Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Science journalism is no longer safe hiding in the hedge fund

Advance Publications is owned by a couple of billionaire families. Condé Nast is owned by Advance Publications. Wired magazine is owned by Condé Nast. And this week — as the world reaches the hottest temperatures on record, as another deadly COVID-19 variant steals into the public’s lungs, as owners of unregulated artificial intelligence threaten to unleash mass unemployment with their article-generating internet toys and the whole world needs increasingly complex topics explained — the science desk at Wired got gutted.

It’s not just Wired, of course. Recurrent Ventures axed 151-year-old Popular Science magazine this year, and presumably the last 13 staffers to steward its cultural legacy, leaving only five editorial staffers to crew the online-only ship. There are no full-time staff writers left at National Geographic after this year, and The Washington Post took a tough hit too. Climate desks at CNBC and Gizmodo got cut down. As did the climate team remaining at CNN, the select beat preserved in 2008 after the outlet axed the general science desk. 

Only a couple of years after buying it, billionaire-owned Red Ventures pummeled CNET with layoffs before making it one of the first major outlets to get caught pushing AI-generated articles. Short-sighted layoffs also hit the science desks at Inverse and FiveThirtyEight. Buzzfeed News, with its powerhouse science desk, was brought down. Fortress Investment Group laid off “under 100” Vice News staffers. And 74 journalists at the L.A. Times got the ax. Great Hill Partners owns G/O Media which burned Jezebel and its editorial staffers right when women’s health is facing greater attack in this country than it has since Roe v. Wade. 

“We stand in solidarity with you. You are valued. Your work matters,” wrote Cassandra Willyard, president of the National Association of Science Writers, in a May release. “​​Only five months in, 2023 has proven to be a year of layoffs and shrinking budgets, threatening science journalists and editors whose expertise is crucially important.” 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


Private equity catastrophes, faceless hedges and trusts, unchecked conglomerates and the ongoing shell game of parent companies — the wealthy gutted US science journalism in 2023 through a number of opaque and convoluted financial vehicles. And there’s no evidence to suggest that trend will stop. Rather, ad-reliant revenue models of wealthy digital proprietors are now failing so hard that their slash-and-burn newsroom tactics are likely to get more aggressive as short-selling the news ramps up to a fire-sale finale. One recent report holds that news outlets saw 2,681 job cuts this year. That’s more than the totals in 2021 or 2022. 

Private equity catastrophes, faceless hedges and trusts, unchecked conglomerates and the ongoing shell game of parent companies — the wealthy gutted US science journalism in 2023 through a number of opaque and convoluted financial vehicles.

Yet when we read the stories of these layoffs, we rarely see the names of the bigger companies and wealthier people who hold the pursestrings. As journalists, we can’t do our job, nor save our field, unless we’re willing to follow the money. Vanity Fair correspondent and former CNN anchor Brian Stetler had a salient point along these lines this week.  

“I know, after twenty years on the TV beat, that moguls like Lachlan Murdoch do not want to be mentioned in the press, unless it’s about charitable giving or canny dealmaking. I know that owners do not want to be questioned about how they will stand up to a wannabe autocrat. But the recent controversy involving Univision and its cozy interview with Trump proved that media power structures are not exempt from interrogation,” Stetler writes in his 2024 prediction.

There’s too much on the line for readers. They need science journalism more than ever and if we don’t cut out the rotted financial root of this industry, our chances of serving those readers are only going to get slimmer. This is no time to quail. Not only are we obligated to reveal the broken parts of our revenue models, but we have the chance to fix many of the broken parts of our larger function in the world.

“As a science writer, I have written about many topics throughout my career. None have affected me more than long Covid. None have more profoundly changed my view about what journalism can achieve and how it can do so,” Ed Yong wrote this week.

We need your help to stay independent

“Journalists can, instead, act as a care-taking profession — one that soothes and nurtures. And we are among the only professions that can do so at a scale commensurate with the scope of the crises before us. We can make people who feel invisible feel seen. We can make everyone else look.”

I can say without hesitation that I’ve yet to meet a journalist who hasn’t been tempted to start their own outlet at least once (even if they never admit it). But when nearly every news article you could want to read is available for free, the idea of starting a subscription-driven online news outlet from scratch while already burned out is a nightmare for most. Likewise, it surely seems a safer bet for many small outlets to become the skinny runt in some equity hedge’s 50-company portfolio, than to stake their writers’ welfare on risky hand-to-mouth alternative revenue models. 

But it looks like we’re running out of options, and we’re going to have to save ourselves from the wealthy one way or another. I hope Michael Greshko’s Neiman prediction is right, and that science journalism is truly “having its Defector moment.” More than that, I hope we’re ready to meet that moment with gusto, and that we don’t hesitate to burn everything we’ve got left in the tank. We’re going to need it if we’re going to crank-start something new. 

An earlier version of this article originally appeared in Salon's Lab Notes, a weekly newsletter from our Science & Health team.

Egusi stew is the comfort food of your dreams

My hatred for bullies introduced me to Egusi, the stew of my dreams. And you can enjoy this beautiful dish with little to no salt. 

I was a 9th grader in a new school. Luckily, I had an older cousin named Bunk who hung around the school even though he didn't go there and knew everyone, so I just mixed right in. 

By the second week, multiple upperclassmen were asking me, "Are you OK? Do you need anything?" and shooting me compliments like, "I love those Jordans, lil man. Do you have every color?" I had the school on lock and didn't have to deal with some of the hardships my classmates faced. 

"A stinky, are you mixed with monkey?" I overheard a guy named Travis saying to a student that I didn't know. "I know you are monkey because you be swinging from trees in Africa . . . you are African right? Stinking ass!" 

Some kids piled around Travis as he went on his tirade; they laughed as if he was the funniest person in the world. The poor kid's eyes started to well up as the crowd egged Travis on, who was now making ape sounds and hopping on and off the lunch table. I'm in minded business. 

I went to middle school with Travis and I remember when he was bullied because his sneakers had holes in them and his clothes were often too small and dated. While we wore Coogi sweaters and Boss jeans, Travis had corduroy trousers that stopped above his ankles and shirts with butterfly collars from the '70s (and this was 20 years later). People always told him he looked like a cast member from the television show "Good Times."

Travis never fought back; he just cried and volunteered in the principal's office to avoid being picked apart in the cafeteria. Something positive must have happened in his life because in high school, he began to wear new Nikes like us and even had a First Down puffer coat. For the first time since I'd known him, he was actually fly — and now punishing this kid in the same way that he used to be punished. 

I found out that his name was Charles and yes, he was from Africa, but not the whole continent. Nigeria. Lagos, to be exact.

I noticed the African kid was in my algebra class. Quiet, thin and sharp, he only spoke when spoken to and always did his work. I found out that his name was Charles, and yes, he was from Africa, but not the whole continent. Nigeria. Lagos, to be exact. 

"Yo, what's Lagos like?" I asked Charles one day during group work. "Y'all got a flag? Do they sell drugs over there?" 

Charles laughed. "I came here when I was 3, grew up in Washington, D.C., and just moved to Baltimore last year." 

Charles has been to Lagos a few times. He told me basically any and everything that happens in Baltimore could also happen in his birth city. 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


"Why you let Travis punk you?" I asked. "I don't know how they get down in Lagos, but if you let somebody play with you over here, you are going to be running from that person for the rest of your life." 

Charles said Travis was a bum and his ignorance did not bother him. I wish I had that kind of temperament or insight, especially at 14. Travis would continue to bully Charles until I couldn't take it anymore. This led to me smashing a history textbook into the side of Travis's head during the middle of one of his monkey dances. Once you start, you can't stop, so I angled my knee across Travis's chest and continued to hit him with the book until I got suspended from school for three days. My dad wasn't upset. He was proud because he hated bullies too. We laughed about the incident over a cheese pizza. 

After I was reinstated, I was later accused of setting a girl's hair on fire. I didn't know who set fire to the young woman's curls and didn't snitch on or finger the guy they wanted to blame for it, so I was kicked out of that school. Charles looked sick on my last day. Not because we were especially close, but I think because I was the only person who ever stood up for him. 

We need your help to stay independent

It would be two years before I saw Charles again. We bumped into each other in front of a nightclub called the Paradox. By then, he had mastered Baltimore culture, wearing New Balance 996 sneakers and an Avirex leather jacket. He was confident and cool and introduced me to his friend group, made up of mostly first-generation kids, as the guy who taught him how to communicate in Baltimore (mostly with his fist), an inside joke that we both laughed at. Charles had a birthday party coming up, which he described as a small gathering with some friends at his mom's house, and he invited me. 

From her kitchen wafted one of the most beautiful smells. While the other teenagers danced to Charles's playlist, I kept my eyes on the kitchen. Shortly after, his mother brought out some plates of jollof, plantain, fried fish, and my new favorite, egusi. I felt like I ate enough for 10 people. 

Egusi would become one of my favorite dishes in years to follow and a mandatory order every time I'm in a city that sells West African cuisine. It was also one of the first dishes I wanted to try to prepare since I decided to consume less salt. As I always believe, if you add enough spice you can do without the salt. Here's my recipe.

Salt-free egusi
Yields
08 servings
Prep Time
15 minutes
Cook Time
01 hour 20 minutes

Ingredients

  • 1 pound chicken, cut into eight parts
  • 1 tablespoon black pepper 
  • 1 red bell pepper, stem and seeds removed
  • 2 habanero pepper, stem and seeds removed
  • 2 fresno pepper, stem and seeds removed
  • 2 onions, peeled, one roughly chopped and the other diced
  • 2 ½  cups egusi melon
  • 1 ¾  cup palm oil 
  • 2 tablespoons locust beans
  • 3 cups salt-free chicken stock 
  • Red Pepper to taste (I like a lot) 
  • 3 ¾ cups chopped spinach
  • Pounded yam, for serving

 

 

Directions

  1. Prepare and cook chicken however you normally prepare your chicken.
  2. Chop white and dark meat chicken into chunks and place to the side. 
  3. Blend peppers and roughly chopped onions together and set aside.
  4. Blend Egusi melon and set aside. 
  5. Heat palm oil in a pan with the diced onion and simmer on low for 5 minutes.
  6. Mix in blended onions and peppers. Continue to stir every 3 minutes, as you do not want this to burn.  Do this for about 10 to 12 minutes.
  7. Add locust beans, chicken stock, black pepper and red pepper to taste. Cover and leave to cook for another 3 minutes. 
  8. Add blended Egusi to the sauce and slowly stir. Cover and let cook on low for 30 minutes. Be sure to slowly stir periodically.  
  9. Add chicken and let stew for 10 minutes.
  10. Stir in spinach and leave to simmer for about 10 minutes. We are ducking salt, but you can add more pepper, if necessary. 
  11. Serve hot, with pounded yam. 

Cook's Notes

-Remember that we are avoiding salt and Mrs. Dash has a collection of salt free seasonings.

-I always recommend buying meat and seasonings from stores that cater more to ethnic dishes, like H Mart. 

FDA: Lead contamination in kids’ applesauce pouches may have been intentional

In recent months, there have been many reports about lead found in applesauce and other fruit pouches that are marketed as being for children. Now, as reported by Marcia Brown and Meredith Lee Hill at Politico, it seems as though the tainted pouches "that have sickened scores of children in the U.S may have bee purposefully contaminated with lead, according to FDA's Deputy Commissioner for Human Foods Jim Jones."

In an exclusive interview with Politico, Jones remarked that "all of the signals we're getting lead to an intentional action on the part of someone in the supply chain." The brands involved include Weis, WanaBana and Schucks which are "all linked to a manufacturing facility in Ecuador," where the FDA is currently conducting an investigation. Jones's theory is that if the act was indeed intentional, then it was never intended to "end up in a country with a robust regulatory process" and that the assumption is that the "adulteration is economically motivated." It is thought that the cinnamon may be the source of the lead. The Washington Post reported that "more than 60 U.S children under the age of six have tested positive for lead poisoning after consuming the pouches — some at levels more than 500 times the acceptable threshold for lead," as per Brown and Hill.

The cinnamon itself has been traced to Negasmart, a supplier of Austrofoods, an Ecuadorian food manufacturer. Jones ensures that the FDA is "going to chase down the data and find whoever was responsible and hold them accountable"

Marvel drops Jonathan Majors after actor found guilty of reckless assault and harassment

A six-person New York jury found actor Jonathan Majors guilty of reckless assault in the third degree and harassment on Monday. The verdict was reached after a little over four hours of deliberation spanning across three days. Shortly after, Marvel Studios dropped the actor, according to Variety.

Majors was arrested on March 25 on charges of assault, strangulation and harassment stemming from a domestic dispute with his ex-girlfriend, Grace Jabbari. During the trial, which began on Dec. 4, Majors faced four remaining charges of misdemeanor assault, aggravated harassment and harassment. Four of the previous eight charges were dismissed and merged into one count of assault ahead of opening statements “due to the nature of the injuries,” per The Hollywood Reporter.

The Marvel actor was found not guilty on one count of intentional assault in the third degree and aggravated harassment in the second degree. His sentencing is set for Feb. 6.

Following his arrest, Majors himself pleaded not guilty to all charges. His legal team also maintained his innocence, claiming instead that Jabbari made up the allegations in an effort to taint Majors’ career and reputation following their breakup. His team further asserted that Jabbari, not Majors, was the aggressor in a domestic altercation that took place inside a car.

The charges against Majors were brought by the state of New York, rather than by Jabbari. The case itself was a criminal trial, rather than a civil trial.

Majors had already been dropped by management and his publicist, and had his ads for the U.S. Army pulled when he was initially arrested. The actor plays Kang the Conqueror in the MCU – introduced in "Loki" and seen in "Ant-man and the Wasp: Quantumania." His character was supposed to be featured in "Avengers: The Kang Dynasty," which has been officially renamed as "Avengers 5" in the wake of the recent verdict. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the movie title change signifies that Kang will be completely written out instead of recast.    

"Avengers 5" was scheduled to shoot in 2024, for a 2025 release. 

A “hierarchy of opinion”: The uniquely intense world of recipe comment moderation

Since the mid-2010s, cookbook author Ali Slagle has published some 360 recipes for “The New York Times’” Cooking section, many of which have topped annual reader favorite lists for their simplicity and indubitable craveability. One of her most beloved recipes, for Thai-inspired chicken meatball soup, drew over 13,500 ratings (averaging five stars) and almost 700 comments. Amid all the praise, criticism, helpful notations and humorous color, Slagle’s voice is notably absent. Indeed, she almost never responds to comments on her recipes — and not just to avoid trolls. 

“I think it’s fun to see everyone help each other,” said Slagle, who wrote the James Beard Award-nominated 2022 cookbook “I Dream of Dinner.” “That’s what cooking is about. It’s not about me telling you what to do. My job to write a recipe is to make it as replicable as possible in the sense that I’m considering all potential variables. I’m suggesting a method, and everyone can figure out their own path to it.”

Recipes attract a uniquely intense level of reader engagement within the food writing sphere. It’s understandable; like food, recipes sit at the incendiary crossroads of science and creativity, of physical nourishment, culture, memory and personal taste. Home cooks not only vary widely in their equipment, but also their experience levels and cooking habits — not to mention why they’re seeking a recipe in the first place. I learned this the hard way when I published a recipe homaging my mom’s spaghetti with meat sauce on global online food community Food52 in 2020, and was promptly, if repetitively, eviscerated by Nicholas A. for my unoriginality: “the same sauce many of us have been making for years….nothing new here and seriously where is the difference in a sauce we all know….nothing new.”

Heart pounding, face on fire, I deleted the comment notification email, which didn’t stop my imposter syndrome from cackling at my abject failure as a recipe writer. Slagle, who was previously on staff at Food52, can relate. 

We need your help to stay independent

“I’m better about it now,” she said. “When I started out, the comments section used to turn my stomach.”

During Slagle’s tenure at Food52 — a site whose audience notoriously comprises pretty serious home cooks — editors and writers also acted as comment moderators, and were expected to participate in the discussions. Commenters would usually provide helpful tips and thought-provoking discussions. Some, however, got personal, particularly when it came to their criticisms. “They’re critical, not of your work, but you as a person — like they’re airing their dirty laundry in the comments section, basically,” she said. 

