, the 2024 election will be historic in many other ways as well with Donald Trump being the first president to attempt a coup, a convicted felon, a sex assaulter as confirmed by a court of law, and now a person under court supervision. No law prevents a felon from running for office and being elected president. Moreover, however unlikely, Donald Trump could win the 2024 election while in prison. He could then orchestrate his release.

The verdict in Trump’s hush-money trial is not a triumph or something to celebrate. At the Atlantic, Charles Sykes writes: "For the moment, Trump’s fate is in the hands of a New York jury. But ultimately, his fate will be up to the voters, won’t it? Millions of voters seem disengaged from this year’s campaign. A New York Times analysis of recent polling found that Trump’s current lead rests with voters “who aren’t paying close attention to politics, who don’t follow traditional news and who don’t regularly vote.” Young voters seem especially dismayed about the election and cynical about the stakes. But Trump continues to tell us who he is and what he intends to do. We’ve been warned, and nobody—including that jury—is coming to save us before November."


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In all, the spectacle of Donald Trump’s criminal trial(s), like the Trumpocene more generally (and how we arrived at this societal crisis) is further evidence of how the American people are being targeted by what Henry Giroux describes as a “disimagination machine(s)”:

These tools of indoctrination relentlessly churn out manufactured ignorance and a shallow notion of self-interest, promoting a depoliticized notion of individualism. Additionally, these machineries of misinformation undermine the moral imagination’s power to empathize with the claims of others while undercutting the courage of individuals to see beyond the socially induced fog of a culture of immediacy. In this context, critical inquiry and thinking are divorced from the public imagination as sources of resistance. One consequence is that individuals and the larger public are thwarted from envisioning a future that advances democratic values of social and economic justice.

Ultimately, we should be very weary and suspicious of anyone with a public platform in the news media, punditry, and/or political class, who claims, with absolute certainty, to know what will happen to the country after Trump’s conviction in the hush-money trial. There are too many variables at play.

How will Donald Trump’s conviction and status as a felon will impact how the American people will vote in the 2024 election? Again, we do not know. But with Trump’s historic conviction, there is at least the reasonable hope that he will have a more difficult time of winning the 2024 election and becoming the country’s first dictator. That final decision will be made not in a courtroom by a jury and a judge, but in the voting booth by the American people.

“She’s suffering no fools”: “Hacks” guest star Helen Hunt weighs in on the finale’s shark attack

Comedy loves a good callback. In this regard “Hacks” rewards viewers who listen keenly to every bit of wisdom its comedy legend Deborah Vance (Jean Smart) shares with comedy writer Ava Daniels (Hannah Einbinder). Every moment in its third season finale “Bulletproof” was set up by previous episodes. Seeing the sock-in-the-jaw closer before it hit, however, required remembering a line Deborah shares with Ava in the second season’s final episode.

“You've got to be a shark,” she tells the younger woman. “You've got do what’s best for you.”

She lovingly adds, “I told you . . . you’re just like me. You got your own mountain to climb.”

Ava may not have learned everything she needs to know about the TV business from Deborah but she certainly mastered her mentor’s greatest lesson: when it comes to getting what you want, fight dirty.

Ava’s sharp writing, along with backstage machinations enacted by her manager Jimmy (Paul W. Downs) and his wildcard of a partner Kayla (Meg Stalter) helped Deborah become the first woman to host a broadcast network’s late-night show. This was history delayed; she had the job decades ago only to have it ripped from her, derailed by a spate of bad publicity.

HacksJean Smart in "Hacks" (Max)The retired executive responsible for that decision (played by Hal Linden) tells her as much when she drops in for a business visit. She was undeniable, he tells her, but toxic PR resulting from her envious ex-husband spreading a rumor she burned down their home in a fury meant none of that mattered. 

”There are a million factors to getting a show on the air or keeping it on the air. With a woman, make it a million and one,” Linden’s former network head tells her. “. . . All you gotta do is pray that something doesn’t happen that gives them an excuse to say no. Other than that, good luck.”

Helen Hunt, the “Mad About You” star who plays the network’s current boss Winnie Landell, knows a little something about that. In a pre-finale conversation with Salon, the Emmy- and Oscar-winning actor shared that she based her top entertainment executive on several high-powered people she’s worked with over the years.

But in “Hacks,” Deborah is the character to whom she relates the most. In Hunt's career as a writer and director she remembers a female studio head telling her that a script she’d written needed to be irrefutable, and perfect, because every major person involved was a woman. Place a male director and actors in the same scenario, the exec pointed out, and it only needed to be really good to go forward.

“That's a little bit I think, what's happening in this moment. Jean’s character has to run through 30 more hoops than a man might,” Hunt said knowingly. But the same applies to Winnie, who balked at handing a historically male legacy job to a 70-year-old woman – despite, as Hunt points out, that Winnie sits at her career peak at 60. 

“If suddenly, there was a woman succeeding in one of those spots, might it change something kind of big?” Hunt asked. “I think it might.”

“I'm guessing that it's all the more important that she not blow it here, you know, making this big choice,” Hunt observed. “It's not a cliché to say, women have a smaller eye of the needle to pass through, you know. Less chances to make a mistake.”

Whatever bad luck there is that could show up in Deborah’s path may be of her own making. When she originally lost late-night, the tale that nuked Deborah’s odds was spurred by her husband leaving her for her sister Kathy (played by J. Smith-Cameron in Season 3). 

HacksJean Smart and Hannah Einbinder in "Hacks" (Max)This time, Deborah makes the unwise choice to betray Ava by doing something worse than firing her for Ava’s own good.  She offers Ava the head writer job on her new show, prompting her to turn down a head writer position at her very cushy present gig, an equivalent position at “Last Week Tonight with John Oliver.”

Right after the ink on that resignation letter has dried, Deborah demotes Ava to second chair, telling her that Winnie is requiring her to hire the previous host’s head writer.

Only that’s not true – a twist that made Hunt like her character even more. “If she's allowing Deborah to make her own choice, I think that's smart,” she said. “Some of the worst TV shows have come when you hire a creator, and then tell them what to do rather than saying, ‘Now I’ve got to sink or swim based on their choices.’  Because having them drive with the brake on and not get to choose their own people isn't good.”

We need your help to stay independent

Ava tells Deborah as much, reminding the comic that she knows her and that the two of them work together brilliantly. That, Ava points out, will make their show special versus what the previous head writer offers – the same shtick, except in a dress.

But Deborah claims to know networks would rather take more of the same than something new, tossing an insulting proposal to Ava in the process. “You can still do all the work! You can be the woman behind the man behind the woman!”

Ava responds with explosive indignation – she has a right to it. “I am not asking for the business or the world to be fair,” she says with tears in her eyes. “I am asking for you to treat me fairly because you owe me that.”

But Deborah is unmoved, telling her to stop crying. “I cannot give them any excuse,” she declares as her final word. “This show has to be bulletproof. It has to work. I’ve lost way too much for it not to.” If she has to lose Ava as part of that, “I’m willing to,” she says.

“I relate to the Deborah character because I grew up on Johnny Carson,” Hunt admitted in our interview. “And if I watch late-night TV, I watch all of those guys. I think they're all amazing. It is a way to take the horror of the news, and somehow swallow the spiky truth of it and come up with something with a little bit of humor.

“If suddenly, there was a woman succeeding in one of those spots, might it change something kind of big?” Hunt asked. “I think it might.”

