Spring Offer: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

While athletes look to bring home the gold, drama ensues in the Olympic Village dining hall

One might think that at the Olympics — the largest sporting celebration in the world — athletes are treated to a breakfast of champions. But according to firsthand accounts from competitors, the food is surprisingly really bad.

So much so that team Great Britain flew in their own private chef to help prepare meals for their athletes following complaints of inadequate serving portions and rationing of high-protein foods, The Independent reported. Several British athletes have also begun bringing packed lunches and meals back to the village. 

“There are not enough of certain foods: eggs, chicken, certain carbohydrates, and then there is the quality of the food, with raw meat being served to athletes,” Andy Anson, the British Olympic Association’s chief executive, told The Times. “They have got to improve it over the next couple of days dramatically.

“Our athletes have decided they would rather go and eat in our performance lodge in Clichy, so we are having to get another chef to come over as the demand is far exceeding what we thought it would be,” he continued, adding that food “is the biggest issue at the moment.”

Competitors have complained about a lack of eggs, which were reportedly rationed at breakfast during the first few days of the Olympics. Same with grilled meats, which many athletes said were “insufficient” in amount, according to the French newspaper L'Équipe

Organizers at the Games claimed the lack of food — and poor quality of food — is due to supply problems with Sodexo Live, the company in charge of catering. Sodexo Live confirmed “a very high demand” for specific food items and said that “volumes will be increased” to “satisfy the needs of the athletes,” per BBC.

The Olympic Village is expected to prepare 40,000 meals each day. In total, the athletes’ village is slated to serve approximately 13 million meals during the Olympic and Paralympic Games.

In an effort to reduce the carbon footprint of meals produced by half, a strict quality charter was developed in anticipation of the Paris Games. A quarter of all ingredients are sourced in a 155-mile (250 km) radius of Paris, and 20% are certified organic, BBC reported. Meat, milk and eggs are all from France, and a third of the food is plant-based.

We need your help to stay independent

Two hundred water, juice and soda fountains were installed in the Olympic Village prior to the Games beginning. Only reusable cups and crockery are available to use.

In the same vein as Great Britain, team Korea also brought their own culinary team in the wake of the food shortage. A team of 15 Korean chefs and nutritionists were flown into France to ensure that the athletes were well-fed throughout the competition, according to the CJ Newsroom. The team sourced meat, milk, vegetables and fruit from France, and airlifted 1½ tons of rice and grains and ½ ton of kimchi and seasonings from Korea. Korean athletes are reportedly enjoying dishes like spicy pork and egg rolls served with rice and Buldak ramen, according to Tasting Table.

Many athletes have taken to social media to share disappointed reviews of the foods currently being served in the village. Singaporean swimmer Quah Jing Wen said the flavor of a French salmon Wellington dish she got “caught her off guard,” but eventually grew on her. She added that most of the meals don’t have enough salt. On TikTok, American track and field athlete Raven Saunders posted a video of a piece of food from the dining hall alongside an audio that says, “You disappointed me.”


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


During a press conference that took place shortly after the U.S. women’s gymnastics team won gold, the athletes criticized the dining hall options after a reporter asked if they were satisfied with French food.   

“Here's the thing. I don't think we're having proper French cuisine in the village like you guys might be eating because you're outside the village,” Simone Biles said. Hezly Rivera echoed similar sentiments, saying, “I don't think it's very good, at least what we're having in the dining hall.”

Despite the overwhelmingly negative reviews, one dining hall item seems to have garnered much praise amongst the athletes. 

Norwegian swimmer Henrik Christiansen is a huge fan of the chocolate muffins, which he gave a score of 11/10 while taste-testing several dining hall foods. In one video, he hailed the muffin as the “single greatest thing about the Olympic Village.” In a separate video, he is caught eating a muffin in bed, and in another, he’s seen apologizing to the muffin for the “really passionate” relationship they’ve enjoyed. U.S. climber Colin Duffy also posted a TikTok praising the chocolate muffin.

“Real Housewife” Melissa Gorga adds a salty, crispy note to her favorite chicken parmigiana

As "Real Housewife" Melissa Gorga told me when we recently spoke, chicken cutlets have been a longtime staple in her house. And like many, both within and outside of the Italian-American domain, one of the main go-tos for leftover chicken cutlets is the iconic chicken parm.

Gorga goes beyond the realm of the traditional, though, with a really interesting addition: Prosicutto di Parma.

As she told me, "You know what, [my family] love[s] prosciutto in this house, everyone loves it. So I just thought about putting a little twist on it. That was my own little, like, take on like doing something different. I think I have one child that, like, pulls it off? But everyone pretty much loves it. It adds a little bit more flavor, a little bit like that salty feel. And it's just good! It makes it my own, right? It makes it like something different and my family got used to it, so they love that now."

Furthermore, Gorga pairs her chicken parm. with both spinach and spaghetti, adding a little extra to the plate.

"I love sautéed broccoli rabe," she said. "I love sautéed spinach, these are all of my [favorites]: I love greens. I can eat greens all day long. I eat lettuce. I should have been a rabbit because I love greens. I can eat them all day." 

Gorga partnered with Rao's Homemade to deliver this delicious dish, utilizing their classic marinara sauce, but as she also said in our conversation, their other sauces are great, too: Swap out the marinara for their arrabiata or even their vodka for a chicken parm. that really colors outside the lines, if you will. Bonus: It's a one-pan meal.

Conversely, use whatever you have on hand! This dish is sure to be a showstopper regardless. And of course, don't forget the sprinkle cookies.

One Pan Chicken Prosciutto di Parmigiana
Yields
04 servings
Prep Time
15 minutes
Cook Time
50 minutes

Ingredients

1 24-ounce jar Rao’s Homemade Marinara Sauce 

1 ½ pounds boneless skinless chicken breasts, cut into four 6-ounce portions 

1 ½ cups Italian panko breadcrumbs 

1 cup all-purpose flour 

4 eggs, lightly beaten 

½ teaspoon kosher salt 

1 teaspoon ground black pepper 

4 ounces Prosciutto di Parma, shaved thin and roughly chopped 

3 tablespoons olive oil 

8 ounces fresh mozzarella, cut into 8 slices 

3 ounces Parmigiano Reggiano, grated 

Fresh basil leaves, torn into pieces (for garnish, about 5 leaves) 

 

Directions

  1. Preheat oven to 375F degrees. Working in a shallow 9×13 baking dish, pour the olive oil into the baking dish and spread all over the bottom. Set it aside. 

  2. Now, season the chicken breast portions with salt and pepper and set those aside. Create a “breading” set-up for the chicken. You will need a shallow pan for the flour, one for the eggs and one for the breadcrumbs. 

  3. Working in one flow, lightly dredge the seasoned chicken in the flour, followed by the eggs and finally the breadcrumbs. You want to make sure that the chicken is fully coated in each of the items. 

  4. As you finish breading each piece of chicken, place them in the lightly greased baking dish.

  5. Bake the breaded chicken in the preheated oven for 20 to 25 minutes until the chicken has reached an internal temperature of 158F degrees. (the chicken is not fully cooked at this stage.)

  6. Next, remove the chicken from the oven and cover it with Rao’s Homemade Marinara Sauce.

  7. Place 2 slices of the mozzarella on top of each chicken piece and liberally sprinkle the Parmigiano Reggiano over the mozzarella. 

  8. Finally, sprinkle chopped prosciutto over the chicken and cheese and place back into the oven. Bake for 10-12 minutes until the chicken reaches an internal temperature of 165F degrees, the cheese is melted and the prosciutto is crispy. 

  9. Carefully, remove the chicken from the oven and allow to cool for 15 minutes before serving.

  10. Before serving, sprinkle the top with the basil leaves. Serve with Rao’s Linguini and sauteed Spinach.

The greed-soaked tale of sexual abuse in USA Swimming — and around the world

This article is adapted from the prologue to “Underwater: The Greed-Soaked Tale of Sexual Abuse in USA Swimming and Around the Globe,” portions of which have been published previously at Salon in different form. The book will be released Sept. 10. Information on pre-ordering is here.

In 2010, seven years before his death, USA Swimming chief executive Chuck Wielgus established a so-called SafeSport program, the first by an Olympic-sanctioned sport governing body. In 2017 this reputed model for the investigation and adjudication of claims of sexual abuse by coaches led to the creation of an Olympics-wide agency, the U.S. Center for SafeSport. Earlier this year a congressional commission report said the center was a failure and recommended its spinoff as an independently funded federal agency.

I came to be reporting on the Olympic movement’s systematic predation of underage athletes through an accident of timing: I happened to have a young daughter who swam competitively for more than five years with our local USA Swimming-sanctioned club. Thankfully, she wasn’t a victim. In any event, I believe, victim-centricity isn’t the right lens through which to critique sexual abuse in swimming; the problem is much more diffuse and insidious. A better way to view things is to ponder why the U.S. Olympic Committee and its associated entities call the shots for all kid athletes, not just aspirants to gold medals and college athletic scholarships.

A recommendation in this area became another key part of this year’s congressional commission report. Full consideration of this question requires an un-blinkered look at the tragically flawed system we have now — how it codifies the casual commodification of kids, turning physical education and mastery of a life skill into the developmental arm of professionalized sports. Unexamined, these objectives splash around in public subsidies and in exaggerated and wrongheaded assumptions about their positive impact on our society.

My daughter Mara was eight years old when she began swimming with the Berkeley Bears. Her mother and I have four kids, and we were thrilled when our older girl was the one who turned into the family jock. I myself was what’s known as a “sinker”; in my youth, I’d learned to overcome fear of the water and to get around in it, but I never mastered technique. Inspired by Mara’s example, I decided to take some lessons of my own, and I finally got the hang of freestyle side breathing . . . sort of. One day, on a family vacation, I found that I could make it the whole distance of the 137-meter-long salt water pool off Kitsilano Beach in Vancouver, Canada. Through our children, we learn.

Our club coach was good at stroke-coaching, inept at organization and tended to flirt with the high school-age girls. At the time, I didn't think much of it.

Mara was a very good little swimmer. Never Olympic-class or athletic scholarship–bound, mind you, nor so aspirational. But she excelled at breaststroke, butterfly and distance freestyle. At meets, Mara racked up prize ribbons: lots of third-places, fourths, fifths, and sixths, the occasional second, the very rare first. One time she got disqualified, and we proudly displayed the DQ slip on the cork board on the wall of her bedroom, along with all the participation ribbons; after all, they said you weren’t a real competitive swimmer until the first time you got busted for an illegal turn. I chaperoned Mara to daily practices, and once a month or so, we got up as early as 5 a.m. for drives to meets as far away as Santa Rosa and San Jose. At the end of her first year, she won the Most Improved Swimmer award at the team banquet.

