Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“There was no kidnapping”: Charges dropped against “Sound of Freedom” investor Fabian Marta

The accessory to kidnapping charges against Fabian Marta, 51, an investor in the summertime box office hit "Sound of Freedom," have been dropped.

"There was no kidnapping," Christine Bertelson, a public information officer for the Missouri Circuit Court, told USA Today.

Bertelson attributed the charges to a "misunderstanding" between relatives of the children involved. Additionally, the court released a memorandum on Sept. 25 stating that the matter had been presented to a grand jury, who determined there was insufficient evidence. The charges were first reported by Newsweek.

Marta is one of thousands who contributed funds to "Sound of Freedom" distributor and producer Angel Studio's marketing campaign. His name appears in the film's credits alongside the more than 6,678 other individuals who contributed to the crowdfunding effort to promote the drama about child sex trafficking.

To date, “Sound of Freedom,” which was reportedly made for $14. 5 million, has grossed more than $234 million worldwide. It's currently the 10th highest-earning film of 2023 domestically, placing it ahead of the domestic takes for "Fast X" and "Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny." “Sound of Freedom" was released on July 4.

On Aug. 15, Angel Studios announced that it had repaid each crowdfunding investor’s original investment, plus a 20% profit. In a statement, Angel Studios CEO Neal Harmon said he was “thrilled to be able to get funds back to them in three months.”

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story erroneously reported that Marta had been charged with kidnapping. Kidnapping accessory charges have been dropped, and the Missouri Circuit Court's public information officer said "there was no kidnapping." A link to unsubstantiated allegations about Marta on X by self-described "anti-disinfo activist" Jim Stewartson has also been removed.

Bureau of Land Management orders removal of oil wells in California’s Carrizo Plain

Record-breaking rains may have flooded California this year, but they also provided enough water for one of the state’s most dazzling wildflower displays to flourish into a “superbloom” so big it could be seen from space. The Carrizo Plain National Monument, located about 170 miles northwest of Los Angeles, is the largest expanse of grassland remaining in the state and blooms into a brilliant mosaic of explosive yellow, purple, blue and orange flowers each spring. But about a dozen oil wells have also taken root in the Carrizo Plain, sometimes called the “Serengeti of California.”

On Wednesday, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management directed oil companies to shut down 11 dormant wells there following public outrage and a lawsuit disputing the Trump administration’s decision to permit the wells in the first place. In a legal agreement between conservation groups and the BLM reached last year, it was decided that the wells and the infrastructure supporting them would be removed by August 2028.

In 2021, the Biden Administration announced the suspension of new oil and gas leases on public lands only to reverse the decision the following year, although the acreage of available land for leasing was significantly reduced.

In response to the removal of wells in the Carrizo Plain, Ileene Anderson, a senior scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a press release: “This is a place for wildflowers, California condors and kit foxes, not oil wells. It’s wonderful to see the fossil fuel era coming to an end here, which will benefit all the rare plants and animals of this stunning landscape.”

“Black people, we are the ultimate outsider”: Justin Simien on “radical” take on “Haunted Mansion”

White people don’t have a monopoly on fantasy and science fiction. Black fans love Star Trek, Star Wars, X-Men, Harry Potter, The Avengers and everything else that non-Black fans with wild imaginations love too. Seeing real representation on screen in these types of projects is becoming more of a reality in Hollywood, thanks to directors like Justin Simien, whose Disney film “Haunted Mansion,” an adaption of the Walt Disney theme park attraction, is in theaters now.

“It actually is extremely radical to see Black people, people of color and white people — and people who just look like Americans — facing these supernatural situations and coming together to get through them,” Simien shared with me on “Salon Talks. “That is actually still a very radical image for cinema.”

Simien, the director behind “Bad Hair” and the critically acclaimed film and Netflix television series “Dear White People,” says that including lots of New Orleans culture, Black culture and a Black lead was part of his initial pitch to Disney. The film, written by Katie Dippold, has a star-studded cast including LaKeith Stanfield, Tiffany Haddish, Owen Wilson, Jared Leto, Danny DeVito, Rosario Dawson and Jamie Lee Curtis, to name a few.

Watch Justin Simien’s “Salon Talks” episode here or read a Q&A of our conversation below to learn more about the lessons he learned while directing so many A-listers for a big studio and what he wants to see come out of the ongoing WGA and SAG-AFTRA Hollywood strikes. (Salon’s unionized employees are represented by the WGA East.)

The following conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

I read that “Haunted Mansion” is personal to you.

It is personal to me for a lot of reasons to be honest with you. I think the central story revolving around a grizzled, kind of snarky, shady dude learning to befriend and be-father a young weirdo kid, that honestly is what made it so personal to me. But then the extra layer was I used to work at Disneyland and when I was a kid.

My mom took me to Disney World, and then I got into this choir. One of the best things about being a part of the Longfellow Elementary Show Choir, thank you very much, was that we would get to go to Disney World and sing there. I grew up a little, a lot, obsessed with Disney and this ride in particular.

How did this whole project come together for you?

I was working in the halls of Disney on a different project that I won’t be working on anymore, as was announced, and I got this script and I thought the script was great. I thought Katie Dippold, the writer of the script, was just really funny and smart and found this kind of way into the mansion that I thought was like, “Oh wow, this is really cool for people who are not fans, but it also plays a lot of fan service for the people that are really hardcore fans.” 

“Black people, we are the ultimate outsider. We are the ultimate sort of fringe character in American life, and we have to create our own spaces.”

I just felt like I knew how to direct it. I felt like it was an ensemble comedy like my first film. It had a lot of horror-like flourishes like my second film. But unlike my first two films, it wasn’t necessarily message-forward. The message of the story was much more embedded, and it felt escapist and it felt like fun. It felt like something that was really different from the stuff I was working on at the time.

I pitched for it and I pitched a vision of practical effects and wanting to really bring in the culture of New Orleans and bring in Black culture and cast a Black lead. I just kind of pitched as if, “Hey, you can go with my version or not,” and they kept going with my version and maybe a few months later I was in Atlanta pre-prepping for this movie, like 2021, and we just finished it. It’s been a journey.

I got to witness it in the theater with other people last night. When it ended, people didn’t get up. People didn’t want to leave.

Wow.

I think something about those dancing ghosts at the end that just had everyone kind of stuck. There’s no shortage of talent in the film. You have everybody from LaKeith Stanfield to Rosario Dawson to Tiffany Haddish to Danny DeVito, to Jamie Lee Curtis, to Owen Wilson, and the list goes on. What was that experience like for you working with so many veterans?

It was amazing. I mean, it was a little intimidating at first because especially with big movie stars, sometimes the personality can eclipse the craft, but that was not the case with these people. These people really all the way around Jared Leto, Jamie Lee Curtis, Danny DeVito, Rosario Dawson, LaKeith Stanfield, we already know, Chase Dillon, Tiffany Haddish, oh my God. Everybody really came to play and they came to work and they came to do their craft and they came to support an ensemble film. There was no diva a**hole attitudes in the room. It really was a loving group of people and I felt so supported by them and I felt so honored to be able to support them in doing their work.

What did you learn from working with all of them?

Endurance. I think it wasn’t even a logical, mental learning. It was a learning in the body. The longest thing I’d ever done is my series, and a series of the show took several months. This by far was the longest production time period I’ve ever been in in my whole life. The thought that you can’t burn out every day, you literally cannot bleed on the floor every day or you just won’t make it. You have to pace yourself and you have to take things as they come and just be with the process. I had to learn that. I had to learn that in my body, like I said, because something like this is so big, but it also moves really slow because it’s so big.

“The thing about doing a studio movie is that it’s like getting shot out of a cannon.”

Some of the page counts, I’m used to shooting seven pages a day or 15 pages a day if I have to, which is a lot of pages in director speak. On this one it was half a page or a page because we had to shoot so much more for the visual effects. So much more had to be wrangled and arranged, and in spite of all of that, trying to keep everything feeling like it was alive for the actors, and we weren’t just sort of props in this bigger smorgasbord picture. So that taught me some patience and some endurance, and I think maybe some compassion too for the process.

We need your help to stay independent

Would you work on something that has this type of shooting schedule again?

Yeah, it would depend though. I think one of the things that I also learned is what kind of impedes my ability to create certain kind of spaces that I think really make the best kind of work. The thing about doing a studio movie is that it’s like getting shot out of a cannon. It’s literally a whole new world of people, places. The actual job of it all, that was exactly the same to me, but just the method by which you get to the job and get to work and get everything else off your plate, very different. I would absolutely love to play in the playground like this and do a shooting schedule like this. There are other things I might change though.

People outside of the industry, we see all of those special effects and we tend to think a lot of that stuff is done in post, But it sounds like a lot of that grind was just happening as you were shooting the movie in general.

Yeah, I was really, especially with “Bad Hair,” I’m in love with practical in-camera effects. “Bad Hair,” it was like that was the vibe of that movie, but it was also kind of like we didn’t have the money to do anything digitally. It was just so much fun. I have such a love for movies before the kind of digital era where they’re using matte paintings and they’re using puppets and they’re using stop-motion. They’re using whatever they can to create this visual world. 

While some of those things may not be as photorealistic as what we can do digitally, the fact that it’s real and it’s tactile, it leaves an impression on the actors, it leaves an impression on the audience when they’re watching it, so a lot of the stuff we built practically. We really built the house. Almost all of the effects, even the ghost swirlies have a practical or several practical elements that the digital team had to build up off of.

There’s no going back for me in that regard. I really loved that process. Hatbox Ghost is a really prime example. He is part digital, he’s part man, he’s part Jared Leto, he’s part our stunt guy, Colin. But before we even started shooting him walking around, we built his head as if we were going to do it animatronically. You don’t even really feel that in the movie, but we had to do that because we needed to know how light would hit his skin surface. We needed to know what it would look like when his eyes moved. These are things that we needed to understand and put on camera before we could even really do the visual wizardry of it all.

It’s just a beauty also to just see so many Black people participating and being a part of a film that could be considered sci-fi. Obviously Octavia Butler, but even beyond that, we love Disney. We love “Star Trek.” We love “Star Wars.” We love all of this kind of art. And it seems like sometimes when we have these conversations, people are surprised.

And I would say even further into the world of fantasy where you have, and you got a “Harry Potter,” there’s usually a Black face somewhere in there. Or something like “Wednesday,” I think there was a big to-do over, what do Black people even look like in some of these spaces and do they even look like anything? Do they ever exist there? 

“You have to pace yourself and you have to take things as they come. I had to learn that.”

Like you said, this is a world in which we all know intimately well. Black people, we are the ultimate outsider. We are the ultimate sort of fringe character in American life, and we have to create our own spaces and we have to pull from our ancestry and from understandings of the spiritual world that are different than what’s in the [mainstream]. I mean, this is literally the fabric of our actual lives, so of course we love fantasy and of course we love sci-fi and frankly, so much of great fantasy and sci-fi is derived from white people’s understanding of Black life.

These are the kinds of things that you don’t really put out on the poster or talk about in all the press interviews, but these are the reasons why I make this movie. Why I make movies like this is because it actually is extremely radical to see Black people, people of color and white people— and people who just look like Americans—facing these supernatural situations and coming together to get through them. That is actually still a very radical image for cinema. And that speaks far more to how cinema has let us all down than it does about the movie being bold or something. It shouldn’t be that radical.

