Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Trump cancels trip to GOP fraud “hearing” at Pennsylvania Wyndham after Giuliani exposed to COVID-19

President Donald Trump scrapped plans to join attorney Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday for a public “hearing” by the Pennsylvania Republican Party on unfounded voter fraud allegations at a Wyndham hotel.

Trump directed aides to make plans for him to travel to Gettysburg, the famed Civil War battle site, for the hearing, according to CNN and The New York Times. Some advisers were “kept in the dark” about the plans, while others “tried” to tell the president that the trip was a “mistake,” according to New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman.

“Among other things, Trump is likely to announce a 2024 campaign soon and this is brand building,” Haberman wrote on Twitter.

But the trip was ultimately scrapped after Giuliani was exposed to someone who tested positive for COVID-19, CNN reported. 

The site of the event — a Republican gathering at a Wyndham Hotel in Gettysburg rather than the capital of Harrisburg — drew mockery on the heels of Giuliani’s ill-fated news conference at the Philadelphia Four Seasons Total Landscaping.

“Do you remember when the Trump folks had their big press conference in Philadelphia? And the president said it was at the Four Seasons, but it turned out it was actually in the parking lot of the Four Seasons Landscaping company out by the crematorium and the porn store? Well, same kind of thing here,” quipped MSNBC host Rachel Maddow. “They’re calling this like, ‘The Pennsylvania Legislature’s investigating the election.’ No, people are going to go eat rolled-up sandwiches on a catering plate while they listen to Rudy Giuliani say the things that he said on Lou Dobbs.”

The event was the latest attempt by Trump and his Republican allies to sow doubt in the results of the election. Both there have been no credible reports of voter fraud, according to both Democratic and GOP state officials. A federal judge ripped Giuliani’s bid to throw out legal ballots, writing over the weekend that the campaign provided only “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations” that were “unsupported by evidence.” The Pennsylvania Supreme Court also rejected the campaign’s claims that its poll observers had been blocked from monitoring the counting of ballots.

Pennsylvania certified its votes on Tuesday. The Trump campaign announced the hearing by state senators on the same day, claiming that it would feature “testimony from witnesses who have filed affidavits attesting to 2020 election fraud” and a “feature a presentation from former New York City Mayor and personal attorney to President Trump, Rudy Giuliani.”

“It’s in everyone’s interest to have a full vetting of election irregularities and fraud,” Giuliani said in the news release. “And the only way to do this is with public hearings, complete with witnesses, videos, pictures and other evidence of illegalities from the Nov. 3 election.”

The release suggested that the hearing was part of the Trump team’s effort to convince Republican-led state legislatures to appoint electors who would overrule the will of the voters in states lost handily by Trump. 

“State legislatures are uniquely qualified and positioned to hold hearings on election irregularities and fraud before electors are chosen,” the campaign said. “As established in Article 2, Section 1.2 of the United States Constitution, state legislatures have the sole authority to select their representatives to the Electoral College, providing a critical safeguard against voter fraud and election manipulation.”

The Pennsylvania GOP said the hearing of the Senate Majority Policy Committee would be held at the request of state Sen. Doug Mastriano, who called for the resignation of Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, a Democrat, citing unspecified reports of “irregularities” already dismissed by courts.

The state’s Republican leaders previously rejected suggestions that they appoint electors who would overturn the will of the voters.

“The Pennsylvania General Assembly does not have and will not have a hand in choosing the state’s presidential electors or in deciding the outcome of the presidential election,” state Sen. Jake Corman and state Rep. Kerry Benninghoff said ahead of the election and reiterated after Trump’s defeat.

Trump lost the state by more than 80,000 votes.

The campaign’s statement said similar hearings were planned in next week in Michigan and Arizona. Michigan certified its votes on Monday in spite of pressure from Trump allies to block the vote. Aaron Van Langevelde, one of two Republicans on the Michigan State Board of Canvassers, joined the panel’s two Democrats to certify the results.

Michigan Republicans denied that there would be a hearing.

“The president’s legal team has been invited to submit written testimony instead,” a spokesman for state Hous Speaker Lee Chatfield told ABC News.

Republican state legislative leaders met with Trump at the White House last week but said they would “follow the normal process regarding Michigan’s electors.” They “have not been made aware of any information that would change the outcome of the election,” the added. 

The Trump team’s complaints about Michigan are particularly strange given that the election in the state was not particularly close. Biden won the state by about 3%, or more than 150,000 votes.

After enough states certified their results to put Biden over 270 electoral votes, General Services Administration head Emily Murphy signed paperwork allowing the presidential transition to formally begin.

Arizona, where Biden won by fewer than 12,000 votes, is expected to certify its results by next week. Despite the campaign’s announcement, Arizona Republicans said there is no hearing planned.

“News to me,” state Senate President Karen Fann told The Arizona Republic.

State House Speaker Rusty Bowers, a Republican, said he had not seen any evidence of fraud.

“I do not see, short of finding some type of fraud — which I haven’t heard of anything — I don’t see us in any serious way addressing a change in electors,” he told the Associated Press. “They are mandated by statute to choose according to the vote of the people.”

The Biden campaign dismissed Trump’s attempts to subvert the election.

“Trump did everything he could to disenfranchise voters and stop the results from being certified in Pennsylvania . . . most recently producing one of the more embarrassing courtroom performances of all time, with the judge in the case ruling that their arguments were ‘without merit’ and ‘unsupported by evidence,’” campaign attorney Bob Bauer said in a statement to the Philadelphia Inquirer. “Trump did not succeed in Pennsylvania and he will not succeed anywhere else.”

Trump isn’t the reason we can’t quit Trump — the obsession is really about his followers

Are we addicted to Donald Trump? It’s a question that’s haunting journalists and political commentators, most of whom hate Trump but cannot deny that his name drives traffic and ratings. Even though Trump lost the election and Joe Biden will be the next president, Trump continues to be the big attention draw for political websites and cable news networks.

Part of that is completely understandable. Trump is still big news. He literally spent the past few weeks attempting a coup. While he failed, that doesn’t change the history-making fact that he even tried, or that he got so much support. Certainly Biden, whose main activity is finding boring-but-competent people to staff his administration, can’t compete with that, and there’s no real indication that he wants to. (Unlike Trump, Biden views governing as a job and not just an opportunity to get attention.) 

But there is no doubt that the media remains flatly fascinated with Trump, in no small part because, as Salon’s Andrew O’Hehir argued Monday, “our readers and viewers have enabled and encouraged us at every step” and stories about Trump “outperform every other category of reporting, commentary or analysis we can possibly offer.”

As Philip Bump at the Washington Post documented Tuesday, since Trump first announced his run for president, he “is the political figure who garners the most search interest, cable news mentions or screen time each month since June 2015.” 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Because of all this, it’s become quite fashionable in some circles to haughtily declare that all this interest is tawdry, and that if we simply ignored Trump, he would go away. Hardly a week goes by on social media where I don’t get some reader who, sick of it all, will lash out at me personally and demand that I stop writing about, tweeting about or otherwise giving attention to Trump.

But the command to ignore him didn’t make the bully disappear in junior high school and it certainly doesn’t work with the president. Nor can Trump’s importance in our politics be easily reduced to a pop psychology assumption that all fascination is inherently addiction and therefore bad. 

The reality is that the Trump obsession isn’t really about Trump himself anyway. It’s about his followers.

Don’t get me wrong. I confess some interest in his psychology, which our traffic shows is widely shared. But let’s face it — even on the sociopath scale, Trump’s not as interesting as more exotic specimens like Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer. As a person, Trump is little more than the aged version of the yuppie villain in an ’80s comedy, with a sweater tied around his neck and a sneer for the scruffy heroes. He only has two emotional registers, whining and bullying. He’s boring. 

Bump’s own numbers show this. Prior to his presidential campaign, Trump wasn’t an object of widespread fascination, no matter how much he hustled for attention. Ratings for his reality show were in the toilet and most people didn’t think about him at all. It was only when Trump started to get support from everyday voters that he became the focal point of American politics. 

The reason that Trump captures so much attention, year in and year out, is because of his followers. How did this two-bit moron who can barely read manage to attract a loyal following — one that has apparently grown from the 63 million people voted for him in 2016 to the 74 million who turned out in 2020? These people adore him, so much so that a quarter-million Americans dead and millions more unemployed only made them more determined to give it all up for the orange guy in an ill-fitting suit who wants to end democracy as we know it. It’s a legitimately fascinating mystery. 

The devotion of the Red Hats is, if anything, more bizarre because Trump is so tiresome. Going to one of his infamous rallies, for instance, is volunteering to be tortured, like being strapped to a chair while the biggest boor in the world rants incoherently at you for over an hour. Listening to him ping-pong endlessly between whining and bragging is a form of boredom that makes solitary confinement seem pleasant by comparison. 

And it’s not like his rally-goers felt differently. You could see it on the faces in the crowds, as his supporters would drift away, not really listening except to perk up to applaud at the mention of buzzwords (“Crooked Hillary,” “build the wall”, “Hunter Biden”), but never really paying much attention to what Trump was actually saying.

They weren’t there for him, after all. They were there as a show of force, to let the hated liberals know that they had the numbers and the determination — so much so that they’d sacrifice a night of their preciously short lives listening to a  braggart ramble on about windmills and and lie about his own vitality for an hour. Trump will never understand this, but it was never about him. He was there for them, a vehicle for their resentments and, critically, their will to power. He was the weapon they wielded in their war to exert dominance over American politics, even as their actual numbers dwindle. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


This movement is what is interesting, because it’s ultimately, about the rise of American fascism. It’s a real threat, as demonstrated by Biden’s uncomfortably close margins in the same swing states Hillary Clinton lost in 2016. Indeed, it’s arguable that these forces still won in 2020, as they (probably) kept control of the Senate, gained seats in the House and have overtaken the federal courts, kneecapping the ability of the majority of American voters, who support the Democrats, to exert their political will.

That the most powerful country in the world is being held hostage by an authoritarian, racist minority drunk on conspiracy theories is the biggest story in politics. It’s part of a larger story about the entire world in the grip of rising authoritarianism. Their power will define Joe Biden’s presidency. Their ability to cripple him will matter more than any of his Cabinet picks or even his executive orders.

Trump is just the shorthand for this very real and ongoing problem. The reason it feels like we can’t quit Trump is that we can’t quit the people who elected him. As Bob Cesca argued this week at Salon, we shouldn’t pander to those people or seek to placate them, but we also can’t just ignore them. Not while they still control so many levers of power. 

Nowadays, most educated people reject the “great man” theory of history. We understand, intellectually at least, that even legendary villains like Hitler or heroes like FDR were a product of their time and not acting out of some cosmic destiny.

But it’s still hard not to reduce politics to personality. Our brains are hardwired to focus on individuals, who have agency and psychology that we can understand, rather than the more diffuse motivations of the crowd. 