The head coach was a former University of California backstroke specialist named Jesse Stovall. He was good at stroke-coaching, even if he was inept at organization, always hid his eyes behind sunglasses and behaved immaturely. Near the beginning of one season, the Bears staged a poolside ice cream social to gather all the athletes and their families. I expected Stovall to welcome everyone with some community-building remarks. Instead, he just stood off to the side, flirting with the high school-age girl swimmers. At the time, I didn’t think much of it.

I was further nonplussed by a bizarre incident at a large end-of-summer meet. This was what’s known as a “trials and finals” meet: Instead of just culling best scores from the various earlier heats to determine placement, the swimmers with the top times in each event moved on to a head-to-head competition in a late-afternoon session. This meet was close to home, and Mara had a full family contingent of cheerleaders, including her visiting aunt from out of town. Preparing for a final in the warm-up pool, she didn’t notice that the sequence of events had been scrambled out of numerical order. The result was that she found herself still in the warm-up pool, instead of being on the starting block of the main pool, at call time for the final heat. She was disqualified.

We need your help to stay independent

As I always did, I lurked outside the team’s E-Z Up tent to listen to the post-race words of wisdom imparted to Mara by an assistant coach. Usually they involved advice about pacing her race lap to lap, or some similar technical tip. This time I heard the assistant, Rick, say to Mara, “Pacific Swimming has an automatic $50 fine when a swimmer misses a final. It’s to keep swimmers from cutting out and no-showing after the trials round. Pacific Swimming sends us the fine, and we put it directly onto the bill for your team membership dues the next month.”

I thought this gazebo was kidding around. But Mara obviously internalized what he said: When we got home, she opened her piggy bank, which held her income from recent babysitting jobs, to see if she could scrape together the 50 bucks. Fining an 11-year-old kid who, in her exuberance to prepare for her final heat, simply got confused about procedures? She wasn’t, for God’s sake, a New York Yankees player who’d missed a hit-and-run sign. Surely this little sports league didn’t actually impose monetary consequences for such mistakes, and its coaches didn’t shove them in the faces of little kids, in lieu of discreet conversations with their parents? Yet when I confronted Rick the next day, he confirmed, with a deadpan, that he’d spoken for real. I told the head coach, Stovall, that this was unacceptable, and pointedly alerted fellow parents by email. The team backed down. We never again heard about the “$50 fine.”

Later, as the team fell into arrears on pool rent payments, we learned that Stovall was accused of pilfering funds. Then came the day we noticed that the Bears’ star swimmer, a 16-year-old girl (also a top student, and pretty), was no longer there. The official story was that she and her family had decided to switch to another team, a short distance away, with better facilities and training resources.

It turned out that our club's top swimmer, a 16-year-old girl, had traveled alone with her coach to a national tournament in Orlando. When they got back, she told a friend what had happened there.

By this time, Mara was approaching 13, and she was winding down her own competitive swimming career. Along with one of her friends, she soon moved to another team, whose coach had a healthier, laid-back attitude and style. There Mara put in another year of practices and meets. I was hoping she’d continue to swim on her high school team, because I’d heard that kids with years of club swimming experience often dominated at that level, but Mara wasn’t interested. She’d had a nice run, but she’d also had enough. Henceforth, and for life, she would just be a skilled swimmer.

It was later that year, 2009, when someone forwarded to me an email chain involving our former coach Jesse Stovall. He’d been ousted from the Bears club, presumably because of the financial improprieties, and now he was coaching an adult group, called a masters team, on the university campus. The startling information from the emails was that one day recently he’d been arrested on Sproul Plaza, the Berkeley campus' iconic gathering place, on a fugitive warrant from Orange County, Florida.

What was that about? I decided to explore.

Police records from Orlando told the whole sordid story. It turned out that the Bears’ top swimmer, that 16-year-old girl (whom I’ll call “Ivory”), hadn’t left on a whim or simply to improve her college athletic scholarship prospects. Rather, she’d stomped off the Bears’ practice pool deck after a shouting match with Stovall, days after they had returned together from a national invitational meet in Orlando. Stovall, who was married and had a baby daughter, had told Ivory’s parents that they could stay home and he’d chaperone her to Florida himself. While they were in Orlando, Stovall had sexually assaulted Ivory in two separate incidents. When they got back, she told a friend about it. The friend told her own therapist — who in turn, as a mandatory reporter of child sexual abuse under California law, informed Berkeley police.

Stovall was arrested. He copped a plea to the criminal charges in Florida and was banned by USA Swimming.

Our local alternative weekly newspaper, the East Bay Express, did a cover story on the scandal. I was the main source, on the record. One other former team parent spoke to the reporter, not for attribution. One of the team's board members, a professor at Cal, either denied to the Express that the episode had been covered up or justified the decision to cover up, depending on how you interpreted his remarks. He vilified me as a disgruntled troublemaker.

A week later I tuned in to “20/20” on ABC, which aired a two-part investigation of USA Swimming sexual abuse. That’s when I realized that what I’d witnessed with Jesse Stovall and the Berkeley Bears was just the local precinct of a national problem. I corresponded with USA Swimming boss Wielgus and others in Colorado Springs. They were cagey. Wielgus touted the launch of his SafeSport program.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


When I decided to check in on the progress of SafeSport two years later, it became immediately clear that the program was a sham and that the scandals of the sport were profound and far-reaching. One key narrative was that of a former swimmer in California, Jancy Thompson, who was suing over USA Swimming’s exposure in the actions of her coach, Norm Haverford.

In the Thompson case, USA Swimming was in the middle of defying multiple California lower court discovery orders to produce the organization’s internal documents; in lieu of complying, the group was writing checks totaling tens of thousands of dollars to pay off contempt sanctions, as if they were parking tickets. Litigation of this stonewalling reached the California Supreme Court, which USA Swimming asked to vacate discovery orders. In July 2012, the court refused, compelling enforcement.

Later in the year, USA Swimming finally submitted, under seal, thousands of pages of papers memorializing discussions of abuse, and with dossiers on scores of accused coaches. Many exploded with seedy information. That massive filing, in turn, was subpoenaed by the FBI field office in Campbell, California, near San Jose. Copies of this tranche of documents were later leaked to me and my reporting partner at the time, Tim Joyce.

USA Swimming finally submitted thousands of pages of papers memorializing discussions of abuse, with dossiers on scores of accused coaches. Many exploded with seedy information, and exposed a tale of corruption and big money.

These documents exposed corruption and big money. They detailed insurance fraud and the most reprehensible mistreatment of young people. Additionally, they trickled out the role of gullible parents, who had outsourced the supervision of their children to Svengali coaches who were purportedly their tickets to athletic success, college scholarships and Olympic medals.

These stories were set in almost every state of every size in every region. When caught, some of the bad guys fled to the more obvious enclaves, such as Canada and Mexico. (Or, like Jesse Stovall, they found refuge in U.S. Masters Swimming, a kind of old folks’ home for some of the sport’s shadow-banned rejects.)

But that was far from the geographical extent of the bigger story. The Caribbean island nation of Barbados — home of swimming’s captive self-insurance subsidiary, the United States Sports Insurance Company — was key. Other foreign locales making appearances were Spain, Venezuela, Brazil, Columbia, Peru, Australia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.

At one point I traveled to Ireland to find out more about the background of the most notorious at-large sex criminal in sports history: George Gibney, who coached the 1984 and 1988 Irish Olympic swimming teams. Gibney had fled the country in 1994 after getting the Irish Supreme Court to toss his indictment on dozens of sexual molestation charges, thanks to a controversial statute-of-limitations technicality. Gibney moved to the U.S. and briefly coached in suburban Denver before his Irish past caught up with him; moved again and then again; and as this book was being written, was still playing out the string in a central Florida suburb. Nazi concentration-camp guards used to enjoy unobtrusive second acts by embedding themselves into American middle-class communities. George Gibney, whose past included no massacres but a serial history of serious violations, did the same.

For Olympics viewers, swimming is a spectacle of glory, the setting where athletes like Michael Phelps and Katie Ledecky break world records, garner gold, retail backstories of grit and overcoming personal obstacles, and stir upswells of patriotic pride.

Treading under the surface of the water, for generations, has been a darker narrative. It’s time to tell that tale, in all its global slime. And it's past time to appreciate that youth sports coach abuse isn’t one of those problems that will be solved by law enforcement breakthroughs or a new insight out of ethics handbooks. The only real fix is cultural, and it will need to be owned by all of us.

Who invented Flamin’ Hot Cheetos is now up for debate in a new lawsuit against Frito-Lay

A former PepsiCo executive is suing Frito-Lay, claiming the company launched a “smear campaign” against him after they claimed he didn't invent Cheetos’ popular Flamin' Hot flavor.

Richard Montañez — who worked as a janitor before becoming vice president of multicultural marketing and sales — accused his former employer of making “false statements" and asserted that he would not let Frito-Lay take away his legacy.

“I created Flamin’ Hot Cheetos not only as a product but as a movement and as a loyal executive for PepsiCo,” Montañez said in a news release, per Delish. “PepsiCo believed in me as a leader because they knew people would follow me, and they did because they knew my soul is my community. We built this into a $2 billion industry, and I cannot let them take away my legacy or destroy my reputation. I will not let them silence me.”

According to his lawsuit, Montañez created the beloved flavor after a machine in the plant he worked in broke down and left behind a batch of unflavored Cheetos. Montañez took those chips home and seasoned them with chili powder in an attempt to mimic the flavor of Mexican elote — a popular street food consisting of grilled corn covered in mayo sauce, chili powder, cheese and lime.

Montañez later pitched his creation to then-CEO Roger Enrico, the lawsuit added. Enrico, who was willing to meet with Montañez, loved the presentation so much that he instructed Frito-Lay to start making and selling the hot Cheetos. In 2000, Montañez was promoted to a business development manager in Southern California and eventually, became PepsiCo’s vice president of multicultural marketing and sales.  

In 2019, Montañez retired from PepsiCo to become a motivational speaker full-time. In 2021, he published a memoir titled “Flamin' Hot: The Incredible True Story of One Man's Rise from Janitor to Top Executive.” Montañez’s life story was also made into a Hulu feature film, “Flamin’ Hot,” in 2023.

However, in 2021, Frito-Lay allegedly went against Montañez, telling the Los Angeles Times that their records didn’t show Montañez “was involved in any capacity in the Flamin' Hot test market.”    

