Spring Offer: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Magma world: A volcanic planet is “constantly exploding” with molten lava, astronomers announce

Like a giant exploding ember floating in space, a planet made of molten lava and covered in active volcanoes was recently described in The Astronomical Journal. Known as TOI-6713.01, the exoplanet was first spotted by UC Riverside astrophysicist Dr. Stephen R. Kane using NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, or TESS. It is part of a star system known as HD 104067, one which is already roughly 66 light years away from our sun.

Like Earth TOI-6713.01 is a rocky planet, but it is almost one-third larger than our home and has a temperature of 2,600 degrees Kelvin, making it hotter than even certain stars. The properties of TOI-6713.01 are perhaps most similar to those of the Jovian moon Io, where scientists recently discovered a lava lake as smooth as glass.

“This is a terrestrial planet that I would describe as Io on steroids,” Kane said in a statement about TOI-6713.01. “It’s been forced into a situation where it’s constantly exploding with volcanoes. At optical wavelengths you would be able to see a glowing, red-hot planet with a molten lava surface.”

TOI-6713.01 has all of this volcanic activity in part because of its unusual orbit. Two other planets in TOI-6713.01's vicinity are constantly squeezing and pushing on it in an effect called tidal energy, crushing its service and giving it an extremely eccentric orbit. The end result is similar to two people swatting a ball with their paddles so often that, despite its massive size, it becomes disfigured.

"The new planet has a mass similar to Uranus and is in an eccentric ∼14 days orbit," the scientists write.

Trump tries to get around his gag order, praising “surrogates” who “beautifully” attack witnesses

If you gag one mouth, three more shall appear.

While Donald Trump has been prevented by Judge Juan Merchan from going after witnesses and jurors in his hush money trial, the former president’s Republican allies have become his attack dogs.

On Monday, as Michael Cohen testified, three lawmakers —Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala. and Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y. — attacked him outside the courthouse.

Vance called Cohen a “convicted felon” who admitted that he secretly recorded his former employer. “Does any reasonable, sensible person really believe anything that Michael Cohen says?” Vance asked. What the senator failed to note in his complaint was the context in which Cohen recorded Trump: to reassure David Pecker, the former publisher of the National Enquirer, that they were acting in good faith with respect to a $150,000 hush payment to Playboy model Karen McDougal.

Tuberville also took a stab at Cohen’s credibility. “I’m sitting here listening to a guy on the stand that they had to get out of house arrest because he lied in another court to testify in this court,” Tuberville said. Here, the senator was just plain wrong: Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to Congress, not in a court, and he was released from home confinement in 2021 (he was sentenced to three years in prison for his own role in the hush money scheme).

Turberville, taking another page from Trump, also suggested that the people he saw inside the Manhattan courtroom were not Americans. “I am disappointed in looking at the American — supposedly American citizens — in that courtroom, that the D.A. comes in and acts like it’s his Super Bowl,” he said.

Malliotakis, for her part, called Cohen a “convicted disbarred perjurer.”

We need your help to stay independent

Trump's surrogates also went after the judge and his family, citing the fact that Merchan's daughter works for a company that has worked for Democrats. Trump has claimed that poses a conflict of interest, an argument rejected by judges who examined the evidence.

Vance, considered a potential vice president pick, asserted that "the judge inside — his daughter is … raising money for Donald Trump’s political opponents."

That followed an attack last Thursday from Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., who outside the Manhattan courthouse called Merchan's daughter a "political operative" and declared that one prosecutor's spouse has donated to Democrats "and I think to Biden." Trump and his allies have repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that the New York state legal system is being run by and for President Joe Biden.

Trump has been pleased with the performance, telling reporters Tuesday that he has "a lot of surrogates and they are speaking very beautifully."

“They come from all over … and they think this is the biggest scam they’ve ever seen,” Trump said.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Trump seems to be testing the limit of his gag order, disclaiming responsibility for what his surrogates say. Scott himself denied that the former president has told him what to say. “No, I’m fed up,” he insisted last week.

It could be a savvy move, relying on surrogates, at least if the court believes that Trump is not putting the words in their mouths.

“They can say whatever they want to say,” former federal prosecutor David Weinstein told the Associated Press. “They are not bound by a gag order.”

But some argue that what the former president deems very beautiful speech might be a violation of his gag order. Joyce Alene, a former U.S. attorney under President Barack Obama, posted on X: “The gag order prohibits Trump from making comments about jurors/witnesses and also from causing others to make them.”

Ultimately whether that's the case will be up to Merchan. In the meantime, though, Trump continues to benefit from a corps of GOP politicians willing to do what his wife Melania has not: show up to court. On Tuesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., made his own appearance. Speaking to reporters in Manhattan, Johnson declared that he had come "on my own, to support President Trump, because I am one of hundreds of millions of people and one citizen who is deeply concerned about this."

“Don’t worry, I’m the president”: Cohen says Trump assured him AG was “in his pocket” after raid

It was April 2018, and the FBI had just raised the home of former Trump fixer Michael Cohen.

The raid came at a time of federal scrutiny over Cohen — including the legality of Cohen's hush money payments on behalf of then-President Donald Trump, and whether they constituted an illegal campaign contribution.

At the time, The New York Times reported that the FBI had seized documents related to payments to adult film star and director Stormy Daniels.

On Tuesday on the witness stand, Cohen testified that he was freaking out.

He at one point described his emotional state: "Destroyed. Nervous. Concerned."

Cohen said he got a reassuring call from Trump: "Don't worry, I'm the president of the United States, there's nothing here. Stay tough. You'll be okay."

Cohen said he "wanted reassurance that the President, Mr. Trump, had my back."

"I felt reassured because I had the president of the United States protecting me," Cohen said. "His justice department should go nowhere and so I felt reassured and I remained in the camp."

Cohen said Trump assured him that then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions was "in his pocket."

Cohen said he told National Enquirer publisher David Pecker not to worry about any FEC probe into the payment to Daniels.

"I told him… do not worry, we have this thing under control, it's taken care of," Cohen said.

In 2018, watchdog group Common Cause filed a complaint claiming the payment was an “in-kind contribution” to Trump’s campaign. But the FEC failed to support their general counsel’s recommendation to investigate amid partisan deadlock in 2021.

Cohen in 2018 pleaded guilty in Manhattan federal court to eight counts that included one count of causing an unlawful campaign contribution, and another count of an excessive campaign contribution, in connection with the payment to Daniels.

Stewart mocks Bob Menendez’s “cartoonish” gold bars as other lawmakers cash in on “legal corruption”

Jon Stewart put New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez in the hot seat over his upcoming corruption and bribery trial while highlighting the many ways other politicians use legal financial ways to engage in corruption without any checks and balances put in place.

On Monday's episode of "The Daily Show," Stewart didn't hold back, irony dripping in every word when he said, "I don't mean to get sentimental here, but in what other country in the world can a Cuban-American can work hand-to-hand with an Egyptian-born businessman to corner the halal meat market? Living in America!"

Menendez and his wife Nadine Menendez were indicted for allegedly accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes in exchange for the senator’s influence. Stewart highlighted some of Menendez's most egregious alleged crimes, which include the senator accepting up to $100,000 worth of gold bars, $480,000 in cash, a Mercedes-Benz car and bribes from business people connected to Egypt and Qatar's governments.

Stewart pointed to a New York Times report in which Menendez's attorneys cited his "traumatic family history" for the reason that he keeps an unprecedented amount of cash in his home. 

“These are simply my emotional-support gold bars,” Stewart joked. “Whenever I’m not with them, I get anxious and will respond to trauma in different ways.”

"So obvious this is shaping up to be one of the more cartoonishly blatant corruption cases in some time. Jersey guy with gold bars stuffed in his jacket and a nice freezer of halal meats. Anything else that may speak to the character of this United States Senator?" Stewart quipped.

The show clarified that Menendez has denied all allegations of wrongdoing, and according to court filings, he may even try to blame his wife.

"Yes, it's those three magic words every woman is dying to hear," Stewart quipped. "It was her!"

Stewart continued, “But perhaps the dumbest thing about this entire, not-quite-believable, 'Real Housewives' episode, is how unnecessary it all is.”

“You, sir, are an elected official in America’s most respected legislative body. It’s like a license to print money. You don’t need to break the law so cartoonishly when the legal corruption in the Senate is so f***ing lucrative,” the host said.

This led Stewart to introduce the show’s latest segment: “Senator Robert Menendez, ‘How dumb is you?'”

We need your help to stay independent

After calling Menendez "f***ing dumb," Stewart showcased many ways that the senator could have enriched himself in legal ways in America including the stock market. Stewart used California politician Alan Lowenthal, whose wife sold shares of Boeing in 2020. The next day the committee Lowenthal works on released a damning report about the 737 Max. Another example is how Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., received a "private briefing in 2020 about how bad the COVID pandemic was going to be for America and he immediately sold off his stock." Also, "Chuck Grassley netted $370,000 in farm subsidies,” Stewart added.

“At every turn, our Congress and our courts have been given a choice,” Stewart said, “Be less corrupt or redefine what constitutes corruption and get on with your bad selves. It's a game of reverse limbo. Having trouble getting under the bar of corruption we've set?” Stewart said as he raised his arms, setting a higher metaphorical bar, "Well, how about now?"

Stewart concluded, “Robert Menendez’s gold bars in exchange for favorable legislation is obviously cartoonishly corrupt, but for anyone out there who thinks the status quo of government patronage and influence is of an entirely different species than Menendez … How dumb is you?”

"The Daily Show" airs Monday through Thursday at 11 p.m. on Comedy Central and streams on Paramount+

Michael Cohen testimony: Trump promised payments in Oval Office meeting

Former Trump attorney and fixer Michael Cohen said Tuesday the former president promised he would get a check during a February 2017 meeting in the Oval Office.

"I was sitting with President Trump and he asked me if I was okay, he asked me if I needed money," Cohen said during his testimony. "And I said: 'No, I'm okay.' He said 'okay.'"

Cohen then said that Trump told him he would receive a check for January and February.

Cohen also told him to "deal with Allen" — referring to former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg.

The prosecution's case hinges on whether Trump schemed to silence salacious stories with hush-money payments made by Cohen, and then reimburse Cohen

Jurors saw an October 2016 bank statement from Michael Cohen’s LLC that showed a $130,000 payment to adult film star and director Stormy Daniels’ lawyer Keith Davidson’s PLC.

Prosecutors also displayed handwritten notes that they allege show Weisselberg's calculations to reimburse Cohen with monthly $35,000 payments over the course of 2017.

Former Trump Organization controller Jeff McConney testified that Weisselberg told him the payments should be “grossed up” to help cover Cohen’s state, federal and city taxes.

