Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Are we looking for extraterrestrial intelligence all wrong?

For the last couple of decades, astronomers and astrophysicists have generally searched for extraterrestrial life by looking for biosignatures — such as water, oxygen or chlorophyll — on other planets. That seems like a sound strategy in general; after all, life has existed on Earth for around 3.7 billion years, while industrial civilization has only existed for 200. 

But now, some astronomers think perhaps we have been searching for alien life by following the wrong clues. The reason has to do with the power of our telescopes, and the fact that the signals from technologically advanced civilizations may be much easier to detect than the traces of unsophisticated biological life. 

Indeed, if a biosignature on another plant in the universe were detected, it would be rather difficult to know the nature of the life — merely that it exists. Most likely, such biosignatures would suggest that microbial life or bacteria exists elsewhere, not necessarily an advanced civilization of other beings.

Hence, there’s a subtle but real philosophical transformation happening in astronomy, where the idea of searching for life via technosignatures — such as radio waves, industrial pollution, light pollution, or anything that would suggest advanced technology is being used — is becoming more prominent. Perhaps the search for technosignatures may become the more common way to search for extraterrestrial life in the near future.

RELATED: First image of our galaxy’s black hole

“I think we are seeing a shift,” said Jason Wright, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Penn State University. “I think NASA has shown a real willingness to bring technosignatures in as part of astrobiology and the search for life in the universe, Congress’ mood has shifted, and NASA can see the writing on the wall, and so it has been opening up its grants programs, and our colleagues in the field are listening to us.”

“It has been appreciated for decades in the SETI community that technosignatures could be more abundant, longer-lived, more detectable, and less ambiguous than biosignatures.”

Wright is the co-author of a paper titled “The Case for Technosignatures: Why They May Be Abundant, Long-lived, Highly Detectable, and Unambiguous,” published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters earlier this year. The paper argues for and against the search for extraterrestrial life via techosigantures, but ultimately lands a very logical conclusion to support investments in such a search:  Technosignatures “can spread among the stars to many sites, it can be more easily detected at large distances, and it can produce signs that are unambiguously technological,” the authors state.

Specifically, the paper questions the role of the Drake equation, which is used by astronomers to calculate the odds of finding intelligent life in the Milky Way. The equation was first proposed by astronomer Frank Drake in 1961. Since many variables in the equation remain unknown, estimates have widely varied over the years. But it’s mostly been used to justify the search for biosignatures when looking for alien life. 

“The intuition suggested by the Drake equation implies that technology should be less prevalent than biology in the galaxy,” the paper states. “However, it has been appreciated for decades in the SETI community that technosignatures could be more abundant, longer-lived, more detectable, and less ambiguous than biosignatures.”

Wright explained to Salon that the Drake equation is “heuristic,” and not necessarily an equation that is meant to be solved. In other words, it’s a way of thinking about the problem that needs to be solved. Keeping that in mind, while the Drake equation suggests that technosignatures are rare, that may not be entirely true now that scientists are aware of more facts about the universe.

“We should seek evidence-based knowledge without being boxed by our egos, emotions or national security traps; for example, the likelihood of us finding extraterrestrial technological objects depends on us willing to look for them and not just on whether the extraterrestrials had sent them.”

“This paper was our attempt in a modern context of astrobiology to put all those arguments back together; now that we know how many planets there are in the galaxy, and now that we have a good sense of how we’re going to look for biosignatures, [we’ll] present the modern version of that argument to our other astrobiology colleagues,” Wright said.

Avi Loeb, the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University, told Salon via email that he sees the future of the search for life in the universe to rely on looking for both technosignatures and biosignatures.

“There are good philosophical reasons for both sides of the argument,” Loeb said. “We should seek evidence-based knowledge without being boxed by our egos, emotions or national security traps; for example, the likelihood of us finding extraterrestrial technological objects depends on us willing to look for them and not just on whether the extraterrestrials had sent them.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


Loeb added that more investments need to be made in the search for extraterrestrials, and investors shouldn’t be afraid to invest in projects that might seem a little out there — like looking for an extraterrestrial civilization’s technology.

“We invest major funds in the search for the nature of dark matter that has minimal impact on our society, but minimal funds on the scientific study of interstellar objects which could be much more impactful,” Loeb said. “As a result, the lack of ‘extraordinary evidence’ is often self-inflicted ignorance.”

As Salon previously reported, some scientists have proposed that the powerful James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) could observe atmospheric pollution in an alien civilization’s sky, in addition to searching for biosignatures on exoplanets.

“Atmospheric pollution is one unique hallmark of industry that does not occur from other forms of biology on Earth, so finding such pollution in an exoplanet atmosphere would be compelling evidence that the planet has technology,” astrobiologist Jacob Haqq Misra previously told Salon. “Many of these searches can be done at the same time as searches for biosignatures, so it is worth keeping the possibility of technosignatures in mind as we attempt to understand exoplanet atmospheres.”

More stories on astronomy:

Kristin Chenoweth reveals her connection to the 1977 Girl Scout murders in “Keeper of the Ashes” doc

Getting sick surprisingly saved Kristin Chenoweth’s life as a child.

The Tony-winning actor revealed that she was supposed to go on a camping trip to Oklahoma’s Camp Scott with her fellow Girl Scout troop members. On the morning of June 13, 1977, three of Chenoweth’s friends — Lori Lee Farmer, 8, Doris Denise Milner, 10, and Michele Heather Guse, 9 — were sexually assaulted and murdered, their bodies later found just a few yards away from their sleeping tents.

Now, almost 45 years later, Chenoweth is returning to her hometown “to find answers once and for all” in ABC News Studios’ “Keeper of the Ashes: The Oklahoma Girl Scout Murders,” which premieres May 24 on Hulu. The four-part docuseries explores the uncertainties of the horrific case along with its lasting impact on the Tulsa community, local law enforcement, and the victims’ families and loved ones.

“This is a story I wish I never had to tell,” Chenoweth says in the trailer. “It haunts me every day.”

RELATED: New “bombshell” motion in “Making a Murderer” case points finger at someone else Steven Avery knew

She also states that she wasn’t able to attend the trip due to illness, which ultimately saved her life.

“I should have been on that trip, but I had gotten sick. My mom said, ‘You can’t go,'” Chenoweth recalls. “It has stuck with me my whole life. I could have been one of them.”

Authorities later arrested and charged Gene Leroy Hart, a local jail escapee who previously committed a string of similar violent crimes. According to an article from the St. Petersburg Times, Hart was acquitted in March 1979 but he returned to state prison to continue serving previous sentences for rape, kidnapping and burglary convictions.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


According to Mayes County Sheriff Mike Reed, investigators conducted new DNA exams in May 2022, which strongly suggested Hart’s involvement in the girls’ murders.

“I pray that there’s something that we’ve done that gives the family a second of something that even resembles closure or acceptance or something,” said Reed per the CBS local station KOTV-DT. “But as far as peace, there is absolutely nothing about this case that has given me one second of peace. Period.”

Chenoweth also expressed similar sentiments about the case’s outcome.

“There’s no closure,” she says. “There’s no pretty red bow at the end.”

“Keeper of the Ashes: The Oklahoma Girl Scout Murders” premieres May 24 on Hulu. Watch a trailer below, via YouTube:

More stories you might like:

“Eyepatch McCain”: Tucker Carlson attacks GOP Rep. Dan Crenshaw’s disability over Ukraine aid

Fox News host Tucker Carlson lashed out Rep. Dan Crenshaw, calling him “eyepatch McCain” to suggest that the lawmaker’s support for U.S. aid to Ukraine was like that of the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a notorious war hawk. 

Carlson’s comment came during a monologue in which the conservative pundit castigated conservative lawmakers for providing military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine, which is under Russian siege, when they could be worrying about America’s baby food shortage. 

“Why is Congress so focused on Ukraine but you can’t find baby formula, you can’t even fill your truck because things in our economy are declining really rapidly,” Carlson said. “Don’t ask questions, according to Congressman Dan Crenshaw of Texas, asking questions like that, really any questions at all, thinking you’re a citizen, makes you pro-Russia.”

“The more I think about it, it takes a lot of gall for eye patch McCain to attack moms who are worried about baby formula as pro-Russia,” Carlson added. “That is probably one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard now that I am thinking about it. Why not just answer the question, why the attacks? What does that tell you?”

RELATED: Republicans’ “pro-life” pivot: GOP suddenly outraged by baby formula shortage

Carlson’s remarks came in response to a Fox News interview Crenshaw gave that same day, during which the Texas Republican called the Republican arguments on Ukraine aid “depressing” and “almost pro-Russia.”

“People are saying ‘we can’t put baby formula on our shelves but we are sending money to Ukrainians?'” he said. “My response to that is, do you know how much baby formula you can buy with $40 billion? None, because it is not a money issue, it is a manufacturing issue.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


This week, the Senate overwhelmingly passed a $40 billion aid package to Ukraine that the House approved last week. However, eleven Republican senators objected to the bill, with many of them questioning its price tag. Donald Trump has slammed the measure, criticizing the bipartisan effort to provide foreign aid as the country wrangles an unprecedented shortage in baby formula. 

“The Democrats are sending another $40 billion to Ukraine, yet America’s parents are struggling to even feed their children,” Trump said on Friday.

The shortage stems largely from a recent product recall by Abbott Labs, one of America’s leading manufacturers of formula. On Monday, the FDA reached an agreement with Abbott to reopen its plant in Michigan, which shuttered in February, in an attempt to get production back on track. Current estimates indicate that eight states across the country have had at least 50% less baby food on store shelves since May 1.

RELATED: Baby food allegedly riddled with poisonous metals—and the Trump administration did nothing about it

AIPAC super PAC funnels millions in dark money to attack progressive candidates in Democratic races

Intent on keeping the influence of the growing pro-Palestinian rights movement in the U.S. to a minimum in Congress, the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee is pulling out all the stops to defeat progressive candidates including state Rep. Summer Lee in Pennsylvania’s 12th District, where voters are going to the polls Tuesday.

As The Intercept reported late Monday, a super PAC started last year by AIPAC called the United Democracy Project (UDP) has spent more than $2.3 million on the district’s Democratic primary race.

About $100,000 from the group has gone to support attorney Steve Irwin while a majority of the ads UDP has paid for have attacked Lee as someone who only “calls herself a Democrat” due to her criticism of President Joe Biden during the 2020 primary race.

According to liberal pro-Israel group J Street, UDP has attempted to conceal its connection to AIPAC by attacking Lee’s positions on issues unrelated to Palestinian rights, such as her support for Medicare for All.

“The United Democracy Project sounds innocuous and the advertising that they’re running in these districts is about healthcare and reproductive rights and things that have nothing to do with Israel,” Logan Bayroff, a spokesperson for J Street, told The Guardian Tuesday.

“But the reason that they’re aligning with certain candidates is because they are more aligned with their more hawkish positions on Israel,” he added, “and because they fear that other candidates will be more progressive and aligned with the Palestinians.”