A ‘hierarchy of opinion’

Slagle is now a freelance writer for the “New York Times,” where comments are read and moderated by staff whose full-time job includes recipe comment moderation — not just for trolls, but impractical observations from readers who haven’t made the recipe, for example. 

When one of her recipes is published, she’ll monitor the comments for the first week, responding if someone expresses confusion over a step or the way it’s communicated. After that, she simply can’t keep up. Occasionally, her editors will reach out if enough readers raise a similar issue — say, they deem a dish too bland or acidic — and Slagle will retest it. 

“I’m always trying to decide, is there something wrong with the recipe or is this just personal taste?” she said. It’s usually the latter. 

Slagle mostly refrains from commenting because it can create a hierarchy of opinion on the forum. If someone asks whether a recipe can be made gluten free, for example, “I didn’t test for that; I don’t know,” she said. “But someone else might have made something similar and substituted with this ingredient. I don’t want my response to seem like the only right one. It should be a more democratic sharing of information.”

“I’m always trying to decide, is there something wrong with the recipe or is this just personal taste?” she said. It’s usually the latter.

As comments amass over time, eliciting upvotes and increasingly meta discourse, the recipe starts branching off into infinite variations — some small, some large — perhaps indoctrinating itself into some readers’ regular cooking repertoire. Take, for example, the rich discourse that resulted from Slagle’s Thai chicken meatballs. 

“I added an egg and panko to the meatballs,” wrote Clh, one of several readers who deemed the meatballs sticky and falling apart. “And put them in the freezer for 2-3 hours before cooking them.”

Chris B. cooked the meatballs in a 425-degree-F oven on a parchment-lined sheet pan for “less fuss and easier clean-up,” while Wendy pressure-cooked them on high in her Instapot with additional stock. However, Lisa followed the recipe to the letter, disagreeing that the meatballs required additional binder to “form beautifully” and stay together.

Together, they form a chorus of potential pathways to this final dish, based on users’ honest feedback — which can help someone who’s attempting it for the first time or feels stuck or frustrated. 

Or maybe is just in need of a laugh. 

For the latter, they might turn to Lizzie D’s comment. “Do you have a cold and are stoned? Pay your roommate $100 and ask them to make this for you. Tell them to use a good stock and follow the recipe.”

We all need the occasional reminder to lighten up; after all, it’s just a recipe. Slagle can’t think of a single recipe she’s published that doesn’t contain at least one hilarious or ridiculous comment. In fact, there’s a whole Instagram account dedicated to the humorous side of recipe comment sections — some intentional, some not — called @nytimescookingcomments (which hasn’t been updated in over a year). 

Occasional nausea notwithstanding, Slagle says she’ll take them all; the hivemind is far more useful and entertaining than a single voice. 

“I think comments are good, especially if you’ve made it,” Slagle said. “I would urge people, if you’ve made the thing, to write a review. You can pick your username, so no one will know it's you. No one is going to track you down. So just be honest.” 

 

Experts have bad news for cash-strapped Giuliani: Even bankruptcy can’t save him from $148M verdict

A federal jury in Washington on Friday ordered former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani to pay nearly $150 million in damages to two former Georgia election workers he defamed by falsely accusing them of election fraud in 2020, upending their lives.

Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea ArShaye "Shaye" Moss filed a lawsuit against Giuliani for making baseless claims about them being involved in a fake ballot processing scheme during their roles as election workers for Fulton County in the last presidential election. The jury awarded the pair $148 million, with a combined $75 million in punitive damages, compensatory damages of $16.2 million to Freeman and $16.9 million to Moss and $20 million to each of them for emotional suffering, The New York Times reported

Jurors listened to firsthand accounts from Freeman and Moss, who detailed the racist threats and harassment they were inundated with after Giuliani identified them in security camera footage of the ballot processing facility and falsely tied them to voter fraud. 

"Every single aspect of my life has changed," Moss said. "I'm most scared of my son finding me or my mom hanging in front of our house.”

Giuliani even accused them of passing USB flash drives like “vials of heroin or cocaine,” alleging a scheme to defraud Trump of an election victory. Moss later testified before Congress, clarifying that she and her mother were passing candy.

The net worth of Giuliani's assets, which has reportedly fluctuated over the years, is currently believed to be less than $48.6 million, CBS News reported. His attorney Joe Sibley told the jury that awarding the plaintiffs tens of millions would be "the civil equivalence of a death penalty" for Giuliani.

But actions with intent, such as defamation, “are not dischargeable in bankruptcy,” former U.S. Attorney Barb McQuade, a University of Michigan law professor, told Salon. Even if Giuliani were to declare bankruptcy, he would still be obligated to fulfill the debt. 

The election workers could obtain orders from the court clerk's office to “garnish any wages and place liens on his properties,” ensuring they receive proceeds from any sales, McQuade said. 

Last week’s verdict adds to the extensive array of legal and financial challenges confronting the former New York City mayor.

“Does he have $148 million? No, I’m not even sure that Rudy Giuliani can afford to pay for Four Seasons landscaping right now,” former acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal told MSNBC’s Jen Psaki on Sunday. 

We need your help to stay independent

But Giuliani cannot shield himself from the ruling through bankruptcy, he added, echoing the same reasons McQuade provided. Katyal explained that safeguards offered by bankruptcy laws do not extend to judgments of this nature, which include intentional harm.

After obtaining a judgment against someone, there is usually a process of post-judgment discovery, which aims to identify the person's assets and assess what can be collected or subjected to a lien, Atlanta defense attorney Andrew Fleischman told Salon.

“In this case, Giuliani quite stubbornly refused to reveal his resources before trial, and it would not shock me if he continues to stonewall,” Fleischman said. “Remember, he hasn’t paid the sanctions award the judge ordered for violations at trial, or $60,000 in phone bills, or his own lawyers who were foolish enough to take him at his word in another case.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Collecting the judgment against him is going to be “agonizing,” but given the substantial amount, the women should be able to find specialists who will track it down and put liens against whatever resources he does have, garnish his wages, and levy against his bank accounts, Fleischman said. 

The judgment is "nondischargeable" in a bankruptcy proceeding, Laurie Levenson, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University, told Salon. The only way Giuliani can get around this is by having the court reduce the judgment, winning an appeal, or settling with the plaintiffs.

Declaring bankruptcy will most likely be unhelpful for Giuliani since it doesn’t cover intentional torts, like defamation. That’s why Alex Jones was unable to discharge his debt, Fleischman explained. 

A reason why people prefer to sue large institutions with insurance is that insurance companies cover their legal expenses in the event of a judgment against them. These companies are concerned with “preserving their reputation and their credit,” he added.

“But Giuliani had his shame gland surgically removed and he’s going to make every step of collecting even a scrap of this judgment into a grinding misery,” Fleischman said. 

Israel is starving Gaza civilians as “method of warfare”: Human Rights Watch

From bombing food production hubs and systematically razing crop fields to halting aid deliveries, Israel is waging a multi-pronged effort to starve the people of Gaza amid the Israel Defense Forces' bombardment of the enclave, Human Rights Watch said in a report Monday—with evidence drawn from the Israeli government's own statements as well as survivors' accounts.

The group demanded that countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and others that have provided Israel with military aid and other support since the country began its latest escalation against Gaza in October speak out against the use of starvation as a weapon of warfare—a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

"For over two months, Israel has been depriving Gaza's population of food and water, a policy spurred on or endorsed by high-ranking Israeli officials and reflecting an intent to starve civilians as a method of warfare," said Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch (HRW). "World leaders should be speaking out against this abhorrent war crime, which has devastating effects on Gaza's population."

HRW pointed to satellite imagery it has collected in northern Gaza since the IDF began its air and ground assault in retaliation for an attack by Hamas on southern Israel on October 7.

The images have shown orchards, greenhouses, and farmland that have been razed over the last two months, "apparently by Israeli forces, compounding concerns of dire food insecurity."

Only sand and dirt have been left behind where farmers in northeastern Gaza grew citrus, potatoes, dragon fruit, and prickly pear since Israeli forces took control of the area in mid-November and "systematically razed" the fields, said the group.

Palestinians in Gaza, home to about 2.3 million people, have lost the ability to grow their own food as Israel has refused to allow food, water, and fuel deliveries into the enclave, leaving bakeries and grocery store shelves empty.

Before the Israeli bombardment began, about 500 aid trucks filled with food and other goods entered Gaza on a daily basis to provide sustenance amid Israel's unlawful occupation and its land, air, and sea blockade that began 16 years ago. Israel has allowed only 100 aid trucks to cross through Egypt's Rafah crossing since October 7. The U.N. humanitarian coordinator for the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Lynn Hastings, said earlier this month that fuel deliveries—needed for farming, cooking, water desalination, healthcare operations, and other necessities—have been "utterly insufficient."

Prior to the current escalation, about half of Gaza's population was facing acute food insecurity and 80% were reliant on humanitarian aid.

The World Food Program (WFP) at the U.N. said earlier this month that 9 in 10 households in northern Gaza and 2 in 3 homes in the south had been without food for at least one full day and night since Israel's assault. It also warned that 38% of families who had been displaced from their homes in northern Gaza were experiencing "severe levels of hunger" and that the enclave faces a "high risk of famine."

"It's critical to understand this is not simply a byproduct of the conflict, an unfortunate result of a terrible situation. It is Israeli government policy," said Andrew Stroehlein, European media and editorial director for HRW.

In addition to the halting of aid and the destruction of Gaza's agricultural sector, the last operational wheat mill was bombed on November 15 ensureing "that locally produced flour will be unavailable in Gaza for the foreseeable future," said HRW.

The group interviewed 11 civilians who described their struggles with finding sufficient food in recent weeks.

A man identified as Taher said that after his family fled south to Gaza City in November, they resorted to eating "just once a day to survive."

"The city was out of everything, of food and water," he told HRW. "If you find canned food, the prices were so high… We were running out of money. We decided to just have the necessities, to have less of everything."

Majed, who left his home in the north after his house was bombed, killing his six-year-old son, said he, his wife, and their four surviving children had no way of making bread for more than a month when they temporarily stayed in Gaza City.

"In those 33 days we didn't have bread because there was no flour," he said. "There was no water—we were buying water, sometimes for $10 a cup. It wasn't always drinkable. Sometimes, [the water we drank] was from the bathroom and sometimes from the sea. The markets around the area were empty. There wasn't even canned food."

HRW noted that the Israeli government itself has made numerous statements in recent weeks pointing to the deliberate destruction of Gaza's food access and the starvation of civilians.

Defense Minister Yoav Gallant infamously called Palestinians in Gaza "human animals" when he announced the "complete siege" and cutting off of aid into the enclave on October 9.

"No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel—everything is closed," Gallant said.

Col. Yogev Bar-Shesht, deputy head of the Civil Administration, said in an interview that eliminating Palestinians' ability to grow food is a deliberate tactic.

"Whoever returns here, if they return here after, will find scorched earth," he said. "No houses, no agriculture, no nothing. They have no future."

HRW's report came as the death toll in Gaza hit at least 19,453, with more than 50,800 injured and thousands believed to be buried underneath rubble.

Article 54(1) of the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions and Article 14 of the Second Additional Protocol both prohibit starvation of civilians as a method of warfare.

"Although Israel is not a party to Protocols I or II, the prohibition is recognized as reflective of customary international humanitarian law in both international and noninternational armed conflicts," said HRW.

The worsening humanitarian catastrophe, and Israel's refusal to operate within the bounds of international law, "calls for an urgent and effective response from the international community," said Shakir.

"The Israeli government is compounding its collective punishment of Palestinian civilians and the blocking of humanitarian aid," he said, "by its cruel use of starvation as a weapon of war."

Pope Francis formally approves blessings for same-sex couples

Pope Francis has formally authorized allowing Roman Catholic priests to bless same-sex couples, in a radical shift in the church’s policy regarding the LGBTQ+ community.

A new document from the Vatican's doctrine office said it is opening “the possibility of blessings for couples in irregular situations and for couples of the same sex” but ultimately leaving that decision to “the prudent and fatherly discernment of ordained ministers.” The blessings “may be carried out providing they are not part of regular Church rituals or liturgies, nor at the same time as a civil union,” CNN reported

Back in 2021, the Vatican doctrine department said the Church could not bless the unions of same-sex couples because “God cannot bless sin.” The ruling came after the Pope had publicly backed same-sex unions for the first time as pontiff in 2020.

“Homosexual people have the right to be in a family. They are children of God,” the Pope said at the time while being interviewed for a feature-length documentary. His comments, however, related to the civil domain and not within the Catholic church.

Despite its limitations, the recent announcement marks a significant change of stance for the Catholic church. James Martin, a prominent Jesuit priest who ministers to queer Catholics, called the document “a major step forward,” adding that it “recognizes the deep desire in many Catholic same-sex couples for God’s presence in their loving relationships” in a post made on X.

“Could get somebody killed”: Ex-FBI agent warns missing Trump binder may “expose US intel sources”

An ex-FBI official cautioned that a Russian intelligence file that was reportedly lost near the end of former President Donald Trump's tenure could "get somebody killed" if it makes its way to the Kremlin. The binder, which contains U.S. and NATO-ally "raw intelligence" on Russia and Russian agents, could only be viewed by legislators and congressional aides, according to CNN. The "Crossfire Hurricane" document was related to Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, a claim which both Trump and Russia have vehemently denied. 

Frank Figliuizzi, former assistant director for counterintelligence at the FBI, warned the lost document poses a potential threat if clandestine information is leaked. "We've got to know what happened with this binder and more importantly, whether this was a mere accident or whether the intention was to hand it to Russia to expose U.S. Intel sources and methods against Russia," Figliuizzi told MSNBC. During his interview, Figliuzzi was asked about Trump's comments made at a recent campaign event in New Hampshire, in which he invoked Vladimir Putin and targeted immigrants, saying that "they've poisoned the blood of our country."  Figluizzi acknowledged that "I'm seldom at a loss for words, but when we have a candidate — a leading candidate, by the way — for his party's nomination for president, quoting our adversary Vladimir Putin to claim that somehow we are less than a democracy, or that democracy is a charade, we need to pay attention."

Regarding the missing binder, Figliuzzi said: "What's troubling here is that this document, this missing binder that's allegedly ten inches thick is filled with unredacted, raw intelligence reporting. That means a person who's positioned and knows, who's reading this — maybe a Russian official — can easily discern sources and methods from it … All of that could literally get somebody killed or cause us to lose well-placed technical methods that are in place. So it's a mystery where this goes."

“A messiah complex”: John Oliver calls out Elon Musk’s wild year on “Last Week Tonight”

“Last Week Tonight” aired its final show of the year on Sunday so understandably, host John Oliver had to end things on a grand note: “This is our final show of the year, so we thought we’d focus on someone who’s had a pretty big 12 months.”

Oliver’s topic of the night was Elon Musk — the owner of SpaceX, Tesla, X (formerly Twitter), The Boring Company, Neuralink and xAI — who the late-night talk show host slammed as “a man who can pull off pretty much any bad guy in a movie.”

“There’s Lex Luthor posing for the cover of Metropolis Maniacs Monthly. There’s ‘Why no, Mr. Bond, I and my child’s bride expect you to die,’” Oliver continued while listing the many “bad guys” that he said Musk resembles. “There’s ‘I just bought your media company and I’m about to strip you for parts.’ There’s space’s first racist sheriff and, finally, the less f**k-able reimagining of Billy Zane’s character in 'Titanic.' Truly, the man has range.”

Oliver added that Musk has been an infamous figure in the news this year “from test launching the most powerful rocket ever built to just this week having to recall 2 million cars due to safety concerns.” He also made jabs at Musk squaring off with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Musk tweeting his agreement with an antisemitic post, Musk attacking companies who said they’d pull their ads off X and Musk boasting that he'd “done more for the environment than . . . any single human on Earth.

“The least surprising thing on Earth is a middle-aged billionaire CEO with self-serving libertarian views, increasingly racist politics and a messiah complex,” Oliver said. “And it is long past time that he faced the kind of accountability that should come with that.”

Watch the "Last Week Tonight" segment below, via YouTube.

Trump lawyer torched for bragging about being sanctioned nearly $1 million over “frivolous” lawsuit

Trump lawyer Alina Habba took to the stage of an ultra-conservative convention over the weekend to brag about being sanctioned nearly $1 million by a Florida-based federal judge earlier this year. 

