Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Texas woman denied abortion calls out Cruz, Cornyn at Senate hearing: “I nearly died on their watch”

Amanda Zurawski, a Texas woman suing the state after being denied an abortion, told senators that the denial of care damaged her mental health and potentially “robbed” her of the opportunity to have children in the future, according to CNN.

She addressed absent Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, telling them she “nearly died on their watch” because of the anti-abortion policies that they support during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on reproductive rights post-Dobbs, the Supreme Court decision that overturned the federal right to abortion last summer.

“We’ve heard a lot today about the mental trauma and the negative harmful effects on a person’s psychological well-being after they have an abortion, supposedly, and I’m curious why that’s not relevant for me as well,” Zurawski said.

“Because I wasn’t permitted to have an abortion and the trauma and the PTSD and the depression that I have dealt with in the eight months since this happened to me is paralyzing,” she added. “On top of that, I am still struggling to have children.”

Zurawski was reportedly denied an abortion following pregnancy complications 18 weeks into her pregnancy. Her water broke, leaving her at a high risk of contracting a deadly infection and fatally threatening the life of her baby. Because the child still had a heartbeat, Zurawksi’s doctors refused to terminate the pregnancy, citing Texas law.

Her doctors only administered abortion care after she went into septic shock, she told the committee, adding that she may have been one of the first Texas patients affected by the reversal of Roe v. Wade.

She is also one of five women currently suing Texas for pain and suffering after being denied abortion care amidst dangerous pregnancy complications due to the state’s restrictive and aggressive abortion laws.

Their language is “incredibly vague, and it leaves doctors grappling with what they can and cannot do, what health care they can and cannot provide,” Zurawski said, in response to implications that her doctors were to blame. “And if they make the wrong the decision, they face up to 99 years in prison and/or losing their license.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Dr. Ingrid Skop, a Texas obstetrician-gynecologist and GOP witness hailed to give her opinion on Zurawski’s experience by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., apologized to Zurawski for her loss and her doctor’s misunderstanding.

“And I am so sorry that your doctors misunderstood Texas law,” she said. “Every single law allows an exclusion for a doctor to use their reasonable medical judgment to determine when to intervene in a medical emergency, which is usually defined as a threat to the life of the mother or permanent irreversible damage to an organ or an organ system.”

She added that even prior to the Supreme Court decision, doctors knew how to assess medical emergencies and offer abortions when needed, citing the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology’s guidance on how to do so for patients in Zurawski’s situation.

Sen. Cornyn, R-Texas, later weighed in, suggesting that Zurawski should consider pursuing a medical malpractice suit against her doctors.

“Dr. Skop is not my physician. She has never been my physician. She has never treated me. She has not seen my medical records,” Zurawski said later in the hearing, addressing both Skop and Cornyn’s comments.

“Quite frankly, my physician and my team of health care professionals that I saw over the course of three days, while I was repeatedly turned away from health care access, made the decision to not provide an abortion because that’s what they felt they had to do under Texas’ law. And that will continue to happen and it is continuing to happen, and it’s not a result of misinterpretation. It’s the result of confusion and the confusion is because the way the law is written.”

Everything you need to know about 2024’s total solar eclipse

April 8, 2024 will be an unforgettable day for many people in North America, as the shadow of a total solar eclipse will bisect the continent like a black marker line. The sight of a total solar eclipse, when viewed on the line of totality (meaning where the sun is fully eclipsed by the Moon), is often touted as one of the most transcendent experiences a human being can have. They are also relatively rare, with about one a year or less and only in very small portions of the planet. 

The experience will be disappointing if it is overcast when it is time for the total solar eclipse — meaning that you have to cross-check travel plans with historical weather reports.

Eclipse hunters have a rule-of-thumb about solar eclipses: partial solar eclipses are worth an hour's drive to go see. Annular eclipses, in which the sun appears to rings the Moon perfectly, are worth one day's travel to see. And a total solar eclipse is worth any and all effort to go and observe. 

Hence, dedicated eclipse hunters get ready for these events years, even decades in advance. As April fast approaches, here's what you need to know to prepare for this spectacular celestial event.

Unlike other vacations, solar eclipses are a little more tricky to plan for. First, eclipses often are visible only in remote parts of the world, or even the ocean, where there are few hotels. Second, you have to plan to be somewhere along the line of totality to see the total solar eclipse — if you're not, you'll only see a partial solar eclipse. The reason has to do with the angle of the sun and Moon relative to where you are on Earth.

Third, different parts along the line of totality will experience different durations of totality — meaning the length of time during which the eclipse is total. Longer, of course, is better.

And finally, clouds can ruin the eclipse: the experience will be disappointing if it is overcast when it is time for the total solar eclipse — meaning that you have to cross-check travel plans with historical weather reports.

All of this makes planning where and how to see a total solar eclipse a careful calculus — with the fifth variable being budget, of course. Hence, the 2024 solar eclipse passes through three different countries with three different currencies and different relative costs of lodging.

Specifically, the April 2024 solar eclipse will stretch across Mexico, the United States and Canada in a long, narrow arch going from southwest to northeast, thanks to the Moon passing directly in front of the Sun, casting a tremendous shadow approximately 120 miles wide. It will pass over many major cities, starting in Mazatlan and Durango, Mexico; then Austin, Little Rock, Cleveland and Buffalo in the U.S.; and Montréal's suburbs in Canada. The length of the eclipse varies by location, with the longest duration being near Torreón, Mexico at 4 minutes and 27 seconds.

The website eclipse2024.org features a simulator in which you can enter any location and get a sense of what the sky will look like on April 8. Of course, any visibility is dependent on the weather. Fun fact: In 1778, Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter that he was "much disappointed" in the solar eclipse that occurred while he was in Virginia, "which proved to be cloudy."

Book hotels in advance

And don't be like President Donald Trump in 2017, who stared directly at the partial solar eclipse without any eye protection, to the chagrin of his aides who tried to stop him.

Some people literally travel all over the world, catching eclipses wherever they can. For example, Dan McGlaun, the creator of the aforementioned eclipse simulator, has seen 14 total solar eclipses in his life. While a total eclipse in North America is a relatively rare event — the last one was in 2017, but the one before that was in 1979 — they do occur around the globe at semi-regular intervals, so for those extreme eclipse enthusiasts with the travel budget, they become much more frequent.

The combination of eclipse veterans with tons of other folks eager to not miss this event means hotels will be booked well in advance. The anticipated tourism will invite plenty of price-gouging, as many experienced in 2017. And local officials are also anxious about chaos, with Ohio adding $1 million to their state budget for security, for example. So you can expect this to be crowded and not cheap. But… the next total solar eclipse that will cover this much of the United States won't be until 2045.

Get good glasses

Hopefully people don't need a reminder not to stare at the sun, but if so, here it is: don't stare at the sun.

Not even through a telescope or camera lens, unless you have a specialized solar filter. It can literally blind you. To watch a solar eclipse without burning holes in your retinas, there are several ways, but whichever you choose, you'll want to get your eyegear well in advance. No sense scrambling for protection at the last moment.

Many companies will be selling eclipse glasses, which are specially polarized lenses that are much darker than sunglasses. Regular sunglasses are not safe for viewing a solar eclipse.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


But if you buy eclipse glasses, ensure that they comply with ISO 12312-2 international safety standards, which is the level of darkness on the lenses. There are counterfeits out there as well, because of course there are, so make sure you purchase your glasses from a reputable vendor. You only get one set of eyes.

There are other ways of viewing a solar eclipse safely, including wearing a welding mask (if you happen to keep one laying around or know someone who does). According to the U.S. National Park Service, you must ensure that that the welding glasses or hood houses a #14 or darker shade filter. If you don't know or if it is anything less, don't risk it, and keep in mind that most welders don't use filters that dark. And don't be like President Donald Trump in 2017, who stared directly at the partial solar eclipse without any eye protection, to the chagrin of his aides who tried to stop him. 

Once the sun passes behind the Moon, you can take off those glasses and look directly at it because, well, the sun isn't there anymore. At this moment, the sky will turn from light blue to dark blue-black, and you will be able to suddenly see a few stars in the sky along with the planet Mercury. 

Double-check weather patterns

Historical weather data is a great aide when it comes to figuring out where to travel. For instance, Montréal, Quebec has a 56% chance of cloud cover during the month of April, which means it's probably not a great place to be — you don't want to be disappointed like Thomas Jefferson was. You can find historic overcast averages for a given city on websites like Weather Underground, AccuWeather and Weather Spark.

Get as close to the center of the line of totality as possible

Eclipses are short and sweet; the longest possible total solar eclipse you could witness in 2024 is just under 4 and a half minutes. But if you are at the edge of the line of totality, as, say, the city of Montréal is, the actual length of time that you get to witness totality could be mere seconds. That could make for a very anticlimactic experience for those who've traveled long and far to witness it, only to see the sun flicker out and then back on seconds later.

You can figure out how long the duration of totality is by entering the city you plan to visit on NASA's JavaScript Solar Eclipse Explorer, then click the century 2001-2100. For example, Cleveland, Ohio will experience a totality lasting 3 minutes and 49 seconds.

Don't miss the 2023 annular eclipse either

Even if you can't make it to the path of totality, a partial solar eclipse will still be visible across the continent. While the experience won't be as immersive as witnessing a total solar eclipse, it still offers a unique opportunity to observe and appreciate the sun and the Moon. Particularly with solar binoculars or the aforementioned welding goggles, it can be a fun experience — in a partial eclipse, the sun appears to have a giant "bite" taken out of it by the Moon.

Additionally, there will be an annular eclipse later in 2023. There are technically four different type of eclipses, with total eclipses being the most well-known and emotionally stirring, according to many accounts. Annular eclipses are when the Moon passes between the Sun and Earth, but when it is at or near its farthest point from Earth. Therefore, it appears smaller and doesn't fully cover the sun. It still looks quite cool (as long as you are wearing protective glasses), and the last one that crossed North America was October 14, 2023.

Tucker Carlson breaks silence as report reveals more damning texts discovered in Dominion lawsuit

Fox’s board of directors and executives discovered salacious, redacted private messages from former host Tucker Carlson the day before the trial for Dominion’s defamation lawsuit against Fox was set to start, The New York Times reports.

Though Fox’s trial lawyers had these messages, which are reportedly worse than the anchor’s discriminatory, inflammatory and often racist comments, for months leading up to the trial, the executives were unaware of them.

This revelation further incentivized Fox to avoid the trial in which Carlson would likely be questioned over the unredacted text messages he sent following the 2020 election included in Dominion’s filing, two sources with knowledge of the discussion told The Times.

Fox settled with the voting technology company for $787.5 million two days after its board learned of the texts.

Several sources with knowledge of their discussions also told the Times that these redacted messages were a catalyst in the network’s decision to part ways with its highest-rated, prime-time host, which it announced to the public on Monday.

One of the sources said that, much like the Dominion settlement, Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch considered forcing Carlson out a “business decision.” By the time he and the other board members had seen the messages, Murdoch had already begun to seek a resolution with Dominion outside of court. The executives had also considered hiring an outside firm to investigate Carlson ahead of any harm he could cause beyond the Dominion case, two sources said.

Dominion lawyers had planned to ask the judge to allow the use of the redacted texts in the trial and prepared to pepper him with questions, aiming to pin him down with the messages that were most offensive to women.

Fox had no comment outside of its initial statement announcing Carlson’s departure and neither Carlson nor his lawyer, Bryan Freedman, responded to the Times request for comment.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Carlson, however, spoke to the public for the first time since his ousting in a video shared on social media on Wednesday night. Though the former anchor did not address his dismissal from the company, he criticized the “unbelievably stupid” and “completely irrelevant” debates on TV.

“Both political parties and their donors have reached consensus on what benefits them and they actively collude to shut down any conversation about it,” he said.

“When honest people say what’s true, calmly and without embarrassment, they become powerful. At the same time, the liars who have been trying to silence them shrink. They become weaker. That’s the iron law of the universe: true things prevail,” he added, claiming that the “people in charge” are afraid and resorting to force.

Despite his firing, Fox isn’t out of the weeds yet as the redacted texts could be used in their upcoming trial with Smartmatic, another voting technology company suing the network for $2.7 billion for implicating it in false claims of a “stolen” 2020 election Fox aired. Abby Grossberg, the former producer of Carlson’s prime time program, is also suing Fox for creating a misogynistic and hostile work environment, citing Carlson’s team’s degrading and sexist behaviors as one of the reasons.

The Times has also obtained video showcasing Carlson’s inappropriate conduct, including one in which the former host is shown off-camera wondering if “postmenopausal fans” will approve of his looks.

These situations are among the variety of reasons company executives have indicated were behind his firing, according to The Times, but learning of the redacted texts ultimately played a large role in Carlson’s removal.

“MAGA economic sabotage”: 217 House Republicans pass debt ceiling bill with harmful cuts

A wide range of advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday fiercely denounced Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives for narrowly passing their “debt ceiling scam” containing “extreme, harmful cuts against average Americans to protect billionaire tax breaks.”

The so-called the Limit, Save, Grow Act was unveiled last week by GOP House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) and passed 217-215, with just four Republicans—Reps. Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Ken Buck (Colo.), Tim Burchett (Tenn.), and Matt Gaetz (Fla.)—joining Democratic opponents and three lawmakers not voting.

Although the House GOP bill would raise the federal government’s arbitrary borrowing limit, averting a first-ever default that would be catastrophic for the U.S. and global economies, the legislation would also cap spending over the next decade, impose fossil fuel-friendly energy policiesrestrict regulations, add work requirements for social programs, block President Joe Biden’s contested student debt relief plan, and repeal Internal Revenue Service (IRS) funds intended to reduce tax-dodging.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has already said the bill is “dead on arrival” in the upper chamber and Biden has also slammed Republicans’ attempted cuts, but given the risks of both the proposal and a potential default, critics still shared their outrage over the vote.

“Nearly every Republican in the U.S. House just voted to slash the already inadequate funding of the Social Security Administration (SSA),” said Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson in a statement.

“Cuts to SSA are cuts to Social Security, and we will hold every single one of these members accountable,” he added. “This vote shows that Republicans are united in support of cutting Social Security, while Democrats are united in support of a clean debt limit increase with no cuts to Social Security or any other benefits.”

Also noting that the “dangerous” bill includes SSA cuts, which would force office closures and layoffs, delaying services for seniors, Alliance for Retired Americans executive director Richard Fiesta asserted that “a political party’s budget reflects its values, and clearly the GOP does not value older Americans.”

“The bill also slashes food assistance for more than 1 million low-income seniors—many of whom rely on government food programs to get their only meal of the day,” he said. “It will cut oversight of nursing homes, putting thousands of the most vulnerable seniors at risk of living in alarming and unsanitary conditions. This is reckless and irresponsible.”

“In addition, this bill jeopardizes millions of Americans’ multiemployer pensions that are guaranteed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,” Fiesta continued. “Finally, it would lead to the eviction of at least 430,000 low-income families from Section 8 housing, 80% of which are headed by seniors.”

Climate Action Campaign director Margie Alt charged that “with this vote, House Republicans showed us who they’re really looking out for—the Big Oil companies and other corporate polluters whose profits they enhanced at the expense of the health and livelihoods of everyday Americans.”

The Republican proposal would reverse some the Inflation Reduction Act’s progress on jobs and environmental justice, and “ironically, the consequences would fall most heavily on red states,” Alt noted. “In addition to a public health and environmental tragedy, this bill will create economic disaster. Every second we delay acting on climate costs Americans in lives lost, economic harm, and environmental degradation.”

Earthjustice vice president of policy and legislation Raúl García argued that Wednesday’s vote shows “Speaker McCarthy is willing to cave to the most extremist voices in his party to further their anti-clean energy and pro-polluter agenda.”

“It’s not a serious proposal, but instead a litany of damaging policies aimed at sacrificing the health and safety of our communities and catering to polluting industries,” García said. “It’s shameful that McCarthy and House Republicans are willing to hold our economy hostage, force the federal government into default, and sacrifice the creation of countless jobs in their districts at the behest of their corporate donors.”

Leading up to the vote, the bill’s opponents have pointed out that while House Republicans claim cuts are necessary for any bill that allows additional debt, in 2017, GOP lawmakers passed and then-President Donald Trump signed a law to provide corporations and rich individuals with tax breaks, which the Congressional Budget Office estimated would increase the federal deficit by nearly $2 trillion over a decade.