Regarding Palestinian rights, Lee has called on the U.S. government to set conditions for the billions of dollars it gives to Israel annually, most of which goes to military assistance, and has accused Israel of committing “atrocities” in Gaza.

Lee has received endorsements from several pro-Palestinian rights lawmakers including Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.

As Ryan Grim, Washington, D.C. bureau chief for The Intercept, said Monday, UDP’s involvement in the race between Lee and Irwin has appeared to have its intended effect on polling.

A poll commissioned by pro-choice group EMILY’s List at the end of March showed Lee with a 25-point lead over Irwin and a high approval rating among likely primary voters.

But a survey conducted by Mercury Public Affairs at the end of April, following the release of UDP’s ads, showed that Irwin was ahead of Lee by one point.

As Common Dreams reported last week, Sanders criticized AIPAC for bankrolling super PACs like UDP and Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI) “to buy elections and control this democracy.”

While UDP has spent considerable money in Pennsylvania, it has also poured $2 million into North Carolina’s 4th District, where former Sanders organizer and Durham City Council member Nida Allam is facing opponents including state Sen. Valerie Foushee.

The state Democratic Party’s progressive caucus pulled its endorsement of Foushee last month, citing her donations from AIPAC and noting the group has also given money to dozens of Republican candidates who objected to the certification of the 2020 presidential election.

Allam is a supporter of Palestinian rights and has been endorsed by fellow progressives including Ocasio-Cortez.

As Jewish Insider reported on Monday, like those in Pennsylvania, ads that UDP has run in the district have also made no mention of Israel or Palestine.

In Texas, the group has also poured $1.2 million to help Rep. Henry Cuellar—the only Democrat in the U.S. House who supports forced pregnancy—defeat his progressive challenger, immigration attorney Jessica Cisneros. The two are facing a primary run-off election in which voting is now underway after Cuellar beat Cisneros by less than two points in March.

Fox News exploits Buffalo shooting to further radicalize Republicans with “great replacement” theory

The bodies of the mostly-Black victims of the white nationalism-inspired mass shooting in Buffalo weren’t even cold on Saturday before the folks at Fox News identified the real victims here: White conservatives. As I predicted they would on Sunday, the whining from right-wing media has since reached ear-piercing levels of shrill in response to mainstream media correctly pointing out that Republicans and their media have been hyping the “great replacement” conspiracy theory that shooter Payton Gendron used to justify the killing of 10 people.

But this isn’t just an attempt to evade accountability.

Fox News pundits are now exploiting the Buffalo shooting to draw their viewers further into white nationalism. Network personalities are romanticizing the hateful ideology that allegedly inspired a massacre as a dangerous truth that the “elite” are trying to suppress. This shooting really illustrates how Fox News has created a victim narrative for its viewers that is so potent that no event is so horrible or violent — including a deadly insurrection in the Capitol or the mass murder of innocent people — that can’t be weaponized by the propaganda machine to further radicalize Republican voters. 

RELATED: Mass shooting in Buffalo: Tucker Carlson and other right-wing conspiracy theorists share the blame

Unsurprisingly, at the front of the remorseless pack was Tucker Carlson. Fox News’ top star was already being called out as the biggest mainstreamer of the “great replacement” conspiracy theory, a ridiculous notion drawn from neo-Nazis and other white supremacists that a cabal of Democrats is masterminding demographic change in order to marginalize white Christians. His response on Monday was a masterful bit of propaganda, using Saturday’s horrorshow to convince his viewers, who are already sympathetic to the terrorist’s views, to double down on racist conspiracy theories. 

“Within minutes of Saturday’s shooting, before all bodies of those 10 murdered Americans had even been identified by their loved ones, professional Democrats had begun a coordinated campaign to blame those murders on their political opponents,” he raged. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Carlson really does know how to do conspiracy theory. In reality, the “great replacement” theory is widely denounced because it’s a racist lie. But he spins this universal condemnation as evidence that Democrats must have “coordinated” the criticism. This, in turn, fits in with a larger narrative that Carlson has been pushing for years now, which is that liberals disparage racist ideas not because they’re wrong, but because they’re right. Carlson wants his audience to believe these ideas are so true that they’re “dangerous” to the “elites,” and that they’re “censoring” the ideas to keep their powerful truth from getting out. 

This is generally how the “cancel culture” narrative works for the right. Ideologies like white nationalism, much less conspiracy theories like “great replacement,” fall apart if you think about them too carefully. So rather than defend these ideas on the merits, propagandists portray the ideas as dangerous truths that a shadowy cabal tries to suppress. The implication is that the best way to rebel against the mythical liberal oppressor is to embrace these racist ideas. 

Every mass shooting or right-wing riot creates an opportunity for right-wing media to play the victim, further endearing themselves to their audience and allowing them to portray racist ideas at dangerous truths.

The Fox News pitch boiled down: Be a white nationalist because it triggers the liberals.

Carlson wasn’t the only host using a conservative victimization narrative to reinscribe the “great replacement” narrative for Fox News viewers. Laura Ingraham ranted about how the media “tried to censor opposing views” and they “tried to criminalize their political opposition after January 6th,” but “none of the anti-free speech tactics ever worked.” Again, criticism is equated with censorship. Again, the Fox News host doesn’t really try to defend these rancid political views. Again, the pivot is to a pitch that her audience adopts insurrectionism, COVID-19 denialism, and white nationalism in order to rebel for “free speech.” 

RELATED: Doubling down on “great replacement” paranoia: How the right is reacting to the Buffalo shooting

Oh his Fox News show, Jesse Watters was banging the same drum, arguing that condemnations of racism are merely attempted to “manipulate” people with “guilt.” “There are very powerful forces in this country that want you to be distracted,” he insisted, characterizing any effort to eradicate the racism that fueled these murders as an effort to change the subject from gas prices and inflation. The implication is not subtle: If Democrats want to shame the racism out of you, you must cling to it harder. And, of course, deny all along that it’s racism and instead argue that it’s just “truth.” 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


The Daily Wire is for that portion of the right-wing audience that is too dim to understand what Fox News is arguing through implication, and needs it spelled out more directly for them. Host Matt Walsh was only too happy to do this, whining about the mainstream media correctly identifying “great replacement” as a conspiracy theory. Instead, he insisted that it’s “just a fact” that “they want to replace, especially white male voters, with voters who they think are going to be beholden to them.”

Donald Trump himself is never one for the more subtle propagandistic techniques of Carlson or Ingraham. He was also blunt on Fox News host Sean Hannity’s radio show, claiming immigration is “like a military invasion.” 

As Nicholas Confessore reported in the recent — and surprisingly gloves-off — New York Times deep dive into Tucker Carlson, Fox News long ago stopped seeing condemnation from mainstream media and liberals as a negative thing, and now instead see it as a selling point.

RELATED: Expert panel on the Buffalo shooter and what he stands for: “He was not a lone gunman”

“Carlson and his team had learned to work the calls for boycotts and cancellation into their programming playbook,” Confessore wrote. “Mr. Carlson would grab third rails on race or immigration, then harvest the inevitable backlash, returning the next evening to roast his critics for trying to suppress an obvious truth.” The strategy “boosted the audience’s loyalty to Fox,” he continued, because it allows Carlson to spin a tale where he and his audience are in the trenches together, fighting against “cancel culture.” But this tactic doesn’t just increase viewer loyalty to Fox News. It also increases their willingness to adopt some of the ugliest ideas the network is peddling, including the “great replacement” conspiracy theory. 

Tucker Carlson wants his audience to believe these ideas are so true that they’re “dangerous” to the “elites,” and that they’re “censoring” the ideas to keep their powerful truth from getting out. 

“Great replacement” used to be a fringe idea that even racist Republicans would dismiss as looney a few years ago. But, as I noted Sunday, polling shows half of Republican voters now buy into the “great replacement” paranoia. That’s after these ideas fueled multiple mass shootings, the 2017 race riot in Charlottesville, and the January 6 insurrection. All of that violence, it seems, only served to make white nationalism more popular on the right. 

In light of all this, one has to assume that, far from trying to avoid liberal outrage in the aftermath of this shooting, Carlson and company welcome it. Every mass shooting or right-wing riot creates an opportunity for right-wing media to play the victim, further endearing themselves to their audience and allowing them to portray racist ideas at dangerous truths. That’s why they don’t seem to care at all that their propaganda is fueling violence. On the contrary, the violence is used to fuel a machine of right-wing self-pity and aggrievement, further driving Republican voters towards fascism. 

Not that any of this should discourage journalists, Democratic politicians, or progressives in general from calling out the violent rhetoric or the racism. Yes, such condemnations are being weaponized by Fox News in order to grow conservative support for radical ideas. But it also helps prevent such ideas from spreading to the larger population.

Republicans need some amount of moderate support to succeed, which they can only get by hoodwinking moderates into thinking they’re not as bad as they actually are. Calling out GOP radicalism is absolutely necessary. Trump, Carlson, and company are going to keep pushing their base towards the far right. Until they start facing real consequences at the ballot box for doing so, this situation is just going to get worse. 

I could eat 100 of these bulgur-feta fritters

Big Little Recipe has the smallest-possible ingredient list and big everything else: flavor, creativity, wow factor. That means five ingredients or fewer — not including water, salt, black pepper, and certain fats (like oil and butter), since we’re guessing you have those covered. Inspired by the column, the Big Little Recipes cookbook is available now.

Yes, I have an Instant Pot. It cooks rice, beans, and polenta more speedily than I ever could on the stove. But you know what I never need it for? Bulgur.

Made from wheat kernels that have been parcooked, dried, and ground, bulgur cooks up in less time than it takes to pick something to watch on Netflix (I’ll save you the trouble — “Bridgerton”). In fact, depending on the grind, it may not need to be cooked at all. Fine bulgur can simply soak in hot water, like a bath.

“Think of bulgur as the ancient version of ‘instant rice,'” writes Abra Berens in “Grist.”

That’s why you’ll find bulgur in a slew of traditional dishes. In kishk, it leisurely ferments with yogurt, becoming what Reem Assil calls, in her cookbook “Arabiyya,” “the Swiss army knife of preserved Arab foods.” In ezogelin çorbasi, aka Turkish bride soup, it simmers with rosy lentils and warm paprika. And in tabbouleh, it joins forces with a lot of parsley — or a little parsley, depending on who you ask.

As Yotam Ottolenghi and Sami Tamimi share in “Jerusalem,” “The Lebanese use the least amount of bulgur, just a tiny quantity of grain dotted sparingly among the parsley. The Palestinians add a little more.”

Either way, the combination of bulgur with parsley, plus cucumber and lemon is hard to beat: nutty and bright, tender and crunchy, grounding and reviving, all at once. And so this recipe follows suit. It is mostly bulgur, parsley, cucumber, and lemon. The similarities stop there, though.

Medium bulgur is steamed into fluff, then smashed with salty feta. These two ingredients effortlessly turn into patties, which effortlessly fry into crispy-edged, melty-centered fritters. From afar, they almost look like sausage patties. And thanks to a splash of feta brine added to the water in which the bulgur cooks, they evoke a similar umami-ness. (Psst: Use the rest of the feta brine for this martini.)