While delivering a speech at the four-day America Fest in Phoenix, Arizona, on Sunday, Habba recounted the outcome of a lawsuit she filed on behalf of former President Donald Trump against Hillary Clinton and dozens of federal officials that was assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks, a Clinton-appointee, and dismissed in January of this year.

"What do you think happened? Nobody's heard of the case, right?" Habba asked the crowd. "It's 'cause it's gone. I never met the judge. I never walked into the courtroom."

Trump brought the sprawling lawsuit against Clinton and 30 other defendants, including FBI and Justice Department officials such as former FBI Director James Comey, in March of 2022, accusing the group of conspiring to spread false allegations of collusion between his campaign and Russia during the 2016 White House contest.

Middlebrooks dismissed the lawsuit that September in a scathing order, saying that the suit was “seeking to flaunt a two-hundred-page political manifesto outlining his grievances against those that have opposed him,” CNBC reported.

In her Sunday speech, Habba went on to recall the "probably 50 lawyers representing all of the radical left" in the case before returning to the lawsuit's dismissal. 

"It got dismissed, and me and President Trump got sanctioned a million dollars for going against crooked Hillary," Habba said, punctuating her claim with shakes of her right hand. 

Someone yelled, "What?" in apparent shock from the crowd, and Habba continued.

"You didn't know that, did you?" Habba replied. "Fake news, folks. Fake news. They won't report it.

"But guess what? We paid that million and we're gonna keep on fighting," she concluded with a deep nod as the audience erupted in applause and cheers. 

Legal experts were quick to note online that Habba's use of her legal penalty to rally support was questionable, also pointing out that news outlets had followed the lawsuit throughout its duration.

"Lawyer is sanctioned by a federal judge for bringing a frivolous case and blames the media for . . . not giving the sanction ruling enough attention. (P.S. it got a lot of attention … )," Orin Kerr, a U.C. Berkeley law professor tweeted, linking to a report from The Associated Press covering Habba and Trump's sanction.

National security attorney Mark Zaid called Habba's boast "very strange."

"Apparently she wants publicity about how unethical a lawyer she is," he wrote on X. "It is incredibly hard to be sanctioned under Rule 11. It actually takes work! #egomaniac #FullOfOneSelf #MAGA (Make America Get Attorneys)."

"Parking garage lawyer who brought a case so frivolous she got sanctioned by the judge is now whining about it," national security attorney Bradley Moss added, referring to Habba's previous job as general counsel for a parking garage company.

We need your help to stay independent

In a scorching 46-page order filed in January, Judge Middlebrooks blasted Trump as a “mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process" and ordered him and Habba to pay $938,000 to cover the legal fees of the 31 defendants in the suit, Politico reported

“Here, we are confronted with a lawsuit that should never have been filed, which was completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose,” Middlebrooks wrote. “Mr. Trump is a prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries. He is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process, and he cannot be seen as a litigant blindly following the advice of a lawyer.“

January's fine marked the second time Trump and Habba were sanctioned in the lawsuit, following the $50,000 sanction sought by a single defendant, Charles Dolan, in November 2022. The second sanction was sought by the remaining defendants. 

In the January order, Clinton received the biggest award of fees out of all the defendants, amounting to a $172,000 payout for Trump and his lawyer. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The sanction kicked off Trump's year of legal setbacks in 2023, in which he accrued 91 charges across four criminal cases, related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and retain national security documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort club after leaving the White House. 

Middlebrooks' ruling provided a point-by-point rundown of the flaws in the former president's initial lawsuit, highlighting that it often misstated, distorted or cherrypicked from key documents he claimed supported his accusations against Clinton and the Justice Department that they were targeting him for criminal prosecution.

“The Amended Complaint is a hodgepodge of disconnected, often immaterial events, followed by an implausible conclusion. This is a deliberate attempt to harass; to tell a story without regard to facts,” Middlebrooks wrote.

The judge specifically pointed to Trump's claim that Clinton conspired with ex-FBI Director Comey to seek Trump's prosecution — one that Middlebrooks noted never happened — as "categorically absurd." He also mentioned that Trump and Habba repeatedly mischaracterized the findings in special counsel Robert Mueller's report. They cited Russian intelligence, which was shared by then-Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe with Sen. Lindsey Graham, as the foundation of one of their claims without noting that it was Russian intelligence and that Ratcliffe said it was unverified.

“Mr. Trump’s lawyers saw no professional impediment or irony in relying upon Russian intelligence as the good faith basis for their allegation,” Middlebrooks said in the order.

Among other criticisms of the barrage of other cases Trump and his attorneys had filed, he called out Habba's attacks on him in a Fox News interview, saying that her appearance continued to distort the facts of the case and assert baseless allegations of impropriety against federal judges and magistrates.

Two decades after “The Return of the King,” we still remember Aragorn’s warning about US militarism

J.R.R. Tolkien foresaw that his intentions would always be misunderstood. He addressed that concern in the 1966 second edition release of “The Lord of the Rings” via a new foreword clarifying his “prime motive” being “the desire of a tale-teller to try his hand at a really long story that would hold the attention of readers, amuse them, delight them, and at times maybe excite them or deeply move them.”

He did not intend for the story to hold any inner meaning or “message,” calling it neither allegorical nor topical. “. . . I cordially dislike allegory in all its manifestations, and always have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its presence,” Tolkien added. “I much prefer history, true or feigned, with its varied applicability to the thought and experience of readers. I think that many confuse ‘applicability’ with ‘allegory’; but the one resides in the freedom of the reader, and the other in the purposed domination of the author.”

Tolkien was a realist, so in the same way that he wrote his trilogy and “The Hobbit” without much expectation that it would be read by many, let alone become a seminal work of literature, he probably didn't assume anyone would read this explanation. In his estimation, it may be enough that it exists to contradict future generations' misguided aggressors from claiming his heroes – elves, dwarves and men led by Aragorn, son of Arathorn, represented them.

Whether Viggo Mortensen had Tolkien’s words on his mind during the press junket for the 2002 release of “The Two Towers,” the second movie in Peter Jackson’s Middle-earth adventure series, is unclear. But his stance on America’s post-9/11 military response to terrorists destroying the Twin Towers in New York and attacking the Pentagon was plain. Mortensen wore a t-shirt on which he wrote “No More Blood for Oil” during the “Two Towers” press junket, stoking furor amid the conservative right and, well, a lot of other people. Al Qaeda’s attack on the United States gave rise to a strain of nationalism that viewed questioning the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and the escalating probability of war in Iraq as un-American.

When “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring” hit theaters on Dec. 10, 2001 – three months after the deadliest strike on American soil since Japanese forces attacked Pearl Harbor – some Americans cast themselves as versions of Mortensen’s hero and “terrorists” as the orcs, goblins and Uruk-hai. (That word is in quotes because depending on who was invoking it, it could refer to Al Qaeda, the Taliban or if the person is an Islamophobe, generic brown people from some Eastern land.)

Mortensen’s statement shirt was his way of pushing back against that in 2002, provided an interviewer asked him about it. Charlie Rose did on the Dec. 3, 2002 episode of his show, where Mortensen was joined by Jackson and co-star Elijah Wood.

“You're obviously making a political statement with your t-shirt,” Rose said.

"I think that they see the U.S. government as Saruman."

“I wouldn't normally,” Mortensen replied, explaining that it’s a reaction to seeing the attempt to view the movies as allegories for the United States’ role in the world at that time.

“If you're going to compare them, then you should get it right,” the actor said, “. . . I don't think that ‘The Two Towers’ or Tolkien's writing or Peter's work or our work has anything to do with the United States' foreign ventures at this time. And it upsets me to hear that in a way. And it upsets me even more that questioning what's going on right now, what the United States is doing, is considered treasonous really: ‘How dare you say that? How un-American of you.’"

By the time “The Return of the King” came out one year after that, the U.S. had expanded its military operations to Iraq, sending in ground troops in March 2003 with President George W. Bush claiming “Mission Accomplished” in May. This was a folly, we know now, although U.S. forces would capture deposed Iraqi president Saddam Hussein on Dec. 13, days before the final ‘Lord of the Rings” film hit theaters.  

Leading up to that moment and afterward were many civilian bombings and insurgent attacks killing American troops. Americans, meanwhile, were more divided on their views of the conflict, with even centrists starting to see the truth in the point Mortensen made to Rose and others.

“I don't think that the civilians on the ground in those countries look at us in the way that maybe Europeans did at the end of World War II, waving flags in the streets,” Mortenson told Rose. “I think that they see the U.S. government as Saruman.”

Meeting “The Return of the King” 20 years later with those words echoing in our memory is a sobering way to mark an anniversary, which we officially passed on Sunday. Jackson’s movies ushered in a new era of mining fantasy properties, with Amazon spending a fortune to corner the market on all things Tolkien. In the wake of “Game of Thrones'” global success, along with Marvel’s neoliberal might-makes-right fantasies and the “Star Wars” resurgence and expansion, Tolkien’s story of outnumbered champions of light somehow triumphing over darkness seems simpler. This is as he may have wanted, one supposes.

We need your help to stay independent

Still, as he said, one can’t help applying to circumstances the story lays out to what we’re living through today. Tolkien viewed unchecked power as dangerous in anyone’s hands — hence our witnessing Gandalf, Galadriel and Aragorn be tested by the One Ring’s temptation. Our current president and everyone before him would have failed.

This is another point Tolkien makes in his foreword, explaining that his legendary war bears no resemblance to World War II, which many assumed he was allegorizing despite his soul-scarring experience fighting in the First World War. If that were the case, he explained, the Ring would not have been destroyed but seized and used against Sauron and all his allies while Saruman would have forged his own ring and challenged the new dominant power.

“In that conflict,” Tolkien concludes, “both sides would have held hobbits in hatred and contempt: they would not long have survived even as slaves.” 

Mortensen viewed some version of that at play in the world of 2002, and eventually 2003. “The people who are terrified at Helms Deep, who are outnumbered in this incredible violence and desire to control — to destroy — the people of Rohan and the rest of the free peoples of Middle-earth, and to control their wills, to control their infrastructure — or destroy it — that's what we're doing in these countries,” he said. “That's really what we're doing, unfortunately. I'm not saying to anyone, to you, or to you, or to you: ‘This is what you should believe.’ I'm just saying, why not ask the question: ‘Why are we doing this?’"

“The Return of the King” opens with a sequence explaining how Smeagol (Andy Serkis) is seduced by the ring and twisted into a shrunken, scraping husk called Gollum. Fundamentally that character’s story is not one of redemption but pity for the smaller beings that corruption perverts and crushes in its quest for dominance. And his creator would warn us against viewing him as representative of anything.

[Gollum's] story is not one of redemption but pity for the smaller beings that corruption perverts and crushes in its quest for dominance. 

But one can never resist viewing the symmetry in a tale like this regardless, which Tolkien acknowledged linking applicability to the reader’s will. Middle-earth’s defenders rout Sauron’s forces when they march on Gondor's seat of power Minas Tirith, by banding together and calling on ancestral spirits to save them. The few that are left after that depleting battle march on Mordor’s gates, ready to die, only to be saved when the darkness collapses around them, destroyed as Sauron’s power dies with the Ring. The good guy are left standing unopposed on a small sliver of land.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


There are many ways to cast modern geopolitical equivalents to these characters, which we’d caution against and cannot be helped. Not in the way that, say, an artist in 2023 could prevent their art from being misappropriated for uses that contradict the beliefs they purport to hold.

“The Return of the King” and the rest of Jackson’s “Lord of the Rings” trilogy are part of film culture’s marrow, mimicked and built upon by other filmmakers that came after, similarly to the way that Tolkien provided modern fantasy’s architecture. It’s inspirational for many reasons, and frequently emotionally and politically co-opted for the wrong ones.

But as Mortensen said in 2003 when another interviewer asked what audiences should expect from “The Return of the King,” “It is a story about something simple, but difficult to find: compassion . . . Merely by treating the people around you with respect and compassion, you are already doing a big step.”

He continued, “Sauron or the American government, or the English government, or the Danish government, it doesn’t matter, they want you to feel as if you could not control anything. The film’s message is that a small person can change everything. Even if in 20 years the special effects will seem outdated, people will still feel that there is a certain integrity and dedication in the story.”

That’s a truth many can agree on. The rest is beyond the artists’ control, no matter what they insist.

 

MTG explodes at Lindsey Graham for admitting there’s no “smoking gun” in Biden impeachment stunt

Right-wing firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., called out Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. for admitting during a recent NBC interview that the House Oversight Committee has yet to produce a "smoking gun" linking President Joe Biden to his son Hunter Biden's allegedly corrupt foreign business dealings. Earlier this month, Hunter Biden was charged with nine federal tax crimes in an indictment prosecutors called  "a four-year scheme to not pay at least $1.4 million" in federal income taxes for the years 2016 through 2019.

Graham in an interview said this weekend, "If there were a smoking gun, I think we'd be talking about it." As the Daily Beast noted, this acknowledgment is in stark contrast to comments Graham made on Fox News over the summer. “When it comes to Donald Trump, there are no rules. Destroy him, destroy his family,” Graham told Fox host Sean Hannity. “When it comes to Hunter Biden and Joe Biden, they get away with almost everything. If you want to change that, we better win in 2024.”

During a Sunday night speech at a conference for the conservative youth group Turning Point USA, Greene hit out at Graham. “How can Lindsey Graham in Washington, D.C. on 'Meet the Press' say that he hasn’t seen a smoking gun of evidence?” Greene said. “That he doesn’t think we’ve produced enough evidence to impeach [President] Joe Biden?” Greene then took a pulse check on the crowd about whether they supported Biden's impeachment, which garnered whooping cheers. “Well, I think somebody else better run for Senator in South Carolina,” Greene said. 

“Deeply awkward”: Florida GOP cuts salary of chairman refusing to resign over rape claim to $1

The Florida Republican Party voted on Sunday to strip Chairman Christian Ziegler of his legislative power and sharply curb his salary to a mere $1 following the emergence of rape allegations earlier this month. 

A search warrant affidavit released in the case on Friday revealed that Ziegler and his wife, Moms for Liberty co-founder Bridget Ziegler, engaged "in a three-way sexual encounter more than a year before the incident." Right-wing group Moms for Liberty touts itself as a parental rights advocacy organization, pushes for staunchly conservative candidates to be elected on school boards, and opposes references to race and LGBTQ+ identity in the classroom, often openly calling for book bans. 

Ziegler has denied the rape allegation. Politico reported that a video of the encounter obtained by a government accountability watchdog group that first broke the story appears to refute some of the claims made by the woman accusing Ziegler. 

Politico reported that 39 executive board members from Florida's GOP gathered at a hotel in Orlando on Sunday, observing that they were irate that Ziegler, who had been facing calls to resign from top party leaders for weeks, had refused to step down, forcing them to congregate from across the state during the holidays and amid intense storms along the East Coast. During the meeting, which was less than two hours long, the board voted to decrease Ziegler's salary and suspend his reimbursements, which Politico reported were approximately $124,000 combined. The executive board also set a three-week countdown to formally expel him from his role, planning a vote in Tallahassee on January 8, 2024. Ziegler did not speak to reporters following the meeting. 

Last week, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis called on Ziegler to resign as state party chair.

"I don't see how he can continue with that investigation ongoing, given the gravity of those situations," DeSantis told reporters in Alpharetta, Georgia, after his Fox News debate with California Gov. Gavin Newsom. "And so I think that he should, I think he should step aside." 

"He's innocent 'til proven guilty, but we just can't have a party chair that is under that type of scrutiny," DeSantis added. 

“You can’t morally lead the Republican Party forward,” Evan Power, vice chair of the Florida Republican Party, said of the Ziegler's allegations after leaving the meeting.

Two members of the GOP spoke to Politico anonymously about a recent report in Florida Politics in which Ziegler purportedly asked for a $2 million payout, saying that Ziegler called the payout a lie and asked those at the meeting to speak up about whether he had asked for money. Three people present for the meeting indicated that Ziegler said he couldn't share much about his police investigation because it was ongoing, but was confident he would not be charged. Earlier in the month, Ziegler's attorney Derek Byrd Byrd said Ziegler "has been fully cooperative with every request made by the Sarasota Police Department," adding that once the police department finishes its probe, he is "confident" they won't file charges and that "Ziegler will be completely exonerated."