“The MAGA House majority demands everyday Americans, from veterans to seniors to children, brace for harmful cuts while they protect every cent of the debt-ballooning Trump tax breaks for billionaires and corporations,” declared Kyle Herrig, president of Accountable.US, after the bill passed the chamber.

“House Republicans even lined up to gut resources needed to crack down on wealthy tax cheats, a foolhardy move that actually adds over $100 billion to the debt,” he stressed, flagging the IRS cuts. “MAGA extremists insist millions of Americans give up health and food security, good-paying manufacturing jobs, and public safety at the same time they shamelessly propose trillions more in new tax giveaways for big corporations that never trickle down to anyone else and fuel the deficit.”

“The MAGA majority offers nothing but a lose-lose proposition: harmful cuts that leave everyday Americans worse off—or a default crisis that crashes the economy, disrupts Social Security checks, and skyrockets interest rates on car loans and mortgages,” Herrig added. “That’s no choice—that’s MAGA economic sabotage.”

According to Patriotic Millionaires chair Morris Pearl, who also slammed the “draconian cuts” to social programs and IRS rollback, “The new House debt ceiling plan proves that the GOP really only cares about the rich.”

“The House GOP just told America that they believe it is more important to make sure rich tax cheats can get away with breaking the law than it is to make sure poor families have access to food and healthcare,” Pearl said. “This isn’t a genuine attempt to balance the federal budget, it’s just another extremist step by the GOP to cut critical social services in order to protect the wealth of tax cheats in the top 1%.”

Democrats in both chambers of Congress on Wednesday renewed demands for raising the debt limit without any attached policies.

“Republicans just passed a bill that would kill jobs, take away federal benefits for millions, and make everyday life for Americans more expensive. This is completely unworkable,” said Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash. “Let’s pass a clean debt ceiling increase.”

Blasting the bill as “a ransom note to the American people to suffer the Republican radical, right-wing agenda or suffer a catastrophic default,” Schumer pledged Wednesday evening that “Democrats won’t allow it.”

Montana GOP bars trans lawmaker from House floor over protest

Montana’s first transgender lawmaker, state Rep. Zooey Zephyr, was barred from entering the House floor on Wednesday afternoon as the Republican majority voted in favor of formally disciplining her over remarks she made last week about a ban on gender-affirming healthcare.

Under the motion, Zephyr (D-100) will be permitted only to cast votes remotely for the duration of the legislative session, which ends May 6.

The House voted 68-32 along party lines to bar Zephyr from the House floor just over a week after she told Republicans that they would have “blood on their hands” if they supported a ban on gender-affirming care for youths.

GOP leaders claimed the motion to formally punish Zephyr was in response to a protest by her supporters in the House gallery on Monday, which they accused her of encouraging. During the protest, Zephyr stood on the House floor and held up a nonfunctioning microphone as the protesters, seven of whom were arrested, were led out of the gallery.

Since Zephyr’s comments last Tuesday, she has not been recognized by House Speaker Matt Regier (R-4), who has demanded Zephyr apologize.

On Wednesday, she spoke on the House floor for the first time since being silenced by the GOP.

“We have seen bills targeting our art forms, our books, our history, and our healthcare,” Zephyr said of the transgender and nonbinary community. “And I rose up in defense of my community [last Tuesday], speaking to harms that these bills bring.”

She condemned the Republicans for accusing her of lacking “decorum” during Monday’s protest and last week’s debate.

“If you use decorum to silence people who hold you accountable, then all you are doing is using decorum as a tool for oppression,” she said.

Zephyr also noted that in accusing the Republicans of having “blood on their hands,” she was referring to studies showing that transgender youths are significantly less likely to experience depression or suicidal ideation if they receive gender-affirming care, which is strongly supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and other groups representing health experts.

The vote to bar Zephyr, who represents 11,000 constituents, from the House floor is “blatantly anti-democratic,” said Alejandra Caraballo of the Harvard Law Cyberlaw Clinic.

Montana House Minority Leader Kim Abbott (D-83) noted that “there is an opportunity cost to choosing this path” as the body debated the motion.

“We don’t have a state budget, we don’t have a plan for housing, we don’t have a plan for childcare,” Abbott said. “And today we’re on this floor, debating this motion.”

“I’m not sure what comes next here,” said Zephyr, “but I will do what I have always done. I will rise in support of my community. I will take the hard and moral choice to stand up for the people who elected me to do so. And I am grateful for those who stood up in defense of democracy.”

As the Montana House voted to bar Zephyr from the floor, Nebraska state Sen. Megan Hunt (D-8) said she had been informed that she was under investigation for a conflict of interest due to her vote against a bill to limit gender-affirming care. Hunt has a transgender child.

“They are going full in on fascism by targeting any state representatives that stand up for trans people,” said Caraballo. “It’s not enough to pass these hurtful laws, they also have to silence and make examples of anyone who stands up to them.”

Judge warns Trump “now sailing in harm’s way” over Eric Trump tweeting about dad’s rape trial

The judge overseeing longtime columnist E. Jean Carroll’s civil rape and defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump issued a warning after Eric Trump tweeted about the trial on Wednesday.

Judge Lewis Kaplan issued a warning on Wednesday morning to Trump lawyer Joe Tacopina after the former president attacked Carroll on Truth Social. Later in the day, the judge called out the attorney over a tweet from the former president’s son.

Kaplan had ruled that LinkedIn founder and Democratic donor Reid Hoffman’s financing of Carroll’s case could not be used as evidence in the trial but Eric Trump fumed on Truth Social and Twitter that the lawsuit against his father was being allegedly funded by a “political activist.”

“A civil lawsuit, being funded by a billionaire, with no direct involvement in the case, out of pure hatred, spite or fear of a formidable candidate, is an embarrassment to our country, should be illegal and tells you everything you need to know about the case,” Eric Trump wrote in a Truth Social post that he later shared on Twitter. The post has since been deleted.

Kaplan issued a second warning to Tacopina over the post.

“I said something this morning about your client perhaps now sailing in harm’s way, conceivably with his son, if what I just heard is true,” Kaplan said, according to The Independent.

“If I were in your shoes, I’d be having a conversation with your client,” the judge said, later adding that “there are some relevant United States statutes here and somebody on your side ought to be thinking about them.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The former president on Truth Social similarly called out Hoffman’s alleged financing of the case and attacked Carroll as “Ms. Bergdorf Goodman” after she accused him of raping her at the department store in the 1990s.

“This is a fraudulent & false story–Witch Hunt!” Trump wrote.

“The Miss Bergdorf Goodman case is financed by a big political donor that they tried to hide,” Trump wrote in another post. “Does anybody believe that I would take a then almost 60 year old woman that I didn’t know, from the front door of a very crowded department store, (with me being very well known, to put it mildly!), into a tiny dressing room, and …. her. She didn’t scream? There are no witnesses? Nobody saw this? She never made a police complaint? If I was seen there with a woman-BIG PRESS. SCAM!”

Kaplan called out Tacopina over his client publicly commenting on evidence banned from the trial, calling the former president’s posts “entirely inappropriate.”

“Your client is basically endeavoring certainly to speak to his quote-unquote public,” Kaplan said, “but more troublesome, to the jury in this case, about stuff that has no business being spoken about.”

Tacopina said he was not aware of the posts and that he would try to get his client to “refrain from any further posts regarding this case.”

“We’re getting into an area conceivably in which your client may or may not be tampering with a new source of potential liability — and I think you know what I mean,” Kaplan replied.

Former U.S. Attorney Joyce White Vance warned that the judge war likely referring to potential obstruction charges.

“The judge in the E Jean Carroll trial is taking Trump’s derogatory social media posts from this morning seriously,” she tweeted. “His reference to other federal statutes is likely to the 18 USC 1500 series of obstruction of justice crimes.”

Joe Biden vs. a dead skunk: Our president may be old, but the opposition is literally rotting

I remember as a child walking to the neighborhood bus stop to go to elementary school and watching a large skunk trying to race across the street, only to be run over by a car.

The look on that skunk’s face, panicked but determined, convinced me it was unaware that it was dead even as it thrashed about, spewing entrails and blood across the road. The stench was unbearable.

That is today’s Republican Party

The GOP is dead. It died before Donald Trump climbed atop its fetid carcass and staked his claim as the last Great White Hope. All that is left of the Grand Old Party that used to include progressives and liberals is a pack of racists, misogynists, science deniers and God-fearing evangelicals who pray for a past that never existed and who fear that the rest of the world is out for retribution against them. There is nothing more fascinating, or horrifying, than watching the paroxysm of violence and fear expelled in the death throes of a dying animal — or a dying political party.

Trump today sits on his fecal throne, “ahead by 45 points,” according to his own polls, over his closest potential challenger, Ron DeSantis. He spouts lunacy about returning to power, which he can’t admit he lost, to a president he won’t admit he lost to — and with a minority of voters backing his play, though they include insurrectionists and stochastic terrorists who still believe in the “Big Lie” and think the Jan. 6 insurrection was a picnic in the park.

Joe Biden said Wednesday from the heat sink in the Rose Garden, during a bilateral press conference with the president of South Korea, that while he may not be the only Democrat able to beat Donald Trump, he’s running for re-election because his “work is unfinished” and the U.S. is “at an inflection point” in history. 

For those who think Biden is incapable of stronger words, he had plenty of those. If North Korea ever chose to use nuclear weapons against the U.S. or its allies, he said, the U.S. would “end whatever regime” made that decision. That’s political-speak for “mess with the bull and you get the horns.” It was also a not-so-subtle reference to the fact that we are closer to nuclear conflict in many regions of the globe than we’ve ever been in my lifetime.

Biden’s announcement about his candidacy this week means he could end up pitted against Trump for a second time. Some are looking forward to that rematch, or at least so the headlines say. I don’t know who the hell would look forward to that, other than crazed MAGA believers who would eat tainted horse meat on a dare. Many voters, including most Democrats, are not looking forward to Biden vs. Trump, round 2. Sequels are rarely better than the original, and there are plenty of reasons not to want a sequel to the 2020 general election featuring the same characters.

Some say Biden is too old. Others say “get over it” and that it’s a done deal; Biden and Trump will square off in November of next year.

I remain unsure that either man will be on the ticket, and I know we can do better than both.

Make no mistake, by any reasonable standard, Biden has done well so far in his two and a half years as president. He’s restored some semblance of stability, shored up our democracy and accomplished things on the national and international stage that should give us all hope. He’s fond of saying how he told world leaders that “America is back” after he was elected, but was greeted with the phrase, “Yeah, for how long?” He is seen as professional and competent, a stark contrast to his predecessor, who talked about curing COVID by ingesting bleach and seriously tried to purchase Greenland.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Speaking of Donald Trump, he has already been indicted on multiple felony counts in New York, and the district attorney of Fulton County, Georgia, gave us advance warning this week that she will present her case this summer. That will potentially mean more charges against Trump and perhaps some of his cronies. He’s already on trial for sexual assault, in the civil case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll. He still faces potential charges in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case as well as related to the Jan. 6 insurrection. By the time fall comes around he may be up to his combover in legal problems. That just might make him ill enough to drop out of the race. 

Trump isn’t much younger than Biden, and the actuarial tables do not speak well for either candidate. With the average lifespan of the American male being around 73 years, both of these guys have exceeded those expectations. At any minute, either or both could be incapacitated by any of a variety of maladies that frequently afflict the elderly. 

Donald Trump faces potential charges in four different investigations, plus a civil suit for sexual assault. Will he really still be running this fall?

There are those in the MAGA court who question Joe Biden’s mental health. I laugh to the point of tears. I mean, you may question Biden’s mental health. But there’s no question about Trump, the perennial ferret on Benzedrine, who is so batshit nuts that he claims to be a billionaire while also selling coffee mugs with fake mugshots for $47 a pop, supposedly to help fund his defense in the Manhattan felony case he claims is bogus. Of course, he also claims to be the political messiah and insists that only he can solve all our problems.

It is Trump’s constant interaction with the press that has removed all doubt about his mental stability. Biden could put to rest many of the questions about his mental health if he interacted with people more often, but he just doesn’t do it. I won’t speculate as to why. He’s had fewer press conferences than any president since Ronald Reagan — who also faced numerous questions about his mental acuity during his second administration. Biden announced his candidacy in a three-minute video released through influencers and traditional news outlets. It was slick and well produced, and was meant to promote the president’s sense of destiny, as well as his desire to move beyond the divisiveness promoted by Donald Trump and his MAGA lunatics. But it actually raises more questions than answers. 

Biden’s initial announcement is low-key, and avoided traditional media. That was by design. So is his resistance to mixing it up with the press, many of whom he does not respect and wishes to avoid. But the thing is, Biden at least inhabits the world of reality. He talks about issues. He speaks to the American people’s actual needs. Yes, he stutters and stammers, as he has always done. He stumbles and makes gaffes. But he also speaks with intelligence and impressive knowledge of the issues. He is always better in person than any of his staff, and always better off the teleprompter than on it.

In both parties, if we look past Biden and Trump, who would we see as potential candidates in the 2024 election? Bench strength is weak on both sides. 

On the Democratic side there is Vice President Kamala Harris, who is not popular and has little support among rank-and-file Democrats. There are some who think she should be replaced on the ticket, but so far Biden has shown no inclination to pull an FDR and find himself a Harry Truman. (That was the last time an incumbent vice president was replaced before an election — in 1944.) Democrats clearly fear losing African-American and women voters, and no one is convinced that California Gov. Gavin Newsom, one of the likely alternatives, could lead. 

The Republicans have even less. Consider Ron DeSantis, a bobble-headed booby with the overwhelming appeal of roadkill and the stench of fascism so deeply ingrained in his actions that when you watch him speak you have flashbacks to Mussolini — even if you’ve never dropped acid.

As you look at all the aging so-called leaders in this country, from Mitch McConnell to Dianne Feinstein to the current and former presidents, there is one thing that you can’t help noticing: Both parties are suffering.

Perhaps the future for the Democrats is someone like Andy Beshear, the Democratic governor of Kentucky, the deep-red commonwealth otherwise dominated by Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell. He was a guest at the White House state dinner Wednesday night. That was his first visit. If Beshear is being groomed for a national role in the Democratic Party, it won’t be his last.

But is there any hope at all left in the Republican Party?

No. There isn’t. It’s the roadkill skunk bleeding out on the asphalt under the cloudy stench of its own excretions.

That dead political skunk is exactly why Joe Biden is running for a second term. He believes it’s his job to clean up the mess.

He told us in the Rose Garden on Wednesday that even if Donald Trump weren’t running, he still would be. He certainly doesn’t fear losing the race. He seems almost resigned to winning it.

But I believe Biden is a reluctant warrior. When he said that what happens in the next two or three years could determine the fate of the nation for the next 20 or 30, I wanted to ask if that meant he only thought he’d be around two or three more years.

But I know better. Biden reminds me of Jimmy Carter. He is running because he believes he has to do all he can with whatever he can for as long as he can. Whether he is correct or not is another matter.

Biden isn’t running for his own glory or his legacy. He has assured himself a place in the history books with his first administration.

Joe Biden isn’t running to ensure his legacy. He’s already earned a place in the history books. He believes that’s not enough — but he should.

He believes that’s not enough, but he should. That’s why, in retrospect, his recent trip to Ireland seems all the more poignant; it almost seems that in considering his own mortality Biden is giving up any chance of a life after his presidency. With all that he’s accomplished in two and a half years, he deserves more than a week’s respite in those rolling green hills of Ireland. But whatever happens, it is not likely he’ll get it. 

The Democratic Party needs to find younger voices who can carry on for the next 20 or 30 years, not just the next two or three.

Meanwhile the Republicans should rename themselves the MAGGOTS, since they’re feasting on a dead corpse..

The country deserves better, but we’re not going to get it until younger voices take the lead.

As volatile as the political landscape is in this country, the next 18 months may be the proving ground that will shine a light on who those younger voices might be.

Yes, if the presidential election were happening today, it would indeed be a replay of the 2020 election.

But there’s a lot of time and a lot of road to cover before we get there. Just watch out for the skunks.

Social media is fueling enthusiasm for new weight loss drugs. Are regulators watching?

Suzette Zuena is her own best advertisement for weight loss.

Zuena, the “founder/visionary” of LH Spa & Rejuvenation in Livingston and Madison, New Jersey, has dropped 30 pounds. Her husband has lost 42 pounds.

“We go out a lot,” Zuena said of the pair’s social routine. “People saw us basically shrinking.” They would ask how the couple did it. Her response: Point people to her spa and a relatively new type of medication — GLP-1 agonists, a class of drug that’s become a weight loss phenomenon.