Tucked next to an enormous salad — which includes not a single leaf of lettuce, and no, I’m not apologizing — it is a dinner to make when you don’t want to make dinner at all. Little effort, big reward.

Recipe: Bulgur-Feta Fritters with Lemony Parsley Salad

More mass shootings are happening at grocery stores – 13% of shooters are motivated by racial hatred

An apparently racially motivated attack at a supermarket in Buffalo, New York, resulted in 10 deaths on May 14, 2022, with the teenage suspect allegedly targeting Black shoppers in a prominently African American neighborhood.

Mass public shootings in which four or more people are killed have become more frequent, and deadly, in the last decade. And the tragedy in Buffalo is the latest in a recent trend of mass public shootings taking place in retail establishments.

We are criminologists who study the life histories of public mass shooters in the United States. Since 2017, we have conducted dozens of interviews with incarcerated perpetrators and people who knew them. We also built a comprehensive database of mass public shootings using public data, with the shooters coded on over 200 different variables, including location and racial profile.

What do we know about supermarket mass shootings?

Only one shooting in our database prior to 2019 took place at a supermarket. In 1999, a 23-year-old white male with a history of criminal violence killed four people at a supermarket in Las Vegas. However, there has been a raft of mass shootings at American supermarkets since.

The Buffalo shooting on May 14, 2022, is similar to an August 2019 shooting at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas. On that occasion, the 21-year-old white suspect posted a racist rant on social media before allegedly driving some distance to intentionally target racial and ethnic minority shoppers. He has been charged with killing 23 people.

Another shooting in 2019 took place at a Kosher grocery store in Jersey City, New Jersey. Two perpetrators, a man and woman, both Black and around the age of 50 with a criminal and violent history, murdered four people before being killed in a shootout with police. Social media posts and a note left behind indicated an antisemitic motive.

Then in March 2021, a 21-year-old man of Middle Eastern descent with a history of paranoid and anti-social behavior entered a King Soopers in Boulder, Colorado, and shot dead 10 people. Six months later, in September 2021, a 29-year-old Asian man killed one person and injured 13 others at a Kroger supermarket in Tennessee. The perpetrator, who worked at the store, was asked to leave his job that morning. He died by suicide before the police arrived on the scene.

No one profile of a retail shooter

Mass shootings are socially contagious. Perpetrators study other perpetrators and learn from each other, which may explain the rise in supermarket shootings in the past few years. However, the data shows there is no one profile of a supermarket mass shooter.

Racial hatred is a feature of about 10% of all mass public shootings in our database. Our analysis suggests that when it comes to retail shooters, around 13% are driven by racism – so slightly above the average for all mass shooting events.

Some grocery stores by their nature may be frequented predominantly by one racial group – for example, Asian markets that cater to local Asian communities.

But racial hatred appears to be just one of many motivations cited by retail shooters. Our data points to a range of factors, including the suspect’s own economic issues (16%), confrontation with employees or shoppers (22%), or psychosis (31%). But the most common motivation among retail shooters is unknown (34%).

Like the Buffalo shooter, 22% of perpetrators of retail mass shootings left behind something to be found, a “manifesto” or video to share their grievances with the world. And nearly half of them leaked their plans ahead of time, typically on social media.

The lack of a consistent profile doesn’t leave us helpless. Our research suggests many strategies to prevent mass shootings – from behavioral threat assessment to restricting access to firearms for high-risk people. And the way to stop the social contagion of mass shootings is to stop providing perpetrators with the fame and notoriety they seek.

Jillian Peterson, Professor of Criminal Justice, Hamline University and James Densley, Professor of Criminal Justice, Metropolitan State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

16 sweet and savory ways to use pistachios

Though almonds and walnuts receive their fair share of admiration, the bright, funky pistachio is arguably the most versatile nut in your pantry. Great as a snack on their own, these nuts can also coat meat and poultry, dress up a simple sandwich, and upgrade any and every dessert. Even better, their vibrant green hue turns the simplest treat into a stunning dessert. So stock up, shell away, and give pistachios the praise they deserve with these sweet and savory recipes. — Taylor Schwartz

1. Strawberry and Pistachio Knafeh Cookies

PIstachios aren’t all that beautiful used whole. It’s when you expose that saturated green interior that things really get going, as in these no-bake cookies (along with rose petals and melted white chocolate) they’re simply stunning.

2. Smoky Eggplant with Whipped Ricotta and Pistachios

Summer starts with this starter. Eggplant, which is in season all summer long, is cut in half and grilled until charred on the outside and totally tender in the middle. It’s then served over a bed of whipped ricotta and sprinkled with pistachios.

3. No-Bake Pistachio Mini Cheesecakes

When you can’t bear the thought of turning on your oven and making your walk-up apartment hotter than it already is (sorry, I’m making this about me), there are these easy individual cheesecakes that are made in muffin tins.

4. Nectarine and Pistachio Crumble

You asked for fruit crumble and we delivered in a big way: with a pistachio streusel sprinkled generously over the stone fruit filling.

5. Pistachio Cookies (Pastine di Pistacchi)

These traditional Sicilian cookies only need seven ingredients, but each one is just as important as the next — pistachios bring color and body, sugar and honey work in tandem to make these sweet, and the zest of oranges and lemons introduce some needed brightness.

6. Food-Processor Pistachio Cake with Raspberry Cream

A fluffy, moist cake that’s not made in a stand mixer? You better believe it. There’s a lot of pistachio paste in this recipe, which not only gives the cake its earthy green hue, but also brings nutty flavor to every bite.

7. Lacy Honey-Pistachio Florentines (aka Nutty Nudes)

Florentine cookies are notoriously intimidating and fragile in nature, but Rick Martinez offers a convincing case for why you should make them anyway: They require basic pantry ingredients, can be made in one bowl, and are delicious when made with any kind of chocolate.

8. Mint-Pistachio Pesto

Our readers voted this their favorite recipe made with mint, but we also think it’s one of the best recipes made with pistachios. This pesto is slightly chunkier than classic basil pesto, but we love the texture (especially when twirled into pasta or smeared on crostini).

9. Asparagus Pasta with Pistachio Aillade

We welcome spring with open arms and this green-as-can-be pasta dish. In addition to the pistachios, tarragon, parsley, asparagus, and spring onions join forces for one zippy recipe.

10. Chocolate-Dunked Pistachio Shortbread

I can’t think of any cookie that doesn’t benefit from being dipped in chocolate. We love how the vibrant green pistachios look against the dark chocolate and buttery shortbread cookie.

11. Pistachio Cake with Lemon, Cardamom, and Rose Water

Equal parts of ground pistachios and almond flour form the base for this absolutely lovely lemon-rose cake that tastes like how a sunny, 60-degree spring day feels.

12. Fried Feta with Pistachios and Hot Honey

In a similar format to halloumi or your favorite cheese ball, a block of feta is crusted with dried herbs, pistachios, hot honey, and lemon juice. Serve with a lot of pita or crostini because everyonewill want to try it.

13. Pistachio Cream Puffs

Confession: I’ve never baked cream puffs before. It’s not that they’re unappealing to me, I swear. It’s just that they’re a little fussy and less practical than a batch of cookies or even cupcakes. But leave it to Erin Jeanne McDowell to convince me otherwise.

14. Jeweled Butter Cookies

More chocolate-dipped cookies for the win — this time inspired by your favorite fruitcake!

15. Olive Oil Blondies with Salted Caramel

You definitely don’t need to add chopped nuts like pistachios to these rich blondies…but you definitely should anyway.

Bernie Sanders calls out DNC after billionaires use super PACs to try to “buy Democratic primaries”

Sen. Bernie Sanders on Tuesday urged the Democratic National Committee to ban super PAC money from the party’s primary process as special interest groups and billionaires pour money into elections in the hopes of defeating progressive candidates, including Summer Lee in Pennsylvania and Nida Allam in North Carolina.

“The Democratic leadership has, appropriately, condemned Republican ‘dark money’ super PACs which spend huge amounts of money to elect their right-wing candidates,” Sanders, I-Vt., wrote in a letter to DNC Chair Jamie Harrison. “I am concerned, however, that I have not heard any criticism from Democratic leaders about the many millions of dollars in dark money being spent by super PACs that are now attempting to buy Democratic primaries.”

“The goal of this billionaire-funded effort is to crush the candidacies of a number of progressive women of color who are running for Congress,” the Vermont senator continued. “I am writing to you today to demand that the Democratic National Committee make it clear that super PAC money is not welcome in Democratic primaries. I believe the party should make a public statement about our values and simultaneously consider actions that punish candidates who refuse to adhere to this principle.”

Sanders’ letter was sent the day of Pennsylvania’s Democratic primary elections, which will feature Lee’s run against corporate lawyer Steve Irwin for a U.S. House seat in the state’s 12th Congressional District and Lt. Gov. John Fetterman’s contest against Rep. Conor Lamb, D-Pa., for a spot in the U.S. Senate.

Both contests have attracted national attention and torrents of super PAC cash. The Intercept‘s Akela Lacy reported Monday that in “less than a month, the United Democracy Project—the political action committee for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC—poured more than $1 million into ads in Pennsylvania’s 12th District.”

“The bulk of the messaging attacked Lee, though just over $100,000 went to materials supporting Irwin,” Lacy noted. “In total, United Democracy Project has spent more than $2.3 million on the race so far.”

In the Senate primary, meanwhile, some of the top financiers in the U.S.—including Bain Capital billionaire Joshua Bekenstein and Lone Pine Capital billionaire Stephen Mandel—have dumped money into Lamb’s super PAC.

“The billionaire class is playing an outsized role in propping up Conor Lamb’s sagging electoral chances,” The American Prospect‘s Alexander Sammon wrote last month.

Sanders, who called out AIPAC by name during a rally for Lee last week, argued in his letter Tuesday that Democratic candidates should have to “compete with each other based on their ideas and grassroots support, not on the kind of billionaire super PAC money they can attract.”

“A super PAC is a super PAC, whether it is funded by Republican billionaires or Democratic billionaires. Dark money is dark money, whether it is funded by Republican billionaires or Democratic billionaires,” Sanders wrote. “There is no question but that the continuation of super PAC money in Democratic primaries will demoralize the Democratic base and alienate potential Democratic voters from the political process.”

“Let us try to create a Democratic Party which is truly democratic,” the senator added.

Dr. Oz makes creepy closing pitch, asks voters to imagine themselves lying in bed with him

Celebrity doctor Mehmet Oz, who is running to represent Pennsylvania in the Senate, made an unsettling political pitch on Monday ahead of the state’s Republican primary, asking voters to imagine themselves lying next to him in bed. 

“So, when you go to bed at night, put your head on that soft pillow, you’ll know Oz will be doing exactly what you want him to do if you were there next to him,” he told Fox News host Sean Hannity. 