Let’s talk about what’s going on in the industry right now. I’m a new screenwriter. I just started writing some things for HBO, and some of those things have just came to a halt because of the writers strike, and we’re out here hurting. But your company Culture Machine is working hard at taking care of fellow artists.

We’re trying to, man. We got maimed like everybody by the strikes, which I got to say, look, it’s collateral damage, because the strikes are happening for a reason. Before the strikes were happening, there was an energy and there was an anger that was boiling up in all artist communities and especially in Black artist communities because we always get it the worst. We know this. It was bound to happen is all I can really say. 

Some of the issues that writers and actors are still fighting for and that the directors were fighting for are really existential issues, things that if we do not arrive at a resolution, they will wipe us out. And for, no shade, but if really wealthy, white writers and actors are in the streets concerned about this, then you better believe we should be concerned about this too because it’s always a little bit worse for us, a lot worse for us actually.

It’s been tricky. Our overall deal at Culture Machine got suspended, which is not even really shaped to our parent company, everyone’s overall deals got suspended, but those overall deals are how we build. It’s how we get office space and CEOs and make connections and make things happen so that when we’re focused on making a movie or making a TV show, which is all-consuming, we can still continue to build our business and our brand and a version of Hollywood that we want to work in. 

We launched a GoFundMe campaign. People were very generous, and even in spite of that generosity, it really is only designed to take us to the fall, which here it is, we’re in the fall. Strike is still going. Not totally sure what all we’re going to do, frankly, but I think it’s important to be out there and to let people know, hey, you can have a hit show, you can have a huge Disney tentpole movie and still really not make enough to cover run-of-the-mill costs to be in this industry and to build a footprint in it.

So that’s what I’m doing. I tend to speak the quiet parts loud, and that’s what we’re doing right now. But at the same time, I really support the labor movement. It really is important that we drill down these issues and kind of let people know what’s really happening here.

Ideally, what does the industry look like after these strikes end?

Man, I have no idea. I truly have no idea. But I would like to see a world in which, frankly — I’m going to be really specific here because I think what we do, I’m a big Baldwinite when it comes to this theory — What we do for the worst of us or the people at the bottom of the status, we do for all of us. If we have a Hollywood where Black people and trans people and women can operate and navigate it just as smoothly as every other white straight man, and by the way, that is not very smooth. Making it in Hollywood for anybody is an extremely difficult and masochistic and crazy process no matter who or what you are. But if we can at least get to where they’re at, the whole thing gets better. I think we are already kind of seeing that in terms of what audiences are responding to in the television space. I think movies are still catching up to that.

“Give us room to fail and survive and do the things that it requires for artists to be great.”

I think that we’ve really got to create a space where artists don’t feel so freaking exhausted and exploited. I think artists are willing to bleed and over-deliver and give everything. You’re a writer, so it’s like when push comes to shove, it doesn’t matter how many payments we have left. It doesn’t matter how many drafts I’m supposed to get paid. We’re obviously not doing it for the money. What a crazy thing to do for money. We’re going to give it our all, just give us an equitable share of the profits that we are generating, period. And give us room to fail and survive and do the things that it requires for artists to be great. That’s only going to help the industry. That’s only going to make the industry richer and more profitable.

What’s next for you?

I have no idea. There’s a number of things that are just on hold until the strike is done. I got to kind of shore up the situation at Culture Machine. Obviously releasing this film is a huge weight off and something to celebrate, but I think it’s probably time to kind of hit some picket lines, do some spec writing for nobody in particular, because we’re not doing that. We’re on strike. For myself, it’s been a long time since I’ve been able to just write for myself, not on assignment. So there’s a lot of that’s going to be going on and yeah, we’re just going to keep pushing, man.

Tell everyone where they can watch “Haunted Mansion.”

Dude, come watch “Haunted Mansion.” I promise you, you haven’t seen anything like it. I’m going to say this, and it’s all I’ll say about it. We have one of the highest audience scores of all the movies out this summer. Come check out what audiences are saying about the film. I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised. And then watch it again on Halloween. Do that, do that. You’ll be doing your part for Black art if you just do that, and I think you’ll enjoy yourself too.

“We’re not imperial”: Elena Kagan contradicts Alito, says “of course Congress can regulate” SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan on Thursday threw her opinion into the heated debate over the highest court’s ethics, asserting that Congress has broad powers to check the Supreme Court despite her conservative colleague’s claim that such action would violate the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution.

According to Politico, Kagan made her comments at the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference in Portland, Oregon, just days after the Senate Judiciary Committee advanced a bill requiring the court to establish an ethics code and a method to enforce it in response to recent controversies around conservative Justice Clarence Thomas’ luxury travel and relationship with GOP megadonor Harlan Crow. 

“It just can’t be that the court is the only institution that somehow is not subject to checks and balances from anybody else. We’re not imperial,” Kagan told the audience of judges and lawyers. “Can Congress do various things to regulate the Supreme Court? I think the answer is: yes.”

She clarified that she was not responding to Justice Samuel Alito’s remarks in an interview last month that Congress would be violating the separation of powers if legislators sought to create ethics and recusal policies for the high court.

“Congress did not create the Supreme Court,” Alito told The Wall Street Journal. “No provision in the Constitution gives them the authority to regulate the Supreme Court — period.”

Kagan said she was unsure precisely what question Alito was asked and suggested that his statement could not have been as far-reaching as it seemed because the Constitution allows Congress to determine the kinds of cases the Supreme Court can hear. 

“Of course, Congress can regulate various aspects of what the Supreme Court does,” said Kagan, who joined the court in 2010 after being nominated by President Barack Obama. “Congress funds the Supreme Court. Congress historically has made changes to the court’s structure and composition. Congress has made changes to the court’s appellate jurisdiction.”

She also quickly added that this provision does not mean Congress could work to dictate the outcome of specific cases.

“Can Congress do anything it wants? Well, no,” she said. “There are limits here, no doubt.”

Kagan expressed reluctance to elaborate on her stance on grounds that the court could someday take on a case in which it is asked to assess those limits. She added that she didn’t want to “jawbone it” while Congress is considering legislation although the bill appears to have almost no chance of clearing the full Senate or being taken up by the House.

However, Kagan explained she would prefer to see the Supreme Court work to defuse the current controversies surrounding it by taking its own steps to address ethics concerns. She became the first justice to publicly confirm the widely held suspicions that the justices are at odds on the matter.

“It’s not a secret for me to say that we have been discussing this issue, and it won’t be a surprise to know that the nine of us have a diversity about this and most things. We’re nine freethinking individuals,” she said.

We need your help to stay independent

“Regardless of what Congress does, the court can do stuff, you know?” Kagan said. “We could decide to adopt a code of conduct of our own that either follows or decides in certain instances not to follow the standard codes of conduct … that would remove this question of what Congress can do. … I hope that we will make some progress in this area.”

During her Thursday remarks, Kagan’s approach was more yielding to her conservative colleagues than in a previous flurry of seemingly frustrated comments following the court’s 5-4 vote to overturn the federal constitutional right to abortion last June. In her first public comments, since the court ended its most recent term over a month ago, Kagan reiterated her past criticism, suggesting that her colleagues were at times ruling along their policy preferences. She cited rulings from this term curtailing the government’s regulatory power over wetlands and striking down President Joe Biden’s student debt relief plan.

It’s important for the Supreme Court “to act like a court … mostly it means acting with restraint and acting with a sense that you are not the king of the world and you do not get to make policy judgments for the American people,” Kagan said.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


She also stressed the importance of the justices reaching an agreement when possible.

“I do believe very strongly in working strenuously to achieve consensus,” she said. “I would rather decide less and have greater consensus than decide more with division. … I like to search for what might be thought of as principled compromises. Some compromises you can’t make, but some compromises you can.”

In the court’s latest term, the conservative majority didn’t always vote along ideological lines in politically contentious cases. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh voted alongside the tribunal’s three liberals in a redistricting case from Alabama, dismissing efforts to skirt legal requirements to create or maintain districts that provide minority voters with a strong chance of electing their desired candidates.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett also joined Roberts, Kavanaugh and the liberals in shutting down an expansive claim that the Constitution grants state legislatures far-reaching authority over election laws, practices and disputes with little input from governors and state courts.

Despite their compromises, the court’s shift to the right is clear. The decisions for three of the most highly contentious cases of the most recent term coincided with the court’s 6-3 ideological split. The liberal defeats — all decided on the final week decisions were released — pertained to cases overturning race-based affirmative action in college admissions, striking down Biden’s $400 billion student debt relief plan, and establishing business’ rights to deny some kinds of services to LGBTQ people.

“Some years are better than other years,” Kagan said last year while reflecting on the term in which the court ruled on abortion. “Time will tell whether this is a court that can get back … to finding common ground.”

“Lack of experience”: Experts say Trump-appointed Judge Cannon made multiple errors in earlier trial

Judge Aileen Cannon, the Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge in the Southern District of Florida presiding over the former president’s classified documents case, made two critical errors in a June trial, Reuters reports, citing legal experts and a court transcript, with one of her missteps violating a fundamental constitutional right of the defendant, which could have invalidated the proceedings. 

Cannon closed the courtroom during jury selection for the June trial of an Alabama man, whom federal prosecutors accused of running a website with images of child sex abuse, to the defendant’s family and the general public, according to a trial transcript obtained by the outlet. Though Cannon cited space restrictions in her small courtroom in the Fort Pierce federal courthouse, the Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant’s right to a public trial.

The 42-year-old judge also failed to swear in the prospective jury pool, an error that forced her to restart jury selection. Some of the former federal prosecutors Reuters interviewed noted that judges’ courtroom deputies would sometimes remind them of procedural steps such as swearing in prospective jurors as they could be more focused on other parts of running a trial.

The renewed jury selection process never began, however, because the trial ended abruptly with defendant William Spearman pleading guilty as part of a “conditional” deal with prosecutors that retains the defendant’s right to appeal certain rulings by the trial judge. 

Cannon’s courtroom closure presents “a fundamental constitutional error,” Stephen Smith, a professor at the Santa Clara School of Law in California, told Reuters. “She ignored the public trial right entirely. It’s as though she didn’t know it existed.”

That day, Scott Berry, the federal public defender representing Spearman, had even argued in the courtroom that Cannon’s refusal to allow his client’s family to be present violated his Sixth Amendment right, the transcript showed.

“All right, thank you. Your objection is overruled,” Cannon responded, according to the transcript.

A federal prosecutor in the case, Greg Schiller, also later urged Cannon to allow Spearman’s mother into the courtroom, referencing a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court precedent that required judges to weigh less restrictive alternatives prior to closing a courtroom to the public, including during jury selection.

When Berry later alerted Cannon to two vacant chairs in the room, Cannon dismissed his request again, saying the chairs were reserved for law enforcement. 

“Mr. Spearman’s mother is free to join us once the jury selection process has concluded and/or there is truly enough room in the courtroom,” the transcript shows Cannon saying.

She did offer later to let Spearman’s family into the courtroom after she realized she had also erred in neglecting to swear in the jury pool, explaining that there would be room after jurors, whom both sides had agreed to dismiss, had left.

We need your help to stay independent

Her decision sparks questions about what her approach will be regarding the immense public interest and scrutiny at Trump’s trial, which is slated to begin on May 20, 2024.