“Very minimal”: Cohen says he did little work for Trump in 2017 when he was paid $420K

Former Trump fixer Michael Cohen testified Tuesday that the checks and invoices for his 2017 payments from Trump falsely stated he was providing legal services to the former president each month.

Cohen said he instead did "very minimal" work for Trump, as well as his wife Melania, in 2017.

According to Cohen, that work included reviewing the particulars of a deal to add Melania's likeness to Madame Tussauds wax museum.

"I reviewed an agreement that Madame Tussauds had sent to her that was to create her likeness and image for their museum," Cohen said.

Prosecutor Susan Hollinger asked: "Was it a substantial amount of time?"

Cohen said: "No ma'am," adding that it was not enough work for him to send an invoice.

Cohen said he also worked with another Trump attorney who was handling Summer Zervos, who had sued Trump for defamation.

All told, Cohen said he did less than 10 hours of legal work for Trump in 2017.

He said he didn't bill for any of those matters.

"I didn't expect to be paid and it was very minimal work," Cohen said.

Cohen said he also didn't bill for legal work he did for Trump in 2018.

He also said he made $4 million in consulting and advisory work for other clients in 2017 and 2018, and said that his title as special attorney to Trump helped him get such work.

“Top Chef”: All about the “brilliance” of Amanda’s vegan gumbo with kombu

While this season’s “Restaurant Wars” seemed a bit anemic, there were still some excellent dishes. Dan’s winning smoked walleye, Dan’s carrot-centric take on clam chowder, Savannah’s chawanmushi, Manny’s mole and Soo’s rice cakes all garnered high acclaim, but one that stood out particularly for me was Amanda’s vegan gumbo z'herbes with greens, grilled mushrooms and kombu. 

While judge Tom Colicchio initially said it was good, though it "doesn't eat like gumbo,” he later called the idea of using kombu as the central flavoring ingredient in a vegan gumbo "brilliant." 

As Amanda showed, kombu is an ideal entrant in the vegan kitchen, adding a certain umami and saltiness that can mimic the sea after all, as Kristen Kish put it when she tried the dish, "kombu is part of the sea . . . the home." 

Kombu can offer the flavor of the sea while remaining entirely vegan, imparting a unique, deep salinity and richness.

Also, don't confuse it with nori! While both seaweed, they have some customary differences. Kombu hails from kelp and is thicker and more substantial, while nori is derived from red algae. The world of seaweed is fascinating and myriad, a tapestry of varying textures and flavors, but kombu and nori are usually the most recognized. 

Emily Han writes in The Kitchn that kombu is a staple Japanese ingredient that is "a seaweed that makes for a versatile pantry ingredient, providing dishes with umami flavor, nutrients, and minerals." In most instances, kombu is used to flavor a broth or stock, or in certain cases, cooked with bonito flakes to make dashi, the fundamental, classic Japanese broth that is the base of countless recipes.

As Alexa Weibel writes in The New York Times, dashi is a "cornerstone of Japanese cuisine" and "has smoky, salty, savory notes and tastes restorative on its own, but more often contributes depth to many traditional Japanese recipes, used as one might use any other broth to build flavor." (Weibel also writes that dashi tastes "oceanic but not overtly fishy.”) Dashi is also the base of the Japanese stalwart, any and all miso soups. 

We need your help to stay independent

Han notes that kombu is "mildly salty and subtly sweet [and] contains glutamic acid (the basis of monosodium glutamate, or MSG), which enhances flavor and tenderizes proteins.” In addition to its customarily flavoring soups, batters and stews, along with anything cooked in liquids — braises, beans, grains — it can also be roasted or crisped, ground and used as a condiment. They can also be steamed, simmered or even stuffed, such as in the traditional dish kobumaki. 

In Saveur, Michael Anthony of Gramercy Tavern in New York City, wrote that kombu "typifies the savory flavor known as umami" and adds a "not so much ocean-y as earthy" flavor to his Spelt Spaghetti with Kombu and Onion Broth. In this recipe at Food & Wine, David Chang "pulverizes the kombu to a powder and blends it with softened butter to baste striped bass fillets." 

In Serious Eats, Becky Selengut gives a primer on seaweed, comparing kombu to wakame, dulse, arame, and of course, nori, noting that seaweed is actually "a colloquial term that refers to red, brown and green algae." Selegut also writes that kombu is "notoriously meaty and valued for its concentration of umami." She also advises "sandwich[ing] raw fish fillets between two pieces of kelp and refigerat[ing] for an hour or two to firm up the flesh and add umami," a unique way to prepare the fish before cooking. 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


Kombu is also an unassuming health boost; as noted by Dr. Josh Axe with Dr. Axe, it "offers tons of minerals, such as calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, vanadium and zinc." It also offers iodine, vanadium and may even aid in lowering the risks of T2 diabetes by "convert[ing] existing blood sugars into storable starches." It's a pretty top tier ingredient.

Certainly not the most ostentatious or flashy ingredient, kombu is an undeniable flavor weapon to have in your arsenal — and maybe it’s now time for it to get some spotlight. Try using it at home, either in a super simple dashi or maybe in a kombu-imbued rice pilaf, a crispy okonomiyaki, or perhaps even take inspiration from Amanda and make a vegan gumbo. Maybe it’ll even be “brilliant” like hers

“Out of loyalty”: Michael Cohen details the many times he lied for Trump

Former Trump fixer Michael Cohen said he lied about his role in paying off adult film star and director Story Daniels on the former president's behalf "out of loyalty."

In 2018, Cohen put out a statement denying that the Trump organization or campaign had paid off Daniels or reimbursed him.

"That's a true statement but it's deceptive, it's misleading," Cohen said.

He said he intentionally "omitted" the fact that Trump reimbursed him.

"I did .. to demonstrate continued loyalty," Cohen said.

Cohen said he knew that once he sent out the statement, the press "would ask additional questions such as, 'What did it come from Trump, did it come from somebody else?'"

Cohen said that's why he said in the statement that he wouldn't further comment on the issue.

“Why am I f***ing listening to you?”: Bill Burr rips Bill Maher’s “very simple solution” to Gaza war

Comedian Bill Burr took Bill Maher to task over campus protests stemming from Israel's war in Gaza and cancel culture, among other topics, during Sunday's episode of the "Club Random with Bill Maher" podcast.

Maher during the episode alleged that campus protesters supporting Gazans are "in with the terrorists."

"They were for the Palestinians," Burr countered. The comedian added that he is "on the side of the kids," prompting a tense exchange.

MAHER: Yeah, that’s easy to say. You know, no one wants to see kids dead.

BURR: That was very brave of you to say that.

MAHER: No, I’m the one who’s actually brave on this.

BURR: Oh, pat yourself on the back.

MAHER: It’s easy to say, “I’m for the kids.” Who’s not for the kids? It comes down to real hard-nosed decisions. Like, a country –

BURR: Oh, stop talking like you’re a general

MAHER: A country got attacked. Israel got attacked.

BURR: I’m not saying they didn’t have a right to go – I’m just sitting there going, like, how do I look at what —

MAHER: They’re the only country in the world that, they get attacked, and then as soon as they counterattack, it’s like, well, we gotta stop this s**t now. “Don’t attack them” is a very simple solution to all this problem in the Middle East. Stop attacking Israel.

"You just solved it," Burr quipped in response. "That’s fantastic. Let’s go to Russia and the Ukraine. How do you solve that one, Bill? Let me hear your hard-nosed decision about that. Well, let me ask you a question. How is war still legal with all this s**t that’s been canceled? Why is that still f**king legal?"

"Would you like a real answer to that?" Maher replied. "Because for something to be illegal, you have to have the capacity to enforce it. And you can’t enforce against war, or else you have to go to war with the country that’s going to war. And we don’t want to go to war with Russia over Ukraine. What would be the sense of making it illegal? Oh, that’s really going to stop Putin."

"Sit down and talk it out? Why can’t Putin do a podcast with the head guy? Like you just solved the Middle East on a podcast. Why can’t they solve what they’re doing on a podcast?" Burr shot back.

"This is why this is not your thing. This is my thing," Maher said.

"It isn’t your thing. It isn’t. You’re like that guy that has a fantasy football team and thinks he’s a f**king GM. That’s exactly what it is. Like, why am I f**king listening to you like you like you’ve done something? What have you done in Washington? Nothing," Burr said.

We need your help to stay independent

Maher and Burr also tangled over "cancel culture" after the host mentioned disgraced comedian Louis C.K., who in 2017 acknowledged the veracity of sexual misconduct allegations that had been made against him. He was accused by several women of indecently exposing himself to them and masturbating.

“You have a very big future in filmmaking, very much like Louis C.K.” Maher said, per The Daily Beast. “Enough. Enough. It’s not the end of the world. People have done so much worse things and gotten less. There’s no rhyme or reason to the Me Too-type punishments.”

“Well, it was like most things,” Burr replied. “It started off with something everyone could agree on and then quickly it just spun out. I remember when cancel culture got to the point of where it was, ‘I don’t like some of the topics in your standup act.’ That’s when it got weird. But that’s all over.”

“What’s over?!” Maher asked. “Cancel culture?”

“Yeah,” Burr said. “No one cares anymore.”

“That’s so not true, either one of us could get canceled in the next two minutes,” Maher claimed.

“No. For what? If you’re not doing anything, it’s just like, you did this joke about this group of people or that group of people,” Burr said. “I feel like I’m going back two years of my life. I don’t even think about it anymore.”

“Eyeballs and controversy and people arguing and being offended and watching somebody get in trouble makes people stop on your website or your TV channel and watch,” Burr continued. “But it’s just not an accurate portrayal of where people’s heads are at. It just isn’t.”

“The jury is going to take notice”: Melania Trump missing in the courtroom and on the campaign trail

About a month into the former president’s hush money trial, there’s no sign of Melania Trump anywhere — not on Donald Trump’s campaign trail and certainly not in the courtroom.

Sarah Matthews, a former Trump White House official, told a CNN panel on Tuesday that Melania’s absence from her husband’s side speaks volumes, especially given the circumstances of the trial itself: a criminal case for allegedly falsifying business records to cover up a hush payment to an adult film star, Stormy Daniels, with whom Trump allegedly had a sexual encounter.

Matthews noted that both Daniel’s and Trump's former fixer, Michael Cohen’s, stated in their testimony that the former president didn’t particularly care about his wife would react to his alleged cheating.

"It flies in the face of Trump's defenses that he was solely concerned with the opinion of his wife," Matthews said. "And what I will say too is that I think the biggest piece of evidence is that Melania Trump isn't here. She's not going to be, probably, attending the trial and I think that the jury is going to take notice of that."

Cohen, testifying Monday, said Trump shrugged off concern about Melania finding out about his extramarital affairs. "'Don’t worry,' he goes. 'How long do you think I will be on the market for? Not long.’”