Ziegler also allegedly attempted to defend himself by citing Florida Republicans who have faced criminal charges or accusations in the past, according to Bill Helmich, Madison County State committeeman.

We need your help to stay independent

Two executive board members who chose not to vote with the rest of the executive board affirmed the commentary. "When it’s that overwhelming against somebody, you don’t want to be the lone two or three people to pipe up,” one of them said. The other member noted that Ziegler was "red like he was ashamed," adding that though they wanted Ziegler to resign voluntarily, they felt he deserved the opportunity for the investigation to run its course. “I have gotten nothing done in three weeks because of this,” said another executive board member. 

Vic Baker, an executive board member from Volusia County, said he urged the group to consider giving Ziegler a leave of absence until the investigation was finished. “I know Christian wanted to be able to clear his name of the criminal aspects of this,” Baker said. “It was clear from reading the room that he wasn’t going to be given that option.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Politico reported that the accusations and Ziegler’s resistance, "have put state Republicans in a deeply awkward position. His refusal to step down has forced party members to deal with an ongoing embarrassment ahead of the 2024 elections — a time when members would rather be planning fundraising and strategy sessions instead of seeking ways to oust their party leader."

Bridget Ziegler last week refused to resign from the Sarasota School Board. DeSantis has the power to oust her but has yet to comment on her situation, with his office ignoring questions about it, Politico reported.

“Delicate matter”: Clarence Thomas’ private complaints about money sparked fears he would resign

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Series: Friends of the Court:SCOTUS Justices’ Beneficial Relationships With Billionaire Donors

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ decadeslong friendship with real estate tycoon Harlan Crow and Samuel Alito’s luxury travel with billionaire Paul Singer have raised questions about influence and ethics at the nation's highest court.

In early January 2000, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was at a five-star beach resort in Sea Island, Georgia, hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt.

After almost a decade on the court, Thomas had grown frustrated with his financial situation, according to friends. He had recently started raising his young grandnephew, and Thomas’ wife was soliciting advice on how to handle the new expenses. The month before, the justice had borrowed $267,000 from a friend to buy a high-end RV.

At the resort, Thomas gave a speech at an off-the-record conservative conference. He found himself seated next to a Republican member of Congress on the flight home. The two men talked, and the lawmaker left the conversation worried that Thomas might resign.

Congress should give Supreme Court justices a pay raise, Thomas told him. If lawmakers didn’t act, “one or more justices will leave soon” — maybe in the next year.

At the time, Thomas’ salary was $173,600, equivalent to over $300,000 today. But he was one of the least wealthy members of the court, and on multiple occasions in that period, he pushed for ways to make more money. In other private conversations, Thomas repeatedly talked about removing a ban on justices giving paid speeches.

Thomas’ efforts were described in records from the time obtained by ProPublica, including a confidential memo to Chief Justice William Rehnquist from a top judiciary official seeking guidance on what he termed a “delicate matter.”

The documents, as well as interviews, offer insight into how Thomas was talking about his finances in a crucial period in his tenure, just as he was developing his relationships with a set of wealthy benefactors.

Congress never lifted the ban on speaking fees or gave the justices a major raise. But in the years that followed, as ProPublica has reported, Thomas accepted a stream of gifts from friends and acquaintances that appears to be unparalleled in the modern history of the Supreme Court. Some defrayed living expenses large and small — private school tuition, vehicle batteries, tires. Other gifts from a coterie of ultrarich men supplemented his lifestyle, such as free international vacations on the private jet and superyacht of Dallas real estate billionaire Harlan Crow.

Precisely what led so many people to offer Thomas money and other gifts remains an open question. There’s no evidence the justice ever raised the specter of resigning with Crow or his other wealthy benefactors.

George Priest, a Yale Law School professor who has vacationed with Thomas and Crow, told ProPublica he believes Crow’s generosity was not intended to influence Thomas’ views but rather to make his life more comfortable. “He views Thomas as a Supreme Court justice as having a limited salary,” Priest said. “So he provides benefits for him.”

Thomas and Crow didn’t respond to questions for this story. Crow, a major Republican donor, has not had cases at the Supreme Court since Thomas joined it and has previously said Thomas is a dear friend. David Sokol, a conservative financier who has taken Thomas on vacation on a private jet, said in a statement that he and Thomas had never discussed the justice’s finances or when he might retire.

Thomas’ comments in 2000 were to Florida Rep. Cliff Stearns, a vocal conservative who’d been in Congress for 11 years and occasionally socialized with the justice. They set off a flurry of activity across the judiciary and Capitol Hill. “His importance as a conservative was paramount,” Stearns said in a recent interview. “We wanted to make sure he felt comfortable in his job and he was being paid properly.”

There’s an often-criticized dynamic surrounding most important jobs in the federal government: The posts pay far less than comparable jobs in the private sector, but officials can cash in once they leave. Ex-regulators sell advice to the regulated. Generals retire to join military contractors. Former senators get jobs lobbying Congress.

But there is no revolving-door payday waiting on the other side of a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. Justices generally stay on the bench past their 80th birthday, if not until death. In 2000, justices were paid more than cabinet secretaries or members of Congress, and far more than the average American. Still, judges’ salaries were not keeping pace with inflation, a source of ire throughout the federal judiciary. Young associates at top law firms made more than Supreme Court justices, while partners at the firms could earn millions a year.

Some of Thomas’ colleagues were extremely wealthy — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was married to a high-paid tax lawyer and Justice Stephen Breyer to the daughter of a wealthy British lord. Thomas did not come from money. When he was appointed to the court in 1991, he was 43 years old and had spent almost all his adult life working for the government. At the time, he still had student loans from law school, Thomas has said.

The full details of Thomas’ finances over the years remain unclear. He made at least two big purchases around the early ’90s: a Corvette and a house in the Virginia suburbs on 5 acres of land. When Thomas and his wife, Ginni, bought the home for $522,000 a year after he joined the court, they borrowed all but $8,000, less than 2% of the purchase price, property records show.

Public records suggest a degree of financial strain. Throughout the first decade of his tenure, the couple regularly borrowed more money, including a $100,000 credit line on their house and a consumer loan of up to $50,000. Around January 1998, Thomas’ life changed when he took in his 6-year-old grandnephew, becoming his legal guardian and raising him as a son. The Thomases sent the child to a series of private schools.

In early January 2000, Thomas took the trip to the Georgia beach resort. Thomas was there to deliver a keynote speech at Awakening, a “conservative thought weekend” featuring golf, shooting lessons and aromatherapy along with panel discussions with businessmen and elected officials. (A founder and organizer of the annual event, Ernest Taylor, told ProPublica that Thomas’ trip was paid for by the organization. Thomas reported 11 free trips that year on his annual financial disclosure, mostly to colleges and universities, but did not disclose attending the conservative conference, an apparent violation of federal disclosure law.)

On a commercial flight back from Awakening, Thomas brought up the prospect of justices resigning to Stearns, the Republican lawmaker. Worried, Stearns wrote a letter to Thomas after the flight promising “to look into a bill to raise the salaries of members of The Supreme Court.”

“As we agreed, it is worth a lot to Americans to have the constitution properly interpreted,” Stearns wrote. “We must have the proper incentives here, too.”

Stearns’ office soon sought help from a lobbying firm working on the issue, and he delivered a speech on the House floor about judges’ salaries getting eroded by inflation. Thomas’ warning about resignations was relayed at a meeting of the heads of several judges’ associations. L. Ralph Mecham, then the judiciary’s top administrative official, fired off the memo describing Thomas’ complaints to Rehnquist, his boss.

“I understand that Justice Thomas clearly told him that in his view departures would occur within the next year or so,” Mecham wrote of Thomas’ conversation with Stearns. Mecham worried that “from a tactical point of view,” congressional Democrats might oppose a raise if they sensed “the apparent purpose is to keep Justices [Antonin] Scalia and Thomas on the Court.” (Scalia had nine children and was also one of the less wealthy justices. Scalia, Mecham and Rehnquist have since died.)

It’s not clear if Rehnquist ever responded. Several months later, Rehnquist focused his annual year-end report on what he called “the most pressing issue facing the Judiciary: the need to increase judicial salaries.”

Several people close to Thomas told ProPublica they believed that it was implausible the justice would ever retire early, and that he may have exaggerated his concerns to bolster the case for a raise. But around 2000, chatter that Thomas was dissatisfied about money circulated through conservative legal circles and on Capitol Hill, according to interviews with prominent attorneys, former members of Congress and Thomas’ friends. “It was clear he was unhappy with his financial situation and his salary,” one friend said.

Former Sen. Trent Lott, then the Republican Senate majority leader, recalled in a recent interview that there were serious concerns at the time that Thomas or other justices would leave.

The public received hardly a hint that such conversations about Thomas were unfolding in Washington. Thomas did once allude to government salaries, in a 2001 speech praising the value of public service. “The job is not worth doing for what they pay. It’s not worth doing for the grief,” he said. “But it is worth doing for the principle.”

Around that time, Thomas was also pushing to allow justices to make paid speeches — a source of income that had been banned in the 1980s. On several occasions, Thomas discussed lifting the ban with appellate Judge David Hansen, who chaired the judiciary’s committee responsible for lobbying Congress on issues like pay, according to Mecham’s memo.

At Sen. Mitch McConnell’s request, a provision removing the ban for judges was quietly inserted into a spending bill in mid-2000. Why McConnell made the proposal became a subject of scrutiny in the legal press. After the Legal Times reported the measure had been dubbed the “Keep Scalia on the Court” bill, Scalia responded that the “honorarium ban makes no difference to me” and denied that he would ever leave the court for financial reasons. (The ban was never lifted. McConnell did not respond to a request for comment.)

During his second decade on the court, Thomas’ financial situation appears to have markedly improved. In 2003, he received the first payments of a $1.5 million advance for his memoir, a record-breaking sum for justices at the time. Ginni Thomas, who had been a congressional staffer, was by then working at the Heritage Foundation and was paid a salary in the low six figures.

Thomas also received dozens of expensive gifts throughout the 2000s, sometimes coming from people he’d met only shortly before. Thomas met Earl Dixon, the owner of a Florida pest control company, while getting his RV serviced outside Tampa in 2001, according to the Thomas biography “Supreme Discomfort.” The next year, Dixon gave Thomas $5,000 to put toward his grandnephew’s tuition. Thomas reported the payment in his annual disclosure filing.

Larger gifts went undisclosed. Crow paid for two years of private high school, which tuition rates indicate would’ve cost roughly $100,000. In 2008, another wealthy friend forgave “a substantial amount, or even all” of the principal on the loan Thomas had used to buy the quarter-million dollar RV, according to a recent Senate inquiry prompted by The New York Times’ reporting. Much of the Thomases’ leisure time was also paid for by a small set of billionaire businessmen, who brought the justice and his family on free vacations around the world. (Thomas has said he did not need to disclose the gifts of travel and his lawyer has disputed the Senate findings about the RV.)

By 2019, the justices’ pay hadn’t changed beyond keeping up with inflation. But Thomas’ views had apparently transformed from two decades before. That June, during a public appearance, Thomas was asked about salaries at the court. “Oh goodness, I think it’s plenty,” Thomas responded. “My wife and I are doing fine. We don’t live extravagantly, but we are fine.”

A few weeks later, Thomas boarded Crow’s private jet to head to Indonesia. He and his wife were off on vacation, an island cruise on Crow’s 162-foot yacht.

After touting stock market, Trump claims record high under Biden only makes “rich people richer”

Donald Trump, who predicted in a 2020 debate that stock markets would crash under President Joe Biden, griped Sunday that stock markets reaching record highs were just making "rich people richer." The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose to a record high last week, hitting 37,000 and surpassing the previous record set in 2022. The former president often patted himself on the back for a bustling stock market during his time in office between 2017 and 2021. 

"The stock market is making rich people richer," Trump said, per Reuters, to a crowd of supporters in Reno, Nevada, in an effort to put an anti-Biden, populist spin on the new record stock market value. "Biden's inflation catastrophe is demolishing your savings and ravaging your dreams," the GOP nomination frontrunner added, changing the subject to high prices — a hallmark of Biden's term thus far — to take a jab at his likely opponent in the 2024 contest. Despite a recent increase in wages, a decrease in inflation and low unemployment, Trump went on: "We are a nation whose economy is collapsing into a cesspool."

Biden mocked Trump last week for his incorrect prediction in a campaign video shared on X/Twitter flaunting the record stock market high, CNBC reports. “Good one, Donald,” Biden tweeted. The video replayed a clip of Trump declaring, "If Biden wins, you’re gonna have a stock market collapse the likes of which you’ve never had," before rolling soundbites of news anchors lauding the stock market's recent upsurge. “Uh, let’s just talk for a moment about the stock market. Boom,” says Larry Kudlow, Trump's former top economic aide, in an included snippet from his Fox Business show.

Trump echoes Hitler — and MAGA hears it loud and clear

Donald Trump believes in eugenics. He really does. Of course, his understanding of it is purely based upon his own belief in his superior genes and good "German blood." He's said it many times in public:

When he said during his first term that he didn't understand why the U.S. allowed people from "shit-hole countries" to emigrate to the U.S. and suggested that we should encourage people from Norway to come instead, it wasn't hard to figure out what he meant by that. His xenophobia never applied to white European immigrants. After all, he married two of them and they are the mothers of four of his five children. His problem is with people of different races. 

If someone of a different race expresses devotion to him then of course he likes them. Think of Kim Jong Un, whom he considers to be one of his greatest allies. But it's a very individual thing. For the most part, Trump believes that people from the "shit-hole" countries are genetically inferior to people like him with his good German blood. 

Trump's out campaigning in earnest now as the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary are just weeks away. And if anyone thought he was going to soft-peddle the "Hitleresque" rhetoric, they were way off base. His basic stump speech is all about banning immigration by those who don't "share our ideology" (whatever he means by that), and rounding people up here in the U.S. and putting them in camps. He's not being subtle about who he's talking about. 

This "blood poisoning" rhetoric is literally right out of Hitler's manifesto, Mein Kampf, in which he wrote, "all great cultures of the past perished only because the originally creative race died out from blood poisoning." By that Hitler meant the Jews were polluting the Aryan bloodstream (although he had a long list of others who were poisoning that good German blood as well) and Trump is talking about everyone except for white people and people of color who worship him personally. But they're on the same wavelength. This is not an accident and Trump isn't speaking off the cuff. It's in his prepared speeches and he's not taking it out. Why would he? It's a big applause line and that's how he knows it's working. 

We need your help to stay independent

It's tempting to believe that Trump doesn't actually know that he's "parroting Adolph Hitler" as the White House charged after his latest tribute to the monstrous, genocidal maniac. After all, it's pretty clear that he hasn't read a book since he was in middle school (if then) and his knowledge of history is limited to a handful of WWII movies. But he doesn't need to. Even if his personal Heinrich Himmler, Stephen Miller, wrote the words, it's obvious from Trump's casual conversation that he is in complete agreement with the fascist sentiments underlying "poisoning the blood of the country." It's fundamental to his beliefs about himself and his own superior genetic make-up. 

Recall that one of the biggest controversies of his first two years came about because of his response to the protest march in Charlottesville Virginia. A group of alt-right men dressed in a sort of uniform of white polo shirts and khaki pants had gathered one night to protest the removal of a Confederate statue. They marched around with tiki torches chanting "Jews will not replace us" and "blood and soil" which seemed extreme even for the Trump years. At a counter-protest the next day one of the alt-right protesters drove through a crowd killing a woman, Heather Heyer. Trump was irritated that the neo-Nazi group was being blamed for what happened and famously declared that "there were good people on both sides," suggesting that not all Nazis are bad people. 

The "blood and soil" chant comes right out of the Third Reich and it's also echoed in Trump's repeated reference to "poisoning the blood of the country." Wikipedia defines it as "a nationalist slogan expressing Nazi Germany's ideal of a racially defined national body ("Blood") united with a settlement area ("Soil"). By it, rural and farm life forms are idealized as a counterweight to urban ones." Does that sound familiar at all? 