Cannon’s trial errors also demonstrate her inexperience as a judge, former federal judges — both Democratic and Republican appointees — told Reuters. Trump’s trial will be Cannon’s first time overseeing a case involving classified materials and navigating the rules surrounding their handling. 

“A lack of experience can be really hard in a big case, especially when there’s all this media attention and everything you do is being watched and commented on and second-guessed,” Jeremy Fogel, a former federal judge who leads California’s Berkeley Judicial Institute, said, adding that Cannon’s mistakes were “fairly significant.”

“It looms larger because of who the judge is,” he added.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The former Chief U.S. District Judge of the Northern District of Iowa, Mark Bennett, argued that Cannon “should have figured ahead of time a way to accommodate a small number of family members in a very small courtroom, in my opinion. It’s just the right thing to do, and not run the risk of there being reversible error.”

Cannon did not respond to the outlet’s request for comment. A Justice Department spokesperson and Berry declined Reuters’ request for comment.

So far as a judge, the former federal prosecutor has presided over four criminal trials that have resulted in jury verdicts. She also previously worked on four criminal trials that concluded with jury verdicts in her role as a prosecutor from 2013-2020, a questionnaire she completed before the Senate confirmed her judgeship indicated.

Cannon became the subject of a rebuke from the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta when it reversed her 2022 order appointing a third party to review materials the FBI had seized from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort club in the classified documents probe.

“We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so,” the 11th Circuit panel of three Republican-appointed judges wrote in their ruling, ordering the dismissal of a lawsuit Trump had filed seeking to shield documents from federal investigators.

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Weissmann said on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, that he had, “No words” for Cannon’s errors in the June trial.

“That tiny courtroom in Fort Pierce really should not be the location of this case,” national security attorney Bradley Moss tweeted.

“Lots of people who become judges were never very good at knowing the law,” Andrew Fleischman, a Georgia trial and appellate lawyer, added.

Mercury pollution is worsening a mental health crisis in this Indigenous community

Mercury poisoning among members of the Grassy Narrows First Nation in Ontario, Canada, is contributing to high rates of attempted suicide among Indigenous youth. That’s according to a new study out of the University of Quebec in Montreal published this month in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. 

The study analyzed data from 162 children and 80 mothers, parsing data on mercury levels in umbilical cords and hair, as well as from surveys on fish consumption and mental health. Researchers concluded that three generations of mercury exposure are linked to today’s youth attempted suicide rates.

Donna Mergler, professor emerita at the University of Quebec in Montreal and lead author of the study, said she and her co-authors found that women from Grassy Narrows who ate a lot of fish during pregnancy were more likely to have children with both emotional and behavioral problems.

“It’s like a cascade of effects from the grandparents down to the children,” Mergler said.

Attempted suicide rates are three times higher among Grassy Narrows First Nation members than other First Nation communities in Canada. Suicide rates for First Nation members in Canada are higher than rates for non-Indigenous people as a whole.

In the 1960s and ’70s, the Reed Paper mill dumped nearly 10 tons of mercury into the river the Grassy Narrows First Nation relies on for fish, according to a 2016 report from Canadian broadcaster CBC, which described the pollution as one of the nation’s worst environmental disasters. The study is the latest in a decades-long effort by the community to grapple with ongoing consequences of industrial pollution on their food. 

“We’re very saddened by the report, but it’s also confirmed what we’ve been fearing all along, the impacts of mercury on our people,” Grassy Narrows First Nation Chief Rudy Turtle said at a recent press conference. “The impacts of mercury have been very devastating in terms of our economy. Our way of life has been totally destroyed.”

High mercury exposure has long been associated with brain damage and other neurological problems. In the United States, pregnant women are discouraged from eating high-mercury fish to protect their fetuses. The bigger the fish, the more likely they’ll have lots of mercury as the substance bioaccumulates. 

In 2016, the Toronto Star reported that mercury levels in walleye fish in Clay Lake were 90 times higher than the recommended levels of daily intake for pregnant women set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Grassy Narrows First Nation members have traditionally fished from the lake and the river it feeds into, with many working as fishing guides for tourists prior to the discovery of the mercury pollution. 

Sarah Rothenberg, an associate professor at Oregon State University’s College of Public Health and Human Sciences, wrote in Environmental Health Perspectives that Mergler’s study is rare in examining the link between mercury exposure and children’s mental health, but said Grassy Narrows is far from the only community facing such challenges. 

Communities living in the Arctic and communities exposed to artisanal and small-scale gold mining may be experiencing mercury exposure, and the potential for similar effects there warrants further investigation, she said. 

Mergler said the study lends scientific evidence to Grassy Narrows’ calls for adequate health care, compensation and a ban on mining and forestry in their territorial lands. In 2020, the federal government promised funds to build a mercury care home but that hasn’t yet materialized. 

Chief Turtle from Grassy Narrows said after the discovery of high mercury levels in the area, commercial fishing companies and lodges closed, spiking unemployment. Still, as per their traditions, his community continues to fish the area for subsistence. 

“It’s just not the same prior to mercury being dumped into our river,” he said.

If you or someone you know may be considering suicide, contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 9-8-8, or the Crisis Text Line by texting HOME to 741741.

This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/global-indigenous-affairs-desk/mercury-pollution-mental-health-crisis-grassy-narrows/.

Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org

Legal expert: Trump lawyer just confirmed “an element of the crime” outside of courthouse

A lawyer for former President Donald Trump, Alina Habba, told reporters Thursday that “everybody was made aware” he lost the 2020 election — a key part of the case against him, which may hinge on prosecutors’ ability to show that Trump sought to overturn the election even though he knew he had lost. Trump’s legal and political advisers repeatedly told him he had lost the election but he continued to push forward anyway.

“But that doesn’t mean that was the only advice he was given,” Habba told reporters outside the D.C. courthouse where Trump was arraigned. “As anybody understands what happens in the Oval Office, there are a numerous amount of advisers and politicians and lawyers – not just one or two – that are giving you advice and telling you what they believe is true. So, he may not agree with Mike Pence. He may not agree with one of his lawyers. But that doesn’t mean that there weren’t other people advising him exactly the opposite. And the president has a right as every one of us do, to listen to several opinions and make their decision.” Former senior FBI agent Peter Strzok pointed out that Habba had effectively echoed the very “allegation” against Trump. “Thank you for confirming an element of the crime,” quipped national security attorney Bradley Moss.

“Pissed off” Trump demands Supreme Court “intercede” after arraignment in Truth Social meltdown

Former President Donald Trump, who was reportedly “pissed off” over the coverage of his arrest, raged about what he deemed the “barrage of weak lawsuits” and indictments stacking up against him in an online rallying cry Friday morning, a day after he was arraigned in a Washington, D.C. federal court over an indictment accusing him of leading a conspiracy to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Trump pleaded not guilty to all felony counts, which include conspiracy and obstruction charges.

“CRAZY! My political opponent has hit me with a barrage of weak lawsuits, including D.A., A.G., and others, which require massive amounts of my time & money to adjudicate. Resources that would have gone into Ads and Rallies, will now have to be spent fighting these Radical Left Thugs in numerous courts throughout the Country,” Trump wrote in a post to Truth Social. “I am leading in all Polls, including against Crooked Joe, but this is not a level playing field. It is Election Interference, & the Supreme Court must intercede. MAGA!” He added in a separate post: “Biden & Garland file bogus cases against me so it becomes difficult for me to campaign. Nothing like this has every happened before. Must be Unconstitutional? BUT SOMEHOW, WE WILL WIN IT ALL!!!”

The 2024 GOP frontrunner has been criticized by fellow candidates in recent weeks for diverting donated campaign funds from his Save America PAC to pay for his legal fees amid his swath of lawsuits and criminal cases. The PAC has spent more than $40 million in legal fees incurred by Trump and his allies this year along, according to The New York Times.

New evidence suggests early puberty can be triggered by pandemic stress

The patient presented with underarm hair, breast development and rapid growth — nothing out of the ordinary for a young adolescent going through puberty. The only thing is, she was just six years old.

New research published Thursday in the Journal of the Endocrine Society indicates cases like these, officially called early or precocious puberty, have been far more common among girls in the pandemic than in years prior. Between March 2020 and June 2021 — when Italy closed schools, parks, and gyms in response to the virus —  the number of girls presenting to one Italian center with early puberty nearly doubled compared to years prior.

“The findings are not surprising based on the anecdotal experience of people in my specialty,” Dr. Louise Greenspan, a pediatric endocrinologist with Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, told Salon in a phone interview. “It’s consistent with what we’ve been seeing.”

Early puberty, generally defined as sexual maturation before age eight in girls and nine in boys, is uncommon, affecting as little as one in 10,000 children pre-pandemic. It is 10 times more common in girls than in boys, although the reasons behind this sex difference are still somewhat mysterious.

Parents who suspect their child is going through early puberty should bring it to the attention of their pediatrician, Greenspan said. They will help decide on whether to pursue treatment, including puberty blockers, to pause development. Early puberty has been linked to other health problems down the line such as heart disease, cancers and mental health problems, including eating and anxiety disorders. 

Parents who suspect their child is going through early puberty should bring it to the attention of their pediatrician.

Precocious puberty was rising before the pandemic, by about three months per decade since 1977. But the pandemic seems to have accelerated this increase. The spike in cases observed in 2020 has been reflected in several studies measuring early puberty in girls around the world: Another study in Italy, as well as data from Turkey and a U.S. center, all suggest between two and three times as many girls came in with early puberty compared to pre-pandemic years.

Although it’s unclear what is triggering this phenomenon, researchers suspect the consequences of lockdowns, like stress and children spending more sedentary time on screens, are likely to blame. In general, chronic stress ages the body — and prior data has specifically shown stressors like the absence of a father figure have been associated with early puberty for some girls.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“We know chronic psychosocial stress can lower the age of puberty onset,” Greenspan said. “So was that part of the problem?”

Body mass index is one measure that has also been correlated with early puberty in girls. In the study published Thursday, girls who started puberty early did have higher BMIs than girls who did not, said study author Dr. Mohamad Maghnie, of the University of Genoa and the Giannina Gaslini Institute in Italy. 

Girls in Maghnie’s study were relatively sedentary during this time period, which may have had an effect. “These girls spent an average of two hours per day using electronic devices, and 88.5% of them stopped any physical activity,” Maghnie wrote to Salon in an email.

We need your help to stay independent

Other data has indicated that changes in sleep cycles or exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals could also be influencing the age at which girls enter puberty.

In the end, early puberty is just one piece of the puzzle helping to explain why women’s reproductive years are getting longer, with some evidence suggesting menopause is also occurring later. 

Greenspan says the spike in early puberty in the pandemic is likely due to social rather than evolutionary changes because the latter would take far longer to play out. Regardless, it’s clear that something in the social or physical environment is reshaping the development of today’s girls — and it seems to have been exacerbated by the pandemic. 

“Sounds like a coup to me”: Experts say Trump lawyer’s statement is “an admission, not a defense”

Former Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann called Donald Trump’s attorney’s appearance on Fox News after the former president’s arraignment Thursday a “rookie mistake” after he appeared to make an “admission” about the case.

Just hours before attorney John Lauro’s appearances on Fox News and Newsmax, Trump was arrested and arraigned in a federal court in Washington D.C., in connection to his latest indictment for allegedly conspiring to prevent the peaceful transfer of power to Joe Biden following the 2020 election. The former president was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights. Trump pleaded not guilty to all four felony counts Thursday.