Cohen clarified through his testimony that Trump was not thinking about Melania, just his campaign. Daniels’ testimony likewise pointed to Trump’s indifference. When she asked about her, Daniels said Trump reassured her by saying he and his wife don't sleep in the same room.

Said Matthews: "I definitely would not really expect her to show up and be in the courtroom, especially when all of these kinds of salacious details are coming out. But I do think that the jury is going to take notice of that and I don't think that bears well for him."

“Exceeded expectations”: Experts say Michael Cohen is “dismantling” Trump lawyers’ defense

Michael Cohen is a liar and convicted criminal. After his testimony Monday, the consensus is that he is also a compelling witness, one able to connect the dots and explain how his lying was a requirement of the job – of working for the defendant, Donald Trump – in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy at the heart of the former president’s hush money case.

In first two weeks of the trial, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office worked to build up Cohen’s credibility before he ever took to the stand, introducing jurors to a host of people, from former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker to a pair of Trump Organization accountants, who could bolster the prosecution’s (and Cohen’s) key claim: that the former president’s onetime fixer paid Stormy Daniels $130,000 to keep quiet ahead of the 2016 election and was reimbursed for this payment by the Republican nominee.

And when it came time for Cohen to talk, prosecutors presented records backing up what he said, from call logs to a potentially smoking-gun recording of Trump and Cohen discussing another hush payment to former Playboy model Karen McDougal.

"It all was the corroborating evidence that allowed Michael Cohen to stand on his own,” MSNBC legal analyst Katie Phang commented. “It was a free-flowing, well-paced, clean, succinct, direct examination,” she continued. “Michael Cohen was afforded the opportunity to drive the narrative forward the way that the D.A.'s office wanted him to do, and the jury was taking notes intensely. There were at least three of them that were feverishly taking notes and looking.”

While some noted that he generally avoided looking at the jurors, instead directing his responses to the prosecutor asking the questions (“It’s weird,” CNN legal affairs correspondent Paula Reid said. “It could be that he’s uncomfortable.”), the consensus appears to be that Cohen ultimately came across as restrained and professional – not like his social media persona, where he slings insults just like his former boss.

“I think he exceeded expectations in how he presented to the jury, at least so far,” Norm Eisen, an attorney who worked for Democrats on Trump’s first impeachment, wrote in a Monday evening commentary. He credited prosecutors with ably setting up Cohen for questions that had already been answered by previous witnesses, so that there would be little doubt in jurors’ minds that, for example, an August 2016 meeting in Trump Tower took place with Trump, Cohen and Pecker to discuss their “catch-and-kill” scheme for neutralizing any damaging stories about the Republican candidate

“By the time we got to October 2016,” Eisen wrote, “Cohen’s recollection of the 'Access Hollywood' tape damage control and Daniels, we had multiple layers of corroboration showing a familiar pattern: paying hush money to avoid harm to the Trump campaign.”

We need your help to stay independent

Cohen was also able to directly rebut the chief defense argument in the case: that even if Daniels was paid off, it had less to do with politics than it did with family, Trump chiefly concerned with how Melania would take the news. As Cohen told it, Trump could not have cared less about his wife.

"Don't worry, how long do you think I'll be on the market for? Not long,” Trump said, according to Cohen, when asked about his spouse finding out about the alleged sexual encounter with Daniels. His primary concern was not the woman he was married to, Cohen said, but the women who might view him as a sleazy predator.

"You'll recall, the defense wants to say this was about the family," MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin said Monday. As the defense counsel argues, "The principal objective here – even if Donald Trump knew about it – the principal objective was not for the campaign, there was no conspiracy here to promote Donald Trump's election through unlawful means. Michael Cohen [was] sort of dismantling that.”

In that, this case, although centered on the falsification of business records to evade campaign finance laws, “really captures Donald Trump,” as conservative attorney turned Trump critic George Conway wrote Monday in The Atlantic. “[W]hat the case is really about is Trump’s modus operandi — lying,” Conway argued.

“To be sure, his other criminal cases involve lies — lies about the 2016 election, lies about the military secrets he stole. But the alleged lies in People v. Trump strike at the core of his moral putrescence — and Trump knows it,” he continued. “They are lies allegedly meant to cover up a tawdry man’s tawdry behavior. The case truly embodies Donald Trump. And for that reason, I think, it deeply disturbs him.”

Don’t be fooled, MAGA fever hasn’t broken

Some Democrats and the corporate news media continue to underestimate the power of former President Donald Trump’s racist and anti-immigrant messaging. Tens of thousands of his supporters showed up at his rally in Wildwood, New Jersey over the weekend, the Associated Press reported. During Trump’s criminal trial in Manhattan, MSNBC hosts have repeatedly used the lack of the physical presence of pro-Trump demonstrators as evidence that our MAGA fever has broken. Wildwood indicates it’s still very much with us.

“When I return to the White House… We will shut down deadly sanctuary cities such as Newark and Philadelphia,” Trump told the massive crowd. “We will not let criminals come into those cities. And we will not let them release illegal criminal aliens into your streets.”

As Max Pizarro reported, Trump “brought his cruel, weird, hateful, indicted, egomaniacal, name-dropping TV personality brand to Wildwood, apparently trying to take advantage of perennial New Jersey dysfunction, while entertaining his own public delusion.”

Saturday’s rally with all of the red, white and blue trappings was reminiscent of that night on February 20, 1939, when 20,000 ‘patriotic’ Americans packed the old Madison Square Garden to cheer Fritz Julius Kuhn, leader of the American Bund, which supported Nazi Germany.

Of course, Trump attacked the press that were assembled to cover the rally and his adoring adherents took the prompt from their mind master and booed the assembled reporters. Like the convenor of a lynch mob, Trump’s dark power is fueled by an alchemy that makes people feel bigger and bolder unified in the hate that energizes and defines them.

There’s an instant gratification from it. No need for discernment or fact-checking. He’s right because he’s always right, which is why the politically correct establishment wants to deny him the chance to protect this country from the immigrant invasion being facilitated by Biden and the Democrats.

And here in the Garden State, thanks to the right-wing media juggernaut that’s composed of 101.5 FM, WABC 770 AM, the New York Post and Fox News many thousands of fans exist in that same parallel universe with Trump. They believe the 2020 election was stolen from the former president who says he would pardon the scores of Jan. 6 insurrectionists who stormed the U.S. Capitol waving the Confederate Star & Bars in hopes of disrupting the certification of Joe Biden’s victory.

Unlike in the Civil War, when the Confederate members of Congress were prohibited by the 14th Amendment from being eligible for their seats when the war was over, the scores of Republican members who voted NOT to certify Biden’s 2020 victory after the violent attack continue to hold office, like Rep. Jeff Van Drew, R-N.J., who chairs Trump’s New Jersey re-election bid. Their betrayal of the U.S. Constitution has been rewarded with committee chairmanships.

“We all love America. I love Cape May. I love New Jersey,” said Van Drew, reported Pizarro.  “We see what’s happening today in a faltering economy. We’re here today because we’re tired of the open borders. There is nothing wrong with saying we believe in America first.”

America first. Hmmm. When did we last hear that catch phrase?

In the years since the attack on the U.S. Capitol former, Rudy Giuliani, the architect of so much calumny, found mass media sanctuary and a paycheck on WABC 770 Radio thanks to billionaire businessman John Catsimatidis. But the former mayor of New York was just one of the radio personalities in the WABC line-up that kept the Trump 2020 Big Lie and virulent anti-immigrant narrative alive.

The law and order former mayor is being criminally prosecuted in Georgia and Arizona for his role in the Trump fake electors conspiracy. Back in December, after a week-long federal civil trial, Giuliani was ordered to pay $148 million for defaming election workers Wandrea “Shaye” Moss and her mother Ruby Freeman. Giuliani, along with Trump,  falsely accused Moss and Freeman of tampering with the ballots they were counting at the State Farm Arena for the Fulton County Board of Elections. The election workers’ lives were completely upended by the Giuliani-Trump axis as the MAGA mob fixated on the two civically minded women.

On Friday, before Trump’s Wildwood rally, Catsimatidis pulled the plug on Giuliani’s radio show “after the station said he [Giuliani] violated its policy by trying to discuss discredited claims about the 2020 presidential election on air,” the New York Times reported.

We need your help to stay independent

“We’re not going to talk about fallacies of the November 2020 election,” Catsimatidis told the newspaper. “We warned him once. We warned him twice. And I get a text from him last night, and I get a text from him this morning that he refuses not to talk about it.”

What’s not clear from the reporting about Giuliani’s show being canceled is why now, after years of promoting Giuliani and his twisted worldview, WABC pulled the plug. Judging by the size of the crowd at Wildwood the damage has already been done.

Saturday’s rally with all of the red, white and blue trappings was reminiscent of that night on February 20, 1939, when 20,000 ‘patriotic’ Americans packed the old Madison Square Garden to cheer Fritz Julius Kuhn, leader of the American Bund, which supported Nazi Germany. Kuhn spoke in front of a massive rendering of George Washington.

Of course, he denounced the “Jewish-controlled press.”

“We, the German American Bund, organized as American citizens with American ideals and determined to protect ourselves, our homes, our wives and children against the slimy conspirators who would change this glorious republic into the inferno of a Bolshevik paradise,” Kuhn told the crowd.

Marshall Curry directed “A Night At the Garden”, the short documentary Academy Award film winner in 2017 that uses archival footing to depict the events of that night 85 years ago which grew a large crowd of counter-protestors outside the venue. Documentary Magazine’s Tom White asked Curry how audiences reacted to the provocative film.

“Most people are shocked. Very few Americans that I have talked to had any idea that the rally happened, and when they watch it, they have the same sense of revulsion at what was happening—and also a sense of familiarity,” Curry said. “We have seen hateful ideologies get wrapped up in the symbols of American patriotism a lot recently.”

Curry continued. “And we have seen an uptick in hate crimes and anti-Semitic crimes, and all of this stuff that should be ancient history for America doesn’t feel like ancient history. It feels familiar.”

As familiar as this weekend’s headlines.

Scientists decode orangutan communication using machine learning

Wendy Erb has spent countless hours studying orangutans in Borneo's tropical peatland forests in order to learn how male Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) communicate. While doing so, she discovered one undeniable advantage of understanding orangutan language: When the males decide to show off their strength by uprooting nearby trees, nearby scientists need to be careful to not get smooshed.

"I often wonder which of these snag crashes are directed at neighboring orangutans and which of them might be a message for us to give these guys some space!"