HacksHannah Einbinder in "Hacks" (Max)Ava thinks so too, appearing to swallow her bitterness the way Deborah says she does by purchasing a bottle of Champagne Krug to drink by herself. 

Then she shows up early for her first day on the job for a face-to-face with Deborah in the network meeting room, where she threatens to let slip a potentially devastating secret Deborah shared in confidence. During a strategic golf retreat for network affiliates on which Ava accompanied her, Deborah slept with the CEO of the network’s parent company.

Therefore, Ava confidently says, “I think I am your head writer after all.”

“You wouldn’t,” Deborah growls in Ava’s face. Only this time she doesn’t flinch or make any other conciliatory move that would show weakness. She meets her mentor’s gaze and answers, “I would. Wouldn’t you?”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In Hunt’s assessment of her character’s view of the cutthroat network TV game, she believes someone like Winnie Lindell would put Deborah in the late-night host’s chair as part of changing some very big things. “She's suffering no fools, and she's smart,” Hunt said. “She might be tough, but she's paid to be tough because you only get one shot at this.”

The same might be said of Ava and the future “Hacks” might have in store for her. At the end of the day, Deborah and Ava are meant for each other for reasons other than their chemistry and affection. They show that to succeed in Hollywood, you have to be a little vicious. Hunt’s character takes out her rage on the pickleball court, where she slaps around people like Jimmy and bets serious money on her games.

Ava wagers something more valuable than a few thousand dollars – her loyalty to the woman who gave her a second chance when nobody else would, punishing and pulling for her in equal measure all the way. That partnership might not survive this job, which might not matter. With her willingness to be a shark and look out for herself, not to mention many years of her career ahead of her, Ava might end up running the whole show.

All episodes of "Hacks" are streaming on Max.

Trump attacks “devil” judge for guilty verdict, practically “begging for incarceration,” expert says

In remarks that could best be described as a rant, former President Donald Trump spoke out Friday against a “very unfair” trial wherein a “devil" — Judge Juan Merchan — supposedly prevented him from being exonerated.

“I would have testified, I wanted to testify,” Trump told reporters. He said the prevailing “theory” is that one must should never testify, even “if it were George Washington,” because a single untruth could be charged as perjury, but he “didn’t care” and still wanted to testify.

Trump then launched into another bizarre attack against the judge in his case, claiming he was the reason he never took the stand in his own defense.

“Was he a bad boy here? Was he a bad boy there?” Trump said, claiming Merchan let prosecutors "go into everything that I was ever involved in." That's why he didn't speak, Trump asserted: "I would have loved to have testified. To this day I would have liked to have testified.”

He again returned to Merchan, who will decide Trump's sentence at a July 11 hearing.

“You saw what happened to some of the witnesses who were on our side, they were literally crucified by this man who looks like an angel but he’s really a devil,” Trump said. “He looks so nice and soft,” the former president continued, but he put people through “hell.” 

Trump, who faces the prospect of prison, did not help himself with his remarks, Georgia State University law professor Anthony Michael Kreis commented on social media.

 “This press conference is not helping Trump," Kreis wrote. "He’d be better just keeping quiet but he’s begging for incarceration at this point."

Todd Blanche made “crucial errors” that prevented “Trump’s best defense,” prosecutor argues

Donald Trump certainly made history Thursday when he became the first former American president to be convicted of felony crimes. However, experts say his attorney, Todd Blanche, might have been able to avoid a conviction if he'd led a better defense.

Dave Aronberg, state attorney for Palm Beach County, Florida, said that he "wasn’t too surprised” by the way things turned out. But, appearing on MSNBC’s “Way Too Early," he argued that Blanche is at least party to blame.

"The prosecution successfully established a firewall around Michael Cohen, and that was important because it neutralized Trump's best defense, which is to call Michael Cohen a liar and to say you've got to just reject the case built around Michael Cohen," he said.

Blanche committed "crucial errors," Aronberg continued, when he failed to rebut the prosecution and “adequately wound Cohen on the stand.” He also faulted the defense team for continuing to insist that Trump barely knew Stormy Daniels. That undermined Blanche's credibility, Aronberg said, “because no one believed that the sexual encounter didn’t happen.”

Second, Blanche claimed that the monthly $35,000 payment to Cohen was a legal service and not a reimbursement for the hush money he paid Daniels. That blocked "Trump's best defense," he said, "which is that the legal services actually covered the reimbursement to a lawyer-slash-fixer and Trump didn't intend to deceive. But Trump's defense made it easier for prosecutors to prove that Trump acted deceptively and turned an obvious $130,000 reimbursement into a bogus $420,000 legal expense."

A former Trump lawyer, Tim Parlatore, also felt Trump was poorly defended in a case that was “incredibly defensible,” as he told a a panel on CNN Thursday evening.

A major reason for the defense’s failure is the amount of time it spent discussing Playboy model Karen McDougal, the "catch-and-kill" scheme with the National Enquirer and “other things that had nothing to do with the actual charge of falsified business records," Parlatore told anchor Wolf Blitzer. “I think that they really fell into the trap of fighting all these things they didn't need to," he said.

Blanche, however, argues he did nothing wrong. Asked by Fox News' Jesse Watters if he would do anything differently, now that there's a verdict, he laughed. "I wouldn't change anything that we did," he said.

Todd Blanche says Trump was “very involved” in crafting his own defense strategy

It seems like the micro-managing, penny-pinching businessman in Donald Trump may have played a part in how his defense team handled his Manhattan hush money trial, at least according to lead Trump attorney Todd Blanche. 

The former president was found guilty on 34 felony counts by a dozen New Yorkers on Thursday. Blanche said  Trump was “very much involved” in conversations over which jurors to object to, suggesting the role he played as the trial went forward.

“He was right there with the whole team talking about the potential jurors,” Blanche told Fox News' Jesse Watters. Indeed, the former president and his lawyer made every decision together, Blanche claimed

Blanche went on to call his client a “smart guy” who “knows what he’s doing,” and would sometimes joke that “he wanted to be the litigator.”

Blanche lamented that Trump was unable to avoid a jury of his peers, though he did not directly attack them the way his client has, instead lauding their professionalism.

“Look, was I satisfied? We put a motion [for an acquittal] in because we said we could not get a fair jury in Manhattan. And that’s not a — I’m not being disparaging to the jurors, man, they were great,” Blanche told Watters. “They showed up on time every day. They were committed. They paid attention. But, we’re in a situation where we had a very limited number of people we could strike.”

He added that an “overwhelming” number of potential jurors had “very strong” negative opinions of the former president. 

While Blanche maintained that “it was an honor” for him to “spend the last few weeks” defending Trump, he appeared to also be excusing his own shaky performance by sharing the blame with his client.

Mere hours after the verdict, he appeared for an interview with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, claiming the former president came up with his own defense strategy. Collins had pointed out that Trump appeared pass notes it to his attorneys on numerous occasions. 

“Who ultimately was in charge of the defense strategy here?” she asked. “Was it you or was it Donald Trump?”

“It was both of us. If there’s a lawyer that comes in and says that they’re in charge of their defense strategy, they’re not doing a service to their client,” Blanche replied. Again, every defendant, everybody who has their life on the line in history, will tap their lawyer every once in a while and say, ‘Hey, what about this? What about that?'"

