Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“Low-quality people”: James Carville says Republican SOTU antics were “white trash on display”

Former Democratic strategist and infamous southerner James Carville bashed Republicans for their behavior during the State of the Union Address on Tuesday, calling them “white trash.”

“Well, you know, I told people I have a PhD in white trashology, you saw real white trash on display,” said Carville, speaking to MSNBC’s Ari Melber. “Let me say something about congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., she dresses like white trash. She really needs a fashion consultant. I recommend George Santos. He could do a good job of dressing up where she doesn’t announce her white trashdom by her own clothes.”

Greene was attempting to dress like a white balloon but that appeared to be lost on most Americans who don’t follow her on Twitter. The bash by Carville is reminiscent of conservative Matt Lewis who wrote in the Daily Beast that Trump would never have Greene as his VP because she was too “low rent” for his high style. Republicans who spoke to Raw Story were displeased with Greene’s behavior at the speech.

“First of all, their lust for cutting Social Security and Medicare is well documented,” Carville said about the GOP. “Newt Gingrich shut the government down and got defeated in the end. We know that George W. Bush tried to privatize Social Security and Medicare. we know when Paul Ryan was Speaker and John Boehner — they did everything they could to cut Social Security and Medicare. We know that that is their objective.”

He went on to say that there was a South Dakota congressman saying that people must come together to make such cuts.

“President Joe Biden is 1000% right on this, and he’s right to press ahead, and I thought he had a great night last night,” Carville continued. “It’s just — the level of white trashdom in the Republican Party is staggering. I mean, for somebody that has observed it for a long time, like I have, I’ve never seen it manifest itself on a level that it’s manifesting itself.”

He went on to say that Republicans were stupid to fall for something so amateurish.

“When something like this happens, how could we be this lucky?” Carville asked. “How could they just walk right into it, right? I mean, oh, my God. They did it. And I know— I’m positive [the White House staff] were hoping for this reaction, but they’d have been satisfied with half of it, but they just went and walked right into the trap. And Kevin McCarthy, who is not white trash, he’s just white Jell-O, he knew what happened.”

Carville went on to cite people like Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., who similarly shouted and made a scene in the past State of the Union Address.

“You cannot do anything to have low-quality people — Lauren Boebert met her husband when — allegedly according to the police report, he exposed himself to her at a bowling alley,” said Carville. “This is not made-up stuff. This is who they are! And even McCarthy, as gutless and spineless as he is, knew that they walked right into the trap. It’s unbelievable.”

Melber noted that ahead of the speech, McCarthy was telling the press that he was going to be civil and he wouldn’t stoop to the level of former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who tore up Trump’s speech copy. In the end, however, he ended up being seen on camera whispering “shhhh” to his caucus.

Melber cited the House of Lords in the U.K., which tends to be raucous and takes pride in its grumbling. He wondered if this was the introduction to the United States becoming that level of politics.

“You know, usually I’m pretty pessimistic about the state of American politics, and to some extent the State of American culture, but I thought this was illuminating,” said Carville. “Come on, this was entertaining, man. You know, if you like entertainment, you know, you couldn’t see this and let them expose themselves, if you will, Lauren Boebert’s husband, to see just how trashy these people are. How rude they are. How ill-mannered they are. And you don’t get to see this very often at this level. And you really got to see it last night at this level. I’m a big believer that, you know, the state of the union, I mean, no one cares. It doesn’t change anything. I don’t know what it all changed last night, but it was vastly and enormously entertaining to me.”

Republican hearing to expose alleged Twitter bias against conservatives spectacularly “backfires”

A House Oversight Committee hearing held this week to purportedly prove that former Twitter executives colluded with federal government officials to cover up a 2020 New York Post article about Hunter Biden’s laptop did not pan out the way Republican members hoped, The Daily Beast reports.

Per CNN, hard-right GOPers in the House, including Rep. James Comer, R-Tenn., Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., have allotted a significant amount of time to push their “factually unsupported narrative” that the so-called “collusion” is designed to suppress conservatives.

Ex-Twitter executives Yoel Roth, James Baker, and Vijaya Gadde, and Anika Collier Navaroli testified during the hearing that “it was a ‘mistake’ to briefly block the article over misinformation concerns,” but they ensured the House members that there was no government involvement, Daily Beast reports.

During the hearing, Comer asserted that Twitter intentionally abided by demands from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to cover up the Hunter Biden story “because they were ‘terrified of Joe Biden not winning the election,'” according to CNN.

However, the GOP member’s accusation backfired.

The former Twitter executives not only proved that there was no government involvement in the Hunter Biden Laptop story, but also testified that former President Donald Trump “received preferential treatment for years” and “directly requested the site remove tweets that he didn’t like,” according to The Daily Beast.

Democratic Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly showed that it was Trump’s administration that attempted to have content removed in 2019 after model Chrissy Teigen tweeted that Trump is a “p***y a** b****.”

And on the other hand, President Joe Biden’s administration never called on the social media giant to have content taken down.

A former senior Trump aide told Rolling Stone, “It was strange to me when all of these investigations were announced because it was all about the exact same stuff that we had done [when Donald Trump was in office].”

“It was normal,” the aide added.

Additionally, CNN reports Navaroli “testified that the social media company ended its ban on abusive language against immigrants to ‘go back to where they came from’ so that Trump would not face repercussions for his racist 2019 attack on four minority Democratic congresswomen.”

Still, the GOP members remain steadfast in pushing their theory.

“My, my, my—what happens when you hold a hearing, and you can’t prove your point?” Connolly asked.

Which planets – and planetary moons – could actually have life?

Science fiction is filled with stories of humans traveling to other planets — and, of course, quite often those planets are inhabited. Whether it’s explorers having romantic adventures in “Star Trek” or determined scientists trying to save humanity in “Interstellar,” people instinctively want to believe that our universe might allow us to casually planet-hop. It is hopeful to believe that we could escape from Earth’s problems to a literal new world, and inspiring to think other fascinating life forms might await us either in our solar system or on exoplanets just beyond.

Wolf 1069b is remarkable similar to Earth: It has roughly 1.26 our planet’s mass and 1.08 times its size.

The mundane scientific reality, though, is that scientists aren’t even sure what alien life would look like. (Some best guesses posit that it’d be microbial.) To even begin speculating, researchers imagine what types of worlds might have conditions similar to Earth’s: They need to orbit stars that possess just the right qualities, be a comparable distance from their star so that liquid water might exist (also known as a a “habitable zone”), have a comparable size (roughly 2.5 Earth radii or 10 Earth masses — or, for rockier worlds, 1.3 Earth radii or 3 Earth masses), and so on. Indeed, of the estimated 5,307 exoplanets in 3,910 planetary systems (as of February 2023), only 1.5 percent of them are catalogued as potentially habitable worlds.

Yet even with odds as low as that, there is still hope. Here are five contenders for extraterrestrial life worthy of consideration.

01
Wolf 1069b
One of the newest additions to the list of potentially habitable worlds, Wolf 1069b‘s discovery was announced in the scientific journal Astronomy & Astrophysics earlier this month. In terms of its physical dimensions, Wolf 1069b is an Earth-like exoplanet, and is indeed remarkably similar to Earth: It has roughly 1.26 our planet’s mass and 1.08 times its size. Wolf 1069b also, as astronomer at Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Diana Kossakowski explained in a statement, “orbits the star within 15.6 days at a distance equivalent to one-15th of the separation between the Earth and the sun.” Given that its host star is much smaller than our own sun, the closer distance improves its prospects of being habitable.

Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


02
Teegarden’s Star b
Teegarden’s Star b might sound like the name of a whimsical bucolic fairy tale, but in reality it is a rocky ball 12 light years from Earth that was discovered in 2019. According to NASA, Teegarden’s Star b is “a super Earth exoplanet,” but that “super” does not mean it has special powers. Super-Earths are worlds that range anywhere from 30-70% larger than Earth. This means that they are still large enough to potentially host life, and Teegarden’s Star b is also in the habitable zone of its star. This means it could potentially support liquid water.
03
TOI 700 d
TOI 700 is a red dwarf star more than 101 lightyears away from Earth. While there are four exoplanets orbiting this star, only TOI 700 d is considered to fall in the habitable zone. In addition, it is considered to have a rocky surface with a mass roughly 1.69 times that of Earth and a radius roughly 1.19 times that of Earth. Overall this exoplanet receives roughly 86% the same energy from its star as Earth receives from its sun, which combined with the other variables makes it a prime candidate for life.
04
Europa
Europa is not an exoplanet, or even a planet. Located squarely in our solar system, Europa is a moon orbiting the largest planet in our solar system, Jupiter. From a telescope, Europa resembles nothing so much as a scuffed up cue ball; its icy crust is scarred with ridges that may contain salty pools of liquid water. Indeed, the entire planet is believed to have swirling oceans beneath the icy surface, perhaps warmed by a planetary core. NASA scientists are also poring through data from its Galileo orbiter in the hope that it may yield some insights.
 
“The modeling found that there could be a variety of different salts present on the surface but suggested that infrared spectroscopy alone is generally unable to identify which specific types of salt are present,” team leader and University of Leicester School of Physics and Astronomy Ph.D. student Oliver King said in a statement to Space.com about the ongoing search for potentially life-creating materials.
05
Mars
This is the big one. The one that constantly attracts the fascination of fiction writers and big-talking entrepreneurs like Elon Musk. Yet the reality of Mars is much more mundane: Scientists theorize that life might have existed on Mars at one point, and may have even spread to Earth through space debris in a process known as panspermia. That said, if life does exist on Mars today, astrobiologists suspect it is more likely to be microbial than consisting of little green men. There are also studies suggesting that life may have previously existed on Mars before the planet underwent climate change. Another recent study suggests life on Mars would have gone extinct 1.3 billion years ago.

Adults in the playroom: Biden and Romney try to rescue order from chaos — but is that enough?

At least two adults showed up in the House of Representatives chamber on Tuesday night — giving the nation some hope for the future. Meanwhile, several of the feral children who hold federal offices arrived and soiled their own sandbox.

Whether it was Mitt Romney destroying George Santos or President Biden owning his hecklers with a smile, America got to see what happens when serious-minded politicians — with real experience — take center stage.

Of course, after watching the social media world tear itself apart over Biden’s State of the Union address, not to mention the laughable retort from  Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the lightweight governor of Arkansas and infamous former presidential mouthpiece, you have to wonder whether not all humans are sentient.

The president used some powerful words to describe a hopeful America. Those words have been part of his standard stump speech, but in an age of divisiveness his closing remarks landed with resonance: “Because the soul of this nation is strong, because the backbone of this nation is strong, because the people of this nation are strong, the State of the Union is strong. As I stand here tonight, I have never been more optimistic about the future of America.”

The only thing the man-child Donald Trump could say in response on his social media platform was that Biden was a liar and the country isn’t that strong. I guess that’s the rallying cry for children who are prone to histrionics. 

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, speaking for the Republicans, countered with, “The dividing line in America is no longer between right or left.  The choice is between normal or crazy. ” She is absolutely right. She is also absolutely crazy.

These contrary thoughts about the status of our country go far deeper than the division between right and  left. Do we even know what a fact is? Are we sentient enough to recognize one if we see it? Those questions are foremost on my mind after listening to and watching Biden speak and after witnessing others decry him as a criminal, the largest liar and worst president ever to live at the White House. As Tom Arnold said in “True Lies,” denial ain’t just a river in Egypt. Many in this country not only live in denial of what Trump did while in office, but deny their own ignorance and are arrogant about it. But enough about George Santos.

The ease and comfort with which certain members of Congress overlook or ignore an insurrection waged for Trump’s benefit at our nation’s Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, while calling Biden a liar and the worst president ever, is horrifyingly and darkly amusing. These very same people became instant experts this week on high-altitude balloons. Satire has never been easier — if we could only laugh.

Far too many members of Congress are willing to overlook Trump’s insurrection while calling Joe Biden a liar. And now they’re instant experts on high-altitude balloons.

Now, back to George Santos. The embattled New York congressman with the invented life story was told to sit down and shut up, as Congress gathered for the State of the Union, by none other than Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, once upon a time the Republican Party’s presidential nominee. Romney is a leading GOP advocate for removing Santos from office and has made no secret about it. You’d think that if Santos had any common sense, he’d lie low and try to weather the storm. But Santos has no sense at all and struck a fanboy stance Tuesday night. There he stood, center aisle, wearing a suit and a bright orange tie, trying to position himself to shake as many hands as possible, as if he were a solitary political groupie.