"Orangutans have extraordinary strength and big males have a penchant for finding standing dead trees and shaking, pushing or pulling them until they topple in a tremendous (and impressive) crash," Erb told Salon. "Orangutan researchers thus need to stay quite vigilant while these giants move through the canopy, as these falling trees can present a real hazard to us mortal bipeds. Though sometimes we fail to note a nearby dead tree when the males are making their evening nests, these males never miss a chance to show off their feats of strength."

Because Erb and her colleagues don't know orangutanese, so to speak, they cannot know if these males ever attempted to warn them while they figuratively and literally flexed their muscles. Yet perhaps one day they will, because in a recent study published today in the journal PeerJ Life & Environment, both the Cornell University tropical field and behavioral ecologist and her peers reveal orangutans have tremendous vocal complexity while calling to each other from long distances.

The researchers set out to learn how many different sound types exist within orangutan long calls, how can they be distinguished and the extent to which they are graded. They observed the calls of 13 male orangutans and were careful not to disturb them. Armed with audio analytic techniques including machine learning, they found that orangutan long calls include only two to four loosely differentiated sound types. Within those sound types, the orangutans produce a divers spectrum of intermediate types which yield sounds capable of being combined into various sequences within a single vocalization.

We need your help to stay independent

This study confirms orangutans possess sophisticated communication abilities, putting them on par with other primates like chimpanzees. At the same time, this paper only scratches the surface in terms of grasping the full intricacy of orangutan communications.

"While vocal complexity is an important concept in animal communication – thought to be shaped by animals’ social and physical environments – we are lacking a unifying framework for quantifying complexity," Erb said. "For species like orangutans, whose sounds fall along a ‘graded’ continuum, we don’t yet know how to interpret the apparently low number of ‘discrete’ sounds; however, we are fairly confident there is much complexity still to unpack in this great ape’s vocal system."


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"We still have a lot of work ahead to unpack this complexity and its significance in the evolution of animal communication systems."

By learning more about orangutan vocalizations, scientists could ultimately better understand how humans learned to speak. Every species develops its vocal complexity because of evolutionary influences such as sexual selection, the details of their habitats, their specific social structures and pressure from predators. For example, the authors write, "black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) groups, individuals flexibly increase the diversity of note types when they are in larger groups, presumably increasing the number of potential messages that can be conveyed."

Humans are able to create far more elaborate sounds that any other primate species, but there is still a direct link between how more primitive primates developed those abilities and how we did. For that to happen, however, scientists will first need to comprehend how the more "graded" vocalizations employed by animals like orangutans manage to effectively convey meaning.

"Our study points to the need to develop a comparative framework for quantifying and comparing complexity within and across species with such graded repertoires," Erb said. "We still have a lot of work ahead to unpack this complexity and its significance in the evolution of animal communication systems."

Researchers dream of a future in which humans can casually converse with orangutans, chimpanzees and other primates as easily as we do among each other. That day is no doubt very far in the future — but it will certainly be useful for future scientists like Erb, at least when they want to avoid being unintentional casualties of orangutan machismo.

"In the dark, it's much harder to assess which way the tree is going to fall, so we were quite lucky to have made it through these heart-pounding wake-up calls unscathed," Erb said. "I often wonder which of these snag crashes are directed at neighboring orangutans and which of them might be a message for us to give these guys some space!"

“It exposes a contradiction”: Can colleges rocked by campus protests recapture a spirit of activism?

The last few weeks have seen protests against Israel’s war in Gaza occur at many dozens of college and university campuses across the United States. Student protests and other acts of solidarity are also taking place internationally. It is far too premature to describe these protests as a mass movement. However, public opinion polls clearly show that there are great levels of discontent among America’s young people about not just Israel’s war in Gaza but about a range of other public policy concerns such as America’s role in the world, the global climate emergency, the neoliberal regime and the type of financial precarity it has caused for huge swaths of the public.

University and college administrators have responded to the student protests by authorizing the police to use a range of means including rubber bullets, pepper spray and tear gas, and in at least one instance deploying an armored vehicle as part of an operation to clear a building at Columbia University in New York. Given that the student protests have been overwhelmingly peaceful, the use of such force by the police can reasonably be described as excessive and extremely dangerous. At least 2,400 people, including at least 50 professors, have been arrested in protests on at least 50 campuses. Several people have been injured by the police.

"The university administrators are facing a real legitimacy crisis."

I recently spoke with Alex Vitale, a professor of sociology at Brooklyn College and the author of “The End of Policing," to contextualize the student protests and the police response. In this interview, Vitale points out the connections between the student protests against Israel’s war in Gaza, America’s culture of militarized policing and abuse, and the corporatization of the country’s universities and colleges. Vitale also shares his insights about how the Biden administration’s response to the student protests may impact the 2024 election.

This is the second of a two-part conversation.

What is the relationship between the police and these universities and colleges in New York?

When right-wing populism became ascendant here in the United States as a reaction to the Occupy movement and Black Lives Matter right-wing intellectuals decried any kind of effort to shut down extremist right-wing speech in universities and public spaces, etc. So, all of a sudden, the most conservative right-wing forces in America are the champions of the First Amendment and freedom of speech. But of course, now, those exact same people are on the frontlines of turning speech acts into crime to be obliterated by police action and grassroots vigilantism whenever possible. The levels of hypocrisy are crystal clear to anyone paying any attention to what is really happening.

The universities are private property, for the most part. This means that the universities have control over whether the police get involved. The police are not making their own decisions to crush these encampments. The only reason the police are there is because university administrators have called them out. Some police have even expressed some reluctance and skepticism about whether it's appropriate to use police violence to manage these situations. The university administrators are facing a real legitimacy crisis. They're preventing dissent. They're shutting down graduations and closing campuses in an attempt to prevent speech about a pressing public issue. The administrators are also hiding behind a few acts of harassment and poor behavior by students that could be addressed on the merits of those individual cases, rather than engaging in a kind of collective punishment of an entire movement. When you call in the police what you get is riot squads, mounted units, snipers on rooftops, and this kind of gross, militarized warrior-style response to some students having a sit-in.

There is that image of the New York police using an armored vehicle and what looks like a tactical team against students at Columbia who had occupied one of the buildings. How is the use of such extreme force and militarized policing justified against college students?

There are two things happening here. One, there is a deeply rooted Islamophobia where these movements have been painted as Islamic extremists. Two, there is a deep disdain for anything that's perceived as politically disorderly, especially if it involves the left. There is also an extreme and grotesque exaggeration of danger and threat, where somehow it is imagined that there are terrorists in these encampments. That creates a logic where "shock and awe" police tactics must be used to control the situation. This is just an incredible overreaction, one that further serves to paint the student protest movement against the human rights violations in Gaza as dangerous, when it really isn't.

What would have happened if one of the Columbia students were maimed or killed by police during that assault?

That certainly is what happened in the 1960s and 1970s when university administrators just threw up their hands and turned the problem over to police, National Guard troops, and state troopers. As a result, students on many campuses across the country were killed or seriously injured. Hopefully that won't happen here. But we had an NYPD officer discharge their firearm accidentally at Columbia during their Fallujah-style assault on the building takeover.

There is always the possibility when deploying all this so-called less lethal weaponry — which in practice is often very lethal — that we will see students suffer serious injuries or even die from police actions. If such a tragedy were to occur, it would just escalate matters and fan the flames of militancy, expand the protest movement, and create more legitimacy problems for both the police and university administrators.

A senior New York City police officer held up a book about "terrorism" that was found in the Columbia library as "proof" that "outside agitators" were involved in the protests. The book was written by a leading historian and was not a "how to" manual or some such thing. That a police officer would make such a claim is the height of comedy and foolishness. But it does point to much larger dynamics at work with how these protests are being perceived by the public. What do we know about this "outside agitator" narrative?   

We have high-ranking city officials and police officials mobilizing this tired old rhetoric about "outside agitators", and this is both patronizing to students and an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the protest movement. There is a video on X (formerly known as Twitter) from an NYPD assistant commissioner saying, "Look at these stacks of water bottles! Here's your proof that there must be outside forces aiding these students." This is ridiculous because it supposes that students do not know how to buy food and water for an encampment, which they've been doing through Occupy and Black Lives Matter and all kinds of other protest movements. These types of claims by the police are politically motivated and a way of taking sides. The police are not a neutral force who are there to enforce the law. The police are politically motivated actors. That fact shapes how the police do what they do, and how they talk to the public about what they do. 

We need your help to stay independent

There are comparisons being made between this moment of student protest activity and the 1960s and early 1970s and the police killings at Kent State, for example. As I see it, there is a great lack of specific historicity and context with such claims.

We're certainly not there, despite what sensational public voices have been saying. Kent State took place after a decade of intense protest activity, both around civil rights and the antiwar movement. Those protest movements were much larger, they were massive. They also represented a much greater threat to the status quo of American imperialism in Southeast Asia.

I hope that we fight back against the criminalization of dissent sufficiently so that we do not get to that point again in this country with a horrible event like Kent State. 

How are individual police responding to being deployed to break up the student protests and encampments? 

I have not spoken to any individual police at these protests.

In general, we can say that police harbor a kind of natural abhorrence of protest because it's disorderly and policing is about the production of social order. I'm also sure that there are police who relish cracking down on these students and there are other police who don't like being involved in such violence. In the end, the attitudes of the individual police officers are largely irrelevant. When the chief of police, the mayor, and the head of a university say they want that encampment cleared, whatever it takes, the police are going to do what they are told. 

What are these student protests further revealing about American higher education, and elite universities and colleges specifically, in this era of the neoliberal regime and corporatization? 

It exposes a contradiction where universities, especially elite ones, compete for students by promoting themselves as being student-centered, student-friendly, and open to student activism. They celebrate past sit-ins and occupations in their promotional materials, and this includes Columbia University. But then when actually confronted by protests, the universities fall back on repression. The reason for that is a kind of deeper truth about the neoliberal university, which is that it is an important part of America's imperial program.

These universities are directly implicated in the production of weapons systems, and the ideologies that justify U.S. military adventurism around the world. And when that program is directly threatened, by demands to stop military research and cooperation or to divest from weapons manufacturers, that represents a profound challenge to the university. If we look closely at these boards of trustees, and the major donors and sources of research and grant money for these universities, we see how intimately tied they are to weapons manufacturers and the producers of the ideologies that favor U.S. military interventionism.

How are faculty responding to the student protests?

We've seen faculty who lack the protection of tenure being penalized for speaking out on the merits of the issues in Gaza. Faculty have been fired, not re-appointed, and otherwise dismissed from their jobs because of social media posts and their views on Israel's actions in Gaza. It is certainly not unreasonable for faculty who lack job security to be concerned about their ability to speak out publicly. Tenured faculty have been more willing to speak out, but they are divided in their opinions about what is happening in Gaza. Where we have seen more unity is in opposition to the criminalization of dissent on college campuses, on the use of police against students, and the failure to substantively negotiate with students about their demands. There have been significant walkouts, grading actions, and letters of protest. For example, there was a CUNY-wide faculty demonstration outside CUNY headquarters calling for CUNY to demand that charges be dropped against CUNY students arrested at City College at the encampment there.