But Trump could keel over tomorrow, never to tweet again, and he wouldn’t go away. He might even grow in power, made into a martyr now that he can no longer embarrass his followers with his routine bouts of public idiocy, such as when he suggested people inject Lysol. Trump the symbol was always far more important than Trump the man. And no matter what happens to Trump the man, the movement he represents remains a live threat to American democracy, and to the world. 

Trump may run for president again in 2024, his daughter-in-law Lara says on Fox Business

Trump campaign senior adviser Lara Trump admitted on Wednesday that President Donald Trump is already planning his future outside the White House.

During an interview on Fox Business, host Dagen McDowell asked the president’s daughter-in-law about a possible run for the presidency in 2024.

“Well, we’re still convinced that he’s going to be in office for the next four years,” Lara Trump argued. “So we’ll have to wait and see if that actually happens.”

“That’s said, if for some reason the president does not, you know, win all these legal battles then I think he’s said that he would be interested in looking to 2024,” she added. “And I think that there are about 74 million Americans that would support him in a run for office.”

Watch the video below via YouTube:

Trump’s bizarre Georgia play: He wants to show Republicans he’s still the boss

Despite having begrudgingly allowed the General Services Administration to issue an “ascertainment” that Joe Biden is the president-elect and the normal transition process could begin, Donald Trump is still relentlessly flogging the lie that the election was stolen by the Democrats and he is the rightful winner. And he’s sending out a daily fusillade of emails begging for money, with the alleged goal of overturning the results.

There is no record of how much the Trump campaign have raised with his grift. According to some reports, they were taking in $10 million a day shortly after the election was called. It appears Team Trump plans to use most of the money for a post-presidency slush fund, either to finance Trump’s hypothetical 2024 run or to curry favors with Republican politicians. I don’t think we need to wonder whether any of it will wind up in Trump’s pockets, because of course it will.

So far, the legal challenges have all been thrown out of court since they offered no real evidence. Once all the lawyers who cared about their reputations dropped out, the only ones left were a clown car full of fools driven by Rudy Giuliani, with the even more delusional legal sidekick Sidney Powell riding shotgun.

Powell was shoved out the door this week when her conspiracy theories proved to be too much even for the Trump campaign, which should tell you everything you need to know. But for a worked-up, cult-like base primed by the likes of Pizzagate and QAnon to believe anything, Powell’s wild stories about how the election was stolen from Trump make perfect sense.

Powell’s “theory” isn’t worth going into here because it’s utter nonsense. But that’s not the reason she was canned. She made the mistake of saying that Republicans and Democrats alike were on the take, which didn’t sit well with the party. But her bigger error was in focusing on Georgia and ranting against Sens. David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, the pair of Republican incumbents who are fighting to hold their seats — and a GOP Senate majority — in the January runoff elections. And Powell had the audacity to air some of the party’s dirty laundry.

Recall that Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia was one of Trump’s made men in Congress, vociferously defending him through thick and thin. When Sen. Johnny Isakson resigned due to poor health, Trump wanted Republican Gov. Brian Kemp to appoint Collins to the Senate. But Kemp preferred the moneyed-up Loeffler — who, together with her husband, New York Stock Exchange chair Jeffrey Sprecher, is reportedly worth at least $800 million — and she was ultimately given the seat. Trump wasn’t happy about that and there’s apparently some lingering bad blood between him and Kemp. You know how he is.

Collins ran against Loeffler in the November special election — a nonpartisan “jungle primary” — and finished third, splitting the Republican vote and leading to Loeffler’s January runoff against the Rev. Raphael Warnock, a Democrat. (Powell claimed the vote was rigged against Collins in favor of Loeffler.) Trump then put Collins in charge of his fruitless recount effort in the state — having already completed a hand audit of all the votes, Georgia is now conducting a second machine recount — and there’s a lot of back-stabbing going on among all the players, complicating their ability to show a united front.

Trump has of course waded in, tweeting one bogus claim about voter fraud and election irregularities after another, all of them false. Loeffler and Perdue, the other incumbent Republican senator headed for a runoff in January (against Democrat Jon Ossoff), sought to please Trump by demanding the resignation of Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who had the temerity to run an honest election. Collins dutifully echoed Trump’s inane tweeting, garnering a harsh rebuke from Raffensperger, who called him a “failed candidate” and “a liar.” (One can’t help but suspect he was indirectly addressing the big guy, who fits that bill even better than Collins.) Trump has been tagging Kemp with every one of his outrageous tweets, undoubtedly taking pleasure in taunting the Georgia governor for refusing to show proper fealty by appointing Collins in the first place.

So, the Republican Party in Georgia was already a big mess, with its various players and the president engaged in a circular firing squad armed with rhetorical AR-15s. Along came Sidney Powell, seemingly implicating the state party in a massive kickback and voter-fraud conspiracy which had to make Mitch McConnell get a little bit twitchy. Unfortunately for Mitch, Georgia Republicans may not be able to put that toothpaste back in the tube. All this infighting hasn’t just tapped into the paranoid strain among the base, it has revitalized one of the most powerful themes of the old conservative movement: a powerful hatred of “RINOs,” or Republicans in Name Only.

Morning Consult recently polled Republican voters and found that the vast majority see Trump as reflecting their values far more than GOP leaders do:

Nearly 7 in 10 Republican voters (68 percent) said they consider Trump to be more in touch with the party’s rank and file, compared with 20 percent who said the same of Republicans in Congress.

Attacking Republican officials who fail to toe the line is comfortably familiar to GOP base voters. (Just ask former House Speaker Paul Ryan.) They’ve been ruthlessly culling their herd this way for a couple of decades now, and are always eager to show their power.

Across social media, Trump followers are calling for Loeffler and Perdue to step in and demand that the state’s presidential vote be audited yet again, with all signatures checked on absentee ballots. As mentioned above, there has already been a hand count, and a machine recount is now underway. Rechecking signatures is literally impossible, since signed envelopes were already checked and separated from the ballots in order to protect the secrecy of the vote. Right-wing Georgia attorney Lin Wood (who is also representing Kenosha vigilante Kyle Rittenhouse) is one of those leading the charge with threats to withhold his vote if the two Senate candidates fail to take action:

He has not backed off even in light of Powell’s removal, and he’s not alone. The Daily Beast reports that a couple of shady groups affiliated with Roger Stone are involved as well, encouraging voters to write in Trump’s name in the Senate races to show the RINOs who’s boss. A lawyer for one of these groups admits that Stone is a client but denies knowing anything about it. (We know Stone would never be involved in any sort of dirty tricks, so that’s that. )

If Stone is involved, these shenanigans are almost certainly being conducted with Trump’s approval. From his point of view, maybe that makes a certain amount of sense. Trump doesn’t care whether the Senate stays in Republican hands, even if he’s actually planning another run in 2024. The idea that he’s anybody’s team player is laughable, and he may see his personal interest in demonstrating how much power he still has with the base as he plans his next moves. It wouldn’t surprise me if Trump’s inner circle sees an advantage in a narrative that Loeffler and Perdue were defeated because his base rejected Republicans who refused to put it all on the line for Trump.

It’s obvious that Donald Trump is in torturous psychological turmoil right now. Demonstrating a little dominance — over whoever happens to be vulnerable — might be just what the doctor ordered.

GOP poised to gerrymander its hold on power — Democrats fall short in nearly every key state

The Republican Party is poised to cement its hold on power in state legislatures and the U.S. House of Representatives after winning nearly every election in which the power to redraw legislative maps was at stake.

Despite winning the White House and still holding a shot at gaining a majority in both chambers of Congress, Democratic losses in state legislative elections across the country gave Republicans far more power to redistrict, or gerrymander, districts following the census next year.

The census is already expected to cost states like New York, California and Illinois congressional seats while giving a big boost to states like Texas, Florida and Arizona. Furthermore, Republicans will have the power to redistrict far more seats than Democrats.

Republicans have control over 30 state maps, according to NBC News. The GOP is set to control the redistricting of 188 congressional seats, or 43% of the House, according to FiveThirtyEight, while Democrats will control the redistricting of no more than 73 seats, or 17%.

Democrats spent hundreds of millions targeting state legislative races but lost nearly every state where control over redistricting was at stake. Republicans were able to hold on to their majority in Texas, fended off Democrats in Pennsylvania, retained their majority in North Carolina, upset Democrats to hold on to the Minnesota state Senate, kept control of the Iowa state House, maintained their supermajorities in Kansas, and flipped the state Senate and House in New Hampshire. Missouri also re-elected Gov. Mike Parson, maintaining Republican control of the state’s redistricting process, and Virginia voters passed an amendment that gives a bipartisan commission rather than the Democratic state legislature the power to redraw maps.

The lone exception could be New York, where Democrats may still win a supermajority in the state Senate once all the votes are counted.

These wins across the country put Republicans in a similar position as they were after the 2010 Republican wave that resulted in the most biased House map against Democrats in modern history. For years, Republicans have been able to win control of the U.S. House and state legislatures despite losing the popular vote.

Though some states have shifted redistricting power to independent commissions or bipartisan panels, only about 38% of House seats will be left up to such panels, compared to 33% in 2011, according to FiveThirtyEight.

“This will put the Republican Party in a position where we’re able to secure a decade of power across the country,” Austin Chambers, president of the Republican State Leadership Committee, told reporters after the election, according to the Washington Post. “It’s something that the Democrats were desperate for, and they came up well short.”

Democrats, who have sniped at each other over the party’s disappointing election slate, made the battle for control of legislative maps a top priority ahead of the election after losing over 900 legislative seats since 2011.

“Democrats didn’t focus on those state legislative races to the extent that we should have in 2010,” former Attorney General Eric Holder, who now heads the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, said ahead of the election. “As a result, the 2011 redistricting went well for the Republicans and led to the gerrymandering that we have seen, and that has affected our politics over the course of this last decade. I think Democrats are focusing now on state-level races.”

But after the election, Holder’s group sought to downplay the losses by pointing to states that changed their rules on redistricting since 2011.

“People are focused on Democrats not making gains in 2020, but we measure this by where we were a decade ago,” Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesman for the group, told the Post. “We’ve reduced the total number of seats drawn entirely by Republican legislatures and governors from 213 in 2011 to 175 in 2021, and that’s before the census.”

Grassroots groups echoed that sentiment, arguing that Democrats “are going into the next redistricting cycle in a better position, at least in some states.”

“Over the last few years, we have been able to defeat Republican trifectas and supermajorities, along with passing fair districting reform measures,” Lyzz Schwegler, the co-founder of Sister District, a volunteer group that aims to end gerrymandering, told Salon. “For instance, in 2011 the GOP had trifecta control of Michigan and Pennsylvania. Going into this cycle, Democrats control at least one branch of government in both of those states. Wins in 2018 broke GOP supermajorities in both chambers in North Carolina, the Pennsylvania Senate and the Michigan Senate. And wins this year kept the GOP from gaining supermajorities in either of Wisconsin’s chambers.”

Even with slightly less influence overall, Republicans will be able to continue to hold on to power in some states despite losing the popular vote. In 2018, Democrats won just three of Wisconsin’s eight U.S. House seats despite winning 200,000 more votes than their Republican counterparts. In Texas, Democrats won 47% of the vote in U.S. House races but won just 13 of the state’s 36 seats.