Santos seems incapable of rational, independent thought — let alone adult action. He later tweeted a snarky comment about Romney, noting that the latter will never be president. That is likely a fact. But it also might be a fact that Santos will soon wear more orange than just the tie he had on Tuesday night. Foreshadowing? 

Meanwhile, consider the State of the Union address itself. I hope you saw it. If you didn’t, and relied on the instant analysis of news anchors and pundits after the fact, I’m advising you otherwise. Ignore the instant analysis. On television we gave the usual mixed bag of cheers and insults, either praising or vilifying Biden while often telling our audience, “The truth is …”

Much of that analysis is based on nothing more than quips and one-liners. Brevity is indeed the soul of wit, but it’s not the soul of analysis. Nonetheless, many pundits proclaimed that they were telling us the unvarnished “truth” about Biden’s address. Pray tell, whose truth are they telling me? What gives anyone the right to tell me what the truth is?

Journalists are not here to tell you “the truth.”

Anyone, in the media or anywhere else, who claims they dictate to you the “truth” is full of shit.

Journalism is the search for facts. If you want truth, as Indiana Jones said, the philosophy class is two doors down.

Unfortunately, these days we don’t deliver the facts. When Biden said he wanted to renew antitrust efforts (recalling famed “trust-buster” Teddy Roosevelt — a Republican, if you’re keeping score) one has to hope that includes breaking up the media monopolies.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Today we are less about news and more about trying to preach our own version of the truth, and in so doing we are humorless, shameless and feckless. Before the State of the Union, I heard from several friends of mine in the business who sat in on planning meetings for their various organizations about how to cover Biden’s speech. Editors made “bold predictions” about Biden “going after the Republicans” and mounting a vicious campaign to denigrate them. “That’s how we see it, objectively,” I was told. That’s objective? Hell, it’s not even well-informed. That’s not how Biden operates.

I don’t ever want to hear anything more about journalists being objective. At the risk of sounding like Woody Allen and Diane Keaton arguing philosophy (“Love and Death,” check it out!) objectivity is subjective.

“I never understood what ‘objectivity’ meant,” explained longtime Washington Post editor Leonard Downie Jr. in a recent opinion piece. “I didn’t consider it a standard for our newsroom. My goals for our journalism were instead accuracy, fairness, nonpartisanship, accountability and the pursuit of truth.” 

I understand what “objectivity” means. Since it’s inherently subjective, I don’t believe in it and I don’t employ it as a standard for journalism. The goal of journalism begins and ends with factual accuracy and exceptional writing — and that doesn’t end after publication. The constant updating is endless at best and forgotten at worst. Want to be fair? Then be accurate.

Pretend you are Lt. Columbo for a minute. Search for facts. It is the height of hubris and arrogance to assume the role of “truth-teller” for the rest of humanity. The best label is “fact-finder.” The truth is always subjective. There are five major religions and about 4,000 other religious faiths on the planet and they all have their truths. 

We need no more false prophets. The journalist serves best who provides facts, corrects them, updates them and supplies them to his fellow man. There’s our relevance.

Facts, it turns out, are far more important than the so-called truths extracted from them. How many “truths” exist independent of facts? The fiction of objectivity gives cover to those who use it to push their own agenda — either by giving false equivalence on disparate issues, or by using “he said, she said” as a defense for reporting, instead of finding the facts.

At the end of the day, the vetted fact is the coin of the realm.

*  *  *

Last week, in between being spared the pain of dining with Bill Barr at a journalistic event where we both spoke, and then presenting a speech in which I called him out for lying, I was reminded of accountability. 

In journalism, facts are more important than the so-called truths extracted from them. As Indiana Jones put it, if you want truth, philosophy class is two doors down.

In speaking before the California Newspaper Publishers Association, I said I was glad Barr was involved in the conference. “Maybe he’ll finally answer some pointed questions about his fiction surrounding the Mueller report,” I said. He promised me an interview to answer those questions after his luncheon speech, but (no surprise) he was lying  to me and didn’t follow through. Thus I could only get a written question presented to him during his speech. I asked whether Barr accepted any responsibility for disinformation or misinformation that was spread while he was Trump’s attorney general. He said he would “accept no responsibility. ” That is a fact.

Whether he knew this or not, Barr was echoing his former boss, who used those same words to claim no responsibility for things he’d participated in as president. It is a fact that neither man will accept any responsibility for anything that they do not believe is in their best interest to defend. 

Both are protecting their own political posteriors these days. Barr tried to defend himself at the recent CNPA meeting by blaming the media for all of his ills, public and private. It was just the latest version of “shoot the messenger.”

Meanwhile, Donald Trump is doing what he always does: yelling like a banshee, moaning in despair, anger, victimhood and hatred, and promising that salvation can only be found through him. Trump is his own version of Lady Macbeth. His is the tale told by an idiot, the epitome of “sound and fury signifying nothing.” 

Nothing remains inevitable for Donald Trump. His descent into nothingness remains as fascinating as a dying dust devil on the lonely western Kansas prairie — one of those places Trump claims to represent, but only exploits. 

Juxtapose Trump and Barr’s partisan posturing with Joe Biden. In his State of the Union address, Biden said that democracy isn’t a partisan thing, but an American thing. He vowed to work with the Republican Congress. The most divisive stance he took during his entire speech Tuesday night was on taxing billionaires. “Let’s finish the job. Reward work, not just wealth. Pass my proposal for a billionaire minimum tax. Because no billionaire should pay a lower tax rate than a school teacher or a firefighter.”

The GOP would have none of it. Speaker Kevin McCarthy wouldn’t even applaud when Biden proposed higher pay for school teachers.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, in the GOP response, tried to lay claim as the “new leadership” in the Republican Party, but could only parrot her former boss. So much for critical thinking. Her entire partisan response to the State of the Union address not only landed with a loud thud but rested on calling Biden a liar and insisting that America stinks. I recently read an article proposing that  misinformation and disinformation were no big  deal. I’d say whoever wrote that skipped Sanders’ speech and is therefore grossly misinformed. 

Here are a few additional facts to consider; Biden had a lot of energy Tuesday night. He handled his hecklers very well and even set a trap for the eternally immature Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, which gave him the opportunity to announce that everyone in Congress had just agreed not to cut Social Security or Medicare. While not quite saying so, he also laid the groundwork for his re-election campaign. “Let’s finish the job,” Biden said more than once. Want to guess how long it will be before that becomes his official campaign slogan?

That’s what the facts suggest. Further information could change that. The Democrats, for now giddy with Biden’s Tuesday speech, will probably repeat Biden’s message and expand upon it going forward. Meanwhile, the president, like  other presidents before him, has taken his message on the road with stops in Wisconsin and Florida over the next few days. Those are potential battleground states in the next election. 

The Republicans, left in disarray after Biden’s speech (I mean, how do you argue against American cooperation?), will try to counter with their divisive rhetoric. Some will try to work with Biden, some will try to kick George Santos out of Congress and others will take the road often traveled by Trump and Barr: They’ll refuse to accept responsibility and blame the Democrats for everything while they — along with some of their Democratic counterparts — rearrange the deckchairs on the Titanic. 

So the 2024 presidential race has begun in earnest. That’s the fact we have yet to acknowledge and perhaps the real importance of Biden’s speech. 

As my dad used to say, “Close the door and buckle up.”

No, we still can’t predict earthquakes (despite what some on Twitter may say)

The world is still reeling from the devastating series of earthquakes that struck Syria and Türkiye this week, injuring more than 68,000 people and killing over 15,000 at the time of this writing. That number is predicted to rise, with some estimates from the United Nations anticipating a death toll as high as 20,000 people, making it one of the deadliest earthquakes this century.

The earthquake occurred at a “triple junction,” where the boundaries of three tectonic plates meet: in this case, the African, Anatolian and Arabian plates. As these giant rock formations rub against each other, they release massive amounts of energy. In this case, it struck about 11 miles (18 kilometers) below ground, west of the city of Gaziantep, Türkiye, which is about two hours north of Aleppo, Syria. Nearly 6000 buildings have been destroyed and many victims are unaccounted for.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the quake registered a 7.8 on the Richter scale, a metric used to measure the intensity of an earthquake. Anything 7.0 or greater is capable of causing severe damage over large areas while earthquakes above 8.0 are among the largest earthquakes that can occur.

The first quake, known as the mainshock, was followed by a 7.5 magnitude aftershock about nine hours later, which is rare to have such a strong aftershock. But the region has been pummeled with smaller quakes ever since. And according to some geologists, it could keep on rattling for months and even years.

It may seem like all of this came out of nowhere and it’s true that neither Syria or Türkiye had any advance warning of this earthquake. But a tweet posted on Feb 3rd seems to have predicted this exact scenario.

Frank Hoogerbeets, a self-proclaimed earthquake predictor, went somewhat viral this week after posting a map with a series of red circles over the exact area where the earthquake happened three days later. “Sooner or later there will be a ~M 7.5 #earthquake in this region (South-Central Turkey, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon),” he wrote on Twitter on Friday.

While this seems eerily prescient, the USGS has flatly declared that it’s not possible to predict earthquakes. In order to accurately predict an earthquake, you must fulfill three criteria: the date and time, the location, and the magnitude. Hoogerbeets got two out of three correct (“sooner or later” is not an exact date or time), though the magnitude was off by 0.3. Close enough? Unfortunately, that still may not be enough to predict an earthquake.

“Statements on social media that an earthquake would happen in the effected region of Turkey were timely given that they were coincidentally made prior to a large earthquake sequence, and the statements were accurate in suggesting that a large earthquake could happen in this region someday because this is a seismically active region with known hazard for large, damaging earthquakes,” William Barnhart, assistant coordinator of the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, told Newsweek. In other words, good guess. “Earthquakes are not a predictable phenomenon. No one can accurately predict the location, magnitude, and timing of an earthquake.”

It’s also worth noting that Hoogerbeets has predicted earthquakes in the past that never ended up occurring. In 2015, he warned Californians that an 8.8 magnitude would strike, but obviously, it never did. According to a news article from that year, Hoogerbeets did predict an earthquake in Nepal, which killed 8,800 people, two days before it happened. But the article doesn’t give much more detail than that. Hoogerbeets did not respond to Salon’s request for comment.

Where is Hoogerbeets getting all this data for his predictions? The alignment of the planets, of course. He is associated with the Solar System Geometry Survey, a website and YouTube channel, in which Hoogerbeets reads an earthquake “forecast” much like a weather report. Their theory is that certain planets like Mars or Saturn arranged themselves in a way that gave gravitational tugs on our planet, much like the Moon does to the tides, causing the quakes.

But earthquakes are not related to or predictable like the weather. The Earth’s outermost layer, the lithosphere, is made up of plates of rock that are cracked like puzzle pieces. These tectonic plates are constantly shuffling around, which makes it hard to anticipate their next move.

Yet, when they stumble over each other, we definitely feel it. Well, sometimes. Most earthquakes go unnoticed, miles below ground, with about 20,000 per year or 55 per day. The intensity depends on many factors, including complex churnings in the Earth’s core. Humans can also cause earthquakes, such as via “fracking,” which is blasting fluid into cracks deep in the earth to suck out fossil fuels and oil. Nuclear bombs, volcanoes, hurricanes and more can also influence earthquake activity.

While the exact mechanisms that trigger earthquakes are not fully understood, we can probably rule out other planets causing them. The sun is also probably not implicated in any of this, though that is hotly contested among some planetary experts.

“There is simply no way an alignment of planets can cause an earthquake on Earth. It’s literally impossible,” astronomer Phil Plait wrote in Slate in 2015. “I’ve done the math on this before; the maximum combined gravity of all the planets under ideal conditions is still far less than the gravitational influence of the Moon on the Earth, and the Moon at very best has an extremely weak influence on earthquakes.”

To disprove this, Hoogerbeets would need to present data showing this influence and probably start correctly guessing a lot more of these events with a lot more precision. Given the sudden attention, it seems unlikely he’ll stop making forecasts. Just because Hoogerbeets is likely wrong about the cause of earthquakes being Mars or whatever does not mean earthquake prediction is a worthless endeavor, of course. Clearly such a technology could help prevent a massive amount of suffering if it could be developed. If Hoogerbeets can achieve something like that, then godspeed.

In 1968, writing in the journal Earth-Science Reviews, Tsuneji Rikitake of the Earthquake Research Institute at the University of Tokyo wrote that earthquake prediction technology was imminent. “Present-day development of earthquake prediction research suggests that actual prediction of some class of earthquakes, if not all, may be possible within a period of a few tens of years provided that basic data could steadily be accumulated,” Rikitake wrote.

