Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Rachael “Raygun” Gunn quits breakdancing after viral Olympics backlash

Rachael “Raygun” Gunn is hanging up her breakdancing shoes.

The Australian competitive bgirl shared that her professional breaking career is over after receiving criticism over her 2024 Paris Olympics performance this summer. The dancer went viral for her unique type of breakdancing which was met with harsh backlash online. Gunn said that she would continue to dance but would not compete in professional spaces anymore.

On an Australian radio show, Gunn shared, "Dancing is so much fun, and it makes you feel good, and I don’t think people should feel crap about, you know, the way that they dance."

In August, the dancer's Olympic performance was highly criticized for moves like rolling on her back, spinning on her head with her feet still on the ground and a kangaroo dance, an original move Gunn created. People online questioned how Gunn qualified for the Olympics when she was not awarded points for her performances, leading to theories about Gunn being an "industry plant," NBC News reported.

Gunn told the radio show that the negative backlash and subsequent level of publicity led her to decide she needed to quit competitive breakdancing. 

"I think the level of scrutiny that’s going to be there and the people who will be filming it and it’ll go online, it’s just not going to mean the same thing,” she said. “It’s not going to be the same experience because of everything that’s at stake."

The dancer drove the nail in the coffin of her future Olympic career, stating she would never compete again. She explained, "I was going to keep competing, for sure, but that seems a really difficult thing for me to do now."

“Such a fighter”: Steve Bannon floats Marjorie Taylor Greene for Homeland Security chief

Steve Bannon, the far-right powerbroker who served as a key Donald Trump advisor from 2015 to 2017, has an idea: let Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., take the reins at the Department of Homeland Security.

“You’re such a fighter,” Bannon gushed on his “War Room” podcast early Wednesday. “Now, is there truth to the rumor that you’re going to take over at DHS?”

Greene, who was partying at Mar-a-Lago during the interview, pivoted to Trump's victory and the broad agenda he would carry out as president.

“I don’t know what’s going to happen, Steve,” she said. “We’re just thrilled to have President Trump back in the White House because everyone knows what that means. We’re going to dismantle the deep state. We’re going to end the weaponized government. We’re going to pardon the J6ers. That’s extremely important. And we are going to restore peace and prosperity back for the American people. And we’re going to end those foreign wars and we’re going to end the climate change scam. Everything’s going to be restored. We’re so excited.”

Greene, who regularly promotes far-right conspiracy theories, had previously expressed interest in leading the department and executing Trump's stated policy of mass deportations of immigrants and their children, many of whom she characterized as "terrorists." Earlier in 2024, she sponsored a resolution to impeach DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over his handling of the border. The Senate found that he did not reach the standard of committing "high crimes and misdemeanors" and dismissed the charges.

At a House committee hearing last year, Greene called Mayorkas a liar. When Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., defended the DHS secretary, she falsely suggested that the Democratic lawmaker had a sexual relationship with a Chinese spy. Lately, Greene has espoused the theory that Democrats can control extreme weather events like Hurricane Helene.

In her interview with Bannon, who just finished his prison sentence for refusing to testify over the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol, Greene suggested the country will now see a counter-revolution.

“America was not going to tolerate the communist regime destroying our freedoms, ripping our borders wide open, trying to turn our kids trans and promoting abortion as reproductive rights,” she said. “America is done with it.”

Election deniers suddenly went “very, very quiet” as soon as it looked like Trump would win

Four years ago, Donald Trump lost a presidential election by millions of votes, declared himself the winner anyway and eventually told a mob of his supporters to go and “stop the steal,” watching television for hours as they ransacked the U.S. Capitol in search of traitorous lawmakers and his own disloyal lieutenant, Mike Pence.

In his Jan. 6 remarks on the Ellipse, Trump had encouraged thousands of his followers to “show strength” and demand that Congress deny his opponent’s resounding victory and instead hand power to the loser of the 2020 election: him. After all, the former president turned president-elect assured his supporters, the other side would do the same thing, if not worse.

“If this happened to the Democrats,” Trump assured his supporters that day in Washington, DC, “there'd be hell all over the country going on.”

In 2024, that assertion has been tested and the results are now available. In her own remarks yesterday in the nation’s capital, Vice President Kamala Harris did something her Republican opponent was demonstrably incapable of: concede.

“A fundamental principle of American democracy is that when we lose an election, we accept the results,” Harris told a crowd at her alma mater, Howard University. “That principle as much as any other distinguishes democracy from monarchy or tyranny, and anyone who seeks the public trust must honor it.”

Following Tuesday’s election, Trump is on track to win the presidency by roughly the same margin in the Electoral College as President Joe Biden. And while he is also on track to win the popular vote, he is likely to do so by millions fewer votes. But in blue states and cities across the country, there are no insurrections or even talk of any; there is depression and resignation over the fact that an undeniable majority of voters chose a candidate they view as morally unfit for office.

A few individual liberals may be in denial, but there is no election-denying industry, at least not for Democrats. There is no talk of forensic audits or voting machines being hacked by foreign adversaries (Russia, it seems, was content to suppress votes with battleground-state bomb threats), and there are no overnight experts talking about ballots being imported by China and obviously thus printed on bamboo (Cyber Ninjas, a right-wing “cybersecurity” firm, was paid $9 million by Arizona taxpayers to investigate that very claim, only to affirm Trump’s 2020 loss).

Respecting democracy, even when disappointed by its results — even, in this case, when many fear the consequences for the freedom and fairness of future elections — is a distinguishing feature between the two parties: one side does it and one side did not.

Even on his way to victory, Trump played the anti-democratic hits.

“A lot of talk about massive CHEATING in Philadelphia,” the president-elect posted Tuesday afternoon on his website, Truth Social, hours before he was declared the winner of Pennsylvania. “Law Enforcement Coming!!!”

Law enforcement never came because the entire post was a lie, either intended to suppress votes or set the stage for a post-election challenge that is no longer necessary. It will now be forgotten, no longer serving the needs of Republican messaging.

We need your help to stay independent

“As soon as it started to look like Trump was going to win, the election denialism went very, very quiet,” Welton Chang, head of the social media-monitoring firm Pyrra Technologies, noted in an interview with The New York Times.

Instead of denying election results, people who had centered their entire personality around that denial instead celebrated a win. On X, where billionaire owner Elon Musk spent the lead-up to Nov. 5 amplifying conspiracy theories, talk of “election integrity” — from him and other rank-and-file deniers — evaporated as results came in. A few, like right-wing activist Naomi Wolf, claimed credit, arguing that their election-denial and army of citizen soldiers had made Democrats too scared to cheat: “They took pics of ballots and video of events. They looked up election laws. Elon Musk let them share all these.” But most on the right just gave it up, happy to accept the results and move on to taunting those who lost fair and square.

A few liberals, in the hours after the election, indulged conspiratorial explanations for why Harris underperformed compared to Biden’s 2020 victory, but none with any stature and certainly none who hold higher elected office. “It’s happening,” Kate Starbird, a disinformation researcher at the University of Washington, commented to The Washington Post. “It’s just happening at a really low level.”

In an age where millions of people get their news and opinions from dubious apps on their phone, few are totally immune to the impacts of emotionally-satisfying conspiracy theories and their viral proliferation. But one party is committed to democracy and democratic norms, and that trickles down. On the left, the conversation is about recovering from a devastating loss, not denying it and demanding that the vice president have the courage to disenfranchise the opposition.

What can we do about a country where a majority of voters backed a man who ran the ugliest campaign in modern American history? Even if many, steeped in misinformation and bad vibes, said their vote was mostly about the prices on Doordash, Trump voters clearly did not see his ugly racism, unfiltered misogyny and attempted coup d’etat as disqualifying, or see any issue with restoring him to power sans checks and balances.

American voters were told by those who know him best that Donald Trump is "the definition of 'fascist.'” A majority voted for him anyway. That is the reality that those committed to democracy are grappling with today.

Beyond the scandals: How crypto is quietly revolutionizing philanthropy

Sam Bankman-Fried, Changpeng Zhao, Mt. Gox and Luna. These names and their associated scandals have dominated crypto news and buried cryptocurrency and blockchain's potential for revolutionary humanitarian impact. The headlines tolling doom have cast a shadow over the work of millions of dedicated mathematicians, entrepreneurs, engineers, artists, ecologists and community advocates and repelled onlookers, creating a profound missed opportunity to reshape philanthropy.

In January 2024, The GivingBlock, one of the largest crypto donation platforms, reported that crypto donations had reached more than $2 billion, projected to exceed $10 billion by 2032. Crypto donors, who are largely millennials, contribute on average 128 times more per donation than cash donors. By leveraging tax incentives like capital gain offsets to eliminate taxes on donations, crypto giving is as financially smart as it is impactful. 

But the benefits of crypto giving go far beyond the financial incentives. Social impact is embedded in the foundation of Web 3. This new economy is fueled by cutting out traditional middlemen, banks, and allowing transparent, secure, and borderless peer-to-peer payments. No ID or passport is needed. This allows people, especially the unbanked, to have full control of their assets with minimal fees. In short, Web 3 provides a path for more equitable wealth distribution and decision-making. 

At Devcon’s 2022 Sustainable Blockchain Summit in Bogotá, Colombia, I met innovators harnessing blockchain to offset carbon emissions, preserve the Amazon Rainforest and curb deforestation and pollution. These efforts highlight the potential to align blockchain with ecological and humanitarian goals.  

When NFTs were booming in 2021 and 2022, we saw dozens of projects raising NFT sales for charity. NFTs are an ideal vehicle for giving back because the owner can dedicate a percentage of sales to charities of their choice in perpetuity. Artblocks, a platform that sells regenerative digital art, raised $48 million in 2021 alone. New Story, a nonprofit building homes to alleviate homelessness worldwide, partnered with artist Brian Ku to release a limited edition series of NFTs where each sale provided a 3D house for a family in Latin America.  

We need your help to stay independent

Now, with the surge in memecoins, we are seeing even more funds diverted to charities. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has championed using memecoin momentum for good, saying, “I want to see quality fun projects that positively impact the ecosystem and the world.” In October 2024 alone, he donated nearly $2 million in memecoin winnings to charities, including $532,000 to the Effective Altruism Fund's Animal Welfare Fund and over $1 million to the United Humanitarian Front, an organization providing grants to humanitarian relief initiatives in Ukraine. 

Influencer Haliey Welch has also leveraged her overnight-celebrity status and her top five podcast to advocate for the use of memecoins for good. In 2024, she started Paws Across America, an organization that brings financial support and advocacy to animal charities across the U.S. 

"By starting Paws Across America, my newfound financial blessings will be shared with the animals that need it most," she said.

The goal of philanthropy in Web 3 is to have donations embedded in our global financial system. Imagine being able to hold a stablecoin (backed by cash and U.S. treasuries) and opting to have your earned interest fund your favorite charities. Crypto holders that stake popular tokens like Ethereum or Solana could use their rewards to fund a donor-advised fund. Investors who provide liquidity for tokens on decentralized exchanges could donate the trading fees they accrue. NFT collections could dedicate a percentage of sales to an organization or DAO treasuries could donate a percentage of their treasuries. With Web 3, the opportunities to seamlessly embed social impact into financial transactions are endless, and Givepact’s API is helping to make that future possible.