Christina Polizzi, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, blamed the existing gerrymandered maps for the party’s disappointing election.

“An unexpected surge of Trump support helped carry Republican legislative candidates over the line. Legislative Republicans won because Donald Trump over-performed. It’s easy to win in rigged districts. While Biden won decisively, to win a majority of districts, Democratic candidates needed to outperform the top of the ticket to win,” she said in a statement to Salon. “Gerrymandering had a huge impact. In our target states like Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina, the maps were deliberately drawn so Republicans could withstand even the bluest wave to win. In these states, Republican wins in 2010 allowed them to subvert our democracy and lock in minority rule.”

After failing to capture the legislatures they targeted despite sinking copious sums of money into the races, Democrats will now have to rely on the courts and a growing grassroots movement to push back on Republican redistricting.

“In 2010, Republicans caught us off guard. This time, we know what’s coming and we understand their playbook — we aren’t going to let them get away with another decade of rigged districts,” Polizzi said. “We are going to fight tooth and nail for fair maps. It’s a decade later — in North Carolina, for example, we have fair courts that could stop obvious Republican gerrymanders. We will also have fairer maps in Michigan because they passed an independent redistricting commission.”

Michael Li, senior counsel for the Democracy Program of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, predicted that Republican efforts will particularly focus on southern states.

“Democrats fell short of winning any of the chambers they were targeting there in the last two cycles in states like Georgia, Texas, Florida and North Carolina,” he told NBC, “so there’s still a lot of potential for abuse there, because there are fewer protections this time around. I think the South in a lot of ways will be the redistricting hot spot of this cycle.”

Li said he expects numerous court battles over potential redistricting abuses as well as challenges over the census itself.

Democrats have long challenged Trump’s attempts to exclude some immigrants from the count and cut short the counting period amid the coronavirus pandemic. But even if courts side with Democrats, there is little that could be done once the census is complete.

“There have been cases where people have tried to get the bureau to make changes, but it’s really hard,” Li said. “You can’t redo the census easily, for instance, so trying to figure out a remedy is going to be a challenge.”

Republicans do not seem particularly worried about legal challenges.

“In North Carolina alone, we’ve been through, what, 17 lawsuits over the legislative and congressional maps just this decade? All that money spent on those lawsuits, and it didn’t yield them a majority in anything — the Senate, the House or in Congress,” Adam Kincaid, head of the National Republican Redistricting Trust, told NBC News. “But Democrats do this and do it over and over again. The way we talk about it is Democrats see a state they want and sue until it’s blue.”

The Supreme Court last year also made it more difficult to challenge partisan gerrymanders, ruling in a 5-4 decision that federal courts have no power to hear such cases. 

Schwegler argued that the next decade of battles over fair maps would be different “because of increased public awareness in the importance of ending gerrymandering and the growth of organizations that are dedicated to the cause.”

“We will continue with our mission of getting Democrats elected to strategic state legislative seats,” she said. “The more progressive power we are able to build at the state level, the more influence we will have over critical fights including health care reform, reproductive freedom, gun reform, environmental regulation, voting rights and many other legislative fights.”

Biden’s incoming press secretary needs to throw open the White House windows

After four years of con games, cover-ups, conspiracy theories and contradictions, the next president of the United States needs to restore the nation’s trust in his office — and the only way to do that is with radical transparency.

That starts, but doesn’t end, with decisions being made right now about how the Biden White House will interact with the press.

Simply returning to pre-Trump standards isn’t nearly enough.

Even before Trump’s parade of propagandists turned the briefing room into a cesspool of disinformation, the job of press secretary — under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama — had devolved into deflecting press inquiries rather than genuinely responding to them.

I still remember my incredible disappointment during the first briefing of the Obama administration, when press secretary Robert Gibbs made it clear he would be as defensive and uninformative as his predecessors in the notoriously opaque Bush administration.

And despite Obama’s promises of transparency, he ended up operating amid unprecedented secrecy — while attacking journalists for trying to tell the public what they need to know.

What we need now to rid ourselves of the stench of Trumpist skullduggery is a metaphorical opening of all the windows in the White House. (Trump’s confusion about what works inside the human body aside, sunlight is indeed the best of disinfectants.)

That means offering the public — sometimes through the press, sometimes directly — as much direct access to the internal operations of the executive branch as possible.

Sure, that increases the risk of political opponents seizing onto details and blowing them out of proportion.

But it also carries with it an enormous political upside: So much of what Republican Party leaders say these days is so unmoored from reality that simply bringing actual facts to light can serve as a hugely effective political rebuttal, and is more likely to get amplified by the reality-based press than obligatory talking points and stale spin.

Simply showing that the government is functioning again will go a long way.

Most people by now have a pretty good idea of what Trump did to the country, but they probably don’t understand just how badly he gutted the White House policy apparatus. Under Trump there was, effectively, no policy apparatus at all. There was, as NYU journalism professor Jay Rosen has put it, “no White House.” It was just Trump. And even Trump varies dramatically from day to day.

It’s not enough for Biden to restore the policy apparatus and process. He needs to let the public see it working. He needs to let us see who is helping him govern, and why, and how.

To make the case that duplicity and bad faith are behind us, he needs to let White House staffers openly describe their motives, and honestly discuss competing views.

Next steps

Biden has already said he’ll restore the daily White House press briefing, and that’s a great start.

But the press should also get him to commit to regular press conferences and to a minimum number of sit-down interviews — and not just with friendly journalists. Press conferences are overrated; it’s the sit-down interviews where reporters have a chance to really explore the issues and, if necessary, pierce the bubble.

One of the most important litmus tests for genuine transparency will be the number of White House aides who are authorized to speak to reporters on the record. There should be dozens of people willing and able to actually explain to reporters what’s going on inside the White House — with attribution and accountability.

In fact, the daily press briefing should regularly feature senior White House and administration officials — and always on the record.

Rather than serving as a roadblock, the press secretary would ideally be an advocate for the press, and for transparency, within the White House.

Finally, let’s not forget what an extraordinary communications tool the Internet can be.

Although Trump’s use of social media to constantly lie, project and blow off steam has been hugely counterproductive, it would be a blow to transparency if Biden only used Twitter for heavily vetted talking points instead of insights into his thinking.

As for the White House web site, well, it’s been a constant disappointment. The highlight of Bush’s listless website was Barneycam. Obama’s website was an improvement, adding an earnestly written blog and a petitions page along with essential information such as financial disclosure statementsstaff salary lists and visitor logs (which Trump refuses to make public.) But considering what it could have been, it underperformed.

And Trump’s White House website, like everything else he builds, is not much more than a brassy façade over shoddy construction.

I’d love to see Biden take the advice I gave Obama 12 years ago, when I suggested he create a Wiki White House:

Imagine a White House Web site where the home page isn’t just a static collection of transcripts and press releases, but a window into the roiling intellectual foment of the West Wing. Imagine a White House Web site where staffers maintain blogs in which they write about who they are and what they are working on; where some meetings are streamed in live video; where the president’s daily calendar is posted online; where major policy proposals have public collaborative workspaces, or wikis; where progress towards campaign promises is tracked on a daily basis; and where anyone can sign up for customized updates by e-mail, text message, RSS feed, Twitter, or the social network of their choice.

My favorite idea, when I was writing that piece, came from Steven Aftergood, head of the Federation of American Scientists’ Project on Government Secrecy. It was intended to make sure the site didn’t simply turn into a propaganda vehicle. Aftergood wondered:

Maybe there’s a way to institutionalize a dissenting view, so you really have not the pretense of debate, but actual debate, that is accessible to the public. … Maybe there’s something like the equivalent of a devil’s advocate on the White House Web site, who criticizes administration policy.”

That last part may be a bit too much to ask for — although I volunteer! — but given how much Trump’s conduct has led to a loss of faith in the government’s competence or even its good intentions, nothing short of extreme openness is likely to win back America’s trust and confidence.

Secret meeting between Netanyahu, Pompeo and Prince Mohammed: Last-minute war plot?

The alarming possibility of a military attack on Iran — a nation that has long been in the sights of war hawks in the United States, Saudi Arabia and Israel — was immediately invoked by foreign policy analysts Monday following reports that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met in secret late Sunday with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

First divulged by unnamed Israeli officials and publicly denied Monday morning by the Saudi foreign minister, the reported covert meeting in Neom, Saudi Arabia, comes on the heels of news last week that President Donald Trump asked senior advisers for options to bomb Iran’s primary nuclear energy site, prompting Iran to vow a “crushing response” to any attack.

Trump’s request for military strike options came days after he lost the presidential election to Joe Biden, who has pledged to act quickly to re-enter the Iran nuclear agreement that Trump violated in May of 2018. Contrary to baseless and ongoing allegations by the U.S. and Israel, Iran says it is not developing and has no plans to develop nuclear weapons — a claim UN inspectors have repeatedly verified in recent years.

The context of the Trump administration’s aggressive posturing and militaristic threats against Iran fueled critics’ concerns following word of the secret meeting between Prince Mohammed, Netanyahu and Pompeo, which was also reportedly attended by Yossi Cohen, director of the Israeli spy agency Mossad.

“It is extremely alarming that the warmongers most reliant on Trump’s blank checks are secretly meeting in the middle of the night as the clock nearly runs out on the Trump administration,” tweeted foreign policy analyst Omar Baddar. “Do they have Iran in the crosshairs?” 

Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, echoed Baddar’s fears and raised the additional concern that the “actual target” of the meeting was “the incoming Biden team, with the aim of deterring the U.S. from seeking diplomacy with Tehran.”

Despite the public denial by Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan — who tweeted early Monday that “the only officials present” at the meeting “were American and Saudi” — unnamed Saudi officials told the Wall Street Journal that Netanyahu attended the meeting with Pompeo and the prince known around the world as MBS.

Among the topics discussed at the hours-long meeting, according to the Journal, were Iran and normalization of relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Both Netanyahu and Pompeo refused to comment on the meeting, but neither denied that it took place.

Joe Cirincione, a distinguished fellow at the Quincy Institute, warned in an op-ed last week that while unlikely, an attack on Iran by either the U.S. or Israel is a possibility worth taking seriously and guarding against.

“A member of Netanyahu’s cabinet, Settlements Minister Tzahi Hanegbi, flatly predicted in early November that Israel will attack Iran if Joe Biden is elected president,” Cirincione pointed out. “Ominously, the U.S. Central Command announced … that it moved a detachment of F-16 fighter-bombers from Germany to the UAE, across the Gulf from Iran.”

Returning the U.S. to compliance with the Iran nuclear agreement, argued Cirincione, “would allow the United States to establish a more robust relationship with Iran with regular contacts — as was the case during the Obama administration — that would reduce the risks of conflicts that could escalate, intended or unintended, into a war that would make the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan look trivial in comparison.”