It seems his prediction about this prediction tech was wrong. It’s still not easy getting that basic data. There aren’t enough sensors deep in the Earth to detect tectonic activity over the timescales needed to create reliable models for such forecasts. This is also part of the reason why we still don’t fully understand the physical processes underneath our feet. Research is actively occurring in this area, including using machine learning, but that of course comes with limitations. So maybe solving this problem will take listening to the planet beneath our feet and not folks on social media.

“She’s not intellectually capable”: Knives out in TrumpWorld over Sanders’ “terrible” SOTU response

Prominent supporters of former President Donald Trump on Wednesday criticized Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ response to President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address.

Sanders, who served as Trump’s White House press secretary, delivered a rebuttal to the president’s speech that largely focused on Republican culture war issues and accused Biden of surrendering his presidency to a “woke mob that can’t even tell you what a woman is.”

“Most Americans simply want to live their lives in freedom and peace, but we are under attack in a left-wing culture war we didn’t start and never wanted to fight. Every day, we are told that we must partake in their rituals, salute their flags, and worship their false idols, all while big government colludes with Big Tech to strip away the most American thing there is—your freedom of speech. That’s not normal. It’s crazy, and it’s wrong,” Sanders said, later adding that the “dividing line in America is no longer between right and left — it’s between normal or crazy.”

Former chief Trump strategist Steve Bannon lit into Sanders’ speech on his “War Room” podcast on Wednesday, criticizing her for failing to mention Trump’s name.

“It was an insult to President Trump. She does not exist politically if it was not for President Trump,” he said.

Bannon called Sanders’ speech “terrible.”

“If you’re gonna give a counter speech, you gotta talk about important issues,” he said. “Don’t get me wrong. The wokeism is very important. But it’s not quite the heart of the matter right now, right? It’s not the heart of the matter. She is not–and the reason is she’s just not–she’s not intellectually capable of going to the heart of the matter, right? Let’s be blunt.”

Bannon made the comments while speaking to longtime Trump booster Lou Dobbs, who was fired from the Fox Business Network for spreading false election claims.

Dobbs said the speech was a “great insult” to Trump, complaining that Sanders did not even mention his name when she discussed going on a Christmas visit to Iraq with the former president and the first lady.

“It looked like the Governors Association had written that speech and aligned themselves with Ron DeSantis. It was a shame,” Dobbs complained.

“You are right this was like written by Ron DeSantis and the entire RGA,” Bannon agreed.

Sanders also drew criticism from her hometown newspaper over her “snarling about wokeness and the radical left.”

“It got pretty dark and weird,” Austin Bailey wrote in an editorial at the Arkansas Times. “A word salad of talking points and name calling, with some attempts at folksy relatability thrown in, Sanders’ rebuttal to Biden’s State of the Union address was light on policy, heavy on menace.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Conservative commentator Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, contrasted Biden’s speech focused on “the economy and concrete issues” with Sanders’ “deep plunge into dystopian culture wars.”

“These annual canned rebuttals usually come off as tone-deaf,” she wrote in an editorial at the Bulwark, “but with Sanders, there was an additional, unexpected contrast with Biden. She spoke for a dreary 15 minutes — all scripted according to teleprompter, with no audience. Biden spoke for more than an hour, with a teleprompter in front of plenty of hostile Republicans. Biden, 80 years young, rolled with it, tackling every tough subject on his agenda, inviting Republicans to join him at every turn. Sanders, 40 years old, droned on, her entire speech devoted to demonizing Biden.”

Former Republican strategist Steve Schmidt accused Sanders of “abusing” viewers with “MAGA lies.”

“Sarah Huckabee Sanders positioned herself as the voice of a rising generation of Americans. No thank you,” Schmidt said on his podcast. “It was stale. It was old. It was an ugly speech from a lying governor who is unfit for any type of public service.”

Minnesota to require 100% carbon-free electricity by 2040

Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota passed an ambitious climate law late Thursday night requiring the state’s power utilities to use 100 percent clean electricity by 2040. The clean electricity legislation was approved on a party-line vote by the state’s Senate. House Democrats passed an identical version of the bill last week, which means it now goes to the state’s Democratic governor, Tim Walz, who intends to sign it. 

“Minnesota has a proud tradition of being a national clean energy leader, but we’ve fallen behind other states,” Democratic House Majority Leader Jamie Long, who authored the bill, told Grist in a statement. “Minnesotans are calling on us to act and we are answering the call.”

The legislation establishes two new mandates for electric utilities in the state: a renewable electricity standard and a carbon-free energy standard. The former builds on a law the North Star State passed in 2007, which required power utilities to get at least 25 percent of their energy supply from renewable sources by 2025. They achieved that goal eight years early. The new standard ups the requirement to 55 percent renewable energy by 2035. The second standard instructs electric utilities that operate in the state to get 100 percent of their power from carbon-free sources by 2040, with targets set along the way — 80 percent carbon-free by 2030 and 90 percent by 2035. Utilities can use a mix of solar, wind, hydropower, nuclear, hydrogen power, and biomass — energy obtained from burning wood and trash — to meet the 2040 goal.  

Minnesota’s two top power utility companies, Xcel Energy and Minnesota Power, previously promised to reach 100 percent carbon-free energy by 2050. This bill speeds up their timeline by a decade, but it also includes “off-ramps” that utilities can take advantage of if the targets prove too onerous. If Xcel, for example, can make a case before state regulators that the benchmarks set by the legislation prevents it from supplying its customers with reliable power, the state may grant it an extension. Utilities can also buy clean energy tax credits to offset their emissions. 

The bill contains provisions that will help streamline the permitting process for new energy projects in the state, set minimum wage requirements for workers hired by the state’s utilities to build large-scale projects, and prevent power from waste incineration plants located in low-income, majority non-white communities from counting toward the 2040 target. 

Environmental justice groups in Minnesota fought hard to get that last provision included in the bill — they argued that waste-to-energy facilities, like the Hennepin Energy Recovery Center in Minneapolis, endanger the health of communities that live around them. The groups said the legislation is a good first step but argued that it doesn’t do enough to disincentivize other garbage incineration plants currently operating across the state.

State Republicans opposed the clean energy standard on the grounds that it would make electricity in the state more expensive and less reliable. “This ‘blackout bill’ is going to make energy unreliable, unsafe, and even dangerous,” the Republican House minority leader, Lisa Demuth, said. “Energy needs to be safe. We need it in Minnesota to be reliable, and this is neither.” Multiple analyses of existing state-level clean energy standards show the mandates have actually improved grid reliability and reduced costs for consumers. 

Minnesota House Democrats attempted to pass similar legislation before, in 2021, and were shot down by the Republican-controlled state Senate. In 2022, the party narrowly clinched a majority in the chamber, which illuminated a new path forward for climate legislation. Minnesota is the first state to pass a clean energy standard since Democrats in Washington, D.C., passed the Inflation Reduction Act, the biggest federal investment in fighting climate change in U.S. history, last August. 

“This is the culmination of a lot of hard work,” Paul Austin, head of Conservation Minnesota, told Grist. “It shows how the federal legislation and the state legislation can work together, and it shows that the states can continue to lead if Congress doesn’t have that window to do major things on climate going forward.”

GOP boos fool no one: Everyone knows Republicans want to slash Social Security and Medicare

After being forced into submission by people like Donald Trump and Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., one would think Speaker Kevin McCarthy would have downgraded his own self-assessment as a master negotiator. But no, ever since he finally secured his seat after 15 humiliating rounds of his own caucus voting against him, McCarthy has forged ahead with what he clearly thinks is a genius plan to trick President Joe Biden into destroying Social Security and Medicare for him: Mobster tactics.

As I explained in the Standing Room Only newsletter, McCarthy’s strategy seems to be to threaten to force the U.S. into debt default and simply let Biden intuit the ransom McCarthy would like paid, i.e. the destruction of Social Security and Medicare. That McCarthy really thought this would work suggests that he is not faking his very public admiration for Trump, who loves to use insinuation to communicate his desires that, usually for legal liability reasons, he can’t speak out loud. McCarthy, not known to anyone to be a bright man, appears to have really thought he could somehow trick Biden into not just decimating these long-standing health care and retirement programs, but that he could do so in a way to force Democrats to take the fall. 

Unsurprisingly, McCarthy’s “clever” negotiation style of being silent about his demands backfired spectacularly.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


McCarthy allowed Biden the space during his State of the Union address to show the public that Republicans are gunning for these popular programs by provoking a defensive denial of yelling and heckling from Republicans that is so over-the-top that it ended up confirming the accusation. Now McCarthy is having to deal with the very thing he was trying to avoid: A news cycle dominated by talk about how Republicans want to steal away the money in accounts workers spend their lives paying into as security when they retire. 

Just how badly did McCarthy’s gambit backfire? So badly that even Republican-friendly outlets like Axios and Politico ran with stories about the GOP’s secret yearnings to end Social Security and Medicare. Axios described Biden as “baiting Republicans to agree with his push to protect Medicare and Social Security.” The New York Times, which is usually overly credulous to Republican talking points, used similar language. Here’s how the Washington Post described the moment

The president responded by professing surprise that they had changed their position and now liked those programs, saying, “I enjoy conversion.” Adding that he would veto any effort to cut Social Security and Medicare, he added wryly, “But apparently it’s not going to be a problem.”

You don’t “bait” people into saying something if they wanted to say it. Implicit throughout the press coverage is that the GOP designs on Social Security and Medicare are well-known. As Tara Golshan at Vanity Fair pointed out in a lengthy Twitter thread, Republican attacks on Social Security and Medicare aren’t nearly as well-disguised as they seem to think they are: 

It’s once again proof that Republicans think voters are extremely stupid.

The euphemisms that Republicans use aren’t nearly as ingenious as they think. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., offered a hilariously typical example of how bad Republicans are at hiding their intentions. In trying to deny that the plan is to destroy Social Security and Medicare, he ended up tweeting confirmation that this is exactly what would happen:

Despite his flailing denials, it’s been clear from the moment that Scott first released his 11-point plan that the main purpose of the “sunset” provision was so that Social Security and Medicare would expire, and a GOP-controlled Congress would just never get around to voting to keep it around. It’s once again proof that Republicans think voters are extremely stupid. Scott really does seem to think that if Republicans just kill these programs passively instead of taking a vote against them, people wouldn’t notice or blame the GOP. In reality, of course, people tend to notice when their checks stop showing up or their doctor won’t see them anymore. And contrary to the fantasies of McCarthy and Scott, voters are not confused about what party, exactly, wants to slash these programs. As Heather “Digby” Parton reminded us at Salon recently, “Republicans have been trying to do away with these vital programs from the moment they were introduced.” 

The attempts to disguise their desires have grown more convoluted over the decades, of course. During the George W. Bush administration, for instance, Republicans thought they could smuggle Social Security destruction past voters by calling it “privatization.” They soon learned that voters, who tend to be skeptical of politicians already, saw directly through that ruse. Democrats won the 2006 midterms by healthy margins. But the Republican dream that they can fool the public with flimsy code words never dies. Former Vice President Mike Pence, also never mistaken for the sharpest tool, has been out there putting the final nail in his presidential aspirations by talking up Social Security “privatization.” 

Swing voters will reward Republicans for their culture war nonsense up until the point where Republicans cause massive damage.

Being generous to Republicans for a moment, there is one reason for them to think a majority of Americans are stupid: They do keep voting for Republicans. Republicans, in fact, won more voters in 2022 than Democrats. That’s hard evidence right there that a majority of Americans are easily snowed into voting against their own interests. 

Those numbers are disappointing reminders that voters could definitely be smarter, of course, but it’s not the slam dunk evidence of American imbecility that Republican politicians seem to think it is. The likelier explanation is that voters understand that Democrats will protect them from Republican efforts to decimate Medicare and Social Security. Perversely, that understanding freed some people up to vote GOP as a means to exercise their racist and sexist resentments, secure in the knowledge that Biden is in the White House to shield them from the worst consequences of electing a bunch of right-wing radicals.

We’ve seen this time and again: Swing voters will reward Republicans for their culture war nonsense up until the point where Republicans cause massive damage. Then they’ll run back to Democrats, to fish the country out of the gutter. We saw this in 2008 when voters elected Barack Obama to bail them out of the disastrous Bush presidency. We saw it again in 2020 when Biden was brought in to clean up for Trump. Voters are irrational at times and prone to complacency — but they aren’t as dumb as Republicans assume. 