“That doesn't mean we don't celebrate Richard but the facts do not support the urban legend.” the company said.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


The LA Times report further claimed that the “Flamin’ Hot” flavor was created in 1989 by a team of snack food professionals based in Plano, Texas. A junior employee named Lynne Greenfeld was assigned to develop the brand — she came up with the Flamin’ Hot name and is credited with the snack’s success, per Frito-Lay. Same with Fred Lindsay, a retired Frito-Lay salesman from the South Side of Chicago who told the LA Times, “I’m the one that was responsible for getting us into Flamin’ Hot products.”

In his recent complaint, Montañez argued that he has been the victim of fraud, racial discrimination, defamation, and violations of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL).

Despite the naysayers, Montañez’s origin story is believed to be true by Jesse Garcia, who plays Montañez in the “Flamin’ Hot” film.   

“I am letting the family give that kind of information, but I believe him,” Garcia told Salon.

Trump’s response to Harris’ challenge to “man up” is a Fox News debate

Donald Trump's previous claims that it would be "inappropriate" to follow through with a debate against Kamala Harris because Democrats had not yet formally nominated a candidate in the wake of President Biden's decision to back out of his reelection campaign no longer holds water.

On Friday, Democratic National Committee Chairman Jaime Harrison announced that Harris officially won enough support from Democratic delegates to formally secure her party's nomination for president and, hours later, Trump posted to Truth Social that he's "agreeing" to debate her on a new date — Sept. 4, rather than Sept. 10 — and on a new network — Fox News, rather than ABC — and this time, he wants it to go down in front of a "full arena audience."

"I have agreed with Fox News to debate Kamala Harris on Wednesday, September 4th," Trump writes in his post. "The debate was previously scheduled against Sleepy Joe Biden on ABC, but has been terminated in that Biden will no longer be a participant, and I am in litigation against ABC Network and George Slopadopoulos, thereby creating a conflict of interest. The Fox News debate will be held in the Great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, at a site in an area to be determined. The Moderators of the debate will be Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum, and the rules will be similar to the rules of my debate with Sleepy Joe, who has been treated horribly by his party."

On Saturday morning, Harris' team issued a statement on Trump's debate proposal, writing, "Donald Trump is running scared and trying to back out of the debate he already agreed to and running straight to Fox News to bail him out. He needs to stop playing games and show up to the debate he already committed to on Sept 10. The Vice President will be there one way or the other to take the opportunity to speak to a prime time national audience. We're happy to discuss further debates after the one both campaigns have already agreed to. Mr. Anytime, anywhere, anyplace should have no problem with that unless he's too scared to show up on the 10th."

Trump's suggested terms for a debate with Harris follow a Friday push from her team for him to "man up," and an earlier call from Harris made in a now-viral video clip from a recent rally, when she urged Trump to say whatever he has to say about her to her face.

In an update from a source familiar with the matter that was relayed to Salon on Saturday evening, they offer background on the specificities of the originally planned ABC debate, stating: 

In May 2024, Trump agreed to the ABC News debate on September 10. This commitment was two months after Trump filed the lawsuit against ABC News (in March 2024).

George Stephanopoulos is not moderating.

Trump and Biden accepted the ABC News debate for September 10 and Harris said she would commit to it.

Who spread vaccine disinformation in the Philippines? The US military did

In June, Reuters reported on a hitherto secret U.S. program connected with the COVID pandemic. In the spring of 2020, as the coronavirus rapidly spread throughout the world, our government reportedly sought to respond to Chinese disinformation which had attempted to deflect responsibility for the virus’ origin, claiming that it had originated in a biological research lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland. What was the government’s plan? To fight fire with fire.

This was around the same time that Rodrigo Duterte, then the Trump-style president of the Philippines, was making noises about a closer relationship to China, even hinting that if the Beijing government prioritized sending vaccine to his country, he’d be willing to cede disputed territory in the South China Sea. An element  within the U.S. military in the Pacific was reportedly eager to keep the Philippine government on side and fight the deluge of Chinese propaganda. 

So the Pentagon apparently authorized a covert disinformation campaign against China, focusing on discrediting Chinese-developed COVID vaccines and protective medical equipment like masks. The channels for this propaganda included Twitter (now X), Facebook and other social media platforms. The campaign appears to have worked: The Philippines ended up with a very low vaccination rate in international comparison (in spite of Duterte’s efforts), and a relatively high death rate. 

While it is generally acknowledged that the Chinese vaccine (known as CoronaVac or Sinovac) is less effective than those developed by Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax, it is hardly useless: It’s typically 60 to 70 percent effective, versus the roughly 90-percent effectiveness of Western vaccines. So it would almost certainly have saved lives in the Philippines, if not for the U.S. disinformation campaign.

It’s all there in the Reuters reporting, and there is no need to expatiate on the obvious immorality of the operation, quite apart from its colossal stupidity. At the same time as U.S. public health officials were tearing out their hair trying to combat domestic COVID disinformation, and doctors and nurses were risking their lives caring for terminally ill vaccine refusers, their government was pumping the same ideological poison into the minds of innocent people abroad. The nonchalant statement of an unnamed Pentagon official says it all: “We weren’t looking at this from a public health perspective. We were looking at how we could drag China through the mud.”

The report left a few dangling loose ends, however, that deserve further investigation by Congress and the Pentagon inspector general:

Are U.S. special forces out of control? The report says that the program was initiated after persistent lobbying by the then-commander of Special Operations Command Pacific, Gen. Jonathan Braga. The article implies that he pleaded directly to Washington. Did his superiors at U.S. Pacific Command in Hawaii know what he was doing? Did they approve? We know from Reuters that various U.S. ambassadors in Southeast Asia did not approve, and would ordinarily have overruled a stupid idea that could harm diplomatic relations. But because then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper designated the propaganda campaign as a de facto wartime action, the diplomats’ objections could be disregarded.

At the same time as U.S. public health officials were tearing out their hair trying to combat domestic COVID disinformation, their government was pumping the same ideological poison into the minds of innocent people abroad.

U.S. special forces were vastly expanded during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and were given greater operational flexibility. They have also tended to produce loose cannons throughout the ranks. Gen. Stanley McChrystal was special forces commander at the height of the  Iraq war and later became commander of all coalition forces in Afghanistan. His career came to grief when he had the bad judgment to insult President Obama other civilian leaders in front of a Rolling Stone reporter. Apparently, the civilian pukes in Washington lacked the general’s gung-ho confidence that with just a little more door-kicking and pyrotechnics, Afghanistan would be pacified — something that hadn’t happened since the Mongol invasions.

This kinetic mentality can get out of hand, as it did in 2017. Four Navy SEALs who were posted to the U.S. embassy in Mali, in a “juvenile” attempt to haze an Army special forces soldier, wound up killing him. Their court martial, in a strange display of leniency, sentenced the most culpable perpetrator to just 10 years in prison, while one of the four defendants did not even receive a punitive discharge. The 10-year sentence was later vacated, with the defendant hiring a Trump lawyer to get him off the hook.

Ironically, vaccine refusal was the cause of another special forces stunt. Personnel from the Navy Special Warfare Command, including SEALs, declined to be vaccinated and sued the Department of Defense. Their venue-shopping landed them in the Fort Worth, Texas, courtroom of U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor, a favorite destination for nutty conservative causes. Shockingly but not surprisingly, O’Connor ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. Ultimately, the Supreme Court blocked the judge’s ruling, but only insofar as it allowed the Navy to reassign the plaintiffs, rather than discipline or discharge them, while litigation continued.

What the personnel had done merited not merely reassignment or discharge, but potentially a court martial for deliberately rendering themselves undeployable, endangering other service members, gross insubordination and possibly even mutiny, as it was an organized action against their unit. 

I have written before about the ways religion is bandied about for political advantage by people whose own religious faith is ludicrously insincere. The justification of the SEALs — whose profession is to kill people — was a risible claim that Christian devotion prompted their refusal, advancing the heretofore undiscovered theological tenet that modification of their bodies by vaccine was an “affront to their Creator.” Apparently that doctrine exempts steroid abuse, which is common in the Navy’s special warfare community.

Even the military has begun to recognize that special forces may have become the tail that wags the dog — too big (larger in scale than the entire German army), diluted in quality, often operating outside the regular chain of command and widely infected with a cowboy mentality. The mindless popular adulation of Navy SEALs in particular has had an adverse impact on civil-military relations, according to some observers. Perhaps we will always need door-kickers, but should they be able to overrule ambassadors in order to execute a cruel and asinine operation in a friendly country?

Who ultimately ordered the covert operation? The Reuters piece noted that Secretary Esper signed the directive to conduct the operation. The legality of his action rested on a provision in the 2019 defense authorization act permitting the military to conduct clandestine influence operations against other countries, including “outside of areas of active hostilities.

This only raises more questions. Were the defense and intelligence committees of Congress, then controlled on the House side by Democrats, duly notified? If so, did the notification simply state that a covert psychological operation was underway, or did it provide enough details to make it clear that it was based on lies that could endanger the population of a friendly country? What was the reaction in Congress?

Perhaps we will always need door-kickers like the Navy SEALs, but should they be able to overrule ambassadors in order to execute a cruel and asinine operation in a friendly country?

It seems unlikely that even as powerful a bureaucratic actor as the secretary of defense would order such a sensitive operation in defiance of the State Department without the guidance of those above him, or at least without their sign-off. The rules of Washington would normally impel a person at Esper’s level to seek cover for his actions. Accordingly, it is probable that he either notified the president directly or through the National Security Council of his order.

That president, of course, would have been DonaldTrump, who had already directed the CIA in 2019 to conduct covert psychological operations inside China. It’s hardly a stretch to speculate that he would have had no problem approving a covert Pentagon operation in the Philippines. It is one more reason why Trump and his appointees should never again be entrusted with public office. Will Congress ever investigate this misbegotten operation and finally nail down the chain of events?

How do we know the operation did not blow back on the United States? The military is prohibited by law from conducting propaganda campaigns in the United States. But given the instant global connectedness of the internet, how could the Pentagon be so sure that its black propaganda campaigns in other countries wouldn’t leak back to the American population? They were, after all, using Twitter and Facebook accounts. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


According to the Census Bureau, the Filipino population in the United States was 4.4 million in 2020, the third-largest Asian-American group. It is inconceivable that none of them would have had contact with friends and relatives in the Philippines who might have been gulled by the American disinformation. If their contacts made them vaccine-hesitant, that could easily have exacerbated the already epidemic anti-vaccine movement here. Given the disproportionate number of Filipino nurses working in the U.S. health care system, this could have had a measurable impact on public health. 

Why did it take so long to shut down the program? Shortly after Joe Biden’s inauguration, representatives from Facebook arranged a meeting with officials of the new administration to complain about the covert program, which contradicted the company’s policy against spreading vaccine disinformation. The officials were reportedly horrified, but again, there are loose ends to the Reuters story.