There are supporters of President Biden in the news media and political class who are arguing that these student protests are undermining his chances of reelection and that the smarter move is to stand down and to support the bigger cause of defeating Donald Trump and the American neofascists and other enemies of democracy. Your thoughts?

That can be flipped on its head just as easily where President Biden is going to lose the 2024 election precisely because of the policies he's pursuing relative to Israel and Gaza and the Middle East. Biden and his advisors could then decide that they need to switch gears on Israel policy because it is damaging their chances of getting reelected because it turns out that big chunks of the electorate, specifically the Democratic Party's base, are not happy.

“The songs for people after the protest”: Kathleen Hanna makes clear she’s a “musician not activist”

It can be hard to imagine — now that we are in the era of Taylor Swift and Beyoncé — but in the 90s, the idea of female artists exerting control over their music was subject to "talking dog"-style press coverage. This was especially true of Riot Grrrl, a female-dominated punk scene that flared brightly and burned out quickly, in no small part because the press treated the movement like a circus sideshow. But Kathleen Hanna, the lead singer of Bikini Kill, kept plugging, kicking off the early aughts trend of synth-heavy indie dance music with her band Le Tigre. 

"I've been playing music for over 30 years and I'm still called an activist and not a musician. It's ridiculous."

Hanna has a new memoir, "Rebel Girl: My Life as a Feminist Punk," that is at times hilarious and other times incredibly dark. She is unflinching in her descriptions of the staggering amount of male violence women endured in the 80s and 90s. (And sadly, too often still.) It's a well-realized document of the youth of the often-overlooked Generation X, at least the progressive, hipster version that flourished artistically in an era of cheaper rents and thrift store fashion. Hanna spoke to Salon about lingering joys and traumas of the era, and how the lessons resonate in ways good and bad today. 

This interview has been edited for length and clarity

Interesting coincidence: Stormy Daniels just wrapped her testimony in Trump's trial. Her story echoes themes in your book like how people look down on sex workers and the fear of male violence. Have you been following this?

I haven't, but I did see a headline today about how [Trump] told Stormy Daniels that she reminded him of his daughter. It's not news to anybody, after the stuff that he's already said about his own child, like how he'd date her if he wasn't her dad. It's absolutely despicable and so crazy-making. This guy can go out there and be like Incest Dad and people are like, "Go, Incest Dad, go!" I think it's because a lot of people have incest dads. They're still waiting for their dad to change and get better.

That's the only thing that I really know about it because I honestly have reached my saturation level with him. That's just the frustration. He basically owns the Supreme Court. He's got Clarence Thomas and that horrible spitting, spewing, "I love beer" guy whose name escapes me right now. I think I'm blacking it out for safety. It's really hard for me to keep updated on the court because it just makes me incredibly angry and I start feeling helpless and hopeless. Definitely, people were triggered to all the racism in their lives, when one of the first things he ever said as a candidate was that Mexicans are rapists. He just continued to be a huge trigger machine to anybody who deals with actual trauma and oppression.

When you say "saturation level," I felt like so much of your book was really talking about that for yourself and for so many people that you've met along the way who endure this constant drumbeat of male violence toward women. It's exhausting and yet you have to deal with it. You not only dealt with it yourself, but as you say in the book, you were often trying to help other people get through their own horrible experiences.

I dealt with it in a lot of really unhealthy ways. Finally, writing this book, I think I've started to get healthier coping mechanisms. I've stopped asking why. I've really stopped asking why did this male violence visit my house on this day. I can't control what creepy men think or what their motives are. Or I can't think about what I could have done differently to avoid their bad behavior. That question of "why" is really like arms out stretching for some words that I can hold on to. So I don't fall off a cliff. But they just don't really exist beyond the fact that people like to maintain their position of power. If anything threatens that, they lash out.

I have come to notice, throughout the book and also through processing some stuff this past week, a common theme swirling around my brain and my body in a bad toxic way: There is a large swath of the male population who really gets turned on by the look of humiliation and fear on women's faces. And I don't understand it. I'm not gonna try to understand it and I'm not gonna try and figure out why it is a thing. Like guys who jack off in their car while they're looking at you. They want you to see them and see your face humiliated and angry and fearful all at the same time.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Just thinking of how much sexism that I've dealt with at almost every venue I've ever played, up until the past couple of years, I kept trying to ask myself why. While I'm not gonna ask that question into infinity, I did start to see this pattern where these dudes really wanted to see a look of fear, anger and humiliation. I'm gonna steal the phrase "the constant drumbeat of male violence" because I think the cumulative effect that it's had on me has been really awful. It got associated with what I love doing most, which is singing and being on stage. Being dehumanized by people who work at venues on a constant basis and being told I don't belong there, that I'm not a real musician, being physically threatened,  the cumulative effect has made performing stressful and dehumanizing. It shouldn't be that way. I'm just climbing out of that hole and I don't appreciate being pushed into it.

"There are a lot of really positive things on the horizon musically that give me a lot of hope."

I was just writing something the other day about how, when I was younger, I really loved water skiing. And I had this uncle who was a creepy child molester kind of guy. In order to water ski, I would wait on the dock for hours for my drunk uncle to show up and drive the boat. I was 12 and he would drive me around the lake. But then, whenever I would get in after skiing, he would grab my *ss and he would let his d**k hang out of his shorts. He also took me to a party and got me drunk when I was 12 years old and passed me off to a 20-year-old. Obviously despicable behavior, but when you're 12, you don't really know. But I do remember thinking I don't like this, but this is the price of admission to do the thing I wanna do.

When bad stuff started happening on stage. Or when every venue we went to was a different kind of psychotic expedition into the land of male cruelty. I was feeling that same way, like this is the price of admission and I just have to take deal with it. And #MeToo actually really helped me feel this shouldn't be the price of admission.

It helps me understand why, back when I was going to a lot of punk shows, I would just have this incandescent rage at men who scoffed at the girl bands. It was well out of proportion, my anger. I've never really thought about how it was of a piece of something far scarier. It sounded like just contempt but you were often on the receiving end when that contempt turned into violence or it turned into harassment.

I've definitely had oversized reactions to things as well and then had to investigate it. Like that guy who told me the only reason my band is even here is because we're girls and they needed to "fill a quota." That hurt my feelings, but I would get overly upset in my head about it. I would cling to it and spend too much time on it. I had to ask why am I having oversized feelings about this. It was because it made me feel unworthy and brought me back to other things from when I was a kid.

"It's important that we publicly engage with our bodies, as goofy and weird as they are, in group settings. I needed joy."

If you grew up with a drunk dad who belittles you and then you go out into the world and you finally find the thing you love, then you're met with many versions of your drunk dad who belittled you every night, it does start to feel like you're in a hell maze that you can't get out of. That the world is just "drunk dad, drunk dad, drunk dad." I really had to look for the support in my life, look for the people who were there for me, look for the places where I found joy. Getting a cat was huge for me because he gave me this unconditional love that I wasn't getting in the outside world.

One of the things you write in the book that really stuck with me was your realization that you're not an activist. You're a musician. That distinction, you write, is important to you. Why?

I was feeling like it was belittling what real activists do. I haven't started an organization that is actually making political changes. I'm not organizing protests. I'm not starting community groups. I may have been an instigator in the loose-knit thing that was Riot Grrrl. But I'm a musician and I'm an artist. I'm socially conscious and I care about ending oppression for all people and being a part of that process. But that makes me more of a cultural worker. I wanna support what real activists do. I also don't have to feel imposter syndrome about that particular thing.

Also, I've been playing music for over 30 years and I'm still called an activist and not a musician. It's ridiculous. How many more records do I have to put out? How many more songs do I have to write? How many more shows do I have to play?  Literally, "musician" is on my tax form. We write actual songs and we actually perform them and they are real. Being called an activist and not a musician over and over for 30 years really made me wanna make the distinction.

We need your help to stay independent

Both obviously have their value.

A big part of what we wanted was to write the songs for people after the protest to come see us. That's how we pictured it. There'd be a big protest and then people would be like, what do we do now? Most protests we went to, there was no community gathering afterward. Being at a protest or even a vigil can feel really connecting and really wonderful on a lot of levels. But we should also be celebrating the fact we're all out in the streets and we're together. Let's have the party keep going on. We were always disappointed at the end of the protest that we had to go home just as individuals.

In the nineties and 2000s, one of the constant things that I heard was, "You're just preaching to the choir." Well if you're saying I'm making music for people who give a s**t, then yes, you're absolutely 100% correct. Correct. If you look at popular culture, there's not much music or art or TV shows directed at people who give a s**t. Who was making music that addresses sexism? In the mainstream? Typically not a lot. I'm perfectly happy to make music for people who give a s**t about ending worldwide oppression. If that's the choir, I love preaching to them. They're usually the last, people that are given anything.

At the risk of sounding like a massive fan girl, I remember the day that the first Le Tigre album came out, and what a revelation it was. I loved Bikini Kill, no doubt about it. But with Le Tigre, I loved how danceable it was. How, like you said, joyous, how fun. It was party music. It's hard I think to convey to people now how truly dramatic of a turn that was.

Part of it was I just didn't wanna keep having people try to beat me up at shows. And honestly, I just didn't see that happening when I went to dance music events. I didn't see people trying to hurt each other or be mean to each other. I also felt like writing more danceable songs was a way to have people engaging with their own bodies. It's important that we publicly engage with our bodies, as goofy and weird as they are, in group settings. I needed joy. I really felt like, in Le Tigre, we were turning our gaze directly at the audience that we wanted to have and singing songs for them that were more joyous and less angry. People had lived vicariously through my rage for long enough. I don't wanna have to be rageful on stage all the time. I can have a couple songs like that, but I don't wanna have that be my brand or my schtick. I was ready to sing in a different way, that didn't damage my voice as much as it had been damaged by Bikini Kill.

It's been 25 years since the first Le Tigre album came out. Right now, when you look at what's going on in music, it's just so many women and queer artists that I see just owe so much to Le Tigre. From Chappell Roan to even Olivia Rodrigo. How do you feel about that?

I feel like everybody is so full of so many influences, especially with the internet. I can never really tell who's influenced by what. I'll listen to Lana Del Rey and I'm like, oh, this sounds like a Chris Isaak record, but redone in this beautiful way with these amazing lyrics. I can hear Joni Mitchell in her. There are certain artists where I immediately hear Wire. It's fun, as a musician, to play that game. But I do feel like that first record did have a lot of influence and it's something that people still listen to, which is great. But I don't spend time thinking about how I've influenced anybody. I just wanna keep making stuff. I never want to see myself as like historical.