RELATED: Donald Trump can’t get his supporters to like Dr. Oz

His remarks drew immediate mockery online. 

“Creepiest political pitch ever? tweeted Christopher Orr, a contributing writer at The Atlantic. “I say yes.”

Media reporter Justin Baragona called Oz’s comments “some weird a** sh*t.”

“Okay well I guess I’m giving up sleep for 2022,” chimed writer Tony Posnanski. 

“I’m not sure exactly what Dr. Oz is promising here, but nobody wants him to keep it,” added Andy and Brian Kamenetzky. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


RELATED: Trump has only himself to blame for Kathy Barnette, Pennsylvania’s terrifying new MAGA darling

Oz is currently running in a crowded field of Republican candidates, including former hedge executive David McCormick and Kathy Barnette, a far-right little-known conservative.

In a general election, Oz would likely face steep opposition from either Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, who recently suffered a stroke, or Rep. Connor Lamb, R-Pa. 

According to Politico, the Republican primary is Oz’s to lose, with the celebrity doctor clinging on to a small advantage in the polls. Last month, Oz received support from Donald Trump in a move that rankled many of the former president’s supporters.

“People love him, otherwise he wouldn’t have been on air for 18 years,” Trump said. “I’ve just spent a lot of time with him. I did endorse him, and the reason is he’s tough, he’s smart and he really loves our country and he wants to do a great job for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

“Heartbreaking”: Frightened librarians face “hostile” harassment trying to navigate new book bans

Librarian Suzette Baker said she faced a hard choice last year when her boss asked her to hide a book on critical race theory behind the counter.

“OK, I’ll look into it,” Baker recalled telling her boss at the time.

But eventually, Baker — a librarian at the Llano County Public Library’s Kingsland Branch — decided to ignore the request. And she continued to vocally protest other decisions, like the ban on ordering new books. She spoke up, telling her supervisors that the library was facing a censorship attack.

By February, the pressure to keep new or donated books from the shelves increased, she said. After waiting weeks for a local library board to approve the books Baker wanted to add to her library, Baker’s boss would tell her that even donated books could not reach the shelves.

On March 9, Baker was fired for insubordination, creating a disturbance and failure to follow instructions.

“This change is inevitable and you are allowing your personal biases, opinions and preferences to unduly influence your actions and judgment,” her dismissal documents stated.

Baker’s experience represents one of many new conflicts facing Texas librarians as book challenges continue to multiply. Many feel left out of decisions on banning books while also facing increased scrutiny from politicians, parents, and county and school district staff. Some have already quit, and others are considering it.

For those librarians working at schools and at public libraries, the pressure to keep some challenged books off the shelves is growing. And some Texas librarians say the insults and threats through social media and the added pressure from supervisors to remove books are taking a toll on the profession.

“It’s the job I’ve always wanted my entire life,” Baker said. “But then it started getting to be a place where it was hostile.”

The Llano County Commissioner’s Court and the county judge, who oversaw some library services and suspended new library book purchases in November, declined to comment, as did the library system’s director, Amber Milum.

Now that Baker is no longer working at the library, she said she worries for the future of Llano County’s library system.

“Immobilized by what the future could look like”

The Texas Tribune spoke to librarians in two independent school districts that have been at the center of book challenges and bans: Keller, northeast of Fort Worth, and Katy, west of Houston. One from each district spoke to the Tribune, but both asked that their names not be published because they feared harassment.

In Keller, local Facebook group pages and Twitter accounts have included pointed comments about librarians being “heretical” and portrayed them as pedophile “groomers” who order pornographic books. After a particular book challenge failed, one commenter included the phrase “pass the millstones,” a biblical reference to execution by drowning.

“It was heartbreaking for me to see comments from a community that I’ve loved and served for 19 years, directed towards me as a person,” the Keller ISD librarian said.

Parents and community members have challenged more than 30 books in Keller ISD since October, including the Bible and Maia Kobabe’s “Gender Queer.” The district has so far removed at least 10 from circulation, and librarians have not been able to order new books since that time, the Keller ISD librarian said.

Several successful Keller ISD board candidates ran this month on campaign promises that they would increase parent involvement in education, including looking harder at school library books.

“I don’t think there’s been a day or an hour in the last 12 months that I haven’t been frightened and immobilized by what the future could look like,” the Keller ISD librarian said.

The Keller ISD librarian said she wants to talk with more parents about the books they want to ban, but so far, only one parent has reached out to her.

“This has been our experience in reality, and we still want to work together,” she said. “Communities have to come together. We can’t keep doing this back and forth.”

“Should I play it safe?”

A librarian In Katy ISD said the wave of book bans has left her less confident about what new books to order for her school library.

She considered ordering a collection of short stories called “Growing Up Trans: In Our Own Words” but worried the book may be targeted for removal.

“Should I play it safe?” she said. “Or should I push the envelope and get a couple and see what happens?”

She worries that librarians will soon be able to fill shelves with only books included on pre-approved lists.

“Are we going to get there?” she said. “Are you just gonna take everything away that I came into this job wanting to do?”

Just north of Austin, at Round Rock Independent School District, the pressure on librarians has been intense, says Ami Uselman, the director of library services for the district. Some of her librarians are reaching breaking points. One came to her in tears, worried about what their church would think about social media accounts calling them groomers. Another quit.

Uselman said parents are walking into schools and grilling librarians with questions about books. Some demanded records for all books purchased in the library, some 30,000 titles. Surprisingly, there’s not been one formal book challenge, she said in late April.

But Uselman’s work phone still lights up with calls, some from people outside of the district, accusing her of stocking inappropriate material in libraries. The pressure to remove books has been easing, but she worries about the next event that could ignite community anger.

“There’s just a lot of misunderstandings,” Uselman said. For example, some parents mistake graphic novels as sexually explicit when instead they are picture and comic books.

“I feel like it has gotten better,” Uselman said. “The problem is just when you think it’s getting better, something else pops up.”

Disclosure: Facebook has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribunes journalism. Find a complete list of them here.


Tickets are on sale now for the 2022 Texas Tribune Festival, happening in downtown Austin on Sept. 22-24. Get your TribFest tickets by May 31 and save big!

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2022/05/17/librarians-texas-book-bans/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

Mom complains on Fox News that biracial son won’t do chores because of CRT, sues his school

The mother of a biracial 13-year-old is suing a Virginia school district over its usage of critical race theory, which, she claimed, caused him to start “seeing himself just as a Black man.”

Melissa Riley, a mother from the Charlottesville area, told Fox News on Monday that she noticed a significant change in her son’s perspectives after the Albemarle School District rolled out anti-racist curricula. 

“We didn’t have issues before. He is in eighth grade,” Riley told host Jesse Watters on Monday. “He’s seeing himself just as a Black man. He’s seeing things that don’t go his way as racism. And he is finding safety in numbers now.”

Riley went on to allege that her son is now attempting to invoke racism in order to get out of his chores.

RELATED: Right’s attack on “critical race theory” goes back decades — but media hasn’t noticed

“I asked him to clean the house, [he said] ‘racism,'” she told Watters.

“You are kidding, right?” he responded. “Or are you serious?”

“No. I’m serious,” Riley insisted. “They have totally changed his perspective. They have put him in a box.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Riley also claimed that the school district said her son could serve as a “Black spokesman for the Black community.”

Riley, who told the New York Post that she is “white and Native American,” said she didn’t find such a suggestion for her son appropriate. “He looks Hawaiian,” she said of her son. “He’s beautiful.” 

“When I told them I didn’t think that that would be appropriate,” she added, “they told me that if he was uncomfortable with the conversations, he and other children of color could go to a safe place during these conversations.”

RELATED: The critics were right: “Critical race theory” panic is just a cover for silencing educators

According to the Post, Riley has signed onto a lawsuit, filed by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a conservative legal group, arguing that the school district’s anti-racist program contravenes the state constitution’s equal protection and free-speech clauses. That suit, submitted in December, was struck down just last month by a judge who reportedly found that there was “nothing inherently evil or wrong” about what the district was teaching. 

“In long monologues about racism and schooling,” Albemarle Circuit Judge Claude Worrell II said at the time, “I think it happens during education that certain people are made to feel uncomfortable about history and their place in it.”

ADF is also backing another lawsuit, filed by a former assistant principal, who alleged that the school board harassed her after she expressed concerns about the school’s anti-racist teachings.

Watch the interview below: 

After GOP freakout over Roe demonstrations, DeSantis criminalizes peaceful protests outside homes

Florida’s right-wing Republican Governor Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a bill into law that criminalizes peaceful protests in residential neighborhoods.

The draconian restrictions on free speech were levied in response to the nationwide explosion of demonstrations directed at the United States Supreme Court’s anticipated overturning of abortion rights that were established in Roe versus Wade.

But when pro-choice activists began picketing outside the homes of the five Associate Justices who were named in the draft majority opinion that was leaked last month, advocates for forced birth like DeSantis decided that the Constitution’s First Amendment right to petition the government should be suspended.

None of the Court’s nine jurists, however, live in Florida.

“Sending unruly mobs to private residences, like we have seen with the angry crowds in front of the homes of Supreme Court justices, is inappropriate,” DeSantis said in a press release. “This bill will provide protection to those living in residential communities and I am glad to sign it into law.”

DeSantis’ statement added that “once this law takes effect, law enforcement officers will provide a warning to any person picketing or protesting outside of a dwelling and will make arrests for residential picketing only if the person does not peaceably disperse after the warning. Residential picketing will be punishable as a second-degree misdemeanor.”

House Bill 1571 “prohibits a person from picketing or protesting before or about the dwelling of a person with specified intent” and “requires a specified warning before arrest.” It takes effect on October 1st, months after the Court is expected to upend a half-century of legal precedent.

Those who violate the new statute are subject to criminal prosecution for a second-degree misdemeanor, the penalties for which include a $500 fine, six months of probation, and a sentence of up to 60 days in jail.

GOP-led Arizona Senate launches investigation after Trump ally suggested Buffalo shooting was fake

On Monday, the Phoenix New Times reported that the Arizona State Senate has opened an investigation into extremist Rep. Wendy Rogers after a comment she posted on social media appearing to claim that the racial massacre in Buffalo was a false flag staged by the FBI.

“Just hours after a shooter killed 10 people Saturday in a racist attack at a grocery store in Buffalo, New York, Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers took to social media to write: ‘Fed boy summer has started in Buffalo,’ implying the attack was a false-flag operation,” reported Katya Schwenk. “She posted the remark Saturday on Gab and Telegram, two social media sites popular on the political right. The posts gained hundreds of likes from Rogers’ supporters.”

“On Monday afternoon, the Arizona Senate voted to open an ethics investigation into her comment. The motion passed in the GOP-controlled chamber. Other than Rogers herself, only two senators cast dissenting votes: East Valley Republicans Warren Petersen, of Gilbert, and Kelly Townsend, of Mesa. Twenty-four senators voted in favor of opening an investigation,” said the report. “Rogers did not speak during the vote. And so far, she has not taken down the posts, nor apologized.”