Trump pressured then-Vice President Mike Pence to refuse to carry out his election certification duties in Congress ahead of the Jan. 6 certification of Biden’s win, urging him instead to return the matter to the states where Republican-dominated legislatures in states Trump lost could replace valid Biden electors with pro-Trump slates of electors. All the while, the former president lobbied several state officials to overturn the results in their states.

Lauro appeared on Fox’s “The Ingraham Angle” and Newsmax’s “Greg Kelly Reports” Thursday evening, offering the same defense of Trump’s actions to the respective hosts.

“What President Trump said is, ‘Let’s go with option D,'” Lauro told Fox host Laura Ingraham. “Let’s just halt, let’s just pause the voting and allow the state legislatures to take one last look and make a determination as to whether or not the elections were handled fairly. That’s constitutional law. That’s not an issue of criminal activity.”

MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell was stunned by the statement.

“That is a Trump criminal defense lawyer quoting Donald Trump committing a crime,” he said. “Donald Trump’s criminal defense lawyer tonight added information to [Special Counsel] Jack Smith’s 42-page description of Donald Trump’s crimes. The conversation that John Lauro just described appears on page 34 of the indictment against his client.”

Weissmann told O’Donnell, “I don’t know why a defense lawyer is going to start giving facts about a critical moment.”

“It’s the whole case!” O’Donnell exclaimed.

“And by the way, it is such a damning thing when you put it in context because remember, what the indictment alleges is prior to that, the reason this had to be done with the vice president is because prior to that, all the efforts that Donald Trump took with respect to the secretaries of state did not work,” Weismann said.

“So, for him to say, ‘Oh, let’s just double check’? I mean, there’s nothing to double-check. He actually threatened criminal prosecution against the secretary of state of Georgia, and he still stuck to his guns. So this sort of like, ‘Oh, let’s just buy some time,’ it’s illegal, and it’s not like there’s any real dispute,” Weissmann continued. “He knew that the secretaries of state had said to him, ‘No, there is no issue, these have been certified, there’s no legal basis to do it.’ So I just don’t know why John, who is a good lawyer, didn’t just zip it and not say anything.”

“They don’t teach TV in law school,” O’Donnell quipped in response.

We need your help to stay independent

Weissmann went on to explain that a defense lawyer who makes a statement on behalf of their client is making an admission that could be used against the client in court.

“You have to make a motion and say, ‘I am saying this was an agent of the defendant.’ I mean, again, the judge would have discretion to say, ‘Maybe this particular statement wasn’t made for him.’ But there’s a case called GAF that says when you are an agent of a defendant and you are making a statement on his or her behalf, that is admissible,” Weissmann said.

“So again, that is why it is fine to say, ‘Here are the defenses.’ But to start weighing in on this, I mean, not that Donald Trump is going to testify, but if he were and he didn’t say exactly this thing, he can be cross-examined on this,” he concluded. “So this was just a kind of rookie mistake to make. Just to be clear, John is a good lawyer. I think this was not a smart move.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Weissmann and other legal experts also shared a clip from Lauro’s Newsmax appearance online late Thursday, mocking the Trump attorney for his “strange defense.”

“The ‘my client just wanted to unlawfully pause an official government proceeding’ is a strange defense to an unlawful disruption of a government proceeding charge,” Georgia State Law professor Anthony Michael Kreis posted on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, in response to the clip.

“An admission. Not a defense,” Weissmann added.

“Sounds like a coup to me,” quipped Joyce Vance, a former U.S. attorney.

“The people have spoken”: Both expelled Tennessee Democrats win back their seats

Two Tennessee Democrats who were expelled by the GOP-controlled state House earlier this year for taking part in a gun control demonstration on the chamber floor won special elections for their seats on Thursday, handily fending off Republican opponents.

State Rep. Justin Jones, who represents Nashville, defeated GOP challenger Laura Nelson with nearly 80% of the vote. State Rep. Justin Pearson of Memphis defeated his Republican opponent, Jeff Johnston, with more than 90% of the vote.

“The people have spoken,” Jones wrote following his victory, directing his message at Tennessee House Speaker Cameron Sexton, a Republican who led the charge to expel Jones and Pearson.

“See you August 21st for special session,” Jones added, referring to an upcoming session called by Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee to address gun violence.

The Tennessee House voted to expel Jones and Pearson in April after the pair and fellow state Rep. Gloria Johnson—who was not expelled—took to the chamber floor with a bullhorn to demand gun control legislation in the wake of a deadly mass shooting in Nashville.

Republicans decried the floor action as a breach of decorum rules and swiftly voted for Jones and Pearson’s expulsion. A vote to expel Johnson, who is planning to challenge U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) next year, fell just short of the two-thirds majority needed.

The expulsion of Jones and Pearson sparked national outrage, with hundreds of state lawmakers and rights groups across the U.S. condemning Republicans’ move as an anti-democratic effort to silence gun control supporters. Tennessee has the 12th-highest gun death rate in the U.S., according to the advocacy group Everytown.

Within days of the expulsion vote, county officials reappointed Jones and Pearson on an interim basis, setting the stage for Thursday’s special election.

In a statement late Thursday, Pearson said that “this is only the beginning for this movement.”

“We will organize, mobilize, and activate to work tirelessly for the day when there are no more calls to respond to mass shootings and gun violence,” said Pearson. “I look forward to heading back to the Tennessee state capitol August 21 for the special session on gun legislation. We, the people, will march, rally and work to pass legislation.”

AP Psychology effectively banned in Florida over lesson on sexual orientation, gender identity

The Republican-controlled Florida Board of Education on Thursday effectively banned Advanced Placement Psychology by notifying school district superintendents that teaching about sexual orientation and gender identity—key subjects in college-level psychology curricula—is prohibited under the state’s so-called “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law.

That means class schedules for the fall semester—which begins next week in most Florida school districts—are in limbo for thousands of students. Last year, around 28,000 pupils in more than 500 Florida high schools took AP Psychology.

In a statement, the College Board—the New York-based national body that approves AP courses and runs SAT testing—called sexual orientation and gender identity “essential topics” in psychology.

“The AP course asks students to ‘describe how sex and gender influence socialization and other aspects of development,'” the board explained. “This element of the framework is not new: gender and sexual orientation have been part of AP Psychology since the course launched 30 years ago.”

“We cannot modify AP Psychology in response to regulations that would censor college-level standards for credit, placement, and career readiness,” the body continued. “Our policy remains unchanged. Any course that censors required course content cannot be labeled ‘AP’ or ‘Advanced Placement,’ and the ‘AP Psychology’ designation cannot be utilized on student transcripts.”

“To be clear, any AP Psychology course taught in Florida will violate either Florida law or college requirements,” the College Board added. “Therefore, we advise Florida districts not to offer AP Psychology until Florida reverses their decision and allows parents and students to choose to take the full course.”

As originally signed into law by Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in March 2022, H.B. 1557—dubbed the “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” bill by critics—”prohibits classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity” in grades K-3 or at any level “that is not age-appropriate.” In May, DeSantis expanded the legislation to include all grades K-12.

Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, condemned the “slippery slope of government censorship and bans” in DeSantis’ Florida.

“Sadly, it’s all part of the DeSantis playbook of eroding rights, censoring those he disagrees with, and undermining access to knowledge,” Weingarten said of the 2024 GOP presidential candidate, whose campaign has been accused of embracing homophobia.

“Just this year, countless educators have been forced to remove or cover up their classroom libraries under threat of sanctions and jail, countless students have lost out because the governor ended AP African American Studies, and now this assault on AP Psychology,” she added. “It’s an unconscionable but far-from-surprising move from an extremist and increasingly unpopular leader who is fast becoming both a national pariah and a global embarrassment.”

At the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest LGBTQ+ advocacy group, president Kelley Robinson said that “psychology is centered around people—all people.”

“Erasing us from the curriculum ignores our existence, sets back Florida students who want to pursue psychology in higher education, and disrupts pathways for future mental health professionals to provide comprehensive, culturally competent mental healthcare for the LGBTQ+ community,” she continued.

“College Board’s AP Psychology curriculum is science-driven and endorsed by both educators and experts,” Robinson noted. “Educational systems that reject the inclusion of LGBTQ+ people from their psychology courses are failing in their commitment to students.”

“As anti-LGBTQ+ lawmakers pass discriminatory legislation and spread dangerous misinformation, we’re continuing to see disturbing attempts to rewrite history and censor education, misaligned with the realities of our country,” she added.

Florida State Rep. Anna Eskamani (D-42) said in a statement, “As someone who graduated from Florida public schools with college credit via AP classes, I know how powerful and effective these classes are and I am sick to my stomach to see what Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Republican Party are doing in our state.”

Florida Department of Education Spokesperson Cassie Pelelis accused the College Board of “attempting to force school districts to prevent students from taking the AP Psychology.”

“The department didn’t ‘ban’ the course,” she insisted. “The course remains listed in Florida’s Course Code Directory for the 2023-24 school year. We encourage the College Board to stop playing games with Florida students and continue to offer the course and allow teachers to operate accordingly.”

During the previous academic year, educators, students, parents, and Democratic lawmakers reacted angrily after the DeSantis administration rejected a new high school AP African American Studies course—without even seeing its syllabus—claiming it violated the state’s ban on “woke” education and lacked “educational value.”

In March, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s preliminary injunction against the Stop WOKE Act.

Trump was “irked” that his D.C. arraignment judge simply called him “Mr. Trump”: report

Former President Donald Trump was particularly “irked” when the magistrate judge overseeing his arraignment Thursday referred to him as simply “Mr. Trump,” CNN’s Kaitlan Collin’s reported Thursday night. “That may not sound odd to anyone else, but he is still referred to by his former title, ‘President Trump,’ when he’s at his Bedminster golf club in New Jersey” and at Mar-a-Lago in Florida, she explained.

Not only is Trump not entitled to the title, however, but referring to him as “Mr. President” is incorrect, Tom Nichols, a staff writer for The Atlantic, explained on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter: “Some titles — governor, ambassador, certain military ranks and yes, ‘professor’ — are lifetime titles. ‘President’ is not; a president is the ‘presiding officer’ while he presides, which is why Senate Presidents are ‘Mr/Madam President’ only while they hold the gavel.” More to the point, Nichols added, “America has only one president at a time,” and it is not Trump. The former president pleaded not guilty Thursday to all four felony charges in the indictment, which accuses him of leading a conspiracy to remain in power after his 2020 electoral defeat. If convicted the 77-year-old could spend the rest of his life in prison.

“We Used to Win Here”: A Salon film

Youth sports participation is declining in America. The number of high schoolers playing a team sport has dropped to its lowest level in history and there are fewer sports programs available to younger children than ever before. At the same time, hyper-elite programs like AAU basketball, which attract the best players from around the country, are thriving thanks to big boosts from corporate brands like Nike, Under Armour and Adidas.

In a documentary short film titled, “We Used to Win Here,” set in Baltimore, Salon examines how the growing divide in youth sports access and opportunity is affecting this city. Something as simple as playing on a recreational basketball team in a child’s neighborhood offers exposure to athletics, community, mentorship and lifelong lessons in competition, showing up and teamwork. 

“We Used to Win Here” features interviews with former Division 1 college and pro basketball players from Baltimore, promising young stars, coaches and program leaders, who all say they learned their tough-minded approach to basketball coming up on Baltimore courts — a culture they say no longer exists today.

Watch “We Used to Win Here”:

“I have never heard that”: Experts stunned after judge “admonished” Trump not to commit any crimes

The magistrate judge presiding over former President Donald Trump’s federal indictment in D.C. on Thursday warned him not to commit any crimes while he is awaiting trial.

Trump appeared before Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya, where he pleaded not guilty to four charges accusing him of conspiring to overturn his 2020 election loss ahead of the deadly Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Upadhyaya told the former president that “the most important condition of release is not committing any new crimes while on release, which could lead to him being detained and could add to the sentence he may eventually face,” according to NPR. “She told Trump that it is a crime to ‘influence a juror or try to threaten or bribe a witness or retaliate against anyone’ connected to the case. Trump said he understands.”

Trump has repeatedly attacked prosecutors and judges in his growing number of legal cases.

“Trump admonished not to commit any crimes as a term of his release. This guy obstructs justice like most of us breathe. And, as the judge observed, it’s also a crime to influence a juror. Same’s true re: a witness. Could be a wild ride,” predicted columnist and author David Rothkopf.

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who served on special counsel Bob Mueller’s team, told MSNBC that the order was “unusual.”

“The standard condition that a judge usually emphasizes to a defendant is that they have to show up at each court appearance. That is the most important thing. That is what bail is for — so that you’ll show up in court,” he said. “But I heard that the standard condition and most important thing today is ‘do not commit a crime” followed up by ‘do not tamper with a juror.’ My first reaction was, I was a prosecutor for 21 years and I was a defense lawyer for five years, and I’ve never heard that.”

We need your help to stay independent

Some legal experts say the conditions could prove too “complicated” for Trump.

“The standard language may not work here, when you have thousands of Americans who could be witnesses and he continues to have daily contact with people who may be involved,” said Laurie Levenson, a law professor at Loyola Law, told the Associated Press. “Everything is more complicated in this case because of who the defendant is, what he has done and that he wants to be president again.”

Upadhyaya on Thursday set the first hearing in the case for August 28, at which time U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who will oversee the case, will set a trial date.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman said it was “very significant that Judge Chutkan already has decided, and told the magistrate to tell the parties, that she will set trial date next hearing.”

“More frequently the judge will have a first hearing and then set schedule no earlier than second hearing, She’s focused on schedule,” he tweeted.

Weissmann told MSNBC that it was “not unusual” for the magistrate judge to have discussed the case with the district judge but “what is unusual is to be so focused on the trial date.”

“That to me, for people who are thinking that Chutkan is not focused on whether this case can go to trial before the general election in November 2024, is the issue,” he said. “And it’s also clear that Trump attorney John Lauro knows that and that is the reason he started saying during the arraignment that he needed to know about the volume of discovery. Because it’s going to be a little eye-popping. There is going to be a huge amount of discovery material and Smith’s team is going to have to deal with that issue. That is going to be the fight.”

Donald Trump has lost control of his own image

Donald Trump was finally indicted this week by the Department of Justice and special counsel Jack Smith for crimes connected with his coup attempt on Jan. 6 and the larger plan to end multiracial democracy by nullifying the results of the 2020 Election.

The specific charges are “conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights.” The second paragraph of the indictment summarizes Trump’s alleged coup plot:

Despite having lost, the Defendant was determined to remain in power.  So for more than two months following election day on November 3, 2020, the Defendant spread lies that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the election and that he had actually won. These claims were false, and the Defendant knew that they were false. But the Defendant repeated and widely disseminated them anyway to make his knowingly false claims appear legitimate, create an intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger, and erode public faith in the administration of the election.

This is the third time that Trump has been charged with breaking federal laws – with the indictment for Jan. 6 and the coup plot being a literal crime against democracy and the worst betrayal ever committed by an American president against his own country.

On Thursday, Donald Trump was arraigned at the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington D.C. This is the same courthouse where more than 1,000 of Trump’s foot soldiers who overran the Capitol as part of his coup attempt were also arraigned.     

In a cover story at the New York Times, Peter Baker perfectly describes the implications of Trump’s repeated historic lawbreaking:

What makes the indictment against Donald J. Trump on Tuesday so breathtaking is not that it is the first time a president has been charged with a crime or even the second. Mr. Trump already holds those records. But as serious as hush money and classified documents may be, this third indictment in four months gets to the heart of the matter, the issue that will define the future of American democracy.

At the core of the United States of America v. Donald J. Trump is no less than the viability of the system constructed during that summer in Philadelphia. Can a sitting president spread lies about an election and try to employ the authority of the government to overturn the will of the voters without consequence? The question would have been unimaginable just a few years ago, but the Trump case raises the kind of specter more familiar in countries with histories of coups and juntas and dictators.

In effect, Jack Smith, the special counsel who brought the case, charged Mr. Trump with one of the most sensational frauds in the history of the United States, one “fueled by lies” and animated by the basest of motives, the thirst for power.

At the Atlantic, Tom Nichols implores every American who claims to love their country to reject Trump and his neofascist movement:

The rest of us, as a nation but also as individuals, can no longer indulge the pretense that Trump is just another Republican candidate, that supporting Donald Trump is just another political choice, and that agreeing with Trump’s attacks on our democracy is just a difference of opinion. (Those of us who share our views in the media have a particular duty to cease discussing Trump as if he were a normal candidate—or even a normal person—especially after today’s indictment.) I have long described Trump’s candidacies as moral choices and tests of civic character, but I have also cautioned that Americans, for the sake of social comity, should resist too many arguments about politics among themselves. I can no longer defend this advice.

The indictment handed down today challenges every American to put a shoulder to the wheel and defend our republic in every peaceful, legal, and civilized way they can.

At the Daily Beast, former Tea Party conservative and now leading never-Trumper and pro-democracy advocate Joe Walsh does not soften the truth that Donald Trump is a violent criminal who needs to be put in prison:

Please don’t breeze past this fact: The former President of the United States believed violence was ultimately how he could execute his attempted coup. He incited that violence for months, and he exploited that violence on Jan. 6.

You can’t read this 45-page indictment and not understand that Donald Trump tried everything he could to overturn the election results, knowing his argument was based on nothing, and that he’d use his power as Commander in Chief of the armed forces to remain in office. (I repeat: Trump wanted to use the military.)

“This was his plan all along. He wanted, he needed, depended upon, encouraged, and incited violence. And he was prepared to order the military to act violently on his behalf.”

Per the indictment, when Trump was warned by his Deputy White House Counsel on Jan. 3 that there was no “outcome-determinative fraud in the election,” and that if Trump remained in office there would be “riots in every major city in the United States,” the unnamed co-conspirator 4 responded, “Well [Deputy White House Counsel], that’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.”

As I write about Trump’s political crime spree against the nation, I keep thinking about one of the greatest “what if?” moments in recent history. Forgotten in the swift and filthy and disorienting currents of the Age of Trump and a media machine that enables and feeds off of it, was that moment in October 2020 when then-President Trump left Walter Reed Medical Center after almost dying from COVID and he had plans to tear open his shirt, revealing a Superman logo underneath it.  If Trump had done such a thing – and I believe that he should have ignored his aides and followed his instincts – it would have been one of the most memorable events in presidential history. Would that have won Trump the 2020 Election by itself? We will never know. But my instincts tell me that gambit, the theater and spectacle of it all, would have pushed Trump closer to the finish line.

We need your help to stay independent

Of course, Donald Trump is not Superman; he shares none of Superman’s qualities of selflessness, courage, strength, integrity, self-sacrifice, goodness, and love of humanity. But that does not matter: in reality, Trump is a supervillain who he and his followers delusionally believe to be a hero.

I also keep thinking about Donald Trump as a professional wrestling heel. And why does the heel inevitably end up losing to the babyface? Because the very traits that allowed the heel to stay on top – egomania, hubris, arrogance, lying, cheating, stealing, manipulation, bullying, and other bad behavior – are the cause of their final undoing.

That is Donald Trump’s story to this point.

Let us not overlook how Donald Trump’s criminal trials are a type of narrow legal remedy. Unfortunately, the harm and damage that Trump, the MAGA movement and the Republican fascists, and larger white right have done and continue to do to the nation cannot be solved or healed by legal means alone. So what does justice look like for those crimes and other acts of grand wrongdoing committed by Trump?

In all, Trumpism (and American neofascism) is much bigger than any one person or persons; it is a cultural problem that will persist far into the future. As I explained in a previous essay here at Salon, to begin that process of healing and purging Trumpism and neofascism from American society and life, requires that he be defeated in the courtroom(s) and at the ballot box.

In a press release, the pro-democracy advocacy group the Lincoln Project warned:

The nation needs to wake up to the very real threat that Trump will win the presidency. He IS the Republican nominee. He IS leading in the polls against Joe Biden. The MAGA GOP is a cult that no longer cares about the rule of law and wants to send Trump back to the White House. No indictment is going to stop his campaign.

All Americans must realize the only choice before voters is between a functioning democracy versus a disgraced former President who tried to overthrow the government. There is only one functioning party in America that cares about the rule of law and believes in democracy – and President Joe Biden is its candidate.

At the Bulwark, Kim Wehle also warns that:

This indictment is a step toward justice. And it is a document of historic importance. But it is also—for the Republican party and for America as a whole—a reckoning. Because Trump’s treasonous, criminal, and malevolent character, as described in this indictment, is exactly what could get him re-elected in 2024.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Villains imagine in their own minds that they are the real victims. On Wednesday, Trump sent out the following fundraising email in response to his indictment and imminent arrest for the crimes of Jan. 6:

The Swamp that I am on a mission to drain is trying to imprison me for life as an innocent man.

But I am not afraid in the slightest.

This is the mission I signed up for when I first chose to run for president as a complete political outsider.

When you begin to drain the Swamp, you finally catch a glimpse of the vile monsters that had been lurking at the bottom.

Summoning the phrase that is looming over Trump’s criminal trials that “our long national nightmare is finally over,” I very much wish that were in fact true. Unfortunately, the nightmare that is the Age of Trump continues, and it will be many months and perhaps longer with trials, appeals, a presidential election, and other things we can’t accurately predict at this point in time before the traitor ex-president and the Republican fascists and their forces are finally defeated and vanquished – assuming such an outcome is even possible given the country’s deep problems.  

Yes, Donald Trump may be surrounded. But that also means Trump can hit a target in any direction when he rages and lashes out. He has lost the ability to fully write his own narrative. This enrages Trump. His rage will not be contained or disciplined. Now is not the time to lower our defenses because that is how evildoers and supervillains like Donald Trump win.

Send in the clowns (with tiny hands): The Trump circus returns to D.C. — for one day

A light rain began to fall.

In the distance, a protester shouted over a bullhorn, “We love the police.”

At the same time, some 20 feet away on my left,  Peter Alexander from NBC was up live explaining the latest developments. In a tent to my right, Major Garrett of CBS was doing the same.

Donald Trump was back in Washington, appearing at the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse, within a stone’s throw of the Capitol — the site of the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the center of the latest charges against him.

After the noon hour, the crowd grew substantially in anticipation of Trump’s scheduled 4 p.m. arraignment. Mostly it consisted of reporters, but a few dozen attention-seeking protesters from both sides of the fence added to the circus-like atmosphere that grew along with the crowd. A guy to my right was meandering through the thousand or so people gathered around, decrying circumcisions while praising the efforts of Donald Trump.

“Tell Trump if he gets re-elected to be dressed up like Caesar and have three belly dancers. One black and one white and one Asian. We want to stop circumcisions,” he said. 

“Do you take many medications?” I inquired.

“I’m not crazy,” he said.

Known as “Circumcision Guy” to the Capitol Police, he is a regular. 

One guy who wasn’t a regular was a young, thin white man who said he had come to D.C. from Ohio to “save Trump.” He walked through the crowd waving a 12-foot “Trump or Death” flag, accompanied by a smaller “Donfather” flag in black that resembled the logo from the “Godfather” films. 

“Jan. 6 wasn’t a crime. It was a First Amendment exercise,” said an aging woman sporting a MAGA hat and braided pink pigtails. She went on to claim that the Capitol riot was a “false flag” started by undercover government operatives. By her own account, she wasn’t there. “I’m smart enough not to admit I was on Capitol grounds that day,” she explained.

Near her, a young Trump supporter who also said he’d come in from out of town marched around with his own “Trump or Death” flag, shouting, “Trump is right about everything.” He dismissed the 78 felony charges against the former president. When I asked, “If he was convicted of a crime, any crime, and you witnessed it, would you still vote for him?” he gave a one-word answer:  “Absolutely.”

“Is there any circumstance under which you wouldn’t vote for him?” I asked. 

“Absolutely not. Because he’s the perfect president,” the man said with supreme confidence.

“You don’t get much, do you, friend?” someone else asked him. OK, that was also me. 

A few minutes later I got a call from a friend: “Wheels down.” Trump’s plane had arrived in D.C. — he flew in from his golf club in New Jersey — and he was headed to the federal courthouse to be arraigned on his latest felony charges. 

As the courthouse shut down to handle this indictment, Patrick and Olaide Morang, an interracial couple, left the courthouse. They’d just been married. “We were told we were the last matter being settled in the courthouse before it shut down for Trump’s arraignment, and we had to see it,” Patrick said. Olaide just shook her head. 

“Hell of a way to celebrate a wedding,” someone else said.

They left the scene smiling, hand in hand, shortly before Trump arrived.

A large crowd surrounded three sides of the courthouse, but the former president was brought in the back, underground and away from the crowds, entering the building through a tunnel.

Inside, special counsel Jack Smith awaited Trump’s arrival. They wound up sitting about 15 feet apart in the courtroom. Reporters inside said they exchanged glances as they waited for the hearing to start. 

As the former president raised his hand to take the oath, someone in the press room reportedly said, “F**k you and your little hand, you little b***h.”

Trump’s entourage led him through the back of the courthouse. More than 50 members of the media, public and court staff were also in the room, along with Secret Service agents and other security. Seven federal judges from the D.C. district observed the proceedings from the back row.

An overflow room housed staffers, press and some of the police officers who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6 insurrection. They watched a livestream that included shots of Smith, Trump (from two angles) and Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya. As the former president raised his hand to take the oath, someone in the room reportedly said, “F**k you and your little hand, you little b***h.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn, who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6 and was awarded the Presidential Citizens Medal by Joe Biden earlier this year, said he wasn’t surprised. “This is how it should happen. That’s where it belongs. It’s in a courtroom. That’s where it should be settled. I didn’t expect much, but I want to be there when the trial starts.”

When Joy Reid of MSNBC later asked Dunn what he would ask Trump if he had the chance, Dunn was succinct: “I wouldn’t ask him a question. I wouldn’t waste my time. I have no words for him.”

Dunn and other officers who gathered at the courthouse on Thursday said they were impressed by Smith. “We saw what he said when he filed the charges,” Dunn said. “He has our best interests at heart.” 

While Trump was being arraigned, outside the building a handful of “Blacks for Trump” protesters marched through the crowd, singing his praises and calling him “King.” They said they hoped to “humiliate” Jack Smith because he’s “a sellout.”

A woman who heard some of this as she walked by shouted, “Blacks for Trump? Isn’t that like chicken for McNuggets?” She got a few laughs, but not from the “Blacks for Trump” crowd.

A woman walking by had a decent comeback: “Blacks for Trump? Isn’t that like chicken for McNuggets?” She got a few laughs, but not from them.

While that was going on a woman dressed in a Trump-baby outfit began crying, “I don’t want to go to jail!” while others nearby shouted, “No bail! Trump in jail!” A woman with a megaphone who railed against the media for giving so much attention to the Trump supporters and ignoring her almost started a fight with a small group of pro-Trump protesters. A guy who said he was a railroad conductor said there was too much hate and that everyone should just get along.

A lunch truck pulled up to sell gyros to hungry folks in the crowd, irrespective of their politics. Another guy walked around shouting, “Ice-cold water! Get your ice-cold water here.”

A truck toting a “Free Julian Assange” poster in its flatbed nearly hit the water vendor, although no malice was intended. A competing water vendor announced that his bottles were 50 cents cheaper.

I was looking for the guy selling ice-cold beer, but I never found him.

Shortly after 4 o’clock the judge released Trump without requiring him to post bail and set the next hearing for Aug. 28.

Those engrossed in the circus outside didn’t even notice Trump’s arrival, much less his departure, even as the sirens screamed, the helicopters whined and the motorcade sped from the scene.

Trump avoided the catnip of hundreds of news outlets from across the globe gathered to witness his latest arraignment. He’s got bigger problems. He loves to play to the cameras, but pool reporters who traveled with him said he looked as if he had the weight of the world on his shoulders. That could be an understatement. Beginning in October he is likely to face court proceedings every month until at least next May or June. This is just the beginning — and given Trump’s propensity to spout off, his lawyers have surely warned him that “anything you can and say will be used against you.”

Still, he couldn’t resist a few words as he boarded his private jet and headed back to his private club in Bedminster. He once again called the prosecution a sham and said it was political persecution, while refusing to address the new charges he now faces.

But looking at the crowd gathered outside the courthouse — the few dozen protesters who grabbed media attention by supporting Trump, and the few dozen there to protest against him — it seems obvious that Trump has lost control of the narrative, just as he faces his greatest challenge.

Donald Trump is battling for his life. His supporters and detractors, energized by his actions, are merely battling for airtime. Trump is ultimately irrelevant to them even as they use his favorite battle cry: Look at me. 

In short, Donald Trump’s performance art, which mesmerized the entire country for years, is fading away. Jack Smith and the Justice Department are trying to bring us back to reality.

Trump’s Jan. 6 defense strategy: “Flood the zone with sh*t”

Within the first 48 hours of Donald Trump’s latest indictment, on federal charges related to his attempted coup after the 2020 election, the number of Republican excuses for his crimes rivaled the number of votes he demanded Georgia election officials fabricate to steal the election. (Which was 11,780, for those whose memory needs refreshing.) In the true spirit of competitive GOP hackery, each “defense” was dumber than the last. 

There were claims that “free speech” provides Trump blanket immunity for conspiring to overturn an election, on the grounds that most conspiring is done with vocal cords. As a Georgia State University law professor, Anthony Michael Kreis, told Salon, “A person cannot walk into a bank and say, ‘stick ’em up,’ and then cling to the First Amendment’s protections.” Similarly, it’s not “free speech” when Trump told people to commit crimes for him, simply because he used his mouth to do so. Even Trump’s former attorney general, Bill Barr, dismissed this gambit by saying, “free speech doesn’t give you the right to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy.” As Barr pointed out, no conspiracy charge could stick if the “conspiring” part was excluded from evidence. 

Then there’s the ‘”What about Hunter Biden” defense, in which Republicans try to change the subject to the non-political crimes of a private citizen, who happens to be the president’s son. The implicit argument here is that because there’s a person who has never held elected office and who failed to pay his taxes, Trump now has a blank check to commit far more serious crimes, such as stealing classified documents or attempting to overthrow democracy. It’s very much as if you argued you get to murder people because your neighbor got a speeding ticket. It certainly demonstrates how much contempt Republicans have for the intelligence of their voters. 

We need your help to stay independent

Then there are the various flavors of psychological projection, as Republicans scream accusations at President Joe Biden about “weaponization of government” and “election interference.” Of course, this is actually what Trump is guilty of since he tried to use presidential powers to overturn an election, a plot that involved trying to gut the Justice Department and threatening to use military violence to finish off his coup. 

Trump’s team knows he can’t win a fair trial so instead they are angling for jury nullification by spewing so much toxic crap that it thoroughly poisons the well.

Trump’s lawyers are making some arguments so stupid that the likeliest explanation is they’re trolling. Trump lawyer Alina Habba told Fox News that Trump “is the most ethical American I know,” a claim so laughable that the only purpose of it must be to get “gawk at this weirdo” headlines. Trump lawyer John Lauro told CBS News that he’s going to ask for a venue change to West Virginia, claiming it’s “more diverse” than Washington D.C. The unsubtle race-baiting echoes the rhetoric of the Big Lie, which relied heavily on claims that votes in cities with large Black populations are “fraudulent.” 

There are so many more, which get increasingly baroque. For instance, Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA is trying to pass off the fake electors scheme as a “publicity stunt,” which is as nonsensical as it is dishonest. Crucially, each is stupider than the last. Partially, this is because trying to mount an honest defense of Trump is impossible. Also, there’s no point in expending effort at polishing these argumentative turds, since the GOP base will regurgitate any talking point handed them, no matter how idiotic. Why feed people lobster, when they are just as willing to eat garbage? 

But mostly, the strategy is what Trump ally and far-right podcaster Steve Bannon famously called the “flood the zone with shit” technique. Opening up a firehose of disinformation and bad faith arguments is about overwhelming the discourse so that ordinary people can’t figure out what the hell is going on, and give up even trying. It also exhausts good faith interlocutors, who wear themselves out trying to debunk all the lies. Liars have a huge advantage in the “debate” format that structures so much political dialogue, because it’s easier and faster to make stuff up than it is to carefully correct it. 

This technique is also called the “Gish gallop,” named after a creationist named Duane Gish, who would employ the tactic in supposed “debates” against biologists. As journalist Mehdi Hasan explains, “Its aim is simple: to defeat one’s opponent by burying them in a torrent of incorrect, irrelevant, or idiotic arguments.” It’s a major reason why scientists and doctors have started to refuse to “debate” purveyors of disinformation, such as anti-vaxxers. The Gish gallop makes a mockery of discourse, and frankly, it’s not a legitimate debate when one side is lying freely and the other is hamstrung by a commitment to facts. 

Notably, the Gish gallop is the strategy Trump used during his coup. He and his allies unleashed a blizzard of lies, accusing thousands of people of being in on a massive conspiracy on Biden’s behalf. It was impossible to keep up with all the false accusations against voting machine companies, election officials, election volunteers, ordinary voters, and politicians from both political parties. Debunking all the lies was even harder.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


If you can stomach it, rereading Trump’s inciting speech on January 6, 2021 illustrates this point. It’s a classic Gish gallop, a litany of lies:  “Over 36,000 ballots were illegally cast by non-citizens,” “15,000 ballots were cast by individuals who moved out of the state,” “18,000 illegal ballots were cast by individuals who registered to vote using an address listed as vacant,” “4,500 illegal ballots were cast by individuals,” “more than 42,000 double votes,” etc., etc. All lies, but fired off in such rapid succession that it numbs the brain, turning off any lingering skepticism in his followers and wearing down his opponents so that fighting back feels unimaginable. 

The good news is the Gish gallop is ineffective in the courtroom, at least when a good and honest judge is in control, which appears to be the case with Judge Tanya Chutkan, the Barack Obama appointee who drew the Trump coup case. A judge can stop lawyers from making false claims to juries and put guardrails on the kinds of arguments they use. Unlike in the typical “debate” format, lawyers rely heavily on facts and evidence, which generally has to be real and not stuff they make up on the spot. In addition, lawyers have ample time and space to rebut arguments from the opposing side. Trump’s lawyers will likely be seriously limited in their efforts to overwhelm the jury with bullshit. We saw how the clarity a court provides worked in the civil trial where E. Jean Carroll sued Trump for rape and defamation. The truth had a fighting chance in a courtroom, and therefore Carroll prevailed. 

The bad news is that Trump, his lawyers, and the larger GOP hope to win this case outside of court. The firehose of lies is about making people give up entirely on trying to figure out the facts, and instead just retreating to their partisan preferences. The hope is that by the time a jury is empaneled, Republican voters will have become so entrenched in the “how dare they come for our precious, precious Trump” position, that any of them who happen to be sitting on the jury will be unable to offer fair hearing of the prosecution’s arguments. 

In other words, Trump’s team knows he can’t win a fair trial so instead they are angling for jury nullification by spewing so much toxic crap that it thoroughly poisons the well. Hopefully, special prosecutor Jack Smith gets his wish for a speedy trial. It’s the best chance of getting a jury that hasn’t been ground down already by Trump’s lies and is ready to hear the case with an open mind. 

“What We Do in the Shadows” prepared us for the disbelief that met the latest Jan. 6 indictment

For five seasons of “What We Do in the Shadows” our favorite nest of Staten Island vampires has managed to live among humans virtually unnoticed, exploiting them however they can while getting away with it. But one day the jig will be up, and they’ll have to face the consequences of all the bloodsucking and murders they’ve committed while trying to pass as human.

These monsters are only able to succeed because humans find disbelief easier than reckoning with the truth.

There may have been a time when one could call this the core tension of “What We Do in the Shadows.” Now, that’s less of a given. Laszlo (Matt Berry), Nadja (Natasia Demetriou), Nandor (Kayvan Novak) and Colin Robinson (Mark Proksch) have grown bolder and sloppier in their interactions with their community.

Vampires have special powers that enable them to get away with all sorts of nonsense; Nandor’s outstanding talent for hypnosis, for instance, gets them out of jail in an early episode. But he also mesmerizes the cops to salute him and Laszlo by telling them he’s Captain “Sully” Sullenberger and Laszlo is Tom Selleck‘s character from “Blue Bloods.”

These should only be short-term fixes, but what’s become increasingly apparent is that these monsters are only able to succeed because humans find disbelief easier than reckoning with the truth. Another explanation, evinced by the vampires’ next-door neighbors Sean (Anthony Atamanuik) and Charmaine (Marissa Jaret Winokur), is that we’re simply too stupid to embrace common sense and accede to be governed by an agreed-upon set of rules and laws.

But maybe that view is colored by a post-third indictment perspective. As Nandor reminds us in “Local News,” this season’s fifth episode, he’s been a Staten Island resident for many centuries.

Unwisely he doesn’t say this to the mockumentary’s producers but to WYXK News Channel 8’s Joanna Roscoe (Jamie Linn Watson) and everyone watching that day’s 7 o’clock newscast. Joanna is broadcasting live from the flooded street outside the vampire residence, where a water main has burst. And Nandor, of all people, decides to give his man-on-the-street account by offering that he hasn’t seen so much water since “the great flood in 1892, Joanna. It was a big boy.”

Then he catches himself. “Silly me, not 1892 – 1992,” kicking a verbal deluge that closes with that accurate yet humanly impossible count of the time he’s put in at his address.

What We Do In The ShadowsWhat We Do In The Shadows (FX)“Many centuries!” Joanna cheerfully repeats, jokingly adding, “Well, it looks like we have discovered the secret to eternal life.” At this, Nandor freaks out and runs off while blurting “Oh s***ty s**t, I’ve f****d it!” announcing to the coven that he’s exposed them.

This kicks off a cascade of panic-informed schemes, including a nearly successful kidnapping conspiracy. It all culminates in a “nothing to see here” fake-out that would give Fox News’ primetime lineup a run for its money.

“What We Do in the Shadows” has never overtly aspired to be politically apposite in its narratives despite the roommates’ ascension to lead the Vampiric Council of the Eastern Seaboard, making The Guide (Kristen Schaal) a regular fixture in their lives.

But that never played as a specific critique of Donald Trump’s administration despite the similarities between Nadja and Nandor’s leadership style and all we endured under the 45th president’s regime. The two of them were and are greedy and shortsighted, repeating the classic tendency among those ill-suited for power to use it as a blunt instrument instead of governing for the many.

But the Vampire Council is a figurehead that’s only as powerful as their leaders’ desire to enforce vampire law, regulations Nadja, Laszlo, Nandor and Colin are constantly circumventing. The group escaped their collective death sentence twice before rising to the political top of the underworld. Not that it matters.

Colin Robinson filibusters with fabricated stories about his nonexistent children and defends empty stances simply to drain his audience of their will to live.

In this new season, they’ve gone a step further by inserting themselves into the human political machine, first by supporting Sean’s run for comptroller on the flimsiest of platforms, then by Colin Robinson taking over Sean’s failed campaign strictly for the opportunities afforded by the debate to feed on a large audience watching live and via telecast.

What We Do In The ShadowsWhat We Do In The Shadows (FX)Nadja and Nandor’s Vampire Council appointment is a classic case of failing upward – the Supreme Worldwide Vampiric Council reasons they’ve outlasted their enemies, so why not hand them the reins of power?

What Colin Robinson does in that local political race is an old-fashioned grift. During the debate, he filibusters with fabricated stories about his nonexistent children and defends empty stances simply to drain his audience of their will to live. Mike Lindell has nothing on him.

“Local News” progresses this by adding unwitting collaborators in the guise of Channel 8’s news crew. They are not faux-furious pundits with smug grins, though, merely your standard headline ciphers. Joanna, the sitcom stereotypical beat reporter, smiles through whatever lunacy flies in her face, calmly vamping as two large men dash up behind her with a sack large enough to stuff her inside.

Back at the studio the anchors vacuously nod at Nandor’s escalating trumpery, as they do when The Guide wrests Joanna’s microphone away to parley on behalf of all vampires. 

“There will be damage. Bloodshed! We are not so different you and us,” she pleads with the newsteam who, again, thinks it’s only covering a neighborhood’s burst water pipe. “We all want peace!”

We need your help to stay independent

This one-sided disarray mimics the chaotic self-serving logic that led to and transpired during the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection. What Justice Department special prosecutor Jack Smith details in a 45-page document is not about what Trump said but what he did, or tried to do. The most chilling example may be the reported exchange in which a White House lawyer predicted there would be “riots in every major city in the United States” if Trump stayed in office after losing the election. At this “co-conspirator 4” (presumed to be former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark) replies, “Well . . . that’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.”  

That a confidante of any outgoing U.S. president would blithely suggest putting down their citizens’ right to protect with the military is frightening. But it’s also the type of suggestion a grasping simpleton would make, someone who knows the letter of the law but doesn’t respect what it’s there to protect or prevent. Coupling that with the Republicans’ mass buy-in to the delusion that the violence Americans witnessed in live coverage that day didn’t happen — that it was mostly a “peaceful protest” — somehow makes it all worse. We came so close to losing our democracy due to some real dolts.

Whether “Local News” writer Sarah Naftalis intended Nandor’s screw-up to function as a goofy allegory for current political events is inconsequential since this week’s nuclear political development invites us to notice a few parallels. Faced with the possibility of being hounded out of her home, Nadja immediately dyes her hair Ivanka blonde and plans her exit route.

What We Do In The ShadowsWhat We Do In The Shadows (FX)Laszlo proposes killing Joanna before downgrading his first strike proposal to kidnapping with no clear strategy of what to do after that. Colin Robinson installs booby traps throughout the house, dons a Rambo-esque get-up and screams about making his last stand.

Nandor riles up the team with a speech worth of a rally held on the Ellipse. “A great enemy is upon us: Joanna Roscoe and her army of Channel 8 viewers! This is not the first foe we have met, nor will it be the last. They may outnumber us. They may have a satellite truck and a sky-high chopper or whatever the f**k . . . But this s**thole on Staten Island is our home!”

With that, they charge the unassuming local news truthteller only to be thwarted by a failure in urban infrastructure: the pavement collapses under their old-timey getaway car. To cover them Colin Robinson kills the live satellite feed by blowing up the news truck, but that doesn’t stop Joanna from noticing the other vampires as they levitate their car out of the sewers.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Knowing the audience would never accept her report without visual proof, she urges her cameraman to record this inconceivable vision, forcing the vampires to chase her back to Channel 8’s studio. Once there, Nandor and Nadja put the anchors to sleep before taking over the newscast to hypnotize their viewers. “You will remember nothing out of the ordinary tonight. That is all ye know and all ye need to know.”

There’s just one problem – the cameras are still rolling, and viewers remain tuned in. So Nadja and Nandor read the next lines in the teleprompter.

“Hip-hip Pup-ray!” Nandor says nervously, with Nadja replying, “Indeed. It is time again for Staten Island’s Annual Puppy Parade.”

“Which is always a barking good time,” Nandor responds. “Here’s hoping we have some nice weather for the promenading pooches.”  

Colin Robinson lends a hand with the weather, ignoring the arterial spray across the green screen, followed by Laszlo doing an impressive job of handling sports headlines.

You can’t claim that “What We Do in the Shadows” has run out of creative ways to prove what Napoleon Bonaparte once said about politics: “Stupidity is not a handicap.” He knew that the people placed in charge of legislating often aren’t up to the task. But their failings are worsened when the public has a say in their hire and refuses to acknowledge their criminal unsuitability for the job.

Then again, knowing that tens of millions are buying the right wing media’s argument that the former president merely engaged in free speech and the deadly insurrection we watched unfold on TV was no big deal, maybe our vampires never had anything to worry about. Humans will gladly ignore anything that makes their reality less convenient, unless it’s puppies exercising their right to peaceful and oh-so-cute assembly.

“What We Do in the Shadows” airs Thursdays at 10 p.m. and streams on Hulu the next day.

“This is not the place that I left”: Trump rips Washington in post-arraignment statement

After pleading not guilty on Thursday to charges relating to the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, Donald Trump addressed reporters before departing for his private plane back to Bedminster.

“This is a very sad day for America,” Trump said. “And it was also very sad driving through Washington, D.C. and seeing the filth and the decay and all of the broken buildings and walls and the graffiti. This is not the place that I left, it’s a very sad thing to see it.”

“This is a persecution of a political opponent,” he furthered. “This was never supposed to happen in America,” going on to make a swipe at Biden by claiming to be beating him by “a lot.” In her own statement made regarding the arraignment, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga re-circulated the “Big Lie” claims that got Trump into all of this trouble in the first place, saying, “President Trump is being arrested, the Deep State is coming after him, all because he committed the ‘crime’ of winning the 2016 election. Joe Biden and his DOJ are conducting the most corrupt election interference campaign we’ve ever seen.”

California’s extreme wildfires are triggering “fire whirls”

Thousands of acres are burning as of Wednesday from California and Oregon to Washington and the US-Canada border, all due to wildfires being exacerbated by climate change. Because humans are emitting greenhouse gases by burning fossil fuels, we are exacerbating unprecedented extreme weather events like extreme wildfires.

As of Wednesday, California’s York fire has torched more than 82,000 acres of Mojave desert, including thousands of iconic Joshua trees. Perhaps the most seemingly bizarre detail: Firefighters battling the wildfires along the California-Nevada border have noticed so-called “fire whirls,” or wildfire plums that spin with naturally rotating air to form tornado-like spinning funnels.

“In some locations, firefighters on the north side of the fire observed fire whirls also known as whirlwinds,” the Mojave National Preserve explained on Monday in a Facebook post. Meanwhile, Oregon’s Bedrock fire has been consuming 1,000 acres every day, with some estimates that it won’t be contained until October. Climate change experts agree that the current extreme weather patterns are not only caused by global warming, but are going to increase in frequency and intensity.

“It’s a ‘new abnormal’ and it is now playing out in real time — the impacts of climate change are upon us in the form of unprecedented, dangerous extreme weather events,” climatologist Michael E. Mann told Salon last month. “And it will only get worse and worse as long as we continue to burn fossil fuels and generate carbon pollution.”

Trump pleads not guilty to 2020 election charges

Donald Trump was arraigned on Thursday for four charges related to the 2020 election, broken down as such: Conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding, obstructing a congressional proceeding and conspiracy against rights in connection with what prosecutors allege was a plan to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Trump pleaded not guilty to the charges, as was expected, and the next hearing has been set for August 28 before Judge Chutkan. Prosecutors did not seek detention of Trump in the meantime. 

During his arraignment, which was attended by Jack Smith and overseen by Magistrate Judge Moxila A. Upadhyaya, Trump was referred to as “Mr.” or “Sir,” a notable break from usual formalities associated with a former president. Per The Washington Post, the judge advised Trump that he must comply with the conditions of his release, making it clear that if he failed to do so, a warrant could be issued for his arrest and he could be held before his trial. “Your most important condition of release is that you not commit a state, federal or local offense. If so, your release may be revoked,” Upadhyaya said. “You may also face a longer sentence for having committed a crime while on release.

Scott MacFarlane, a CBS News Congressional Correspondent who live-tweeted from the courthouse, highlighted the ways in which Trump did all he could to save face during the proceedings saying, “Trump gets a motorcade escort out of the courthouse. No photos of Trump in court were permitted. Unlike so many other high-profile criminal defendants, he is insulated from the images of a courthouse walk, a booking photo or police arrest. He gets to control the optics.”

“Untold: Jake Paul the Problem Child”: The 6 most eye-opening revelations from Netflix’s doc

Not many social media influencers can say they have a successful career on the internet and in competitive sports. But Jake Paul surely can. 

The self-proclaimed “problem child,” alongside his older brother Logan, made a name for themselves on the now-defunct Vine where they uploaded skits, pranks and scripted videos. They then took their content over to YouTube and soon enough, the brothers earned a huge following. And with that huge following came money, clout and infamy. There was a time when the Paul brothers’ names were synonymous with all things bad and ugly. As for Jake, the 26-year-old had several scandals, lawsuits and run-ins with law enforcement under his belt.

It was around this time that Jake ditched his career in social media and Hollywood for one in sports, specifically in boxing. The sport became a safe haven of sorts for the controversial star, who developed mental health issues in the aftermath of his internet downfall. But it also was quite ruthless, considering that die-hard fans of the sport bashed Jake for being a fraud and accused him of ruining the art of boxing.

Jake’s story of an influencer-turned-athlete (and entrepreneur and rapper) is less inspirational and more sensational. His journey is chronicled in “Untold: Jake Paul the Problem Child,” an all-new sports documentary from Netflix. In addition to starring Jake, the feature includes interviews with his close family members, mentors and other fellow boxers, many of whom once undermined Paul’s dedication and commitment to the sport.

Here are the six biggest revelations from the documentary:

01
Jake said he was physically abused by his father
Untold: Jake Paul the Problem ChildGreg Paul in “Untold: Jake Paul the Problem Child” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

Jake opened up about his relationship with his father, Greg Paul, saying he would “slap the sh*t out of me.” 

 

“I don’t resent it,” he continued. “I’m understanding of why he did that. That’s all he knew.”

 

Greg, however, asserted that he never laid hands on his kids but admitted that he disciplined them rather harshly: “I said, ‘Jake, I did pick you up and throw you on a couch a couple times. But I was afraid of you. That’s what the f**k dads are supposed to do.’ If somebody comes in here, starts harassing everybody and smacking around an old lady, do you want a couple Greg Pauls in the room? Or do you want some f**king fairy fa**ot, whiny-a** little b***h who’s gonna sit there and talk about emotions? Who do you want in the room?”

 

Jake’s relationship with his father still remains complicated, according to Logan. “Jake is still traumatized to this day about how my dad treated him, and they still don’t get along like they should,” he said.

02
Jake credits Disney Channel for giving him purpose in life
Untold: Jake Paul the Problem ChildJake Paul in “Untold: Jake Paul the Problem Child” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

Shortly after the Paul brothers went viral on the internet, they dropped out of high school and moved to Los Angeles, where they collaborated with other big-shot influencers. Jake also began pursuing a career in Hollywood and eventually landed the starring role of Dirk Mann, a self-proclaimed “internet daredevil” and tritagonist in the Disney Channel comedy show “Bizaardvark.”

 

“And so it really blew me up, took me to another level, and legitimized my whole purpose,” Jake said. “It gave credibility to what it was that I was trying to do.” As told by Greg, his son was so famous that girls threw their panties at him when he walked down the street. Jake also made a ton of money and was able to buy a $7.4 million house at just 18 years of age.

 

Paul was later fired from the show mid-season after his neighbors complained about his rowdy YouTube stunts, which included starting a fire in his backyard, doing dirt bike stunts on his street, and burning a mattress and other furniture in an empty swimming pool. In a KTLA news segment, Paul’s neighbors called their living situation a “living hell” and a “war zone.”

03
Jake and Logan had YouTube beef with each other
Untold: Jake Paul the Problem ChildJake Paul in “Untold: Jake Paul the Problem Child” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

What once began as a collaborative effort soon turned into bitter competition as the Paul brothers fought to attain more followers, online fame and clout. At first, the brothers engaged in playful taunting. But their minor squabbles eventually intensified into a bitter hatred for one another.

 

“He was my only competition on YouTube, and I was getting more views than him,” Jake said of his brother. An overconfident Logan claimed otherwise, saying he was beating his younger brother in the entertainment arena: “This is so f**kin’ stupid, but I had more subs. I had the girl. I had more people paying attention. I was selling more merch.

 

“‘I’m bigger than you. I’m better looking than you. I’m more creative than you. I tell better stories than you,'” Logan continued. “I thought I was just a better version of Jake. It was war, dog. It was YouTube f**kin’ war.” The competition became so heated that Logan even slept with his younger brother’s ex-girlfriend at the time, believing that this would prove the point that he was the superior sibling.

04
Boxing “reinvigorated” Jake
Untold: Jake Paul the Problem ChildJake Paul in “Untold: Jake Paul the Problem Child” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

Following his social media downfall, Jake said he found solace in boxing, which made him “feel alive again.”

 

“I think in the YouTube world, not only was I not making progress, I was hurting myself,” Jake continued. “I was going the opposite way. For the longest time, I didn’t like myself. I wasn’t happy. And so when I got into something where I could slowly start to make progress, it brought back happiness in my life. And boxing gave me that again.”

 

His older brother reiterated his sentiments, saying boxing gave Jake worth, “which he hadn’t [when] making stupid insignificant vlogs on YouTube.”

 

“In the world I was living in, I was on top. I was getting a bunch of views,” Jake added. “I knew what I was doing. I had a big ego. Then I step into the boxing gym, all of that goes out the door. You get in the ring with one of these guys, they’ll beat your a**.”

05
Jake’s multiple run-ins with law enforcement
Untold: Jake Paul the Problem ChildJake Paul in “Untold: Jake Paul the Problem Child” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

On Aug. 5, 2020, FBI agents served a search warrant at Jake’s Calabasas home and seized multiple firearms in a raid that was connected to a riot at an Arizona shopping mall. Misdemeanor charges were filed against Jake in early June following the riot, which took place at Scottsdale Fashion Square in May 2020. Jake said he was trying to find people protesting against the death of George Floyd and denied partaking in looting or vandalism.   

 

In April 2021, Jake was accused of sexual assault by TikTok star Justine Paradise. In a 20-minute video posted on YouTube, Paradise alleged Jake forced her to perform oral sex on him and touched her inappropriately without consent. Jake denied the accusations in a statement posted on Twitter.

 

In January 2022, Jake released an explicit YouTube diss track directed at UFC president Dana White, in which he called White a “scumbag” for not increasing fighter pay or giving them healthcare options.

 

“I haven’t met a single person who says anything good about you,” Paul said in a message at the end of his rap. “I passed my drug test, and you went silent. I’m keeping my foot on your neck until you tap, b***h. Stop raising your pay-per-view prices on the fans and not paying fighters more. Greedy, lonely, old, bald b***h.”

06
Jake is gearing up for his fight with Nate Diaz
Untold: Jake Paul the Problem ChildJake Paul in “Untold: Jake Paul the Problem Child” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)
Jake currently lives with his brother in Puerto Rico, where he also trains. His next fight will take place on Aug. 5, 2023, in Dallas, Texas, against professional mixed martial artist Nate Diaz. Diaz recently dissed Jake in an episode of Bradley Martyn’s Raw Talk, saying, “Imma go beat his a** for talkin’ s**t.”

“Untold: Jake Paul the Problem Child” is currently available for streaming on Netflix. Watch a trailer for the documentary below, via YouTube:

Ron DeSantis vows to “start slitting throats on day one” while discussing federal workers

Florida Governor and 2024 presidential candidate Ron DeSantis said that he would “start slitting throats on day one” when taking on federal “deep state” workers during a Sunday campaign event in New Hampshire hosted by former Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass. According to The Hill, DeSantis has previously used the jarring expression in an interview he did last month with right-leaning outlet Real America’s Voice, where he discussed how, if elected, he would change the hierarchy in the Department of Defense.

“You know, they may have to slit some throats. And it’s a lot harder to do that if these are people that you’ve trained with in the past or that you know,” DeSantis said after criticizing the idea that a retired flag or general officer could be promoted to secretary of defense. “So we’re going to have somebody out there, you know, be very firm, very strong, but they are going to make sure that we have the best people in the best positions, and there’s not going to be necessarily prior relationships that would cloud that judgment.”

The national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, Everett Kelley, decried DeSantis’ comments about federal employees as “dangerous, disgusting, disgraceful, and disqualifying” in a statement. “We’ve seen too often in recent years – from the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 to the sacking of the Capitol on January 6, 2021 – that violent anti-government rhetoric from politicians has deadly consequences,” Kelley concluded. “Any candidate who positions themselves within that shameful tradition has no place in public office.”