Back when that album came out, I felt like we just had almost nothing in that vein. Now, there's so much out there that's scratching that urge. So, that's great. That's what I feel satisfied about. There are so many more interesting people making really good music. There are a lot of really positive things on the horizon musically that give me a lot of hope. When it does seem like we are heading towards an authoritarian mainstream landscape and everything's going backward and things are really terrible, we still find sites of resistance on the underground.

For me, music is the ultimate. I also love visual art, but music creates a room. It creates a sonic space that you can live inside and be surrounded by someone who is like funny and like-minded and has these influences that you also hold dear and is doing something brand new. When I'm driving my car around, I just feel really inspired, like I wanna keep going. It's full circle. I get to be inspired by people who may have been inspired by something I did. They inspire me and then I make something else. That feels pretty cool. That makes me feel very successful.

Medical school graduates are avoiding states with abortion bans. Experts warn it could cause chaos

Abortion restrictions might be influencing where medical students apply for residency programs, which could have stark implications across entire state healthcare systems, with some doctors warning it could essentially unravel entirely.

According to a new analysis by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Research and Action Institute, updated data from 2023 found a continued decline in medical students applying to residency programs located in states with restrictive abortion laws. The trend aligned with a similar one that the research institute saw in the first year after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. 

“The biggest takeaway is that for a second year, we are seeing decreases in the number of applications in states where abortion bans are in place,” Kendal Orgera, a senior research analyst at AAMC told Salon in a phone interview. “And that varies by specialty — for OBGYNs in states where abortion is banned has decreased even more and this shows a big implication of the potential workforce of the future.”

As of May 2, 2024, abortions are nearly totally banned in 14 states across the country. Some, but not all, have narrow exceptions, such as preventing the death of the mother, when the pregnancy is the result of incest or rape, or when there is a lethal fetal anomaly. While many of these states don’t make it technically illegal for a pregnant person to get an abortion, they do penalize providers, like OBGYNs or family medicine doctors, for conducting them.

"It's a big message to legislators that doctors don't want to be told how to practice medicine."

Penalties vary by state. For example, in Idaho, providers live in constant fear that they will have to deny a pregnant patient stabilizing, emergency abortion care, or they will face two to five years in prison and lose their medical license. In Texas, providers can be fined at least $100,000 or face between 5 to 99 years of jail time

As Orgera said, residency applications for a variety of specialties declined in abortion ban staes. But for OBGYNs, the decline was even more drastic. 

“It was a 4.2 decrease overall in the states that have banned abortion, but it was a 6.7 percent drop in OBGYNs,” Orgera said. “Texas has actually seen a decrease in senior med students since 2021.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


According to the report, states with restrictive abortion laws saw a bigger decrease in the numbers of both OBGYN and emergency medicine applicants applying for residency programs than states with less restrictive gestational limits. The continued decline, the AAMC stated, comes after nearly five years of growth. 

“The examination of two years of data suggests that restrictions on women's health care may continue to disproportionately decrease the likelihood that new doctors will apply to residencies in states that offer the most restrictive practice environments,’” the researchers wrote. "Because these policy decisions appear to affect where physicians plan to practice, state governments and health care leaders need to consider the potential impact of those decisions on the physician workforce.”

Dr. Kara Cadwallader, who is a family medicine physician in Idaho, told Salon this shows how the impact highly restrictive abortion laws will have on the country’s healthcare system. 

"Why would anyone want to train where they can't really learn the right standard of care?"

“I thought it was very interesting that it's not just the specialties we would imagine, like OBGYN and family medicine, pediatrics and emergency medicine, had a big decline, which is scary, and that’s our workforce pipeline,” Cadwallader said. “I think the fact that it's not just specialties that tend to take care of pregnant women is really telling — it's a big message to legislators that doctors don't want to be told how to practice medicine.” 

Cadwallader said abortion bans say “very loud and clear” that if a doctor comes to the state, legislators “will tell you how to practice medicine.” 

“Why would anyone want to train where they can't really learn the right standard of care?” Cadwallader said. “I think it's a mistake to think that this is just about abortion — this is about the government dictating medical practice. And that goes bad, especially when they refuse to take any input from doctors and write laws that are ambiguous and harmful.”

Dr. David Hackney, a Cleveland-based maternal fetal medicine doctor, told Salon he often communicates with doctors with different specialties when caring for a pregnant patient. For example, if a pregnant patient has cancer he’s working with oncology. He said he is frequently communicating with people in cardiology, neurology and neurosurgery.

“Pregnancy itself is not siloed away within the field of OBGYN, and I think one of the things that many medical specialties have specifically realized after the Dobbs decision is the extent to which everyone is involved,” Hackney told Salon. “The other major issue, of course, is medical students are generally of reproductive age. A lot of residents and fellows are in the age group that's overlapping with when people would often have children. This is a group that’s potentially deciding where they want to go to start their families.”

We need your help to stay independent

Both Hackney and Cadwallader said medical students frequently choose residency programs based on where they want to practice medicine as well. 

This decline in residency applicants also comes at a time when doctors who have practiced in abortion ban states for years are uprooting their practices and moving elsewhere. As previously reported by Salon, a report published last month by the Idaho Physician Well-being Action Collaborative found that Idaho lost 22 percent of its practicing OGBYNs in the 15 months following Dobbs. The report also found that 55 percent of the state’s high-risk OBGYNs have left the state, leaving less than five in the entire state to treat patients. 

If there isn’t a pipeline to fill these spots, it will cause chaos in the healthcare system, doctors said.

“I think our system is already starting to fall apart in Idaho, because we've lost our ability to care for pregnant women,” Cadwallader said. “It sounds really dramatic, but I think our healthcare system is starting to unravel.”

“You’re a billionaire, just pay it”: Friends told Trump to pay off Stormy Daniels, Cohen says

Former President Donald Trump wanted to hold off on paying Stormy Daniels until after the 2016 election, Michael Cohen testified Monday, believing he might not have to buy her silence at all after people were done voting. But after Cohen received a heads up that Daniels was preparing to sell her story to a British tabloid, Trump, having consulted with friends and allies, ordered his former fixer to make the deal.

"He stated to me that he had spoken to some friends, some individuals, smart people, and that it's $130,000. You’re a billionaire, just pay it," Cohen testified, according to CNN. The Republican candidate had concluded "there's no reason to keep this thing out there, so do it," Cohen said. "He expressed to me, 'Just do it. Meet up with Allen Weisselberg and figure this whole thing out.'"

Weisselberg, the Trump Organization's former chief financial officer, spoke with Cohen before the payment to Daniels was made, according to call logs presented in court Monday. "There was significant urgency" to get the deal done, Cohen said, with Daniels threatening to compound Trump's issues with women voters.

Cohen ultimately paid Daniels and her attorney $130,000 from a home equity line of credit he had taken out. He was later reimbursed to the tune of $420,000, an amount that was intended to cover the taxes Cohen would have to pay by claiming the money was payment for legal expenses. Trump is accused of falsifying business records to cover up the Daniels payment, which prosecutors say should have been publicly disclosed as a contribution to his 2016 campaign. 

Legal expert: Prosecutor undercut Trump lawyers’ strategy to “destroy” Michael Cohen’s credibility

Prosecutors began their questioning of once-devoted Trump fixer Michael Cohen Monday with an eye toward humanizing the disbarred attorney and emphasizing his direct contact with the president, according to a legal expert.

Cohen took the stand Monday in a Manhattan courthouse as prosecutors used his testimony and evidence from phone records to audio recordings to put together the pieces of Trump’s alleged scheme to quash salacious stories about extramarital affairs with hush money and then disguise those payments as legal fees – all in violation of state law. 

Cohen testified that Trump told him he would be repaid for paying off adult film star and director Stormy Daniels, who has long claimed she and Trump had a sexual encounter at his Lake Tahoe hotel suite in 2006.

“I was doing everything that I could and more in order to protect my boss, which was something I had done for a long time,” Cohen said, according to The New York Times

The jury will weigh whether they see Cohen “as an immoral Trump fixer trying to atone for his sins, or a vindictive employee out for revenge,” Syracuse University College of Law professor Gregory Germain told Salon. 

NYU Law emeritus professor Stephen Gillers said prosecutor Susan Hoffinger sought above all to “humanize Cohen.”

“She wanted to establish a basis for the jury to trust him,” Gillers said. “And she wanted to show the jury that Cohen will also say complimentary things about Trump.”

After days of testimony from witnesses who described Cohen’s devotion, interactions and frustrations with Trump, prosecutors on Monday sought to demonstrate his once close relationship with Cohen. 

“She needed to show that Cohen has a basis for knowing what his testimony will reveal because he had access to Trump almost without restriction,” Gillers said. “Finally, she wanted to establish that Trump was a micromanager, who insisted on knowing everything about what his subordinates were doing. All of this aims to establish Cohen’s credibility before the cross examination tries to destroy it.”

Last year, a Manhattan grand jury indicted Trump with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records – including checks, invoices and general ledger entries. Prosecutors say Trump schemed to pay off Daniels, model Karen McDougal and a doorman who falsely claimed Trump had an affair with a housekeeper.

Trump pleaded not guilty to those charges and denies the extramarital affairs he allegedly covered up to preserve his 2016 presidential campaign. 

Trump’s defense team has repeatedly warned jurors that Cohen simply cannot be trusted, pointing to his  time in federal prison for tax fraud and perjury. 

Trump attorney Todd Blanche has said Cohen is “obsessed” with the idea of sending Trump to jail, and that he has a history of misrepresenting conversations with Trump.

“I submit to you that he cannot be trusted,” Blanche told jurors in his opening statement.

Trump’s lawyers say Cohen was not a salaried employee at the time of the Daniels’ payoff. The defense team says Cohen acted on his own accord to pay off Daniels, and is now blaming Trump for his own decisions.

We need your help to stay independent

MAKING TRUMP HAPPY

On Monday, Cohen discussed his childhood and how he entered Trump’s inner circle by purchasing Trump properties, landing a job as his special counsel, working with the National Enquirer to quash salacious stories, renegotiating bills for the businessman and speaking to Trump frequently in the lead-up to the 2016 election.

“The only thing that was on my mind was to accomplish the task, to make him happy,” Cohen testified, according to The New York Times.

Cohen said he would lie on Trump’s behalf – and constantly sought approval and credit from Trump. He said he always kept Trump apprised of his efforts to kill negative stories, particularly after the “catastrophic” release of the “Access Hollywood” audio recording in which Trump bragged about grabbing women by their genitalia.

“‘Women are going to hate me,’” Cohen recounted Trump saying to him about the prospect of Daniels speaking publicly about their alleged sexual encounter. “‘Just take care of it.’”