One senator in support of the investigation, Democrat Victoria Steele of Tuscon, said, “This Senator was up before the ethics committee a year ago. In March, our state senate voted to censure her because of hateful, anti-Semitic comments. Spewing hate and furthering racist comments is not what we should be here for.”

Rogers, who herself has ties to white nationalists, is also a close ally of former President Donald Trump who has repeatedly spread false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen, and has traveled around the country demanding that state results be “decertified,” which is not a real legal process.

She has even faced calls by members of her own party, including gubernatorial candidate Matt Salmon, to resign.

GOP senator booed at university commencement speech apologizes for “two genders” comment

Wyoming Sen. Cynthia Lummis, a Republican, apologized on Sunday after being booed during a weekend commencement address for claiming that the “two sexes” are a “fundamental scientific truth.”

Lummis claimed that “it was never my intention to make anyone feel un-welcomed or disrespected,” reported Oil City News. “My reference to the existence of two sexes was intended to highlight the times in which we find ourselves, times in which the metric of biological sex is under debate with potential implications for the shared Wyoming value of equality,” the lawmaker added. 

Speaking at the University of Wyoming’s graduation ceremony, the GOP lawmaker implied that America’s constitutional rights are being stripped away as a result of left-wing ideology on sex and gender. Lummis went on to say that “even fundamental scientific truths, such as the existence of two sexes, male and female, are subject to challenge these days.” 

Her comment was immediately booed by the student body. University of Wyoming student Matthew Shepard was brutally murdered in Laramie in 1998, a pivotal movement in the struggle for LGBTQ+ rights. 

“You know, I — I challenge those of you,” Lummis continued on, directly addressing the graduating students. “I’m not making a comment on the fact that there are people who transition between sexes,” she added before trailing off to another subject.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


After the address, University of Wyoming President Ed Seidel released a statement addressing Lummis’ remarks.

“One of our speakers made remarks regarding biological sex that many on campus take issue with,” he said. “While we respect the right of all to express their views, from students to elected officials, we unequivocally state that UW is an institution that supports and celebrates its diverse communities that collectively make us the wonderful place that we are.”

The lawmaker’s comments come as Republican-led states continue to enact sweeping anti-LGBTQ+ legislation across the country. Dozens of states have banned trans students from playing sports that correspond to their gender and receiving gender-affirming care. Many have instituted vague restrictions on the educational “instruction” of race, sex, and gender, deputizing aggrieved parents to take action against public school teachers and officials who contravene state law. 

RELATED: Ron DeSantis’ war on “woke” Disney is really an attack on core American values

FEC Republicans block action on alleged Trump money laundering scheme despite fining Hillary

The Federal Election Commission decided not to take action on a complaint alleging that the Trump campaign laundered hundreds of millions of dollars after commissioners deadlocked down party lines.

The FEC, which requires a majority of its six-member panel to back any action, has not released the reasons it declined to pursue the complaint but said it was “equally divided” on several legal questions it considered in a letter to the Campaign Legal Center (CLC), which filed the complaint, according to Insider.

FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub, a Democrat and the longest-tenured member of the panel, told the outlet that she voted to find reason to believe the Trump campaign and its associates violated federal law.

“Disclosure is the core mission of the FEC, and it’s important for an informed electorate to know where the money is coming from and where the money is going,” Weintraub said, adding that she was “disappointed that we did not have the votes to go forward.”

Weintraub also expressed concern that the decision will “look to the public like the commission is making decisions on a partisan basis.”

RELATED: Jared Kushner signed off on $617 million company to ease Trump’s paranoia about Brad Parscale

The FEC, which has three Republican members and three Democrats, has been ineffective for years because of partisan deadlock. Republican commissioners have repeatedly blocked action on campaign finance complaints, though the FEC issued a fine to the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democrats in March. The commission fined Clinton’s campaign $8,000 and the Democratic National Committee $105,000 for obscuring their funding for the infamous “Steele dossier.”

The CLC, a nonpartisan watchdog group, accused the Trump campaign of a much larger scheme to hide its spending. The group filed a complaint alleging that the Trump campaign funneled hundreds of millions in donor cash through American Made Media Consultants (AMMC), a shell company that Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner helped create, and Parscale Strategy, which is run by former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale, to hide payments to sub-vendors. The Trump campaign funneled about $617 million in campaign spending through AMMC, making it virtually impossible for the public to know how the money was spent.

The complaint notes that Parscale Strategy was run by one of Trump’s top aides and AMMC’s board included family members of Trump and former Vice President Mike Pence.

“The Trump campaign laundered well over half a BILLION dollars through a shell company tied to Jared Kushner and Brad Parscale’s PR firm, but the Republicans on the FEC don’t think you have the right to know who truly benefited from those funds,” Robert Maguire, research director at the government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said on Twitter.

“Why in the world does the FEC even require groups to file their expenditure details if someone can just pay hundreds of millions of dollars to one or two vendors—tied to the son-in-law and former campaign chief—and then have those vendors actually dole out the funds in secret?” Maguire questioned.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The CLC filed its initial complaint back in July 2020 and in March sued the FEC in federal court, accusing it of slow-walking the complaint.

“The FEC is responsible for protecting voters’ right to know how politicians are raising and spending money, but the FEC has abdicated its responsibilities for years — particularly when it comes to enforcing the law against the Trump campaign — so the FEC’s deadlock over the campaign’s massive concealment scheme is shameful but not surprising,” Adav Noti, the CLC’s legal director, told Insider.

An FEC action in the case could have resulted in severe penalties for the Trump campaign. Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wis., estimated that the penalties could be in the hundreds of millions.

“If Mr. Kushner’s American Made Media Consultants did in fact spend $617 million as reported, he and his associates — which include additional Trump family members as well as the Vice President’s nephew — could face penalties amounting to more than one billion dollars,” Pocan wrote in a letter to the Justice Department and the FEC in December 2020.

Reps. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., and Kathleen Rice, D-N.Y., both of whom are former federal prosecutors, also called on the FBI to investigate the scheme, noting that violations of the campaign finance law over $25,000 are felonies punishable by up to five years in prison.

“As former prosecutors, we know that this behavior, if true, violates multiple laws,” the lawmakers wrote, pressing the FBI for an investigation into whether “Kushner and members of the Trump family have violated federal campaign funding or other statutes.”

Read more:

“Flash droughts” are Midwest’s next big climate threat

September in Oklahoma is typically a rainy season, when farmers take advantage of the state’s third-wettest month to plant winter wheat. But last year, many were caught off guard by abnormally dry weather that descended without warning. In the span of just three weeks, nearly three-quarters of the state began experiencing drought conditions, ranging from moderate to extreme. 

Fast-moving droughts like this one are developing more and more quickly as climate change pushes temperatures to new extremes, recent research indicates — adding a new threat to the dangers of pests, flooding, and more long-term drought that farmers in the U.S. already face. Known as “flash droughts,” these dry periods can materialize in as quickly as five days, often devastating agricultural areas that aren’t prepared for them. 

During last year’s drought in Oklahoma, Jonathan Conder, a meteorologist for a local news station in Oklahoma City, marveled at the speed and severity of the event. Tulsa, the state’s second-largest city, went 80 days without more than a quarter-inch of rain, while temperatures in southwestern Oklahoma climbed into the triple digits.

“This is huge for Oklahoma,” Conder said during his broadcast on October 1. “Our agricultural community, the farmers who plant wheat, they may not even be able to plant if they don’t get two inches of rain.”

The threshold for drought conditions differs by location, with the U.S. Drought Monitor using data on soil moisture, streamflow, and precipitation to categorize droughts by their severity. While typical droughts develop over months as precipitation gradually declines, flash droughts are characterized by a steep drop in rainfall, particularly during a season that normally receives plenty, along with high temperatures and fast winds that quickly dry out the soil. They can wither crops or prevent seeds from sprouting, delaying or diminishing the harvest.  

Now, flash droughts are coming on faster and faster — making them more difficult to predict and more damaging, according to a recent study published in Nature Communications. The research, from scientists at the University of Texas and Hong Kong Polytechnic University, found that in the last 20 years, the percentage of flash droughts developing in under a week increased by more than 20 percent in the Central United States. 

“There should be more attention paid to this phenomenon,” said Zong-Liang Yang, a geosciences professor at the University of Texas and one of the study’s co-authors, as well as “how to actually implement [these findings] into agricultural management.” 

Scientists have long warned that warming temperatures and shifting rainfall patterns due to climate change pose a threat to the cash crops of the Midwest and Great Plains, primarily corn, wheat, and soybeans. But flash droughts are a relatively new area of research, Yang said, with the term gaining usage only in the last couple of decades. 

The increase in their severity and frequency, though, is already being felt across the U.S. In 2012, a flash drought struck the Central U.S. in the middle of the growing season, causing an estimated $31.2 billion in crop losses. Another flash drought hit Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota in the spring of 2017, leading to more than $2.6 billion in agricultural losses, along with “widespread wildfires, poor air quality, damaged ecosystems, and degraded mental health,” according to a study published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

Expert panel on the Buffalo shooter and what he stands for: “He was not a lone gunman”

Last Saturday,10 Black people were shot dead in Buffalo in an apparent white supremacist terror attack. The alleged shooter, 18-year-old Payton Gendron, specifically targeted a busy supermarket in a majority Black community.

Gendron’s apparent goal was to kill as many Black people as possible in order to intimidate, terrorize and dehumanize not just the Black community in Buffalo but Black America more generally. His attack can also be understood as an assault on the very idea of multiracial democracy, and a brutal rejection of the premise that nonwhites should have the same rights and freedoms in the United States as white people.

Black America has centuries of experience with white racial terrorism but has never surrendered to it. In fact, Black Americans remain the foremost guardians of American democracy.

Payton Gendron apparently live-streamed his attack on the internet and also published a 180-page manifesto embracing a range of white supremacist, antisemitic and fascist themes, including the “great replacement” theory and its claims that Black and brown people are “replacing” white people in America and Europe and that whites must be protected from “extinction” and “genocide.”

RELATED: Buffalo: This is where Donald Trump’s race-war fantasies lead

In total, Gendron’s manifesto reads like a catalog of the white racial paranoid fantasies, delusions and conspiracy theories that have become standard talking points for Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, and numerous Republican elected officials, candidates, and other public figures. 

Gendron’s act of terrorism is not surprising: It is the predictable if not inevitable result of a decades-long strategy by the Republican Party and larger white right to encourage and normalize political violence and terrorism against Black and brown people, Democrats, liberals, progressives, the LGBTQ community, Muslims, and anyone else deemed to be the enemy of their fascist, authoritarian project. 

As I wrote earlier this week, 

Donald Trump, the Republicans and the larger white right did not start the slow, long-burning fire of white supremacy in America. But they have gleefully thrown gasoline, grenades and other explosives on the fire and then danced around the flames as they spread. 