Hitler also targeted "the enemy within" for persecution, imprisonment and death. According to the Holocaust Encyclopedia, those included

Roma (Gypsies), people with disabilities, PolesSoviet prisoners of war, and Afro-Germans. The Nazis also identified political dissidents, Jehovah’s Witnesseshomosexuals, and so-called asocials as enemies and security risks either because they consciously opposed the Nazi regime or some aspect of their behavior did not fit Nazi perceptions of social norms. They sought to eliminate domestic non-conformists and so-called racial threats through a perpetual self-purge of German society.

Here's Trump over the weekend promising to purge America of undesirables. (They have persuaded him not to use the word vermin … for now.) 

His list also includes "communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical-left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country that lie and steal and cheat on elections" and he has vowed to "expel," "cast out," "throw off," "rout," "evict" and "purge" his enemies. This is right out of the Nazi playbook.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Trump is always looking for a way to thrill his followers with a new outrage so it's easy to say he's just putting on a show. But I think he means it. He's very bitter and angry at half of America for not loving him unconditionally and his thirst for revenge is overwhelming. It's not about ideology, it's personal. But the program that he's contemplating as his instrument to pay back all those who've refused to bow and scrape before him is a full-on fascist agenda. And he knows it (the man watches a lot of TV.) He just believes it will work for him. 

And he may be right, at least as far as the Republican base is concerned. They may not be aware of, or care about, the echoes of Hitler in his words but they like what they are hearing. According to a new poll by the Des Moines Register, "43% of likely Republican caucusgoers [] say they are more likely to support him." Asked about his statement that immigrants are "poisoning the blood of the country," 42% say the same thing. And 43% say "It doesn’t matter that Trump said he would have 'no choice' but to lock up his political opponents." 

Back in the early days of the internet, there was a thing called Godwin's Law which held that "as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches." It was assumed to mean that the discussion had devolved into absurdity and should be abandoned when that happens. I fear that too many people may end up assuming that about these discussions as well. But the man who coined the adage, Mike Godwin, wrote a clarification a few years back, after the events in Charlottesville:

It still serves us as a tool to recognize specious comparisons to Nazism — but also, by contrast, to recognize comparisons that aren’t. And sometimes the comparisons can spot the earliest symptoms of horrific “attitudes, actions and language” well before our society falls prey to the full-blown disease.

Just because Trump's first term didn't result in the full flowering of Nazi America doesn't mean that the signs weren't there. He has been saying things for years that point inexorably to his underlying fascist worldview. And even more disturbing, the response he gets from his tens of millions of followers clearly shows that they share it.  

“He is right”: Trump allies defend rally speech that “parroted Adolf Hitler”

Some allies of former President Donald Trump jumped to his defense amid alarm over a rally speech that the Biden campaign argued had “parroted Adolf Hitler.”

Trump claimed during a rally in New Hampshire that immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.”

“They let — I think the real number is 15, 16 million people into our country. When they do that, we got a lot of work to do. They’re poisoning the blood of our country,” Trump said. “That’s what they’ve done. They poison mental institutions and prisons all over the world, not just in South America, not just to three or four countries that we think about, but all over the world. They’re coming into our country from Africa, from Asia, all over the world.”

NBC News noted that the term “blood poisoning” was used by Hitler in his manifesto “Main Kampf,” in which he rails against immigration and race mixing.

“All great cultures of the past perished only because the originally creative race died out from blood poisoning,” Hitler wrote.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., on Sunday defended the former president’s remarks.

“Seventy-six percent of the American people, not Donald Trump, believe the border is broken. They’re worried about fentanyl coming over killing them,” the Trump ally told NBC News host Kristen Welker when asked how Republicans feel about the comments.

“But what about his language? Just that language that poisoning the blood?” Welker pressed.

“Yeah, no I am worried about an outcome,” Graham replied. “He is right — he had the border secured the lowest in 40 years in December of 2022. The Biden administration, you’re talking about Donald Trump’s language, as you sat on the sidelines and allowed the country to be invaded 172 people on the terrorist list have come on your watch fentanyl is filling more Americans.”

Welker again asked Graham if he felt comfortable with Trump’s “language.”

“You know, we’re talking about language? I could care less what language people use as long as we get it right,” Graham replied. “If you’re talking about the language Trump uses rather than trying to fix it, that’s a losing strategy for the Biden administration,” he added.

Fox News host Brian Kilmeade on Monday also complained that “they” didn’t “like his rhetoric” at the rally.

“He was talking about the border. He was talking about people coming from other countries, coming from prisons. And they wanted to focus on all the Sunday shows, Lawrence, on the word he used ‘poison,'” Kilmeade lamented, according to Mediaite.

“He’s just trying to say we want to keep America, America,” he said. “We want to build up the border and find out who’s coming in and out. And they tried to say that this language was the problem.”

We need your help to stay independent

The White House and the Biden campaign condemned Trump’s remarks over the weekend.

“Tonight Donald Trump channeled his role models as he parroted Adolf Hitler, praised Kim Jong Un, and quoted Vladimir Putin while running for president on a promise to rule as a dictator and threaten American democracy,” Biden campaign spokesperson Ammar Moussa said in a statement on Saturday.

White House spokesman Andrew Bates accused Trump of “echoing the grotesque rhetoric of fascists and violent white supremacists and threatening to oppress those who disagree with the government.”

Trump’s Republican primary rival Chris Christie also condemned the remarks during a Sunday appearance on CNN.

“He’s disgusting, and what he’s doing is dog-whistle to Americans who feel absolutely under stress and strained from the economy and from the conflicts around the world, and he’s dog-whistling to blame it on people from areas that don’t look like us,” Christie said. “The other problem with this is the Republicans who are saying this is OK.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Authoritarianism expert Ruth Ben-Ghiat on CNN called Trump’s comments “fascist rhetoric.”

“The worries about polluting the blood of the superior race go as a standard of Nazism. It’s not just the Nazis. It’s also fascists. In Italy Mussolini literally talked about killing rats, to go back to Trump’s use of vermin in an earlier speech. He talked about killing rats who were bringing infectious diseases and communism into Italy,” the New York University professor explained.

Ben-Ghiat cited Trump’s earlier comments vowing mass deportations and mass detentions, arguing that he was using “fascist rhetoric” for a “very precise purpose.”

“Dehumanizing immigrants, which is what this language does, is a way to get Americans prepared now to accept these repressions later on,” she said. “That’s what’s so terrible, and that’s also another thing that’s so fascist about this.”

She also warned that immigrants will not be the only ones targeted.

“Anyone who thinks this isn’t going to bother them because they’re not an immigrant, they’re not going to stop with immigrants,” she said. “I’m quite concerned that he is mentioning what he calls mental institutions and prisons so often. In another speech, he actually talked about the need to expand psychiatric institutions to confine people and he mentioned special prosecutor Jack Smith as someone who should end up in a ‘mental institution.’

“This is what fascists and especially communists used to do to critics,” Ben-Ghiat added. “They used to put people who didn’t believe in the propaganda of the state or who were troublemakers into psychiatric institutions. So the swathe of people who are going to be targeted certainly doesn’t stop with immigrants.”

Saving the American chestnut: A story of renewal, regrowth and hope

From the northernmost reach of the White Mountains and Mahoosuc Highlands of Maine, through the crystalline escarpments of the Catskills and Blue Ridge — down into the Shenandoah, Cumberland and Coosah valleys — the internet was first carried into Appalachia by American chestnut utility poles. Straight-grained and rot-resistant, Castanea dentata’s abundant hardwood was so prized for its durability that the words you’re reading now may well have traveled to you across the aging timber backs of a few remaining sentinels. 

Once called “the redwood of the east” with a typical height of more than 100 feet and a diameter up to 10 feet, the American chestnut is a historical icon of Appalachian ecology. Its destruction was also an archetypical North American ecological disaster. But now, amid the rising despair and psychological weight of climate change, citizen scientists are using community conservation to restore an ecology of hope for the trees. Their victories are preserving more than a keystone biological species. They’re saving a living vessel of ancient stories from cultures around the world — including the hidden histories of their own mountain homes. 

Among the most significant dietary and economic resources in Appalachia, the chestnut fed a rich sprawl of multiracial agrarian communities, fattening both hogs and children among Kentucky’s poorest families, whose grandparents still recount memories of individually named trees. 

“In 1898 my father built a party telephone line five miles long from his store on Wells Creek into Sandy Hook, the County Seat of Elliott County, Kentucky,” reads the account of Curt Davis, collected by the American Chestnut Cooperators’ Foundation.

“He specified in the construction of the line that all poles be chestnut that were seven to eight inches in diameter at the butt and 24 feet long. He knew that there would not be more than one inch decrease in the diameter in 24 linear feet because they grew straight and tall. He also knew that the poles would be uniform and long lasting,” he wrote. 

Davis, born in 1910, tells of a land busy with harvesting the timber and fruit of chestnuts — and of the chestnut market news brought by his father’s new party-line telephone. 

“I find in my father's 1898 and 1899 ledgers where chestnuts used in bartering at the country stores were traded at $0.12 to $0.15 per gallon, for baking powder at $0.05 a pound,” he said. “Salt at $0.02 a pound….sugar at $0.04 a pound.”

But one day, a rich man in New York brought all that to a crashing end for Appalachia. 

In 1876, Samuel Browne Parsons Jr. caused what is often called the greatest ecological disaster in American history when he imported a crop of Japanese and Chinese chestnut trees to sell in the U.S. Parsons was a landscape architect whose father had made a tidy career importing Asian plants. Parsons himself attended Yale and then inherited his dad's business, selling his imported chestnut crop to renowned planners like Frederick Law Olmstead and distributing them throughout America’s parks. 

In 1876, one man in New York caused the greatest ecological disaster in American history. He imported a crop of Japanese and Chinese chestnut trees — and they carried passengers.

Parsons’ trees, however, were carrying passengers. One was a pathogenic fungus called Cryphonectria parasitica, or chestnut blight. It lay quietly in the Asian trees whose native immunity concealed its threat, but the North American species was highly vulnerable. The blight precipitated an insidious acid in the American chestnut trees, and gnawed grievous cankers into their woody trunks. Weeping orange gashes oozed spores that spiraled down the harrowed bodies of the ancient giants. Mycelial wedges squirmed into their tight layers of protective underbark and water-feeding cambium. The blight slowly choked American chestnuts to death, toppling entire forests throughout the temperate Appalachian and Allegheny ranges. 

Though their fine straight planks continued to stand vigil in the fence lines and barns of family farms, the trees themselves seemed to suddenly disappear.  

“I can remember well that all of them were gone by 1927 on the Wells Creek farms in Eastern Kentucky where I was born,” Davis said.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


There is no mention of this massacre in the New York Times’ glowing profile of Parsons’ 30-year tenure over the city’s Department of Parks. But his legacy came at a cost which Appalachia has paid ever since: The imported chestnut blight killed nearly 4 billion American chestnut trees across 200 million acres of US forest. In less than 40 years it would obliterate enough ecosystems to drive some species into extinction. That fate seemed likely for the chestnut as well.

But a curious thing was discovered about the old forests in the mountains. The blight did not always kill the entire tree. Rot and death would spread through their venerable trunks and crumple their limbs — but their roots and stumps, cradled by the continent’s most ancient mountains, lived on in the sandy, acidic Appalachian soil.

Stumps generally survived the blight, and kept producing hopeful shoots for years to come. The diseased tendrils would stretch themselves toward the sun each spring, even while weaker and thinner than they ought to be, climbing skyward for five years or so before succumbing to the blight and dying back down. Most never even grew old enough to flower, but the trees kept trying. They still are: About 430 million American chestnut trees exist across the species’ native range today. In a sense, they were buying time for us to figure out how to save them.

Most surviving chestnut trees have a relatively tiny diameter at breast height, or DBH, measured at about 4.5 feet from the ground. As of 2022, roughly 84% of such trees were measured at one-inch DBH or smaller, while those whose DBH is 10 inches or larger only total in the tens of thousands. The only reason that estimate is known, or even possible, is because the chestnut has had other allies besides the mountains. The people of the mountains likewise refused to give up. And now, against all odds, the trees and their friends are winning. 

At Berea College Forest in Kentucky, a TACF volunteer team of state chapter members, including foresters Clint Patterson and Phil Vogel, climb the 1,500-foot elevation of a sandstone ridge to check the condition of catkins on two flowering wild American chestnut trees which have now grown 40 feet tall. 2023. (Kentucky Chapter of The American Chestnut Foundation, used with permission)

Shepherds of the forest 

The American Chestnut Foundation (TACF) is the Appalachia-based nonprofit that has given the disappearing tree its greatest hope for resurrection. TACF’s small band of tree stewards have fought for the species’ conservation since 1983, but they’re just the face of the volunteer-led local groups that power TACF every day. Citizen scientists are the eyes, ears and pruning shears of TACF. The group connects these local researchers to national experts and scientists at the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Forest Service. Thanks to those local communities’ efforts, TACF logged more than 500 of the larger chestnuts by 2022, and now tracks hundreds of orchards across the entire native range. 

Jared Westbrook is TACF’s national science director, overseeing the testing and cultivation of orchard strains across every state chapter. Under Westbrook, TACF is taking a few different approaches to preservation, each offering a different degree of success depending on the region. The key strategy, however, is to backcross-breed blight-immune Chinese chestnuts (Castanea mollissima) with the heirloom American chestnuts in order to create a hybrid species that is as genetically as close as possible to the native species while still offering the maximum possible disease resistance.

"It’s all about this intelligent immune system in a tree that recognizes it’s under attack"

“We retain a very small fraction — 1% or less — of the trees that we plant,” Westbrook said. “And so now we've gotten to the point where we've been able to generate populations that inherited most of their genome from American chestnut. They have some intermediate resistance. We've identified that needle in the haystack.”

Much as animal species can be bred for hardiness by selectively mating the strongest pairs, the scientists gather the handful of chestnut trees from each stand that show improved blight resistance over their predecessors, and use only those for cross-breeding. To resurrect a sprawl of ancient woodlands is no task for the short-sighted, nor one that can be measured in units as tiny as years. Westbrook and TACF have learned to think in generations.  

“We have good parents and cross them together,” Westbrook said. “And we generate the kids and we select even better. We have to do that repeatedly with more generations until we have trees that have adequate resistance where they can reproduce on their own in the forest.” 

This hybrid breeding approach is slow work that requires methodical care from thousands of volunteers — planting hundreds of thousands of trees, physically maintaining and testing each of them, and cutting back all but the strongest. But it’s working. Results over the last decade, Westbrook said, have exponentially surpassed those from TACF’s entire 40-year history. 

“​​We've improved the blight resistance like five times over from what an American chestnut has had naturally, looking at our forest trials. And yet, these victories are still not as resistant as Chinese trees,” he said.
 
Asked if he could roughly gauge the overall increase and how far the trees had to go, Westbrook said that “on a scale of zero to 100, the average resistance we're getting right now with our best parents is about 40 or 50.”  

The ethics of tree medicine

TACF’s hybridization strategy isn’t the only approach to saving the American chestnut, however. Other groups aim to preserve the historical genetic diversity of the native species. Rather than lose the unique and native American tree and replace it with a newly created hybrid, they hope to cure the native species before it disappears.

The chestnut blight secretes a searing chemical, oxalic acid, into the tree bark, eventually causing cankers and death. In what are called Darling chestnuts, however, a CRISPR-modified wheat gene is inserted into the tree and thwarts this acid with minimal genetic alteration. Basically, this allows the creation of 100% pure American chestnut trees — or at least very close to that — with just one gene added. 

Westbrook said that while TACF is working with other groups to refine this potential solution and preserve the heirloom American chestnut varietal, there are still significant hurdles to clear. Long-term resistance of trees with the inserted gene is unclear, and the gene creates an array of unpredictable side effects.

The chestnut was once known as the “cradle to grave tree.” Its straight-grain, lightweight planks were used for both cradles and caskets.

“The trees don't grow as tall for example,” he said. “They don't survive as well. They're a little more sensitive to stress….It’s like having a fever all the time, like your immune system is overactive. And you can't turn it off. So you have the advantage of, I guess, genetic purity, but the side effects of an overactive approach may not be a viable strategy going forward.” 