Biden is making a safe bet for his re-election: Remind voters that he’s the only thing standing between them and Republicans ending these fundamental social safety net programs. That’s why the Republican Party increasingly opposes democracy and is even embracing fascism. If they have to rely on democratic systems, their multi-generational scheme to finally end Social Security and Medicare will likely never come to fruition. 

Republican identity politics: Authoritarianism — not individualism — is central to GOP

Repetition is one of the most essential principles in marketing. It is how a brand creates a relationship with consumers. If the marketing campaign is successful, the consumer will link the brand with certain emotions, images, and ideas. In the most effective marketing campaigns, the consumer embraces a given brand as exemplifying those qualities to the exclusion of the competing brands. 

At Forbes, Robin Lewis uses the example of Apple to demonstrate how this model functions:

Simply stated, a brand or store has a neurological connection with its customers if those customers approach the store visit as they would a visit to the home of a good friend. The trip requires almost no perceivable effort because they know it is going to be a fun and enjoyable experience.

The consumer mind-connecting process created by Jobs for Apple is instructional for all consumer-facing businesses because of its holistic approach.

Once connected, Apple and its cult of addicts are impervious to competitors. Steve Jobs was almost obsessed with building this deep connection with consumers. His ability to translate science, technology and innovation into artistically designed, consumer-friendly products is now legendary. The unique Apple Stores served as the final link in the connection.

Republicans are masters of marketing using endless repetition. 

They have successfully captured their public and created for them an entire alternate reality — a closed episteme — consisting of not just the party but a right-wing hate media echo chamber. Republicans can have all of their questions answered by this alternate reality.  

Their Orwellian newspeak version of “freedom, liberty and individual rights” just means that people are free as long as they do what Republicans want.

Republicans have used their marketing machine to brand themselves as the party of “freedom”, “liberty” and “individual rights.” This is objectively not true. Today’s Republican Party and “conservative” movement are fascists and authoritarians who in total hate real democracy and freedom. Their ultimate goal is to take away the civil and human rights and freedoms of those people they deem to be the enemy and therefore not “real Americans.” 

Their Orwellian newspeak version of “freedom, liberty and individual rights” just means that people are free as long as they do what Republicans want. For example, Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is engaging in a fascist project consisting of thought crime laws, banning books and authors who are deemed “dangerous,” and using his own personal Gestapo to intimidate and harass his political enemies.

DeSantis and his agents are also, quite literally, declaring the personhood of queer, gay, lesbian, transgendered and nonbinary people to be illegal. Part of this attack on their humanity and literal existence involves encouraging vigilantism and other violence. DeSantis is also taking away the reproductive rights and freedoms of women and girls.

.New research highlights the central role that authoritarian ideas – especially misogyny and hostile sexism – play in today’s Republican Party and the behavior of its voters. While self-identified Democrats and the public as a whole have increasingly embraced the idea of gender equality as a norm, Republicans have become more regressive and misogynistic, according to a study by the communications and polling firm PerryUnDem. PerryUnDem’s research also shows that hostile sexism and the core belief that women are inferior to men (meaning support for “traditional gender roles”) is highly correlated with opposing women’s reproductive rights. A belief that women do not have the intellectual or moral wisdom required to make decisions about their own bodies (i.e. they need to be guided by men) is also highly correlated with opposing women’s reproductive rights and freedoms.

In addition, Republicans are also much more likely than Democrats to believe that women who choose to have abortions are irresponsible. Republicans in the study also believe that feminism has done more harm than good for the country.

PerryUnDem’s report summarizes these findings:

Are sexist beliefs related to views toward abortion? Yes. There are very strong correlations between sexist beliefs and views toward abortion.

2. How pervasive are false stereotypes of women who have abortions? Upwards of 60% of the public hold stereotypical views.

3. What variables in our survey best predict wanting abortion legal or illegal? False stereotypes of women and women who have abortions.

The group identified as “hostile Anti-Egalitarians” — a group that includes almost 50 percent of Republican men — are most likely to hold such misogynistic views.

PerryUndem’s report elaborates:

This segment – 18% of all survey respondents – is the least progressive on gender and holds the most hostile sexist views. This cohort almost universally (95%) agrees feminism has done more harm than good. Large majorities agree women are too easily offended (91%) and 80% agree that white men are the most attacked group in the country right now. Three quarters (75%) say they’re more comfortable with women having traditional roles in society. Just 12% say a husband should definitely be prosecuted in the case of marital rape. This group skews white (76%), older (72% are 45+), men (57%), married (59%), Republican (58%), and religious (38% attend religious services once a week or more). Forty-four percent of Republican men are Antiegalitarians.

In a previous essay here at Salon, Amanda Marcotte explained how hostile sexism and misogyny fit into the Republican Party’s strategy:

Republicans know that there’s no substantive voting constituency for their economic policies. Tapping into this anger over women’s economic and social gains allows the party to reach voters who would not be motivated by spending cuts to Social Security or tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. So while most Americans may reject the misogyny that underpins abortion bans, the anti-choice message is tapping a larger group of voters than Republicans could otherwise access. If they give up sexism now, they risk losing their core voters without necessarily getting new ones to replace them. Misogyny has been central to the Republican brand for too long, it turns out, for them to risk changing course now…

“The research tells us that anti-abortion attitudes” are about more than “babies or when life begins,” Tresa Undem, the co-founder of PerryUndem, told Salon. Instead, “views are about one’s fundamental beliefs toward women.” When it comes to Republicans, “they hold the most hostile sexist views.”

In other words, to keep the GOP base motivated to donate, volunteer, and vote in elections, the Republican party needs to appeal to sexist attitudes. The most effective way to win over misogynist voters is to attack reproductive rights.

And new research by UC Berkeley political scientist Cecilia Hyunjung Mo complements PerryUndem’s findings. In conversation with Edward Lempinen of the Berkeley News, Mo elaborates on what she describes as “modern sexism” and anxieties related to hierarchy and loss of status:

Today, we’re seeing the advancement of women and several minority groups. We’re increasingly talking about issues of inequality. But if you’re thinking, “I’m not on top anymore and I should be on top,” then you might start feeling aggrieved by these changes.

Mo highlights how modern sexism impacts men’s voting and other political behavior:

Additionally, in current work I’m doing in the U.S., my collaborators and I see preliminary evidence that modern sexism and some other dimensions of sexism seem to be a lot more predictive of voting now than they were in the past.

These constituencies seem to be arguing, “Gender discrimination doesn’t exist anymore. We need to stop caring about advancing women. Women are getting too much. Men are being left behind. And we don’t like government agencies and taxpayer dollars being invested in trying to remedy some form of discrimination that we don’t think exists anymore.”

Donald Trump, Mo explains, skillfully uses white male rage as a tool to radicalize his followers into attacking and undermining pluralistic democracy. “Having the president of the United States champion their causes emboldened the aggrieved white male, and as their grievances were being amplified, they were made to feel that something could actually be done to address their concerns.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The mainstream American news media, especially its professional centrists with their “bothsidesism” and horserace coverage obsessions, have consistently failed to properly adapt to the Age of Trump, ascendant neofascism, and the larger democracy crisis. One of their greatest failures is a near-religious cult-like devotion to a belief in “normal politics” where the institutions and democracy are strong because of so-called shared values. The mainstream news media refuses to accept the foundational central role that emotions and identity play in politics. What America’s news media and mainstream political class need to understand and accept is that modern conservatism is a type of motivated social cognition where sexism, racism, misogyny, social dominance behavior, authoritarianism and other factors play a central role in political decision-making. To deny these facts is to willfully refuse to understand the true nature of America’s democracy crisis.

Once again, if a person tells you who they are believe them.

Being a Republican or conservative today is a statement of one’s core identity and personhood where fascism, authoritarianism, violence, and a need to dominate and control others deemed as being outside of one’s tribe is central to the group identity and brand. Today’s Republican fascists have been screaming at the top of their lungs about who they really are and too many members of America’s news media and political class have convinced themselves that they are somehow not serious. That denial will be written in capital letters as the epitaph for America’s democracy and civil society.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders roasted by hometown paper for SOTU response

Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ response to President Joe Biden’s State of the Union Address was roundly slammed by Austin Bailey in an editorial for the Arkansas Times published on Wednesday.

“Ted Cruz and Marjorie Taylor Greene might not have liked it much, but President Joe Biden exceeded expectations with his State of the Union address. Hecklers tried but failed to knock him off his game. His signature empathy infused the hour-plus speech, and at the end there was little doubt this 80-year-old man isn’t done yet,” wrote Bailey. “As the celebratory afterparty rolled on in the U.S. House chamber, Gov. Sarah Sanders commandeered TV screens to darken the mood. Excerpts her office shared earlier in the day hinted Sanders’ speech would include her standard snarling about wokeness and the radical left. No surprises there.”

Among other things, Sanders claimed that a “woke mob” was taking over the United States, and under Biden, “we must partake in their rituals, salute their flags and worship their false idols.” She even claimed that when Trump was president, she sort of felt like she was in the military, when she wasn’t.

The speech, wrote Bailey, was “a word salad of talking points and name calling, with some attempts at folksy relatability thrown in,” that was “light on policy, heavy on menace.”

Bailey also criticized Sanders for claiming that Democrats started the culture wars when she “[launched a] skirmish against transgender people unprovoked,” for championing the bravery of the Little Rock Nine while touting a school voucher program “all but guaranteed to worsen segregation in Arkansas schools along racial and socioeconomic lines,” and for blaming Biden for drug crises around the country when “suffering families didn’t seem to bother her before.”

Sanders’ speech has been largely panned around the country, with MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough calling it “dystopian,” and Lincoln Project co-founder Steve Schmidt accusing her of “abusing” America.

Lauren Boebert furious over Twitter “censoring” her account

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) blasted former Twitter employees on Wednesday for allegedly “censoring” her account before Elon Musk purchased the social media platform.

During a House Oversight Committee hearing on Wednesday, Boebert became irate as she recalled that Twitter had limited the visibility of her account.

“Did either of you approve the shadow-banning of my account?” Boebert asked former Twitter employees Vijaya Gadde and Yoel Roth.

Both witnesses said they had not approved restrictions on the lawmaker’s personal Twitter account, but she was not satisfied.

“I know you looked at it because fascist Twitter 1.0 had a public interest exceptions policy, which means for members of Congress to be shadow-banned, it had to go before you, Mr. Roth,” she asserted. “So, I’ll ask again. Did you shadow-ban my account?”

“Again, not to the best of my recollection,” Roth replied.

“So the answer, Mr. Roth, is yes, you did,” Boebert announced before claiming that Twitter had shadow-banned her over a joke about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“It’s a freaking joke about Hillary Clinton being angry that she couldn’t rig her election!” Boebert exclaimed. “It’s a joke! But in response, being the sinister overlords that you all are, you placed a 90-day account filter, so I could not be found!”

Boebert used the majority of her five-minute question period to yell at the witnesses about her personal acccount.

“I bet that Putin is sitting in the Kremlin wishing he had as much election intervention interference as you four here today!” she shouted. “We’ve heard about threats to Democracy; what about shutting down a duly-elected member of Congress? This is fundamental to our nation’s governance, and you all attacked that very foundation!”

“I’m not angry for myself,” Boebert insisted. “I’m not angry because I was silenced. I can reach out to Elon and to his staff and I can see what’s happened. And I can sit here today and hold you all in account. I am angry for the millions of Americans who were silenced because of your decisions, because of your actions, because of your collusion with the federal government!”

Watch the video below from the House Oversight Committee.

Twitter hearing uses old Chrissy Teigen tweet as example of suppression attempt from Trump

During Wednesday’s House Oversight Committee hearing, a 2019 tweet written by model and TV personality Chrissy Teigen was brought up as evidence that Trump’s White House made attempts to press the platform for content removal. 

While the primary focus of the hearing was to ascertain Twitter’s involvement in suppressing a 2020 New York Post story on the ongoing Hunter Biden laptop ordeal, light shone into other corners when it came to government involvement with the platform.

When questioned by the committee on the tweet, in which Teigen responded to Trump referring to her as the “filthy-mouthed wife” of musician husband John Legend by calling him a “pu**y a** b***h,” Anika Navaroli, a former executive on Twitter’s safety policy branch, admitted that the platform did receive requests from Trump’s team for its removal.