Fascism is an ideology based on racial authoritarianism and violence. As the conflict created by the Trump movement heats up, we are likely to see more terrorist attacks against Black and brown people and other targeted groups, attacks just as horrifying as the one last Saturday in Buffalo, or perhaps worse. There is a line inscribed in blood that leads from Donald Trump’s hateful rhetoric to Jan. 6, 2021, to last Saturday in Buffalo. Where it will lead next? Unfortunately, we will soon find out as the next chapter in the new American neofascist nightmare is being written all around us in real time.

I asked a range of experts to offer their insights about Saturday’s terror attack in Buffalo and what that event reveals about American society in this moment of democracy crisis, rising neofascism and other troubles. Their comments have been edited for clarity and length.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Anthea Butler is a professor of religious studies and Africana studies at the University of Pennsylvania. Her new book is “White Evangelical Racism: The Politics of Morality in America.”

The shooting in Buffalo is another murderous white man killing people because of his supposed racial grievances. The manifesto, the body armor and the lethal weaponry are all signs of the impotence and ignorance of these white supremacists grasping for relevancy in a world that does not want their posturing for power.

Unless America comes to grips with this deep malevolence and pathology, it will be given over to these ill-fated losers who believe taking human life will make them better than the people they hate.

Until America comes to grips with the deep hatred, malevolence and pathology of the racism that eats away at this nation, this country will soon be given over to these ill-fated malevolent losers who believe taking human life will make them better than the Black, red and brown people that they hate so much.

Whether in the name of white supremacy or white Christian life, these people are destroying the fabric of the American society they claim to want to redeem but destroy further with every shooting.

Tim Wise is an author, activist and leading expert on white privilege and racism. He is the author of many books, including his most recent “Dispatches From the Race War.”

Once again, we see how the doom loop of racist discourse — from 4chan to Fox News to the offices of several Republican members of Congress — is feeding hatred and violence and terrorism. The Great Replacement theory may have started out in the fever swamps of the far right, but it has now been thoroughly mainstreamed. Until and unless we put aside the deliberately naive notion of white racial innocence and the privilege that insulates white killers from being seen as terrorists, no matter how politically driven their actions, we will see more blood and chaos, and more confusion about how it could have happened.

Federico Finchelstein is professor of history at the New School for Social Research and Eugene Lang College in New York. He is the author of several books, including “From Fascism to Populism in History.” His most recent book is “A Brief History of Fascist Lies.”

This new terrorist attack is clearly fascist, not only because it is self-defined as such by its perpetrator, who also called himself a racist and antisemite, but also because it embodies key elements of fascism, such as the use of extreme violence and even physical elimination in the name of racism and white supremacy. Fascism is not new in America. What is new is the fact that these fascist domestic terrorists are a part of a broader coalition which Trumpism as a movement epitomizes so well. Participants in this extremist coalition might not share similar methodologies for dealing with “enemies,” but they share similar ideas about how homogeneous America should be, and similar paranoias about domination and “replacement” fueled by old racist fantasies.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Replacement theory” is the new name for old fascist racism. Thus, the killer is a fellow traveler of this alliance between fascists, wannabe fascists, right wing populists and conservative enablers. In the past, many of these actors regarded these terrorists as toxic, as bad politics and bad optics, but now they have shortened the distance between ideas supported by terrorists and their own fanatic aspirations rooted in xenophobia.

Matthew Sheffield is an expert on right-wing news media, messaging and communication strategies. He is also the editor and publisher of Flux and host of the “Theory of Change” video podcast.

Although its more naive members may not be aware of this, the Republican Party has always counted on the votes of racists. In the 1970s, they decided to peel off segregationist Democrats, and they’ve been a valuable part of the GOP ever since.

This was a deliberate choice that the “conservative” movement made. Rather than becoming more moderate and expressing their values through policies that could gain majority support, the American right embarked on a minoritarian strategy. They decided rather than gain casual voters from the middle, they would fire up voters from the far right.

The only way the GOP has been able to sustain itself has been to whip up its voter base with fear-mongering about immigration and Islam, taking messaging cues from the far right.

This has been the strategy ever since. But as the percentage of white religious fundamentalists goes down every year, the only way the GOP has been able to sustain itself has been to whip up its shrinking voter base into ever more erratic fits of frenzy. The key to doing that, for a number of years, has been fear-mongering about immigration and Islam. Almost invariably, GOP elites have taken their messaging cues from the furthest right. In 2016, it was documented multiple times that the Trump campaign copied and pasted memes that were generated on neo-Nazi message boards.

The hateful conspiracy theories apparently spouted by the Buffalo killer originated on white supremacist and neo-Nazi websites, but they have been elevated to nightly propaganda instruction thanks to Fox hosts Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham and others, all at the behest of Rupert Murdoch, who we recently learned has apparently employed a white nationalist to write his memoirs.

Undoubtedly, some Republican elites believe in the hateful and violent rhetoric that their colleagues spout, but it’s also the case that many of them believe it brings them money and power. There is no moral difference. If you ape the messages of racists, if you repeat their tropes, your reason for doing so is of no import. You are a racist yourself, because you communicate the same things they do.

David Rothkopf is a columnist for the Daily Beast and USA Today, host of “Deep State Radio” and author of many books on politics and foreign policy. His next book is “American Resistance.” He was formerly editor and CEO of Foreign Policy and a senior official in the Clinton administration.

He was not a lone gunman. While his family and community bear responsibility for how this monster went astray, that is a small fraction of the story. A decades-long, heavily funded effort to twist our interpretation of the Second Amendment to make assault weapons freely available across the U.S. put the gun in his hand. Fox News and 4chan and other extremists put the words for his manifesto in his head. Trump and others in the GOP provided him with the validation to believe that his racism and violence were acceptable. Jan. 6 and the Proud Boys and Kyle Rittenhouse and MAGA offshoots everywhere made him feel like he was part of a movement. Decades of right-wing institutionalization of hate and division within our society led to this gruesome mass murder, and they will lead to the next and the next and the next.

Jared Holt is resident fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, where he focuses on domestic extremist groups and their use of digital technology. He was previously an investigative reporter at Right Wing Watch.

The tragedy in Buffalo follows a grim and heartbreakingly predictable pattern. In recent years, killers in El Paso, Pittsburgh and Christchurch have been driven to commit atrocities in the name of “great replacement” conspiracy theories popular with white supremacists. It is impossible to separate those racist theories from the bloodshed they have inspired. And like other killers in recent years, the suspect in custody appears to have used the internet to broadcast his ideology and violence to an audience of fellow believers, likely hoping to inspire copycats and solicit “sainthood” from others in the white supremacist movement.

Though the Biden administration has made some progress in addressing the threat domestic extremism poses to national security, it is working uphill against a Republican Party seeking to exert minority rule over the country by agitating its most extreme elements, aided by its accompanying array of media outlets like Fox News. Hosts on Fox News, including Tucker Carlson, and opinion makers on the right have played a large role in mainstreaming extremist ideas like the “great replacement” theory. That doesn’t mean they directly have blood on their hands, but the damage those figures have done in legitimizing these violent ideologies rather than attempting to smother them is horrifying.

Stephanie Foggett is a research fellow at the Soufan Center, an independent nonprofit offering research, analysis and strategic dialogue on global security challenges and foreign policy issues. She is an expert on global terrorism and counterterrorism, online extremism, the Islamic State and the rise of white supremacy.

The horrific act of violence committed on May 14 in Buffalo should be investigated as an act of domestic terrorism. The perpetrator’s actions were racially motivated and he left behind an online manifesto describing his ideology and his desire to engage in an act of terrorism in support of this cause. It is important that we recognize this violence as domestic terrorism and that we contend with the violent ideology behind it.

The perpetrator’s 180-page document leaves no doubt about the violent ideology that inspired his act of violence. In his own words, he describes himself as a white supremacist, a racist and a terrorist. The document makes for disturbing reading and is clearly inspired by other acts of domestic and international white supremacist terrorism. In the name of white supremacy, it justifies political marginalization, political violence and ultimately the extermination of entire groups of people. In his writings he espouses the “great replacement” conspiracy theory and sets out a roadmap for genocide against nonwhites.

We must push back against claims that the perpetrator was a lone actor. He emerged from a transnational white supremacist online ecosystem, intended to inspire collective violence.

An important takeaway after reading his document is that we must push back against any claims that the perpetrator was a lone actor. He states, “I am the sole perpetrator” in his document. For me, the 180-page document says otherwise. He clearly intends to inspire others to violence, through both his words and his deeds. Furthermore, he states very clearly that he himself was inspired to violence by others, and names several white supremacist and far-right terrorists from the U.S., Britain, Norway, Italy and New Zealand as having motivated his own act of violence. His political ramblings clearly draw from a transnational white supremacist online ecosystem, intended to inspire collective violence in the name of the same racist cause.

The perpetrator says he was radicalized online and gained his ideas “mostly from the internet.” Parts of his manifesto draw heavily from the writings of the terrorist behind the Christchurch attacks in New Zealand. Other areas of his manifesto include clippings, cartoons and memes he has pulled from his online activities, as well as common talking points which have now permeated the U.S. mainstream referencing “white genocide” and “great replacement.” Today, violent white supremacist ideology is packaged in podcasts, videos, cartoons and memes through an online ecosystem that is normalizing hate and targeting young audiences globally. From his livestream of the attack to his online manifesto, the perpetrator clearly wants to contribute his violent content back into the white supremacist online ecosystem, in order to radicalize others and inspire more acts of violence. 

Jean Guerrero is an opinion columnist at the Los Angeles Times. She is the author of the recent book “Hatemonger: Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, and the White Nationalist Agenda.” Her essays and other writing have been featured at Vanity Fair, Politico, the Nation, Wired, the New York Times and The Washington Post.

This latest white terror attack is devastating. The shooter, per his own Discord logs, didn’t want to kill anyone. But he felt obligated to do so based on disinformation that radicalized him into believing that the survival of white people depended on him committing a racist massacre. The disinformation included anti-Black content from the same white supremacists (such as Peter Brimelow and Jared Taylor) whose ideas were mainstreamed in the U.S., via Breitbart, by Trump’s senior adviser and speechwriter Stephen Miller in 2015 and 2016. 

GOP politicians and Fox News host Tucker Carlson have been normalizing the “great replacement” theory, which deliberately confuses demographic change with white genocide. Right-wing propagandists will frame the attack as the act of an incomprehensible lunatic to distract from their voluntary, clear-eyed complicity. Blaming mental illness is a convenient way to avoid examining the real causes of these white terror attacks and to ensure that they continue to take place.

Right-wing propagandists will frame the attack as the work of an incomprehensible lunatic — to distract us from their complicity.

The only way to avoid full-blown race war now is, first, to hold Republicans accountable for their scapegoating politics and, second, to insist on examining other causes of white extremism, such as toxic ideas of masculinity that promote violence. Any discussion of national security that does not center domestic white terrorism, such as conversations about the U.S.-Mexico border, are deliberate distractions to protect the status quo, in which communities of color live in constant terror of massacre.