Why hadn’t the new administration learned about the program through Pentagon channels already, during the presidential transition? Why did it take until the spring of 2021 to order DOD to shut it down? And in spite of the order, why did the program linger through the summer? Was the Biden administration lax in its follow-up, or was the Pentagon out of control?

Over the decades, the U.S. military has conducted numerous programs of breathtaking stupidity: the above-ground nuclear tests of the 1950s that exposed draftees to atomic radiation, dumping thousands of tons of Agent Orange defoliant over Indochina during the 1960s, the toxic burn pits of the Iraq war. Civilian leadership in this country needs to shed its adolescent awe of martial derring-do and gain firm control over a very dangerous weapon.

“Pointing and laughing”: Democrats leaned in on “weird” and experts say it’s working

With Vice President Kamala Harris leading the charge, Democrats have rallied en masse around labeling former President Donald Trump and his running mate, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, as "weird" — a move that's appeared to have sent the Republican candidate and his allies scrambling for an adroit counter. 

Democrats have brandished the label in interviews and online, notes the Associated Press, highlighting Vance's comments on abortion and attacks on political leaders who don't have children. They've also used the "weird" attack to reframe concerns around right-wing policy ideas that threaten civil rights and other basic freedoms, such as book bans and anti-LGBTQ legislation.

As it grows in popularity — and goes viral on social media — the "weird" branding appears to have offered Democrats a hold over far-right Republicans that the party rarely saw when President Joe Biden led its ticket. The new attack line also reflects a departure from the rhetorical strategy of President Joe Biden's campaign, which experts told Salon could prove to be an effective change in bolstering Harris' bid for the presidency.

"I haven't seen a rhetorical strategy this good, effective and fun in a long time. This was really sharp," David Karpf, a professor of strategic political communication at George Washington University, told Salon. Much of that sharpness, he argued, can be attributed to the "intervening eight years" between Trump's 2015 political debut and now, when "all the normies have been driven out of the Republican party."

"When Democrats are now saying, 'These guys just sound a bit weird,' it's because they've all been talking to each other for long enough that if you're not part of the Republican cinematic universe, none of it makes any sense," Karpf said. "When you take a step back, their policy proposals are serious and dangerous, but they're also just so off-putting and ridiculous."

The "weird" strategy roll out began with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who's been characterizing far-right Republicans' behavior and proposals as such for months, during an appearance on MSNBC last month, in which he called Trump and Vance "just weird." Walz, a contender to be Harris' running mate, doubled down on the point during a subsequent CNN segment, noting Trump's repeated, odd references to Hannibal Lecter, the fictional serial killer from the film "Silence of the Lambs," in his rally speeches. 

Harris' campaign quickly adopted the rhetoric, first deploying it in a news release responding to a Trump's Fox News appearance last week, including in a list of takeaways on his performance: "Trump is old and quite weird?” In another instance, the campaign proclaimed that that “JD Vance is weird," citing his support for abortion bans, while in another a campaign spokesperson argued Vance had “spent all week making headlines for his out-of-touch, weird ideas.”

Other Democrats soon picked up the torch. Sens. Brian Schatz of Hawaii and Chris Murphy of Connecticut last week posted a video dubbing Vance's past remarks about restricting the political power of childless Americans "a super weird idea."

Harris later cemented the "weird" characterization as the Democratic attack line of the moment at her first fundraiser since becoming the likely Democratic nominee, noting Trump's "wild lies about my record and some of what he and his running mate are saying — it is just plain weird.”

“I mean that’s the box you put that in, right?” she told the Massachusetts crowd last Saturday.

We need your help to stay independent

The label's use has only erupted from there, with some Democrats even hurling the branding of "weird" at far-right policy at-large. Just Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., wielded the label against former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy after he bemoaned the tactic as "dumb" and "juvenile" on X, formerly Twitter.

"It’s an incel platform, dude. It’s SUPER weird. And people need to know," the congresswoman posted.

Jacob Neiheisel, a University at Buffalo professor of political science, told Salon that campaigns regularly try to brand the opposition by latching onto negative symbols or language and shaping it to their ends. Previous campaign efforts to brand opposing candidates as "weird" in some way have seemed to work in the past, he explained, pointing to the attack ad against then-Gov. Mike Dukakis, D-Mass., from then-Vice President George H. W. Bush during the 1988 election cycle that tanked the Democratic nominee's campaign as an example. The ad mocked Dukakis' appearance in a combat tank, making him an object of ridicule.

"That was probably effective for other reasons, but he looked ridiculous," Neiheisel said, noting that the imagery of "this diminutive guy in this massive helmet and this enormous tank" wasn't "a good look" for Dukakis. "Those kinds of things are associated with ads we think of as being particularly effective."

Democrats' current rhetorical strategy works so well because it focuses on style, Karpf argued. It positions the current far-right platform as "out of character with normal Americana" and at odds with more traditional, Reagan-era conservatism. In doing so, it paints policy ideas now popular on the right as strange deviations from American values.

"We have people coming around saying, 'Yeah, we need to end no fault divorce." Like what are you talking about, man?" Karpf said.

The emphasis on the absurdity of the current Republican platform strikes a marked contrast with  the more serious refrain of the Biden campaign, which sought to highlight the potential danger of the former president winning back the White House: Trump and his policies pose a "threat to democracy."

Neiheisel said he suspects that the Democratic Party found that mobilizing the electorate on an "abstract concept" didn't amount to the "home run that they hoped it would be" and shifted gears as a result. 

The reason for the failure of the "threat" framing to energize voters could be the "very different things" Americans mean when they indicate on surveys that "defense of democracy is a big issue," he argued. "You'll get some fairly high number of Republicans saying that they're concerned about democracy, but it's not the kinds of things that Democrats are concerned about."

Karpf added that, because of the length of the United States' election cycle, voters are left "stewing" on a serious message such as Biden's for months because they can't take any tangible actions until November. In the meantime, he said, alarming rhetoric from the former president — such as Trump's claim last week that, should he win, Christians won't have to vote again — become "normalized." 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


"So what 'weird' [by] focusing on style does is it allows the Democrats to talk about this in ways that are actually fun and shareable," Karpf said. "They are pointing and laughing at these people who want to do awful things and getting other people involved and saying, 'Yeah, that's off-putting. That doesn't sound like America at all.'"

That, Karpf continued,  "works real well because it's a good way to pass the time and also spread the message, as opposed to being the people who are pounding the table saying, 'Take Project 2025 seriously, and please keep taking it as seriously for another four months until we can finally vote."

Trump's allies have attempted to volley the attack back to Democrats and Harris, specifically. Over a video of Walz calling the former president and his running mate "weird," Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said on X, falsely, that the vice president and her supporters were "weird" themselves for "trying to gaslight everyone into thinking the shooting was staged," a reference to the attempt on Trump's life last month (Harris has never suggested the attempt was "staged").

Donald Trump Jr. did the same Monday on X, writing: "You know what’s really weird? Soft on crime politicians like Kamala allowing illegal aliens out of prison so they can violently assault Americans.”

But despite Trump's and his allies' efforts, Neiheisel said the reversal tactic hasn't yielded very convincing results.

"It's a little bit schoolyard in some ways," he said. "I don't know that that's necessarily a position of strength for them to be in. You don't really want to be forced in a position where you're adopting your opponent's agenda and you're using their same kinds of language and tactics." 

The Republican counters to Harris and Democrats' "weird" branding, he added, also feel "a little rushed" as though the party didn't anticipate Biden bowing out of the race like he did or have a great contingency plan in place for such an outcome. 

Karpf said the "weak" Republican response signals that they "haven't found their footing yet." 

"Republicans are still stumbling trying to find any sort of coherent response to it," he argued, noting that the back-and-forth, particularly between the presidential candidates, reminds him that Harris "is a prosecutor and Donald Trump doesn't do well with prosecutors." Democrats, he predicted, will continue to deploy the attack line until the GOP offers an "effective retort." 

"I don't think we're going to be hearing this for the next 97 days, but I think we're going to be focused on this for a while because they need to come up with a rejoinder," he said.

Dog whistling past Dixie: Republicans are in over their heads playing the Kamala Harris race card

Donald Trump just made it official, in case you had doubts: The GOP is the party of racism, whether reverse-spun, dog-whistled or broadcast without guise.

On Wednesday, in comments the White House called “repulsive,” Trump said of presumptive Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, “all of a sudden, she made a turn, and she became a Black person.” He made the comments in a room of Black journalists. 

Trump’s comments were of a kind with those Republicans made last week, repeatedly referring to Kamala Harris as a “DEI hire” – diversity, equity and inclusion – implying that she hadn’t earned her way to her position on merit. Try that on the millions of voters who elected her to four state and federal offices without a defeat.

The list of racist GOP hits on the vice president keeps growing. Monday, Lara Trump, the former president’s daughter-in-law whom he planted as co-chair of the Republican National Committee, said that the vice president is like a “trash bag” disguised as a women’s high-priced designer handbag.

Politico reported earlier this week that Rep. Mike Garcia, R-CA, had “harsh words” to describe Harris: “She’s not very intelligent, she’s not very well-spoken.” Calling Garcia’s words “harsh” misses the racial venom in Garcia’s words. He might as well have said she comes for “the inner city.”

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., warned his members last week that the racial dog whistle won’t hunt. It apparently won’t heel either.

The tipoff to the racism in Garcia’s statement is in how far removed it is from reality. Anybody who has watched Kamala Harris recently, or seen her cross-examine a witness as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, knows her skill with language. Check out this 2019 video clip of her reducing Bill Barr, the Attorney General of the United States under then-President Donald Trump, to a puddle as he “grappled” with  the meaning of the word “suggest!”

And let’s not forget her poise and authority in the 2020 vice-presidential debate when she reigned in Mike Pence: “I’m speaking, Mr. Vice President. If you let me finish, we can have a conversation.”

For any who don’t know, a “dog whistle” is “political shorthand for a phrase that may sound innocuous to some people,” but is in reality, “a covert appeal to some noxious set of views” – such as in racial bias. Because of historic inequality whose legacy persists, unconscious racism can slip out even in well-intentioned people. An example is paying an intended compliment which, in actuality, implies a slur on their ethnic group or race. 

One example is when someone expresses surprise that a Black American is articulate. Further along the same continuum is when one’s commanding speech actually provokes ire, confusion, and fragility in the listener who cannot reconcile reality with entrenched stereotype beliefs. 

Whether Garcia’s trolling results from implicit or explicit bias or racialized cognitive dissonance, the net effect is that he’s gone full MAGA. He accused her, in effect, of what’s known in other circles as being “inarticulate while Black.” 