With crypto approaching a $3 trillion market cap and drawing bipartisan interest, now is the time to look beyond the negative headlines and recognize how this technology is reshaping the future of philanthropy.

It’s time to prepare for the Trump sequel

I hate sequels.

Godfather II was OK, but most other sequels suck. I guarantee you the Trump sequel won’t be anywhere near as entertaining as Godfather II, though the body count promises to be much higher.

But don’t count me among the teary-eyed hand-wringers who wonder how the country I love so much has been flushed down the toilet. We got flushed when the Supreme Court gave presidents full immunity for “official” actions only the justices on the court can sanction. Pro tip: Don’t expect Joe Biden to take advantage of this tool, which may be the ultimate power in the U.S. political universe. The Star Chamber of the Supreme Court won’t side with him in any case. Darth Vader Trump, on the other hand, will get a free pass.

Trump, who now effectively owns the Senate, will get every criminal he wants approved and appointed to important posts in the government.

So, we are left facing another round of Trump insanity at the White House, brought to us by the same people who voted him in the first time but failed to get him elected in 2020. Three is either a charm or a curse – depending on your point of view – and there are plenty of people gloating or kvetching today.

The finger-pointing has begun. Screams of voter suppression and rigging the election are co-mingling with accusations that Attorney General Merrick Garland slow-walked the federal prosecutions against Trump and condemnation of Senator Mitch McConnell for failing to vote for a conviction during Trump’s second impeachment. 

Some say Vice President Harris spent too much time singing “Happy. Happy. Joy. Joy” while ignoring serious populist issues. Some say the elitism of the Democrats is equally obvious; they won’t accept the fact that most Americans won’t accept a woman – and especially a woman of color as president. All of that may be true.

The only concrete accusation so far is against Russian actors for calling in fake bomb scares to five Georgia precincts. That is a blatant act of war, but no one today is worried about that. 

They are worried — or joyful — about Trump and his sequel.

I’m reminded of a line in the film “Con Air” that aptly describes him. “He's a font of misplaced rage. Name your cliché; mother held him too much or not enough, last picked at kickball, late night sneaky uncle, whatever. Now he's so angry moments of levity actually cause him pain; gives him headaches. Happiness, for that gentleman, hurts.”

To extend that comparison a bit, and using another line from “Con Air”, Trump’s election on any other day, might seem strange. But today it does not. Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups, George Carlin warned us. Or, if you prefer a different take on it;

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing,” John F. Kennedy warned as he misquoted Edmund Burke.

The next step in the sequel comes when Congress certifies Trump’s win. It’s sure to come without the histrionics of the last election—though violence is prevalent in the United States, and I discount nothing at this point. But it will probably be relatively peaceful. Then we will witness an inauguration and a claim from Trump of a record number of attendees despite whatever the facts may bring. And then we get down to it.

In the next Trump administration, federal workers will be purged unless they sign loyalty oaths, immigrants will be rounded up, the National Guard and the military will be used by generals who’ve offered their fealty to Trump and MAGA and then it is really off to the races.

Trump, who now effectively owns the Senate, will get every criminal he wants approved and appointed to important posts in the government. The Democrats are hoping to take the House, but don’t hold your breath for that.

We face the prospect of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismantling the FDA (He’s already promised to do so), so goodbye to safe food and drugs. Project 2025 will be implemented and then we will dismantle the National Weather Service, Medicare, Social Security, women’s rights and a variety of other things most Trump supporters have come to rely upon. We’re facing massive tariffs, mass deportation and when it scuttles the economy, Trump will blame the Democrats and his 70 million plus voters will believe him.

We need your help to stay independent

Then again, for the last month Trump has told us the election is rigged. He claimed there was massive voter fraud in Philadelphia.  Maybe he was right. Of course, he hasn’t said anything since he won Pennsylvania.

He remains a pathetic bully, but the Democrats have failed to overcome him. Trump continues to lower the bar and the Democrats can’t manage to crawl over it. It is horribly pathetic.  Former Republican presidential candidate Joe Walsh, who campaigned harder for Kamala Harris than he ever campaigned for any Republican says that is the biggest problem with the Democratic party; They don’t get it. “I’ve been saying it for years. We’re living in a populist moment. Working-class Americans are pissed off. Trump uses this populist moment to demagogue, lie to, and scare working-class Americans. Democrats have never recognized this populist moment.”  

Or, put another way, Trump, Elon Musk and other billionaires – including Jeff Bezos, have exploited the inherent anger against the donor and ruling class to continue to rule and dominate – as part of the ruling class. Makes sense when you figure out how numb many people are to facts, how horribly the press has communicated facts, how little most people think of those reporting the facts, and how gullible those very same people are. Few people have gone broke banking on American ignorance. Millions bought Milli Vanilli records and believe the WWE is “for real” so don’t act surprised that Trump won.

And while we want to point all the fingers we can at whoever we want, please remember the Walt Kelly cartoon “Pogo” and the quote, “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

Americans get the government they deserve, good and hard. It’s not good this time and it is going to be exceptionally hard. But, part of me channels my inner George Carlin, who also said, “I have found that over the last 20 to 30 years, somewhere in that span, I began to pull away from having a stake in any of this. I don’t really have an emotional stake in the outcome anymore, in terms of my caring. I don’t really give a f**k, when you get right down to it.”

George may have been overcompensating a bit for his extreme displeasure with the route this country took after the election of Ronald Reagan and who could blame him? Everything we see today is a result of trickle-down economics and Ronald Reagan’s embrace of the far right evangelical movement. 

A handful of companies own all the oil. A handful of companies operate most grocery stores and a handful of companies own and operate all of the news you digest. Garbage in and garbage out, controlled for the purposes of making the rich, richer, the poor poorer and utilizing the marginalized middle class to make it all happen.

Now, that sounds cheery as hell, and I won’t try to persuade you there isn’t cause for concern.

Just listening to family members who claim to be Christians supporting a man who is decidedly unchristian in his actions is enough to make you think we’re screwed. But, then again, what do you expect from an unserious man who pantomimes fellatio on a microphone, is obviously suffering a mental decline and has all of the appeal of a leper on crack? Turns out more than 71 million people like lepers on crack.

Ultimately, the Democrats, to paraphrase Walsh, need to look inward. While we were told of record voter turnout, the numbers don’t support it. It supports a record number of early voters, but Trump, so far, has received 2.5 million fewer votes than he did in 2020 while the Democrats have 14.5 million fewer. Proportionally, that’s not a good sign, even if the final numbers grow. The Democrats underperformed.

I blame George Clooney and his silly letter printed by the New York Times that trashed Joe Biden. Maybe the Democrats overreacted to Biden’s appearance in the first debate. Maybe not, but Clooney called Biden a friend and then trashed him publicly. With friends like that . . .


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Look, it’s all done. Trump is in. And part of me will be watching this one from the sidelines as I unhappily acknowledge that my granddaughter was born with fewer rights today than her mother had 30 years ago. That’s a serious problem.

Here’s the serious answer, from George Bernard Shaw:

 “This is the true joy in life, being used for a purpose recognized by yourself as a mighty one. Being a force of nature instead of a feverish, selfish little clod of ailments and grievances, complaining that the world will not devote itself to making you happy. I am of the opinion that my life belongs to the whole community and as long as I live, it is my privilege to do for it what I can. I want to be thoroughly used up when I die, for the harder I work, the more I live. I rejoice in life for its own sake. Life is no brief candle to me. It is a sort of splendid torch which I have got hold of for the moment and I want to make it burn as brightly as possible before handing it on to future generations.”

So, cry if you must, wring your hands, clutch your pearls and then get back into it.

Life is waiting. Don’t waste it.

“The fight for our freedom will take hard work, but . . .the fight for our country is always worth it,” Harris said in her concession speech Wednesday. “Don’t ever give up.”

If possible, also have a laugh.

A cat lady’s survival guide for the second Trump administration

For days and weeks to come, there will be endless analyses of how Donald Trump, a convicted criminal who fomented an insurrection and was found civilly liable for sexual assault, still somehow won another presidential election. There's racism, right-wing propaganda, a failing information environment, and perhaps an American death wish. All those were big factors, but we cannot overlook how much the Trump campaign was built around a pitch to men that he would finally bring women to heel.

Yelling "I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT" on social media is one of the millions of things Trump has done that should have disqualified him, if only on grounds of idiocy, but the underlying sentiment — disobedient women need to be punished — was unmistakable. The result is a nauseating gender gap in exit polling, showing a majority of women in every age group voted for Kamala Harris, yet the vice president could not crack 50% even with the youngest group of men.

If MAGA men are half as strong as Joe Rogan tells them they are, they can toughen up and accept women's rejection.

What is remarkable about Trump and the MAGA movement is how visceral and personal the misogyny is. These aren't the conservatives of old who hid their woman-hatred behind a Bible and condescending talk about "family values." Trump and his allies channel a palpable anger at individual women for having the gall to walk around like full citizens. We see it in Trump's inability to stop defaming E. Jean Carroll, a woman a civil jury found he sexually assaulted in the 90s. We see it in Trump's running mate, Sen. JD Vance, and his obsession with "cat ladies."  We see it in the bizarre impregnation fantasies of billionaire Elon Musk and in MAGA influencer Ben Shapiro setting Barbie dolls on fire. In the face of this, there's been a lot of pressure on women to do more to soothe fragile male egos. There are endless articles about the "male loneliness epidemic," which are well-intended but overlook how too many men follow leaders who openly encourage antisocial behavior. We talk endlessly about creating healthy masculinities to compete with the toxic kind but sidestep how women can't actually make men want to be better. Pundits have even flirt with the suggestion that if women just, you know, threw a little more sex in the direction of terrible men, that would calm them down. (Stormy Daniels tried placating Trump with sex, and that didn't work, y'all.) 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


I don't know about y'all, but after the majority of men voted to put a man who has proudly admitted to violating women's bodies back into office, I'm feeling like it's time to wind down this era of hand-holding and hair-stroking. Taking inspiration from Taylor Swift, it's time for a new era: one where being a giant sexist pig has consequences. If MAGA men are half as strong as Joe Rogan tells them they are, they can toughen up and accept women's rejection. There's even ways for progressive men to participate in the "suck it up" program. We can all join hands and tell the guardians of toxic masculinity to kiss our collective rear end. I have some ideas on how we can, in our daily lives, resist the efforts of MAGA men to colonize women's bodies and minds. But please, feel free to come up with some of your own!

Divorce your Republican husband

Those ads showing women secretly voting for Harris were cute, but, in retrospect, too gentle. Look, MAGA men know that they are becoming ever more impossible to live with, which is why Vance and his allies are making noises about ending no-fault divorce. There's no time like the present to kick your Trump-voting spouse to the curb. If anything, you might want to move quickly, before they come after that right, like they did the right to abortion. It's been 9 years. He's not going to see you as a person deserving full rights. Cut him loose. 