Teddy Wilson is a journalist with a decade of experience covering the Christian right and the conservative movement. Previously he was the U.S. investigations editor at openDemocracy, a research analyst at Political Research Associates and a staff reporter at Rewire News Group.

While it is important for academics and researchers who study radicalization and extremist violence to read and analyze the “manifesto,” which should arguably be referred to as a “confession” to avoid using terminology that bestows any implicit intellectual weight, I have serious doubts that these writings will reveal any important new understanding of the white supremacist movement. There is nothing ambiguous about the movement’s goals, or particularly complex or nuanced about its ideology.

There were warnings about the rise of right-wing authoritarianism years before right-wing populist demagogues such as Jair Bolsonaro, Viktor Orbán and Donald Trump exploited cultural grievances to achieve political power. There were warnings about the increased activities of far-right violent extremists years before the Oath Keepers, Three Percenters and Proud Boys led the Jan. 6 insurrection. There are now warnings about the growing threat from white supremacist terrorism. Ignoring these warnings will continue to cost lives. We are now on a path toward a white supremacist terrorist mass casualty event — another Oklahoma City.

Read more on the Buffalo shooting, and what led to it:

What “great replacement”? Right wants us to shut up about Buffalo shooter’s ideology

Last Saturday, as the entire world now knows, an 18-year-old man named Payton Gendron killed 10 people in a Tops supermarket in Buffalo.

Of the 13 people Gendron shot, 11 were Black — in his livestream of the shooting, he’s heard saying “sorry” to a white man he shoots. The other victims seem to have hardly even been spared a thought.

Gendron’s motivations for the shooting were made clear in a 180-page manifesto he published online. The document, which includes multiple antisemitic references and makes clear he was expressly targeting the store, and that particular Buffalo neighborhood, because of the area’s large Black population, leaves little to the imagination.

RELATED: Doubling down on “great replacement” paranoia: How the right is reacting to the Buffalo shooting

The manifesto included a nearly word-for-word repeat of Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s interpretation of the racist “Great Replacement” narrative, a far-right conspiracy theory that claims Democrats and/or Jews are trying to dilute the white American electorate by importing immigrants of color.

This should come as no surprise to anyone who’s paid even the slightest attention to Carlson over the past few years. The TV-dinner heir and child of total privilege who claims to speak for the common man has long had an affinity for the most racist of conspiracy theories.

Yet rather than reflect on the similarity between the ideological conspiracy theory they’re pushing and the motivations of the Buffalo shooter, many conservatives are crying foul at the suggestion they might have some culpability for spreading hate.

Carlson is hardly alone. His allies and followers in the Republican Party have been parroting the “replacement” line for years. GOP rising star Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., one of the biggest proponents of the conspiracy, used it in a September 2021 campaign ad. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., used the term directly in a tweet praising Carlson, and candidates such as Ohio Republican U.S. Senate nominee J.D. Vance have also embraced the language. Judd Legum has a good overview here.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


But instead of rethinking how they talk about immigrants and people of color, conservatives have gone on the offensive, playing aggrieved to drown their critics in crocodile tears. Stefanik, in a statement, expressed her sympathies for the victims of the shooting — and then turned things over to senior advisor Alex DeGrasse for a doubling down on anti-immigrant sentiments.

Meanwhile, Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo. — whom Stefanik replaced in the GOP House leadership after Cheney was ousted for her criticism of Donald Trump — tried to distance herself and her party from the racism she has supported for years, claiming that “House GOP leadership has enabled white nationalism, white supremacy, and anti-semitism” while conveniently ignoring her own support for the racist birther movement, her career of Islamophobic hate speech and her hardline anti-immigration rhetoric — all of which is functionally little different from the more explicit conspiracy theories being repeated by Stefanik, et al.

Social media influencer and frequent Carlson guest Glenn Greenwald (a former Salon columnist), writing on his Substack blog, argued that those seeking to look into the ideological ties between the Fox News host and the shooter were being unfair. “There is no racial hierarchy in Carlson’s view of American citizenship and to claim that there is is nothing short of a defamatory lie,” Greenwald wrote, conveniently ignoring — as usual — the fact that Carlson’s entire worldview is based on racial hierarchy and bigotry.

Other media figures also leapt at the opportunity to play defense, whining about fairness and respect for the dead. Commentator Kmele Foster complained, “When a lunatic goes on a deadly rampage, maybe wait 24-48 hrs before co-opting the tragedy to malice your political enemies.” Daily Wire writer Megan Basham pretended to take the high road, calling on critics “not to pit racial groups against one another,” a principle that, if applied, would erase the majority of her boss Ben Shapiro’s output. Breitbart’s Joel Pollack protested that inquiring into the shooter’s obvious ideological links to other right-wingers was a “predictable attempt to exploit the shooting to censor debate and opposition” — even as he reiterated his support for the “Great Replacement” theory.

Wailing about persecution and unfairness is the right’s go-to move whenever its leading voices are forced to actually answer for the reality of their belief system, and the fallout from Saturday’s shooting is no different. The more noise they make to distract you, the more worried they are that people are beginning to pay attention to what they actually say.

Read more on the Buffalo shooting, and what led to it:

Why is Joe Biden’s Justice Department still defending so many of Trump’s policies?

More than 16 months into Joe Biden’s presidency, his Department of Justice and other agencies continue to defend and advance legal positions held by the Trump administration, an analysis by a leading government watchdog revealed Monday.

Former President Trump and his DOJ “consistently made a mockery of the law throughout his four years in power,” the Center for Economic and Policy Research’s Revolving Door Project asserted. “And while their laughable reasoning and indefensible positions were struck down at a historic rate, many cases were still waiting for Biden. Sixteen months into Biden’s presidency, an alarming number remain, either in some form of pause or advancing forward with the Biden administration adopting Trump’s position.”

Revolving Door Project researcher Hannah Story Brown said in a statement that “one-third of the way through Biden’s presidency, it’s becoming clear how long a shadow the Biden administration is willing to let Trump-era legal positions cast.”

RELATED: Merrick Garland is ignoring the DOJ’s original mission: Battling seditionists like Donald Trump

She added that the president and Attorney General Merrick Garland’s “adherence to an outdated and often breached norm of consistency between attorneys general is undermining this administration’s deepest commitments even as Trump’s judicial appointees continue to shred legal norms and sabotage democracy.”

The Revolving Door Project analysis contains a detailed — but non-comprehensive — list highlighting the Biden administration’s defense of Trump-era cases and positions across a wide range of subjects and departments.

The DOJ is defending Trump in a defamation lawsuit over a sexual assault accusation; is seeking to dismiss lawsuits against the former president and his officials for violently removing racial justice protesters ahead of a 2020 Washington photo-op; and is trying to keep documents affirming alleged improprieties related to the Trump International Hotel from the public eye.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


On immigration, the Biden administration continued to misuse Title 42, a provision of the Public Health Safety Act first invoked by Trump as the coronavirus pandemic began in March 2020. More than one million asylum-seekers have been deported under the policy, the majority of them during Biden’s tenure.

The Biden administration also continues to defend the violation of unaccompanied migrant children’s legal rights under the Migrant Protection Protocols program, has appealed a court’s decision in Gomez et al. v Trump et al. ordering the issuance of more than 9,000 diversity visas, and has caved to Republican pressure and withdrawn from settlement talks with migrants whose families were separated at the border.

Biden’s DOJ and Department of Education are defending Trump-era Education Secretary Betsy DeVos’ repeal of a rule that helped prevent for-profit colleges exploit students, while shielding DeVos from testifying in a case involving a class-action lawsuit brought by defrauded student borrowers. The Education Department also continues to seek dismissal of a lawsuit by former California Attorney General Xavier Becerra challenging DeVos’ Distance Education and Innovation regulations.

On the environmental front, Garland’s DOJ is defending Trump-era fossil fuel projects including Enbridge’s Line 3 tar sands pipeline despite Biden’s pledge to combat the climate emergency.

The Biden administration is also upholding a doctrine barring military service members who were raped from suing the government, is failing to defend voting rights, and is endorsing an expansion of police power. It is also delaying gender-affirming surgery for a transgender woman prisoner despite a court order and the threat of judicial sanction, defending the Department of Homeland Security’s authority to conduct warrantless searches of electronic devices, and upholding a Social Security provision that denies Puerto Rico residents benefits.

“The Biden administration must move quickly to drop, reverse, or settle the cases that Trump left behind,” Revolving Door Project asserted. “And — we would have thought this wouldn’t need to be said — the administration should adopt Trump’s positions about as often as a stopped clock is accurate.”

Read more on Merrick Garland and the Biden-era Justice Department:

“Completely unfair”: Marjorie Taylor Greene complains that people think she is “unintelligent”

Rep. Majorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., blamed the media this week because she said people believe that she is “angry or crazy or unintelligent.”

“They create me as someone to not be liked,” Greene told conservative podcast host Lisa Boothe. “They make me out as if I’m angry or crazy or basically just unintelligent, which, you know, is completely unfair. But they say give me all the ‘isms.’ You know, ‘ists.’ Like the racist, the homophobic, um, you know, anti-Semitic. They put all those labels on me and none of them are true.”

“That’s pretty frustrating so I think people get the wrong idea about me,” she added.

During the interview, Greene also complained about arming Ukraine while American mothers are not able to find baby formula.

“Our government, it’s not the same government. It’s a regime. They’re communists. They are waging a war against America,” Greene opined. “Anyone that went inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, whether they just walked around or they fought with police officers or they broke their way in, no matter what level they were on, they have become political targets. They have been arrested. They’re being prosecuted.”

And she slammed Nina Jankowicz, who has been selected to lead a Department of Homeland Security disinformation board.

“The ministry of truth is absolutely absurd and that woman, we have a lot to say about her,” Greene remarked. “The very idea that they can make her the decision-maker of what’s true and what isn’t true and she’s just clearly a far-left woman who seems miserable in her own right.”

“And I just feel sorry for her child to have that kind of mother,” she concluded.

Listen to the podcast below.

Law enforcement could use online data against abortion seekers if Supreme Court strikes down Roe

When the draft of a Supreme Court decision that would overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked to the press, many of us who have been studying privacy for vulnerable individuals came to a troubling realization: The marginalized and vulnerable populations whose online risks have been the subject of our attention are likely to grow exponentially. These groups are poised to encompass all women of child-bearing age, regardless of how secure and how privileged they may have imagined themselves to be.

In overturning Roe, the anticipated decision would not merely deprive women of reproductive control and physical agency as a matter of constitutional law, but it would also change their relationship with the online world. Anyone in a state where abortion becomes illegal who relies on the internet for information, products and services related to reproductive health would be subject to online policing.

As a researcher who studies online privacy, I’ve known for some time how Google, social media and internet data generally can be used for surveillance by law enforcement to cast digital dragnets. Women would be at risk not just from what they reveal about their reproductive status on social media, but also by data from their health applications, which could incriminate them if it were subpoenaed.