We need your help to stay independent

As Yannick Marshall, an assistant professor of Africana Studies at Illinois’ Knox College put it:

If Man is seen as a speaking animal, then the further Black people are placed outside of good speech, the further they are dehumanized. . . If Man is a political animal . . .  then the “black” who is . . . incapable of good speech, is always external to politics and thus the law. 

Usually, dog whistles contain a patina of “plausible deniability” for hiding racial animus. In the infamous 1988 Willie Horton ad run against George H.W. Bush’s Democratic opponent Mike Dukakis, Bush’s backers defended it as not about race but rather about “law and order,” notwithstanding all the enhanced Black visuals of Horton, its featured criminal. 

Trump’s, his daughter-in-law’s and Garcia’s comments have no such cover.

It’s notable that being “inarticulate” does not seem to disqualify white politicians, as we know from the “misunderestimated” George W. Bush. He was famous for misspeaking. Yet he was culturally and politically regarded as a guy you’d just love to have a beer with. 

Kamala Harris did not get elected a district attorney, an attorney general, a senator, and a vice president by being inarticulate. Saying otherwise is all part of an orchestrated MAGA playing the race card to its base and anyone else who might be vulnerable to it. 

The Republicans may not know that very cool white dudes, like actors Jeff Bridges and Mark Ruffalo, are all in for a black woman for president. In fact, just Monday night, his “White dudes for Harris” Zoom raised $4 million from 200,000 participants. Like those actors, Garcia resides in Southern California, representing a “Biden district” – one that the president carried while Garcia beat his Democratic opponent.  Unlike those actors, however, Garcia is living in the past. This November, his district’s voters can send his House membership right back there with him.

An Indigenous tribe is regaining control of its ancestral lands while fighting climate change

The Yurok Tribe are one of the oldest existing communities in California. With a homeland stretching along northern coastal communities from Crescent City to Trinidad, there are estimated to be more than 6,000 Yurok alive in 2024. Yet despite living along the Klamath River for at least 10,000 years, the Yurok have in recent history had very little say over California's natural resources.

"Climate change is the only potential obstacle regarding the preservation of this land for future generations."

Then last year, the Klamath River Renewal Corporation (KRRC) announced that it would begin dismantling the Klamath Hydroelectric Project, which has blocked fish passage and changed the Klamath's river flows for over 100 years. Now additional steps are being taken to restore control of the region's natural resources to the local indigenous community.

In March, the Yurok Tribe signed an agreement with the National Park Service and California State Parks that constitutes a memorandum of understanding: An environmentalist nonprofit known as the Save the Redwoods League, which currently controls the 125-acre national park known as 'O Rea, will eventually transfer control back to the Yurok Tribe.

"Soon, the tribe will own the land," Yurok Tribal Heritage Preservation Officer Rosie Clayburn told Salon. "The tribe has already converted most the former mill site into a beautiful meadow filled with native grasses. In a few years, there will be no signs that the mill ever existed. The property is located roughly in the middle of Yurok ancestral territory."

The current owners of the land are also enthusiastic about this change.

"It is incredibly exciting news and we are proud to be a partner," Patrick Taylor, the Redwoods national and state parks interpretation and education program manager, told Salon. "However, an important technical point is that the agreement did not change the management of the national park. Rather, this is a commitment for partners to work together in continuing to restore a specific piece of land that will be transferred from Save the Redwoods League to the Yurok Tribe in about two years. We do additionally regularly partner on park operations and projects with the Yurok."

Yurok Fisheries Department Director Barry McCovey, a Yurok citizen who has studied the Klamath River for more than 20 years, told Salon that the lower four Klamath dams had "created the perfect conditions" for the toxic blue-green algae to proliferate.

"During the late summer and early fall, it can be unsafe to make contact with the Klamath due to the serious health risks associated with the algae," McCovey said. "The dams altered riverine habitat in a way that created the perfect breeding grounds for fish diseases. These pathogens can kill up to 90% of the juvenile salmon as they make their way to the sea. In time, dam removal will significantly reduce the amount of this disease in the river. The dams also considerably alter the river’s natural flow regime and disrupt the interconnected biological processes that sustain a healthy aquatic ecosystem. The removal of the dams will greatly resolve these issues, too."

In addition to helping the region ecologically, the transfer of control is also expected to assist economically.

"Many Yurok people had to work in the mill that operated on this parcel," Clayburn said. "At the time, there were hardly any jobs in this area. More than 90 percent of the Tribe’s land base was stolen, making it impossible to establish a tribal economy based on traditional values. Yurok people did not want work in the mill because of what it meant for the forest, but there were no other options. It was either work in the mill or starve."

Jessica Carter, the director of parks and public engagement at Save the Redwoods League, who works as tribal court director for the Yurok, told Salon that the partners working together to transfer control back to their tribe "have a clear and compelling shared vision for the ‘O Rew Redwoods Gateway, and our work over the next two years is intended to ensure sustainable conservation."

Carter added, "The partners will create the detailed framework for this new model of long-term co-management of tribal-owned land with federal and state agencies by finalizing the agreements and mechanisms for permanent conservation, public access, co-management and funding."


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"The Yurok Tribe aims to construct a visitor center highlighting the distinct history and living culture of the Tribe and the extraordinary natural, cultural and recreational resources of the parks."

The park's managers will also be mindful of climate change. As humans continue burning fossil fuels that pump greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, they overheat the planet and cause a myriad of environmental problems. 'O Rew Redwoods Gateway is no exception.

"Climate change is the only potential obstacle regarding the preservation of this land for future generations," Clayburn said. "However, the restoration project anticipates a warmer, drier future and aims to proactively prevent future impacts from climate change." 

To make the park more resilient to climate change, those involved in large-scale restoration have built off-channel ponds and large wood structures on the creek which "slow flows and enable water to fill underground aquifers faster in the winter. The cold water is naturally released back into the creek during the dry months," Clayburn said.

The Yurok have also been restoring native plants, handsowing 50,000 native trees, grasses and shrubs on the property.

"The Tribe will be planting even more native flora in the coming year," Clayburn explained. "At maturity, these plants will shade the creek and keep water temperatures down, not to mention sequester carbon from the atmosphere."

McCovey elaborated on the extent to which the Yurok community is directly invested in the success of these projects.

"With nearly 100 employees, the Yurok Fisheries Department alone employs more biologists than any other agency in California, aside from the state department of fish and wildlife," McCovey said. "The department conducts research, oversees salmon harvests, informs water policy decisions, monitors fish health and plans and implements river restoration projects. In 2021, the Tribe launched the Yurok Tribe Construction Corporation." The federal government works in collaboration with the KRRC to implement and analyze various large-scale projections in the region. "On the Klamath, a central component of Yurok culture, this work enables the tribe to play a major role in healing the river for future generations."

In addition to demonstrating that conservation can be maintained through equitable approaches between scientists and local communities, the new plan can also stimulate additional public interest in Yurok culture.

We need your help to stay independent

"After the transfer, the Yurok Tribe aims to construct a visitor center highlighting the distinct history and living culture of the Tribe and the extraordinary natural, cultural and recreational resources of the parks," Clayburn said. "The Yurok Tribe also plans to build a traditional village on-site, including plank houses and a sweat house."

Perhaps the most inspiring part of the story is that it has brought groups which historically have been at war — Indigenous communities being victimized by government agencies — together in a positive relationship.

"The healing of this land has brought together the Yurok Tribe, Save the Redwoods League, California Trout, numerous local restoration experts, and critical agency funding partners such as the California State Coastal Conservancy, California Wildlife Conservation Board, and NOAA Restoration Center so that we can address and mitigate some of the imminent climate threats," Carter said.

Philadelphia mayor’s tweet pushing Shapiro for VP sparks confusion

Philadelphia mayor Cherelle Parker sent Democrats on social media into a frenzy on Friday, after she endorsed Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro as the Democratic candidate for vice president.

Vice President Kamala Harris, who is set to announce her VP pick ahead of a Tuesday rally, reportedly hasn’t made a decision yet, though Shapiro appears in a list of six or so vetted nominees, including Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, and Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear.

But Parker’s tweet, plus a report from Philidelphia journalist Ernest Owens claiming the post “was scheduled for Monday,” were enough to convince many that Shapiro was locked in as VP. The post is still live as of Friday evening.

“I can’t think of a better partner than our governor,” the mayor says in the clip, leading some to believe Shapiro had been picked to join the ticket.

The tweet, which came at around the same time as Harris was meeting with transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg as part of the selection process, was “not an announcement of anything,” per a source who told the Philadelphia Inquirer that Parker was simply showing support for Shapiro.

The Pennsylvania governor may be an ideal candidate to sway Rust Belt voters, but he isn’t without his baggage. Shapiro’s sharp criticism of pro-Palestinian campus demonstrations and defense of charter schools may be alienating to young progressive voters, a group Harris reinvigorated after Biden left the race.

Harris, who officially became the Democratic presidential nominee after a virtual vote on Friday, is expected to finalize her pick over the weekend, a decision the campaign hopes will maintain the enthusiasm streak that’s propelled Harris’ campaign since President Joe Biden left the race last month.

“Eyeing those new couches”: JD Vance’s TikTok debut isn’t going well, thanks to trolls

JD Vance may have made an unfortunate gaffe in his first post on TikTok, promoting an appearance on the “Nelk Boys” podcast in a room with several white couches, nudging trolls to remind viewers of the bizarre furniture-amorous memes that have become viral in recent weeks. 

A claim about Donald Trump’s running mate and purported sexual relations with a couch was quickly debunked (though the Associated Press pulled their fact check.) Still, the rumor’s legacy will seemingly continue to haunt the VP nominee.

The Thursday video, the first under Vance’s verified account, garnered thousands of comments in its first day, with a majority referring to his "couch-f***er energy," as John Oliver put it.

“JD Vance just eyeing those new couches,” the top comment on the post reads, while others drew attention to the Senator’s “never-Trump” past.

Other couch-related remarks, netting hundreds of likes, included: “Letting him near a couch is insane work,” and “No couch is safe with JD around.”

Vance, who already raised eyebrows when he joked at a rally that his wife would make him sleep on the couch, has spent many of his early stumps pressing back on the Harris campaign’s allegation that he and Trump are “weird.”

Though the comments underscore the aura of “weirdness” that has plagued Vance for the first three weeks or so of his candidacy, a glimpse into the nominee’s metrics fall in line with his historic unpopularity.  

Vance’s first post earned less than 120,000 likes more than 24 hours after it was posted, eclipsed in the same timeframe by a post from Harris' campaign account, “Kamala HQ,” trolling Vance’s most cringe-worthy moments and garnering over 150,000 likes.

The candidate drew in just under 70,000 followers in his first 24 hours, a far cry from Harris’ explosive 1.6 million followers in her first 16 hours, and Trump’s 3 million on his first day on the platform.