TACF is now exploring ways to make sure that the wheat gene only “turns on” when the tree is fighting off the blight, and only in the right tissues.

“That’s the more pinpointed, precise way of making the tree resistant rather than it being on volume 10 all the time,” Westbrook said.

Chinese hybrids, however, already offer an entire immune system naturally geared for this challenge. For example, chemicals in the Chinese trees’ bark counter the acid cankers by creating a sort of scab around the injury. 

“It’s all about this intelligent immune system in a tree that recognizes it’s under attack,” Westbrook said. “It enables them to mount an appropriate defense where it is only on when it's needed — and only as much as necessary, only as little as possible.” 

Berea College Forester Clint Patterson and TACF Kentucky Chapter President Ken Darnell check the results of an experiment to promote root growth on young wild American Chestnut sprouts, within the 9,000-acre Berea College Forest. 2023. (Kentucky Chapter of The American Chestnut Foundation, used with permission)

Kitchen table conservation

In Kentucky, the slow process of careful hybrid cultivation means TACF volunteers like Ken Darnell can find themselves taking 3,700 steps forward and about 3,660 back. 

Darnell is what one might call a kitchen-table conservationist. Before joining TACF, he spent his career leveraging forestry science and biotech for kitchen cabinet manufacturing. Now he says he’s ready to get back to the forest. One hike after another, handling one tree at a time, he is full-time TACF volunteer and the head of its Kentucky chapter, spending nearly 40 hours a week managing the orchards and organizing efforts across the state. 

In just one orchard, Darnell oversaw the planting and maintenance of about 3,700 hybrid chestnuts in the last eight years. By the end of this year, all but the 40 strongest will be cut down. Those 40 or so trees, which prove maximum resistance against blight, will be used to hand-pollinate other orchards, making the next crop stronger. This orchard is a project in partnership with Eastern Kentucky University, the most highly maintained crop in the state. Its hybrids are about 15/16ths American chestnut and 1/16th Chinese chestnut. 

Ken Darnell has overseen the planting and maintenance of about 3,700 hybrid chestnuts in the last eight years. By the end of this year, all but the 40 strongest will be cut down.

“To plant those 3,700 trees was a lot of work,” Darnell said. “Kids, volunteers, members, Kentucky TACF chapter people, national leaders coming to help us — [it was] a tremendous amount of work and planning. Then once we planted those trees it was a lot of work to nurse them and baby them, to get them to grow up.”

That work includes weed control, planting, loading and fertilization. The Kentucky volunteers also have to watch over the trees throughout the year to protect them from the destructive ambrosia beetles, whose larvae would quickly kill half of the orchard if left unchecked. Volunteers must tend to each of the 3,700 trees, making the trek across the state three times per spring and spraying every single tree with protectants to give their tiniest leaves a chance at reaching maturity. 

“Then we injected them with the blight. And what a mean thing to do to your baby trees,” Darnell said. “To test them, we actually acquired some blight in Petri dishes, cut a little hole in the trees, injected a piece of the blight from the Petri dish into the tree, and put a piece of tape around the blight in the tree, just to force the issue with the tree. Some of the trees inherit the right combinations of genes, some don’t.”

After giving the trees a couple of years to process the blight, the results become more apparent. The volunteers continuously sift the orchard, cutting off decaying pieces, sorting blight-stricken trees from those injured by other factors, measuring and recording each sproutling’s growth. Every two years or so, TACF scientists like Westbrook will come to the orchard to test the trees and guide the orchard selection. 

“It helps us speed up the process and choose more quickly which trees to cut. It sounds like a sin to cut more trees, but it’s to let the better trees grow more vigorously,” Westbrook said. “That will let us get down to the final 40 or so that will have enough blight resistance to use their nuts for controlled cross-pollination.

“When we have these 40 trees, we can do any combination of breeding with them just once. We'll try to have 40 trees from diverse parents across the orchard. We don't want 40 trees of a single mother — that's not a good idea. We're trying to have genetic diversity.”

In Appalachia, the chestnut was once known as the “cradle to grave tree.” Its straight-grain, lightweight planks were used for both cradles and caskets. Its early summer blooms ensured plentiful offspring and protected it from an annual spring-frost death visited on other nut trees. Its thick foliage drew in game for hunting, sheltering small ecosystems and wrapping communities in a dense protective layer against the cutting mountain winds. 

Kentuckians haven’t forgotten this. And Darnell now stewards the chestnut stands from cradle to grave, preserving their legacy and arborcraft, one sapling at a time. He watches as volunteers bring their kids into orchards to help maintain the tree communities, shows them how to care for the trees as the trees once cared for the people. 

He often hikes the orchards in shared delight with others, and he says he’s not giving up on the trees any time soon. He can already walk through the shade and light of the newer 20-year orchards, enjoying the early fruits of TACF’s work, and giving us all a glimpse of the chestnut’s future.

Side quest: The tongues of nut-worshiping women  

There are many names the world over for what we call the American chestnut tree, including the names given it by the first peoples of its native range. In Choctaw, it is otapi. Among the Powhatan-speaking Algonquian tribes of Virginia, the trees are opomens. The Iriquoian language of the Cherokee or Tsalagi peoples has several words for them, including tili (ᏘᎵ) and unagina (ᎤᎾᎩᎾ). 

As far as Eurocentric science is concerned, however, our American chestnut’s official name is Castanea dentata. The Latinized Castanea is a more definitive version of the Greek kastana — an ancient linguistic mutation of the Tsakonian kastanakon karuon (κάρυον) meaning “nut,” “hard-shelled seed” or “kernel.” For Greek writers, it referred to chestnuts, walnuts, hazelnuts and other nut-bearing trees. The trees, they say, were danced to life. 

The Peloponnese area of Greece, called Tsakonia, was once called Kynouria and became known for the hypnotic, serpentine dances of the dryads called Karyatides. That word means “ladies of the nut tree,” and the nymphs were devotees of the goddess Karya, chthonic all-mother Kar in Crete’s oldest pre-Minoan stories. She likely originated in the Babylonian kharimati, singing priestesses of bull-riding goddess Ishtar. Karya was later beloved of Dionysus, and was finally changed into a nut tree. 

The city where the women danced became Karyai. Under the Greeks, the priestesses adopted Artemis Caryatis, moon goddess of the wilderness, twin sister to Apollo, the sun god. In 12-day autumn festivals they wove hands together and circled chestnut, walnut and hazelnut trees, their dance through labyrinthine groves like Ariadne’s gift to Theseus. 

To this day, a magnificent plane tree crop still surrounds Artemis’ temple at Karyes. It’s said they were planted by King Menelaus in 1100 B.C., a tribute to his tree-cult devotee wife Helen of Troy, sister of the Castores (the mythic Gemini). And to this day in Kastanitsa the annual Chestnut Festival is held at the end of October. 

Steer west from the Greek isles, and you'll find the largest and oldest known chestnut tree in the world, Castagnu dî Centu Cavaddi (the “Hundred Horse Chestnut”). It has been living on Sicily’s Mount Etna for nearly 4,000 years.

The Greek Karuon or kỹros (κῦρος) both come from the Old Persian Kūruš (“like the Sun”) and meant not just a chestnut shell but a brain shell, a skull (as in cranium or crane). Here’s the connection: It becomes “horn” when written kérat (κέρᾰ, root of keratin), and as voú-keras (βούκερον) it becomes “ox or bull horn.” Finally, as kerátona vomón (Κεράτωνα βωμόν) it is the “Horned Altar” around which Theseus first danced in praise of the sun-god Apollo. A dance called the Crane.

If you steer your boat west from the Greek isles, you will find the largest and oldest known chestnut tree in the world. It has been living on Sicily’s Mount Etna for nearly 4,000 years. With an awe-striking circumference of 190 feet, it is called Castagnu dî Centu Cavaddi (the “Hundred Horse Chestnut”), which some argue is the largest single tree in the world. Its name is a boast of size, recalling a huntress queen once caught in a thunderstorm, who sheltered inside the tree with her entire retinue and horses. The first government act of environmental protection in the world is thought by some to have come from Sicily in 1745, when it instituted protection of the Hundred Horse Chestnut. 

The same blight that killed one out of every four hardwood trees in Appalachia took hold of Greece in 1963. Just as in Kentucky, the devastation ripped an important cash crop away from rural mountain communities, spurring on city-bound migration as people fled withering agrarian economies. And just as on the eastern seaboard of North America, the damage spread faster in a vacuum of ecological protection. 

By 1988, the threat wormed into Mt. Athos’ coppice forests, a UNESCO-protected site where local politics finally forced action. Losses were slowed in 1998 with a new conservation project that clear-cut infected trees, then deployed a naturally occurring virus against the fungus. Another project built on its success had spread across 29 counties by 2016. The virus spread and the orchards began to recover. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


But Greece produced 18,000 tons of chestnuts a year in the 1960s, and by 2005 that was down to 11,000 tons. In Karystos, on the Greek island of Evia, a reforestation project now seeks to restore a magical chestnut forest called Kastanlogos, the oldest in the country. The project expects to restore 30,000 chestnut trees by the end of this year. 

If the bias of Western empirical science leads us to ignore the names given to American chestnut trees by those who knew them first, then consider that the oh-so-scientific term of Castanea dentata asserts that the tree is a magical being. And it’s a she. To be exact, she’s an ancient pre-Hellenic goddess who was transformed into the tree. And her name isn’t Castanea; it’s Karya. 

Her people have not given up on navigating her pervasive ecological disease. And her Greek dryads, the Karyatides, still dance today.

Biodiversity and cultural-climate change 

As much in Kentucky as in Greece, the people of a place are fated by its forests. We may not have an ancient Minoan dance to celebrate the chestnut tree, but we’ve got a song from Dolly Parton, whose uncle Bill Owens was a 25-year TACF member and oversaw the planting of hundreds of American chestnuts at Dollywood. No Appalachian could ask for more goddess lore than that. 

Preserving the diversity of Appalachia’s forests has also meant preserving the diversity of its people and culture. In the southern mountains of Kentucky’s Cumberland County lies a place once called Coe Ridge or Zeketown. It was founded in 1866 by Ezekiel and Patsy Ann Coe, a formerly enslaved couple who purchased the land after reclaiming their enslaved children, creating a prosperous Black community that would thrive for nearly a century with the help of 300 to 400 acres fueling its chestnut and timber trade. 

In much of Appalachia, coal mining, gas fracking and pollution ripped through the natural wealth of forests, leaving behind impoverished communities, multiple health hazards, few and distant hospitals and countless small towns with mortgaged futures. 

Once the chestnut trees disappeared, though, Coe Ridge began to fade. Outward migration sent residents looking for work in neighboring Illinois, Ohio and Virginia. As historian Donald Davis writes, the chestnut played such an important role in the diet and economy of Appalachia that its loss helped tilt the region’s marginalized populations away from “a semi-agrarian and intimately forest-dependent way of life” to one concentrated in more industrialized areas. 

That industrialization would come at a steep cost to mountains, forests and people. Coal mining, natural gas fracking and the accompanying pollution of air and water from unchecked resource extraction all ripped through the natural wealth of forests, leaving behind impoverished communities, multiple health hazards, few and distant hospitals and countless small towns with mortgaged futures. 

Cassie Stark, TACF’s mid-Atlantic science coordinator, says her region is seeing specific challenges from climate change on top of the chestnut blight they’re already facing. The main threat is a root rot in the trees caused by a soil-borne pathogen called Phytophthora, a new strain of the same microorganism that helped cause the Irish famine of the 1840s.

“This used to be mainly a problem in the southern region. Now we're seeing it more northern,” Stark explained. “Phytophthora thrives on these humid, moist, kind of swampier sites. Unfortunately, that is the kind of problem that's kind of creeping up into our region as things start to warm up.”

TACF Mid-Atlantic Regional Science Coordinator Cassie Stark and TACF Kentucky Chapter President Ken Darnell tour four Kentucky chestnut orchards in the summer of 2023 with TACF National Science Director Jared Westbrook (Kentucky Chapter of The American Chestnut Foundation, used with permission)

An ecology of hope

If you scoured a map of the U.S. for the precise spot where climate change destruction and the country’s mental health epidemic most visibly intersect, your finger would likely land on Appalachia. 

The growing pile of studies on mental health disparities in the region has been an early warning for other landscapes as climate-change dread creeps into America’s psychic periphery. In 2017, a study on Appalachian women who lived near gas extraction wells reported greater feelings of powerlessness and increased community illness to the industry’s presence. In 2012, those living near mountain-top removal sites were found to have a higher risk of mental health problems. 

Also in 2012, a different study from the Appalachian Regional Commission found that “persons in Central Appalachia, where coal mining is heaviest, are at greater risk for major depression and severe psychological distress compared with other areas of Appalachia or the nation.” 

That distress can be heard clearly enough in the voices of Appalachian students recorded in one 2022 study.

“It's really frustrating because the more I learn about stuff, the more overwhelming it becomes,” said one student. “I want to do my best to make a difference. I use my reusable bags and I have my metal straw. I do so much on the small scale in my everyday life to make myself feel like I'm making a difference, but it's frustrating knowing that the cause of all of this is out of my hands and there's nothing I as an individual can do to make as big a difference as I want to.”

Other students felt worn down, between concern over impending climate catastrophe and family political tensions. The region is often described as one where community identities are rooted in a sense of “place,” a bone-deep sense of connectedness not just to the land, but the collective. In many regions and groups, climate change drives feelings of hopelessness and powerlessness, which can set off a “paralyzing downward spiral of despair.” But those feelings of are felt even more strongly by those with a keener sense of connectedness to their environment.

It’s a double-edged sword: That sense of place-connectedness, if actively cultivated with a community, may also render us more resilient against the psychological weight of climate change. It’s no surprise that TACF’s efforts to conserve Appalachia’s biological heritage have had a fortifying affect on the spirits of its volunteers and members. Stark says she can see this effect in real time. 

“We're often flooded with the news as to what's going on and how are we going to fix it. And ‘how do I do my part?’ and ‘Is one person enough?’ and ‘What can I do?’” Stark said. She gets a lot of calls and emails from people who “just happened upon our website, and they’re like, ‘How do I get involved? Where can I volunteer near me?’ They want to come out, they want to see the trees and they want to physically start making that difference and doing what they can.”

Increased volunteering and the recent breakthroughs in genetics are actually changing the pace of TACF’s work, hinting at a newfound momentum fueled by this symbiosis.

“I joined at an exciting time,” Stark said. “The progress we’re making in the past five years, compared to the progress that we've made in the past 30 years, is really astounding. That's just because of new technology and the way science is progressing. So I just feel really hopeful.”

TACF Mid-Atlantic Regional Science Coordinator Cassie Stark (right) processes chestnuts out of their hulls following a harvest in 2023. (Kentucky Chapter of The American Chestnut Foundation, used with permission)

We know from dozens of studies that time spent in the forests affords nearly immediate benefits to mental health, offering promising results for those with dementia, substance use disorders, depression and anxiety. There’s an umbrella term for these kinds of therapeutic interventions involving nature and animal conservation: “green care.” A 2023 systemic review of several meta-analyses likewise found that psychological and physical connections with nature improve both human well-being and the actual product of nature conservation work. It’s a symbiotic joy: The more helpful you are to the trees, the better your mental health.

Time spent in the forest offers immediate benefits to mental health — and we feel even better when we believe we’re in a more biodiverse forest and are contributing to its biodiversity.

Interestingly, these studies show we feel even better when we believe we’re in a more biodiverse forest and are contributing to its biodiversity. Another 2023 study surveyed 500 people who performed one 10-minute activity five times over eight days in any place with nature nearby and found specifically that “nature-based citizen science potentially supports people's well-being over-and-above the benefits of being outside.” 

Last year, Oxford University psychiatry experts and National Health Service members called nature restoration work “an essential mental health intervention.” And actual forestry work itself — the light-intensity grunt work of planting, pruning, hauling saplings and tromping around a bit — was found to specifically improve participants’ sense that they themselves have been mentally and emotionally restored. 

These restorative benefits seem to be growing among TACF volunteers, too. Members seem undaunted by the length of the intergenerational journey ahead, according to Stark. As volunteers work shoulder-to-shoulder with their neighbors, the long arc of the work ahead can help to soften the anxiety about impending doom, and to generate resolve, resilience and hope.  