But she’s not just spreading her message in person. She’s also doing it on Instagram. And she’s not alone. A chorus of voices is singing these drugs’ praises. Last summer, investment bank Morgan Stanley found mentions of one of these drugs on TikTok had tripled. People are streaming into doctors’ office to inquire about what they’ve heard are miracle drugs.

What these patients have heard, doctors said, is nonstop hype, even misinformation, from social media influencers. “I’ll catch people asking for the skinny pen, the weight loss shot, or Ozempic,” said Priya Jaisinghani, an endocrinologist and clinical assistant professor at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine.

Competition to claim a market that could be worth $100 billion a year for drugmakers alone has triggered a wave of advertising that has provoked the concern of regulators and doctors worldwide. But their tools for curbing the ads that go too far are limited — especially when it comes to social media. Regulatory systems are most interested in pharma’s claims, not necessarily those of doctors or their enthused patients.

Few drugs of this type are approved by the FDA for weight loss — they include Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy. But after shortages made that treatment harder to get, patients turned to other pharmaceuticals — like Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic and Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro — that are approved only for Type 2 diabetes. Those are often used off-label — though you wouldn’t hear that from many of their online boosters.

The drugs have shown promising clinical results, Jaisinghani and her peers emphasize. Patients can lose as much as 15% of their body weight. Novo Nordisk is sponsoring research to examine whether Wegovy causes reductions in the rate of heart attacks for patients with obesity.

The medications, though, come at a high price. Wegovy runs patients paying cash at least $1,305 a month in the Washington, D.C., area, according to a GoodRx search in late March. Insurers only sometimes cover the cost. And patients typically regain much of their lost weight after they stop taking it.

Hype Is Driving Demand

But patients are not necessarily coming to doctors’ offices now because of the science. They are citing things they saw on TikTok, like Chelsea Handler and other celebrities talking about their injections. It leads to the questions “how come she can get it” and “why can I not,” said Juliana Simonetti, a physician and co-director of the comprehensive weight management program at the University of Utah.

The excitement — which doctors worry may cause some patients to use medications inappropriately — is coming also from business interests. Some are doctors promoting their venture-capital-backed startups. Others are spas hawking everything from wrinkle-smoothing and lip-plumping to, yes, weight loss benefits of semaglutide, the active ingredient in Wegovy and Ozempic; their prices, often in the hundreds of dollars, are well below what consumers would pay if picking up the prescription at a pharmacy.

In the U.S., the FDA has oversight over ads from the pharmaceutical industry, which must acknowledge risks and side effects of drugs. But ads from people who write prescriptions don’t necessarily have the same restrictions. FDA regulations apply if the prescriber is working on behalf of a regulated entity, like a pharmaceutical manufacturer or distributor.

“The FDA is also committed to working with external partners, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), to address concerns with prescription drug marketing practices of telehealth companies on various platforms, including social media,” agency spokesperson Jeremy Kahn emailed KFF Health News.

Pharma firms run campaigns to educate health care professionals or raise “awareness” that may indirectly tout drugs. Novo Nordisk has an ongoing internet campaign to redefine and destigmatize how Americans think of obesity — and, left unmentioned, the drugs that treat it.

KFF Health News also found that, beyond the industry group’s examination, at least two other entities were promoting Novo Nordisk products in the United Kingdom.

Australian regulators have taken down nearly 1,900 ads as of early March for improperly plugging various GLP-1 agonists, an agency spokesperson told KFF Health News. Novo Nordisk says it didn’t put up the ads, the majority of which were for their product Ozempic. The regulators are declining to say who’s involved.

Doctors are also sounding alarms about the publicity. They believe patients will be driven to use these medications off-label, obtain unreliable forms of these drugs, or exacerbate other health conditions, like eating disorders. The drugs act in part as an appetite suppressant, which can dramatically reduce calorie intake to a concerning degree when not paired with nutritional guidance.

Elizabeth Wassenaar, a regional medical director for the Eating Recovery Center, believes the drugs and associated advertising buildup will inadvertently trigger eating disorders. KFF Health News found ads showing thin patients measuring themselves with a tape measure and stepping on the scale, with accompanying captions goading viewers into going on GLP-1s.

“They’re being marketed very, very pointedly to groups that are vulnerable to experiencing body image dissatisfaction,” she said.

Remi Bader, a curve model and TikTok creator specializing in documenting her “realistic” clothing buys, told one podcast her story of coming off a “few months” on Ozempic. She said she gained twice the weight back and that her binge eating disorder got “so much worse.” One study, published in the journal Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, found two-thirds of lost weight came back after discontinuation of semaglutide.

But social media users and influencers — whether with white coats or ordinary patients — are hopping on every platform to spread news of positive weight loss outcomes. There are those, for instance, who had gastric bypass surgery that didn’t work and are now turning to TikTok for guidance, support, and hope as they begin taking a GLP-1. There’s even a poop-centric Facebook group in which people discuss the sometimes fraught topic of the drugs’ effect on their bowel movements.

Commercialism and Compounding Spark Excitement and Concern

Some have been so delighted by their medication-assisted weight loss they have become brand ambassadors. Samantha Klecyngier has dropped at least 58 pounds since she started on Mounjaro. She heard of the drug and her telemedicine weight loss program, Sequence, on TikTok. She and many others who have experienced considerable weight loss since starting the medication regimen point to its positive impact and their improved quality of life. Now she officially promotes the company on the app.

Though Klecyngier, a mother of two from the Chicago area, is not diabetic, she uses Mounjaro. When she was growing up, her parents had Type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases that led them both to have open-heart surgery. Her father lost his life to complications of diabetes. She wants to avoid that fate.

But Klecyngier’s story — combining a personal journey with a profit-making entity — is symbolic of another trend on social media: commercialism. There’s a spate of startups eyeing big money matching pharmaceuticals and related support with patients. (Sequence, the company Klecyngier pitches, just got acquired by WW, also known as WeightWatchers.)

Some doctors use social media to educate viewers about the drugs. Michael Albert, chief medical officer of telehealth practice Accomplish Health, says offering information to his more than 250,000 followers has helped point patients to the medical practice. It’s received thousands of patient inquiries, more than the clinic can take on.

Companies like Accomplish — startups with well-credentialed doctors — are the glossy side of this social media boom.

But there are others — like many spas and weight loss centers — that offer the drugs, sometimes without much medical support, often alongside Botox and dermal fillers. Obesity doctors worry such marketing is creating unrealistic expectations.

Some spas and telemedicine operators claim to have “compounded” semaglutide. But compounding — when pharmacies, rather than drug manufacturers, prepare a drug — is a risky proposition, doctors caution. “The risks are enormous,” Simonetti said, warning of potential contamination from poor compounding practices. “The risks of getting bacteria,” she warned, “the risks include death.”

Weight loss clinics also frequently tout unconventional additions to semaglutide, including vitamin B12 and amino acids. Some patients incorrectly believe the former helps with nausea, Jaisinghani said; other clinics tout greater weight loss.

Novo Nordisk spokesperson Allison Schneider told KFF Health News in an email that the company shares doctors’ concerns about compounding and that it’s begun sending letters warning “certain Health Care Providers” about the related risks.

Some operations defend their use of often-cheaper compounded drugs. LH Spa & Rejuvenation, founded by Zuena, offers a compounded semaglutide formulation from QRx Weight Loss for $500 over four weeks. The spa learned about the regimen from a doctor. “I’m purchasing it,” Zuena said. “It comes next-day air in legitimate vials with lot numbers, expirations.” Patients’ injections and dosages are overseen by on-site medical staff.

Most operators in this burgeoning industry are keen to emphasize their products’ high quality or their company’s good works, as they seek money. Ro, a telehealth firm offering GLP-1s, said its marketing campaign in the New York City subway “aims to start an important, sometimes difficult, conversation focused on de-stigmatizing obesity as a condition.”

This widespread tactic is nothing short of maddening for pharma industry critics. “They talk about trying to destigmatize obesity at the same time they’re talking about losing weight. They’re co-opting the concept,” said Judy Butler, a research fellow at PharmedOut, a Georgetown University Medical Center project focusing on evidence-based practices for drugs. “They’re trying to sell a weight loss drug.”


KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Subscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.

Trump’s entire defense in the E. Jean Carroll rape trial: shameless misogyny

The most important thing to know about the E. Jean Carroll vs. Donald Trump trial is this: Carroll has been consistent in her telling of how Trump raped her in a department store dressing room in the 90s. Trump, on the other hand, can’t keep his story straight.

From the first time she spoke out, in 2019, about the alleged assault at Bergdorf Goodman, Carroll’s story hasn’t changed: She ran into Trump while she was out and about, and, as she knew him a little socially, she went shopping with him as a lark. She was flirting with him lightly but was shocked when he followed her into a dressing room, threw her against a wall, and raped her. She escaped. She told friends. They told her it was rape. She struggled with that word because she didn’t want to seem like a victim. But now she has come to accept that “rape” is what it was. 

She repeated these details Wednesday in front of a jury in New York City, where she’s suing Trump for battery and defamation.

“I’m here because Donald Trump raped me,” she began.

In a heart-wrenching testimony, Carroll told her story once again: She hung out with Trump on a whim. They bantered. Then he raped her. She was so scarred by the experience, she said, that she was “unable to ever have a romantic life again.” This, too, is consistent with her first public recounting of this story, published in her book and in New York magazine in 2019: “I have never had sex with anybody ever again.”

Trump, however, is all over the place.

He claimed he never met Carroll — but then admitted he did when shown a picture of them together. He claimed she was not his “type” — but when he was shown a photo of Carroll from the time of the alleged assault, he mistook her for his second wife, Marla Maples. In response to the other two dozen accusations against him, Trump said “vicious claims about me of inappropriate conduct with women are totally and absolutely false,” and swore he would soon provide proof exonerating himself. He has never produced this proof. But while claiming publicly to abhor sexual abuse, in private, Trump bragged about how he enjoys assaulting women. He famously said into a hot mic, “Grab ’em by the pussy” because “when you’re a star, they let you do it.” Sometimes he splits the difference between these “sexual assault is bad” and “sexual assault is good” views, by saying that his alleged victims are not attractive enough to attack. The implication is that it would be on the table if they were hotter. 

The misogyny defense attempts to shift the frame from “did he do it?” to “isn’t she annoying by making a fuss over this?”

Due to all of this, Trump’s legal team is in a pickle. Their client is inconsistent on the basic question of whether rape is cool or not. He is the most famous liar in the world, taking any credibility defense off the table. So the defense team is playing the oldest card in the book: The misogyny defense.

It’s a mish-mash of victim-blaming and sexist stereotypes, all to imply that women simply aren’t important enough to rate the time and energy it takes to listen to their complaints about sexual abuse. Sadly, the misogyny defense has a long history for one simple reason: It all too often works. It plays off the larger social belief that a woman’s role is to suffer in silence. The misogyny defense attempts to shift the frame from “did he do it?” to “isn’t she annoying by making a fuss over this?” So many of us have been conditioned to dismiss women’s voices that the misogyny defense still, in 2023, has a whole lot of power. 

During his opening statement Tuesday, Trump’s lawyer, Joe Tacopina, shamelessly invoked the tedious stereotype that’s typically used against sexual abuse accusers: That they are scheming witches only out for all the riches and rewards that misogynists assume are granted to rape victims. Of the women who have accused Trump — a group that numbers over two dozen, mind you — Tacopina said, “They schemed to hurt Donald Trump politically.” Of Carroll herself, he said she made up “a false claim of rape for money, for political reasons and for status.”

Tacopina’s theory, however, is self-contradictory. To defend this claim, he alluded to a right-wing conspiracy theory that anti-Trump lawyer George Conway put Carroll up to this whole scheme. But the timeline is quite clear: Conway only pushed Carroll to sue after Carroll came forward with the allegations. If she was making up the story for money, how is that money only came into the picture after she spoke out? 

Misogynists talk as if speaking out about rape is a fun party. The reality is closer to what Carroll described in her deposition: “[W]omen who have been raped are looked at in this society as less, are looked at as spoiled goods, are looked at as rather dumb to let themselves get attacked.” She repeated this concern in court Wednesday, saying, “I was ashamed. I thought it was my fault.” She noted that people often prefer to blame the victim, which, of course, is exactly what Tacopina and Trump are depending on. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Speaking out has led Carroll to be the constant target of abuse from one of the most famous men in the world. As she testified, “The force of hatred coming at me was staggering” and “I’ve regretted this 100 times,” especially as so many people look on her now with “pity.”  But it’s far from over. Even as she was preparing to take the stand, Trump was letting loose with more invective on Truth Social, sneering that she’s “Ms. Bergdorf Goodman” and calling her story a “hoax.” 

When the judge called out Trump’s posts in court, Tacopina said he would “ask him to refrain from any further posts.” But Tacopina’s defense strategy is mining the same territory: Using sexist stereotypes to discredit accusers and belittling the pain of victims. In particular, Tacopina leaned heavily into the idea that the real problem is hysterical women turning molehills into mountains. 

Trump’s absence from the courtroom can also be read as part of this misogyny-based defense strategy.

Over the weekend, Tacopina argued against allowing journalist Natasha Stoynoff to testify about a 2005 incident, in which she described Trump “pushing me against the wall and forcing his tongue down my throat.” Tacopina claimed that this shouldn’t count as evidence, because it was “mere kissing.” This downplaying doesn’t comport with what Stoynoff wrote in People, where she described being pinned by Trump and only rescued because a butler came into the room. She also describes Trump saying, “You know we’re going to have an affair, don’t you?” It’s a comment that makes clear his belief that her consent would not be necessary for an “affair.”

(This is why I object to the press calling Trump’s single sexual encounter with Stormy Daniels as an “affair,” as well. While Daniels says she consented, what she describes is reluctant at best. She said she felt “I had it coming for making a bad decision for going to someone’s room alone.” “Consent” under duress is not an “affair,” even if we want to quibble over whether it meets the legal standard of consent.) 

Trump’s absence from the courtroom can also be read as part of this misogyny-based defense strategy. As former federal prosecutor Shan Wu wrote in the Daily Beast, this is likely meant “to send a not-so-subtle message to the jury that the claims are not serious enough to even warrant his attendance.” Wu is skeptical of this as a strategy, noting juries feel that if they “have to be there because of him,” he should also be there. But it does comport with the larger sexist strategy of the defense. How better to signal contempt for women’s stories than by refusing to even listen to them?

Of course, there’s a pragmatic reason to keep Trump away, which is that he’s too undisciplined. He can’t keep his story straight regarding sexual abuse, and whether he’s for it or against it. During the deposition, for instance, Trump tried to stick to his story that no encounter happened. But, being the sexist pig he is, he kept veering very close to contradicting himself in order to invoke another sexist myth about rape, which is that victims are asking for it. 

“She actually indicated that she loved it,” he grumbled during the October 19, 2022 testimony, referring to a CNN interview he watched with Carroll. “In fact, I think she said it was sexy, didn’t she? She said it was very sexy to be raped.”

Carroll’s attorney almost caught him, by replying, “So, sir, I just want to confirm:· It’s your testimony that E. Jean Carroll said that she loved being sexually assaulted by you?” Seemingly realizing his screw-up, Trump back-tracked and started dithering about how he was merely speculating about her mental acuity based on a cable news program. But one can see from this, and from Trump’s social media posts, why his lawyers are so worried he will let some damning detail slip if he’s under the pressure of cross-examination. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


“She’s lying” and “she was asking for it” have always contradicted each other, but are often invoked side-by-side by rape apologists. Traditionally, misogyny doesn’t need to be logical for people to buy it. But in a court, at least these days, even sexists know it doesn’t make sense to both say she wanted it and it didn’t happen. It’s a small sign of progress.

As for larger signs of progress well, only time will tell. It seems silly to believe that Carroll is enjoying the experience of being subjected to threats and insults, as Tacopina’s defense strategy would have you believe. But that’s the point of the misogyny defense. It’s not really about making sense, so much as giving people an excuse not to care. Despite the ubiquity of the “believe women” slogan, it’s never really been about truth at all. It’s about whether or not rape matters. If you tell a story where victims are schemers and gold-diggers and attention whores, that allows people to shrug off the duty to care what happens to them. 

As Carroll herself repeatedly said both before and during her testimony, she mostly kept quiet not because she worried people wouldn’t believe her. It’s because she thought they would blame her. She spoke out after the #MeToo movement because she thought, for the first time, she might find sympathy instead of second-guessing. Certainly, her supporters were out in droves this week. But it remains to be seen if the shift to empathy instead of victim-blaming has permeated the culture enough to win over a jury. 

“After Trump comes others”: Author Jeff Sharlet explains why “neofascists are not going to stop”

America is still trapped in the Age of Trump and its fascist fever dream nightmare.

The Republican fascists are escalating their nationwide campaign to end multiracial democracy and freedom. As seen on Jan. 6, these plans include terrorism and other acts of violence.

Donald Trump is the Republican frontrunner and polls show that he has a very real chance of returning to power where he will then, per his public promises and threats, engage in a “final battle” and campaign of revenge and retribution against he and his fascist MAGA movement’s “enemies” – meaning Democrats, liberals, progressives, Black and brown people, the LGBTQ community, and anyone else who dares to defend real democracy and common decency.

The right-wing propaganda machine and echo chamber is amplifying the fascist assaults on democracy and a humane society.

“Right now, the American condition is to pretend that fascism isn’t happening.”

White Christofascists and other right-wing Christian evangelicals believe that Donald Trump is an emissary or prophet from their God – a MAGA fascist Jesus – and that it is their sacred duty to support the traitor president and to end secular pluralistic democracy.

For more than a decade in such books as “The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power” and “C Street: The Fundamentalist Threat to American Democracy”, author and journalist Jeff Sharlet has been warning the American people about the rise of American neofascism and the Age of Trump – what he describes as “the Trumpocene.” Sharlet’s new book, “The Undertow: Scenes from a Slow Civil War,” is an invaluable field map and guide for an America that is sick with neofascism and other great societal sicknesses and troubles and how to navigate, survive, and perhaps even triumph over them.  

In a wide-ranging conversation, Sharlet explains how American neofascism in its various forms seduced wide swaths of (White) American society through permission to engage in violence, sexism, misogyny, white supremacy, and other antisocial and evil behavior. He warns that the country is still very much in crisis – despite what many Americans, both elites and everyday people would like to believe — and that a collapse into a fascist regime appears to be imminent. 

Sharlet also shares what he learned from his time with the late Harry Belafonte about righteous anger and how to transform such energy into art, activism, sacrifice, and radical democratic freedom dreaming and positive social change work.

This conversation has been edited for clarity and length

Where are we in the story that is the Age of Trump, what you call the “Trumpocene”? Some days it feels like an endless book where one chapter just leads to another.

A book without an end? I do think that’s the case – but not in the way you may be thinking of. It is not the Trumpocene that is unending but the struggle that is ongoing.

Today is a poignant day to explore that. “The Undertow” opens with Harry Belafonte, we learned of his death [Tuesday] at age 96. I got to spend time with him. I opened the book with him, even knowing that it would cost me readers and sales. Harry Belafonte? To start a book on the Trumpocene? Huh? I needed to start the book with some beauty and some hope. We needed to explore the beauty of the man and the beauty of his anger —and that endures.

The hope that Belafonte gives is not some type of cheap grace. We are not going to beat Trumpism at some appointed time that is close in the future. That is not how the real world works; the struggle is going to be long.

Harry Belafonte, 96 years old, on his death day, knew that he got defeated. Harry Belafonte knew and understood that more than most people, he was a man who was so essential to the Civil Rights Movement. He hated the Hollywoodization of the movement. He would tell me that we dreamed of some things, we fought, and they killed a lot of us. When I was talking to Mr. Belafonte, he would address Martin Luther King, in the present tense, like a ghost that was with him.

“It is not the Trumpocene that is unending but the struggle that is ongoing.”

The struggle is long. Too many people want a happy ending.

Nope.

After Trump comes others. I think the Never Trumpers have a much clearer sense of this reality than a lot of liberals and even leftists. And for them, it’s more obvious because they lost their whole social world.

The Trumpocene is like the Age of Reagan. The Age of Reagan goes from 1980 to 2016. Reaganism became our American vernacular. Remember, Barack Obama would cite Ronald Reagan, the country’s first black president was working in the Reaganesque vernacular. In the book, I profile a preacher who says that Donald Trump is coming back, whether that means the man himself or the spirit in the flesh of another. So many liberals are saying, “Oh, but DeSantis is down and out!” Do you really think this is over that quick? The damage done, the hurt we felt? What about grief? What about mourning? We’ve lost a lot. That’s going to take years to process and heal.

I recently saw the new “Evil Dead” movie. I kept thinking about Trump and his speaking in demonic tongues. The people outside of the MAGAverse and Trumpworld, think that he is speaking nonsense because they do not understand him. They make fun of and mock Trump and his movement because they do not understand the language that is being spoken and the power of the Irrational and those mysteries. How do you decipher Trump’s vernacular? What are he and the other neofascists saying to the congregation?

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about Donald Trump and the performance of what it means to be “Donald Trump.” And considering all of the coverage that Trump gets, the media still doesn’t get some of the most important aspects of him and his appeal. Trump is a performer. That is why people go to the rallies. Not the politics, but for the performance. The school board meetings where the Trumpists and MAGA types show up or are members are also a mini-Trump rally too. By that measure, there are Trump rallies all over the country right now.  

When secular folks hear or see someone speaking in tongues they inevitably ask, is this real? That is the wrong question. What matters is that it is happening. Is this person who is speaking strange syllables, seemingly in a language I don’t understand, are they just doing gobbledygook? Or are they possessed by the spirit? Wrong question. The question is the power of the performance. When you say that Trump is speaking in tongues, that’s the difference.

The Age of Reagan moved our common vernacular towards a more right-wing language. But that language was still something recognizable. Reaganism is a profoundly violent ethos — yet it never openly celebrated that violence. The movie “Red Dawn” informs so many of the folks that I talked to for “The Undertow” about a new American civil war. What they’re imagining is Patrick Swayze in the mountains. These right-wing militia types think that they are the Wolverines in “Red Dawn” playing tricks on the Russians. Patrick Swayze’s violence in “Red Dawn” is righteous violence. He takes no pleasure in it; he’s trying to restore the high school. He’s trying to restore the football game. Whereas speaking in tongues, the ecstatic carnivalesque language of Trumpism is pleasure in violence.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In 2016, it’s the first Trump rally in the book, and I go to Youngstown, Ohio. There’s a nice, sweet, grandparent-like couple. So, I go to the Trump rally just like anybody else. I am waiting in line for six hours. I am not using a press pass. I am out there with the people. It’s hot, and you’re waiting for the big plane to come in. There’s no place to go. I’m pressed against this couple. The old guy says, “I’m gonna get a protester and I’m gonna beat the crap out of him and I’m gonna get on CNN.” His wife, decked out in all kinds of turquoise jewelry, sort of looks like a hippie. She scolds him playfully. Then she smiles at him. What I am seeing there is militant eroticism, the sexuality of violence. And then she leans into me, this old grandmotherly lady, and whispers in my ear. “Don’t she look like she’d been rode hard and put up wet?” That is the pleasure of transgression. She’s talking about Hillary Clinton. That’s not what Reagan was offering.

I say, to my fellow lefties, true, it’s always been bad, and now it’s worse. This is a new damn thing.

I think some of the worse writing and reporting and analysis about the Age of Trump is by these “good liberal” centrist normal establishment politics types who, even after seven years, keep saying, “I can’t understand why anyone would like this! It’s shocking! It’s unimaginable!” What world do they live in? Violence is fun. Trump and his foul charisma and norm-shattering is exciting for his people and too many others. Trumpism, like other forms of fascism and fake populism, is thrilling and visceral. Are the mainstream media types just in extreme denial? Are they lying to themselves? Or do they know better and are pretending otherwise?

Violence—or at least, the imagination of violence—can be fun. Sex is fun too. Trump is promising you the pleasure and freedom of transgression and ugliness. Horror is fun. Be it the Trump rallies or the militia churches that I ended up visiting, they indulge in white supremacism, even as they draw some people of color in with their gravitational power. Part of America’s culture is violence, horror, gross sexuality, misogyny and so on. This is part of what “The Undertow” in the title of the book is. Part of what Trumpism or fascism is saying is, “Instead of swimming against the current, what if you just fell back into it?” So many of the people who end up supporting Trump were swimming against the current before.

“I say, to my fellow lefties, true, it’s always been bad, and now it’s worse. This is a new damn thing.”

Ashli Babbitt is the central figure in the book’s narrative. She is a two-time Obama voter. She is also a domestic terrorist who ended up dying during the Jan. 6 invasion of the Capitol. But before that in her life, she tried to be a smarter person. After she died, because she was a domestic terrorist and insurrectionist, a lot of people made a lot of the fact that although 14 years in the Air Force and the Air Force Reserve, she did not advance far. Why didn’t she advance far? Because when officers messed with people, she would stand up for them. She was swimming against the current for a long time, and then at a certain point, that whiteness whispered to her and said, “Just give in.” In 2016, she sends out her first Tweet and its #love. And it’s for Trump. This two-time Obama voter, a white working-class woman, goes all in so quickly for Trump. I saw that again and again and again.

To understand Trumpism and neofascism and this disastrous moment, you have to be willing to walk with the evil and look it in the eye. You have to become familiar if not comfortable in its presence in order to defeat it. Looking away guarantees defeat. I am working class. I grew up with people who were and are right-wing reactionary types that likely now support Trump – or worse. I am of that milieu. 

When I talk to our fellow travelers in the news media, liberal and lefty types too, centrist Democrats, I tell them what Trump and the Republican fascists, and the larger white right are doing is exactly what I would be doing to defeat them. I go even farther, and I tell them they are lucky I am not on the other side because what I would do – and what the neofascists are going to do – is only going to get far worse. They are only getting started. There are so many vulnerabilities and pain points in this system and among the liberal consensus and normal politics types to be exploited. It is actually very easy. I’m not psychic. I just understand the strategy and tactics. What do you and I understand that many of our peers in this business do not?

I think what we understand is that these neofascists are not going to stop, because why would they stop? The pleasure is in transgression. The pleasure is in going further. There is no ideological position to which they are loyal. There is no policy to which they’re loyal. They’re going to keep going. There is no movement per se but transgression. And as soon as something becomes normal, they’ll go further. The folks who imagine “Handmaid’s Tale” as the end zone, no, whatever it is, you have to go further. Now, this is the good news too, because a movement of ultimate transgression is going to burn out. As a society and country, America is going to experience and have to go through fascism. We’re not in it now. There’s a fascist movement now. It drives me crazy. People say, “Well, it’s not like the Hitler regime.” No, it’s not. That was a regime. We don’t have a fascist regime. We could with a fascist movement. It’s worse post-Trump than it was during Trump’s presidency.

The Republican-fascists and the larger white right are so much better than the left and Democrats at storytelling and creating compelling characters. They understand how to use storytelling and emotions in a way that the American political mainstream, especially the Democrats, do not. As a professor of creative writing, how do you explain this?

Publishers complain about how people don’t buy books anymore, yet those same publishers spent enormous sums on a book by Nancy Pelosi. How did they imagine that would sell? That is not a claim based on misogyny or sexism. What’s the damn story there with Pelosi? Many years crafting small incremental changes? That’s not a compelling tale. Marjorie Taylor Greene? That’s a good story. Bad person. Good story. A villain. Compelling. Marjorie Taylor Greene comes into politics a few years ago and gets kicked out of all these committees. It’s amazing how long it took people to realize that she was going to run the Republican Party. And they really thought that Kevin McCarthy was going to do it. And they thought Kevin McCarthy was going to do it because Mitch McConnell pulled it off. Mitch McConnell is a good villain. Kevin McCarthy is not a good villain; Mitch McConnell is Mr. Burns. He’s so cynical. Marjorie Taylor Greene is so damn crazy and that is what makes her good as a character. Thank God, there’s enough people who still said, “Okay, wait a minute. I don’t want to go to a Biden rally, but I’m going to vote for him”. Too many people who just want a return to normalcy celebrated Biden’s victory as some type of permanent victory. Okay. Seven more million people voted for Biden but there were still a lot of people who voted for Donald Trump.

What about Donald Trump as a character?

I recognized him when he came down that golden escalator because I’ve been writing about the elite and polite American Christian nationalist right for years. They support figures like Trump overseas and have been for decades. By that I mean the dictators in Indonesia, Somalia, all the little generals and colonels in South America. So, when Trump comes riding down the golden escalator in 2015, I’m like, oh, that’s the guy they’ve been supporting for a long time overseas and here it is coming back to the United States.

“This two-time Obama voter, a white working-class woman, goes all in so quickly for Trump. I saw that again and again and again.”

For a long time, the elites, the political class, have been saying that “the establishment” will hold here. Trump understood that it wouldn’t. He understood the premise. I don’t know that he understood intellectually, but I think people who call Trump stupid are fools. People who call Trump incompetent are wrong. Trump is competent at what he values — he just doesn’t care about the things that we, good small “d” democrats, care about. Trump is supremely competent at getting attention and that’s what he cares about most. How would I describe Trump, the character? I don’t know. Moreover, I don’t care as much about the character of Trump as I care about the people who follow him and identify with him. 

In my travels, I keep encountering these guys flying the all-black flag of “no prisoners, no mercy, no quarter.” The flag that says in a coming Civil War they hope for, kill them all. That black flag is a genocide flag. That’s who I think Trump is. Trump is the assemblage of it all, the violence, conspiracy theories, the neofascism, the hatred.

Can you elaborate on these militia churches? Militant White Christianity is central to America neofascism. We saw its power on Jan. 6.

I went to this rally in Sacramento. I am invited to a church a little bit north in Yuba City, the Church of Glad Tidings, which is a church on the Trump circuit. I go up there, and it’s a militia church. They don’t have a cross anymore, because they think the cross is kind of sissy. Instead, they have a pulpit made of swords, and they speak of hangings and executions. They host “new militia recruitment night” every Tuesday and that becomes the tenor of the religiosity that I encounter as I drive eastward across the United States. There is a pastor in Omaha, his name is Hank Kunneman, at the Lord of Hosts Church in Omaha, Nebraska. It is a nice suburban, semi-mega church and it is absolutely pro-Civil War. They are armed to the teeth. He takes Psalm 23, which is a really gentle psalm. You know? “Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.” Pastor Hank says, “thy rod, that is the gun.” And there are men in the back of the church with guns, and those men with guns ended up telling me to leave because I am a journalist and they think I am of the devil.

Donald Trump is telling his followers that he is some type of “Jesus Christ”-like martyr who is being “persecuted” by Biden and the Democrats because he is finally being held accountable for decades of law breaking. White Christian right-wing evangelicals are among Trump’s strongest backers because they see him as a tool of their God. Across the right-wing alternate universe there is a whole narrative of Trump as Jesus, or being anointed by Jesus, or that he is some type of prophet and savior. This is an example of fascism as a type of religious politics. How do we better explain to the public and the mainstream news media and political class that these people are deadly serious in their beliefs? That this is not funny or some type of joke?

The fault in this reasoning and this logic is the assumption that fascism begins and ends with a Third Reich, or with Mussolini, or with Europe. If we want to understand fascism, we should be looking at examples all around the world. Then we start to see all the many different ways in which it works with religiosity, and that includes Christianity.

“I have a queer nonbinary trans child, and that kid is being criminalized in 20 states now. How do I tell them don’t be afraid?”

But what fascism does is to supplant the supremacy of God in the believer’s mind and intermingle that with a supremacy of a great leader. Now, people get caught up because of the short time that Hitler and the Third Reich were in power. Too many people have convinced themselves that once the great leader Trump is gone that it is over. Not necessarily, because when we start to see the long-term authoritarian fascist regimes in other countries, we see that they’re able to supplant leader after leader after leader. Once you’ve made that bait and switch where this earthly person represents the divine, and moreover, represents the divine that takes pleasure in violence, you can keep that system going for a long time. I don’t think American fascism will. I don’t like the word “optimistic”. But on that score, I’m actually optimistic. I don’t think it will do that. How many of us will be on the other side to see what comes?

Consider that there are pregnant people dying for lack of reproductive rights. They’re not getting through it. I think of the surges and waves of trans and queer suicides, especially among young people. They’re not getting through it. They’re gone. They’re casualties. I have a queer nonbinary trans child, and that kid is being criminalized in 20 states now. How do I tell them don’t be afraid? This is a privilege of whiteness because I think there’s no parent of color in the country who has not had to struggle with that. Fascism is expanding and it comes after everybody.

How did your encounter with death, your two heart attacks, influence your vision and thinking about American democracy and this society’s overall health? What did a threat to your mortality “gift” you with in terms of privileged insight?

“The Undertow” is a chronicle of a death trip on multiple scales. I take the term, “death trip,” from a book by mentor, Michael Lesy, “Wisconsin Death Trip.” And there’s a way in which this book is a death trip on multiple scales when I’m traveling across the country. Along the way, I picked up a portion of my stepmother’s ashes. I’m carrying Michael’s book with me. And I’ve got my own kind of broken heart, which has been a way of opening doors for me in talking to other people for a long time. My own child is ill. The death trip is a memento mori, that old medieval art tradition, which reminds us that we all die. We live with the knowledge that we die. That seems obvious and simple and banal. Yet we know that it’s not obvious and simple or banal because if it was we wouldn’t have horse race coverage of our politics in the Trumpocene. We wouldn’t be playing the same tune over and over and over.

My encounter with death enabled me to say, one, I’ve got to tell the story, because I’m trying to keep my kid alive. I’m living surrounded by death, as are we all. I don’t doubt for a second that the nature of fascism in the United States has not been massively accelerated by the million-plus dead from COVID that we did not mourn. We didn’t acknowledge it, we declared the pandemic over, and the dead keep dying. There was real loss and there’s ongoing loss. This is our national condition. The dead are gone. They’re dead. They’re not coming back. You can either take the nihilistic approach and just focus on the loss or you can learn to live with the loss and confront the reality of what has happened. Right now, the American condition is to pretend that fascism isn’t happening. Not all of us, but enough of us to make it dangerous. We’re never going to go back in our lives to that notion that a great crisis will bring us all together as a people. We know from the pandemic that it won’t. We know that we’ll turn on each other here in America. It didn’t have to be that way, but that is what we did. We must live with that fact, that failure. That failure does not have to be definitive for all time. But it’s there for us. What do we do with it? And the same is true with fascism. The same is true with Trump. What do we do with that failure?

How would you compare brother Harry Belafonte to Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump?

What I like about Harry Belafonte and what he says, toward the end of that first chapter of the book, is that it doesn’t matter where your anger comes from so much as what you do with it. He was a very angry man, all of his days. What did he do with it? Mr. Belafonte made beauty. He turned the anger into beautiful songs. Trump and Tucker? They stay right there with the anger. It comes from their sense of white loss, and they don’t do anything good with the anger. Yes, they build power. But that’s just replicating the anger. That’s like cancer. Trump and Tucker, they make no beauty. Their dream is punishment, sadism, pain. They set no one free of the pain and anger and hatred. Why would they ever set anyone free? If they did so they would lose their demographic and their grift. Harry Belafonte represented the opposite of what Tucker and Trump did. Still does. He’s gone, but he left us with songs. 

Are your allergies worse than usual? You’re not alone

A telltale sign of the arrival of spring is the onset of seasonal allergic rhinitis, usually marked by a runny nose, watery and red eyes, or an itchy throat, ears, and palate. But this year, many Americans are finding that their allergic symptoms are not merely unpleasant, but downright unbearable — and in some cases, worse than they’ve ever experienced before.

On Twitter, a deluge of posts bemoans the severity of this year’s allergy season, with users frantically searching for relief from the onslaught of symptoms. Searches for terms like “are allergies bad today?” skyrocketed in April, as people seek answers to this sudden and intense wave of daily discomfort.

It’s not just your imagination: allergies really are getting worse this year. But what could be driving them?

Some of the blame can be laid on weather. According to the NOAA March 2023 climate report, the precipitation total for the contiguous U.S. was 0.30 inch above average, ranking in the wettest third of the 129-year record. Indeed, precipitation was above average across much of the West, and from eastern Oklahoma to the Great Lakes. This increase in precipitation is likely affecting this season’s allergies.

“Many are saying that likely due to the unseasonable winter weather, it’s been a lot wetter in [the] southwest than previous years, is contributing to longer pollen seasons and higher amounts of pollen,” Dr. Purvi Parikh, allergist and immunologist with Allergy & Asthma Network told Salon. More precipitation, Parikh said, “contributes to early, longer and higher levels of pollen.”

“[More precipitation] contributes to early, longer and higher levels of pollen.”

Indeed, the severity of allergy symptoms boils down to the pollen count, and how long pollen counts are high. Pollen is essentially flower sperm. In the spring and fall, it is released from seed plants, and flies through the wind to fertilize other plants. According to the Allergy and Asthma Foundation of America (AAFA), pollen — which commonly comes from trees, weeds and plants — is the most common trigger of seasonal allergies. Pollen counts estimate how much pollen is in the air using a device called an air sampler that captures the pollen.

When the pollen count is high, people usually have more severe reactions, which can sometimes be asthmatic. A pollen allergy occurs when one’s immune system identifies pollen as dangerous, which is why limiting time outdoors during a high pollen count day can help ease symptoms.

“Tree pollens usually cause spring allergies, and tree pollens are different between north and south California; juniper and cedars are mainly in the north, while ash and olive are in the south,” Dr. Cliff Han, a biologist and founder and CEO of AllerPops, told Salon. “Grass and weed cause mostly summer and fall allergies.”

But worsening pollen allergies aren’t just a 2023 thing. As a whole, thanks to climate change, people with seasonal allergies are bound to suffer more in the future, and have been faring worse over the last decade or so. According to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the length of the pollen season increased by 20 days and pollen concentration increased by 21 percent between 1990 and 2018.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


In 2018, a study published in the journal PLOS ONE by researchers at the University of Washington and the University of Massachusetts at Amherst found that ragweed, a common pollen culprit, will expand its reach as a consequence of rising temperatures across the United States in the future. Researchers estimated that in roughly 35 years ragweed’s ecological range will move northward, which would bring pollen allergies to regions it has never been before. According to a study published in the journal Scientific Reports in June 2021, temperature increases in northern California are worsening pollen-related allergies, while precipitation changes are associated with more mold spores in the air.

“Overall [climate change] makes the climate warmer so plants pollinate longer,” Parikh said. “Rising CO2 levels also make plants give off more pollen as plants feed off of it — making them super pollinators.”

“Rising temperatures extend the growing season and the duration of allergy season.”

As explained by the Union of Concerned Scientists, carbon dioxide increases plants’ growth rate, which is also another way climate change and worsening allergies are linked.

“Carbon dioxide, the heat-trapping gas that is the primary cause of our warming planet, increases the growth rate of many plants and increases the amount and potency of pollen,” the Union of Concerned Scientists explained. “Rising temperatures extend the growing season and the duration of allergy season. And an extended spring season alters the amounts of blooms and fungal spores that are known to exacerbate allergy symptoms.”

This is serious, experts say, as an estimated 10 people die from asthma a day.

“Any coughing wheezing chest tightness must be managed by the doctor as it could be a sign of asthma and life threatening,” Parikh said.

Han said there are various ways for people with allergies to alleviate their symptoms.

“People can manage their symptoms by allergen avoidance, for example, staying indoors and wearing a mask, by taking antihistamines or steroids to control the inflammation,” Han said. “However, managing symptoms cannot stop the allergies from getting worse or other complications such as food allergies and autoimmune from happening.”

Kevin McCarthy’s debt ceiling gamble: The stupid cruelty of Republicans’ default tantrum

Republicans are yet again holding our nation’s economic well-being hostage as they threaten to default on our debt if their ideological demands are unmet. They want to sell this as a kinder, gentler debt ceiling fight. But don’t be fooled, this round of unending MAGA extremism is the most toxic version yet. Once again, the GOP’s tantrum underscores a sad truth: Republicans have no real economic agenda; they only have MAGA, a worldview as stupid as it is cruel.

This absurd cruelty is at the forefront this week as Republicans inch closer to passing legislation to slash the federal budget back to levels adopted in 2022. In a midnight deal, Speaker Kevin McCarthy made this legislation even more punitive to lock in the votes needed to pass it out of the House, which Republicans control by the slimmest of margins.

MAGA Republicans do not need to negotiate budget cuts through the debt limit process. There is a regular rule of order in the House of Representatives to do so. Yet despite controlling the House, Republicans have yet to release a budget or pass legislation to address MAGA policy priorities that can get through the Senate, let alone be signed by the President. They have not released a budget because their economic priorities of cutting Social Security and Medicare are politically toxic. 

Ironically, conservatives have traditionally raised the debt ceiling (with help from Democrats) when there is a Republican president. They have also massively increased the deficit when they hold the White House. According to the Washington Post, “In the ten debt ceiling votes under a Republican administration, an average of 65 percent of House Republicans and 74 percent of Senate Republicans voted in favor of adjusting or suspending it. But in Democratic administrations, those numbers decline to 24 percent and 20 percent, respectively.” 

If Republicans are so concerned about the national debt, they should take a long hard look in the mirror. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Among Donald Trump’s many ignoble accomplishments is the explosive rise in the national debt under his watch. It rose to $7.8 trillion during his time in the White House. George W. Bush also saw a massive increase in the national debt. Under W’s tenure, the deficit increased by 105%; sadly, he is not the biggest offender here. During Ronald Reagan’s administration, the national debt increased by 186% over eight years. 

The absurdity of Republican arguments in this default fight is surpassed only by the cruelty of their demands. 

The Republican solution to the challenges our country currently face is to take away programs put in place to help people who are struggling right now.  By slashing federal spending to levels adopted in the Fiscal Year 2022 budget, we could see massive cuts to programs that benefit seniors, veterans, and children, like Social Security, Medicare, and food assistance programs.  

Under the Republican plan, we could see 22% cuts to education, veterans’ health care, child care, opioid treatments, and cut Medicaid for 2 million people. Cuts this size could take away food assistance from more than one million seniors and 1.2 million women, babies, and children. And finally, these cuts would take away healthcare access for 2 million people via Community Health Centers, disproportionately impacting rural areas.

These cuts would devastate White, Black, and Brown families nationwide who utilize these programs in large numbers. Take Medicare, for example; as of 2021, total Medicare enrollment was over 63 million people, with 73% of the users being white, 10% Black, 9.4 % Hispanic, and 4.4% AAPI. A cut of 22% in that budget could result in the loss of health care for many people. 

America’s economy is transitioning; unemployment is at record lows, Latino and Black unemployment is near or at historic lows, wages are rising, and more people have health insurance than ever before. We are turning the page on a catastrophic global pandemic, but as should be expected, challenges remain. We need solutions here, not brinkmanship that could jeopardize the progress made.

The MAGA Republican default fight is stupidly cruel for ideological reasons and has nothing to do with economic policy. Republicans in control of the House could pass legislation thru the committee process, work across the aisle and present a plan to help American workers. Remember, these same Republicans ran in 2022, saying they would provide solutions and help to improve things. They have offered nothing of the sort. They want to cut these programs that help so many people and offer nothing to replace them. 

Worse, they are now risking our progress with brinkmanship, bravado, and not much else. Our country deserves better.

“The L Word” goes to DC: Karine Jean-Pierre had some guests over for Lesbian Visibility Week

The attack against LGBTQ+ rights rages on — but on Tuesday, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre carved out time during her regularly scheduled press briefing to celebrate Lesbian Visibility Week with some very special guests — proving that some battles are best fought from within. 

Speaking at the briefing upon special invitation, “The L Word” cast member Leisha Hailey and executive producer Ilene Chaiken delivered statements on the importance of visibility and representation, praising Biden’s White House for the noted fight to secure health and safety for the LGBTQ+ community amidst an ongoing onslaught from Republican lawmakers. Cast members Jennifer Beals and Kate Moennig stood by in support.

Guiding her guests to stand beside her at the podium, Jean-Pierre greeted the room saying, “So this week is Lesbian Visibility Week, and as the first openly queer person to hold a position of press secretary for the president of the United States, I see every day how important visibility and representation are . . . Even though I grew up in one of the most diverse cities in the world (New York), as a young queer woman of color I felt alone and sometimes invisible. For so many people in our community, “The L Word”s impact can not be understated. Being able to see diverse narratives that reflect our lives is incredibly important.”

Ironically, but not to take away from the beauty and importance of Tuesday’s briefing, Showtime announced the cancellation of “The L Word: Generation Q” — a series that furthered the narrative that began with the debut of “The L Word” in 2004 — just last month, which is a fleece-covered thorn not lost on the cast.

In Wednesday’s episode of the podcast “Pants,” hosted by Hailey and Moennig, they joked about Showtime footing the bill for the trip to Washington, although they’d recently been “fired.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“We’re honored to have the opportunity to be here today standing beside the first out lesbian press secretary in our history who serves the most pro-LGBTQ+ president in our history, said Chaiken, the first from the show to speak following Jean-Pierre’s introduction. “When ‘The L Word’ debuted in 2004, we too accomplished a few firsts by bringing our stories into homes and communities across the country and around the world. We learned by the beautiful response to our show how profoundly important it is for people, particularly young people, to see themselves reflected in our entertainment culture.”

And while, currently, that appreciation for LGBTQ+ representation being reflected in entertainment feels on shaky ground after the cancellation of so many queer shows in recent months (The L Word: Generation Q,” “A League of Their Own,” “First Kill,” Queer as Folk,” etc.) public recognition such as what took place at the White House on Tuesday gives hope for what’s possible. There are plans in the works for a reboot of “The L Word,” rumored to be set in New York, and hopefully many more shows that won’t see the chopping block as quickly as the ones that came before it.

“Visibility starts in our homes and our communities,” said Hailey, taking to the mic after Chaiken. “And even if it feels like you’re under attack, know that we see you.”

Moennig and Beals, although not delivering statements of their own, shared clips from their day at the White House on social media. In Beals’ Instagram post, seen below, the ladies dance with Jean-Pierre down a White House corridor to the tune of Beyoncé’s “Run the World (Girls).”

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cre0GzKg4rp/?hl=en

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cre74Y2up-T/

As Chaiken said perfectly during her statement, “They may try to erase our stories from classrooms and libraries, but we’re here today, here at the White House. We won’t be erased.”

North Dakota GOP approves near-total abortion ban after rejecting free school lunches

Republican Gov. Doug Burgum of North Dakota on Monday signed one of the nation’s most draconian abortion bans into law, just weeks after the state’s GOP lawmakers shot down a proposal to provide free school lunches to low-income students.

The new forced pregnancy law, which takes immediate effect, prohibits abortion care in nearly all cases. Abortion is allowed in cases of rape or incest, but only during the first six weeks of pregnancy—before many people realize they are pregnant. Abortion is also allowed without gestational limits if terminating a pregnancy could prevent the pregnant person’s “death or a serious health risk.”

North Dakota is one of several states where dormant abortion bans took immediate effect last June when the U.S. Supreme Court’s reactionary majority overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that had legalized the healthcare procedure nationwide.

However, “North Dakota’s trigger ban was blocked last year by a district judge, after its sole abortion provider, the Red River Women’s Clinic, filed a lawsuit against the law,” The New York Times reported Monday. “The state Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling last month and said the state constitution protected abortion rights in some situations.”

Burgum, a former vice president at Microsoft, said in a statement that North Dakota’s new forced pregnancy law “clarifies and refines” the existing abortion ban that has been blocked by courts.

As the Times noted:

Under the earlier ban, providers who performed an abortion to save the life of a mother could face felony prosecution. The provider would need to offer an “affirmative defense” proving that the abortion was medically necessary within the confines of the state law.

Under the new version of the law, the exceptions do not require an affirmative defense from providers. But providers could still face criminal charges if they violate the exceptions detailed in the law.

Elisabeth Smith, director of state policy and advocacy at the Center for Reproductive Rights, accused North Dakota lawmakers of “attempting to bypass the state constitution and court system with this total ban.”

“They made the exceptions a little bit less narrow but essentially tried to repackage the trigger ban,” she told the Times.

North Dakota has been completely bereft of abortion clinics since August, when the Fargo-based Red River Women’s Clinic moved its operations a short distance across the border to Moorhead, Minnesota. But as the Times reported, Center for Reproductive Rights attorneys representing the clinic “say it is important to ensure that the ban does not take effect, so that patients facing medical emergencies can receive abortions in hospitals and from their doctors.”

As the lawsuit opposing North Dakota’s currently enjoined abortion ban proceeds, fresh legal challenges to the state’s new forced pregnancy law are expected.

“I don’t think women in North Dakota are going to accept this, and there will be action in the future to get our rights back,” state Rep. Liz Conmy, D-11, told The Associated Press. “Our Legislature is overwhelmingly pro-pregnancy, but I think women in the state would like to make their own decisions.”