“In that particular instance, I do remember hearing that we had received a request from the White House to make sure that we evaluated this tweet and that they wanted it to come down because it was a derogatory statement directed toward the president,” Navaroli said.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


After video from the hearing began to circulate on Wednesday, Teigen reacted to the old beef making headlines again by returning to the scene of the “crime” with a clip and the message “I . . . oh my God.”

Veering back to the subject of their decision to suppress the article on Biden’s laptop, the former Twitter executives who spoke at the hearing admitted that no government party had a hand in them doing so.

“It isn’t obvious what the right response is to a suspected but not confirmed cyberattack by another government on a presidential election,” Twitter’s former Head of Trust and Safety Yoel Roth said in a quote obtained from CNN. “I believe Twitter erred in this case because we wanted to avoid repeating the mistakes of 2016.”

“Cover-up”: Workers “know the truth” about the derailment disaster — why are they being ignored?

Throughout the recent hazardous chemical freight train derailment in Ohio and the four-day ordeal that followed while the flaming wreck was stabilized, the one perspective that was consistently missing from the reporting was that of the union railroad workers. It didn’t matter if it was the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Associated Press , the reporting relied on interviews with local, state and federal officials as well as statements from the Norfolk Southern, the rail carrier but not the perspective of their union workers.

It was as if robots and AI were already driving the train. The entire narrative of the cataclysm was framed by officials and the corporation whose malfunctioning train was now putting workers and the community in life-threatening jeopardy. The derailment played out in the rural borderland of Ohio and Pennsylvania requiring both states to activate an emergency evacuation response.

On Friday evening, the tranquility of East Palestine, Ohio, with a population of 4,761 people, was upended when a Norfolk Southern train with 150 cars in tow, derailed sparking a conflagration that inundated the area with toxic smoke. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], 20 of the cars in train were carrying hazardous materials. 

The U.S. EPA had to start monitoring the air for carbon monoxide, oxygen hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen cyanide, phosgene, and hydrogen chloride. Throughout the weekend, firefighters did their best to keep the disabled tanker cars cool as some of the hazardous cargo burned off. The local fire chief told reporters he was concerned about the presence of vinyl chloride, a colorless, toxic, and flammable gas.

“If you are in this red zone that is on the map and you refuse to evacuate, you are risking death,” Pennsylvania’s Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) warned. “If you are within the orange area on this map, you risk permanent lung damage within a matter of hours or days.”                                 

In initial comments, a member of the National Transportation Safety Board [NTSB] posited that the derailment of the 150-car train was most likely caused by a problem with one of the axles on one of the freight or tanker cars. The catastrophic derailment, with significant public health and environmental implications, comes a few months after President Biden and Congress imposed a contract on the nation’s rail unions that their rank and file rejected in part because it lacked paid sick days.  

In the Congressional debate over the draconian and anti-democratic move, members who supported the rail workers gave the nation a crash course in how the nation’s rail industry operates. Since the 1980s, the nation had gone from close to 50 Class 1 railroads down to just seven with the Wall Street monopoly power akin to the 19th-century robber barons. Through their 21st century “precision scheduling railroading,” these latter-day robber barons where putting workers’ safety and the community’s well-being at risk.

Monday, the rail carrier had to undertake a controlled gas release from several of the tankers who were at risk of exploding and potentially sending shrapnel as far as a mile away. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine (R) had to deploy the National Guard as officials scrambled to prevent a “catastrophic tanker failure” while the local Sheriff issued a stern evacuation order.  

“The 1-mile evacuation zone in East Palestine is in effect and will be enforced. You may be arrested for 2917.13 Misconduct in an emergency, which is a fourth-degree misdemeanor if only adults are in the household, and a first-degree misdemeanor if children are in the household. Further charges of endangering children will apply also. There is a high probability of a toxic gas release and or explosion. Again, we will be enforcing the evacuation zone. Please, for your own safety, remove your families from danger.”

“You need to leave,” Gov. DeWine warned. “You just need to leave. We are ordering you to leave. This is a matter of life and death.”

A spokesman for the Norfolk Southern Railroad described for NPR how the rail carrier  was creating a small hole in each one of the unstable tank cars and allowing substances to go down into a pit which would then be lit on fire to  control the tank cars they were worried might just explode. After a planned detonation, news reports described “a black mushroom” cloud billowing upward.

“The detonation went perfect and we’re already to a point where the cars are safe,” declared the railroad’s spokesman.

THE PRICE FOR PROFITS

At a December union solidarity rally for rail workers on Capitol Hill Brian Renfrow, president of the National Letter Carriers, was cheered when he observed that since 2015 the seven largest railroads were squeezing their workers while racking up record profits “totaling near $150 billion and in that same time frame, since 2015, these same companies have cut tens of thousands of jobs.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., described how the greed mentality of Wall Street had thoroughly corrupted the rail industry putting workers and the communities through which the train passed at risk.

“They walked into the industry a number of years ago and said, ‘Hey, you are too nice to your workers. Tighten up — cut, cut, and cut,’ and in the last six years we have seen a 30 percent reduction in the workforce,” Sanders said. “You guys have to do more with less support and that is their ideology: How do we work people to the bone, so we can make $20 billion a year? That is why we have to put an end to precision schedule railroading.”

Greg Regan, the president of the AFL-CIO’s Transportation Trades Department, representing the 37 unions in that sector, said it was too soon to attribute specific causes for the East Palestine derailment. But he warned that in general, America’s freight rail carriers were eluding any real regulation because the federal reporting system for near misses and minor incidents that signal bigger problems remains entirely voluntary and not one of them was opting to participate unlike in the aviation industry.

“I don’t think we have a very accurate accounting of how often these incidents occur and what the risks are for both the employees and the general public because not one of these Class One railroads participates in the Confidential Close Calls reporting system where employees can report near misses or minor incidents without fear of repercussions from their employer,” he said.

Regan added that while the Class 1 freight behemoths were choosing to fly without this basic safety net, the nation’s commuter and passenger rail outfits like Amtrak were participating in this commonsense compliance program that promotes safety because what gets measured gets managed.

Ross Grooters is an Iowa based locomotive engineer [BLET Teamsters], and the co-chair of Railroad Workers United, a cross-craft caucus of rail workers and their supporters. Like Regan, he would not speculate about the East Palestine derailment while the official investigation was underway, however, he did stress that “as with any of these accidents, there are a series of failures involved.”

And he does believe that the lack of a labor perspective in the reporting out of these kinds of industrial accidents leaves the public in the dark about just how dangerous and stressful railroading has become as Wall Street has increasingly put the squeeze on the railroading workforce.

SILENCE=DEATH CULTURE

“It would certainly be helpful to center the story around the voices of the workers but there’s going to be a lot of fear against anybody speaking out in our industry for fear of retaliation from these companies — this has a real chilling effect on people’s ability to speak out,” Grooters said during a phone interview. “And, yes it does mean that the public is not educated about how increasingly risky these jobs have become as the carriers are taking more chances in order to pad their bottom line and increase their profits.”

John Samuelsen, the international president of the Transport Workers Union, which represents 150,000 workers in the rail, airline, transit, utility, and service sectors believes that the public loses when labor’s insights are not included in the news media’s reporting on derailments

“The workers know the truth as to what happened in that derailment and employers are the voice of the cover-up and the employers’ instincts is to blame workers for these types of derailments,” Samuelsen said. “They will never blame disinvestment and state of good repair of both the rolling stock and the track. The employers will never acknowledge that they have cut staff on the rails to bare bones. So, without the voice of the workers and their unions there’s never going to be balanced, truthful reporting on what happened on any given derailment or any given tragedy across freight rail — and that includes collisions.”

Samuelsen continued. “If you look at our public mass transit derailments in Philadelphia, Miami or here in New York City — the union was in the forefront of getting to the heart of the matter for what the cause of the derailment was. In fact, in 2016, there was the case with the subway derailment in Brooklyn at the 7th Ave. Station that put the collapsing of the MTA’s state of good repair, and it was the involvement of TWU Local 100 that drove that narrative and resulted in the advancement of the good repair agenda. Absent the voice of the unions — these companies are just going to do business the way they want.” 

The TWU International president says that when unions can foster a ‘speak up culture’ consumers and transit corridor communities benefit directly.

“Just look at the insight that the trade union movement provided to the debacle of Southwest Airlines at the end of last year when thousands and thousands of air travelers were stranded by cancellations because the carrier had disinvested over several decades by not upgrading in the technology required to avoid the kind of collapse that actually happened,” he said. “Without the truth telling from TWU Locals 555 and 556, Southwest would still be doing their perpetual song and dance.” 

Sara Nelson, president of CWA’s Association of Flight Attendants, said, “A true commitment to safety includes embracing non-punitive reporting systems for everyone working in the operation; the opportunity to identify and catch safety loopholes before they become tragic is paramount for workplace safety and public safety.”

An email inquiry to Norfolk Southern media desk to determine their status in, or views on the Confidential Close Calls compliance regime, was not returned in time for publication.  

The AFL-CIO’s Regan observed the first priority of the unions that represent the workers on the train involved in the East Palestine derailment has to be representing them before the NTSB. “They have to maintain their standing in the NTSB to make sure there is no BS from the railroads trying to whitewash what happened — that explains why you are not hearing from the operating crafts [in the media],” Regan said. “And potentially, that would be true for the track inspectors or signal [maintainers]; the minute you start talking to the press you lose your standing.”

Meanwhile, as of this writing, the folks that were forced to evacuate their homes have filled regional hotels and motels with their lives upended. Local TV news outlets have begun reporting local fish kills. At least one class action lawsuit by residents has been filed.

“Leslie Run comes out of East Palestine and that goes into Bull Creek, which then goes into North Fork. And we know for sure that there has been some fish kill in Leslie Run and Bull Creek, and some portions of the North Fork,” Matthew Smith, the assistant regional scenic river manager for the Ohio’s Division of Natural Areas and Preserves told WKBN-TV.

PUBLIC MEDIA COMES THROUGH

The breaking news reporting out of WESA NPR affiliate, based in Pittsburgh stood out as exemplary. Its reporting did not include labor voices, but they did engage local environmentalists who were conversant with the impact of the rail carriers’ reliance on their ‘precision scheduling railroading’ which incentivized the running of longer and heavier trains while cutting the workforce.

Glenn Olcrest, with Pollution Protection Pittsburgh, told the local NPR station a similar evacuation in his city’s East Liberty section would require the evacuation of more than 30,000 residents.

“This is a blueprint of what’s going to come to a neighborhood near you in Pittsburgh,” Olcrest told WESA.

East Palestine evacuee Lisa Fulton told a WKYC-TV [3News] reporter she was angry with officials and the rail company because initially she was told to evacuate as just a precaution. “I think they hid things from us,” Fulton said. “Who knows when we will go back? It’s never going to be the same again.”

“I like to make people happy”: Before she was famous, Shania Twain “enjoyed” working at McDonald’s

Who wants to join me in singing the refrain that has chronicled endless karaoke nights and road trip sing-alongs? “Let’s go, girls!”

When it comes to music, Shania Twain has long known how to rock this country. But have you ever paused to ask, “Where did Shania want us to ‘go’?” And was her intended destination actually a fast-food restaurant?

In addition to providing one of the primary soundtracks of my childhood, Twain’s story has taught me a lot about perseverance. She suffered from childhood abuse, lost both parents at the age of 22, endured a very public divorce (her husband cheated on her with her best friend) and at one point thought she had lost her voice “forever” due to Lyme disease.

With a brand new album “Queen of Me” out this month (which I’m listening to it as I write this article), Twain is flexing her strengths, embracing the past and looking forward to the future. In the process, Twain has opened up about a past job she enjoyed before becoming a famous recording artist: McDonald’s.

The “Man! I Feel Like A Woman!” singer recently told ET Canada that she “like[s] to serve.”

“I always love, like, ‘Welcome to McDonald’s, can I take your order please?’ It’s just very quite rhythmic, and I like to serve,” Twain said. “I like to make people happy.”

Twain was especially a fan of the drive-thru, which she called “particularly fun because you could speak to the people on the other side without seeing them.”

The Canadian-born county music superstar, who recently unveiled a new hair color and donned a buzzy outfit (was it Moira Rose chic?) at this year’s Grammy Awards, added that she “enjoyed” every one of her past jobs.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


“I can be honest about that. I like to work,” Twain said. “I like to be busy.”

What may impress you much is Twain juggled two jobs, working at McDonald’s during the week while simultaneously pursuing music.

“Obviously, I was on stage at night on the weekends,” she recalled, “and I was at McDonald’s after school during the week just making people happy, man.”