Who is tracked and how

People who are most vulnerable to online privacy encroachment and to the use or abuse of their data have traditionally been those society deems less worthy of protection: people without means, power or social standing. Surveillance directed at marginalized people reflects not only a lack of interest in protecting them, but also a presumption that, by virtue of their social identity, they are more likely to commit crimes or to transgress in ways that might justify preemptive policing.

Many marginalized people happen to be women, including low-income mothers, for whom the mere act of applying for public assistance can subject them to presumptions of criminal intent. These presumptions are often used to justify invasions of their privacy. Now, with anti-abortion legislation sweeping Republican-controlled states and poised to go into effect if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, all women of reproductive age in those states are likely to be subject to those same presumptions.

Before, women had to worry only that Target or Amazon might learn of their pregnancies. Based on what’s already known about privacy incursions by law enforcement against marginalized people, it’s likely that in a post-Roe world women will be more squarely in the crosshairs of digital forensics. For example, law enforcement agencies routinely use forensic tools to search people’s cellphones when investigating a wide range of crimes, sometimes without a search warrant.

Imagine a scenario in which a co-worker or neighbor reports someone to the authorities, which gives law enforcement officials grounds to pursue digital evidence. That evidence could include, for example, internet searches about abortion providers and period app data showing missed periods.

The risk is especially acute in places that foster bounty-hunting. In a state like Texas where there is a potential for citizens to have standing to sue people who help others access abortion services, everything you say or do in any context becomes relevant because there’s no probable cause hurdle to accessing your data.

Outside of that case, it’s difficult to do full justice to all the risks because context matters, and different combinations of circumstances can conspire to elevate harms. Here are risks to keep in mind:

  • Sharing information about your pregnancy on social media.
  • Internet search behavior related directly or indirectly to your pregnancy or reproductive health, regardless of the search engine you use.
  • Location tracking via your phone, for example showing that you visited a place that could be linked to your reproductive health.
  • Using apps that reveal relevant sensitive data, like your menstrual cycle.
  • Being overconfident in using encryption or anonymous tools.

Heeding alarms

Scholars, including my colleagues and me, have been raising alarms for years, arguing that surveillance activities and lack of privacy threatening those most vulnerable are ultimately a threat to all. That’s because the number of people at risk can rise when political forces identify a broader population as posing threats justifying surveillance.

The lack of action on privacy vulnerability is due in part to a failure of imagination, which frequently blinkers people who see their own position as largely safe in a social and political system.

There is, however, another reason for inattention. When considering mainstream privacy obligations and requirements, the privacy and security community has, for decades, been caught up in a debate about whether people really care about their privacy in practice, even if they value it in principle.

I’d argue that the privacy paradox – the belief that people are less motivated to protect their privacy than they claim to be – remains conventional wisdom today. This view diverts attention from taking action, including giving people tools to fully evaluate their risks. The privacy paradox is arguably more a commentary on how little people understand the implications of what’s been called surveillance capitalism or feel empowered to defend against it.

With the general public cast as indifferent, it is easy to assume that people generally don’t want or need protection, and that all groups are at equal risk. Neither is true.

All in it together?

It’s hard to talk about silver linings, but as these online risks spread to a broader population, the importance of online safety will become a mainstream concern. Online safety includes being careful about digital footprints and using anonymous browsers.

Maybe the general population, at least in states that are poised to trigger or validate abortion bans, will come to recognize that Google data can be incriminating.

 

Nora McDonald, Assistant Professor of Information Technology, University of Cincinnati

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Arizona Republican linked to white nationalists suggests the feds faked Buffalo shooting

An Arizona Republican state legislator with ties to white nationalists suggested the Buffalo massacre was staged.

State Sen. Wendy Rogers, an election conspiracist who spoke at a white nationalist event, posted a message on the social media platform Telegram that speculated government agents had carried out the murder of 10 people at a grocery store in a Black neighborhood, reported HuffPost.

“Fed boy summer has started in Buffalo,” Rogers posted, although she didn’t make clear why federal agents would stage the mass shooting.

The 18-year-old suspect in the shootings left a lengthy manifesto referring to the “great replacement” conspiracy theory that has motivated previous gunmen, and Rogers has espoused similar views about immigration and race.

“We Americans who love this country are being replaced by people who do not love this country,” Rogers tweeted last year. “I will not back down from this statement. Communists and our enemies are using mass immigration, education, big tech, big corporations and other strategies to accomplish this.”

Fox News broadcaster Tucker Carlson and Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., who represents the Buffalo area, have also promoted “great replacement” ideology.

Rogers, a first-term legislator, was censured in March for her violent rhetoric, and she spoke in February at the white nationalist America First Political Action Conference in Florida, where she praised white supremacist influencer Nick Fuentes, who has also claims the Buffalo killings were a false flag.

Why “Bridgerton” pivoting to a different love story next season makes sense

Fans of the acclaimed Netflix period drama “Bridgerton” were thrown for a loop after it was announced that the show’s third season wouldn’t follow the order set out by the book series.

According to Variety, the news was revealed by Nicola Coughlan who plays Penelope Featherington during Sunday’s FYSEE panel. “Bridgerton,” which is based on Julia Quinn’s novel series of the same name, has so far followed the same progression as the books — the first season focused on Daphne (Phoebe Dynevor) and Simon’s (Regé-Jean Page) story, followed the first book, “The Duke & I” while the next season, which focused on Kate (Simone Ashley) and Anthony’s (Jonathan Bailey) story, as set out by the second book, “The Viscount Who Loved Me.”

It was assumed that Season 3 would follow the author’s third book, “An Offer from a Gentleman,” about the romance between second-eldest Bridgerton heir Benedict (Luke Thompson) and his love interest Sophie Beckett, but Coughlan revealed that Netflix would save Benedict’s tale for later. Instead, the spotlight will be on Penelope and Colin Bridgerton’s (Luke Newton) burgeoning love story, which is detailed in Quinn’s fourth book, “Romancing Mister Bridgerton.” At this time, Benedict’s season has not been confirmed, but it will most likely be pushed for a later date, perhaps after Penelope’s showcase. The sudden change in focus came as a surprise to many and quickly riled up fans on social media.

On Monday, Jess Brownell, the new “Bridgerton” showrunner replacing Chris Van Dusen, explained how the timing works for Colin and Penelope’s relationship to come next.

RELATED: 5 ways to fix “Bridgerton” next season to transform this guilty pleasure into guilt-free escapism

“I really feel like it’s Colin and Penelope’s time. Because we’ve been watching both of these actors on our screens since Season 1, we’ve already invested in them a little bit. We know who they are as people,” she told Variety. “I feel like, especially in the last season, there are these moments of tension between them where it’s like, Colin walks up to the line of almost realizing that Penelope has feelings for him but doesn’t quite get there. Instead of treading water on that dynamic, we wanted to push it into their season. It really felt like the perfect moment to tee it up.”

Frankly, fans of Quinn’s books shouldn’t have been too surprised at the sped-up timeline for this couple for several reasons.

The Lady Whistledown reveal

There’s only so much Lady Whistledown subterfuge that can be played out onscreen before it starts to feel repetitive.

One of the first major changes Netflix’s series made was to unmask Penelope Featherington’s secret identity as anonymous gossip columnist Lady Whistledown for viewers at the end of the first season. Whereas, in the novels, the reader – and the ton – doesn’t learn of Penelope’s double life until she finally gets together with Colin by the end of her novel, which marks the halfway point of the book series. 

That meant that Penelope was suddenly in the foreground for Season 2, which led to more creative opportunities for conflict. She struggled to print her gossip sheet while simultaneously trying to hide her identity from both the Queen (Golda Rosheuvel) and her best friend, Eloise Bridgerton (Claudia Jessie), who is also Colin’s younger sister.

Penelope had to make some difficult decisions to throw the vengeful Queen off the scent of Eloise, whom she suspected of being Lady Whistledown. The inelegant solution? Penelope floated a nasty rumor about the Bridgertons in the scandal sheet, which clearly Eloise would not do if she were the mysterious author – but in the process it hurt the clan’s reputation. There’s only so much Lady Whistledown subterfuge that can be played out onscreen before it starts to feel repetitive, so to move from this to Penelope’s love life in Season 3 makes sense to change up the conflict.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The Colin dynamic

The fallout from the Bridgerton rumor, however, is that it lights an intense hatred of Lady Whistledown in Colin Bridgerton’s heart. How’s that for an obstacle in the rocky road to love for him and Penelope? His prejudice against the gossipmonger will naturally be played out next season, and it’s smart to then have him discover that his nemesis, Lady Whistledown, is one and the same as the woman he is destined to love. Can you imagine if “Bridgerton” stayed faithful to the books’ order and tried to stretch that hatred out for another season?

It’s smart to then have Colin discover that his nemesis, Lady Whistledown, is one and the same as the woman he is destined to love.

And it’s clear that the show has been intending the Colin and Penelope storyline to come next anyway. Season 2 teased more “Polin” moments, especially after the pair had their first dance together. Although the moment is both tender and intimate, it’s later revealed that Colin is not romantically interested in Penelope, which she overhears him telling his friends. It’s a very “Pride & Prejudice” Mr. Darcy evesdropping moment, which can’t make Penelope happy. Colin, who has already been rejected by Marina Thompson (Ruby Barker), can’t stop “friend zoning” the one person who cares about him the most.

Getting them together earlier also means that the Lady Whistledown storyline can either be shelved or at least changed. Perhaps Colin will help Penelope in her endeavors or they can leave that behind them and just travel the world.

The problem with Benedict

LGBTQ representation hopes spring eternal. How about making Benedict bi?

Lastly, Benedict’s own storyline still remains unclear at this point, including his sexuality, with many fans theorizing that he’s queer and/or gay. To be clear, Van Dusen denied that reading of the character, and we’ve only seen Benedict trysting with women in the first two seasons. But LGBTQ representation hopes spring eternal. How about making Benedict bi? Already the series has delved far deeper into his artistic side, which could point to making him far more openminded than his peers.

According to the books, Benedict is destined to fall in love with Sophie — a Regency-era Cinderella who is mistreated by her stepmother and stepsisters and forced to work as a servant — after their first meeting at a masquerade ball. With “Bridgerton” being far more cognizant of how modern viewers see social issues, the class commentary inherent in a Cinderella-style story will need time to be finessed.

Not only that, but the show will need to cast a wide net to find someone to play Sophie if she’s going to live up to the screen presence of previous Bridgerton love interests: the scene-stealing Duke (Regé-Jean Page) in the first season and fiery Kate Sharma (Simone Ashley) in the second. It’s wise to hold on Benedict and give more time for his character — and possible love interest(s) — to grow.

In contrast, Colin and Penelope are already part of the core cast, and therefore filming can begin immediately (or as soon as scripts are approved). And while we’re on the subject of people who have already been cast, Eloise’s love interest in the books has already been introduced on the show as well. With her anger at sussing out Penelope’s lies at the end of Season 2, we woudn’t be surprised if that fuels Eloise to become disillusioned and soon leave London, which would move her story up also.

More stories you might like: