David Thomson

Three women

In "Croupier" the most seductive female character is the least perfect.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Three women

In “Croupier” — easily the smartest movie around at the moment — the title character, Jack Manfred (Clive Owen), has three women. All are odd, all very fuckable. He lives with Marion (Gina McKee); Bella (Kate Hardie) is another dealer at the casino; and Jani (Alex Kingston) is a customer.

Bella is the least likely to be the “looker” — if you look quickly. She’s a bag of pale scrawn, with breasts like service flaps stuck on her chest. (We see this as she changes her clothes in front of Jack.) She wears heavy spectacles and her hair is just a drab cloche dropped on her head. But she’s got a terrific overbite upper lip, the curve of which rhymes with the tip of her nose. It’s the sort of thing most American women would have surgery to remove. Bella sticks it out. And her rather flat, insolent manner seems to say, “Look at it, doesn’t it take your breath away?” What would it feel like to be kissed by it, do you think? Are you thinking? her gaze asks. In America, with all its cosmetic devoutness, a little bit of physical imperfection is like heaven.

Well, Jack’s a winner at the casino. He’s done it before; he loves to watch others lose, and he enjoys the strict rules — no gambling yourself, no palsies with customers, no dickering with other dealers. Of course, he breaks all the rules. And he’s writing a novel about the whole thing, to be called “I Croupier.” Plus he has that long, fresh look of a hot poker just plunged in ice water.

One night at the club he calls a customer for cheating, and the guy vows vengeance. Then another night this guy is waiting outside and there’s a nasty fight. But Bella rescues him, and takes him back to her place. She sees his blood and the bruising — and it’s like, “click!”: the thought of the pain, the colors of violence.

We know Bella had been on the game once — and she only did S&M. And she and Jack are on the kitchen floor, like two puppies, doing anything to get inside each other fast, so they can sleep. Wriggling, squirming, getting their stupid legs out of the way and his foot-and-a-half in.

Fabulous scene. See the rest. It’s directed by Mike Hodges; written by Paul Mayersberg.

Nasty Michelle

You've got to worry when the sexiest thing in theaters this week is a preview for a movie coming in July.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Nasty Michelle

The project sounded simple enough. Each week I would search my viewing for some enticingly sexy moment — a turn-on of the week. All this would be a way of indicating that there is alarmingly little old-fashioned sex in our movies anymore. And wondering why.

Still, I was surprised how hard it was to find a starter. How could anyone endure Demi Moore’s “mirror, mirror on the walls/who can tell me? Where are my balls?” in “A Passion of Mind”? I was half-tickled by the way, in “Gladiator,” Connie Nielsen’s costume took on the ribbons of bondage, as if to say, “Notice me! Undress me!” I guessed that there’d be at least a hint of Tom Cruise’s floppy-haired self-satisfaction in “M:i-2,” but that felt too odd for a first shot. What could I use?

Then it happened — the real thing, if you can trust a trailer. I want to see “What Lies Beneath” (which doesn’t open until July 21) because, for the first time since “The Fabulous Baker Boys” and her Catwoman, someone seems to have realized that Michelle Pfeiffer is a sexpot waiting to blow, particularly if you stroke her the wrong way.

Her flame has been turned down and down in films where she suffers, worries or acts nobly. And while I don’t understand “What Lies Beneath” yet (this could be the rapture before dismay), there are unmistakable signs that she isn’t just the nice wife but a green-eyed craves-it that Harrison Ford was dumb enough to spurn once before. There are shots in the trailer where she gets very nasty and hungry and shows every inclination of eating her way down to Harrison’s bone. When Pfeiffer looks at Harrison, it’s as if her very eyes have sucked him dry already. And sex in movies begins and ends with the essential erogenous zone — the eyes.

I know, director Robert Zemeckis has never done sex before, and I’m not filled with seed on his behalf. Worse, Ford has acquired a Gregory Peck-like way of urging his women to calm down — as if he were fearful of being caught up in a skin riot.

But Pfeiffer has seemed oddly aimless in recent years for a big star, until her wicked eyes click in on the target. More than that, it’s about time on-screen that a flat-out raver took a wholesome union and a complacent male and ripped them apart until the audience howled like wolves.

Don’t tell me it’s all a misunderstanding, Mr. Zemeckis.

Continue Reading Close

Page 19 of 19 in David Thomson