Ivanka Trump had little to say after her father was convicted, while Melania remained totally silent

Ivanka Trump was a no-show during the former president’s weeks-long hush money trial. When her father was convicted on 34 felony charges Thursday, the former White House aide had little to say, offering just four words of support: "I love you dad," shared alongside a photo on Instagram of her and her dad when she was a child.

Ivanka's older brother, Donald Jr., who had filmed himself in the courthouse Wednesday, had much more to say. Within a few hours of the verdict, he fired out a slew of profane social media content: 14 posts on X, seven on Truth Social, a video on Instagram, and four more posts on Facebook for good measure. All were in support of his father, who is now the first former American president to be convicted of a crime.

“Such bullshit,” read his first tweet on X, just after the verdict came out.

“Guilty on all counts. The Democrats have succeeded in their years long attempt to turn America into a third-world shithole. November 5 is our last chance to save it,” read the next tweet. And finally, as if to tie a bow on the whole thing, another post on the matter read “Sentencing is 4 days before the GOP Convention…They're not even trying to hide the ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!!”

Melania Trump, the former first lady, remained silent.

“Every member of Donald Trump’s immediate family has now expressed support for him, showing up at the courthouse or, in Ivanka’s case, posting on social media,” Olivia Nuzzi, Washington correspondent for New York magazine, posted on X Thursday. “The exception is Melania Trump, who never attended the trial and has said nothing about today’s guilty verdict.”

Trump’s former White House press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, speculated on CNN that both Ivanka and Melania’s absence from the trial would have “absolutely” bothered Trump. “If Mrs. Trump wasn’t at some event and it was really noted, he would definitely bring it up with her. So I’m sure in this context, it's definitely really bothering him.”

In fact, throughout the trial, one repeat question from reporters that the former president continued to ignore was: “Where is Melania?” Trump even attended a Mother’s Day lunch at Mar-a-Lago on May 12 without her.

“Don’t rule it out”: Experts say “anyone else” convicted of Trump’s crimes would get prison time

In his closing arguments, former President Donald Trump's lead attorney warned the jury that a conviction could mean time behind bars.

“You cannot send someone to prison and you cannot convict somebody based upon the words of Michael Cohen,” Todd Blanche declared. That quickly earned him a rebuke from Judge Juan Merchan, the one man who – now that the jury ignored Blanche’s pleading – has the ultimate power to decide whether Trump gets hit with a fine, put on probation or is sentenced to time behind bars.

Sentencing won’t happen until July 11. And because Trump, like any convicted felon, has the right to appeal, it’s unlikely he would serve any carceral sentence, if one is even handed down, until 2025. But considering the facts, many legal experts say that a man just found guilty of 34 class E felonies in the state of New York, with a similar inability to even fake remorse, would likely be looking at time behind bars.

Trump, after all, was found guilty not just of falsifying business records, but doing so in the service of an underlying crime: as part of a conspiracy, the prosecution said, to evade campaign finance laws ahead of the 2016 election, preventing voters who had just heard him boast of sexual assault on the “Access Hollywood” tape from learning that he had also allegedly cheated on his wife in a problematic sexual encounter with an adult film star.

For a first-time convicted offender like Trump, there is no minimum sentence under New York law. “This means the judge will have discretion in imposing a sentence, taking into account the seriousness of the conduct on which Trump is convicted, the evidence at trial, Trump’s testimony, and other factors,” according to an explainer from Just Security, a legal affairs website affiliated with the New York University School of Law, published before the trial began.

Trump's behavior during the trial did not make things better for the defendant. Ten times he was found in contempt of court for violating a gag order and attacking jurors, witnesses and the judge’s family. In the closing days, the defense called a witness, attorney Robert Costello, whose testimony only aided the prosecution, which introduced an email from him discussing his efforts to pressure Cohen against cooperating with law enforcement, complaining that the ex-Trump fixer was “playing with the most powerful man on the planet.” And following the verdict, the defendant himself, instead of acting contrite or respectfully pledging to continue his legal battle, denounced it all as “a rigged trial by a conflicted judge who is corrupt.”

We need your help to stay independent

“For anyone else, this would mean jail,” Andrew Weissmann, a former federal prosecutor who worked with special counsel Robert Mueller, said on MSNBC. Trump is not only lacking in remorse, he said, but “flaunting” its absence.

Trump and his allies are right when they complain of two-tiered justice in America, but it is people like the Republican nominee – a billionaire and former president – who typically evade consequences for actions that would land others who lack such money and power in a prison cell. And it is Trump’s status that remains his strongest defense today, even with a judge he has repeatedly insulted.

Karen Friedman Agnifilo, a former prosecutor with the New York District Attorney’s Office, said that if “you were to remove the name Donald Trump,” it would be an easy call. Trump has “three open other felony indictments in three other jurisdictions, in both state and federal court,” she told CNN, and has shown disdain for the entire justice process. “We’ll see what happens, but anyone else in that position would get prison.”

In 2015, for example, a construction company executive who falsified business records to cover up a bribe had to spend every weekend in jail for a year – a sentence, noted by Just Security in its guide to potential punishments for Trump, that points to how creative Merchan could choose to get if he believes a former president deserves to be behind bars.

“I do anticipate that the district attorney will ask for some sentence of incarceration,” Ryan Goodman, a professor at NYU School of Law, said on CNN. “And I do think that there is a good likelihood that the judge will impose some sentence of incarceration,” he said, adding that he does not believe such a sentence would come into effect until after Trump has exhausted his appeals.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Norm Eisen, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said that if anyone deserves prison for falsifying business records it is this particular defendant.

“This is the most serious falsifying business records case in the history of the state of New York,” Eisen said on CNN. “I think Alvin Bragg is going to ask for a sentence of incarceration and I think Judge Merchan will very seriously with that.”

Look, said Eisen: “Donald Trump engaged in a conspiracy to interfere with the 2016 election and covered it up. That’s how you get a felony: the underlying conspiracy. That is as serious a crime, tampering with American democracy, that you can have. And the judge knows that. So I think [there’s] a serious risk of a jail sentence.”

“I thoroughly agree,” conservative attorney George Conway posted on Threads. “Guilty of thirty-four felonies. No acceptance of responsibility. Total contempt for the law and the legal process. Literally held in contempt ten times. Attacks on witnesses and jurors. There’s no substantial justification for not sending him to prison.”

If prison seems like an anti-Trump fantasy, consider that so did a conviction on nearly three dozen felonies in a case that at one point looked like it would never even be brought.

Anthony Michael Kreis, a constitutional law professor at Georgia State University College of Law, previously doubted that incarceration could be in the cards. But Trump’s blatant disrespect for the rule of law will be hard to ignore come his July 11 sentencing hearing.

“Trump is going to rant and rant and rant about the process being corrupt and declaring his innocence,” he posted on social media. “Judges aren’t going to take kindly to that no matter who they are.”

Trump loyalists like Ari Fleischer, White House press secretary under former President George W. Bush, are already preparing their followers for what once seemed impossible.

“Brace yourself,” said the man best known for telling America that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. “It won’t surprise me if Judge Merchan sentences to prison,” he posted on X, bemoaning the fact that Democratic “activists” believe “Trump is a threat to democracy” and “prison is where he belongs.”

“Don’t rule it out,” he warned.