Cohen said Trump also said: “Guys may think it's cool, but this is going to be a disaster for the campaign.’”

Cohen testified that in summer 2016, he worked to keep McDougal’s story about an alleged extramarital affair with Trump quiet. In one call with Cohen, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker and Trump, Cohen said Pecker discussed a potential $150,000 payment to quash the story. 

“No problem – I’ll take care of it,” Cohen testified Trump said. 

Cohen said Trump directed him to speak with former Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg – who is currently in jail after pleading guilty to two counts of perjury in Trump’s civil fraud trial.  

Cohen testified that Weisselberg told him to avoid going through the Trump Organization to pay off McDougal.

“It was typical for everyone” to discuss financial matters with Weisselberg,” Cohen testified, according to MSNBC correspondent Katie Phang.

The National Enquirer’s publisher, American Media Inc., ended up paying McDougal $150,000 in August 2016. 

But AMI CEO David Pecker testified that after receiving legal advice, he called off a deal for Cohen’s LLC to pay AMI $125,000 for McDougal’s nondisclosure. 

By October 2016, Cohen was negotiating with Daniels’ lawyer Keith Davidson on a $130,000 payment for Daniels through a non-disclosure agreement. The payment to Daniels came from another Cohen LLC. 

In a Monday guest essay for The New York Times, Andrew Weissmann, a former senior prosecutor in Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation, said Cohen’s baggage poses a ”significant risk” for Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg.

“He recently claimed under oath in a New York civil fraud trial against Mr. Trump (where the court found him credible and ruled against Mr. Trump) that he lied to a federal judge when he pleaded guilty to one of several crimes,” Weissmann wrote. “By way of explanation, he seemed to contend he was pressured to plead guilty by the federal prosecutors.”

But Weissmann said prosecutors were right to call Cohen as a witness.

“Jurors often want to hear someone recount what they already know occurred, but that has not been said directly,” Weissmann said. “The jurors will then often reach a verdict of guilty, and despite having found the conspiracy existed as recounted by a key criminal accomplice — someone like Mr. Cohen — they will later say they did not believe or need that witness’s testimony.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


UNDERLYING ELECTION CRIME

Paying hush money itself is not a crime – but Manhattan prosecutors bumped up the falsification of business record charges to felonies by alleging Trump had the records falsified to conceal criminal activity. 

Specifically, prosecutors say Trump violated Section 17-152 of New York state election code, which says it’s a misdemeanor to “conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to public office by unlawful means.”  

“Through these false business records, the defendant intended to make sure that nobody learned about the Stormy Daniels payoff and the illegal election fraud scheme launched at the Trump Tower meeting in 2015,” prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said in opening statements. 

Colangelo also said: “At the end of the case, we are confident that you will have no reasonable doubt that Donald Trump is guilty of falsifying business records with the intent to conceal an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of a presidential election.”

Prosecutors have provided jurors with financial records – including checks drawn from Trump’s own bank account signed by the former president himself, and handwritten notes outlining a plan to “gross up” payments to Cohen to cover his taxes – allegedly linking Trump with the reimbursements to Cohen for the hush-money payments.

“The hard part of the case is not proving that Trump wanted to hide embarrassing information from the public, but whether he was trying to cover up a crime, such as an illegal campaign contribution,” Germain told Salon. “Cohen could be helpful to Trump or the DA if he could testify that he and Trump didn't believe, or did believe, that the payment would be an illegal campaign contribution.”

For prosecutors to make their case, legal experts say they likely need Cohen to directly link Trump with another set of business records: the post-election Trump Organization ledgers that allegedly disguised Cohen’s hush-money reimbursements as legal fees. 

Cohen touched on that issue in his testimony Monday, when he said he would not have paid $130,000 for Daniels' deal without expecting to be paid back. 

Cohen also addressed another hurdle for prosecutors — Trump's reluctance to use emails and his lack of an email address. Jurors saw a text message from Melania Trump asking Cohen to call "DT" on his cell.

“During certain conversations, he’d comment that emails are like written papers — he knows too many people who have gone down as a direct result of having emails that prosecutors can use in a case,” Cohen said, according to Politico.

Cohen and other witnesses called by the prosecution have described Trump as a frugal micro-manager who closely scrutinized financial decisions.

Trump’s team has argued he had a “complete lack of knowledge or intent” about the checks, invoices and ledger entries. They maintain that the $420,000 payment to Cohen was for a legal retainer. 

“I don't expect they're going to call a witness that says that President Trump had anything to do with what was written on the ledger, with generating the check, with the invoice coming in,” Trump attorney Todd Blanche said in opening statements.

Steve Buscemi punched in the eye while out and about in New York City

Steve Buscemi was reportedly punched while walking around Manhattan last Wednesday, according to NBC.

The 66-year-old Golden Globe and Emmy winner was left with a bruised and bleeding eye after the assault and was subsequently transported to NYC Health and Hospitals/ Bellevue. While the NYPD opened an investigation, no arrests have been made since Buscemi, a Brooklyn native, was attacked last week. 

Police have described the reported attacker as “a male with dark complexion, wearing a dark colored baseball style cap, blue t shirt, black pants, white sneakers, and carrying a bookbag,” per CNN.

“Steve Buscemi was assaulted in Mid-Town Manhattan, another victim of a random act of violence in the city,” Buscemi’s publicist wrote in an email statement to NBC. “He is OK and appreciates everyone’s well wishes, though incredibly sad for everyone that this has happened to while also walking the streets of NY.”

While the attack was ostensibly arbitrary, it marks the latest in a series of seemingly random attacks done to pedestrians while walking around New York. Dozens of women have taken to social media in recent months to document being punched while going about the city doing mundane tasks. 

“Women are going to hate me”: Trump feared impact of Stormy Daniels story, says Michael Cohen

Having just experienced the fallout from the "Access Hollywood" tape, Donald Trump knew that having Stormy Daniels go public about an alleged sexual encounter would be ruinous for his White House aspirations, former fixer Michael Cohen testified Monday in the former president's Manhattan hush money trial.

Daniels, an adult film star, testified last week that she had sex with Trump in his hotel room at a celebrity golf tournament in 2006. Cohen, working with then-National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, had paid her $130,000 in 2016 to keep quiet about the alleged details of that encounter, which prosecutors say was intended to influence the election but was falsely reported as a legal expense.

According to Cohen, Trump was livid when told that Daniels was seeking a buyer for her story. "He said to me, 'this is a disaster, a total disaster,'" Cohen testified. "He told me to work with David and get control over this."

At no point did Trump express concern about this wife, Melania, finding out, Cohen claimed.

"'Don't worry,' he goes, 'how long do you think I’ll be on the market for? Not long.' He wasn’t thinking about Melania. This was all about the campaign," Cohen said, prompting Trump to smirk and shake his head in the courtroom, CNN reported.

What did concern Trump, according to Cohen, was how others might react.

"Women are going to hate me," Trump said, per Cohen. "Guys may think this is cool, but this is going to be a disaster for the campaign."

But Trump, as his defense team has argued, is also infamously cheap and sought to avoid having to pay, Cohen testified.

"I want you to just push it out as long as you can, just get past the election," Trump said, according to Cohen. "Because if I win it will have no relevance because I'm president. And if I lose, I don't even care."

Through its time change, “Interview with the Vampire” examines how war poisons the blood

What is time to an immortal? “Anne Rice’s Interview with the Vampire” cannot help but ask versions of that question as it applies to individual figures or encapsulates the species’ dilemma. 

In the TV adaptation’s second season, Louis de Pointe du Lac (Jacob Anderson) fixates on memories of his unnaturally long lifetime in human terms as a function of trying to recall the details with conciseness. Centuries-old vampires like his current lover Armand (Assad Zaman) or his maker Lestat de Lioncourt (Sam Reid) take a longer view: once all natural means of mortality are removed from the moral equation of living, day-to-day and year-to-year particulars cease to concern them.  

As long as there is blood, there is a means to endure.  

Decades, epochs and waves of cultural change wash over them. But Louis hasn’t been undead for that long. He’s still furiously treading the waters of his guilt to keep from drowning in it. That anchors him to his years and times more firmly than most.

The bulk of “Interview of the Vampire” stares into the past through the eyes of unreliable narrators, all of whom want to present themselves as more noble and heroic than they are, or at least to have the reader’s understanding if not their benediction.

If that were all this show offered, to paraphrase the crescendo of one of Anderson’s impassioned monologues in the second season premiere, maybe that would be enough. Rice’s “Vampire Chronicles” are broadly known and loved, after all. Already there are fans on subreddits wondering when and whether characters from future novels will make an entrance.

But creator and showrunner Rolin Jones’ inspired changes keep us guessing, along with altering much of the plot’s subtext.  Casting Black actors to play Louis and Claudia (first played by Bailey Bass, portrayed this season by Delainey Hayles) opens “Interview with the Vampire” to explorations of race and class exploitation that were never present in Rice’s books. 

But the times more palpably sway the story in these new episodes. Ridding themselves of Lestat frees Louis and Claudia, but it also leaves them directionless. At the curious Claudia’s insistence, they journey to Eastern Europe in search of Old World vampires who can help them figure out who they are supposed to be. Since Jones sets the story in the early 20th century, that places them in World War II, a time of mass death and destruction. 

As long as there is blood, there is a means to endure.  

What sounds like the ideal vacation for a blood drinker is anything but, although a feral Claudia thrives. Preying on the weak suits her lack of concern for human morals although, to keep the audience on their side, we only see her eviscerate Nazi border guards and Soviet soldiers occupying the Romanian village where they eventually land. 

Interview With the VampireInterview With the Vampire (AMC)Nevertheless, she and Louis are miserable. In New Orleans they slept in luxuriantly lined coffins. Here they hide from the sun in muddy graves. Blood is easy to come by but, as they discover, thin and unsatisfying. Louis says he can never feel warm – a common complaint among vampires, certainly, but in a land ravaged by cruelty it depletes instead of nourishes. 

Since AMC’s drama follows the basic contours of the tortured relationship Louis, Lestat and Claudia share in Anne Rice’s 1976 novel, its readers have some sense of how this eight-episode second season progresses. 

The seduction of this new season is in the ambiguity of its characters’ true aim and the changeable nature of their desires. Louis and Claudia terminated the agonized trap in which Lestat caught them at the end of Season 1 but, unnaturally, this is not the end of their dealings with him. Neither does it simplify the love triangle they navigate, one fraught with distrust and worry and gorgeous in its sensual gothic splendor. 

Lestat haunts Louis, his figment traipsing beside him as he and Claudia roam the miserable dark, searching for clues about where they come from in an ancestral sense to compensate for what their maker denied them. The rift between him and Claudia is only wider and her resentment toward him for cursing her to be trapped in an adolescent body even more caustic. 

But some of that is an effect of the blood. 

We need your help to stay independent

In “What Can the Damned Really Say to the Damned,” Louis and Claudia land in Romania at the end of the war, where a villager named Emilia (Stephanie Hayes) takes them in, trading vodka and cigarettes for shelter with the rest of her people. A British journalist named Morgan (Blake Ritson) is among them, caught between the Soviet occupiers, rogue German soldiers who don’t realize they’ve lost, and as Emilia grimly hints, maybe something else lurks in the forest.

Precisely what they’re looking for, but not what they’re expecting. As in Rice’s book, the vampires in this part of the world are sickly and barely sentient. Confronting one leads them to Daciana, one of the true ancients, a shriveled crone to whom Claudia offers hope and a few drops of her blood.

The elder rapturously likens the offering to cream from the top of a milk bucket. It is not enough. Before this, we see a small taste of life in this place where humans survive on soup and a few shreds of decency but cannot shake the specter of fear. “Interview with the Vampire” and stories like it are outsider tales; the monsters live among humans but function on society’s margins. 

For Louis and Claudia, that’s even more the case although Louis’ refusal to accept that is what draws us and his reluctant biographer Daniel Molloy (Eric Bogosian) to him and seals him in his misery. Hence when Morgan assumes Louis is either a Communist or a deserter in trying to figure him out, his self-characterizations as “a magical vodka Negro having the first alright night in quite a while” is mildly droll and lamentable. But these are humans emerging from a long tunnel of hatred and deadly prejudice, only to replace them with other hatreds and prejudices. 

“The humans, there’s too much sadness,” Louis tells Daciana. “Too much pain.” Someone else puts it more plainly: “They don’t want life anymore.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


This reading of Louis and Claudia’s lineage allows writer Hannah Moscovitch to transform a station along the characters’ development track into an apologue about war and misery. Moscovitch posits that if the old vampire world is rotten, that is less an effect the organic obsolescence time causes than the necrosis imposed by rampant inhumanity. 

Interview With the VampireInterview With the Vampire (AMC)Rice’s book is a bloody, romantic, moving journey through loneliness and regret – enough to hold us for a few episodes if the showrunner were to have taken a more literal route. Inviting a deeper reading suggests this adaptation aims to extend its lifespan by appealing to fears and philosophies haunting us now. The kind of rancor and bitterness that ushered forth World War II poisons us too. Hoping for better times keeps us going.

That makes it more of a relief to see Louis and Claudia abandon the sepia grimness of Eastern Europe for a Paris that is reawakening. One assumes the prey tastes better for the usual reasons. 

But the despair strangling Romania is not too distant from that place either regardless of how forward-looking it may be. It stalks the City of Lights like Lestat’s apparition stalks his lover, like time itself, although “Interview with the Vampire” makes us content to slow it down for a while.

"Interview with the Vampire" premieres at 9 p.m. Sunday, May 12 on AMC and streams on AMC+.

Study: Americans’ budgets for eating out have dropped by 10%

A new study has found that American consumers now spend 30% of their monthly food budgets on restaurants — down from 40% just two years ago. 

According to Nation’s Restaurant News, the survey, which was conducted by the restaurant marketing technology company Popmenu, asked 1,000 respondents about how they spent their money on food and their attitudes about restaurants. While “64% of consumers said they would visit a restaurant every day if they could,” many reported that inflation had caused them to reconsider how they spent their food budgets, including cutting back on dining out. 

This decreased spending is reflected in current U.S. Census Bureau data that shows food and drink businesses generated $93.7 billion on a seasonally adjusted basis in March 2024, versus $94.2 billion in November. 

“We are all feeling pressure on unit economics. Our labor costs are extremely high. Prime costs are going up. We have to price to close that gap so we have enough profit margin to survive,” Lauren Fernandez, CEO/founder of Full Course said during Nation’s Restaurant News’ recent CREATE Roadshow event in Atlanta. “One of the fastest levers to pull is taking price, but some of us are at risk of taking too much price.”




 

Michael Cohen: Melania Trump came up with idea to spin “Access Hollywood” tape as “locker room talk”

Prosecutors in Donald Trump's hush money trial have sought to highlight the impact of the "Access Hollywood" recording on the 2016 campaign, in which the former president could be heard boasting of sexual assault, arguing that it was in the wake of that revelation that crimes were committed to prevent others from speaking out.

But testifying Monday, Michael Cohen, the one-time fixer for the former president, said that the argument that the recording merely reflected "locker room talk" came not from within the campaign but was suggested by Trump's wife, Melania.

"We needed to put a spin on this," Cohen explained Monday, per CNN. "The spin he wanted put on it was that this is 'locker room talk,' something that Melania had recommended — or, at least, he told me that’s what Melania had thought it was — and use that in order to get control over the story and to minimize its impact on him and his campaign."

It was in the tumultuous aftermath of its release that Cohen paid Stormy Daniels $130,000 to keep quiet, a transaction that was falsely recorded — allegedly with Trump's knowledge — as a legal expense so as to avoid campaign finance reporting requirements. In 2018, Cohen received a three-year prison sentence for his role in the scheme.

Daniels last week testified that she had a sexual encounter with Trump in 2006, just months after Melania gave birth to his son, Barron. Trump, Daniels said, told her not to "worry" about his wife.

Bird flu detected in Colorado dairy cattle − a vet explains the risks

Colorado has highly pathogenic avian influenza – also known as HPAI or bird flu – on a dairy farm, the ninth state with confirmed cases. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Veterinary Services Laboratories confirmed the virus on April 25, 2024, in a herd in northeast Colorado.

This farm is one of 35 dairy farms across the U.S. with verified cases of bird flu in cattle as of May 7, 2024, according to the USDA.

Bird flu is not new to Colorado. The state experienced an outbreak in poultry that began in 2022. Since then, the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has reported that 6.3 million birds in nine commercial flocks and 25 backyard flocks have been affected by the virus. The most recent detection was in February 2024.

But this is the first time the disease has made cattle in Colorado sick.

I'm a veterinarian and epidemiologist at Colorado State University who focuses on infectious diseases in dairy cows. I spent many years on a USDA incident management team working on multiple cattle and poultry disease outbreaks, and I'm leading the efforts at Colorado State University to study this novel outbreak.

 

The first cases of bird flu in cattle

Bird flu was first detected in dairy cattle in Texas and Kansas in March 2024.

Colorado State University faculty responded to the outbreak by forming a multistate group with state departments of agriculture, the USDA and other universities to gain a better perspective of how this virus is transmitted between farms and among cows. The team is coordinating the sampling and testing of sick and healthy cows on affected farms to understand which animals are shedding the virus, meaning they are more likely to spread the disease, and for how long.

We are also working to identify mitigation steps to help control this disease. Our network of animal health specialists is working with dairy producers and informing them of new data on a weekly basis.

 

Detecting bird flu in cattle

In February 2024, veterinarians and researchers began testing the blood, urine, feces, milk and nasal swab samples of sick cows. The virus was detected most frequently in raw milk, suggesting the disease may have been spread to other cows during the milking process.

More recent laboratory tests have also detected the virus in cows' nasal secretions for a short time before the virus presents in their raw milk.

In late April, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and USDA began testing commercial milk samples. To date, authorities have not detected any live virus in these samples.

That's expected because the pasteurization process, which heats milk to at least 161 degrees Fahrenheit (72 degrees Celsius) for at least 15 seconds, kills the virus. Pasteurization times and temperatures used in the U.S. are designed to kill bacterial pathogens, but they are working against this virus.

Raw milk, as its name implies, is not pasteurized. The CDC has linked drinking raw milk to many foodborne illnesses, including E. coli and salmonella. The presence of the virus that causes bird flu, H5N1, is an additional reason for concern.

Dairy producers are required to divert abnormal milk and milk from sick cows from the food supply to protect consumers.

In addition to milk, the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service has tested samples of commercial ground beef from states with sick cows. No virus had been found in beef as of May 1, 2024.

 

Slowing the spread of the disease

At this early stage of the outbreak in dairy cows, researchers don't know exactly how bird flu spreads in cattle, so recommendations to contain it may shift as more is learned.

I have seen many infected cows and they look dull and depressed, similar to how humans feel during a viral infection. Many infected cows have signs similar to humans with the flu, such as a fever.

Many dairy producers separate sick cows in hospital pens, away from healthy ones, so sick cows can be easily monitored and treated.

Since the virus has been found in nasal secretions in early infection, it's possible the water tanks for the herds' drinking water could be a source of infection. Farmers should continue to clean these tanks at least weekly – and even more often in hospital pens – as a best practice.

 

Infected cows can recover

The good news is that most cows get better. Like a human with the flu, they respond to anti-inflammatory drugs and oral fluids.

A small percentage of cows do get secondary bacterial infections and die or are humanely euthanized. Some cows recover from the infection but stop producing milk and are removed from the herd and usually slaughtered for beef.

Because the virus is detected most often in milk from sick cows, our team recommends dairy producers continue following best milking practices on the dairy farm, including disinfecting the cow's teats before and after milking, even healthy cows.

Just one case of human conjunctivitis due to bird flu was reported in a Texas dairy farmworker in late March. The worker was likely exposed through direct contact with milk from an infected cow or from rubbing their eyes with their hands or gloves that had come in contact with contaminated milk. The CDC recommends farmworkers wear personal protective equipment, including eye protection, when in direct or close physical contact with raw milk.

 

How dairy producers can protect herds

Viruses can end up on farms through the movement of cattle, people, vehicles, equipment and wild birds.

The U.S. dairy industry has a Secure Milk Supply Plan that addresses foreign and emerging dairy cattle diseases like bird flu. The plan calls for increased biosecurity practices on farms during disease outbreaks.

Biosecurity practices include limiting cattle movement on and off farms, allowing only required personnel access to cattle, preventing vehicles and equipment from other farms from entering cattle areas, and cleaning and disinfecting vehicles entering and leaving dairy farms. Following these practices should greatly reduce the opportunity for the virus to enter new herds.

Birds also carry the virus. They are more difficult to control because of their easy access to feed and water on dairy farms. State and federal fish and game departments and wildlife agencies work with farmers to reduce the risk of diseases spread by wild birds. These include programs to limit the number of birds attracted to dairy farms while respecting rules protecting these species.

Producers who observe cows with clinical signs of bird flu should let their veterinarians know so that proper testing can be done to confirm the presence of bird flu. If a test result is positive, the lab that conducts the test must report it to the USDA. As USDA and affected states continue to track the disease, an accurate estimate of affected farms will allow investigators to determine how the virus is spreading from farm to farm – and if we are making progress in containing it.

 

Jason Lombard, Associate Professor and Veterinarian, Colorado State University

 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.