“Comics for Kamala” event organized amid weeks of record-breaking Zooms

Comedians including Cecily Strong, Patton Oswalt and Ben Stiller will rally for Vice President and Democratic Presidential nominee Kamala Harris on a Monday Zoom meeting, the latest in a string of massive digital fundraising events that have profoundly shaped the race.

Jon Hamm, Jason Bateman, Tom Arnold and Kathy Griffin have also confirmed their attendance for the August 5th "Comics for Kamala" virtual rally, set for 8 p.m. EST, per a post on Arnold’s Instagram account.

According to Deadline, the call was organized by California Rep. Eric Swalwell, who reached out to standups to raise cash and boost organizing efforts for the Harris campaign.

“President Biden so graciously stepping aside and passing the torch has just energized so many people,” Swalwell told Deadline, adding that Vice President Harris “likes to have fun, and part of who she is is her great laugh.”

That laugh, which is immortalized in the viral “coconut tree” meme, has become the subject of negative attacks from the right, who brand Harris’ chipper demeanor as a liability, with Trump boldly dubbing her “LAFFIN’ KAMALA.”

The Zoom call is the latest in a series of Harris fundraisers on the platform, including a 44,000-strong “Black women for Harris” call last month, a “White Dudes for Harris” meeting that raised $4 million, and a record-breaking “White women for Harris” call, which boasted over 100,000 participants.

The Harris campaign, which shattered Trump’s July fundraising numbers and pulled in over $300 million, is off to an unprecedented start, flipping polls by more than five digits in the three weeks since Harris presumed the top of the ticket.

The comics will join amongst celebrity endorsements from rappers Quavo and Megan Thee Stallion, who joined Harris on stage at her largest rally yet in Atlanta earlier this week, as the Trump campaign managed to pull rousing endorsements from C-listers including Amber Rose and Kid Rock at the Republican National Convention.

Molly Kearney, first nonbinary cast member, bows out of “Saturday Night Live”

Comedian Molly Kearney announced their departure from “Saturday Night Live,” ahead of the show’s 50th season, in a Friday Instagram post.

“That’s a wrap on my time on SNL! Reflecting on the amazing 2 seasons I got on this show, it was such a dream come true,” Kearney, who joined Studio 8H during season 48 in 2022, wrote. “So incredibly grateful for this period in my life.”

Kearney, the first nonbinary member of the show’s cast, shouted out comics Marcello Hernandez, Devon Walker, and Michael Longfellow, who each joined the show in its 48th season.

“My brother for life,” Hernandez commented on the post, while Longfellow added, “Love you for life my dawg.”

The comic spoofed celebs like Kevin James and Guy Fieri as a featured player, also using the “SNL” stump to raise awareness for a slate of anti-LGBTQ legislation around the country, during an April 2023 “Weekend Update” segment.

Kearney, who previously appeared on Amazon’s “A League of Their Own,” joins a long list of “SNL” alumni as the show preps for its 50th season, set to begin in September, paired with a planned 50th Anniversary celebration next year. Kearney hasn't yet shared their reason for bowing out of the show.

Kearney’s departure announcement comes just a day after fellow cast member Punkie Johnson announced her exit from the show at a comedy show in Brooklyn, in an announcement that, like Kearney’s, came much earlier than the typical cast shake-up notices from NBC.

Hunter Biden to be sentenced shortly after Election Day

Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, will be sentenced on November 13 — just days after the presidential election — for lying on a gun application and for illegally possessing a firearm.

U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika wrote in a Friday order that sentencing would be set for November, as Biden faces a September trial in California on tax-related charges.

Biden was convicted by a Delaware jury in June after less than 24 hours of deliberation, despite some jurors’ suggestions that the prosecution was unnecessary.  

The June trial came days after former President Donald Trump earned a guilty verdict for falsifying business records to influence the 2016 election, a ruling that is under siege after a Supreme Court ruling granted Trump immunity for some actions he took as president.  

Biden, who has demonstrated remorse for the period of his life in which he was addicted to drugs, has been the subject of a GOP-led House Oversight Committee investigation and a Republican-requested, wide-reaching special counsel investigation since 2023.

Still pending is a motion for dismissal, citing Trump Mar-A-Lago documents case judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling that the use of Special Counsels, such as that in Biden’s case, was not permitted by the Constitution.

President Biden, who promised on the campaign trail not to pardon his son, has yet to waiver in those plans, in the wake of his decision not to run for re-election. 

“This is not a man fighting a woman”: Olympics boxing controversy ignites conservative culture war

Another controversy has engulfed the 2024 Paris Olympics but this time it involves gender and boxing.

False allegations have been swirling around conservative media outlets and online spaces that Algerian boxer Imane Khelif is a transgender woman in the women's competition. Right-wing conservative figures like Donald Trump, Elon Musk, J.K. Rowling and many others have openly perpetuated this conspiracy theory online.

The controversy began when the fight between Italian boxer Angela Carini and Khelif swiftly ended after a mere 46 seconds on Thursday. Carini broke out in tears and left the ring, withdrawing from the match. After the match, she told reporters, “I was told a lot of times that I was a warrior but I preferred to stop for my health. I have never felt a punch like this,” The Hollywood Reporter reported.

Carini has since publically apologized to Khelif in an interview with an Italian newspaper, Gazzetta dello Sport. She said, "I'm sorry for my opponent, too. If the [The International Olympic Committee] said she can fight, I respect that decision," The BBC reported.

About dropping out of the match, she said, "It wasn't something I intended to do. Actually, I want to apologize to her and everyone else. I was angry because my Olympics had gone up in smoke. I don’t have anything against Khelif. Actually, if I were to meet her again I would embrace her."

However, Carini's withdrawal has ignited a gender-centered culture war. Her opponent, Khelif, is one of two boxers allowed to compete in Paris after being disqualified from the women’s world championships in 2023 for failing testosterone and gender eligibility tests. The IOC called the decision to bar Khelif and another boxer from the championship as a “sudden and arbitrary decision," USA Today reported

Khelif was raised as and identifies as a woman and is not transgender nor intersex. According to the IOC, Khelif has a difference in sexual development (DSD), which is not the same as being transgender. This can mean that some people who develop as a woman can also have XY chromosomes. Despite women with DSD currently being allowed to compete in women's sports at the Olympics, that has not stopped conservative media from misgendering Khelif.

Musk has posted multiple times on X about the match between the women. He argued, "Men don’t belong in women’s sports."

In a series of tweets, Rowling also misgendered Khelif. The author posted a picture of the two women, stating, "Could any picture sum up our new men’s rights movement better? The smirk of a male who’s knows he’s protected by a misogynist sporting establishment enjoying the distress of a woman he’s just punched in the head, and whose life’s ambition he’s just shattered."

In another post, Rowling said, “A young female boxer has just had everything she’s worked and trained for snatched away because [the IOC] allowed a male to get in the ring with her."

Trump has also posted on Truth Social,  "I will keep men out of women’s sports!” The Republican presidential nominee once said on “The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show,” that “what gets the biggest applause” at his rallies is saying, “We will not allow men to play in women’s sports,” Rolling Stone reported.

Despite the misgendering of Khelif, the IOC issued a statement defending her and the other disqualified boxer, Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting. “The IOC is saddened by the abuse that the two athletes are currently receiving. Every person has the right to practice sport without discrimination,” it read. "We obviously condemn the harassment of which [Khelif] is a victim. Hate, denigration and insults are the opposite of the values we defend."

The IOC's spokesperson Mark Adams also urged people on Friday to be more mindful about discussing Khelif and Lin. “What I would urge is that we try to take the culture war out of this and actually address the issues and think about the individuals and the people concerned. Real damage is being done by misinformation.”

Marks reiterated, “The Algerian boxer was born a female, was registered a female, lived her life as a female, boxed as a female, has a female passport. This is not a transgender case. There has been some confusion that somehow it’s a man fighting a woman. This is just not the case, scientifically on that, there is consensus. Scientifically, this is not a man fighting a woman. And I think we need to kind of get that out.”

Also, Adams clarified that gender eligibility is an unsatisfactory system, dubbing it as a "minefield." He continued, "There are many women with higher [testosterone] levels than men so the idea that a testosterone test is some kind of magic bullet is not true." 

 

Trump’s election interference case returns to DC judge following Supreme Court immunity ruling

Following its controversial immunity ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday sent Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 election interference case back to a federal judge in Washington, DC, The Washington Post reported. U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan will now decide how much of the case can survive the high court's new "immunity" test, which grants presidents immunity for "official acts."

In a 6-3  decision last month split along ideological lines, the Supreme Court's right-wing majority ruled that Trump and other presidents are absolutely immune from prosecution when carrying out their official duties. But they did carve out narrow exceptions for private acts by certain official acts that can be taken to trial, while leaving it up to lower courts to figure out what that means.

Former federal prosecutor and George Washington University law professor Randal Eliason told the Post that some of the urgency to act on the election obstruction case has been reduced in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision, even as some hope the special prosecutor Jack Smith will be given an opportunity to present the evidence he's gathered before November.

“There’s no point in haste now, because there’s no way to do the trial now before the election,” Eliason said. Should the GOP presidential nominee return to the White House, his Justice Department will almost certainly drop the case at his demand. If Trump loses the election, however, “there will be plenty of time to do a trial next year and get all the issues right,” the law professor said.

Whatever Judge Chutkan decides is also subject to appeal, meaning the Supreme Court could again step in to put a stop to any prosecution if its six conservative justices decide their immunity ruling is not being respected.

“This essentially means Chutkan now will now have the first crack at figuring out (1) what the decision means and (2) how it impacts Jack Smith's case against Trump,” legal analyst and Chris Geidner, editor of Law Dork, wrote on Threads. "[T]his will be messy for a while.”

Italian Olympic boxer apologizes as “transvestigation” against opponent spreads

Italian Olympic boxer Angela Carini is standing with Algerian opponent Imane Khelif, a cisgender woman who faced a barrage of attacks from far-right “transvestigators” online.

Carini took to Italian newspaper Gazzetta dello Sport to issue an apology to Khelif, who defeated her in a 46-second match on Thursday, inciting attacks on the boxer who once failed a now-discredited “gender test” conducted by the International Boxing Association.

Carini, who initially refused to shake hands with Khelif, said she didn’t intend to disrespect the athlete.

“I want to apologize to her and everyone else. I was angry because my Olympics had gone up in smoke,” she reportedly said, adding that she didn’t agree with the transphobic discourse launched by the defeat. "I'm sorry for my opponent, too. If the IOC said she can fight, I respect that decision."

While former President Donald Trump, VP nominee JD Vance, author JK Rowling, and the rest of the far-right transphobic internet swarm pushed unsubstantiated claims against Khelif, the IOC and others quickly quashed rumors that Khelif, who was born as a woman, was transgender.