And yes, I'm aware that plenty of women voted for Trump, too. They should also be unceremoniously dumped, but odds are most of them are already married to another Trumper. But you can cut them off, as well. Consequences can be for all genders! 

Never date a Trump voter

There's chatter on social media about the "4B movement," a South Korean movement of women who are boycotting men. It's a radical idea that includes not just rejecting marriage, but all heterosex and child-bearing. Maybe I'm spoiled by knowing so many genuinely good, Harris-voting men, but I'm not quite ready to go there. Plus, for those of us who are exclusively attracted to men, a life without sex is just punishment. The point of this is to punish sexist men, not ourselves.

But refusing to date Trump voters? That's an easy one. Don't waste a single moment of your one precious life on such men. Use your freed-up time to volunteer with pro-choice or environmental groups, which adds the bonus of meeting new friends. Or, if you really want to stick it to Vance, join a cat rescue group. 

There are already MAGA men fanning out on social media, declaring that this election means women no longer have the right to reject them. 

The good news is a swipe left or the word "no" punctuated with a laugh will relieve them of this delusion. 

Put off getting married — or avoid it altogether

I'm skeptical of the sex-free agenda, but what's great about not getting married is it's usually much easier than getting married. You just have to keep not planning a wedding, which leaves more time for that cat rescue work. It was already true that straight marriage is, statistically speaking, a raw deal for women. It's a direct transfer of free time hours from a woman to a man, due mostly to men being able to foist housework off on women. But with Republicans escalating their threats to take away the right to divorce, marriage may be too big a risk to take right now. 

Trust me: I've been not-married for nearly two decades to the same guy, and it was so easy to do. We just kept never getting around to it. Procrastination is rarely a virtue, but in this case, it's an excellent way to stick it to the patriarchy. 

Get an IUD — or sterilized

Both Vance and Musk spend much of their waking hours complaining that the uteruses of (white) America are not full enough. Vance, lying, has even argued that Democratic leaders tell women not to have children because of climate change. But Vance and Trump's policies and cultural grievances are exactly why it is an increasingly bad idea to have kids. They are making a world so scary and degraded that it's perfectly understandable not to want to inflict it on a child. 

If these men can't leave the house without being triggered by someone else's appearance, they deserve to suffer.

Plus, just as with marriage, the risks of getting pregnant are rising rapidly. Not to bring the mood down too much, but the stories are piling up of women killed or maimed because of abortion bans. Trump will likely ban abortion nationwide, which MAGA leaders are admitting out loud now that they've won. Maybe this will be over in a few years and having kids will be safe again. Or maybe you can drift into your menopause years as a fun-loving bohemian auntie, instead of "Grandma." But in the meantime, sticking to the childless part of the cat lady lifestyle is one way to deny the jerks a victory. 

No patience for MAGA male whining 

Cut all those men right out of your life who have made being a whiner their "manly" identity. Men complain about way too much these days: Taylor Swift, Chappell Roan, women who swipe left on Tinder, "Barbie" or other movies with female leads, pronouns in social media bios, pumpkin spice lattes, whatever Joe Rogan is telling them to be angry about. If they are such manly men, they need to practice some old-fashioned masculine stoicism. "Suck it up, crybaby" should be the standard issue response to all male complaining (unless it's about real stuff, like abortion bans killing women). 

The beauty is this is one progressive men can do as well, if not better, than women. If you have a male friend who is throwing himself a pity party because he didn't like what some liberal lady said on Twitter, one swift way to deal is telling him to eat some crackers. Then block his number. The male loneliness epidemic is not your problem to solve. Get yourself less awful friends — there are even platonic female friendships available! 

Dress how you want

At the very tippy top of pointless reasons men voted for a fascist, the outrage over women who have blue hair and tattoos beautifully illustrates how broken their brains are. The amount of carping by dudes on MAGA social media because some women don't try to meet their L.L. Bean fantasies of bland feminine beauty is truly astounding. Being mad about blue hair and tattoos takes up approximately 85-95% of their waking hours. Even cat-owning doesn't rate as high as an "outrage" as women styling themselves in ways MAGA men don't like. 

If you were considering a dramatic change to your appearance, such as dying your hair a loud and unnatural color, there is no time like the present. Or if you're ready for that first tattoo, go for it. I recommend a picture of a cute cat or a riot grrrl punching a groper in the face. This is also a fun activity that men can partake in. MAGA men may be too cowardly to indulge a longing to wear glitter or paint their fingernails, but you don't have to be. Wear pink clothes and skirts, if you like! If these men can't leave the house without being triggered by someone else's appearance, they deserve to suffer.

We need your help to stay independent

Adopt cats

You've now freed yourself of having to care about men who can't even take care of their country, but there is one more step on the road to living the true cat lady lifestyle: Cats!

Unlike men, who have agency and could have called a therapist instead of following Elon Musk on Twitter, lonely and needy cats are innocent and deserving of your love. When you engage one of the many excellent rescue groups around the country, you will find there are clingy cats or aloof cats, energetic cats or lazy cats, stubborn cats or people pleasers. But what you don't have to worry about is if your potential new pet voted for Trump or secretly believes Jordan Peterson makes good points. Cats are 100% MAGA-free, which automatically makes them better than most men. Even if you go a little wild and get "too many" cats — say 3 or 4 — you can comfort yourself by remembering that's still fewer than the number of children that MAGA wants to force women to have. 

This is one more men can participate in. Men can and should be cat ladies, too. Don't let the sexist cat-haters scare you off, my dudes! A cuddly feline friend is always and forever better than having toxic men in your life. 

Obviously, much of this is tongue-in-cheek, but there's a serious point here. As writer Soraya Chemaly told my Salon colleague, Mary Elizabeth Williams, women are "quiet quitting from heteropatriarchy" already. They're pickier about who they date. Slightly over half of women aren't married. The childbirth rate has steadily declined for years, and did not pick back up after the pandemic and subsequent economic recovery. Nearly half of the childless adults under 50 say they will never have kids, and not because they can't afford it. Most say they just don't want to. 

There are responses to this that could have been productive. Men could regard women as equals and act accordingly, in ways big and small, from respecting a woman's right to keep her last name to respecting her opinions to picking up after yourself. Many men do this, and as some of them are my friends, so I can tell you they don't shut up about how well they clean up on the dating market because of it. Yet a whole bunch of men are throwing a tantrum and voting for a party that makes empty promises that they don't have to learn to be better because women can be forced into compliance. The sooner they find out that is not true, the higher the odds that they give up the dream of male domination. So turn up the volume on that quiet quitting and make it a hell of a lot louder. 

Dentists are pulling “healthy” and treatable teeth to profit from implants, experts warn

Becky Carroll was missing a few teeth, and others were stained or crooked. Ashamed, she smiled with lips pressed closed. Her dentist offered to fix most of her teeth with root canals and crowns, Carroll said, but she was wary of traveling a long road of dental work.

Then Carroll saw a TV commercial for another path: ClearChoice Dental Implant Centers. The company advertises that it can give patients “a new smile in as little as one day” by surgically replacing teeth instead of fixing them.

So Carroll saved and borrowed for the surgery, she said. In an interview and a lawsuit, Carroll said that at a ClearChoice clinic in New Jersey in 2021, she agreed to pay $31,000 to replace all her natural upper teeth with pearly-white prosthetic ones. What came next, Carroll said, was “like a horror movie.”

Carroll alleged that her anesthesia wore off during implant surgery, so she became conscious as her teeth were removed and titanium screws were twisted into her jawbone. Afterward, Carroll’s prosthetic teeth were so misaligned that she was largely unable to chew for more than two years until she could afford corrective surgery at another clinic, according to a sworn deposition from her lawsuit.

ClearChoice has denied Carroll’s claims of malpractice and negligence in court filings and did not respond to requests for comment on the ongoing case.

“I thought implants would be easier, and all at once, so you didn’t have to keep going back to the dentist,” Carroll, 52, said in an interview. “But I should have asked more questions … like, Can they save these teeth?”

Dental implants have been used for more than half a century to surgically replace missing or damaged teeth with artificial duplicates, often with picture-perfect results. While implant dentistry was once the domain of a small group of highly trained dentists and specialists, tens of thousands of dental providers now offer the surgery and place millions of implants each year in the U.S.

Becky CarrollBecky Carroll of New Jersey has alleged in a lawsuit that she suffered a botched dental implant surgery in 2021, leaving her unable to chew for more than two years. (Nicole Keller/CBS News/KFF News)

Amid this booming industry, some implant experts worry that many dentists are losing sight of dentistry’s fundamental goal of preserving natural teeth and have become too willing to remove teeth to make room for expensive implants, according to a months-long investigation by KFF Health News and CBS News. In interviews, 10 experts said they had each given second opinions to multiple patients who had been recommended for mouths full of implants that the experts ultimately determined were not necessary. Separately, lawsuits filed across the country have alleged that implant patients like Carroll have experienced painful complications that have required corrective surgery, while other lawsuits alleged dentists at some implant clinics have persuaded, pressured, or forced patients to remove teeth unnecessarily.

The experts warn that implants, for a single tooth or an entire mouth, expose patients to costs and surgery complications, plus a new risk of future dental problems with fewer treatment options because their natural teeth are forever gone.

“There are many cases where teeth, they’re perfectly fine, and they’re being removed unnecessarily,” said William Giannobile, dean of the Harvard School of Dental Medicine. “I really hate to say it, but many of them are doing it because these procedures, from a monetary standpoint, they’re much more beneficial to the practitioner.”

Giannobile and nine other experts say they are combating a false public perception that implants are more durable and longer-lasting than natural teeth, which some believe stems in part from advertising on TV and social media. Implants require upkeep, and although they can’t get cavities, studies have shown that patients can be susceptible to infections in the gums and bone around their implants.

“Just because somebody can afford implants doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re a good candidate,” said George Mandelaris, a Chicago-area periodontist and member of the American Academy of Periodontology Board of Trustees. “When an implant has infection, or when an implant has bone loss, an implant dies a much quicker death than do teeth.”

Carroll displays the dental implants she got in her upper jawCarroll displays the dental implants she got in her upper jaw in 2021. (Photo courtesy of Rebecca Carroll/KFF NEws)

In its simplest form, implant surgery involves extracting a single tooth and replacing it with a metal post that is screwed into the jaw and then affixed with a prosthetic tooth commonly made of porcelain, also known as a crown. Patients can also use “full-arch” or “All-on-4” implants to replace all their upper or lower teeth — or all their teeth.

For this story, KFF Health News and CBS News sought interviews with large dental chains whose clinics offer implant surgery — ClearChoice, Aspen Dental, Affordable Care, and Dental Care Alliance — each of which declined to be interviewed or did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The Association of Dental Support Organizations, which represents these companies and others like them, also declined an interview request.

ClearChoice, which specializes in full-arch implants, did not answer more than two dozen questions submitted in writing. In an emailed statement, the company said full-arch implants “have become a well-accepted standard of care for patients with severe tooth loss and teeth with poor prognosis.”