“The Beatles for me are it”: Darius Rucker reflects on early musical influences, courtesy of his mom

Grammy Award-winning singer-songwriter and musician Darius Rucker joined host Kenneth Womack to talk about discovering the Beatles’ music as a young child, the “most perfect record ever made,” his new memoir “Life’s Too Short” and much more on “Everything Fab Four,” a podcast co-produced by me and Womack (a music scholar who also writes about pop music for Salon) and distributed by Salon.

Rucker, best known as the founder and frontman of ‘90s rock group Hootie & the Blowfish – the multi-platinum selling band behind the hits “Only Wanna Be With You,” “Hold My Hand” and “Let Her Cry” – told Womack that while growing up, “Music was very important in our household. I don’t even remember a time when music wasn’t always around.”

His mom, who was in the church choir and whom Rucker said, “has an amazing voice,” had a cabinet that “most people used for liquor” filled with hundreds of record albums. “I was five years old and came across two Beatles 45s. There was not another white group in her whole collection. But I would sit there and play those two over and over and just fell in love with them.” Once he started working as a teen, he would use his money to buy his own Beatles albums and began playing the drums, eventually teaching himself to play guitar.

“For me, playing guitar and writing songs just came together,” said Rucker. “I didn't want to pretend I could write songs like the Beatles. But once I started playing, I just wanted to write my own songs and see what happened.” Hootie & the Blowfish formed when he was in college (the band taking its name from the nicknames of two fellow classmates) and played together for seven years before landing a record contract. “A lot of times we struggled,” he explained to Womack, “but the music kept us together.” And as the group gets ready to head back out on the road this summer, Rucker said, “We like each other. We have a lot of respect for each other. When it’s time to get back together and play, we just fall right into it . . . Playing our hits and meaning something to people like that, it’s awesome.”

Subscribe today through Spotify, Apple Podcasts, GooglePodcasts, Stitcher, RadioPublic, Breaker, Player.FM, Pocket Casts or wherever you're listening.

Rucker has also just released his first book, “Life’s Too Short: A Memoir,” in which he examines some of his relationships for the first time and said he “just wanted to be honest. I didn’t need to write a hook like with a song, I just needed to tell the story.” But as for what he said he could talk about 24 hours a day: “The Beatles for me are it. They're just the most important thing in music history. Everybody is influenced by the Beatles, everybody else has to line up behind them. They’re just better than everybody else, and I knew it when I was five.”

Listen to the entire conversation with Darius Rucker on “Everything Fab Four” and subscribe via Spotify, Apple, Google or wherever you’re listening. 

“Everything Fab Four” is distributed by Salon. Host Kenneth Womack is the author of a two-volume biography on Beatles producer George Martin and the bestselling books "Solid State: The Story of Abbey Road and the End of the Beatles” and “John Lennon, 1980: The Last Days in the Life.” His latest book is the authorized biography of Beatles road manager Mal Evans, “Living the Beatles Legend,” out now.

Donald Trump was done in by his own defense

Donald Trump is now a convicted felon, found guilty by a jury of his peers in the city in which he was born and raised and lived for the first 70 years of his life. The front page of his former hometown newspaper looked like this today:

Republicans have all rallied in support of the Dear Leader by whining and complaining about the judicial system being used against a political opponent, apparently trying to convince the American people that anyone running for office should be immune from prosecution for their crimes. (That's pretty rich coming from the crowd that chanted "lock her up" for four solid years.)

Donald Trump has lost every single legal proceeding brought against him in the last three years. 

Needless to say, every one of the lawsuits filed against him and the crimes he is accused of were being very publicly investigated long before Trump decided to run for president again. In fact, there's a good case to be made that that's why he announced a second run, as the LA Times' Doyle McManus pointed out back in October of 2021:

As long as he’s running (or even sort of running), Trump can denounce every inquest and subpoena as just another part of a political vendetta. It’s a way to hold his troops together — and to make every prosecutor think twice. 

He didn't have to run for president. There were a whole bunch of Republicans who ran against him in the primaries, ready and willing to take on the job. But Trump needed to run so that he would be able to say to himself and others that all these civil and criminal cases against him aren't his fault. Nothing is ever his fault.

The problem for Trump is that reality is finally catching up to him. His Big Lies may be working on his cult following but they don't work in a court of law where real evidence is presented and ordinary people and experienced jurists are charged with weighing the facts to determine the truth. Donald Trump has lost every single legal proceeding brought against him in the last three years. 

The Trump Organization was found guilty of 17 felonies, landing CFO Allen Weisselberg in jail. He lost two defamation cases brought by E. Jean Carroll. He lost the mammoth New York civil fraud case. And now he's lost his first criminal trial with a sweeping guilty verdict on all 34 felony counts. The pending cases in DC, Georgia and Florida may not end up being adjudicated before the election but if he loses in November they will likely go ahead and there's a very good chance he'll lose those as well (assuming the Supreme Court doesn't decide to fully sacrifice what's left of its credibility to spare him.) 

Trump is a domineering bully who doesn't know how to run anything.

You would think that a man this rich and powerful would have such good legal representation that prosecutors and judges would be no match for them. Think about OJ Simpson and his Dream Team. So why is Trump's team so lame? I think most legal observers would say that it's because Trump is a terrible client who demands that his lawyers follow his lead and that's a very bad way to conduct a defense.

Consider how it's worked out for him so far. Trump stayed fairly hands off from the first E. Jean Carroll trial which he lost and had to pay Carroll $5 million dollars. He obviously wasn't happy about that and his lawyer Joe Tacopina abruptly resigned on the eve of the second one. Trump then decided to take the case in hand personally and replaced Tacopina with his favorite TV lawyer, Alina Habba who, along with Trump, had already been sanctioned for almost a million dollars in a case Trump brought against the Clintons which the judge called "completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose." During the trial, Trump acted out whenever he attended, even flouncing out of the courtroom at one point. Habba, for her part, mirrored Trump's behavior, irritating the judge and the jury, which awarded Carroll $83.3 million dollars, including $65 million in punitive damages. 

We need your help to stay independent

He performed the same rude and disruptive dance in the New York State fraud case, resulting in a gag order and sanctions for violating them. Trump was clearly in charge of that case too, even to the extent that Habba pasted on his grim mug shot expression every time she came before the cameras. He clearly believed that his case should be tried as if it was his Truth Social feed. That didn't work out too well either. He was found liable to the tune of nearly half a billion dollars. 

The assumption was that his first criminal trial would be different. He would be required to attend the trial every day it was in session and he'd hired some real lawyers this time. But it was soon obvious that he was still running the show. It wasn't just that he was outside the courthouse slamming the judge and the prosecutor every single day, which no defense lawyer would think makes a lot of sense. He also got himself sanctioned again for violating his gag order against discussing witnesses, jury members or family members of court employees which was just plain stupid. But It was undeniable that Trump was dictating the way they argued the case as well. 

For instance, any lawyer would have said that Trump should just stipulate to the tryst with Stormy Daniels so they could avoid the whole spectacle of her testimony. But Trump insisted that they deny it ever happened. And when she was cross examined by Trump's attorney, he also obviously wanted them to try to make her look like a liar instead of simply asking her if she knew anything about the records at the Trump organization and when she said no, just letting it go. After all, that's what the case was about.

By contrast he wouldn't let them go hard after David Pecker, his buddy who also happens to have a box full of papers that Trump believes might incriminate him in god-only-knows-what. They treated him like he was their witness when, in fact, his testimony was pivotal to the prosecution The same with his former gal friday, Hope Hicks. Any lawyer who wasn't hamstrung by his client would have tried to shake their testimony. 

And then there was Robert Costello, the friend of Rudy Giuliani who made a complete mess of the case and should never have been called to testify. He ended up making Michael Cohen look as respectable as a monk by comparison. That was almost certainly Trump's doing after seeing Costello testify before the MAGA Republicans in the House the week before. (His crude, bombastic style was like looking in the mirror.) 

Trump's lead lawyer Todd Blanche appeared on Fox and CNN after the verdict and had nothing but great things to say about Trump. But he did make it crystal clear that Trump was in charge of the case. 

He also said that Trump was very much involved with jury selection and told Kaitlan Collins on CNN that they mutually decided that Trump shouldn't take the stand. Blanche seemed a little bit shell-shocked and is probably exhausted but he pretty much admitted that Trump was running the defense strategy. You have to wonder if he will be with Trump much longer. 

All of this just illustrates what we already know: Trump is a domineering bully who doesn't know how to run anything, whether it's a legal defense or the U.S. government. You'd think after losing all these elections, civil cases and now criminal trials Republicans would get it through their heads that this man who calls everything a hoax and a fake is actually talking about himself. 

Trump is no outlaw, just a grubby, sad criminal

I was asked a few times by people over Memorial Day weekend what I thought would happen in Donald Trump's criminal trial for fraud in Manhattan. I expressed cautious optimism that he would be convicted, pointing out that the prosecution presented an overwhelming amount of evidence while the defense acted like a bunch of clowns. Folks reacted with surprise to this prediction. They've been burned too many times, watching Trump wriggle away from consequences for a dizzying number of crimes, including his efforts to overthrow democracy. Thursday, however, a ray of hope opened up as Trump was found guilty on 34 state felony charges

Trump, with his lickspittle staff and his checkbook crimes, is closer to the corrupt Prince John than Robin Hood.

District Attorney Alvin Bragg and lead prosecutor Joshua Steinglass had two advantages over others who have tried to hold Trump accountable. First, there are no powerful Republicans swooping in to save Trump from consequences in New York. There are no corrupt Federalist judges, like Aileen Cannon or the Supreme Court Six, finding ways to delay Trump's federal trials indefinitely. No Senate Republicans to stop Trump from being rightfully convicted after his impeachment in the House of Representatives. No wealthy donors to step in and pay his civil judgments, whether for his extensive business fraud or his sexual assault of E. Jean Carroll. Second, Trump was facing a jury of his peers. I had some faith that ordinary people, when faced with inescapable evidence of Trump's criminality, would suck it up and do their civic duty. Unlike, say, all the people who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution but decided to protect the leader of the GOP instead. 

There was one other reason I felt a thrum of hope, one I feared to say out loud even to my friends outside of the world of politics: It sure seemed like Trump and his people expected he'd get convicted.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


As the trial progressed, Trump escalated far beyond his tired litany of claims that everything was "rigged" against him, though he kept that pattern up. He's been experimenting by trying to cast himself as a rakish outlaw. He wants voters to imagine his crimes are about standing up to a corrupt system. In reality, he is corruption embodied; a man who has never acted on anything but self-interest and who only evades justice by paying people off, usually in promised (if infrequently actualized) political favors. 

"Trump Leans Into an Outlaw Image as His Criminal Trial Concludes," read a New York Times headline on Tuesday. In it, reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonah Bromwich outlined how Trump was laying the groundwork, pre-verdict, to spin a guilty verdict into what he hopes is an electoral asset. He's "surrounding himself with accused criminals and convicts," they reported, even bringing the notorious Hell's Angel gangster, Chuck Zito, to trial with him. They note that Trump now valorizes "those prosecuted for storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021," and that he has sold merchandise featuring his mug shot after his Georgia arrest for his coup efforts in that state. Trump's tendency to celebrate his own criminality is so extensive that Haberman and Bromwich overlook some important examples, like how Trump repeatedly compares himself to murderous gangster Al Capone or waxes poetic about how much he adores fictional serial killer Hannibal Lecter

No doubt there's a long history of Americans romanticizing criminals, going back at least to Jesse James or Billy the Kid, who became icons of the Wild West. In the early 20th century, bank robbers like Bonnie and Clyde often became folk heroes. While Mafia movies like "Goodfellas" or "Scarface" usually conclude with the downfall of their criminal anti-heroes, all too often fans focus only on the early parts of the movies, when the bad guys are riding high, before the law and their own demons catch up with them. Most recently, we witnessed how all too many people thought Walter White was the hero of "Breaking Bad," instead of a character study condemning the darkness that lurks inside many otherwise "upstanding" citizens. 

But even by those standards, there's good reason to hope Trump's attempt to cast himself as a charming rogue will fall flat. For one thing, his images from the court are of a tired, elderly man with bad hair and makeup. This is not Warren Beatty sexily robbing a bank as Clyde Barrow or a 2003-era Johnny Depp winking at the camera as pirate Jack Sparrow. But more importantly, Trump's crimes aren't a daring good time. They're just the pathetic scramblings of a loser trying to avoid being exposed as the fraud he is. 

The details of the crimes that led to his 34 felony convictions are not flattering. First, there was the sex itself that led to the tawdry cover-up attempt. The story told by adult film actress Stormy Daniels was not of being seduced by an irresistible bad boy. Instead, she described a charmless bore who extracted sex by being "bigger and blocking the way" and making false promises that he could get her on TV. 

Then there was the coverup itself. The main theme of the testimony was Donald the Coward, who hides behind a series of "fixers" so he never has to deal directly with the fallout from his poor choices. The stereotypical romantic outlaw is a man who dives headlong into danger. Such criminal heroes take on dopey authority figures that are fun for audiences to root against, whether it's sanctimonious cops, rich bankers, or fancy nobles whose wealth needs a little forcible redistribution. Trump, with his lickspittle staff and his checkbook crimes, is closer to the corrupt Prince John than Robin Hood. His crimes aren't exciting strikes against "The Man." He is "The Man," preying on vulnerable people, like the 27-year-old Daniels or the financially desperate people he defrauded through Trump University or even some of the lost souls he snookered into storming the Capitol on Jan. 6. The regular folks on the New York streets weren't cheering Trump, but the brave jurors who stood against him. It felt like the end of "Ghostbusters," when New Yorkers applauded our little guy heroes who saved the city from a demonic apocalypse.

After being found guilty on all 34 counts, Trump did what he does best, which is whine at length at the cameras. (Not very dashing!) It was the same tirade we're used to hearing from him ad nauseum: He's perfect and never does anything wrong — it's everyone else who is the real criminal. And as usual, he went heavy into the racist lies while trying to invoke who the "real" criminals are: "Millions and millions of people pouring into our country right now from prisons and from mental institutions, terrorists, and they're taking over our country." Every word was untrue, from the numbers (which fall far short of "millions" by a couple of zeroes) to his characterization of refugees, who are families trying to escape criminal gangs, not members of them. 

What is especially typical of this rant wasn't just the racism, but Trump's famous psychological projection. His description of immigrants would be better applied to himself: mentally unwell "terrorists" who are "taking over our country." Migrants are not the people who sent a violent mob to the Capitol to overthrow an election and install a dictatorship. Trump did that. There's nothing glamorous or fun about Trump or his crimes. They're just the shabby dealings of an overprivileged fat cat trying to hang onto power he never deserved in the first place. 

Donald Trump up close and personal: A president convicted by a jury of his peers

In the end, it was a jury of ordinary people who brought him down.

Convicted felon. Donald Trump, the twice impeached, former president sat through the reading of the verdict in his New York felony case, floored. According to witnesses in the courtroom, he was stunned – almost unable to believe what had just occurred. Guilty on all 34 felony counts.

Let’s be blunt: Republicans love to win. That alone could sway many of those who secretly like Trump but realize that he could lose.

This was the only trial scheduled before the November election and Donald Trump went 0 for 34. A massive downfall. But, look at it this way, Donald Trump always wanted to make history. Now he has.

Trump is the first former president to be tried and convicted of a felony. He has set a record that hopefully will stand for eternity. Outside the courtroom, he lashed out with his usual conspiratorial venom, claiming the Biden administration was after him, insisting that he was an innocent man and complaining that our “whole country is being rigged right now.”

But somebody finally held Trump accountable. His victimhood sounded hollow.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg took a case that initially had been dropped. He used a paper trail along with Trump’s own people and put together a narrative that the jurors believed: Donald Trump is guilty.

Joe Biden’s re-election campaign quickly responded: “In New York today, we saw that no one is above the law.” And reiterated the obvious: Trump will likely still be on the ballot and must be defeated in November. “The threat Trump poses to our democracy has never been greater. He is running an increasingly unhinged campaign of revenge and retribution, pledging to be a dictator ‘on day one’ and calling for our Constitution to be ‘terminated’ so he can regain and keep power.”

What few understand, but anyone who covered the Trump White House realizes, is that the jury found Trump guilty for the very same reasons those who spent a lot of time with him at the White House found him to be reprehensible; close quarters with Trump strips away the veneer of civility and invincibility that he is able to maintain for the casual observer. To see Trump up close is to understand how truly wretched and repulsive he is. 

That came through as the jury’s verdict was read publicly. Trump couldn’t run and couldn’t hide. He took it right between the eyes – the jury saw through him. He is spent.

“Donald Trump is a convicted felon,” Eric Swalwell, a Democratic congressman from California, wrote on social media. “This verdict is not a win for any single person. It’s a win for an idea. The idea that we all follow the same rules. The rule of law won today.”

One of those most affected by the verdict is Michael Cohen, Trump’s former fixer. He was convicted of lying for Donald Trump and spent time in prison for doing it. When he tried to write his first book, he found himself tossed back into prison by the Trump Justice Department. “Today is an important day for accountability and the rule of law,” he told me – restoring his faith in a justice system that Trump used to try and gag Cohen.

As it turned out, the jury believed Cohen more than Trump though Trump’s defense attorney was keen on painting Cohen as a horrible liar. Turns out, Donald is worse.

We need your help to stay independent

Now the question remains: Will Trump do any prison time for his offense? He has constantly insulted Judge Juan Merchan, who threatened to throw Trump in jail for contempt during the trial for violating a gag order.

While Trump’s age, 77, would lead one to believe it is unlikely he will go to prison for a class E felony that is punishable by a fine, probation or up to four years in prison per count, there are some who believe he will and should spend time in a cell.

Michael Cohen once fantasized about Trump spending time in the same cell he occupied, telling me that would be justice. But that was a few years ago, and now, Cohen is silent on that possibility.

Trump’s remaining minions in the MAGA party have not been silenced, however. They continue to spout the same venom as the felon they follow. And while they are solidly behind Trump today, he is scheduled to be sentenced just three days before the Republican National Convention kicks off in Milwaukee, and at least one former right-wing member of Congress is calling on the party to reconsider his expected nomination.

Some, like former Republican presidential candidate Joe Walsh, think Trump’s conviction will actually help him politically come November. “The Biden team better brace themselves,” he told me. “His cult thinks it was a political prosecution, and they’ll all help him out.” True to that sentiment, Trump was already selling black “MAGA” hats within an hour of the verdict being announced.

Whether or not Trump’s conviction will ultimately help him, is not the point, according to former Obama ethics Czar Norm Eisen. He has been in the courtroom every day of the trial. “For today, the enormity of Trump being finally held accountable by a jury of his peers after so many allegations resonates across the nation and around the world,” he explained.

That cannot be understated. Every first reference to Donald Trump in the future will include “convicted felon.” Although, notably, a high-ranking Republican I spoke to late Thursday evening said “I have no problem with a convicted felon representing the Republican Party.”

Trump may never serve a day in prison. He may continue to be the Republican presidential nominee, though both of those suppositions are highly debatable.

For months I’ve maintained that Trump will not be on the ballot in November. I believe that the Republicans now have the leverage they need to take back their party from the MAGA extremists – if they have the energy to do so. If the Republican Party wishes to survive, Trump will not be on the ballot in the fall. Let’s be blunt: Republicans love to win. That alone could sway many of those who secretly like Trump but realize that he could lose. 

If the rule of law is applied equally, he may also well be in prison.

The decision by a jury of Trump’s peers in Manhattan showed that no one is above the law and Donald Trump’s days of political relevance can be counted as easily as the number of convictions he received in Manhattan.

Donald may not even need to use all his fingers and toes to count them.

Jaguars are returning to America, but Fish and Wildlife Service don’t think they need protections

On Wednesday, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced a new regulation, effective immediately, that significantly reduces the designated territory for jaguars in the American southwest. The new and final rule removes 64,797 acres of the jaguar's critical habitat designation, in compliance with an earlier court ruling. That leaves approximately 640,000 acres for the jaguars across Cochise, Pima and Santa Cruz counties.

While this may seem harsh, the sad reality is that jaguars (Panthera onca) have been increasingly sparse in the United States. Indeed, many people may not even realize they are native here. But in an encouraging sign for wildlife, their scarcity is slowly reversing.

This year, there have been multiple witness reports of jaguars at the U.S.-Mexico border, indicating the majestic spotted wild cat is making a steady comeback in the southwestern United States. It all comes down to conservationist groups who capture images of the animals using photographic and video recording equipment.

"We are watching jaguars reestablish themselves in the United States at a steady drum beat, in real time," said Russ McSpadden, the Southwest Conservation Advocate at the Center for Biological Diversity, recalling that the spotted cats have been trickling across the border since 2015. "It’s a beautiful thing."

Jaguar footage captured on field camera 2023Federal remote field camera footage taken on April 3, 2023. (Courtesy of Center for Biological Diversity)

To name the jaguars that keep crossing America's southwest border, McSpadden turned to local high schools, recalling how the students at Valencia Middle School chose the name El Jefe ("the chief") for a jaguar in 2015; how in 2017 students at Hiaki Highschool at the Pascua Yaqui Pueblo gave a second ca the moniker Yo'oko Nahsuareo (Jaguar Warrior in the Yaqui language); how in the same year students at the Paolo Freire Freedom School and chose the name Sombra; and how several schools on the Tohono O’odham Nation named a newly-discovered jaguar O: had Ñu:kudam, which translates as “jaguar protector” in the O’odham language.

McSpadden said that "it was inspiring to hear the kids describe a sense of cultural power to express that word in their own native language and to have their language expressed through the living presence of a jaguar in the United States. One student told me 'this is proof that jaguars belong here and proof that our language belongs here.'"

Some experts believe that the few jaguars we have seen so far in Arizona do not represent the full population, such as Megan “Turtle” Southern, a jaguar recovery coordinator at The Rewilding Institute, who said that eight jaguars have been documented in the United States since 1996. "But that doesn’t mean there haven’t been others who have gone unseen. Jaguars belong in the borderlands, historically and still today. This is their home," Southern explained.

"They’ve always been here. They belong here."

Some of these jaguars have even become local celebrities, such as a cat known as Macho B that sadly died amidst allegations that the Arizona Game and Fish Department had unintentionally caused the animal's death. Macho B lived to be 15 years old — a fairly long lifespan for a jaguar.

"It has been eight years since the equal-in-stardom jaguar El Jefe was last seen in Arizona, having since moved south into Mexico," Southern recalled. "This new jaguar follows in their footsteps, a trail that leads through Arizona and New Mexico to vast areas of wild, rugged habitat and abundant prey."

While jaguars seem exotic to Arizonans today, McSpadden pointed out that the American southwest has historically been part of the jaguars' northern range, stretching across the Sky Island Mountains and the Mogollon Rim. While the number of cats in that region "would never have been, in the best of times, as large of a population as many would associate with more tropical stretches of the species range," McSpadden said, they still existed there until government predator control programs determined to drive them out.

"Jaguars were nearly, but never fully, extirpated from this region," McSpadden explained, adding that they are "tenacious" animals, and populations from northern Mexico have always strayed across the U.S.-Mexico border from time to time. "The recent detections of a new jaguar in at least two of southern Arizona’s Sky Island mountain ranges is another beautiful example of these majestic felines reestablishing their millennia-old territory in what is now the United States. They’ve always been here. They belong here. They are an important part of the ecology of mountains and rugged canyons of the Southwest."


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"Conservation efforts should be focused on Sonora and elsewhere in Mexico, where females are present and breeding occurs."

The next logical question is whether jaguar populations can and should be restored to their former levels. McSpadden observed that this can happen in "multiple ways," from reintroducing populations to the "absolutely critical" goal of protecting their potential habitats like the Sky Islands, the Mogollon Rim and Gila National Forest.

"Jaguar habitat is threatened by proposed open-pit mines, transportation infrastructure and other massive developments as well as the growing threat of insurmountable border barriers," McSpadden told Salon. "The jaguars we see in the United States are part of the same population as the jaguars we see in northern Mexico. These jaguars are part of one population that is, unfortunately, threatened by politics, nationalism and fearmongering. Connectivity is critical for wildlife."

According to Ganesh Marin, a PhD candidate in Wildlife Conservation and Management at the University of Arizona, conservationists who want to restore jaguar populations need to remember that they naturally have large territories. In terms of staging an American comeback, this may be the biggest obstacle facing the jaguars.

"The principal challenge in the past was eradication by anti-predator campaigns. Today the main challenge is habitat loss, irruption of natural corridors by roads and barriers, and conflict with humans," Marin told Salon. Yet there are precedents for successfully conserving wild cats in the American southwest; Marin observed that humans are currently coexisting with pumas, "another feline similar in size to a jaguar."

Southern and McSpadden both mentioned the reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone as another example of a successful rewinding. In spite of this, some groups are advocating for killing the wolves to protect cattle. McSpadden also cited the ongoing efforts to reintroduce jaguars to the southern extremity of Ibera Argentina. By contrast, public information officer Mark Hart from the Arizona Game and Fish Department threw cold water on the idea of reintroducing jaguars to Arizona.

"We do not think the American southwest is critical to the long-term survival of the species, since no females have been present here since 1963," Hart told Salon. "Conservation efforts should be focused on Sonora and elsewhere in Mexico, where females are present and breeding occurs."

When asked about the conservation challenges that exist for the jaguars that currently lived there, Hart replied that the governments needs to enforce the "protections afforded the jaguar under the federal Endangered Species Act."

Hart does not downplay the fact that jaguars currently are crossing the border. He said that "there is one confirmed new individual in the Huachuca Mountains near Sierra Vista," as well as a possible second cat that roamed the Chiricahua Mountains south of Willcox since November 2016 but has not been seen since October 2022. "There have been eight jaguars present in the region since the 1990s, all males presumed to have entered the [United States] in search of new territory after being driven out of Sonora by older, stronger males." 

Marin noted that the last female jaguar in Arizona was killed in 1949, leaving the region as a veritable boys' club ever since.

"All are dispersing and coming from Mexico," Marin wrote to Salon. "These individuals are in search of new territory; however, because there are no females documented, when they become adults, they go back into Sonora looking for a mating partner."

Additionally, the jaguar migration is partially driven by the same factor fueling mass extinctions all over the world — climate change. Even if climate change brings more jaguars into the United States, to the delight of many Americans, it also is a bad omen for Earth's future.

We need your help to stay independent

"Global climate trends, higher temperatures, drier environments, these things are pushing many species further north and these higher elevations in the Sky Island Mountains, the Gila Wilderness, the Colorado Plateau will likely become even more critical to the survival of these big cats," McSpadden said.

Because jaguars are adaptable, they can move to diverse habitats as climate change makes their current regions inhospitable. In that sense, they set an example that our species can follow. McSpadden added that "I personally see their return as a signal of a hopeful future, where the jaguar’s resilience is not just ecologically valuable, but is also a compass for our own human resilience in a dangerously changing climate."

Regardless of whether jaguars can or even should make a comeback in the American southwest, their very presence at the time of this writing is welcomed by many. It is perhaps a relief that, even though humans are making an ugly mess of things along the U.S.-Mexico border with the ongoing immigration crisis, there are always big cats in the same area to set a better example. McSpadden reminds us of the children who helped name the cats.

"These students are examples of how interconnectedness with the natural world is often parallel with interconnectedness with culture. Jaguars and culture were once deeply interwoven in this region and can continue to be so," McSpadden said.

“An irreducible verdict”: Maddow and other experts clock in on Trump in his felon era

When the sun rose Thursday morning, Donald Trump was still a former president facing beaucoup counts in his New York criminal trial. Come dinner time, for many across the United States, he's cemented in history, and in memory, as America's first felon president. But whether that "president" title is a future and/or past thing, remains to be seen.

After hearing the jury tick off a verdict of guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the trial overseen by Judge Juan Merchan, Trump spoke to reporters outside the courtroom, bashing the "conflicted judge" that led to his Wikipedia page being updated to reflect the latest ding to his reputation, with lightning speed. And then he made a bee-line for his motorcade to ensconce himself in Trump Tower, a location that once held much different meaning in the middle of a city that Trump once thought held him in convenient favor. But as Karen O of the Yeah Yeah Yeahs sings in "Maps," "Wait, they don't love you . . ." 

In this instance, the song stops there.

Seconds after the jury handed down their verdict, which happened sooner than most — with the exception of, perhaps, Trump's campaign team — anticipated, reactions began to roll in from experts in the political-sphere.

On MSNBC, Rachel Maddow all but cracked her knuckles before weighing-in with, "This is a definitive and this is an irreducible verdict . . . The sentencing process will go on and those will all be pressure points. But the legal system in this country treats any former president as any citizen."

"The test for us as a country starts right now," Maddow said elsewhere, pressing down on the "what's next?" of it all.