Critics of the anti-trans movement, including left-wing commentator Hasan Piker, say the incident is emblematic of the extremes that transphobic rhetoric leads to, posing threats of violence even for cisgender women.

“Transphobia is a legitimate brain disease that eventually causes people to suspect EVERYONE of being trans,” Piker wrote in a post to X. “This harms trans women AND ciswomen.”

Elon Musk’s PAC is misdirecting and scraping data from unknowing swing-state voters

A PAC to which Elon Musk once pledged $45 million a month to boost Donald Trump’s re-election bid is engaging in questionable data-scraping practices, a report says.

Per CNBC, Musk’s America PAC is running vivid ads featuring an assassination attempt on Trump promoting voter registration resources, but directing swing-state voters through separate forms, which collect extensive personal data and opt registrants into messaging from the group.

Salon confirmed that zip codes entered on a voter registration section on America PAC’s website in key swing states, including Arizona and Pennsylvania, brought users to a separate form from users who inputted zip codes in states like New York or Texas, who are linked directly to states’ voter registration sites.

Swing-state voters, who are prompted to hand over their age, address, phone number, and other sensitive data to the Tesla CEO’s organization, weren’t given similar links to voter registration sites as non-swing-state voters.

The report comes as the far-right billionaire’s influence in the 2024 race increasingly worries watchdogs, who point to the massive sums of money tossed around by Musk in addition to the dangerous, conspiracy-laden rhetoric he amplifies online.

Musk recently shared an undisclosed deepfake video of Vice President Kamala Harris on the X platform, which he purchased to protect conservative speech online. The video, which featured a fake Harris labeling herself as a “diversity hire,” was condemned by the Harris campaign for the false and racist content.

The executive, who is reportedly being considered for a role in the Trump administration, is also leveraging the X platform to push Trump, including suspending pro-Harris fundraising accounts and pushing the Trump-Vance ticket in undisclosed advertisements.

The efforts mirror Trump campaign-affiliated Cambridge Analytica’s 2016 efforts to scrape data from tens of millions of Facebook users in an effort to manipulate voters, a scandal that cost Facebook owner Meta $725 million in a class-action payout.

“United as one party”: Harris locks up Democratic nomination, securing a majority of DNC delegates

Vice President Kamala Harris has won enough support from Democratic delegates to formally secure her party's nomination for president, Democratic National Committee Chairman Jaime Harrison announced Friday, CNN reported

“I will officially accept your nomination next week, once the virtual voting process is closed, but I’m happy to know we have enough delegates to secure the nomination,” Harris said on a call with supporters on Friday, where the news was first announced, NBC News reported. Harris’s campaign sats that she has already secured more than the 2,350 votes required to lock up the presidential nomination.

“Later this month, we will gather in Chicago, united as one party, where we’re going to have an opportunity to celebrate this historic moment together,” Harris added, according to The New York Times.

The official DNC announcement of the results won’t come until Monday evening, the final day of the process for delegates, who began casting their virtual ballots for the nomination on Thursday. At that point Harris will be the party's official nominee.

Harris, who was the only candidate to gather the 300 delegate signatures necessary to qualify, is the sole name on the ballot. Delegates will not be able to change votes they cast in the virtual process, the party planning instead to hold a “ceremonial and confirmatory” roll vote in person at the DNC.

Justin Timberlake loses license after DWI not guilty plea

Justin Timberlake pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor driving under the influence on Friday, but the hearing did not play out in his favor.

Hamptons-area judge, Carl Irace, suspended the two-time Super Bowl performer’s license due to the singer's refusal to take a breathalyzer test during his arrest.

The “SexyBack” singer’s lawyer, Edward Burke Jr., denied the charges against Timberlake, who was arrested in Sag Harbor, New York in June, a moment which ascended to virality.

“I’ll say it again: Justin Timberlake was not intoxicated and we’re very confident that charge, that criminal charge, will be dismissed,” Burke, who was warned with the threat of a gag order by Judge Irace for “irresponsible” public comments, said, according to Variety.

“It comes off as an attempt to poison the case before it even begins,” Irace reportedly said of Burke’s comments to reporters outside the courthouse, after a hearing last week.

Timberlake, who joked about the arrest in a June concert, was present virtually during the hearing, as he's currently in Europe on tour. But he could be expected to appear at a September hearing, Dateline reported.

Per Burke, the singer will lose access to his license until the case comes to an end, with a trial potentially causing complications for the singer’s packed touring schedule, set to sweep across Europe and North America through December. 

Timberlake, who reportedly told his arresting officer, “This is going to ruin the tour,"  has yet to postpone or cancel any dates.

“I love my Black job”: Simone Biles takes a dig at Donald Trump after she wins gold again

Simone Biles just earned another gold medal and she had this to say about it: "I love my Black job."

The six-time gold medalist is the most decorated gymnast of all time and showed that with her all-around final win on Thursday. 

After her win, singer Ricky Davila tweeted a photo of the gymnast holding up the silver goat charm on her necklace in one hand and her new gold medal in another. The tweet said, "Simone Biles being the GOAT, winning Gold medals and dominating gymnastics is her Black job."

Biles responded to the post, "I love my Black job" with a Black heart emoji. 

The reference to a "Black job" is from Donald Trump's first debate of the year against President Joe Biden in June. Trump stated that immigrants are "taking Black jobs now and it could be 18, it could be 19 and even 20 million people," NBC News reported.

He continued, "They’re taking Black jobs, and they’re taking Hispanic jobs, and you haven’t seen it yet, but you’re going to see something that’s going to be the worst in our history."

Following the debate, Black people online explained their version of Black jobs, creating a viral moment in Black online spaces on X and TikTok.

During the National Association of Black Journalists conference on Thursday, Trump was asked to clarify what he meant by Black jobs. "A Black job is anybody that has a job. That's what it is," Trump babbled, according to Salon's senior critic Melanie McFarland.

 

 

Cancer rates are on the rise for younger generations — and obesity may be a big reason why

Cancer rates are on the rise for younger generations, as a recent study in the journal Lancet Public Health demonstrates. For Generation X and Millennials, the rates for 17 different types of cancers have increased dramatically, with many cases linked to the rise in obesity rates.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) analyzed information from nearly 24 million patients diagnosed with 34 types of cancer (with over 7 million fatal cases) between Jan. 1, 2000 and Dec. 31, 2019. Within that cohort, the ACS discovered that the incidence rates have skyrocketed for 17 of the 34 types of cancers among two specific demographics: Generation X and Millennials. Notably, these include cancers that are linked to obesity including "colorectum, uterine corpus, gallbladder and other biliary, kidney and renal pelvis, and pancreas" cancers.

That said, the authors only hint at obesity as being a culprit of the cancer rate spike, arguing that "the rising cancer incidence for many cancer types in successively younger generations suggests increases in the prevalence of carcinogenic exposures during early life or young adulthood, which have yet to be elucidated." They advocated intervention strategies "that align with the social and cultural context, values, and preferences of the young generations."

Outside experts, however, believe that this data points to the obesity epidemic as a likely culprit. Among other things, free fatty acids — which are more likely to be present at high quantities in the blood of people with obesity — are associated with cancers and other diseases, like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

“When someone is obese, a lot of things change in the body, including chronic inflammation that leads to years and years worth of damage to cells and tissues in the body, which can lead to cancer,” Timothy Rebbeck, professor of cancer prevention at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, told Yahoo Life.

"Without effective population-level interventions, the maturation of younger generations could lead to an overall increase in cancer burden in the future, halting or reversing decades of progress against cancer," the study authors warn.

“Deadpool & Wolverine” shows how the Marvelization of movie storytelling loses the plot

Last weekend I joined millions of people worldwide in helping “Deadpool & Wolverine” set records for the sixth-biggest film opening of all time. When my husband and our friends decided to make an outing of it, we didn’t see it in those terms.

We simply wanted to hang out, enjoy some laughs and take it in before social media and our news feed spoiled the surprises. And Ryan Reynolds’ fan service vehicle did not disappoint. Chock full of chuckles, the movie unites Reynolds’ Deadpool with his one-time "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" co-star Hugh Jackman to revive the clawed cigar aficionado, last seen in 2017’s “Logan,” the film that was meant to close the “Wolverine” trilogy.

“Deadpool & Wolverine” also pulls in threads from other “Avengers”-adjacent titles in the MCU, including the mostly forgettable “Fantastic Four” movies and TV's “Loki.” There’s a throwaway line from the villain that’s probably a tip of the hat to “She-Hulk,” fourth-wall-breaking jokes about Marvel heroes, and DC heroes, and a wink at Reynolds’ run of mediocre romantic comedies in the aughts.

You'll notice that I’ve said nothing about whether the tale or visuals are remarkable. Anyone who sits through the end credits of a franchise movie and gawks at screens filled with hundreds of names of special effects and visual effects crew knows most of the is digitally animated. That all but renders that second discussion pointless.

Like those visuals, the story’s engineering is extensive. “Deadpool & Wolverine” credits five writers, including Reynolds and director Shawn Levy, who have a knack for making the audience feel smart in the MCU definition of that term.

Acts are held together by a long chain of references to other superhero titles and real-world actors, their careers and gossip about their romantic lives. Knowing which studio owns the rights to each character’s cameo and which timelines are crossing is essential to appreciating the cleverness in its execution. It’s an easter egg hunt where the eggs litter an open field.

Beyond this, there isn’t much of an emotional point aside from Deadpool figuring out what it means to matter. For a film that delights in the moment but leaves little to nothing of a mark on the heart after you leave the theater that's . . . also kind of funny.

Should we expect a superhero movie to move us? Some did, once upon a time. Christopher Nolan’s “Batman” entries are a balanced mixture of atmosphere, performance and character depth that made the audience ache at the hero’s failings. It is not a coincidence Nolan is one of the few auteurs who can still get a major studio to produce, promote and release his movies which are decidedly not about men who fly or punch through buildings.

If he hadn’t proven himself in that arena, would he have gotten to make “Oppenheimer,” a major studio release with a specific, stimulating vision? On the flip side, would “Barbie” have gratified audiences as much as it did if the script hadn’t been conceived and evolved by Greta Gerwig and her partner Noah Baumbach, a pair of  independent filmmakers?

Franchise mania has taken the blame for the decline of indie cinema and general originality, which isn’t unfounded. Out of the top 20 highest-earning movies of 2024 domestically, only three are not a sequel, an extension of an existing title or character, a la “The Garfield Movie” and “The Fall Guy” or a biopic. (Those three are “Civil War,” “IF” and “Migration.”)

An entire generation has never known a time without the MCU and its reliable narrative architecture.