“The use of full-arch restorations reflects the evolution of modern dentistry, offering patients a solution that restores their ability to eat, speak, and live comfortably — far beyond what traditional dentures can provide,” the company said.

Carroll said she regrets not letting her dentist try to fix her teeth and rushing to ClearChoice for implants.

“Because it was a nightmare,” she said.

‘They Are Not Teeth’

Dental implant surgery can be a godsend for patients with unsalvageable teeth. Several experts said implants can be so transformative that their invention should have contended for a Nobel Prize. And yet, these experts still worry that implants are overused, because it is generally better for patients to have their natural teeth.

Paul Rosen, a Pennsylvania periodontist who said he has worked with implants for more than three decades, said many patients believe a “fallacy” that implants are “bulletproof.”

“You can’t just have an implant placed and go off riding into the sunset,” Rosen said. “In many instances, they need more care than teeth because they are not teeth.”

Generally, a single implant costs a few thousand dollars while full-arch implants cost tens of thousands. Neither procedure is well covered by dental insurance, so many clinics partner with credit companies that offer loans for implant surgeries. At ClearChoice, for example, loans can be as large as $65,000 paid off over 10 years, according to the company’s website.

Despite the price, implants are more popular than ever. Sales increased by more than 6% on average each year since 2010, culminating in more than 3.7 million implants sold in the U.S. in 2022, according to a 2023 report produced by iData Research, a health care market research firm.

Despite the price, implants are more popular than ever.

Some worry implant dentistry has gone too far. In 10 interviews, dentists and dental specialists with expertise in implants said they had witnessed the overuse of implants firsthand. Each expert said they’d examined multiple patients in recent years who were recommended for full-arch implants by other dentists despite their teeth being treatable with conventional dentistry.

Giannobile, the Harvard dean, said he had given second opinions to “dozens” of patients who were recommended for implants they did not need.

“I see many of these patients now that are coming in and saying, ‘I’ve been seen, and they are telling me to get my entire dentition — all of my teeth — extracted.’ And then I’ll take a look at them and say that we can preserve most of your teeth,” Giannobile said.

Tim Kosinski, who is a representative of the Academy of General Dentistry and said he has placed more than 19,000 implants, said he examines as many as five patients a month who have been recommended for full-arch implants that he deems unnecessary.

“There is a push in the profession to remove teeth that could be saved,” Kosinski said. “But the public isn’t aware.”

Luiz Gonzaga, a periodontist and prosthodontist at the University of Florida, said he, too, had turned away patients who wanted most or all their teeth extracted. Gonzaga said some had received implant recommendations that he considered “an atrocity.”

“You don’t go to the hospital and tell them ‘I broke my finger a couple of times. This is bothering me. Can you please cut my finger off?’ No one will do that,” Gonzaga said. “Why would I extract your tooth because you need a root canal?”

Jaime Lozada, director of an elite dental implant residency program at Loma Linda University, said he’d not only witnessed an increase in dentists extracting “perfectly healthy teeth” but also treated a rash of patients with mouths full of ill-fitting implants that had to be surgically replaced.

Lozada said in August that he’d treated seven such patients in just three months.

“When individuals just make a decision of extracting teeth to make it simple and make money quick, so to speak, that’s where I have a problem,” Lozada said. “And it happens quite often.”

When full-arch implants fail, patients sometimes don’t have enough jawbone left to anchor another set. These patients have little choice but to get implants that reach into cheekbones, said Sohail Saghezchi, an oral and maxillofacial surgeon at the University of California-San Francisco.

“It’s kind of like a last resort,” Saghezchi said. “If those fail, you don’t have anywhere else to go.”

‘It Was Horrendous Dentistry’

Most of the experts interviewed for this article said their rising alarm corresponded with big changes in the availability of dental implants. Implants are now offered by more than 70,000 dental providers nationwide, two-thirds of whom are general dentists, according to the iData Research report.

Dentists are not required to learn how to place implants in dental school, nor are they required to complete implant training before performing the surgery in nearly all states. This year, Oregon started requiring dentists to complete 56 hours of hands-on training before placing any implants. Stephen Prisby, executive director of the Oregon Board of Dentistry, said the requirement — the first and only of its kind in the U.S. — was a response to dozens of investigations in the state into botched surgeries and other implant failures, split evenly between general dentists and specialists.

“I was frankly stunned at how bad some of these dentists were practicing,” Prisby said. “It was horrendous dentistry.”

Many dental clinics that offer implants have consolidated into chains owned by private equity firms that have bought out much of implant dentistry. In health care, private equity investment is sometimes criticized for overtreatment and prioritizing short-term profit over patients.

Private equity firms have spent about $5 billion in recent years to buy large dental chains that offer implants at hundreds of clinics owned by individual dentists and dental specialists. ClearChoice was bought for an estimated $1.1 billion in 2020 by Aspen Dental, which is owned by three private equity firms, according to PitchBook, a research firm focused on the private equity industry. Private equity firms also bought Affordable Care, whose largest clinic brand is Affordable Dentures & Implants, for an estimated $2.7 billion in 2021, according to PitchBook. And the private equity wing of the Abu Dhabi government bought Dental Care Alliance, which offers implants at many of its affiliated clinics, for an estimated $1 billion in 2022, according to PitchBook.

ClearChoice and Aspen Dental each said in email statements that the companies’ private equity owners “do not have influence or control over treatment recommendations.” Both companies said dentists or dental specialists make all clinical decisions.

Private equity deals involving dental practices increased ninefold from 2011 to 2021, according to an American Dental Association study published in August. The study also said investors showed an interest in oral surgery, possibly because of the “high prices” of implants.

“Some argue this is a negative thing,” said Marko Vujicic, vice president of the association’s Health Policy Institute, who co-authored the study. “On the other hand, some would argue that involvement of private equity and outside capital brings economies of scale, it brings efficiency.”

Edwin Zinman, a San Francisco dental malpractice attorney and former periodontist who has filed hundreds of dental lawsuits over four decades, said he believed many of the worst fears about private equity owners had already come true in implant dentistry.

“They’ve sold a lot of [implants], and some of it unnecessarily, and too often done negligently, without having the dentists who are doing it have the necessary training and experience,” Zinman said. “It’s for five simple letters: M-O-N-E-Y.”

Hundreds of Implant Clinics With No Specialists

For this article, journalists from KFF Health News and CBS News analyzed the webpages for more than 1,000 clinics in the nation’s largest private equity-owned dental chains, all of which offer some implants. The analysis found that more than 70% of those clinics listed only general dentists on their websites and did not appear to employ the specialists — oral surgeons, periodontists, or prosthodontists — who traditionally have more training with implants.

Affordable Dentures & Implants listed specialists at fewer than 5% of its more than 400 clinics, according to the analysis. The rest were staffed by general dentists, most of whom did not list credentialing from implant training organizations, according to the analysis.

ClearChoice, on the other hand, employs at least one oral surgeon or prosthodontist at each of its more than 100 centers, according to the analysis. But its new parent company, Aspen Dental, which offers implants in many of its more than 1,100 clinics, does not list any specialists at many of those locations.

Not everyone is worried about private equity in implant dentistry. In interviews arranged by the American Academy of Implant Dentistry, which trains dentists to use implants, two other implant experts did not express concerns about private equity firms.

Brian Jackson, a former academy president and implant specialist in New York, said he believed dentists are too ethical and patients are too smart to be pressured by private equity owners “who will never see a patient.”

Jumoke Adedoyin, a chief clinical officer for Affordable Care, who has placed implants at an Affordable Dentures & Implants clinic in the Atlanta suburbs for 15 years, said she had never felt pressure from above to sell implants.

“I’ve actually felt more pressure sometimes from patients who have gone around and been told they need to take their teeth out,” she said. “They come in and, honestly, taking a look at them, maybe they don’t need to take all their teeth out.”

Still, lawsuits filed across the country have alleged that dentists at implant clinics have extracted patients’ teeth unnecessarily.

For example, in Texas, a patient alleged in a 2020 lawsuit that an Affordable Care dentist removed “every single tooth from her mouth when such was not necessary,” then stuffed her mouth with gauze and left her waiting in the lobby as he and his staff left for lunch. In Maryland, a patient alleged in a 2021 lawsuit that ClearChoice “convinced” her to extract “eight healthy upper teeth,” by “greatly downplay[ing] the risks.” In Florida, a patient alleged in a 2023 lawsuit that ClearChoice provided her with no other treatment options before extracting all her teeth, “which was totally unnecessary.”

ClearChoice and Affordable Care denied wrongdoing in their respective lawsuits, then privately settled out of court with each patient. ClearChoice and Affordable Care did not respond to requests for comment submitted to the companies or attorneys. Lawyers for all three plaintiffs declined to comment on these lawsuits or did not respond to requests for comment.

Fred Goldberg, a Maryland dental malpractice attorney who said he has represented at least six clients who sued ClearChoice, said each of his clients agreed to get implants after meeting with a salesperson — not a dentist.

“Every client I’ve had who has gone to ClearChoice has started off meeting a salesperson and actually signing up to get their financing through ClearChoice before they ever meet with a dentist,” Goldberg said. “You meet with a salesperson who sells you on what they like to present as the best choice, which is almost always that they’re going to take out all your natural teeth.”

Becky Carroll, the ClearChoice patient from New Jersey, told a similar story.

Carroll said in her lawsuit that she met first with a ClearChoice salesperson referred to as a “patient education consultant.” In an interview, Carroll said the salesperson encouraged her to borrow money from family members for the surgery and it was not until after she agreed to a loan and passed a credit check that a ClearChoice dentist peered into her mouth.

“It seems way backwards,” Carroll said. “They just want to know you’re approved before you get to talk to a dentist.”

CBS News producer Nicole Keller contributed to this report.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing.

“He now has immunity”: Expert warns second term Trump can do “awful lot” without fear of prosecution

President-elect Donald Trump projected victory on Tuesday left the legal cases in jeopardy as he prepares to take office.

Trump's federal criminal cases in Florida and Washington, D.C. already had uncertain fates. Special counsel Jack Smith sought to revive the former — dismissed earlier this year — in an appeal to the 11th Circuit Court and re-indicted the latter following a Supreme Court decision on official presidential acts in June. In Georgia, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis' election interference case all but ground to a halt as an appeals court agreed to determine whether her relationship with a former lead prosecutor disqualified her from the case. The president-elect's sentencing in New York on 34 felony counts, however, is still scheduled for late November, following previous delays.

Now, in the wake of his electoral win, experts told Salon that Trump's federal cases are essentially dead, and his Georgia trial will likely follow suit while his sentencing in New York is unlikely to amount to little more than a financial slap on the wrist.

"For the most part, his ongoing legal battles are going to disappear," said David Schultz, a professor of legal studies and political science at Hamline University in Minnesota. 

"Given the fact that he now has immunity under the Trump v. United States [Supreme Court] case, this potentially frees Trump up to do an awful lot in his second term as president of the United States in ways that he might have been limited because of fear of running for re-election, or because of possible prosecution," he added in a phone interview.