Roger Stone-linked group urges voters to write in Trump in Georgia runoffs as revenge against GOP

A super PAC linked to longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone is calling for Republicans to write-in the president’s name in the upcoming Senate runoff elections in Georgia as retaliation after his re-election bid failed in the once red state.

The Committee for American Sovereignty, a group tied to Stone which raised millions pushing disinformation during the 2016 election, launched a new website urging Republican voters to “crush” the “plot to destroy America” by “writing in Trump for the Georgia Senate runoffs.”

“With enough write-ins in the Georgia senate race, we can tilt the balance in Georgia in Trump’s favor!” the site says. “If we can do this, we have a real chance at getting these RINO senators to act on the illegitimate and corrupt election presided over by a Democrat party that is invested in the Communist takeover of Our Great Nation.”

The website was first covered by The Daily Beast. Trump supporters on Parler, the far-right version of Twitter, have also pushed a similar plan to boycott the pivotal runoffs or write in Trump’s name.

“Though their effort remains on the party’s fringes, the trajectory of the movement has Republicans fearful that it could cost the GOP control of the Senate,” the outlet reported.

Since the election is a run-off, there is no write-in option to ensure that one candidate gets at least 50% of the vote.

Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., and Sen. David Perdue, R-Ga., face competitive runoffs, and some Republicans fear President Donald Trump’s attempts to subvert the election could derail their chances. Loeffler and Perdue issued a statement calling on Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a fellow Republican, to resign over unfounded claims of irregularities after Trump became the first Republican to lose the state in nearly three decades. Gov. Brian Kemp, a staunch Trump ally, also urged an investigation into nonexistent ballot issues but resisted criticizing his fellow Republican. 

Raffensperger, meanwhile, has gone on a scorched-earth campaign to refute the false statements made by Trump and other Republican officials about the election. He went on a social media tear to debunk many of the unfounded conspiracy theories pushed by Trump; urged Loeffler and Perdue to focus on winning their own races; criticized Rep. Doug Collins, who is leading Trump’s recount effort in the state, as a “failed candidate” and a “liar;” and accused Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. of trying to interfere in the state’s election with a pressure campaign to throw out legal ballots.

“We told the [Trump] campaign if they find instances of voter fraud, we will check it out. We have not seen widespread, systemic voter fraud that would overturn the results of the people,” Raffensperger told Fox News on Monday, predicting that the second recount requested by Trump would yield the same result as the first one.

The Committee for American Sovereignty was set up in 2016 for operatives like Stone and Blackwater founder Erik Prince to “attempt to suppress the Black vote by amplifying claims that Bill Clinton had an illegitimate biracial son,” but the group had since gone mostly quiet, according to The Beast.

It appears to have restarted activities after attorney Sidney Powell pushed a bizarre conspiracy theory accusing Kemp of being involved in a “communist” plot involving Dominion voting machines, which are used across the country, of switching votes from Trump to President-elect Joe Biden.

“Mr. Kemp and the secretary of state need to go with it, because they’re in on the Dominion scam with their last-minute purchase or reward of a contract to Dominion of $100 million,” Powell said in an Saturday interview with Newsmax.

Her comments prompted Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, who appeared alongside Powell at a news conference days earlier, to release a statement claiming that “she is not a member of the Trump Legal Team.”

Lin Wood, another pro-Trump lawyer who filed a lawsuit seeking to block the state from certifying its election, said on Saturday that he would not vote in the runoff unless Loeffler and Perdue “take action” and demand a special session of the legislature.

“Threaten to withhold your votes & money,” he said on Twitter. “Demand that they represent you.”

The calls have sparked alarm among Republicans — and even Team Trump.

“That is NONSENSE,” Donald Trump Jr. tweeted in response to calls to boycott the runoffs. “IGNORE those people. We need ALL of our people coming out to vote for Kelly & David.”

But Republicans in Georgia are worried that Trump’s legal antics have already damaged the party’s hopes of winning control of the Senate.

“Many Republicans are at a point now where they don’t trust the outcome of the system, which is never a good thing,” Gabriel Sterling, the state’s voting system manager, told Yahoo News. “. . . We’ve crossed a tipping point where . . . there may be some Republicans who don’t trust the outcomes of the system at all, and say, ‘Why bother to vote?’ Which of course makes zero sense, because if you don’t vote at all, it will increase the likelihood of the person who you don’t want to win it.”

“Is it going to suppress the vote to a certain degree?” he added. “Absolutely.”

Raffensperger said Trump had already cost himself the state by “suppressing” GOP votes, noting that 24,000 Republicans who voted in the primaries by mail did not vote at all in the general election.

“Those 24,000 people did not vote in the fall, either. They did not vote absentee, because they were told by the president, ‘Don’t vote absentee. It’s not secure,'” he said last week. “But then they did not come out and vote in person. He would have won by 10,000 votes. He actually . . . suppressed his own voting base.”

Mitch McConnell pushed Trump to pick Amy Coney Barrett on the night Ruth Bader Ginsburg died: report

On Friday night, September 18, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell learned that liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had died of cancer at the age of 87. And according to PBS’ “Frontline,” McConnell contacted President Donald Trump that very night and made it clear he wanted to see Judge Amy Coney Barrett nominated for the seat and confirmed by the U.S. Senate as quickly as possible.

Josh Holmes, McConnell’s former chief of staff, explained to “Frontline” that on September 18, “McConnell told (Trump) two things. McConnell said: First, I’m going to put out a statement that says we’re going to fill the vacancy. Second, he said, you’ve gotta nominate Amy Coney Barrett.”

That quote is from the PBS documentary, “Supreme Revenge: Battle for the Court,” which premieres this week.

PBS’ Patrice Taddonio notes that McConnell’s response to Ginsburg’s death was totally different from his response to Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in 2016. Scalia, a far-right Ronald Reagan appointee, died eight months before that year’s presidential election — and McConnell wouldn’t even consider President Barack Obama’s nominee, Judge Merrick Garland. McConnell argued that it was unfair to nominate Garland that close to a presidential election, but he had no problem with Trump nominating Barrett in September.

Taddonio explains, “As sources recount in the documentary, charges of hypocrisy did not deter McConnell. In the aftermath of Ginsburg’s death, McConnell’s political maneuvering went according to his plan — with Barrett’s speedy confirmation days before the 2020 election serving as a crowning achievement in a hard-fought, decades-long effort to tilt the ideology of the nation’s highest court to the right.”

Associated Press reporter Darlene Superville, one of the interviewees for the documentary, told PBS, “What it meant for Sen. McConnell was to cement a conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s something that McConnell has longed for, dreamed about, worked for during his entire career in the Senate.”

“Supreme Revenge: Battle for the Court” not only deals with recent Supreme Court history, but goes back to the 1980s — when Reagan was president and his nomination of Robert Bork was derailed.

Taddonio notes that the documentary “traces how a 30-year-old grievance — starting with the bruising and failed confirmation hearing of President Reagan’s Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork, presided over by Joe Biden (D-Del.), at that time the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee — sparked a vow from then-freshman Sen. McConnell to retaliate. The documentary goes on to track how McConnell made good on that promise in the years to come and how he eventually secured a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court majority that could shape American life and policy for a generation.”

Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner weigh move to Florida, because New York is too “inhospitable”: report

With their reputation in tatters after serving as senior White House advisors, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner are looking to move somewhere other than New York City when Donald Trump’s term ends in January.

“Town officials in Bedminster, N.J., have the plans for a possible Trump family future, or at least the blueprints: a major addition to Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner’s ‘cottage’ on the grounds of the Trump National Golf Club, four new pickleball courts, a relocated heliport, and a spa and yoga complex. As Manhattan awaits word of the Trump family’s return, the first daughter and her husband appear to be making preparations elsewhere: a Garden State refuge behind guarded gates, perhaps, or Florida, where President Trump is renovating his Mar-a-Lago estate,” The New York Times reported Tuesday. “But New York now seems inhospitable and nowhere in their plans.”

Donny Deutsch explained why the two are so unwelcome in Manhattan.

“In an odd way, they will even have a harder time than Trump himself. He’s despicable but larger than life,” Deutsch said. “Those two are the hapless minions who went along.”

“The View” ridicules “ice queen” Melania Trump for pretending to love Christmas after profane rant

First lady Melania Trump was caught on tape by a friend ranting about Christmas at the White House. After years of conservatives alleging that liberals were engaging in a “War on Christmas,” Melania ranted, “Who gives a f*ck about Christmas stuff and decoration?”

“I’m in the Christmas spirit!” cheered Republican strategist Ana Navarro, belting out, “Joy to the world, the Trump’s are gone!”

“Really this tape we heard of Melania was so ironic and absurd and ridiculous,” Navarro continued. “How long have we been hearing Donald Trump talk about the war on Christmas, the war on Christmas, blah, blah, blah. Turns out the whole time the war on Christmas was coming from within the White House. No wonder she decorated the White House with those trees that looked like the ‘Handmaid’s Tale.’ Be best. Be gone.”

Sunny Hostin confessed she’s just happy that the national nightmare is finally over.

“I don’t think she’s had this big change of heart,” Hostin said after viewing photos of the first lady receiving the Christmas tree. “I happen to love Christmas decorating. I think it would such an honor to decorate the White House. That’s an iconic thing to do. Every time she decorated it looked like the Narnia ice queen. It was horrible all the time. Now we know why it was horrible. She didn’t like to do it. I never heard a first lady or anyone else say, ‘Who gives a blank about Christmas stuff?’ We all care about Christmas stuff! Melania, you’re the first lady! I have to agree. She’s like the Grinch who stole Christmas decorations from the White House. I’m just happy this is over. I really am.”

Sara Haines compared it to the “Instagram moment” vs. reality. On Instagram, the first lady is all smiles with the Christmas tree but behind the scenes, the reality is she’s waging her own war on Christmas. 

“Secretly taping the First Lady and willfully breaking an NDA to publish a salacious book is a clear attempt at relevance. The timing of this continues to be suspect – as does this never-ending exercise in self-pity and narcissism,” Melania Trump’s chief of staff Stephanie Grisham said in a statement.

“Fox is dead to me!”: President Trump boosts Randy Quaid’s psychedelic attacks on Fox News

President Donald Trump on Tuesday shared a social media video of actor Randy Quaid performing a dramatic reenactment of one of his tweets attacking Fox News with psychedelic flair. It was captioned, “FOX IS DEAD TO ME!”

Trump also thanked the star of “Independence Day” and right-wing conspiracy theorist for pushing false allegations of election fraud. (Despite his vows to overturn the results, Trump had already directed his administration to work with President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team the previous day.)

In one tweet shared by the president, Quaid called for an “in-person-only, paper ballot re-vote” nationwide. “Are you listening Republicans?” he asked.

The video posted by Quaid was similar in style to a clip the actor posted last year attacking Bette Middler. It featured a close-up of Quaid’s bearded face lit with a flashing green-and-red strobe effect. In the clip, Quaid quoted a Trump tweet in a tone reminiscent of a Hollywood villain. The caption also read, “TIME TO MAKE OAN & NEWSMAX RICH.”