Ty Cobb, a former member of the White House legal team who reported to Trump, told Salon that the verdict is "predictable."

"I think most experienced trial lawyers would recognize that the jurors were going to look at the chronology that the government set forth and the government accurately portrayed Pecker's testimony during the closing," Cobb said. "Once the jury corroborated that, they were sort of on the path to conviction. The jury instructions were very favorable to the government, not unfairly so. With the variety of possibilities that were available for the jurors, they were about as favorable as they could have been. I think the speed of the verdict and the fact it was unanimous as to all counts suggests that they didn't really have much difficulty in terms of going with their gut. I'm not sure they parsed the fine complex details that were presented, as those instructions were highly complex. This is certainly the product of the evidence that they were allowed to see on the indictment that was presented to them. I think that indictment will get closely scrutinized on appeal and it may or may not be upheld. I think the defense has a strong argument about whether it is constitutionally applied. They may not win on that but it will be seriously considered. All in all a predictable result. Whether it holds up on appeal is a little more of a toss-up than it typically is on conviction. But not by any means an uncertainty.  We'll have the issue about if he is sentenced to an incarcerative period… Whether it impacts him politically, I'm not optimistic that it will have much impact. But you would think being a convicted felon would not enhance your presidential resume."

And Bennett Gershman, a professor of law at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law since its founding as the Pace Law School in 1976, tells Salon in an email:

"As I predicted. Trump is now a 'convicted felon.' The verdict is a total vindication of the decision by District Attorney Bragg to bring the criminal charges, a masterful presentation of the evidence by the prosecution, and a brilliant summation. The jury should be saluted for their diligence and courage. I really have no way knowing how this verdict will play out politically. Trump and his handers are getting the disinformation machine into high gear to spread false and utterly ridiculous accusations about the judge and his instructions to the jury, and are essentially trying to spin another lame conspiracy theory which will be heard by millions of clueless Trump supporters and may have dire consequences, maybe the biggest being the potential for violence. But we need more time to digest what just happened."


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Hillary Clinton, forced to carry the weight of "lock her up" chants until the day she slips from this realm, gave her first public reaction to the verdict well into the night, with one simple and well-earned line:

"Anything going on today?"

Amidst the "Home Alone" memes, the Gwyneth Paltrow "I wish you well" memes, and the general hoots and hollers of glee coming from some (most) corners of the respectable internet, many, like Biden campaign spokesman Michael Tyler, stressed that the celebrations should be short as . . . the guy could still win.

But, as Maddow said earlier in the evening on MSNBC, "This is the system working in a fair way." And the right side of history is bracing to see how that works out.

Biden campaign reacts to news of Trump being found guilty in hush money trial

As a Manhattan jury slapped Donald Trump with 34 felony counts on Thursday afternoon, President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden were getting situated somewhere near their residence in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, where they're expected to spend the weekend together. But, rest assured, they got the message.

In a statement from Biden campaign spokesman Michael Tyler, the keyed up news of Trump's verdict was met with the following relatively straight-faced response:

“In New York today, we saw no one is above the law. Donald Trump has always mistakenly believed he would never face consequences for breaking the law for his own personal gain. But today's verdict does not change the fact that the American people face a simple reality. There is still only one way to keep Donald Trump out of the Oval Office: at the ballot box. Convicted felon or not, Trump will be the Republican nominee for president. The threat Trump poses to our democracy has never been greater. He is running an increasingly unhinged campaign of revenge and retribution, pledging to be a dictator 'on day one' and calling for our Constitution to be 'terminated' so he can regain and keep power. A second Trump term means chaos, ripping away Americans' freedoms and fomenting political violence — and the American people will reject it this November."

Biden himself has yet to issue a statement, but Ian Sams, a spokesperson for the White House counsel's office, tells CBS News, "We respect the rule of law."

 

 

Third bird flu case in humans confirmed, with new coughing and respiratory symptoms reported

Bird flu has been confirmed in a third American this year, marking the second case linked to a Michigan dairy, according to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. This raises concerns that the virus, which in April appeared in dairy farms throughout the United States, may be spreading further among people, not just animals. Four people in America have been infected so far, including an infection from poultry in 2022.

The latest farmworker infection is from a different farm than the one reported in Michigan on May 22. Another major difference is the symptoms this individual reported, with coughing and respiratory symptoms in addition to eye infections as reported in the two other cases this year.

"This is the first human case of H5 in the United States to report more typical symptoms of acute respiratory illness associated with influenza virus infection," the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a statement Thursday. "Based on the information available at this time, this case does not change CDC’s current A(H5N1) bird flu human health risk assessment for the U.S. general public because all three sporadic cases had direct contact with infected cows."

The latest patient was given an antiviral medication called oseltamivir and is reported to be recovering from his respiratory symptoms. In an official statement, Michigan's chief medical executive Dr. Natasha Bagdasarian reported that although the first Michigan case involved a worker being splashed in the eye with infected milk, the second occurred after the worker was directly exposed to an infected cow.

"Neither individual was wearing full personal protective equipment (PPE)," said Bagdasarian. "This tells us that direct exposure to infected livestock poses a risk to humans, and that PPE is an important tool in preventing spread among individuals who work on dairy and poultry farms."

So far, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has documented 67 outbreaks at dairy farms across nine states. On Tuesday, the USDA reported that tests have confirmed highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza in alpacas at an Idaho farm where the virus had struck a poultry flock, indicating that cows are far from the only mammals at risk of carrying the virus.

Infectious disease experts initially expressed alarm about the bird flu outbreak when they learned it had been transmitted to dairy cows. When viruses are able to jump between species, it increases the likelihood that they may reach human populations. Similarly, once a human is infected, it is easier for them to spread the disease to others.

“The more this spreads, the more it jumps from animal to animal, the more ability it has to mutate,” Katelyn Jetelina, an epidemiologist and author of the newsletter Your Local Epidemiologist, told Salon in April. “I think that it's a good sign that we haven't seen more human cases, we haven't seen any human clusters, but that doesn't mean that it can't happen — the flu is incredibly unpredictable and we need to treat it with urgency and transparency.” 

“The real verdict is gonna be Nov. 5”: Trump calls criminal trial “a disgrace”

Emerging from the courtroom, moments after jurors in his Manhattan criminal trial found him guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records Thursday, Donald Trump paused amidst a safety circle of his lawyers and son, Eric Trump, before facing reporters to deliver a statement as the first U.S. president to ever be charged with a crime after leaving office.

"This was a disgrace," Trump said. "This was a rigged trial by a conflicted judge who's corrupt. It's a rigged trial, a disgrace. They wouldn't give us a venue change. We were at 5% or 6% in this district, in this area. This was a rigged, disgraceful trial. The real verdict is gonna be Nov. 5, by the people. And they know what happened here, and everybody knows what happened here . . . we didn't do a thing wrong. I'm a very innocent man. It's okay. I'm fighting for our country. I'm fighting for our Constitution. Our whole country is being rigged right now. This was done by the Biden administration, in order to wound or hurt a political opponent. And I think it's just a disgrace. And we'll keep fighting. We'll fight 'til the end, and we'll win."

The Trump campaign must have seen this verdict coming, as they'd seemingly prepared a fundraising pitch around it, which they dropped on social media minutes after the verdict was handed down. 

Trump's sentencing will take place on July 11, days before the Republican National Convention.