But what was Twain’s favorite menu item? The French fries.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CoMVAMdjUzy/

“I eat them now without animal fat . . . My favorite station outside of the drive-thru was the fry station,” she said. “I just love to make the perfect fry. You know, the kind you see on TV.”

Celebrate Twain with a trip to your neighborhood McDonald’s — and blast her music all the way through the drive-thru. Will you press play on “That Don’t Impress Me Much” or “You’re Still the One?” “Have it your way,” as one McDonald’s competitor famously said.

One of my favorite music fun facts is that Twain’s 1996 album “Come On Over” is the world’s biggest-selling studio album by a female solo artist, according to the Guinness World Records. While that album has so many terrific moments, vocal showcases and outrageously catchy tunes, I’ve always been a sucker for Twain’s inexplicable shout of “cool!” at the top of “Don’t Be Stupid (You Know I Love You).”

Twain’s other albums are equally as terrific; I’m especially partial to “UP!” and “The Woman in Me.” Her latest, “Queen of Me,” is available now in stores and on streaming platforms.

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. While our editorial team independently selected these products, Salon has affiliate partnerships, so making a purchase through our links may earn us a commission.

Learn the secret for parchment paper piping bags

In a pastry chef’s toolbox, you often find items like a candy thermometer, a bench scraper and an offset spatula, tools that professionals simply can’t live without. You may be surprised to find out that one of the principal, indispensable tools a pastry chef often relies on is a DIY project of sorts. According to Institute of Culinary Education (ICE) Pastry & Baking Arts Chef-Instructor Stephen Chavez, a parchment cornet is as valuable, if not more than, a store-bought pastry bag when it comes to decorating cakes.

Here’s a deep dive into this fundamental pastry technique that covers the origin of this humble parchment tool, other methods for making a cornet and the best ways to use it.

How to use the piping bag

ICE’s Dean of The Art of Cake Decorating, Toba Garrett, explains that it is essential for a pastry chef to master using paper cones in her book, “Professional Cake Decorating.” She believes that “paper cones provide control when piping — the smaller the bag, the greater the control.” Best of all, she notes that this disposable tool reduces the time spent cleaning up any kitchen messes. According to Chef Chavez, cornets are especially great for working with chocolate. He points out that a traditional pastry bag can quickly lose its shape and become floppy when exposed to the warmth of a liquid. The result is minimal control when piping delicate features on a pastry or cake. Made from silicone-coated parchment, cornets can hold liquids well, without leaks or spills, and maintain shape despite contact with heat. Additionally, Chef Chavez comments that paper cornets can provide an eco-friendly solution for plastic pastry bags.

Tracing the technique back

Pastry chefs kept the cornet somewhat of a secret in the mid-to-late 1850s in Europe until the French-born chef Urbain François Dubois brought the handy kitchen hack to light. He recounted the wonders of this tool in his book, “Artistic Cookery: A Practical System Suited for the Use of the Nobility and Gentry and for Public Entertainments,” in 1870.

This pointed, sturdy medium for decorating cakes gained popularity quickly once exposed. Bakers and pastry chefs adopted the tool for its appropriate stiffness and barrier to help keep away the heat radiating from their hands that could affect the icing or chocolate’s consistency and the control they needed for decorating their creations. Much like a paintbrush, these paper cones helped cake decorators achieve the finesse required for intricately detailed decorations, which can’t be accomplished with most other pastry tools.

How to make a traditional cornet

To make two large-sized, standard cones, fold a large piece of parchment paper in half, crosswise to form two equally sized triangles. Crease the paper using an offset metal spatula. Then slightly lift the folded parchment paper to position the offset spatula’s sharp edge at the top of the crease. At a 45-degree angle, run the offset spatula through the crease to cut the parchment, hold the paper steady with your free hand and make two independent paper triangles.

Label the corners of the triangle A, B and C, with the C on the 90-degree corner. Point corner C towards your body. Using your dominant hand’s thumb and pointer finger, grab the edge of corner A and wrap it towards your body to form a cone, with the points of A and C aligned and touching. With your free hand, repeat the process in the opposite direction, so that corner B wraps around the existing cone shape to meet the points of corners A and C.

Lastly, hold the cone with both hands — thumbs inside the cone — and fold corners A, B and C into the cone to secure the edges from coming undone. Now, you’re ready to start using the signature parchment paper cone.

Alternative ways to make a cornet

To maximize a large parchment paper sheet, Chef Chavez says you can make eight cornets out of one sheet of paper. Fold the paper in half — like a book — and cut through the crease. Then stack the two sheets together, and repeat the previous step to create four individual papers. Lastly, fold the four sheets of paper on a diagonal, and cut through the crease to yield eight triangular sheets for making cornets.

Aside from a traditional cornet, Chef Chavez explains that you can also create a leaf tip for instances where you don’t have a star tip on hand. Cut a small V shape into the cornet’s pointed end to make decorative flowers or leaves to embellish a cake.

Cornet making stepsCornet making steps (Courtesy of ICE)

The professional way to use a cornet

1. Make several to keep on hand at all times.

Chef Chavez recommends making several cornets to keep in your pastry toolbox at all times. Because these paper cones do not occupy much room, keeping a few ready-to-go cones can save you from a sticky situation in the kitchen. If you have perfectly tempered chocolate ready to decorate a cake, you’ll want to work quickly to ensure it does not harden before you can use it. Stack a few cones together and fold flat to minimize the space the paper occupies in your kit.

2. Use for savory plating, too.

Expand the horizons of a cornet beyond chocolate work by using it as a tool for plating intricate dishes. When using a viscous or thicker liquid for plating, a cornet may come in handy for assisting in accuracy and precision.

3. Roll away from the seam.

Once you’ve created your paper cone and filled it up with your icing or chocolate, Chef Chavez recommends sealing the cornet’s opening by rolling away from the seam to create a tighter and more compact cone. If you roll towards the seam, your mixture may begin to leak and your paper cone may come undone.

4. Use your fingers to tighten the cone.

Chef Chavez explains that by holding the cone with your pointer fingers and thumbs, you can use the international money sign, finger motion to tighten the cone. Keeping your thumbs steady in the inside of the cone, use your pointer fingers to pull away from the pointed end of the cone. This motion will help create a tighter cone with a finely pointed peak.

5. Practice makes perfect.

As with most kitchen skills, Chef Chavez believes that anyone can master this essential pastry technique after a few rounds of practice.

By Maki Yazawa, Institute of Culinary Education

Google targets low-income people with ads for “fake abortion clinics”: Study

Research published Monday shows that Google is targeting lower-income users with advertisements for so-called crisis pregnancy centers, anti-choice organizations known to steer people away from accessing abortion care.

As the Tech Transparency Project (TTP), which conducted the analysis, explained: “Crisis pregnancy centers—which critics have dubbed ‘fake abortion clinics‘—appear to offer medical services but instead push an anti-abortion message, providing free ultrasounds and baby supplies with the aim of persuading women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Abortion rights advocates accuse them of using deceptive tactics to get women in the door—and targeting their advertising at low-income women and women of color in urban areas.”

For its investigation, TTP established Google accounts for test users in Phoenix, Arizona; Atlanta, Georgia; and Miami, Florida. The users were characterized as 21-year-old women belonging to three different household income groups as defined by Google: average- or lower-income, moderately high-income, and high-income. While logged into each account, researchers entered 15 abortion-related search terms, including “Abortion clinic near me” and “I want an abortion,” and then recorded ads that appeared on the first five pages of results. Researchers used a Google Chrome browser with no previous history, and they used virtual private networks to make it look like the users were conducting searches from their respective cities.

TTP found that Google showed ads for crisis pregnancy centers to women on the lower end of the income scale at a higher rate than their wealthier counterparts in two of the three cities. In Phoenix, average- or lower-income women saw 56% of ads come from crisis pregnancy centers, higher than what moderately high-income women (41%) and high-income women (7%) saw. In Atlanta, 42% of the ads targeted at average- or lower-income women came from crisis pregnancy centers, more than Google showed to moderately high-income women (18%) and high-income women (29%).

“By pointing low-income women to [crisis pregnancy centers] more frequently than higher-income women in states with restrictive laws, Google may delay these women from finding an actual abortion clinic to get a legal and safe abortion,” TTP director Katie Paul told The Guardian on Tuesday.

“The time window is critical in some of these states,” said Paul.

Abortion is banned after 15 weeks of pregnancy in Arizona and Florida. In Georgia, abortion is banned after six weeks, before many people know they are pregnant.

Because it can cost thousands of dollars in lost wages, child care, transportation, and lodging, lower-income people are less likely to be able to travel for abortion care.

Women on the lower end of the income scale did not receive ads for crisis pregnancy centers at the highest rate in every city in TTP’s study. In Miami, researchers observed an inverse pattern: high-income women saw a larger share of ads from anti-abortion organizations (39%) than moderately high-income women (10%) and average- or lower-income women (15%).

“It’s not clear why Miami diverged from the other cities, but one possibility is that crisis pregnancy centers, which often seek to delay women’s abortion decisions until they are past the legal window for the procedure, are more actively targeting lower-income women in states like Arizona and Georgia, which have more restrictive abortion laws than Florida,” TTP hypothesized. Although Republican lawmakers in Arizona and Florida have both prohibited abortion after 15 weeks, Arizona’s ban comes with heightened restrictions.

Still, even if high-income women in Miami received more crisis pregnancy center ads on the top five pages of search results, that doesn’t mean those are the ones they saw first. Ad rank is significant, and according to TTP, Google showed ads for anti-abortion organizations “higher up in the search results for lower-income women than it did for women of other income levels.”

The search terms used are also important. Several queries in TTP’s experiment yielded only crisis pregnancy center ads for lower-income women.

“Although companies buying ads with Google can selectively target the groups they want to reach–including by income–Paul adds that many users won’t be aware they are being targeted by Google in this way,” The Guardian reported.

“Google has a large share of influence, particularly in the United States when people are trying to search for authoritative information,” Paul explained. “People generally tend to consider Google’s search engine as an equalizer. They think the results they get are the results that everyone’s going to get. But that’s just not the case.”

“Lower-income women are being targeted,” she said, “and they’re the ones that are going to suffer the most under these policies.”

As TTP pointed out: “Google is helping these centers reach their intended audience. Abortion rights groups and academic studies have noted that crisis pregnancy centers typically target women of lower socioeconomic classes, in part by advertising free services on public transportation and in bus shelters.”

Crisis pregnancy centers have sought to expand their reach since the U.S. Supreme Court’s far-right majority overturnedRoe v. Wade last summer.

These facilities have “been known to employ a number of shady tactics to convince women seeking an abortion to keep their pregnancies,” The Guardian noted. “Those include posing as abortion clinics online though they do not offer abortion care, refusing pregnancy tests for women who say they intend to have an abortion, and touting widely disputed research about abortion care to patients. Crisis centers,which go largely unregulated despite offering medical services, have been known to target low-income women precisely because they find it harder to travel out of state for abortion care.”

Previous reports have shown that Google is increasingly aiding these anti-abortion organizations, particularly in the GOP-led states that eliminated reproductive freedom as soon as the constitutional right to abortion was revoked.

TTP’s new findings “add to growing questions about Google’s handling of crisis pregnancy centers,” the group wrote. “Bloomberg News has reported that Google Maps routinely misdirected users searching for abortion clinics to crisis pregnancy centers and that Google often failed to affix a warning, as promised, to crisis pregnancy center ads indicating they do not provide abortions. (In response to the first report, Google pledged to clearly label U.S. facilities that provide abortions in Google Maps and search results.)”

“Last fall, TTP also found that Google frequently served ads for crisis pregnancy centers that falsely suggest they offer abortions, violating the platform’s policy against advertising that misleads users,” the group noted.

During its new investigation, “TTP found similar omissions in multiple ads.”

When your mom is your campaign manager: Inside the pricey, competitive world of school valentines

If you haven’t gotten them yet, it may already be too late. Valentines. And not for your sweetheart, not for your crush. For the 20 or likely many more small strangers in your child’s class. 

Gone are the days of cutting hearts from red construction paper and sending kids off with a shoebox to collect equally rudimentary holiday cards from classmates. Class valentines are now an expensive, elaborate and competitive business. And the burden of obtaining valentines and making them just right, like most things relating at all to parenthood, falls squarely upon moms.