Household economics play a role. Movies are no longer the relatively inexpensive outings, making known properties surer bets for studios wagering on moviegoers gravitating toward the recognizable. With 34 MCU films released over 16 years, it’s the most reliable brand around next to “Spider-Man” and “Star Wars.”

As demand for these movies exploded, their plots stagnated. Neither Deadpool nor Wolverine can be killed, which is the reason “Logan” was such a creative swing.

Audience demand made it inevitable that these two would return. Reuniting them is simply fun and simple math. But to quote one of cinema’s greatest auteurs, these details remove all sense of revelation, mystery or genuine emotional danger, replacing them with cameos to set up the next title or “phase.” 

“The pictures are made to satisfy a specific set of demands, and they are designed as variations on a finite number of themes,” Martin Scorsese wrote in a 2019 New York Times op-ed. “They are sequels in name but they are remakes in spirit, and everything in them is officially sanctioned because it can’t really be any other way.”

He continued, “That’s the nature of modern film franchises: market-researched, audience-tested, vetted, modified, revetted and remodified until they’re ready for consumption.”

We need your help to stay independent

There may be no better proof of that than the MCU’s current runaway success – for now. Bigger news arrived last weekend at Comic-Con in San Diego, where Marvel revealed the studio’s redirection from the Kang the Conqueror chapters – tossed after Jonathan Majors’ conviction on reckless assault in the third degree and harassment late last year.

Robert Downey Jr.Robert Downey Jr. speaks onstage at the Marvel Studios Panel during 2024 Comic-Con International at San Diego Convention Center on July 27, 2024 in San Diego, California. (Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images)Its plan to take the Avengers into the future revolves around the resurrection of supervillain Doctor Doom — now played by Robert Downey Jr., whose portrayal of Tony Stark, aka Iron Man, led the “Avengers” films. Stark’s death in “Avengers: Endgame” was meant to end an era. Shifting his far to another character doesn’t feel like a refresh, but we’ll have to see: he’ll re-debut in 2026’s “Avengers: Doomsday” and return in 2027’s “Avengers: Secret Wars.”

I am a cinephile who loves devouring Turner Classic Movies on a rainy day. I am a Marvel fan, too. I am also a “Star Wars” fan and enjoy James Gunn’s interpretation of the DCU. And five years after Scorsese angered comic book movie true believers with his stand against the MCU and other IP-driven movies and TV series, I find myself agreeing with him more than ever.

Movies and TV are dominated by genre storytelling held together by formulaic writing that forgoes character development, mood setting and creative plotting. This has long been my problem with “House of the Dragon” – what is “Game of Thrones” if not the TV version of the MCU?

Like most comic book movies, the writers seem only obliged to ensure certain characters appear, operating on the assumption that audiences can refer to the source material or phone a friend who knows.

At least “Deadpool & Wolverine” is self-aware derivative cinema, effectively marketed over a period lasting almost two years. The return for that is impressive to put it mildly, earning more than $550 million worldwide in less than a week after its release, Variety reports. While it’s being praised for reviving both the MCU and a summertime box office that’s grown dependent on Marvel’s releases, you’ll have to forgive me for wondering if that hype is a bit premature.

Numbers don’t lie, and in an industry spooked by diminishing financial returns as streaming continues to upend conventional models, the numbers drive more decision-making than imagination.

“House of the Dragon” has spent two seasons maneuvering characters into place to ride said dragons without weaving emotional stakes or true individuality into their fabric. Such an estimation makes the Targaryen name the beast of burden hauling most of the narrative, which has so far amounted to half-empty crates.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


But what do I know? George R.R. Martin’s “Thrones” prequel is a huge hit for HBO and Warner Bros. Discovery’s streaming service Max. The Marvel Cinematic Universe is the highest-grossing movie franchise of all time, grossing nearly $30 billion worldwide.

My complaints may be mine alone, but I don’t think so. After all, we’ve all seen evidence of Marvel’s willingness to innovate. The success of “Deadpool & Wolverine” comes after a string of movies that struck out at the box office and low-performing TV series, some of which were perfectly entertaining and deserved more attention.

WandaVision,” the MCU’s first foray into episodic content on Disney+, reached beyond the standard “save the planet” digital violence to explore the weirdness of grief and magical thinking. “Ms. Marvel” used its namesake hero’s origin story and adolescence to merge her teenage dreams with social media-inspired graphics and animation.

Regardless, some have theorized the issue is a matter of bloat, with Disney pushing for quantity of releases instead of holding out for quality.

But let’s not discount the impact 16 years of these movies dominating our cultural dialogue has had in recalibrating our definition of what movies can be. The target theatrical audience ranges between 14 to 34 years old.

That means an entire generation has never known a time without the MCU and its reliable narrative architecture, with its wash, rinse, repeat of clever rejoinders, conflict resolution through fist fights and celebrity cameos. It’s the stuff of popcorn binging and soda gulping, a classic summertime treat. I wouldn’t want a “Deadpool” movie to be otherwise. But I also want more from future efforts. A story with some weight and thought that it would be a good place to restart.

"Deadpool & Wolverine" is playing in theaters worldwide.

“The walls are closing in”: States under strain as Iowa abortion ban goes into effect

This week, Iowa’s “detectable fetal heartbeat” law went into effect. Previously, Iowa permitted abortions until 22 weeks of pregnancy, although there were still barriers to accessing care. Now, abortions are illegal once fetal cardiac activity has been detected on an ultrasound — usually between six to eight weeks of pregnancy, frequently before many people know they are pregnant. 

While the law technically has exceptions for rape, incest, life of the mother and fatal fetal anomalies, they have been vaguely written and will to be difficult to implement, experts caution. For example, in the rape exception, survivors must adhere to specific rules for reporting the attack, like having exactly 45 days to report the attack to police or a doctor. As the Des Moines Register explains, the fatal fetal anomaly exception permits abortion when a fetal abnormality “is incompatible with life,” which is vague. 

Iowa’s new law was expected, but the fallout comes as access to abortion care continues to tighten across the country in a darkening post-Roe landscape. This means the effects won’t only impact Iowans, but people across the country. Isaac Maddow-Zimet, a data scientist at Guttmacher Institute, told Salon in general that as more states pass six-week bans, it leads to an increase in travel across state lines. In 2023, Guttmacher Institute estimated that around 171,000 people traveled to access abortion care, which is more than double the number who traveled across state lines in 2019 or 2020.

“Any ban in one state has impacts on many others, because many folks are often looking to see where they can get care in neighboring states,” Maddow-Zimet said. “Often they're traveling, sometimes from very far distances to access that care, and that care often comes with a lot of costs.”

Such costs can be financial, but also put strain on patients via upticks in wait times and appointment availability. 

"With what’s happening in the Midwest, it's almost like the walls are closing in."

When Florida’s six-week abortion went into effect, it created almost a “wall in the south," according to Serra Sippel, interim executive director of The Brigid Alliance, an organization that helps facilitate abortion travel and logistical support for people who are 15 weeks pregnant or more. Sippel told Salon that since the Florida ban, the Brigid Alliance has helped more than 56 people travel out of the state for abortion care, with the average itinerary costing $2,842. It’s estimated that only one in three Americans can comfortably cover a $400 emergency expense.

“With what’s happening in the Midwest, it's almost like the walls are closing in,” Sippel said. “There is not enough support and help out there, abortion funds are strained in terms of resources, and not having enough resources.” 

Lyz Lenz, board co-chair of the Iowa Abortion Access Fund, told Salon the abortion fund had long been preparing for the detectable heartbeat bill to go into effect. She emphasized the fund is operating and available to help Iowans seeking access to abortion care. It partnered with the Chicago Abortion Fund (CAF), a non-profit organization that provides medical referrals and funds to people who are facing barriers to access abortion services, to better connect patients with clinics and providers. However, like other abortion funds across the country, money is tight. 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


“We’re just trying to tell Iowans who we are, that we're still here, that we're still operating and then fundraising to meet that need,” Lenz said. “It's also important for people to know that this has ripple effects, that this is going to affect every single Iowan no matter what.” 

Chelsea Souder, the co-owner of Hope Clinic in Granite City, Illinois, said while they are expecting a surge in patients from Iowa shortly, the clinic has already seen one over the last year from Iowa. 

“We already saw in 2024 about a 400 percent increase in patients from Iowa, and that was before this ban took effect,” Souder said. “I think that's for a lot of reasons, there's a lot of confusion, many states around Iowa have also lost access, and Iowa had access, but it also a lot of hurdles for people to jump through to be able to get that access, like multi-day appointments.” 

On average, Souder said, a patient travels to Hope Clinic at least 225 miles one way. 

"Any time there is a new ban, no matter where it is, it sends the whole kind of system out of whack."

“If you're coming to Hope Clinic from even the far east side of Iowa, that's at least a three-and-a-half hour drive,” Souder said. “We've already seen sort of the ripple effect happen with Iowans, and I think we'll definitely see a larger increase now since Monday.”

The effects of Iowa’s ban will especially be felt in its neighbor, Illinois. Since Dobbs overturned Roe, Illinois has already seen an influx in patients from the south. Data from the Society of Family Planning #WeCount found that after Dobbs, Illinois saw the biggest increase in out-of-state abortions. Florida, a state that now also has a six-week ban, saw the second biggest increase. The bordering states of Florida, Alabama and Georgia, also face near-total bans. California saw the third biggest increase in out-of-state abortions.

“Any time there is a new ban, no matter where it is, it sends the whole kind of system out of whack,” Megan Jeyifo, executive director of Chicago Abortion Fund told Salon. “We are no longer seeing a regional implication of a ban, but it pretty quickly has national implications as the service area for getting an abortion shrinks.” 

That’s because, Jeyifo elaborated, every state that has a ban or gestational limit was not just serving their own community, but also a community from another state. 

We need your help to stay independent

“We would routinely support people going from Nebraska to Iowa," Jeyifo said. “So it’s not just Iowans who are losing access, but people around the Midwest, that may have been depending on Iowa, will also lose that access."

Illinois has built a robust infrastructure to handle the surge, and its state legislature is supportive. Most recently, Democratic Governor J.B. Pritzker signed the Birth Equity Act, a legislation aimed to ensure reproductive health care access, including abortion care, across the state. As part of the act, Illinois-based health insurance must cover abortion care without extra costs like co-pays or deductibles. Still, many in the abortion fund space wonder how much more Illinois can handle. 

“We’ve had a 165% increase in callers from Iowa in the first three weeks of July, when abortion was still legal, and so that was just a response to the chaos, misinformation and fear,” Jeyifo said. “I do remain optimistic about our state and optimistic about what our state can teach other receiving states, but Illinois cannot carry the entire country or the entire Deep South, or even the entire Midwest.”