Charges in Trump's Florida federal case, which accused him of illegally retaining national security documents after leaving office and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them, were dismissed in July. U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon ruled in the dismissal that Smith was unconstitutionally appointed to oversee the case in violation of the Constitution's appointments and appropriations clauses. Smith, however, appealed that dismissal days later to the 11th Circuit Court in an effort to restore the case.

Smith's case against Trump in D.C., accusing him of attempting to subvert President Joe Biden's 2020 electoral victory and obstruct Congress' certification of the results on Jan. 6, 2021, was dealt a heavy blow in July when the Supreme Court ruled the former president was broadly immune from official acts conducted within "his core constitutional powers" while in office. 

That decision tossed the task of determining which indicted acts constituted official ones back to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan's court. Smith filed a superseding indictment against Trump, which maintained the same four counts, in August that sought to avoid immunity battles by removing allegations about the then-president's communications with White House officials.

Both of those cases will be dismissed with Trump re-entering the White House, said former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani in a phone interview. Federal prosecutors, who have long had internal guidance against criminally prosecuting a sitting president, are likely to file motions to dismiss the case and appeal. If Smith's office doesn't, Trump can direct his new pick for attorney general to fire the special prosecutor and kill the cases that way. 

"It's just a question of whether those cases will be dismissed in November or December or in January," Rahmani told Salon. "But Jack Smith should dismiss those cases."

We need your help to stay independent

Given the federal government's practice against criminally prosecuting a sitting president, Rahmani said he expects D.A. Willis to take a similar approach in the Georgia case. Bennett Gershman, a Pace University law professor and former New York prosecutor said, however, that such an outcome is unlikely.

"The Georgia case will still be prosecuted by Fani Willis, who was reelected yesterday, and there is no reason to think she will abandon the case," Gershman told Salon in an email. "In fact, there is every reason to think she will move ahead aggressively."

The Fulton County district attorney charged Trump and 18 others, some of whom later accepted plea deals or had charges dropped, in a sprawling racketeering indictment last August, accusing them of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia. The case was derailed in the spring over allegations that Willis financially benefitted from her romantic relationship with a special prosecutor she hired to work on the case. Though the Trump legal team's bid to have her disqualified from over the claims failed, the decision is now on appeal with proceedings in the trial court paused as it proceeds. 

Schultz said that he expects Trump's legal team to request the case be put on hold until after his presidency because Trump will be "too distracted" with his presidency to continue with the prosecution once he takes office. 

Rahmani added that the case can't reasonably be paused for the duration of Trump's presidency because he, like any other criminal defendant, has a right to a speedy trial. Should Willis proceed with the case, she'd likely have to dismiss it and refile it later, but by then the statute of limitations to prosecute will have run out. 

What comes of Trump's criminal case in New York is more complicated because a jury has already convicted him, he said.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The president-elect was convicted in May of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a plot to cover up a hush-money payment to an adult film star, with his sentencing originally scheduled for mid-July at the conclusion of a trial characterized by gag order violations, attacks on uninvolved parties and shaky defense. Despite delays in his sentencing date — first pushed to mid-September before New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan rescheduled it again for Nov. 26 — proceedings in Trump's New York criminal case will continue. 

Merchan said he will decide on Trump's motion to vacate the guilty verdict based on the Trump v. United States decision, which also barred evidence of official acts from being introduced during criminal proceedings, on Nov. 12, according to CNN. Trump's legal team argues that the introduction of evidence, such as Trump's tweets while in office and communications with former White House aide Hope Hicks, during the New York proceedings should now be grounds for dismissal or a retrial.

"There obviously will be strident arguments by Trump’s lawyers to either have the sentencing delayed until after Trump leaves office in four years or to dismiss the case outright. There will be arguments over presidential immunity and the claimed impossibility of Trump serving a sentence while president," Gershman said. "But I think the arguments to delay or drop the sentence are baseless. The execution of the sentence will almost certainly be delayed while Trump appeals the conviction, and that will be a lengthy process."

Rahmani said he has always expected Trump would ultimately evade prison time (he could be sentenced to up to four years) because his charges constituted the lowest possible felonies in New York, he has no criminal history and it would be near impossible to imprison a former president with Secret Service protection. 

"Now that he's president-elect it makes it even less likely," Rahmani said. "Judge Merchan didn't jail Trump for 10 full violations of his gag order, he's not going to sentence him to any time. He'll probably be fined, and that will be the end of it."

While Schultz agreed and raised the possibility of a "minor probation," Gershman argued that Merchan could impose a prison sentence of six to 24 months, citing Merchan's sentencing of ex-Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg to five months for "conduct far less heinous than Trump’s."

Asked what he took away from the ways Trump's various legal battles played out over the last several months, each legal expert named different points of contention. 

Gershman decried the "repetitive legal ploys, frivolous arguments and gamesmanship" Trump's legal team engaged in to delay his cases and the Supreme Court and Judhge Cannon's role in making the lawyers' gambit "a huge success." Rahmani bemoaned the years it took Willis and Smith to hand down their indictments as well as Willis' mid-case scandal.

Schultz noted Trump's effectiveness in leveraging the cases and proceedings to his advantage in fundraising and campaigning.

"Democrats made a huge mistake thinking that his legal problems would be his demise, that there would be multiple trials, he'd be convicted multiple times, or be so bogged down with his criminal trials that he would eventually be unable to mount an effective campaign," he said. "In fact, all the evidence is suggesting that he turned all those indictments into assets."

How the polls accurately forecast a Trump victory

Donald Trump’s shocking Election Day victory wasn’t the only comeback on Election Day. The polling industry, which suffered serious black eyes after drastically understating Trump’s support in both the 2016 and 2020 contests, came through in 2024 by correctly gauging the extent to which voters would cast their ballots for the president elect.

“Polls did pretty well, and performance seems to be getting better as the vote-counting continues,” Dr. Christopher Wlezien, a professor of government at the University of Texas in Austin, told Salon. “Using the final FiveThirtyEight numbers, national polls appear to be off by 2.3% points and polls in swing states about 2.5% on average. These are below average errors, e.g., the average error in the last week’s polls for all presidential elections between 1952 and 2020 is 2.5%.”

The bad news for the polling industry is that, to the extent that the polls were off, it was once again by understating Trump’s support. Yet this time there is an important difference: The polls were only off to the degree that one expects during massive contests such as a presidential election. Like all surveys attempting to accurately measure public opinion, polls depend on selecting a representative sample of the population in question. Some will certainly get it closer than others — at the time of this writing, for example, the polling firms J. L. Partners and Atlas Intel seem to have forecasted better than their peers — but, as nothing is certain in life, it is virtually impossible to be 100 percent accurate.

For that reason, Wlezien explained, even the largest and most rigorously researched surveys acknowledge an area of uncertainty in their math. For the most part, the polls that understated Trump’s support did so within those parameters.

“The key characteristic is a decline in the Democratic vote, not an increase in the Republican, suggesting that Democrats were unable to reassemble the winning coalition from 2020.”

“They still understated Trump vote share consistently, which is as we’ve seen before, and this led to some incorrect ‘calls’ in some states and possibly the nation, depending on where we end up,” Wlezien said. “But it’s obviously hard to get the winner right when contests are so close even when polls are performing very well.”

Chris Jackson, the senior vice president at the polling firm Ipsos, told Salon that it’s too early to definitively assess how close the polls were, given that states like California, Nevada, Arizona and Maine are still counting the results. Nevertheless, some details are pretty clear.

“Pre-election polls clearly showed that a Trump victory was well within the realm of possibility and it would only take a slight advantage for him to sweep most of the battleground states considering how closely they track together,” Jackson said.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


When all of the votes have been tabulated, Trump is likely to gain the popular vote as well as the Electoral College, albeit by a smaller percentage margin than other recent presidential winners such as Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 or Joe Biden in 2020. Trump’s current 2024 margin is just over 1.5 percent, although that will shrink as more votes from heavily Democratic California are counted. By contrast, Obama won popular vote margins of 7.2 percent and 3.9 percent, while Biden bested Trump by 4.5 percent. Biden also won more than 81.2 million votes, much higher than the roughly 77 million votes Trump will ultimately accrue (compared to roughly 75 million votes for Harris).

“This election appears to be more of a response to the aftermath of the pandemic and inflation,” Jackson said. “The key characteristic is a decline in the Democratic vote, not an increase in the Republican, suggesting that Democrats were unable to reassemble the winning coalition from 2020.”

Unlike past presidents who caused massive voter realignments which were reflected in overwhelming popular mandates — the most recent examples are Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 and Ronald Reagan in 1980 — Trump did not sweep every region and demographic. Just as swing voters spurned the George W. Bush administration in 2008 and Donald Trump’s own first term in 2020 because they were upset about the economy (and rallied behind Barack Obama in 2012 because of economic recovery following the 2008 housing crash), so too did they spurn President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris due to rampant inflation.

Once again, that vindicates the polling industry. The polls showed voters' foremost concern was the economy consistently and repeatedly for months leading up to the election.

“About what happened on Election Day, outcomes always involve referendum judgments and choice, and it looks like the former, say, as reflected in low presidential approval ratings, carried the day this time, though there’s more work to do here parsing what voters did and why,” Wlezien said. “There appears to be interesting and surprising variation across groups that can be seen in the exit poll results.”

He added, “Again, it is too early to fully understand poll accuracy. However, polls that used voter files or other tools to more closely tie the data to the electorate appear to have performed better.”

For his part, Wlezien is curious about why certain methodologies were more effective this time around. After all, pollsters who want to repeat their successes in 2024 will need to learn from what they did right this time.

“I’m interested to see what we can glean from information about what polling organizations did to produce their estimates and whether and how this impacted their results and performance, which also might help us understand the tendency to understate Trump vote shares,” Wlezien said.

“The best of America’s story”: Biden responds to Harris election loss

President Joe Biden praised the campaign of Vice President Kamala Harris after Harris conceded the presidential election to Donald Trump on Wednesday. 

Biden called Harris "a tremendous partner and public servant full of integrity, courage, and character" following Harris' public concession speech at Howard University in Washington, D.C.

The incumbent president dropped out of the race mere months before Election Day due to mounting pressure around his age and fitness, paving the way for Harris to take a space at the top of the Democratic Party's ticket. On Wednesday, he noted that Harris inherited "extraordinary circumstances" and lauded the "clear vision" of her "historic campaign."

"As I’ve said before, selecting Kamala was the very first decision I made when I became the nominee for president in 2020. It was the best decision I made," Biden shared on X. "Her story represents the best of America’s story. And as she made clear today, I have no doubt that she’ll continue writing that story."

Biden's statement hit similar notes to Harris' concession speech, in which she urged Democrats to keep fighting and avoid giving in to despair.

"She will continue the fight with purpose, determination, and joy. She will continue to be a champion for all Americans," Biden said. "Above all, she will continue to be a leader our children will look up to for generations to come as she puts her stamp on America’s future."