Burgum, who also signed a bill prohibiting gender-affirming healthcare for trans youth last week, argued that the new abortion ban “reaffirms North Dakota as a pro-life state.”

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom, however, contrasted North Dakota Republicans’ willingness to enact a forced pregnancy law with their refusal last month to expand access to free school lunches.

Condemning GOP lawmakers and officials, Newsom summarized their position as follows: “Mandating birth is state responsibility. Helping feed those kids is not.”

Just 10 days after North Dakota Republicans rejected a bill that would have broadened eligibility for free school lunches, they voted in early April to increase their own daily meal reimbursements from $35 to $45, adding insult to injury.

“I’m beyond enraged at these cruel backward MAGA extremist politicians,” tweeted human rights lawyer Qasim Rashid. “A special place in hell.”

In sharp contrast to their counterparts in Bismarck, North Dakota, lawmakers in St. Paul recently made Minnesota the fourth state to guarantee universal free school meals.

Meanwhile, a first-of-its-kind lawsuit filed last month by five Texas women whose lives were endangered by that state’s near-total abortion ban underscores the spurious nature of so-called “abortion exceptions,” as Common Dreams reported.

With its new law, North Dakota became at least the 14th state with an active ban on nearly all abortions. Additional states have slightly less restrictive prohibitions in place.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 opinion last summer in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ended the constitutional right to abortion and turned regulation of the procedure over to individual states, leaving tens of millions of people without access to lifesaving reproductive healthcare.

The ruling’s elimination of federal protections has enabled right-wing lawmakers to prohibit or restrict abortion in more than half of the states, unleashing a life-threatening crisis that human rights advocates consider a violation of U.S. obligations under international law.


CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story featured an image of the South Dakota capitol building. This story has been updated to feature an image of the North Dakota capitol building. 

Florida GOP passes bill that allows for “legal kidnapping” of transgender children

The Florida House of Representatives has approved a bill that would allow state courts to intervene in custody disputes and remove transgender children who are receiving gender-affirming care from supportive families with whom they live. In extreme circumstances, legal experts say this may even “involve the state taking physical custody of a child.”

SB 254 would classify gender-affirming care for transgender youth as a form of “serious physical harm,” which could be cited during a custody enforcement hearing to allow unsupportive parents to take “physical custody of [the] child.” The amended bill, which originally passed on April 4 by a vote of 27 to 12, now returns to the Senate.

“This law ensures death … It violates my parental rights,” said Eimear Roy Mulcahy, who is a parent of a trans child speaking to the Tallahassee Democrat.

The vote comes as the Florida legislature has also recently passed two other anti-LGTBQ bills — one targeting LGBTQ friendly businesses and one prohibiting gender-inclusive bathrooms.

“It is shameful that our Florida Legislature continues to pass dangerous bills designed to silence, harm, and erase trans people in Florida,” Kara Gross, the legislative director and senior policy counsel of the ACLU in Florida, said in a statement. “These bills directly threaten transgender Floridians’ fundamental human rights and safety. The Florida Legislature’s insistence on targeting trans people is bizarre, unnecessary, unconstitutional, and extremely dangerous.”

While the most recent language of SB 254 no longer includes the horrific provision that would have allowed Florida courts to modify out-of-state custody agreements, allowing unsupportive parents to move their children to Florida to prevent them from accessing gender-affirming health care, it still includes the “trans kidnapping” provision that would give courts emergency jurisdiction to remove trans children from their families because they are receiving gender-affirming care.

“I can’t believe I’m writing this,” said former Democratic Rep. Carlos Guillermo Smith. “Parents would be charged with felonies [and] thrown in prison. This is fascist.”

The legislation would also prohibit the use of state funds for gender-affirming care, prohibit gender-affirming care for trans youth, and direct the state Board of Medicine to adopt emergency rules regarding trans youth who are already receiving gender-affirming care. Any health care practitioner who provides trans kids with gender-affirming care would be guilty of a felony under the legislation.

Florida Sen. Lori Berman, D, condemned Republican attacks on bodily autonomy and trans health care in a comment before the chamber voted to pass the legislation.

“I would say free states don’t ban health care,” Berman said. “This bill is wrong on the way it attacks transgender adults, wrong on the way it attacks parents’ rights to raise their children, and wrong on how it puts medical professionals at risk.”

In March, the Florida Board of Medicine enacted a rule that banned gender-affirming care for transgender youth who had not yet started puberty blockers or hormone therapy, making it the eighth state to restrict gender-affirming care for trans youth. Under the rule, health care practitioners could have complaints filed against them; if found to be in violation of the rule, practitioners could face fines, suspension of their licenses, and other consequences. The rule is currently being contested by the Southern Legal Counsel and national advocacy groups in court. SB 254 would circumvent this lawsuit by legislating the gender-affirming health care ban for trans youth into law.

“This law will cause massive upheaval in medical care for the transgender community and cause immediate harm to thousands of Floridians of all ages who will lose access to lifesaving medical care,” the ACLU said in a statement.

E. Jean Carroll’s testimony reveals graphic details of alleged rape by Trump

On Wednesday, E. Jean Carroll took the stand in a Manhattan federal court to tell her side of the story as it pertains to her battery and defamation lawsuit against former President Trump.

Carroll alleges that in 1996, Trump violently raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room and, later, publicly denied her claims to the fact, which threatened to tarnish her reputation as a journalist. 

“I’m here because Donald Trump raped me, and when I wrote about it, he said it didn’t happen,” Carroll testified. “He lied and shattered my reputation and I’m here to try to get my life back.”

Recounting the events of 1996, Carroll stated that Trump asked her to join him at the NY department store so that he could get her advice on a present he needed to purchase but, once inside, things took a harrowing turn.

According to reporting by CNN, Carroll said that the vibe between her and Trump was playful and that, at one point, Trump picked out a sheer gray bodysuit in the store’s lingerie department. When Trump suggested that she try it on, she said he should do it himself.

After Trump gestured that she enter a dressing room with him, she did so, which she now regrets. 

“I didn’t picture anything about what was about to happen,” Carroll said. “That open door has plagued me for years because I just walked into it, walked in.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Alone in the dressing room together, Carroll alleges that Trump shoved her against the wall and proceeded to insert his fingers inside of her vagina, and then his penis, which led to injury.

According to Carroll, she got away from Trump by putting her knee up and pushing him off of her. 

“I’m proud to say I did get out,” Carroll said on the stand, showing visible signs of distress. 

Following the attack, she confided in a friend and was initially resolved to never speak of the alleged attack again out of fear of retaliation.

“I was frightened of Donald Trump. I thought he would retaliate and I was ashamed. I thought it was my fault,” Carroll said. 

With all this coming to a head so many years later, Carroll said on Wednesday that she’s finally “settling a personal score.”

He called me a liar repeatedly and it really has decimated my reputation,” she said. “I’m a journalist – the one thing I have to have is the trust of the readers.”

Trump continues to deny Carroll’s claims in the face of the trial, still underway. 

California’s Medicaid experiment spends money to save money — and help the homeless

Sporting a bright smile and the polished Super Bowl ring he won as a star NFL player in the late 1980s, Craig McEwen doesn’t fit the archetype of someone teetering on the brink of homelessness.

Evicted from his San Diego County apartment last July, McEwen — who endured repeated concussions during his six seasons in the NFL — scoured housing listings for anything he could afford.

Working as a part-time groundskeeper at a golf course for $15 an hour, his frantic search turned up nothing. So, feeling overwhelmed by rents pushing $3,000 a month for a one-bedroom apartment, he made a plan: move into his truck or rent a storage container to live in — an alternative he turned to when he was previously homeless in 2004.

McEwen is hopeful that a massive health care initiative in California offering new, specialized social services will help him get back on his feet. He is one of nearly 145,000 low-income Californians enrolled in CalAIM, an endeavor Gavin Newsom, the state’s Democratic governor, is spearheading to transform its Medicaid program, called Medi-Cal, into a new kind of safety net that provides housing and other services for people who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless and have complicating conditions like mental illness or chronic disease that can make it difficult to manage life.

California launched the initiative in early 2022, rolling it out quietly, with health insurers and community groups scrambling to provide social services and benefits that fall outside traditional health care. It’s a five-year, $12 billion social experiment that Newsom is betting will eventually cut soaring health care spending in Medi-Cal, the largest Medicaid program in the country with 15.5 million enrollees.

The state is contracting the work to its 23 Medi-Cal managed-care health insurance companies. They are responsible for delivering a slew of new benefits to the most vulnerable enrollees: not only those with housing insecurity, but also people with mental health or addictive disorders; formerly incarcerated people transitioning back to society; seniors and people with disabilities; children in foster care; and Californians who frequent hospital emergency rooms or are admitted often to short-term skilled nursing facilities.

While only a sliver of the state’s Medi-Cal patients are enrolled in CalAIM, tens of thousands of low-income Californians could qualify for the new benefits. They’re eligible for help in finding housing and for paying rental move-in costs like security deposits.

But the help goes beyond housing. The state is also providing the most at-risk patients with intensive case management, alongside pioneering social services — such as healthy home-delivered meals for diabetes patients and mold removal in homes of patients with severe asthma.

Top state health officials say that with such an ambitious program — using Medicaid to help solve homelessness and combat chronic disease — they expected the rollout to be bumpy. After 2026, when the initiative’s funding ends, the state plans to prove the experiment works and permanently adopt the benefits. Meanwhile, other states are closely watching California, hoping to learn from its successes and failures.

“California is a leader, and it’s always experimenting in new and interesting ways,” said Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association. “What it can do is provide proof of concept, and then this can grow to other states.”

Insurers, in essence, are building a new health care workforce, contracting with nonprofit and for-profit organizations to enroll the most vulnerable — and expensive — Medi-Cal patients. They’re hiring social workers and case managers to find those who rack up extreme health care costs in hospital emergency rooms, nursing homes, prisons, jails, and mental health crisis centers.

As Newsom sees it, the immense investment will pay off for taxpayers. Targeting people cycling in and out of costly institutions will reduce health care spending, he argues, while also helping people get healthy. State health officials say 5% of high-need Medi-Cal patients account for roughly half of all health care spending in the low-income health care program.

The most important currency in pulling off this massive health care experiment is trust. And that is being built on the ground, with community outreach workers scouring hospitals and homeless encampments, for example, to find those eligible for CalAIM.

The most at-risk Medi-Cal patients are being linked to specialized teams deployed under a new entitlement benefit at the heart of the initiative called “enhanced care management.” While other services like covering security deposits are optional, this is not. Health insurers are required to accept people who are most in need and provide a wide range of health and social services.

It can be simple things like arranging an Uber to get to a medical appointment or buying a computer for an enrollee looking for a job. Or purchasing a bike for a low-income kid. But it also involves intensive, one-on-one work that can require case managers to take patients to get an identification card, make nighttime phone calls to ensure patients are taking medications, and hunt down available apartments.

“This is the missing piece, and it’s the hardest work — the most costly work,” Newsom said in an interview with KFF Health News. “People on the streets and sidewalks, they’ve lost trust. They’ve become socially isolated. They’ve lost connection, and so developing that is so foundational.”

‘My Own Prison’

McEwen, who was a tight end for the NFL team now known as the Washington Commanders and later for the San Diego Chargers, was hailed as a “legacy.” But playing professional football took an extreme toll.

“My position was to block for the quarterback, and back in the day, you were allowed to hit people in the head,” McEwen said, recalling regular concussions on the field that he’d snap himself out of by sniffing ammonia packets. He helped lead the Washington team to a Super Bowl victory in 1987, but in the decades since, his health has deteriorated.

McEwen has struggled for years to find regular work while dealing with thoughts of suicide, anger, forgetfulness, and depression that he says stem from traumatic brain injuries sustained during his football career. At 57, he endures continual pain from ruptured disks in his neck and spine, along with shortness of breath from severe heart disease.

He’d holed up in his apartment for years, with curtains nailed to his windows, drowning his pain with alcohol. “I basically created my own prison,” he said.

After he was evicted last July, a longtime friend swooped in to let him stay temporarily in a spare bedroom at his family’s house just outside San Diego. But McEwen’s financial and emotional struggle to find stable housing hasn’t ended.

“We don’t call it fear. Us ballplayers, we call it excitement,” McEwen said on a rainy morning in early March, his eyes swelling with tears. “I’m excited. I know what’s at stake. My life is at stake.”

Housing instability is just one part of it. He’d often forget to take his medications for high cholesterol and clogged arteries. He felt paralyzing anxiety and his brain was so scrambled he’d miss important doctor appointments — a side effect, he said, of the concussions.

McEwen knew he needed help.

He’d learned from a friend that California was helping Medi-Cal patients with not just medical needs but also social services, and he started making calls, insisting on getting in. “I said wait, you’re giving people a coach? Someone who can make appointments for me and go to my doctor visits with me?”

Weeks after receiving his eviction notice, his Medi-Cal insurer, Molina Healthcare, connected him with a personal care manager, whom McEwen calls “my advocate, someone who can teach me how to do for myself and give myself a life worth living.”

But who gets in the program is often a roll of the dice, depending largely on which Medi-Cal insurance company a person is enrolled in. Persistence plays a big role.

Despite early glimmers of hope, the rollout has been chaotic. Providers on the ground scramble to find any available housing for enrollees. Groups implementing the initiative say inadequate funding and dire health workforce shortages have severely constrained their ability to serve all those in need. And enrollment by health insurers is uneven, with some quickly approving new benefits for their members while others are denied. Some insurers provide on-the-spot Uber rides for doctor appointments while others offer only a bus pass.

“What is being offered is insufficient, and this program is not set up to support those who are actually the most vulnerable and need the most intensive support,” said Nancy Behm, associate director of CalAIM for a San Diego nonprofit called People Assisting the Homeless, or PATH.

Operating under contracts with Blue Shield of California, Molina Healthcare, and Health Net, PATH launched intensive case management and housing services in January 2022. But it has since stopped providing intensive case management benefits largely due to a lack of sufficient funding to do the grueling work of connecting with homeless people living in encampments. “We’re hitting barriers on every front,” Behm said.

Newsom, with his soaring political ambitions, is promising to help the most vulnerable Californians. Termed out in 2026, speculation is mounting that the two-term governor is eyeing a presidential run, and he’s using health care as a core issue to elevate his national profile. In reality, his Medi-Cal initiative is falling far short.

“This is an extremely ambitious program, but it doesn’t come close to helping the entirety of the population it’s targeting,” said Doug Herman, who worked for former President Barack Obama and former Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti. “This isn’t a policy solution big enough to really make a dent in homelessness.”

No Walk in the Park

On a brisk morning in late February, Jeannine Nash pulled into the drive-thru of a Jack in the Box in Chula Vista, just south of San Diego. She dug in her wallet to find $8.17 for 10 breakfast sandwiches to hand out to homeless people on her regular rounds visiting encampments.

“It helps me to come out here before work, to get an idea of what the needs are,” Nash said as she approached a nearby homeless woman slumped over on a sidewalk who had nothing with her but a brand-new walker and hospital discharge paperwork tucked in a plastic bag.

Nash is director of referrals for Serene Health, a for-profit health care company that is one of nearly 500 provider organizations being paid to link homeless people or those at risk with intensive case management, housing, and other services.

A recovering addict herself, Nash said her life experience has helped her connect with people living outside and struggling with substance use disorders. She figures out how to get those who appear resistant to accept services. “So many people are distrustful of authority,” said Nash, who has a son who is homeless.

“This is very, very dear to my heart,” Nash said. In her decades since becoming sober, she has gained deep experience getting the people most at risk of spiraling deeper into crisis into treatment beds and even apartments. She’s cultivated relationships with housing and nursing home agencies so she can quickly identify openings.

But her job comes with extraordinary challenges. She often has to level with people living outside, telling them there is simply nowhere for them to go. “There’s just not enough beds or housing out there,” she said. “And if you don’t have an income, it’s not going to happen.”

Nash handed the homeless woman in the doorway two sandwiches, coaxing her to eat. The woman, Christina Gallegos, 38, was suffering from extreme liver damage due to chronic drinking and had crawled the few blocks from Scripps Mercy Hospital in Chula Vista, where she was discharged the night before.

She had been in the emergency room, her hospital discharge paperwork showed — one of several ER trips she’d made in the past month. She was given the walker but couldn’t walk and dragged it into a doorway for shelter.

“We see this all the time. It’s getting really bad,” Nash said, texting her contacts to find a bed for Gallegos. “She’s definitely eligible. It’s just finding somewhere for her to go that is going to be hard.”

Gallegos has Medi-Cal but hasn’t been enrolled in the new benefits California is offering. She was among an estimated 8,500 homeless people identified in San Diego County in 2022, a 10% increase since 2020.

San Diego County is massive and populous, and while homeless encampments permeate suburban enclaves like Chula Vista, homeless people are largely clustered in San Diego’s downtown neighborhood and its parks.

One popular place to pitch a tent is Balboa Park near the San Diego Zoo. Its canyons and sprawling green lawns are peppered with tent communities, whose inhabitants plead for help from community groups. Many hang on to business cards from homeless outreach workers in hopes of scoring a shelter bed or permanent housing. While some people do get housing, many feel as if outreach efforts amount to broken promises.

One man, David Lloyd, pulled from his pocket a phone number for an outreach worker from the homeless services provider PATH, who told him that he was on a waiting list for housing but that he could be waiting in the queue for years.

“It’s a big list,” said Lloyd, 66. “I just want to get off the streets. I’m tired of the cops harassing me all the time.”

Cally Wood, 35, said she is addicted to fentanyl and has been on the waiting list for housing for more than a year. “It just feels really impossible,” she said. “There’s nothing affordable.”

Health insurance executives, including Martha Santana-Chin, Medi-Cal president for Health Net in California, said Medi-Cal managed-care plans are making progress in helping get people off the streets and into services. Yet she acknowledged the initial rollout falls short.

“We just don’t have the housing supply that we need,” Santana-Chin said, “to be confident that all of these folks who need support and services are going to get permanently placed.”

Hampered by Sweeps

Across the region, sweeps of homeless encampments are common and becoming part of everyday life for people living outside. Deteriorating and unsanitary conditions on the streets fuel public frustration.

Newsom has ratcheted up the practice of clearing encampments, arguing that people dealing with homelessness should not be allowed to live outdoors, despite a dearth of alternatives. He’s allocating state funding to cities and counties to remove tents from streets and sidewalks and move people into any shelter or housing available. San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria, also a Democrat, is unapologetic about adopting the approach.

“We’re doing the cleanups that are necessary for public safety,” Gloria told KFF Health News. “These conditions are unsanitary, and it puts people’s health and safety at risk, and it leads to people dying. Some people disagree with me under the guise of caring for these individuals, but the sidewalk is not a home.”

Outreach workers on the ground, however, say the enforcement crackdown only makes their jobs harder. One of the most critical goals of the new Medi-Cal initiative is to regularly visit people on the streets, build relationships with them, and help them with health care needs, all while preparing them for housing — if it becomes available.

“This really takes a lot of time. Sometimes you start with just bringing someone socks or a bottle of water. It can take 70 encounters for someone to accept our help,” said Andrea Karrer, an outreach worker with PATH. “But that time is what allows you to build trust with someone, and when they have to constantly move, you have to find that person, and sometimes start all over.”

And the disruptions ultimately cause people without housing to get sicker and visit the ER more often, she and other outreach workers said.

“When you have to move every two or three days, getting to the doctor or staying on medication is not the biggest priority. You’re in survival mode,” Karrer said.

A Labor-Intensive Effort

Serene Health is one of hundreds of providers enrolling Medi-Cal patients into intensive case management. Together, they have signed up 108,000 patients statewide so far, according to California’s Department of Health Care Services, which administers Medi-Cal. An additional 28,000 are receiving the new housing services such as security deposit payments and help identifying affordable housing.

“A lot of the stuff we’re doing is just really new to health care,” said Jacey Cooper, the state’s Medicaid director. She said that health insurers are offering housing services in all 58 counties, yet she acknowledged that the need exceeds capacity.

“It takes time for that infrastructure to come to fruition,” Cooper said of the challenge of identifying housing for Medi-Cal patients who frequent hospital ERs. “We are in a massive education moment of even making sure people understand who’s eligible and how to refer, and educating the entire delivery system, from hospitals to providers.”

Meanwhile, Newsom is asking the Biden administration for permission to add another housing benefit that would cover up to six months of direct rent payments.

Veronica Ortiz, a lead care manager for Serene Health, has Craig McEwen on her roster of about 60 patients — a large caseload that is difficult to manage.

But Ortiz bubbles with compassion and energy and said working with patients like McEwen has given her even more drive to make a difference. The work is arduous, but McEwen is quickly becoming more independent, she said.

“When we come into their lives, we’re strangers, so we have to spend a lot of time meeting face-to-face with people and helping with anything they need, otherwise they’re not going to trust us.”

But help didn’t come fast enough for Donna Fontenot, a San Diego County resident who is being evicted from her apartment this month. Her landlord told her she had to leave following repeated ER trips, hospitalizations, and skilled nursing home stays stemming from an initial fall in 2022 that left her in a wheelchair.

“I’m petrified and absolutely panicking, I have nowhere to go,” Fontenot said. With one hospitalization alone costing an average of $18,000 in California, Fontenot, who is on Medi-Cal, has racked up high health care costs.

She has been hospitalized eight times since March 2022, she said. And on five occasions, her injuries to her feet and legs were so extreme that she needed placement in a nursing home.

Yet her Medi-Cal insurer, the San Diego-based Community Health Group, instituted a rule that to qualify for some housing services, she must have a child under 18. So she isn’t receiving housing assistance that could help her. She is, however, enrolled in intensive case management. But she was not aware of that until KFF Health News informed her.

“I feel like I won the lottery,” she said. “Is it going to help me?”

Her care manager hasn’t been as involved in her life as Ortiz has been with McEwen. Fontenot continues to search on her own for housing, and recently asked to be switched into Serene Health to get more hands-on assistance. “I’ve never needed help like this before. I feel so broken,” she said in tears. “Where am I going to go?”

Today, Ortiz is helping McEwen search for housing. She also has focused on helping him get his heart condition under control and find more stable work.

In March, he landed a job as a security guard patrolling sporting events, including at football stadiums. And he scored a hard-to-get surgery appointment for late this month to help unclog the arteries in his heart.

“Before Veronica, I was waiting to die. I was eating and drinking to die. But she showed up for me. Somebody cared about me. And that gave me the courage to share with her what my dream would be,” McEwen said. “I thought I needed football to be loved — then I’d be worth it.

“But I know now that my true purpose is to be of service and to be there for my daughter. I decided to get back on the field, instead of sitting on the sidelines.”


This article was produced by KFF Health News, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation. 

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Subscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.

“This is an untenable position”: John Roberts refuses to testify despite Supreme Court scandals

Progressive critics have condemned the refusal of U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts to accept an invitation to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee over a string of alleged ethics violations by Justices on the Court, specifically Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.

Roberts finally responded late Tuesday night to an invitation issued over two weeks ago by Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who chairs the committee, following revelations that Thomas had accepted lavish gifts from a billionaire right-wing activist over the course of decades without disclosing them.

On Tuesday, Politico reported that Gorsuch had sold property to the head of a powerful law firm that has repeatedly had business before the Court without disclosing the identity of the purchaser.

“While the Supreme Court is on fire with scandals, Chief Justice John Roberts refuses to answer questions about the long list of troubling ethics issues undermining the credibility and integrity of our nation’s highest court.”

In his letter to Durbin on Tuesday, Roberts said he “must respectfully decline your invitation” and cited the separation of powers as the key reason he would not appear. But critics, including Democratic lawmakers and outside watchdogs, denounced the decision.

“Under Roberts, the Supreme Court has unraveled constitutional rights and seen several justices engage in corrupt financial arrangements. Now he is refusing to answer questions,” declared Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., in response. “How does Roberts expect SCOTUS to maintain authority if they reject accountability themselves?”

Ocasio-Cortez has been among those lawmakers in the House calling for Thomas to be investigated or impeached over the revelations contained in a pair of stories by Pro Publica this month.

“This is an untenable position,” said Kyle Herrig, president of the watchdog group Accountable.US, in response to Roberts’ refusal to appear.

“While the Supreme Court is on fire with scandals, Chief Justice John Roberts refuses to answer questions about the long list of troubling ethics issues undermining the credibility and integrity of our nation’s highest court,” Herrig continued. “We need urgent reform to restore public trust in our Court—and we need it now.”

In a statement in the wake of the Thomas’ revelations, Brett Edkins, managing director of policy and political affairs for Stand Up America, said that it will be up to Congress to seek judicial reforms to curb ethics violations that many argue have led to wholesale corruption on the Court.

“Thomas is unfit to serve on any court, let alone our nation’s highest court. His failure to disclose his close financial dealings with a GOP billionaire has single-handedly destroyed what little credibility this MAGA Court had left,” Edkins said.

“Congress has a constitutional duty to hold this Court in check,” he added. “Failing to hold Justice Thomas accountable, hold hearings, and pass a Supreme Court code of ethics would be a dereliction of that duty.”

Durbin has said the hearing on May 2 will go on with or without the participation of Roberts or the other Justices.

“I extended an invitation to the chief justice, or his designate, in an attempt to include the court in this discussion,” Durbin said. “But make no mistake: Supreme Court ethics reform must happen whether the court participates in the process or not.”

How watching others eat junk food can actually cut our appetite and help us lose weight

One evening, at home. You’re sat comfortably on the sofa, watching your favorite TV show. An ad comes up, showing a scrumptious burger in its full glory. The camera zooms into each ingredient: the crisp salad; the tender meat; the rich, creamy sauce; the crunchy French fries and one person enjoying this delightful flavor range. You think to yourself that your diet is about to take a hit. But we beg to differ.

In a series of studies published in the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, we found advertisements showing people eating junk food prompted people on a diet to eat less. While this may seem counterintuitive, these findings are in line with previous research on mental imagery. Recent studies show merely imagining ourselves carrying out actions or experiencing emotions activates similar neural networks to those linked with their actual performance or experience.

What happens when we imagine ourselves eating?

The images we are exposed to throughout our lives hold the power to shape our experiences to a remarkable degree. According to neuroimage studies, the mere sight of someone being hit by a hammer will fire up the neural networks in our brain that are associated with pain. As a result, these images will trigger emotions and behavior consistent with feelings of pain.

Such effects also extend to food consumption. The field of consumption imagery refers to rich images of food consumption – for example, an ad showing the close-up of a pizza and someone eating it. Some studies have even indicated consumption imagery could cause people to wrongly recall having eaten the food on display.

Why is this important? This is important because simply thinking that we have eaten something can make us feel full. In 2010, researchers asked people to picture themselves eating either 3 or 30 M&M’s chocolates. They then handed them a bowl of sweets to eat. People who had imagined themselves eating 30 of the button-shaped chocolates ended up feeling satiated and ate fewer sweets compared to those who imagined eating only 3. With our research, we decided to take this question to the next level and test if the effect holds when people see someone else eating in an ad.

If you are dieting, seeing someone eating makes you eat less

We invited 132 dieting students at our lab at the Grenoble Ecole de Management to watch an ad. Half of them saw an M&M’s advertisement brimming with consumption imagery: sweets, colors and a person eating them. The other half of the students saw an ad with two animated M&M’s at a supermarket till, devoid of consumption imagery. We then gave each student a 70g cup of M&M’s and asked them to eat to their heart’s content. Among the students, those who saw the M&M’s advertisement containing consumption imagery ate fewer sweets than those who saw the ad without.

We followed up this study with another one where 130 students saw an advertisement for a hamburger. Out of the volunteer pool, half were asked to visualize themselves eating the hamburger and the other half were asked to imagine filming it. Students then received a silver bag of chocolate-coated biscuits sticks to eat. Those who watched the ad and imagined eating the hamburger ate fewer chocolate-coated biscuits than those who only imagined filming it.

Both studies are proof that the mere sight of someone eating junk food or of junk food alone is enough to put dieters off it, at least for a time.

How can dieting campaigns help you eat less?

In the next study, we tested whether we could use these findings to promote healthy eating. We predicted that healthy eating promotion campaigns heavy on unhealthy consumption imagery would have a stronger effect on dieters. We designed four ads to incentivize healthy eating:

           
Credit: Mia Birau and Carolina O.C. Werle. Author provided
           
           
Credit: Mia Birau and Carolina O.C. Werle. Author provided
           
           
Credit: Mia Birau and Carolina O.C. Werle. Author provided
           
           
Credit: Mia Birau and Carolina O.C. Werle. Author provided
           

In total, 594 American adults were recruited to participate in our online study. Each participant was randomly selected to view one of the four ads. We then asked them to

imagine that you are about to have a snack and you open a bag of chips. There are 20 chips in the bag. How many potato chips would you eat RIGHT NOW?

People who viewed the campaign requiring them to imagine themselves wolfing down the French fries indicated a desire to eat fewer chips than those who were exposed to the French fries campaign without consumption imagery. Those who had imagined themselves eating an apple were more inclined to succumb to the potato chips than those who had visualized themselves eating the French fries.

These results go against the grain of current public policy practices that aim to promote healthy eating by relying on images of nutritious foods. However, our research indicates that healthy eating campaigns should include and portray the consumption of unhealthy food. Indeed, dieters imagining themselves eating junk food consciously associate it with a failure to reach their weight loss goals.

What is the takeaway for you?

Today people prioritize their health and well-being more and more. If you are one of the many who set dieting and healthier eating as their number 1 resolution for 2023, our tip to you is that you resist the urge to cover your eyes when seemingly tempting ads pop up. Instead, engage with them fully, imagining your lips reaching out to the prohibited food. As science would have it, this might just cut down your unhealthy eating habits.

Birau Mia, Associate Professor of Marketing, EM Lyon Business School and Carolina O.C. Werle, Professor of Marketing, Grenoble École de Management (GEM)

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

“He apologized”: The View’s Sunny Hostin says Don Lemon’s CNN firing was “undeserved”

Sunny Hostin called comparisons of Tucker Carlson’s termination from Fox News to Don Lemon’s from CNN a “false equivalency” in a “Salon Talks” interview on Tuesday.

Hostin, the co-host of “The View,” sat down with Salon to discuss racism, the challenges women face in the media industry and her take on Carlson on Monday’s episode of the talk show, saying “karma doesn’t lose anyone’s address” in response to news of the former Fox anchor’s departure.

“You get in this world what you put in and you get — that’s what you get in return. I’m a firm believer of that,” she said when asked about her reaction on “The View.”

Hostin, who has worked with both Carlson and Lemon, added that the comparison of the two former hosts is inaccurate because it solely comes from the fact that their terminations were announced on the same day, not on their individual characters or credibility.

“Tucker lied to his audience intentionally, right? And he did it for money, in my view,” she said, adding “I don’t think he believed most of what he was saying, but he did it anyway. He intentionally misled people and, in the process of that, helped in dividing this country a great deal and also, in a sense, helped with the degradation of our democracy.”

Hostin continued to admonish Carlson’s behavior as “unforgivable” for a “so-called journalist,” punctuating the jab with air quotes. 

She went on to describe her working relationship and 20-year friendship with Don Lemon, who was fired Monday for his history of sexist and misogynistic comments about women, defending him and labeling him an “actual journalist.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“I can say that my experience with Don was not an experience with a misogynist,” Hostin said, referencing his love and respect for his mother, his late sister, her and the other women she’s seen him interact with as examples of his true behavior. “I know that he made some comments that were ageist for sure and were sexist, but he apologized. I’ve never heard Tucker Carlson apologize for anything,” she added.

Hostin concluded her thoughts on Lemon, explaining her disappointment in a firing she feels was “underserved” and questioning the move as a result of cancel culture.

“I wonder if we are in the world now where, you know, I thought cancel culture had kind of gone away,” she said. “And how do you get canceled from your career of 17 years after you’ve apologized for something and done the work of making yourself a better person?”

Former prosecutor: Opening argument suggests Carroll’s “case will be powerful”

E. Jean Carroll’s lawyer, Shawn Crowley told the jury on Tuesday that her client is suing former President Donald Trump for raping her in a New York department store in 1996 to “clear her name, pursue justice, and get her life back” after Trump repeatedly denied the incident. 

The alleged assault nearly 30 years ago in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room has filled Carroll with fear and shame, the lawyer said Tuesday in a Manhattan federal court.

“The whole attack lasted just a few minutes, but it would stay with her forever,” Crowley said in her opening statement.

Carroll, a longtime magazine columnist, is suing Trump for battery and defamation. She alleges the former president raped her in the Manhattan luxury department store in the spring of 1996 and later defamed her when she went public with the allegations.