The unspoken — or often, actually and clearly spoken — rule of school is that you must bring something for everyone in the class, or for no one. The first issue of class valentines is making sure no kid is left out, no name spelled incorrectly, which becomes difficult when dealing with young spellers, readers and writers. Writing out 30 classmates’ names was a chore for my child, more homework than his actual homework at that age. 

Don’t get the slime — never get the slime.

But sometime between kindergarten and first or second grade, I noticed the valentines coming home were much fancier than the ones I had sent off in his backpack (along with larger cards for the teacher, teacher’s aide, principal — and extras). Parents were giving away toys wrapped with cards, whole candy bars or cookies. A card was no longer enough. A handmade card was embarrassing.

A search for class valentines on Amazon pulls up pages of cards with something else: cards with pencils, balls, bracelets, plastic toys, fidget toys, sunglasses, slime (don’t get the slime — never get the slime), art kits, rubber duckies, stress balls and more. There aren’t any cards, not just cards, until well into the fourth page of results — and if you’re going the plain card route, your selection is much more limited than if you wanted, say, finger puppet valentines or glow stick valentines or lip gloss valentines or foam airplane kit valentines.

One of the aspects I never anticipated about parenthood was how much plastic comes into the house, how many little tiny plastic crap things a child accumulates from well-meaning family, friends — or classmates on Valentine’s Day. These valentines (and then some) also add up financially. This year, spending for Valentine’s Day is expected to be almost $26 billion, making 2023 one of the highest spending years on record, according to CNBC. On average, Americans will spend $192.80 on Valentine’s Day this year, up from last year, as CNBC reports, but their article on how to save money on Valentine’s Day gives tips for couples only. Nothing about school valentines.

Back in 2017, ABC News reported, based on data from the Greeting Card Association, that Americans would spend $1 billion on cards for Valentine’s Day. That’s a lot of red.  

Valentines, like the birthday treats of yore, have become a way to win friends and influence people, with moms as campaign managers.

The pressure and the race is on. At stake? Respect from your child’s teacher — you didn’t forget, you didn’t leave anybody out — and most importantly, social status for your kid. Because like every messed-up thing about school (and probably, parenthood), Valentine’s Day cards have become a competition. “Want to avoid a handmade fail?” reads a 2017 article from Today about school valentines, with the false-cheery tone of a Stepford Wife. Recommendations include $24 for a dozen Anthropologie valentines and video game-themed bracelets.

Valentines, like the birthday treats of yore, have become a way to win friends and influence people, with moms as campaign managers. Because the people shopping for perfect valentines, the people paying for them, making sure every name is correct and sending their children off to school safely with all the heart-shaped bribes are overwhelmingly women. 

The class parents in my child’s school every year? They call it a “parent,” but it’s not. It’s a mom. Every year, every one.

Mothers do most of the unpaid, extra labor of school. The class parents in my child’s school every year? They call it a “parent,” but it’s not. It’s a mom. Every year, every one. The volunteers at the book fairs, the bakers of the bake sales? Moms. As Soraya Chemaly wrote in TIME, “Schools benefit hugely from the unpaid labor of mothers – most of whom, today, don’t have the luxury of not needing jobs. The pressure to donate unpaid labor at schools is inextricably entwined with ideas about mothering and work. Every time volunteer cultures are gender imbalanced it is almost certainly a symptom of women’s work being taken for granted, invisible and unpaid.” Women volunteer more than men in general, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, but they’re also more likely to volunteer for an educational group specifically (and for children’s sports and recreation) than men.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Our incredibly imbalanced view of parenthood, which rests so heavily on moms rather than dads, never stops, from the school nurse calling my number rather than my male partner’s, to the clothes shopping responsibilities, the homework duties and the hunt for valentines. We’re finally and begrudgingly starting to learn that holiday magic doesn’t just happen, women make it happen. Moms make valentines happen too, with all the cards’ pressure, expense and expectation, and maybe it’s time we return that to sender.

Cop charged in deadly Tyre Nichols beating sent graphic photo to “at least 5 people”: report

One of the former Memphis police officers charged in the beating death of Tyre Nichols texted a picture of him beaten and dazed on the pavement to “at least five people,” The New York Times reported on Tuesday.

“As Tyre Nichols sat propped against a police car, bloodied, dazed and handcuffed after being beaten by a group of Memphis police officers, one of those officers took a picture of him and sent it to at least five people, the Memphis Police Department said in a document released by the state on Tuesday,” reported Jessica Jaglois, Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs, and Mitch Smith. “The document was sent to the Tennessee Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission as part of a request last month for the regulatory agency to decertify five officers involved in the beating. Those officers have since been fired and charged with second-degree murder in Mr. Nichols’s death.”

The former officer in question, Demetrius Haley, admitted to “sending a photograph of Mr. Nichols to … two fellow officers, a civilian employee of the department and a female acquaintance,” along with one other unidentified person, according to the report.

This comes after the police department released a series of body camera and aerial videos showing the beating, in which Nichols, who had been pulled over for reckless driving, initially sounded calm and compliant, but as the beatings started, tried to run away, then screamed for his mother as officers attacked him so aggressively that they can be seen accidentally pepper-spraying themselves. EMTs who arrived on scene are also accused of failing to administer proper care, with two technicians being fired. Nichols died in the hospital three days later.

“While on the police force, Mr. Haley was reprimanded in 2021 for failing to file a report after grabbing someone by the arm while making an arrest, according to records released by the city this week,” said the report. “Mr. Haley said at a disciplinary hearing that he had been mistaken about ‘the amount of force necessary to require’ such documentation, and a lieutenant spoke on his behalf, saying he worked hard and ‘routinely makes good decisions.'”

The death of Nichols has sparked national debate over the utility of elite anti-crime units like the Memphis “SCORPION unit” responsible for the incident, since disbanded. These units are often created in response to local or national worries about increases in crime, but often have some of the most excessive force complaints and supervision problems.

“This is just crazy”: Iowa GOP’s child labor bill would let kids work “dangerous” jobs

Labor advocates on Tuesday decried a business-backed bill introduced by Republican state lawmakers in Iowa that would roll back child labor laws so that teens as young as 14 could work in previously prohibited jobs including mining, logging, and animal slaughtering—a proposal one union president called dangerous and “just crazy.”

Senate File 167, introduced by state Sen. Jason Schultz (R-6) would expand job options available to teens—including letting children as young as 14 work in freezers and meat coolers and loading and unloading light tools, under certain conditions.

Teens under 18 would still be generally barred from employment in fields including mining, logging, demolition, and meatpacking, and from operating potentially dangerous machinery and equipment including circular saws, guillotine shears, and punching machines.

However, the Des Moines Register reports the proposed law contains “an entirely new section” that “would allow the Iowa Workforce Development and state Department of Education heads to make exceptions to any of the prohibited jobs for teens 14-17 ‘participating in work-based learning or a school or employer-administered, work-related program.'”

The proposed bill—which comes amid an ongoing labor shortage in Iowa—also expands the hours teens may work, and shields businesses from liability if a minor employee is sickened, injured, or killed as a result of a company’s negligence.

“This is just crazy,” Charlie Wishman, president of the Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO, told the Des Moines Register. “A kid can still lose an arm in a work-based learning program.”

Wishman said the bill will gut more than a century of child labor protections, many of which were enacted in an era when “children were hurt and killed” on the job.

“The idea of putting children into work activities that could be dangerous is something that is not only irresponsible but reprehensible,” Wishman added.

Iowa state Sen. Claire Celsi (D-16) called the proposed legislation “another sign that the labor market in Iowa is in big trouble.”

“Businesses are so desperate to hire warm bodies that they want politicians to bend child labor laws (and eliminate corporate liability),” she wrote on Twitter.

State Sen. Nate Boulton (D-20), an attorney specializing in labor law, described the bill as “offensive.”

“Putting children at risk, and creating immunity for that risk, is not acceptable,” he told Iowa Starting Line.

As in other states, child labor violations are not uncommon in Iowa, with immigrant minors particularly susceptible to exploitation.

“These efforts to roll back child labor laws overlap with the conservative changes to school curriculum,” tweeted education podcaster and author Jennifer Berkshire. “The through line is an effort to teach kids that free enterprise rules and that the boss is king.”

CNN host fact-checks GOP claim that no one wants to cut Social Security: “Rick Scott said that!”

Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., tried to claim that no Republicans wanted to cut Social Security during an appearance on CNN Wednesday, but he was quickly called out by host Kaitlan Collins.

While discussing President Joe Biden’s State of the Union speech, Donalds accused Biden of creating a “fallacy” that the GOP had plans to cut Social Security and Medicare.

Collins, however, interjected and pointed to Republican plans to do just that.

“Rick Scott said that!” she said, referring to the Florida Republican senator’s plan to have Social Security and Medicare sunset every five years unless Congress votes to keep funding them. “I read it on Rick Scott’s website!”

Donalds then pivoted to say that no Republican wanted to tie changes to Social Security and Medicare to any vote on increasing the debt ceiling.

Collins then showed Donalds a clip of Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., saying that both Social Security and Medicare should be reclassified as discretionary spending to make them easier to cut.

Donalds said that changes to Social Security and Medicare needed to be “studied” to ensure their solvency, but insisted that no Republican wanted to tie cuts to the programs to raising the debt ceiling.

Watch the video below or at this link.

Three major things most people get wrong about the brain, according to a neuroscientist

Squished between your ears, soaked in blood and swaddled in bone is your brain, a metabolic engine construed from roughly three pounds of fat and wired with electricity that, among other things, allows you to read and understand this sentence. Yet humans still have many fundamental questions about how this machine works, how it stirs consciousness into being and how to repair it when it breaks down.

Today, there's a greater interest in neuroscience than ever before, as companies like Neuralink promise to bridge the gap between brains and computers and as researchers inch closer to cracking neurological and psychiatric disorders like Alzheimer's, depression and addiction, all while so-called artificial intelligence slithers deeper into every crevice of the internet.

Yet, there's still a lot that people get fundamentally wrong about neuroscience. From the myth that humans only use 10 percent of their brain to the idea that creativity and logic is a "right-brained" versus "left-brained" issue, there are many popular misconceptions about neuroscience that have wormed their way into public consciousness. This isn't a benign problem, either — misinformation surrounding mental health can generate stigma, such as the belief that mental disorders are the result of weakness or lack of willpower.

But there's a good reason people get so much wrong about the brain. With an estimated 128 billion neurons, it's often said that the brain is "the most complex thing we have yet discovered in our universe."

"That's not untrue," Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett, a neuroscientist, psychologist and author, told Salon with a chuckle. As a result, there's a lot of oversimplification, she says. The problem is especially egregious for some neurotransmitters — molecules or drug-like substances that relay signals between neurons. Dopamine or serotonin, for example, are neurotransmitters often reduced to being the "reward" or "happy" chemicals respectively, when they do so much more throughout the body (not just the brain) and their result is location specific.

"The power isn't in the chemical. It's in the chemical and the receptor," Feldman Barrett explains. It isn't easy to explain these complex relationships. In addition to regularly publishing cutting-edge neuroscience on emotion, psychology and more, Feldman Barrett is author of the 2020 book "Seven and a Half Lessons About the Brain," a book that tries to update and make modern neuroscience more accessible.

Here are three major things people get wrong about the brain:

Myth #1
The brain is region specific

Sometimes people will break it down into distinct geographies to better explain how the brain works. For example, the cerebral cortex is an outer layer of the brain that is responsible for functions such as memory, attention, and perception itself. But the boundaries between different regions is more nebulous than it might appear.

 

"Mental phenomena behavior are not localized to one little area of causation," Feldman Barrett explains. "There isn't a one-to-one mapping. The brain is functioning systemic wide. It doesn't work like a machine, where you can manipulate one little area and expect nothing else to be affected."

 

"The idea is that there are certain characteristics that are thought to be localized to specific regions of the brain," Feldman Barrett continues. "And that there's a one-to-one correspondence between the characteristic [or] behavior that you're observing or the feature that you're interested in and a location in the brain."

 

For example, the brain processes use to perceive an object, such as a tree, involves visual processing in the occipital lobe, one of the four major lobes of the cerebral cortex. Damaging the occipital lobe has been associated with hallucinations, misidentifying colors and difficulty reading.

 

But to fully perceive an object, the occipital lobe also pings other regions, especially the parietal lobe and temporal lobe, respectively responsible for sensory information (touch, temperature, etc.) and processing sensory information. It's through feedback of these systems that visual perception is possible. Every hub in the brain seems to serve some dual or multifaceted purpose.