“Will they learn any lessons?”: Sanders drags Democratic Party after Harris election loss

Bernie Sanders is worried that the Democratic Party will learn no lessons from their overwhelming presidential election loss on Tuesday.

In a blistering statement shared by the Vermont senator on X on Wednesday, Sanders said the party has "abandoned working class people." He said Kamala Harris' loss on Tuesday was merely reaping what the party had sown. 

"It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them," Sanders wrote. "While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right."

Sanders played the hits in his statement, decrying the lack of universal healthcare in the U.S. and rampant income inequality.

Sanders supported Harris throughout the campaign. He encouraged voters to head to the polls in spite of his own opposition to their handling of Israel's War in Gaza. In his statement on Wednesday, he called the Harris campaign's continued support of Israel a blunder.

“Today, despite strong opposition from a majority of Americans, we continue to spend billions funding the extremist Netanyahu government’s all-out war against the Palestinian people, which has led to the horrific humanitarian disaster of mass malnutrition and the starvation of thousands of children,” he said.

Sanders wondered openly whether the Democratic Party would "learn any real lessons from this disastrous campaign."

"Will they understand the pain and political alienation that tens of millions of Americans are experiencing?" he asked. "Probably not."

Read his entire statement below:

Smith seeking to end cases against Trump following election win: report

Special Counsel Jack Smith is looking to wrap up his cases against Donald Trump following Trump's presidential election victory on Tuesday, per a report from ABC News

Smith has spent years building two cases against the president-elect, claiming that he conspired to overturn the 2020 election and illegally kept classified documents in his home at Mar-a-Lago. Those cases had to be almost entirely rebuilt following a Supreme Court ruling that granted widespread immunity to presidents while they are in office. 

Smith's narrowly focused new take on the cases was no less devastating, with legal experts telling Salon that Trump had little to no defense against the allegations made by the specially appointed prosecutor. The classified documents case was tossed by Trump-friendly judge Aileen Cannon in July, with Smith appealing that decision the following month.

Smith is reportedly seeking to squash the cases, as the Department of Justice has a long-standing policy not to prosecute sitting presidents.

Trump has made his intention to end Smith's DOJ tenure clear in interviews on the campaign trail. The president-elect said he would dismiss the Merrick Garland appointee "within two seconds" of being sworn in.

"We got immunity at the Supreme Court. It's so easy," Trump told radio host Hugh Hewitt in October. "He'll be one of the first things addressed." 

“We must accept the results”: Harris concedes election at Howard University

Kamala Harris conceded defeat in the 2024 presidential election on Wednesday in a speech that encouraged her supporters to not give in to despair.

Speaking at her alma mater, Howard University in Washington, D.C., Harris asked that Democrats "never give up" and "keep fighting" while stressing that the Biden administration would engage in a "peaceful transfer of power."

“We must accept the results of this election,” she said. "A fundamental principle of American democracy is when we lose an election, we accept the results."

While she did not mention President-Elect Donald Trump by name in this portion of the speech, Harris' remarks were a clear reference to the Capitol riots on January 6, 2021, and Trump's alleged role in plots to disrupt the certification of President Joe Biden's election. 

"In our nation, we owe loyalty not to a president or to a party but to the Constitution of the United States,” she said. "I am here to say while I concede this election, I do not concede the fight that fueled this campaign."

Harris compelled her supporters to keep up the fight for reproductive justice and gun control, among other issues. She said that her supporters have a lot of work ahead of them, as Trump will likely enter into a second term with control of all three branches of government, but she stressed that "hard work is good work." 

"Hard work can be joyful work, and the fight for our country is always worth it," she said. "This is not a time to throw up our hands. This is a time to roll up our sleeves." 

“Biden is the reason”: Harris aide lays blame for election loss on president

The dust has not yet settled on the second election of Donald Trump, but some members of the Kamala Harris team have already found a reason for the vice president's stunning loss: Joe Biden

“We ran the best campaign we could, considering Joe Biden was president,” a Harris aide told Politico. “Joe Biden is the singular reason Kamala Harris and Democrats lost tonight.”

If the current math holds, Harris will have lost in every single swing state she needed to carry to the election. That Harris aide was far from alone in thinking Biden was a weight around the Democratic candidate's neck. 

Throughout election night, anchors and analysts were clear that Harris was fighting an uphill battle. Their exit polls showed that the typical voter was dissatisfied with the Biden administration. 

“I got to say, I think that with the present conditions in the country – I mean, in conventional terms, it would be a miracle that Kamala Harris could win with that kind of headwind,” CNN host Chris Wallace said. “If she is able to overcome those numbers and still win this election, then she has done a remarkable job of somehow separating herself."

Harris did little to distinguish her platform from the work of the Biden administration. The lack of distance between her vision of America and Biden's was thrown into disastrously stark relief with a gaffe during a visit to "The View." Harris was directly asked by the hosts what she would do differently from Biden, and she said that "not a thing…comes to mind."

That message of stagnation played horribly, with the Trump campaign turning Harris' words into a campaign ad. 

Vice President Kamala Harris calls to congratulate President-elect Donald Trump

Vice President Kamala Harris called Donald Trump Wednesday afternoon to congratulate him on winning the 2024 U.S. election, a senior Harris aide told reporters.

Harris also emphasized the importance of unity and a peaceful transfer of power to the president-elect, the aide said.

Trump defeated Harris in Tuesday night’s election, sweeping the "blue wall" states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. The Associated Press called the race at 5:35 a.m. ET.

Four years ago, Trump refused to accept his loss to President Joe Biden, inciting an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Trump is just the second president to lose re-election and come back to win a second term. 

In his victory speech, Trump praised his third political campaign.

"This was a movement like nobody's ever seen before, and frankly, this was, I believe, the greatest political movement of all time," Trump told a crowd of supporters. "There's never been anything like this in this country, and now it's going to reach a new level of importance because we're going to help our country heal."

Biden also called and congratulated Trump on his victory, according to the White House, expressing “his commitment to ensuring a smooth transition and emphasized the importance of working to bring the country together."

The 2024 presidential race was projected to be one of the closest in history. Harris’ team was expecting the results to be uncertain up to days after the polls closed, the aides told reporters. She spent most of Tuesday preparing a speech that would encourage Americans to “hold on” while waiting for results. 

Harris, who has not appeared publicly since Tuesday, is scheduled to give a concession speech at 4 p.m. ET at her alma mater, Howard University.

 

 

The illusion of Donald Trump and the fourth founding of America

I have been chronicling the Age of Trump for more than eight years. It has caused great harm to our individual and collective emotional, spiritual, intellectual, and yes, physical lives. So much has happened in that time that it is difficult to remember it all. Distortions of time and memory lapses are common problems for individuals and societies under extreme stress. 

As I think about the 2024 election, I keep hearing the lyrics of Irish poet Thomas Moore’s song “The Minstrel Boy”:

The Minstrel-Boy to the war is gone,

    In the ranks of death you'll find him;

His father's sword he has girded on,

    And his wild harp slung behind him.

"Land of song!" said the warrior-bard,

    "Tho' all the world betrays thee,

One sword, at least, thy rights shall guard,

    One faithful harp shall praise thee!"

The Minstrel fell!—but the foeman's chain

    Could not bring that proud soul under;

The harp he lov'd ne'er spoke again,

    For he tore its chords asunder;

And said, "No chains shall sully thee,

    Thou soul of love and bravery!

Thy songs were made for the pure and free,

    They shall never sound in slavery.

As a member of the Black working class and the child of a janitor and home healthcare worker, it feels surreal to find comfort in a 19th-century Irish song about war and loss. I can't get it out of my mind as I meditate about the future of American democracy and society.

Donald Trump and the MAGAfied Republicans have won the 2024 election. Trump has won both the popular vote and the Electoral College. He is the first Republican to do so since George W. Bush in 2004. The MAGAfied Republicans have also taken control of the United States Senate. It may be several days or weeks before we know which party will control the House of Representatives.

While the following reality may cause great pain and a narcissistic injury to Democrats and the professional class of the pro-democracy coalition, the results of the 2024 election are a mandate for Trumpism and American fascism in whatever form they may take. Such an outcome was not forced on the American people. No, they chose it. As I have been repeatedly warning here at Salon, Trump and his MAGA movement are much more popular and enduring than many in the mainstream news media and the professional pundits would like to believe. The American people and their democracy are now far worse off due, in large part, to such denial and incredulity.

Based on the early exit polls and other preliminary data, for example, Trump's rally at New York City’s Madison Square Garden (New York is a Democratic Party power base), which was attended by more than 20,000 of his followers, was a bold and successful gambit, and one emblematic of a much larger national trend. Trump is a master propagandist and political strongman and charismatic leader who knows what his MAGA people and many other Americans want as he encourages and then mines their rage and anger. Kamala Harris and her campaign’s strategy of “joy” and “hope” and mocking Trump and the MAGA people for being “weird” were simply not an effective weapon (or defense) in a battle with fascists and other enemies of democracy and human decency. This is especially true when the opposition embraces such monikers as a badge of honor and pride as more proof that they are “owning the libs.”

With the election of Donald Trump, America will need a fourth founding to defend and renew its democracy against a man and regime who, as promised, will rule like a dictatorship or some other form of authoritarianism modeled after Vladimir Putin's Russia or Viktor Orbán's Hungary.

I am certain of several things. Such conclusions require no great insight or genius. I simply adhere to Masha Gessen’s wisdom and warning to listen to what Trump and the MAGA people and the other fascists and authoritarians are saying and to take them seriously.

As Jamelle Bouie writes in the New York Times, “This brings us to the second thing you must keep in mind if you want to understand Trump. He may rant and he may rave, but his rantings and ravings aren’t static; they carry meaning, even if the signal is hard to find in the noise.”

Trump will be a dictator in an American mold. He is empowered by the United States Supreme Court to be a king who can break the law at will without consequences as long he does such things as part of his “presidential duties.” Trump is channeling the Führer principle and what Nazi legal scholar Carl Schmitt described as a “state of exception.” In this model of governance, Donald Trump is the State; his corrupt desires and various failings of character and morality will be made into official public policy; The American people will have to learn to read and respond to Trump’s moods and mercurial nature and impulses if they want to survive. If the Republicans retain control of the House, and Trump takes control of the bureaucracy and replaces career professionals and experts with loyalists, there will be few counterbalances against Trump’s near-unlimited power.

Trump’s first regime was disorganized as compared to the highly organized cruelty that his second regime will unleash upon the American people. To that end, Trump’s propagandists and other agents are literally threatening a regime of “trauma.” Trump is personally promising to crush the “enemy within” and the “demonic” Democrats and “the Left” as he “purifies” the “blood” of the nation from the human vermin. Trump has also repeatedly threatened his “enemies,” meaning any individual or group who dares to oppose him and the MAGA movement, with prison and/or death. Trump has also fantasized about his own version of “the Purge” where his police and other right-wing street thugs can run amok, killing and brutalizing “the enemy” at will.