“Fox News daytime ratings have completely collapsed. Weekend daytime even worse,” Quaid said. “Very sad to watch this happen.”

The “Christmas Vacation actor then made a Hannibal Lecter-style slurping noise with his tongue before resuming his soliloquy.

“They forgot what made them successful — what got them there. They forgot the golden goose,” he added. “The biggest difference between the 2016 election and 2020 was Fox News.”

Trump has waged an ongoing election-year feud with the network credited by many for his rise. After Fox News called Arizona for Biden, the Trump campaign reportedly launched a full-court press to reverse the decision. Top strategist Jason Miller “frantically” plead with the network to retract, while top adviser Jared Kushner placed a call to Fox owner Rupert Murdoch directly.

When those efforts failed, Trump reportedly planned post-election “vote-counting rallies” with a focus on attacking the conservative outlet, which he allegedly wants to “clobber” with his own right-wing media machine after he exits 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. 

Trump is “going to spend a lot of time slamming Fox,” a source told Axios, which reported that the president was thinking about creating a “cheaper” streaming network to compete with the Fox Nation digital platform.

The night before Trump re-tweeted Quaid, Fox News primetime host Laura Ingraham took the step of acknowledging that Biden had won the election in spite of the incumbent president’s protests. 

“Unless the legal situation changes in a dramatic, and frankly, an unlikely manner, Joe Biden will be inaugurated on Jan. 20,” Ingraham said on her broadcast.

“If I told you there was an excellent, phenomenal chance that the Supreme Court was going to step in and deliver a victory to President Trump, I would be lying to you,” she added. 

Ingraham’s colleague Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson made a similar concession on his Nov. 10 show, also assuring his audience that he would not tell a lie.

“At this stage, the fraud that we can confirm does not seem to be enough to alter the election result. We should be honest and tell you that,” Carlson said. “Of course, that could change.”

It was not the first time that Quaid had picked bones with the conservative network in a bizarre social media rant.

In 2015, the “Kingpin” star posted a conspiracy-studded rant railing against Murdoch and his News Corp media empire for allegedly profiteering off of Quaid’s oeuvre.

“What did I get in return?” Quaid asked. “A Warner Brothers exec, Bruce Berman, stole my house, and News Corp’s The New York Post continues to smear me to high heaven with a pack of lies.”

In the video, Quaid, who at the time was living along with his wife in self-imposed Canadian exile while facing outstanding warrants for their arrest in the U.S. on burglary charges, said he had been “put through a living hell of biblical proportion.”

“So Rupert, you want to f*ck me? I’m going to f*ck you,” Quaid said.

The actor then handed his wife a Murdoch mask. The rest of the video is not safe for work.

How viruses use bats’ bodies as an evolutionary training ground

Imagine that you are a Shamel’s horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus shameli). With a complex nose shaped like a horseshoe, you use echolocation to find insects that you can eat, since as an invertivore your diet depends on consuming invertebrates. You live in southeast Asian countries like Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. Not that you have a concept of the nation-state, as a bat; rather, your range is defined by tropical forests, and that is how you think of geography. Indeed, you do not think far beyond these tropical forests; how could anything outside of their range concern you?

It certainly would surprise you to learn that a mostly hairless primate species are suddenly tremendously interested in you, stricken, as millions of them are, with a deadly virus that may have become more lethal by and through your being. Some of these upright-walking primates even think that your anatomy contains clues as to how this disease moved through their population.

Indeed, because of their unique immune system, there has been a sudden flurry of interest in Shamel’s horseshoe bats, a species few humans know about. As reported in Nature, researchers told the scholarly journal that two Shamel’s horseshoe bats, which had been stored in a freezer in Cambodia since 2010, contained in their bodies a coronavirus closely related to SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the disease COVID-19. If that coronavirus is found to share more than 97% of its genome with SARS-CoV-2, it could help explain how a pandemic that originated in bats was able to be passed along to humans, according to virologists at the Pasteur Institute in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Around the same time, researchers in Japan claimed that they found a virus called Rc-o319, which has also been found in bat droppings, inside a Japanese horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus cornutus). Because Rc-o319 only shares 81% of its genome with SARS-CoV-2, it will not be able to directly help scientists learn more about the pandemic’s origins. Still, that discovery still confirms viruses closely related to SARS-CoV-2 are relatively common in horseshoe bats, including species outside of China.

The next question, then, is why are bats so prone to getting coronaviruses?

The answer is that it’s not just various breeds of coronaviruses that bats are ridden with — it’s all viruses. Science Daily reported in February that deadly disease outbreaks like MERS, Ebola, Marburg and the original SARS originated in bats. A study from the University of California, Berkeley published in the journal eLife found that some bat species have unusually aggressive immune systems that respond to viruses in a way that causes them to replicate more quickly.

While the bats’ bodies are able to keep the viruses out of their cells, however, the viruses adapt and reproduce more quickly in order to try to get around their defenses. Those viruses then take those same traits and apply them when infecting animals that do not have the same unusually aggressive immune system — such as human beings.

“The bottom line is that bats are potentially special when it comes to hosting viruses,” Mike Boots, a disease ecologist and UC Berkeley professor of integrative biology, told Science Daily. “It is not random that a lot of these viruses are coming from bats. Bats are not even that closely related to us, so we would not expect them to host many human viruses. But this work demonstrates how bat immune systems could drive the virulence that overcomes this.”

Another study seemed to reinforce this conclusion. As Infectious Disease Special Edition reported in May, a research team at the University of Saskatchewan found that cells from a brown bat could be persistently infected with MERS (or Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome, which is also caused by a coronavirus) because of adaptations made by both the bats’ cells and the virus. To adapt to changes made by the bats’ cells to protect itself, the MERS virus will quickly mutate one specific gene so that it can continue to survive inside the bat.

In other words, while bats do not seem to suffer greatly from the same diseases they pass on to people, the very traits that allow them to endure those illnesses make those viruses particularly dangerous when they reach the human population.

Still, if you’re a poor bat flitting through the dry tropical forests of southeast Asia, don’t fret. Killing bats is not key to stopping future pandemics. 

“Culling bats will not end the COVID-19 pandemic or any future emerging infectious disease outbreaks, in fact this may well increase the dangers since stressed animals may become more disease prone,” writes the Bat Conservation Trust. “It is human activity that led to the current pandemic and it will be changing human behavior in relation to wildlife that may prevent future pandemics. To prevent future outbreaks we need to stop uncontrolled habitat destruction and control the trade in wild animals.”

The group notes that bats and humans have coexisted, and even become accustomed to each other. “There are over 1,400 bat species around the world . . .  Many have adapted to living alongside us in both urban and rural environments, in our gardens, parks and even roosting around our homes, without posing a threat to their human neighbors.”

Don’t just laugh at “Hillbilly Elegy” — its damaging myths still need to be countered

The day my novel was listed by the Los Angeles Times as one of “8 Books to Read Instead of Hillbilly Elegy,” I was denied a screener to write about the film. Based on the memoir of the same name by J.D. Vance, the Netflix movie has received overwhelmingly negative reviews leading up to its release this week. The rumor was they had clamped down on advanced screeners—even for journalists with editors and deadlines—because they didn’t want more bad PR.

As my friend and fellow Ohioan said: A bunch of rich people made a bad movie and a poor person’s work is getting jeopardized by it.

A venture capitalist who has publicly aligned himself as a nationalist and who once entertained running for Republican office, Vance’s backstory has a familiar ring for many whose families migrated, but not very far, from the farm to town. Like Vance, I too had a grandmother from Kentucky coal country, and my parents, the first in their respective families to go to college, also raised their children in an Ohio Rust Belt town, dominated by AK Steel, the employer of Vance’s Papaw. I remember when the steel workers union went on strike and posted a “Scab of the Week” sign with full names. I remember when the factory was closed.

Vance (played as a child by Owen Asztalos, and young adult by Gabriel Basso) spent youthful summers in central Appalachia; I spent most of my adult life there. My son was born in Appalachian Ohio, at home, and when my then-husband left us, I had to temporarily drop out of school to care for him alone. We fell below the poverty line. Where we remain.

Single moms like me don’t fare well in the Ron Howard-directed adaptation, which, like the book, focuses heavily on the addiction struggles of Vance’s mother, Bev (Amy Adams), and the violence both experienced and perpetuated by his family, especially his Mamaw, played by Glenn Close. There’s a lot of screaming in “Hillbilly Elegy.” I’m reminded of my high school theatre teacher, Raymond Gerrell, who advised: If you start yelling at the highest level, there’s nowhere for you to go.

Blaming the mother seems in line with Vance’s public concern about fertility—which he later claimed was “a joke,” but he did say in a Fresh Air interview with Terry Gross that he believed the key to a successful “home life” was to marry someone with no experience of poverty or trauma, which in Vance’s case means, apparently, a former clerk for Brett Kavanaugh. It’s strange that marry out is not a bigger part of the “Hillbilly” narrative.

But to be fair, there’s both a lot to deal with and nothing here in “Hillbilly Elegy.”

I’m no film scholar, but I do tell stories for a living, and the film’s reliance on voiceover narration is both jarring, inconsistent, and feels lazy: Viewers should be able to piece the story together ourselves. But both that and the chaotic back-and-forth narrative, with its manically inserted flashbacks, provide the structure for the film, because there’s not enough real story for a story. It can’t work chronologically. It can’t be told without heavy artifice.

Perhaps fittingly, the movie was not filmed in Appalachia, but in central Georgia, so you don’t even see many of those hills Mamaw waxes poetically about. There are no hairpin turns, no pawpaws or black locust trees.

The swelling music and weirdly-tinted shots that resemble an Instagram filter make “Hillbilly Elegy” feel like a Hallmark film without Christmas. It could be called poverty porn, except there’s not much poverty, other than the run-down houses the camera pans over as B-roll: Vance’s credit cards work, Bev is able to afford a motel. The Vance home in Middletown, Ohio, is nice. When young J.D. tries to shoplift a calculator, Mamaw buys it for him. That doesn’t line up. As my partner, who is Chicano, said: White people’s idea of poverty is basically being middle class.

Common facets of Appalachia—and most rural or small town life—accrue mythical proportions in the film, which lets you know it was created for outsiders: the importance of family, the reverence paid to grandmothers, even taking justice into your own hands because the sheriff is certainly not going to do anything about it.

What is not treated as myth in the film, but should have? That just anyone can “get out” of generational poverty through hard work.

In an article in The Washington Post, Appalachian sociology scholars Lanora Johnson and W. Carson Byrd talk of searching and failing to find the real Appalachia in the movie, concluding that “Unfortunately, we’ve seen this movie before.” Some reader comments on their piece argue the message of “Hillbilly Elegy” is that support and encouragement are key to a child’s success.

The key to a white, abled and male child’s success, maybe. No women are getting out of poverty in the “Hillbilly” yarn. Nobody who doesn’t look exactly like Vance himself.

Black people exist in the world of this film only as a sheriff’s deputy, an employee pumping gas in New Jersey, and a Black woman rehab administrator Vance bullies into admitting his mom. None of these characters have more than a couple of throwaway lines.  