 

The superior colliculus is a part of the brain often associated with visual processing. But some of Feldman Barrett's research, published ahead of peer-review, suggests that it also plays a role in processing many types of sensory information, including information related to a person's feelings and emotions.

 

"We need to be looking at the whole brain, not little swaths of it," Feldman Barrett says.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


Myth #2
You have a "reptile" brain

When scientists look at brains across animal species, they find many similarities and differences, especially when it comes to size and complexity. For a while, many neuroscientists believed that human brains could be split into three different segments: the reptilian brain, the paleomammalian brain, and the neomammalian brain. This is often called the "triune brain" theory, first postulated by neuroscientist Paul D. McLean and popularized by astronomer Carl Sagan. Unfortunately, it doesn't hold much weight these days.

 

It's true human brains are by far the most Gordian when it comes to the knots in our skulls, but evolution doesn't work like a line graph. That famous "March of Progress" image of monkeys slowly evolving into apes and then humans is not exactly how evolution works and has largely been debunked.

 

Human brains are not the apex of evolution — our cognitive complexity simply helped us stay alive long enough to pass down our genes. And just because our brains look similar to our predecessors does not mean they function the same. In fact, every time a new brain evolves, it almost completely reorganizes. And again, the brain cannot easily be divided into distinct segments.

 

A study published last September in the journal Neuroevolution provides clear evidence that mammals don't have reptile brains. Authored by researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, the team compared central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) brains with mouse brains. They profiled more than 280,000 cells, generating an "atlas" of over 230 distinct types of neurons. There were many similarities, but they weren't limited to location and contained a mix of the "old" and "new" neurons.

 

In other words, evolution keeps some things, shuffles others around and discards plenty. It's not accurate to say mammals have lizard brains stacked beneath the more recently evolved stuff. Tiny misconceptions like these can have big impacts. According to Feldman Barrett, the triune brain theory is simplistic, but the same lens has been applied to other aspects of the brain.

 

"That's not only the story of brain development, that's the story of mental illness," Feldman Barrett explains. "Mental illness is described as overactive emotion circuits and underactive cognitive control circuits. That's how almost every single mental illness is described." Both models are overly simplistic.

Myth #3
Brain damage is always permanent

Our brains may be special, but they are mostly soft, squishy bundles of fat, water and various proteins and carbohydrates. Obviously, we need a rock-hard skull to protect all this precious matter, but sometimes our brains still get damaged.

 

One of the most prevalent myths of neuroscience is that this damage is inevitably permanent and irreversible. It's sort of related to the myth that the brain stops developing once you reach a certain age. Neither is true.

 

One of the principle tenets of neuroscience is Hebbian theory, which can be summarized as "Neurons that fire together, wire together." (Although not literally. The gaps between neurons — the synapses — are still critical.) Pathways in the brain that are used more frequently become stronger, like desire paths in the woods. The more a shortcut is taken, the sooner a weed-filled avenue becomes a path and then a road.

 

It may take additional "construction," but new roads can also be built in the brain, regardless of age. A baby is born with essentially a blank slate of neurons. As its brain ages, different centers solidify communication networks and build vast matrixes that give us complex ways of processing the world.

 

But the idea that once the brain reaches a certain age, these pathways are set in stone is wrong. If someone suffers a terrible brain injury in which important neurons die, the brain will sometimes find "detours" and continue functioning using undamaged neural highways.

 

This is called "neuroplasticity" and can be induced using certain therapies or drugs like psilocybin, although more research is needed in this area. Of course, it depends on many factors, including where the injury occurs and some brain damage is irreversible.

 

Overall, we should appreciate how complex our brains are and try not to simplify these concepts too much.

 

"Complexity empowers a brain to act flexibly in all kinds of situations," Feldman Barrett wrote in her book. "It opens a door so we can think abstractly, have a rich, spoken language, imagine a future very different from the present, and have the creativity and innovation to construct airplanes and suspension bridges and robot vacuum cleaners. Complexity also helps us contemplate the whole world beyond our immediate surroundings, even outer space, and care about the past and the future to an extent that other animals do not."

 

Humans are animals, of course, but what makes our brains special isn't so much the physical anatomy. It's the deep intricacy that makes us so different.

“He traveled on Epstein’s Lolita Express”: Trump’s “groomer” attack on DeSantis backfires with MAGA

Former President Donald Trump accused Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis of engaging in “grooming” behavior in his latest attack against his top rival for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.

The former president on Truth Social Tuesday reposted a post accusing DeSantis of drinking alcohol with minors when he was a high school teacher. 

“That’s not Ron, is it? He would never do such a thing!” Trump wrote sarcastically.

The picture shows a 23-year-old DeSantis standing and smiling between three women with blurred-out faces.

One of the women in the photos is holding a brown glass bottle but DeSantis isn’t pictured drinking. The caption on the post reads, “Here is Ron DeSantimonious grooming high school girls with alcohol as a teacher,” followed by the vomit emoji.  

The original message Trump reshared was from a user named Dong-Chan Lee, whose account describes him as a “paleoconservative” and Trump supporter.

In another repost, Trump added more sarcastic commentary, writing “No way?” while Dong-Chan Lee’s caption read “Ron DeSantis was having a ‘drink’ party with his students when he was a high school teacher. Having drinks with underage girls and cuddling with them certainly look [sic] pretty gross and ephebophiliaesque.”

The first time this photo of DeSantis appeared online was last year after Hill Reporter – a Democratic super PAC blog – posted it.

The photo was taken after the 2001-02 academic year that DeSantis spent as a teacher at the elite Darlington School before attending Harvard Law School, according to The New York Times

Darlington is a boarding school located in Rome, Georgia, where DeSantis coached baseball and football and taught history and government, the Times reported. 

Several students recalled DeSantis going to parties with the seniors, the New York Times reported, citing anonymous sources. Two students recalled DeSantis attending at least two parties where alcohol was served after graduation. 

The students reported not being bothered by his attendance but now question it, the report said.

Some of his former students also described him as a “total jock” who partied with students and thought it was “very special” that he graduated from Yale.

Two other students remembered a prank that involved DeSantis challenging a student, who had bragged about how much milk he could drink, to guzzle as much milk as he could in one sitting. The student did and ended up throwing up while dozens of other students watched. 

“I think about it, now — I’m a teacher now in public school,” Adam Moody, who witnessed the incident told the Times. “I put myself in that moment, and it’s just unthinkable. There’s a cruelty to the sense of humor. There’s a cruelty to the mentorship.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Trump’s “grooming” accusation against DeSantis suggested hypocrisy on the part of the Florida governor, whose staff has accused LGBTQ people as well as those who oppose his “Don’t Say Gay” bill of “grooming.” 

Ahead of the gubernatorial election, Trump nicknamed DeSantis “DeSanctimonious,” and said it was “disloyal” for the governor to leave open the question of running for president given that Trump’s 2018 gubernatorial endorsement helped him win his first election. 

But Trump’s attack drew backlash from some of his longtime supporters, many of whom are looking to back DeSantis in 2024.

“Trump is falsely accusing DeSantis of pedophilia,” tweeted right-wing commentator Ian Miles Cheong. “It is only fair to point out the fact that he traveled on Epstein’s Lolita Express seven times. It is also fair to point out that Trump lied about the number of times he traveled on that plane.”

DeSantis, who has yet to announce whether he is running for president, has largely ignored Trump’s attacks but hit back after the latest jab.

“I’d just say this: I spend my time delivering results for the people of Florida and fighting against Joe Biden,” he told reporters. “I don’t spend my time trying to smear other Republicans.”

Astronomers find a potentially habitable exoplanet right in Earth’s galactic backyard

Nearly 50 years ago, astronomers didn’t know for certain if there were any planets outside of our own solar system.

However, thanks to recent technological advances, the last three decades have brought on a slew of astronomy data such that there are now an estimated 5,307 exoplanets in 3,910 planetary systems (as of February 2023). While finding exoplanets (meaning planets outside of our own solar system) is no longer a significant challenge, what is difficult is finding the habitable ones — meaning those that could sustain life on Earth as we know it. Currently, only an estimated 1.5 percent of exoplanets discovered have been catalogued as potentially habitable worlds.

According to computer simulations, this exoplanet could have a “moderate Earth-like atmosphere” and moderate temperatures.

This month, a team of international astronomers announced that they’ve discovered a remarkable exoplanet that is remarkably similar to Earth as well as very close, at least on a galactic scale. The details of the discovery were published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, which noted that the new planet, dubbed Wolf 1069b, has roughly 1.26 of the Earth’s mass and about 1.08 its size. But perhaps most tantalizing is that Wolf 1069b is located in the habitable zone of its host star — meaning that liquid water could exist on its surface.

“When we analyzed the data of the star Wolf 1069, we discovered a clear, low-amplitude signal of what appears to be a planet of roughly Earth mass,” said Diana Kossakowski, an astronomer at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Germany and lead author on the new research, in a statement. “It orbits the star within 15.6 days at a distance equivalent to one-15th of the separation between the Earth and the sun.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


This means that the potentially habitable exoplanet is much closer to its host star. In fact, a year on this exoplanet equates to nearly half a month on Earth. While such proximity to one’s parent star could equate to unbearably hot temperatures, it doesn’t in this solar system because the host star is much smaller than our sun. The researchers estimate that Wolf 1069b only receives about 65 percent of the incident radiant power of what the Earth gets from the Sun. Kossakowski explained that this changes the location of solar system’s habitable zone, making it acceptable for a potentially habitable planet to be closer to its host star.

“As a result, the so-called habitable zone is shifted inwards,” Kossakowski said.

At a mere 31 light-years away, Wolf 1069 b is now the sixth closest Earth-mass planet in the habitable zone of its host star. That is extremely close, at least in galactic terms: the nearest star to Earth is 4.2 light years away, while the Milky Way galaxy is 100,000 light years in diameter and has at least 100 billion stars.

According to computer simulations, this exoplanet could have a “moderate Earth-like atmosphere” and moderate temperatures. But unlike Earth, this exoplanet is tidally locked, which means that the side that is always facing its star experiences eternal day while it is always night on the opposite side. As a result, astronomers believe that if it is habitable, it would only be on the daytime side.

Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb told Salon via email this new exoplanet is very reminiscent to Proxima Centauri b, which is the nearest potentially habitable exoplanet to our solar system. Indeed, Proxima Centauri b has an orbital period of 11.2 days and orbits a dwarf star with 12.2 percent the mass of the sun.

“Dwarf stars like these are the most common stars; their lifespan is trillions of years, hundreds of times longer than Sun-like stars because they burn their nuclear fuel slowly,” Loeb said. “Since they are nearly a thousand times fainter than the Sun, the habitable zone is tens of times closer than the Earth-Sun separation.”

But the question as to whether or not it is truly suitable for life remains to be determined. Loeb added that the atmospheres of planets like  Wolf 1069 b are typically “more vulnerable to stripping by the stellar winds and ultraviolet flare.”

“If the atmospheres are stripped, the planets could not have liquid water on their surface because it would evaporate into gas,” Loeb said. Loeb noted we’ve seen this happen in our own solar system: “The liquid oceans on Mars evaporated after it lost its atmosphere; this risk for losing atmospheres in the habitable zone of dwarf stars may explain why we reside near a rarer star like the Sun.”

The next step would be to search for biosignatures on Wolf 1069b. Unfortunately, the technology just isn’t there yet.

“We’ll probably have to wait another ten years for this,” Kossakowski points out. “Though it’s crucial we develop our facilities considering most of the closest potentially habitable worlds are detected via the RV [radial velocity] method only,” which is how Kossakowski and her colleagues found this new exoplanet. 

“An embarrassment”: Mitt Romney’s “heated confrontation” with George Santos revealed

Senator Mitt Romney, R-Utah, approached Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., who is facing multiple investigations for fabricating his professional and personal life, in what led to a “heated confrontation,” minutes before President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address, Huffpost reports.

While U.S. senators entered the House chamber to greet one another, Romney and Santos could be seen not shaking hands in a video shared to Twitter, as the Utah senator said to his lying colleague, “you ought to be embarrassed.”

Per Huffpost, a House member “who witnessed the exchange” recalled the incident, adding Romney also slammed the freshman representative saying, “You don’t belong here.”

Following the exchange, The Hill reporter Al Weaver asked the former governor of Massachusetts whether he called Santos “an embarrassment.”

Romney responded, “I don’t know the exact words I said. He shouldn’t have been there. Look, he’s a sick puppy. He shouldn’t have been there.”

Watch the exchange between the Republican senators below or at this link.