Trump has publicly fantasized about a “bloody story” of mass deportations and concentration camps targeting Black and brown “illegal immigrants.” Legal residents and naturalized citizens (and all American citizens) will also face the threat of deportation and loss of rights and citizenship.

Trump has also threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act and the Alien Enemies Act to order a military occupation of “blue states” and Democrat-led major cities as part of a plan to crush dissent.

The United States will be pushed toward a White “Christian” theocracy. The civil and human rights of racial and ethnic minorities will be imperiled, as the gains of the civil rights movements will be further undermined and rolled back. Environmental collapse and climate disaster will be greatly accelerated by the Trump regime and its anti-science policies as real experts are purged from across the government and replaced with Trump loyalists. Women’s rights to control their bodies will be further stripped. Freedom of the press, free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, freedom of thought, and other Constitutionally protected rights and liberties will be restricted.

Pocketbook voters who do not care about such abstractions as civic virtue and civic responsibility or democracy will see the prices of a range of goods they depend upon from food to clothing and other services increase because of tariffs on imported goods and the devastating impact that deporting millions of undocumented residents will cause the economy. Their wages will also be stagnant or effectively decrease because of inflation and other shocks to the economy. The social safety net will be gutted even more — this will include de facto cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, as well as overturning the Affordable Care Act. The very richest Americans (like Donald Trump) and corporations will pay even less money in taxes — assuming they pay any taxes at all; the tax burden will be shifted even more onto the middle-class, poor, and working-class Americans.

Trump would destroy the country’s foreign alliances, specifically NATO. This will create global instability. Trump will cede even more of America’s influence and power to Vladimir Putin and Russia and its plans of foreign aggression and expansion. The devastating war against Ukraine is only the first step in Putin’s imperial vision.

Trump and his allies and agents have publicly announced and detailed their fascist and authoritarian plans in Agenda 47 and Project 2025.

In one paragraph, the Editorial Board of the New York Times summarized the existential danger that Trump and his regime will pose to American democracy and freedom:

You already know Donald Trump. He is unfit to lead. Watch him. Listen to those who know him best. He tried to subvert an election and remains a threat to democracy. He helped overturn Roe, with terrible consequences. Mr. Trump’s corruption and lawlessness go beyond elections: It’s his whole ethos. He lies without limit. If he’s re-elected, the G.O.P. won’t restrain him. Mr. Trump will use the government to go after opponents. He will pursue a cruel policy of mass deportations. He will wreak havoc on the poor, the middle class, and employers. Another Trump term will damage the climate, shatter alliances, and strengthen autocrats. Americans should demand better. Vote.

The average American will likely not be impacted at first — unless they are a member of a targeted group. This illusion of safety and normalcy is very dangerous; it is one of the primary ways that authoritarian leaders take control of a society and create compliant subjects. Eventually, most Americans will internalize the cultural logic of Trumpism and fascism and begin to self-police and conform — and enforce the new order against their family members, friends, neighbors, and strangers. Too many Americans will find a way to use this corrupt power, and the threat of it, to gain advantages for themselves. They are collaborators and quislings. MAGA, like other fascist and authoritarian systems, will, almost inevitably, turn against its own members.

America has three foundings: the Revolutionary War, the Civil War and the Civil Rights Movement. With the election of Donald Trump, America will need a fourth founding to defend and renew its democracy against a man and regime who, as promised, will rule like a dictatorship or some other form of authoritarianism modeled after Vladimir Putin's Russia or Viktor Orbán's Hungary.

Are there enough Americans who are up to such a task and responsibility? Based on Tuesday’s election results, I very much doubt it.

Democrat Tammy Baldwin clings on to Wisconsin Senate seat

Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., has won re-election to a third term, holding a crucial seat for Democrats in a state that cast its lot with President-elect Donald Trump for a second time.

With more than 99% of votes reporting, according to the Associated Press, she appears to have beaten her GOP opponent, businessman Eric Hovde, by just under 1 point, 49.4% to 48.5%. In doing so, she slightly outperformed Vice President Kamala Harris, who earned 48.9% of the vote to Trump's 49.7%.

The AP declared Baldwin the winner Wednesday afternoon.

“It is clear that the voters have spoken and our campaign has won,” Baldwin said in a statement. “The people of Wisconsin have chosen someone who always puts Wisconsin first, someone who shows up, listens, and works with everyone to get the job done."

While Republicans are projected to gain control of the Senate with at least 52 and possibly as many as 54 seats in the next Congress, Baldwin's narrow victory helps position Democrats for taking back the majority in 2026. That's the year potentially vulnerable Republicans and open seats in Maine, North Carolina, Ohio and Kentucky are up for election; in 2028, Democrats will also be itching to defeat Wisconsin's other senator, right-wing firebrand Ron Johnson.

Throughout the campaign, Baldwin tarred her GOP rival as an out-of-touch wealthy businessman, while Hovde blasted the incumbent senator as a Washington creature who was too permissive on issues like immigration and transgender rights. Towards the end of the race, Republican ads raised innuendoes about Baldwin's relationship with her long-term partner and financial advisor, claiming it was a conflict of interest and that she was "in bed with Wall Street."

The $20 million that Hovde poured into the race from his own pockets, out of the $29.5 million he raised in total, paled in comparison to Baldwin's record $52.3 million haul. Much of the latter was spent on ads hammering Hovde over past statements, like suggesting that nursing home residents shouldn't vote and that he understood Black culture because of his foundation work in Africa.

Several of Baldwin’s ads ended with the question: “What is wrong with this guy?"

Negative ads drove both candidates' favorability ratings underwater and the polls tightened in the race's closing weeks. While Hovde maintained an early lead as ballots were counted across the state, wide margins for Baldwin in Milwaukee and Madison pushed her in front by early Wednesday morning.

The race is still close enough that Hovde has not yet conceded the race. If the margin between them is less than one percent — as it is right now — he can request a recount, though that no recount has yet reversed a statewide election in Wisconsin. Baldwin, opting not to wait for his call, declared in her statement that she was proud to "keep fighting" for Wisconsinites, and that they had rejected wealthy individuals and special interests who "want to come to our state, spread hate and division and buy their way into power."

Meghan McCain calls out “The View” for “malfeasance”

There's no end in sight for Meghan McCain's bitter feud with "The View" years after her disgruntled departure.

The television personality and former "The View" host took issue with ABC excluding women who voted for Donald Trump to offer their perspective on the election results and his win.

In a post on X, McCain said on Wednesday morning, “It is actual malfeasance on the part of ABC news that there isn’t one single conservative woman on 'The View' this morning who voted for Trump or simply isn’t repulsed by his supporters to explain to America why he is still so popular.”

McCain's statements about the show follow "The View's" Election Day episode. Host Alyssa Farah Griffin is the show's only conservative on the show, and the former Trump White House staffer stated Tuesday, “For the first time in my life, I voted for a Democrat." Other hosts who joined the panel were hosts Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Ana Navarro, Sara Haines and Sunny Hostin, who are either Independents or Democrats.

On election night, McCain mentioned Kamala Harris's appearance on "The View" last month. While hurricanes were raging in the South, Harris bashed her opponent's response on the show in October, "[Trump] really lacks empathy on a very basic level."

McCain said Tuesday evening, "Don’t underestimate how much damage Harris' answer on 'The View' that she couldn’t name one difference between her and Biden did to her."

RFK Jr., Trump’s would-be health czar, says he will “clear out” entire departments at the FDA

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would "clear out" entire departments of the Food and Drug Administration that are “not doing their jobs,” he told MSNBC on Wednesday.

“In some categories there are entire departments, like the nutrition department at FDA, that have to go, that are not doing their jobs, that are not protecting our kids,” Kennedy said. "I can get the corruption out of the agencies, it’s what I’ve been doing for 40 years."

Kennedy, who suspended his independent presidential campaign in August and endorsed President-elect Donald Trump, is known for his opposition to vaccinations, particularly among children. He emerged as a leading opponent of vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic and is also vocal critic of pesticides, water fluoridation and the pharmaceutical industry.

“FDA’s war on public health is about to end,” Kennedy wrote in a post on X. “This includes its aggressive suppression of psychedelics, peptides, stem cells, raw milk, hyperbaric therapies, chelating compounds, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamins, clean foods, sunshine, exercise, nutraceuticals and anything else that advances human health and can’t be patented by Pharma."

Last week, Kennedy told supporters that Trump promised him “control” of several public health agencies, including the FDA, th Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture.

The Trump campaign later denied that Kennedy would have a position at HHS, even as Trump has repeatedly confirmed his intentions to put Kennedy in charge of health policy. “I’m gonna let him go wild on health. I’m gonna let him go wild on the food. I’m gonna let him go wild on medicines,” Trump said during his rally at Madison Square Garden last month. 

The president-elect again mentioned RFK Jr. in his victory speech on Tuesday night.

“He’s going to help make America healthy again,” Trump said as the crowd chanted “Bobby."

Experts have warned of the consequences of appointing Kennedy, whose organization, Children's Health Defense (CHD), has campaigned against vaccinations around the world. 

“It’s very sad to me that as a community, we have taken the most magnificent innovation in human health in the history of humanity and turned it into a political weapon,” physician Catherine Ohmstede told NBC News. 

In 2019, Kennedy visited the pacific island of Samoa with CHD to campaign against a measles vaccine. Vaccination rates dropped from 60-70% to 31% before measles swept through Samoa and killed 83 people, the majority of whom were children, Mother Jones reported.

Kennedy’s own cousin, healthcare lawyer Ted Kennedy Jr., said he was “deeply concerned” by Trump’s decision to elevate his cousin.

“We can’t put anyone in charge of healthcare who doesn’t understand how doctors and scientists develop best practices and keep us safe, and has no medical background and no knowledge about how health care is organized, delivered and paid for,” he told Stat.

Trump victory encourages Jan. 6 defendants to ask for their cases to be set aside

President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly promised to pardon his supporters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but some of those same defendants are not waiting until he's sworn in before asking that their cases be set aside.

On Wednesday morning, lawyers for Christopher Carnell filed a motion to delay his status hearing scheduled for Nov. 8, and also potentially those of other defendants. It was promptly rejected by Judge Beryl Howell, who is overseeing the trials of several defendants charged with violently trespassing on federal grounds in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election.

But Carnell apparently hoped that Trump's victory would see his request granted. In that he's not alone.

"Throughout his campaign, President-elect Trump made multiple clemency promises to the January 6 defendants, particularly to those who were nonviolent participants," the filing said. "Mr. Carnell, who was an 18 year old nonviolent entrant into the Capitol on January 6, is expecting to be relieved of the criminal prosecution that he is currently facing when the new administration takes office."

That argument did not persuade Howell, who issued her rejection without comment. But less than an hour later, lawyers for another defendant, Jaimee Avery, asked for a delay of their own. "It would create a gross disparity for Ms. Avery to spend even a day in jail when the man who played a pivotal role in organizing and instigating the events of January 6 will now never face consequences for his role in it," the motion read.

As of the publication of this article, Howell has not yet responded to the request.