From one of the very first shots, I knew the Appalachia of this film was not going to be the Appalachia that I, my family, or my friends know: When young Vance rescues a turtle crossing the road, he carries it off with him on his bike. Any self-respecting Appalachian knows you bring the turtle across the road to where it was headed, you don’t take it off its (likely egg-laying) path.

My son had already stomped off to his room by that point in the film, refusing to watch any more with me.

Vance’s caring nature and encyclopedic knowledge of turtles are early ways the movie lets us know this boy is different from the others: the kids who want to kill the turtle, the boys who beat him up when he can’t fight back. J.D. is special. He wants to watch news about Al Gore and Monica Lewinsky. He is no good at cards. He is Other than his family and therefore he will make it.

The film presents Vance as the white male savior of his family, though how exactly he saves them all is unclear. Aspects of the story that might actually be useful to include are utterly absent from the film. How did Bev get clean? How did Vance get to Yale law school from The Ohio State University? My high school classmate who was a first-generation student there dropped out, unable to find support either from his family or from the massive state school. How did Vance manage? We won’t know from this film.

No one who is actually poor is going to look at this movie as a roadmap, but people who are in positions of power to deny money and opportunities may. To only laugh at this movie is a mistake, and undercuts its danger, both of spreading inaccurate myths about poverty and completely overshadowing (and disbelieving) the stories of women, BIPOC, disabled people and queer people living in the region and in poverty throughout America.

When I posted on a freelancer’s group, desperately seeking a screener so I could write this review, strangers responded by telling me just not to write it, not to give Vance more breath. They misunderstood a key issue: This is a paycheck, and I need a paycheck. Part of being a writer in Appalachia since 2016, when “Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir” came out, is refuting this man.

How better could that energy be served, that time better spent on our own creative projects, projects Hollywood and the publishing industry seem not to want to pay for? We like our struggle stories male with a side of white.

I don’t think this review or most press that “Hillbilly Elegy” has received would make anyone run out and watch the film, other than to use it as a drinking game, which in some cases could actually be physically dangerous. I would not, for example, recommend drinking every time someone threatens to kill someone else or calls a woman a bitch.

But I keep coming back to what my friend said: This movie and the book that sired it not only perpetuate dangerous stereotypes about poverty, about a wide and diverse region, about women and about people struggling with addiction, but stories like these keep money and access from those who need it.

The $45 million Netflix paid to distribute the film means that many other projects will not be funded. It’s not only that this movie gets so much wrong. It also takes up so much space.

When my novel was coming out this year, a publicist urged me to downplay the fact that the story was set in my home of Appalachian Ohio. We have Appalachia fatigue, this person based in New York advised, urging me instead to focus on the climate change storyline in the book.

Is there only so much attention we’re willing to pay to stories of poverty? What if people will only listen for so long—and “Hillbilly Elegy” drowns out other voices, especially those who have a different experience than Vance’s bootstraps act?

“Hillbilly Elegy” doesn’t matter. Except for the focus, attention and income it draws away from actual Appalachians’ projects. Except for the brain space, energy and time it occupies for rural people, women, people of color, queer people and disabled people living in the region, living in poverty and trying to do the real work of telling their own stories. I can advise you not to give Vance’s myth another dime. But I cannot advise you not to give it another thought. Like the very real trauma of poverty — which means I and my neighbors will always work as many jobs as are offered, which means for the rest of my life I will calculate the price of the groceries in my cart to the dollar before the embarrassment of the checkout counter — the hurt lingers. We will continue to fight our battles with those stereotypes privately. Publicly, may we widen the stage so that a diverse array of narratives can dilute the overwhelming influence of Vance’s personal story.

Here are 7 dreamy lo-fi tracks to soothe your brain and make you productive

Lo-fi music,  a genre crafted from mellow, repetitive beats, has boomed during the pandemic. 

Why? Well, as Jessica Stillman reported for Inc., with kids at home, offices shuttered and stress at an all-time high, people are hungry for escape. Lo-fi (which often dovetails with similar downtempo music like “chillhop”) offers a mental respite. 

“The basic idea is this: the wordless music peppered with nostalgic sounds like the ‘sizzle’ of a vinyl record is neither so slow it makes you sleepy, nor so fast it makes you anxious,” Stillman wrote. “It’s neither so boring you forget it entirely, nor so interesting it distracts you from your work. Instead it gives your brain just enough stimulation to tune out stress and be productive.” 

I can attest to this. Since March, the popular YouTube channel lofi hip hop radio – beats to relax/study to — which averages 50,000 listeners at a time — has been a staple in my home. The synthy, subdued tracks really have helped me tune out of the pandemic distractions in order to do things like work, meal prep and sleep. 

Heading into an unprecedented holiday season, I’ve bookmarked some stand-out songs that you should incorporate into your lo-fi playlists. They’re the perfect soundtrack for cooking holiday meals, high-stress family interactions (or Zoom calls), or just surviving the pandemic in general. 

“Letter from Yokosuka,” Nujabes 

Nujabes is the stage name of  the late Japanese composer and producer Jun Seba. As Kevin Cortez wrote for Genius, the artist is revered as one of the “godfathers of lo-fi” and, as KQED published, “a search on Spotify unveils dozens of playlists dedicated to Nujabes, who crafted lushly immersive arrangements of hip-hop, jazz fusion and house tracks.” 

“Letter from Yokosuka” is one of Nujabes’ more mellow instrumental pieces, but — with a gorgeous saxophone track from his frequent collaborator Uyama Hiroto — it’s totally captivating with jazz and traditional Japanese music influences. 

“Sugar Haze” HM Surf 

HM Surf is a Norweigan artist who, per their recent Reddit AMA, lives in a cabin in the woods where they produce music and record ambient forest sounds with their miniature Zoom recorder. Those sounds tend to find their way into HM Surf’s music, like “Sugar Haze,” a sweet, dreamy loop augmented with nature ambience. I feel like this song comes as close as humanly possible to capturing in song the feeling of snacking on a piece of perfectly ripe fruit while sitting in a small sliver of sunlight by your apartment window. 

“Sincerely Yours,” Sophie Meiers

Sophie Meiers is a 20-something singer, songwriter, and producer who — in Gen Z fashion — started her career by collaborating with different musicians over Soundcloud. Inspired by Nujabes and Erykah Badu, Meiers said in an interview with Revolt that she was drawn to lo-fi because of the “crunchy and smooth tones of samples hypnotically pacing along with steady hip hop bumps.” 

“Sincerely Yours” shows off her warm vocals and introspective lyrics

“Mnemophobia” (Instrumental), Brainstory

The brand Brainstory definitely wouldn’t be classified as lo- or chill-fi; the California-based trio of brothers, who have toured with Chicano Batman, draw inspiration from ’60s and ’70s psychedelic pop. But the instrumental version of their song, “Mnemophobia” has this kind of crackly, beachy sound that evokes images of an oceanside campfire on a chilly evening. 

“Moon on the Bath,” Japanese Breakfast 

Japanese Breakfast is the musical project of Michelle Zauner who is well-known for her spacy pop songs like “Everybody Loves You,” which displays, as Vanyaland put it in 2016, “musicianship with a distinct bite.” She’s a beloved live performer — her Tiny Desk performance, for instance, has over a half-million views — but her experimental instrumental tracks, like “Moon on the Bath” belong on any soothing playlist you create. 

“Eleven,” Freddie Joachim

Joachim — an avid collector of old hip-hop, jazz and soul records — was born in the Philippines and raised in San Diego, California. He began DJ-ing in the ’90s, then transitioned into producing soulful instrumental albums with distinctive percussive tracks and hypnotic melodies. “Eleven” is a solid sample of his work. 

“Bookoo Bread Co Instrumental,” Scallops Hotel

The lyrics of Scallops Hotel — one of the several stage names of Chicago-born rapper and producer Rory Ferreira — are exceptionally witty and self-aware; a favorite of mine comes from Bookoo Bread Co., where Ferreira sings, “My mind is not a radio broadcasting/ Pull up the collar on my London Fog/ Rap is all monologue.” 

But even when you strip it down, the instrumentals of “Bookoo Bread Co.” are as contemplative, complex and soothing as the lyrics. 

 

Fox News mogul Rupert Murdoch may “buy Trump off” to avoid losing fans to rival network: report

Rupert Murdoch is considering buying off President Donald Trump to keep him from stealing some of his Fox News audience.

The president reportedly has considered launching his own network or joining another to rival the conservative Fox News, which has drawn his ire for perceived disloyalty, and Vanity Fair reported that Murdoch has considered making an offer Trump can’t refuse.

“Rupert is going to make a humongous offer,” one of the sources said. “The thinking is, Let’s buy Trump off so he shuts the f*ck up.” 

Two sources told Vanity Fair that Trump’s attacks are alarming the Murdoch family, and they’re mulling a plan to offer the soon-to-be ex-president a $100 million package that would include HarperCollins publishing his memoir and Fox News bringing him on board as a contributor or show host.

However, a source denied that HarperCollins would make an offer for the memoir.

At Trump’s final bizarre turkey pardon, his ongoing refusal to concede was the elephant in the room

Days before Thanksgiving 2018, two turkeys — Peas and Carrots — were vying for the presidential pardon, an oddball tradition formalized by George H.W. Bush in 1989. Leading up to the event, the White House had set up online and social media polls to determine the fowls’ fates. 

When the votes were finally tallied, President Donald Trump revealed that Peas had won in “a fair and open election.” 

“Unfortunately, Carrots refused to concede and demanded a recount, and we’re still fighting with Carrots,” Trump said at the time. “And I will tell you, we’ve come to a conclusion — Carrots, I’m sorry to tell you, the results did not change. Too bad for Carrots!”

Too bad for Carrots, indeed. 

During this year’s turkey pardon, held Tuesday in The White House Rose Garden, Trump didn’t mention his own refusal to officially concede the 2020 presidential election, nor did he reference the numerous, baseless allegations of voter fraud he and his oddball legal team lobbed into courts across the country (despite the fact, as Salon’s Roger Sollenberger has reported, no state election officials have reported evidence of such fraud). 

The president did, however, open the event by talking about the stock market, and even managed to squeeze in a racist reference to the “China virus” between pardoning one of the “two magnificent gobblers” in attendance. 

“Thank you very much, please,” Trump said as he stepped in front of the microphone. “I just want to congratulate everybody. The Dow Jones Industrial Average just broke, for the first time in history, 30,000. That’s good, that’s great for jobs and good for everything.” 

The president had already held a surprise, one-minute press conference earlier in the day, The Hill reported

“His appearance on Tuesday may have been an attempt to grab credit for the historic rise on the Dow, and to siphon some attention away from Biden, who was scheduled to speak at 1 p.m. about his Cabinet picks,” The Hill’s Brett Samuels wrote

It’s also worth pointing out that the Dow surpassed 30,000 shortly after several of Biden’s Cabinet picks were announced, along with updates on the development of several effective COVID-19 vaccines.