“Three women, one clear pattern,” Crowley said. “Start with a friendly encounter in a semi-public place. All of a sudden pounce, kiss, grab, grope. Don’t wait. When you are a star, you can do anything you want. And when they speak up about what happened, attack. Humiliate them. Call them liars. Call them too ugly to assault.”

Carroll testified on Wednesday following the testimony of Cheryl Beal, who worked at the department store.

“We can infer from opening statements that Carroll’s case will be powerful, supported by not only her own testimony but that of friends who spoke with her soon after the event as well as other victims of Trump’s alleged misconduct,” former federal prosecutor Kevin O’Brien told Salon.

Trump lawyer Joe Tacopina attacked Carroll, alleging that her account was untrue and accusing her of exploiting her story for personal gain.

“She became a celebrity and loved every minute of it,” Tacopina told the jury, which consists of three women and six men.

He continued to attack Carroll’s credibility, saying she filed the lawsuit out of political motivation, to sell a book and for public attention.

Caroll was “advancing a false claim of rape for money, for political reasons and for status,” Tacopina argued.

“The themes in the opening statements are not surprising,” former U.S. Attorney Barb McQuade, a law professor at the University of Michigan, told Salon.

Even though Carroll does not need to prove motive to prevail in this case, she added, the jury has to consider all the facts and make sense of the facts to render a verdict.

“Trump needs to come up with some reason that Carroll would put herself through this ordeal so many years after the alleged attack occurred,” McQuade said. “Selling books and making money is a potential motive that he can use to try to persuade the jury that she is lying.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Carroll sued Trump for defamation in 2019 and later added a charge of battery under a recently adopted New York law that provides adult sexual assault victims the opportunity to file civil lawsuits, even if the statutes of limitations have long expired.

Trump, who has repeatedly denied Carroll’s allegation, has said that the writer was not his “type” and was “totally lying.”

The former president’s counsel has laid out his strategy, which is built upon undermining Carroll’s credibility, O’Brien pointed out. Tacopina has suggested that Carrol waited decades before bringing these charges against Trump for self-serving reasons like fame, money and political hostility.

“Moreover, there appear to be gaps in her case,” O’Brien said. “She never secured the security footage from the store, or filed a police report or – a potentially critical point – noted the alleged incident in her own diary. Defense counsel will harp on these delays and omissions to suggest that enough is amiss here to undermine Carroll’s credibility.” 

In addition to Carroll testifying, the jury will also hear from two friends in whom Carroll confided as well as two former Bergdorf Goodman employees who worked at the store in 1996, Crowley said.

The jury will also see the “Access Hollywood” tape, in which Trump explicitly detailed how he groped women.

“You’ll hear him bragging about doing almost the same thing he did to Ms. Carroll to other women,” Carroll’s attorney said.

Trump has previously defended his language soon after the tape received public scrutiny, referring to his remarks as “locker room talk”.

While much of the trial will “hinge on the testimony” of the two other alleged victims, O’Brien said, “the most important witness is Carroll herself.” 

“Her candor and recollection of key details will be closely weighed by the jurors, as well as signs of the trauma she allegedly suffered,”  O’Brien said. “Her cross-examination could be an ordeal.”

“I’m not trying to fool anybody”: From Elvis to Zod, Michael Shannon is versatile but no chameleon

Michael Shannon isn’t an actor who disappears into his characters. It’s more they disappear into him.

Whether he’s playing Elvis or General Zod, he doesn’t try to duplicate whatever popular image you already have of the person. Instead, he’d rather try to show you something you don’t know. “It’s not so much to try and fool you into thinking that I’m them,” he said on “Salon Talks. “But it’s trying to communicate what the experience of being them is like.”

Now, in the Showtime limited series “Waco: The Aftermath,” the two-time Academy Award nominee reprises his role as Gary Noesner, the FBI negotiator during the infamous 1993 Texas siege. In “Aftermath,” Noesner is dealing with the fallout of the botched raid, and investigating the growing rise of domestic terrorism in America.

Noesner, now retired and a consultant on the series, “calls me his doppelganger,” said Shannon, adding, “It’s funny because we don’t look alike necessarily or even sound alike all that much.” Maybe it’s because he figured out the shared skill set that put the two men at the top of their professions, and has helped Shannon embody both Elvis Presley and George Jones, a feat Shannon says “is ridiculous.” Shannon also opened up to us about why he has empathy for General Zod, and his latest project that’s putting him behind the camera for a change.

Watch the “Salon Talks” episode with Michael Shannon here or read our conversation below.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity and length.

This show takes place in the aftermath of Waco and the landscape in America with the rise of extremism and domestic terrorism. Tell me about the world that your character FBI agent Gary Noesner is now inhabiting, and who he is when we meet him in this different place in his life.

I think Gary’s still picking up the pieces a little bit. Waco is such a catastrophic event, and definitely wasn’t all his fault or anything. But it was just a lot to process there, going through that, and definitely wanting to avoid having that happen again in the future. It’s not the kind of thing you want to have happened twice, let alone once. So probably very hyper-aware and wondering how Waco is going to manifest in the zeitgeist or affect the zeitgeist consciousness of the country.

This story tells us the origins in many ways of where we are right now. When you were doing the research for this, how much of the story did you already know? Were there things that surprised you about connecting those dots to where we are now in this country? 

“Acting and negotiating have a fair amount in common, oddly enough.”

Obviously, I remember when it happened, but my exposure to it when it happened was very limited to whatever was on television. I think that’s the way they wanted it. In order to find out much about it, you really have to go looking for it. They don’t want it to just be general knowledge, which is why Gary Noesner writing his book “Stalling for Time,” was a real generous thing for him to do, to illuminate things that we probably wouldn’t know about otherwise or wouldn’t consider otherwise. I was coming at it originally from probably a very similar place to anyone else, in that I just remembered it was an upsetting thing that I had seen on television.

You’ve played a lot of real people, but not so many real people who are still around and are consultants on the projects that you’re working on, like Gary Noesner is. What was it like working with him again? What kind of a relationship do you have with someone knowing that you have been given the responsibility or the privilege of playing him?

That could be very nerve-wracking, but Gary’s such a lovely person. He’s really easy to be around and he calls me his doppelganger. It’s funny because we don’t look alike necessarily or even sound alike all that much, but he seems to trust me and he seems to enjoy watching the fruits in my labor, even if he doesn’t always think it’s exactly the way it happened.

He’s smart enough to know that there are going to be some differences between his life experience and what’s on the show, and he doesn’t mind that as long as he feels like it’s in general telling a story that means something to him. And so far I think it is. But I could pick up the phone right now and start texting with him. He’s always sending me pictures of when he goes on vacation or whatever. He’s just a real sweet guy, particularly considering what he’s been through.

As this series shows, what happened in Waco, Texas in 1993 was just part of his life story.

He’s seen it in all different magnitudes, from something as big as Waco to even just a domestic dispute and everything in between. He is retired now and he seems very much at peace. I don’t know how he did it, but that’s how he seems.

What did he teach you or what did you learn from him about the art of negotiation? Do you use that now going forward in your acting?

Not to over oversimplify it, but it’s really about two fundamental things that are quite basic and anybody can do them. One is to listen. Listening is also one of the primary building blocks of acting, so there’s a good overlap there. I think great listening is something that people take for granted. To really listen to somebody and consider why they’re saying what they’re saying and why they’re doing what they’re doing, it’s not something that can really be taught so much.

A lot of it’s very instinctual, but the other is just having empathy for other people, having the capacity to imagine what it’s like to be someone else and be in their position. Again, another also has in common with one of the foundations of acting. I guess acting and negotiating have a fair amount in common, oddly enough.

You’ve played so many real life people, from Elvis to George Jones to Richard Kuklinski. What is the side of that person that you’re trying to get to or communicate as an actor?

I’m not trying to do an impersonation. It doesn’t mean that I don’t study the person abundantly. Anytime I’m playing someone where I have the materials that I can study them, I do. If it’s a book I can read, if it’s a video I can watch, if it’s an interview I can listen to, anything I can get my hands on.

“The fact that I played Elvis and George Jones is ridiculous. You should either be able to play one or the other.”

A good way to talk about it is when I did the Elvis movie, I was hanging out with Jerry Schilling, who was Elvis’s friend. I had a lot of trepidation going into that one. I was like, “I don’t know Jerry, I don’t know if I can do this. I don’t really look like Elvis or sound like Elvis.” Jerry basically just said, “Look, I don’t really care. There’s a lot of people in the world who have put a lot of effort into looking and sounding like my friend and being able to convince people that they are a version of my friend. But very few people, very few people have actually thought about what it was like to be my friend, what it was like to be him, what it must have felt like.”

That was a big turning point for me in that project, because I went from being scared to death of doing it to it being the only thing I wanted to do because what he said made a lot of sense. That’s my basic marching orders anytime I’m playing a real person. It’s not so much to try and fool you into thinking that I’m them, but it’s trying to communicate what the experience of being them is like. Because logic dictates, unless you’re, I don’t know, Lon Chaney Jr. or something that, you can only look like so many different people. I mean, the fact that I played Elvis and George Jones is ridiculous. You should either be able to play one or the other. But I guess I’m not trying to fool anybody into thinking that I’m anybody other than who I am, but I am trying to imagine what it felt like to be them.

You play a lot of really, really scary guys. The guy who the audience is specifically not supposed to root for. What is it about the antagonist that appeals to you?

I don’t know. I’m at a loss for words and it’s not like I don’t understand your question. Your question is a very understandable, sensible question. I guess this sounds like a cop-out, but I just never really think of it that way. The way I look at it is that every character is the protagonist of their own story. What creates an antagonist isn’t the character or the actor, it’s the filmmaker or the person that’s making the story. They’re the ones saying, “This is the protagonist, this is the antagonist.” 

“Every character is the protagonist of their own story.”

As an actor playing a part, I’m not thinking about that at all. One of the reasons I was interested in playing General Zod, is because to me, he wasn’t an antagonist. The world in which he is from, he is the protagonist. All he’s trying to do is save his civilization, which is his job. It just so happens that in the context of the story of “Man of Steel,” he winds up being the antagonist because we’re here on Earth and we’re like, “Oh no, don’t hurt us.” But I think that’s important. That’s an important delineation because it applies to how people behave on Earth and how people relate to one another on Earth is, everybody’s the center of their own universe. 

He is God. And Zod is coming back.

Zod is coming back. He’s going to be in “The Flash.” They spilled the beans at the Super Bowl. I was surprised they did that. You’d think they’d want it to be some big surprise, but what are you going to do? Yes, he’s coming back.

In addition to everything else you’ve got going on, you have directed your first feature yourself. Can you tell me a little bit about “Eric Larue”?

Of course, I’d love to. Eric Larue is a teenage boy. I think he’s 17, 18. One day he goes to school and he shoots three of his classmates, and he winds up going to prison. So he’s in prison. The movie is about his mom Janice, who is played by Judy Greer, and his dad Ron, who’s played by Alexander Skarsgard, and how their lives have changed because of what their son did and how they’re trying to cope with it or figure out, well, what do we do now? It explores a lot about religion and explores a lot of stuff. But yeah, that’s the thumbnail version of it.

“Waco: The Aftermath” new episodes stream on Fridays and on Showtime on Sundays. 

“Entirely inappropriate”: Judge rebukes Trump over E. Jean Carroll attack on Truth Social

The judge presiding over advice columnist E. Jean Carroll’s rape and defamation civil lawsuit chastised former President Donald Trump for comments he posted on Truth Social an hour before the trial resumed Wednesday.

In his posts, Trump discussed the lawsuit twice, claiming that Carroll’s lawyer was a “political operative” and labeling the suit a scam, The New York Times reports. 

Judge Lewis Kaplan called Trump’s posts “entirely inappropriate,” suggesting that Trump could be attempting to influence the jury. The judge had previously told the parties’ legal teams to “inform your clients and witnesses to please refrain from making any statements that are likely to incite violence or civil unrest” on Tuesday, the day the trial began. 

“Your client is basically endeavoring certainly to speak to his quote-unquote public,” Kaplan said on Wednesday, appearing to reference a pretrial debate over DNA evidence, “but more troublesome, to the jury in this case, about stuff that has no business being spoken about.”

After the evidence disclosure deadline passed in February, Trump’s lawyers offered up a DNA sample in exchange for parts of the report about genetic material found on Carroll’s dress during the incident. The judge, however, declined, calling the move a stalling tactic.

When Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, informed the judge of Trump’s posts, he reminded the court that Trump has refused to give a sample for three years.

Trump’s lawyer Joe Tacopina, who said that he did not know of the posts, assured Judge Kaplan that he would do his best to get Trump “to refrain from any further posts regarding this case.”

Kaplan responded in kind, telling Tacopina that “we’re getting into an area conceivably in which your client may or may not be tampering with a new source of potential liability — and I think you know what I mean,” possibly referring to a potential contempt sanction.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Although I don’t expect Judge Kaplan to take any direct action against Trump for his bizarre posts on Truth Social during the trial, it’s apparent that Kaplan is (rightfully) upset,” former federal prosecutor and CNN legal analyst Renato Mariotti tweeted about the situation. “It’s not going to help Trump’s team when the judge is considering a close call, that’s for sure.”

Former U.S. attorney and MSNBC legal analyst Joyce Vance warned that judges “don’t like it when parties comment on cases publicly while there’s a jury in the box. Trump can’t be bothered to be in the court room & has said he won’t testify–probably afraid of cross ex. It’s easier to take cheap, untrue shots on social media.”

The trial is set to last one to two weeks, though it remains unclear whether Trump will testify. 

The case, filed after New York passed a law last May allowing adult assault victims an opportunity to file civil cases, revolves around Carroll’s 2019 memoir, in which she details the mid-1990s encounter with Donald Trump in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room.

Trump denied that he assaulted Carroll in 2019, saying that she was “totally lying” and deeming the allegations a hoax.

Carroll subsequently sued Trump for both battery and defamation.

Fox reportedly has a secret “oppo file” with dirt on Tucker Carlson: They “keep a file on everybody”

Fox News executives have compiled an “oppo file” of supposed dirt on Tucker Carlson, sources in and close to the network told Rolling Stone.

One of the eight sources, a former on-air Fox personality, told the outlet that Carlson and some of the channel’s executives are separating on “the worst” and “messiest possible terms,” a claim that counters the network’s earlier assertion that Carlson’s separation was amicable.

The network, which announced the anchor’s departure on Monday, is holding on to the file in preparation for a potential attack from Carlson following his departure, two sources alleged.

The file, assembled by Fox and its communications department, includes complaints regarding Carlson’s workplace conduct, allegations that he created a toxic workplace environment and disparaging comments Carlson made about his colleagues and managers, three of the sources said.

The network, however, denied the existence of the file in a statement to Rolling Stone.

“This is patently absurd and categorically false,” a Fox spokesperson reportedly said. “We thank Tucker for his service to the network as a host, and prior to that, as a contributor.”

The report comes amidst former “Tucker Carlson Tonight” producer Abby Grossberg’s lawsuit against the network, which also levies claims of a toxic and misogynistic work environment. The suit alleges lewd and misogynist behavior by Carlson’s team, including allegations that Carlson’s staff made inappropriate jokes about Jewish people and derogatorily referred to women. Grossberg claims she saw several images of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. in a revealing bathing suit displayed around the workplace.

Fox also denied these claims.

“FOX News Media engaged an independent outside counsel to immediately investigate the concerns raised by Ms. Grossberg, which were made following a critical performance review,” a spokesperson for the network said in a statement. “Her allegations in connection with the Dominion case are baseless and we will vigorously defend Fox against all of her claims.” 

Though it’s unclear what could prompt Fox to release the damaging information from the file to the public, slamming network leadership can push the network to retaliate, according to the sources, an action signified by its history of running unsavory stories about former personnel.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Carlson was revealed to have sent texts to other Fox staff bashing other talent in the court filing from Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation suit against Fox, which the latter settled for $787.5 million last week.

The sources also said that the network’s communication department’s leader, Irena Briganti, is known for her aggressive PR methods for tamping down internal dissent, assertions that sources in New York Magazine’s 2016 story “The Silencing of Fox News’ Powerful Publicist Irena Briganti” also seems to support.

“Irena tries to keep a file on everybody.… ,” an ex-anchor for Fox claimed. “Any talent like Tucker would have a lot of things; other people complaining. They encourage it, and then just keep it on file. It’s just a classic dirty trick.”

“[Briganti] keeps files on everybody to screw with them,” another former host added. “It’s classic Fox.”