“The volunteers I work with are all so optimistic and passionate, and believe that this is something that we can accomplish. And a lot of them know this might not be in their own lifetime,” Stark said.

We need your help to stay independent

“It's a long process of restoration, especially when you're working with a tree. Their life cycles are so long. But just setting that groundwork for the next generation coming behind them, and continuing to work, is the idea.” 

If you feel hopeless, if you are afraid and paralyzed, come to the woods and listen. If you are lost in the labyrinth of despair, watching the creeping dread-rot hollow you out — whether you’re circling the dark on the uptown 1 train or bleeding out willpower under fluorescent lights — follow Ariadne’s telephone wires through the web of straight-grain utility maypoles up the mountain. Hike the winding chestnut orchards of Kentucky, thrice-circle their groves in the spring and let your children learn their names. 

If you can’t bloom, if you tire of climbing and wither without end — come sink your hands like roots into the sandy soil and let your oldest allies lend you strength to grow anew in enduring hope. Slowly by the seasons, one kernel at a time, you will feel your heartwood restored.

“We say restoration is a process,” Stark tells me, “not a product.”

Right-wing tantrum over Jill Biden Christmas video accidentally reveals how much MAGA hates America

Last week, First Lady Jill Biden, rejecting her predecessor's loathing of Christmas cheer, posted a sweet and silly video of the Dorrance Dance company performing a tap dance to a jazz reimagining of "Dance of the Floreadores" from "The Nutcracker Suite."

To normal people, the video was a bit of old-fashioned Christmas cheer in the great American tradition of musical extravaganzas like those of Busby Berkeley. To MAGA-Americans, however, it was a moral and aesthetic outrage that was going straight into their file labeled "Why Now Is The Time For American Fascism." Tellingly, despite the flood of angry comments, Republicans struggled to articulate exactly what they found so offensive. Vague terms like "weird," "grotesque and abhorrent," and "classless" accompanied odd accusations that the performance reminded them of "The Hunger Games." Chaya Raichik of Libs of TikTok whined that it "should’ve come with a sensitivity label." To her million-plus Twitter followers, right-wing influencer Brigitte Gabriel groused, "Children should not be watching this smut!" 

 

The people MAGA hates were up in the White House having a good time. 

Soon the New York Post and Breitbart got involved. They, too, were stubbornly unwilling to offer any specifics about their objections, beyond the Breitbart writer complaining that the dancers "are so PROUD of themselves." (The dancers are smiling broadly, which is the tradition of musical theater.) Even Ross Douthat, supposedly a "reasonable" conservative columnist at the New York Times, couldn't help but join the anti-joy dogpile. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Well, MAGA has their reasons to beat around the bush, but that shouldn't stop the rest of us. Anyone with working knowledge of right-wing trigger points knows what fueled the outrage, and it's not just a general right-wing aversion to fun. It's plain bigotry. The first smiling face we see in the video is a Black woman. Throughout the video, many of the dancers read as people of color and queer people. Plus, the music is jazz, not classical. We are apparently at that point in fascist development where they reject syncopated rhythms as decadent and emasculating.

Who knew "Swing Kids," the 1993 Christian Bale movie about the Nazi ban on jazz, would be so relevant in 2023? This is especially idiotic coming from people who always falsely accuse liberals of waging "war on Christmas." I have yet to see a progressive influencer, much less a liberal New York Times columnist, get angry because someone else is having holiday fun. 

Biden's haters dug up a statement of anti-racism from the troupe's leader, Michelle Dorrance, and held it out as some kind of gotcha. But they gotcha'd themselves, by dragging that subtext right into the daylight. Racism and homophobia are obviously what's fueling this tantrum. Getting outraged over an anti-racist statement is an unwitting admission of what they can't say out loud. (Well, most, anyway. There were a few MAGA types who flatly stated their objection: "This is gay as hell.") All the coded language about "weird" and "classless" and "smut" was just a thin veil over the real grievance: The people MAGA hates were up in the White House having a good time. 

No doubt the vast majority of this furor is performative instead of deeply felt. Most of these people have been taking in musicals and goofy Christmas entertainment their entire lives without a second thought. But this should be seen as part of the larger MAGA project to categorize increasing amounts of culture as "woke" and therefore forbidden. They're gradually reducing the amount of contact Trumpists have with the outside world, until the only entertainment they're allowed is old Donald Trump speeches. Standard cult move, really: Cut your followers off from any pleasure or association with the outside world, making them easier to control. 

This should be seen as part of the larger MAGA project to categorize increasing amounts of culture as "woke" and therefore forbidden. They're gradually reducing the amount of contact Trumpists have with the outside world, until the only entertainment they're allowed is old Donald Trump speeches.

But what struck me in all this is how deeply anti-American this right-wing fury is.  "Dance of the Floreadores," usually called the "Waltz of the Flowers" was originally composed for an 1892 ballet by a Russian, Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky. But absolutely everything else about this video is a testament to the vast musical creativity of Americans. Jazz was invented in the U.S. As was tap dancing, which developed from the intermingling of Irish immigrants and African-Americans. The musical is an American invention, and its garish traditions blossomed during the Great Depression when extravaganza at the movie theater relieved the dullness of everyday life. The particular arrangement of the "Waltz of the Flowers" featured at the White House is from a 1960 album of jazz renditions of "The Nutcracker Suite" by Duke Ellington and his band, with arrangements by his long-time collaborator Billy Strayhorn. 

These are the kinds of histories that we should be proud of. All this artistic innovation defined American culture and proved to be so popular that it spread out across the globe. But it also tells a story about the United States that the MAGA movement wants to erase. It's about the outsized impact that Black Americans have had on American music, basically inventing and refining and redefining every musical form that originated here. (Yes, even country-western.) It's about how queer people have always been with us and always been artistic innovators, including Strayhorn, who was an out gay Black man when both identities were dangerous. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


It's fitting that the MAGA movement, which has unsubtly aligned itself with Vladimir Putin's anti-democratic agenda, would react as if this video is smearing American taint all over a pure Russian artifact. One supposes as well that the Libs of Tik Tok/Moms for Liberty crowd would like to ignore what even Putin cannot, that Tchaikovsky was gay. They can't help but expose how they hold American culture in contempt. Instead, they fetishize a sanitized version of 19th-century European culture. It's reminiscent of Trump's efforts to ban modern American architecture for what he deemed the "classical" style of columns and marble. None of this is subtle, but just bigotry trying to justify itself in grandiose trappings. 

In all this, they reveal one of the biggest lies of a movement built on lies: That they are "patriots." They don't love America. They hate everything about it. As Yale philosophy professor Jason Stanley has explained, "Fascism appeals to an imaginary and glorious past destroyed by the forces of liberalism, cosmopolitanism and globalism." Part of the authoritarian project is erasing the actual past, especially in America where liberal ideals, cultural interchange, and urban life were central to forging the culture that is uniquely ours. It's why book banning has become such a craze on the right, despite its political unpopularity. Erasing real history means destroying the books that have recorded it. 

It's all why, as silly as this right-wing rage over a harmless tap dance video may be, it's still important to take note of it. This is part of the larger and growing culture war, aimed at rewriting American culture in their own image, while erasing the way immigration, racial diversity, and queerness have shaped it. Nor do these eliminationist impulses stop at cultural expression. People themselves get targeted. Trump is out there promising to "root out" the "vermin," a group so hazily and expansively defined it could encompass everyone who voted against him. In this reaction to a sweet little Christmas video, we get an idea of who Trump's supporters also have in mind with their "rooting out" fantasies. 

Jan. 6 officer: Republicans would “keep us from protecting the Capitol” if Trump tries another coup

On Jan. 6, 2021, then-President Donald Trump and his agents attempted a coup. Central to Trump’s coup attempt was an assault by his MAGA followers on the Capitol, where the goal was to stop the certification of the election and to keep him in power. As revealed by direct witnesses and as shown by his behavior and statements, Trump wanted to lead a march on the Capitol like a conquering dictator. After an hours-long battle, Trump’s MAGA followers succeeded in overrunning the Capitol. Five police officers would die as a result of this terrorist attack. 138 others were injured. In many ways, Jan. 6 was a trial run and proof of concept for a future coup attempt by the neofascists and their allies here in America.

These are the plain facts.

In her book ‘The Origins of Totalitarianism," Hannah Arendt warned:

The result of a consistent and total substitution of lies for factual truth is not that the lie will now be accepted as truth, and truth be defamed as lie, but that the sense by which we take our bearings in the real world – and the category of truth versus falsehood is among the mental means to this end – is being destroyed.

To that point, Trump, the MAGA people, the Republican fascists, and his other propagandists and agents are actively rewriting the events of Jan. 6 (and American history more broadly) as part of their Big Lie about the 2020 Election. For example, Speaker Mike Johnson has ordered that the faces of Trump’s Jan. 6 MAGA attack force be blurred in video surveillance footage as a way of protecting them from being prosecuted for their crimes by the Department of Justice.

We need your help to stay independent

Capitol Hill police Sgt. Aquilino Gonell defended the Capitol on Jan. 6 from Trump’s MAGA attack force. He is a firsthand witness to history and will carry the physical and emotional trauma and scars from that day with him for the rest of his life. A Dominican immigrant, former U.S. Army soldier, and Iraq War veteran, Gonell has been a Capitol Hill police officer for the past 17 years and was one of four police officers who testified before the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 insurrection. He’s been recently featured in The New York Times Magazine, The Washington Post, NPR, CBS Mornings, NBC News, Fox-TV, MSNBC, The Daily Beast, The Hill, and Rolling Stone.

Sgt. Gonell’s new book (with co-author Susan Shapiro) is "American Shield: The Immigrant Sergeant Who Defended Democracy."

In this conversation, Gonell shares what it is like to see the very same Republicans in Congress whose lives he and the other Capitol Police protected on Jan. 6 now betray them by supporting Trump and his coup attempt. Gonell explains his disgust at seeing the Jan. 6 terrorists being feted as “heroes” and “patriots” and “political prisoners” by Trump and the other neofascists — and to know that he and his fellow Capitol police would be in great danger if Trump were to return to power in 2025.  At the end of this conversation, Gonell implores Trump’s followers to understand that the ex-president is a selfish and dangerous man who does not care anything about them and only values power and his own ego.

This interview has been lightly edited for clarity and length

How are you feeling given all that happened on Jan. 6 and your journey so far?

I'm doing okay considering the circumstances of everything that I have gone through and everything that has happened since January 6. I have made a lot of strides in terms of treatment for my injuries, both physical and mental. But it's ongoing for me because I am still involved with investigations, trial cases, going to court to give my victim statements and to testify as well. 

How is your personal trauma connected to the trauma that Jan. 6 and the Age of Trump caused, and is continuing to cause, the country and the American people?

There is a not small part of the American public, the Republicans and Trump supporters almost mostly, who say that nothing bad happened that day on Jan. 6. And some of them who admit Jan. 6 was real will say that it wasn't as bad as I and the other officers who were there say it was. That we are lying, and my injuries are not as severe as I say they are. But some of the same people who are saying those ridiculous things are the very same people who I risked my life for on that day at the Capitol. How can you reconcile that? I risked my life to protect you and then you turn around and say, "well, these were my friends. These were my supporters. It's okay. We condone the violence on Jan. 6 because of that."

"These Republicans claim to support the police and the rule of law, but they are demanding that the same people who assaulted me should be freed."

This all involves a type of physical, mental, emotional — and moral injury.

I did my job that day. I kept my oath. When the Republicans I protected that day reject what happened or minimize it or make excuses they are saying that my sacrifices were not necessary. That puts a heavy weight on you. Jan. 6 was a type of Pearl Harbor event. I expect the country and those Republican members of Congress to comport themselves like we as a nation responded after 9-11 or Pearl Harbor: we should be rallying against a common enemy. Instead of rallying around the officers and supporting them, these Republicans and other Trump supporters are defending the indefensible.

Some of the same Republicans who were running for their lives on Jan. 6, who me and the other Capitol Police were risking our lives to defend, are now saying that the Jan. 6 mob are "political prisoners" or "peaceful protesters" and should be released. These Republicans claim to support the police and the rule of law, but they are demanding that the same people who assaulted me should be freed. The so-called "pro-law enforcement" people on the right say we are crybabies or call us other names when we point out the hypocrisy. Don't claim to support the police or "back the blue" if you want to protect the people on Jan. 6 who were attacking us and trying to keep Trump in power. 

How do you think the Republicans who were there on Jan. 6 (and more broadly who still have the ability to distinguish between reality and fantasy) are reconciling their lies about that day? 

I don't know. Why don't I know? Because they've never spoken to me. So, I don't know what their thoughts are, other than what I hear them say on TV and in public more generally. But I do know how they felt that day on Jan. 6 and in the days afterward.

Those Republicans knew that Trump was responsible for putting their lives at risk.  They know that Trump put our democracy and our standing in the world as a nation at risk. They know Trump wants to be a dictator. He is outright saying it directly now. Trump is not going to be a dictator just a day as he is claiming. Trump wants to be a dictator forever. What is there to stop him?

Now those Republicans are defending Trump's threats of being a dictator, by saying that he is just joking. Was Trump joking on Jan. 6 about "stop the steal"? Was Trump joking when he sent his followers to attack the Capitol and go after them? Those Republicans were running for their lives. They are more afraid of being voted out of office than they are telling the truth about Jan. 6 and Trump. By comparison, I was willing to lose my life in order to protect those Republicans in Congress. Frankly, if another Jan. 6 took place, I would not trust these Republicans to not betray me and the other police. Would the Republicans keep us from protecting the Capitol from Trump's followers? Yes. Perhaps even restrain us and hold us down? Yes, I believe they would.   

It is important to confront lies with the truth and the facts — even when the lies and malign distortions are so obvious and ridiculous. What would you say to the average Fox News viewer or other person who lives in TrumpWorld and the MAGAverse who actually believes that Jan. 6 was not violent? Or that you and the other police who were there are exaggerating?

Nothing happened to who? The members of Congress who were running for their lives? The members of Congress and their families and staff who were hiding, trying to get to refuge? I can show them pictures of my bloodied and bruised body. I got hit by someone who stole a police baton. I can show them evidence of that. 

I'll show you my pictures and videos. I can show them my medical bills for my mental therapy and physical therapy. I have three years of evidence. For those who want us to forget Jan. 6 and just move on well they should tell Donald Trump to just move on because he is campaigning right now on his Big Lies about the 2020 Election.

Speaker Johnson and the other Republican fascists and Trump supplicants are literally rewriting history as we speak. They are now blurring the faces of Trump's MAGA attack force in the video footage of Jan. 6 in order to protect them from prosecution.    

These are the same people who claim to be the party of the rule of law. It is ridiculous. Speaker of the House Johnson, one of the leaders of the Republicans and third in line to the presidency, then goes on to say that they are going to blur out the images of the faces of the people inside the Capitol, that breached the Capitol, because he doesn't want them to be prosecuted and arrested. If Johnson or any of his Republican colleagues would have gotten hurt on January 6, then they would have a different perspective on what the rule of law is, and how Trump's mob deserves to be punished. They are trying to whitewash and rewrite history.

What of the lie that Trump's MAGA attack force was "peaceful" and that they were let into the Capitol on Jan. 6 by the police, which supposedly means that no crimes were committed?

There were barriers and fences with signage telling people to keep out. There were police telling the mob to stay away. Police were blocking them with bike ranks and other barriers. Trump's people breached the Capitol. They didn't care about the signs. They cut down the fences. They removed the bike racks. They remove the barriers. They disregarded the lawful commands of officers, including myself. Trump's mob assaulted police officers in order to get as far as they did inside of the Capitol. The Capitol was on lockdown for the transfer of power. The Capitol was also restricted and closed to the public due to COVID-19 protocols that were in place around the country. Some of these people and their defenders say things such as, "they were given permission because nobody arrested them." That is illogical and ridiculous too. There were not enough police officers to stop everyone. If a person did not receive direct explicit permission to be in the Capitol that day they were trespassing. It is that simple.

And if you got into the Capitol building through a window you are the equivalent of a thief or vandal breaking into a building you don't belong in. There are other members of Trump's mob on Jan. 6 that say things like "well, we were peaceful!". They are still breaking the law because they are interfering with police business and the law. There is also the excuse and defense that if we were really breaking the law on Jan. 6 the police would have shot us. Would that have mattered at all? Each officer was outnumbered more than 50 to 1. How many rounds do we have in our guns without reloading? Not close to enough. That crowd did not go through security. They were armed. Shooting them would not have worked. 

Do you believe that the reaction by the police to Trump's followers on Jan. 6 would have been different if they were Black and brown or Muslims?

I believe the reaction would have been the same. In my case, I did have the thought of using lethal force, especially when they were trying to pull me into the mob. I wasn't afraid to use lethal force and any repercussions from that. I was in the right and my use of lethal force would have been justified. I was certain of that. I decided to try to use my free hand to escape, to get that person to let me go. Luckily, a fellow officer showed up to help free me from the mob. If I could not have gotten away from the mob I would have transitioned to lethal force. The officers there had the opportunity and justification to use lethal force, but we collectively chose not to. It would have been justified.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In the end, we decided that it would have made things worse because none of those people have been screened for weapons. I also believe that the mob outside was waiting for us to shoot first. We showed lots of restraint on Jan. 6. If we had fired, the mob would have escalated to shooting back and even worse. We now know that Trump and his allies had plans to declare martial law, to invoke the Insurrection Act. If we had used lethal force on Jan. 6 that would have played right into Trump's hands and matters would have been even worse.

Trump has declared the Jan. 6 terrorists and other criminals to be "heroes" and "political prisoners." He is basically saying that he is going to pardon them when/if he returns to power. Trump has also endorsed prosecuting the Capitol police who defended the country on Jan. 6. How are you processing this?

I did what I was supposed to do on Jan. 6. I did my job that day. I protected the Capitol. I protected my colleagues. And I did it without thinking about who I was doing it for. I protected everyone in that Capitol regardless of their party affiliation or anything else. Think about it in terms of the metaphor of a loose bullet. Once you fire a gun you cannot guarantee where the bullet is going to go and what or who it is going to hit. The bullet doesn't care whether you are Republican, Democrat, independent, gay, straight, religious or not. The bullet doesn't care about your views on abortion or gun laws. Trump's mob was the bullet. That mob was trying to kill everyone inside the Capitol on Jan. 6.

If some of the Republicans had died that day from the mob and that attack, it would have had a profound impact on how they view the events of Jan. 6. It would radically change their views about patriotism, Trump, politics, and many other things including facts and reality and the Big Lie about the 2020 Election. 

How do you think January 6 will be remembered given how Trump and his agents in the Republican Party are literally rewriting the history of that day to fit their twisted and evil vision?

It is Jan. 6 denialism. It is erasing and rewriting history to serve a lie.

There is that famous poem about the Holocaust, which reads something like first they came for this group and then they came for that group. I didn't say anything. Then at the end they come for you and there is one to protect you. At the end, if you deny what Trump is, and what he is trying to do as a dictator, then you will have no one to blame but yourself when Trump and his MAGA followers come after you. Trump is not a cult leader in my opinion. His followers know exactly what they are doing and why they support him with all of his threats of revenge and retribution.

For you, what does it mean to be a patriot?

I did my job on Jan. 6. I don't look at what I did as something that was patriotic. I was doing what my job requires me to do. Some people take that oath to heart, other people do not. When I joined the military, I bought into the American values and principles, and no one is above the law. Everybody's held responsible for the action; everybody is treated equally. Of course, that is an ideal. My record as a police officer and a member of the military speaks for itself. I would treat Trump supporters or Hillary Clinton supporters the same way. The same goes for Black Lives Matter, Antifa, or any group. I would and have consistently done my job fairly as a Capitol police officer.

The hypocrisy here by the Republicans and other Trump followers is obvious and gross: if I did the same things I did on Jan. 6 and the mob consisted of Black Lives Matter or Antifa they would support me and declare me a hero, backing me 100 percent. But Trump's mob are their people. Republican supporters and voters, so they see events the opposite way.

I can sleep soundly. My conscience is clear. I will tell Trump's supporters this about duty and responsibility: I am more likely to go inside of a burning building to rescue you than the former president, a dictator wannabe who you support. Trump would pretend to not even know you and then throw some more gasoline on the building to finish you off. Trump isn't your champion. If Trump takes over and wants to put me in jail for doing my job on Jan. 6, then they know where to find me. 

Caring for others has health benefits. But the way Americans do it is all wrong

In November, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched a campaign to curb burnout among healthcare workers. The program, called Impact Wellbeing, is the first federal campaign of its kind to give hospitals what the CDC refers to as evidence-informed solutions to reduce healthcare worker burnout. The campaign came after another report suggesting the mental health crisis among healthcare is only worsening in the United States. CDC data showed that more recently, health workers reported having more days of poor mental health within the previous month. Additionally, there was a rise in the percentage of healthcare workers who reported feeling burned out “very often.” 

The story goes that the pandemic exacerbated challenges that healthcare workers were facing leading to unprecedented levels of burnout. Even before then, a myriad of factors were accumulating leading to healthcare workers suffering mentally and emotionally. Healthcare workers say the solution, and impact, is more complex than what a federal campaign can offer, although the campaign is a start. In part because it doesn’t address what drew them to be healthcare workers in the first place: to help others.

While previous research shows that caregiving has positive health effects, the narrative around caregiving in America has turned into one about exhaustion, impossibility and rage. What healthcare workers are experiencing is a microcosm of that.

In October, a study published in JAMA found that healthcare workers — nurses, physicians, other healthcare-diagnosing and treating practitioners, health technicians, healthcare support workers and behavioral health workers — are at an increased risk of death by suicide compared to those who worked in non–health care professions. Many nursing practices are centered around Jean Watson’s Theory of Caring, which states “the centrality of human caring and on the caring-to-caring transpersonal relationship and its healing potential for both the one who is caring and the one who is being cared for.”

Caring in this context is a mutually beneficial experience for both the nurse and the patient. Caring can be re-energizing and a catalyst for self-growth. Yet the inability for nurses in particular to do their jobs is causing what many in the profession would prefer to call “moral distress” instead of “burnout.” 

“The basic definition of moral distress is when you know the right thing to do,” Gerard Brogan, RN and director of nursing practice, told Salon. “But constraints outside your control are preventing you from doing that.”

Caring can be re-energizing and a catalyst for self-growth. Yet the inability for nurses to do their jobs is causing what many call “moral distress.”

In 2014, a National Opinion Research Center found that 83 percent of nonprofessional caregivers viewed their work as a “positive experience.” It gave them a sense of giving back to someone who had cared for them. Scientific research has shown that caregivers live longer. For example, a study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine found that people who volunteered at least 100 hours a year had a reduced risk of dying over a four-year follow-up period compared to those who didn’t volunteer. Another study in 2013 found that volunteering can lower blood pressure.

“Any nurse who's done it for any length of time knows it’s a very rewarding profession,” Jean Ross, a nurse and president of National Nurses United (NNU), told Salon, adding that in her 45-year career she’s seen a massive decline in the industry leading to endemic moral distress. It used to be that nurses were listened to and supported in the workplace, she said. “Now, it’s all designed to comply with some sort of efficiency-expert model, where you don't want to have too many staff on hand or too many supplies on hand, look what happened.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


Indeed, the way caregiving is undervalued, underappreciated, and overall forced to do in isolation, is part of the problem. Healthcare workers, and the estimated 53 million Americans who are unpaid caregivers for a family member, have very little structural support in America. This inherently makes caregiving more taxing and stressful. Brogan said especially when it comes to nursing, it’s like healthcare workers and management “have different priorities.”

During the pandemic, molecular biologist Steve Cole wanted to simulate how isolation could be affecting antiviral immunity and how caregiving could be an antidote. To find an answer, researchers relocated 21 adult male rhesus macaques from their communities to two weeks in an isolated cage. Sheltering in place for the monkeys was associated with 30 to 50 percent reduction in the circulating immune cell population, which showed up in their blood samples as quickly as 48 hours of isolation and persisted for two weeks. Improved immunity didn’t resolve until four weeks later when they returned to their respective monkey communities.

"The way we have it arranged in our society now is that you are more or less 24/7 responsible for this person."

However, there was an exception: when some of the monkeys were given a chance to care for a younger monkey in isolation, their immune responses were more robust than those who were in complete isolation. Cole said this study showed the potential health benefits of caregiving, how it can give people a sense of purpose and meaning. But the way it’s done in America is “very stressful.” 

“The way we have it arranged in our society now is that you are more or less 24/7 responsible for this person,” he said. “A sustainable version of caregiving is where caregivers do it for some part of their lives, and then they get some rest and regeneration.”

Ross said measures that are meant to curb the crisis among healthcare workers, like adding a “zen room” in hospitals for healthcare workers don’t help. What they need are the tools and support to care for their patients. 

We need your help to stay independent

“Those things that they offer to us, they do nothing that is helpful to us,” Ross said. “You're running your butt off, you don't have enough nurses to care for your patients, and we should take a break and go to the zen room?”

Brogan said he became a nurse when he was 19. He was idealistic, and wanted a job where he felt like he had meaning. He’s never seen nurses suffer from so much “moral injury” than he’s seen over the last few years. 

“I speak to nurses all day every day, and I've never ever seen this level of disaffection amongst nurses with their employers,” Brogan said. “Anecdotally, I hear people say ‘I just can't do this anymore.’”

Senate staffer fired over video of him allegedly having sex in judiciary hearing room

On Friday, a video of two men having sex on a table in a Senate hearing room began to circulate and it didn't take long to identify one of the two individuals as being Aidan Maese-Czeropski, a legislative aide who has since been fired from the office of Sen. Ben Cardin.

News of the amateur porno first broke on Daily Caller, reporting along with a selection of extremely NSFW clips that it had been shared in a private group for gay men in politics. The man with whom the ex-staffer was engaging in what appears to be unprotected anal sex has yet to be identified.

Cardin's office told Politico on Saturday: "Aidan Maese-Czeropski is no longer employed by the US Senate," and Czeropski has since issued a statement of his own via a LinkedIn post, writing, "This has been a difficult time for me, as I have been attacked for who I love to pursue a political agenda. While some of my actions in the past have shown poor judgement, I love my job and would never disrespect my workplace. Any attempts to characterize my actions otherwise are fabricated and I will be exploring what legal options are available to me in these matters."

As The Guardian points out, the room where this all allegedly took place appears to be Hart 216, the judiciary room, which hosted the 9/11 commission hearings and where James Comey, the former FBI director, gave his testimony on Donald Trump in 2017.

Norman Lear: Hollywood’s last religious liberal

The emergence of Donald Trump into the national spotlight has led to yet another “evangelical scare” in America’s short religious history. Like past scares, which first unfolded around the Presidency of Ronald Reagan and his proverbial rise to power by way of the newly discovered “evangelical,” this one has found a home among Hollywood’s best and brightest. 

This coming February, actor and producer Rob Reiner will be at the center of discussions having to do with American politics and evangelical religion because his movie, “God & Country: The Rise of Christian Nationalism,” is set to release. Based largely on journalist Katherine Stewart’s Power Worshippers: Inside the Dangerous Rise of Christian Nationalism, Reiner’s treatment of American Christianity and its recent history in the US have led many to believe that Christianity is “in crisis,” and is in need of thorough resuscitation.

This is not the first time a member of Hollywood has decided to go after American conservatism and its various religious supporters. Not only is this a great way of making oneself politically irrelevant to most everyday Americans, but it also creates resentment, and distrust of the political system itself. Reiner is not the first person to leverage Hollywood and its various wares against those who threaten to obliterate it. Far from it. In fact, such a tradition of social criticism goes back at least to the television programming of fellow Hollywood producer, writer, and theorist of the right, Norman Milton Lear, who passed away earlier this month. It took Reiner only two days after Lear’s passing to post his message about his movie on X, formerly known as Twitter. The video currently has over 5.6 million views. The timing of such a posting suggests that Reiner contemplated when he and his team would release their trailer, and decided that Lear’s passing would be a good time to do so. It also suggests Reiner’s desire to assume the throne of Lear’s social criticism. Not only is this incredibly crass and lacking in empathy and understanding, but it also fundamentally misunderstands the project Lear established himself more than half a century ago in his television and non-profit work. 

We need your help to stay independent

While I have been critical of this project, looking back now, Lear was the religious left’s last, best hope to combat the ascendance of Ronald Reagan and modern conservatism. He tried his absolute best to address Reagan and the “Christian Nation movement”  that he saw gathering on the horizon. Since 2016, the study of the American right has devolved into a chaotic and arbitrary mess of academic insight and journalistic provocation. Scholars, pundits, and commentators across the political spectrum have spent the last eight years attempting to explain the rise of one Donald J. Trump to little to no avail. In many respects, Lear was the unadulterated leader of the Religious Left. In another sense, he was the last member of a dying breed: the religious liberal. However we define the wars of culture that have consumed our public life down to the literal present, it must include the various ways in which cultural production itself has become a sight of enormous power and influence to sway public opinion since the 1970s. Lear’s programming and non-profit activism epitomized this power.

“The symbols of public culture are always mediated in the social world by a variety of social institutions,” argued sociologist James Davison Hunter in his seminal 1991 publication Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. “It is, therefore, in the context of institutional structures that cultural conflict becomes crystallized.” In the face of a rising conservative ascendancy, Lear decided he wanted to write and produce a movie called Religion. “As their crusades to spread fear and division became more blatant,” remarked Lear in his autobiography, “so did my desire to sabotage their efforts through ridicule.” And ridicule he did. In many respects, Lear first invented and then perfected such an approach to social change as one of the religious left’s most apt social theorists of the right. The problem was that he eventually confused cultural influence with political power, thus fundamentally misunderstanding how politics function within the public square. 

“I’d begun making notes for a screenplay titled Religion, with the intent to satirize these fundamentalist TV ministries as savagely…as Paddy Chayefsky mocked television itself in the film Network.” Universal Pictures ordered a screenplay of the idea. Shortly thereafter, Lear met with comedians Richard Pryor and Robin Williams in hopes of producing a compelling story. They decided on two men entering the ministry solely for tax purposes. One man finds God, while the other “becomes a political tool of right-wing billionaires” as Lear describes it in his autobiography. While the latter pastor only gets his “fifteen minutes of fame,” such renown lands him, according to Lear, on the cover of Time.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Lear would ultimately scrap the movie idea for a faster, more hard-hitting form of communication that fit the calamitous times: the PSA. “The need to alert people immediately to the danger at hand was pressing and I realized I could create a public service announcement and get it on the air in a matter of weeks. That is what I did.” Thus was born the very first advertisement for People for the American Way,” one of the most, if not the most, influential interfaith non-profits of the religious left.

PFAW was also born out of reactionary analyses to conservative protestants and their political aspirations. Lear’s decision to go with the PSA only after he saw Jimmy Swaggart on TV asking his viewers to pray for the removal of a Supreme Court justice. At that moment, Lear had had enough. And he decided to do something about it based on his not-inconsiderable experience as a religious minority in America- one who had grown up within earshot of the quotas that guided the entrance of Jewish students into Yale. In many respects, Lear was one of the most significant figures in the recent religious past because he tracked the rise of the right for so long — but alas to little avail. What has come of right-wing monitoring organizations? Why the need to fact-check and adjudicate? Why the need to ridicule? I love satire as much as anyone, but to the extent that it’s used as part of a larger cultural tactic to enact social change not only renders it virtually meaningless in the world of politics, but it also comes off as smug, and entitled. 

According to the director of God & Country, Dan Partland, the issues couldn’t be clearer. “To be clear, Christianity is not the problem. Having one’s faith inform one’s political beliefs is not the problem. The problem is the intertwining of a Christian identity with a political identity such that it can be hard to tell where one ends and the other begins.” As usual, those who do not actually specialize in such things, like the First Amendment and its adjudication, are sloppy in their analyses. Including the academics associated with Reiner: a celebrity’s row if there ever was one. If anything, Lear was closer to diagnosing the problem MORE THAN FORTY YEARS AGO in his very first PFAW PSA. “My problem is I know my boy is as good a Christian as me. My wife? She’s better. So maybe there’s something wrong when people, even preachers, suggest other people are good Christians or bad Christians depending on their political views. That’s not the American Way.”