The turkey pardoning was a short event as well, lasting less than ten minutes, much of which Trump spent talking about the novel coronavirus. 

“During this Thanksgiving we extend our eternal gratitude to the doctors, nurses, healthcare workers and scientists who have waged the battle against the China virus,” Trump said. “We give thanks for the vaccines and therapies that will soon end the pandemic. It’s just such a tremendous feeling knowing they are coming, and they are coming likely next week or shortly thereafter.” 

The president then proceeded to officially pardon Corn — whose compatriot was named Cob — a 42-pound turkey who will retire to Virginia Tech’s “Gobblers Rest,” at the university’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. 

As Trump turned to walk back into the White House, a reporter called after him, asking what most Americans are probably thinking as the president’s days in office draw to a close: “Will you be issuing a pardon for yourself?”

“Boy, did we screw up”: Charles Koch renounces partisanship while pouring money into Georgia GOP

Republican megadonor Charles Koch, the billionaire industrialist whose untold millions in political contributions stoked the furnace of right-wing politics for the last decade, admits to “Axios on HBO” that he “screwed up by being partisan” in an interview set to air on Tuesday night.

“Some of the politicians we got elected — I would see them on TV, and they would be talking about policies that were antithetical: against immigration, against criminal justice reform, against a more peaceful foreign policy,” says Koch, who along with his now-deceased brother David co-fathered and funded the anti-government Tea Party movement which led to the rise of President Donald Trump.

“I was horrified — because we had vetted them all, and they all seemed aligned on major issues and on empowering people,” Koch claims. “And then once they got elected — I didn’t expect them to fully agree with us on everything but to at least be champions on the major [issues] that they said they were. And then — to do the opposite.”

Asked whether his complaint was based more on principles or results, Koch, who broke with much of the Trump wing of the Republican Party for the 2018 midterms, indicated the latter.

“We couldn’t get results. The whole purpose of getting into politics was to find people who would help move us toward a society of equal rights and mutual benefit where people could realize their potential,” he said. “And we were doing the opposite of it.”

Koch said he wanted to help elect people who would “succeed by helping others succeed” in the wake of Trump’s divisive administration.

The remarks come days after Koch — CEO of Koch Industries, which Forbes named yesterday as America’s largest private company — released a new book, “Believe in People: Bottom-Up Solutions for a Top-Down World.”

“If 2020 has taught us anything, it’s that the old ways of doing things aren’t working,” reads a description on the book’s website. “But the solutions to our country’s problems are all around us. If we’re willing to believe in people, empower them from the bottom-up and unite with anybody to do right, we can work together to build a society where everyone can rise.”

That rhetoric recalls the decentralized impression of the Tea Party movement, a national network which was mobilized by high-dollar Koch groups Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Works. The brothers also created the first national Tea Party website.

In defense of that work, Charles Koch has previously cited the movement’s promulgation of “free-market, small-government ideals.” Over time, those morphed into a revolutionary, anti-government furor which appealed to — and eventually empowered — some of the darkest urges on the far-right.

“Boy, did we screw up. What a mess!” Koch writes in his new book. “[P]artisan politics prevented us from achieving the thing that motivated us to get involved in politics in the first place — helping people by removing barriers.”

The fiscally conservative ideals which first gave life to the Tea Party have in recent years gone largely ignored by conservatives, who have refashioned themselves in Trump’s image — overseeing trillion-dollar deficits, limiting free trade and embracing government subsidy programs.

After Senate Republicans approved a massive 2019 budget bill, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., eulogized the movement on the Senate floor. “The Tea Party is no more,” he said at the time.

“I was slow to react to this fact,” Koch writes in the new book, “letting us head down the wrong road for the better part of a decade.”

Despite that outward renunciation of partisan politics, Americans for Prosperity Action — Koch’s super PAC — is currently dumping hundreds of thousands of dollars into Georgia’s twin Senate runoffs this January, which will determine partisan control of the U.S. Senate.

Koch’s co-author, Brian Hooks, explained to Axios that the network had long backed Sen. David Perdue, R-Ga., the multimillionaire former CEO of Dollar General who last week was hit with a Senate ethics complaint amid allegations of using his office to profit from lucrative defense budget contracts.

“[W]e think that he can actually make a difference if he’s returned to the Senate,” Hooks said.

Koch, in the end, was not apologetic.

“I’m not big into regrets,” he told Axios. “All the divisions today, we didn’t create. They were there before, and they are there after.”

A reliable pandemic forecasting model says cases will nearly double by Inauguration Day

A COVID-19 forecasting model that accurately predicted the coronavirus’ spread over the summer anticipates that the number of people who will contract the disease will nearly double between now and President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20.

In a paper published on Monday in the scholarly journal Scientific Reports, three researchers from Washington University in St. Louis’ Olin Business School describe how their COVID-19 forecasting model projects there will be an explosion of new cases after a major “contagion event or right after a reopening” before settling into a period of stable and slightly declining disease spread.

As he authors argue, “each additional infectious individual has less impact on the disease spread as more people become infected,” because “infections are more likely to occur within interconnected [social] networks” rather than individuals constantly bumping into strangers and infecting them.

The Olin scholars’ model accounts for the fact that different areas of the country will follow different social distancing norms. They also note that if social distancing is eliminated, as many right-wing politicos and pundits have called for, there will be “a massive increase” in the number of cases. They reiterate this point in their conclusion, writing that “we need to be cautious of breakouts in networks and maintain a reasonably high level of social distancing during the reopening of the economy.”

One of the paper’s co-authors, marketing professor Raphael Thomadsen, told the college newspaper The Source that “one of the key reasons for the increased accuracy of this model over other COVID-19 forecasts is that this model accounts for the fact that people live in interconnected social networks rather than interacting mostly with random groups of strangers.”

In June, the Olin scholars’ model accurately predicted that, because contagious individuals were more likely to repeatedly expose the same people due to “overlapping social connections,” the summer and early fall would see “a brief period of exponential growth in the beginning or after reopening.” After, they predicted that they would “expect new cases to quickly settle into a prolonged period of stable, slightly declining levels of disease spread,” as Thomadsen put it at the time.

More than 12.4 million people have been infected with the novel coronavirus in the United States as of Tuesday, according to the Johns Hopkins University & Medicine Coronavirus Resource Center. Within that group 257,707 Americans have died as a result of the disease, more than one-fifth of the total global population of COVID-19 fatalities.

The projected explosion in coronavirus cases is likely to put more pressure on outgoing President Donald Trump to work with President-elect Joe Biden, whose victory in the 2020 election he was unwilling to acknowledge until today. Operation Warp Speed chief advisor Dr. Moncef Slaoui has admitted that he has had “no contact” with Biden transition officials about addressing the pandemic and Biden chief of staff Ron Klain told ABC that “our transition isn’t getting access to agency officials to help develop our plans, and there’s a lot of focus on that vaccine roll out plan that’s going to be critical in the early days of a Biden presidency – we have no access to that.”

Experts agree that the process for distributing a successful vaccine (both Pfizer and Moderna recently announced promising steps forward in that regard) is likely to be extremely complex and that it will be more difficult for Biden to effectively implement that program if he has to play catch-up once he takes office. It would also be essential for Trump to support him in his efforts to vaccinate the American population, as expert agree that herd immunity can only occur if at least 70 percent of a population is vaccinated.

Public health experts have been repeatedly alarmed by President Trump’s mishandling of the pandemic. Trump’s failures include downplaying the seriousness of the pandemic, defunding government agencies that would have helped combat the pandemic, delaying a declaration of national emergency by more than two months, fighting to prematurely reopen the economy, failing to push for measures that would engage in contact tracing and accelerate manufacturing tests and promoting pseudoscience regarding the pandemic. Trump has even denigrated the importance of wearing a mask, though there is scientific consensus that wearing a mask is essential to limiting the spread of highly contagious respiratory viruses like SARS-CoV-2.

Ronan Farrow earns Grammy nomination for “Catch and Kill” audiobook

Ronan Farrow‘s “Catch and Kill” audiobook, in which details how he broke the Harvey Weinstein story, earned a Grammy nomination for best spoken word album on Tuesday.

Farrow won the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for public service for his reporting in The New Yorker. Fellow nominees in the spoken word album category are “Acid for the Children: A Memoir” by Flea, “Alex Trebek – The Answer Is” by Ken Jennings, “Blowout Corrupted Democracy, Rogue State Russia, and the Richest, Most Destructive Industry on Earth” by Rachel Maddow and “Charlotte’s Web (E.B. White)” by Meryl Streep and cast.

Read more from Variety: “Saved by the Bell”: The 30 best episodes, ranked

Despite receiving positive reviews for the subject matter and impact on Hollywood and the #MeToo era, the audiobook featured some unintentionally strange accents from Farrow that picked up attention on social media upon its release.

In the audiobook, Farrow does impressions of President Trump and actor Rosie Perez, including Ukrainian and Australian accents.

Read more from Variety: “Chappelle’s Show” removed from Netflix at Dave Chappelle’s request

“In my last book, I got some criticism for not differentiating the voices enough. I did work as an anime voice actor earlier in my career in a small way, and it was important to me to do as much justice as possible to the really brave characters,” Farrow told Variety in an interview last year. “We did a very careful, respectful job, and gave a lot of thought to making sure that those voices were differentiated in a way that would help the reader, and captured a little bit of who those people were. But also weren’t full impersonations; it’s sort of at the halfway mark. I’m not an actor. But we wanted to make sure that it was imbued with a sufficient amount of character that these people came across in a full, well-rounded way.”

Previous winners in the spoken word category include Michelle Obama’s “Becoming,” Carrie Fisher’s “The Princess Diarist,” Carol Burnett’s “In Such Good Company: Eleven Years of Laughter, Mayhem, and Fun in the Sandbox,” and President Jimmy Carter’s “A Full Life: Reflections at 90.”

Read more from Variety: Netflix could break an 85-year streak at the Oscars

See the full list of Grammy nominations here.

Dave Chappelle pulls “Chappelle’s Show” off Netflix, slams ViacomCBS for not paying him

Netflix has removed “Chappelle’s Show” off its streaming platform at the request of series creator and star Dave Chappelle, who is speaking out against series owner ViacomCBS for licensing the Comedy Central hit without paying him. Deadline confirmed the removal. Netflix licensed “Chappelle’s Show” on a non-exclusive basis (the show also streams on HBO Max and ViacomCBS platforms like CBS All Access) and started streaming all three seasons of the program November 1. As Deadline notes: “Companies that license a program pay the seller who, in turn, has to compensate the creatives on the show.”

Read more from IndieWireThe best TV series of 2020

Chappelle posted a video to his Instagram page titled “Unforgiven” in which he explained his explained the reasons for pulling “Chappelle’s Show” from Netflix after not being paid by ViacomCBS. The video was filmed during a recent standup set.

“People think I made a lot of money from ‘Chappelle’s Show,'” Chappelle says in the video. “When I left that show I never got paid. [ViacomCBS] didn’t have to pay me because I signed the contract. But is that right? I found out that these people were streaming my work and they never had to ask me or they never have to tell me. Perfectly legal because I signed the contract. But is that right? I didn’t think so either.”

Read more from IndieWireBrad Pitt describes movie night with David Fincher: “He’ll mutter the whole time”

“That’s why I like working for Netflix,” Chappelle continues, nodding to Netflix specials such as “Sticks and Stones.” “I like working for Netflix because when all those bad things happened to me, that company didn’t even exist. And when I found out they were streaming ‘Chappelle’s Show,’ I was furious. How could they not– how could they not know? So you know what I did? I called them and I told them that this makes me feel bad. And you want to know what they did? They agreed that they would take it off their platform just so I could feel better.”

Chappelle says in the video that Netflix “paid me my money, they do what they say they’re going to do, and they went above and beyond what you could expect from a businessman. They did something just because they thought that I might think that they were wrong. And I do — I think that if you are fucking streaming that show you’re fencing stolen goods.”

Read more from IndieWireMad Mikkelson’s “Hannibal” Season 4 wish list includes Buffalo Bill and surprise casting

The comedian concluded by telling his fans to boycott his show on streaming platforms. “I’m coming to you. I’m begging you — if you ever liked me, if you ever think there was anything worthwhile about me, I’m begging you, please don’t watch that show,” Chappelle says in the video. “I’m not asking you to boycott any network — boycott me. Boycott ‘Chappelle’s Show.’ Do not watch it unless they pay me.”

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

A post shared by Dave Chappelle (@davechappelle)

Limbaugh criticizes Trump’s lawyers: They promised “blockbuster” evidence — then “nothing happened”

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh on Monday complained that President Donald Trump’s legal team had failed to deliver any evidence after promising “bombshells” in its bid to subvert the election.

Limbaugh, who received the Medal of Freedom from Trump earlier this year, hyped unfounded claims made by the president’s legal team as much as any media personality since President-elect Joe Biden won the election.

“Rudy [Giuliani] made a strong case that the fraud is big enough to change the result and that the evidence is clear,” Limbaugh proclaimed after the legal team’s disastrous press conference last week where black goo streamed down Giuliani’s profusely sweating face. “Sidney Powell, with the evidence of fraud from the machines. She detailed evidence of communist money from China, from Russia.”

Limbaugh even echoed Powell’s bizarre and totally baseless claim that Dominion voting machines, which are used across much of the country, had “melted down” because they “could not overcome the number of legitimate Trump votes” since the “Trump votes were so overwhelming.”

But after Powell was ousted from the president’s legal team for pushing a conspiracy theory which even Giuliani and Trump thought was bonkers amid repeated losses in court, Limbaugh lamented that no bombshells had been revealed.

“You call a gigantic press conference like that — one that lasts an hour — and you announce massive bombshells, then you better have some bombshells,” Limbaugh said. “There better be something at that press conference other than what we got.”

According to Limbaugh, Powell “jumped the shark.”

“I talked to so many people who were blown away by it — by the very nature of the press conference,” he added. “They promised blockbuster stuff, and then nothing happened. And that’s just — it’s not good.”

Powell claimed, without any evidence, in the news conference and subsequent media appearances that a global plot tied to Venezuela, Cuba and likely China aimed to program Dominion voting machines to switch votes from Trump to Biden — but the conspirators got caught because the overwhelming number of votes received by Trump “broke” the algorithm. Despite Trump announcing Powell as a member of his legal team and her appearance at the news conference, Giuliani later released a statement claiming that she was “not a member of the Trump Legal Team” and not working for the president “in his personal capacity.”

“It’s a tough thing to deny that she was ever a part of it, because they introduced her as part of it. I mean, she was at that press conference last week,” Limbaugh said on Monday. “The problem with that press conference last week, folks — it goes way beyond Sidney Powell.”

Powell also drew criticism from Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who said he would have offered her a week’s worth of shows to broadcast her conspiracy theory to millions.

“But she never sent us any evidence despite a lot of requests — polite requests, not a page,” Carlson said last week. “When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign — people in positions of authority — they told us Powell has never given them any evidence either, nor did she provide any today at the press conference . . . She never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another.”

Despite not producing any evidence, Powell later expanded her conspiracy theory to include alleged bribes to Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican.

“Sidney Powell accusing Gov. Brian Kemp of a crime on television yet being unwilling to go on TV and defend and lay out the evidence that she supposedly has — this is outrageous conduct,” former Gov. Chris Christie, R-N.J., a longtime Trump ally, told ABC News after her comments. “Quite frankly, the conduct of the president’s legal team has been a national embarrassment.”

New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman reported that Trump had soured on his legal team, as well.

“While Giuliani was key in stoking Trump’s conspiracy theories, Trump loss in [the Pennsylvania] suit made him realize Giuliani was not painting honest picture,” she wrote on Twitter. “He told Trump other advisers were lying to him. Then he proceeded to have hair dye drip down his face at a conspiracy theory-laced presser [with] Sidney Powell.”

Trump on Monday said he would allow the presidential transition to begin, even as he vowed to fight the results and “never concede.”

But Republicans worry that Trump’s legal antics have greatly damaged the party ahead of two runoff Senate elections in Georgia that will determine control of the upper chamber.

“Many Republicans are at a point now where they don’t trust the outcome of the system, which is never a good thing,” Gabriel Sterling, who runs the state’s voting system, told Yahoo News on Monday. “Is it going to suppress the vote to a certain degree? Absolutely.”

Monolith discovered in Utah desert has everyone buzzing over “2001: A Space Odyssey”

Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey” continues to generate headlines 52 years after it first opened in theaters. The science-fiction epic is back in the news after crew members from the Utah Department of Public Safety and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources discovered a silver monolith out in the Utah desert. The solid object stood about 10 to 12 feet high. The monolith’s exact location was not given as to prevent people from traveling out into the desert.

Read more from IndieWire: The best TV series of 2020

Helicopter pilot Bret Hutchings told Salt Lake City broadcaster KSL-TV the monolith appeared planted by an anonymous person, with wildlife crew guessing the slab was constructed by an artist or fan of Kubrick’s science-fiction landmark. Hutchings quipped, “We were joking around that if one of us suddenly disappears, I guess the rest of us make a run for it…That’s been about the strangest thing that I’ve come across out there in all my years of flying.”

The monolith was first discovered Wednesday, November 18 as Hutchings and his crew were flying over the desert counting bighorn sheep. The wildlife crew noticed the monolith sticking up out of a rock and landed the helicopter to investigate.

Read more from IndieWire: Brad Pitt describes movie night with David Fincher: “He’ll mutter the whole time”

“One of the biologists is the one who spotted it and we just happened to fly directly over the top of it,” Hutchings told KSL-TV. “He was like, ‘Whoa, whoa, whoa, turn around, turn around!’ And I was like, ‘What.’ And he’s like, ‘There’s this thing back there — we’ve got to go look at it!’ We were thinking, is this something NASA stuck up there or something? Are they bouncing satellites off it?”

Read more from IndieWire: Mad Mikkelson’s “Hannibal” Season 4 wish list includes Buffalo Bill and surprise casting

The monolith appears in “2001: A Space Odyssey” at pivotal moments in history to provide a higher consciousness to whomever comes across its path. When the apes discover the monolith during the first chapter of “2001,” it’s implied the mysterious slab teaches the animal species to use bones as weapons. Later in the film, humanity’s discovery of the monolith leads to breakthroughs in artificial intelligence.

Watch KSL-TV’s report on the Utah monolith in the video below.

Ingraham admits Trump lost — and saying otherwise is “lying”: “This constitutes living in reality”

Fox News host Laura Ingraham acknowledged on Monday that President-elect Joe Biden would be inaugurated in January after the Trump administration allowed the transition to begin.

“Unless the legal situation changes in a dramatic, and frankly, an unlikely manner, Joe Biden will be inaugurated on Jan. 20,” Ingraham said. 

“To say this constitutes living in reality. And if I offered you a false reality — if I told you that there was an excellent, phenomenal chance that the Supreme Court was going to step in and deliver a victory to President Trump — I would be lying to you,” the Fox News host later added.

Ingraham noted that the Trump administration had formally allowed the transition to begin.

“As unpleasant and disappointing as these past three weeks have been to so many of us, as much as we wish things were different, this is where things stand tonight,” she said.

Trump said on Twitter that he had given Emily Murphy, the head of the Government Services Administration, the go-ahead to “do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols.” (Murphy claimed in her letter to Biden that she had acted on her own.)

Murphy had refused to sign the paperwork ascertaining Biden’s win to allow his transition to formally begin before enough states certified their results to put the president-elect over 270 electoral votes on Monday.

Despite allowing the transition to begin, Trump declared that “we will prevail” and vowed to “never concede to fake ballots & ‘Dominion,'” a reference to a baseless conspiracy theory about voting machines switching votes that led to attorney Sidney Powell’s ouster from his legal team.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson railed against Powell’s unfounded conspiracy theory, publicly calling her out for failing to produce any evidence to back up what would amount to one of the biggest scandals in American political history.

Multiple judges have rejected virtually all of the claims from Trump and his allies alleging fraud, because there is no evidence to substantiate them. In spite of this, Ingraham continued to sow doubt in the result even as she admitted Trump’s defeat.

“To say this does not mean I don’t think that the election was rife with problems and potential fraud. And to say this does not constitute being a sell-out to the conservative populist movement,” she said. “And it does not mean that I disagree at all with the president’s right and obligation to pursue all legitimate legal challenges to this outcome.”

This appears to be the new line among Fox News opinion hosts, who have resisted echoing specific unfounded allegations made by Trump’s legal team but expressed doubt about the “fairness” of the results — even though there is no evidence of widespread fraud or irregularities. In fact, while Trump lost, Republicans outperformed expectations in their Senate and House races while winning far more state legislative majorities across the country.

“The 2020 presidential election was not fair. No honest person would claim that it was fair,” Carlson said on his Monday broadcast. “On many levels, the system was rigged against one candidate and in favor of another, and it was rigged in ways that were not hidden from view. We all saw it happen. The media openly colluded with the Democratic nominee. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris refused to explain what they would do if they were elected. That’s never happened before in any presidential election in American history.”

Carlson’s complaint was misleading given that the Biden-Harris team released copious documents detailing their plans while Trump repeatedly failed to explain on Fox News what he intended to do in a second term.

Both hosts have had to defend their acknowledgment of Trump’s legal failures amid attacks from Trump supporters. With most Republican officials around the country silent, 77% of Trump voters say they believe Biden won due to fraud — even though Trump’s team has produced zero evidence. Trump has amped up his attacks on Fox News, urging viewers to switch to the even more far-right OAN or Newsmax, where the race still has not been called despite key swing states certifying their results. In fact, one OAN host is currently working with Trump’s legal team, according to The Daily Beast.

“TIME TO MAKE OAN & NEWSMAX RICH. FOX IS DEAD TO ME!” actor Randy Quaid said in a bizarre video retweeted by the president on Tuesday.