Since the insurrection, the Justice Department carried out one of the most wide-ranging criminal investigations in history, charging more than 1,500 people around the country for their roles in attacking the Capitol and the police officers defending the premises. That effort is likely to stop under Trump, who has decried their arrests as political persecution.

“This isn’t the end”: Jon Stewart reassures viewers as Donald Trump clinches win

Jon Stewart has words for us. 

Donald Trump is the winner of the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris with wide margins that still have not been fully tabulated yet. He's on his way to becoming the 47th President of the United States after his third attempt at running for president.

During "The Daily Show's" election special on Tuesday evening, Jon Stewart calmed the nation as results leaned heavily towards a second Trump presidency. Stewart even called out pollsters who misjudged the race between Trump and Harris: "Blow me," he said. The host acknowledged that regardless of who the winner is, people would project many different outcomes attached to them.

“We’re going to come out of this election and we’re going to make all kind of pronouncements about what this country is, and what this world is,” Stewart shared with the late-night audience. “And the truth is, we’re not really going to know s**t. We’re going to make it seem like this is the finality of our civilization.”

Stewart stressed after the election is over and a winner is unanimously decided — there is still more to do in the U.S. He urged that change doesn't just begin and end with an election.

"We’re all going to have to wake up tomorrow morning and work like hell to move the world to the place that we prefer it to be. And I just want to point out, just as a matter of perspective, that the lessons that our pundits take away from these results, that they will pronounce with certainty, will be wrong. And we have to remember that,” he said.

The comedian pulled receipts to back up his statement, including archival clips from pundits like George Stephanopoulos's blanket statement on former President Barack Obama after his 2008 win. At the time, Stephanopoulos had said with certainty, "There is no question this is the beginning — this is the first election of the future. I think we are moving towards a post-racial America." 

"That lasted a day," Stewart noted.

We need your help to stay independent

After Obama won again in 2012, Fox News pundit Bill O'Reilly said that the GOP needs to show "Hispanic voters that the party respects them."

That message was highlighted against Trump's 2015 campaign, racially profiling Mexicans. But needless to say, years of definitive statements led pundits to claim that Trump would “never be allowed to step foot in the Capitol again" after the Jan. 6 insurrection, and on Tuesday evening — they were proved wrong.

"My point is this: F**k!" Stewart yelled. 

Despite the Trump win, Stewart ended the episode hopeful. He stressed, “This isn’t the end. I promise you, this is not the end. We have to regroup, and we have to continue to fight and continue to work day in and day out to create a better society for our children, for this world, for this country, that we know is possible. It’s possible.”

"The Daily Show" airs Monday through Thursday at 11 p.m. ET on Comedy Central and streams on Paramount+.

 

As Russia celebrates, Trump’s win leaves Ukraine and the rest Europe unsure of what’s next

After being elected as the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump promised to “end wars” in his victory speech Tuesday night, leaving Europe apprehensive about the conflict in Ukraine and the future of NATO.

Trump promised to return to an “America First” foreign policy, vowing to stop using the country’s resources to fight wars abroad. Throughout his campaign, the president-elect repeatedly claimed he could end the war between Russia and Ukraine “in a day,” though he has failed to provide any specifics. In his previous term, Trump paired isolationist rhetoric with escalated U.S. interventions from Somalia to Yemen.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was among the first foreign leaders to congratulate Trump, sharing his hopes for collaborative action to end the war. 

“Congratulations to @realDonaldTrump on his impressive election victory! I recall our great meeting with President Trump back in September, when we discussed in detail the Ukraine-U.S. strategic partnership, the Victory Plan, and ways to put an end to Russian aggression against Ukraine,” Zelensky wrote on X. 

Trump is likely to urge Moscow and Kyiv to agree to a ceasefire upon taking office, while also slashing aid for Ukraine's defense. The U.S. has provided Ukraine with $175 billion in aid since the country was invaded by Russia in early 2022. But many fear Trump's ceasefire talks will be on Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s terms, which include rejecting any future attempts by Ukraine to join NATO

Last month, Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, told NBC News that to end the war in Ukraine, “we’re going to have to engage in some sort of negotiation between Ukraine, between Russia, between our NATO allies in Europe."

Vance has been a vocal critic of U.S. aid to Ukraine, calling for the latter to surrender territory to Russia, a stance that Zelensky said was “too radical,” The New Yorker reported in September. 

Many Russian officials were quick to celebrate Trump’s victory, eager for the possibility of a negotiation that favors their interests. Several Russian officials were openly gleeful about Harris’ loss, prematurely celebrating the end of America’s aid to Ukraine.

"Kamala Harris was right when she quoted Psalm 30:5: 'Weeping may remain in the night, but joy comes in the morning,’” Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote on Telegram. “Hallelujah, I would add for myself.”

The Russian parliament’s head of foreign affairs, Leonid Slutsky, told The Washington Post that Trump’s victory will be a huge blow for Ukraine.

“Judging by the pre-election rhetoric … the Republican team is not going to send more and more American taxpayer money into the furnace of the proxy war against Russia,” he said.

We need your help to stay independent

Putin himself had yet to congratulate Trump as of Wednesday afternoon. There has been a wealth of speculation in recent months about Trump’s relationship with the Russian leader, as details of secret communication between the two men have emerged since Trump left the White House in 2021.

For much of the rest of Europe, a second Trump term brings apprehension and uncertainty. During his first presidency, Trump threatened to leave NATO. This time around, he’s repeatedly warned that the U.S. will abandon European allies who don’t invest more in defense. He’s previously criticized many of NATO’s European members for failing to commit more of heir GDP to their defense budgets.

While a Trump presidency likely means Europe can rely on the United States much less for its defense, it could also force EU governments to build stronger alliances, Politico reported.

A post from French prime minister Emmanuel Macron hinted as much. After congratulating Trump, Macron wrote that he had spoken with his German counterpart about the fate of their two countries going forward.

“I have just spoken with the Chancellor @OlafScholz. We will work towards a more united, stronger, more sovereign Europe in this new context. By cooperating with the United States of America and defending our interests and our values,” Macron wrote on X. 

Scholz' echoed Macron's words. "The European Union must stand close together and act in a united manner," he told reporters on Wednesday, the Associated Press reported.

House election forecast flips to GOP as Democrats hold on to their last hope

After an election night collapse in both the presidential election and key Senate races, Democrats are looking to the House as their last hope. As it stands, the lower chamber is too close to call, though it’s leaning towards Republican control. The battle for the House majority is likely to come down to California, where it could take days — or longer — to count all the votes.

In the House, Democrats posted good results in New York, where they lost key seats in 2022, flipping the state’s 22nd District, where Democrat John Mannion defeated Rep. Brandon Williams, and 19th District, where Democrat Josh Riley unseated Rep. Marc Molinaro.

Democrats also held on in the 18th District, where Rep. Pat Ryan won re-election, and appear on track to flip the Fourth District, where Democrat Laura Gillen is poised to unseat Rep. Anthony D'Esposito, though the race there still has not been called. Likewise, Democrats fell short in their attempts to flip Rep. Nick LaLota's seat in New York’s First District on Long Island, and Rep. Mike Lawler's seat in the state’s 17th District in the Hudson Valley.

As of Wednesday morning, Republicans had won 198 House seats while Democrats won 180 seats. The only thing clear about the results at this point are that it will be a slim majority, whichever party wins, and that the full results won’t be apparent until all the races in California are called.

California was home to 10 competitive races in 2024, with five of them being tossups — all of which had Republican incumbents. While the Associated Press has not called any of the five tossup races yet, GOP candidates had an advantage in all five: Rep. John Duarte in the 13th, Rep. David Valadao in the 22nd, Rep. Mike Garcia in the 27th, Rep. Ken Calvert in the 41st and Rep. Michelle Steel in the 45th, on Wednesday morning. Much of the vote is yet to be counted.

Republicans did get a good sign Wednesday morning, however, when California’s Third District was called for incumbent Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley. The Third District was seen as competitive, but unlikely to flip unless Democrats were positioned to outperform expectations in the state. As of Wednesday morning, Republicans took 58% of the vote in the district with 60% reporting.

Liberty Vittert, the lead data scientist at Decision Desk HQ, told Salon that this call shifted their House projection in favor of Republicans, who now have an 80% chance of winning the lower chamber in her assessment.

We need your help to stay independent

Outside of the House battlegrounds in New York and California, Republicans also appear to have performed well in both of Pennsylvania’s most closely watched races in the Seventh and Eight Districts. Republicans Ryan Mackenzie and Robert Bresnahan enjoy slight advantages over Rep. Susan Wild and Rep. Matt Cartwright in their races, with 99% reporting in both races. The GOP incumbent, Rep. Scott Perry, was also ahead in the tossup 10th District, though the race has not yet been called.

In Michigan, Democrats managed to hold onto the Eighth District, where Democrat Kristen McDonald Rivet won, as well as the Third District, where Rep. Hillary Scholten won. Republicans managed to flip the competitive Seventh District, where Republican Tom Barrett was victorious, and lead in the 10th District, where Rep. John James appears likely to hold on, though the race has not yet been called. 

As of Wednesday morning, Republicans also appeared on track to win in both of Wisconsin’s competitive districts, the First and the Third, where Rep. Bryan Steil and Rep. Derrick Van Orden are poised to keep their seats. Democrats, meanwhile, appear to be holding on in North Carolina’s lone swing district, the First, where Rep. Don Davis leads in the vote total with 99% reporting.

As it stands, the House could be the only check on a Republican agenda. Legislative action would be required for former President Donald Trump to enact some of his key policy proposals like mass deportations and tariffs. A House majority would also give Democrats the leadership positions on key committees, which would give them investigative powers.

TGI Fridays has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

TGI Fridays Inc., the casual dining restaurant chain, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Saturday. The company said the COVID-19 pandemic was the “primary driver of our financial challenges,” in a recent statement. The Chapter 11 restructuring process will allow TGI Fridays “to proceed with an optimized corporate infrastructure that enables them to reach their full potential.” 

“The next steps announced today are difficult but necessary actions to protect the best interests of our stakeholders, including our domestic and international franchisees and our valued team members around the world,” said Rohit Manocha, Executive Chairman of TGI Fridays Inc. in the statement.

TGI Fridays has “secured a commitment for debtor-in-possession financing to support operations while proceeding through the Chapter 11 process,” the statement specified. The company also filed motions with the Bankruptcy Court in the Northern District of Texas, which will allow it to “continue its customer programs in the normal course” when approved.

Back in January, TGI Fridays closed 36 “underperforming” locations in 12 states and has since continued shutting down more restaurants across the nation. The company closed 50 locations last week. Its total restaurant count is now 163, compared to 270 locations prior to the mass shutdowns.    

TGI Fridays follows in the footsteps of Red Lobster and Buca di Beppo chains, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the past months. In September, Red Lobster received court approval for its restructuring plan to continue operating under a new firm, RL Investor Holdings LLC. And as of Nov. 5, Buca di Beppo also received court approval to be sold out of bankruptcy to the Houston-based firm Main Street Capital for $27 million.